Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Chicago, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Rules Concerning Supervision To Adopt Rules Based on NYSE American Rules 3110-Equities and 3120-Equities, 46191-46199 [2024-11576]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 103 / Tuesday, May 28, 2024 / Notices
delay and designates the proposal
operative upon filing.24
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 25 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
CboeEDGX–2024–025 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–CboeEDGX–2024–025. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
24 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
25 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:43 May 24, 2024
Jkt 262001
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–CboeEDGX–2024–025 and should be
submitted on or before June 18, 2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.26
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–11577 Filed 5–24–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–100187; File No. SR–
NYSECHX–2024–18]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Chicago, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Its Rules
Concerning Supervision To Adopt
Rules Based on NYSE American Rules
3110—Equities and 3120—Equities
May 21, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on May 16,
2024, the NYSE Chicago, Inc. (‘‘NYSE
Chicago’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
rules concerning supervision to adopt
rules based on NYSE American Rules
3110—Equities (Supervision) and
26 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12), (59).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00137
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46191
3120—Equities (Supervisory Control
System) and make certain conforming
changes. The proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange’s website at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
rules concerning supervision to adopt
rules based on NYSE American Rules
3110—Equities (Supervision) and
3120—Equities (Supervisory Control
System) and make certain conforming
changes. More specifically, the
Exchange proposes to (1) adopt new rule
text that is substantially similar to NYSE
American Rule 3110—Equities and
NYSE American Rule 3120—Equities;
(2) delete Article 6, Rule 5 (Registration,
Supervision and Training) except for
certain text that will be retained as new
Rule 11.20 (Adherence to Law); and (3)
make conforming changes to Rule
10.9217 (Violations Appropriate for
Disposition Under Rule 9216(b)).
Background and Proposed Rule Change
Current Supervision Rules
The Exchange’s current supervision
Rule is Article 6, Rule 5.
Subsection (a) of Article 6, Rule 5 sets
forth a basic declaration that
Participants are responsible for
adherence to federal securities laws and
Exchange rules, and must reasonably
supervise their operations and
associated persons to prevent violations
of thereof.
Subsection (b) provides for the
designation of persons with supervisory
authority. Specifically, the rule provides
that each Participant Firm must
designate a principal executive officer,
general partner or managing partner to
hold overall authority and responsibility
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
46192
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 103 / Tuesday, May 28, 2024 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
for the Participant Firm’s internal
supervision and compliance with
securities laws and regulations,
although under the rule the designated
supervisor under the rule may formally
delegate their supervisory duties and
authority to other persons within the
firm. The rule also requires that
Participants 4 maintain, for a period of
not less than six years (the first two
years in an easily accessible place),
records of the names of all persons who
are designated as supervisory personnel
and the dates for which those
designations are effective. In the
absence of such designation by a
Participant Firm, the rule provides that
the firm’s General Partner(s), President,
Chief Executive Officer or other
principal executive officer shall be
deemed to be responsible for a Firm’s
internal supervision and compliance
function. In addition, each Participant
Firm shall designate and specifically
identify to the Exchange on Schedule A
of Form BD one or more principals to
serve as a Chief Compliance Officer.
Article 6, Rule 5(c) governs written
supervisory procedures, and provides
that each Participant Firm shall
establish, maintain and enforce written
procedures to supervise the types of
business in which it engages and to
supervise the activities of registered and
associated persons. Such written
procedures must be reasonably designed
to achieve compliance with applicable
securities laws and regulations, and
with the applicable rules of the
Exchange. The rule further specifies that
the Participant Firm’s written
supervisory procedures must set forth
the following: the supervisory system
established by the Participant Firm; the
titles, registration status and locations of
the required supervisory personnel; and
the responsibilities of each supervisor as
they relate to the types of business
engaged in, applicable securities laws
and the rules of the Exchange. Article 6,
Rule 5(c) requires that a copy of a
Participant Firm’s written supervisory
procedures or the relevant portions
thereof, be maintained at each location
where supervisory activities are
conducted on behalf of the firm. Each
Participant Firm is required to
periodically review and amend its
4 The term ‘‘Participant’’ is defined in Article 1,
Rule 1(s) to mean, among other things, any
Participant Firm that holds a valid Trading Permit
and that a Participant shall be considered a
‘‘member’’ of the Exchange for purposes of the Act.
If a Participant is not a natural person, the
Participant may also be referred to as a Participant
Firm, but unless the context requires otherwise, the
term Participant shall refer to an individual
Participant and/or a Participant Firm. For the
avoidance of doubt, this rule filing will use the
phrase Participant and/or Participant Firm.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:43 May 24, 2024
Jkt 262001
written supervisory procedures as
appropriate within a reasonable time,
including but not limited to, updates
required by changes in applicable
securities laws and regulations,
including the rules of the Exchange, and
as changes occur in the supervisory
system. In addition, the rule provides
that each Participant Firm shall be
responsible for communicating these
amendments within its organization.
Finally, the rule requires each
Participant Firm to maintain records
evidencing actual review of
transactions, systems, programs or other
activities by the designated supervisory
personnel pursuant the written
supervisory procedures.
Article 6, Rule 5(d) governs internal
controls and training. The rule requires
that at least annually, each Participant
Firm must discuss compliance matters
with its registered and associated
persons and must maintain records
confirming the dates of these
discussions and the subject matters that
were discussed. Each Participant Firm
must also establish internal controls to
determine that proper supervision is
being exercised.
Article 6, Rule 5(e) governs branch
and resident offices. Under the rule, a
Participant Firm for which this
Exchange is the Designated Examining
Authority or which is subject to
examination by another self-regulatory
organization not having a comparable
rule, shall not open a branch or resident
office unless it has obtained the prior
written approval of the Exchange.
Application for approval of the opening
of a branch or resident office must be
made on a form provided by the
Exchange at least one month (or such
shorter period as the Exchange may
approve) prior to the proposed opening
date of the office. A Participant Firm
maintaining branch or resident offices
must establish procedures providing for
close supervision of such offices, and
maintain a close, responsible
relationship with the person in charge
of such office or offices. A designated
partner or officer of the main office is
personally responsible for proper
supervision of such branch or resident
office.
Finally, Supplementary Material .01
governs registration of new branch
offices and sets forth the steps to be
taken when registering new branch
offices as required by Article 6, Rule
5(d). Supplementary Material .01
requires each Participant Firm to
forward a completed Form BR to the
Exchange. In addition, prior to approval
of the branch office, the office manager
or the registered representative in
charge must have completed the
PO 00000
Frm 00138
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Exchange requirements for registration.
The office may begin operating as a
branch on receipt of written approval
from the Exchange.
Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to delete the
foregoing rules relating to supervision
(except as noted below), which are, in
main part, either duplicative of, or do
not align with, the proposed supervision
requirements discussed below, and
adopt the text of NYSE American Rules
3110—Equities and 3120—Equities,
subject to certain technical and
conforming changes.5 The text in
current rule Article 6, Rule 5(a)
following the heading ‘‘Adherence to
Law’’ would be retained in its entirety
and moved to Rule 11 governing
business conduct without substantive
change as new Rule 11.20, also titled
‘‘Adherence to Law.’’ 6
Proposed Rule 11.3110 (Supervision)
Proposed Rule 11.3110 is based
primarily on requirements in the NYSE
American and FINRA rulebooks and
current Article 6, Rule 5 relating to,
among other things, supervisory
systems, written procedures, internal
inspections, and review of
correspondence.
Proposed Rule 11.3110(a)
Proposed Rule 11.3110(a) would
cover supervisory systems and would
require each Participant Firm to
establish and maintain a system to
supervise the activities of each
associated person that is reasonably
designed to achieve compliance with
applicable securities laws and
regulations, and with applicable
Exchange rules. Under the proposed
rule, final responsibility for proper
supervision would rest with the
Participant Firm. In addition, a
Participant Firm’s supervisory system
would need to provide, at a minimum,
for the following:
• The establishment and maintenance
of written procedures as required by
proposed Rule 11.3110.
• The designation, where applicable,
of an appropriately registered principal
with authority to carry out the
supervisory responsibilities of the
Participant Firm for each type of
business in which it engages for which
5 The technical and conforming changes are that
the Exchange would substitute ‘‘Participant Firm’’
for ‘‘member organization’’ and change a crossreference to NYSE American Rules 2210 to
Exchange Rule 11.2210.
6 The Exchange notes that its affiliate NYSE
National, Inc. has a similar business conduct rule.
See NYSE National Rule 11.3.2 (Violations
Prohibited).
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 103 / Tuesday, May 28, 2024 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
registration as a broker-dealer is
required.
• The registration and designation as
a branch office or an office of
supervisory jurisdiction (‘‘OSJ’’) of each
location, including the main office, that
meets the definitions contained in
proposed Rule 11.3110(e). The
Exchange has not previously designated
OSJs. As such, the requirements relating
to OSJs described hereinafter would be
new for Participant Firms.
• The designation of one or more
appropriately registered principals in
each OSJ and one or more appropriately
registered representatives or principals
in each non-OSJ branch office with
authority to carry out the supervisory
responsibilities assigned to that office
by the Participant Firm.
• The assignment of each registered
person to an appropriately registered
representative or principal who would
be responsible for supervising that
person’s activities.
• The use of reasonable efforts to
determine that all supervisory personnel
are qualified, either by virtue of
experience or training, to carry out their
assigned responsibilities.
• The participation of each registered
representative and registered principal,
either individually or collectively, no
less than annually, in an interview or
meeting conducted by persons
designated by the Participant Firm at
which compliance matters relevant to
the activities of the representative and
principal are discussed, which may
occur in conjunction with the
discussion of other matters and may be
conducted at a central or regional
location or at the representative’s or
principal’s place of business.
Proposed Rule 11.3110(b)
Proposed Rule 11.3110(b)(1) would
address written procedures and would
require each Participant Firm to
establish, maintain, and enforce written
procedures to supervise the types of
business in which it engages and the
activities of its associated persons that
are reasonably designed to achieve
compliance with applicable securities
laws and regulations and applicable
Exchange rules.
Under proposed Rule 11.3110(b)(2),
the supervisory procedures required by
proposed Rule 11.3110(b) would need to
include procedures for the review by a
registered principal, evidenced in
writing, of all transactions relating to
the investment banking or securities
business of the Participant Firm.
Consistent with NYSE American Rule
3110(b)(3)—Equities, proposed Rule
11.3110(b)(3) would be marked
‘‘Reserved.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:43 May 24, 2024
Jkt 262001
Under proposed Rule 11.3110(b)(4),
the supervisory procedures required by
proposed Rule 11.3110(b) would need to
also include procedures for the review
of incoming and outgoing written
(including electronic) correspondence
and internal communications relating to
the Participant Firm’s investment
banking or securities business and be
appropriate for the Participant Firm’s
business, size, structure, and customers.
The supervisory procedures would need
to require the Participant Firm’s review
of:
• Incoming and outgoing written
(including electronic) correspondence to
properly identify and handle in
accordance with firm procedures,
customer complaints, instructions,
funds and securities, and
communications that are of a subject
matter that require review under
Exchange rules and federal securities
laws.
• Internal communications to
properly identify those communications
that are of a subject matter that require
review under Exchange rules and
federal securities laws.
Such reviews would need to be
conducted by a registered principal and
evidenced in writing, either
electronically or on paper. Those
communications include (without
limitation) certain communications with
the public that require a principal’s
preapproval (Rule 11.2210).
Proposed Rule 11.3110(b)(5) requires
a Participant Firm’s supervisory
procedures to include procedures to
capture, acknowledge, and respond to
all written (including electronic)
customer complaints.
Under proposed Rule 11.3110(b)(6),
the supervisory procedures required by
proposed Rule 11.3110(b) would need to
set forth the supervisory system
established by the Participant Firm
pursuant to proposed Rule 11.3110(a),
and would need to include:
• The titles, registration status, and
locations of the required supervisory
personnel and the responsibilities of
each supervisory person as these relate
to the types of business engaged in,
applicable securities laws and
regulations, and Exchange rules.
• A record, preserved by the
Participant Firm for a period of not less
than three years, the first two years in
an easily accessible place, of the names
of all persons who are designated as
supervisory personnel and the dates for
which such designation is or was
effective.
• Procedures prohibiting associated
persons who perform a supervisory
function from:
PO 00000
Frm 00139
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46193
Æ Supervising their own activities;
and
Æ Reporting to, or having their
compensation or continued employment
determined by, a person or persons they
are supervising.
D If a Participant Firm determines,
with respect to any of its supervisory
personnel, that compliance with the
preceding two bullets is not possible
because of the Participant Firm’s size or
a supervisory personnel’s position
within the firm, the Participant Firm
would need to document:
• The factors the Participant Firm
used to reach such determination; and
• How the supervisory arrangement
with respect to such supervisory
personnel otherwise complies with
proposed Rule 11.3110(a).
• Procedures reasonably designed to
prevent the supervisory system required
pursuant to proposed Rule 11.3110(a)
from being compromised due to the
conflicts of interest that may be present
with respect to the associated person
being supervised, including the position
of such person, the revenue such person
generates for the firm, or any
compensation that the associated person
conducting the supervision may derive
from the associated person being
supervised.
Proposed Rule 11.3110(b)(7) would
require a Participant Firm to keep and
maintain a copy of its written
supervisory procedures, or such
relevant portions, in each OSJ and at
each location where supervisory
activities are conducted on behalf of the
Participant Firm. Each Participant Firm
would need to promptly amend its
written supervisory procedures to
reflect changes in applicable securities
laws or regulations, including Exchange
rules, and as changes occur in its
supervisory system. Each Participant
Firm would be responsible for promptly
communicating its written supervisory
procedures and amendments to all
associated persons to whom such
written supervisory procedures and
amendments are relevant based on their
activities and responsibilities.
Proposed Rule 11.3110(c)
Proposed Rule 11.3110(c) would
cover internal inspections. Proposed
Rule 11.3110(c)(1) would require each
Participant Firm to conduct a review, at
least annually (on a calendar-year basis),
of the businesses in which it engages.
The review would need to be reasonably
designed to assist the Participant Firm
in detecting and preventing violations
of, and achieving compliance with,
applicable securities laws and
regulations, and with applicable
Exchange rules. Each Participant Firm
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
46194
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 103 / Tuesday, May 28, 2024 / Notices
would need to review the activities of
each office, which would include the
periodic examination of customer
accounts to detect and prevent
irregularities or abuses. Each Participant
Firm would also need to retain a written
record of the date upon which each
review and inspection is conducted.
In addition, proposed Rule
11.3110(c)(1) would require each
Participant Firm to inspect at least
annually (on a calendar-year basis)
every OSJ and any branch office that
supervises one or more non-branch
locations. Each Participant Firm would
need to also inspect at least every three
years every branch office that does not
supervise one or more non-branch
locations. In establishing how often to
inspect each non-supervisory branch
office, the Participant Firm would need
to consider whether the nature and
complexity of the securities activities
for which the location is responsible,
the volume of business done at the
location, and the number of associated
persons assigned to the location require
the non-supervisory branch office to be
inspected more frequently than every
three years. If a Participant Firm
establishes a more frequent inspection
cycle, the Participant Firm would need
to ensure that at least every three years,
the inspection requirements enumerated
in proposed Rule 11.3110(c)(2) have
been met. The Participant Firm’s written
supervisory and inspection procedures
would need to set forth the nonsupervisory branch office examination
cycle, an explanation of the factors the
Participant Firm used in determining
the frequency of the examinations in the
cycle, and the manner in which a
Participant Firm will comply with
proposed Rule 11.3110(c)(2) if using
more frequent inspections than every
three years. Each Participant Firm
would need to inspect, on a regular
periodic schedule, every non-branch
location. In establishing such schedule,
the Participant Firm would need to
consider the nature and complexity of
the securities activities for which the
location is responsible and the nature
and extent of contact with customers.
The Participant Firm’s written
supervisory and inspection procedures
would also need to set forth the
schedule and an explanation regarding
how the Participant Firm determined
the frequency of the examination.
Proposed Rule 11.3110(c)(2) would
require the inspection and review by a
Participant Firm pursuant to proposed
Rule 11.3110(c)(1) to be reduced to a
written report and kept on file by the
Participant Firm for a minimum of three
years, unless the inspection is being
conducted pursuant to proposed Rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:43 May 24, 2024
Jkt 262001
11.3110(c)(1)(C) and the regular periodic
schedule is longer than a three-year
cycle, in which case the report would
need to be kept on file at least until the
next inspection report has been written.
Under proposed Rule 11.3110(c)(2)(A),
if applicable to the location being
inspected, that location’s written
inspection report would need to
include, without limitation, the testing
and verification of the Participant
Firm’s policies and procedures,
including supervisory policies and
procedures in the following areas:
• Safeguarding of customer funds and
securities;
• Maintaining books and records;
• Supervision of supervisory
personnel;
• Transmittals of funds (e.g., wires or
checks, etc.) or securities from
customers to third party accounts; from
customer accounts to outside entities
(e.g., banks, investment companies,
etc.); from customer accounts to
locations other than a customer’s
primary residence (e.g., post office box,
‘‘in care of’’ accounts, alternate address,
etc.); and between customers and
registered representatives, including the
hand-delivery of checks; and
• Changes of customer account
information, including address and
investment objectives changes and
validation of such changes.
The policies and procedures regarding
transmittals of funds would need to
include a means or method of customer
confirmation, notification, or follow-up
that can be documented. Participant
Firm s may use reasonable risk-based
criteria to determine the authenticity of
the transmittal instructions. The
policies and procedures regarding
changes of customer account
information would need to include, for
each change processed, a means or
method of customer confirmation,
notification, or follow-up that can be
documented and that complies with
SEA Rules 17a–3(a)(17)(i)(B)(2) and
17a–3(a)(17)(i)(B)(3).
If a Participant Firm does not engage
in all of the activities enumerated in the
bullets immediately above at the
location being inspected, the Participant
Firm would need to identify those
activities in the Participant Firm’s
written supervisory procedures or the
location’s written inspection report and
document in the Participant Firm’s
written supervisory procedures or the
location’s written inspection report that
supervisory policies and procedures for
such activities would need to be in
place at that location before the
Participant Firm can engage in them.
Under proposed Rule 11.3110(c)(3),
for each inspection conducted pursuant
PO 00000
Frm 00140
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to the proposed rule, a Participant Firm
would need to:
• have procedures reasonably
designed to prevent the effectiveness of
inspections from being compromised
due to the conflicts of interest that may
be present with respect to the location
being inspected, including but not
limited to, economic, commercial, or
financial interests in the associated
persons and businesses being inspected;
and
• ensure that the person conducting
an inspection is not an associated
person assigned to the location or is not
directly or indirectly supervised by, or
otherwise reporting to, an associated
person assigned to the location. If a
Participant Firm determines that
compliance with this requirement is not
possible either because of a Participant
Firm’s size or its business model, the
Participant Firm would need to
document in the inspection report both
the factors the Participant Firm used to
make its determination and how the
inspection otherwise complies with
proposed Rule 11.3110(c)(1).
The Exchange currently does not have
a comparable rule.
Proposed Rule 11.3110(d)
Section 15(g) of the Act,7 adopted as
part of the Insider Trading and
Securities Fraud Enforcement Act of
1988 (‘‘ITSFEA’’),8 requires every
registered broker or dealer to establish,
maintain, and enforce written policies
and procedures reasonably designed to
prevent the misuse of material, nonpublic information by the broker or
dealer or any associated person of the
broker or dealer.
Proposed Rule 11.3110(d) would
cover transaction reviews and
investigations. Proposed Rule
11.3110(d)(1) would require each
Participant Firm to include in its
supervisory procedures a process for the
review of securities transactions
reasonably designed to identify trades
that may violate the provisions of the
Act, the rules thereunder, or Exchange
rules prohibiting insider trading and
manipulative and deceptive devices that
are effected for the:
• Accounts of the Participant Firm;
• Accounts introduced or carried by
the Participant Firm in which a person
associated with the Participant Firm has
a beneficial interest or the authority to
make investment decisions;
• Accounts of a person associated
with the Participant Firm that are
7 15
U.S.C. 78o(g).
Insider Trading and Securities Fraud
Enforcement Act of 1988, Public Law 100–704, 102
Stat. 4677.
8 See
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 103 / Tuesday, May 28, 2024 / Notices
disclosed to the Participant Firm
pursuant to Article 8, Rule 6 (Prohibited
Accounts) or FINRA Rule 3210
(Accounts At Other Broker-Dealers and
Financial Institutions), as applicable;
and
• Covered accounts.
Under proposed Rule 11.3110(d)(2),
each Participant Firm would need
promptly to conduct an internal
investigation into any such trade to
determine whether a violation of those
laws or rules has occurred. In addition,
under proposed Rule 11.3110(d)(3), a
Participant Firm engaging in investment
banking services would need to file with
the Exchange, written reports, signed by
a senior officer of the Participant Firm,
at such times and, without limitation,
including such content, as follows:
• Within ten business days of the end
of each calendar quarter, a written
report describing each internal
investigation initiated in the previous
calendar quarter pursuant to proposed
Rule 11.3110(d)(2), including the
identity of the Participant Firm, the date
each internal investigation commenced,
the status of each open internal
investigation, the resolution of any
internal investigation reached during
the previous calendar quarter, and, with
respect to each internal investigation,
the identity of the security, trades,
accounts, associated persons of the
Participant Firm, or associated person of
the Participant Firm’s family members
holding a covered account, under
review, and that includes a copy of the
Participant Firm’s policies and
procedures required by proposed Rule
11.3110(d)(1).
• Within five business days of
completion of an internal investigation
pursuant to proposed Rule 11.3110(d)(2)
in which it was determined that a
violation of the provisions of the Act,
the rules thereunder, or Exchange rules
prohibiting insider trading and
manipulative and deceptive devices had
occurred, a written report detailing the
completion of the investigation,
including the results of the
investigation, any internal disciplinary
action taken, and any referral of the
matter to the Exchange, another SRO,
the SEC, or any other federal, state, or
international regulatory authority.
For purposes of proposed Rule
11.3110(d)(4) the following definitions
would apply:
• The term ‘‘covered account’’ would
include any account introduced or
carried by the Participant Firm that is
held by:
Æ The spouse of a person associated
with the Participant Firm;
Æ A child of the person associated
with the Participant Firm or such
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:43 May 24, 2024
Jkt 262001
person’s spouse, provided that the child
resides in the same household as or is
financially dependent upon the person
associated with the Participant Firm;
Æ Any other related individual over
whose account the person associated
with the Participant Firm has control; or
Æ Any other individual over whose
account the associated person of the
Participant Firm has control and to
whose financial support such person
materially contributes.
• The term ‘‘investment banking
services’’ would include, without
limitation, acting as an underwriter,
participating in a selling group in an
offering for the issuer, or otherwise
acting in furtherance of a public offering
of the issuer; acting as a financial
adviser in a merger or acquisition;
providing venture capital or equity lines
of credit or serving as placement agent
for the issuer or otherwise acting in
furtherance of a private offering of the
issuer.
Proposed Rule 11.3110(e) 9
Proposed Rule 11.3110(e) would
define OSJ and branch office. As noted
above, OSJ would be a new designation
for the Exchange and the definition of
the term would substantially mirror
NYSE American’s definition. The term
would mean any office of a Participant
Firm at which any one or more of the
following functions take place:
• Order execution or market making;
• Structuring of public offerings or
private placements;
• Maintaining custody of customers’
funds or securities;
• Final acceptance (approval) of new
accounts on behalf of the Participant
Firm;
• Review and endorsement of
customer orders;
• Final approval of retail
communications for use by persons
associated with the Participant Firm,
pursuant to Rule 11.2210(b)(1), except
for an office that solely conducts final
approval of research reports; or
• Responsibility for supervising the
activities of persons associated with the
Participant Firm at one or more other
branch offices of the Participant Firm.
The definition of ‘‘branch office’’
would be new and would mean any
location where one or more associated
persons of a Participant Firm regularly
conducts the business of effecting any
transactions in, or inducing or
attempting to induce the purchase or
sale of, any security, or is held out as
such, excluding:
9 Like its affiliate NYSE American, the Exchange
does not propose to adopt current FINRA Rule
3110(e), which governs the responsibility to
investigate applicants for registration.
PO 00000
Frm 00141
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46195
• Any location that is established
solely for customer service or back
office type functions where no sales
activities are conducted and that is not
held out to the public as a branch office;
• Any location that is the associated
person’s primary residence, provided
that
Æ only one associated person, or
multiple associated persons who reside
at that location and are members of the
same immediate family, conduct
business at the location;
Æ the location is not held out to the
public as an office and the associated
person does not meet with customers at
the location;
Æ neither customer funds nor
securities are handled at that location;
Æ the associated person is assigned to
a designated branch office, and such
designated branch office is reflected on
all business cards, stationery, retail
communications and other
communications to the public by such
associated person;
Æ the associated person’s
correspondence and communications
with the public are subject to the firm’s
supervision in accordance with
proposed Rule 11.3110;
Æ electronic communications (e.g.,
email) are made through the Participant
Firm’s electronic system;
Æ all orders are entered through the
designated branch office or an electronic
system established by the Participant
Firm that is reviewable at the branch
office;
Æ written supervisory procedures
pertaining to supervision of sales
activities conducted at the residence are
maintained by the Participant Firm; and
Æ a list of the residence locations is
maintained by the Participant Firm.
• Any location, other than a primary
residence, that is used for securities
business for less than 30 business days
in any one calendar year, provided the
Participant Firm complies with the first
eight bullet points immediately above;
• Any office of convenience, where
associated persons occasionally and
exclusively by appointment meet with
customers, which is not held out to the
public as an office;
• Any location that is used primarily
to engage in non-securities activities
and from which the associated person(s)
effects no more than 25 securities
transactions in any one calendar year,
provided that any retail communication
identifying such location also sets forth
the address and telephone number of
the location from which the associated
person(s) conducting business at the
non-branch locations are directly
supervised;
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
46196
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 103 / Tuesday, May 28, 2024 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
• The Floor of a registered national
securities exchange where a Participant
Firm conducts a direct access business
with public customers; or
• A temporary location established in
response to the implementation of a
business continuity plan.
Notwithstanding the exclusions for
branch offices described above, any
location that is responsible for
supervising the activities of persons
associated with the Participant Firm at
one or more non-branch locations of the
Participant Firm would be considered a
branch office.
The term ‘‘business day’’ would not
include any partial business day
provided that the associated person
spends at least four hours on such
business day at his or her designated
branch office during the hours that such
office is normally open for business.
Proposed Supplementary Materials to
Rule 11.3110
Proposed Supplementary Material .01
to Rule 11.3110 would require a
Participant Firm’s main office location
to be registered and designated as a
branch office or OSJ if it meets the
definitions of a ‘‘branch office’’ or
‘‘office of supervisory jurisdiction’’ as
set forth in proposed Rule 11.3110(e). In
general, the nature of activities
conducted at a main office will satisfy
the requirements of such terms.
Proposed Supplementary Material .02
to Rule 11.3110 would provide that, in
addition to the locations that meet the
definition of OSJ in proposed Rule
11.3110(e), each Participant Firm would
need to also register and designate other
offices as OSJs as is necessary to
supervise its associated persons in
accordance with the standards set forth
in proposed Rule 11.3110. In making a
determination as to whether to
designate a location as an OSJ, the
Participant Firm should consider the
following factors:
• Whether registered persons at the
location engage in retail sales or other
activities involving regular contact with
public customers;
• Whether a substantial number of
registered persons conduct securities
activities at, or are otherwise supervised
from, such location;
• Whether the location is
geographically distant from another OSJ
of the firm;
• Whether the Participant Firm’s
registered persons are geographically
dispersed; and
• Whether the securities activities at
such location are diverse or complex.
Proposed Supplementary Material .03
to Rule 11.3110 would provide
additional guidance relating to proposed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:43 May 24, 2024
Jkt 262001
Rule 11.3110(a)(4), which requires a
Participant Firm to designate one or
more appropriately registered principals
in each OSJ with the authority to carry
out the supervisory responsibilities
assigned to that office (‘‘on-site
principal’’). The proposed
Supplementary Material would provide
that the designated on-site principal for
each OSJ would need to have a physical
presence, on a regular and routine basis,
at each OSJ for which the principal has
supervisory responsibilities.
Consequently, there is a general
presumption that a principal will not be
designated and assigned to be the onsite principal pursuant to proposed Rule
11.3110(a)(4) to supervise more than
one OSJ. If a Participant Firm
determines it is necessary to designate
and assign one appropriately registered
principal to be the on-site principal
pursuant to proposed Rule 11.3110(a)(4)
to supervise two or more OSJs, the
Participant Firm would need to take
into consideration, among others, the
following factors:
• Whether the on-site principal is
qualified by virtue of experience and
training to supervise the activities and
associated persons in each location;
• Whether the on-site principal has
the capacity and time to supervise the
activities and associated persons in each
location;
• Whether the on-site principal is a
producing registered representative;
• Whether the OSJ locations are in
sufficiently close proximity to ensure
that the on-site principal is physically
present at each location on a regular and
routine basis; and
• The nature of activities at each
location, including size and number of
associated persons, scope of business
activities, nature and complexity of
products and services offered, volume of
business done, the disciplinary history
of persons assigned to such locations,
and any other indicators of irregularities
or misconduct.
The Participant Firm would need to
establish, maintain, and enforce written
supervisory procedures regarding the
supervision of all OSJs. In all cases
where a Participant Firm designates and
assigns one on-site principal to
supervise more than one OSJ, the
Participant Firm would need to
document in the Participant Firm’s
written supervisory and inspection
procedures the factors used to
determine why the Participant Firm
considers such supervisory structure to
be reasonable and the determination by
the Participant Firm will be subject to
scrutiny.
Proposed Supplementary Material .04
to Rule 11.3110 would provide that a
PO 00000
Frm 00142
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Participant Firm is not required to
conduct in-person meetings with each
registered person or group of registered
persons to comply with the annual
compliance meeting (or interview)
required by proposed Rule
11.3110(a)(7). A Participant Firm that
chooses to conduct compliance
meetings using other methods (e.g., ondemand webcast or course, video
conference, interactive classroom
setting, telephone, or other electronic
means) would need to ensure, at a
minimum, that each registered person
attends the entire meeting (e.g., an ondemand annual compliance webcast
would require each registered person to
use a unique user ID and password to
gain access and use a technology
platform to track the time spent on the
webcast, provide click-as-you go
confirmation, and have an attestation of
completion at the end of a webcast) and
is able to ask questions regarding the
presentation and receive answers in a
timely fashion (e.g., an on-demand
annual compliance webcast that allows
registered persons to ask questions via
an email to a presenter or a centralized
address or via a telephone hotline and
receive timely responses directly or
view such responses on the Participant
Firm’s intranet site).
Proposed Supplementary Material .05
to Rule 11.3110 would provide that a
Participant Firm may use a risk-based
review system to comply with proposed
Rule 11.3110(b)(2)’s requirement that a
registered principal review all
transactions relating to the investment
banking or securities business of the
Participant Firm. A Participant Firm is
not required to conduct detailed reviews
of each transaction if a Participant Firm
is using a reasonably designed riskbased review system that provides a
Participant Firm with sufficient
information that permits the Participant
Firm to focus on the areas that pose the
greatest numbers and risks of violation.
Proposed Supplementary Material .06
to Rule 11.3110 would provide that, by
employing risk-based principles, a
Participant Firm would need to decide
the extent to which additional policies
and procedures for the review of:
• Incoming and outgoing written
(including electronic) correspondence
that fall outside of the subject matters
listed in proposed Rule 11.3110(b)(4)
are necessary for its business and
structure. If a Participant Firm’s
procedures do not require that all
correspondence be reviewed before use
or distribution, the procedures would
need to provide for:
Æ The education and training of
associated persons regarding the firm’s
procedures governing correspondence;
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 103 / Tuesday, May 28, 2024 / Notices
Æ The documentation of such
education and training; and
Æ Surveillance and follow-up to
ensure that such procedures are
implemented and followed.
• Internal communications that are
not of a subject matter that require
review under Exchange rules and
federal securities laws are necessary for
its business and structure.
Proposed Supplementary Material .07
to Rule 11.3110 would provide that the
evidence of review required in proposed
Rule 11.3110(b)(4) would need to be
chronicled either electronically or on
paper and clearly identify the reviewer,
the internal communication or
correspondence that was reviewed, the
date of review, and the actions taken by
the Participant Firm as a result of any
significant regulatory issues identified
during the review. Merely opening a
communication would not be sufficient
review.
Proposed Supplementary Material .08
to Rule 11.3110 would provide that, in
the course of the supervision and review
of correspondence and internal
communications required by proposed
Rule 11.3110(b)(4), a supervisor/
principal may delegate certain functions
to persons who need not be registered.
However, the supervisor/principal
remains ultimately responsible for the
performance of all necessary
supervisory reviews, irrespective of
whether he or she delegates functions
related to the review. Accordingly,
supervisors/principals would need to
take reasonable and appropriate action
to ensure delegated functions are
properly executed and should evidence
performance of their procedures
sufficiently to demonstrate overall
supervisory control.
Proposed Supplementary Material .09
to Rule 11.3110 would provide that each
Participant Firm would need to retain
the internal communications and
correspondence of associated persons
relating to the Participant Firm’s
investment banking or securities
business for the period of time and
accessibility specified in SEA Rule 17a–
4(b). The names of the persons who
prepared outgoing correspondence and
who reviewed the correspondence
would need to be ascertainable from the
retained records, and the retained
records would need to be readily
available to the Exchange, upon request.
Proposed Supplementary Material .10
to Rule 11.3110 would provide that a
Participant Firm’s determination that it
is not possible to comply with proposed
Rules 3110(b)(6)(C)(i) or (b)(6)(C)(ii)
prohibiting supervisory personnel from
supervising their own activities and
from reporting to, or otherwise having
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:43 May 24, 2024
Jkt 262001
compensation or continued employment
determined by, a person or persons they
are supervising generally will arise in
instances where:
• The Participant Firm is a sole
proprietor in a single-person firm;
• A registered person is the
Participant Firm’s most senior executive
officer (or similar position); or
• A registered person is one of several
of the Participant Firm’s most senior
executive officers (or similar positions).
Proposed Supplementary Material .11
to Rule 11.3110 would provide that a
Participant Firm may use electronic
media to satisfy its obligation to
communicate its written supervisory
procedures, and any amendment
thereto, pursuant to proposed Rule
11.3110(b)(7), provided that:
• The written supervisory procedures
have been promptly communicated to,
and are readily accessible by, all
associated persons to whom such
supervisory procedures apply based on
their activities and responsibilities
through, for example, the Participant
Firm’s intranet system;
• All amendments to the written
supervisory procedures are promptly
posted to the Participant Firm’s
electronic media;
• Associated persons are notified that
amendments relevant to their activities
and responsibilities have been made to
the written supervisory procedures;
• The Participant Firm has reasonable
procedures to monitor and maintain the
security of the material posted to ensure
that it cannot be altered by
unauthorized persons; and
• The Participant Firm retains current
and prior versions of its written
supervisory procedures in compliance
with the applicable record retention
requirements of SEA Rule 17a–4(e)(7).
Proposed Supplementary Material .12
to Rule 11.3110 would provide that, in
fulfilling its obligations under proposed
Rule 11.3110(c), each Participant Firm
would need to conduct a review, at least
annually, of the businesses in which it
engages. The review would need to be
reasonably designed to assist in
detecting and preventing violations of
and achieving compliance with
applicable securities laws and
regulations and with Exchange rules.
Each Participant Firm would need to
establish and maintain supervisory
procedures that take into consideration,
among other things, the firm’s size,
organizational structure, scope of
business activities, number and location
of the firm’s offices, the nature and
complexity of the products and services
offered by the firm, the volume of
business done, the number of associated
persons assigned to a location, the
PO 00000
Frm 00143
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46197
disciplinary history of registered
representatives or associated persons,
and any indicators of irregularities or
misconduct (i.e., ‘‘red flags’’), etc. The
procedures established and reviews
conducted would need to provide that
the quality of supervision at remote
locations is sufficient to ensure
compliance with applicable securities
laws and regulations and with Exchange
rules. A Participant Firm would need to
be especially diligent in establishing
procedures and conducting reasonable
reviews with respect to a non-branch
location where a registered
representative engages in securities
activities. Based on the factors outlined
above, Participant Firms may need to
impose reasonably designed supervisory
procedures for certain locations or may
need to provide for more frequent
reviews of certain locations.
Proposed Supplementary Material .13
to Rule 11.3110 would provide
additional guidance to proposed Rule
11.3110(c)(1)(C), which would require a
Participant Firm to inspect on a regular
periodic schedule every non-branch
location. In establishing a non-branch
location inspection schedule, there is a
general presumption that a non-branch
location will be inspected at least every
three years, even in the absence of any
indicators of irregularities or
misconduct (i.e., ‘‘red flags’’). If a
Participant Firm establishes a longer
periodic inspection schedule, the
Participant Firm would need to
document in its written supervisory and
inspection procedures the factors used
in determining that a longer periodic
inspection cycle is appropriate.
Proposed Supplementary Material .14
to Rule 11.3110 would provide that a
Participant Firm’s determination that it
is not possible to comply with proposed
Rule 11.3110(c)(3)(B) with respect to
who is not allowed to conduct a
location’s inspection will generally arise
in instances where:
• The Participant Firm has only one
office; or
• The Participant Firm has a business
model where small or single person
offices report directly to an OSJ manager
who is also considered the offices’
branch office manager.
Proposed Supplementary Material .15
to Rule 11.3110 would provide that for
purposes of the proposed rule, the term
‘‘associated person’’ and ‘‘person
associated with a Participant Firm’’
would have the same meaning as the
terms ‘‘person associated with a
member’’ or ‘‘associated person of a
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
46198
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 103 / Tuesday, May 28, 2024 / Notices
member’’ as defined in Article I (rr) of
the FINRA By-Laws.10
Finally, proposed Supplementary
Material .16 to Rule 11.3110 would
provide that individuals in charge of a
group of employees shall reasonably
discharge their duties and obligations
with respect to supervision and control
of those employees related to the
business of their employer and
compliance with securities laws and
regulations and Exchange rules.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Proposed Rule 11.3120 (Supervisory
Control System)
Proposed Rule 11.3120(a), which is
based on NYSE American Rule
3120(a)—Equities, would provide that
each Participant Firm would need to
designate and specifically identify to the
Exchange one or more principals who
would need to establish, maintain, and
enforce a system of supervisory control
policies and procedures that:
• Test and verify that the Participant
Firm’s supervisory procedures are
reasonably designed with respect to the
activities of the Participant Firm and its
associated persons, to achieve
compliance with applicable securities
laws and regulations, and with
applicable Exchange rules; and
• Create additional or amend
supervisory procedures where the need
is identified by such testing and
verification.
The designated principal or principals
would be required to submit to the
Participant Firm’s senior management
no less than annually, a report detailing
each Participant Firm’s system of
supervisory controls, the summary of
the test results and significant identified
exceptions, and any additional or
amended supervisory procedures
created in response to the test results.
Proposed Rule 11.3120(b) would
provide that each report provided to
senior management pursuant to
proposed Rule 11.3120(a) in the
calendar year following a calendar year
in which a Participant Firm reported
$200 million or more in gross revenue
would need to include, to the extent
applicable to the Participant Firm’s
business:
10 Article I (rr) of FINRA’s By-Laws provides that
‘‘person associated with a member’’ or ‘‘associated
person of a member’’ means: (1) a natural person
who is registered or has applied for registration
under FINRA’s rules; (2) a sole proprietor, partner,
officer, director, or branch manager of a member, or
other natural person occupying a similar status or
performing similar functions, or a natural person
engaged in the investment banking or securities
business who is directly or indirectly controlling or
controlled by a member, whether or not any such
person is registered or exempt from registration
with the FINRA under its By-Laws or rules; and (3)
for purposes of FINRA Rule 8210, any other person
listed in Schedule A of Form BD of a member.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:43 May 24, 2024
Jkt 262001
• A tabulation of the reports
pertaining to customer complaints and
internal investigations made to the
Exchange during the preceding year;
and
• Discussion of the preceding year’s
compliance efforts, including
procedures and educational programs,
in each of the following areas:
Æ Trading and market activities;
Æ Investment banking activities;
Æ Antifraud and sales practices;
Æ Finance and operations;
Æ Supervision; and
Æ Anti-money laundering.
The proposed rule change seeks to
mitigate compliance costs and burdens
with respect to proposed Rule 11.3120’s
annual reporting requirements by
requiring that only Participant Firms
reporting $200 million or more in gross
revenues in the preceding year include
in their annual reports supplemental
information. The Exchange also believes
that the proposed threshold strikes the
appropriate balance as it encompasses
larger Participant Firms, Participant
Firms engaged in significant
underwriting activities and substantial
trading activities or market making
business, and Participant Firms with
extensive sales platforms.
Proposed Rule 11.3120(c) would
provide that, for purposes of proposed
Rule 11.3120(b), ‘‘gross revenue’’ is
defined as:
• Total revenue as reported on
FOCUS Form Part II or IIA (line item
4030) less commodities revenue (line
item 3990), if applicable; or
• Total revenue as reported on
FOCUS Form Part II CSE (line item
4030) less, if applicable,
Æ Commissions on commodity
transactions (line item 3991); and
Æ Commodities gains or losses (line
items 3924 and 3904).
Proposed Supplementary Material .01
to Rule 11.3120 would provide that for
purposes of the proposed rule, the term
‘‘associated person’’ and ‘‘person
associated with a Participant Firm’’
would have the same meaning as the
terms ‘‘person associated with a
member’’ or ‘‘associated person of a
member’’ as defined in Article I (rr) of
the FINRA By-Laws.11
Finally, the Exchange proposes
conforming changes to Rule 10.9217 to
replace references to Article 6, Rule 5(a)
& (b) with proposed Rule 11.20 and Rule
11.3110(a) as well as references to
Article 6, Rule 5(c) with Rule
11.3110(b)(1).
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Act,12 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5),13 in
particular, because it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade and to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system. Specifically, the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change
supports the objectives of the Act by
providing greater harmonization
between Exchange rules and the rules of
its affiliates and FINRA of similar
purpose, resulting in less burdensome
and more efficient regulatory
compliance. In particular, Exchange
Participant Firms that are also FINRA
members are already subject to
Exchange supervisory rules and FINRA
Rules 3110 and 3120, and harmonizing
these rules by adopting proposed Rules
11.3110 and 11.3120 would promote
just and equitable principles of trade by
requiring a single standard for
supervision. To the extent the Exchange
has proposed changes that differ from
the NYSE American version of the
Exchange rules, such changes are
generally technical in nature and do not
change the substance of the proposed
rules. The Exchange also believes that
the proposed rule change will update
and add specificity to the requirements
governing supervision, which will
promote just and equitable principles of
trade and help to protect investors.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change is not intended to
address competitive issues but rather to
achieve greater consistency between the
Exchange’s rules and the rules of its
affiliate and FINRA concerning
supervision.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed
rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 14 and Rule
12 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
14 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
13 15
11 See
PO 00000
note 10, supra.
Frm 00144
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 103 / Tuesday, May 28, 2024 / Notices
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.15 Because the
proposed rule change does not: (i)
significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
prior to 30 days from the date on which
it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder.
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 16 normally does not
become operative prior to 30 days after
the date of the filing. However, pursuant
to Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii),17 the
Commission may designate a shorter
time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 18 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–NYSECHX–2024–18 and
should be submitted on or before June
18, 2024.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
NYSECHX–2024–18 on the subject line.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–NYSECHX–2024–18. This
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
16 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
17 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
18 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
18:43 May 24, 2024
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–100196; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2024–022]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Amend the
Cabinet Proximity Option Fee To
Establish a Reservation Fee for
Cabinets With Power Densities Greater
Than 10 kW
May 21, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
15 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
[FR Doc. 2024–11576 Filed 5–24–24; 8:45 am]
19 17
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 9,
2024, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
(‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Exchange’s Cabinet Proximity Option
Fee at General 8, Section 1, as described
further below.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/
rulebook/nasdaq/rules, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change 3 is to amend the Exchange’s
Cabinet Proximity Option Fee at General
8, Section 1(d) by establishing a
reservation fee for cabinets with power
densities greater than 10 kilowatts
(‘‘kW’’).4
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 The Exchange initially filed the proposed
pricing change on March 1, 2024 (SR–NASDAQ–
2024–009). On March 13, 2024, the Exchange
withdrew that filing and submitted SR–NASDAQ–
2024–013. On May 9, 2024, the Exchange withdrew
that filing and submitted this filing.
4 On February 16, 2024, the Exchange filed a
proposal to offer the Exchange’s Cabinet Proximity
Option program for cabinets with power densities
greater than 10 kW. See Securities Exchange Act
2 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00145
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46199
Continued
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 28, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46191-46199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-11576]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-100187; File No. SR-NYSECHX-2024-18]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Chicago, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its
Rules Concerning Supervision To Adopt Rules Based on NYSE American
Rules 3110--Equities and 3120--Equities
May 21, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given
that, on May 16, 2024, the NYSE Chicago, Inc. (``NYSE Chicago'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its rules concerning supervision to
adopt rules based on NYSE American Rules 3110--Equities (Supervision)
and 3120--Equities (Supervisory Control System) and make certain
conforming changes. The proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its rules concerning supervision to
adopt rules based on NYSE American Rules 3110--Equities (Supervision)
and 3120--Equities (Supervisory Control System) and make certain
conforming changes. More specifically, the Exchange proposes to (1)
adopt new rule text that is substantially similar to NYSE American Rule
3110--Equities and NYSE American Rule 3120--Equities; (2) delete
Article 6, Rule 5 (Registration, Supervision and Training) except for
certain text that will be retained as new Rule 11.20 (Adherence to
Law); and (3) make conforming changes to Rule 10.9217 (Violations
Appropriate for Disposition Under Rule 9216(b)).
Background and Proposed Rule Change
Current Supervision Rules
The Exchange's current supervision Rule is Article 6, Rule 5.
Subsection (a) of Article 6, Rule 5 sets forth a basic declaration
that Participants are responsible for adherence to federal securities
laws and Exchange rules, and must reasonably supervise their operations
and associated persons to prevent violations of thereof.
Subsection (b) provides for the designation of persons with
supervisory authority. Specifically, the rule provides that each
Participant Firm must designate a principal executive officer, general
partner or managing partner to hold overall authority and
responsibility
[[Page 46192]]
for the Participant Firm's internal supervision and compliance with
securities laws and regulations, although under the rule the designated
supervisor under the rule may formally delegate their supervisory
duties and authority to other persons within the firm. The rule also
requires that Participants \4\ maintain, for a period of not less than
six years (the first two years in an easily accessible place), records
of the names of all persons who are designated as supervisory personnel
and the dates for which those designations are effective. In the
absence of such designation by a Participant Firm, the rule provides
that the firm's General Partner(s), President, Chief Executive Officer
or other principal executive officer shall be deemed to be responsible
for a Firm's internal supervision and compliance function. In addition,
each Participant Firm shall designate and specifically identify to the
Exchange on Schedule A of Form BD one or more principals to serve as a
Chief Compliance Officer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The term ``Participant'' is defined in Article 1, Rule 1(s)
to mean, among other things, any Participant Firm that holds a valid
Trading Permit and that a Participant shall be considered a
``member'' of the Exchange for purposes of the Act. If a Participant
is not a natural person, the Participant may also be referred to as
a Participant Firm, but unless the context requires otherwise, the
term Participant shall refer to an individual Participant and/or a
Participant Firm. For the avoidance of doubt, this rule filing will
use the phrase Participant and/or Participant Firm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article 6, Rule 5(c) governs written supervisory procedures, and
provides that each Participant Firm shall establish, maintain and
enforce written procedures to supervise the types of business in which
it engages and to supervise the activities of registered and associated
persons. Such written procedures must be reasonably designed to achieve
compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations, and with
the applicable rules of the Exchange. The rule further specifies that
the Participant Firm's written supervisory procedures must set forth
the following: the supervisory system established by the Participant
Firm; the titles, registration status and locations of the required
supervisory personnel; and the responsibilities of each supervisor as
they relate to the types of business engaged in, applicable securities
laws and the rules of the Exchange. Article 6, Rule 5(c) requires that
a copy of a Participant Firm's written supervisory procedures or the
relevant portions thereof, be maintained at each location where
supervisory activities are conducted on behalf of the firm. Each
Participant Firm is required to periodically review and amend its
written supervisory procedures as appropriate within a reasonable time,
including but not limited to, updates required by changes in applicable
securities laws and regulations, including the rules of the Exchange,
and as changes occur in the supervisory system. In addition, the rule
provides that each Participant Firm shall be responsible for
communicating these amendments within its organization. Finally, the
rule requires each Participant Firm to maintain records evidencing
actual review of transactions, systems, programs or other activities by
the designated supervisory personnel pursuant the written supervisory
procedures.
Article 6, Rule 5(d) governs internal controls and training. The
rule requires that at least annually, each Participant Firm must
discuss compliance matters with its registered and associated persons
and must maintain records confirming the dates of these discussions and
the subject matters that were discussed. Each Participant Firm must
also establish internal controls to determine that proper supervision
is being exercised.
Article 6, Rule 5(e) governs branch and resident offices. Under the
rule, a Participant Firm for which this Exchange is the Designated
Examining Authority or which is subject to examination by another self-
regulatory organization not having a comparable rule, shall not open a
branch or resident office unless it has obtained the prior written
approval of the Exchange. Application for approval of the opening of a
branch or resident office must be made on a form provided by the
Exchange at least one month (or such shorter period as the Exchange may
approve) prior to the proposed opening date of the office. A
Participant Firm maintaining branch or resident offices must establish
procedures providing for close supervision of such offices, and
maintain a close, responsible relationship with the person in charge of
such office or offices. A designated partner or officer of the main
office is personally responsible for proper supervision of such branch
or resident office.
Finally, Supplementary Material .01 governs registration of new
branch offices and sets forth the steps to be taken when registering
new branch offices as required by Article 6, Rule 5(d). Supplementary
Material .01 requires each Participant Firm to forward a completed Form
BR to the Exchange. In addition, prior to approval of the branch
office, the office manager or the registered representative in charge
must have completed the Exchange requirements for registration. The
office may begin operating as a branch on receipt of written approval
from the Exchange.
Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to delete the foregoing rules relating to
supervision (except as noted below), which are, in main part, either
duplicative of, or do not align with, the proposed supervision
requirements discussed below, and adopt the text of NYSE American Rules
3110--Equities and 3120--Equities, subject to certain technical and
conforming changes.\5\ The text in current rule Article 6, Rule 5(a)
following the heading ``Adherence to Law'' would be retained in its
entirety and moved to Rule 11 governing business conduct without
substantive change as new Rule 11.20, also titled ``Adherence to Law.''
\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The technical and conforming changes are that the Exchange
would substitute ``Participant Firm'' for ``member organization''
and change a cross-reference to NYSE American Rules 2210 to Exchange
Rule 11.2210.
\6\ The Exchange notes that its affiliate NYSE National, Inc.
has a similar business conduct rule. See NYSE National Rule 11.3.2
(Violations Prohibited).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule 11.3110 (Supervision)
Proposed Rule 11.3110 is based primarily on requirements in the
NYSE American and FINRA rulebooks and current Article 6, Rule 5
relating to, among other things, supervisory systems, written
procedures, internal inspections, and review of correspondence.
Proposed Rule 11.3110(a)
Proposed Rule 11.3110(a) would cover supervisory systems and would
require each Participant Firm to establish and maintain a system to
supervise the activities of each associated person that is reasonably
designed to achieve compliance with applicable securities laws and
regulations, and with applicable Exchange rules. Under the proposed
rule, final responsibility for proper supervision would rest with the
Participant Firm. In addition, a Participant Firm's supervisory system
would need to provide, at a minimum, for the following:
The establishment and maintenance of written procedures as
required by proposed Rule 11.3110.
The designation, where applicable, of an appropriately
registered principal with authority to carry out the supervisory
responsibilities of the Participant Firm for each type of business in
which it engages for which
[[Page 46193]]
registration as a broker-dealer is required.
The registration and designation as a branch office or an
office of supervisory jurisdiction (``OSJ'') of each location,
including the main office, that meets the definitions contained in
proposed Rule 11.3110(e). The Exchange has not previously designated
OSJs. As such, the requirements relating to OSJs described hereinafter
would be new for Participant Firms.
The designation of one or more appropriately registered
principals in each OSJ and one or more appropriately registered
representatives or principals in each non-OSJ branch office with
authority to carry out the supervisory responsibilities assigned to
that office by the Participant Firm.
The assignment of each registered person to an
appropriately registered representative or principal who would be
responsible for supervising that person's activities.
The use of reasonable efforts to determine that all
supervisory personnel are qualified, either by virtue of experience or
training, to carry out their assigned responsibilities.
The participation of each registered representative and
registered principal, either individually or collectively, no less than
annually, in an interview or meeting conducted by persons designated by
the Participant Firm at which compliance matters relevant to the
activities of the representative and principal are discussed, which may
occur in conjunction with the discussion of other matters and may be
conducted at a central or regional location or at the representative's
or principal's place of business.
Proposed Rule 11.3110(b)
Proposed Rule 11.3110(b)(1) would address written procedures and
would require each Participant Firm to establish, maintain, and enforce
written procedures to supervise the types of business in which it
engages and the activities of its associated persons that are
reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable securities
laws and regulations and applicable Exchange rules.
Under proposed Rule 11.3110(b)(2), the supervisory procedures
required by proposed Rule 11.3110(b) would need to include procedures
for the review by a registered principal, evidenced in writing, of all
transactions relating to the investment banking or securities business
of the Participant Firm.
Consistent with NYSE American Rule 3110(b)(3)--Equities, proposed
Rule 11.3110(b)(3) would be marked ``Reserved.''
Under proposed Rule 11.3110(b)(4), the supervisory procedures
required by proposed Rule 11.3110(b) would need to also include
procedures for the review of incoming and outgoing written (including
electronic) correspondence and internal communications relating to the
Participant Firm's investment banking or securities business and be
appropriate for the Participant Firm's business, size, structure, and
customers. The supervisory procedures would need to require the
Participant Firm's review of:
Incoming and outgoing written (including electronic)
correspondence to properly identify and handle in accordance with firm
procedures, customer complaints, instructions, funds and securities,
and communications that are of a subject matter that require review
under Exchange rules and federal securities laws.
Internal communications to properly identify those
communications that are of a subject matter that require review under
Exchange rules and federal securities laws.
Such reviews would need to be conducted by a registered principal
and evidenced in writing, either electronically or on paper. Those
communications include (without limitation) certain communications with
the public that require a principal's preapproval (Rule 11.2210).
Proposed Rule 11.3110(b)(5) requires a Participant Firm's
supervisory procedures to include procedures to capture, acknowledge,
and respond to all written (including electronic) customer complaints.
Under proposed Rule 11.3110(b)(6), the supervisory procedures
required by proposed Rule 11.3110(b) would need to set forth the
supervisory system established by the Participant Firm pursuant to
proposed Rule 11.3110(a), and would need to include:
The titles, registration status, and locations of the
required supervisory personnel and the responsibilities of each
supervisory person as these relate to the types of business engaged in,
applicable securities laws and regulations, and Exchange rules.
A record, preserved by the Participant Firm for a period
of not less than three years, the first two years in an easily
accessible place, of the names of all persons who are designated as
supervisory personnel and the dates for which such designation is or
was effective.
Procedures prohibiting associated persons who perform a
supervisory function from:
[cir] Supervising their own activities; and
[cir] Reporting to, or having their compensation or continued
employment determined by, a person or persons they are supervising.
[ssquf] If a Participant Firm determines, with respect to any of
its supervisory personnel, that compliance with the preceding two
bullets is not possible because of the Participant Firm's size or a
supervisory personnel's position within the firm, the Participant Firm
would need to document:
The factors the Participant Firm used to reach such
determination; and
How the supervisory arrangement with respect to such
supervisory personnel otherwise complies with proposed Rule 11.3110(a).
Procedures reasonably designed to prevent the supervisory
system required pursuant to proposed Rule 11.3110(a) from being
compromised due to the conflicts of interest that may be present with
respect to the associated person being supervised, including the
position of such person, the revenue such person generates for the
firm, or any compensation that the associated person conducting the
supervision may derive from the associated person being supervised.
Proposed Rule 11.3110(b)(7) would require a Participant Firm to
keep and maintain a copy of its written supervisory procedures, or such
relevant portions, in each OSJ and at each location where supervisory
activities are conducted on behalf of the Participant Firm. Each
Participant Firm would need to promptly amend its written supervisory
procedures to reflect changes in applicable securities laws or
regulations, including Exchange rules, and as changes occur in its
supervisory system. Each Participant Firm would be responsible for
promptly communicating its written supervisory procedures and
amendments to all associated persons to whom such written supervisory
procedures and amendments are relevant based on their activities and
responsibilities.
Proposed Rule 11.3110(c)
Proposed Rule 11.3110(c) would cover internal inspections. Proposed
Rule 11.3110(c)(1) would require each Participant Firm to conduct a
review, at least annually (on a calendar-year basis), of the businesses
in which it engages. The review would need to be reasonably designed to
assist the Participant Firm in detecting and preventing violations of,
and achieving compliance with, applicable securities laws and
regulations, and with applicable Exchange rules. Each Participant Firm
[[Page 46194]]
would need to review the activities of each office, which would include
the periodic examination of customer accounts to detect and prevent
irregularities or abuses. Each Participant Firm would also need to
retain a written record of the date upon which each review and
inspection is conducted.
In addition, proposed Rule 11.3110(c)(1) would require each
Participant Firm to inspect at least annually (on a calendar-year
basis) every OSJ and any branch office that supervises one or more non-
branch locations. Each Participant Firm would need to also inspect at
least every three years every branch office that does not supervise one
or more non-branch locations. In establishing how often to inspect each
non-supervisory branch office, the Participant Firm would need to
consider whether the nature and complexity of the securities activities
for which the location is responsible, the volume of business done at
the location, and the number of associated persons assigned to the
location require the non-supervisory branch office to be inspected more
frequently than every three years. If a Participant Firm establishes a
more frequent inspection cycle, the Participant Firm would need to
ensure that at least every three years, the inspection requirements
enumerated in proposed Rule 11.3110(c)(2) have been met. The
Participant Firm's written supervisory and inspection procedures would
need to set forth the non-supervisory branch office examination cycle,
an explanation of the factors the Participant Firm used in determining
the frequency of the examinations in the cycle, and the manner in which
a Participant Firm will comply with proposed Rule 11.3110(c)(2) if
using more frequent inspections than every three years. Each
Participant Firm would need to inspect, on a regular periodic schedule,
every non-branch location. In establishing such schedule, the
Participant Firm would need to consider the nature and complexity of
the securities activities for which the location is responsible and the
nature and extent of contact with customers. The Participant Firm's
written supervisory and inspection procedures would also need to set
forth the schedule and an explanation regarding how the Participant
Firm determined the frequency of the examination.
Proposed Rule 11.3110(c)(2) would require the inspection and review
by a Participant Firm pursuant to proposed Rule 11.3110(c)(1) to be
reduced to a written report and kept on file by the Participant Firm
for a minimum of three years, unless the inspection is being conducted
pursuant to proposed Rule 11.3110(c)(1)(C) and the regular periodic
schedule is longer than a three-year cycle, in which case the report
would need to be kept on file at least until the next inspection report
has been written. Under proposed Rule 11.3110(c)(2)(A), if applicable
to the location being inspected, that location's written inspection
report would need to include, without limitation, the testing and
verification of the Participant Firm's policies and procedures,
including supervisory policies and procedures in the following areas:
Safeguarding of customer funds and securities;
Maintaining books and records;
Supervision of supervisory personnel;
Transmittals of funds (e.g., wires or checks, etc.) or
securities from customers to third party accounts; from customer
accounts to outside entities (e.g., banks, investment companies, etc.);
from customer accounts to locations other than a customer's primary
residence (e.g., post office box, ``in care of'' accounts, alternate
address, etc.); and between customers and registered representatives,
including the hand-delivery of checks; and
Changes of customer account information, including address
and investment objectives changes and validation of such changes.
The policies and procedures regarding transmittals of funds would
need to include a means or method of customer confirmation,
notification, or follow-up that can be documented. Participant Firm s
may use reasonable risk-based criteria to determine the authenticity of
the transmittal instructions. The policies and procedures regarding
changes of customer account information would need to include, for each
change processed, a means or method of customer confirmation,
notification, or follow-up that can be documented and that complies
with SEA Rules 17a-3(a)(17)(i)(B)(2) and 17a-3(a)(17)(i)(B)(3).
If a Participant Firm does not engage in all of the activities
enumerated in the bullets immediately above at the location being
inspected, the Participant Firm would need to identify those activities
in the Participant Firm's written supervisory procedures or the
location's written inspection report and document in the Participant
Firm's written supervisory procedures or the location's written
inspection report that supervisory policies and procedures for such
activities would need to be in place at that location before the
Participant Firm can engage in them.
Under proposed Rule 11.3110(c)(3), for each inspection conducted
pursuant to the proposed rule, a Participant Firm would need to:
have procedures reasonably designed to prevent the
effectiveness of inspections from being compromised due to the
conflicts of interest that may be present with respect to the location
being inspected, including but not limited to, economic, commercial, or
financial interests in the associated persons and businesses being
inspected; and
ensure that the person conducting an inspection is not an
associated person assigned to the location or is not directly or
indirectly supervised by, or otherwise reporting to, an associated
person assigned to the location. If a Participant Firm determines that
compliance with this requirement is not possible either because of a
Participant Firm's size or its business model, the Participant Firm
would need to document in the inspection report both the factors the
Participant Firm used to make its determination and how the inspection
otherwise complies with proposed Rule 11.3110(c)(1).
The Exchange currently does not have a comparable rule.
Proposed Rule 11.3110(d)
Section 15(g) of the Act,\7\ adopted as part of the Insider Trading
and Securities Fraud Enforcement Act of 1988 (``ITSFEA''),\8\ requires
every registered broker or dealer to establish, maintain, and enforce
written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent the
misuse of material, non-public information by the broker or dealer or
any associated person of the broker or dealer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78o(g).
\8\ See Insider Trading and Securities Fraud Enforcement Act of
1988, Public Law 100-704, 102 Stat. 4677.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule 11.3110(d) would cover transaction reviews and
investigations. Proposed Rule 11.3110(d)(1) would require each
Participant Firm to include in its supervisory procedures a process for
the review of securities transactions reasonably designed to identify
trades that may violate the provisions of the Act, the rules
thereunder, or Exchange rules prohibiting insider trading and
manipulative and deceptive devices that are effected for the:
Accounts of the Participant Firm;
Accounts introduced or carried by the Participant Firm in
which a person associated with the Participant Firm has a beneficial
interest or the authority to make investment decisions;
Accounts of a person associated with the Participant Firm
that are
[[Page 46195]]
disclosed to the Participant Firm pursuant to Article 8, Rule 6
(Prohibited Accounts) or FINRA Rule 3210 (Accounts At Other Broker-
Dealers and Financial Institutions), as applicable; and
Covered accounts.
Under proposed Rule 11.3110(d)(2), each Participant Firm would need
promptly to conduct an internal investigation into any such trade to
determine whether a violation of those laws or rules has occurred. In
addition, under proposed Rule 11.3110(d)(3), a Participant Firm
engaging in investment banking services would need to file with the
Exchange, written reports, signed by a senior officer of the
Participant Firm, at such times and, without limitation, including such
content, as follows:
Within ten business days of the end of each calendar
quarter, a written report describing each internal investigation
initiated in the previous calendar quarter pursuant to proposed Rule
11.3110(d)(2), including the identity of the Participant Firm, the date
each internal investigation commenced, the status of each open internal
investigation, the resolution of any internal investigation reached
during the previous calendar quarter, and, with respect to each
internal investigation, the identity of the security, trades, accounts,
associated persons of the Participant Firm, or associated person of the
Participant Firm's family members holding a covered account, under
review, and that includes a copy of the Participant Firm's policies and
procedures required by proposed Rule 11.3110(d)(1).
Within five business days of completion of an internal
investigation pursuant to proposed Rule 11.3110(d)(2) in which it was
determined that a violation of the provisions of the Act, the rules
thereunder, or Exchange rules prohibiting insider trading and
manipulative and deceptive devices had occurred, a written report
detailing the completion of the investigation, including the results of
the investigation, any internal disciplinary action taken, and any
referral of the matter to the Exchange, another SRO, the SEC, or any
other federal, state, or international regulatory authority.
For purposes of proposed Rule 11.3110(d)(4) the following
definitions would apply:
The term ``covered account'' would include any account
introduced or carried by the Participant Firm that is held by:
[cir] The spouse of a person associated with the Participant Firm;
[cir] A child of the person associated with the Participant Firm or
such person's spouse, provided that the child resides in the same
household as or is financially dependent upon the person associated
with the Participant Firm;
[cir] Any other related individual over whose account the person
associated with the Participant Firm has control; or
[cir] Any other individual over whose account the associated person
of the Participant Firm has control and to whose financial support such
person materially contributes.
The term ``investment banking services'' would include,
without limitation, acting as an underwriter, participating in a
selling group in an offering for the issuer, or otherwise acting in
furtherance of a public offering of the issuer; acting as a financial
adviser in a merger or acquisition; providing venture capital or equity
lines of credit or serving as placement agent for the issuer or
otherwise acting in furtherance of a private offering of the issuer.
Proposed Rule 11.3110(e) \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Like its affiliate NYSE American, the Exchange does not
propose to adopt current FINRA Rule 3110(e), which governs the
responsibility to investigate applicants for registration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule 11.3110(e) would define OSJ and branch office. As
noted above, OSJ would be a new designation for the Exchange and the
definition of the term would substantially mirror NYSE American's
definition. The term would mean any office of a Participant Firm at
which any one or more of the following functions take place:
Order execution or market making;
Structuring of public offerings or private placements;
Maintaining custody of customers' funds or securities;
Final acceptance (approval) of new accounts on behalf of
the Participant Firm;
Review and endorsement of customer orders;
Final approval of retail communications for use by persons
associated with the Participant Firm, pursuant to Rule 11.2210(b)(1),
except for an office that solely conducts final approval of research
reports; or
Responsibility for supervising the activities of persons
associated with the Participant Firm at one or more other branch
offices of the Participant Firm.
The definition of ``branch office'' would be new and would mean any
location where one or more associated persons of a Participant Firm
regularly conducts the business of effecting any transactions in, or
inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale of, any security,
or is held out as such, excluding:
Any location that is established solely for customer
service or back office type functions where no sales activities are
conducted and that is not held out to the public as a branch office;
Any location that is the associated person's primary
residence, provided that
[cir] only one associated person, or multiple associated persons
who reside at that location and are members of the same immediate
family, conduct business at the location;
[cir] the location is not held out to the public as an office and
the associated person does not meet with customers at the location;
[cir] neither customer funds nor securities are handled at that
location;
[cir] the associated person is assigned to a designated branch
office, and such designated branch office is reflected on all business
cards, stationery, retail communications and other communications to
the public by such associated person;
[cir] the associated person's correspondence and communications
with the public are subject to the firm's supervision in accordance
with proposed Rule 11.3110;
[cir] electronic communications (e.g., email) are made through the
Participant Firm's electronic system;
[cir] all orders are entered through the designated branch office
or an electronic system established by the Participant Firm that is
reviewable at the branch office;
[cir] written supervisory procedures pertaining to supervision of
sales activities conducted at the residence are maintained by the
Participant Firm; and
[cir] a list of the residence locations is maintained by the
Participant Firm.
Any location, other than a primary residence, that is used
for securities business for less than 30 business days in any one
calendar year, provided the Participant Firm complies with the first
eight bullet points immediately above;
Any office of convenience, where associated persons
occasionally and exclusively by appointment meet with customers, which
is not held out to the public as an office;
Any location that is used primarily to engage in non-
securities activities and from which the associated person(s) effects
no more than 25 securities transactions in any one calendar year,
provided that any retail communication identifying such location also
sets forth the address and telephone number of the location from which
the associated person(s) conducting business at the non-branch
locations are directly supervised;
[[Page 46196]]
The Floor of a registered national securities exchange
where a Participant Firm conducts a direct access business with public
customers; or
A temporary location established in response to the
implementation of a business continuity plan.
Notwithstanding the exclusions for branch offices described above,
any location that is responsible for supervising the activities of
persons associated with the Participant Firm at one or more non-branch
locations of the Participant Firm would be considered a branch office.
The term ``business day'' would not include any partial business
day provided that the associated person spends at least four hours on
such business day at his or her designated branch office during the
hours that such office is normally open for business.
Proposed Supplementary Materials to Rule 11.3110
Proposed Supplementary Material .01 to Rule 11.3110 would require a
Participant Firm's main office location to be registered and designated
as a branch office or OSJ if it meets the definitions of a ``branch
office'' or ``office of supervisory jurisdiction'' as set forth in
proposed Rule 11.3110(e). In general, the nature of activities
conducted at a main office will satisfy the requirements of such terms.
Proposed Supplementary Material .02 to Rule 11.3110 would provide
that, in addition to the locations that meet the definition of OSJ in
proposed Rule 11.3110(e), each Participant Firm would need to also
register and designate other offices as OSJs as is necessary to
supervise its associated persons in accordance with the standards set
forth in proposed Rule 11.3110. In making a determination as to whether
to designate a location as an OSJ, the Participant Firm should consider
the following factors:
Whether registered persons at the location engage in
retail sales or other activities involving regular contact with public
customers;
Whether a substantial number of registered persons conduct
securities activities at, or are otherwise supervised from, such
location;
Whether the location is geographically distant from
another OSJ of the firm;
Whether the Participant Firm's registered persons are
geographically dispersed; and
Whether the securities activities at such location are
diverse or complex.
Proposed Supplementary Material .03 to Rule 11.3110 would provide
additional guidance relating to proposed Rule 11.3110(a)(4), which
requires a Participant Firm to designate one or more appropriately
registered principals in each OSJ with the authority to carry out the
supervisory responsibilities assigned to that office (``on-site
principal''). The proposed Supplementary Material would provide that
the designated on-site principal for each OSJ would need to have a
physical presence, on a regular and routine basis, at each OSJ for
which the principal has supervisory responsibilities. Consequently,
there is a general presumption that a principal will not be designated
and assigned to be the on-site principal pursuant to proposed Rule
11.3110(a)(4) to supervise more than one OSJ. If a Participant Firm
determines it is necessary to designate and assign one appropriately
registered principal to be the on-site principal pursuant to proposed
Rule 11.3110(a)(4) to supervise two or more OSJs, the Participant Firm
would need to take into consideration, among others, the following
factors:
Whether the on-site principal is qualified by virtue of
experience and training to supervise the activities and associated
persons in each location;
Whether the on-site principal has the capacity and time to
supervise the activities and associated persons in each location;
Whether the on-site principal is a producing registered
representative;
Whether the OSJ locations are in sufficiently close
proximity to ensure that the on-site principal is physically present at
each location on a regular and routine basis; and
The nature of activities at each location, including size
and number of associated persons, scope of business activities, nature
and complexity of products and services offered, volume of business
done, the disciplinary history of persons assigned to such locations,
and any other indicators of irregularities or misconduct.
The Participant Firm would need to establish, maintain, and enforce
written supervisory procedures regarding the supervision of all OSJs.
In all cases where a Participant Firm designates and assigns one on-
site principal to supervise more than one OSJ, the Participant Firm
would need to document in the Participant Firm's written supervisory
and inspection procedures the factors used to determine why the
Participant Firm considers such supervisory structure to be reasonable
and the determination by the Participant Firm will be subject to
scrutiny.
Proposed Supplementary Material .04 to Rule 11.3110 would provide
that a Participant Firm is not required to conduct in-person meetings
with each registered person or group of registered persons to comply
with the annual compliance meeting (or interview) required by proposed
Rule 11.3110(a)(7). A Participant Firm that chooses to conduct
compliance meetings using other methods (e.g., on-demand webcast or
course, video conference, interactive classroom setting, telephone, or
other electronic means) would need to ensure, at a minimum, that each
registered person attends the entire meeting (e.g., an on-demand annual
compliance webcast would require each registered person to use a unique
user ID and password to gain access and use a technology platform to
track the time spent on the webcast, provide click-as-you go
confirmation, and have an attestation of completion at the end of a
webcast) and is able to ask questions regarding the presentation and
receive answers in a timely fashion (e.g., an on-demand annual
compliance webcast that allows registered persons to ask questions via
an email to a presenter or a centralized address or via a telephone
hotline and receive timely responses directly or view such responses on
the Participant Firm's intranet site).
Proposed Supplementary Material .05 to Rule 11.3110 would provide
that a Participant Firm may use a risk-based review system to comply
with proposed Rule 11.3110(b)(2)'s requirement that a registered
principal review all transactions relating to the investment banking or
securities business of the Participant Firm. A Participant Firm is not
required to conduct detailed reviews of each transaction if a
Participant Firm is using a reasonably designed risk-based review
system that provides a Participant Firm with sufficient information
that permits the Participant Firm to focus on the areas that pose the
greatest numbers and risks of violation.
Proposed Supplementary Material .06 to Rule 11.3110 would provide
that, by employing risk-based principles, a Participant Firm would need
to decide the extent to which additional policies and procedures for
the review of:
Incoming and outgoing written (including electronic)
correspondence that fall outside of the subject matters listed in
proposed Rule 11.3110(b)(4) are necessary for its business and
structure. If a Participant Firm's procedures do not require that all
correspondence be reviewed before use or distribution, the procedures
would need to provide for:
[cir] The education and training of associated persons regarding
the firm's procedures governing correspondence;
[[Page 46197]]
[cir] The documentation of such education and training; and
[cir] Surveillance and follow-up to ensure that such procedures are
implemented and followed.
Internal communications that are not of a subject matter
that require review under Exchange rules and federal securities laws
are necessary for its business and structure.
Proposed Supplementary Material .07 to Rule 11.3110 would provide
that the evidence of review required in proposed Rule 11.3110(b)(4)
would need to be chronicled either electronically or on paper and
clearly identify the reviewer, the internal communication or
correspondence that was reviewed, the date of review, and the actions
taken by the Participant Firm as a result of any significant regulatory
issues identified during the review. Merely opening a communication
would not be sufficient review.
Proposed Supplementary Material .08 to Rule 11.3110 would provide
that, in the course of the supervision and review of correspondence and
internal communications required by proposed Rule 11.3110(b)(4), a
supervisor/principal may delegate certain functions to persons who need
not be registered. However, the supervisor/principal remains ultimately
responsible for the performance of all necessary supervisory reviews,
irrespective of whether he or she delegates functions related to the
review. Accordingly, supervisors/principals would need to take
reasonable and appropriate action to ensure delegated functions are
properly executed and should evidence performance of their procedures
sufficiently to demonstrate overall supervisory control.
Proposed Supplementary Material .09 to Rule 11.3110 would provide
that each Participant Firm would need to retain the internal
communications and correspondence of associated persons relating to the
Participant Firm's investment banking or securities business for the
period of time and accessibility specified in SEA Rule 17a-4(b). The
names of the persons who prepared outgoing correspondence and who
reviewed the correspondence would need to be ascertainable from the
retained records, and the retained records would need to be readily
available to the Exchange, upon request.
Proposed Supplementary Material .10 to Rule 11.3110 would provide
that a Participant Firm's determination that it is not possible to
comply with proposed Rules 3110(b)(6)(C)(i) or (b)(6)(C)(ii)
prohibiting supervisory personnel from supervising their own activities
and from reporting to, or otherwise having compensation or continued
employment determined by, a person or persons they are supervising
generally will arise in instances where:
The Participant Firm is a sole proprietor in a single-
person firm;
A registered person is the Participant Firm's most senior
executive officer (or similar position); or
A registered person is one of several of the Participant
Firm's most senior executive officers (or similar positions).
Proposed Supplementary Material .11 to Rule 11.3110 would provide
that a Participant Firm may use electronic media to satisfy its
obligation to communicate its written supervisory procedures, and any
amendment thereto, pursuant to proposed Rule 11.3110(b)(7), provided
that:
The written supervisory procedures have been promptly
communicated to, and are readily accessible by, all associated persons
to whom such supervisory procedures apply based on their activities and
responsibilities through, for example, the Participant Firm's intranet
system;
All amendments to the written supervisory procedures are
promptly
posted to the Participant Firm's electronic media;
Associated persons are notified that amendments relevant
to their activities and responsibilities have been made to the written
supervisory procedures;
The Participant Firm has reasonable procedures to monitor
and maintain the security of the material posted to ensure that it
cannot be altered by unauthorized persons; and
The Participant Firm retains current and prior versions of
its written supervisory procedures in compliance with the applicable
record retention requirements of SEA Rule 17a-4(e)(7).
Proposed Supplementary Material .12 to Rule 11.3110 would provide
that, in fulfilling its obligations under proposed Rule 11.3110(c),
each Participant Firm would need to conduct a review, at least
annually, of the businesses in which it engages. The review would need
to be reasonably designed to assist in detecting and preventing
violations of and achieving compliance with applicable securities laws
and regulations and with Exchange rules. Each Participant Firm would
need to establish and maintain supervisory procedures that take into
consideration, among other things, the firm's size, organizational
structure, scope of business activities, number and location of the
firm's offices, the nature and complexity of the products and services
offered by the firm, the volume of business done, the number of
associated persons assigned to a location, the disciplinary history of
registered representatives or associated persons, and any indicators of
irregularities or misconduct (i.e., ``red flags''), etc. The procedures
established and reviews conducted would need to provide that the
quality of supervision at remote locations is sufficient to ensure
compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations and with
Exchange rules. A Participant Firm would need to be especially diligent
in establishing procedures and conducting reasonable reviews with
respect to a non-branch location where a registered representative
engages in securities activities. Based on the factors outlined above,
Participant Firms may need to impose reasonably designed supervisory
procedures for certain locations or may need to provide for more
frequent reviews of certain locations.
Proposed Supplementary Material .13 to Rule 11.3110 would provide
additional guidance to proposed Rule 11.3110(c)(1)(C), which would
require a Participant Firm to inspect on a regular periodic schedule
every non-branch location. In establishing a non-branch location
inspection schedule, there is a general presumption that a non-branch
location will be inspected at least every three years, even in the
absence of any indicators of irregularities or misconduct (i.e., ``red
flags''). If a Participant Firm establishes a longer periodic
inspection schedule, the Participant Firm would need to document in its
written supervisory and inspection procedures the factors used in
determining that a longer periodic inspection cycle is appropriate.
Proposed Supplementary Material .14 to Rule 11.3110 would provide
that a Participant Firm's determination that it is not possible to
comply with proposed Rule 11.3110(c)(3)(B) with respect to who is not
allowed to conduct a location's inspection will generally arise in
instances where:
The Participant Firm has only one office; or
The Participant Firm has a business model where small or
single person offices report directly to an OSJ manager who is also
considered the offices' branch office manager.
Proposed Supplementary Material .15 to Rule 11.3110 would provide
that for purposes of the proposed rule, the term ``associated person''
and ``person associated with a Participant Firm'' would have the same
meaning as the terms ``person associated with a member'' or
``associated person of a
[[Page 46198]]
member'' as defined in Article I (rr) of the FINRA By-Laws.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Article I (rr) of FINRA's By-Laws provides that ``person
associated with a member'' or ``associated person of a member''
means: (1) a natural person who is registered or has applied for
registration under FINRA's rules; (2) a sole proprietor, partner,
officer, director, or branch manager of a member, or other natural
person occupying a similar status or performing similar functions,
or a natural person engaged in the investment banking or securities
business who is directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by
a member, whether or not any such person is registered or exempt
from registration with the FINRA under its By-Laws or rules; and (3)
for purposes of FINRA Rule 8210, any other person listed in Schedule
A of Form BD of a member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, proposed Supplementary Material .16 to Rule 11.3110 would
provide that individuals in charge of a group of employees shall
reasonably discharge their duties and obligations with respect to
supervision and control of those employees related to the business of
their employer and compliance with securities laws and regulations and
Exchange rules.
Proposed Rule 11.3120 (Supervisory Control System)
Proposed Rule 11.3120(a), which is based on NYSE American Rule
3120(a)--Equities, would provide that each Participant Firm would need
to designate and specifically identify to the Exchange one or more
principals who would need to establish, maintain, and enforce a system
of supervisory control policies and procedures that:
Test and verify that the Participant Firm's supervisory
procedures are reasonably designed with respect to the activities of
the Participant Firm and its associated persons, to achieve compliance
with applicable securities laws and regulations, and with applicable
Exchange rules; and
Create additional or amend supervisory procedures where
the need is identified by such testing and verification.
The designated principal or principals would be required to submit
to the Participant Firm's senior management no less than annually, a
report detailing each Participant Firm's system of supervisory
controls, the summary of the test results and significant identified
exceptions, and any additional or amended supervisory procedures
created in response to the test results.
Proposed Rule 11.3120(b) would provide that each report provided to
senior management pursuant to proposed Rule 11.3120(a) in the calendar
year following a calendar year in which a Participant Firm reported
$200 million or more in gross revenue would need to include, to the
extent applicable to the Participant Firm's business:
A tabulation of the reports pertaining to customer
complaints and internal investigations made to the Exchange during the
preceding year; and
Discussion of the preceding year's compliance efforts,
including procedures and educational programs, in each of the following
areas:
[cir] Trading and market activities;
[cir] Investment banking activities;
[cir] Antifraud and sales practices;
[cir] Finance and operations;
[cir] Supervision; and
[cir] Anti-money laundering.
The proposed rule change seeks to mitigate compliance costs and
burdens with respect to proposed Rule 11.3120's annual reporting
requirements by requiring that only Participant Firms reporting $200
million or more in gross revenues in the preceding year include in
their annual reports supplemental information. The Exchange also
believes that the proposed threshold strikes the appropriate balance as
it encompasses larger Participant Firms, Participant Firms engaged in
significant underwriting activities and substantial trading activities
or market making business, and Participant Firms with extensive sales
platforms.
Proposed Rule 11.3120(c) would provide that, for purposes of
proposed Rule 11.3120(b), ``gross revenue'' is defined as:
Total revenue as reported on FOCUS Form Part II or IIA
(line item 4030) less commodities revenue (line item 3990), if
applicable; or
Total revenue as reported on FOCUS Form Part II CSE (line
item 4030) less, if applicable,
[cir] Commissions on commodity transactions (line item 3991); and
[cir] Commodities gains or losses (line items 3924 and 3904).
Proposed Supplementary Material .01 to Rule 11.3120 would provide
that for purposes of the proposed rule, the term ``associated person''
and ``person associated with a Participant Firm'' would have the same
meaning as the terms ``person associated with a member'' or
``associated person of a member'' as defined in Article I (rr) of the
FINRA By-Laws.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See note 10, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange proposes conforming changes to Rule 10.9217
to replace references to Article 6, Rule 5(a) & (b) with proposed Rule
11.20 and Rule 11.3110(a) as well as references to Article 6, Rule 5(c)
with Rule 11.3110(b)(1).
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Act,\12\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5),\13\ in particular, because it is designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade and to remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system.
Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change
supports the objectives of the Act by providing greater harmonization
between Exchange rules and the rules of its affiliates and FINRA of
similar purpose, resulting in less burdensome and more efficient
regulatory compliance. In particular, Exchange Participant Firms that
are also FINRA members are already subject to Exchange supervisory
rules and FINRA Rules 3110 and 3120, and harmonizing these rules by
adopting proposed Rules 11.3110 and 11.3120 would promote just and
equitable principles of trade by requiring a single standard for
supervision. To the extent the Exchange has proposed changes that
differ from the NYSE American version of the Exchange rules, such
changes are generally technical in nature and do not change the
substance of the proposed rules. The Exchange also believes that the
proposed rule change will update and add specificity to the
requirements governing supervision, which will promote just and
equitable principles of trade and help to protect investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is
not intended to address competitive issues but rather to achieve
greater consistency between the Exchange's rules and the rules of its
affiliate and FINRA concerning supervision.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \14\ and Rule
[[Page 46199]]
19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\15\ Because the proposed rule change does not:
(i) significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative prior to 30 days from the date on which it was filed,
or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, if consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest, the proposed
rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \16\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\17\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \18\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-NYSECHX-2024-18 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSECHX-2024-18. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSECHX-2024-18 and
should be submitted on or before June 18, 2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-11576 Filed 5-24-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P