Self-Regulatory Organizations; MEMX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange's Fee Schedule Regarding Options Market Data Products, 32507-32514 [2024-08808]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 82 / Friday, April 26, 2024 / Notices Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION All submissions should refer to file number SR–CboeBZX–2024–027. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions should refer to file number SR–CboeBZX–2024–027 and should be submitted on or before May 17, 2024. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.26 Sherry R. Haywood, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2024–08945 Filed 4–25–24; 8:45 am] ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 BILLING CODE 8011–01–P [Release No. 34–99998; File No. SR–MEMX– 2024–14] Self-Regulatory Organizations; MEMX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange’s Fee Schedule Regarding Options Market Data Products April 19, 2024. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on April 15, 2024, MEMX LLC (‘‘MEMX’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange is filing with the Commission a proposed rule change to amend the Market Data section of its fee schedule applicable to its equity options platform (‘‘MEMX Options’’) to adopt fees for certain of its market data products, which are currently offered free of charge, pursuant to MEMX Rules 15.1(a) and (c). The Exchange proposes to implement the changes to the Fee Schedule pursuant to this proposal immediately. The text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. 1 15 26 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:31 Apr 25, 2024 2 17 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. Frm 00117 Fmt 4703 A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the Market Data section of the Exchange’s fee schedule applicable to MEMX Options (‘‘MEMX Options Fee Schedule’’) to adopt fees for certain of its options market data products which are currently offered free of charge, namely MEMOIR Options Depth and MEMOIR Options Top (collectively, the ‘‘Options Data Feeds’’). As set forth below, the Exchange believes that the proposed fees are fair and reasonable and has based its proposal on the fact that competitive forces exist with respect to Options Data Feeds, the fact that Options Data Feeds are optional data products for which there are substitutes, a comparison to competitor pricing, and a detailed cost analysis. The Exchange is proposing to implement the proposed fees on April 15, 2024. The Exchange previously filed this proposal on March 28, 2024 (SR– MEMX–2024–11) (the ‘‘Initial Proposal’’). The Exchange has withdrawn the Initial Proposal and replaced the proposal with the current filing (SR–MEMX–2024–14). Before setting forth the additional details regarding the proposal as well as the cost analysis conducted by the Exchange, immediately below is a description of the proposed fees. Proposed Market Data Pricing MEMX Options offers two separate data feeds to subscribers—MEMOIR Options Depth and MEMOIR Options Top. The Exchange notes that there is no requirement that any subscribing entity (‘‘Firm’’) subscribe to a particular Options Data Feed or any Options Data Feed whatsoever, but instead, a Firm may choose to maintain subscriptions to those Options Data Feeds they deem appropriate based on their business model. The proposed fee will not apply differently based upon the size or type of Firm, but rather based upon the subscriptions a Firm has to Options Data Feeds. The proposed pricing for each of the Options Data Feeds is set forth below. MEMOIR Options Depth The MEMOIR Options Depth feed is a MEMX-only market data feed that contains depth of book quotations and execution information based on options orders entered in the System.3 For the 3 See Sfmt 4703 32507 E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM MEMX Rule 21.15(b)(1). 26APN1 32508 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 82 / Friday, April 26, 2024 / Notices receipt of access to the MEMOIR Options Depth feed, the Exchange proposes to charge $1,500 per month. This proposed access fee would be charged to any data recipient that receives a data feed of the MEMOIR Options Depth feed for purposes of internal distribution (i.e., an ‘‘Internal Distributor’’), for external redistribution (i.e. an ‘‘External Distributor’’), or both. The Exchange proposes to define an Internal Distributor as ‘‘a Distributor that receives an Exchange Data product and then distributes that data to one or more data recipients within the Distributor’s own organization,’’ 4 and an External Distributor as ‘‘a Distributor that receives an Exchange Data product and then distributes that data to a third party or one or more data recipients outside the Distributor’s own organization.’’ 5 The proposed access fee will be charged only once per month per Firm regardless of whether the Firm uses the MEMOIR Options Depth feed for internal distribution, external distribution, or both.6 MEMOIR Options Top The MEMOIR Options Top feed is a MEMX-only market data feed that contains top of book quotations and executions based on options orders entered into the System.7 For the receipt of access to the MEMOIR Options Top feed, the Exchange proposes to charge $750 per month. This proposed access fee would be charged to any data recipient that receives a data feed of the MEMOIR Options Top feed for purposes of internal distribution (i.e., an Internal Distributor), external redistribution (i.e. an External Distributor), or both. The proposed access fee for internal and external distribution will be charged only once per month per Firm regardless of whether the Firm uses the MEMOIR Options Top feed for internal distribution, external distribution, or both. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Billing Process The Exchange proposes to bill for the Options Data Feeds in the same manner as it does for the market data products it provides for its equities Exchange, (the ‘‘Equities Data Feeds’’), and to make 4 See Market Data Definitions under the proposed MEMX Options Fee Schedule. The Exchange also proposes to adopt a definition for ‘‘Distributor’’, which would mean any entity that receives an Exchange Data product directly from the Exchange or indirectly through another entity and then distributes internally or externally to a third party. 5 See Market Data Definitions under the proposed MEMX Options Fee Schedule. 6 The proposed definitions of Internal Distributor and External Distributor are the same definitions used in the Exchange’s Equities Fee Schedule. 7 See MEMX Rule 21.15(b)(2). VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:31 Apr 25, 2024 Jkt 262001 this clear on the Fee Schedule. Specifically, the Fee Schedule would state that ‘‘[f]ees for Market Data products are assessed based on each active product at the close of business on the first day of each month,’’ and that ‘‘[i]f a product is cancelled by a subscriber’s submission of a written request or via the MEMX User Portal prior to such fee being assessed, then the subscriber will not be obligated to pay the applicable product fee. MEMX does not return pro rated fees if a product is not used for an entire month.’’ The Exchange believes that this billing methodology has been efficient with respect to the Equities Data Feeds and is well understood by market participants. Additional Discussion—Background The Exchange launched MEMX Options on September 27, 2023. As a new entrant in the equity options trading space, MEMX has not yet charged fees for options market data provided by the Exchange. The objective of this approach was to eliminate any fee-based barriers for Members to join the Exchange, which the Exchange believes has been helpful in its ability to attract order flow as a new options exchange. Further, the Exchange did not initially charge for options market data because MEMX believes that any exchange should first deliver meaningful value to Members and other market participants before charging fees for its products and services. The Exchange also did not begin charging for the Equities Data Feeds until 2022, nearly two years after it launched as a national securities exchange in 2020. In connection with the adoption of fees for the Equities Data Feeds, the Exchange conducted an extensive cost analysis (the ‘‘2022 Cost Analysis’’),8 and the Exchange’s proposal herein to adopt fees for Options Data Feeds stems from the same cost analysis, which it has reviewed and updated for 2024 (the ‘‘2024 Cost Analysis’’). As discussed more fully below, the Exchange recently calculated its annual aggregate costs for providing market data for both its equities and options trading platforms (i.e. the ‘‘Exchange Data Feeds’’) at approximately $3.6 million.9 In order to establish fees that are designed to recover the aggregate costs of providing the Exchange Data Feeds with a 8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97130 (March 13, 2023), 88 FR 16491 (March 17, 2023) (SR–MEMX–2023–04). 9 As described more fully below, the Exchange’s Cost Analysis combines costs and revenues for Equities and Options in order to not double count any allocations, among other reasons. PO 00000 Frm 00118 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 reasonable profit margin, the Exchange is proposing to modify its Fee Schedule, as described above. In addition to the 2024 Cost Analysis, described below, the Exchange believes that its proposed approach to market data fees is reasonable based on a comparison to competitors. Additional Discussion—Comparison With Other Exchanges The proposed fee structure for the Options Data Feeds is not novel but is instead comparable to the fee structure currently in place for the options exchanges operated by MIAX, in particular, MIAX Pearl Options (‘‘MIAX Pearl’’),10 and the options exchanges operated by Nasdaq, in particular, Nasdaq BX Options (‘‘BX Options’’).11 The Exchange is proposing fees for its Options Data Feeds that are similar in structure to MIAX Pearl and BX Options and rates that are equal to, or lower than, than the rates data recipients pay for comparable data feeds from those exchanges, in a more simplified fashion.12 The Exchange notes that other competitors maintain fees applicable to options market data that are considerably higher than those proposed by the Exchange, including Cboe BZX Options (‘‘BZX Options’’), NYSE Arca Options and NYSE American Options.13 However, the 10 See MIAX Pearl Options Fee Schedule, available at: https://www.miaxglobal.com/markets/ us-options/pearl-options/fees (the ‘‘MIAX Pearl Fee Schedule’’). 11 See the Nasdaq BX Options Fee Schedule, available at: https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/ rulebook/bx/rules/bx-options-7. 12 As noted below, based on its review of MIAX Pearl’s Fee Schedule, the Exchange believes that MIAX Pearl charges separate fees for Internal and External Distribution of its options data feeds, and while its External Distribution fees are identical to the Exchange’s proposed flat fee for all uses for both comparable products, its Internal Distribution Fees are slightly lower than what the Exchange is proposing for access to the Exchange’s Options Data Feeds. Nevertheless, given that the Exchange allows both Internal and External Distribution for a single fee for a single data feed, the Exchange believes its proposed fees remain comparable and competitive with MIAX Pearl. 13 Fees for BZX Options Depth, which is the comparable product to MEMOIR Options Depth, are $3,000 for internal distribution and $2,000 for external distribution compared to the Exchange’s proposed fee of $1,500 for all uses. In addition, BZX Options charges professional user fees of $30 per month and non-professional user fees of $1.00 per month for each entity to which it distributes the feed (alternatively, it offers distributors an option to purchase a monthly Enterprise Fee of $3,500 to distribute to an unlimited number of users), which the Exchange is not proposing to charge. Fees for BZX Options Top, which is the comparable product to MEMOIR Options Top, are $3,000 for internal distribution, $2,000 for external distribution, with Professional User Fees of $5 per month, NonProfessional Fees of $0.10 per month per user, or an Enterprise Fee ranging anywhere from $20,000 to $60,000 per month depending on the number of E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM 26APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 82 / Friday, April 26, 2024 / Notices ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Exchange has focused its comparison on MIAX Pearl and BX Options because their similar market data products are offered at prices lower than several other incumbent exchanges, which is a similar approach to that proposed by the Exchange.14 The fees for the MIAX Pearl Liquidity Feed—which like the MEMOIR Options Depth feed, includes top of book, depth of book, trades, and administrative messages—consist of an internal distributor access fee of $1,250 per month and an external distributor access fee of $1,500 per month. As such, the Exchange’s proposed rate for all uses of $1,500 per month is equal to what MIAX Pearl charges for external distribution, and $250 higher than what it charges for internal distribution only.15 The fees for the MIAX Pearl Top of Market Feed—which is the comparable product to MEMOIR Options Top, consist of an internal distributor access fee of $500 per month and an external distributor access fee of $750. Again, the Exchange’s proposed rate for all uses of $750 per month is identical to what MIAX Pearl charges for external distribution, and $250 higher than what it charges for internal distribution. While the Exchange’s proposed fee is slightly higher than what MIAX Pearl charges for internal distribution of its similar products, the Exchange believes that the simplicity of a single fee is preferable, specifically by reducing audit risk and simplifying reporting, both for the Exchange and its customers. Further, to the extent MIAX Pearl assesses both fees for both uses, it users to which the distributer plans to distribute the feed. Again, the Exchange is not proposing any additional User Fees for MEMOIR Options Top, but rather, a flat fee of $750 for all uses. See the BZX Options Fee Schedule, available at: https:// www.cboe.com/us/options/membership/fee_ schedule/bzx/. Fees for NYSE Arca Options Deep and NYSE American Options Deep, which are the comparable products to MEMOIR Options Depth, are $3,000 for access (internal use) and $2,000 for redistribution (external distribution), and $5,000 for non-display use, compared to the Exchange’s proposed fee of $1,500 for all uses. NYSE Arca Options and NYSE American Options also charge professional user fees of $50 per User, and NonProfessional User Fees of $1.00 per user, capped at $5,000 per month. Again, the Exchange does not require any counting of users and has instead proposed a flat fee of $1,500 for all uses. Fees for the NYSE Arca Options Top and NYSE American Options Top, which are the comparable products to MEMOIR Options Top are the same as above ($3,000 for internal, $2,000 for external and $5,000 for non-display, with the additional Professional and Non-Professional User Fees), compared to the Exchange’s proposed fee of $750 for all uses. See NYSE Proprietary Market Data Pricing Guide, available at: https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/ nyse/data/NYSE_Market_Data_Pricing.pdf. 14 See supra notes 10–11. 15 See MIAX Pearl Options Fee Schedule, supra note 10. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:31 Apr 25, 2024 Jkt 262001 would cost more overall to receive and provide both internal and external distribution of MIAX Pearl’s comparable options data feeds than it does to receive and provide both internal and external distribution of the Exchange’s Options Data Feeds. As an additional cost comparison, the fees for both Nasdaq BX Options Depth of Market Feed (‘‘BX Depth’’) and Top of Market Feed (‘‘BX Top’’) are $1,500 per month for internal distribution and $2,000 for external distribution, with an added $2,500 fee for a non-Display Enterprise License.16 While one distributor fee allows access to both BX Top and BX Depth, (for example, $1,500 per month would allow a BX Options customer internal distribution of both BX Top and BX Depth) if a BX Options Customer wanted the same access provided under the Exchange’s proposed fees, (i.e. for all uses) it would need to pay an additional $2,000 for external distribution and $2,500 per month for a non-display enterprise license fee. In addition, BX Options charges monthly per subscriber fees for professional or non-professional use 17 which the Exchange will not charge for its similar market data products. Additional Discussion—Cost Analysis In general, the Exchange believes that exchanges, in setting fees of all types, should meet very high standards of transparency to demonstrate why each new fee or fee increase meets the Exchange Act requirements that fees be reasonable, equitably allocated, not unfairly discriminatory, and not create an undue burden on competition among members and markets. In particular, the Exchange believes that each exchange should take extra care to be able to demonstrate that these fees are based on its costs and reasonable business needs. Accordingly, in proposing to charge fees for Options Data Feeds, the Exchange has sought to be especially diligent in assessing those fees in a transparent way against its own aggregate costs of providing the related service, and also carefully and transparently assessing the impact on Members—both generally and in relation to other Members, i.e., to assure the fee will not create a financial burden on any participant and will not have an undue impact in particular on smaller Members and competition among Members in general. The Exchange does not believe it needs to otherwise address questions about market competition in the context of this filing because the proposed fees are 16 See Nasdaq BX Options Fee Schedule, supra note 11. 17 Id. PO 00000 Frm 00119 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 32509 so clearly consistent with the Act based on its 2024 Cost Analysis. The Exchange also believes that this level of diligence and transparency is called for by the requirements of Section 19(b)(1) under the Act,18 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,19 with respect to the types of information self-regulatory organizations (‘‘SROs’’) should provide when filing fee changes, and Section 6(b) of the Act,20 which requires, among other things, that exchange fees be reasonable and equitably allocated,21 not designed to permit unfair discrimination,22 and that they not impose a burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.23 This rule change proposal addresses those requirements, and the analysis and data in this section are designed to clearly and comprehensively show how they are met.24 As noted above, MEMX has conducted and recently updated a study of its aggregate costs to produce the Exchange Data Feeds—the 2024 Cost Analysis. The 2024 Cost Analysis required a detailed analysis of MEMX’s aggregate baseline costs, including a determination and allocation of costs for core services provided by the Exchange—transaction execution, market data, membership services and trading permits, regulatory services, physical connectivity, and application sessions (which provide order entry, cancellation and modification functionality, risk functionality, ability to receive drop copies, and other functionality). MEMX separately divided its costs between those costs necessary to deliver each of these core services, including infrastructure, software, human resources (i.e., personnel), and certain general and administrative expenses (‘‘cost drivers’’). Next, MEMX adopted an allocation methodology with various principles to guide how much of a particular cost should be allocated to 18 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b-4. 20 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 21 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). 22 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 23 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). 24 In 2019, Commission staff published guidance suggesting the types of information that SROs may use to demonstrate that their fee filings comply with the standards of the Exchange Act (‘‘Fee Guidance’’). While MEMX understands that the Fee Guidance does not create new legal obligations on SROs, the Fee Guidance is consistent with MEMX’s view about the type and level of transparency that exchanges should meet to demonstrate compliance with their existing obligations when they seek to charge new fees. See Staff Guidance on SRO Rule Filings Relating to Fees (May 21, 2019) available at https://www.sec.gov/tm/staff-guidancesro-rulefilings-fees [sic]. 19 17 E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM 26APN1 32510 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 82 / Friday, April 26, 2024 / Notices transaction fees, fees for connectivity services, membership and regulatory fees, and market data fees. Accordingly, the Exchange generally must cover its expenses from these four primary sources of revenue. Through the Exchange’s extensive 2024 Cost Analysis, the Exchange analyzed every expense item in the Exchange’s general expense ledger to determine whether each such expense relates to the provision of the Exchange Data Feeds, and, if such expense did so relate, what portion (or percentage) of such expense actually supports the provision of the Exchange Data Feeds, and thus bears a relationship that is, ‘‘in nature and closeness,’’ directly related to the Exchange Data Feeds. Based on its analysis, MEMX calculated its aggregate annual costs for providing the Exchange Data Feeds, at $3,683,375. This results in an estimated monthly cost for providing Exchange Data Feeds of $306,948. The Exchange notes that it utilized the same principles to generate the Cost Analysis in 2022 applicable to COSTS DRIVER Human Resources Data Center Technology (Hardware, Software Licenses, etc.) Depreciation Allocated Shared Expenses TOTAL ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Human Resources In allocating personnel (Human Resources) costs, in order to not double count any allocations, the Exchange first excluded any employee time allocated towards options regulation in order to recoup costs via the Options Regulatory Fee (‘‘ORF’’).25 Of the remaining employee time left over, MEMX then calculated an allocation of employee time for employees whose functions include directly providing services necessary to offer the Exchange Data Feeds, including performance thereof, as well as personnel with ancillary functions related to establishing and providing such services (such as information security and finance personnel). The Exchange notes that it has fewer than 100 employees and each department leader has direct knowledge of the time spent by each employee with respect to the various tasks necessary to operate the Exchange. The estimates of 25 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99259 (January 2, 2024), 89 FR 965 (January 8, 2024) (SR– MEMX–2023–38). VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:31 Apr 25, 2024 Jkt 262001 Frm 00120 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Costs Related to Offering Exchange Data Feeds The following chart details the individual line-item (annual) costs considered by MEMX to be related to offering the Exchange Data Feeds to its Members and other customers as well as the percentage of the Exchange’s overall costs that such costs represent for such area (e.g., as set forth below, the Exchange allocated approximately 8% of its overall Human Resources cost to offering Exchange Data Feeds). COSTS %of ALL $ 2,606,282 8% $ 69,340 2% $ 287,141 7% $ 397,471 5% $ 323,141 4% $3,683,375 5.8% Human Resources cost were therefore determined by consulting with such department leaders, determining which employees are involved in tasks related to providing the Exchange Data Feeds, and confirming that the proposed allocations were reasonable based on an understanding of the percentage of their time such employees devote to tasks related to providing the Exchange Data Feeds. The Exchange notes that senior level executives were allocated Human Resources costs to the extent the Exchange believed they are involved in overseeing tasks related to providing the Exchange Data Feeds. The Human Resources cost was calculated using a blended rate of compensation reflecting salary, equity and bonus compensation, benefits, payroll taxes, and 401(k) matching contributions. In 2022, 6.9% of the Exchange’s Human Resources costs were allocated towards the provision of the Equities Data Feeds, which is slightly lower than the 8% allocation in the 2024 Cost Analysis. The Exchange notes this increase is due to additional hiring PO 00000 the Equities Data Feeds only, and at that time, the estimated annual aggregate cost to provide the Equities Data fees was $3,014,348. The differences between such estimated costs and the overall analysis are primarily based on: (1) the addition of MEMX Options, (ii) increased, and in some cases decreased, costs projected by the Exchange, (iii) and changes made to reallocate certain costs into categories that more closely align the Exchange’s audited financial statements, as further described below. necessary to support the launch of MEMX Options and the Options Data Feeds. Data Center Data Center costs includes an allocation of the costs the Exchange incurs to provide the Exchange Data Feeds in the third-party data centers where the Exchange maintains its equipment as well as related costs (the Exchange does not own the Primary Data Center or the Secondary Data Center, but instead, leases space in data centers operated by third parties). As the Data Center costs are primarily for space, power, and cooling of servers, the Exchange allocated approximately 2% of the Data Center costs for the Exchange Data Feeds. This is a lower allocation than the 2022 Cost Analysis due to the fact that a greater portion of the Exchange’s Data Center costs are now being allocated to the provision of Connectivity, as can be seen in the Exchange’s recent proposal to adopt E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM 26APN1 EN26AP24.086</GPH> each core service. For instance, fixed costs that are not driven by client activity (e.g., message rates), such as data center costs, were allocated more heavily to the provision of physical connectivity (80%), with smaller allocations to logical ports (11%), and the remainder to the provision of transaction execution, regulatory services, and market data services (9%). The allocation methodology was decided through conversations with senior management familiar with each area of the Exchange’s operations. After adopting this allocation methodology, the Exchange then applied an estimated allocation of each cost driver to each core service, resulting in the cost allocations described below. By allocating segmented costs to each core service, MEMX was able to estimate by core service the potential margin it might earn based on different fee models. The Exchange notes that as a non-listing venue it has four primary sources of revenue that it can potentially use to fund its operations: Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 82 / Friday, April 26, 2024 / Notices Options Connectivity Fees (the ‘‘Options Connectivity Filing’’).26 Technology The Technology category includes the Exchange’s network infrastructure, other hardware, software, and software licenses used to operate and monitor physical assets necessary to provide the Exchange Data Feeds. Of note, certain of these costs were included in separate Network Infrastructure and Hardware and Software Licenses categories in the 2022 Cost Analysis; however, in order to align more closely with the Exchange’s audited financial statements, these costs were combined into the broader Technology category. The Exchange allocated approximately 7% of its Technology costs to the Exchange Data Feeds in 2024. Depreciation The vast majority of the software the Exchange uses with respect to its operations, including the software used to generate and disseminate the Exchange Data Feeds has been developed in-house and the cost of such development is depreciated over time. Accordingly, the Exchange included Depreciation costs related to depreciated software used to generate and disseminate the Exchange Data Feeds. The Exchange also included in the Depreciation costs certain budgeted improvements that the Exchange intends to capitalize and depreciate with respect to the Exchange Data Feeds in the near-term, as well as the servers used at the Exchange’s primary and back-up data centers specifically used for the Exchange Data Feeds. As with the other allocated costs in the Exchange’s updated Cost Analysis, the Depreciation cost was therefore narrowly tailored to depreciation related to the Exchange Data Feeds. In the 2022 Cost Analysis, the Exchange allocated approximately 18% of its Depreciation costs towards the provision of the Equities Data Feeds, which is higher than the 5% allocated herein. This decrease is due to the overall reallocation of Depreciation to other revenue streams. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Allocated Shared Expenses Finally, a limited portion of general shared expenses were allocated to the Exchange Data Feeds. The costs included in general shared expenses allocated to the Exchange Data Feeds include office space and office expenses (e.g., occupancy and overhead expenses), utilities, recruiting and training, marketing and advertising costs, professional fees for legal, tax and accounting services (including external and internal audit expenses), and telecommunications costs. The cost of paying individuals to serve on the Exchange’s Board of Directors or any committee was not allocated to providing Exchange Data Feeds. The Exchange allocated 4% of its Allocated Shared Expenses to the Exchange Data Feeds in 2024, which is slightly higher than the 1.8% allocated in 2022. This is due to the general increase in the costs included in this category overall, resulting in a higher allocation. Cost Analysis—Additional Discussion In conducting its Cost Analysis, the Exchange did not allocate any of its expenses in full to any core service and did not double-count any expenses. Instead, as described above, the Exchange identified and allocated applicable cost drivers across its core services and used the same approach to analyzing costs to form the basis of the Options Connectivity Filing 27 and this filing proposing fees for the Options Data Feeds. Thus, the Exchange’s allocations of cost across core services were based on real costs of operating the Exchange and were not double-counted across the core services or their associated revenue streams. The Exchange anticipates that the projected 2024 revenue for Options Data Feeds ($34,675), in addition to what the Exchange anticipates it will collect for the Equities Data Feeds ($305,305), will generate approximately $339,980 monthly ($4,079,762 annually). The Exchange’s method of revenue projection is in part based on its experience in charging for Equities Data Feeds (i.e. the Exchange anticipates that certain Firms may discontinue current subscriptions immediately upon the Exchange charging for Options Data Feeds, or sometime thereafter, as was the case when it began charging for Equities Data Feeds). The proposed fees for Exchange Data Feeds are designed to permit the Exchange to cover the costs allocated to providing Exchange Data Feeds with a profit margin that the Exchange believes is modest (approximately 9.7%),28 which the Exchange believes is fair and reasonable after taking into account the costs related to creating, generating, and disseminating the Exchange Data Feeds and the fact that the Exchange will need 27 See supra note 26. Exchange calculated this profit margin by dividing the annual projected profit of $396,387 by the annual projected revenue of $4,079,762 and multiplying by 100. 28 The 26 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99635 (February 29, 2024), 89 FR 16049 (March 6, 2024) (SR–MEMX–2024–06). VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:31 Apr 25, 2024 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00121 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 32511 to fund future expenditures (increased costs, improvements, etc.). The Exchange like other exchanges is, after all, a for-profit business. Accordingly, while the Exchange believes in transparency around costs and potential margins, as well as periodic review of revenues and applicable costs (as discussed below), the Exchange does not believe that these estimates should form the sole basis of whether or not a proposed fee is reasonable or can be adopted. Instead, the Exchange believes that the information should be used solely to confirm that an Exchange is not earning supra-competitive profits, and the Exchange believes its Cost Analysis and related projections demonstrate this fact. As a general matter, the Exchange believes that its costs will remain relatively similar in future years. It is possible however that such costs will either decrease or increase. To the extent the Exchange sees growth in use of Exchange Data Feeds it will receive additional revenue to offset future cost increases. However, if use of Exchange Data Feeds is static or decreases, the Exchange might not realize the revenue that it anticipates or needs in order to cover applicable costs. Accordingly, the Exchange is committing to conduct a one-year review after implementation of these fees. The Exchange expects that it may propose to adjust fees at that time, to increase fees in the event that revenues fail to cover costs with a reasonable profit margin.29 Similarly, the Exchange expects that it would propose to decrease fees in the event that revenue materially exceeds current projections. In addition, the Exchange will periodically conduct a review to inform its decision making on whether a fee change is appropriate (e.g., to monitor for costs increasing/decreasing or subscribers increasing/decreasing, etc. in ways that suggest the thencurrent fees are becoming dislocated from the prior cost-based analysis) and expects that it would propose to increase fees in the event that revenues fail to cover its costs and a reasonable margin, or decrease fees in the event that revenue or the profit margin materially exceeds current projections. In the event that the Exchange determines to propose a fee change, the results of a timely review, including an updated cost estimate, will be included in the rule filing proposing the fee change. More generally, the Exchange 29 The Exchange notes that it does not believe that a 9.7% profit margin is necessarily competitive, and instead that this is likely significantly below the mark-up many businesses place on their products and services. E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM 26APN1 32512 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 82 / Friday, April 26, 2024 / Notices ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 believes that it is appropriate for an exchange to refresh and update information about its relevant costs and revenues in seeking any future changes to fees, and the Exchange commits to do so. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of Section 6(b) 30 of the Act in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) 31 of the Act, in particular, in that it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its Members and other persons using its facilities. Additionally, the Exchange believes that the proposed fees are consistent with the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) 32 of the Act in that they are designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to a free and open market and national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest, and, particularly, are not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. The Exchange notes prior to addressing the specific reasons the Exchange believes the proposed fees and fee structure are reasonable, equitably allocated and not unreasonably discriminatory, that the proposed definitions and fee structure described above are consistent with the definitions and fee structure used by most U.S. options exchanges, MIAX Pearl and BX Options in particular. As such, the Exchange believes it is adopting a model that is easily understood by Members and nonMembers, most of which also subscribe to market data products from other exchanges. For this reason, the Exchange believes that the proposed definitions and fee structure described above are consistent with the Act generally, and Section 6(b)(5) 33 of the Act in particular. One of the primary objectives of MEMX is to provide competition and to reduce fixed costs imposed upon the industry. Consistent with this objective, the Exchange believes that this proposal reflects a simple, competitive, reasonable, and equitable pricing structure, with fees that are discounted 30 15 U.S.C. 78f. U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). 32 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 33 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 31 15 VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:31 Apr 25, 2024 when compared to comparable data products and services offered by competitors.34 Reasonableness Overall. With regard to reasonableness, the Exchange understands that the Commission has traditionally taken a market-based approach to examine whether the SRO making the fee proposal was subject to significant competitive forces in setting the terms of the proposal. The Exchange understands that in general the analysis considers whether the SRO has demonstrated in its filing that (i) there are reasonable substitutes for the product or service; (ii) ‘‘platform’’ competition constrains the ability to set the fee; and/or (iii) revenue and cost analysis shows the fee would not result in the SRO taking supracompetitive profits. If the SRO demonstrates that the fee is subject to significant competitive forces, the Exchange understands that in general the analysis will next consider whether there is any substantial countervailing basis to suggest the fee’s terms fail to meet one or more standards under the Exchange Act. The Exchange further understands that if the filing fails to demonstrate that the fee is constrained by competitive forces, the SRO must provide a substantial basis, other than competition, to show that it is consistent with the Exchange Act, which may include production of relevant revenue and cost data pertaining to the product or service. The Exchange has not determined its proposed overall market data fees based on assumptions about market competition, instead relying upon a cost-plus model to determine a reasonable fee structure that is informed by the Exchange’s understanding of different uses of the products by different types of participants. In this context, the Exchange believes the proposed fees overall are fair and reasonable as a form of cost recovery plus the possibility of a reasonable return for the Exchange’s aggregate costs of offering the Exchange Data Feeds. The Exchange believes the proposed fees are reasonable because they are designed to generate annual revenue to recoup some or all of Exchange’s annual costs of providing market data in both Equities and Options with a reasonable profit margin. The Exchange also believes that performing the Cost Analysis by combining costs and revenues for Equities and Options is reasonable because in this manner the Exchange is able to ensure that it does not double count any allocations. The 34 See Jkt 262001 PO 00000 supra note 13. Frm 00122 Fmt 4703 Exchange believes that this holistic approach is reasonable due to the fact that many of the costs associated with providing the Options Data Feeds are the same as those associated with providing the Equities Data Feeds, and the Exchange believes that separately analyzing them could potentially result in double-counting. As discussed in the Purpose section, the Exchange estimates that the fees proposed herein related to Options Data Feeds, coupled with the fees it already charges for Equities Data Feeds, will result in annual revenue of approximately $4 million, representing a profit margin of approximately 9.7% for the provision of market data on its platforms. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that this fee methodology is reasonable because it allows the Exchange to recoup some or all of its expenses for providing market data products (with any additional revenue representing no more than what the Exchange believes to be a reasonable rate of return). The Exchange also believes that the proposed fees are reasonable because they are generally less than the fees charged by competing options exchanges for comparable market data products, notwithstanding that the competing exchanges may have different system architectures that may result in different cost structures for the provision of market data. The Exchange believes the proposed fees for the Options Data Feeds are reasonable when compared to fees for comparable products, such as the MIAX Pearl Top of Market Feed, the MIAX Pearl Liquidity Feed, and the BX Options Top and Depth Feeds, compared to which the Exchange’s proposed fees are equivalent or lower, as well as other comparable data feeds priced significantly higher than the Exchange’s proposed fees for the Exchange Data Feeds.35 Additionally, the Exchange’s single flat fee for each of its Options Data Feeds, regardless of use type, offers a more simplistic approach to market data pricing. Specifically with respect to the MEMOIR Options Depth feed, the Exchange believes that the proposed fee for such feed is reasonable because it represents not only the value of the data available from the MEMOIR Options Top feed, which has a lower proposed fee, but also the value of receiving the depth-of-book data on an order-by-order basis. The Exchange believes it is reasonable to have pricing based, in part, upon the amount of information contained in each data feed and the value of that information to market participants. The MEMOIR Options Top feed, as described above, 35 Id. Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM 26APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 82 / Friday, April 26, 2024 / Notices can be utilized to trade on the Exchange but contains less information than that is available on the MEMOIR Options Depth feed. Thus, the Exchange believes it reasonable for the products to be priced as proposed, with MEMOIR Options Depth having a higher price than MEMOIR Options Top. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposed fees for the Options Data Feeds are reasonable. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Equitable Allocation Overall. The Exchange believes that its proposed fees are reasonable, fair, and equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory because they are designed to align fees with services provided. The Exchange believes that the proposed fees are equitably allocated because they will apply uniformly to all data recipients that choose to subscribe to the Options Data Feeds. Any Firm that chooses to subscribe to one or both of the Options Data Feeds is subject to the same Fee Schedule, regardless of what type of business they operate, and the decision to subscribe to one or both of the Options Data Feeds is based on objective differences in usage of Options Data Feeds among different Firms, which are still ultimately in the control of any particular Firm. The Exchange believes the proposed pricing between Options Data Feeds is equitably allocated because it is based, in part, upon the amount of information contained in each data feed and the value of that information to market participants. The MEMOIR Options Top feed, as described above, can be utilized to trade on the Exchange but contains less information than that is available on the MEMOIR Options Depth feed. Thus, the Exchange believes it is an equitable allocation of fees for the products to be priced as proposed, with MEMOIR Options Top having the lower price of the two Options Data Feeds. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposed fees for the Exchange Data Feeds are equitably allocated. The Proposed Fees Are Not Unfairly Discriminatory The Exchange believes the proposed fees for the Options Data Feeds are not unfairly discriminatory because any differences in the application of the fees are based on meaningful distinctions between the feeds themselves. Overall. The Exchange believes that the proposed fees are not unfairly discriminatory because they would apply to all data recipients that choose to subscribe to the same Options Data VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:31 Apr 25, 2024 Jkt 262001 Feed(s). Any Firm that chooses to subscribe to the Options Data Feeds is subject to the same Fee Schedule, regardless of what type of business they operate. Because the proposed fee for MEMOIR Options Depth is higher, Firms seeking lower cost options may instead choose to receive data through the MEMOIR Options Top feed for a lower cost. Alternatively, Firms can choose to receive data solely from the Options Price Reporting Authority (‘‘OPRA’’) for a lower cost. The Exchange notes that Firms can also choose to subscribe to a combination of data feeds for redundancy purposes or to use different feeds for different purposes. In sum, each Firm has the ability to choose the best business solution for itself. The Exchange does not believe it is unfairly discriminatory to base pricing upon the amount of information contained in each data feed, which may have additional value to a market participant. As described above, the MEMOIR Options Top feed can be utilized to trade on the Exchange but contains less information than that is available on the MEMOIR Options Depth feed. Thus, the Exchange believes it is not unfairly discriminatory for the products to be priced as proposed, with MEMOIR Options Top having a lower price than MEMOIR Options Depth. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposed fees for the Exchange Data Feeds are not unfairly discriminatory. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,36 the Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Intra-Market Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed fees for Options Data Feeds place certain market participants at a relative disadvantage to other market participants because, as noted above, the proposed fees are associated with usage of Options Data Feeds by each market participant based on the type of business they operate, and the decision to subscribe to one or both Options Data Feeds is based on objective differences in usage of Options Data Feeds among different Firms, which are still ultimately in the control of any particular Firm, and such fees do not impose a barrier to entry to smaller participants. Accordingly, the proposed fees for Options Data Feeds do not favor certain categories of market participants in a manner that would impose a burden on competition; rather, the allocation of the proposed fees reflects the types of Options Data Feeds consumed by various market participants. Inter-Market Competition The Exchange does not believe the proposed fees place an undue burden on competition on other SROs that is not necessary or appropriate. In particular, market participants are not forced to subscribe to any of the Options Data Feeds, as described above. Additionally, other exchanges have similar market data fees in place for their participants, but with comparable and in many cases higher rates for options market data feeds.37 The proposed fees are based on actual costs and are designed to enable the Exchange to recoup its applicable costs with the possibility of a reasonable profit on its investment as described in the Purpose and Statutory Basis sections. Competing options exchanges are free to adopt comparable fee structures subject to the SEC rule filing process. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 38 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) 39 thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, 37 See supra note 13. U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 39 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 38 15 36 15 PO 00000 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). Frm 00123 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 32513 E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM 26APN1 32514 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 82 / Friday, April 26, 2024 / Notices including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments [Release No. 34–100002; File No. SR– CboeEDGA–2024–013] • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include file number SR– MEMX–2024–14 on the subject line. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fees Schedule Related to Physical Port Fees Paper Comments April 22, 2024. • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to file number SR–MEMX–2024–14. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions should refer to file number SR–MEMX–2024–14 and should be submitted on or before May 17, 2024. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.40 Sherry R. Haywood, Assistant Secretary. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on April 9, 2024, Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGA’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGA Equities’’) proposes to amend its Fees Schedule. The text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5. The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the Exchange’s website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/ equities/regulation/rule_filings/edga/), at the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. [FR Doc. 2024–08808 Filed 4–25–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 1 15 40 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:31 Apr 25, 2024 2 17 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. Frm 00124 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule relating to physical connectivity fees.3 By way of background, a physical port is utilized by a Member or non-Member to connect to the Exchange at the data centers where the Exchange’s servers are located. The Exchange currently assesses the following physical connectivity fees for Members and nonMembers on a monthly basis: $2,500 per physical port for a 1 gigabit (‘‘Gb’’) circuit and $7,500 per physical port for a 10 Gb circuit. The Exchange proposes to increase the monthly fee for 10 Gb physical ports from $7,500 to $8,500 per port. The Exchange notes the proposed fee change better enables it to continue to maintain and improve its market technology and services and also notes that the proposed fee amount, even as amended, continues to be in line with, or even lower than, amounts assessed by other exchanges for similar connections.4 The physical ports may also be used to access the Systems for the following affiliate exchanges and only one monthly fee currently (and will continue) to apply per port: the Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (options and equities), Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (options and equities platforms), Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc., and Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc., (‘‘Affiliate Exchanges’’).5 3 The Exchange initially filed the proposed fee changes on July 3, 2023 (SR–CboeEDGA–2023–011). On September 1, 2023, the Exchange withdrew that filing and submitted SR–CboeEDGA–2023–015. On September 29, 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued a Suspension of and Order Instituting Proceedings to Determine whether to Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change to Amend its Fees Schedule Related to Physical Port Fees (the ‘‘OIP’’). On September 29, 2023, the Exchange filed the proposed fee change (SR– CboeEDGA–2023–016). On October 13, 2023, the Exchange withdrew that filing and submitted SR– CboeEDGA–2023–017. On December 12 2023, the Exchange withdrew that filing and submitted SR– CboeEDGA–2023–022. On February 9, 2024, the Exchange withdrew that filing and submitted SR– CboeEDGA–2024–006. On April 9, 2024, the Exchange withdrew that filing and submitted this filing. 4 See e.g., The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’), General 8, Connectivity to the Exchange. Nasdaq and its affiliated exchanges charge a monthly fee of $15,000 for each 10Gb Ultra fiber connection to the respective exchange, which is analogous to the Exchange’s 10Gb physical port. See also New York Stock Exchange LLC, NYSE American LLC, NYSE Arca, Inc., NYSE Chicago Inc., NYSE National, Inc. Connectivity Fee Schedule, which provides that 10 Gb LX LCN Circuits (which are analogous to the Exchange’s 10 Gb physical port) are assessed $22,000 per month, per port. 5 The Affiliate Exchanges are also submitting contemporaneous identical rule filings. E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM 26APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 82 (Friday, April 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32507-32514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-08808]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-99998; File No. SR-MEMX-2024-14]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; MEMX LLC; Notice of Filing and 
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the 
Exchange's Fee Schedule Regarding Options Market Data Products

April 19, 2024.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on April 15, 2024, MEMX LLC (``MEMX'' or the ``Exchange'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the 
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which 
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing 
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from 
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing with the Commission a proposed rule change 
to amend the Market Data section of its fee schedule applicable to its 
equity options platform (``MEMX Options'') to adopt fees for certain of 
its market data products, which are currently offered free of charge, 
pursuant to MEMX Rules 15.1(a) and (c). The Exchange proposes to 
implement the changes to the Fee Schedule pursuant to this proposal 
immediately. The text of the proposed rule change is provided in 
Exhibit 5.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the Market Data 
section of the Exchange's fee schedule applicable to MEMX Options 
(``MEMX Options Fee Schedule'') to adopt fees for certain of its 
options market data products which are currently offered free of 
charge, namely MEMOIR Options Depth and MEMOIR Options Top 
(collectively, the ``Options Data Feeds''). As set forth below, the 
Exchange believes that the proposed fees are fair and reasonable and 
has based its proposal on the fact that competitive forces exist with 
respect to Options Data Feeds, the fact that Options Data Feeds are 
optional data products for which there are substitutes, a comparison to 
competitor pricing, and a detailed cost analysis. The Exchange is 
proposing to implement the proposed fees on April 15, 2024. The 
Exchange previously filed this proposal on March 28, 2024 (SR-MEMX-
2024-11) (the ``Initial Proposal''). The Exchange has withdrawn the 
Initial Proposal and replaced the proposal with the current filing (SR-
MEMX-2024-14).
    Before setting forth the additional details regarding the proposal 
as well as the cost analysis conducted by the Exchange, immediately 
below is a description of the proposed fees.
Proposed Market Data Pricing
    MEMX Options offers two separate data feeds to subscribers--MEMOIR 
Options Depth and MEMOIR Options Top. The Exchange notes that there is 
no requirement that any subscribing entity (``Firm'') subscribe to a 
particular Options Data Feed or any Options Data Feed whatsoever, but 
instead, a Firm may choose to maintain subscriptions to those Options 
Data Feeds they deem appropriate based on their business model. The 
proposed fee will not apply differently based upon the size or type of 
Firm, but rather based upon the subscriptions a Firm has to Options 
Data Feeds. The proposed pricing for each of the Options Data Feeds is 
set forth below.
MEMOIR Options Depth
    The MEMOIR Options Depth feed is a MEMX-only market data feed that 
contains depth of book quotations and execution information based on 
options orders entered in the System.\3\ For the

[[Page 32508]]

receipt of access to the MEMOIR Options Depth feed, the Exchange 
proposes to charge $1,500 per month. This proposed access fee would be 
charged to any data recipient that receives a data feed of the MEMOIR 
Options Depth feed for purposes of internal distribution (i.e., an 
``Internal Distributor''), for external redistribution (i.e. an 
``External Distributor''), or both. The Exchange proposes to define an 
Internal Distributor as ``a Distributor that receives an Exchange Data 
product and then distributes that data to one or more data recipients 
within the Distributor's own organization,'' \4\ and an External 
Distributor as ``a Distributor that receives an Exchange Data product 
and then distributes that data to a third party or one or more data 
recipients outside the Distributor's own organization.'' \5\ The 
proposed access fee will be charged only once per month per Firm 
regardless of whether the Firm uses the MEMOIR Options Depth feed for 
internal distribution, external distribution, or both.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See MEMX Rule 21.15(b)(1).
    \4\ See Market Data Definitions under the proposed MEMX Options 
Fee Schedule. The Exchange also proposes to adopt a definition for 
``Distributor'', which would mean any entity that receives an 
Exchange Data product directly from the Exchange or indirectly 
through another entity and then distributes internally or externally 
to a third party.
    \5\ See Market Data Definitions under the proposed MEMX Options 
Fee Schedule.
    \6\ The proposed definitions of Internal Distributor and 
External Distributor are the same definitions used in the Exchange's 
Equities Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

MEMOIR Options Top
    The MEMOIR Options Top feed is a MEMX-only market data feed that 
contains top of book quotations and executions based on options orders 
entered into the System.\7\ For the receipt of access to the MEMOIR 
Options Top feed, the Exchange proposes to charge $750 per month. This 
proposed access fee would be charged to any data recipient that 
receives a data feed of the MEMOIR Options Top feed for purposes of 
internal distribution (i.e., an Internal Distributor), external 
redistribution (i.e. an External Distributor), or both. The proposed 
access fee for internal and external distribution will be charged only 
once per month per Firm regardless of whether the Firm uses the MEMOIR 
Options Top feed for internal distribution, external distribution, or 
both.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See MEMX Rule 21.15(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Billing Process
    The Exchange proposes to bill for the Options Data Feeds in the 
same manner as it does for the market data products it provides for its 
equities Exchange, (the ``Equities Data Feeds''), and to make this 
clear on the Fee Schedule. Specifically, the Fee Schedule would state 
that ``[f]ees for Market Data products are assessed based on each 
active product at the close of business on the first day of each 
month,'' and that ``[i]f a product is cancelled by a subscriber's 
submission of a written request or via the MEMX User Portal prior to 
such fee being assessed, then the subscriber will not be obligated to 
pay the applicable product fee. MEMX does not return pro rated fees if 
a product is not used for an entire month.'' The Exchange believes that 
this billing methodology has been efficient with respect to the 
Equities Data Feeds and is well understood by market participants.
Additional Discussion--Background
    The Exchange launched MEMX Options on September 27, 2023. As a new 
entrant in the equity options trading space, MEMX has not yet charged 
fees for options market data provided by the Exchange. The objective of 
this approach was to eliminate any fee-based barriers for Members to 
join the Exchange, which the Exchange believes has been helpful in its 
ability to attract order flow as a new options exchange. Further, the 
Exchange did not initially charge for options market data because MEMX 
believes that any exchange should first deliver meaningful value to 
Members and other market participants before charging fees for its 
products and services.
    The Exchange also did not begin charging for the Equities Data 
Feeds until 2022, nearly two years after it launched as a national 
securities exchange in 2020. In connection with the adoption of fees 
for the Equities Data Feeds, the Exchange conducted an extensive cost 
analysis (the ``2022 Cost Analysis''),\8\ and the Exchange's proposal 
herein to adopt fees for Options Data Feeds stems from the same cost 
analysis, which it has reviewed and updated for 2024 (the ``2024 Cost 
Analysis''). As discussed more fully below, the Exchange recently 
calculated its annual aggregate costs for providing market data for 
both its equities and options trading platforms (i.e. the ``Exchange 
Data Feeds'') at approximately $3.6 million.\9\ In order to establish 
fees that are designed to recover the aggregate costs of providing the 
Exchange Data Feeds with a reasonable profit margin, the Exchange is 
proposing to modify its Fee Schedule, as described above. In addition 
to the 2024 Cost Analysis, described below, the Exchange believes that 
its proposed approach to market data fees is reasonable based on a 
comparison to competitors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97130 (March 13, 
2023), 88 FR 16491 (March 17, 2023) (SR-MEMX-2023-04).
    \9\ As described more fully below, the Exchange's Cost Analysis 
combines costs and revenues for Equities and Options in order to not 
double count any allocations, among other reasons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Additional Discussion--Comparison With Other Exchanges
    The proposed fee structure for the Options Data Feeds is not novel 
but is instead comparable to the fee structure currently in place for 
the options exchanges operated by MIAX, in particular, MIAX Pearl 
Options (``MIAX Pearl''),\10\ and the options exchanges operated by 
Nasdaq, in particular, Nasdaq BX Options (``BX Options'').\11\ The 
Exchange is proposing fees for its Options Data Feeds that are similar 
in structure to MIAX Pearl and BX Options and rates that are equal to, 
or lower than, than the rates data recipients pay for comparable data 
feeds from those exchanges, in a more simplified fashion.\12\ The 
Exchange notes that other competitors maintain fees applicable to 
options market data that are considerably higher than those proposed by 
the Exchange, including Cboe BZX Options (``BZX Options''), NYSE Arca 
Options and NYSE American Options.\13\ However, the

[[Page 32509]]

Exchange has focused its comparison on MIAX Pearl and BX Options 
because their similar market data products are offered at prices lower 
than several other incumbent exchanges, which is a similar approach to 
that proposed by the Exchange.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See MIAX Pearl Options Fee Schedule, available at: https://www.miaxglobal.com/markets/us-options/pearl-options/fees (the ``MIAX 
Pearl Fee Schedule'').
    \11\ See the Nasdaq BX Options Fee Schedule, available at: 
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/bx/rules/bx-options-7.
    \12\ As noted below, based on its review of MIAX Pearl's Fee 
Schedule, the Exchange believes that MIAX Pearl charges separate 
fees for Internal and External Distribution of its options data 
feeds, and while its External Distribution fees are identical to the 
Exchange's proposed flat fee for all uses for both comparable 
products, its Internal Distribution Fees are slightly lower than 
what the Exchange is proposing for access to the Exchange's Options 
Data Feeds. Nevertheless, given that the Exchange allows both 
Internal and External Distribution for a single fee for a single 
data feed, the Exchange believes its proposed fees remain comparable 
and competitive with MIAX Pearl.
    \13\ Fees for BZX Options Depth, which is the comparable product 
to MEMOIR Options Depth, are $3,000 for internal distribution and 
$2,000 for external distribution compared to the Exchange's proposed 
fee of $1,500 for all uses. In addition, BZX Options charges 
professional user fees of $30 per month and non-professional user 
fees of $1.00 per month for each entity to which it distributes the 
feed (alternatively, it offers distributors an option to purchase a 
monthly Enterprise Fee of $3,500 to distribute to an unlimited 
number of users), which the Exchange is not proposing to charge. 
Fees for BZX Options Top, which is the comparable product to MEMOIR 
Options Top, are $3,000 for internal distribution, $2,000 for 
external distribution, with Professional User Fees of $5 per month, 
Non-Professional Fees of $0.10 per month per user, or an Enterprise 
Fee ranging anywhere from $20,000 to $60,000 per month depending on 
the number of users to which the distributer plans to distribute the 
feed. Again, the Exchange is not proposing any additional User Fees 
for MEMOIR Options Top, but rather, a flat fee of $750 for all uses. 
See the BZX Options Fee Schedule, available at: https://www.cboe.com/us/options/membership/fee_schedule/bzx/. Fees for NYSE 
Arca Options Deep and NYSE American Options Deep, which are the 
comparable products to MEMOIR Options Depth, are $3,000 for access 
(internal use) and $2,000 for redistribution (external 
distribution), and $5,000 for non-display use, compared to the 
Exchange's proposed fee of $1,500 for all uses. NYSE Arca Options 
and NYSE American Options also charge professional user fees of $50 
per User, and Non-Professional User Fees of $1.00 per user, capped 
at $5,000 per month. Again, the Exchange does not require any 
counting of users and has instead proposed a flat fee of $1,500 for 
all uses. Fees for the NYSE Arca Options Top and NYSE American 
Options Top, which are the comparable products to MEMOIR Options Top 
are the same as above ($3,000 for internal, $2,000 for external and 
$5,000 for non-display, with the additional Professional and Non-
Professional User Fees), compared to the Exchange's proposed fee of 
$750 for all uses. See NYSE Proprietary Market Data Pricing Guide, 
available at: https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/data/NYSE_Market_Data_Pricing.pdf.
    \14\ See supra notes 10-11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The fees for the MIAX Pearl Liquidity Feed--which like the MEMOIR 
Options Depth feed, includes top of book, depth of book, trades, and 
administrative messages--consist of an internal distributor access fee 
of $1,250 per month and an external distributor access fee of $1,500 
per month. As such, the Exchange's proposed rate for all uses of $1,500 
per month is equal to what MIAX Pearl charges for external 
distribution, and $250 higher than what it charges for internal 
distribution only.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See MIAX Pearl Options Fee Schedule, supra note 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The fees for the MIAX Pearl Top of Market Feed--which is the 
comparable product to MEMOIR Options Top, consist of an internal 
distributor access fee of $500 per month and an external distributor 
access fee of $750. Again, the Exchange's proposed rate for all uses of 
$750 per month is identical to what MIAX Pearl charges for external 
distribution, and $250 higher than what it charges for internal 
distribution.
    While the Exchange's proposed fee is slightly higher than what MIAX 
Pearl charges for internal distribution of its similar products, the 
Exchange believes that the simplicity of a single fee is preferable, 
specifically by reducing audit risk and simplifying reporting, both for 
the Exchange and its customers. Further, to the extent MIAX Pearl 
assesses both fees for both uses, it would cost more overall to receive 
and provide both internal and external distribution of MIAX Pearl's 
comparable options data feeds than it does to receive and provide both 
internal and external distribution of the Exchange's Options Data 
Feeds.
    As an additional cost comparison, the fees for both Nasdaq BX 
Options Depth of Market Feed (``BX Depth'') and Top of Market Feed 
(``BX Top'') are $1,500 per month for internal distribution and $2,000 
for external distribution, with an added $2,500 fee for a non-Display 
Enterprise License.\16\ While one distributor fee allows access to both 
BX Top and BX Depth, (for example, $1,500 per month would allow a BX 
Options customer internal distribution of both BX Top and BX Depth) if 
a BX Options Customer wanted the same access provided under the 
Exchange's proposed fees, (i.e. for all uses) it would need to pay an 
additional $2,000 for external distribution and $2,500 per month for a 
non-display enterprise license fee. In addition, BX Options charges 
monthly per subscriber fees for professional or non-professional use 
\17\ which the Exchange will not charge for its similar market data 
products.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Nasdaq BX Options Fee Schedule, supra note 11.
    \17\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Additional Discussion--Cost Analysis
    In general, the Exchange believes that exchanges, in setting fees 
of all types, should meet very high standards of transparency to 
demonstrate why each new fee or fee increase meets the Exchange Act 
requirements that fees be reasonable, equitably allocated, not unfairly 
discriminatory, and not create an undue burden on competition among 
members and markets. In particular, the Exchange believes that each 
exchange should take extra care to be able to demonstrate that these 
fees are based on its costs and reasonable business needs. Accordingly, 
in proposing to charge fees for Options Data Feeds, the Exchange has 
sought to be especially diligent in assessing those fees in a 
transparent way against its own aggregate costs of providing the 
related service, and also carefully and transparently assessing the 
impact on Members--both generally and in relation to other Members, 
i.e., to assure the fee will not create a financial burden on any 
participant and will not have an undue impact in particular on smaller 
Members and competition among Members in general. The Exchange does not 
believe it needs to otherwise address questions about market 
competition in the context of this filing because the proposed fees are 
so clearly consistent with the Act based on its 2024 Cost Analysis. The 
Exchange also believes that this level of diligence and transparency is 
called for by the requirements of Section 19(b)(1) under the Act,\18\ 
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\19\ with respect to the types of information 
self-regulatory organizations (``SROs'') should provide when filing fee 
changes, and Section 6(b) of the Act,\20\ which requires, among other 
things, that exchange fees be reasonable and equitably allocated,\21\ 
not designed to permit unfair discrimination,\22\ and that they not 
impose a burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.\23\ This rule change proposal 
addresses those requirements, and the analysis and data in this section 
are designed to clearly and comprehensively show how they are met.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
    \24\ In 2019, Commission staff published guidance suggesting the 
types of information that SROs may use to demonstrate that their fee 
filings comply with the standards of the Exchange Act (``Fee 
Guidance''). While MEMX understands that the Fee Guidance does not 
create new legal obligations on SROs, the Fee Guidance is consistent 
with MEMX's view about the type and level of transparency that 
exchanges should meet to demonstrate compliance with their existing 
obligations when they seek to charge new fees. See Staff Guidance on 
SRO Rule Filings Relating to Fees (May 21, 2019) available at 
https://www.sec.gov/tm/staff-guidancesro-rule-filings-fees [sic].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted above, MEMX has conducted and recently updated a study of 
its aggregate costs to produce the Exchange Data Feeds--the 2024 Cost 
Analysis. The 2024 Cost Analysis required a detailed analysis of MEMX's 
aggregate baseline costs, including a determination and allocation of 
costs for core services provided by the Exchange--transaction 
execution, market data, membership services and trading permits, 
regulatory services, physical connectivity, and application sessions 
(which provide order entry, cancellation and modification 
functionality, risk functionality, ability to receive drop copies, and 
other functionality). MEMX separately divided its costs between those 
costs necessary to deliver each of these core services, including 
infrastructure, software, human resources (i.e., personnel), and 
certain general and administrative expenses (``cost drivers''). Next, 
MEMX adopted an allocation methodology with various principles to guide 
how much of a particular cost should be allocated to

[[Page 32510]]

each core service. For instance, fixed costs that are not driven by 
client activity (e.g., message rates), such as data center costs, were 
allocated more heavily to the provision of physical connectivity (80%), 
with smaller allocations to logical ports (11%), and the remainder to 
the provision of transaction execution, regulatory services, and market 
data services (9%). The allocation methodology was decided through 
conversations with senior management familiar with each area of the 
Exchange's operations. After adopting this allocation methodology, the 
Exchange then applied an estimated allocation of each cost driver to 
each core service, resulting in the cost allocations described below.
    By allocating segmented costs to each core service, MEMX was able 
to estimate by core service the potential margin it might earn based on 
different fee models. The Exchange notes that as a non-listing venue it 
has four primary sources of revenue that it can potentially use to fund 
its operations: transaction fees, fees for connectivity services, 
membership and regulatory fees, and market data fees. Accordingly, the 
Exchange generally must cover its expenses from these four primary 
sources of revenue.
    Through the Exchange's extensive 2024 Cost Analysis, the Exchange 
analyzed every expense item in the Exchange's general expense ledger to 
determine whether each such expense relates to the provision of the 
Exchange Data Feeds, and, if such expense did so relate, what portion 
(or percentage) of such expense actually supports the provision of the 
Exchange Data Feeds, and thus bears a relationship that is, ``in nature 
and closeness,'' directly related to the Exchange Data Feeds. Based on 
its analysis, MEMX calculated its aggregate annual costs for providing 
the Exchange Data Feeds, at $3,683,375. This results in an estimated 
monthly cost for providing Exchange Data Feeds of $306,948. The 
Exchange notes that it utilized the same principles to generate the 
Cost Analysis in 2022 applicable to the Equities Data Feeds only, and 
at that time, the estimated annual aggregate cost to provide the 
Equities Data fees was $3,014,348. The differences between such 
estimated costs and the overall analysis are primarily based on: (1) 
the addition of MEMX Options, (ii) increased, and in some cases 
decreased, costs projected by the Exchange, (iii) and changes made to 
reallocate certain costs into categories that more closely align the 
Exchange's audited financial statements, as further described below.
Costs Related to Offering Exchange Data Feeds
    The following chart details the individual line-item (annual) costs 
considered by MEMX to be related to offering the Exchange Data Feeds to 
its Members and other customers as well as the percentage of the 
Exchange's overall costs that such costs represent for such area (e.g., 
as set forth below, the Exchange allocated approximately 8% of its 
overall Human Resources cost to offering Exchange Data Feeds).
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26AP24.086

Human Resources
    In allocating personnel (Human Resources) costs, in order to not 
double count any allocations, the Exchange first excluded any employee 
time allocated towards options regulation in order to recoup costs via 
the Options Regulatory Fee (``ORF'').\25\ Of the remaining employee 
time left over, MEMX then calculated an allocation of employee time for 
employees whose functions include directly providing services necessary 
to offer the Exchange Data Feeds, including performance thereof, as 
well as personnel with ancillary functions related to establishing and 
providing such services (such as information security and finance 
personnel). The Exchange notes that it has fewer than 100 employees and 
each department leader has direct knowledge of the time spent by each 
employee with respect to the various tasks necessary to operate the 
Exchange. The estimates of Human Resources cost were therefore 
determined by consulting with such department leaders, determining 
which employees are involved in tasks related to providing the Exchange 
Data Feeds, and confirming that the proposed allocations were 
reasonable based on an understanding of the percentage of their time 
such employees devote to tasks related to providing the Exchange Data 
Feeds. The Exchange notes that senior level executives were allocated 
Human Resources costs to the extent the Exchange believed they are 
involved in overseeing tasks related to providing the Exchange Data 
Feeds. The Human Resources cost was calculated using a blended rate of 
compensation reflecting salary, equity and bonus compensation, 
benefits, payroll taxes, and 401(k) matching contributions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99259 (January 2, 
2024), 89 FR 965 (January 8, 2024) (SR-MEMX-2023-38).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In 2022, 6.9% of the Exchange's Human Resources costs were 
allocated towards the provision of the Equities Data Feeds, which is 
slightly lower than the 8% allocation in the 2024 Cost Analysis. The 
Exchange notes this increase is due to additional hiring necessary to 
support the launch of MEMX Options and the Options Data Feeds.
Data Center
    Data Center costs includes an allocation of the costs the Exchange 
incurs to provide the Exchange Data Feeds in the third-party data 
centers where the Exchange maintains its equipment as well as related 
costs (the Exchange does not own the Primary Data Center or the 
Secondary Data Center, but instead, leases space in data centers 
operated by third parties). As the Data Center costs are primarily for 
space, power, and cooling of servers, the Exchange allocated 
approximately 2% of the Data Center costs for the Exchange Data Feeds. 
This is a lower allocation than the 2022 Cost Analysis due to the fact 
that a greater portion of the Exchange's Data Center costs are now 
being allocated to the provision of Connectivity, as can be seen in the 
Exchange's recent proposal to adopt

[[Page 32511]]

Options Connectivity Fees (the ``Options Connectivity Filing'').\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99635 (February 29, 
2024), 89 FR 16049 (March 6, 2024) (SR-MEMX-2024-06).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Technology
    The Technology category includes the Exchange's network 
infrastructure, other hardware, software, and software licenses used to 
operate and monitor physical assets necessary to provide the Exchange 
Data Feeds. Of note, certain of these costs were included in separate 
Network Infrastructure and Hardware and Software Licenses categories in 
the 2022 Cost Analysis; however, in order to align more closely with 
the Exchange's audited financial statements, these costs were combined 
into the broader Technology category. The Exchange allocated 
approximately 7% of its Technology costs to the Exchange Data Feeds in 
2024.
Depreciation
    The vast majority of the software the Exchange uses with respect to 
its operations, including the software used to generate and disseminate 
the Exchange Data Feeds has been developed in-house and the cost of 
such development is depreciated over time. Accordingly, the Exchange 
included Depreciation costs related to depreciated software used to 
generate and disseminate the Exchange Data Feeds. The Exchange also 
included in the Depreciation costs certain budgeted improvements that 
the Exchange intends to capitalize and depreciate with respect to the 
Exchange Data Feeds in the near-term, as well as the servers used at 
the Exchange's primary and back-up data centers specifically used for 
the Exchange Data Feeds. As with the other allocated costs in the 
Exchange's updated Cost Analysis, the Depreciation cost was therefore 
narrowly tailored to depreciation related to the Exchange Data Feeds. 
In the 2022 Cost Analysis, the Exchange allocated approximately 18% of 
its Depreciation costs towards the provision of the Equities Data 
Feeds, which is higher than the 5% allocated herein. This decrease is 
due to the overall reallocation of Depreciation to other revenue 
streams.
Allocated Shared Expenses
    Finally, a limited portion of general shared expenses were 
allocated to the Exchange Data Feeds. The costs included in general 
shared expenses allocated to the Exchange Data Feeds include office 
space and office expenses (e.g., occupancy and overhead expenses), 
utilities, recruiting and training, marketing and advertising costs, 
professional fees for legal, tax and accounting services (including 
external and internal audit expenses), and telecommunications costs. 
The cost of paying individuals to serve on the Exchange's Board of 
Directors or any committee was not allocated to providing Exchange Data 
Feeds. The Exchange allocated 4% of its Allocated Shared Expenses to 
the Exchange Data Feeds in 2024, which is slightly higher than the 1.8% 
allocated in 2022. This is due to the general increase in the costs 
included in this category overall, resulting in a higher allocation.
Cost Analysis--Additional Discussion
    In conducting its Cost Analysis, the Exchange did not allocate any 
of its expenses in full to any core service and did not double-count 
any expenses. Instead, as described above, the Exchange identified and 
allocated applicable cost drivers across its core services and used the 
same approach to analyzing costs to form the basis of the Options 
Connectivity Filing \27\ and this filing proposing fees for the Options 
Data Feeds. Thus, the Exchange's allocations of cost across core 
services were based on real costs of operating the Exchange and were 
not double-counted across the core services or their associated revenue 
streams.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ See supra note 26.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange anticipates that the projected 2024 revenue for 
Options Data Feeds ($34,675), in addition to what the Exchange 
anticipates it will collect for the Equities Data Feeds ($305,305), 
will generate approximately $339,980 monthly ($4,079,762 annually). The 
Exchange's method of revenue projection is in part based on its 
experience in charging for Equities Data Feeds (i.e. the Exchange 
anticipates that certain Firms may discontinue current subscriptions 
immediately upon the Exchange charging for Options Data Feeds, or 
sometime thereafter, as was the case when it began charging for 
Equities Data Feeds). The proposed fees for Exchange Data Feeds are 
designed to permit the Exchange to cover the costs allocated to 
providing Exchange Data Feeds with a profit margin that the Exchange 
believes is modest (approximately 9.7%),\28\ which the Exchange 
believes is fair and reasonable after taking into account the costs 
related to creating, generating, and disseminating the Exchange Data 
Feeds and the fact that the Exchange will need to fund future 
expenditures (increased costs, improvements, etc.).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ The Exchange calculated this profit margin by dividing the 
annual projected profit of $396,387 by the annual projected revenue 
of $4,079,762 and multiplying by 100.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange like other exchanges is, after all, a for-profit 
business. Accordingly, while the Exchange believes in transparency 
around costs and potential margins, as well as periodic review of 
revenues and applicable costs (as discussed below), the Exchange does 
not believe that these estimates should form the sole basis of whether 
or not a proposed fee is reasonable or can be adopted. Instead, the 
Exchange believes that the information should be used solely to confirm 
that an Exchange is not earning supra-competitive profits, and the 
Exchange believes its Cost Analysis and related projections demonstrate 
this fact.
    As a general matter, the Exchange believes that its costs will 
remain relatively similar in future years. It is possible however that 
such costs will either decrease or increase. To the extent the Exchange 
sees growth in use of Exchange Data Feeds it will receive additional 
revenue to offset future cost increases. However, if use of Exchange 
Data Feeds is static or decreases, the Exchange might not realize the 
revenue that it anticipates or needs in order to cover applicable 
costs. Accordingly, the Exchange is committing to conduct a one-year 
review after implementation of these fees. The Exchange expects that it 
may propose to adjust fees at that time, to increase fees in the event 
that revenues fail to cover costs with a reasonable profit margin.\29\ 
Similarly, the Exchange expects that it would propose to decrease fees 
in the event that revenue materially exceeds current projections. In 
addition, the Exchange will periodically conduct a review to inform its 
decision making on whether a fee change is appropriate (e.g., to 
monitor for costs increasing/decreasing or subscribers increasing/
decreasing, etc. in ways that suggest the then-current fees are 
becoming dislocated from the prior cost-based analysis) and expects 
that it would propose to increase fees in the event that revenues fail 
to cover its costs and a reasonable margin, or decrease fees in the 
event that revenue or the profit margin materially exceeds current 
projections. In the event that the Exchange determines to propose a fee 
change, the results of a timely review, including an updated cost 
estimate, will be included in the rule filing proposing the fee change. 
More generally, the Exchange

[[Page 32512]]

believes that it is appropriate for an exchange to refresh and update 
information about its relevant costs and revenues in seeking any future 
changes to fees, and the Exchange commits to do so.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ The Exchange notes that it does not believe that a 9.7% 
profit margin is necessarily competitive, and instead that this is 
likely significantly below the mark-up many businesses place on 
their products and services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with the provisions of Section 6(b) \30\ of the Act in general, and 
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) \31\ of the Act, in 
particular, in that it is designed to provide for the equitable 
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its Members 
and other persons using its facilities. Additionally, the Exchange 
believes that the proposed fees are consistent with the objectives of 
Section 6(b)(5) \32\ of the Act in that they are designed to promote 
just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and 
coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, 
processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions 
in securities, to remove impediments to a free and open market and 
national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the 
public interest, and, particularly, are not designed to permit unfair 
discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \31\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \32\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes prior to addressing the specific reasons the 
Exchange believes the proposed fees and fee structure are reasonable, 
equitably allocated and not unreasonably discriminatory, that the 
proposed definitions and fee structure described above are consistent 
with the definitions and fee structure used by most U.S. options 
exchanges, MIAX Pearl and BX Options in particular. As such, the 
Exchange believes it is adopting a model that is easily understood by 
Members and non-Members, most of which also subscribe to market data 
products from other exchanges. For this reason, the Exchange believes 
that the proposed definitions and fee structure described above are 
consistent with the Act generally, and Section 6(b)(5) \33\ of the Act 
in particular.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    One of the primary objectives of MEMX is to provide competition and 
to reduce fixed costs imposed upon the industry. Consistent with this 
objective, the Exchange believes that this proposal reflects a simple, 
competitive, reasonable, and equitable pricing structure, with fees 
that are discounted when compared to comparable data products and 
services offered by competitors.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ See supra note 13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reasonableness
    Overall. With regard to reasonableness, the Exchange understands 
that the Commission has traditionally taken a market-based approach to 
examine whether the SRO making the fee proposal was subject to 
significant competitive forces in setting the terms of the proposal. 
The Exchange understands that in general the analysis considers whether 
the SRO has demonstrated in its filing that (i) there are reasonable 
substitutes for the product or service; (ii) ``platform'' competition 
constrains the ability to set the fee; and/or (iii) revenue and cost 
analysis shows the fee would not result in the SRO taking 
supracompetitive profits. If the SRO demonstrates that the fee is 
subject to significant competitive forces, the Exchange understands 
that in general the analysis will next consider whether there is any 
substantial countervailing basis to suggest the fee's terms fail to 
meet one or more standards under the Exchange Act. The Exchange further 
understands that if the filing fails to demonstrate that the fee is 
constrained by competitive forces, the SRO must provide a substantial 
basis, other than competition, to show that it is consistent with the 
Exchange Act, which may include production of relevant revenue and cost 
data pertaining to the product or service.
    The Exchange has not determined its proposed overall market data 
fees based on assumptions about market competition, instead relying 
upon a cost-plus model to determine a reasonable fee structure that is 
informed by the Exchange's understanding of different uses of the 
products by different types of participants. In this context, the 
Exchange believes the proposed fees overall are fair and reasonable as 
a form of cost recovery plus the possibility of a reasonable return for 
the Exchange's aggregate costs of offering the Exchange Data Feeds. The 
Exchange believes the proposed fees are reasonable because they are 
designed to generate annual revenue to recoup some or all of Exchange's 
annual costs of providing market data in both Equities and Options with 
a reasonable profit margin. The Exchange also believes that performing 
the Cost Analysis by combining costs and revenues for Equities and 
Options is reasonable because in this manner the Exchange is able to 
ensure that it does not double count any allocations. The Exchange 
believes that this holistic approach is reasonable due to the fact that 
many of the costs associated with providing the Options Data Feeds are 
the same as those associated with providing the Equities Data Feeds, 
and the Exchange believes that separately analyzing them could 
potentially result in double-counting. As discussed in the Purpose 
section, the Exchange estimates that the fees proposed herein related 
to Options Data Feeds, coupled with the fees it already charges for 
Equities Data Feeds, will result in annual revenue of approximately $4 
million, representing a profit margin of approximately 9.7% for the 
provision of market data on its platforms. Accordingly, the Exchange 
believes that this fee methodology is reasonable because it allows the 
Exchange to recoup some or all of its expenses for providing market 
data products (with any additional revenue representing no more than 
what the Exchange believes to be a reasonable rate of return). The 
Exchange also believes that the proposed fees are reasonable because 
they are generally less than the fees charged by competing options 
exchanges for comparable market data products, notwithstanding that the 
competing exchanges may have different system architectures that may 
result in different cost structures for the provision of market data.
    The Exchange believes the proposed fees for the Options Data Feeds 
are reasonable when compared to fees for comparable products, such as 
the MIAX Pearl Top of Market Feed, the MIAX Pearl Liquidity Feed, and 
the BX Options Top and Depth Feeds, compared to which the Exchange's 
proposed fees are equivalent or lower, as well as other comparable data 
feeds priced significantly higher than the Exchange's proposed fees for 
the Exchange Data Feeds.\35\ Additionally, the Exchange's single flat 
fee for each of its Options Data Feeds, regardless of use type, offers 
a more simplistic approach to market data pricing. Specifically with 
respect to the MEMOIR Options Depth feed, the Exchange believes that 
the proposed fee for such feed is reasonable because it represents not 
only the value of the data available from the MEMOIR Options Top feed, 
which has a lower proposed fee, but also the value of receiving the 
depth-of-book data on an order-by-order basis. The Exchange believes it 
is reasonable to have pricing based, in part, upon the amount of 
information contained in each data feed and the value of that 
information to market participants. The MEMOIR Options Top feed, as 
described above,

[[Page 32513]]

can be utilized to trade on the Exchange but contains less information 
than that is available on the MEMOIR Options Depth feed. Thus, the 
Exchange believes it reasonable for the products to be priced as 
proposed, with MEMOIR Options Depth having a higher price than MEMOIR 
Options Top.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For all of the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the 
proposed fees for the Options Data Feeds are reasonable.
Equitable Allocation
    Overall. The Exchange believes that its proposed fees are 
reasonable, fair, and equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory 
because they are designed to align fees with services provided. The 
Exchange believes that the proposed fees are equitably allocated 
because they will apply uniformly to all data recipients that choose to 
subscribe to the Options Data Feeds. Any Firm that chooses to subscribe 
to one or both of the Options Data Feeds is subject to the same Fee 
Schedule, regardless of what type of business they operate, and the 
decision to subscribe to one or both of the Options Data Feeds is based 
on objective differences in usage of Options Data Feeds among different 
Firms, which are still ultimately in the control of any particular 
Firm. The Exchange believes the proposed pricing between Options Data 
Feeds is equitably allocated because it is based, in part, upon the 
amount of information contained in each data feed and the value of that 
information to market participants. The MEMOIR Options Top feed, as 
described above, can be utilized to trade on the Exchange but contains 
less information than that is available on the MEMOIR Options Depth 
feed. Thus, the Exchange believes it is an equitable allocation of fees 
for the products to be priced as proposed, with MEMOIR Options Top 
having the lower price of the two Options Data Feeds.
    For all of the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the 
proposed fees for the Exchange Data Feeds are equitably allocated.
The Proposed Fees Are Not Unfairly Discriminatory
    The Exchange believes the proposed fees for the Options Data Feeds 
are not unfairly discriminatory because any differences in the 
application of the fees are based on meaningful distinctions between 
the feeds themselves.
    Overall. The Exchange believes that the proposed fees are not 
unfairly discriminatory because they would apply to all data recipients 
that choose to subscribe to the same Options Data Feed(s). Any Firm 
that chooses to subscribe to the Options Data Feeds is subject to the 
same Fee Schedule, regardless of what type of business they operate. 
Because the proposed fee for MEMOIR Options Depth is higher, Firms 
seeking lower cost options may instead choose to receive data through 
the MEMOIR Options Top feed for a lower cost. Alternatively, Firms can 
choose to receive data solely from the Options Price Reporting 
Authority (``OPRA'') for a lower cost. The Exchange notes that Firms 
can also choose to subscribe to a combination of data feeds for 
redundancy purposes or to use different feeds for different purposes. 
In sum, each Firm has the ability to choose the best business solution 
for itself. The Exchange does not believe it is unfairly discriminatory 
to base pricing upon the amount of information contained in each data 
feed, which may have additional value to a market participant. As 
described above, the MEMOIR Options Top feed can be utilized to trade 
on the Exchange but contains less information than that is available on 
the MEMOIR Options Depth feed. Thus, the Exchange believes it is not 
unfairly discriminatory for the products to be priced as proposed, with 
MEMOIR Options Top having a lower price than MEMOIR Options Depth.
    For all of the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the 
proposed fees for the Exchange Data Feeds are not unfairly 
discriminatory.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\36\ the Exchange 
does not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any burden 
on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of 
the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Intra-Market Competition
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed fees for Options 
Data Feeds place certain market participants at a relative disadvantage 
to other market participants because, as noted above, the proposed fees 
are associated with usage of Options Data Feeds by each market 
participant based on the type of business they operate, and the 
decision to subscribe to one or both Options Data Feeds is based on 
objective differences in usage of Options Data Feeds among different 
Firms, which are still ultimately in the control of any particular 
Firm, and such fees do not impose a barrier to entry to smaller 
participants. Accordingly, the proposed fees for Options Data Feeds do 
not favor certain categories of market participants in a manner that 
would impose a burden on competition; rather, the allocation of the 
proposed fees reflects the types of Options Data Feeds consumed by 
various market participants.
Inter-Market Competition
    The Exchange does not believe the proposed fees place an undue 
burden on competition on other SROs that is not necessary or 
appropriate. In particular, market participants are not forced to 
subscribe to any of the Options Data Feeds, as described above. 
Additionally, other exchanges have similar market data fees in place 
for their participants, but with comparable and in many cases higher 
rates for options market data feeds.\37\ The proposed fees are based on 
actual costs and are designed to enable the Exchange to recoup its 
applicable costs with the possibility of a reasonable profit on its 
investment as described in the Purpose and Statutory Basis sections. 
Competing options exchanges are free to adopt comparable fee structures 
subject to the SEC rule filing process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ See supra note 13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \38\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \39\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \39\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or 
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing,

[[Page 32514]]

including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. 
Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
file number SR-MEMX-2024-14 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-MEMX-2024-14. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for 
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not 
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We 
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted 
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All 
submissions should refer to file number SR-MEMX-2024-14 and should be 
submitted on or before May 17, 2024.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \40\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-08808 Filed 4-25-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.