Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Change To Establish Fees for the NYSE American Aggregated Lite Data Feed, 47661-47672 [2024-12040]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 107 / Monday, June 3, 2024 / Notices
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–NYSE–2024–29 and should be
submitted on or before June 24, 2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.54
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–12039 Filed 5–31–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270–347, OMB Control No.
3235–0393]
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request; Extension: Rule 15g–4
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–2736
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(‘‘PRA’’) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the existing collection of information
provided for in Rule 15g–4—Disclosure
of compensation to brokers or dealers
(17 CRF 240.15g–4) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et
seq.). The Commission plans to submit
this existing collection of information to
the Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) for extension and approval.
Rule 15g–4 requires brokers and
dealers effecting transactions in penny
stocks for or with customers to disclose
the amount of compensation received by
the broker-dealer in connection with the
transaction. The purpose of the rule is
to increase the level of disclosure to
investors concerning penny stocks
generally and specific penny stock
transactions.
The Commission estimates that
approximately 170 broker-dealers will
each spend an average of approximately
87.0833333 hours annually to comply
with this rule. Thus, the total time
burden is approximately 14,804 hours
per year.
Written comments are invited on: (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
estimates of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted by
August 2, 2024.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
under the PRA unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Please direct your written comments
to: David Bottom, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, c/o John
Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington,
DC 20549, or send an email to: PRA_
Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: May 29, 2024.
Sherry R. Haywood.
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–12099 Filed 5–31–24; 8:45 am]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–100229; File No. SR–
NYSEAMER–2024–31]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
American LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Change To Establish Fees for the
NYSE American Aggregated Lite Data
Feed
May 28, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on May 13,
2024, NYSE American LLC (‘‘NYSE
American’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to establish
fees for the NYSE American Aggregated
Lite data feed. The proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
website at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
NYSE American LLC Equities
Proprietary Market Data Fees Schedule
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
54 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 May 31, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00153
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47661
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
47662
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 107 / Monday, June 3, 2024 / Notices
(‘‘Fee Schedule’’) and establish fees for
the NYSE American Aggregated Lite
(‘‘NYSE American Agg Lite’’) data feed
that would be effective May 13, 2024.4
In summary, the NYSE American Agg
Lite is a NYSE American-only
frequency-based depth of book market
data feed of the NYSE American’s limit
order book for up to ten (10) price levels
on both the bid and offer sides of the
order book for securities traded on the
Exchange and for which the Exchange
reports quotes and trades under the
Consolidated Tape Association (‘‘CTA’’)
Plan or the Nasdaq/UTP Plan. The
NYSE American Agg Lite is a
compilation of limit order data that the
Exchange provides to vendors and
subscribers. The NYSE American Agg
Lite includes depth of book order data
as well as security status messages. The
security status message informs
subscribers of changes in the status of a
specific security, such as trading halts,
short sale restriction, etc. In addition,
the NYSE American Agg Lite includes
order imbalance information prior to the
opening and closing of trading.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Background
The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market. The Commission
has repeatedly expressed its preference
for competition over regulatory
intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities
markets. In Regulation NMS, the
Commission highlighted the importance
of market forces in determining prices
and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
that current regulation of the market
system ‘‘has been remarkably successful
in promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 5
While Regulation NMS has enhanced
competition, it has also fostered a
‘‘fragmented’’ market structure where
trading in a single stock can occur
across multiple trading centers. When
multiple trading centers compete for
order flow in the same stock, the
Commission has recognized that ‘‘such
competition can lead to the
fragmentation of order flow in that
stock.’’ 6 Indeed, cash equity trading is
4 The proposed rule change establishing the
NYSE American Agg Lite data feed was
immediately effective on February 27, 2024. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99690 (March
7, 2024), 89 FR 18445 (March 13, 2024) (SR–
NYSEAMER–2024–14) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
To Establish the NYSE American Aggregated Lite
Market Data Feed).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005)
(File No. S7–10–04) (Final Rule) (‘‘Regulation
NMS’’).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61358,
75 FR 3594, 3597 (January 21, 2010) (File No. S7–
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 May 31, 2024
Jkt 262001
currently dispersed across 16
exchanges,7 numerous alternative
trading systems,8 and broker-dealer
internalizers and wholesalers, all
competing for order flow. Based on
publicly-available information, no
single exchange currently has more than
20% market share (whether including or
excluding auction volume).9
Proposed NYSE American Agg Lite Data
Feed Fees
To reflect the value of NYSE
American’s market data, the Exchange
proposes to establish the fees listed
below for the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed, operative on May 13, 2024.
The Exchange proposes to charge fees
for the same categories of market data
use as its affiliated exchanges (namely,
NYSE, NYSE Arca and NYSE National)
currently charge. The Exchange believes
that adopting the same fee structure as
its affiliated exchanges would reduce
administrative burdens on market data
subscribers that also currently subscribe
to market data feeds from the
Exchange’s affiliates.
1. Access Fee. For the receipt of
access to the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed, the Exchange proposes to
charge $500 per month. This proposed
Access Fee would be charged to any
data recipient that receives the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed. Data
recipients that only use display devices
to view NYSE American Agg Lite
market data and do not separately
receive a data feed would not be
charged an Access Fee. The proposed
Access Fee would be charged only once
per firm.
2. User Fees. The Exchange proposes
to charge a Professional User Fee (Per
User) of $1 per month. The Exchange
does not propose a fee for NonProfessional Users. The Professional
User Fee would apply to each display
device that has access to the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed.
3. Redistribution Fee. For
redistribution of the NYSE American
Agg Lite data feed, the Exchange
proposes to establish a fee of $250 per
month. The proposed Redistribution Fee
02–10) (Concept Release on Equity Market
Structure).
7 See Cboe U.S Equities Market Volume
Summary, available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/
equities/market_share. See generally https://
www.sec.gov/fastanswers/
divisionsmarketregmrexchangesshtml.html.
8 See FINRA ATS Transparency Data, available at
https://otctransparency.finra.org/otctransparency/
AtsIssueData. A list of alternative trading systems
registered with the Commission is available at
https://www.sec.gov/foia/docs/atslist.htm.
9 See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market
Volume Summary, available at https://
markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/.
PO 00000
Frm 00154
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
would be charged to any Redistributor
of the NYSE American Agg Lite data
feed, which is defined to mean a vendor
or any person that provides a real-time
NYSE American market data product
externally to a data recipient that is not
its affiliate or wholly-owned subsidiary,
or to any system that an external data
recipient uses, irrespective of the means
of transmission or access. The proposed
Redistribution Fee would be charged
only once per Redistributor account. As
an incentive to potential Redistributors
to subscribe to the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed, the Exchange proposes to
waive the Access Fee and Redistribution
Fee for a Redistributor if the
Redistributor provides NYSE American
Agg Lite externally to at least one data
feed recipient and reports such data
feed recipient or recipients to the
Exchange. For example, a Redistributor
that subscribes to the NYSE American
Agg Lite data feed will have the Access
Fee and Redistribution Fee waived if
such Redistributor provides NYSE
American Agg Lite externally to at least
one data feed recipient and reports such
data feed recipient to the Exchange.
By targeting this proposed fee waiver
to Redistributors that provide external
distribution of NYSE American Agg
Lite, the Exchange believes that this
would provide an incentive for
Redistributors to make the NYSE
American Agg Lite market data product
available to its customers. Specifically,
if a data recipient is interested in
subscribing to NYSE American Agg Lite
and relies on a Redistributor to obtain
market data products from the
Exchange, that data recipient would
need its Redistributor to subscribe to
and redistribute NYSE American Agg
Lite. The Exchange believes that this
proposed fee waiver for Redistributors
of NYSE American Agg Lite would
provide an incentive for Redistributors
to make NYSE American Agg Lite
available to their customers, which will
increase the availability of the
Exchange’s market data products to a
larger potential population of data
recipients.
Further, the Exchange proposes to
adopt a credit that would be applicable
to Redistributors that provide external
distribution of NYSE American Agg Lite
to Professional and Non-Professional
Users. As proposed, such Redistributors
would receive a credit equal to the
amount of the monthly Professional
User and Non-Professional User Fees for
such external distribution, up to a
maximum of the combination of the
Access Fee and Redistribution Fee for
NYSE American Agg Lite that the
Redistributor would otherwise be
required to pay to the Exchange. For
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 107 / Monday, June 3, 2024 / Notices
example, a Redistributor that reports
external Professional Users in a month
totaling $750 or more would receive a
maximum credit of $750 for that month,
which could effectively reduce its
monthly fee for access and
redistribution to zero. If that same
Redistributor were to report external
User quantities in a month totaling $600
of monthly usage, that Redistributor
would receive a credit of $600. The
Exchange believes the proposed credit
would provide Redistributors with an
incentive to increase their redistribution
of NYSE American Agg Lite because the
credit they would be eligible to receive
would increase if they report additional
external User quantities.
4. Enterprise Fees.
The Exchange proposes to establish
an enterprise license that will reduce
Exchange fees and administrative costs
for subscribers that disseminate NYSE
American Agg Lite. Subscribers that are
broker-dealers will be able to distribute
the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed
for display usage to an unlimited
number of recipients (professional users
and non-professional users) for a
monthly fee of $550, with an
opportunity to lower that fee to $500 per
month if they contract for twelve
months of service in advance.
As proposed, the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed may be distributed
pursuant to the proposed market data
enterprise license only for display usage
and in the context of a brokerage
relationship with a broker-dealer
through such broker-dealer’s own
devices. Purchase of an enterprise
license would eliminate per User
subscriber fees for NYSE American Agg
Lite. Further, the Exchange proposes to
waive the Access Fee and the
Redistribution Fee for NYSE American
Agg lite for Redistributors that pay the
Professional and Non-Professional
Enterprise Fee. The Exchange believes
the proposed fee waiver would provide
an incentive for Redistributors to
subscribe to the NYSE American Agg
Lite market data product at the
enterprise level to reduce the fees it
would pay to the Exchange and without
having to report the number of users
that receive the data feed from the
Redistributor.
Subscribers that intend to purchase a
market data enterprise license for at
least twelve months may elect to
purchase this product in advance for a
monthly fee of $500 per month for
distribution to an unlimited number of
professional users and non-professional
users. This feature is intended to
simplify cost projections and budgeting
for both subscribers and the Exchange.
Subscribers that elect not to purchase
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 May 31, 2024
Jkt 262001
this particular feature will nevertheless
be able to obtain all of the market data
information offered by NYSE American
Agg Lite by paying the standard fee of
$550 per month for distribution to an
unlimited number of professional users
and non-professional users. Subscribers
that elect to pay the monthly fee will be
able to switch to the annual fee at any
time, and those that elect to purchase
the annual contract would be able to
change to the monthly contract, with
notice, at the end of the twelve-month
period.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed market data enterprise license
will reduce exchange fees, lower
administrative costs for subscribers, and
help expand the availability of market
information to investors, and thereby
increase participation in financial
markets.
5. Non-Display Use Fees.
The Exchange proposes to establish
non-display fees for the NYSE American
Agg Lite data feed that are based on the
non-display use categories charged by
NYSE, NYSE Arca, NYSE National, the
CTA, and the UTP Plan for non-display
use.10 Non-display use would mean
accessing, processing, or consuming the
NYSE American Agg Lite data feed
delivered directly or through a
Redistributor, for a purpose other than
in support of a data recipient’s display
or further internal or external
redistribution (‘‘Non-Display Use’’).
Non-Display Use would include trading
uses such as high frequency or
algorithmic trading as well as any
trading in any asset class, automated
order or quote generation and/or order
pegging, price referencing for
algorithmic trading or smart order
routing, operations control programs,
investment analysis, order verification,
surveillance programs, risk
10 See Endnote 1 to the NYSE Proprietary Market
Data Fees, available here: https://www.nyse.com/
publicdocs/nyse/data/NYSE_Market_Data_Fee_
Schedule.pdf; Endnote 1 to the NYSE Arca Equities
Proprietary Market Data Fees, available here:
https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/data/
NYSE_Arca_Equities_Proprietary_Data_Fee_
Schedule.pdf; Endnote 1 to the NYSE National
Equities Proprietary Market Data Fees, available
here: https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/data/
NYSE_National_Market_Data_Fee_Schedule.pdf;
Endnote 8 to the Schedule of Market Data Charges
for the CTA, available here: https://
www.ctaplan.com/publicdocs/ctaplan/
notifications/trader-update/Schedule
%20Of%20Market%20Data%20Charges%20%20January%201,%202015.pdf; and Non-Display
Usage Fees as set forth in the UTP Plan Fee
Schedule and Non-Display Policy, available here:
https://utpplan.com/DOC/Datapolicies.pdf. See, e.g.,
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 69285 (April
3, 2013), 78 FR 21172 (April 9, 2013) (SR–
NYSEMKT–2013–32) and 72020 (September 9,
2014), 79 FR 55040 (September 15, 2014) (SR–
NYSEMKT–2014–72).
PO 00000
Frm 00155
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47663
management, compliance, and portfolio
management.
Under the proposal, for Non-Display
Use of NYSE American Agg Lite, there
would be three categories of, and fees
applicable, to, data recipients. One, two,
or three categories of Non-Display Use
may apply to a data recipient.
• As proposed, the Category 1 Fee
would be $1,000 per month and would
apply when a data recipient’s NonDisplay Use of the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed is on its own behalf, not
on behalf of its clients.
• As proposed, Category 2 Fees
would be $1,000 per month and would
apply to a data recipient’s Non-Display
Use of the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed on behalf of its clients.
• As proposed, Category 3 Fees
would be $1,000 per month and would
apply to a data recipient’s Non-Display
Use of the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed for the purpose of internally
matching buy and sell orders within an
organization, including matching
customer orders for a data recipient’s
own behalf and/or on behalf of its
clients. This category would apply to
Non-Display Use in trading platforms,
such as, but not restricted to, alternative
trading systems (‘‘ATSs’’), broker
crossing networks, broker crossing
systems not filed as ATSs, dark pools,
multilateral trading facilities, exchanges
and systematic internalization systems.
A data recipient will be charged $1,000
per month for each platform on which
it uses the Non-Display data internally
to match buy and sell orders, up to a cap
of $3,000 per month; even if the data
recipient uses the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed for more than three
platforms, it will not pay more than
$3,000 for such Category 3 use per
month.
The description of the three nondisplay use categories is set forth in the
Fee Schedule in endnote 1 and that
endnote would be referenced in the
NYSE American Agg Lite data feed fees
on the Fee Schedule. The text in the
endnote would remain unchanged.
Data recipients that receive the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed for NonDisplay Use would be required to
complete and submit a Non-Display Use
Declaration before they would be
authorized to receive the feed. A firm
subject to Category 3 Fees would be
required to identify each platform that
uses the NYSE American Agg Lite data
feed for a Category 3 Non-Display Use
basis, such as ATSs and broker crossing
systems not registered as ATSs, as part
of the Non-Display Use Declaration.
6. Non-Display Use Declaration Late
Fee. Data recipients that receive the
NYSE American Agg Lite data feed for
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
47664
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 107 / Monday, June 3, 2024 / Notices
Non-Display Use would be required to
complete and submit a Non-Display Use
Declaration before they would be
authorized to receive the feed.
Beginning in 2025, NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed recipients would be
required to submit, by January 31 of
each year, the Non-Display Use
Declaration. The requirement to submit
a Non-Display Use Declaration applies
to all real-time NYSE American data
feed product recipients. The Exchange
proposes to charge a Non-Display Use
Declaration Late Fee of $1,000 per
month to any data recipient that pays an
Access Fee for the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed that has failed to timely
complete and submit a Non-Display Use
Declaration. Specifically, with respect to
the Non-Display Use Declaration due by
January 31 of each year, the NonDisplay Use Declaration Late Fee would
apply to data recipients that fail to
complete and submit the Non-Display
Use Declaration by the January 31 due
date, and would apply beginning
February 1 and for each month
thereafter until the data recipient has
completed and submitted the annual
Non-Display Use Declaration.
The proposed Non-Display Use
Declaration Late Fee applicable to NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed would be
set forth in endnote 2 on the Fee
Schedule. As proposed, endnote 2
would be amended with the proposed
addition of the following new text: ‘‘The
Non-Display Declaration Late Fee will
apply, beginning in 2025, to NYSE
American Aggregated Lite data
recipients that fail to complete and
submit the annual Non-Display Use
Declaration by the January 31st due
date, and applies beginning February 1st
and for each month thereafter until the
data recipient has completed and
submitted the annual Non-Display use
Declaration.’’
In addition, if a data recipient’s use of
the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed
changes at any time after the data
recipient submits a Non-Display Use
Declaration, the data recipient must
inform the Exchange of the change by
completing and submitting at the time
of the change an updated declaration
reflecting the change of use.
7. Multiple Data Feed Fee. The
Exchange proposes to establish a
monthly fee, the ‘‘Multiple Data Feed
Fee,’’ that would apply to data
recipients that take a data feed for a
market data product in more than two
locations. Data recipients taking the
NYSE American Agg Lite data feed in
more than two locations would be
charged $200 per additional location per
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 May 31, 2024
Jkt 262001
month. No new reporting would be
required.11
8. Three-Month Fee Waiver. The
Exchange currently provides a onemonth free trial to any firm that
subscribes to a particular NYSE
American market data product for the
first time. Under the current one-month
trial, a first-time subscriber is not
charged the Access Fee, Non-Display
Fee, any applicable Professional and
Non-Professional User Fee and
Redistribution Fee for one calendar
month.12 The Exchange now proposes
an additional three-month fee waiver for
any Redistributor that subscribes to a
particular NYSE American market data
product for the first time for external
redistribution. As proposed, a first-time
Redistributor would be any firm that has
not previously subscribed to and
externally redistributed a particular
NYSE American market data product
listed on the Fee Schedule. As
proposed, a first-time Redistributor that
subscribes to a particular NYSE
American market data product would
not be charged the Access Fee and the
Redistribution Fee for that product for
three calendar months. Any other fees,
including but not limited to, NonDisplay Fee, any applicable Professional
and Non-Professional User Fee, and
Enterprise Fee would be billable after
the first calendar month after a first-time
Redistributor subscribes to a particular
NYSE American market data product.
For example, a first-time Redistributor
that chooses to subscribe to NYSE
American Agg Lite on June 24, 2024
would not be charged the Access Fee
and the Redistribution Fee for the
months of July, August, and September
2024. The proposed fee waiver would be
for the three calendar months following
the date a Redistributor is approved to
receive access to the particular NYSE
American market data product. The
Exchange would provide the threemonth fee waiver for each particular
product to each Redistributor once.
The Exchange believes that providing
a three-month fee waiver to NYSE
American market data products listed
on the Fee Schedule would enable
potential Redistributors to determine
whether a particular NYSE American
market data product provides value to
their business models before fully
11 Data vendors currently report a unique Vendor
Account Number for each location at which they
provide a data feed to a data recipient. The
Exchange considers each Vendor Account Number
a location. For example, if a data recipient has five
Vendor Account Numbers, representing five
locations, for the receipt of the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed, that data recipient will pay the
Multiple Data Feed fee with respect to three of the
five locations.
12 See Fee Schedule.
PO 00000
Frm 00156
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
committing to expend development and
implementation costs related to the
receipt of that product, and is intended
to encourage increased use of the
Exchange’s market data products by
defraying some of the development and
implementation costs Redistributors
would ordinarily have to expend before
using a product. The proposed threemonth fee waiver would also provide
Redistributors with time to begin
onboarding new clients prior to being
liable to the Access Fee and the
Redistribution Fee, allowing time to
choose how to allocate costs and
increase revenues to defray costs
associated with providing a new feed to
its customers.
Application of Proposed Fees
The Exchange is not required to make
the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed
available or to offer any specific pricing
alternatives to any customers, nor is any
firm required to purchase the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed. Firms that
choose to purchase the NYSE American
Agg Lite data feed do so for the primary
goals of using it to increase their
revenues, reduce their expenses, and in
some instances to compete directly with
the Exchange (including for order flow).
Those firms are able to determine for
themselves whether or not the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed or any
other similar products are attractively
priced.
The Exchange believes that
subscribers would use the price level
detail information available in the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed to make
trading decisions that directly benefit
the transaction services that the
Exchange offers. The Exchange
determined the level of the fees to
charge for the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed based on the value of the
Exchange’s transaction services.
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change would provide an incentive
both for data subscribers to subscribe to
NYSE American Agg Lite and for
Redistributors to subscribe to the
product for purposes of providing
external distribution of NYSE American
Agg Lite. The Exchange believes that
this proposed rule change also has the
potential to attract new Redistributors
for NYSE American Agg Lite.
The proposed fee structure is not
novel as it is based on the fee structure
currently in place for the NYSE
American OpenBook feed. The
Exchange is proposing fees for the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed that are
based on the existing fee structure and
rates that data recipients already pay for
the NYSE American OpenBook feed.
Specifically, the fees for the NYSE
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 107 / Monday, June 3, 2024 / Notices
American OpenBook feed—which like
the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed,
includes depth of book and security
status messages—consist of an Access
Fee of $1,000 per month, a Professional
User Fee (Per User) of $5 per month, a
Non-Professional User Fee (Per User) of
$1 per month, Non-Display Fees of
$2,000 per month for each of Categories
1, 2 and 3. The Exchange does not
currently charge a Redistribution Fee for
NYSE American OpenBook. The
Exchange also charges a Non-Display
Use Declaration Late Fee of $1,000 per
month and a Multiple Data Feed Fee of
$200 per month for NYSE American
OpenBook.13
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,14
in general, and Sections 6(b)(4) and
6(b)(5) of the Act,15 in particular, in that
it provides an equitable allocation of
reasonable fees among users and
recipients of the data and is not
designed to permit unfair
discrimination among customers,
issuers, and brokers.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
The Proposed Rule Change Is
Reasonable
In adopting Regulation NMS, the
Commission granted SROs and brokerdealers increased authority and
flexibility to offer new and unique
market data to the public. The
Commission has repeatedly expressed
its preference for competition over
regulatory intervention in determining
prices, products, and services in the
securities markets. Specifically, in
Regulation NMS, the Commission
highlighted the importance of market
forces in determining prices and SRO
revenues, and also recognized that
current regulation of the market system
‘‘has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 16
With respect to market data, the
decision of the United States Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit in NetCoalition v. SEC upheld
the Commission’s reliance on the
existence of competitive market
mechanisms to evaluate the
reasonableness and fairness of fees for
proprietary market data:
13 See NYSE American LLC Equities Proprietary
Market Data Fees at https://www.nyse.com/
publicdocs/nyse/data/NYSE_American_Equities_
Market_Data_Fee_Schedule.pdf.
14 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
15 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4), (5).
16 See Regulation NMS Adopting Release, 70 FR
37495, at 37499.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 May 31, 2024
Jkt 262001
In fact, the legislative history
indicates that the Congress intended
that the market system ‘‘evolve through
the interplay of competitive forces as
unnecessary regulatory restrictions are
removed’’ and that the SEC wield its
regulatory power ‘‘in those situations
where competition may not be
sufficient,’’ such as in the creation of a
‘‘consolidated transactional reporting
system.’’ 17
The court agreed with the
Commission’s conclusion that
‘‘Congress intended that ‘competitive
forces should dictate the services and
practices that constitute the U.S.
national market system for trading
equity securities.’ ’’ 18
More recently, the Commission
confirmed that it applies a ‘‘marketbased’’ test in its assessment of market
data fees, and that under that test:
the Commission considers whether
the exchange was subject to significant
competitive forces in setting the terms
of its proposal for [market data],
including the level of any fees. If an
exchange meets this burden, the
Commission will find that its fee rule is
consistent with the Act unless there is
a substantial countervailing basis to find
that the terms of the rule violate the Act
or the rules thereunder.19
An exchange may demonstrate that its
fees are constrained by competitive
forces by showing that platform
competition applies.
As the United States Supreme Court
recognized in Ohio v. American
Express, platforms are firms that act as
intermediaries between two or more sets
of agents, and typically the choices
made on one side of the platform affect
the results on the other side of the
platform via externalities, or ‘‘indirect
network effects.’’ 20 Externalities are
linkages between the different sides of
a platform such that one cannot
understand pricing and competition for
goods or services on one side of the
platform in isolation; one must also
account for the influence of the other
sides. As the Supreme Court explained:
To ensure sufficient participation,
two-sided platforms must be sensitive to
the prices that they charge each
17 NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 535 (D.C.
Cir. 2010) (‘‘NetCoalition I’’) (quoting H.R. Rep. No.
94–229 at 92 (1975), as reprinted in 1975
U.S.C.C.A.N. 323).
18 Id. at 535.
19 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–
90217 (October 16, 2020), 85 FR 67392 (October 22,
2020) (SR–NYSENAT–2020–05) (‘‘National IF
Approval Order’’) (internal quotation marks
omitted), quoting Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74781
(December 9, 2008).
20 Ohio v. American Express, 138 S. Ct. 2274,
2280–81 (2018).
PO 00000
Frm 00157
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47665
side. . . . Raising the price on side A
risks losing participation on that side,
which decreases the value of the
platform to side B. If the participants on
side B leave due to this loss in value,
then the platform has even less value to
side A—risking a feedback loop of
declining demand. . . . Two-sided
platforms therefore must take these
indirect network effects into account
before making a change in price on
either side.21
The Exchange and its affiliated
exchanges have long maintained that
they function as platforms between
consumers of market data and
consumers of trading services. Proving
the existence of linkages between the
two sides of this platform requires an indepth economic analysis of both public
data and confidential exchange data
about particular customers’ trading
activities and market data purchases.
Exchanges, however, are prohibited
from publicly sharing details about
these specific customer activities and
purchases. For example, pursuant to
Exchange Rule 7.41E, transactions
executed on the Exchange are processed
anonymously.
Exchanges function as platforms for
market data and transaction services
mean that exchanges do not set fees for
market data products without
considering, and being constrained by,
the effect the fees will have on the
order-flow side of the platform. As the
D.C. Circuit recognized in NetCoalition
I, ‘‘[n]o one disputes that competition
for order flow is fierce.’’ 22 The court
further noted that ‘‘no exchange
possesses a monopoly, regulatory or
otherwise, in the execution of order
flow from broker dealers,’’ and that an
exchange ‘‘must compete vigorously for
order flow to maintain its share of
trading volume.’’ 23
As noted above, while Regulation
NMS has enhanced competition, it has
also fostered a ‘‘fragmented’’ market
structure where trading in a single stock
can occur across multiple trading
centers. When multiple trading centers
compete for order flow in the same
stock, the Commission has recognized
that ‘‘such competition can lead to the
fragmentation of order flow in that
stock.’’ 24 The Commission’s Division of
Trading and Markets has also
recognized that with so many
‘‘operating equities exchanges and
dozens of ATSs, there is vigorous price
21 Id.
at 2281.
22 NetCoalition
I, 615 F.3d at 544 (internal
quotation omitted).
23 Id.
24 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61358,
75 3594, 3597 (January 21, 2010) (File No. S7–02–
10) (Concept Release on Equity Market Structure).
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
47666
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 107 / Monday, June 3, 2024 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
competition among the U.S. equity
markets and, as a result, [transaction]
fees are tailored and frequently
modified to attract particular types of
order flow, some of which is highly
fluid and price sensitive.’’ 25 Indeed,
today, equity trading is currently
dispersed across 16 exchanges,26
numerous alternative trading systems,27
broker-dealer internalizers and
wholesalers, all competing for order
flow. Based on publicly-available
information, no single exchange
currently has more than 20% market
share.28
Further, low barriers to entry mean
that new exchanges may rapidly and
inexpensively enter the market and offer
additional substitute platforms to
compete with the Exchange. For
example, since 2020, three new ones
have entered the market: Long Term
Stock Exchange (LTSE), which began
operations as an exchange on August 28,
2020; 29 Members Exchange (MEMX),
which began operations as an exchange
on September 29, 2020; 30 and Miami
International Holdings (MIAX), which
began operations of its first equities
exchange on September 29, 2020.31
These low barriers enable existing
exchange customers to disintermediate
and start their own exchanges if they
think the prices charged for exchange
proprietary market data products are too
high. This is precisely the rationale
behind the creation of MEMX, which
was formed by some of the largest and
25 Commission Division of Trading and Markets,
Memorandum to EMSAC, dated October 20, 2015,
available here: https://www.sec.gov/spotlight/
emsac/memo-maker-taker-fees-on-equitiesexchanges.pdf.
26 See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market
Volume Summary, available at https://
markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/.
27 See FINRA ATS Transparency Data, available
at https://otctransparency.finra.org/
otctransparency/AtsIssueData. A list of alternative
trading systems registered with the Commission is
available at https://www.sec.gov/foia/docs/
atslist.htm.
28 See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market
Volume Summary, available at https://
markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/.
29 See LTSE Market Announcement: MA–2020–
020, dated August 14, 2020, announcing LTSE
production securities phase-in planned for August
28, available here: https://assets-global.websitefiles.com/6462417e8db99f8baa06952c/
6462417e8db99f8baa0698e7_MA-2020-020__
Production_Securities_Launching_August_28_-_
Google_Docs.pdf and LTSE Market Announcement:
MA–2020–025, available here: https://assetsglobal.website-files.com/
6462417e8db99f8baa06952c/
6462417e8db99f8baa069873_MA-2020-025.pdf.
30 As of October 29, 2020, MEMX is trading all
NMS symbols. See https://info.memxtrading.com/
trader-alert-20-10-memx-trading-symbols-update/.
31 See MIAX Pearl Press release, dated September
29, 2020, available here: https://
www.miaxoptions.com/sites/default/files/alert-files/
MIAX_Press_Release_09292020.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 May 31, 2024
Jkt 262001
most well capitalized financial firms
that are also Exchange customers
(including Bank of America, BlackRock,
Charles Schwab, Citadel, Citi, E*Trade,
Fidelity, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan,
Jane Street, Morgan Stanley, TD
Ameritrade, and others).32
For example, one of MEMX’s
founding principles is that exchange
proprietary market data prices are too
high, and that MEMX will benefit its
members by offering ‘‘[l]ower pricing on
market data.’’ 33 Nor is this a new
phenomenon: exchange customers
formed BATS to compete with
incumbent exchanges and once
registered as an exchange in 2008, BATS
did not initially charge for market data.
The BATS venture was a financial
success for its founders, first through
recouping their investment in its initial
public offering and then in the
subsequent sale of BATS to Cboe, which
now charges for market data from those
exchanges. Notably, MEMX has some of
the same founding broker-dealer
customers, leading some to dub MEMX
‘‘BATS 2.0.’’ 34
The fact that this cycle is viable and
repeatable by entities that both trade on
and compete with existing exchanges
confirms that barriers to entry are low
and that these markets are competitive
and contestable.35 And low barriers to
entry act as a market check on high
prices.36
32 MEMX Home Page (‘‘Founded by members and
investors, MEMX aims to drive simplicity,
efficiency, and competition in equity markets.’’),
available at https://memx.com/.
33 MEMX home page, available at https://
memx.com/.
34 See ‘‘MEMX turns up the heat on US stock
exchanges,’’ Financial Times, January 9, 2019,
available at https://www.ft.com/content/4908c8b01418-11e9-a581-4ff78404524e; see also ‘‘US
equities exchanges: If you can’t beat them, join
them,’’ Euromoney, February 13, 2019, available at
https://www.euromoney.com/article/
b1d3tfby4p3y4v/us-equities-exchanges-if-you-cantbeat-them-join-them.
35 United States v. SunGard Data Sys., 172 F.
Supp. 2d 172, 186 (D.D.C. 2001) (recognizing that
‘‘[a]s a matter of law, courts have generally
recognized that when a customer can replace the
services of an external product with an internallycreated system, this captive output (i.e. the selfproduction of all or part of the relevant product)
should be included in the same market.’’). In
SunGard, the court rejected the Antitrust Division’s
attempt to block SunGuard’s acquisition of the
disaster recovery assets of Comdisco on the basis
that the acquisition would ‘‘substantially lessen
competition in the market for shared hotsite
disaster recovery services,’’ when the evidence
showed that ‘‘internal hotsites’’ created by
customers competed with the ‘‘external shared
hotsite business’’ engaged in by the merging parties.
Id. at 173–74, 187.
36 United States v. Baker Hughes, 908 F.2d 981,
987 (1990) (‘‘In the absence of significant barriers
[to entry], a company probably cannot maintain
supracompetitive pricing for any length of time.’’);
see also David S. Evans and Richard Schmalensee,
Markets with Two-Sided Platforms, in 1 Issues In
PO 00000
Frm 00158
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In sum, the fierce competition for
order flow thus constrains any exchange
from pricing its market data at a
supracompetitive price and constrains
the Exchange in setting its fees at issue
here.
The proposed fees are therefore
reasonable because in setting them, the
Exchange is constrained by the
availability of numerous substitute
platforms offering market data products
and trading. Such substitutes need not
be identical, but only substantially
similar to the product at hand.
More specifically, in setting fees for
the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed,
the Exchange is constrained by the fact
that, if its pricing across the platform is
unattractive to customers, customers
have their pick of an increasing number
of alternative platforms to use instead of
the Exchange. The Exchange believes
that it has considered all relevant factors
and has not considered irrelevant
factors in order to establish reasonable
fees. The existence of numerous
alternative platforms to the Exchange’s
platform ensures that the Exchange
cannot set unreasonable market data
fees without suffering the negative
effects of that decision in the fiercely
competitive market for trading order
flow.
Subscribing to the NYSE American
Agg Lite is entirely optional. The
Exchange is not required to make the
NYSE American Agg Lite available to
any customers, nor is any customer
required to purchase the NYSE
American Agg Lite market data feed.
Unlike some other data products (e.g.,
the consolidated quotation and last-sale
information feeds) that firms are
required to purchase in order to fulfil
regulatory obligations,37 a customer’s
decision whether to purchase the NYSE
American Agg Lite is entirely
discretionary. Most firms that choose to
subscribe to the NYSE American Agg
Lite would do so for the primary goals
of using it to increase their revenues,
reduce their expenses, and in some
instances to compete directly with the
Exchange for order flow. Such firms are
Competition Law And Policy 667, 685 (ABA
Section of Antitrust Law 2008) (noting that
exchange mergers in 2005 and 2006 were approved
by competition authorities in part in reliance on
planned and likely entry of other firms).
37 The Exchange notes that broker-dealers are not
required to purchase proprietary market data to
comply with their best execution obligations. See In
the Matter of the Application of Securities Industry
and Financial Markets Association for Review of
Actions Taken by Self-Regulatory Organizations,
Release Nos. 34–72182; AP–3–15350; AP–3–15351
(May 16, 2014). Similarly, there is no requirement
in Regulation NMS or any other rule that
proprietary data be utilized for order routing
decisions, and some broker-dealers and ATSs have
chosen not to do so.
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 107 / Monday, June 3, 2024 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
able to determine for themselves
whether the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed is necessary for their business
needs, and if so, whether or not it is
attractively priced. If the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed does not
provide sufficient value to firms based
on the uses those firms may have for it,
such firms may simply choose to
conduct their business operations in
ways that do not use the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed.
Further, in the case of products that
are also redistributed through market
data vendors such as Bloomberg and
Refinitiv, the vendors themselves
provide additional price discipline for
proprietary data products because they
control the primary means of access to
certain end users. These vendors impose
price discipline based upon their
business models. For example, vendors
that assess a surcharge on data they sell
are able to refuse to offer proprietary
products that their end users do not or
will not purchase in sufficient numbers.
Vendors may elect not to make NYSE
American Agg Lite available to its
customers unless their customers
request it, and customers will not elect
to pay the proposed fees unless NYSE
American Agg Lite can provide value by
sufficiently increasing revenues or
reducing costs in the customer’s
business in a manner that will offset the
fees. All of these factors operate as
constraints on pricing proprietary data
products.
In setting the proposed fees for the
NYSE American Agg Lite data feed, the
Exchange considered the
competitiveness of the market for
proprietary data and all of the
implications of that competition.
Even putting aside the facts that
exchanges are platforms and that pricing
decisions on the two sides of the
platform are intertwined, the Exchange
is constrained in setting the proposed
market data fees by the availability of
numerous substitute market data
products. The Commission has been
clear that substitute products need not
be identical, but only substantially
similar to the product at hand.38
The NYSE American Aggregated Lite
market data feed is subject to significant
38 For example, in the National IF Approval
Order, the Commission recognized that for some
customers, the best bid and offer information from
consolidated data feeds may function as a substitute
for the NYSE National Integrated Feed product,
which contains order by order information. See
National IF Approval Order, supra note 19, at 67397
[release p. 21] (‘‘[I]nformation provided by NYSE
National demonstrates that a number of executing
broker-dealers do not subscribe to the NYSE
National Integrated Feed and executing brokerdealers can otherwise obtain NYSE National best
bid and offer information from the consolidated
data feeds.’’ (internal quotations omitted)).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 May 31, 2024
Jkt 262001
competitive forces that constrain its
pricing. Specifically, the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed competes
head-to-head with similar market data
products currently offered by the four
U.S. equities exchanges operated by
Cboe Exchange, Inc.—Cboe BZX
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BZX’’), Cboe BYX
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BYX’’), Cboe EDGA
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGA’’), and Cboe
EDGX Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGX’’), each of
which offers a market data product
called BZX Summary Depth, BYX
Summary Depth, EDGA Summary Depth
and EDGX Summary Depth, respectively
(collectively, the ‘‘Cboe Summary
Depth’’).39 Similar to Cboe Summary
Depth, NYSE American Agg Lite can be
utilized by vendors and subscribers to
quickly access and distribute aggregated
order book data. As noted above, NYSE
American Agg Lite, similar to Cboe
Summary Depth, would provide
aggregated depth per security, including
the bid, ask and share quantity for
orders received by NYSE American,
except unlike Cboe Summary Depth,
which provides aggregated depth per
security for up to five price levels,
NYSE American Agg Lite would provide
aggregated depth per security for up to
ten price levels on both the bid and offer
sides of the NYSE American limit order
book as well as auction imbalance data.
The specific fees that the Exchange
proposes for the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed are reasonable for the
following additional reasons.
Overall. The Exchange believes that
the proposed fees for the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed are
reasonable because they represent the
value of the data available but also the
value of receiving the data on an
aggregated basis. The Exchange believes
that providing vendors and subscribers
with the option to subscribe to a market
data product that integrates a subset of
data from existing products and where
such aggregated data is published at a
pre-defined interval, thus lowering
bandwidth, infrastructure and
operational requirements, would allow
vendors and subscribers to choose the
best solution for their specific business
needs.
The Exchange believes the proposed
fees for the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed are also reasonable when
compared to fees for comparable
39 See BZX Rule 11.22(m) BZX Summary Depth;
BYX Rule 11.22(k) BYX Summary Depth; EDGA
Rule 13.8(f) EDGA Summary Depth; and EDGX Rule
13.8(f) EDGX Summary Depth. The Cboe Summary
Depth offered by BZX, BYX, EDGA and EDGX are
each a data feed that offers aggregated two-sided
quotations for all displayed orders for up to five (5)
price levels and contains the individual last sale
information, market status, trading status and trade
break messages.
PO 00000
Frm 00159
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47667
products, such as the Cboe Summary
Depth.40 Additionally, the Exchange is
proposing fees for the NYSE American
Agg Lite data feed that are based on the
existing fee structure that data
recipients already pay for the NYSE
American’s other market data products.
The Exchange believes that adopting the
same fee structure would reduce
administrative burdens on NYSE
American data subscribers that also
currently subscribe to market data feeds
from NYSE American.
Access Fee. The Exchange believes
that is reasonable to charge access fees
because of the value of the data to data
recipients in their profit-generating
activities. The Exchange believes that
the proposed monthly Access Fee of
$500 for the NYSE American Aggregated
Lite data feed is reasonable because it is
lower than the fees charged by BZX,
BYX, EDGA, and EDGX, each of which
charges between $2,500 per month to
$5,000 per month for both Internal
Distribution and External Distribution of
the Cboe Summary Depth market data
product.41
User Fees. The Exchange believes that
having separate Professional and NonProfessional User fees for the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed is
reasonable because it will make the
product more affordable and result in
greater availability to Professional and
Non-Professional Users. Not charging a
Non-Professional User fee is reasonable
because it provides a cost-effective
method for Non-Professional Users to
access the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed by providing the same data
that is available to Professional Users.
The proposed monthly Professional
User Fee (Per User) of $1 and monthly
Non-Professional User Fee (Per User) of
$0 are reasonable because they are
comparable to user fees generally
charged by exchanges. For example,
NYSE American charges a monthly
Professional User Fee (Per User) of $5
and a monthly Non-Professional User
Fee (Per User) of $1 for the NYSE
American OpenBook feed.42 Although
the proposed User Fees for Professional
and Non-Professional Users are higher
than those charged by BZX, BYX, EDGA
and EDGX, the Exchange notes that User
fees are only a subset of the total fees
that vendors and subscribers pay and
the lower fees proposed to access and
redistribute NYSE American Agg Lite
would provide such market data
recipients with a more affordable
40 See https://cdn.cboe.com/resources/
membership/US_Market_Data_Product_Price_
List.pdf.
41 Id.
42 See Fee Schedule.
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
47668
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 107 / Monday, June 3, 2024 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
alternative to existing substitutes offered
by the Exchange and its competitors.
Redistribution Fees. The Exchange
believes that it is reasonable to charge
redistribution fees because vendors
receive value from redistributing the
data in their business products for their
customers. The Exchange believes that
charging a Redistribution Fee is
reasonable because the vendors that
would be charged such a fee profit by
re-transmitting the Exchange’s market
data to their customers. This fee would
be charged only once per month to each
vendor account that redistributes the
NYSE American Agg Lite data feed,
regardless of the number of customers to
which that vendor redistributes the
data. The Exchange believes the
proposed monthly Redistribution Fee of
$250 for the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed is reasonable because it is
nominal and lower than the fees
charged by BZX, BYX, EDGA and
EDGX, each of which charges
considerably more for both Internal
Distribution and External Distribution of
the Cboe Summary Depth market data
feed.43
Enterprise Fees. The Exchange
believes the proposed enterprise license
is reasonable because it would reduce
exchange fees, lower administrative
costs for subscribers that are brokerdealers and help expand the availability
of market information to investors, and
thereby increase participation in
financial markets. Subscribers that are
broker-dealers would be able to
disseminate the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed for display usage to an
unlimited number of professional users
and non-professional users for a
monthly fee of $550, or $500 if they
contract for twelve months of service in
advance. The proposed enterprise
license would result in lower fees for
subscribers able to reach the largest
audience of investors, including retail
investors. Discounts for broader
dissemination of market data
information have routinely been
adopted by exchanges and permitted by
the Commission as equitable allocations
of reasonable dues, fees and charges.44
Non-Display Use Fees. The Exchange
believes the proposed Non-Display Use
fees are reasonable, because they reflect
the value of the data to the data
recipients in their profit-generating
43 See
supra, note 40.
example, the Commission has permitted
pricing discounts for market data under Nasdaq
Rules 7023(c) and 7047(b). See also Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 82182 (November 30,
2017), 82 FR 57627 (December 6, 2017) (SR–NYSE–
2017–60) (changing an enterprise fee for NYSE BBO
and NYSE Trades).
44 For
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 May 31, 2024
Jkt 262001
activities and do not impose the burden
of counting non-display devices.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed Non-Display Use fees reflect
the significant value of the non-display
data use to data recipients, which
purchase such data on an entirely
voluntary basis. Non-display data can be
used by data recipients for a wide
variety of profit-generating purposes,
including proprietary and agency
trading and smart order routing, as well
as by data recipients that operate order
matching and execution platforms that
compete directly with the Exchange for
order flow. The data also can be used for
a variety of non-trading purposes that
indirectly support trading, such as risk
management and compliance. Although
some of these non-trading uses do not
directly generate revenues, they can
nonetheless substantially reduce a
recipient’s costs by automating such
functions so that they can be carried out
in a more efficient and accurate manner
and reduce errors and labor costs,
thereby benefiting recipients. The
Exchange believes that charging for nontrading uses is reasonable because data
recipients can derive substantial value
from such uses, for example, by
automating tasks so that can be
performed more quickly and accurately
and less expensively than if they were
performed manually.
Previously, the non-display use data
pricing policies of many exchanges
required customers to count, and the
exchanges to audit the count of, the
number of non-display devices used by
a customer. As non-display use grew
more prevalent and varied, however,
exchanges received an increasing
number of complaints about the
impracticality and administrative
burden associated with that approach.
In response, the Exchange and its
affiliated exchanges developed a nondisplay use pricing structure that does
not require non-display devices to be
counted or those counts to be audited,
and instead looks merely at the three
following categories of potential use of
non-display data: use of the data on the
customer’s own behalf (Category 1), use
on behalf of clients (Category 2), and use
to internally match buy and sell orders
within an organization (Category 3).
The Exchange believes that it is
reasonable to segment the fee for nondisplay use into these three categories.
As noted above, the uses to which
customers can put the NYSE American
Agg Lite data feed are numerous and
varied, and the Exchange believes that
charging separate fees for these separate
categories of use is reasonable because
it reflects the actual value the customer
derives from the data, based upon how
PO 00000
Frm 00160
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
many categories of use the customer
makes of the data. Segmenting the fees
for non-display data in this way avoids
the unreasonable result of customers
that make only limited non-display use
of the data paying the same fees as
customers that use the data for
numerous different revenue-generating
and cost-saving purposes.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed fees of $1,000 per month for
each of Categories 1, 2, and 3 is
reasonable. These fees are comparable to
non-display use fees generally charged
by exchanges. For example, the fees for
Non-Display Use of NYSE American
OpenBook for Categories 1, 2 and 3 is
$2,000 per month.45 The Exchange
believes that the proposed fees directly
and appropriately reflect the significant
value of using non-display data in a
wide range of computer-automated
functions relating to both trading and
non-trading activities and that the
number and range of these functions
continue to grow through innovation
and technology developments.
The Exchange also believes that,
regarding Category 3 fees, it is
reasonable to charge $1,000 per month
for each trading platform on which the
data recipient uses the Non-Display
data, because such use of the data is
directly in competition with the
Exchange and the Exchange should be
permitted to recoup some of its lost
trading revenue by charging for the data
that makes such competition possible.
The Exchange believes that it is
reasonable to cap such fees for Category
3 use at $3,000 per month per data
recipient, because a higher monthly fee
may potentially dissuade competitors
from buying the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed for use by their trading
platforms.
The proposed Non-Display Use fees
for the NYSE American Agg Lite data
feed are also reasonable because they
take into account the extra value of
receiving the data for Non-Display Use
on an integrated basis. The Exchange
believes that the proposed fees directly
and appropriately reflect the significant
value of using the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed on a non-display basis in
a wide range of computer-automated
functions relating to both trading and
non-trading activities and that the
number and range of these functions
continue to grow through innovation
and technology developments.46
45 See
Fee Schedule.
also Exchange Act Release No. 69157,
March 18, 2013, 78 FR 17946, 17949 (March 25,
2013) (SR–CTA/CQ–2013–01) (‘‘[D]ata feeds have
become more valuable, as recipients now use them
to perform a far larger array of non-display
functions. Some firms even base their business
46 See
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 107 / Monday, June 3, 2024 / Notices
Non-Display Use Declaration Late
Fee. The Exchange believes that it is
reasonable to require annual
submissions of the Non-Display Use
Declaration so that the Exchange will
have current and accurate information
about the use of the NYSE American
Agg Lite data feed and can correctly
assess fees for the uses of the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed. Requiring
annual submissions of such declarations
is reasonable because it also allows
users to re-assess their own usage each
year.
The Exchange believes that it is
reasonable to impose a late fee in
connection with the submission of the
Non-Display Use Declaration. In order
to correctly assess fees for the nondisplay use of the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed, the Exchange needs to
have current and accurate information
about the use of the NYSE American
Agg Lite data feed. The failure of data
recipients to submit the Non-Display
Use Declaration on time leads to
potentially incorrect billing and
administrative burdens, including
tracking and obtaining late Non-Display
Use Declarations and correcting and
following up on payments owed in
connection with late Non-Display Use
Declarations. The purpose of the late fee
is to incent data recipients to submit the
Non-Display Use Declaration promptly
to avoid the administrative burdens
associated with the late submission of
Non-Display Use Declarations.
Multiple Data Feed Fee. The Exchange
believes that it is reasonable to require
data recipients to pay a modest
additional fee for taking a data feed for
a market data product in more than two
locations, because such data recipients
can derive substantial value from being
able to consume the product in as many
locations as they want. In addition,
there are administrative burdens
associated with tracking each location at
which a data recipient receives the
product. The Multiple Data Feed Fee is
designed to encourage data recipients to
better manage their requests for
additional data feeds and to monitor
their usage of data feeds. The proposed
fee is designed to apply to data feeds
received in more than two locations so
that each data recipient can have one
primary and one backup data location
before having to pay a multiple data
feed fee.
models on the incorporation of data feeds into black
boxes and application programming interfaces that
apply trading algorithms to the data, but that do not
require widespread data access by the firm’s
employees. As a result, these firms pay little for
data usage beyond access fees, yet their data access
and usage is critical to their businesses.’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 May 31, 2024
Jkt 262001
Three-Month Fee Waiver. The
Exchange believes the proposal to waive
the Access Fee and the Redistribution
Fee for the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed to new Redistributors for three
calendar months is reasonable because
it would enable potential Redistributors
to determine whether a particular NYSE
American market data product provides
value to their business models before
fully committing to expend
development and implementation costs
related to the receipt of that product,
and is intended to encourage increased
use of the Exchange’s market data
products by defraying some of the
development and implementation costs
Redistributors would ordinarily have to
expend before using a product. The
proposed fee waiver would also allow
Redistributors to become familiar with
the feed and determine whether it suits
their needs without incurring fees.
Making a new market data product
available without charging a fee for
three months is consistent with
offerings of other exchanges. For
example, BZX offers subscribers of BZX
Summary Depth a three-month credit
for external distribution, which is akin
to the three-month fee waiver proposed
by the Exchange.47
For all of the foregoing reasons, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
fees for the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed are reasonable.
The Proposed Fees Are Equitably
Allocated
The Exchange believes the proposed
fees for the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed are allocated fairly and
equitably among the various categories
of users of the feed, and any differences
among categories of users are justified.
Overall. The Exchange believes that
the proposed fees are equitably
allocated because they will apply to all
data recipients that choose to subscribe
to the NYSE American Agg Lite data
feed. Any subscriber or vendor that
chooses to subscribe to the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed is subject
to the same Fee Schedule, regardless of
what type of business they operate or
the use they plan to make of the data
feed. Subscribers and vendors are not
required to purchase the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed and may
choose to receive the data on the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed regardless
of what type of business they operate or
47 See e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No.
94432 (March 16, 2022), 87 FR 16277 (March 22,
2022) (SR–CboeBZX–2022–015) (Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change To Amend the Fees Applicable to Various
Market Data Products).
PO 00000
Frm 00161
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47669
the use they plan to make of the data
feed.
Access Fee. The Exchange believes
the proposed monthly Access Fee of
$500 for the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed is equitably allocated because
it would be charged on an equal basis
to all data recipients that receive a data
feed of the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed, regardless of what type of
business they operate or the use they
plan to make of the data feed.
User Fees. The Exchange believes that
the fee structure differentiating
Professional User fees ($1 per month per
user) from Non-Professional User fees
($0 per month per user) for display
device access to the NYSE American
Agg Lite data feed is equitable. This
structure has long been used by the
Exchange to reduce the price of data to
Non-Professional Users and make it
more broadly available.48 Offering the
NYSE American Agg Lite data feed to
Non-Professional Users with the same
data as is available to Professional Users
results in greater equity among data
recipients. These user fees would be
charged uniformly to all display devices
that have access to the NYSE American
Agg Lite data feed.
Redistribution Fees. The Exchange
believes the proposed monthly fee of
$250 for redistributing the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed is equitably
allocated because it would be charged
on an equal basis to those Redistributors
that choose to redistribute the feed.
Enterprise Fees. The Exchange
believes the proposed enterprise license
is equitably allocated because it would
be available on an equal basis to all
subscribers that are broker-dealers, each
of whom would benefit from reduced
exchange fees and from lower
administrative costs. Moreover, the
specific feature of the proposed
enterprise license that will allow
subscribers to lower fees by subscribing
to a twelve-month contract is also an
equitable allocation because all
subscribers will have the same option of
choosing between the stability of a
fixed, lower rate, and the more flexible
option of maintaining the ability to
change market data products after a
month of service. Subscribers will be
free to move from the monthly to the
annual rate at any time, or from annual
48 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No.
70212 (August 15, 2013), 78 FR 51775 (August 21,
2013) (SR–NYSEMKT–2013–69) (lowering the NonProfessional User Fee (Per User) for NYSE MKT
BBO and Trades); Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 20002, File No. S7–433 (July 22, 1983), 48 FR
34552 (July 29, 1983) (establishing Non-Professional
fees for CTA data); NASDAQ BX Equity 7 Pricing
Schedule, Section 123.
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
47670
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 107 / Monday, June 3, 2024 / Notices
to a monthly fee, with notice, at the
expiration of the twelve-month period.
Non-Display Use Fees. The Exchange
believes the proposed Non-Display Use
fees are equitably allocated because they
would require subscribers to pay fees
only for the uses they actually make of
the data. As noted above, non-display
data can be used by data recipients for
a wide variety of profit-generating
purposes (including trading, risk
management, and compliance) as well
as purposes that do not directly generate
revenues but nonetheless substantially
reduce the recipient’s costs by
automating certain functions. The
Exchange believes that it is equitable to
charge non-display data subscribers a
$1,000 fee for each category of use they
make of such data—namely, using the
data on their own behalf (Category 1),
on behalf of their clients (Category 2),
and to internally match buy and sell
orders within an organization (Category
3)—because this fee structure results in
subscribers with greater uses of the data
paying higher fees, and subscribers with
fewer uses of the data paying lower fees.
This segmented fee structure is also
equitable because no subscriber of nondisplay data would be charged a fee for
a category of use in which it did not
actually engage.
The Exchange also believes that,
regarding Category 3 fees, it is equitable
to charge $1,000 per month for each
trading platform on which the data
recipient uses the Non-Display data,
because such use of the data is directly
in competition with the Exchange and
the Exchange should be permitted to
recoup some of its lost trading revenue
by charging for the data that makes such
competition possible. The Exchange
believes that it is equitable to cap such
fees for Category 3 use at $3,000 per
month per data recipient, because a
higher monthly fee may potentially
dissuade competitors from buying the
NYSE American Agg Lite data feed for
use by their trading platforms.
Non-Display Use Declaration Late
Fee. The Exchange believes that the
proposed fee of $1,000 per month for a
late Non-Display Use Declaration is
equitably allocated because it applies to
any data recipient that pays an Access
Fee for the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed but has failed to complete and
submit a Non-Display Use Declaration.
In addition, the Exchange believes that
it is equitable to charge a late fee to
subscribers who fail to timely submit
their Non-Display Use Declarations
because their failure to do so leads to
potentially incorrect billing and
administrative burdens on the part of
the Exchange. The Exchange believes it
is equitable to defray these
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 May 31, 2024
Jkt 262001
administrative costs by imposing a late
fee only on subscribers’ whose
declarations were late, as opposed to all
subscribers.
Multiple Data Feed Fee. The Exchange
believes that the $200 per month per
location fee to data recipients taking the
NYSE American Agg Lite data feed in
more than two locations is equitable
because it would apply to all such
customers, regardless of what type of
business they operate or the use they
make of the data feed. In addition, the
Exchange believes that it is equitable to
charge a fee to subscribers for taking a
data feed in more than two locations
because there are administrative
burdens on the part of the Exchange
associated with tracking each location at
which a data recipient receives the
product. The Exchange believes that it
is equitable for it to defray these
administrative costs by imposing a
modest fee only on subscribers who
seek to take the feed in more than two
locations, as opposed to all subscribers.
Three-Month Fee Waiver. The
Exchange believes the proposal to waive
the Access Fee and the Redistribution
Fee for the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed to new Redistributors for three
calendar months is equitable because it
would apply to any first-time
Redistributor, regardless of the use they
plan to make of the feed. As proposed,
any first-time Redistributor of the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed would not
be charged the Access Fee and the
Redistribution Fee for three calendar
months. The Exchange believes it is
equitable to restrict the availability of
this three-month fee waiver to
Redistributors that have not previously
subscribed to and redistributed the
NYSE American Agg Lite data feed,
since customers who are current or
previous subscribers of the feed are
already familiar with it and are able to
determine whether it suits their needs.
For all of the foregoing reasons, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
fees for the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed are equitably allocated.
The Proposed Fees Are Not Unfairly
Discriminatory
The Exchange believes the proposed
fees for the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed are not unfairly discriminatory
because any differences in the
application of the fees are based on
meaningful distinctions between
customers, and those meaningful
distinctions are not unfairly
discriminatory between customers.
Overall. The Exchange believes that
the proposed fees are not unfairly
discriminatory because they would
apply to all data recipients that choose
PO 00000
Frm 00162
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to subscribe to the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed. Any subscriber,
including Redistributor, that chooses to
subscribe to the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed is subject to the same Fee
Schedule, regardless of what type of
business they operate or the use they
plan to make of the data feed.
Subscribers, including Redistributors,
may choose to receive the data on the
NYSE American Agg Lite data feed
regardless of what type of business they
operate or the use they plan to make of
the data feed.
Access Fee. The Exchange believes
the proposed monthly Access Fee of
$500 for the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed is not unfairly discriminatory
because it would be charged on an equal
basis to all data recipients that receive
a data feed of the NYSE American Agg
Lite, regardless of what type of business
they operate or the use they plan to
make of the data feed.
User Fees. The Exchange believes that
the fee structure differentiating
Professional User fees ($1 per month per
user) from Non-Professional User fees
($0 per month per user) for display
device access to the NYSE American
Agg Lite data feed is not unfairly
discriminatory. This structure has long
been used by the Exchange to reduce the
price of data to Non-Professional Users
and make it more broadly available.49
Offering the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed to Non-Professional Users
with the same data as is available to
Professional Users results in greater
equity among data recipients. These
user fees would be charged uniformly to
all display devices that have access to
the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed.
Redistribution Fees. The Exchange
believes the proposed monthly fee of
$250 for redistributing the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed is not
unfairly discriminatory because it
would be charged on an equal basis to
those Redistributors that choose to
redistribute the feed.
Enterprise Fees. The Exchange
believes the proposed enterprise license
will not unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Act does not prohibit all
distinctions among customers, but only
discrimination that is unfair, and it is
not unfair discrimination to charge
those subscribers that are able to reach
the largest audiences of investors,
including retail investors, a lower fee for
incremental investors in order to
encourage the widespread distribution
of market data. This principle has been
repeatedly endorsed by the
Commission, as evidenced by the
49 Id.
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 107 / Monday, June 3, 2024 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
approval of enterprise licenses for other
market data products.50 Moreover, the
proposed enterprise license will be
subject to significant competition, and
that competition will ensure that there
is no unfair discrimination. Each
subscriber will be able to accept or
reject the license depending on whether
it will or will not lower costs for that
particular subscriber, and, if the license
is not sufficiently competitive, the
Exchange may lose market share. The
proposed enterprise license will
compete with other enterprise licenses
of the Exchange, underlying fee
schedules promulgated by the
Exchange, and enterprise licenses and
fee structures implemented by other
exchanges. As such, it is a voluntary
product for which market participants
can readily find substitutes.
Accordingly, the Exchange is
constrained from introducing a fee that
would be inequitable or unfairly
discriminatory.
Non-Display Use Fees. The Exchange
believes the proposed Non-Display Use
fees are not unfairly discriminatory
because they would require subscribers
for non-display use to pay fees only for
the categories of use they actually make
of the data. As noted above, non-display
data can be used by data recipients for
a wide variety of profit-generating
purposes (including trading, risk
management, and compliance) as well
as purposes that do not directly generate
revenues but nonetheless substantially
reduce the recipient’s costs by
automating certain functions. The
Exchange believes that it is not unfairly
discriminatory to charge non-display
data subscribers a $1,000 per month fee
for each category of use they make of
such data—namely, using the data on
their own behalf (Category 1), on behalf
of their clients (Category 2), and to
internally match buy and sell orders
within an organization (Category 3)—
because this fee structure results in
subscribers with greater uses for the
data paying higher fees, while
subscribers with fewer uses of the data
pay lower fees. This segmented fee
structure is not unfairly discriminatory
because no subscriber of non-display
data would be charged a fee for a
category of use in which it did not
actually engage.
The Exchange also believes that,
regarding Category 3 fees, it is not
50 See e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No.
83751 (July 31, 2018), 83 FR 38428 (August 6, 2018)
(SR–NASDAQ–2018–058) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
To Lower Fees and Administrative Costs for
Distributors of Nasdaq Basic, Nasdaq Last Sale, NLS
Plus and the Nasdaq Depth-of-Book Products
Through a Consolidated Enterprise License).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 May 31, 2024
Jkt 262001
unreasonably discriminatory to charge
$1,000 per month for each trading
platform on which the data recipient
uses the Non-Display data, because such
use of the data is directly in competition
with the Exchange and the Exchange
should be permitted to recoup some of
its lost trading revenue by charging for
the data that makes such competition
possible. The Exchange believes that it
is not unreasonably discriminatory to
cap such fees for Category 3 use at
$3,000 per month per data recipient,
because a higher monthly fee may
potentially dissuade competitors from
buying the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed for use by their trading
platforms.
Non-Display Use Declaration Late
Fee. The Exchange believes that the
proposed fee of $1,000 per month for a
late Non-Display Use Declaration is not
unfairly discriminatory because it
applies to any data recipient that pays
an Access Fee for the NYSE American
Agg Lite data feed but has failed to
complete and submit a Non-Display Use
Declaration. In addition, the Exchange
believes that it is not unfairly
discriminatory to charge a late fee to
subscribers who fail to timely submit
their Non-Display Use Declarations
because their failure to do so leads to
potentially incorrect billing and
administrative burdens on the part of
the Exchange. Nor is it unfairly
discriminatory for the Exchange to
defray these administrative costs by
imposing a late fee only on subscribers’
whose declarations were late, as
opposed to all subscribers.
Multiple Data Feed Fee. The Exchange
believes that the $200 per month per
location fee to data recipients taking the
NYSE American Agg Lite data feed in
more than two locations is not unfairly
discriminatory because it would apply
to all such customers, regardless of what
type of business they operate or the use
they make of the data feed. In addition,
the Exchange believes that it is not
unfairly discriminatory to charge a fee
to subscribers for taking a data feed in
more than two locations because there
are administrative burdens on the part
of the Exchange associated with tracking
each location at which a data recipient
receives the product. The Exchange
believes that it is not unfairly
discriminatory for it to defray these
administrative costs by imposing a
modest fee only on subscribers who
seek to take the feed in more than two
locations, as opposed to all subscribers.
Three-Month Fee Waiver. The
Exchange believes the proposal to waive
the Access Fee and the Redistribution
Fee for the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed to new Redistributors for three
PO 00000
Frm 00163
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47671
months is not unfairly discriminatory
because it would apply to any first-time
Redistributor, regardless of the use they
plan to make of the feed. As proposed,
any first-time Redistributor of the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed would not
be charged the Access Fee and the
Redistribution Fee for three calendar
months. The Exchange believes it is not
unfairly discriminatory to restrict the
availability of this three-month fee
waiver to Redistributors that have not
previously subscribed to the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed, since
Redistributors who are current or
previous subscribers of the feed are
already familiar with it and are able to
determine whether it suits their needs.
For all of the foregoing reasons, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
fees for the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed are not unfairly
discriminatory.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed fees will impose any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
Intramarket Competition. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
fees do not put any market participants
at a relative disadvantage compared to
other market participants. As noted
above, the proposed fee schedule would
apply to all subscribers, including
Redistributors, of the NYSE American
Agg Lite data feed, and customers may
not only choose whether to subscribe to
the feed at all, but may tailor their
subscriptions by choosing particular
uses of the feed but not others (e.g.,
Category 1 only versus all three
categories; display device access only
versus non-display use).
The Exchange also believes that the
proposed fees neither favor nor penalize
one or more categories of market
participants in a manner that would
impose an undue market on
competition. As shown above, to the
extent that particular proposed fees
apply to only a subset of subscribers
(e.g., Category 2 fees apply only to those
making non-display use on behalf of
clients; late fees apply only to customers
who fail to timely submit their
declarations), those distinctions are not
unfairly discriminatory and do not
unfairly burden one set of customers
over another. To the contrary, by
tailoring the proposed fees in this
manner, the Exchange believes that it
has eliminated the potential burden on
competition that might result from
unfairly asking subscribers to pay fees
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
47672
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 107 / Monday, June 3, 2024 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
for services they did not use, or late fees
they did not actually incur.
Intermarket Competition. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
fees do not impose a burden on
competition or on other SROs that is not
necessary or appropriate. As noted
above, exchanges are platforms for
market data and trading. In setting the
proposed fees, the Exchange was
constrained by the availability of
numerous substitute platforms also
offering market data products and
trading, and low barriers to entry mean
new exchange platforms are frequently
introduced. The fact that exchanges are
platforms ensures that no exchange can
make pricing decisions for one side of
its platform without considering, and
being constrained by, the effects that
price will have on the other side of the
platform. In setting fees for the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed, the
Exchange is constrained by the fact that,
if its pricing across the platform is
unattractive to customers, customers
will have its pick of an increasing
number of alternative platforms to use
instead of the Exchange. Given this
intense competition between platforms,
no one exchange’s market data fees can
impose an unnecessary burden on
competition, and the Exchange’s
proposed fees do not do so here.
In addition, the Exchange believes
that the proposed fees do not impose a
burden on competition or on other
exchanges that is not necessary or
appropriate because of the availability
of numerous substitute market data
products. Many other exchanges offer
proprietary data feeds like the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed, supplying
depth of book order data, security status
updates, stock summary messages, and
the exchange’s best bid and offer at any
given time, on a real-time basis. Because
market data users can find suitable
substitute feeds, an exchange that
overprices its market data products
stands a high risk that users may
substitute another platform, in which
case the platform would stand to lose
both market data and trading fees. These
competitive pressures ensure that no
one exchange’s market data fees can
impose an unnecessary burden on
competition, and the Exchange’s
proposed fees do not do so here.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 May 31, 2024
Jkt 262001
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 51 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 52
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 53 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–NYSEAMER–2024–31 and should
be submitted on or before June 24, 2024.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.54
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
NYSEAMER–2024–31 on the subject
line.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–NYSEAMER–2024–31. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
[FR Doc. 2024–12040 Filed 5–31–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–100232; File No. SR–NYSE–
2024–30]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Amend the
NYSE Proprietary Market Data Fee
Schedule
May 28, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on May 13,
2024, New York Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
54 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
51 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
52 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
53 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
PO 00000
Frm 00164
Fmt 4703
1 15
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 107 (Monday, June 3, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47661-47672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-12040]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-100229; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2024-31]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Change To Establish Fees
for the NYSE American Aggregated Lite Data Feed
May 28, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on May 13, 2024, NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I
and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to establish fees for the NYSE American
Aggregated Lite data feed. The proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE American LLC Equities
Proprietary Market Data Fees Schedule
[[Page 47662]]
(``Fee Schedule'') and establish fees for the NYSE American Aggregated
Lite (``NYSE American Agg Lite'') data feed that would be effective May
13, 2024.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The proposed rule change establishing the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed was immediately effective on February 27, 2024. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99690 (March 7, 2024), 89 FR
18445 (March 13, 2024) (SR-NYSEAMER-2024-14) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Establish the
NYSE American Aggregated Lite Market Data Feed).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In summary, the NYSE American Agg Lite is a NYSE American-only
frequency-based depth of book market data feed of the NYSE American's
limit order book for up to ten (10) price levels on both the bid and
offer sides of the order book for securities traded on the Exchange and
for which the Exchange reports quotes and trades under the Consolidated
Tape Association (``CTA'') Plan or the Nasdaq/UTP Plan. The NYSE
American Agg Lite is a compilation of limit order data that the
Exchange provides to vendors and subscribers. The NYSE American Agg
Lite includes depth of book order data as well as security status
messages. The security status message informs subscribers of changes in
the status of a specific security, such as trading halts, short sale
restriction, etc. In addition, the NYSE American Agg Lite includes
order imbalance information prior to the opening and closing of
trading.
Background
The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. The
Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over
regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services
in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, the Commission
highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and
SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation of the
market system ``has been remarkably successful in promoting market
competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors
and listed companies.'' \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (File No. S7-10-04) (Final
Rule) (``Regulation NMS'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While Regulation NMS has enhanced competition, it has also fostered
a ``fragmented'' market structure where trading in a single stock can
occur across multiple trading centers. When multiple trading centers
compete for order flow in the same stock, the Commission has recognized
that ``such competition can lead to the fragmentation of order flow in
that stock.'' \6\ Indeed, cash equity trading is currently dispersed
across 16 exchanges,\7\ numerous alternative trading systems,\8\ and
broker-dealer internalizers and wholesalers, all competing for order
flow. Based on publicly-available information, no single exchange
currently has more than 20% market share (whether including or
excluding auction volume).\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61358, 75 FR 3594,
3597 (January 21, 2010) (File No. S7-02-10) (Concept Release on
Equity Market Structure).
\7\ See Cboe U.S Equities Market Volume Summary, available at
https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share. See generally
https://www.sec.gov/fastanswers/divisionsmarketregmrexchangesshtml.html.
\8\ See FINRA ATS Transparency Data, available at https://otctransparency.finra.org/otctransparency/AtsIssueData. A list of
alternative trading systems registered with the Commission is
available at https://www.sec.gov/foia/docs/atslist.htm.
\9\ See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market Volume
Summary, available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed NYSE American Agg Lite Data Feed Fees
To reflect the value of NYSE American's market data, the Exchange
proposes to establish the fees listed below for the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed, operative on May 13, 2024. The Exchange proposes to
charge fees for the same categories of market data use as its
affiliated exchanges (namely, NYSE, NYSE Arca and NYSE National)
currently charge. The Exchange believes that adopting the same fee
structure as its affiliated exchanges would reduce administrative
burdens on market data subscribers that also currently subscribe to
market data feeds from the Exchange's affiliates.
1. Access Fee. For the receipt of access to the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed, the Exchange proposes to charge $500 per month. This
proposed Access Fee would be charged to any data recipient that
receives the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed. Data recipients that
only use display devices to view NYSE American Agg Lite market data and
do not separately receive a data feed would not be charged an Access
Fee. The proposed Access Fee would be charged only once per firm.
2. User Fees. The Exchange proposes to charge a Professional User
Fee (Per User) of $1 per month. The Exchange does not propose a fee for
Non-Professional Users. The Professional User Fee would apply to each
display device that has access to the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed.
3. Redistribution Fee. For redistribution of the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed, the Exchange proposes to establish a fee of $250 per
month. The proposed Redistribution Fee would be charged to any
Redistributor of the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed, which is defined
to mean a vendor or any person that provides a real-time NYSE American
market data product externally to a data recipient that is not its
affiliate or wholly-owned subsidiary, or to any system that an external
data recipient uses, irrespective of the means of transmission or
access. The proposed Redistribution Fee would be charged only once per
Redistributor account. As an incentive to potential Redistributors to
subscribe to the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed, the Exchange
proposes to waive the Access Fee and Redistribution Fee for a
Redistributor if the Redistributor provides NYSE American Agg Lite
externally to at least one data feed recipient and reports such data
feed recipient or recipients to the Exchange. For example, a
Redistributor that subscribes to the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed
will have the Access Fee and Redistribution Fee waived if such
Redistributor provides NYSE American Agg Lite externally to at least
one data feed recipient and reports such data feed recipient to the
Exchange.
By targeting this proposed fee waiver to Redistributors that
provide external distribution of NYSE American Agg Lite, the Exchange
believes that this would provide an incentive for Redistributors to
make the NYSE American Agg Lite market data product available to its
customers. Specifically, if a data recipient is interested in
subscribing to NYSE American Agg Lite and relies on a Redistributor to
obtain market data products from the Exchange, that data recipient
would need its Redistributor to subscribe to and redistribute NYSE
American Agg Lite. The Exchange believes that this proposed fee waiver
for Redistributors of NYSE American Agg Lite would provide an incentive
for Redistributors to make NYSE American Agg Lite available to their
customers, which will increase the availability of the Exchange's
market data products to a larger potential population of data
recipients.
Further, the Exchange proposes to adopt a credit that would be
applicable to Redistributors that provide external distribution of NYSE
American Agg Lite to Professional and Non-Professional Users. As
proposed, such Redistributors would receive a credit equal to the
amount of the monthly Professional User and Non-Professional User Fees
for such external distribution, up to a maximum of the combination of
the Access Fee and Redistribution Fee for NYSE American Agg Lite that
the Redistributor would otherwise be required to pay to the Exchange.
For
[[Page 47663]]
example, a Redistributor that reports external Professional Users in a
month totaling $750 or more would receive a maximum credit of $750 for
that month, which could effectively reduce its monthly fee for access
and redistribution to zero. If that same Redistributor were to report
external User quantities in a month totaling $600 of monthly usage,
that Redistributor would receive a credit of $600. The Exchange
believes the proposed credit would provide Redistributors with an
incentive to increase their redistribution of NYSE American Agg Lite
because the credit they would be eligible to receive would increase if
they report additional external User quantities.
4. Enterprise Fees.
The Exchange proposes to establish an enterprise license that will
reduce Exchange fees and administrative costs for subscribers that
disseminate NYSE American Agg Lite. Subscribers that are broker-dealers
will be able to distribute the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed for
display usage to an unlimited number of recipients (professional users
and non-professional users) for a monthly fee of $550, with an
opportunity to lower that fee to $500 per month if they contract for
twelve months of service in advance.
As proposed, the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed may be
distributed pursuant to the proposed market data enterprise license
only for display usage and in the context of a brokerage relationship
with a broker-dealer through such broker-dealer's own devices. Purchase
of an enterprise license would eliminate per User subscriber fees for
NYSE American Agg Lite. Further, the Exchange proposes to waive the
Access Fee and the Redistribution Fee for NYSE American Agg lite for
Redistributors that pay the Professional and Non-Professional
Enterprise Fee. The Exchange believes the proposed fee waiver would
provide an incentive for Redistributors to subscribe to the NYSE
American Agg Lite market data product at the enterprise level to reduce
the fees it would pay to the Exchange and without having to report the
number of users that receive the data feed from the Redistributor.
Subscribers that intend to purchase a market data enterprise
license for at least twelve months may elect to purchase this product
in advance for a monthly fee of $500 per month for distribution to an
unlimited number of professional users and non-professional users. This
feature is intended to simplify cost projections and budgeting for both
subscribers and the Exchange. Subscribers that elect not to purchase
this particular feature will nevertheless be able to obtain all of the
market data information offered by NYSE American Agg Lite by paying the
standard fee of $550 per month for distribution to an unlimited number
of professional users and non-professional users. Subscribers that
elect to pay the monthly fee will be able to switch to the annual fee
at any time, and those that elect to purchase the annual contract would
be able to change to the monthly contract, with notice, at the end of
the twelve-month period.
The Exchange believes that the proposed market data enterprise
license will reduce exchange fees, lower administrative costs for
subscribers, and help expand the availability of market information to
investors, and thereby increase participation in financial markets.
5. Non-Display Use Fees.
The Exchange proposes to establish non-display fees for the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed that are based on the non-display use
categories charged by NYSE, NYSE Arca, NYSE National, the CTA, and the
UTP Plan for non-display use.\10\ Non-display use would mean accessing,
processing, or consuming the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed delivered
directly or through a Redistributor, for a purpose other than in
support of a data recipient's display or further internal or external
redistribution (``Non-Display Use''). Non-Display Use would include
trading uses such as high frequency or algorithmic trading as well as
any trading in any asset class, automated order or quote generation
and/or order pegging, price referencing for algorithmic trading or
smart order routing, operations control programs, investment analysis,
order verification, surveillance programs, risk management, compliance,
and portfolio management.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Endnote 1 to the NYSE Proprietary Market Data Fees,
available here: https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/data/NYSE_Market_Data_Fee_Schedule.pdf; Endnote 1 to the NYSE Arca
Equities Proprietary Market Data Fees, available here: https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/data/NYSE_Arca_Equities_Proprietary_Data_Fee_Schedule.pdf; Endnote 1 to
the NYSE National Equities Proprietary Market Data Fees, available
here: https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/data/NYSE_National_Market_Data_Fee_Schedule.pdf; Endnote 8 to the
Schedule of Market Data Charges for the CTA, available here: https://www.ctaplan.com/publicdocs/ctaplan/notifications/trader-update/Schedule%20Of%20Market%20Data%20Charges%20-%20January%201,%202015.pdf; and Non-Display Usage Fees as set forth
in the UTP Plan Fee Schedule and Non-Display Policy, available here:
https://utpplan.com/DOC/Datapolicies.pdf. See, e.g., Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 69285 (April 3, 2013), 78 FR 21172 (April
9, 2013) (SR-NYSEMKT-2013-32) and 72020 (September 9, 2014), 79 FR
55040 (September 15, 2014) (SR-NYSEMKT-2014-72).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the proposal, for Non-Display Use of NYSE American Agg Lite,
there would be three categories of, and fees applicable, to, data
recipients. One, two, or three categories of Non-Display Use may apply
to a data recipient.
As proposed, the Category 1 Fee would be $1,000 per month
and would apply when a data recipient's Non-Display Use of the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed is on its own behalf, not on behalf of its
clients.
As proposed, Category 2 Fees would be $1,000 per month and
would apply to a data recipient's Non-Display Use of the NYSE American
Agg Lite data feed on behalf of its clients.
As proposed, Category 3 Fees would be $1,000 per month and
would apply to a data recipient's Non-Display Use of the NYSE American
Agg Lite data feed for the purpose of internally matching buy and sell
orders within an organization, including matching customer orders for a
data recipient's own behalf and/or on behalf of its clients. This
category would apply to Non-Display Use in trading platforms, such as,
but not restricted to, alternative trading systems (``ATSs''), broker
crossing networks, broker crossing systems not filed as ATSs, dark
pools, multilateral trading facilities, exchanges and systematic
internalization systems. A data recipient will be charged $1,000 per
month for each platform on which it uses the Non-Display data
internally to match buy and sell orders, up to a cap of $3,000 per
month; even if the data recipient uses the NYSE American Agg Lite data
feed for more than three platforms, it will not pay more than $3,000
for such Category 3 use per month.
The description of the three non-display use categories is set
forth in the Fee Schedule in endnote 1 and that endnote would be
referenced in the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed fees on the Fee
Schedule. The text in the endnote would remain unchanged.
Data recipients that receive the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed
for Non-Display Use would be required to complete and submit a Non-
Display Use Declaration before they would be authorized to receive the
feed. A firm subject to Category 3 Fees would be required to identify
each platform that uses the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed for a
Category 3 Non-Display Use basis, such as ATSs and broker crossing
systems not registered as ATSs, as part of the Non-Display Use
Declaration.
6. Non-Display Use Declaration Late Fee. Data recipients that
receive the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed for
[[Page 47664]]
Non-Display Use would be required to complete and submit a Non-Display
Use Declaration before they would be authorized to receive the feed.
Beginning in 2025, NYSE American Agg Lite data feed recipients would be
required to submit, by January 31 of each year, the Non-Display Use
Declaration. The requirement to submit a Non-Display Use Declaration
applies to all real-time NYSE American data feed product recipients.
The Exchange proposes to charge a Non-Display Use Declaration Late Fee
of $1,000 per month to any data recipient that pays an Access Fee for
the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed that has failed to timely complete
and submit a Non-Display Use Declaration. Specifically, with respect to
the Non-Display Use Declaration due by January 31 of each year, the
Non-Display Use Declaration Late Fee would apply to data recipients
that fail to complete and submit the Non-Display Use Declaration by the
January 31 due date, and would apply beginning February 1 and for each
month thereafter until the data recipient has completed and submitted
the annual Non-Display Use Declaration.
The proposed Non-Display Use Declaration Late Fee applicable to
NYSE American Agg Lite data feed would be set forth in endnote 2 on the
Fee Schedule. As proposed, endnote 2 would be amended with the proposed
addition of the following new text: ``The Non-Display Declaration Late
Fee will apply, beginning in 2025, to NYSE American Aggregated Lite
data recipients that fail to complete and submit the annual Non-Display
Use Declaration by the January 31st due date, and applies beginning
February 1st and for each month thereafter until the data recipient has
completed and submitted the annual Non-Display use Declaration.''
In addition, if a data recipient's use of the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed changes at any time after the data recipient submits a
Non-Display Use Declaration, the data recipient must inform the
Exchange of the change by completing and submitting at the time of the
change an updated declaration reflecting the change of use.
7. Multiple Data Feed Fee. The Exchange proposes to establish a
monthly fee, the ``Multiple Data Feed Fee,'' that would apply to data
recipients that take a data feed for a market data product in more than
two locations. Data recipients taking the NYSE American Agg Lite data
feed in more than two locations would be charged $200 per additional
location per month. No new reporting would be required.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Data vendors currently report a unique Vendor Account
Number for each location at which they provide a data feed to a data
recipient. The Exchange considers each Vendor Account Number a
location. For example, if a data recipient has five Vendor Account
Numbers, representing five locations, for the receipt of the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed, that data recipient will pay the
Multiple Data Feed fee with respect to three of the five locations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Three-Month Fee Waiver. The Exchange currently provides a one-
month free trial to any firm that subscribes to a particular NYSE
American market data product for the first time. Under the current one-
month trial, a first-time subscriber is not charged the Access Fee,
Non-Display Fee, any applicable Professional and Non-Professional User
Fee and Redistribution Fee for one calendar month.\12\ The Exchange now
proposes an additional three-month fee waiver for any Redistributor
that subscribes to a particular NYSE American market data product for
the first time for external redistribution. As proposed, a first-time
Redistributor would be any firm that has not previously subscribed to
and externally redistributed a particular NYSE American market data
product listed on the Fee Schedule. As proposed, a first-time
Redistributor that subscribes to a particular NYSE American market data
product would not be charged the Access Fee and the Redistribution Fee
for that product for three calendar months. Any other fees, including
but not limited to, Non-Display Fee, any applicable Professional and
Non-Professional User Fee, and Enterprise Fee would be billable after
the first calendar month after a first-time Redistributor subscribes to
a particular NYSE American market data product. For example, a first-
time Redistributor that chooses to subscribe to NYSE American Agg Lite
on June 24, 2024 would not be charged the Access Fee and the
Redistribution Fee for the months of July, August, and September 2024.
The proposed fee waiver would be for the three calendar months
following the date a Redistributor is approved to receive access to the
particular NYSE American market data product. The Exchange would
provide the three-month fee waiver for each particular product to each
Redistributor once.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that providing a three-month fee waiver to
NYSE American market data products listed on the Fee Schedule would
enable potential Redistributors to determine whether a particular NYSE
American market data product provides value to their business models
before fully committing to expend development and implementation costs
related to the receipt of that product, and is intended to encourage
increased use of the Exchange's market data products by defraying some
of the development and implementation costs Redistributors would
ordinarily have to expend before using a product. The proposed three-
month fee waiver would also provide Redistributors with time to begin
onboarding new clients prior to being liable to the Access Fee and the
Redistribution Fee, allowing time to choose how to allocate costs and
increase revenues to defray costs associated with providing a new feed
to its customers.
Application of Proposed Fees
The Exchange is not required to make the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed available or to offer any specific pricing alternatives to
any customers, nor is any firm required to purchase the NYSE American
Agg Lite data feed. Firms that choose to purchase the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed do so for the primary goals of using it to increase
their revenues, reduce their expenses, and in some instances to compete
directly with the Exchange (including for order flow). Those firms are
able to determine for themselves whether or not the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed or any other similar products are attractively priced.
The Exchange believes that subscribers would use the price level
detail information available in the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed to
make trading decisions that directly benefit the transaction services
that the Exchange offers. The Exchange determined the level of the fees
to charge for the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed based on the value
of the Exchange's transaction services.
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change would provide an
incentive both for data subscribers to subscribe to NYSE American Agg
Lite and for Redistributors to subscribe to the product for purposes of
providing external distribution of NYSE American Agg Lite. The Exchange
believes that this proposed rule change also has the potential to
attract new Redistributors for NYSE American Agg Lite.
The proposed fee structure is not novel as it is based on the fee
structure currently in place for the NYSE American OpenBook feed. The
Exchange is proposing fees for the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed
that are based on the existing fee structure and rates that data
recipients already pay for the NYSE American OpenBook feed.
Specifically, the fees for the NYSE
[[Page 47665]]
American OpenBook feed--which like the NYSE American Agg Lite data
feed, includes depth of book and security status messages--consist of
an Access Fee of $1,000 per month, a Professional User Fee (Per User)
of $5 per month, a Non-Professional User Fee (Per User) of $1 per
month, Non-Display Fees of $2,000 per month for each of Categories 1, 2
and 3. The Exchange does not currently charge a Redistribution Fee for
NYSE American OpenBook. The Exchange also charges a Non-Display Use
Declaration Late Fee of $1,000 per month and a Multiple Data Feed Fee
of $200 per month for NYSE American OpenBook.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See NYSE American LLC Equities Proprietary Market Data Fees
at https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/data/NYSE_American_Equities_Market_Data_Fee_Schedule.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\14\ in general, and
Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\15\ in particular, in that it
provides an equitable allocation of reasonable fees among users and
recipients of the data and is not designed to permit unfair
discrimination among customers, issuers, and brokers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4), (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Proposed Rule Change Is Reasonable
In adopting Regulation NMS, the Commission granted SROs and broker-
dealers increased authority and flexibility to offer new and unique
market data to the public. The Commission has repeatedly expressed its
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. Specifically,
in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market
forces in determining prices and SRO revenues, and also recognized that
current regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably
successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that
are most important to investors and listed companies.'' \16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Regulation NMS Adopting Release, 70 FR 37495, at 37499.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to market data, the decision of the United States
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in NetCoalition
v. SEC upheld the Commission's reliance on the existence of competitive
market mechanisms to evaluate the reasonableness and fairness of fees
for proprietary market data:
In fact, the legislative history indicates that the Congress
intended that the market system ``evolve through the interplay of
competitive forces as unnecessary regulatory restrictions are removed''
and that the SEC wield its regulatory power ``in those situations where
competition may not be sufficient,'' such as in the creation of a
``consolidated transactional reporting system.'' \17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 535 (D.C. Cir. 2010)
(``NetCoalition I'') (quoting H.R. Rep. No. 94-229 at 92 (1975), as
reprinted in 1975 U.S.C.C.A.N. 323).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The court agreed with the Commission's conclusion that ``Congress
intended that `competitive forces should dictate the services and
practices that constitute the U.S. national market system for trading
equity securities.' '' \18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ Id. at 535.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
More recently, the Commission confirmed that it applies a ``market-
based'' test in its assessment of market data fees, and that under that
test:
the Commission considers whether the exchange was subject to
significant competitive forces in setting the terms of its proposal for
[market data], including the level of any fees. If an exchange meets
this burden, the Commission will find that its fee rule is consistent
with the Act unless there is a substantial countervailing basis to find
that the terms of the rule violate the Act or the rules thereunder.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-90217 (October
16, 2020), 85 FR 67392 (October 22, 2020) (SR-NYSENAT-2020-05)
(``National IF Approval Order'') (internal quotation marks omitted),
quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2,
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74781 (December 9, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
An exchange may demonstrate that its fees are constrained by
competitive forces by showing that platform competition applies.
As the United States Supreme Court recognized in Ohio v. American
Express, platforms are firms that act as intermediaries between two or
more sets of agents, and typically the choices made on one side of the
platform affect the results on the other side of the platform via
externalities, or ``indirect network effects.'' \20\ Externalities are
linkages between the different sides of a platform such that one cannot
understand pricing and competition for goods or services on one side of
the platform in isolation; one must also account for the influence of
the other sides. As the Supreme Court explained:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ Ohio v. American Express, 138 S. Ct. 2274, 2280-81 (2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To ensure sufficient participation, two-sided platforms must be
sensitive to the prices that they charge each side. . . . Raising the
price on side A risks losing participation on that side, which
decreases the value of the platform to side B. If the participants on
side B leave due to this loss in value, then the platform has even less
value to side A--risking a feedback loop of declining demand. . . .
Two-sided platforms therefore must take these indirect network effects
into account before making a change in price on either side.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ Id. at 2281.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange and its affiliated exchanges have long maintained that
they function as platforms between consumers of market data and
consumers of trading services. Proving the existence of linkages
between the two sides of this platform requires an in-depth economic
analysis of both public data and confidential exchange data about
particular customers' trading activities and market data purchases.
Exchanges, however, are prohibited from publicly sharing details about
these specific customer activities and purchases. For example, pursuant
to Exchange Rule 7.41E, transactions executed on the Exchange are
processed anonymously.
Exchanges function as platforms for market data and transaction
services mean that exchanges do not set fees for market data products
without considering, and being constrained by, the effect the fees will
have on the order-flow side of the platform. As the D.C. Circuit
recognized in NetCoalition I, ``[n]o one disputes that competition for
order flow is fierce.'' \22\ The court further noted that ``no exchange
possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of
order flow from broker dealers,'' and that an exchange ``must compete
vigorously for order flow to maintain its share of trading volume.''
\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ NetCoalition I, 615 F.3d at 544 (internal quotation
omitted).
\23\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted above, while Regulation NMS has enhanced competition, it
has also fostered a ``fragmented'' market structure where trading in a
single stock can occur across multiple trading centers. When multiple
trading centers compete for order flow in the same stock, the
Commission has recognized that ``such competition can lead to the
fragmentation of order flow in that stock.'' \24\ The Commission's
Division of Trading and Markets has also recognized that with so many
``operating equities exchanges and dozens of ATSs, there is vigorous
price
[[Page 47666]]
competition among the U.S. equity markets and, as a result,
[transaction] fees are tailored and frequently modified to attract
particular types of order flow, some of which is highly fluid and price
sensitive.'' \25\ Indeed, today, equity trading is currently dispersed
across 16 exchanges,\26\ numerous alternative trading systems,\27\
broker-dealer internalizers and wholesalers, all competing for order
flow. Based on publicly-available information, no single exchange
currently has more than 20% market share.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61358, 75 3594,
3597 (January 21, 2010) (File No. S7-02-10) (Concept Release on
Equity Market Structure).
\25\ Commission Division of Trading and Markets, Memorandum to
EMSAC, dated October 20, 2015, available here: https://www.sec.gov/spotlight/emsac/memo-maker-taker-fees-on-equities-exchanges.pdf.
\26\ See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market Volume
Summary, available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/.
\27\ See FINRA ATS Transparency Data, available at https://otctransparency.finra.org/otctransparency/AtsIssueData. A list of
alternative trading systems registered with the Commission is
available at https://www.sec.gov/foia/docs/atslist.htm.
\28\ See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market Volume
Summary, available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, low barriers to entry mean that new exchanges may rapidly
and inexpensively enter the market and offer additional substitute
platforms to compete with the Exchange. For example, since 2020, three
new ones have entered the market: Long Term Stock Exchange (LTSE),
which began operations as an exchange on August 28, 2020; \29\ Members
Exchange (MEMX), which began operations as an exchange on September 29,
2020; \30\ and Miami International Holdings (MIAX), which began
operations of its first equities exchange on September 29, 2020.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ See LTSE Market Announcement: MA-2020-020, dated August 14,
2020, announcing LTSE production securities phase-in planned for
August 28, available here: https://assets-global.website-files.com/6462417e8db99f8baa06952c/6462417e8db99f8baa0698e7_MA-2020-020__Production_Securities_Launching_August_28_-_Google_Docs.pdf and
LTSE Market Announcement: MA-2020-025, available here: https://assets-global.website-files.com/6462417e8db99f8baa06952c/6462417e8db99f8baa069873_MA-2020-025.pdf.
\30\ As of October 29, 2020, MEMX is trading all NMS symbols.
See https://info.memxtrading.com/trader-alert-20-10-memx-trading-symbols-update/.
\31\ See MIAX Pearl Press release, dated September 29, 2020,
available here: https://www.miaxoptions.com/sites/default/files/alert-files/MIAX_Press_Release_09292020.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These low barriers enable existing exchange customers to
disintermediate and start their own exchanges if they think the prices
charged for exchange proprietary market data products are too high.
This is precisely the rationale behind the creation of MEMX, which was
formed by some of the largest and most well capitalized financial firms
that are also Exchange customers (including Bank of America, BlackRock,
Charles Schwab, Citadel, Citi, E*Trade, Fidelity, Goldman Sachs, J.P.
Morgan, Jane Street, Morgan Stanley, TD Ameritrade, and others).\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ MEMX Home Page (``Founded by members and investors, MEMX
aims to drive simplicity, efficiency, and competition in equity
markets.''), available at https://memx.com/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For example, one of MEMX's founding principles is that exchange
proprietary market data prices are too high, and that MEMX will benefit
its members by offering ``[l]ower pricing on market data.'' \33\ Nor is
this a new phenomenon: exchange customers formed BATS to compete with
incumbent exchanges and once registered as an exchange in 2008, BATS
did not initially charge for market data. The BATS venture was a
financial success for its founders, first through recouping their
investment in its initial public offering and then in the subsequent
sale of BATS to Cboe, which now charges for market data from those
exchanges. Notably, MEMX has some of the same founding broker-dealer
customers, leading some to dub MEMX ``BATS 2.0.'' \34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ MEMX home page, available at https://memx.com/.
\34\ See ``MEMX turns up the heat on US stock exchanges,''
Financial Times, January 9, 2019, available at https://www.ft.com/content/4908c8b0-1418-11e9-a581-4ff78404524e; see also ``US equities
exchanges: If you can't beat them, join them,'' Euromoney, February
13, 2019, available at https://www.euromoney.com/article/b1d3tfby4p3y4v/us-equities-exchanges-if-you-cant-beat-them-join-them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact that this cycle is viable and repeatable by entities that
both trade on and compete with existing exchanges confirms that
barriers to entry are low and that these markets are competitive and
contestable.\35\ And low barriers to entry act as a market check on
high prices.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ United States v. SunGard Data Sys., 172 F. Supp. 2d 172,
186 (D.D.C. 2001) (recognizing that ``[a]s a matter of law, courts
have generally recognized that when a customer can replace the
services of an external product with an internally-created system,
this captive output (i.e. the self-production of all or part of the
relevant product) should be included in the same market.''). In
SunGard, the court rejected the Antitrust Division's attempt to
block SunGuard's acquisition of the disaster recovery assets of
Comdisco on the basis that the acquisition would ``substantially
lessen competition in the market for shared hotsite disaster
recovery services,'' when the evidence showed that ``internal
hotsites'' created by customers competed with the ``external shared
hotsite business'' engaged in by the merging parties. Id. at 173-74,
187.
\36\ United States v. Baker Hughes, 908 F.2d 981, 987 (1990)
(``In the absence of significant barriers [to entry], a company
probably cannot maintain supracompetitive pricing for any length of
time.''); see also David S. Evans and Richard Schmalensee, Markets
with Two-Sided Platforms, in 1 Issues In Competition Law And Policy
667, 685 (ABA Section of Antitrust Law 2008) (noting that exchange
mergers in 2005 and 2006 were approved by competition authorities in
part in reliance on planned and likely entry of other firms).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In sum, the fierce competition for order flow thus constrains any
exchange from pricing its market data at a supracompetitive price and
constrains the Exchange in setting its fees at issue here.
The proposed fees are therefore reasonable because in setting them,
the Exchange is constrained by the availability of numerous substitute
platforms offering market data products and trading. Such substitutes
need not be identical, but only substantially similar to the product at
hand.
More specifically, in setting fees for the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed, the Exchange is constrained by the fact that, if its pricing
across the platform is unattractive to customers, customers have their
pick of an increasing number of alternative platforms to use instead of
the Exchange. The Exchange believes that it has considered all relevant
factors and has not considered irrelevant factors in order to establish
reasonable fees. The existence of numerous alternative platforms to the
Exchange's platform ensures that the Exchange cannot set unreasonable
market data fees without suffering the negative effects of that
decision in the fiercely competitive market for trading order flow.
Subscribing to the NYSE American Agg Lite is entirely optional. The
Exchange is not required to make the NYSE American Agg Lite available
to any customers, nor is any customer required to purchase the NYSE
American Agg Lite market data feed. Unlike some other data products
(e.g., the consolidated quotation and last-sale information feeds) that
firms are required to purchase in order to fulfil regulatory
obligations,\37\ a customer's decision whether to purchase the NYSE
American Agg Lite is entirely discretionary. Most firms that choose to
subscribe to the NYSE American Agg Lite would do so for the primary
goals of using it to increase their revenues, reduce their expenses,
and in some instances to compete directly with the Exchange for order
flow. Such firms are
[[Page 47667]]
able to determine for themselves whether the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed is necessary for their business needs, and if so, whether or
not it is attractively priced. If the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed
does not provide sufficient value to firms based on the uses those
firms may have for it, such firms may simply choose to conduct their
business operations in ways that do not use the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ The Exchange notes that broker-dealers are not required to
purchase proprietary market data to comply with their best execution
obligations. See In the Matter of the Application of Securities
Industry and Financial Markets Association for Review of Actions
Taken by Self-Regulatory Organizations, Release Nos. 34-72182; AP-3-
15350; AP-3-15351 (May 16, 2014). Similarly, there is no requirement
in Regulation NMS or any other rule that proprietary data be
utilized for order routing decisions, and some broker-dealers and
ATSs have chosen not to do so.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, in the case of products that are also redistributed
through market data vendors such as Bloomberg and Refinitiv, the
vendors themselves provide additional price discipline for proprietary
data products because they control the primary means of access to
certain end users. These vendors impose price discipline based upon
their business models. For example, vendors that assess a surcharge on
data they sell are able to refuse to offer proprietary products that
their end users do not or will not purchase in sufficient numbers.
Vendors may elect not to make NYSE American Agg Lite available to its
customers unless their customers request it, and customers will not
elect to pay the proposed fees unless NYSE American Agg Lite can
provide value by sufficiently increasing revenues or reducing costs in
the customer's business in a manner that will offset the fees. All of
these factors operate as constraints on pricing proprietary data
products.
In setting the proposed fees for the NYSE American Agg Lite data
feed, the Exchange considered the competitiveness of the market for
proprietary data and all of the implications of that competition.
Even putting aside the facts that exchanges are platforms and that
pricing decisions on the two sides of the platform are intertwined, the
Exchange is constrained in setting the proposed market data fees by the
availability of numerous substitute market data products. The
Commission has been clear that substitute products need not be
identical, but only substantially similar to the product at hand.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ For example, in the National IF Approval Order, the
Commission recognized that for some customers, the best bid and
offer information from consolidated data feeds may function as a
substitute for the NYSE National Integrated Feed product, which
contains order by order information. See National IF Approval Order,
supra note 19, at 67397 [release p. 21] (``[I]nformation provided by
NYSE National demonstrates that a number of executing broker-dealers
do not subscribe to the NYSE National Integrated Feed and executing
broker-dealers can otherwise obtain NYSE National best bid and offer
information from the consolidated data feeds.'' (internal quotations
omitted)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NYSE American Aggregated Lite market data feed is subject to
significant competitive forces that constrain its pricing.
Specifically, the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed competes head-to-
head with similar market data products currently offered by the four
U.S. equities exchanges operated by Cboe Exchange, Inc.--Cboe BZX
Exchange, Inc. (``BZX''), Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc. (``BYX''), Cboe EDGA
Exchange, Inc. (``EDGA''), and Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``EDGX''),
each of which offers a market data product called BZX Summary Depth,
BYX Summary Depth, EDGA Summary Depth and EDGX Summary Depth,
respectively (collectively, the ``Cboe Summary Depth'').\39\ Similar to
Cboe Summary Depth, NYSE American Agg Lite can be utilized by vendors
and subscribers to quickly access and distribute aggregated order book
data. As noted above, NYSE American Agg Lite, similar to Cboe Summary
Depth, would provide aggregated depth per security, including the bid,
ask and share quantity for orders received by NYSE American, except
unlike Cboe Summary Depth, which provides aggregated depth per security
for up to five price levels, NYSE American Agg Lite would provide
aggregated depth per security for up to ten price levels on both the
bid and offer sides of the NYSE American limit order book as well as
auction imbalance data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\39\ See BZX Rule 11.22(m) BZX Summary Depth; BYX Rule 11.22(k)
BYX Summary Depth; EDGA Rule 13.8(f) EDGA Summary Depth; and EDGX
Rule 13.8(f) EDGX Summary Depth. The Cboe Summary Depth offered by
BZX, BYX, EDGA and EDGX are each a data feed that offers aggregated
two-sided quotations for all displayed orders for up to five (5)
price levels and contains the individual last sale information,
market status, trading status and trade break messages.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The specific fees that the Exchange proposes for the NYSE American
Agg Lite data feed are reasonable for the following additional reasons.
Overall. The Exchange believes that the proposed fees for the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed are reasonable because they represent the
value of the data available but also the value of receiving the data on
an aggregated basis. The Exchange believes that providing vendors and
subscribers with the option to subscribe to a market data product that
integrates a subset of data from existing products and where such
aggregated data is published at a pre-defined interval, thus lowering
bandwidth, infrastructure and operational requirements, would allow
vendors and subscribers to choose the best solution for their specific
business needs.
The Exchange believes the proposed fees for the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed are also reasonable when compared to fees for comparable
products, such as the Cboe Summary Depth.\40\ Additionally, the
Exchange is proposing fees for the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed
that are based on the existing fee structure that data recipients
already pay for the NYSE American's other market data products. The
Exchange believes that adopting the same fee structure would reduce
administrative burdens on NYSE American data subscribers that also
currently subscribe to market data feeds from NYSE American.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ See https://cdn.cboe.com/resources/membership/US_Market_Data_Product_Price_List.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Access Fee. The Exchange believes that is reasonable to charge
access fees because of the value of the data to data recipients in
their profit-generating activities. The Exchange believes that the
proposed monthly Access Fee of $500 for the NYSE American Aggregated
Lite data feed is reasonable because it is lower than the fees charged
by BZX, BYX, EDGA, and EDGX, each of which charges between $2,500 per
month to $5,000 per month for both Internal Distribution and External
Distribution of the Cboe Summary Depth market data product.\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\41\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
User Fees. The Exchange believes that having separate Professional
and Non-Professional User fees for the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed
is reasonable because it will make the product more affordable and
result in greater availability to Professional and Non-Professional
Users. Not charging a Non-Professional User fee is reasonable because
it provides a cost-effective method for Non-Professional Users to
access the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed by providing the same data
that is available to Professional Users. The proposed monthly
Professional User Fee (Per User) of $1 and monthly Non-Professional
User Fee (Per User) of $0 are reasonable because they are comparable to
user fees generally charged by exchanges. For example, NYSE American
charges a monthly Professional User Fee (Per User) of $5 and a monthly
Non-Professional User Fee (Per User) of $1 for the NYSE American
OpenBook feed.\42\ Although the proposed User Fees for Professional and
Non-Professional Users are higher than those charged by BZX, BYX, EDGA
and EDGX, the Exchange notes that User fees are only a subset of the
total fees that vendors and subscribers pay and the lower fees proposed
to access and redistribute NYSE American Agg Lite would provide such
market data recipients with a more affordable
[[Page 47668]]
alternative to existing substitutes offered by the Exchange and its
competitors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\42\ See Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Redistribution Fees. The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to
charge redistribution fees because vendors receive value from
redistributing the data in their business products for their customers.
The Exchange believes that charging a Redistribution Fee is reasonable
because the vendors that would be charged such a fee profit by re-
transmitting the Exchange's market data to their customers. This fee
would be charged only once per month to each vendor account that
redistributes the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed, regardless of the
number of customers to which that vendor redistributes the data. The
Exchange believes the proposed monthly Redistribution Fee of $250 for
the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed is reasonable because it is
nominal and lower than the fees charged by BZX, BYX, EDGA and EDGX,
each of which charges considerably more for both Internal Distribution
and External Distribution of the Cboe Summary Depth market data
feed.\43\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\43\ See supra, note 40.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enterprise Fees. The Exchange believes the proposed enterprise
license is reasonable because it would reduce exchange fees, lower
administrative costs for subscribers that are broker-dealers and help
expand the availability of market information to investors, and thereby
increase participation in financial markets. Subscribers that are
broker-dealers would be able to disseminate the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed for display usage to an unlimited number of professional
users and non-professional users for a monthly fee of $550, or $500 if
they contract for twelve months of service in advance. The proposed
enterprise license would result in lower fees for subscribers able to
reach the largest audience of investors, including retail investors.
Discounts for broader dissemination of market data information have
routinely been adopted by exchanges and permitted by the Commission as
equitable allocations of reasonable dues, fees and charges.\44\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\44\ For example, the Commission has permitted pricing discounts
for market data under Nasdaq Rules 7023(c) and 7047(b). See also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82182 (November 30, 2017), 82 FR
57627 (December 6, 2017) (SR-NYSE-2017-60) (changing an enterprise
fee for NYSE BBO and NYSE Trades).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-Display Use Fees. The Exchange believes the proposed Non-
Display Use fees are reasonable, because they reflect the value of the
data to the data recipients in their profit-generating activities and
do not impose the burden of counting non-display devices.
The Exchange believes that the proposed Non-Display Use fees
reflect the significant value of the non-display data use to data
recipients, which purchase such data on an entirely voluntary basis.
Non-display data can be used by data recipients for a wide variety of
profit-generating purposes, including proprietary and agency trading
and smart order routing, as well as by data recipients that operate
order matching and execution platforms that compete directly with the
Exchange for order flow. The data also can be used for a variety of
non-trading purposes that indirectly support trading, such as risk
management and compliance. Although some of these non-trading uses do
not directly generate revenues, they can nonetheless substantially
reduce a recipient's costs by automating such functions so that they
can be carried out in a more efficient and accurate manner and reduce
errors and labor costs, thereby benefiting recipients. The Exchange
believes that charging for non-trading uses is reasonable because data
recipients can derive substantial value from such uses, for example, by
automating tasks so that can be performed more quickly and accurately
and less expensively than if they were performed manually.
Previously, the non-display use data pricing policies of many
exchanges required customers to count, and the exchanges to audit the
count of, the number of non-display devices used by a customer. As non-
display use grew more prevalent and varied, however, exchanges received
an increasing number of complaints about the impracticality and
administrative burden associated with that approach. In response, the
Exchange and its affiliated exchanges developed a non-display use
pricing structure that does not require non-display devices to be
counted or those counts to be audited, and instead looks merely at the
three following categories of potential use of non-display data: use of
the data on the customer's own behalf (Category 1), use on behalf of
clients (Category 2), and use to internally match buy and sell orders
within an organization (Category 3).
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to segment the fee for
non-display use into these three categories. As noted above, the uses
to which customers can put the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed are
numerous and varied, and the Exchange believes that charging separate
fees for these separate categories of use is reasonable because it
reflects the actual value the customer derives from the data, based
upon how many categories of use the customer makes of the data.
Segmenting the fees for non-display data in this way avoids the
unreasonable result of customers that make only limited non-display use
of the data paying the same fees as customers that use the data for
numerous different revenue-generating and cost-saving purposes.
The Exchange believes that the proposed fees of $1,000 per month
for each of Categories 1, 2, and 3 is reasonable. These fees are
comparable to non-display use fees generally charged by exchanges. For
example, the fees for Non-Display Use of NYSE American OpenBook for
Categories 1, 2 and 3 is $2,000 per month.\45\ The Exchange believes
that the proposed fees directly and appropriately reflect the
significant value of using non-display data in a wide range of
computer-automated functions relating to both trading and non-trading
activities and that the number and range of these functions continue to
grow through innovation and technology developments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\45\ See Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also believes that, regarding Category 3 fees, it is
reasonable to charge $1,000 per month for each trading platform on
which the data recipient uses the Non-Display data, because such use of
the data is directly in competition with the Exchange and the Exchange
should be permitted to recoup some of its lost trading revenue by
charging for the data that makes such competition possible. The
Exchange believes that it is reasonable to cap such fees for Category 3
use at $3,000 per month per data recipient, because a higher monthly
fee may potentially dissuade competitors from buying the NYSE American
Agg Lite data feed for use by their trading platforms.
The proposed Non-Display Use fees for the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed are also reasonable because they take into account the extra
value of receiving the data for Non-Display Use on an integrated basis.
The Exchange believes that the proposed fees directly and appropriately
reflect the significant value of using the NYSE American Agg Lite data
feed on a non-display basis in a wide range of computer-automated
functions relating to both trading and non-trading activities and that
the number and range of these functions continue to grow through
innovation and technology developments.\46\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\46\ See also Exchange Act Release No. 69157, March 18, 2013, 78
FR 17946, 17949 (March 25, 2013) (SR-CTA/CQ-2013-01) (``[D]ata feeds
have become more valuable, as recipients now use them to perform a
far larger array of non-display functions. Some firms even base
their business models on the incorporation of data feeds into black
boxes and application programming interfaces that apply trading
algorithms to the data, but that do not require widespread data
access by the firm's employees. As a result, these firms pay little
for data usage beyond access fees, yet their data access and usage
is critical to their businesses.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 47669]]
Non-Display Use Declaration Late Fee. The Exchange believes that it
is reasonable to require annual submissions of the Non-Display Use
Declaration so that the Exchange will have current and accurate
information about the use of the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed and
can correctly assess fees for the uses of the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed. Requiring annual submissions of such declarations is
reasonable because it also allows users to re-assess their own usage
each year.
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to impose a late fee in
connection with the submission of the Non-Display Use Declaration. In
order to correctly assess fees for the non-display use of the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed, the Exchange needs to have current and
accurate information about the use of the NYSE American Agg Lite data
feed. The failure of data recipients to submit the Non-Display Use
Declaration on time leads to potentially incorrect billing and
administrative burdens, including tracking and obtaining late Non-
Display Use Declarations and correcting and following up on payments
owed in connection with late Non-Display Use Declarations. The purpose
of the late fee is to incent data recipients to submit the Non-Display
Use Declaration promptly to avoid the administrative burdens associated
with the late submission of Non-Display Use Declarations.
Multiple Data Feed Fee. The Exchange believes that it is reasonable
to require data recipients to pay a modest additional fee for taking a
data feed for a market data product in more than two locations, because
such data recipients can derive substantial value from being able to
consume the product in as many locations as they want. In addition,
there are administrative burdens associated with tracking each location
at which a data recipient receives the product. The Multiple Data Feed
Fee is designed to encourage data recipients to better manage their
requests for additional data feeds and to monitor their usage of data
feeds. The proposed fee is designed to apply to data feeds received in
more than two locations so that each data recipient can have one
primary and one backup data location before having to pay a multiple
data feed fee.
Three-Month Fee Waiver. The Exchange believes the proposal to waive
the Access Fee and the Redistribution Fee for the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed to new Redistributors for three calendar months is
reasonable because it would enable potential Redistributors to
determine whether a particular NYSE American market data product
provides value to their business models before fully committing to
expend development and implementation costs related to the receipt of
that product, and is intended to encourage increased use of the
Exchange's market data products by defraying some of the development
and implementation costs Redistributors would ordinarily have to expend
before using a product. The proposed fee waiver would also allow
Redistributors to become familiar with the feed and determine whether
it suits their needs without incurring fees. Making a new market data
product available without charging a fee for three months is consistent
with offerings of other exchanges. For example, BZX offers subscribers
of BZX Summary Depth a three-month credit for external distribution,
which is akin to the three-month fee waiver proposed by the
Exchange.\47\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\47\ See e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94432 (March
16, 2022), 87 FR 16277 (March 22, 2022) (SR-CboeBZX-2022-015)
(Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change To Amend the Fees Applicable to Various Market Data
Products).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For all of the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the
proposed fees for the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed are reasonable.
The Proposed Fees Are Equitably Allocated
The Exchange believes the proposed fees for the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed are allocated fairly and equitably among the various
categories of users of the feed, and any differences among categories
of users are justified.
Overall. The Exchange believes that the proposed fees are equitably
allocated because they will apply to all data recipients that choose to
subscribe to the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed. Any subscriber or
vendor that chooses to subscribe to the NYSE American Agg Lite data
feed is subject to the same Fee Schedule, regardless of what type of
business they operate or the use they plan to make of the data feed.
Subscribers and vendors are not required to purchase the NYSE American
Agg Lite data feed and may choose to receive the data on the NYSE
American Agg Lite data feed regardless of what type of business they
operate or the use they plan to make of the data feed.
Access Fee. The Exchange believes the proposed monthly Access Fee
of $500 for the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed is equitably allocated
because it would be charged on an equal basis to all data recipients
that receive a data feed of the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed,
regardless of what type of business they operate or the use they plan
to make of the data feed.
User Fees. The Exchange believes that the fee structure
differentiating Professional User fees ($1 per month per user) from
Non-Professional User fees ($0 per month per user) for display device
access to the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed is equitable. This
structure has long been used by the Exchange to reduce the price of
data to Non-Professional Users and make it more broadly available.\48\
Offering the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed to Non-Professional Users
with the same data as is available to Professional Users results in
greater equity among data recipients. These user fees would be charged
uniformly to all display devices that have access to the NYSE American
Agg Lite data feed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\48\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70212
(August 15, 2013), 78 FR 51775 (August 21, 2013) (SR-NYSEMKT-2013-
69) (lowering the Non-Professional User Fee (Per User) for NYSE MKT
BBO and Trades); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 20002, File No.
S7-433 (July 22, 1983), 48 FR 34552 (July 29, 1983) (establishing
Non-Professional fees for CTA data); NASDAQ BX Equity 7 Pricing
Schedule, Section 123.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Redistribution Fees. The Exchange believes the proposed monthly fee
of $250 for redistributing the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed is
equitably allocated because it would be charged on an equal basis to
those Redistributors that choose to redistribute the feed.
Enterprise Fees. The Exchange believes the proposed enterprise
license is equitably allocated because it would be available on an
equal basis to all subscribers that are broker-dealers, each of whom
would benefit from reduced exchange fees and from lower administrative
costs. Moreover, the specific feature of the proposed enterprise
license that will allow subscribers to lower fees by subscribing to a
twelve-month contract is also an equitable allocation because all
subscribers will have the same option of choosing between the stability
of a fixed, lower rate, and the more flexible option of maintaining the
ability to change market data products after a month of service.
Subscribers will be free to move from the monthly to the annual rate at
any time, or from annual
[[Page 47670]]
to a monthly fee, with notice, at the expiration of the twelve-month
period.
Non-Display Use Fees. The Exchange believes the proposed Non-
Display Use fees are equitably allocated because they would require
subscribers to pay fees only for the uses they actually make of the
data. As noted above, non-display data can be used by data recipients
for a wide variety of profit-generating purposes (including trading,
risk management, and compliance) as well as purposes that do not
directly generate revenues but nonetheless substantially reduce the
recipient's costs by automating certain functions. The Exchange
believes that it is equitable to charge non-display data subscribers a
$1,000 fee for each category of use they make of such data--namely,
using the data on their own behalf (Category 1), on behalf of their
clients (Category 2), and to internally match buy and sell orders
within an organization (Category 3)--because this fee structure results
in subscribers with greater uses of the data paying higher fees, and
subscribers with fewer uses of the data paying lower fees. This
segmented fee structure is also equitable because no subscriber of non-
display data would be charged a fee for a category of use in which it
did not actually engage.
The Exchange also believes that, regarding Category 3 fees, it is
equitable to charge $1,000 per month for each trading platform on which
the data recipient uses the Non-Display data, because such use of the
data is directly in competition with the Exchange and the Exchange
should be permitted to recoup some of its lost trading revenue by
charging for the data that makes such competition possible. The
Exchange believes that it is equitable to cap such fees for Category 3
use at $3,000 per month per data recipient, because a higher monthly
fee may potentially dissuade competitors from buying the NYSE American
Agg Lite data feed for use by their trading platforms.
Non-Display Use Declaration Late Fee. The Exchange believes that
the proposed fee of $1,000 per month for a late Non-Display Use
Declaration is equitably allocated because it applies to any data
recipient that pays an Access Fee for the NYSE American Agg Lite data
feed but has failed to complete and submit a Non-Display Use
Declaration. In addition, the Exchange believes that it is equitable to
charge a late fee to subscribers who fail to timely submit their Non-
Display Use Declarations because their failure to do so leads to
potentially incorrect billing and administrative burdens on the part of
the Exchange. The Exchange believes it is equitable to defray these
administrative costs by imposing a late fee only on subscribers' whose
declarations were late, as opposed to all subscribers.
Multiple Data Feed Fee. The Exchange believes that the $200 per
month per location fee to data recipients taking the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed in more than two locations is equitable because it would
apply to all such customers, regardless of what type of business they
operate or the use they make of the data feed. In addition, the
Exchange believes that it is equitable to charge a fee to subscribers
for taking a data feed in more than two locations because there are
administrative burdens on the part of the Exchange associated with
tracking each location at which a data recipient receives the product.
The Exchange believes that it is equitable for it to defray these
administrative costs by imposing a modest fee only on subscribers who
seek to take the feed in more than two locations, as opposed to all
subscribers.
Three-Month Fee Waiver. The Exchange believes the proposal to waive
the Access Fee and the Redistribution Fee for the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed to new Redistributors for three calendar months is
equitable because it would apply to any first-time Redistributor,
regardless of the use they plan to make of the feed. As proposed, any
first-time Redistributor of the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed would
not be charged the Access Fee and the Redistribution Fee for three
calendar months. The Exchange believes it is equitable to restrict the
availability of this three-month fee waiver to Redistributors that have
not previously subscribed to and redistributed the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed, since customers who are current or previous subscribers
of the feed are already familiar with it and are able to determine
whether it suits their needs.
For all of the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the
proposed fees for the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed are equitably
allocated.
The Proposed Fees Are Not Unfairly Discriminatory
The Exchange believes the proposed fees for the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed are not unfairly discriminatory because any differences
in the application of the fees are based on meaningful distinctions
between customers, and those meaningful distinctions are not unfairly
discriminatory between customers.
Overall. The Exchange believes that the proposed fees are not
unfairly discriminatory because they would apply to all data recipients
that choose to subscribe to the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed. Any
subscriber, including Redistributor, that chooses to subscribe to the
NYSE American Agg Lite data feed is subject to the same Fee Schedule,
regardless of what type of business they operate or the use they plan
to make of the data feed. Subscribers, including Redistributors, may
choose to receive the data on the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed
regardless of what type of business they operate or the use they plan
to make of the data feed.
Access Fee. The Exchange believes the proposed monthly Access Fee
of $500 for the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed is not unfairly
discriminatory because it would be charged on an equal basis to all
data recipients that receive a data feed of the NYSE American Agg Lite,
regardless of what type of business they operate or the use they plan
to make of the data feed.
User Fees. The Exchange believes that the fee structure
differentiating Professional User fees ($1 per month per user) from
Non-Professional User fees ($0 per month per user) for display device
access to the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed is not unfairly
discriminatory. This structure has long been used by the Exchange to
reduce the price of data to Non-Professional Users and make it more
broadly available.\49\ Offering the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed to
Non-Professional Users with the same data as is available to
Professional Users results in greater equity among data recipients.
These user fees would be charged uniformly to all display devices that
have access to the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\49\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Redistribution Fees. The Exchange believes the proposed monthly fee
of $250 for redistributing the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed is not
unfairly discriminatory because it would be charged on an equal basis
to those Redistributors that choose to redistribute the feed.
Enterprise Fees. The Exchange believes the proposed enterprise
license will not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers,
brokers or dealers. The Act does not prohibit all distinctions among
customers, but only discrimination that is unfair, and it is not unfair
discrimination to charge those subscribers that are able to reach the
largest audiences of investors, including retail investors, a lower fee
for incremental investors in order to encourage the widespread
distribution of market data. This principle has been repeatedly
endorsed by the Commission, as evidenced by the
[[Page 47671]]
approval of enterprise licenses for other market data products.\50\
Moreover, the proposed enterprise license will be subject to
significant competition, and that competition will ensure that there is
no unfair discrimination. Each subscriber will be able to accept or
reject the license depending on whether it will or will not lower costs
for that particular subscriber, and, if the license is not sufficiently
competitive, the Exchange may lose market share. The proposed
enterprise license will compete with other enterprise licenses of the
Exchange, underlying fee schedules promulgated by the Exchange, and
enterprise licenses and fee structures implemented by other exchanges.
As such, it is a voluntary product for which market participants can
readily find substitutes. Accordingly, the Exchange is constrained from
introducing a fee that would be inequitable or unfairly discriminatory.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\50\ See e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83751 (July
31, 2018), 83 FR 38428 (August 6, 2018) (SR-NASDAQ-2018-058) (Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Lower Fees and Administrative Costs for Distributors of Nasdaq
Basic, Nasdaq Last Sale, NLS Plus and the Nasdaq Depth-of-Book
Products Through a Consolidated Enterprise License).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-Display Use Fees. The Exchange believes the proposed Non-
Display Use fees are not unfairly discriminatory because they would
require subscribers for non-display use to pay fees only for the
categories of use they actually make of the data. As noted above, non-
display data can be used by data recipients for a wide variety of
profit-generating purposes (including trading, risk management, and
compliance) as well as purposes that do not directly generate revenues
but nonetheless substantially reduce the recipient's costs by
automating certain functions. The Exchange believes that it is not
unfairly discriminatory to charge non-display data subscribers a $1,000
per month fee for each category of use they make of such data--namely,
using the data on their own behalf (Category 1), on behalf of their
clients (Category 2), and to internally match buy and sell orders
within an organization (Category 3)--because this fee structure results
in subscribers with greater uses for the data paying higher fees, while
subscribers with fewer uses of the data pay lower fees. This segmented
fee structure is not unfairly discriminatory because no subscriber of
non-display data would be charged a fee for a category of use in which
it did not actually engage.
The Exchange also believes that, regarding Category 3 fees, it is
not unreasonably discriminatory to charge $1,000 per month for each
trading platform on which the data recipient uses the Non-Display data,
because such use of the data is directly in competition with the
Exchange and the Exchange should be permitted to recoup some of its
lost trading revenue by charging for the data that makes such
competition possible. The Exchange believes that it is not unreasonably
discriminatory to cap such fees for Category 3 use at $3,000 per month
per data recipient, because a higher monthly fee may potentially
dissuade competitors from buying the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed
for use by their trading platforms.
Non-Display Use Declaration Late Fee. The Exchange believes that
the proposed fee of $1,000 per month for a late Non-Display Use
Declaration is not unfairly discriminatory because it applies to any
data recipient that pays an Access Fee for the NYSE American Agg Lite
data feed but has failed to complete and submit a Non-Display Use
Declaration. In addition, the Exchange believes that it is not unfairly
discriminatory to charge a late fee to subscribers who fail to timely
submit their Non-Display Use Declarations because their failure to do
so leads to potentially incorrect billing and administrative burdens on
the part of the Exchange. Nor is it unfairly discriminatory for the
Exchange to defray these administrative costs by imposing a late fee
only on subscribers' whose declarations were late, as opposed to all
subscribers.
Multiple Data Feed Fee. The Exchange believes that the $200 per
month per location fee to data recipients taking the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed in more than two locations is not unfairly
discriminatory because it would apply to all such customers, regardless
of what type of business they operate or the use they make of the data
feed. In addition, the Exchange believes that it is not unfairly
discriminatory to charge a fee to subscribers for taking a data feed in
more than two locations because there are administrative burdens on the
part of the Exchange associated with tracking each location at which a
data recipient receives the product. The Exchange believes that it is
not unfairly discriminatory for it to defray these administrative costs
by imposing a modest fee only on subscribers who seek to take the feed
in more than two locations, as opposed to all subscribers.
Three-Month Fee Waiver. The Exchange believes the proposal to waive
the Access Fee and the Redistribution Fee for the NYSE American Agg
Lite data feed to new Redistributors for three months is not unfairly
discriminatory because it would apply to any first-time Redistributor,
regardless of the use they plan to make of the feed. As proposed, any
first-time Redistributor of the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed would
not be charged the Access Fee and the Redistribution Fee for three
calendar months. The Exchange believes it is not unfairly
discriminatory to restrict the availability of this three-month fee
waiver to Redistributors that have not previously subscribed to the
NYSE American Agg Lite data feed, since Redistributors who are current
or previous subscribers of the feed are already familiar with it and
are able to determine whether it suits their needs.
For all of the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the
proposed fees for the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed are not unfairly
discriminatory.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed fees will impose
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Intramarket Competition. The Exchange believes that the proposed
fees do not put any market participants at a relative disadvantage
compared to other market participants. As noted above, the proposed fee
schedule would apply to all subscribers, including Redistributors, of
the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed, and customers may not only choose
whether to subscribe to the feed at all, but may tailor their
subscriptions by choosing particular uses of the feed but not others
(e.g., Category 1 only versus all three categories; display device
access only versus non-display use).
The Exchange also believes that the proposed fees neither favor nor
penalize one or more categories of market participants in a manner that
would impose an undue market on competition. As shown above, to the
extent that particular proposed fees apply to only a subset of
subscribers (e.g., Category 2 fees apply only to those making non-
display use on behalf of clients; late fees apply only to customers who
fail to timely submit their declarations), those distinctions are not
unfairly discriminatory and do not unfairly burden one set of customers
over another. To the contrary, by tailoring the proposed fees in this
manner, the Exchange believes that it has eliminated the potential
burden on competition that might result from unfairly asking
subscribers to pay fees
[[Page 47672]]
for services they did not use, or late fees they did not actually
incur.
Intermarket Competition. The Exchange believes that the proposed
fees do not impose a burden on competition or on other SROs that is not
necessary or appropriate. As noted above, exchanges are platforms for
market data and trading. In setting the proposed fees, the Exchange was
constrained by the availability of numerous substitute platforms also
offering market data products and trading, and low barriers to entry
mean new exchange platforms are frequently introduced. The fact that
exchanges are platforms ensures that no exchange can make pricing
decisions for one side of its platform without considering, and being
constrained by, the effects that price will have on the other side of
the platform. In setting fees for the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed,
the Exchange is constrained by the fact that, if its pricing across the
platform is unattractive to customers, customers will have its pick of
an increasing number of alternative platforms to use instead of the
Exchange. Given this intense competition between platforms, no one
exchange's market data fees can impose an unnecessary burden on
competition, and the Exchange's proposed fees do not do so here.
In addition, the Exchange believes that the proposed fees do not
impose a burden on competition or on other exchanges that is not
necessary or appropriate because of the availability of numerous
substitute market data products. Many other exchanges offer proprietary
data feeds like the NYSE American Agg Lite data feed, supplying depth
of book order data, security status updates, stock summary messages,
and the exchange's best bid and offer at any given time, on a real-time
basis. Because market data users can find suitable substitute feeds, an
exchange that overprices its market data products stands a high risk
that users may substitute another platform, in which case the platform
would stand to lose both market data and trading fees. These
competitive pressures ensure that no one exchange's market data fees
can impose an unnecessary burden on competition, and the Exchange's
proposed fees do not do so here.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \51\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \52\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\51\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\52\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \53\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\53\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-NYSEAMER-2024-31 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSEAMER-2024-31. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSEAMER-2024-31 and should
be submitted on or before June 24, 2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\54\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\54\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-12040 Filed 5-31-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
