Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022, 26127-26129 [2024-07904]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 73 / Monday, April 15, 2024 / Notices and Mexico. For rescinded administrative reviews of AD/CVD orders on Canada or Mexico, Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 41 days after the date of publication of this recission notice in the Federal Register. Notification to Importers This notice serves as the only reminder to importers of merchandise subject to AD orders of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in these segments of these proceedings. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). Dated: April 2, 2024. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2024–07856 Filed 4–12–24; 8:45 am] ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:44 Apr 12, 2024 Jkt 262001 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–843] Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2021– 2022 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that ITC Limited made sales of subject merchandise in the United States at prices below normal value (NV), and Navneet Education Ltd. (Navneet) did not, during the period of review (POR) September 1, 2021, through August 31, 2022. DATES: Applicable April 15, 2024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Brummitt or Katherine Sliney, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7851 or (202) 482–2437, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On October 5, 2023, Commerce published the Preliminary Results for this review in the Federal Register and invited interested parties to comment on those results.1 For a summary of the events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.2 Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order 3 The products covered by this Order are certain lined paper products from 1 See Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2021–2022, 88 FR 69125 (October 5, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Lined Paper Products from India; 2021–2022,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 3 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper Products from the People’s Republic of China; Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the People’s Republic of China; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 26127 India. For a complete description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Final Determination of No Shipments As noted in the Preliminary Results, we received no-shipment claims from Dinakar Process Private Limited (Dinakar), JC Stationery (P) Ltd (JC Stationery), and M/s. Bhaskar Paper Products (Bhaskar), and we preliminarily determined that JC Stationery and Bhaskar had no shipments during the POR.4 Information on the record regarding U.S. Custom and Border Protection (CBP) entry data showed that Dinakar had suspended entries into the United States.5 Additionally, CBP reported information that contradicted Dinakar’s no-shipment claim.6 Prior to the Preliminary Results, Commerce requested that Dinakar and ITC Limited 7 correct customs entry forms that Dinakar and ITC Limited claim were filed incorrectly.8 Commerce preliminarily determined that the record did not support a finding of no shipments for Dinakar.9 Following the Preliminary Results, Commerce again requested that Dinakar and ITC Limited provide information that the entry documentation that the parties claimed incorrectly listed Dinakar as the exporter or manufacturer of entries into the United States during the POR was revised.10 Dinakar and ITC Limited were unable to demonstrate that the entry documents were revised to remove Dinakar as the exporter of subject entries into the United States during the POR.11 Accordingly, Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 (September 28, 2006) (Order). 4 See Preliminary Results, 88 FR at 69126. 5 See Commerce’s Letter dated April 3, 2023 (ACCESS barcode 4361597–01); see also Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’ dated February 6, 2023, at Attachment. 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Release of U.S. Customs and Border Protection Information Relating to December 22, 2022 Entry Document Request,’’ dated January 17, 2023. 7 Commerce noted in the Preliminary Results that we initiated this review on ‘‘ITC Limited-Education and Stationery Products Business’’ (ITC–ESPB), but record evidence indicates that ITC–ESPB is not a company but is merely a department of ITC Limited. Accordingly, ITC Limited is the entity subject to this review, not ITC–ESPB. There is no additional information on this record or arguments from parties following the Preliminary Results that would lead Commerce to reevaluate this determination. 8 See Commerce’s Letter dated March 9, 2023 (ACCESS barcode 4351661–01). 9 See Preliminary Results, 88 FR at 69125. 10 See Commerce’s Letters, ‘‘Supplemental Questionnaire,’’ dated November 3, 2023. (There were letters with identical titles issued separately to Dinakar and to ITC Limited on this date.) 11 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 2. E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM 15APN1 26128 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 73 / Monday, April 15, 2024 / Notices Commerce determines that the record does not support a finding of no shipments for Dinakar. Following the publication of the Preliminary Results, we received no comments from interested parties regarding JC Stationery and Bhaskar, nor has any party submitted record evidence which would call our preliminary determinations of no shipments for these two companies into question. Therefore, for the final results, we continue to find that JC Stationery and Bhaskar had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. Accordingly, consistent with Commerce’s practice, we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by JC Stationery and Bhaskar, but exported by other parties, at the rate for the intermediate reseller, if available, or at the all-others rate.12 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Rates for Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination For the rate for non-selected respondents in an administrative review, generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts available}.’’ In this segment of the proceeding, because the rate calculated for Navneet is zero, we have assigned a dumping margin to the companies not selected for individual review based on the weighted-average dumping margin calculated for ITC Limited. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised by parties in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is included in the appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized 12 See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:44 Apr 12, 2024 Jkt 262001 Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade/gov/ public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ Changes Since the Preliminary Results will apply to entries of subject We made no changes to the merchandise during the POR for which Preliminary Results based on comments the examined companies did not know from interested parties. that the merchandise they sold to an intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading Final Results of the Review company, or exporter) was destined for As a result of this administrative the United States. In such instances, we review, Commerce determines that the will instruct CBP to liquidate following estimated weighted-average unreviewed entries at the all-others rate dumping margins exist for the period, if there is no rate for the intermediate September 1, 2021, through August 31, company(ies) involved in the 2022: transaction. Further, the assessment rate for Weighted- antidumping duties for each of the average companies not selected for individual Exporter/producer dumping examination will be equal to the margin (percent) weighted-average dumping margin identified above in the ‘‘Final Results of ITC Limited ................................. 23.16 the Review.’’ Commerce intends to issue Navneet Education Ltd ............... 0.00 assessment instructions to CBP no Cellpage Ventures Private Limited .......................................... 23.16 earlier than 35 days after the date of Dinakar Process Private Limited 23.16 publication of the final results of this Lotus Global Private Limited ...... 23.16 review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Pioneer Stationery Private Limited .......................................... 23.16 Court of International Trade, the PP Bafna Ventures Private Limassessment instructions will direct CBP ited .......................................... 23.16 not to liquidate relevant entries until the SGM Paper Products ................. 23.16 time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., Disclosure within 90 days of publication). Normally, Commerce will disclose to Cash Deposit Requirements interested parties the calculations The following cash deposit performed in connection with the final requirements for estimated antidumping results of review withing five days of duties will be effective for all shipments any public announcement or, if there is of subject merchandise entered, or no public announcement, within five withdrawn from warehouse, for days of the date of publication of this consumption on or after the publication notice in the Federal Register, in date of the final results of this accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). administrative review, as provided by However, because we have made no section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the changes to the Preliminary Results, cash deposit rates for the companies there are no new calculations to identified above in the ‘‘Final Results of disclose. the Review’’ section will be equal to the Assessment Rates company-specific weighted-average Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the dumping margin established in the final Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce results of this administrative review; (2) will determine, and CBP shall assess, for merchandise exported by a company antidumping duties on all appropriate not covered in this administrative entries of subject merchandise in review but covered in a completed prior accordance with the final results of this segment of the proceeding, the cash review. Pursuant to 19 CFR deposit rate will continue to be the 351.212(b)(1), for ITC Limited and company-specific rate published for the Navneet Education Ltd., we calculated most recently completed segment of this importer-specific antidumping duty proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a assessment rates by aggregating the total firm covered in this review or amount of dumping calculated for the completed prior segment of this examined sales of each importer and proceeding but the producer is, the cash dividing each of these amounts by the deposit rate will be the companytotal entered value associated with those specific rate established in the sales. Where either the respondent’s completed segment for the most recent PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM 15APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 73 / Monday, April 15, 2024 / Notices period for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 3.91 percent ad valorem, the all-others rate established in the investigation of this proceeding.13 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Continue to Find Dinakar Process Private Limited Subject to this Review V. Recommendation Notification to Importers International Trade Administration This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties has occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties and/or an increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the amount of the countervailing duties. [A–570–985] Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5) and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). Dated: March 28, 2024. Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Whether Navneet’s ECommerce Sales Were Made at the Same Level of Trade as its Home Market Sales in Channels Two, Three, Four, and Five 13 See Order. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:44 Apr 12, 2024 Jkt 262001 [FR Doc. 2024–07904 Filed 4–12–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Xanthan Gum From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on xanthan gum from the People’s Republic of China (China) would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of this AD order. DATES: Applicable April 5, 2024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luke Caruso, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2081. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On July 19, 2013, Commerce published in the Federal Register the AD order on xanthan gum from China.1 On October 2, 2023, the ITC instituted,2 and Commerce initiated,3 the sunset review of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). As a result of its review, Commerce determined that revocation of the Order would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping, and therefore, notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins of dumping likely to prevail should the Order be revoked.4 1 See Xanthan Gum from the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 78 FR 43143 (July 19, 2023) (Order). 2 See Xanthan Gum From China; Institution of a Five-Year Review, 88 FR 67809 (October 2, 2023). 3 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 88 FR 67729 (October 2, 2023). 4 See Xanthan Gum from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 89 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 26129 On April 5, 2024, the ITC published its determination, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, that revocation of the Order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.5 Scope of the Order The scope of this order covers dry xanthan gum, whether or not coated or blended with other products. Further, xanthan gum is included in this order regardless of physical form, including, but not limited to, solutions, slurries, dry powders of any particle size, or unground fiber. Xanthan gum that has been blended with other product(s) is included in this scope when the resulting mix contains 15 percent or more of xanthan gum by dry weight. Other products with which xanthan gum may be blended include, but are not limited to, sugars, minerals, and salts. Xanthan gum is a polysaccharide produced by aerobic fermentation of Xanthomonas campestris. The chemical structure of the repeating pentasaccharide monomer unit consists of a backbone of two P-1,4-D-Glucose monosaccharide units, the second with a trisaccharide side chain consisting of P-D-Mannose-(1,4)-P-DGlucuronic acid(1,2)-a-D-Mannose monosaccharide units. The terminal mannose may be pyruvylated and the internal mannose unit may be acetylated. Merchandise covered by the scope of this order is classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (‘‘HTS’’) of the United States at subheadings 3913.90.20, 3913.90.2015, and 3824.99.4900. This tariff classification is provided for convenience and customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope is dispositive. Continuation of the Order As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that revocation of the Order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, Commerce hereby orders the continuation of the Order. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. FR 7363 (February 2, 2024), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. 5 See Xanthan Gum from China; Determination, 89 FR 24033 (April 5, 2024) (ITC Final Determination). E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM 15APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 73 (Monday, April 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26127-26129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-07904]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-843]


Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No 
Shipments; 2021-2022

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that ITC 
Limited made sales of subject merchandise in the United States at 
prices below normal value (NV), and Navneet Education Ltd. (Navneet) 
did not, during the period of review (POR) September 1, 2021, through 
August 31, 2022.

DATES: Applicable April 15, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Brummitt or Katherine Sliney, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-7851 
or (202) 482-2437, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On October 5, 2023, Commerce published the Preliminary Results for 
this review in the Federal Register and invited interested parties to 
comment on those results.\1\ For a summary of the events that occurred 
since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.\2\ Commerce conducted this administrative review in 
accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; and Preliminary 
Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022, 88 FR 69125 (October 5, 
2023) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum (PDM).
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Final Results 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Lined Paper 
Products from India; 2021-2022,'' dated concurrently with, and 
hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order 3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 
Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper Products from the People's 
Republic of China; Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined 
Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the People's Republic of 
China; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper 
Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 (September 28, 2006) 
(Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The products covered by this Order are certain lined paper products 
from India. For a complete description of the scope, see the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.

Final Determination of No Shipments

    As noted in the Preliminary Results, we received no-shipment claims 
from Dinakar Process Private Limited (Dinakar), JC Stationery (P) Ltd 
(JC Stationery), and M/s. Bhaskar Paper Products (Bhaskar), and we 
preliminarily determined that JC Stationery and Bhaskar had no 
shipments during the POR.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Preliminary Results, 88 FR at 69126.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Information on the record regarding U.S. Custom and Border 
Protection (CBP) entry data showed that Dinakar had suspended entries 
into the United States.\5\ Additionally, CBP reported information that 
contradicted Dinakar's no-shipment claim.\6\ Prior to the Preliminary 
Results, Commerce requested that Dinakar and ITC Limited \7\ correct 
customs entry forms that Dinakar and ITC Limited claim were filed 
incorrectly.\8\ Commerce preliminarily determined that the record did 
not support a finding of no shipments for Dinakar.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Commerce's Letter dated April 3, 2023 (ACCESS barcode 
4361597-01); see also Memorandum, ``Respondent Selection,'' dated 
February 6, 2023, at Attachment.
    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Release of U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection Information Relating to December 22, 2022 Entry Document 
Request,'' dated January 17, 2023.
    \7\ Commerce noted in the Preliminary Results that we initiated 
this review on ``ITC Limited-Education and Stationery Products 
Business'' (ITC-ESPB), but record evidence indicates that ITC-ESPB 
is not a company but is merely a department of ITC Limited. 
Accordingly, ITC Limited is the entity subject to this review, not 
ITC-ESPB. There is no additional information on this record or 
arguments from parties following the Preliminary Results that would 
lead Commerce to reevaluate this determination.
    \8\ See Commerce's Letter dated March 9, 2023 (ACCESS barcode 
4351661-01).
    \9\ See Preliminary Results, 88 FR at 69125.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Following the Preliminary Results, Commerce again requested that 
Dinakar and ITC Limited provide information that the entry 
documentation that the parties claimed incorrectly listed Dinakar as 
the exporter or manufacturer of entries into the United States during 
the POR was revised.\10\ Dinakar and ITC Limited were unable to 
demonstrate that the entry documents were revised to remove Dinakar as 
the exporter of subject entries into the United States during the 
POR.\11\ Accordingly,

[[Page 26128]]

Commerce determines that the record does not support a finding of no 
shipments for Dinakar.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Commerce's Letters, ``Supplemental Questionnaire,'' 
dated November 3, 2023. (There were letters with identical titles 
issued separately to Dinakar and to ITC Limited on this date.)
    \11\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Following the publication of the Preliminary Results, we received 
no comments from interested parties regarding JC Stationery and 
Bhaskar, nor has any party submitted record evidence which would call 
our preliminary determinations of no shipments for these two companies 
into question. Therefore, for the final results, we continue to find 
that JC Stationery and Bhaskar had no shipments of subject merchandise 
during the POR. Accordingly, consistent with Commerce's practice, we 
intend to instruct CBP to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise 
produced by JC Stationery and Bhaskar, but exported by other parties, 
at the rate for the intermediate reseller, if available, or at the all-
others rate.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 
26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal from the 
Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rates for Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination

    For the rate for non-selected respondents in an administrative 
review, generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, 
which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a 
market economy investigation. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, 
the all-others rate is normally ``an amount equal to the weighted 
average of the estimated weighted average dumping margins established 
for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any 
zero or de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the 
basis of facts available{time} .''
    In this segment of the proceeding, because the rate calculated for 
Navneet is zero, we have assigned a dumping margin to the companies not 
selected for individual review based on the weighted-average dumping 
margin calculated for ITC Limited.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised by parties in the case and rebuttal briefs are 
addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues 
addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is included in the 
appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public 
document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade/gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    We made no changes to the Preliminary Results based on comments 
from interested parties.

Final Results of the Review

    As a result of this administrative review, Commerce determines that 
the following estimated weighted-average dumping margins exist for the 
period, September 1, 2021, through August 31, 2022:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                      Exporter/producer                         dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITC Limited.................................................       23.16
Navneet Education Ltd.......................................        0.00
Cellpage Ventures Private Limited...........................       23.16
Dinakar Process Private Limited.............................       23.16
Lotus Global Private Limited................................       23.16
Pioneer Stationery Private Limited..........................       23.16
PP Bafna Ventures Private Limited...........................       23.16
SGM Paper Products..........................................       23.16
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    Normally, Commerce will disclose to interested parties the 
calculations performed in connection with the final results of review 
withing five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public 
announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this 
notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 
However, because we have made no changes to the Preliminary Results, 
there are no new calculations to disclose.

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), 
Commerce will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on 
all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the 
final results of this review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), for ITC 
Limited and Navneet Education Ltd., we calculated importer-specific 
antidumping duty assessment rates by aggregating the total amount of 
dumping calculated for the examined sales of each importer and dividing 
each of these amounts by the total entered value associated with those 
sales. Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is 
zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an 
importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will 
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to 
antidumping duties.
    Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' will apply to entries of 
subject merchandise during the POR for which the examined companies did 
not know that the merchandise they sold to an intermediary (e.g., a 
reseller, trading company, or exporter) was destined for the United 
States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed 
entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate 
company(ies) involved in the transaction.
    Further, the assessment rate for antidumping duties for each of the 
companies not selected for individual examination will be equal to the 
weighted-average dumping margin identified above in the ``Final Results 
of the Review.'' Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to 
CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final 
results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is 
filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment 
instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until 
the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has 
expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements for estimated antidumping 
duties will be effective for all shipments of subject merchandise 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the 
publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as 
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rates 
for the companies identified above in the ``Final Results of the 
Review'' section will be equal to the company-specific weighted-average 
dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative 
review; (2) for merchandise exported by a company not covered in this 
administrative review but covered in a completed prior segment of the 
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review or 
completed prior segment of this proceeding but the producer is, the 
cash deposit rate will be the company-specific rate established in the 
completed segment for the most recent

[[Page 26129]]

period for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 
rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 3.91 
percent ad valorem, the all-others rate established in the 
investigation of this proceeding.\13\ These cash deposit requirements, 
when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties 
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure 
to comply with this requirement could result in the Commerce's 
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing 
duties has occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping 
duties and/or an increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the 
amount of the countervailing duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or 
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective 
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and 
the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5) 
and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).

    Dated: March 28, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Whether Navneet's E-Commerce Sales Were Made at the 
Same Level of Trade as its Home Market Sales in Channels Two, Three, 
Four, and Five
    Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Continue to Find Dinakar 
Process Private Limited Subject to this Review
V. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2024-07904 Filed 4-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.