Forged Steel Fittings From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022, 49154-49157 [2024-12738]
Download as PDF
49154
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 11, 2024 / Notices
investigation (i.e., 17.74 percent) if there
is no rate for the intermediate
company(ies) involved in the
transaction.15
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided for
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the
company-specific cash deposit rate for
MAL will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin established in
the final results of this review (except,
if that rate is de minimis within the
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), then
the cash deposit rate will be zero); (2)
for producers or exporters not covered
in this review but covered in a prior
segment of the proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently-completed segment of this
proceeding in which they were
reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review or a prior
segment of the proceeding but the
producer is, then the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recently completed segment of this
proceeding for the producer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other producers or exporters
will continue to be 17.74 percent, the
all-others rate established in the lessthan-fair-value investigation.16 These
cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review
period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
preliminary results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act,
15 For a full discussion of this practice, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003).
16 See Order, 86 FR at 7530.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Jun 10, 2024
Jkt 262001
and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2) and
351.221(b)(4).
Dated: May 23, 2024.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive
functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Intent to Rescind, In Part
V. Affiliation and Collapsing
VI. Discussion of the Methodology
VII. Currency Conversion
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2024–12743 Filed 6–10–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–067]
Forged Steel Fittings From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Final
Determination of No Shipments; 2021–
2022
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
Qingdao Bestflow Industrial Co., Ltd.
(Bestflow), the sole participating
mandatory respondent in this review
and an exporter of forged steel fittings
from the People’s Republic of China
(China), and Both-Well Taizhou Steel
Fittings Co., Ltd. (Both-Well), a nonindividually-examined exporter of
forged steel fittings from China, sold
subject merchandise in the United
States at prices below normal value
(NV) during the period of review (POR)
November 1, 2021, through October 31,
2022. Further, Commerce determines
that Xin Yi International Trade Co.,
Limited (Xin Yi) had no shipments of
subject merchandise during the POR.
Lastly, Commerce determines that 23
companies for which this review was
initiated are not eligible for a separate
rate and are, thus, part of the Chinawide entity.
DATES: Applicable June 11, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jinny Ahn, AD/CVD Operations, Office
VI, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0968.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce published the Preliminary
Results 1 on December 7, 2023, and
invited interested parties to comment.
On March 22, 2024, we extended the
deadline for the final results of this
review until June 4, 2024.2 For a
complete description of the events that
occurred since the Preliminary Results,
see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.3
Scope of the Order 4
The merchandise covered by the
Order is forged steel fittings from China.
Subject carbon and alloy forged steel
fittings are normally entered under
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) subheadings
7307.99.1000, 7307.99.3000,
7307.99.5045, and 7307.99.5060. They
also may be entered under HTSUS
subheadings 7307.92.3010,
7307.92.3030, 7307.92.9000, and
7326.19.0010. The HTSUS subheadings
are provided for convenience and
customs purposes; the written
description of the scope is dispositive.
For a complete description of the scope
of the Order, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the parties’ briefs
are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. A list of the issues
addressed is included as Appendix I to
this notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
1 See Forged Steel Fittings from the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2021–
2022, 88 FR 85221 (December 7, 2023) (Preliminary
Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum (PDM).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review,’’ dated March 22, 2024.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Final Results of the Administrative Review of
the Antidumping Duty Order on Forged Steel
Fittings from the People’s Republic of China; 2021–
2022,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
4 See Forged Steel Fittings from Italy and the
People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty
Orders, 83 FR 60397, dated November 26, 2018
(Order).
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 11, 2024 / Notices
directly at https://access.trade.gov/
public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our review of the record and
comments received from interested
parties regarding the Preliminary
Results, we made certain revisions to
the margin calculations for Bestflow.5
Further, we have assigned Bestflow’s
revised final weighted-average dumping
margin to the non-examined separate
rate respondent, Both-Well. For a
discussion of these changes, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Final Determination of No Shipments
In the Preliminary Results, we
preliminarily determined that Xin Yi
had no shipments of subject
merchandise to the United States during
the POR.6 No party filed comments with
respect to this preliminary
determination and we received no
information to contradict the
preliminary finding. Therefore, we
continue to find that Xin Yi had no
shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR and will issue
appropriate liquidation instructions that
are consistent with our ‘‘automatic
assessment’’ clarification for these final
results.7
Separate Rate
In our Preliminary Results, we
determined that Bestflow and Both-Well
demonstrated their eligibility for
separate rates.8 We received no
arguments since the issuance of the
Preliminary Results that provide a basis
for reconsideration of these
determinations. Therefore, for these
final results, we continue to find that
the two companies listed in the table in
the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of
this notice are each eligible for a
separate rate.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
The China-Wide Entity
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce
found that 23 companies for which a
review was initiated did not establish
their eligibility for a separate rate.9 No
parties contested this finding. As such,
we continue to determine these 23
companies identified in Appendix II are
part of the China-wide entity. Because
no party requested a review of the
China-wide entity, and Commerce no
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Final Results Calculation
Memorandum for Both-Well,’’ dated concurrently
with this notice.
6 See Preliminary Results, 88 FR at 85222.
7 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (Assessment Practice
Refinement).
8 See Preliminary Results PDM at 7–8.
9 Id. at 9.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Jun 10, 2024
Jkt 262001
longer considers the China-wide entity
as an exporter conditionally subject to
administrative reviews,10 we did not
conduct a review of the China-wide
entity. Thus, the weighted-average
dumping margin for the China-wide
entity rate (i.e., 142.72 percent) is not
subject to change.11
Rate for Non-Examined Separate Rate
Respondent
The statute and Commerce’s
regulations do not address what
weighted-average dumping margin to
apply to companies not selected for
individual examination when
Commerce limits its examination in an
administrative review pursuant to
section 777A(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act). Generally,
Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of
the Act, which provides instructions for
calculating the all-others rate in an
investigation, for guidance when
calculating the weighted-average
dumping margin for respondents that
are not individually examined in an
administrative review. Section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act states that the allothers rate should be calculated by
averaging the weighted-average
dumping margins determined for
individually-examined respondents,
excluding rates that are zero, de
minimis, or based entirely on facts
available.
In the Preliminary Results,12 and
consistent with Commerce’s practice,13
we assigned the non-examined, separate
rate company (i.e., Both-Well) a
weighted-average dumping margin
equal to the calculated weighted-average
dumping margin for the mandatory
respondent whose rate was not zero, de
minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), or
based entirely on facts available (i.e., the
weighted-average dumping margin for
Bestflow). Both-Well and the Bonney
Forge Corporation, a domestic interested
party, commented on the methodology
for calculating this separate rate. See
Issues and Decision Memorandum at
Comment 5. For the final results, we
continue to apply this approach and
assign Both-Well the weighted-average
dumping margin calculated for Bestflow
which is not zero, de minimis, or based
entirely on facts available, as it is
10 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement
of Change in Department Practice for Respondent
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
FR 65963, 65969–70 (November 4, 2013).
11 See Order, 83 FR at 60397.
12 See Preliminary Results PDM at 9.
13 See, e.g., Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving
and Racks from the People’s Republic of China:
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value, 74 FR 36656, 36660 (July 24, 2009).
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49155
consistent with the intent of, and our
use of, section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act.14
Final Results of Review
Commerce determines that the
following weighted-average dumping
margins exist for the period November
1, 2021, through October 31, 2022:
Exporter
Qingdao Bestflow Industrial
Co., Ltd .............................
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
118.97
Review-Specific Rate Applicable to the
Following Company
Both-Well (Taizhou) Steel
Fittings Co., Ltd .................
118.97
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed in connection with these
final results to interested parties in this
review under an administrative
protective order (APO) within five days
of the date of publication of this notice
in the Federal Register in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce
has determined, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review.
Commerce intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35
days after the date of publication of the
final results of this review in the
Federal Register. If a timely summons is
filed at the U.S. Court of International
Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant
entries until the time for parties to file
a request for a statutory injunction has
expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).
We will instruct CBP to assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review, when the
company-specific weighted-average
dumping margin is not zero or de
minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent), or
when the importer-specific assessment
rate calculated in the final results of this
review is not zero or de minimis.15
Where either a company’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de
14 See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from
the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results and
Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 76 FR 56158, 56160
(September 12, 2011).
15 See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
49156
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 11, 2024 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
minimis, or an importer-specific
assessment rate is zero or de minimis,
we will instruct CBP to liquidate the
appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties.
For Bestflow, which has a final
weighted-average dumping margin that
is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than
0.5 percent), we will instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties at the time of
liquidation, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1).16 Because Bestflow did
not report entered value for its U.S.
sales, we intend to calculate importeror customer-specific per-unit
assessment rates by dividing the total
amount of dumping calculated for all
reviewed sales to the importer or
customer by the total quantity of the
same sales. Commerce will also
calculate (estimated) ad valorem
importer- or customer-specific
assessment rates with which to assess
whether the per-unit assessment rates
are de minimis. We intend to calculate
estimated importer- (or customerspecific ad valorem assessment rates by
dividing the total amount of dumping
calculated for all reviewed U.S. sales to
the importer or customer by the total
estimated entered value of the same
sales.17
For the respondent that was not
selected for individual examination in
this administrative review, and which
qualified for a separate rate (i.e., BothWell), the assessment rate will be equal
to the weighted-average dumping
margin from the final results (i.e.,
118.97 percent). For the companies who
are not eligible for a separate rate, and,
thus, are part of the China-wide entity,
we will instruct CBP to apply an ad
valorem assessment rate of 142.72
percent to all POR entries of subject
merchandise which was exported by
those companies.
Pursuant to a refinement in our nonmarket economy practice, for sales that
were not reported in the U.S. sales data
submitted by Bestflow during this
review, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate entries associated with those
sales at the rate for the China-wide
entity.18 Additionally, any suspended
entries that entered under Xin Yi’s case
number (i.e., at Xin Yi’s cash deposit
rate) will be liquidated at the
16 Commerce will apply the assessment rate
calculation method adopted in Antidumping
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average
Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain
Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77
FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
17 See 19 CFR 351.212 (b)(1).
18 See Assessment Practice Refinement, 76 FR at
65694 for a full discussion of this practice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Jun 10, 2024
Jkt 262001
antidumping duty assessment rate for
the China-wide entity.19
regulations and terms of an APO is a
violation subject to sanction.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for shipments of
the subject merchandise from China
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for
companies listed in the table above, the
cash deposit rate will be 118.97 percent;
(2) for previously examined Chinese and
non-Chinese exporters not listed above
that have separate rates, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
exporter’s existing cash deposit rate; (3)
for all Chinese exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found
to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will be the rate for the
China-wide entity (i.e., 142.72 percent);
and (4) for all non-Chinese exporters of
subject merchandise which have not
received their own separate rate, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the Chinese exporter that
supplied that non-Chinese exporter.
These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Interested Parties
These final results and notice are
issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping and/or countervailing
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this POR. Failure
to comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping and/or
countervailing duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties, and/or an increase
in the amount of antidumping duties by
the amount of the countervailing duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to an APO of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
19 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: June 4, 2024.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive
functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Used the
Latest Revised U.S. Sales Database for
the Calculation of Bestflow’s WeightedAverage Dumping Margin
Comment 2: Inland Freight Surrogate Value
(SV)
Comment 3: Calculation of Labor SV
Covering Multiple Years of the POR
Comment 4: Whether to Continue to Apply
Partial Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to
Determine the Normal Value (NV) for the
Sales of Merchandise Supplied by
Bestflow’s Uncooperative Suppliers
Comment 5: Whether to Continue to Assign
Bestflow’s Weighted-Average Dumping
Margin to Both-Well
VI. Recommendation
Appendix II
Companies Not Eligible for a Separate Rate
and Treated as Part of the China-Wide Entity
1. Cixi Baicheng Hardware Tools, Ltd.
2. Dalian Guangming Pipe Fittings Co., Ltd.
3. Eaton Hydraulics (Luzhou) Co., Ltd.
4. Eaton Hydraulics (Ningbo) Co., Ltd.
5. Jiangsu Forged Pipe Fittings Co., Ltd.
6. Jiangsu Haida Pipe Fittings Group Co.
7. Jinan Mech Piping Technology Co., Ltd.
8. Jining Dingguan Precision Parts
Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
9. Lianfa Stainless Steel Pipes & Valves
(Qingyun) Co., Ltd.
10. Luzhou City Chengrun Mechanics Co.,
Ltd.
11. Ningbo HongTe Industrial Co., Ltd.
12. Ningbo Long Teng Metal Manufacturing
Co., Ltd.
13. Ningbo Save Technology Co., Ltd.
14. Ningbo Zhongan Forging Co., Ltd.
15. Q.C. Witness International Co., Ltd.
16. Shanghai Lon Au Stainless Steel
Materials Co., Ltd.
17. Witness International Co., Ltd.
18. Yancheng Boyue Tube Co., Ltd.
19. Yancheng Haohui Pipe Fittings Co., Ltd.
20. Yancheng Jiuwei Pipe Fittings Co., Ltd.
21. Yancheng Manda Pipe Industry Co., Ltd.
22. Yingkou Guangming Pipeline Industry
Co., Ltd.
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 11, 2024 / Notices
23. Yuyao Wanlei Pipe Fitting Manufacturing
Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2024–12738 Filed 6–10–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
Review and Approval; Comment
Request; Application for Export Trade
Certificate of Review
International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of information collection,
request for comment.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to comment on
proposed, and continuing information
collections, which helps us assess the
impact of our information collection
requirements and minimize the public’s
reporting burden. The purpose of this
notice is to allow for 60 days of public
comment preceding submission of the
collection to OMB.
DATES: To ensure consideration,
comments regarding this proposed
information collection must be received
on or before August 12, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments by
mail to Amanda Reynolds, Team Lead,
International Trade Administration
(ITA) by email to ETCA@trade.gov or
PRA@trade.gov. Please reference OMB
Control Number 0625–0125 in the
subject line of your comments. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
specific questions related to collection
activities should be directed to Amanda
Reynolds, Team Lead, (202) 482–5131
and email ETCA@trade.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
I. Abstract
Title III of the Export Trading
Company Act (hereinafter ‘‘the Act’’) of
1982 (Pub. L. 97–290, 15 U.S.C. 4001 et
seq.), authorizes the Secretary of
Commerce to issue, with the
concurrence of the Attorney General, an
Export Trade Certificate of Review to
any person that establishes that its
proposed export trade, export trade
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Jun 10, 2024
Jkt 262001
activities, and methods of operation
meet the four standards found in section
303 (a) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.
An Export Trade Certificate of Review
provides the certificate holder and its
members with limited antitrust
immunity for specified export-related
activities. Application for an Export
Trade Certificate of Review is voluntary.
The information to be collected is found
at 15 CFR part 325.3—Export Trade
Certificates of Review. The collection of
information is necessary for both the
Departments of Commerce and Justice to
conduct an analysis, in order to
determine whether the applicant and its
members are eligible to receive the
protection of an Export Trade Certificate
of Review and whether the applicant’s
proposed export-related conduct meets
the standards in Section 303(a) of the
Act. The collection of information
constitutes the essential basis of the
statutory determinations to be made by
the Secretary of Commerce and the
Attorney General.
The Department of Commerce
conducts its economic and legal
analysis of the information supplied by
applicants through the Office of Trade
and Economic Analysis and the Office
of the General Counsel. In the
Department of Justice, analysis is
conducted by the Antitrust Division.
Title III was enacted to reduce
uncertainty regarding the application of
U.S. antitrust laws to export activities.
An Export Trade Certificate of Review
provides its holder and members named
in the Certificate with (a) protection
from government actions under state
and federal antitrust laws for the export
conduct specified in the Certificate, and
(b) certain protection from private suits,
by limiting liability in private actions to
actual damages when the challenged
activities are covered by an Export
Trade Certificate of Review.
49157
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: Title III of the Export
Trading Company Act of 1982, 15 U.S.C.
4011–4021.
IV. Request for Comments
We are soliciting public comments to
permit the Department/Bureau to: (a)
Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary for
the proper functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the
accuracy of our estimate of the time and
cost burden for this proposed collection,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
Evaluate ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) Minimize the
reporting burden on those who are to
respond, including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or
summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this ICR. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you may ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of
the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs,
Commerce Department.
II. Method of Collection
The form is sent by request to U.S.
firms.
[FR Doc. 2024–12771 Filed 6–10–24; 8:45 am]
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0625–0125.
Form Number(s): ITA–4093P.
Type of Review: Regular submission,
extension of a current information
collection.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations; not-for-profit
institutions, and state, local or tribal
government.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 9.
Estimated Time per Response: 32
hours (application); 2 hours (annual
report).
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 426 hours.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
Review and Approval; Comment
Request; Generic Clearance for
Decision Science Data Collections
National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST), Commerce.
AGENCY:
Notice of information collection,
request for comment.
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49154-49157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-12738]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-067]
Forged Steel Fittings From the People's Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final
Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
Qingdao Bestflow Industrial Co., Ltd. (Bestflow), the sole
participating mandatory respondent in this review and an exporter of
forged steel fittings from the People's Republic of China (China), and
Both-Well Taizhou Steel Fittings Co., Ltd. (Both-Well), a non-
individually-examined exporter of forged steel fittings from China,
sold subject merchandise in the United States at prices below normal
value (NV) during the period of review (POR) November 1, 2021, through
October 31, 2022. Further, Commerce determines that Xin Yi
International Trade Co., Limited (Xin Yi) had no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR. Lastly, Commerce determines that 23
companies for which this review was initiated are not eligible for a
separate rate and are, thus, part of the China-wide entity.
DATES: Applicable June 11, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jinny Ahn, AD/CVD Operations, Office
VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0968.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce published the Preliminary Results \1\ on December 7, 2023,
and invited interested parties to comment. On March 22, 2024, we
extended the deadline for the final results of this review until June
4, 2024.\2\ For a complete description of the events that occurred
since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Forged Steel Fittings from the People's Republic of
China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022, 88 FR
85221 (December 7, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated March 22, 2024.
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Final Results
of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Forged
Steel Fittings from the People's Republic of China; 2021-2022,''
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues
and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order 4
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Forged Steel Fittings from Italy and the People's
Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Orders, 83 FR 60397, dated
November 26, 2018 (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The merchandise covered by the Order is forged steel fittings from
China. Subject carbon and alloy forged steel fittings are normally
entered under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
subheadings 7307.99.1000, 7307.99.3000, 7307.99.5045, and 7307.99.5060.
They also may be entered under HTSUS subheadings 7307.92.3010,
7307.92.3030, 7307.92.9000, and 7326.19.0010. The HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs purposes; the written description
of the scope is dispositive. For a complete description of the scope of
the Order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the parties' briefs are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed is
included as Appendix I to this notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed
[[Page 49155]]
directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our review of the record and comments received from
interested parties regarding the Preliminary Results, we made certain
revisions to the margin calculations for Bestflow.\5\ Further, we have
assigned Bestflow's revised final weighted-average dumping margin to
the non-examined separate rate respondent, Both-Well. For a discussion
of these changes, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Final Results Calculation Memorandum for
Both-Well,'' dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Determination of No Shipments
In the Preliminary Results, we preliminarily determined that Xin Yi
had no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the
POR.\6\ No party filed comments with respect to this preliminary
determination and we received no information to contradict the
preliminary finding. Therefore, we continue to find that Xin Yi had no
shipments of subject merchandise during the POR and will issue
appropriate liquidation instructions that are consistent with our
``automatic assessment'' clarification for these final results.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Preliminary Results, 88 FR at 85222.
\7\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (Assessment
Practice Refinement).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Separate Rate
In our Preliminary Results, we determined that Bestflow and Both-
Well demonstrated their eligibility for separate rates.\8\ We received
no arguments since the issuance of the Preliminary Results that provide
a basis for reconsideration of these determinations. Therefore, for
these final results, we continue to find that the two companies listed
in the table in the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice
are each eligible for a separate rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Preliminary Results PDM at 7-8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The China-Wide Entity
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce found that 23 companies for
which a review was initiated did not establish their eligibility for a
separate rate.\9\ No parties contested this finding. As such, we
continue to determine these 23 companies identified in Appendix II are
part of the China-wide entity. Because no party requested a review of
the China-wide entity, and Commerce no longer considers the China-wide
entity as an exporter conditionally subject to administrative
reviews,\10\ we did not conduct a review of the China-wide entity.
Thus, the weighted-average dumping margin for the China-wide entity
rate (i.e., 142.72 percent) is not subject to change.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Id. at 9.
\10\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65969-70 (November
4, 2013).
\11\ See Order, 83 FR at 60397.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate for Non-Examined Separate Rate Respondent
The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address what
weighted-average dumping margin to apply to companies not selected for
individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an
administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act). Generally, Commerce looks to section
735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the
all-others rate in an investigation, for guidance when calculating the
weighted-average dumping margin for respondents that are not
individually examined in an administrative review. Section 735(c)(5)(A)
of the Act states that the all-others rate should be calculated by
averaging the weighted-average dumping margins determined for
individually-examined respondents, excluding rates that are zero, de
minimis, or based entirely on facts available.
In the Preliminary Results,\12\ and consistent with Commerce's
practice,\13\ we assigned the non-examined, separate rate company
(i.e., Both-Well) a weighted-average dumping margin equal to the
calculated weighted-average dumping margin for the mandatory respondent
whose rate was not zero, de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), or
based entirely on facts available (i.e., the weighted-average dumping
margin for Bestflow). Both-Well and the Bonney Forge Corporation, a
domestic interested party, commented on the methodology for calculating
this separate rate. See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 5.
For the final results, we continue to apply this approach and assign
Both-Well the weighted-average dumping margin calculated for Bestflow
which is not zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available, as
it is consistent with the intent of, and our use of, section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Preliminary Results PDM at 9.
\13\ See, e.g., Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks
from the People's Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value, 74 FR 36656, 36660 (July 24, 2009).
\14\ See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam: Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 56158, 56160
(September 12, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
Commerce determines that the following weighted-average dumping
margins exist for the period November 1, 2021, through October 31,
2022:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qingdao Bestflow Industrial Co., Ltd.................... 118.97
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Review-Specific Rate Applicable to the Following Company
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Both-Well (Taizhou) Steel Fittings Co., Ltd............. 118.97
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations performed in connection with
these final results to interested parties in this review under an
administrative protective order (APO) within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal Register in accordance with
19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b),
Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by
this review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP
no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final
results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is
filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment
instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until
the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has
expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).
We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this review, when the company-specific
weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less
than 0.50 percent), or when the importer-specific assessment rate
calculated in the final results of this review is not zero or de
minimis.\15\ Where either a company's weighted-average dumping margin
is zero or de
[[Page 49156]]
minimis, or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis,
we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without
regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Bestflow, which has a final weighted-average dumping margin
that is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), we will
instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties at the time of liquidation,
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\16\ Because Bestflow did not
report entered value for its U.S. sales, we intend to calculate
importer- or customer-specific per-unit assessment rates by dividing
the total amount of dumping calculated for all reviewed sales to the
importer or customer by the total quantity of the same sales. Commerce
will also calculate (estimated) ad valorem importer- or customer-
specific assessment rates with which to assess whether the per-unit
assessment rates are de minimis. We intend to calculate estimated
importer- (or customer-specific ad valorem assessment rates by dividing
the total amount of dumping calculated for all reviewed U.S. sales to
the importer or customer by the total estimated entered value of the
same sales.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ Commerce will apply the assessment rate calculation method
adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
\17\ See 19 CFR 351.212 (b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the respondent that was not selected for individual examination
in this administrative review, and which qualified for a separate rate
(i.e., Both-Well), the assessment rate will be equal to the weighted-
average dumping margin from the final results (i.e., 118.97 percent).
For the companies who are not eligible for a separate rate, and, thus,
are part of the China-wide entity, we will instruct CBP to apply an ad
valorem assessment rate of 142.72 percent to all POR entries of subject
merchandise which was exported by those companies.
Pursuant to a refinement in our non-market economy practice, for
sales that were not reported in the U.S. sales data submitted by
Bestflow during this review, we will instruct CBP to liquidate entries
associated with those sales at the rate for the China-wide entity.\18\
Additionally, any suspended entries that entered under Xin Yi's case
number (i.e., at Xin Yi's cash deposit rate) will be liquidated at the
antidumping duty assessment rate for the China-wide entity.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Assessment Practice Refinement, 76 FR at 65694 for a
full discussion of this practice.
\19\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for
shipments of the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for companies listed
in the table above, the cash deposit rate will be 118.97 percent; (2)
for previously examined Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not listed
above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to
be the exporter's existing cash deposit rate; (3) for all Chinese
exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be
entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for
the China-wide entity (i.e., 142.72 percent); and (4) for all non-
Chinese exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their
own separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to
the Chinese exporter that supplied that non-Chinese exporter. These
cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure
to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred
and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties, and/or an
increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the amount of the
countervailing duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to an APO
of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation
subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
These final results and notice are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213(h) and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: June 4, 2024.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Used the Latest Revised U.S. Sales
Database for the Calculation of Bestflow's Weighted-Average Dumping
Margin
Comment 2: Inland Freight Surrogate Value (SV)
Comment 3: Calculation of Labor SV Covering Multiple Years of
the POR
Comment 4: Whether to Continue to Apply Partial Adverse Facts
Available (AFA) to Determine the Normal Value (NV) for the Sales of
Merchandise Supplied by Bestflow's Uncooperative Suppliers
Comment 5: Whether to Continue to Assign Bestflow's Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin to Both-Well
VI. Recommendation
Appendix II
Companies Not Eligible for a Separate Rate and Treated as Part of the
China-Wide Entity
1. Cixi Baicheng Hardware Tools, Ltd.
2. Dalian Guangming Pipe Fittings Co., Ltd.
3. Eaton Hydraulics (Luzhou) Co., Ltd.
4. Eaton Hydraulics (Ningbo) Co., Ltd.
5. Jiangsu Forged Pipe Fittings Co., Ltd.
6. Jiangsu Haida Pipe Fittings Group Co.
7. Jinan Mech Piping Technology Co., Ltd.
8. Jining Dingguan Precision Parts Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
9. Lianfa Stainless Steel Pipes & Valves (Qingyun) Co., Ltd.
10. Luzhou City Chengrun Mechanics Co., Ltd.
11. Ningbo HongTe Industrial Co., Ltd.
12. Ningbo Long Teng Metal Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
13. Ningbo Save Technology Co., Ltd.
14. Ningbo Zhongan Forging Co., Ltd.
15. Q.C. Witness International Co., Ltd.
16. Shanghai Lon Au Stainless Steel Materials Co., Ltd.
17. Witness International Co., Ltd.
18. Yancheng Boyue Tube Co., Ltd.
19. Yancheng Haohui Pipe Fittings Co., Ltd.
20. Yancheng Jiuwei Pipe Fittings Co., Ltd.
21. Yancheng Manda Pipe Industry Co., Ltd.
22. Yingkou Guangming Pipeline Industry Co., Ltd.
[[Page 49157]]
23. Yuyao Wanlei Pipe Fitting Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2024-12738 Filed 6-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P