Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Pursuant to IEX Rule 15.110 To Amend IEX's Fee Schedule To Adopt a Physical Connectivity Fee and Increase Certain Port Fees, 42528-42543 [2024-10588]
Download as PDF
42528
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.20
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
Commission shall either approve or
disapprove, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove, the
proposed rule change (File No. SR–ISE–
2024–12).
[FR Doc. 2024–10598 Filed 5–14–24; 8:45 am]
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.6
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[FR Doc. 2024–10589 Filed 5–14–24; 8:45 am]
[Release No. 34–100086; File No. SR–ISE–
2024–12]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
ISE, LLC; Notice of Designation of
Longer Period for Commission Action
on a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt
Rules To List and Trade FLEX Options
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
May 9, 2024.
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Pursuant to
IEX Rule 15.110 To Amend IEX’s Fee
Schedule To Adopt a Physical
Connectivity Fee and Increase Certain
Port Fees
On March 11, 2024, Nasdaq ISE, LLC
(‘‘ISE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
adopt rules that will govern the listing
and trading of flexible exchange options
(‘‘FLEX Options’’). The proposed rule
change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on March 29,
2024.3
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 4 provides
that, within 45 days of the publication
of notice of the filing of a proposed rule
change, or within such longer period up
to 90 days as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding, or as to which the
self-regulatory organization consents,
the Commission shall either approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule change should be
disapproved. The 45th day after
publication of the notice for this
proposed rule change is May 13, 2024.
The Commission is extending this 45day time period.
The Commission finds that it is
appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to take action on the
proposed rule change so that it has
sufficient time to consider the proposed
rule change. Accordingly, the
Commission, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act,5 designates June 27,
2024, as the date by which the
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99825
(March 21, 2024), 89 FR 22294.
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
5 Id.
[Release No. 34–100085); File No. SR–IEX–
2024–08]
May 9, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’
or ‘‘Exchange Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,3 notice is hereby given that,
on May 2, 2024, the Investors Exchange
LLC (‘‘IEX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Pursuant to the provisions of Section
19(b)(1) under the Act,4 and Rule 19b–
4 thereunder,5 the Exchange is filing
with the Commission a proposed rule
change to modify its Fee Schedule,
pursuant to IEX Rules 15.110(a) and (c),
to amend certain connectivity fees. IEX
will implement the proposed fees
beginning on June 1, 2024.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available at the Exchange’s website at
www.iextrading.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
20 17
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:12 May 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
6 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(31).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
5 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of
and basis for the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
IEX is proposing to modify its Fee
Schedule, pursuant to IEX Rules
15.110(a) and (c), to add a new fee for
physical connections to its Primary Data
Center,6 Disaster Recovery Data Center 7
and the IEX Testing Facility (‘‘ITF’’)
(‘‘physical connectivity fees’’),8 and
increase fees for logical order entry
ports (also referred to as ‘‘Order Entry
Ports’’) 9 in excess of five per subscriber
(‘‘port fees’’). IEX has not previously
imposed any physical connectivity fees
but has charged port fees since October
1, 2019.10 The Exchange has not
changed the port fees since they were
implemented, but since that time, the
Exchange has experienced increases in
related operational expenses including
significant upgrades to its trading
platform infrastructure. As discussed
more fully below, the Exchange recently
calculated its aggregate annual costs of
$12,904,100 for providing physical
6 All connections to the IEX Primary Data Center
(including for order entry and market data receipt)
are made through IEX’s point-of-presence (‘‘IEX
POP’’) in Secaucus, NJ. From the IEX POP,
messages travel to IEX’s Primary Data Center.
7 The Disaster Recovery Data Center, also known
as the ‘‘Secondary Data Center’’, is the physical
location of IEX’s backup trading platform. It is
located in Chicago, Illinois.
8 The only connections offered to the Primary
Data Center are 10 gigabit (‘‘10G’’) physical port
connections. The Exchange offers both 10G and 1
gigabit (‘‘1G’’) physical port connections to the ITF,
for which it incurs physical connectivity-related
costs; however, as discussed below, the Exchange
is not proposing to charge for the connections to the
ITF itself.
9 Order Entry Ports are used for sending and
receiving order messages. Other uses for logical
ports, which are not subject to the fees proposed
herein, include drop copy ports and market data
ports.
10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86626
(August 9, 2019), 84 FR 41793 (August 15, 2019)
(SR–IEX–2019–07) (‘‘Port Fee Filing’’).
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
connectivity and $5,924,000 for
providing Order Entry Ports.
Increased operational costs include
costs related to monitoring and analysis
of data and performance of the network
connections with nanosecond
granularity and continuous
improvements in network performance.
The costs associated with maintaining
and enhancing a state-of-the-art network
impacts the overall operational costs of
the Exchange. The Exchange believes
that it is appropriate to offset a portion
of those increased costs by adding fees
for physical connectivity and increasing
fees for Order Entry Ports. Maintaining
and enhancing the performance of the
Exchange’s systems is necessary to
compete with other market venues and
meet Users’ 11 expectations when
trading on the Exchange, as well as to
assist the Exchange in complying with
its Regulation SCI compliance
obligations to have levels of capacity,
integrity, resiliency, availability and
security adequate to maintain IEX’s
operational capability and promote the
maintenance of fair and orderly
markets,12 and to support a robust
trading environment for Users.13 In
addition, the Exchange is in the process
of implementing significant upgrades to
its trading system to enhance scalability,
network performance and connectivity,
thereby enhancing the User experience.
The associated costs are substantial,
including costs to purchase new
connectivity infrastructure equipment
as well as other ongoing expenses. The
Exchange believes it is necessary and
appropriate to offset a portion of these
costs with fees for physical connectivity
and increased fees for Order Entry Ports.
Accordingly, the Exchange now
proposes to amend the Fee Schedule to
begin charging fees for physical
connectivity and increase existing fees
for Order Entry Ports in excess of five
per subscriber, in order to offset a
portion of these increased related costs
and expenses, with a limited potential
return in excess of such costs if actuals
differ from projections, as set forth
below in the Exchange’s cost analysis.
As described below, IEX proposes to
charge $4,000 for each physical port
connection to its Primary Data Center,
which fee would also include one (1)
10G connection to its Disaster Recovery
Center and one (1) 10G or 1G
11 See
IEX Rule 1.160(qq).
CFR 242.1001(a)(1)).
13 Reg SCI Rule 1001(a) requires that IEX
establish, maintain, and enforce written policies
and procedures reasonably designed to ensure
(among other things) that its Reg SCI systems have
levels of capacity adequate to maintain IEX’s
operational capability and promote the
maintenance of fair and orderly markets.
12 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:12 May 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
connection to its ITF; and to increase
the fees it charges for Order Entry Ports
in excess of five per subscriber from
$100 to $250 per month. IEX is
proposing to continue to provide Order
Entry Ports at the Disaster Recovery
Data Center and ITF, as well as drop
copy ports and market data ports, free
of charge. In each case, as detailed
below, the proposed fees are less than
comparable connectivity services
offered by other equities exchanges, and
significantly less than comparable fees
charged by legacy exchanges.14 The
Exchange proposes to implement the
changes to the Fee Schedule pursuant to
this proposal on June 1, 2024.
As described in previous filings,15 in
setting its prices for market data and
connectivity products, IEX has
established a general framework
(‘‘Framework’’) that is based on a high
level of transparency with regard to its
costs of providing these services and
which is designed to set prices at levels
that are reasonably related to those
costs.16 As relevant to this filing, the
Framework includes the following
elements:
• Prices are determined based on a
comprehensive and transparently
applied methodology for allocating costs
to different exchange products.
• Based on this methodology, specific
exchange costs are reasonably allocated
to the products and services for which
the exchange seeks to charge, including
technology and staff directly related to
the products and services being charged
for. In this way, IEX prevents ‘‘doublecounting’’ of costs across more than one
set of product classes (e.g., market data,
physical connectivity, and logical
connectivity).
14 See infra note 53 for a discussion of legacy and
non-legacy exchanges.
15 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94630
(April 7, 2022), 87 FR 21945 (April 13, 2022) (SR–
IEX–2022–22) (‘‘IEX Market Data Fee Filing’’); see
also Port Fee Filing, supra note 10.
16 Since the IEX Market Data Fee Filing, which
applied this Framework to provide a high level of
transparency of relevant costs, other exchanges
have adopted similar fees based on their own
detailed cost analyses. IEX believes that the
information provided in this filing meets or exceeds
the level of detail and analysis contained in those
filings. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
98584 (September 28, 2023), 88 FR 68736 (October
4, 2023) (SR–PEARL–2023–51) (‘‘MIAX
Connectivity Fee Filing’’) (increasing physical and
logical connectivity fees for MIAX Pearl equities
members and non-members from $1,000/month to
$2,500/month for 1G connections; from $3,500/
month to $8,000/month for 10G connections; and
from $0 for ports in excess of five but less than 25
per User, and from $300-$450/month for ports in
excess of 25 per User to $450/month); see also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. No. 95936
(September 27, 2022), 87 FR 59845 (October 3,
2022) (SR–MEMX–2022–26) (‘‘MEMX Connectivity
Fees Filing’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42529
• Cost allocation takes account of
recent or planned enhancements to
exchange operations.
• IEX strives to maintain a relatively
flat, simple fee structure that avoids
disproportionate or discriminatory
impacts on any group of members or
market participants.
The physical connectivity and port
fees proposed in this filing have been
developed consistent with this
Framework. In particular, as described
more fully below, in this rule filing IEX
provides a cost analysis that includes,
among other things, descriptions of how
the Exchange allocated costs between
the Exchange’s various cost drivers to
ensure no cost was double counted, as
well as additional detail supporting its
cost allocation processes.
IEX is in the process of implementing
significant upgrades to its technological
infrastructure. These upgrades, which
include substantial enhancements to the
speed and efficiency with which the
Exchange can handle message traffic, as
well as enhancements to the various
matching engines, are thereby projected
to provide noticeable performance
improvements to Users. Additionally,
these enhancements are designed to
allow for greater scalability of the
Exchange’s System 17 as overall message
traffic in the securities markets
increases, and IEX seeks to capture a
greater percentage of equity trading
volume.
Consistent with the Framework, in
proposing to charge physical
connectivity and port fees, IEX assessed
those fees in relation to its own
aggregate costs of providing the services,
as well as the impact on Members 18 (as
well as other Users and subscribers)—
both generally and in relation to other
Members, i.e., so that the fees will not
create a financial burden on any
participant or an undue impact in
particular on smaller Members and
competition among Members in general.
IEX believes that its approach is
consistent with the requirements of
Section 19(b)(1) under the Act,19 and
Rule 19b–4 thereunder,20 and Section
6(b) of the Act,21 which requires, among
other things, that exchange fees be
reasonable and equitably allocated,22
not designed to permit unfair
discrimination,23 and that they not
impose a burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
17 See
IEX Rule 1.160(nn).
IEX Rule 1.160(s).
19 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
20 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
21 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
22 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
23 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
18 See
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
42530
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Notices
of the purposes of the Act.24 This rule
change proposal addresses those
requirements, and the analysis and data
in each of the sections that follow are
designed to clearly and
comprehensively show how they are
met.25
In determining the appropriate fees to
charge, IEX considered its costs of
providing physical and logical
connectivity, using a methodology that
is designed to allocate those costs that
are related to the establishment,
maintenance, support, and
enhancements to its connectivity
products. Based on this allocation, IEX
has set the proposed fees at levels that
are designed to offset a portion of its
costs, with a limited potential return in
excess of such costs if actuals differ
from projections. Because of the
uncertainty of forecasting subscribers’
decision-making with respect to their
IEX physical connections and Order
Entry Ports it is not possible to make a
definitive projection of the revenues
that will be received.
*
*
*
*
*
Connectivity Fee Changes
IEX offers the ability to physically
connect to the Exchange via the IEX
POP 26 to its Members, Data
Recipients 27, Service Bureaus 28, and
Extranet Providers 29 (collectively,
‘‘Connectivity Subscribers’’).30 In order
to cover a portion of the aggregate costs
of providing physical connectivity to its
Connectivity Subscribers, the Exchange
proposes to modify its Fee Schedule as
described above and detailed below. IEX
notes that it currently does not charge
any fees for physical connectivity, and
24 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
2019, the Commission staff published
guidance suggesting the types of information that
self-regulatory organizations (‘‘SROs’’) may use to
demonstrate that their fee filings comply with the
standards of the Exchange Act (‘‘Staff Guidance’’).
While IEX understands that the Staff Guidance does
not create new legal obligations on SROs, IEX has
consistently applied the Staff Guidance to provide
the type and level of transparency in demonstrating
compliance when seeking to modify fees. See Staff
Guidance on SRO Rule Filings Relating to Fees
(May 21, 2019) available at https://www.sec.gov/tm/
staff-guidance-sro-rule-filings-fees.
26 Physical connectivity is provided via network
switch and cabling infrastructure that allows a
subscriber to access a logical port for send and
receive order messages, as well receive market data
messages.
27 See IEX Rule 11.130(c).
28 See IEX Rule 11.130(d).
29 See IEX Rule 11.130(e).
30 Service Bureaus offer technology-based
services to Members for a fee, including physical
connectivity and Order Entry Ports. Extranet
Providers offer physical connectivity services to
Members and Data Recipients.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
25 In
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:12 May 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
therefore the full cost of providing such
connectivity is borne by IEX.
The number of physical connections
to IEX’s Primary Data Center (via the
IEX POP) assigned to each Connectivity
Subscriber as of February 29, 2024,
ranged from one (1) to 14, as determined
by the Connectivity Subscriber based on
the scope and scale of its trading
activity on the Exchange (or other IEX
activity, in the case Data Recipients,
Service Bureaus, and Extranet
Providers), including its determination
of the need for redundant
connectivity.31 Approximately 67% of
IEX’s Members do not maintain a direct
physical connection to the Exchange’s
Primary Data Center (though many such
Members have physical connectivity
through a Service Bureau or Extranet
Provider) and another 22% have either
one (1) or two (2) physical connections
to the Exchange in the Primary Data
Center. Presently, only 10% of
Members, maintain three or more
physical connections to the Exchange to
the Primary Data Center.
The Exchange currently does not
charge any fees to connect to its Primary
Data Center, its Disaster Recovery Data
Center, or the ITF. In order to offset a
portion of the costs of providing this
physical connectivity, plus a limited
potential return in excess of such costs
if actuals differ from projections, the
Exchange proposes to charge $4,000 per
month for each physical connection to
its Primary Data Center (all of which are
10G connections), which fee would also
include an option for one (1) 10G
connection to its Disaster Recovery
Center and one (1) 10G or 1G
connection to its ITF. This integrated
approach is designed to simplify the fee
structure and encourage physical
connectivity to the Disaster Recovery
Data Center and testing at the ITF. As
proposed, and discussed more fully
below, IEX fees are significantly lower
than comparable physical connectivity
fees of other equity exchanges.
Order Entry Ports Fee Changes
Similar to other exchanges, IEX offers
Order Entry Ports, also known as
‘‘sessions’’, for order entry and receipt
of trade execution reports and order
messages.32 Members can also choose to
31 21 Connectivity Subscribers maintain one (1) or
two (2) physical connections at IEX’s Disaster
Recovery Center, and 20 Connectivity Subscribers
maintain one (1) or two (2) physical connections to
the ITF.
32 Logical connectivity for order entry is provided
via network switch and cabling infrastructure that
delivers order and execution messages, as well as
server infrastructure that runs software processes
responsible for validating and formatting such
messages for either internal or external
consumption.
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
connect to IEX indirectly through a
session maintained by a third-party
Service Bureau. Service Bureau sessions
may provide access to one or multiple
Members on a single session.33 The
number of sessions assigned to each
Port Subscriber as of February 29, 2024
ranges from one to 279, depending on
the scope and scale of the User’s trading
activity on IEX (either through a direct
connection or through a Service Bureau)
as determined by the User. For example,
by using multiple sessions, Members
can segregate order flow from different
internal desks, business lines, or
customers. IEX does not impose any
minimum or maximum requirements for
how many Order Entry Ports a Port
Subscriber can maintain, and it is not
proposing to impose any minimum or
maximum requirements.
IEX currently charges Port Subscribers
$100 per port on a monthly basis for
each Order Entry Port at the Primary
Data Center in excess of five per Port
Subscriber. In order to offset a portion
of its costs with a limited potential
return in excess of such costs if actuals
differ from projections, the Exchange
proposes to increase the fees it charges
for each such port in excess of five per
Port Subscriber from $100 per month to
$250 per month.34 These proposed fees
would continue not to apply to logical
ports used for other purposes, such as
receiving market data or drop copies,35
nor would such ports count toward the
five free Order Entry Ports calculation.
Furthermore, IEX would continue not to
charge any fee for logical ports used to
connect to IEX’s Disaster Recovery Data
Center or ITF, nor would such ports
count toward the five free Order Entry
Ports calculation.36
Conforming Changes to Fee Schedule
• To reflect the fee changes described
above, IEX proposes to update the
Connectivity Fees section of the IEX Fee
Schedule as follows: In the first row of
33 Members and Service Bureaus are collectively
referred to herein as ‘‘Port Subscribers.’’
34 As described in the Statutory Basis section,
infra, these fees are significantly lower than fees
charged by IEX’s competitors for their sessions.
35 Confirmations of orders and execution reports
are transmitted by the Exchange over the Order
Entry Port that was used to enter the order. A ‘‘drop
copy’’ contains redundant information that a
Member chooses to have ‘‘dropped’’ to another
destination (e.g., to allow the Member’s back office
and/or compliance department, or another
Member—typically the Member’s clearing broker—
to have immediate access to the information for risk
management and other purposes). Drop copies can
only be sent via a drop copy port. Drop copy ports
cannot be used to enter orders.
36 IEX expects to incur costs of $5,924,000 in 2024
to offer Order Entry Ports. At the current fee level,
IEX would expect to generate fee revenue of
$1,389,500 resulting in negative income of
$4,534,500.
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Notices
the Connectivity Fees table, after the
words ‘‘10G Physical Port’’, add the
words ‘‘Connection to Primary Data
Center’’ to reflect that the $4,000 per
port monthly 10G fee applies to those
connections. Additionally, IEX proposes
to remove from this row the current
footnote 1, which currently reads: ‘‘10G
physical ports are available to connect
to IEX’s production systems (i.e., the
IEX POP and Disaster Recovery Data
Centers) and the IEX Test Facility
(‘‘ITF’’).’’ IEX is proposing to remove
this footnote as the information
contained therein is being added to
other sections of the Connectivity Fees
table.
• Add a new footnote 1 to the first
row of the table, after the words ‘‘$4,000
per month’’, which states: ‘‘Physical
connectivity fees are billed to and
payable by the Member, Service Bureau,
Data Recipient, or Extranet Provider
maintaining the physical port
connection at the Primary Data Center
based on the number of physical
connections to the Primary Data Center
as of the first of each month.’’
• Add a new second row to the
Connectivity Fees table specifying that a
‘‘10G Physical Port Connection to
Disaster Recovery Data Center’’ is
‘‘Included with 10G Physical Port
Connection at Primary Data Center.’’
• Update the (now) third row of the
Connectivity Fees table so it reads ‘‘1G
or 10G Physical Port Connection to IEX
Test Facility (‘‘ITF’’)’’ are ‘‘Included
with 10G Physical Port Connection at
Primary Data Center.’’ Update footnote 2
to add the words ‘‘and Service Bureaus’’
after the word ‘‘Members’’, in order to
reflect that both Members and Service
Bureaus may have physical connections
to the ITF.
• Update the (now) fourth row of the
Connectivity Fees table so it reads
‘‘Logical Port (except for Primary Data
Center Order Entry Port)’’ are free, to
reflect that some Order Entry Ports, in
particular at the ITF and the Disaster
Recovery Data Center, will continue to
be offered free of charge, and that all
other logical ports (e.g., drop copy ports)
will continue to be offered free of
charge.
• Update the (now) fifth row of the
Connectivity Fees table so it reads
‘‘Primary Data Center Order Entry Port’’
to specify that IEX will only be charging
for Order Entry Ports (above 5 per Port
Subscriber) at the Primary Data Center.
No changes are proposed for footnote 3.
• Update footnote 4 to add the words
‘‘Primary Data Center’’ before the words
‘‘Logical Order Entry Ports,’’ and delete
the second sentence of the footnote,
because the effective date of these
proposed fee changes will be the same
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:12 May 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
42531
date as the effective date of the fee
schedule.
excessive pricing or supra-competitive
profit.
As discussed in the Purpose section
Implementation
and
in IEX’s Port and Market Data Fee
Although fee filings are immediately
Filings,42 IEX believes that exchanges,
effective upon filing, IEX plans to
in setting fees of all types, should meet
implement these fee changes on June 1,
2024, in order to provide ample advance high standards of transparency to
demonstrate why each new fee or fee
notice and allow impacted market
amendment meets the requirements of
participants time to prepare for the
the Act that fees be reasonable,
change. As proposed, monthly physical
connectivity fees will be assessed based equitably allocated, not unfairly
discriminatory, and not create an undue
on the number of 10G physical port
burden on competition among market
connections maintained by a Member,
participants. The Exchange believes this
Service Bureau, Data Recipient, or
Extranet Provider as of the first of each
high standard is especially important
month. Similarly, monthly logical
when an exchange imposes various fees
connectivity fees will be assessed based for market participants to access an
on the number of Primary Data Center
exchange’s marketplace.
Order Entry Ports assigned to each
In the Staff Guidance, the
Member or Service Bureau as of the first
Commission Staff stated that, ‘‘[a]s an
of each month.
initial step in assessing the
2. Statutory Basis
reasonableness of a fee, staff considers
whether the fee is constrained by
IEX believes that the proposed fees
significant competitive forces.’’ 43 IEX
are consistent with the provisions of
37
believes
that as a general matter,
Section 6(b) of the Act in general and
physical and logical connectivity fees
further the objectives of Section
6(b)(4) 38 of the Act, in particular, in that cannot be sufficiently justified based on
they are designed to provide for the
unproven assumptions about
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
competition, notwithstanding that a
fees and other charges among its
newer and/or smaller securities
Members and other persons using its
exchange, such as IEX, may be less able
facilities. The Exchange also believes
to set prices for its physical and logical
that the proposed fee changes promote
connectivity free of constraint by
just and equitable principles of trade
significant competitive forces than may
and will not be unfairly discriminatory, be the case for more established
consistent with the objectives of Section securities exchanges.
6(b)(5) 39 of the Act.
The Staff Guidance further stated that,
The Exchange believes that the
‘‘. . . even where an SRO cannot
information provided herein to justify
demonstrate, or does not assert, that
the proposed fees meets or exceeds the
significant competitive forces constrain
amount of detail required in respect of
the fee at issue, a cost-based discussion
proposed fee changes under the Act, as
well as the amount of detail required by may be an alternative basis upon which
to show consistency with the Exchange
the Commission in its review of similar
Act.’’ 44 Thus, similar to fee proposals
fee filings by other exchanges 40 and is
also consistent with Staff Guidance 41 on submitted by other exchanges,45 IEX has
such filings. Accordingly, the Exchange not determined its proposed physical
and logical connectivity fees based on
believes that the proposed fees are
consistent with the Act because they: (i) assumptions about market competition,
are reasonable, equitably allocated, not
instead relying upon a cost-based model
unfairly discriminatory, do not create an to determine a reasonable fee structure
undue burden on competition; (ii) are
that is informed by the extent to which
consistent with prior Commission
demand for each product drives IEX’s
action on other exchanges’ fee filings
overall costs. In this context, IEX
and the Staff Guidance; and (iii) are
believes the proposed fees overall are
supported by evidence (including the
fair and reasonable as a form of cost
revenue and cost data and analysis
recovery because they are designed to
detailed below) that they are fair and
offset a portion of IEX’s costs with a
reasonable and will not result in
limited possibility of a reasonable return
in excess of IEX’s aggregate costs of
37 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
offering physical and logical
38
15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
40 Specifically, the Commission allowed fee
filings by MIAX Pearl and MEMX to remain
effective by not suspending them within 60 days of
filing, see supra note 16.
41 See Staff Guidance, supra note 25.
39 15
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42 See Port Fee Filing, supra 10; IEX Market Data
Fee Filing, supra note 15.
43 See Staff Guidance, supra note 25.
44 See Staff Guidance, supra note 25.
45 See supra note 16.
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
42532
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Notices
connectivity, if actuals differ from
projections.46
Cost Analysis
In general, the Exchange believes that
exchanges, in setting fees of all types,
should meet very high standards of
transparency to demonstrate why each
new fee or fee increase meets the
Exchange Act requirements that fees be
reasonable, equitably allocated, not
unfairly discriminatory, and not create
an undue burden on competition among
members and markets. In particular, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
fees meet the standards of the Exchange
Act based on the relationship of the fees
to related costs and to IEX’s business
objectives, without needing to rely on a
market competition analysis.
In proposing to charge fees for
physical connectivity and increase fees
for Order Entry Ports, the Exchange
assessed those fees in a transparent way
against its own aggregate costs of
providing each service, as well as the
impact on Members and other
Connectivity Subscribers—both
generally and in relation to other
Members and Connectivity Subscribers,
i.e., to reasonably assure the fee will not
create an undue financial burden or
impact on particular participants,
smaller Members or Connectivity
Subscribers, or competition among
Members and other Connectivity
Subscribers in general. The Exchange
believes that this level of transparency
is appropriate as a way of demonstrating
that the fees meet the requirements of
Section 19(b)(1) under the Act,47 and
Rule 19b–4 thereunder,48 with respect
to the types of information exchanges
should provide when filing fee changes,
and Section 6(b) of the Act,49 which
requires, among other things, that
exchange fees be reasonable and
equitably allocated,50 not designed to
permit unfair discrimination,51 and that
they not impose a burden on
competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.52 This rule change
proposal addresses those requirements,
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
46 IEX
has not sought to justify the proposed fees
solely on the basis that fees of the same type are
constrained by competition. To the extent that the
Commission later determines that exchange fees for
market data, technology, or other technology
products in general may be justified on the basis
that they are effectively constrained by market
competition, IEX reserves the right in future filings
to use competition analysis as an independent basis
to show why particular fees meet the requirements
of the Exchange Act.
47 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
48 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
49 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
50 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
51 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
52 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:12 May 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
and the analysis and data in each of the
sections that follow are designed to
clearly and comprehensively show how
they are met.53
As detailed below, the Exchange
recently calculated its aggregate annual
costs for providing physical
connectivity at $12,904,100 (or
approximately $1,075,342 per month for
physical connectivity costs, rounded to
the nearest dollar when dividing the
combined annual cost by 12 months).
The Exchange also recently calculated
its aggregate annual costs for providing
Order Entry Ports at $5,924,000 (or
approximately $493,667 per month for
Order Entry Port costs, rounded to the
nearest dollar when dividing the
combined annual cost by 12 months). In
order to cover a portion of the aggregate
costs of providing physical and logical
connectivity to its Connectivity
Subscribers and Port Subscribers,
respectively, the Exchange proposes to
modify its Fee Schedule as described
above.
In connection with this fee filing, the
Exchange recently conducted a cost
analysis to determine the Exchange’s
costs associated with providing physical
and logical connectivity to the Exchange
(‘‘2024 Cost Analysis’’). This 2024 Cost
Analysis, similar to analyses performed
by MIAX Pearl and MEMX in their
connectivity fee filings 54, included a
comprehensive, wholistic, detailed
analysis of the Exchange’s aggregate
baseline costs, including a
determination and allocation of costs for
core services provided by the
Exchange—trading and routing, market
data, physical connectivity, and logical
ports (which provide order entry,
cancellation and modification
functionality, risk functionality, the
ability to receive drop copies, and other
functionality). The Exchange separately
divided its costs between those costs
necessary to deliver each of these core
services, including infrastructure,
software, human resources, and certain
general and administrative expenses
(‘‘cost drivers’’).55
53 See Staff Guidance, supra note 25. The
Exchange notes that other newer entrants to the
equities exchange marketplace (‘‘non-legacy
exchanges’’) have asserted that the Commission has
historically applied different standards of
transparency and accountability in evaluating
whether their fee filings, as compared to fee filings
by larger incumbent exchanges (‘‘legacy
exchanges’’), satisfied the Act’s requirements. See
e.g., MIAX Connectivity Fee Filing, supra note 16.
54 See supra note 16.
55 IEX previously conducted cost analyses in 2019
in connection with charging for Order Entry Ports
and in 2021 in connection with charging for market
data. The 2024 Cost Analysis is a more
comprehensive analysis that incorporates all
expenses related to providing core Exchange
services and is also consistent with the cost
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The 2024 Cost Analysis specifies how
hardware, software, vendor, and human
resources costs were allocated for
trading and routing, market data,
physical connectivity, and logical ports,
and identified an annual dollar cost for
each line item in each category.56 The
Exchange adopted an allocation
methodology with transparent and
consistently applied principles to guide
how much of a particular cost amount
should be allocated to each core service.
As set forth below, the cost allocation
process is then applied to each of the
cost drivers. For instance, fixed
infrastructure costs that are not driven
by client activity (e.g., message rates),
such as data center costs, were allocated
more heavily to the provision of
physical connectivity (54% of fixed
infrastructure costs were allocated to
physical connectivity, with smaller
allocations to Order Entry Ports (6%),
and the remainder to the provision of
other connectivity, other ports,
transaction execution, and market data
services (40%). After adopting this
allocation methodology, the Exchange
then applied an allocation of each cost
driver to each core service, resulting in
the cost allocations described below.
By allocating segmented costs to each
core service, the Exchange estimates by
core service the potential positive or
negative margins it might earn based on
different fee models. As a non-listing
venue, the Exchange has only several
potential sources of revenue that it can
use to fund its operations: transaction
fees, fees for physical connectivity and
port services, membership fees,
regulatory fees, and market data fees.
The Exchange does not charge
membership or regulatory fees.
Moreover, as a general matter, each of
these sources of revenue is based on
services that are interrelated. For
instance, trading and routing obviously
necessitates that Users have physical
and logical connectivity to send orders
to IEX. Given this interrelationship, the
allocation of costs to each service and
the relative weighting of such costs
depends on the exercise of reasonable
judgment by the Exchange. While there
is no standardized and generally
accepted methodology for the allocation
of an exchange’s costs across different
products and services, the Exchange’s
methodology is the result of an
extensive review and analysis,
transparently applied, and IEX believes
this methodology provides a more than
analyses described by MIAX Pearl and MEMX in
their filings.
56 All allocation percentages discussed herein,
were rounded up or down to the nearest whole
number.
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
42533
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Notices
ample basis to justify the proposed fees,
particularly in light of the adoption of
similar or much larger fees by other
exchanges 57 with minimal or no cost
analysis. Through the Exchange’s
extensive 2024 Cost Analysis, the
Exchange analyzed each expense
category in the Exchange’s general
expense ledger to determine whether
and how to allocate such expense to the
provision of physical and/or logical
connectivity as appropriate.
Costs Related To Offering Physical
Connectivity to the Primary Data Center,
the Disaster Recovery Data Center and
the ITF
The following charts detail the costs
considered by the Exchange to be
related to offering physical connectivity
to the Primary Data Center, Disaster
Recovery Data Center, and ITF, each via
an unshared network as well as the
percentage of the Exchange’s overall
costs that such costs represent for each
cost driver (e.g., as set forth below, the
Exchange allocated 14% of its overall
Human Resources cost to offering
physical connectivity to the Primary
Data Center, Disaster Recovery Data
Center, and ITF).
PRIMARY DATA CENTER, DISASTER RECOVERY DATA CENTER, AND ITF
Allocated
annual cost a
Cost drivers
Allocated
monthly cost b
% of cost
driver
Human Resources .................................................................................................................
Connectivity (external fees, cabling, switches, etc.) .............................................................
External Market Data .............................................................................................................
Data Center ...........................................................................................................................
Hardware and Software Maintenance and Licenses and Internet Services .........................
Depreciation ...........................................................................................................................
Allocated Shared Expenses ..................................................................................................
$7,475,449
0
0
2,721,667
1,244,888
88,132
1,373,962
$622,954
0
0
226,806
103,741
7,344
114,497
14
0
0
71
37
7
8
Total ................................................................................................................................
12,904,100
1,075,342
15
a
The Annual Cost includes figures rounded to the nearest dollar.
The Monthly Cost was determined by dividing the Annual Cost for each line item by twelve (12) months and rounding up or down to the
nearest dollar.
b
The following are additional details
regarding each of the cost drivers
considered by the Exchange to be
related to offering physical connectivity
to the Primary Data Center, Disaster
Recovery Data Center and the ITF.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Human Resources
The Exchange notes that IEX Group,
Inc. (‘‘IEXG’’) (the parent company of
the Exchange) had 68 employees who
were fully dedicated to Exchange
functions and 59 employees who
performed some functions on behalf of
the Exchange as of February 29, 2024.
Each department leader has direct
knowledge of the time spent by each
employee with respect to the various
tasks necessary to operate the Exchange.
The estimates of Human Resources cost
were therefore determined by consulting
with such department leaders,
determining which employees are
involved in tasks related to providing
physical connectivity, and confirming
that the proposed allocations were
reasonable based on an understanding
of the percentage of their time such
employees devote to such tasks, as well
as to other exchange services. This
process ensures that every employee is
100% allocated, with no double
counting of employee time across
different categories of exchange
57 See
infra notes 71 and 72.
14% average allocation applied to shared
services employees represents an average of the
time that the direct and ancillary employees spend
on physical connectivity. The 14% overall Human
58 The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:12 May 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
services. For shared services employee
costs, the Exchange first allocated a
percentage of the shared services
employees from IEXG to the Exchange.
This allocation was based on an
assessment during the company’s
annual budget process by IEXG’s
management and Finance teams on how
the shared services functions support
the IEXG’s different businesses. This
assessment resulted in 75% of the
shared services employees’ costs being
allocated to the Exchange. For the 2024
Cost Analysis, the Exchange calculated
an average of the direct and ancillary
employees time devoted to physical
connectivity (approximately 14%) and
applied the 14% average to each shared
services department’s employee costs.
This rate was deemed appropriate for
shared services employees as these
functions operate to support the direct
and ancillary functions. Overall,
employee costs, as allocated, were
calculated using a blended rate of
compensation reflecting salary, equity
and bonus compensation, benefits,
payroll taxes, and 401(k) matching
contributions and totaled 14% of
Exchange Human Resources expenses.58
Specifically, the Exchange calculated
an allocation of employee time for
employees whose functions include
providing and maintaining physical
connectivity and performance thereof,
specifically Data Engineering, Network
Engineering, Software Development
Engineer and Test/Quality Assurance,
Software Engineering, System
Reliability Engineering, and Technology
Project Management. The Exchange also
allocated Human Resources costs to the
provision of physical connectivity to a
limited subset of employees with
ancillary functions related to
establishing and maintaining such
physical connectivity, specifically
Business Analytics, Business
Development, Business Operations,
Market Operations, Market Policy,
Product, Quantitative Research and
Regulation. In addition, the Exchange
allocated Human Resources costs to
employees in groups providing shared
services that thereby support physical
connectivity, specifically Marketing,
Office Management, Human Resources,
Finance & Accounting, Information
Security, Legal, Risk, Government
Relations, senior level executives, and
Compliance employees.
For employees that have direct or
ancillary functions related to physical
connectivity, the estimates of Human
Resources cost were determined by
consulting with applicable department
leaders, who determined which
employees are involved in tasks related
Resource allocation represents the total of the
direct, ancillary and shared services employees cost
allocations to physical connectivity. While the
number is coincidentally the same for this
allocation, the overall total represents a different
calculation in that the components attributable to
direct and ancillary employees reflect variations in
individual employee compensation and time spent
on physical connectivity.
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
42534
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
to providing physical connectivity, and
provided reasonable allocations based
on an estimate of the percentage of time
such employees devote to those tasks.
Employees from these departments
perform numerous functions to support
physical connectivity, such as the
installation, re-location, configuration,
and maintenance of connections and the
hardware they access. This hardware
includes servers, routers, switches,
firewalls, and monitoring devices. These
employees also perform software
upgrades, vulnerability assessments,
remediation and patch installs,
equipment configuration and hardening,
as well as performance and capacity
management. Further, these employees
engage in research and development
analysis for equipment and software
supporting physical connectivity and
design, provide regulatory oversight,
and support the development and ongoing maintenance of internally
developed applications as well as data
capture and analysis, and Member and
internal Exchange reports related to
network and system performance. The
above list of employee functions is not
exhaustive of all the functions
performed by Exchange employees to
support physical connectivity, but it
illustrates the breath of functions those
employees perform in support of the
above cost and time allocations.
Last, the Exchange notes that its
Human Resources costs associated with
physical connectivity have increased in
recent years as the Exchange engaged in
a several-years-long initiative to upgrade
its system infrastructure and trading
system, as discussed in the Purpose
section. Thus, employees are allocated
to work on various business initiatives
and enhancements to support the
Exchange’s business, add new
functionality, and expand its product
offerings. These technology changes
directly impact the Exchange’s interface
specifications and matching engine
which, in turn, impacts physical
connectivity by requiring additional
coding, testing, and other updates
necessary to accommodate the above
initiatives.
Connectivity (External Fees, Cabling,
Switches,)
The Exchange did not allocate costs
for physical connectivity to external
markets to receive market data to the
provision of physical connectivity. As
discussed below, a portion of such costs
(as well as market data fees paid to
external markets) were allocated to
logical access as such market data is
necessary for IEX to offer certain
services related to such connectivity,
such as certain risk checks that are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:12 May 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
performed prior to execution, and
checking for other conditions (e.g., limit
order price protection, trading collars,
aggregate and net notional risk checks,
LULD bands).
External Market Data
The Exchange did not allocate
external market data fees to the
provision of physical connectivity. As
discussed below, a portion of such fees
were allocated to logical access, as such
market data is necessary for IEX to offer
certain services related to such
connectivity, such as certain risk checks
that are performed prior to execution,
and checking for other conditions (e.g.,
limit order price protection, trading
collars, aggregate and net notional risk
checks, LULD bands).
Data Center
Data Center costs include the costs the
Exchange incurs to provide physical
connectivity in the third-party data
centers where it maintains its
equipment (such as dedicated space,
security services, cooling and power).
The Exchange does not own the Primary
Data Center or the Disaster Recovery
Data Center, but instead, leases space in
data centers operated by third parties.
The Exchange has allocated a high
percentage of the Data Center costs
(71%) to physical connectivity because
the third-party data centers and the
Exchange’s physical equipment
contained therein is the most direct cost
in providing physical access to the
Exchange. In other words, for the
Exchange to operate in a dedicated
space with connectivity by market
participants to a trading platform, costs
to operate in the data centers are
tangible costs that are directly related to
its ability to offer physical connectivity
to market participants.
Hardware and Software Maintenance
and Licenses and Internet Services
Hardware and Software Licenses and
internet Services includes hardware and
software licenses used to operate and
monitor physical assets necessary to
offer physical connectivity to the
Exchange, such as integrated
development environments, data
visualization applications for building
monitoring and real time analytic
dashboards, knowledge management
services and release management
software. IEX allocated 37% of
Exchange Hardware and Software
Maintenance and Licenses and internet
Services expenses to the provision of
physical connectivity.
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Depreciation
All physical assets, software, and
hardware used to provide physical
connectivity, which also includes assets
used for testing and monitoring of
Exchange infrastructure, were valued at
cost, and depreciated over three years.
In general, the Depreciation costs
overall relate to hardware necessary to
operate the Exchange, some of which
are owned by the Exchange and some of
which are leased by the Exchange to
allow efficient periodic technology
refreshes. The Exchange also included
in the Depreciation cost driver certain
budgeted improvements that the
Exchange intends to capitalize and
depreciate with respect to physical
connectivity in the near-term. As with
the other allocated costs in the
Exchange’s 2024 Cost Analysis, the
Depreciation cost was narrowly tailored
to depreciation related to physical
connectivity. As noted above, the
Exchange allocated 7% of its allocated
depreciation costs to providing physical
connectivity.
Allocated Shared Expenses
Finally, as with other exchange
products and services, a portion of
general shared expenses was allocated
to overall physical connectivity costs
(8% of Exchange Allocated Shared
Expenses). These general shared costs
are integral to exchange operations,
including its ability to provide physical
connectivity. Costs included in general
shared expenses include office space
and office expenses (e.g., occupancy and
overhead expenses), utilities, recruiting
and training, marketing and advertising
costs, professional fees for legal, tax and
accounting services (including external
and internal audit expenses), and
telecommunications. These general
shared expenses are incurred by the
Exchange’s parent company, IEXG, as a
direct result of operating the Exchange.
The Exchange allocated shared services
costs in line with the average allocation
rate for employees in the direct and
ancillary categories (14%), consistent
with the methodology used to allocate
the cost of shared services employees as
described above.59 The Exchange
believes it is reasonable to assign an
allocation of shared expenses to
physical connectivity, consistent with
allocations for shared services
employees, while continuing to ensure
that such allocated expenses are not
double counted when allocated to other
products and services for which the
59 The 14% average allocation applied to
applicable allocated shared expenses is based on
the average of the time that the direct and ancillary
employees spend on physical connectivity.
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
42535
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Notices
Exchange charges fees. Separately, for
other shared expenses related to the
Exchange’s regulatory obligations, such
as fees paid to FINRA pursuant to a
regulatory services agreement between
the Exchange and FINRA, fees paid to
the Depository Trust and Clearing
Corporation, audit fees, and fees paid to
Securities Information Processors, were
allocated differently, less than 1% was
allocated to the provision of physical
connectivity. Thus, the Allocated
Shared Expenses applied to offering
physical connectivity totaled 8%.
Approximate Monthly Cost
After determining the approximate
allocated monthly cost related to
physical connectivity, the total monthly
cost for physical connectivity to the
Primary Data Center, Disaster Recovery
Data Center, and ITF of $1,075,342 was
divided by the number of Primary Data
Center physical connections the
Exchange maintained (because Disaster
Recovery Center and ITF connectivity is
included with each connection to the
Primary Data Center) as of February 29,
2024 (180 connections), to arrive at a
cost of approximately $5,974 per month,
per physical 10G connection.
*
*
*
*
*
Costs Related To Offering Order Entry
Ports
The following chart details the
individual line-item costs considered by
the Exchange to be related to offering
Order Entry Ports as well as the
percentage of the Exchange’s overall
costs such costs represent for such area
(e.g., as set forth below, the Exchange
allocated 8% of its overall Human
Resources cost to offering Order Entry
Ports).60
ORDER ENTRY PORTS
Allocated
annual cost c
Cost drivers
Allocated
monthly cost d
Percent of
cost driver
Human Resources .................................................................................................................
Connectivity (external fees, cabling, switches, etc.) .............................................................
External Market Data .............................................................................................................
Data Center ...........................................................................................................................
Hardware and Software Maintenance and Licenses and Internet Services .........................
Depreciation ...........................................................................................................................
Allocated Shared Expenses ..................................................................................................
$4,227,561
161,051
141,035
122,923
345,906
225,727
699,796
$352,297
13,421
11,753
10,244
28,826
18,811
58,316
8
5
8
3
10
18
4
Total ................................................................................................................................
5,924,000
493,667
7
c The
Annual Cost includes figures rounded to the nearest dollar.
Monthly Cost was determined by dividing the Annual Cost for each line item by twelve (12) months and rounding up or down to the nearest dollar.
d The
The following provides additional
detail regarding each of the cost drivers
considered by the Exchange to be
related to offering Order Entry Ports.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Human Resources
As noted above, IEXG (the parent
company of the Exchange) had 68
employees who are fully dedicated to
Exchange functions and 59 additional
employees who perform some functions
on behalf of the Exchange as of February
29, 2024. As discussed in the section on
physical connectivity, each department
leader has direct knowledge of the time
spent by each employee with respect to
the various tasks necessary to operate
the Exchange. The estimates of Human
Resources cost were therefore
determined by consulting with
applicable department leaders, who
determined which employees are
involved in tasks related to providing
Order Entry Ports, and provided
reasonable allocations based on an
understanding of the percentage of their
time such employees devote to such
60 As described above, IEX is proposing to
continue to not charge fees for the first five Order
Entry Ports at the Primary Data Center assigned to
any Port Subscriber, and to not charge fees for
logical connectivity to the Disaster Recovery Data
Center or ITF.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:12 May 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
tasks. This process ensures that every
employee is 100% allocated, with no
double counting of employee time
across different categories of exchange
services. For shared services employee
costs, the Exchange first allocated a
percentage of the shared services
employees from IEXG to the Exchange.
This allocation was based on an
assessment during the company’s
annual budget process by IEXG’s
management and Finance teams on how
the shared services functions support
IEXG’s different businesses. This
assessment resulted in 75% of the
shared services employee’s costs being
allocated to the Exchange. The
Exchange then allocated these costs to
its core services, including logical ports
in line with the average allocation rate
for employees in the direct and ancillary
categories. For the 2024 Cost Analysis,
the Exchange calculated an average of
the direct and ancillary employees time
devoted to logical connectivity (7%) and
applied the 7% average to each shared
services department’s employee costs.
This rate was deemed appropriate for
shared services employees as these
functions operate to support the direct
and ancillary functions. Overall,
employee costs for employees in the
direct, ancillary and shared services
categories, as allocated, were calculated
using a blended rate of compensation
reflecting salary, equity and bonus
compensation, benefits, payroll taxes,
and 401(k) matching contributions and
totaled 8% of Exchange Human
Resources expenses.61
Specifically, the Exchange calculated
an allocation of employee time for
employees whose functions include
providing and maintaining Order Entry
Ports and performance thereof,
specifically Data Engineering, Network
Engineering, Software Development
Engineer and Test/Quality Assurance,
Software Engineering, System
Reliability Engineering, and Technology
Project Management. The Exchange also
allocated Human Resources costs to the
provision of Order Entry Ports to a
limited subset of employees with
61 The 7% average allocation applied to shared
services employees represents an average of the
time that the direct and ancillary employees spend
on logical Order Entry Ports. The 8% overall
Human Resource allocation represents the total of
the direct, ancillary and shared services employees
cost allocations to logical connectivity. The overall
total represents a different calculation than the
average allocation in that the components
attributable to direct and ancillary employees
reflect variations in individual employee
compensation and time spent on logical
connectivity.
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
42536
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Notices
ancillary functions related to
establishing and maintaining such
connectivity, specifically Business
Analytics, Business Development,
Business Operations, Market
Operations, Market Policy, Product,
Quantitative Research and Regulation.
In addition, the Exchange allocated
Human Resources costs to employees in
groups providing shared services that
thereby support Order Entry Ports,
specifically Marketing, Office
Management, Human Resources,
Finance & Accounting, Information
Security, Legal, Risk, Government
Relations, senior level executives, and
Compliance employees.
For employees that have direct or
ancillary functions related to Order
Entry Ports, the estimates of Human
Resources cost were determined by
consulting with applicable department
leaders, who determined which
employees are involved in tasks related
to providing logical connectivity, and
provided reasonable allocations based
on an estimate of the percentage of time
such employees devote to those tasks.
Employees from these departments
perform numerous functions to support
logical connectivity, such as the
installation, re-location, configuration,
and maintenance of connections and the
hardware they access. This hardware
includes servers, routers, switches,
firewalls, and monitoring devices. These
employees also perform software
upgrades, vulnerability assessments,
remediation and patch installs,
equipment configuration and hardening,
and performance and capacity
management. Further, these employees
engage in research and development
analysis for equipment and software
supporting logical connectivity and
design, provide regulatory oversight,
and support the development and ongoing maintenance of internally
developed applications as well as data
capture and analysis, and Member and
internal Exchange reports related to
network and system performance. The
above list of employee functions is not
exhaustive of all the functions
performed by Exchange employees to
support logical connectivity, but it
illustrates the breath of functions those
employees perform in support of the
above cost and time allocations.
Last, the Exchange notes that its
Human Resources costs associated with
logical connectivity have increased in
recent years as the Exchange engaged in
a several-years-long initiative to upgrade
its system infrastructure and trading
platform, as discussed in the Purpose
section. Thus, employees are allocated
to work on various business initiatives
and enhancements to support the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:12 May 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
Exchange’s business, add new
functionality, and expand its product
offerings. These technology changes
directly impact the Exchange’s interface
specifications and matching engine
which, in turn, impacts logical
connectivity by requiring additional
coding, testing, and other updates
necessary to accommodate the above
initiatives.
Connectivity (External Fees, Cabling,
Switches, etc.)
The Connectivity cost driver includes
external fees paid to connect to other
exchanges, cabling, and switches. The
Connectivity cost driver includes
external fees paid to connect to other
exchanges and third parties, along with
other cable and switch infrastructure
required to operate the Exchange. The
Connectivity cost driver is narrowly
focused on technology used to complete
connections on the Exchange and to
connect to external markets. The
Exchange requires connectivity to
external markets to enable it to receive
market data to run the Exchange’s
matching engine (and make routing
decisions for its affiliated routing
broker, IEX Services, LLC, pursuant to
IEX Rule 2.220) and basic operations
compliant with existing regulations,
primarily Regulation NMS. The
Exchange allocated 5% of such costs (as
well as market data fees paid to external
markets) to logical access as such
market data is necessary for IEX to offer
certain services related to such
connectivity, such as certain risk checks
that are performed prior to execution,
and checking for other conditions (e.g.,
limit order price protection, trading
collars, and aggregate and net notional
risk checks, LULD bands).
External Market Data
External Market Data includes fees
paid to third parties, including other
exchanges, to receive and consume
market data from other markets. The
Exchange includes a portion of External
Market Data fees to the provision of
Order Entry Ports as such market data
is also necessary to offer certain services
related to such connectivity, such as
certain risk checks that are performed
before an order enters the matching
engine (e.g., validating orders against
the national best bid and national best
offer, trading collars, whether a symbol
is halted or subject to a short sale circuit
breaker). Thus, as market data from
other exchanges is consumed at the port
level to validate orders before additional
processing occurs with respect to such
orders, the Exchange believes it is
reasonable to allocate a limited
proportion of such costs to Order Entry
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Ports (8% of Exchange External Market
Data expenses).
Data Center
Data Center costs include the costs the
Exchange incurs to provide logical
connectivity in the third-party data
centers where it maintains its
equipment (such as rent for dedicated
space, security services, cooling and
power). The Exchange does not own the
Primary Data Center or the Disaster
Recovery Data Center, but instead,
leases space in data centers operated by
third parties. The Exchange has
allocated a portion of the Data Center
cost to logical access ports based on its
reasonable assessment (3% of Data
Center expenses).
Hardware and Software Maintenance
and Licenses and Internet Services
Hardware and Software Licenses
include hardware and software licenses
used to monitor the health of the order
entry services provided by the
Exchange, as described above. The
Exchange uses a third-party vendor to
provide the initial logical order entry
port configurations, which have been
extensively customized by Exchange
employees. Internet Services relate to
the internet Service Provider vendor
that is used to monitor and administer
the order entry port sessions. The
Exchange allocated 10% of Hardware
and Software Maintenance and Licenses
and internet Services expenses to the
provision of Order Entry Ports based
upon its reasonable assessment.
Depreciation
As noted above, the software the
Exchange uses to provide Order Entry
Ports is licensed from a third-party
service provider, although it has been
significantly customized by in-house
employees. Related costs include both
development work, as well as quality
assurance and testing to ensure the
software works as intended. These costs
are depreciated over time once the
software is activated in the production
environment. Hardware used to provide
Order Entry Ports includes equipment
used for testing and monitoring of order
entry infrastructure and other physical
equipment the Exchange purchased and
is also depreciated over time.
All hardware and software, which
also includes assets used for testing and
monitoring of order entry infrastructure,
were valued at cost and depreciated or
leased over a three-year period. Thus,
the depreciation cost primarily relates to
servers necessary to operate the
Exchange, some of which is owned by
the Exchange and some of which is
leased by the Exchange in order to allow
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Notices
efficient periodic technology refreshes.
The Exchange allocated 18% of
Exchange Depreciation expenses to the
provision of Order Entry Ports based
upon its reasonable assessment.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Allocated Shared Expenses
Finally, as with other exchange
products and services, a portion of
general shared expenses was allocated
to overall logical connectivity costs (4%
of Exchange Allocated Shared
Expenses). These general shared costs
are integral to exchange operations,
including its ability to provide logical
connectivity. Costs included in general
shared expenses include office space
and office expenses (e.g., occupancy and
overhead expenses), utilities, recruiting
and training, marketing and advertising
costs, professional fees for legal, tax and
accounting services (including external
and internal audit expenses), and
telecommunications. These general
shared expenses are incurred by the
Exchange’s parent company, IEXG, as a
direct result of operating the Exchange.
The Exchange allocated shared services
costs in line with the average allocation
rate for employees in the direct and
ancillary categories (7%), consistent
with the methodology used to allocate
the cost of shared services employees as
described above.62 The Exchange
believes it is reasonable to assign an
allocation of shared expenses to logical
Order Entry Ports, consistent with
allocations for shared services
employees, while continuing to ensure
that such allocated expenses are not
double counted when allocated to other
products and services for which the
Exchange charges fees. Separately, for
other shared expenses related to the
Exchange’s regulatory obligations, such
as fees paid to FINRA pursuant to a
regulatory services agreement between
the Exchange and FINRA, fees paid to
the Depository Trust and Clearing
Corporation, audit fees, and fees paid to
Securities Information Processors, were
allocated differently, less than 1% was
allocated to the provision of logical
connectivity. Thus, the Allocated
Shared Expenses applied to offering
physical connectivity totaled 4%.
*
*
*
*
*
Approximate Monthly Cost
The total monthly cost allocated to
logical ports of $493,667 was divided by
the number of chargeable Order Entry
Ports the Exchange maintained at the
time that proposed pricing was
62 The 7% average allocation applied to
applicable allocated shared expenses is based on
the average of the time that the direct and ancillary
employees spent on logical connectivity.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:12 May 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
determined 63 (1,161), to arrive at a cost
of approximately $425 per month, per
chargeable Order Entry Port (rounded to
the nearest dollar when dividing the
approximate monthly cost by the
number of Order Entry Ports).
*
*
*
*
*
Cost Analysis—Additional Discussion
In conducting its 2024 Cost Analysis,
the Exchange did not generally allocate
any overall expense category in full to
any core services (including physical
connectivity or logical Order Entry
Ports) and did not double-count any
expenses. Instead, as described above,
the Exchange allocated applicable cost
drivers across its core services. For
instance, in calculating the Human
Resources expenses to be allocated to
physical connections based upon the
methodology described above, the
Exchange allocated network
infrastructure employees with a high
percentage of the cost of such
employees (75%) to physical
connectivity given their focus on
functions necessary to provide physical
connections. The compensation of those
same employees was allocated 20% to
Order Entry Ports, and the remaining
5% was allocated to trading and routing,
market data, and other Exchange
functions. For ancillary employees, who
work closely with and support network
infrastructure employees, the Exchange
allocated a smaller percentage of 8% for
physical connectivity and 4% for Order
Entry Ports, with the remaining 88%
allocated to trading and routing, market
data, and other core services provided
by the Exchange. For shared services
employees, the Exchange allocated costs
across a wider range of employee groups
pursuant to the allocation methodology
described above resulting in an
allocation of 14% to physical
connectivity, 8% to Order Entry Ports,
and 78% to trading and routing, market
data, and other core services provided
by the Exchange.
In total, the Exchange allocated 14%
of its Human Resources costs to
providing physical connectivity and 8%
of its Human Resources costs to
providing Order Entry Ports, for a total
allocation of 22% of its Human
Resources expense to provide these
specific connectivity services. In turn,
63 The Exchanges’ costs for providing logical
connectivity include the costs of providing logical
connectivity for which the Exchange charges no
fees (i.e., free logical connectivity to its Disaster
Recovery Data Center or its ITF, as well as up to
five free Order Entry Ports to its Primary Data
Center to Port Subscribers). See supra note 60. Thus
the total number of assigned Order Entry Ports
figure includes more ports than the total number of
ports for which the Exchange charges any fees.
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42537
the Exchange allocated the remaining
78% of its Human Resources expense
toward the cost of providing trading and
routing, market data and other core
services provided by the Exchange.
The Exchange allocated depreciation
expense to all core services, including
physical connections and Order Entry
Ports, but in different amounts. The
Exchange believes it is reasonable to
allocate the identified portion of such
expense because such expense includes
the actual cost of the computer
equipment, such as dedicated servers,
computers, laptops, monitors,
information security appliances and
storage, and network switching
infrastructure equipment, including
switches and taps that were purchased
to operate and support the network.
Without this equipment, IEX would not
be able to operate the Exchange and
provide connectivity services to its
Members and Sponsored Participants.
The Exchange allocated 25% of overall
depreciation and amortization expense
to connectivity services (7% attributed
to physical connectivity and 18% to
Order Entry Ports). The Exchange
allocated the remaining depreciation
and amortization expense (75%) toward
the cost of providing trading and
routing, market data, and other
Exchange functions.
The Exchange’s revenue estimates
described herein are based on
projections for physical connectivity
and Order Entry Ports and will only be
realized to the extent such revenue
streams actually produce the revenue
estimated. The Exchange does not yet
know whether such expectations will be
realized. For instance, in order to
generate the revenue expected from
connectivity, the Exchange will have to
be successful in retaining existing
clients that wish to maintain physical
connectivity and/or Order Entry Ports or
in obtaining new clients that will
purchase such services.
The 2024 Cost Analysis is based on
the Exchange’s 2024 fiscal year of
operations and projections. It is
possible, however, that actual costs may
be higher or lower. To the extent the
Exchange sees growth in use of
connectivity services, it will receive
additional revenue to offset current
costs and future cost increases.
However, if use of connectivity
services is static or decreases, the
Exchange might not realize the revenue
that it anticipates or needs in order to
offset applicable costs as projected and
described herein. In the event revenues
fail to cover future costs and a
reasonable mark-up of such costs
(potential future markup of such costs),
the Exchange may later propose to
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
42538
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
increase related fees. Similarly, the
Exchange may propose to decrease fees
in the event that revenue materially
exceeds our current projected costs. In
addition, the Exchange will periodically
conduct a review to inform its decision
making on whether a fee change is
appropriate (e.g., to monitor for costs
increasing/decreasing or subscribers
increasing/decreasing, etc. in ways that
suggest the then-current fees are
becoming dislocated from the prior costbased analysis) and would propose to
increase fees in the event that revenues
fail to cover its costs, or decrease fees in
the event that revenue or the mark-up
materially exceeds our current projected
costs so that it would constitute
excessive pricing or a supra-competitive
profit. In the event that the Exchange
determines to propose a fee change, the
results of a timely review, including an
updated cost estimate, will be included
in the rule filing proposing the fee
change. More generally, the Exchange
believes that it is appropriate for an
exchange to refresh and update
information about its relevant costs and
revenues in seeking any future changes
to fees, and the Exchange commits to do
so.
Projected Revenue
The proposed fees will allow the
Exchange to cover certain costs incurred
by the Exchange associated with
providing and maintaining necessary
hardware and other network
infrastructure as well as network
monitoring and support services.
Without such hardware, infrastructure,
monitoring and support, the Exchange
would be unable to provide the physical
connectivity and Order Entry Port
services required by Connectivity
Subscribers and Port Subscribers.
The Exchange routinely works to
improve the performance of the
network’s hardware and software. The
costs associated with maintaining and
enhancing a state-of-the-art exchange
network is a significant expense for the
Exchange, and thus the Exchange
believes that it is reasonable and
appropriate to offset a portion of those
costs, with a limited potential return in
excess of such costs if actuals differ
from projections, by adopting and
increasing fees for connectivity services.
Costs in this category enable the
Exchange, for example, to measure
network performance with nanosecond
granularity and allow the Exchange to
continuously improve network
performance, based on Connectivity
Subscribers’ needs and expectations.
As detailed above, the Exchange has
five primary sources of revenue that it
can potentially use to fund its
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:12 May 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
operations: transaction fees, fees for
connectivity services, membership and
regulatory fees (which the Exchange
does not charge), and market data fees.
Accordingly, the Exchange must cover
its expenses from these five primary
sources of revenue.
The Exchange’s 2024 Cost Analysis
estimates the 2024 annual cost to
provide physical connectivity will be
$12,904,100. These costs include costs
to provide physical connectivity at IEX’s
Primary Data Denter, Disaster Recovery
Data Center, and ITF. Based on current
usage (i.e., that all current Connectivity
Subscribers pay fees as proposed to
maintain existing physical
connectivity), the Exchange estimates
that it would generate annual revenue of
approximately $8,640,000, that would
cover 67% of such costs. The cost
recovery would vary from this estimate
if actual usage were more or less than
current usage.
The Exchange’s 2024 Cost Analysis
estimates the 2024 annual cost to
provide Order Entry Ports services will
be $5,924,000. Based on current usage,
the Exchange estimates that would
generate annual revenue of
approximately $3,483,000, that would
cover 59% of such costs.64 The cost
recovery would vary from this estimate
if actual usage were more or less than
current usage.
Based on the above discussion, IEX
believes that the proposed fees are fair
and reasonable because they are
reasonably related to the associated
costs of providing products and services
and will not result in excessive pricing,
or supra-competitive profit. To the
contrary, the proposed fees are expected
to only provide a partial recovery of its
costs to provide physical and logical
connectivity. Further, the proposed fees
are comparable to, or lower than, similar
fees for similar products charged by
competing exchanges. For example, for
physical connectivity to the Primary
Data Center which would include
physical connectivity at the Disaster
Recovery Data Center and the ITF, the
Exchange proposes a lower monthly fee
($4,000) than the monthly fees charged
by MIAX Pearl ($8,000), MEMX
($6,000), and Cboe EDGA ($8,500) for
just their 10G connections to their
primary data centers.65 Moreover, IEX is
64 For comparison, see MEMX Connectivity Fees
Filing, Securities Exchange Act Release No. No.
95936 (September 27, 2022), 87 FR 59845, 59851
(October 3, 2022) (SR–MEMX–2022–26) (proposing
to adopt fees for connectivity and stating that
MEMX would earn approximately 8% markup).
65 See MIAX Pearl Equities Exchange Fee
Schedule as of May 1, 2024, available at https://
www.miaxglobal.com/sites/default/files/fee_
schedule-files/MIAX_Pearl_Equities_Fee_Schedule_
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
not proposing to charge additional fees
for physical connectivity to its Disaster
Recovery Data Center, while competing
exchanges charge separately for such
connectivity. Specifically, MIAX Pearl
charges a monthly fee of $3,000, MEMX
charges a monthly fee of $3,000, and
Cboe EDGA charges a monthly fee of
$6,000 for their comparable 10G
connections to their secondary data
centers.66 Similarly, the proposed
increases to the logical port fees would
continue to result in lower fees than
those of IEX’s competitors. Accordingly,
the Exchange believes that this
comparative analysis provides an
additional layer of support for how its
proposed fees meet the requirements of
the Act in that they are lower than the
fees charged by competing exchanges.67
The Exchange believes it is
appropriate and consistent with the Act
to raise its fees, as proposed, to facilitate
enhancements and upgrades to its
technology, which are essential for it to
continue to compete with other equities
exchanges. The Exchange believes the
proposed fees are reasonable because
they are based on the extent to which
each product drives the Exchange’s
overall costs, which recognizes that
certain market participants ascribe
certain market value to each such
product, and the Exchange’s objective to
make access to its trading system
broadly available to market participants.
The Exchange notes that its revenue
estimates are based on projections and
will only be realized to the extent
customer activity produces the revenue
estimated. The Exchange does not yet
know whether such projections will be
realized. For instance, in order to
generate the revenue expected from
physical connectivity as well as Order
Entry Ports, the Exchange will need to
be successful in retaining existing
clients that wish to utilize its physical
connectivity and Order Entry Ports and/
or obtaining new clients that will
purchase such access. To the extent the
Exchange experiences a net loss in
Connectivity or Port Subscribers, the
Exchange could experience a net
reduction in revenue. In assessing an
05012024.pdf; MEMX Connectivity Fee Schedule,
available at https://info.memxtrading.com/
connectivity-fees/; Cboe U.S. Equities Fee Schedule,
EDGA Equities, available at https://www.cboe.com/
us/equities/membership/fee_schedule/edga/.
66 See supra note 65.
67 However, even if the Exchange earns
incrementally more revenue, the proposed fees are
fair and reasonable because they would not result
in excessive pricing or supra-competitive profit
compared to other equities exchanges, based on the
total expenses of the Exchange associated with
providing physical connectivity and Order Entry
Ports versus the total projected revenue of the
Exchange associated with those services.
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Notices
exchange’s rule filing to adopt nontransaction fees based on a cost analysis,
IEX believes that it is also relevant for
the Commission to consider the extent
to which the proposed fees are
comparable to and competitive with
similar fees charged by other exchanges
in order to ensure that the regulatory
oversight of comparable fees across
exchanges is applied in a way that
promotes fair and non-discriminatory
intermarket competition.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
The Proposed Pricing Is Not Unfairly
Discriminatory and Provides for the
Equitable Allocation of Fees, Dues, and
Other Charges
Physical Connectivity Fees
IEX believes that its proposed
physical connectivity fee of $4,000 to
connect to the Primary Data Center,
which includes physical connectivity to
the Disaster Recovery Data Center and
ITF for no additional charge, is
reasonable, fair and equitable, and not
unfairly discriminatory because it is
designed to align fees with the costs of
services provided and will apply
equally to all Members and other
Connectivity Subscribers 68 with direct
physical connectivity to the Exchange,
and will minimize barriers to entry by
providing high speed 10G connectivity
at prices well below those offered by
any other exchange. IEX believes that
the cost-based fee of $4,000 per month
is low enough that it will not operate to
restrain any subscriber’s ability to
maintain physical connectivity to the
Exchange. These lower fees for 10G
physical connectivity mean that even
those firms which might maintain two
or more physical connections to the
Exchange will still pay considerably less
than competing exchanges charge for
equivalent physical connectivity.
Further, the number of physical
connections to the Exchange will
continue to be based on decisions by
each firm, including the ability to
reduce fees by reducing the number of
physical connections to the Exchange.
The Exchange believes that charging
$4,000 for physical connectivity to the
Exchange is fair and equitable, and not
unfairly discriminatory because it will
enable all Members (and other firms
with physical connectivity) to obtain a
10G connection to IEX at prices wellbelow those of any other equity
exchange, thereby encouraging order
flow and liquidity from a diverse set of
market participants, facilitating price
discovery and the interaction of orders.
68 As
discussed above, the types of firms that
might pay for physical connectivity to the Exchange
are: Members, Service Bureaus, Data Recipients,
and Extranet Providers.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:12 May 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
IEX also notes that Connectivity
Providers that determine they need two
or more physical connections to the
Exchange (generally because they
generate relatively higher inbound
message volume or need faster message
throughput) thereby account for a
disproportionate share of IEX’s
aggregate costs for providing physical
connectivity. Therefore, IEX believes it
is not unfairly discriminatory for such
Members to pay a higher proportionate
share of the physical connectivity fees
by paying for each additional
connection.
Accordingly, the Exchange believes
that the fee will be applied consistently
with its specific purpose—to offset a
portion of its costs with a limited
potential return in excess of such costs
if actuals differ from projections.
The Exchange further believes that the
proposed fees are reasonable, fair and
equitable, and non-discriminatory
because they will apply to all
Connectivity Subscribers in the same
manner and are not targeted at a specific
type or category of market participant
engaged in any particular trading
strategy. All Members, Service Bureaus,
Data Recipients, and Extranet Providers
will pay the same ‘‘per unit’’ rate for
physical connectivity to the Exchange.
Further, the physical connectivity fee is
not connected to volume-based tiers or
dependent on executing a minimum
volume of orders on IEX. All
Connectivity Subscribers will be subject
to the same fee schedule, regardless of
the volume sent to or executed on IEX.
The fee also does not depend on any
distinctions between Members, Service
Bureaus, Data Recipients, and Extranet
Providers. The fee will be assessed
solely based on the number of physical
connections a firm selects and not on
any other distinction applied by IEX.
While firms that send relatively more
inbound messages to IEX may select two
or more physical connections to the
Exchange, thereby resulting in higher
fees, that distinction is based on
decisions made by each firm and the
extent and nature of the firm’s business
on IEX rather than application of the fee
by IEX. Members, Service Bureaus, Data
Recipients, and Extranet Providers can
determine how many physical
connections they need to implement
their trading or business strategies
effectively.
IEX also believes that it is reasonable,
equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory to base its billing for
physical connectivity on the number of
physical connections assigned to
Members, Service Bureaus, Data
Recipients, and Extranet Providers as of
the first day of each month. IEX believes
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42539
that this approach is fair because
Members, Service Bureaus, Data
Recipients, and Extranet Providers will
have a reasonable understanding and
expectation of the cutoff date for
determining whether the firm requires
one or more physical connections to the
Exchange.
Furthermore, the Exchange believes
that the proposed fee is consistent with
Section 11A of the Exchange Act in that
it is designed to facilitate the
economically efficient execution of
securities transactions, fair competition
among brokers and dealers, exchange
markets and markets other than
exchange markets, and the practicability
of brokers executing investors’ orders in
the best market. Specifically, the
proposed low, cost-based fee will enable
a broad range of Members, Service
Bureaus, Data Recipients, and Extranet
Providers to continue to physically
connect to IEX, thereby facilitating the
economically efficient execution of
securities transactions on IEX, fair
competition between and among such
Members, Service Bureaus, Data
Recipients, and Extranet Providers, and
the practicability of Members that are
brokers executing investors’ orders on
IEX when it is the best market.
As discussed above, IEX believes the
proposed fees are reasonable because
they are equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory, based on a thorough and
transparent cost-based analysis as well
as a comparison to similar fees charged
by other exchanges, as detailed below.
Moreover, the proposed fees would
support IEX’s ability to cover its costs
(in whole or in part) to provide physical
connectivity, with a limited potential
return in excess of such costs if actuals
differ from projections, and thereby
invest in infrastructure, new products
and other innovations, and
competitively price transaction fees.
These investments in the IEX’s future
growth are designed to enable IEX to
attract additional business and build
market share, with the benefit, inter alia,
of attracting more displayed liquidity to
the Exchange to the benefit of all market
participants.
Finally, IEX does not believe that
physical connectivity fees are properly
constrained by competitive market
pressures. Nevertheless, the Exchange
believes that a competitive analysis of
its proposed fees, as discussed below,
also demonstrates that they are
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory.
Logical Connectivity Fees
With respect to Order Entry Ports, IEX
believes that its proposed fee is
reasonable, fair and equitable, and not
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
42540
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
unfairly discriminatory because it is
designed to align fees with the costs of
services provided, will apply equally to
all Members that are assigned Order
Entry Ports (either directly or through a
Service Bureau), and will minimize
barriers to entry by continuing to
provide all Port Subscribers with five
free Order Entry Ports. Because the first
five Order Entry Ports are free, a
significant majority of Port Subscribers
will not be subject to any fee. Even for
Port Subscribers that choose to maintain
more than five Order Entry Ports, IEX
believes that the cost-based fee of $250
is low enough that it will not operate to
restrain any Port Subscriber’s ability to
maintain the number of Order Entry
Ports that it determines are consistent
with its business objectives. The small
number of Members projected to be
subject to the highest fees will still pay
considerably less than competing
exchanges charge. For example, the
monthly cost per order entry port on
Nasdaq, NYSE, and Cboe EDGA is $575,
$550, and $550, respectively.69 IEX
further notes that NYSE and Nasdaq
both charge for other logical ports that
IEX will continue to offer for free, such
as those used for testing and disaster
recovery purposes.70 Further, the
number of assigned Order Entry Ports
will continue to be based on decisions
by each Port Subscriber, including the
ability to reduce fees by discontinuing
unused Order Entry Ports.
The Exchange believes that providing
five free Order Entry Ports is fair and
equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory because it will enable all
Members and Service Bureaus to access
IEX on those ports free of charge,
thereby encouraging order flow and
liquidity from a diverse set of market
participants, facilitating price discovery
and the interaction of orders. IEX
continues to believe that five Order
Entry Ports is an appropriate number to
provide for free because it aligns with
the number of such ports currently
maintained by a meaningful majority of
Port Subscribers. Port Subscribers with
relatively higher inbound message
volume also request (and are assigned)
69 See Nasdaq Price List—Trading Connectivity,
Logical Connectivity, https://www.nasdaqtrader.
com/Trader.aspx?id=PriceListTrading2#
logicalconnectivity; NYSE Price List as of February
12, 20204, available at https://www.nyse.com/
publicdocs/nyse/markets/nyse/NYSE_Price_
List.pdf; and Cboe U.S. Equities Fee Schedule,
EDGA Equities, available at https://www.cboe.com/
us/equities/membership/fee_schedule/edga/.
70 See Nasdaq Price List—Trading Connectivity,
Logical Connectivity, https://
www.nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=
PriceListTrading2#logicalconnectivity; NYSE Price
List as of February 12, 20204, available at https://
www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/nyse/
NYSE_Price_List.pdf;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:12 May 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
more Order Entry Ports than other Port
Subscribers, which in turn means they
account for a disproportionate share of
IEX’s aggregate costs for providing
Order Entry Ports. Therefore, IEX
believes it is not unfairly discriminatory
for the Port Subscribers with higher
inbound message volume to pay a
higher proportionate share of the Order
Entry Port fees.
Accordingly, the Exchange believes
that the fee will be applied consistently
with its specific purpose—to offset a
portion its costs, with a limited
potential return in excess of such costs
if actuals differ from projections,
encourage the efficient use of Order
Entry Ports, and align fees with Port
Subscribers’ Order Entry Port and
system usage.
The Exchange further believes that the
proposed fees are reasonable, fair and
equitable, and non-discriminatory
because they will apply to all Members
in the same manner and are not targeted
at a specific type or category of market
participant engaged in any particular
trading strategy. All Members (or
Service Bureaus) will receive five free
Order Entry Ports and pay the same
$250 per Order Entry Port for each
additional Order Entry Port. Each Order
Entry Port is identical, providing logical
connectivity to IEX on identical terms.
While the proposed fee will result in a
different effective ‘‘per unit’’ rate for
different Members (or Service Bureaus)
after factoring in the five free Order
Entry Ports, the Exchange does not
believe that this difference is material
given the overall low fee of $250 per
Order Entry Port. Because the first five
Order Entry Ports are free of charge,
each entity will have a ‘‘per unit’’ rate
of less than $250. Further, the fee is not
connected to volume-based tiers. All
Members will be subject to the same fee
schedule, regardless of the volume sent
to or executed on IEX. The fee also does
not depend on any distinctions between
Members, customers, broker-dealers, or
any other entity. The fee will be
assessed solely based on the number of
Order Entry Ports an entity selects and
not on any other distinction applied by
IEX. While entities that send relatively
more inbound messages to IEX may
select more Order Entry Ports, thereby
resulting in higher fees, that distinction
is based on decisions made by each Port
Subscriber and the extent and nature of
the Port Subscribers’ business on IEX
rather than application of the fee by IEX.
Members (and their Service Bureaus)
can determine how many Order Entry
Ports they need to implement their
trading strategies effectively. As
proposed, IEX will continue to offer
multiple Order Entry Ports at a low fee
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to enable all Port Subscribers to
purchase as many Order Entry Ports as
their business needs dictate in order to
optimize throughput and manage
latency across the Exchange.
Notwithstanding that Port Subscribers
with the highest number of Order Entry
Ports will pay a greater percentage of the
total projected fees than is represented
by their Order Entry Port usage, IEX
does not believe that the proposed fee
is unfairly discriminatory. It is not
possible to fully synchronize IEX’s
objective to provide five free Order
Entry Ports to all Port Subscribers,
thereby minimizing barriers to entry and
incentivizing liquidity on the Exchange,
with an approach that exactly aligns the
projected per Port Subscriber fee with
each Port Subscriber’s number of
requested Order Entry Ports. As
proposed, IEX is providing a reasonable
number of Order Entry Ports to each
Member (or Service Bureau) without
charge. Any variance between projected
fees and Order Entry Port usage is
attributable to objective differences
among Members in terms of the number
of Order Entry Ports they determine are
appropriate based on their trading on
IEX. Any difference in impact would be
allocated to Port Subscribers with
substantially higher trading volume.
IEX also believes that it is reasonable,
equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory to base its billing for
Order Entry Ports on the number of
Order Entry Ports assigned to each User
as of the first day of each month. IEX
believes that this approach is fair
because Members (and Service Bureaus)
will have a reasonable understanding
and expectation of the cutoff date for
determining whether a User has more
than five assigned Order Entry Ports.
Finally, the Exchange believes that
the proposed fee is consistent with
Section 11A of the Exchange Act in that
it is designed to facilitate the
economically efficient execution of
securities transactions, fair competition
among brokers and dealers, exchange
markets and markets other than
exchange markets, and the practicability
of brokers executing investors’ orders in
the best market. Specifically, the
proposed low, cost-based fee will enable
a broad range of IEX Members to
continue to connect to IEX, thereby
facilitating the economically efficient
execution of securities transactions on
IEX, fair competition between and
among such Members, and the
practicability of Members that are
brokers executing investors’ orders on
IEX when it is the best market.
As discussed above, IEX believes the
proposed fees are reasonable because
they are equitable and not unfairly
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Notices
discriminatory, based on a thorough and
transparent cost-based analysis, as well
as a comparison to similar fees charged
by other exchanges, as detailed below.
Moreover, the proposed fees would
support IEX’s ability to offset its costs
(in whole or in part) to provide logical
connectivity, with a limited potential
return in excess of such costs if actuals
differ from projections, and thereby
invest in infrastructure, new products
and other innovations, and
competitively price transaction fees.
These investments in the IEX’s future
growth are designed to enable IEX to
attract additional business and build
market share, with the benefit, inter alia,
of attracting more displayed liquidity to
the Exchange to the benefit of all market
participants.
As discussed above, IEX does not
believe that logical connectivity fees are
properly constrained by competitive
market pressures. Nevertheless, the
Exchange believes that an analysis of
similar fees charged by competitor
exchanges, as discussed below, also
demonstrates that the proposed fees are
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory.
The Proposed Fees Promote
Competition by Offering a Lower Cost
Solution
The Exchange believes the competing
exchanges’ physical connectivity and
port fees are useful examples of
alternative approaches to providing and
charging for physical and logical
connectivity. To that end, the Exchange
believes the proposed fees are
reasonable, in addition to being costbased, because the proposed fees are
less than fees charged for similar
physical connectivity and logical order
42541
entry port access provided by other
exchanges with comparable market
shares. These fees are designed to
recoup a portion of its costs for
providing physical and logical
connectivity, with a limited potential
return in excess of such costs if actuals
differ from projections, thereby enabling
it to invest in competitive infrastructure
and other offerings and compete with
other equities exchanges. The following
table demonstrates that the Exchange’s
proposed fees would be significantly
less than fees charged for similar
physical and logical connectivity
provided by other exchanges with
similar market share. Each of the
physical or logical connectivity fees in
place at competing exchanges listed
below were filed with the Commission
for immediate effectiveness and remain
in place today.
Exchange
Type of connection or port
IEX (market share of 1.94% for the month of March
2024) e.
10G connection to Primary Data Center .....................
$4,000 per connection (as proposed).
Monthly fee
10G connection to Disaster Recovery Data Center ....
Included with 10G connection to Primary Data Center
(as proposed).
1–5 ports: FREE 6 ports or more: $250 per port (as
proposed).
FREE.
$2,500 per connection.f g
$8,000 per connection.f
$1,000 per connection.f h
$3,000 per connection.f
1–5 ports: FREE 6 ports or more: $450 per port.f
FREE.f
Not available.i
$6,000 per connection.i
$3,000 per connection.i
$450 per port.i
$450 per port.i
$2,500 per connection.g j
$8,500 per connection.j
$2,000 per connection.j
$6,000 per connection.j
$550 per port.j
$650 per port.j
Primary Data Center Logical Order Entry Ports ..........
MIAX Pearl Equities (market share of 1.87% for the
month of March 2024) e.
MEMX (market share of 2.53% for the month of
March 2024) e.
Cboe EDGA (market share of 1.78% for the month of
March 2024) e.
All other logical ports (including Drop Copy ports) .....
1G connection to primary/secondary data center .......
10G connection to primary/secondary data center .....
1G connection to disaster recovery data center .........
1G [sic] connection to disaster recovery data center ..
FIX and MEO Ports .....................................................
FXD Ports (i.e., Drop Copy Ports) ...............................
1G connection to primary data center .........................
10G connection to primary data center .......................
10G connection to disaster recovery data center .......
Order Entry Ports .........................................................
Drop Copy Ports ..........................................................
1G connection to primary data center .........................
10G connection to primary data center .......................
1G connection to disaster recovery data center .........
10G connection to disaster recovery data center .......
Order Entry Ports .........................................................
Purge Ports ..................................................................
e See
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
‘‘U.S. Equities Market Volume Summary’’, available at https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/.
f See MIAX Pearl Equities Exchange Fee Schedule as of May 1, 2024, available at https://www.miaxglobal.com/sites/default/files/fee_schedule-files/MIAX_Pearl_Equities_Fee_Schedule_05012024.pdf.
g IEX notes that some equities exchanges also offer a 1G connection to their primary data center, but understands that only a small minority of market participants
find a 1G connection to be adequate for trading and market data purposes.
h MIAX Pearl waives the fee for a single 1G connection to the disaster recovery center for members required by MIAX Pearl to conduct disaster recovery data center testing. See https://www.miaxglobal.com/sites/default/files/fee_schedule-files/MIAX_Pearl_Equities_Fee_Schedule_05012024.pdf.
i See MEMX Connectivity Fee Schedule, available at https://info.memxtrading.com/connectivity-fees/.
j See Cboe U.S. Equities Fee Schedule, EDGA Equities, available at https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/membership/fee_schedule/edga/.
Moreover, IEX’s proposed fees are
substantially lower than the fees other
exchanges that operate listing markets
charge for the equivalent physical and
logical connectivity. For example, NYSE
charges $22,000 per month for a 10G
physical connection, plus an initial
charge of $15,000; and charges $550 per
order entry and drop copy ports.71
71 See
NYSE Connectivity Fee Schedule as of
April 3, 2024, available at https://www.nyse.com/
publicdocs/Wireless_Connectivity_Fees_and_
Charges.pdf. and NYSE Price List as of February 12,
20204, available at https://www.nyse.com/
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:12 May 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
Nasdaq charges $10,550 per month for
a 10G physical connection, plus an
initial charge of $1,055 (and $15,825 per
month for a 10G ‘‘Ultra’’ connection,
plus an initial charge of $1,583); and
charges $575 per order entry port, $550
per drop copy port, $100 per test ports,
and $25 per disaster recovery ports.72
By contrast, IEX, as proposed, will
publicdocs/nyse/markets/nyse/NYSE_Price_
List.pdf.
72 See Nasdaq Price List—Trading Connectivity,
Logical Connectivity, https://
www.nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=
PriceListTrading2#logicalconnectivity.
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
charge $4,000 for a 10G physical
connection, offers up to five Order Entry
Ports for free, and charges $250 per port
for 6 or more ports.
There is no regulatory requirement
that any broker-dealer connect to and
access any (or all of) the available equity
exchanges. Market participants may
choose to become a member of one or
more (or no) equities exchanges based
on the market participant’s assessment
of the business opportunity relative to
the costs of the Exchange. In lieu of
becoming a member at each exchange, a
market participant may join one
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
42542
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Notices
exchange and elect to have its orders
routed in the event that a better price is
available on an away market. Nothing in
the Order Protection Rule 73 requires a
broker-dealer to become a Member of—
or establish connectivity to—the
Exchange. All equities exchanges have
rules in place to avoid trading through
a better priced quotation on another
exchange in violation of Order
Protection Rule.74
As noted earlier, IEX believes that as
a general matter, physical and logical
connectivity fees cannot be sufficiently
justified based solely on unproven
assumptions about competition,
notwithstanding that a newer and/or
smaller securities exchange, such as
IEX, may be less able to set prices for
its physical and logical connectivity free
of constraint by significant competitive
forces than may be the case for more
established securities exchanges.75
In summary, for all of the foregoing
reasons, the Exchange believes that the
proposed fees are reasonable, equitably
allocated, and not unfairly
discriminatory.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
IEX does not believe that the
proposed rule change will result in any
burden on intramarket or intermarket
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
Physical Connectivity Fees
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on intermarket competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The proposed fees are cost-based fees,
which are designed to enable the
Exchange to recoup applicable costs,
with a limited potential return on its
investment in excess of such costs if
actuals differ from projections, as
described in the Purpose and Statutory
Basis sections. Competing equities
exchanges are free to propose
comparable fee structures subject to the
SEC rule filing process. And as
discussed above, market participants are
not required to connect to all exchanges.
There is no reason to believe that IEX’s
proposed price increase will adversely
impact any other exchange’s ability to
compete. Further, as detailed above, the
proposed fees are lower than similar
fees charged by other exchanges. IEX
believes that a comparison to
73 See
17 CFR 242.611.
e.g., IEX Rule 11.230.
75 And as noted earlier, IEX’s proposed fees are
significantly less than fees charged by its
competitors.
74 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:12 May 14, 2024
Jkt 262001
comparable fees charged by competitor
markets helps to ensure that regulatory
oversight of comparable fees across
exchanges is applied in a way that
promotes fair and non-discriminatory
intermarket competition. Accordingly,
the Exchange does not believe its
proposed fee changes impose any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange also does not believe
that the proposed fees will impose any
burden on intramarket competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
All Connectivity Subscribers will be
charged the same amount for each
physical connection to the Primary Data
Center, with free physical connectivity
to the Disaster Recovery Data Center and
ITF. The proposed fees do not favor
certain categories of Connectivity
Subscribers in a manner that would
impose an undue burden on
competition. The Exchange does not
believe that the proposed rule change
would place certain Connectivity
Subscribers at the Exchange at a relative
advantage or disadvantage compared to
other Connectivity Subscribers or affect
the ability of such firms to compete.
Connectivity Subscribers that utilize
more physical connectivity services
typically utilize the most bandwidth,
and those are the firms that consume the
most resources from the Exchange.
Accordingly, the proposed fees for
physical connectivity services do not
favor certain categories of Connectivity
Subscribers in a manner that would
impose a burden on competition; rather,
the allocation of the proposed physical
connectivity fees reflects the Exchange
resources consumed by the various
Connectivity Subscribers and the costs
to the Exchange of providing such
physical connectivity services.
Finally, as described in the Purpose
section, the proposed fee change is
designed to assist the Exchange in
complying with its Regulation SCI
compliance obligations to have levels of
capacity adequate to maintain IEX’s
operational capability and promote the
maintenance of fair and orderly markets,
thereby promoting both intermarket and
intramarket competition by enabling
IEX to support a robust trading
environment for its Members and
compete with other equities venues.
Logical Connectivity Fees
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change with respect
to Order Entry Port Fees will impose
any burden on intermarket competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The proposed fees are cost-based fees,
which are designed to enable the
Exchange to recoup applicable costs,
with a limited potential return on its
investment in excess of such costs if
actuals differ from projections, as
described in the Purpose and Statutory
Basis sections. Competing equities
exchanges are free to propose
comparable fee structures subject to the
SEC rule filing process. And as
discussed above, market participants are
not regulatorily required to connect to
all exchanges. There is no reason to
believe that IEX’s proposed price
increase will adversely impact any other
exchange’s ability to compete. Further,
as detailed above, the proposed fees are
lower than similar fees charged by other
exchanges. IEX believes that a
comparison to comparable fees charged
by competitor markets helps to ensure
that regulatory oversight of comparable
fees across exchanges is applied in a
way that promotes fair and nondiscriminatory intermarket competition.
Accordingly, the Exchange does not
believe its proposed fee changes impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange also does not believe
that the proposed fees will impose any
burden on intramarket competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IEX does not believe that the proposed
increased Port Fees will impose any
burden on intramarket competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purpose of the Act
because all Members (and/or their
Service Bureaus) will continue to be
entitled to five free ports and subject to
the same low, cost-based fee for
additional ports. While different total
fees would be assessed depending on
the number of Order Entry Ports a
Member (or Service Bureau) requests,
these different fees are not based on the
type of Member requesting the Order
Entry Port(s) but on the number of such
ports it requests, and each Port
Subscriber can determine the number of
such ports to request. Further, providing
five free Order Entry Ports is designed
to avoid creating barriers to entry for
smaller Members, thereby promoting
intramarket competition. In addition,
IEX believes that even Members subject
to relatively higher fees for more Order
Entry Ports will still be subject to a
relatively low aggregate fee (and
significantly less than competing
exchanges, as described above) and thus
the proposed fee will not operate as a
barrier to entry for such Members or
impose a significant business cost
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 2024 / Notices
burden on such Members relative to
their levels of business activity.
The proposed fees do not favor certain
categories of Connectivity Subscribers
in a manner that would impose an
undue burden on competition. The
Exchange does not believe that the
proposed rule change would place
certain Connectivity Subscribers at the
Exchange at a relative advantage or
disadvantage compared to other
Connectivity Subscribers or affect the
ability of such firms to compete.
Finally, as described in the Purpose
section, the proposed fee change is
designed to assist the Exchange in
complying with its Regulation SCI
compliance obligations to have levels of
capacity adequate to maintain IEX’s
operational capability and promote the
maintenance of fair and orderly markets,
thereby promoting both intermarket and
intramarket competition by enabling
IEX to support a robust trading
environment for its Members and
compete with other equities venues.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) 76 of the Act.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 77 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
IEX–2024–08 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–IEX–2024–08. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–IEX–2024–08 and should be
submitted on or before June 5, 2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.78
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–10588 Filed 5–14–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–100102; File No. SR–NYSE–
2024–23]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Section 703.12(II) of the NYSE
Listed Company Manual To Expand the
Circumstances Under Which Rights
May Be Listed on the NYSE
May 10, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that on April 29,
2024, New York Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Section 703.12(II) of the NYSE Listed
Company Manual (‘‘Manual’’) to expand
the circumstances under which rights
may be listed on the NYSE. The text of
the proposed rule change is set forth in
Exhibit 5. The proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange’s website at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
1 15
76 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
77 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:12 May 14, 2024
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
78 17
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42543
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42528-42543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-10588]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-100085); File No. SR-IEX-2024-08]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Pursuant to
IEX Rule 15.110 To Amend IEX's Fee Schedule To Adopt a Physical
Connectivity Fee and Increase Certain Port Fees
May 9, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'' or ``Exchange Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\
notice is hereby given that, on May 2, 2024, the Investors Exchange LLC
(``IEX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) under the Act,\4\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\5\ the Exchange is filing with the
Commission a proposed rule change to modify its Fee Schedule, pursuant
to IEX Rules 15.110(a) and (c), to amend certain connectivity fees. IEX
will implement the proposed fees beginning on June 1, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
website at www.iextrading.com, at the principal office of the Exchange,
and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
IEX is proposing to modify its Fee Schedule, pursuant to IEX Rules
15.110(a) and (c), to add a new fee for physical connections to its
Primary Data Center,\6\ Disaster Recovery Data Center \7\ and the IEX
Testing Facility (``ITF'') (``physical connectivity fees''),\8\ and
increase fees for logical order entry ports (also referred to as
``Order Entry Ports'') \9\ in excess of five per subscriber (``port
fees''). IEX has not previously imposed any physical connectivity fees
but has charged port fees since October 1, 2019.\10\ The Exchange has
not changed the port fees since they were implemented, but since that
time, the Exchange has experienced increases in related operational
expenses including significant upgrades to its trading platform
infrastructure. As discussed more fully below, the Exchange recently
calculated its aggregate annual costs of $12,904,100 for providing
physical
[[Page 42529]]
connectivity and $5,924,000 for providing Order Entry Ports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ All connections to the IEX Primary Data Center (including
for order entry and market data receipt) are made through IEX's
point-of-presence (``IEX POP'') in Secaucus, NJ. From the IEX POP,
messages travel to IEX's Primary Data Center.
\7\ The Disaster Recovery Data Center, also known as the
``Secondary Data Center'', is the physical location of IEX's backup
trading platform. It is located in Chicago, Illinois.
\8\ The only connections offered to the Primary Data Center are
10 gigabit (``10G'') physical port connections. The Exchange offers
both 10G and 1 gigabit (``1G'') physical port connections to the
ITF, for which it incurs physical connectivity-related costs;
however, as discussed below, the Exchange is not proposing to charge
for the connections to the ITF itself.
\9\ Order Entry Ports are used for sending and receiving order
messages. Other uses for logical ports, which are not subject to the
fees proposed herein, include drop copy ports and market data ports.
\10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86626 (August 9,
2019), 84 FR 41793 (August 15, 2019) (SR-IEX-2019-07) (``Port Fee
Filing'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increased operational costs include costs related to monitoring and
analysis of data and performance of the network connections with
nanosecond granularity and continuous improvements in network
performance. The costs associated with maintaining and enhancing a
state-of-the-art network impacts the overall operational costs of the
Exchange. The Exchange believes that it is appropriate to offset a
portion of those increased costs by adding fees for physical
connectivity and increasing fees for Order Entry Ports. Maintaining and
enhancing the performance of the Exchange's systems is necessary to
compete with other market venues and meet Users' \11\ expectations when
trading on the Exchange, as well as to assist the Exchange in complying
with its Regulation SCI compliance obligations to have levels of
capacity, integrity, resiliency, availability and security adequate to
maintain IEX's operational capability and promote the maintenance of
fair and orderly markets,\12\ and to support a robust trading
environment for Users.\13\ In addition, the Exchange is in the process
of implementing significant upgrades to its trading system to enhance
scalability, network performance and connectivity, thereby enhancing
the User experience. The associated costs are substantial, including
costs to purchase new connectivity infrastructure equipment as well as
other ongoing expenses. The Exchange believes it is necessary and
appropriate to offset a portion of these costs with fees for physical
connectivity and increased fees for Order Entry Ports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See IEX Rule 1.160(qq).
\12\ 17 CFR 242.1001(a)(1)).
\13\ Reg SCI Rule 1001(a) requires that IEX establish, maintain,
and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to
ensure (among other things) that its Reg SCI systems have levels of
capacity adequate to maintain IEX's operational capability and
promote the maintenance of fair and orderly markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accordingly, the Exchange now proposes to amend the Fee Schedule to
begin charging fees for physical connectivity and increase existing
fees for Order Entry Ports in excess of five per subscriber, in order
to offset a portion of these increased related costs and expenses, with
a limited potential return in excess of such costs if actuals differ
from projections, as set forth below in the Exchange's cost analysis.
As described below, IEX proposes to charge $4,000 for each physical
port connection to its Primary Data Center, which fee would also
include one (1) 10G connection to its Disaster Recovery Center and one
(1) 10G or 1G connection to its ITF; and to increase the fees it
charges for Order Entry Ports in excess of five per subscriber from
$100 to $250 per month. IEX is proposing to continue to provide Order
Entry Ports at the Disaster Recovery Data Center and ITF, as well as
drop copy ports and market data ports, free of charge. In each case, as
detailed below, the proposed fees are less than comparable connectivity
services offered by other equities exchanges, and significantly less
than comparable fees charged by legacy exchanges.\14\ The Exchange
proposes to implement the changes to the Fee Schedule pursuant to this
proposal on June 1, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See infra note 53 for a discussion of legacy and non-legacy
exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As described in previous filings,\15\ in setting its prices for
market data and connectivity products, IEX has established a general
framework (``Framework'') that is based on a high level of transparency
with regard to its costs of providing these services and which is
designed to set prices at levels that are reasonably related to those
costs.\16\ As relevant to this filing, the Framework includes the
following elements:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94630 (April 7,
2022), 87 FR 21945 (April 13, 2022) (SR-IEX-2022-22) (``IEX Market
Data Fee Filing''); see also Port Fee Filing, supra note 10.
\16\ Since the IEX Market Data Fee Filing, which applied this
Framework to provide a high level of transparency of relevant costs,
other exchanges have adopted similar fees based on their own
detailed cost analyses. IEX believes that the information provided
in this filing meets or exceeds the level of detail and analysis
contained in those filings. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
98584 (September 28, 2023), 88 FR 68736 (October 4, 2023) (SR-PEARL-
2023-51) (``MIAX Connectivity Fee Filing'') (increasing physical and
logical connectivity fees for MIAX Pearl equities members and non-
members from $1,000/month to $2,500/month for 1G connections; from
$3,500/month to $8,000/month for 10G connections; and from $0 for
ports in excess of five but less than 25 per User, and from $300-
$450/month for ports in excess of 25 per User to $450/month); see
also Securities Exchange Act Release No. No. 95936 (September 27,
2022), 87 FR 59845 (October 3, 2022) (SR-MEMX-2022-26) (``MEMX
Connectivity Fees Filing'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prices are determined based on a comprehensive and
transparently applied methodology for allocating costs to different
exchange products.
Based on this methodology, specific exchange costs are
reasonably allocated to the products and services for which the
exchange seeks to charge, including technology and staff directly
related to the products and services being charged for. In this way,
IEX prevents ``double-counting'' of costs across more than one set of
product classes (e.g., market data, physical connectivity, and logical
connectivity).
Cost allocation takes account of recent or planned
enhancements to exchange operations.
IEX strives to maintain a relatively flat, simple fee
structure that avoids disproportionate or discriminatory impacts on any
group of members or market participants.
The physical connectivity and port fees proposed in this filing
have been developed consistent with this Framework. In particular, as
described more fully below, in this rule filing IEX provides a cost
analysis that includes, among other things, descriptions of how the
Exchange allocated costs between the Exchange's various cost drivers to
ensure no cost was double counted, as well as additional detail
supporting its cost allocation processes.
IEX is in the process of implementing significant upgrades to its
technological infrastructure. These upgrades, which include substantial
enhancements to the speed and efficiency with which the Exchange can
handle message traffic, as well as enhancements to the various matching
engines, are thereby projected to provide noticeable performance
improvements to Users. Additionally, these enhancements are designed to
allow for greater scalability of the Exchange's System \17\ as overall
message traffic in the securities markets increases, and IEX seeks to
capture a greater percentage of equity trading volume.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See IEX Rule 1.160(nn).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with the Framework, in proposing to charge physical
connectivity and port fees, IEX assessed those fees in relation to its
own aggregate costs of providing the services, as well as the impact on
Members \18\ (as well as other Users and subscribers)--both generally
and in relation to other Members, i.e., so that the fees will not
create a financial burden on any participant or an undue impact in
particular on smaller Members and competition among Members in general.
IEX believes that its approach is consistent with the requirements of
Section 19(b)(1) under the Act,\19\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\20\ and
Section 6(b) of the Act,\21\ which requires, among other things, that
exchange fees be reasonable and equitably allocated,\22\ not designed
to permit unfair discrimination,\23\ and that they not impose a burden
on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance
[[Page 42530]]
of the purposes of the Act.\24\ This rule change proposal addresses
those requirements, and the analysis and data in each of the sections
that follow are designed to clearly and comprehensively show how they
are met.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See IEX Rule 1.160(s).
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\20\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
\23\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\24\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
\25\ In 2019, the Commission staff published guidance suggesting
the types of information that self-regulatory organizations
(``SROs'') may use to demonstrate that their fee filings comply with
the standards of the Exchange Act (``Staff Guidance''). While IEX
understands that the Staff Guidance does not create new legal
obligations on SROs, IEX has consistently applied the Staff Guidance
to provide the type and level of transparency in demonstrating
compliance when seeking to modify fees. See Staff Guidance on SRO
Rule Filings Relating to Fees (May 21, 2019) available at https://www.sec.gov/tm/staff-guidance-sro-rule-filings-fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In determining the appropriate fees to charge, IEX considered its
costs of providing physical and logical connectivity, using a
methodology that is designed to allocate those costs that are related
to the establishment, maintenance, support, and enhancements to its
connectivity products. Based on this allocation, IEX has set the
proposed fees at levels that are designed to offset a portion of its
costs, with a limited potential return in excess of such costs if
actuals differ from projections. Because of the uncertainty of
forecasting subscribers' decision-making with respect to their IEX
physical connections and Order Entry Ports it is not possible to make a
definitive projection of the revenues that will be received.
* * * * *
Connectivity Fee Changes
IEX offers the ability to physically connect to the Exchange via
the IEX POP \26\ to its Members, Data Recipients \27\, Service Bureaus
\28\, and Extranet Providers \29\ (collectively, ``Connectivity
Subscribers'').\30\ In order to cover a portion of the aggregate costs
of providing physical connectivity to its Connectivity Subscribers, the
Exchange proposes to modify its Fee Schedule as described above and
detailed below. IEX notes that it currently does not charge any fees
for physical connectivity, and therefore the full cost of providing
such connectivity is borne by IEX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ Physical connectivity is provided via network switch and
cabling infrastructure that allows a subscriber to access a logical
port for send and receive order messages, as well receive market
data messages.
\27\ See IEX Rule 11.130(c).
\28\ See IEX Rule 11.130(d).
\29\ See IEX Rule 11.130(e).
\30\ Service Bureaus offer technology-based services to Members
for a fee, including physical connectivity and Order Entry Ports.
Extranet Providers offer physical connectivity services to Members
and Data Recipients.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The number of physical connections to IEX's Primary Data Center
(via the IEX POP) assigned to each Connectivity Subscriber as of
February 29, 2024, ranged from one (1) to 14, as determined by the
Connectivity Subscriber based on the scope and scale of its trading
activity on the Exchange (or other IEX activity, in the case Data
Recipients, Service Bureaus, and Extranet Providers), including its
determination of the need for redundant connectivity.\31\ Approximately
67% of IEX's Members do not maintain a direct physical connection to
the Exchange's Primary Data Center (though many such Members have
physical connectivity through a Service Bureau or Extranet Provider)
and another 22% have either one (1) or two (2) physical connections to
the Exchange in the Primary Data Center. Presently, only 10% of
Members, maintain three or more physical connections to the Exchange to
the Primary Data Center.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ 21 Connectivity Subscribers maintain one (1) or two (2)
physical connections at IEX's Disaster Recovery Center, and 20
Connectivity Subscribers maintain one (1) or two (2) physical
connections to the ITF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange currently does not charge any fees to connect to its
Primary Data Center, its Disaster Recovery Data Center, or the ITF. In
order to offset a portion of the costs of providing this physical
connectivity, plus a limited potential return in excess of such costs
if actuals differ from projections, the Exchange proposes to charge
$4,000 per month for each physical connection to its Primary Data
Center (all of which are 10G connections), which fee would also include
an option for one (1) 10G connection to its Disaster Recovery Center
and one (1) 10G or 1G connection to its ITF. This integrated approach
is designed to simplify the fee structure and encourage physical
connectivity to the Disaster Recovery Data Center and testing at the
ITF. As proposed, and discussed more fully below, IEX fees are
significantly lower than comparable physical connectivity fees of other
equity exchanges.
Order Entry Ports Fee Changes
Similar to other exchanges, IEX offers Order Entry Ports, also
known as ``sessions'', for order entry and receipt of trade execution
reports and order messages.\32\ Members can also choose to connect to
IEX indirectly through a session maintained by a third-party Service
Bureau. Service Bureau sessions may provide access to one or multiple
Members on a single session.\33\ The number of sessions assigned to
each Port Subscriber as of February 29, 2024 ranges from one to 279,
depending on the scope and scale of the User's trading activity on IEX
(either through a direct connection or through a Service Bureau) as
determined by the User. For example, by using multiple sessions,
Members can segregate order flow from different internal desks,
business lines, or customers. IEX does not impose any minimum or
maximum requirements for how many Order Entry Ports a Port Subscriber
can maintain, and it is not proposing to impose any minimum or maximum
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ Logical connectivity for order entry is provided via
network switch and cabling infrastructure that delivers order and
execution messages, as well as server infrastructure that runs
software processes responsible for validating and formatting such
messages for either internal or external consumption.
\33\ Members and Service Bureaus are collectively referred to
herein as ``Port Subscribers.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IEX currently charges Port Subscribers $100 per port on a monthly
basis for each Order Entry Port at the Primary Data Center in excess of
five per Port Subscriber. In order to offset a portion of its costs
with a limited potential return in excess of such costs if actuals
differ from projections, the Exchange proposes to increase the fees it
charges for each such port in excess of five per Port Subscriber from
$100 per month to $250 per month.\34\ These proposed fees would
continue not to apply to logical ports used for other purposes, such as
receiving market data or drop copies,\35\ nor would such ports count
toward the five free Order Entry Ports calculation. Furthermore, IEX
would continue not to charge any fee for logical ports used to connect
to IEX's Disaster Recovery Data Center or ITF, nor would such ports
count toward the five free Order Entry Ports calculation.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ As described in the Statutory Basis section, infra, these
fees are significantly lower than fees charged by IEX's competitors
for their sessions.
\35\ Confirmations of orders and execution reports are
transmitted by the Exchange over the Order Entry Port that was used
to enter the order. A ``drop copy'' contains redundant information
that a Member chooses to have ``dropped'' to another destination
(e.g., to allow the Member's back office and/or compliance
department, or another Member--typically the Member's clearing
broker--to have immediate access to the information for risk
management and other purposes). Drop copies can only be sent via a
drop copy port. Drop copy ports cannot be used to enter orders.
\36\ IEX expects to incur costs of $5,924,000 in 2024 to offer
Order Entry Ports. At the current fee level, IEX would expect to
generate fee revenue of $1,389,500 resulting in negative income of
$4,534,500.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conforming Changes to Fee Schedule
To reflect the fee changes described above, IEX proposes
to update the Connectivity Fees section of the IEX Fee Schedule as
follows: In the first row of
[[Page 42531]]
the Connectivity Fees table, after the words ``10G Physical Port'', add
the words ``Connection to Primary Data Center'' to reflect that the
$4,000 per port monthly 10G fee applies to those connections.
Additionally, IEX proposes to remove from this row the current footnote
1, which currently reads: ``10G physical ports are available to connect
to IEX's production systems (i.e., the IEX POP and Disaster Recovery
Data Centers) and the IEX Test Facility (``ITF'').'' IEX is proposing
to remove this footnote as the information contained therein is being
added to other sections of the Connectivity Fees table.
Add a new footnote 1 to the first row of the table, after
the words ``$4,000 per month'', which states: ``Physical connectivity
fees are billed to and payable by the Member, Service Bureau, Data
Recipient, or Extranet Provider maintaining the physical port
connection at the Primary Data Center based on the number of physical
connections to the Primary Data Center as of the first of each month.''
Add a new second row to the Connectivity Fees table
specifying that a ``10G Physical Port Connection to Disaster Recovery
Data Center'' is ``Included with 10G Physical Port Connection at
Primary Data Center.''
Update the (now) third row of the Connectivity Fees table
so it reads ``1G or 10G Physical Port Connection to IEX Test Facility
(``ITF'')'' are ``Included with 10G Physical Port Connection at Primary
Data Center.'' Update footnote 2 to add the words ``and Service
Bureaus'' after the word ``Members'', in order to reflect that both
Members and Service Bureaus may have physical connections to the ITF.
Update the (now) fourth row of the Connectivity Fees table
so it reads ``Logical Port (except for Primary Data Center Order Entry
Port)'' are free, to reflect that some Order Entry Ports, in particular
at the ITF and the Disaster Recovery Data Center, will continue to be
offered free of charge, and that all other logical ports (e.g., drop
copy ports) will continue to be offered free of charge.
Update the (now) fifth row of the Connectivity Fees table
so it reads ``Primary Data Center Order Entry Port'' to specify that
IEX will only be charging for Order Entry Ports (above 5 per Port
Subscriber) at the Primary Data Center. No changes are proposed for
footnote 3.
Update footnote 4 to add the words ``Primary Data Center''
before the words ``Logical Order Entry Ports,'' and delete the second
sentence of the footnote, because the effective date of these proposed
fee changes will be the same date as the effective date of the fee
schedule.
Implementation
Although fee filings are immediately effective upon filing, IEX
plans to implement these fee changes on June 1, 2024, in order to
provide ample advance notice and allow impacted market participants
time to prepare for the change. As proposed, monthly physical
connectivity fees will be assessed based on the number of 10G physical
port connections maintained by a Member, Service Bureau, Data
Recipient, or Extranet Provider as of the first of each month.
Similarly, monthly logical connectivity fees will be assessed based on
the number of Primary Data Center Order Entry Ports assigned to each
Member or Service Bureau as of the first of each month.
2. Statutory Basis
IEX believes that the proposed fees are consistent with the
provisions of Section 6(b) \37\ of the Act in general and further the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4) \38\ of the Act, in particular, in that
they are designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among its Members and other persons using
its facilities. The Exchange also believes that the proposed fee
changes promote just and equitable principles of trade and will not be
unfairly discriminatory, consistent with the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) \39\ of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\38\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
\39\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the information provided herein to
justify the proposed fees meets or exceeds the amount of detail
required in respect of proposed fee changes under the Act, as well as
the amount of detail required by the Commission in its review of
similar fee filings by other exchanges \40\ and is also consistent with
Staff Guidance \41\ on such filings. Accordingly, the Exchange believes
that the proposed fees are consistent with the Act because they: (i)
are reasonable, equitably allocated, not unfairly discriminatory, do
not create an undue burden on competition; (ii) are consistent with
prior Commission action on other exchanges' fee filings and the Staff
Guidance; and (iii) are supported by evidence (including the revenue
and cost data and analysis detailed below) that they are fair and
reasonable and will not result in excessive pricing or supra-
competitive profit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ Specifically, the Commission allowed fee filings by MIAX
Pearl and MEMX to remain effective by not suspending them within 60
days of filing, see supra note 16.
\41\ See Staff Guidance, supra note 25.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in the Purpose section and in IEX's Port and Market
Data Fee Filings,\42\ IEX believes that exchanges, in setting fees of
all types, should meet high standards of transparency to demonstrate
why each new fee or fee amendment meets the requirements of the Act
that fees be reasonable, equitably allocated, not unfairly
discriminatory, and not create an undue burden on competition among
market participants. The Exchange believes this high standard is
especially important when an exchange imposes various fees for market
participants to access an exchange's marketplace.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\42\ See Port Fee Filing, supra 10; IEX Market Data Fee Filing,
supra note 15.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Staff Guidance, the Commission Staff stated that, ``[a]s an
initial step in assessing the reasonableness of a fee, staff considers
whether the fee is constrained by significant competitive forces.''
\43\ IEX believes that as a general matter, physical and logical
connectivity fees cannot be sufficiently justified based on unproven
assumptions about competition, notwithstanding that a newer and/or
smaller securities exchange, such as IEX, may be less able to set
prices for its physical and logical connectivity free of constraint by
significant competitive forces than may be the case for more
established securities exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\43\ See Staff Guidance, supra note 25.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Staff Guidance further stated that, ``. . . even where an SRO
cannot demonstrate, or does not assert, that significant competitive
forces constrain the fee at issue, a cost-based discussion may be an
alternative basis upon which to show consistency with the Exchange
Act.'' \44\ Thus, similar to fee proposals submitted by other
exchanges,\45\ IEX has not determined its proposed physical and logical
connectivity fees based on assumptions about market competition,
instead relying upon a cost-based model to determine a reasonable fee
structure that is informed by the extent to which demand for each
product drives IEX's overall costs. In this context, IEX believes the
proposed fees overall are fair and reasonable as a form of cost
recovery because they are designed to offset a portion of IEX's costs
with a limited possibility of a reasonable return in excess of IEX's
aggregate costs of offering physical and logical
[[Page 42532]]
connectivity, if actuals differ from projections.\46\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\44\ See Staff Guidance, supra note 25.
\45\ See supra note 16.
\46\ IEX has not sought to justify the proposed fees solely on
the basis that fees of the same type are constrained by competition.
To the extent that the Commission later determines that exchange
fees for market data, technology, or other technology products in
general may be justified on the basis that they are effectively
constrained by market competition, IEX reserves the right in future
filings to use competition analysis as an independent basis to show
why particular fees meet the requirements of the Exchange Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost Analysis
In general, the Exchange believes that exchanges, in setting fees
of all types, should meet very high standards of transparency to
demonstrate why each new fee or fee increase meets the Exchange Act
requirements that fees be reasonable, equitably allocated, not unfairly
discriminatory, and not create an undue burden on competition among
members and markets. In particular, the Exchange believes that the
proposed fees meet the standards of the Exchange Act based on the
relationship of the fees to related costs and to IEX's business
objectives, without needing to rely on a market competition analysis.
In proposing to charge fees for physical connectivity and increase
fees for Order Entry Ports, the Exchange assessed those fees in a
transparent way against its own aggregate costs of providing each
service, as well as the impact on Members and other Connectivity
Subscribers--both generally and in relation to other Members and
Connectivity Subscribers, i.e., to reasonably assure the fee will not
create an undue financial burden or impact on particular participants,
smaller Members or Connectivity Subscribers, or competition among
Members and other Connectivity Subscribers in general. The Exchange
believes that this level of transparency is appropriate as a way of
demonstrating that the fees meet the requirements of Section 19(b)(1)
under the Act,\47\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\48\ with respect to the
types of information exchanges should provide when filing fee changes,
and Section 6(b) of the Act,\49\ which requires, among other things,
that exchange fees be reasonable and equitably allocated,\50\ not
designed to permit unfair discrimination,\51\ and that they not impose
a burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.\52\ This rule change proposal addresses those
requirements, and the analysis and data in each of the sections that
follow are designed to clearly and comprehensively show how they are
met.\53\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\47\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\48\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\49\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\50\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
\51\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\52\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
\53\ See Staff Guidance, supra note 25. The Exchange notes that
other newer entrants to the equities exchange marketplace (``non-
legacy exchanges'') have asserted that the Commission has
historically applied different standards of transparency and
accountability in evaluating whether their fee filings, as compared
to fee filings by larger incumbent exchanges (``legacy exchanges''),
satisfied the Act's requirements. See e.g., MIAX Connectivity Fee
Filing, supra note 16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As detailed below, the Exchange recently calculated its aggregate
annual costs for providing physical connectivity at $12,904,100 (or
approximately $1,075,342 per month for physical connectivity costs,
rounded to the nearest dollar when dividing the combined annual cost by
12 months). The Exchange also recently calculated its aggregate annual
costs for providing Order Entry Ports at $5,924,000 (or approximately
$493,667 per month for Order Entry Port costs, rounded to the nearest
dollar when dividing the combined annual cost by 12 months). In order
to cover a portion of the aggregate costs of providing physical and
logical connectivity to its Connectivity Subscribers and Port
Subscribers, respectively, the Exchange proposes to modify its Fee
Schedule as described above.
In connection with this fee filing, the Exchange recently conducted
a cost analysis to determine the Exchange's costs associated with
providing physical and logical connectivity to the Exchange (``2024
Cost Analysis''). This 2024 Cost Analysis, similar to analyses
performed by MIAX Pearl and MEMX in their connectivity fee filings
\54\, included a comprehensive, wholistic, detailed analysis of the
Exchange's aggregate baseline costs, including a determination and
allocation of costs for core services provided by the Exchange--trading
and routing, market data, physical connectivity, and logical ports
(which provide order entry, cancellation and modification
functionality, risk functionality, the ability to receive drop copies,
and other functionality). The Exchange separately divided its costs
between those costs necessary to deliver each of these core services,
including infrastructure, software, human resources, and certain
general and administrative expenses (``cost drivers'').\55\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\54\ See supra note 16.
\55\ IEX previously conducted cost analyses in 2019 in
connection with charging for Order Entry Ports and in 2021 in
connection with charging for market data. The 2024 Cost Analysis is
a more comprehensive analysis that incorporates all expenses related
to providing core Exchange services and is also consistent with the
cost analyses described by MIAX Pearl and MEMX in their filings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2024 Cost Analysis specifies how hardware, software, vendor,
and human resources costs were allocated for trading and routing,
market data, physical connectivity, and logical ports, and identified
an annual dollar cost for each line item in each category.\56\ The
Exchange adopted an allocation methodology with transparent and
consistently applied principles to guide how much of a particular cost
amount should be allocated to each core service. As set forth below,
the cost allocation process is then applied to each of the cost
drivers. For instance, fixed infrastructure costs that are not driven
by client activity (e.g., message rates), such as data center costs,
were allocated more heavily to the provision of physical connectivity
(54% of fixed infrastructure costs were allocated to physical
connectivity, with smaller allocations to Order Entry Ports (6%), and
the remainder to the provision of other connectivity, other ports,
transaction execution, and market data services (40%). After adopting
this allocation methodology, the Exchange then applied an allocation of
each cost driver to each core service, resulting in the cost
allocations described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\56\ All allocation percentages discussed herein, were rounded
up or down to the nearest whole number.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
By allocating segmented costs to each core service, the Exchange
estimates by core service the potential positive or negative margins it
might earn based on different fee models. As a non-listing venue, the
Exchange has only several potential sources of revenue that it can use
to fund its operations: transaction fees, fees for physical
connectivity and port services, membership fees, regulatory fees, and
market data fees. The Exchange does not charge membership or regulatory
fees. Moreover, as a general matter, each of these sources of revenue
is based on services that are interrelated. For instance, trading and
routing obviously necessitates that Users have physical and logical
connectivity to send orders to IEX. Given this interrelationship, the
allocation of costs to each service and the relative weighting of such
costs depends on the exercise of reasonable judgment by the Exchange.
While there is no standardized and generally accepted methodology for
the allocation of an exchange's costs across different products and
services, the Exchange's methodology is the result of an extensive
review and analysis, transparently applied, and IEX believes this
methodology provides a more than
[[Page 42533]]
ample basis to justify the proposed fees, particularly in light of the
adoption of similar or much larger fees by other exchanges \57\ with
minimal or no cost analysis. Through the Exchange's extensive 2024 Cost
Analysis, the Exchange analyzed each expense category in the Exchange's
general expense ledger to determine whether and how to allocate such
expense to the provision of physical and/or logical connectivity as
appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\57\ See infra notes 71 and 72.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Costs Related To Offering Physical Connectivity to the Primary Data
Center, the Disaster Recovery Data Center and the ITF
The following charts detail the costs considered by the Exchange to
be related to offering physical connectivity to the Primary Data
Center, Disaster Recovery Data Center, and ITF, each via an unshared
network as well as the percentage of the Exchange's overall costs that
such costs represent for each cost driver (e.g., as set forth below,
the Exchange allocated 14% of its overall Human Resources cost to
offering physical connectivity to the Primary Data Center, Disaster
Recovery Data Center, and ITF).
Primary Data Center, Disaster Recovery Data Center, and ITF
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allocated
Cost drivers Allocated annual monthly cost % of cost
cost \a\ \b\ driver
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Human Resources.............................................. $7,475,449 $622,954 14
Connectivity (external fees, cabling, switches, etc.)........ 0 0 0
External Market Data......................................... 0 0 0
Data Center.................................................. 2,721,667 226,806 71
Hardware and Software Maintenance and Licenses and Internet 1,244,888 103,741 37
Services....................................................
Depreciation................................................. 88,132 7,344 7
Allocated Shared Expenses.................................... 1,373,962 114,497 8
--------------------------------------------------
Total.................................................... 12,904,100 1,075,342 15
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ The Annual Cost includes figures rounded to the nearest dollar.
\b\ The Monthly Cost was determined by dividing the Annual Cost for each line item by twelve (12) months and
rounding up or down to the nearest dollar.
The following are additional details regarding each of the cost
drivers considered by the Exchange to be related to offering physical
connectivity to the Primary Data Center, Disaster Recovery Data Center
and the ITF.
Human Resources
The Exchange notes that IEX Group, Inc. (``IEXG'') (the parent
company of the Exchange) had 68 employees who were fully dedicated to
Exchange functions and 59 employees who performed some functions on
behalf of the Exchange as of February 29, 2024. Each department leader
has direct knowledge of the time spent by each employee with respect to
the various tasks necessary to operate the Exchange. The estimates of
Human Resources cost were therefore determined by consulting with such
department leaders, determining which employees are involved in tasks
related to providing physical connectivity, and confirming that the
proposed allocations were reasonable based on an understanding of the
percentage of their time such employees devote to such tasks, as well
as to other exchange services. This process ensures that every employee
is 100% allocated, with no double counting of employee time across
different categories of exchange services. For shared services employee
costs, the Exchange first allocated a percentage of the shared services
employees from IEXG to the Exchange. This allocation was based on an
assessment during the company's annual budget process by IEXG's
management and Finance teams on how the shared services functions
support the IEXG's different businesses. This assessment resulted in
75% of the shared services employees' costs being allocated to the
Exchange. For the 2024 Cost Analysis, the Exchange calculated an
average of the direct and ancillary employees time devoted to physical
connectivity (approximately 14%) and applied the 14% average to each
shared services department's employee costs. This rate was deemed
appropriate for shared services employees as these functions operate to
support the direct and ancillary functions. Overall, employee costs, as
allocated, were calculated using a blended rate of compensation
reflecting salary, equity and bonus compensation, benefits, payroll
taxes, and 401(k) matching contributions and totaled 14% of Exchange
Human Resources expenses.\58\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\58\ The 14% average allocation applied to shared services
employees represents an average of the time that the direct and
ancillary employees spend on physical connectivity. The 14% overall
Human Resource allocation represents the total of the direct,
ancillary and shared services employees cost allocations to physical
connectivity. While the number is coincidentally the same for this
allocation, the overall total represents a different calculation in
that the components attributable to direct and ancillary employees
reflect variations in individual employee compensation and time
spent on physical connectivity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, the Exchange calculated an allocation of employee
time for employees whose functions include providing and maintaining
physical connectivity and performance thereof, specifically Data
Engineering, Network Engineering, Software Development Engineer and
Test/Quality Assurance, Software Engineering, System Reliability
Engineering, and Technology Project Management. The Exchange also
allocated Human Resources costs to the provision of physical
connectivity to a limited subset of employees with ancillary functions
related to establishing and maintaining such physical connectivity,
specifically Business Analytics, Business Development, Business
Operations, Market Operations, Market Policy, Product, Quantitative
Research and Regulation. In addition, the Exchange allocated Human
Resources costs to employees in groups providing shared services that
thereby support physical connectivity, specifically Marketing, Office
Management, Human Resources, Finance & Accounting, Information
Security, Legal, Risk, Government Relations, senior level executives,
and Compliance employees.
For employees that have direct or ancillary functions related to
physical connectivity, the estimates of Human Resources cost were
determined by consulting with applicable department leaders, who
determined which employees are involved in tasks related
[[Page 42534]]
to providing physical connectivity, and provided reasonable allocations
based on an estimate of the percentage of time such employees devote to
those tasks. Employees from these departments perform numerous
functions to support physical connectivity, such as the installation,
re-location, configuration, and maintenance of connections and the
hardware they access. This hardware includes servers, routers,
switches, firewalls, and monitoring devices. These employees also
perform software upgrades, vulnerability assessments, remediation and
patch installs, equipment configuration and hardening, as well as
performance and capacity management. Further, these employees engage in
research and development analysis for equipment and software supporting
physical connectivity and design, provide regulatory oversight, and
support the development and on-going maintenance of internally
developed applications as well as data capture and analysis, and Member
and internal Exchange reports related to network and system
performance. The above list of employee functions is not exhaustive of
all the functions performed by Exchange employees to support physical
connectivity, but it illustrates the breath of functions those
employees perform in support of the above cost and time allocations.
Last, the Exchange notes that its Human Resources costs associated
with physical connectivity have increased in recent years as the
Exchange engaged in a several-years-long initiative to upgrade its
system infrastructure and trading system, as discussed in the Purpose
section. Thus, employees are allocated to work on various business
initiatives and enhancements to support the Exchange's business, add
new functionality, and expand its product offerings. These technology
changes directly impact the Exchange's interface specifications and
matching engine which, in turn, impacts physical connectivity by
requiring additional coding, testing, and other updates necessary to
accommodate the above initiatives.
Connectivity (External Fees, Cabling, Switches,)
The Exchange did not allocate costs for physical connectivity to
external markets to receive market data to the provision of physical
connectivity. As discussed below, a portion of such costs (as well as
market data fees paid to external markets) were allocated to logical
access as such market data is necessary for IEX to offer certain
services related to such connectivity, such as certain risk checks that
are performed prior to execution, and checking for other conditions
(e.g., limit order price protection, trading collars, aggregate and net
notional risk checks, LULD bands).
External Market Data
The Exchange did not allocate external market data fees to the
provision of physical connectivity. As discussed below, a portion of
such fees were allocated to logical access, as such market data is
necessary for IEX to offer certain services related to such
connectivity, such as certain risk checks that are performed prior to
execution, and checking for other conditions (e.g., limit order price
protection, trading collars, aggregate and net notional risk checks,
LULD bands).
Data Center
Data Center costs include the costs the Exchange incurs to provide
physical connectivity in the third-party data centers where it
maintains its equipment (such as dedicated space, security services,
cooling and power). The Exchange does not own the Primary Data Center
or the Disaster Recovery Data Center, but instead, leases space in data
centers operated by third parties. The Exchange has allocated a high
percentage of the Data Center costs (71%) to physical connectivity
because the third-party data centers and the Exchange's physical
equipment contained therein is the most direct cost in providing
physical access to the Exchange. In other words, for the Exchange to
operate in a dedicated space with connectivity by market participants
to a trading platform, costs to operate in the data centers are
tangible costs that are directly related to its ability to offer
physical connectivity to market participants.
Hardware and Software Maintenance and Licenses and Internet Services
Hardware and Software Licenses and internet Services includes
hardware and software licenses used to operate and monitor physical
assets necessary to offer physical connectivity to the Exchange, such
as integrated development environments, data visualization applications
for building monitoring and real time analytic dashboards, knowledge
management services and release management software. IEX allocated 37%
of Exchange Hardware and Software Maintenance and Licenses and internet
Services expenses to the provision of physical connectivity.
Depreciation
All physical assets, software, and hardware used to provide
physical connectivity, which also includes assets used for testing and
monitoring of Exchange infrastructure, were valued at cost, and
depreciated over three years. In general, the Depreciation costs
overall relate to hardware necessary to operate the Exchange, some of
which are owned by the Exchange and some of which are leased by the
Exchange to allow efficient periodic technology refreshes. The Exchange
also included in the Depreciation cost driver certain budgeted
improvements that the Exchange intends to capitalize and depreciate
with respect to physical connectivity in the near-term. As with the
other allocated costs in the Exchange's 2024 Cost Analysis, the
Depreciation cost was narrowly tailored to depreciation related to
physical connectivity. As noted above, the Exchange allocated 7% of its
allocated depreciation costs to providing physical connectivity.
Allocated Shared Expenses
Finally, as with other exchange products and services, a portion of
general shared expenses was allocated to overall physical connectivity
costs (8% of Exchange Allocated Shared Expenses). These general shared
costs are integral to exchange operations, including its ability to
provide physical connectivity. Costs included in general shared
expenses include office space and office expenses (e.g., occupancy and
overhead expenses), utilities, recruiting and training, marketing and
advertising costs, professional fees for legal, tax and accounting
services (including external and internal audit expenses), and
telecommunications. These general shared expenses are incurred by the
Exchange's parent company, IEXG, as a direct result of operating the
Exchange. The Exchange allocated shared services costs in line with the
average allocation rate for employees in the direct and ancillary
categories (14%), consistent with the methodology used to allocate the
cost of shared services employees as described above.\59\ The Exchange
believes it is reasonable to assign an allocation of shared expenses to
physical connectivity, consistent with allocations for shared services
employees, while continuing to ensure that such allocated expenses are
not double counted when allocated to other products and services for
which the
[[Page 42535]]
Exchange charges fees. Separately, for other shared expenses related to
the Exchange's regulatory obligations, such as fees paid to FINRA
pursuant to a regulatory services agreement between the Exchange and
FINRA, fees paid to the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation,
audit fees, and fees paid to Securities Information Processors, were
allocated differently, less than 1% was allocated to the provision of
physical connectivity. Thus, the Allocated Shared Expenses applied to
offering physical connectivity totaled 8%.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\59\ The 14% average allocation applied to applicable allocated
shared expenses is based on the average of the time that the direct
and ancillary employees spend on physical connectivity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approximate Monthly Cost
After determining the approximate allocated monthly cost related to
physical connectivity, the total monthly cost for physical connectivity
to the Primary Data Center, Disaster Recovery Data Center, and ITF of
$1,075,342 was divided by the number of Primary Data Center physical
connections the Exchange maintained (because Disaster Recovery Center
and ITF connectivity is included with each connection to the Primary
Data Center) as of February 29, 2024 (180 connections), to arrive at a
cost of approximately $5,974 per month, per physical 10G connection.
* * * * *
Costs Related To Offering Order Entry Ports
The following chart details the individual line-item costs
considered by the Exchange to be related to offering Order Entry Ports
as well as the percentage of the Exchange's overall costs such costs
represent for such area (e.g., as set forth below, the Exchange
allocated 8% of its overall Human Resources cost to offering Order
Entry Ports).\60\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\60\ As described above, IEX is proposing to continue to not
charge fees for the first five Order Entry Ports at the Primary Data
Center assigned to any Port Subscriber, and to not charge fees for
logical connectivity to the Disaster Recovery Data Center or ITF.
Order Entry Ports
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allocated
Cost drivers Allocated annual monthly cost Percent of
cost \c\ \d\ cost driver
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Human Resources.............................................. $4,227,561 $352,297 8
Connectivity (external fees, cabling, switches, etc.)........ 161,051 13,421 5
External Market Data......................................... 141,035 11,753 8
Data Center.................................................. 122,923 10,244 3
Hardware and Software Maintenance and Licenses and Internet 345,906 28,826 10
Services....................................................
Depreciation................................................. 225,727 18,811 18
Allocated Shared Expenses.................................... 699,796 58,316 4
--------------------------------------------------
Total.................................................... 5,924,000 493,667 7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\c\ The Annual Cost includes figures rounded to the nearest dollar.
\d\ The Monthly Cost was determined by dividing the Annual Cost for each line item by twelve (12) months and
rounding up or down to the nearest dollar.
The following provides additional detail regarding each of the cost
drivers considered by the Exchange to be related to offering Order
Entry Ports.
Human Resources
As noted above, IEXG (the parent company of the Exchange) had 68
employees who are fully dedicated to Exchange functions and 59
additional employees who perform some functions on behalf of the
Exchange as of February 29, 2024. As discussed in the section on
physical connectivity, each department leader has direct knowledge of
the time spent by each employee with respect to the various tasks
necessary to operate the Exchange. The estimates of Human Resources
cost were therefore determined by consulting with applicable department
leaders, who determined which employees are involved in tasks related
to providing Order Entry Ports, and provided reasonable allocations
based on an understanding of the percentage of their time such
employees devote to such tasks. This process ensures that every
employee is 100% allocated, with no double counting of employee time
across different categories of exchange services. For shared services
employee costs, the Exchange first allocated a percentage of the shared
services employees from IEXG to the Exchange. This allocation was based
on an assessment during the company's annual budget process by IEXG's
management and Finance teams on how the shared services functions
support IEXG's different businesses. This assessment resulted in 75% of
the shared services employee's costs being allocated to the Exchange.
The Exchange then allocated these costs to its core services, including
logical ports in line with the average allocation rate for employees in
the direct and ancillary categories. For the 2024 Cost Analysis, the
Exchange calculated an average of the direct and ancillary employees
time devoted to logical connectivity (7%) and applied the 7% average to
each shared services department's employee costs. This rate was deemed
appropriate for shared services employees as these functions operate to
support the direct and ancillary functions. Overall, employee costs for
employees in the direct, ancillary and shared services categories, as
allocated, were calculated using a blended rate of compensation
reflecting salary, equity and bonus compensation, benefits, payroll
taxes, and 401(k) matching contributions and totaled 8% of Exchange
Human Resources expenses.\61\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\61\ The 7% average allocation applied to shared services
employees represents an average of the time that the direct and
ancillary employees spend on logical Order Entry Ports. The 8%
overall Human Resource allocation represents the total of the
direct, ancillary and shared services employees cost allocations to
logical connectivity. The overall total represents a different
calculation than the average allocation in that the components
attributable to direct and ancillary employees reflect variations in
individual employee compensation and time spent on logical
connectivity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, the Exchange calculated an allocation of employee
time for employees whose functions include providing and maintaining
Order Entry Ports and performance thereof, specifically Data
Engineering, Network Engineering, Software Development Engineer and
Test/Quality Assurance, Software Engineering, System Reliability
Engineering, and Technology Project Management. The Exchange also
allocated Human Resources costs to the provision of Order Entry Ports
to a limited subset of employees with
[[Page 42536]]
ancillary functions related to establishing and maintaining such
connectivity, specifically Business Analytics, Business Development,
Business Operations, Market Operations, Market Policy, Product,
Quantitative Research and Regulation. In addition, the Exchange
allocated Human Resources costs to employees in groups providing shared
services that thereby support Order Entry Ports, specifically
Marketing, Office Management, Human Resources, Finance & Accounting,
Information Security, Legal, Risk, Government Relations, senior level
executives, and Compliance employees.
For employees that have direct or ancillary functions related to
Order Entry Ports, the estimates of Human Resources cost were
determined by consulting with applicable department leaders, who
determined which employees are involved in tasks related to providing
logical connectivity, and provided reasonable allocations based on an
estimate of the percentage of time such employees devote to those
tasks. Employees from these departments perform numerous functions to
support logical connectivity, such as the installation, re-location,
configuration, and maintenance of connections and the hardware they
access. This hardware includes servers, routers, switches, firewalls,
and monitoring devices. These employees also perform software upgrades,
vulnerability assessments, remediation and patch installs, equipment
configuration and hardening, and performance and capacity management.
Further, these employees engage in research and development analysis
for equipment and software supporting logical connectivity and design,
provide regulatory oversight, and support the development and on-going
maintenance of internally developed applications as well as data
capture and analysis, and Member and internal Exchange reports related
to network and system performance. The above list of employee functions
is not exhaustive of all the functions performed by Exchange employees
to support logical connectivity, but it illustrates the breath of
functions those employees perform in support of the above cost and time
allocations.
Last, the Exchange notes that its Human Resources costs associated
with logical connectivity have increased in recent years as the
Exchange engaged in a several-years-long initiative to upgrade its
system infrastructure and trading platform, as discussed in the Purpose
section. Thus, employees are allocated to work on various business
initiatives and enhancements to support the Exchange's business, add
new functionality, and expand its product offerings. These technology
changes directly impact the Exchange's interface specifications and
matching engine which, in turn, impacts logical connectivity by
requiring additional coding, testing, and other updates necessary to
accommodate the above initiatives.
Connectivity (External Fees, Cabling, Switches, etc.)
The Connectivity cost driver includes external fees paid to connect
to other exchanges, cabling, and switches. The Connectivity cost driver
includes external fees paid to connect to other exchanges and third
parties, along with other cable and switch infrastructure required to
operate the Exchange. The Connectivity cost driver is narrowly focused
on technology used to complete connections on the Exchange and to
connect to external markets. The Exchange requires connectivity to
external markets to enable it to receive market data to run the
Exchange's matching engine (and make routing decisions for its
affiliated routing broker, IEX Services, LLC, pursuant to IEX Rule
2.220) and basic operations compliant with existing regulations,
primarily Regulation NMS. The Exchange allocated 5% of such costs (as
well as market data fees paid to external markets) to logical access as
such market data is necessary for IEX to offer certain services related
to such connectivity, such as certain risk checks that are performed
prior to execution, and checking for other conditions (e.g., limit
order price protection, trading collars, and aggregate and net notional
risk checks, LULD bands).
External Market Data
External Market Data includes fees paid to third parties, including
other exchanges, to receive and consume market data from other markets.
The Exchange includes a portion of External Market Data fees to the
provision of Order Entry Ports as such market data is also necessary to
offer certain services related to such connectivity, such as certain
risk checks that are performed before an order enters the matching
engine (e.g., validating orders against the national best bid and
national best offer, trading collars, whether a symbol is halted or
subject to a short sale circuit breaker). Thus, as market data from
other exchanges is consumed at the port level to validate orders before
additional processing occurs with respect to such orders, the Exchange
believes it is reasonable to allocate a limited proportion of such
costs to Order Entry Ports (8% of Exchange External Market Data
expenses).
Data Center
Data Center costs include the costs the Exchange incurs to provide
logical connectivity in the third-party data centers where it maintains
its equipment (such as rent for dedicated space, security services,
cooling and power). The Exchange does not own the Primary Data Center
or the Disaster Recovery Data Center, but instead, leases space in data
centers operated by third parties. The Exchange has allocated a portion
of the Data Center cost to logical access ports based on its reasonable
assessment (3% of Data Center expenses).
Hardware and Software Maintenance and Licenses and Internet Services
Hardware and Software Licenses include hardware and software
licenses used to monitor the health of the order entry services
provided by the Exchange, as described above. The Exchange uses a
third-party vendor to provide the initial logical order entry port
configurations, which have been extensively customized by Exchange
employees. Internet Services relate to the internet Service Provider
vendor that is used to monitor and administer the order entry port
sessions. The Exchange allocated 10% of Hardware and Software
Maintenance and Licenses and internet Services expenses to the
provision of Order Entry Ports based upon its reasonable assessment.
Depreciation
As noted above, the software the Exchange uses to provide Order
Entry Ports is licensed from a third-party service provider, although
it has been significantly customized by in-house employees. Related
costs include both development work, as well as quality assurance and
testing to ensure the software works as intended. These costs are
depreciated over time once the software is activated in the production
environment. Hardware used to provide Order Entry Ports includes
equipment used for testing and monitoring of order entry infrastructure
and other physical equipment the Exchange purchased and is also
depreciated over time.
All hardware and software, which also includes assets used for
testing and monitoring of order entry infrastructure, were valued at
cost and depreciated or leased over a three-year period. Thus, the
depreciation cost primarily relates to servers necessary to operate the
Exchange, some of which is owned by the Exchange and some of which is
leased by the Exchange in order to allow
[[Page 42537]]
efficient periodic technology refreshes. The Exchange allocated 18% of
Exchange Depreciation expenses to the provision of Order Entry Ports
based upon its reasonable assessment.
Allocated Shared Expenses
Finally, as with other exchange products and services, a portion of
general shared expenses was allocated to overall logical connectivity
costs (4% of Exchange Allocated Shared Expenses). These general shared
costs are integral to exchange operations, including its ability to
provide logical connectivity. Costs included in general shared expenses
include office space and office expenses (e.g., occupancy and overhead
expenses), utilities, recruiting and training, marketing and
advertising costs, professional fees for legal, tax and accounting
services (including external and internal audit expenses), and
telecommunications. These general shared expenses are incurred by the
Exchange's parent company, IEXG, as a direct result of operating the
Exchange. The Exchange allocated shared services costs in line with the
average allocation rate for employees in the direct and ancillary
categories (7%), consistent with the methodology used to allocate the
cost of shared services employees as described above.\62\ The Exchange
believes it is reasonable to assign an allocation of shared expenses to
logical Order Entry Ports, consistent with allocations for shared
services employees, while continuing to ensure that such allocated
expenses are not double counted when allocated to other products and
services for which the Exchange charges fees. Separately, for other
shared expenses related to the Exchange's regulatory obligations, such
as fees paid to FINRA pursuant to a regulatory services agreement
between the Exchange and FINRA, fees paid to the Depository Trust and
Clearing Corporation, audit fees, and fees paid to Securities
Information Processors, were allocated differently, less than 1% was
allocated to the provision of logical connectivity. Thus, the Allocated
Shared Expenses applied to offering physical connectivity totaled 4%.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\62\ The 7% average allocation applied to applicable allocated
shared expenses is based on the average of the time that the direct
and ancillary employees spent on logical connectivity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Approximate Monthly Cost
The total monthly cost allocated to logical ports of $493,667 was
divided by the number of chargeable Order Entry Ports the Exchange
maintained at the time that proposed pricing was determined \63\
(1,161), to arrive at a cost of approximately $425 per month, per
chargeable Order Entry Port (rounded to the nearest dollar when
dividing the approximate monthly cost by the number of Order Entry
Ports).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\63\ The Exchanges' costs for providing logical connectivity
include the costs of providing logical connectivity for which the
Exchange charges no fees (i.e., free logical connectivity to its
Disaster Recovery Data Center or its ITF, as well as up to five free
Order Entry Ports to its Primary Data Center to Port Subscribers).
See supra note 60. Thus the total number of assigned Order Entry
Ports figure includes more ports than the total number of ports for
which the Exchange charges any fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Cost Analysis--Additional Discussion
In conducting its 2024 Cost Analysis, the Exchange did not
generally allocate any overall expense category in full to any core
services (including physical connectivity or logical Order Entry Ports)
and did not double-count any expenses. Instead, as described above, the
Exchange allocated applicable cost drivers across its core services.
For instance, in calculating the Human Resources expenses to be
allocated to physical connections based upon the methodology described
above, the Exchange allocated network infrastructure employees with a
high percentage of the cost of such employees (75%) to physical
connectivity given their focus on functions necessary to provide
physical connections. The compensation of those same employees was
allocated 20% to Order Entry Ports, and the remaining 5% was allocated
to trading and routing, market data, and other Exchange functions. For
ancillary employees, who work closely with and support network
infrastructure employees, the Exchange allocated a smaller percentage
of 8% for physical connectivity and 4% for Order Entry Ports, with the
remaining 88% allocated to trading and routing, market data, and other
core services provided by the Exchange. For shared services employees,
the Exchange allocated costs across a wider range of employee groups
pursuant to the allocation methodology described above resulting in an
allocation of 14% to physical connectivity, 8% to Order Entry Ports,
and 78% to trading and routing, market data, and other core services
provided by the Exchange.
In total, the Exchange allocated 14% of its Human Resources costs
to providing physical connectivity and 8% of its Human Resources costs
to providing Order Entry Ports, for a total allocation of 22% of its
Human Resources expense to provide these specific connectivity
services. In turn, the Exchange allocated the remaining 78% of its
Human Resources expense toward the cost of providing trading and
routing, market data and other core services provided by the Exchange.
The Exchange allocated depreciation expense to all core services,
including physical connections and Order Entry Ports, but in different
amounts. The Exchange believes it is reasonable to allocate the
identified portion of such expense because such expense includes the
actual cost of the computer equipment, such as dedicated servers,
computers, laptops, monitors, information security appliances and
storage, and network switching infrastructure equipment, including
switches and taps that were purchased to operate and support the
network. Without this equipment, IEX would not be able to operate the
Exchange and provide connectivity services to its Members and Sponsored
Participants. The Exchange allocated 25% of overall depreciation and
amortization expense to connectivity services (7% attributed to
physical connectivity and 18% to Order Entry Ports). The Exchange
allocated the remaining depreciation and amortization expense (75%)
toward the cost of providing trading and routing, market data, and
other Exchange functions.
The Exchange's revenue estimates described herein are based on
projections for physical connectivity and Order Entry Ports and will
only be realized to the extent such revenue streams actually produce
the revenue estimated. The Exchange does not yet know whether such
expectations will be realized. For instance, in order to generate the
revenue expected from connectivity, the Exchange will have to be
successful in retaining existing clients that wish to maintain physical
connectivity and/or Order Entry Ports or in obtaining new clients that
will purchase such services.
The 2024 Cost Analysis is based on the Exchange's 2024 fiscal year
of operations and projections. It is possible, however, that actual
costs may be higher or lower. To the extent the Exchange sees growth in
use of connectivity services, it will receive additional revenue to
offset current costs and future cost increases.
However, if use of connectivity services is static or decreases,
the Exchange might not realize the revenue that it anticipates or needs
in order to offset applicable costs as projected and described herein.
In the event revenues fail to cover future costs and a reasonable mark-
up of such costs (potential future markup of such costs), the Exchange
may later propose to
[[Page 42538]]
increase related fees. Similarly, the Exchange may propose to decrease
fees in the event that revenue materially exceeds our current projected
costs. In addition, the Exchange will periodically conduct a review to
inform its decision making on whether a fee change is appropriate
(e.g., to monitor for costs increasing/decreasing or subscribers
increasing/decreasing, etc. in ways that suggest the then-current fees
are becoming dislocated from the prior cost-based analysis) and would
propose to increase fees in the event that revenues fail to cover its
costs, or decrease fees in the event that revenue or the mark-up
materially exceeds our current projected costs so that it would
constitute excessive pricing or a supra-competitive profit. In the
event that the Exchange determines to propose a fee change, the results
of a timely review, including an updated cost estimate, will be
included in the rule filing proposing the fee change. More generally,
the Exchange believes that it is appropriate for an exchange to refresh
and update information about its relevant costs and revenues in seeking
any future changes to fees, and the Exchange commits to do so.
Projected Revenue
The proposed fees will allow the Exchange to cover certain costs
incurred by the Exchange associated with providing and maintaining
necessary hardware and other network infrastructure as well as network
monitoring and support services. Without such hardware, infrastructure,
monitoring and support, the Exchange would be unable to provide the
physical connectivity and Order Entry Port services required by
Connectivity Subscribers and Port Subscribers.
The Exchange routinely works to improve the performance of the
network's hardware and software. The costs associated with maintaining
and enhancing a state-of-the-art exchange network is a significant
expense for the Exchange, and thus the Exchange believes that it is
reasonable and appropriate to offset a portion of those costs, with a
limited potential return in excess of such costs if actuals differ from
projections, by adopting and increasing fees for connectivity services.
Costs in this category enable the Exchange, for example, to measure
network performance with nanosecond granularity and allow the Exchange
to continuously improve network performance, based on Connectivity
Subscribers' needs and expectations.
As detailed above, the Exchange has five primary sources of revenue
that it can potentially use to fund its operations: transaction fees,
fees for connectivity services, membership and regulatory fees (which
the Exchange does not charge), and market data fees. Accordingly, the
Exchange must cover its expenses from these five primary sources of
revenue.
The Exchange's 2024 Cost Analysis estimates the 2024 annual cost to
provide physical connectivity will be $12,904,100. These costs include
costs to provide physical connectivity at IEX's Primary Data Denter,
Disaster Recovery Data Center, and ITF. Based on current usage (i.e.,
that all current Connectivity Subscribers pay fees as proposed to
maintain existing physical connectivity), the Exchange estimates that
it would generate annual revenue of approximately $8,640,000, that
would cover 67% of such costs. The cost recovery would vary from this
estimate if actual usage were more or less than current usage.
The Exchange's 2024 Cost Analysis estimates the 2024 annual cost to
provide Order Entry Ports services will be $5,924,000. Based on current
usage, the Exchange estimates that would generate annual revenue of
approximately $3,483,000, that would cover 59% of such costs.\64\ The
cost recovery would vary from this estimate if actual usage were more
or less than current usage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\64\ For comparison, see MEMX Connectivity Fees Filing,
Securities Exchange Act Release No. No. 95936 (September 27, 2022),
87 FR 59845, 59851 (October 3, 2022) (SR-MEMX-2022-26) (proposing to
adopt fees for connectivity and stating that MEMX would earn
approximately 8% markup).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on the above discussion, IEX believes that the proposed fees
are fair and reasonable because they are reasonably related to the
associated costs of providing products and services and will not result
in excessive pricing, or supra-competitive profit. To the contrary, the
proposed fees are expected to only provide a partial recovery of its
costs to provide physical and logical connectivity. Further, the
proposed fees are comparable to, or lower than, similar fees for
similar products charged by competing exchanges. For example, for
physical connectivity to the Primary Data Center which would include
physical connectivity at the Disaster Recovery Data Center and the ITF,
the Exchange proposes a lower monthly fee ($4,000) than the monthly
fees charged by MIAX Pearl ($8,000), MEMX ($6,000), and Cboe EDGA
($8,500) for just their 10G connections to their primary data
centers.\65\ Moreover, IEX is not proposing to charge additional fees
for physical connectivity to its Disaster Recovery Data Center, while
competing exchanges charge separately for such connectivity.
Specifically, MIAX Pearl charges a monthly fee of $3,000, MEMX charges
a monthly fee of $3,000, and Cboe EDGA charges a monthly fee of $6,000
for their comparable 10G connections to their secondary data
centers.\66\ Similarly, the proposed increases to the logical port fees
would continue to result in lower fees than those of IEX's competitors.
Accordingly, the Exchange believes that this comparative analysis
provides an additional layer of support for how its proposed fees meet
the requirements of the Act in that they are lower than the fees
charged by competing exchanges.\67\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\65\ See MIAX Pearl Equities Exchange Fee Schedule as of May 1,
2024, available at https://www.miaxglobal.com/sites/default/files/fee_schedule-files/MIAX_Pearl_Equities_Fee_Schedule_05012024.pdf;
MEMX Connectivity Fee Schedule, available at https://info.memxtrading.com/connectivity-fees/; Cboe U.S. Equities Fee
Schedule, EDGA Equities, available at https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/membership/fee_schedule/edga/.
\66\ See supra note 65.
\67\ However, even if the Exchange earns incrementally more
revenue, the proposed fees are fair and reasonable because they
would not result in excessive pricing or supra-competitive profit
compared to other equities exchanges, based on the total expenses of
the Exchange associated with providing physical connectivity and
Order Entry Ports versus the total projected revenue of the Exchange
associated with those services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes it is appropriate and consistent with the Act
to raise its fees, as proposed, to facilitate enhancements and upgrades
to its technology, which are essential for it to continue to compete
with other equities exchanges. The Exchange believes the proposed fees
are reasonable because they are based on the extent to which each
product drives the Exchange's overall costs, which recognizes that
certain market participants ascribe certain market value to each such
product, and the Exchange's objective to make access to its trading
system broadly available to market participants.
The Exchange notes that its revenue estimates are based on
projections and will only be realized to the extent customer activity
produces the revenue estimated. The Exchange does not yet know whether
such projections will be realized. For instance, in order to generate
the revenue expected from physical connectivity as well as Order Entry
Ports, the Exchange will need to be successful in retaining existing
clients that wish to utilize its physical connectivity and Order Entry
Ports and/or obtaining new clients that will purchase such access. To
the extent the Exchange experiences a net loss in Connectivity or Port
Subscribers, the Exchange could experience a net reduction in revenue.
In assessing an
[[Page 42539]]
exchange's rule filing to adopt non-transaction fees based on a cost
analysis, IEX believes that it is also relevant for the Commission to
consider the extent to which the proposed fees are comparable to and
competitive with similar fees charged by other exchanges in order to
ensure that the regulatory oversight of comparable fees across
exchanges is applied in a way that promotes fair and non-discriminatory
intermarket competition.
The Proposed Pricing Is Not Unfairly Discriminatory and Provides for
the Equitable Allocation of Fees, Dues, and Other Charges
Physical Connectivity Fees
IEX believes that its proposed physical connectivity fee of $4,000
to connect to the Primary Data Center, which includes physical
connectivity to the Disaster Recovery Data Center and ITF for no
additional charge, is reasonable, fair and equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory because it is designed to align fees with the costs of
services provided and will apply equally to all Members and other
Connectivity Subscribers \68\ with direct physical connectivity to the
Exchange, and will minimize barriers to entry by providing high speed
10G connectivity at prices well below those offered by any other
exchange. IEX believes that the cost-based fee of $4,000 per month is
low enough that it will not operate to restrain any subscriber's
ability to maintain physical connectivity to the Exchange. These lower
fees for 10G physical connectivity mean that even those firms which
might maintain two or more physical connections to the Exchange will
still pay considerably less than competing exchanges charge for
equivalent physical connectivity. Further, the number of physical
connections to the Exchange will continue to be based on decisions by
each firm, including the ability to reduce fees by reducing the number
of physical connections to the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\68\ As discussed above, the types of firms that might pay for
physical connectivity to the Exchange are: Members, Service Bureaus,
Data Recipients, and Extranet Providers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that charging $4,000 for physical
connectivity to the Exchange is fair and equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory because it will enable all Members (and other firms with
physical connectivity) to obtain a 10G connection to IEX at prices
well-below those of any other equity exchange, thereby encouraging
order flow and liquidity from a diverse set of market participants,
facilitating price discovery and the interaction of orders. IEX also
notes that Connectivity Providers that determine they need two or more
physical connections to the Exchange (generally because they generate
relatively higher inbound message volume or need faster message
throughput) thereby account for a disproportionate share of IEX's
aggregate costs for providing physical connectivity. Therefore, IEX
believes it is not unfairly discriminatory for such Members to pay a
higher proportionate share of the physical connectivity fees by paying
for each additional connection.
Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the fee will be applied
consistently with its specific purpose--to offset a portion of its
costs with a limited potential return in excess of such costs if
actuals differ from projections.
The Exchange further believes that the proposed fees are
reasonable, fair and equitable, and non-discriminatory because they
will apply to all Connectivity Subscribers in the same manner and are
not targeted at a specific type or category of market participant
engaged in any particular trading strategy. All Members, Service
Bureaus, Data Recipients, and Extranet Providers will pay the same
``per unit'' rate for physical connectivity to the Exchange. Further,
the physical connectivity fee is not connected to volume-based tiers or
dependent on executing a minimum volume of orders on IEX. All
Connectivity Subscribers will be subject to the same fee schedule,
regardless of the volume sent to or executed on IEX. The fee also does
not depend on any distinctions between Members, Service Bureaus, Data
Recipients, and Extranet Providers. The fee will be assessed solely
based on the number of physical connections a firm selects and not on
any other distinction applied by IEX. While firms that send relatively
more inbound messages to IEX may select two or more physical
connections to the Exchange, thereby resulting in higher fees, that
distinction is based on decisions made by each firm and the extent and
nature of the firm's business on IEX rather than application of the fee
by IEX. Members, Service Bureaus, Data Recipients, and Extranet
Providers can determine how many physical connections they need to
implement their trading or business strategies effectively.
IEX also believes that it is reasonable, equitable, and not
unfairly discriminatory to base its billing for physical connectivity
on the number of physical connections assigned to Members, Service
Bureaus, Data Recipients, and Extranet Providers as of the first day of
each month. IEX believes that this approach is fair because Members,
Service Bureaus, Data Recipients, and Extranet Providers will have a
reasonable understanding and expectation of the cutoff date for
determining whether the firm requires one or more physical connections
to the Exchange.
Furthermore, the Exchange believes that the proposed fee is
consistent with Section 11A of the Exchange Act in that it is designed
to facilitate the economically efficient execution of securities
transactions, fair competition among brokers and dealers, exchange
markets and markets other than exchange markets, and the practicability
of brokers executing investors' orders in the best market.
Specifically, the proposed low, cost-based fee will enable a broad
range of Members, Service Bureaus, Data Recipients, and Extranet
Providers to continue to physically connect to IEX, thereby
facilitating the economically efficient execution of securities
transactions on IEX, fair competition between and among such Members,
Service Bureaus, Data Recipients, and Extranet Providers, and the
practicability of Members that are brokers executing investors' orders
on IEX when it is the best market.
As discussed above, IEX believes the proposed fees are reasonable
because they are equitable and not unfairly discriminatory, based on a
thorough and transparent cost-based analysis as well as a comparison to
similar fees charged by other exchanges, as detailed below. Moreover,
the proposed fees would support IEX's ability to cover its costs (in
whole or in part) to provide physical connectivity, with a limited
potential return in excess of such costs if actuals differ from
projections, and thereby invest in infrastructure, new products and
other innovations, and competitively price transaction fees. These
investments in the IEX's future growth are designed to enable IEX to
attract additional business and build market share, with the benefit,
inter alia, of attracting more displayed liquidity to the Exchange to
the benefit of all market participants.
Finally, IEX does not believe that physical connectivity fees are
properly constrained by competitive market pressures. Nevertheless, the
Exchange believes that a competitive analysis of its proposed fees, as
discussed below, also demonstrates that they are equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory.
Logical Connectivity Fees
With respect to Order Entry Ports, IEX believes that its proposed
fee is reasonable, fair and equitable, and not
[[Page 42540]]
unfairly discriminatory because it is designed to align fees with the
costs of services provided, will apply equally to all Members that are
assigned Order Entry Ports (either directly or through a Service
Bureau), and will minimize barriers to entry by continuing to provide
all Port Subscribers with five free Order Entry Ports. Because the
first five Order Entry Ports are free, a significant majority of Port
Subscribers will not be subject to any fee. Even for Port Subscribers
that choose to maintain more than five Order Entry Ports, IEX believes
that the cost-based fee of $250 is low enough that it will not operate
to restrain any Port Subscriber's ability to maintain the number of
Order Entry Ports that it determines are consistent with its business
objectives. The small number of Members projected to be subject to the
highest fees will still pay considerably less than competing exchanges
charge. For example, the monthly cost per order entry port on Nasdaq,
NYSE, and Cboe EDGA is $575, $550, and $550, respectively.\69\ IEX
further notes that NYSE and Nasdaq both charge for other logical ports
that IEX will continue to offer for free, such as those used for
testing and disaster recovery purposes.\70\ Further, the number of
assigned Order Entry Ports will continue to be based on decisions by
each Port Subscriber, including the ability to reduce fees by
discontinuing unused Order Entry Ports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\69\ See Nasdaq Price List--Trading Connectivity, Logical
Connectivity, https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=PriceListTrading2#logicalconnectivity; NYSE Price
List as of February 12, 20204, available at https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/nyse/NYSE_Price_List.pdf; and Cboe U.S.
Equities Fee Schedule, EDGA Equities, available at https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/membership/fee_schedule/edga/.
\70\ See Nasdaq Price List--Trading Connectivity, Logical
Connectivity, https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=PriceListTrading2#logicalconnectivity; NYSE Price
List as of February 12, 20204, available at https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/nyse/NYSE_Price_List.pdf;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that providing five free Order Entry Ports is
fair and equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory because it will
enable all Members and Service Bureaus to access IEX on those ports
free of charge, thereby encouraging order flow and liquidity from a
diverse set of market participants, facilitating price discovery and
the interaction of orders. IEX continues to believe that five Order
Entry Ports is an appropriate number to provide for free because it
aligns with the number of such ports currently maintained by a
meaningful majority of Port Subscribers. Port Subscribers with
relatively higher inbound message volume also request (and are
assigned) more Order Entry Ports than other Port Subscribers, which in
turn means they account for a disproportionate share of IEX's aggregate
costs for providing Order Entry Ports. Therefore, IEX believes it is
not unfairly discriminatory for the Port Subscribers with higher
inbound message volume to pay a higher proportionate share of the Order
Entry Port fees.
Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the fee will be applied
consistently with its specific purpose--to offset a portion its costs,
with a limited potential return in excess of such costs if actuals
differ from projections, encourage the efficient use of Order Entry
Ports, and align fees with Port Subscribers' Order Entry Port and
system usage.
The Exchange further believes that the proposed fees are
reasonable, fair and equitable, and non-discriminatory because they
will apply to all Members in the same manner and are not targeted at a
specific type or category of market participant engaged in any
particular trading strategy. All Members (or Service Bureaus) will
receive five free Order Entry Ports and pay the same $250 per Order
Entry Port for each additional Order Entry Port. Each Order Entry Port
is identical, providing logical connectivity to IEX on identical terms.
While the proposed fee will result in a different effective ``per
unit'' rate for different Members (or Service Bureaus) after factoring
in the five free Order Entry Ports, the Exchange does not believe that
this difference is material given the overall low fee of $250 per Order
Entry Port. Because the first five Order Entry Ports are free of
charge, each entity will have a ``per unit'' rate of less than $250.
Further, the fee is not connected to volume-based tiers. All Members
will be subject to the same fee schedule, regardless of the volume sent
to or executed on IEX. The fee also does not depend on any distinctions
between Members, customers, broker-dealers, or any other entity. The
fee will be assessed solely based on the number of Order Entry Ports an
entity selects and not on any other distinction applied by IEX. While
entities that send relatively more inbound messages to IEX may select
more Order Entry Ports, thereby resulting in higher fees, that
distinction is based on decisions made by each Port Subscriber and the
extent and nature of the Port Subscribers' business on IEX rather than
application of the fee by IEX. Members (and their Service Bureaus) can
determine how many Order Entry Ports they need to implement their
trading strategies effectively. As proposed, IEX will continue to offer
multiple Order Entry Ports at a low fee to enable all Port Subscribers
to purchase as many Order Entry Ports as their business needs dictate
in order to optimize throughput and manage latency across the Exchange.
Notwithstanding that Port Subscribers with the highest number of
Order Entry Ports will pay a greater percentage of the total projected
fees than is represented by their Order Entry Port usage, IEX does not
believe that the proposed fee is unfairly discriminatory. It is not
possible to fully synchronize IEX's objective to provide five free
Order Entry Ports to all Port Subscribers, thereby minimizing barriers
to entry and incentivizing liquidity on the Exchange, with an approach
that exactly aligns the projected per Port Subscriber fee with each
Port Subscriber's number of requested Order Entry Ports. As proposed,
IEX is providing a reasonable number of Order Entry Ports to each
Member (or Service Bureau) without charge. Any variance between
projected fees and Order Entry Port usage is attributable to objective
differences among Members in terms of the number of Order Entry Ports
they determine are appropriate based on their trading on IEX. Any
difference in impact would be allocated to Port Subscribers with
substantially higher trading volume.
IEX also believes that it is reasonable, equitable, and not
unfairly discriminatory to base its billing for Order Entry Ports on
the number of Order Entry Ports assigned to each User as of the first
day of each month. IEX believes that this approach is fair because
Members (and Service Bureaus) will have a reasonable understanding and
expectation of the cutoff date for determining whether a User has more
than five assigned Order Entry Ports.
Finally, the Exchange believes that the proposed fee is consistent
with Section 11A of the Exchange Act in that it is designed to
facilitate the economically efficient execution of securities
transactions, fair competition among brokers and dealers, exchange
markets and markets other than exchange markets, and the practicability
of brokers executing investors' orders in the best market.
Specifically, the proposed low, cost-based fee will enable a broad
range of IEX Members to continue to connect to IEX, thereby
facilitating the economically efficient execution of securities
transactions on IEX, fair competition between and among such Members,
and the practicability of Members that are brokers executing investors'
orders on IEX when it is the best market.
As discussed above, IEX believes the proposed fees are reasonable
because they are equitable and not unfairly
[[Page 42541]]
discriminatory, based on a thorough and transparent cost-based
analysis, as well as a comparison to similar fees charged by other
exchanges, as detailed below. Moreover, the proposed fees would support
IEX's ability to offset its costs (in whole or in part) to provide
logical connectivity, with a limited potential return in excess of such
costs if actuals differ from projections, and thereby invest in
infrastructure, new products and other innovations, and competitively
price transaction fees. These investments in the IEX's future growth
are designed to enable IEX to attract additional business and build
market share, with the benefit, inter alia, of attracting more
displayed liquidity to the Exchange to the benefit of all market
participants.
As discussed above, IEX does not believe that logical connectivity
fees are properly constrained by competitive market pressures.
Nevertheless, the Exchange believes that an analysis of similar fees
charged by competitor exchanges, as discussed below, also demonstrates
that the proposed fees are equitable and not unfairly discriminatory.
The Proposed Fees Promote Competition by Offering a Lower Cost Solution
The Exchange believes the competing exchanges' physical
connectivity and port fees are useful examples of alternative
approaches to providing and charging for physical and logical
connectivity. To that end, the Exchange believes the proposed fees are
reasonable, in addition to being cost-based, because the proposed fees
are less than fees charged for similar physical connectivity and
logical order entry port access provided by other exchanges with
comparable market shares. These fees are designed to recoup a portion
of its costs for providing physical and logical connectivity, with a
limited potential return in excess of such costs if actuals differ from
projections, thereby enabling it to invest in competitive
infrastructure and other offerings and compete with other equities
exchanges. The following table demonstrates that the Exchange's
proposed fees would be significantly less than fees charged for similar
physical and logical connectivity provided by other exchanges with
similar market share. Each of the physical or logical connectivity fees
in place at competing exchanges listed below were filed with the
Commission for immediate effectiveness and remain in place today.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type of connection
Exchange or port Monthly fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IEX (market share of 1.94% 10G connection to $4,000 per
for the month of March Primary Data Center. connection (as
2024) \e\. proposed).
10G connection to Included with 10G
Disaster Recovery connection to
Data Center. Primary Data Center
(as proposed).
Primary Data Center 1-5 ports: FREE 6
Logical Order Entry ports or more: $250
Ports. per port (as
proposed).
All other logical FREE.
ports (including
Drop Copy ports).
MIAX Pearl Equities (market 1G connection to $2,500 per
share of 1.87% for the primary/secondary connection.\f\ \g\
month of March 2024) \e\. data center. $8,000 per
10G connection to connection.\f\
primary/secondary $1,000 per
data center. connection.\f\ \h\
1G connection to $3,000 per
disaster recovery connection.\f\
data center. 1-5 ports: FREE 6
1G [sic] connection ports or more: $450
to disaster per port.\f\
recovery data FREE.\f\
center.
FIX and MEO Ports...
FXD Ports (i.e.,
Drop Copy Ports).
MEMX (market share of 2.53% 1G connection to Not available.\i\
for the month of March primary data center. $6,000 per
2024) \e\. 10G connection to connection.\i\
primary data center. $3,000 per
10G connection to connection.\i\
disaster recovery $450 per port.\i\
data center. $450 per port.\i\
Order Entry Ports...
Drop Copy Ports.....
Cboe EDGA (market share of 1G connection to $2,500 per
1.78% for the month of primary data center. connection.\g\ \j\
March 2024) \e\. 10G connection to $8,500 per
primary data center. connection.\j\
1G connection to $2,000 per
disaster recovery connection.\j\
data center. $6,000 per
10G connection to connection.\j\
disaster recovery $550 per port.\j\
data center. $650 per port.\j\
Order Entry Ports...
Purge Ports.........
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\e\ See ``U.S. Equities Market Volume Summary'', available at https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/.
\f\ See MIAX Pearl Equities Exchange Fee Schedule as of May 1, 2024,
available at https://www.miaxglobal.com/sites/default/files/fee_schedule-files/MIAX_Pearl_Equities_Fee_Schedule_05012024.pdf.
\g\ IEX notes that some equities exchanges also offer a 1G connection to
their primary data center, but understands that only a small minority
of market participants find a 1G connection to be adequate for trading
and market data purposes.
\h\ MIAX Pearl waives the fee for a single 1G connection to the disaster
recovery center for members required by MIAX Pearl to conduct disaster
recovery data center testing. See https://www.miaxglobal.com/sites/default/files/fee_schedule-files/MIAX_Pearl_Equities_Fee_Schedule_05012024.pdf.
\i\ See MEMX Connectivity Fee Schedule, available at https://info.memxtrading.com/connectivity-fees/.
\j\ See Cboe U.S. Equities Fee Schedule, EDGA Equities, available at
https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/membership/fee_schedule/edga/.
Moreover, IEX's proposed fees are substantially lower than the fees
other exchanges that operate listing markets charge for the equivalent
physical and logical connectivity. For example, NYSE charges $22,000
per month for a 10G physical connection, plus an initial charge of
$15,000; and charges $550 per order entry and drop copy ports.\71\
Nasdaq charges $10,550 per month for a 10G physical connection, plus an
initial charge of $1,055 (and $15,825 per month for a 10G ``Ultra''
connection, plus an initial charge of $1,583); and charges $575 per
order entry port, $550 per drop copy port, $100 per test ports, and $25
per disaster recovery ports.\72\ By contrast, IEX, as proposed, will
charge $4,000 for a 10G physical connection, offers up to five Order
Entry Ports for free, and charges $250 per port for 6 or more ports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\71\ See NYSE Connectivity Fee Schedule as of April 3, 2024,
available at https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/Wireless_Connectivity_Fees_and_Charges.pdf. and NYSE Price List as
of February 12, 20204, available at https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/nyse/NYSE_Price_List.pdf.
\72\ See Nasdaq Price List--Trading Connectivity, Logical
Connectivity, https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=PriceListTrading2#logicalconnectivity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no regulatory requirement that any broker-dealer connect
to and access any (or all of) the available equity exchanges. Market
participants may choose to become a member of one or more (or no)
equities exchanges based on the market participant's assessment of the
business opportunity relative to the costs of the Exchange. In lieu of
becoming a member at each exchange, a market participant may join one
[[Page 42542]]
exchange and elect to have its orders routed in the event that a better
price is available on an away market. Nothing in the Order Protection
Rule \73\ requires a broker-dealer to become a Member of--or establish
connectivity to--the Exchange. All equities exchanges have rules in
place to avoid trading through a better priced quotation on another
exchange in violation of Order Protection Rule.\74\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\73\ See 17 CFR 242.611.
\74\ See e.g., IEX Rule 11.230.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted earlier, IEX believes that as a general matter, physical
and logical connectivity fees cannot be sufficiently justified based
solely on unproven assumptions about competition, notwithstanding that
a newer and/or smaller securities exchange, such as IEX, may be less
able to set prices for its physical and logical connectivity free of
constraint by significant competitive forces than may be the case for
more established securities exchanges.\75\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\75\ And as noted earlier, IEX's proposed fees are significantly
less than fees charged by its competitors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In summary, for all of the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes
that the proposed fees are reasonable, equitably allocated, and not
unfairly discriminatory.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
IEX does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on intramarket or intermarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Physical Connectivity Fees
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed
fees are cost-based fees, which are designed to enable the Exchange to
recoup applicable costs, with a limited potential return on its
investment in excess of such costs if actuals differ from projections,
as described in the Purpose and Statutory Basis sections. Competing
equities exchanges are free to propose comparable fee structures
subject to the SEC rule filing process. And as discussed above, market
participants are not required to connect to all exchanges. There is no
reason to believe that IEX's proposed price increase will adversely
impact any other exchange's ability to compete. Further, as detailed
above, the proposed fees are lower than similar fees charged by other
exchanges. IEX believes that a comparison to comparable fees charged by
competitor markets helps to ensure that regulatory oversight of
comparable fees across exchanges is applied in a way that promotes fair
and non-discriminatory intermarket competition. Accordingly, the
Exchange does not believe its proposed fee changes impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
The Exchange also does not believe that the proposed fees will
impose any burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. All Connectivity
Subscribers will be charged the same amount for each physical
connection to the Primary Data Center, with free physical connectivity
to the Disaster Recovery Data Center and ITF. The proposed fees do not
favor certain categories of Connectivity Subscribers in a manner that
would impose an undue burden on competition. The Exchange does not
believe that the proposed rule change would place certain Connectivity
Subscribers at the Exchange at a relative advantage or disadvantage
compared to other Connectivity Subscribers or affect the ability of
such firms to compete. Connectivity Subscribers that utilize more
physical connectivity services typically utilize the most bandwidth,
and those are the firms that consume the most resources from the
Exchange. Accordingly, the proposed fees for physical connectivity
services do not favor certain categories of Connectivity Subscribers in
a manner that would impose a burden on competition; rather, the
allocation of the proposed physical connectivity fees reflects the
Exchange resources consumed by the various Connectivity Subscribers and
the costs to the Exchange of providing such physical connectivity
services.
Finally, as described in the Purpose section, the proposed fee
change is designed to assist the Exchange in complying with its
Regulation SCI compliance obligations to have levels of capacity
adequate to maintain IEX's operational capability and promote the
maintenance of fair and orderly markets, thereby promoting both
intermarket and intramarket competition by enabling IEX to support a
robust trading environment for its Members and compete with other
equities venues.
Logical Connectivity Fees
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change with
respect to Order Entry Port Fees will impose any burden on intermarket
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. The proposed fees are cost-based fees, which are
designed to enable the Exchange to recoup applicable costs, with a
limited potential return on its investment in excess of such costs if
actuals differ from projections, as described in the Purpose and
Statutory Basis sections. Competing equities exchanges are free to
propose comparable fee structures subject to the SEC rule filing
process. And as discussed above, market participants are not
regulatorily required to connect to all exchanges. There is no reason
to believe that IEX's proposed price increase will adversely impact any
other exchange's ability to compete. Further, as detailed above, the
proposed fees are lower than similar fees charged by other exchanges.
IEX believes that a comparison to comparable fees charged by competitor
markets helps to ensure that regulatory oversight of comparable fees
across exchanges is applied in a way that promotes fair and non-
discriminatory intermarket competition. Accordingly, the Exchange does
not believe its proposed fee changes impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.
The Exchange also does not believe that the proposed fees will
impose any burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. IEX does not
believe that the proposed increased Port Fees will impose any burden on
intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purpose of the Act because all Members (and/or their
Service Bureaus) will continue to be entitled to five free ports and
subject to the same low, cost-based fee for additional ports. While
different total fees would be assessed depending on the number of Order
Entry Ports a Member (or Service Bureau) requests, these different fees
are not based on the type of Member requesting the Order Entry Port(s)
but on the number of such ports it requests, and each Port Subscriber
can determine the number of such ports to request. Further, providing
five free Order Entry Ports is designed to avoid creating barriers to
entry for smaller Members, thereby promoting intramarket competition.
In addition, IEX believes that even Members subject to relatively
higher fees for more Order Entry Ports will still be subject to a
relatively low aggregate fee (and significantly less than competing
exchanges, as described above) and thus the proposed fee will not
operate as a barrier to entry for such Members or impose a significant
business cost
[[Page 42543]]
burden on such Members relative to their levels of business activity.
The proposed fees do not favor certain categories of Connectivity
Subscribers in a manner that would impose an undue burden on
competition. The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule
change would place certain Connectivity Subscribers at the Exchange at
a relative advantage or disadvantage compared to other Connectivity
Subscribers or affect the ability of such firms to compete.
Finally, as described in the Purpose section, the proposed fee
change is designed to assist the Exchange in complying with its
Regulation SCI compliance obligations to have levels of capacity
adequate to maintain IEX's operational capability and promote the
maintenance of fair and orderly markets, thereby promoting both
intermarket and intramarket competition by enabling IEX to support a
robust trading environment for its Members and compete with other
equities venues.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) \76\ of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\76\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \77\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\77\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-IEX-2024-08 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-IEX-2024-08. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-IEX-2024-08 and should be
submitted on or before June 5, 2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\78\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\78\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-10588 Filed 5-14-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P