Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq GEMX, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Options 7, Section 6, 21099-21104 [2024-06324]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 26, 2024 / Notices
Purge Ports are only utilized in the
Market Maker’s assigned options series.
Unlike other market participants,
Market Makers are subject to market
making and quoting obligations.29 These
liquidity providers are critical market
participants in that they are the only
market participants that provide
liquidity to MRX on a continuous basis.
In addition, the Exchange notes that
Lead Market Makers are required to
submit quotes in the Opening Process to
open an options series.30 Market Makers
are subject to a number of fees, unlike
other market participants. Market
Makers pay separate Membership
Fees,31 and CMM Trading Right Fees,32
in addition to other fees paid by other
market participants. Providing Market
Makers a means to cap their cost related
to quoting and enabling all Market
Makers to acquire SQF Ports and SQF
Purge Ports at no cost beyond a certain
dollar amount enables these market
participants to provide the necessary
liquidity to MRX at lower costs.
Therefore, because Market Makers fulfill
a unique role on the Exchange, are the
only market participant required to
submit quotes as part of their
obligations to operate on the Exchange,
and, in light of that role, they are
eligible for certain incentives. The
proposed SQF Port and SQF Purge Fee
cap is designed to continue to incent
Market Makers to quote on MRX,
thereby promoting liquidity, quote
competition, and trading opportunities.
The Exchange’s proposal to remove
the italicized language in Options 7,
Section 6 related to a technology
migration that took place in 2022 does
not impose an undue burden on
competition because the rule text
related to the technology migration is no
longer necessary because the migration
is complete and the fees are no longer
applicable. No Member is subject to the
pricing described for the 2022
technology migration.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
29 See
Options 2, Sections 4 and 5.
Options 3, Section 8.
31 See Options 7, Section 5, E.
32 See Options 7, Section 5, F.
30 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Mar 25, 2024
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.33 At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is: (i)
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest; (ii) for the protection of
investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
MRX–2024–07 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–MRX–2024–07. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
33 15
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
Frm 00160
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21099
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–MRX–2024–07 and should be
submitted on or before April 16, 2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.34
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–06323 Filed 3–25–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–99787; File No. SR–GEMX–
2024–07]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
GEMX, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Options 7,
Section 6
March 20, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 7,
2024, Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (‘‘GEMX’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Rules at Options 7, Section 6, C, Ports
and Other Services.3
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/
rulebook/gemx/rules, at the principal
34 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 The Exchange initially filed the proposed
pricing changes on November 28, 2023 (SR–GEMX–
2023–16) to be effective on December 1, 2023. On
December 5, 2023, the Exchange withdrew SR–
GEMX–2023–16 and replaced it with SR–GEMX–
2023–19. On January 16, 2023, the Exchange
withdrew SR–GEMX–2023–19 and submitted SR–
GEMX–2024–03. On March 7, 2024, the Exchange
withdrew SR–GEMX–2024–03 and submitted this
filing.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
21100
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 26, 2024 / Notices
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
The Exchange proposes to amend
Options 7, Section 6, C, Ports and Other
Services. Specifically, the Exchange
proposes to amend the monthly caps for
SQF Ports 4 and SQF Purge Ports.5
Today, GEMX assesses $1,250 per
port, per month for an SQF Port as well
as an SQF Purge Port.6 Also, today, SQF
4 ‘‘Specialized Quote Feed’’ or ‘‘SQF’’ is an
interface that allows Market Makers to connect,
send, and receive messages related to quotes,
Immediate-or-Cancel Orders, and auction responses
to the Exchange. Features include the following: (1)
options symbol directory messages (e.g., underlying
instruments); (2) System event messages (e.g., start
of trading hours messages and start of opening); (3)
trading action messages (e.g., halts and resumes); (4)
execution messages; (5) quote messages; (6)
Immediate-or-Cancel Order messages; (7) risk
protection triggers and purge notifications; (8)
opening imbalance messages; (9) auction
notifications; and (10) auction responses. The SQF
Purge Interface only receives and notifies of purge
requests from the Market Maker. Market Makers
may only enter interest into SQF in their assigned
options series. Immediate-or-Cancel Orders entered
into SQF are not subject to the Order Price
Protection, Market Order Spread Protection, and
Size Limitation Protection in Options 3, Section
15(a)(1)(A), (1)(B), and (2)(B) respectively. See
Supplementary Material .03(c) to Options 3, Section
7.
5 SQF Purge is a specific port for the SQF
interface that only receives and notifies of purge
requests from the Market Maker. Dedicated SQF
Purge Ports enable Market Makers to seamlessly
manage their ability to remove their quotes in a
swift manner. The SQF Purge Port is designed to
assist Market Makers in the management of, and
risk control over, their quotes. Market Makers may
utilize a purge port to reduce uncertainty and to
manage risk by purging all quotes in their assigned
options series. Of note, Market Makers may only
enter interest into SQF in their assigned options
series. Additionally, the SQF Purge Port may be
utilized by a Market Maker in the event that the
Member has a system issue and determines to purge
its quotes from the order book.
6 The Exchange proposes to add a comma
between ‘‘per port’’ and ‘‘per month’’ in the Options
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Mar 25, 2024
Jkt 262001
Ports and SQF Purge Ports are subject to
a monthly cap of $17,500, which cap is
applicable to Market Makers.
At this time, the Exchange proposes to
increase the SQF Port and SQF Purge
Port monthly cap fee of $17,500 per
month to $27,500 per month.7 The
Exchange is not amending the $1,250
per port, per month SQF Port and SQF
Purge Port. As is the case today, the
Exchange would not assess a Member an
SQF Port or SQF Purge Port fee beyond
the monthly cap once the Member has
exceeded the monthly cap for the
respective month.
Despite increasing the monthly cap
for SQF Ports and SQF Purge Ports from
$17,500 per month to $27,500 per
month, the Exchange will continue to
offer Members the opportunity to cap
their SQF Port and SQF Purge Port fees
so that they would not be assessed these
fees beyond the cap.
Pursuant to Supplementary Material
.03(c) to Options 3, Section 7, Market
Makers may only enter interest into SQF
in their assigned options series.
Pursuant to Supplementary Material
.03(c) to Options 3, Section 7, the SQF
interface allows Market Makers to
connect, send, and receive messages
related to quotes, Immediate-or-Cancel
Orders, and auction responses to the
Exchange. A GEMX Market Maker
requires only one SQF Port to submit
quotes in its assigned options series into
GEMX. An SQF Purge is a specific port
for the SQF interface that only receives
and notifies of purge requests from the
Market Maker. A GEMX Market Maker
may submit all quotes through one SQF
Port and utilize one SQF Purge Port to
view its purge requests. While a Market
Maker may elect to obtain multiple SQF
Ports and SQF Purge Ports to organize
its business,8 only one SQF Port and
SQF Purge Port is necessary for a Market
Maker to fulfill its regulatory quoting
obligations.9
7, Section 6, C, SQF Port and SQF Purge Port Fee
rule text. The Exchange also proposes to remove an
extraneous period in Options 7, Section 6, C, in the
second paragraph.
7 Today, 62% of GEMX Market Makers have
capped their SQF Ports and SQF Purge Ports on
GEMX. The Exchange notes that of the Market
Makers currently registered on GEMX, there is a
mix of size of Market Makers that cap.
8 For example, a Market Maker may desire to
utilize multiple SQF Ports for accounting purposes,
to measure performance, for regulatory reasons or
other determinations that are specific to that
Member.
9 GEMX Market Makers have various regulatory
requirements as provided for in Options 2, Section
4. Additionally, GEMX Market Makers have certain
quoting requirements with respect to their assigned
options series as provided in Options 2, Section 5.
SQF Ports are the only quoting protocol available
on GEMX and only Market Makers may utilize SQF
Ports. The same is true for SQF Purge Ports.
PO 00000
Frm 00161
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,10 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5)
of the Act,11 in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
among members and issuers and other
persons using any facility, and is not
designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The proposed pricing change to
increase the SQF Port and SQF Purge
Port monthly cap from $17,500 per
month to $27,500 per month is
reasonable because despite the increase
in the monthly cap, the Exchange will
continue to offer Members the
opportunity to cap their SQF Port and
SQF Purge Port fees so that they would
not be assessed these fees beyond the
cap. Additionally, a GEMX Market
Maker requires only one SQF Port to
submit quotes in its assigned options
series into GEMX. A GEMX Market
Maker may submit all quotes through
one SQF Port and utilize one SQF Purge
Port to view its purge requests. While a
Market Maker may elect to obtain
multiple SQF Ports and SQF Purge Ports
to organize its business,12 only one SQF
Port and SQF Purge Port is necessary for
a Market Maker to fulfill its regulatory
quoting obligations.13 Members may
choose a greater number of SQF Ports or
SQF Purge Ports, beyond one port,
depending on that Member’s particular
business model. Additionally, the
Exchange believes that the caps are
reasonable for two reasons.
First, SQF Ports are a secure method
for Market Makers to submit quotes into
the Exchange’s match engine and for the
Exchange to send messages related to
those quotes to Market Makers. GEMX
must manage the security and message
traffic, among other things, for each
port. Utilizing the cap to manage a
Market Maker’s costs while also
managing the quantity of SQF Ports
issued on GEMX has led the Exchange
to select $27,500 as the amended
monthly cap for SQF Ports and SQF
10 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
12 For example, a Market Maker or may desire to
utilize multiple SQF Ports for accounting purposes,
to measure performance, for regulatory reasons or
other determinations that are specific to that
Member.
13 GEMX Market Makers have various regulatory
requirements as provided for in Options 2, Section
4. Additionally, GEMX Market Makers have certain
quoting requirements with respect to their assigned
options series as provided in Options 2, Section 5.
SQF Ports are the only quoting protocol available
on GEMX and only Market Makers may utilize SQF
Ports.
11 15
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 26, 2024 / Notices
Purge Ports. By capping the ports at a
different level, the Exchange is
considering the message traffic and
message rates associated with the
current number of outstanding ports and
its ability to process messages. The
ability to have a cap and amend that cap
permits the Exchange to scale its needs
with respect to processing messages in
an efficient manner. The Exchange notes
that Cboe Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Cboe’’) limits
usage on each port and assesses fees for
incremental usage.14
Second, the Exchange notes that
multiple ports are not necessary,
however, to the extent that some Market
Makers elect to obtain multiple ports,
the Exchange is offering to cap their
total port cost at $27,500 per month.
GEMX believes the existence of a cap
allows for efficiencies and permits
Market Makers to increase their number
of ports beyond the cap. The cap levels
the playing field by allowing those
Market Makers that want to obtain a
larger number of ports to do so with the
certainty of a fee cap. Without the cap,
GEMX Market Makers may pay more to
obtain multiple ports on GEMX. BOX
Exchange LLC (‘‘BOX’’) assesses $1,000
per month for all SAIL Ports for Market
Making and $500 per month per port up
to 5 ports for order entry and $150 per
month for each additional port.15
MIAX’s MIAX Express Interface (‘‘MEI’’)
Fee levels are based on a tiered fee
21101
structure based on the Market Maker’s
total monthly executed volume during
the relevant month.16
The number of ports that members
choose to purchase varies widely.
Today, on GEMX, no Marker Makers
have 1 SQF Port/SQF Purge Port, 1
Market Maker had 2–5 SQF Ports/SQF
Purge Ports, 4 Market Makers have
between 6–10 SQF Ports/SQF Purge
Ports, and 8 Market Makers have more
than 11 SQF Ports/SQF Purge Ports. The
chart below represents the number of
SQF Ports and SQF Purge Ports that are
subscribed to by members across the six
Nasdaq affiliated options markets.
SQF & SQF Purge Ports Across Nasdaq Exchanges
Data as of/t,.farch 1r 2024
B!.!tket 2~5 Ports
Bu.cket:•l?ort
"¥~,ofTi:ttit!: 0.24%
%ofTvtai: 0.82%
::s{if?-.ort~:·27
:::-ofP.orts.-:8
Buck-Br: 6,.lOPorts
'bvfTctaL4.43%,
;;of Ports~ 146
8-Jt:i->et: l.l+ Ports
<:"◊OfTotaJ:94.51%
The Exchange’s proposed pricing
change to increase the SQF Port and
SQF Purge Port monthly cap from
$17,500 per month to $27,500 per
month is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the Exchange
would uniformly not assess any Market
Makers that exceeded the proposed
monthly cap any SQF Port and SQF
Purge Port fees for that month beyond
the cap. Market Makers are the only
market participants that are assessed
SQF Port and SQF Purge Port fees
because they are the only market
participants that are permitted to quote
on the Exchange. SQF Ports and SQF
Purge Ports are only utilized in the
Market Maker’s assigned options series.
The following chart represents the
classification of GEMX Members and
the percentage of Market Makers.
14 Each Cboe Binary Order Entry (‘‘BOE’’) or FIX
Logical Port incur the logical port fee indicated
when used to enter up to 70,000 orders per trading
day per logical port as measured on average in a
single month. For each incremental usage of up to
70,000 per day per logical port will incur an
additional logical port fee of $800 per month. BOE
or FIX Logical Ports provide users the ability to
enter order/quotes. See Cboe’s Fees Schedule.
15 See BOX’s Fee Schedule.
16 MEI is a connection to MIAX systems that
enables Market Makers to submit simple and
complex electronic quotes to MIAX. MIAX caps its
MEI Ports. For these Monthly MIAX MEI Fees
levels, if the Market Maker’s total monthly executed
volume during the relevant month is less than
0.060% of the total monthly executed volume
reported by OCC in the market maker account type
for MIAX-listed option classes for that month, then
the fee will be $14,500 instead of the fee otherwise
applicable to such level. See MIAX’s Fee Schedule.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Mar 25, 2024
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00162
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
EN26MR24.011
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
z. of f'orts· 3,116
21102
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 26, 2024 / Notices
GEMX Member Type Distribution
March2024
Unlike other market participants,
Market Makers are subject to market
making and quoting obligations.17 These
liquidity providers are critical market
participants in that they are the only
market participants that provide
liquidity to GEMX on a continuous
basis. In addition, the Exchange notes
that Lead Market Makers are required to
submit quotes in the Opening Process to
open an options series.18 Market Makers
are subject to a number of fees, unlike
other market participants. Market
Makers pay separate Membership
Fees,19 and CMM Trading Right Fees,20
in addition to other fees paid by other
market participants. Providing Market
Makers a means to cap their cost related
to quoting and enabling all Market
Makers to acquire SQF Ports and SQF
Purge Ports at no cost beyond a certain
dollar amount enables these market
participants to provide the necessary
liquidity to GEMX at lower costs.
Therefore, because Market Makers fulfill
a unique role on the Exchange, are the
only market participant required to
submit quotes as part of their
obligations to operate on the Exchange,
and, in light of that role, they are
eligible for certain incentives. The
proposed SQF Port and SQF Purge Fee
cap is designed to continue to incent
Market Makers to quote on GEMX,
17 See
Options 2, Sections 4 and 5.
Options 3, Section 8.
19 See Options 7, Section 6, A.
20 See Options 7, Section 6, B.
18 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Mar 25, 2024
Jkt 262001
thereby promoting liquidity, quote
competition, and trading opportunities.
In 2022, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE
Arca’’) proposed to restructure fees
relating to OTPs for Market Makers.21 In
that rule change,22 NYSE Arca argued
that,
Market Makers serve a unique and
important function on the Exchange (and
other options exchanges) given the quotedriven nature of options markets. Because
options exchanges rely on actively quoting
Market Makers to facilitate a robust
marketplace that attracts order flow, options
exchanges must attract and retain Market
Makers, including by setting competitive
Market Maker permit fees. Stated otherwise,
changes to Market Maker permit fees can
have a direct effect on the ability of an
exchange to compete for order flow. The
Exchange also believes that the number of
options exchanges on which Market Makers
can effect option transactions also ensures
competition in the marketplace and
constrains the ability of exchanges to charge
supracompetitive fees for access to its market
by Market Makers.
Further, NYSE ARCA noted that,23
The Exchange further believes that its
ability to set Market Maker permit fees is
constrained by competitive forces based on
the fact that Market Makers can, and have,
chosen to terminate their status as a Market
21 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95412
(June 23, 2022), 87 FR 38786 (June 29, 2022) (SR–
NYSEArca–2022–36). NYSE Arca proposed to
increase both the monthly fee per Market Maker
OTP and the number of issues covered by each
additional OTP because, among other reasons, the
number of issues traded on the Exchange has
increased significantly in recent years.
22 Id at 38788.
23 Id at 38790.
PO 00000
Frm 00163
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Maker if they deem Market Maker permit fees
to be unreasonable or excessive. Specifically,
the Exchange notes that a BOX participant
modified its access to BOX in connection
with the implementation of a proposed
change to BOX’s Market Maker permit fees.
The Exchange has also observed that another
options exchange group experienced
decreases in market share following its
proposed modifications of its access fees
(including Market Maker trading permit fees),
suggesting that market participants
(including Market Makers) are sensitive to
changes in exchanges’ access fees and may
respond by shifting their order flow
elsewhere if they deem the fees to be
unreasonable or excessive.
There is no requirement, regulatory or
otherwise, that any Market Maker connect to
and access any (or all of) the available
options exchanges. The Exchange also is not
aware of any reason why a Market Maker
could not cease being a permit holder in
response to unreasonable price increases.
The Exchange does not assess any
termination fee for a Market Maker to drop
its OTP, nor is the Exchange aware of any
other costs that would be incurred by a
Market Maker to do so.
The Exchange likewise believes that
its ability to cap SQF Port and SQF
Purge fees is constrained by competitive
forces and that its proposed
modifications to the SQF Port and SQF
Purge Fee cap is reasonably designed in
consideration of the competitive
environment in which the Exchange
operates, by balancing the value of the
enhanced benefits available to Market
Makers due to the current level of
activity on the Exchange with a fee
structure that will continue to incent
Market Makers to support increased
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
EN26MR24.012
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Clearinga!id EAM·
52.38%.
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 26, 2024 / Notices
liquidity, quote competition, and
trading opportunities on the Exchange,
for the benefit of all market participants.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
Intermarket Competition
The proposal does not impose an
undue burden on intermarket
competition. The Exchange believes its
proposal remains competitive with
other options markets who also offer
order entry protocols. The Exchange
notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market in which market
participants can readily favor competing
venues if they deem fee levels at a
21103
particular venue to be excessive. The
chart below shows the February 2024
market share for multiply listed options
by exchange. Of the 17 operating
options exchanges, none currently has
more than a 17.6% market share.
Customers widely distribute their
transactions across exchanges according
to their business needs and the ability
of each exchange to meet those needs
through technology, liquidity and
functionality.
Options Market Share by Exchange: February 2024
CBOE
17.6%
ARCA
12.5%
PHLX
9.3%
AMEX
7.0%
EDGX
6.6%
!SE
6.0%
MIAX
6.0%
BOX
Options Exchanges- Parent Company
BOX
5.8%
MPRL
5.5%
NOM
5.0%
BATS
4.0%
EMLD
3.5%
C2
MEMX
3.1%
1.4%
GEMX
2.4%
MRX
2.4%
BXOP-2.0%
MEMX-1.4%
Market share is the percentage of
volume on a particular exchange
relative to the total volume across all
exchanges, and indicates the amount of
order flow directed to that exchange.
High levels of market share enhance the
value of trading and ports.
In such an environment, the Exchange
must continually adjust its fees to
remain competitive with other
exchanges. Because competitors are free
to modify their own fees in response,
and because market participants may
readily adjust their order routing
practices, the Exchange believes that the
degree to which fee changes in this
market may impose any burden on
competition is extremely limited.
Other exchanges amended certain
costs attributed to Market Makers.24 In
2022, MRX proposed a monthly cap for
SQF Ports and SQF Purge Ports of
17,500.25 MRX noted in its rule change
24 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95412
(June 23, 2022), 87 FR 38786 (June 29, 2022) (SR–
NYSEArca–2022–36).
25 See Securities Exchange Act No. 96824
(February 7, 2023), 88 FR 8975 (February 10, 2023)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Mar 25, 2024
Jkt 262001
that, ‘‘Only one SQF quote protocol is
required for an MRX Market Maker to
submit quotes into MRX and to meet its
regulatory requirements.’’ 26
Additionally, BOX Exchange LLC
(‘‘BOX’’) assesses $1,000 per month for
all SAIL Ports for Market Making and
$500 per month per port up to 5 ports
for order entry and $150 per month for
each additional port.27 MIAX’s MIAX
Express Interface (‘‘MEI’’) Fee levels are
based on a tiered fee structure based on
the Market Maker’s total monthly
executed volume during the relevant
month.28
(SR–MRX–2023–05) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
To Amend MRX Options 7, Section 6).
26 Id at 8976.
27 See BOX’s Fee Schedule.
28 MEI is a connection to MIAX systems that
enables Market Makers to submit simple and
complex electronic quotes to MIAX. MIAX caps its
MEI Ports. For these Monthly MIAX MEI Fees
levels, if the Market Maker’s total monthly executed
volume during the relevant month is less than
0.060% of the total monthly executed volume
reported by OCC in the market maker account type
for MIAX-listed option classes for that month, then
PO 00000
Frm 00164
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
If the Commission were to apply a
different standard of review this
proposal than it applied to other
exchange fee filings, where Market
Maker fees were increased and port fee
caps were established, it would create a
burden on competition such that it
would impair GEMX’s ability to
compete among other options markets.
Intramarket Competition
The Exchange’s proposed pricing
change to increase the SQF Port and
SQF Purge Port monthly cap from
$17,500 per month to $27,500 per
month does not impose an undue
burden on competition because the
Exchange would uniformly not assess
any Market Makers that exceeded the
proposed monthly cap any SQF Port
and SQF Purge Port fees for that month
beyond the cap. Market Makers are the
only market participants that are
assessed SQF Port and SQF Purge Port
fees because they are the only market
the fee will be $14,500 instead of the fee otherwise
applicable to such level. See MIAX’s Fee Schedule.
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
EN26MR24.013
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Source; OCC., Nadsaq Economic Research
21104
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 26, 2024 / Notices
participants that are permitted to quote
on the Exchange. SQF Ports and SQF
Purge Ports are only utilized in the
Market Maker’s assigned options series.
Unlike other market participants,
Market Makers are subject to market
making and quoting obligations.29 These
liquidity providers are critical market
participants in that they are the only
market participants that provide
liquidity to GEMX on a continuous
basis. In addition, the Exchange notes
that Lead Market Makers are required to
submit quotes in the Opening Process to
open an options series.30 Market Makers
are subject to a number of fees, unlike
other market participants. Market
Makers pay separate Membership
Fees,31 and CMM Trading Right Fees,32
in addition to other fees paid by other
market participants. Providing Market
Makers a means to cap their cost related
to quoting and enabling all Market
Makers to acquire SQF Ports and SQF
Purge Ports at no cost beyond a certain
dollar amount enables these market
participants to provide the necessary
liquidity to GEMX at lower costs.
Therefore, because Market Makers fulfill
a unique role on the Exchange, are the
only market participant required to
submit quotes as part of their
obligations to operate on the Exchange,
and, in light of that role, they are
eligible for certain incentives. The
proposed SQF Port and SQF Purge Fee
cap is designed to continue to incent
Market Makers to quote on GEMX,
thereby promoting liquidity, quote
competition, and trading opportunities.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.33 At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is: (i)
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest; (ii) for the protection of
investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
29 See
Options 2, Sections 4 and 5.
Options 3, Section 8.
31 See Options 7, Section 6, A.
32 See Options 7, Section 6, B.
33 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
30 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Mar 25, 2024
Jkt 262001
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
[FR Doc. 2024–06324 Filed 3–25–24; 8:45 am]
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
GEMX–2024–07 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–GEMX–2024–07. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–GEMX–2024–07 and should be
submitted on or before April 16, 2024.
PO 00000
Frm 00165
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.34
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–99801; File No. SR–
NYSEARCA–2024–27]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed
Rule Change To List and Trade Shares
of the 7RCC Spot Bitcoin and Carbon
Credit Futures ETF
March 20, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on March
13, 2024, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE
Arca’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to list and
trade shares of the 7RCC Spot Bitcoin
and Carbon Credit Futures ETF under
NYSE Arca Rule 8.500–E (Trust Units).
The proposed rule change is available
on the Exchange’s website at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
34 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21099-21104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-06324]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-99787; File No. SR-GEMX-2024-07]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq GEMX, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Options 7,
Section 6
March 20, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on March 7, 2024, Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (``GEMX'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its Rules at Options 7, Section 6,
C, Ports and Other Services.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Exchange initially filed the proposed pricing changes on
November 28, 2023 (SR-GEMX-2023-16) to be effective on December 1,
2023. On December 5, 2023, the Exchange withdrew SR-GEMX-2023-16 and
replaced it with SR-GEMX-2023-19. On January 16, 2023, the Exchange
withdrew SR-GEMX-2023-19 and submitted SR-GEMX-2024-03. On March 7,
2024, the Exchange withdrew SR-GEMX-2024-03 and submitted this
filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/gemx/rules, at the
principal
[[Page 21100]]
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Options 7, Section 6, C, Ports and
Other Services. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to amend the
monthly caps for SQF Ports \4\ and SQF Purge Ports.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ ``Specialized Quote Feed'' or ``SQF'' is an interface that
allows Market Makers to connect, send, and receive messages related
to quotes, Immediate-or-Cancel Orders, and auction responses to the
Exchange. Features include the following: (1) options symbol
directory messages (e.g., underlying instruments); (2) System event
messages (e.g., start of trading hours messages and start of
opening); (3) trading action messages (e.g., halts and resumes); (4)
execution messages; (5) quote messages; (6) Immediate-or-Cancel
Order messages; (7) risk protection triggers and purge
notifications; (8) opening imbalance messages; (9) auction
notifications; and (10) auction responses. The SQF Purge Interface
only receives and notifies of purge requests from the Market Maker.
Market Makers may only enter interest into SQF in their assigned
options series. Immediate-or-Cancel Orders entered into SQF are not
subject to the Order Price Protection, Market Order Spread
Protection, and Size Limitation Protection in Options 3, Section
15(a)(1)(A), (1)(B), and (2)(B) respectively. See Supplementary
Material .03(c) to Options 3, Section 7.
\5\ SQF Purge is a specific port for the SQF interface that only
receives and notifies of purge requests from the Market Maker.
Dedicated SQF Purge Ports enable Market Makers to seamlessly manage
their ability to remove their quotes in a swift manner. The SQF
Purge Port is designed to assist Market Makers in the management of,
and risk control over, their quotes. Market Makers may utilize a
purge port to reduce uncertainty and to manage risk by purging all
quotes in their assigned options series. Of note, Market Makers may
only enter interest into SQF in their assigned options series.
Additionally, the SQF Purge Port may be utilized by a Market Maker
in the event that the Member has a system issue and determines to
purge its quotes from the order book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today, GEMX assesses $1,250 per port, per month for an SQF Port as
well as an SQF Purge Port.\6\ Also, today, SQF Ports and SQF Purge
Ports are subject to a monthly cap of $17,500, which cap is applicable
to Market Makers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The Exchange proposes to add a comma between ``per port''
and ``per month'' in the Options 7, Section 6, C, SQF Port and SQF
Purge Port Fee rule text. The Exchange also proposes to remove an
extraneous period in Options 7, Section 6, C, in the second
paragraph.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At this time, the Exchange proposes to increase the SQF Port and
SQF Purge Port monthly cap fee of $17,500 per month to $27,500 per
month.\7\ The Exchange is not amending the $1,250 per port, per month
SQF Port and SQF Purge Port. As is the case today, the Exchange would
not assess a Member an SQF Port or SQF Purge Port fee beyond the
monthly cap once the Member has exceeded the monthly cap for the
respective month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Today, 62% of GEMX Market Makers have capped their SQF Ports
and SQF Purge Ports on GEMX. The Exchange notes that of the Market
Makers currently registered on GEMX, there is a mix of size of
Market Makers that cap.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Despite increasing the monthly cap for SQF Ports and SQF Purge
Ports from $17,500 per month to $27,500 per month, the Exchange will
continue to offer Members the opportunity to cap their SQF Port and SQF
Purge Port fees so that they would not be assessed these fees beyond
the cap.
Pursuant to Supplementary Material .03(c) to Options 3, Section 7,
Market Makers may only enter interest into SQF in their assigned
options series. Pursuant to Supplementary Material .03(c) to Options 3,
Section 7, the SQF interface allows Market Makers to connect, send, and
receive messages related to quotes, Immediate-or-Cancel Orders, and
auction responses to the Exchange. A GEMX Market Maker requires only
one SQF Port to submit quotes in its assigned options series into GEMX.
An SQF Purge is a specific port for the SQF interface that only
receives and notifies of purge requests from the Market Maker. A GEMX
Market Maker may submit all quotes through one SQF Port and utilize one
SQF Purge Port to view its purge requests. While a Market Maker may
elect to obtain multiple SQF Ports and SQF Purge Ports to organize its
business,\8\ only one SQF Port and SQF Purge Port is necessary for a
Market Maker to fulfill its regulatory quoting obligations.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ For example, a Market Maker may desire to utilize multiple
SQF Ports for accounting purposes, to measure performance, for
regulatory reasons or other determinations that are specific to that
Member.
\9\ GEMX Market Makers have various regulatory requirements as
provided for in Options 2, Section 4. Additionally, GEMX Market
Makers have certain quoting requirements with respect to their
assigned options series as provided in Options 2, Section 5. SQF
Ports are the only quoting protocol available on GEMX and only
Market Makers may utilize SQF Ports. The same is true for SQF Purge
Ports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\10\ in general, and furthers the objectives of
Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\11\ in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any
facility, and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed pricing change to increase the SQF Port and SQF Purge
Port monthly cap from $17,500 per month to $27,500 per month is
reasonable because despite the increase in the monthly cap, the
Exchange will continue to offer Members the opportunity to cap their
SQF Port and SQF Purge Port fees so that they would not be assessed
these fees beyond the cap. Additionally, a GEMX Market Maker requires
only one SQF Port to submit quotes in its assigned options series into
GEMX. A GEMX Market Maker may submit all quotes through one SQF Port
and utilize one SQF Purge Port to view its purge requests. While a
Market Maker may elect to obtain multiple SQF Ports and SQF Purge Ports
to organize its business,\12\ only one SQF Port and SQF Purge Port is
necessary for a Market Maker to fulfill its regulatory quoting
obligations.\13\ Members may choose a greater number of SQF Ports or
SQF Purge Ports, beyond one port, depending on that Member's particular
business model. Additionally, the Exchange believes that the caps are
reasonable for two reasons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ For example, a Market Maker or may desire to utilize
multiple SQF Ports for accounting purposes, to measure performance,
for regulatory reasons or other determinations that are specific to
that Member.
\13\ GEMX Market Makers have various regulatory requirements as
provided for in Options 2, Section 4. Additionally, GEMX Market
Makers have certain quoting requirements with respect to their
assigned options series as provided in Options 2, Section 5. SQF
Ports are the only quoting protocol available on GEMX and only
Market Makers may utilize SQF Ports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
First, SQF Ports are a secure method for Market Makers to submit
quotes into the Exchange's match engine and for the Exchange to send
messages related to those quotes to Market Makers. GEMX must manage the
security and message traffic, among other things, for each port.
Utilizing the cap to manage a Market Maker's costs while also managing
the quantity of SQF Ports issued on GEMX has led the Exchange to select
$27,500 as the amended monthly cap for SQF Ports and SQF
[[Page 21101]]
Purge Ports. By capping the ports at a different level, the Exchange is
considering the message traffic and message rates associated with the
current number of outstanding ports and its ability to process
messages. The ability to have a cap and amend that cap permits the
Exchange to scale its needs with respect to processing messages in an
efficient manner. The Exchange notes that Cboe Exchange, Inc.
(``Cboe'') limits usage on each port and assesses fees for incremental
usage.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Each Cboe Binary Order Entry (``BOE'') or FIX Logical Port
incur the logical port fee indicated when used to enter up to 70,000
orders per trading day per logical port as measured on average in a
single month. For each incremental usage of up to 70,000 per day per
logical port will incur an additional logical port fee of $800 per
month. BOE or FIX Logical Ports provide users the ability to enter
order/quotes. See Cboe's Fees Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second, the Exchange notes that multiple ports are not necessary,
however, to the extent that some Market Makers elect to obtain multiple
ports, the Exchange is offering to cap their total port cost at $27,500
per month. GEMX believes the existence of a cap allows for efficiencies
and permits Market Makers to increase their number of ports beyond the
cap. The cap levels the playing field by allowing those Market Makers
that want to obtain a larger number of ports to do so with the
certainty of a fee cap. Without the cap, GEMX Market Makers may pay
more to obtain multiple ports on GEMX. BOX Exchange LLC (``BOX'')
assesses $1,000 per month for all SAIL Ports for Market Making and $500
per month per port up to 5 ports for order entry and $150 per month for
each additional port.\15\ MIAX's MIAX Express Interface (``MEI'') Fee
levels are based on a tiered fee structure based on the Market Maker's
total monthly executed volume during the relevant month.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See BOX's Fee Schedule.
\16\ MEI is a connection to MIAX systems that enables Market
Makers to submit simple and complex electronic quotes to MIAX. MIAX
caps its MEI Ports. For these Monthly MIAX MEI Fees levels, if the
Market Maker's total monthly executed volume during the relevant
month is less than 0.060% of the total monthly executed volume
reported by OCC in the market maker account type for MIAX-listed
option classes for that month, then the fee will be $14,500 instead
of the fee otherwise applicable to such level. See MIAX's Fee
Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The number of ports that members choose to purchase varies widely.
Today, on GEMX, no Marker Makers have 1 SQF Port/SQF Purge Port, 1
Market Maker had 2-5 SQF Ports/SQF Purge Ports, 4 Market Makers have
between 6-10 SQF Ports/SQF Purge Ports, and 8 Market Makers have more
than 11 SQF Ports/SQF Purge Ports. The chart below represents the
number of SQF Ports and SQF Purge Ports that are subscribed to by
members across the six Nasdaq affiliated options markets.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26MR24.011
The Exchange's proposed pricing change to increase the SQF Port and
SQF Purge Port monthly cap from $17,500 per month to $27,500 per month
is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange would
uniformly not assess any Market Makers that exceeded the proposed
monthly cap any SQF Port and SQF Purge Port fees for that month beyond
the cap. Market Makers are the only market participants that are
assessed SQF Port and SQF Purge Port fees because they are the only
market participants that are permitted to quote on the Exchange. SQF
Ports and SQF Purge Ports are only utilized in the Market Maker's
assigned options series. The following chart represents the
classification of GEMX Members and the percentage of Market Makers.
[[Page 21102]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26MR24.012
Unlike other market participants, Market Makers are subject to
market making and quoting obligations.\17\ These liquidity providers
are critical market participants in that they are the only market
participants that provide liquidity to GEMX on a continuous basis. In
addition, the Exchange notes that Lead Market Makers are required to
submit quotes in the Opening Process to open an options series.\18\
Market Makers are subject to a number of fees, unlike other market
participants. Market Makers pay separate Membership Fees,\19\ and CMM
Trading Right Fees,\20\ in addition to other fees paid by other market
participants. Providing Market Makers a means to cap their cost related
to quoting and enabling all Market Makers to acquire SQF Ports and SQF
Purge Ports at no cost beyond a certain dollar amount enables these
market participants to provide the necessary liquidity to GEMX at lower
costs. Therefore, because Market Makers fulfill a unique role on the
Exchange, are the only market participant required to submit quotes as
part of their obligations to operate on the Exchange, and, in light of
that role, they are eligible for certain incentives. The proposed SQF
Port and SQF Purge Fee cap is designed to continue to incent Market
Makers to quote on GEMX, thereby promoting liquidity, quote
competition, and trading opportunities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See Options 2, Sections 4 and 5.
\18\ See Options 3, Section 8.
\19\ See Options 7, Section 6, A.
\20\ See Options 7, Section 6, B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2022, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'') proposed to restructure
fees relating to OTPs for Market Makers.\21\ In that rule change,\22\
NYSE Arca argued that,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95412 (June 23,
2022), 87 FR 38786 (June 29, 2022) (SR-NYSEArca-2022-36). NYSE Arca
proposed to increase both the monthly fee per Market Maker OTP and
the number of issues covered by each additional OTP because, among
other reasons, the number of issues traded on the Exchange has
increased significantly in recent years.
\22\ Id at 38788.
Market Makers serve a unique and important function on the
Exchange (and other options exchanges) given the quote-driven nature
of options markets. Because options exchanges rely on actively
quoting Market Makers to facilitate a robust marketplace that
attracts order flow, options exchanges must attract and retain
Market Makers, including by setting competitive Market Maker permit
fees. Stated otherwise, changes to Market Maker permit fees can have
a direct effect on the ability of an exchange to compete for order
flow. The Exchange also believes that the number of options
exchanges on which Market Makers can effect option transactions also
ensures competition in the marketplace and constrains the ability of
exchanges to charge supracompetitive fees for access to its market
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Market Makers.
Further, NYSE ARCA noted that,\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ Id at 38790.
The Exchange further believes that its ability to set Market
Maker permit fees is constrained by competitive forces based on the
fact that Market Makers can, and have, chosen to terminate their
status as a Market Maker if they deem Market Maker permit fees to be
unreasonable or excessive. Specifically, the Exchange notes that a
BOX participant modified its access to BOX in connection with the
implementation of a proposed change to BOX's Market Maker permit
fees. The Exchange has also observed that another options exchange
group experienced decreases in market share following its proposed
modifications of its access fees (including Market Maker trading
permit fees), suggesting that market participants (including Market
Makers) are sensitive to changes in exchanges' access fees and may
respond by shifting their order flow elsewhere if they deem the fees
to be unreasonable or excessive.
There is no requirement, regulatory or otherwise, that any
Market Maker connect to and access any (or all of) the available
options exchanges. The Exchange also is not aware of any reason why
a Market Maker could not cease being a permit holder in response to
unreasonable price increases. The Exchange does not assess any
termination fee for a Market Maker to drop its OTP, nor is the
Exchange aware of any other costs that would be incurred by a Market
Maker to do so.
The Exchange likewise believes that its ability to cap SQF Port and
SQF Purge fees is constrained by competitive forces and that its
proposed modifications to the SQF Port and SQF Purge Fee cap is
reasonably designed in consideration of the competitive environment in
which the Exchange operates, by balancing the value of the enhanced
benefits available to Market Makers due to the current level of
activity on the Exchange with a fee structure that will continue to
incent Market Makers to support increased
[[Page 21103]]
liquidity, quote competition, and trading opportunities on the
Exchange, for the benefit of all market participants.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Intermarket Competition
The proposal does not impose an undue burden on intermarket
competition. The Exchange believes its proposal remains competitive
with other options markets who also offer order entry protocols. The
Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee
levels at a particular venue to be excessive. The chart below shows the
February 2024 market share for multiply listed options by exchange. Of
the 17 operating options exchanges, none currently has more than a
17.6% market share. Customers widely distribute their transactions
across exchanges according to their business needs and the ability of
each exchange to meet those needs through technology, liquidity and
functionality.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26MR24.013
Market share is the percentage of volume on a particular exchange
relative to the total volume across all exchanges, and indicates the
amount of order flow directed to that exchange. High levels of market
share enhance the value of trading and ports.
In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust its
fees to remain competitive with other exchanges. Because competitors
are free to modify their own fees in response, and because market
participants may readily adjust their order routing practices, the
Exchange believes that the degree to which fee changes in this market
may impose any burden on competition is extremely limited.
Other exchanges amended certain costs attributed to Market
Makers.\24\ In 2022, MRX proposed a monthly cap for SQF Ports and SQF
Purge Ports of 17,500.\25\ MRX noted in its rule change that, ``Only
one SQF quote protocol is required for an MRX Market Maker to submit
quotes into MRX and to meet its regulatory requirements.'' \26\
Additionally, BOX Exchange LLC (``BOX'') assesses $1,000 per month for
all SAIL Ports for Market Making and $500 per month per port up to 5
ports for order entry and $150 per month for each additional port.\27\
MIAX's MIAX Express Interface (``MEI'') Fee levels are based on a
tiered fee structure based on the Market Maker's total monthly executed
volume during the relevant month.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95412 (June 23,
2022), 87 FR 38786 (June 29, 2022) (SR-NYSEArca-2022-36).
\25\ See Securities Exchange Act No. 96824 (February 7, 2023),
88 FR 8975 (February 10, 2023) (SR-MRX-2023-05) (Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend MRX
Options 7, Section 6).
\26\ Id at 8976.
\27\ See BOX's Fee Schedule.
\28\ MEI is a connection to MIAX systems that enables Market
Makers to submit simple and complex electronic quotes to MIAX. MIAX
caps its MEI Ports. For these Monthly MIAX MEI Fees levels, if the
Market Maker's total monthly executed volume during the relevant
month is less than 0.060% of the total monthly executed volume
reported by OCC in the market maker account type for MIAX-listed
option classes for that month, then the fee will be $14,500 instead
of the fee otherwise applicable to such level. See MIAX's Fee
Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the Commission were to apply a different standard of review this
proposal than it applied to other exchange fee filings, where Market
Maker fees were increased and port fee caps were established, it would
create a burden on competition such that it would impair GEMX's ability
to compete among other options markets.
Intramarket Competition
The Exchange's proposed pricing change to increase the SQF Port and
SQF Purge Port monthly cap from $17,500 per month to $27,500 per month
does not impose an undue burden on competition because the Exchange
would uniformly not assess any Market Makers that exceeded the proposed
monthly cap any SQF Port and SQF Purge Port fees for that month beyond
the cap. Market Makers are the only market participants that are
assessed SQF Port and SQF Purge Port fees because they are the only
market
[[Page 21104]]
participants that are permitted to quote on the Exchange. SQF Ports and
SQF Purge Ports are only utilized in the Market Maker's assigned
options series. Unlike other market participants, Market Makers are
subject to market making and quoting obligations.\29\ These liquidity
providers are critical market participants in that they are the only
market participants that provide liquidity to GEMX on a continuous
basis. In addition, the Exchange notes that Lead Market Makers are
required to submit quotes in the Opening Process to open an options
series.\30\ Market Makers are subject to a number of fees, unlike other
market participants. Market Makers pay separate Membership Fees,\31\
and CMM Trading Right Fees,\32\ in addition to other fees paid by other
market participants. Providing Market Makers a means to cap their cost
related to quoting and enabling all Market Makers to acquire SQF Ports
and SQF Purge Ports at no cost beyond a certain dollar amount enables
these market participants to provide the necessary liquidity to GEMX at
lower costs. Therefore, because Market Makers fulfill a unique role on
the Exchange, are the only market participant required to submit quotes
as part of their obligations to operate on the Exchange, and, in light
of that role, they are eligible for certain incentives. The proposed
SQF Port and SQF Purge Fee cap is designed to continue to incent Market
Makers to quote on GEMX, thereby promoting liquidity, quote
competition, and trading opportunities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ See Options 2, Sections 4 and 5.
\30\ See Options 3, Section 8.
\31\ See Options 7, Section 6, A.
\32\ See Options 7, Section 6, B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\33\ At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is: (i) necessary or appropriate in the public
interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such
action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether
the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-GEMX-2024-07 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-GEMX-2024-07. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-GEMX-2024-07 and should be
submitted on or before April 16, 2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-06324 Filed 3-25-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P