Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results, 53042-53043 [2024-13841]
Download as PDF
53042
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 25, 2024 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
second year following the date the loan
note guarantee was issued.
As set forth in 7 CFR 5001.454(d),
each fiscal year, the Agency shall
establish a limit on the maximum
portion of B&I guarantee authority
available for that fiscal year that may be
used to guarantee loans with a reduced
guarantee fee. The Agency has
established that not more than 12
percent of the Agency’s B&I guarantee
authority will be reserved for loan
guarantee requests with a reduced fee.
Once this limit is reached, all additional
loans will be at the standard fee.
Unless precluded by a subsequent FY
2025 appropriation, these rates will
apply to all guaranteed loans obligated
in FY 2025. The amount of the periodic
retention fee on each guaranteed loan
will be determined by multiplying the
periodic retention fee rate by the
outstanding principal loan balance as of
December 31, multiplied by the
percentage of guarantee.
Non-Discrimination Statement
In accordance with Federal civil
rights law and U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) civil rights
regulations and policies, the USDA, its
agencies, offices, and employees, and
institutions participating in or
administering USDA Programs are
prohibited from discriminating based on
race, color, national origin, religion, sex,
gender identity (including gender
expression), sexual orientation,
disability, age, marital status, family/
parental status, income derived from a
public assistance program, political
beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior
civil rights activity, in any program or
activity conducted or funded by USDA
(not all bases apply to all programs).
Remedies and complaint filing
deadlines vary by program or incident.
Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means of communication for
program information (e.g., Braille, large
print, audiotape, American Sign
Language, etc.) should contact the
responsible Agency or USDA through
the 711 Relay Service. Additionally,
program information may be made
available in languages other than
English.
To file a program discrimination
complaint, a complainant should
complete a Form, AD–3027, USDA
Program Discrimination Complaint
Form, which can be obtained online at
https://www.usda.gov/sites/files/
documents/ad-3027.pdf, from any
USDA office, by calling (866) 632–9992,
or by writing a letter addressed to
USDA. The letter must contain the
complainant’s name, address, telephone
number, and a written description of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Jun 24, 2024
Jkt 262001
alleged discriminatory action in
sufficient detail to inform the Assistant
Secretary for Civil Rights (ASCR) about
the nature and date of an alleged civil
rights violation. The completed AD–
3027 form or letter must be submitted to
USDA by:
(1) Mail: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20250–9410; or
(2) Fax: (833) 256–1665 or (202)690–
7442; or
(3) Email: program.intake@usda.gov.
USDA is an equal opportunity
provider, employer, and lender.
Basil I. Gooden,
Under Secretary, Rural Development.
[FR Doc. 2024–13895 Filed 6–24–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–011]
Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
Products From the People’s Republic
of China: Notice of Court Decision Not
in Harmony With the Final Results of
the Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review; Notice of Amended Final
Results
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 21, 2024, the U.S.
Court of International Trade (the Court)
issued its final judgment in Trina Solar
(Changzhou) Science & Technology Co.,
Ltd., et al. v. United States, Court No.
23–00219 (CIT March 21, 2024),
sustaining the U.S. Department of
Commerce’s (Commerce) final remand
results pertaining to the countervailing
duty administrative review on certain
crystalline silicon photovoltaic products
(solar products) from the People’s
Republic of China (China), covering the
period of review (POR) January 1, 2021,
through December 31, 2021. Commerce
is notifying the public that the Court’s
final judgment is not in harmony with
the final results of the administrative
review, and that Commerce is amending
its final results.
DATES: Applicable March 31, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gene H. Calvert, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–3586.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 13, 2023, Commerce
published its final results of the 2021
administrative review of solar products
from China.1 Commerce reached an
affirmative determination for Trina
Solar (Changzhou) Science &
Technology Co., Ltd. and its crossowned affiliates (collectively, Trina
Solar). In the Final Results, Commerce
exclusively relied on freight rates
published by The Descartes Systems
Group Inc. (Descartes) when
determining ocean freight rates for
calculating the subsidy rates for several
programs pursuant to which the
Government of China provided goods
for less than adequate remuneration
(LTAR).2 Trina Solar filed a complaint
concerning this issue.
Subsequently, and considering the
Court’s holding in Risen Energy I and
Risen Energy II,3 Commerce requested
that the issue be remanded for further
consideration. On December 12, 2023,
the Court granted Commerce’s motion
for voluntary remand with additional
guidance.4 Specifically, the Court
instructed Commerce to consider its
rulings in Risen Energy I and Risen
Energy II and to use a multiple route
database in keeping with the statutory
preference for relying on a broadly
based ocean freight rate, in the absence
of ‘‘the ability to concretely explain a
strong reason for a single rate source.’’ 5
Upon reconsideration of this issue,
Commerce determined not to rely on the
Descartes database for the base rates for
ocean freight in constructing world
market benchmarks for LTAR programs
under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2)(ii). Instead,
Commerce relied on ocean freight rates
published by Xeneta AS (Xeneta)
exclusively for the base ocean freight
rates and then made certain adjustments
to the Xeneta data to account for any
missing ocean freight surcharges,
relying on the Descartes data.6 On
1 See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
Products from the People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review; 2021, 88 FR 62770 (Final Results), and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum
(IDM).
2 Id. at Comment 5.
3 See Risen Energy Co., v. United States, 570 F.
Supp. 3d 1369, 1372 (CIT 2022) (Risen Energy I);
see also Risen Energy Co. v. United States, Slip Op.
23–48 (CIT April 11, 2023) (Risen Energy II).
4 See Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science &
Technology Co., Ltd. v. United States, Court No. 23–
00219, Slip Op. No. 23–174 (CIT December 12,
2023).
5 Id.
6 See Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science &
Technology Co., Ltd. v. United States, Court No. 23–
00219, ‘‘Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant
E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM
25JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 25, 2024 / Notices
February 22, 2024, Commerce issued its
final results of redetermination
calculating an estimated countervailable
subsidy rate of 9.02 percent ad valorem
for Trina Solar,7 and on March 21, 2024,
the Court sustained Commerce’s Final
Redetermination.8
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken,9 as clarified
by Diamond Sawblades,10 the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held
that, pursuant to section 516A(c) and (e)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), Commerce must publish a
notice of a court decision that is not ‘‘in
harmony’’ with a Commerce
determination and must suspend
liquidation of entries pending a
‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The
Court’s March 21, 2024, judgment
constitutes a final decision of the Court
that is not in harmony with Commerce’s
Final Results. This notice is published
in fulfillment of the publication
requirements of Timken.
Amended Final Results
Because there is now a final court
judgment, Commerce is amending its
Final Results with respect to Trina
Solar’s countervailable subsidy rate for
the period January 1, 2021, through
December 31, 2021, as follows:
Producer/exporter
Subsidy rate
(percent
ad valorem)
Trina Solar (Changzhou)
Science & Technology
Co., Ltd.11 .........................
9.02
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
to Court Order,’’ dated February 22, 2024 (Final
Redetermination).
7 Id.
8 See Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science &
Technology Co., Ltd., et al., v. United States, Court
No. 23–00219 (CIT March 21, 2024).
9 See Timken Co., v. United States, 893 F.2d 337
(Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken).
10 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coal. v. United
States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond
Sawblades).
11 Commerce found Trina Solar (Changzhou)
Science & Technology Co., Ltd. to be cross-owned,
within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.525(b)(6)(vi),
among and across the following companies:
Yancheng Trina Solar Guoneng Science &
Technology Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar (Su Qian)
Technology Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar Yiwu Technology
Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar
(Yancheng Dafeng) Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar Science &
Technology (Yancheng) Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar
(Suqian) Optoelectronics Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar
(Changzhou) Optoelectronic Device Co., Ltd.;
Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy Co., Ltd.;
Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; Turpan Trina
Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar (Hefei) Science
and Technology Co., Ltd.; Changzhou Hesai PV
17:03 Jun 24, 2024
Jkt 262001
Liquidation of Suspended Entries
Commerce intends to instruct CBP to
assess countervailing duties on
unliquidated entries of subject
merchandise produced and/or exported
by Trina Solar in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(b). We will instruct CBP to
assess countervailing duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
administrative review where the ad
valorem rate is not zero or de minimis.
Where an ad valorem subsidy rate is
zero or de minimis,12 we will instruct
CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to countervailing duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 516A(c) and
(e), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: June 18, 2024.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive
functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2024–13841 Filed 6–24–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–552–801]
Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty New
Shipper Review; 2022–2023
Cash Deposit Requirements
Commerce intends to issue revised
cash deposit instructions to U.S.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
for the entries indicated above. The
revised cash deposit rate, indicated
above, will be effective March 31, 2024.
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) has conducted a
new shipper review of Co May ImportExport Company Limited (Co May)
regarding the antidumping duty order
on certain frozen fish fillets (fish fillets)
from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam
(Vietnam). The period of review (POR)
is August 1, 2022, through January 31,
2023. Based on our analysis, Commerce
finds that Co May did not make sales of
subject merchandise at prices below
normal value during the POR.
DATES: Applicable June 25, 2024.
AGENCY:
Ribbon Materials Co., Ltd.; Changzhou Hewei New
Material Technology Co., Ltd.; Changzhou Trina
Hezhong PV Co., Ltd.; and Changzhou Trina PV
Ribbon Materials Co., Ltd. See Final Results.
12 See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53043
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2243.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 30, 2024, Commerce
published the Preliminary Results of
this new shipper review and invited
interested parties to comment.1 On
April 5, 2024, Commerce extended the
deadline for issuance of these final
results to June 14, 2024.2 On May 17,
2024, the petitioners 3 submitted a case
brief.4 On May 22, 2024, Co May
submitted a rebuttal brief.5 On May 30,
2024, Commerce held a public hearing.6
For a complete description of the events
that occurred subsequent to the
Preliminary Results, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.7
Scope of the Order 8
The products covered by the Order
are fish fillets from Vietnam. For a
complete description of the scope of this
order, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
We addressed all issues raised in the
case and rebuttal briefs filed by
interested parties in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum. A list of the
1 See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results of New
Shipper Review; 2022–2023, 89 FR 5862 (January
30, 2024) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for
Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper
Review,’’ dated April 5, 2024.
3 The petitioners are the Catfish Farmers of
America and individual U.S. catfish processors
America’s Catch, Inc., Alabama Catfish, LLC d/b/a
Harvest Select Catfish, Inc., Consolidated Catfish
Companies, LLC d/b/a Country Select Catfish, Delta
Pride Catfish, Inc., Guidry’s Catfish, Inc., Heartland
Catfish Company, Magnolia Processing, Inc. d/b/a
Pride of the Pond, and Simmons Farm Raised
Catfish, Inc.
4 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Case Brief,’’ dated May
17, 2024.
5 See Co May’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief of Co May
Import Export Company Limited,’’ dated May 22,
2024.
6 See Hearing Transcript, ‘‘Public Hearing in the
Matter of: Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam, New Shipper
Review,’’ dated May 30, 2024.
7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Final Results of the New Shipper Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Frozen Fish
Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam;
2022–2023,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
8 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Certain
Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam, 68 FR 47909 (August 12, 2003) (Order).
E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM
25JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 122 (Tuesday, June 25, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53042-53043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-13841]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-570-011]
Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products From the
People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony
With the Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review; Notice of Amended Final Results
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 21, 2024, the U.S. Court of International Trade (the
Court) issued its final judgment in Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science &
Technology Co., Ltd., et al. v. United States, Court No. 23-00219 (CIT
March 21, 2024), sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce's
(Commerce) final remand results pertaining to the countervailing duty
administrative review on certain crystalline silicon photovoltaic
products (solar products) from the People's Republic of China (China),
covering the period of review (POR) January 1, 2021, through December
31, 2021. Commerce is notifying the public that the Court's final
judgment is not in harmony with the final results of the administrative
review, and that Commerce is amending its final results.
DATES: Applicable March 31, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gene H. Calvert, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3586.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 13, 2023, Commerce published its final results of the
2021 administrative review of solar products from China.\1\ Commerce
reached an affirmative determination for Trina Solar (Changzhou)
Science & Technology Co., Ltd. and its cross-owned affiliates
(collectively, Trina Solar). In the Final Results, Commerce exclusively
relied on freight rates published by The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
(Descartes) when determining ocean freight rates for calculating the
subsidy rates for several programs pursuant to which the Government of
China provided goods for less than adequate remuneration (LTAR).\2\
Trina Solar filed a complaint concerning this issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from
the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2021, 88 FR 62770 (Final Results), and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (IDM).
\2\ Id. at Comment 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsequently, and considering the Court's holding in Risen Energy I
and Risen Energy II,\3\ Commerce requested that the issue be remanded
for further consideration. On December 12, 2023, the Court granted
Commerce's motion for voluntary remand with additional guidance.\4\
Specifically, the Court instructed Commerce to consider its rulings in
Risen Energy I and Risen Energy II and to use a multiple route database
in keeping with the statutory preference for relying on a broadly based
ocean freight rate, in the absence of ``the ability to concretely
explain a strong reason for a single rate source.'' \5\ Upon
reconsideration of this issue, Commerce determined not to rely on the
Descartes database for the base rates for ocean freight in constructing
world market benchmarks for LTAR programs under 19 CFR
351.511(a)(2)(ii). Instead, Commerce relied on ocean freight rates
published by Xeneta AS (Xeneta) exclusively for the base ocean freight
rates and then made certain adjustments to the Xeneta data to account
for any missing ocean freight surcharges, relying on the Descartes
data.\6\ On
[[Page 53043]]
February 22, 2024, Commerce issued its final results of redetermination
calculating an estimated countervailable subsidy rate of 9.02 percent
ad valorem for Trina Solar,\7\ and on March 21, 2024, the Court
sustained Commerce's Final Redetermination.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Risen Energy Co., v. United States, 570 F. Supp. 3d
1369, 1372 (CIT 2022) (Risen Energy I); see also Risen Energy Co. v.
United States, Slip Op. 23-48 (CIT April 11, 2023) (Risen Energy
II).
\4\ See Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science & Technology Co., Ltd.
v. United States, Court No. 23-00219, Slip Op. No. 23-174 (CIT
December 12, 2023).
\5\ Id.
\6\ See Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science & Technology Co., Ltd.
v. United States, Court No. 23-00219, ``Final Results of
Redetermination Pursuant to Court Order,'' dated February 22, 2024
(Final Redetermination).
\7\ Id.
\8\ See Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science & Technology Co., Ltd.,
et al., v. United States, Court No. 23-00219 (CIT March 21, 2024).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken,9 as clarified by Diamond
Sawblades,10 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit held that, pursuant to section 516A(c) and (e) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce must publish a notice of a
court decision that is not ``in harmony'' with a Commerce determination
and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a ``conclusive'' court
decision. The Court's March 21, 2024, judgment constitutes a final
decision of the Court that is not in harmony with Commerce's Final
Results. This notice is published in fulfillment of the publication
requirements of Timken.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Timken Co., v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir.
1990) (Timken).
\10\ See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coal. v. United States, 626
F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended Final Results
Because there is now a final court judgment, Commerce is amending
its Final Results with respect to Trina Solar's countervailable subsidy
rate for the period January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021, as
follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy rate
Producer/exporter (percent ad
valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science & Technology Co., 9.02
Ltd.\11\...............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Commerce found Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science & Technology
Co., Ltd. to be cross-owned, within the meaning of 19 CFR
351.525(b)(6)(vi), among and across the following companies:
Yancheng Trina Solar Guoneng Science & Technology Co., Ltd.; Trina
Solar (Su Qian) Technology Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar Yiwu Technology
Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar (Yancheng Dafeng) Co.,
Ltd.; Trina Solar Science & Technology (Yancheng) Co., Ltd.; Trina
Solar (Suqian) Optoelectronics Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar (Changzhou)
Optoelectronic Device Co., Ltd.; Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy
Co., Ltd.; Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; Turpan Trina Solar
Energy Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar (Hefei) Science and Technology Co.,
Ltd.; Changzhou Hesai PV Ribbon Materials Co., Ltd.; Changzhou Hewei
New Material Technology Co., Ltd.; Changzhou Trina Hezhong PV Co.,
Ltd.; and Changzhou Trina PV Ribbon Materials Co., Ltd. See Final
Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for the entries indicated above.
The revised cash deposit rate, indicated above, will be effective March
31, 2024.
Liquidation of Suspended Entries
Commerce intends to instruct CBP to assess countervailing duties on
unliquidated entries of subject merchandise produced and/or exported by
Trina Solar in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b). We will instruct CBP
to assess countervailing duties on all appropriate entries covered by
this administrative review where the ad valorem rate is not zero or de
minimis. Where an ad valorem subsidy rate is zero or de minimis,\12\ we
will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard
to countervailing duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
516A(c) and (e), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: June 18, 2024.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2024-13841 Filed 6-24-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P