Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Concerning the Option Clearing Corporation's Interpretative Guidance on Contract Adjustments for Cash Dividends and Distributions, 16043-16047 [2024-04698]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 6, 2024 / Notices
proposed rule change to amend FINRA
Rule 6730 to reduce the 15-minute
TRACE reporting timeframe to one
minute, with exceptions for member
firms with de minimis reporting activity
and for manual trades. The proposed
rule change was published for comment
in the Federal Register on January 25,
2024.3 section 19(b)(2) of the Act 4
provides that, within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a
proposed rule change, or within such
longer period up to 90 days as the
Commission may designate if it finds
such longer period to be appropriate
and publishes its reasons for so finding
or as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
shall either approve the proposed rule
change, disapprove the proposed rule
change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved. The 45th
day after publication of the notice for
this proposed rule change is March 10,
2024. The Commission is extending this
45-day time period for Commission
action. The Commission finds that it is
appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to take action on the
proposed rule change so that it has
sufficient time to consider the proposed
rule change and the comments received.
Accordingly, pursuant to section
19(b)(2) of the Act, the Commission
designates April 24, 2024, as the date by
which the Commission shall approve or
disapprove, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove, the
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
FINRA–2024–004).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.5
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–04697 Filed 3–5–24; 8:45 am]
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
3 See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99404
(January 19, 2024), 89 FR 5034 (January 25, 2024).
Comments received on the proposed rule change
are available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/srfinra-2024-004/srfinra2024004.htm.
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
5 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(31).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Mar 05, 2024
Jkt 262001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–99641; File No. SR–OCC–
2024–003]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Options Clearing Corporation; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of Proposed Rule Change Concerning
the Option Clearing Corporation’s
Interpretative Guidance on Contract
Adjustments for Cash Dividends and
Distributions
February 29, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Exchange Act’’ or ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby
given that on February 20, 2024, The
Options Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’ or
‘‘Corporation’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared primarily by OCC. OCC filed
the proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(i) 3 of the Act and
Rule 19b–4(f)(1) 4 thereunder, such that
the proposed rule change was
immediately effective upon filing with
the Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Terms of Substance of the Proposed
Rule Change
This proposed rule change would reissue interpretative guidance relating to
the adjustment of stock options for cash
dividends and distributions on
underlying securities with certain
amendments, including (1) to reflect
previously approved changes in the
process for making such adjustment
determinations; and (2) to address
OCC’s general approach to certain
additional scenarios. Amendments to
the interpretative guidance, are
included in Exhibit 5 of File No. SR–
OCC–2024–003. Material proposed to be
added is marked by underlining, and
material proposed to be deleted is
marked with strikethrough text. All
terms with initial capitalization that are
not otherwise defined herein have the
same meaning as set forth in the ByLaws and Rules.5
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(1).
5 OCC’s By-Laws and Rules can be found on
OCC’s public website: https://www.theocc.com/
Company-Information/Documents-and-Archives/
By-Laws-and-Rules.
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16043
II. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the
Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission,
OCC included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. OCC has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B),
and (C) below, of the most significant
aspects of these statements.
(A) Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the
Proposed Rule Change
OCC is the issuer of and sole clearing
agency for standardized equity options
listed on national securities exchanges
registered with the Commission. In
accordance with OCC’s By-Laws,
adjustments may be made to some of the
standardized terms of outstanding
options upon the occurrence of certain
events related to the underlying
security, such as a stock dividend, stock
distribution, stock split, reverse stock
split, rights offering, distribution,
reorganization, recapitalization,
reclassification in respect of an
underlying security, or a merger,
consolidation, dissolution or liquidation
of the issuer of the underlying security.6
The determination whether to adjust
outstanding options in response to a
particular event, and, if so, what the
adjustment should be, is made by OCC,
taking into consideration policies and
interpretations established in OCC’s ByLaws and any policies and
interpretations having general
application to specific types of events or
specified kinds of cleared contracts
established by a committee (the
‘‘Securities Committee’’) consisting of
representatives of each of the U.S.
options markets and a representative of
OCC.7
OCC previously filed with the
Commission and issued interpretative
guidance concerning the application of
OCC’s adjustment policies and
procedures and other adjustment rules
6 Adjustments for listed options are discussed at
length in the Characteristics and Risks of
Standardized Options (‘‘Options Disclosure
Document’’ or ‘‘ODD’’), which broker-dealers are
required to provide to a customer prior to accepting
an order to purchase or sell a listed option. See 17
CFR 240.9b–1. The Options Disclosure Document is
also available on OCC’s website: https://
www.theocc.com/company-information/documentsand-archives/options-disclosure-document.
7 See OCC By-Laws, Art. VI § 11.
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
16044
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 6, 2024 / Notices
for cash dividends.8 In the interest of
promoting clarity and transparency for
market participants, OCC is proposing
to re-issue that interpretative guidance
subject to proposed amendments that
would (1) update the interpretative
guidance’s discussion of how
adjustment determinations are made to
reflect subsequent changes to the
determination process since the
interpretative guidance was last issued,
and (2) provide additional guidance on
certain underlying events.9 OCC does
not propose to change its policies or
practices with respect to such contract
adjustments. OCC merely proposes to
publish guidance reflecting its current
policies and practices. Accordingly,
OCC does not believe that this proposed
change would have any impact on
market participants other than to
provide them with additional
information.
(1) Purpose
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Background
OCC’s By-Laws and Rules authorize
OCC to make adjustments to listed
options when certain events occur
related to the underlying security, such
as a stock dividend, stock distribution,
stock split, reverse stock split, rights
offering, distribution, reorganization,
recapitalization, or reclassification with
respect to the underlying security or the
merger, consolidation, dissolution or
liquidation of the issuer of the
underlying security. The By-Laws
provide policies and procedures for
making such determinations, including
that OCC determines whether to adjust
a contract, taking into account such
8 See, e.g., Exchange Act Release No. 68531 (Dec.
21, 2012), 77 FR 77157 (Dec. 31, 2012) (SR–OCC–
2012–26).
9 Consistent with prior practice, the interpretative
guidance would be issued as an OCC Information
Memorandum that would supersede the previously
published Information Memoranda related to this
interpretative guidance. The Information
Memorandum would contain prefatory material
intended to provide context for its issuance, remind
readers of its relationship to the prior Information
Memoranda and this proposed rule change, and
summarize the relevant OCC By-Laws that are the
subject of the interpretation. OCC does not believe
this prefatory material is a rule within the meaning
of Section 19(b) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C.
78s(b), and the regulations thereunder because
unlike the interpretative guidance promulgated
through this proposed rule change, the prefatory
material it is not a stated policy, practice or
interpretation that establishes or changes any
standard, limit, or guideline with respect to the
rights, obligations or privileges of specified persons
or the meaning, administration, or enforcement of
an existing rule. See 17 CFR 240.19b–4(a)(6)(ii). Nor
does the prefatory material constitute a material
aspect of the operation of OCC. See 17 CFR
240.19b–4(a)(6)(i). OCC is providing a copy of the
Information Memorandum it intends to issue upon
implementation of the new guidance as Exhibit 3
to File No. SR–OCC–2024–003.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Mar 05, 2024
Jkt 262001
factors as fairness to holders and writers
(or purchasers and sellers) of the
affected contracts, the maintenance of a
fair and orderly market in the affected
contracts, consistency of interpretation
and practice, efficiency of exercise
settlement procedures, and the
coordination with other clearing
agencies of the clearance and settlement
of transactions in the underlying
interest.10 OCC applies these factors to
a particular corporate action on a caseby-case basis, considering the
circumstances known to it at the time
the determination is made, subject to
OCC’s discretion to depart from policy
and precedent when the Corporation
determines that unusual circumstances
make such a departure appropriate.11
OCC’s By-Laws also provide general
rules applicable to specific types of
corporate actions, including with
respect to cash dividends or
distributions made by the issuer of an
underlying security. For example, the
By-Laws establish a general rule that
OCC does not adjust listed options to
reflect ‘‘ordinary cash dividends or
distributions,’’ which the By-Laws
define to mean ‘‘[c]ash dividends or
distributions (regardless of size) by the
issuer of the underlying security which
[OCC] believes to have been declared
pursuant to a policy or practice of
paying such dividends or distributions
on a quarterly or other regular basis or
which [OCC] believes represents an
acceleration or deferral of such
payments.’’ 12 OCC established this
general rule because when an issuer’s
policy or practice of paying such
dividends is public, such ordinary
dividends can be priced into options
premiums.13 OCC’s By-Laws also
provide that for cash dividends not
declared pursuant to an issuer’s policy
or practice of paying such distributions
at regular intervals (i.e., ‘‘special’’ cash
dividends and distributions), OCC will
not adjust if the amount distributed is
less than $0.125 per share (or $12.50 per
contract for listed options with a unit of
trading larger than 100 shares). OCC
established this de minimis threshold in
part to avoid the proliferation of
outstanding option symbols and
series.14
10 See
OCC By-Laws, Art. VI § 11(a).
11 Id.
12 See OCC By-Laws, Art. VI § 11A, Interpretation
and Policy .01.
13 See Exchange Act Release No. 55258 (Feb 8,
2007), 72 FR 7701, 7703 (Feb. 16, 2007) (SR–OCC–
2006–01).
14 Symbols can proliferate when a dividend
amount is added to the deliverable, yielding a nonstandard option. Id., at note 14 and accompanying
text. The resulting non-standard options may be
illiquid and difficult to trade. Following an
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In connection with the adoption of
the general rules against adjustments for
cash dividends and distributions that
are ordinary or below the de minimis
threshold, OCC previously filed and
published interpretative guidance
promulgated by its Securities
Committee to address questions about
how those rules would be administered
and applied.15 Presented in question
and answer (‘‘Q&A’’) format, the
interpretative guidance provided an
overview of OCC’s adjustment policies
with respect to cash dividends and
guidance on the application of those
policies in a variety of scenarios. OCC
has since updated and re-issued that
interpretative guidance, the last time in
2012.16 Based on its continued
relevance to market participants seeking
to understand how OCC applies its
adjustment policies, OCC proposes to
re-issue the interpretative guidance with
certain updates discussed below.
(1) Conforming Changes To Reflect the
Current Determination Process
The proposed changes would remove
references to the adjustment panel of the
Securities Committee in the
interpretative guidance’s discussion of
how options adjustments are made.
Since the interpretative guidance was
last issued in 2012, the Commission
approved a proposed rule change that
affected the determination process.17
Previously, an adjustment panel of the
Securities Committee, consisting of
representatives from the exchanges on
which an option was listed and OCC’s
Chairman, would make determinations
about whether that option should be
adjusted in response to a corporate
action. Currently, adjustment
determinations are made by OCC rather
than adjustment panels of the Securities
Committee.18 However, the Securities
Committee still maintains a role in
promulgating statements of policy and
interpretations having general
adjustment, exchanges typically introduce standard
options with the same strikes.
15 See Exchange Act Release No. 58059 (June 30,
2008), 73 FR 39367 (July 9, 2008) (SR–OCC–2008–
10).
16 See Exchange Act Release No. 68531, supra
note 6 [sic]. See also Exchange Act Release No.
66742 (Apr. 5, 2012), 77 FR 21819 (Apr. 11, 2012)
(SR–OCC–2012–05); Exchange Act Release No.
59442 (Feb. 24, 2009), 74 FR 9654 (Mar. 5, 2009)
(SR–OCC–2009–01).
17 See Exchange Act Release No. 69977 (July 11,
2013), 78 FR 42815 (July 17, 2013) (SR–OCC–2013–
05).
18 This change in governance arose from a request
by the options exchanges promoted by a desire to
consider ways to lessen investor confusion and
enhance consistency in making option contract
adjustments. See Exchange Act Release No. 69642
(May 28, 2013), 78 FR 33138, 33139 (June 3, 2013)
(SR–OCC–2013–05).
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 6, 2024 / Notices
application to specified types of
corporate actions or specified kinds of
cleared contracts.19 In making
adjustment determinations, OCC must
consider such policy statements and
interpretations in addition to the factors
and general rules set forth in the ByLaws in light of the circumstances
known to OCC at the time such
determination is made, subject to OCC’s
discretion to depart from policy or
precedent when the OCC determines
that unusual circumstances make such a
departure appropriate.20 OCC assumed
sole responsibility for making
adjustment determinations after
corresponding updates to the Options
Disclosure Document were approved by
the Commission in 2018.21 Accordingly,
when OCC re-issues the interpretative
guidance on cash dividends and
distributions, OCC proposes to replace
references to determinations made by an
adjustment panel of the Securities
Committee with references to OCC and
make other non-substantive, textual
edits to the interpretative guidance
consistent with that change. These
changes are intended to reflect the
current, Commission-approved process
for adjustment determinations made by
OCC.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
(2) Additional Interpretative Guidance
OCC also proposes to add additional
Q&As that would provide guidance for
several situations OCC has observed
since the interpretative guidance was
last issued, including (a) specific
guidance with respect to variable
dividends, and (b) additional guidance
with respect to dividends issued by real
estate investment trusts (‘‘REITs’’).
a. Variable Dividends
OCC has seen an increase in the
number of issuers that have established
policies or practices of distributing
‘‘variable dividends.’’ Typically, such
variable dividends are paid at regular
intervals if issuer-defined thresholds for
paying the dividends are met. The
amount of the variable dividend may
increase or decrease (sometimes
significantly) from dividend to dividend
based on issuer-established thresholds
and, on occasion, may not be paid at all
if the issuer-established thresholds are
not met. These variable dividends may
also be in addition to regular dividends
paid pursuant to the issuer’s policy or
practice.
For example, on May 19, 2022, Arch
Resources, Inc. (ARCH) announced an
19 See
OCC By-Laws, Art. VI § 11(a).
20 Id.
21 See Exchange Act Release No. 84565 (Nov. 9,
2018), 83 FR 57778, 57779 (Nov. 16, 2018) (SR–
ODD–2018–01).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Mar 05, 2024
Jkt 262001
$8.11 quarterly dividend, which
included a fixed component of $0.25
and a variable component of $7.86 per
share. In making its adjustment
determination, OCC considered an
ARCH press release, issued on February
15, 2022, communicating that ARCH
was launching a capital return program
pursuant to which it planned to ‘‘return
to stockholders approximately 50
percent of the prior quarter’s
discretionary cash flow . . . via a
variable quarterly cash dividend in
conjunction with its existing fixed
quarterly cash dividend.’’ 22 OCC
determined that the quarterly variable
dividend was an ‘‘ordinary dividend’’ as
defined in Interpretation and Policy .01
to Article VI, Section 11A of OCC’s ByLaws, and therefore not subject to
adjustment, because the dividend had
been declared pursuant to a policy or
practice of paying such dividend on a
quarterly or other regular basis.23
As another example, on March 9,
2022, Zim Integrated Shipping Services
Ltd. (ZIM) announced a cash dividend
of $17.00 per share, representing 50% of
ZIM’s 2021 net income, taking into
account the quarterly dividends paid
during the first three fiscal quarters of
the year.24 Pursuant to the issuer’s
stated policy, ZIM intended to
‘‘distribute a dividend to shareholders
on a quarterly basis at a rate of
approximately 20% of the net income
derived during such fiscal quarter with
respect to the first three fiscal quarters
of the year’’ and that the ‘‘cumulative
annual dividend amount to be
distributed by [ZIM] (including the
interim dividends paid during the first
three fiscal quarters of the year) [would]
total 30–50% of the annual net
income.’’ 25 OCC determined that the
$17 dividend was an ‘‘ordinary
dividend’’ declared pursuant to a policy
or practice of paying such dividend on
a quarterly or other regular basis, and
therefore not subject to adjustment.26
22 See Arch Resources Reports Fourth Quarter
2021 Results (Feb. 15, 2022), https://
investor.archrsc.com/2022-02-15-Arch-ResourcesReports-Fourth-Quarter-2021-Results.
23 See Info Memo #50473 (May 20, 2022). OCC
does not issue Info Memos notifying market
participants that OCC has determined not to adjust
options (a ‘‘No-Adjustment’’ Info Memo) each time
an issuer announces a dividend OCC determines to
be ordinary and therefore not subject to adjustment.
In general, OCC considers whether a NoAdjustment Info Memo may be warranted based on
inquiries made by Clearing Members or others with
respect to a particular corporate action.
24 See ZIM Reports Record Financial Results for
the Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2021 (March 9,
2022), https://investors.zim.com/news/newsdetails/2022/ZIM-Reports-Record-FinancialResults-for-the-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2021/
default.aspx.
25 Id.
26 See Info Memo #50158 (March 9, 2022).
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16045
OCC proposes to add a Q&A to the
interpretative guidance reflecting that if
OCC determines such variable
dividends are paid pursuant to an
issuer’s policy or practice of paying
such variable dividends at regular
intervals, OCC generally considers them
to be ordinary dividends and not
adjustable, even if, on occasion, no
variable dividend is paid or if the
amount of the dividend increases or
decreases based on the issuerestablished thresholds. OCC believes
this guidance would align with the
precedent described above and provide
market participants with greater clarity
about how OCC applies the adjustment
policies outlined in the By-Laws to
variable dividends.
b. REITs
OCC proposes to add further guidance
about situations in which an issuer may
pay a dividend outside of its normal
schedule of dividend payments that the
issuer describes as necessary to
maintain its tax status as a particular
type of organization, such as a REIT.
The existing interpretative guidance
answered several questions concerning
dividends paid by REITs and similar
companies. For example, the existing
interpretative guidance addressed that
while REITs may pay dividends at
irregular intervals, these companies
often have regular dividend policies, but
will actually pay dividends only when
certain conditions are met, or in
response to market conditions. Similar
to the variable dividend situation, in
which, on occasion, no variable
dividend is paid if issuer-established
thresholds are not met, the prior
interpretative guidance provided that
such REIT distributions generally would
be considered ordinary distributions
when they occur pursuant to the policy
of the company.
However, OCC has observed at least
one case in which an issuer has
declared a dividend outside of its
normal schedule of dividend payments
to maintain its tax status as a particular
type of organization, such as a REIT.
Specifically, On July 22, 2022, Public
Storage (‘‘PSA’’) announced a ‘‘special,’’
‘‘one-time’’ dividend of $13.15 per
common share.27 As explained in the
issuer’s press release, PSA was
distributing a projected tax gain in
connection with its investment in
27 See Public Storage Announces $2.3 Billion
Special Dividend Related to PS Business Parks
Merger Consideration (July 22, 2022), https://
investors.publicstorage.com/news-events/pressreleases/news-details/2022/Public-StorageAnnounces-2.3-Billion-Special-Dividend-Related-toPS-Business-Parks-Merger-Consideration/
default.aspx.
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
16046
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 6, 2024 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
another company that had been
acquired ‘‘in order to meet the
distribution requirements as a
[REIT].’’ 28 Nevertheless, OCC
determined that the dividend was nonordinary under its By-Laws and issued
an Info Memo concerning an adjustment
to options on PSA.29
As OCC would clarify in the further
guidance, such a dividend would most
likely be considered non-ordinary and
warrant an adjustment if OCC
determines that the dividend is not
being made pursuant to the issuer’s
established dividend policies and
practices based on the company’s
departure from its regular dividend
schedule and any characterization the
company may make about the pay-out
as ‘‘special’’ or ‘‘one time.’’ In other
words, an issuer’s characterization of a
dividend as necessary to maintain its
tax status as a particular type of
organization is not determinative of
whether a dividend is ‘‘ordinary’’ under
OCC’s By-Laws. Rather, the question is
whether the dividend is paid pursuant
to an issuer’s policy of paying such a
dividend at regular intervals to maintain
its tax status. If such an issuer
announces a special dividend outside of
its regular dividend policies and
practices, such dividend will most
likely be considered non-ordinary and
warrant an adjustment even if the issuer
is paying the dividend to maintain its
tax status. OCC proposes to add a Q&A
to the interpretative guidance to reflect
OCC’s practices in this situation.
(2) Statutory Basis
OCC believes the proposed rule
changes are consistent with Section 17A
of the Exchange Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder. Section
17A(b)(3)(F) of the Exchange Act 30
requires, among other things, that the
rules of a clearing agency be designed to
protect investors and the public interest.
OCC believes that by allowing it to
amend and re-issue the interpretative
guidance, the proposed changes would
protect investors and the public interest
by providing market participants with
up-to-date information about OCC’s
current process for making adjustment
determinations. In addition, OCC
believes the additional interpretative
guidance would provide investors and
the general public further clarity about
the application of OCC’s adjustment
policies and procedures to scenarios not
specifically addressed in the existing
guidance. Providing this information
will help investors make more informed
decisions in connection with their
participation in the listed options
market. Accordingly, OCC believes the
proposed changes are consistent with
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Exchange
Act.31
In addition, Exchange Act Rule 17Ad–
22(e)(23) requires OCC to maintain
written policies and procedures
reasonably designed to, among other
things, publicly disclose all relevant
rules and material procedures and
provide sufficient information to enable
participants to identify and evaluate the
risks they incur by participating in
OCC.32 The proposed changes would
allow OCC to update interpretative
guidance concerning its adjustment
policies and procedures previously filed
as a rule with the Commission, thereby
facilitating the re-issuance of guidance
about material procedures that remain
relevant. OCC believes that by updating
the guidance to reflect current
precedent, the proposed changes will
help participants in the listed options
market to better understand the risks
related to contract adjustments in the
scenarios addressed, consistent with the
requirements of Rule 17Ad–22(e)(23).33
to the proposed rule change, and none
have been received.
(B) Clearing Agency’s Statement on
Burden on Competition
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
OCC–2024–003 on the subject line.
Section 17A(b)(3)(I) of the Exchange
Act requires that the rules of a clearing
agency not impose any burden on
competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Exchange Act.34 The
proposed changes would amend
interpretative guidance applicable to the
adjustment of all listed options issued
for a particular underlying security.
These proposed changes would not
impact the rights or obligations of
Clearing Members or other participants
in a way that would benefit or
disadvantage any participant versus
another participant. To the contrary,
this proposed change would provide all
market participants with information
relevant to understanding the risks of
participation. Accordingly, OCC does
not believe that the proposed changes
have any impact, or impose any burden,
on competition.
(C) Clearing Agency’s Statement on
Comment on the Proposed Rule Change
Received From Members, Participants or
Others
Written comments were not and are
not intended to be solicited with respect
32 17
29 See
33 17
Info Memo #50775 (July 25, 2022).
30 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Mar 05, 2024
Jkt 262001
CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(23)(i), (ii).
CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(23).
34 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(I).
PO 00000
Frm 00078
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–OCC–2024–003. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
35 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
37 Notwithstanding its immediate effectiveness,
implementation of this rule change will be delayed
until this change is deemed certified under CFTC
Regulation 40.6.
36 17
31 Id.
28 Id.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 35 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 36 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
The proposal shall not take effect
until all regulatory actions required
with respect to the proposal are
completed.37
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 6, 2024 / Notices
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of OCC
and on OCC’s website at https://
www.theocc.com/CompanyInformation/Documents-and-Archives/
By-Laws-and-Rules.
Do not include personal identifiable
information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. We may
redact in part or withhold entirely from
publication submitted material that is
obscene or subject to copyright
protection.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–OCC–2024–003 and should
be submitted on or before March 27,
2024.
For the Commission, by the Division
of Trading and Markets, pursuant to
delegated authority.38
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–04698 Filed 3–5–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–99647; File No. SR–ISE–
2024–07]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Expand Its Cabinet
Proximity Option Program
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
February 29, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on February
26, 2024, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (‘‘ISE’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
38 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Mar 05, 2024
Jkt 262001
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to expand the
Exchange’s Cabinet Proximity Option
program.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Currently, the Exchange offers a
Cabinet Proximity Option program
where, for a monthly fee, customers can
obtain an option for future use on
available, unused cabinet space in
proximity to their existing equipment.
Cabinets reserved under the Cabinet
Proximity Option program are unused
cabinets that customers reserve for
future use and can be converted to a
powered cabinet at the customer’s
request. Under the program, customers
can reserve up to maximum of 20
cabinets that the Exchange endeavors to
provide as close as reasonably possible
to the customer’s existing cabinet space,
taking into consideration power
availability within segments of the
datacenter and the overall efficiency of
use of datacenter resources as
determined by the Exchange. Should
reserved datacenter space be needed for
use, the reserving customer will have
three business days to formally contract
with the Exchange for full payment for
the reserved cabinet space in contention
or it will be reassigned. In making
determinations to require exercise or
relinquishment of reserved space as
among numerous customers, the
Exchange will take into consideration
several factors, including: proximity
between available reserved cabinet
space and the existing space of a
customer seeking additional space for
actual cabinet usage; a customer’s ratio
of cabinets in use to those reserved; the
length of time that a particular
reservation(s) has been in place; and any
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16047
other factor that the Exchange deems
relevant to ensure overall efficiency in
use of the datacenter space.3
Currently, the Exchange offers
reservations for low, medium, medium/
high, or high density cabinets under the
Cabinet Proximity Option program.4
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to offer the Exchange’s
Cabinet Proximity Option program for
cabinets with power densities greater
than 10 kW, in addition to those
reservations currently offered under the
program.5 Although the Exchange has
offered the Cabinet Proximity Option
program since 2017,6 the Exchange has
yet to offer reservations under the
Cabinet Proximity Option program for
cabinets with power densities greater
than 10 kW (despite offering cabinets
with power densities greater than 10
kW). The Exchange now wishes to offer
the Cabinet Proximity Option program
for these higher power density cabinets.
Similar to the Exchange’s Cabinet
Proximity Option program, the New
York Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’)
offers ‘‘PNU cabinets,’’ which are
reserved cabinets that are not active and
can be converted to powered, dedicated
cabinets when the user requests.7
NYSE’s PNU cabinets are not limited to
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–
62397 (June 28, 2010), 75 FR 38860 (July 6, 2010)
(SR–NASDAQ–2010–019). In 2017, the Exchange
synchronized its options for connecting to the
Exchange with that of its sister exchanges and
adopted uniform colocation services, including the
Cabinet Proximity Option program. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 34–81903 (October 19,
2017), 82 FR 49450 (October 25, 2017) (SR–ISE–
2017–91).
4 See General 8, Section 1(d). Low density
cabinets are cabinets with power densities less than
or equal to 2.88 kilowatts (‘‘kW’’). Medium density
cabinets are cabinets with power densities greater
than 2.88 kW and less than or equal to 5 kW.
Medium/High density cabinets are cabinets with
power densities greater than 5 kW and less than or
equal to 7 kW. High density cabinets are cabinets
with power densities greater than 7 kW and less
than 10 kW. See General 8, Section 1(a).
5 Currently, the Exchange offers Super High
Density Cabinets with power densities greater than
10 kW and less than or equal to 17.3 kW. See
General 8, Section 1(a). In addition, the Exchange
intends to offer cabinets with new power densities
in the future, including power densities greater than
17.3 kW.
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–
81903 (October 19, 2017), 82 FR 49450 (October 25,
2017) (SR–ISE–2017–91).
7 Due to heightened demand for power and
cabinets, NYSE established certain procedures
related to PNU cabinet conversion and restrictions
on new PNU cabinet offerings. NYSE adopted a
policy that, if unallocated cabinet inventory is at or
below 40 cabinets, new PNU cabinets are not
offered. However, when the unallocated cabinet
inventory is more than 40 cabinets, NYSE may
continue to offer PNU cabinets. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 34–90732 (December 18,
2020), 85 FR 84443 (December 28, 2020). See also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–91515
(April 8, 2021), 86 FR 19674 (April 14, 2021).
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16043-16047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-04698]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-99641; File No. SR-OCC-2024-003]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Concerning the Option Clearing Corporation's Interpretative Guidance on
Contract Adjustments for Cash Dividends and Distributions
February 29, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Exchange Act'' or ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice
is hereby given that on February 20, 2024, The Options Clearing
Corporation (``OCC'' or ``Corporation'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared
primarily by OCC. OCC filed the proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(i) \3\ of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(1) \4\
thereunder, such that the proposed rule change was immediately
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the
Proposed Rule Change
This proposed rule change would re-issue interpretative guidance
relating to the adjustment of stock options for cash dividends and
distributions on underlying securities with certain amendments,
including (1) to reflect previously approved changes in the process for
making such adjustment determinations; and (2) to address OCC's general
approach to certain additional scenarios. Amendments to the
interpretative guidance, are included in Exhibit 5 of File No. SR-OCC-
2024-003. Material proposed to be added is marked by underlining, and
material proposed to be deleted is marked with strikethrough text. All
terms with initial capitalization that are not otherwise defined herein
have the same meaning as set forth in the By-Laws and Rules.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ OCC's By-Laws and Rules can be found on OCC's public
website: https://www.theocc.com/Company-Information/Documents-and-Archives/By-Laws-and-Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis
for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, OCC included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. OCC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections (A),
(B), and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of these
statements.
(A) Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis
for, the Proposed Rule Change
OCC is the issuer of and sole clearing agency for standardized
equity options listed on national securities exchanges registered with
the Commission. In accordance with OCC's By-Laws, adjustments may be
made to some of the standardized terms of outstanding options upon the
occurrence of certain events related to the underlying security, such
as a stock dividend, stock distribution, stock split, reverse stock
split, rights offering, distribution, reorganization, recapitalization,
reclassification in respect of an underlying security, or a merger,
consolidation, dissolution or liquidation of the issuer of the
underlying security.\6\ The determination whether to adjust outstanding
options in response to a particular event, and, if so, what the
adjustment should be, is made by OCC, taking into consideration
policies and interpretations established in OCC's By-Laws and any
policies and interpretations having general application to specific
types of events or specified kinds of cleared contracts established by
a committee (the ``Securities Committee'') consisting of
representatives of each of the U.S. options markets and a
representative of OCC.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Adjustments for listed options are discussed at length in
the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options (``Options
Disclosure Document'' or ``ODD''), which broker-dealers are required
to provide to a customer prior to accepting an order to purchase or
sell a listed option. See 17 CFR 240.9b-1. The Options Disclosure
Document is also available on OCC's website: https://www.theocc.com/company-information/documents-and-archives/options-disclosure-document.
\7\ See OCC By-Laws, Art. VI Sec. 11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OCC previously filed with the Commission and issued interpretative
guidance concerning the application of OCC's adjustment policies and
procedures and other adjustment rules
[[Page 16044]]
for cash dividends.\8\ In the interest of promoting clarity and
transparency for market participants, OCC is proposing to re-issue that
interpretative guidance subject to proposed amendments that would (1)
update the interpretative guidance's discussion of how adjustment
determinations are made to reflect subsequent changes to the
determination process since the interpretative guidance was last
issued, and (2) provide additional guidance on certain underlying
events.\9\ OCC does not propose to change its policies or practices
with respect to such contract adjustments. OCC merely proposes to
publish guidance reflecting its current policies and practices.
Accordingly, OCC does not believe that this proposed change would have
any impact on market participants other than to provide them with
additional information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See, e.g., Exchange Act Release No. 68531 (Dec. 21, 2012),
77 FR 77157 (Dec. 31, 2012) (SR-OCC-2012-26).
\9\ Consistent with prior practice, the interpretative guidance
would be issued as an OCC Information Memorandum that would
supersede the previously published Information Memoranda related to
this interpretative guidance. The Information Memorandum would
contain prefatory material intended to provide context for its
issuance, remind readers of its relationship to the prior
Information Memoranda and this proposed rule change, and summarize
the relevant OCC By-Laws that are the subject of the interpretation.
OCC does not believe this prefatory material is a rule within the
meaning of Section 19(b) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. 78s(b), and
the regulations thereunder because unlike the interpretative
guidance promulgated through this proposed rule change, the
prefatory material it is not a stated policy, practice or
interpretation that establishes or changes any standard, limit, or
guideline with respect to the rights, obligations or privileges of
specified persons or the meaning, administration, or enforcement of
an existing rule. See 17 CFR 240.19b-4(a)(6)(ii). Nor does the
prefatory material constitute a material aspect of the operation of
OCC. See 17 CFR 240.19b-4(a)(6)(i). OCC is providing a copy of the
Information Memorandum it intends to issue upon implementation of
the new guidance as Exhibit 3 to File No. SR-OCC-2024-003.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Purpose
Background
OCC's By-Laws and Rules authorize OCC to make adjustments to listed
options when certain events occur related to the underlying security,
such as a stock dividend, stock distribution, stock split, reverse
stock split, rights offering, distribution, reorganization,
recapitalization, or reclassification with respect to the underlying
security or the merger, consolidation, dissolution or liquidation of
the issuer of the underlying security. The By-Laws provide policies and
procedures for making such determinations, including that OCC
determines whether to adjust a contract, taking into account such
factors as fairness to holders and writers (or purchasers and sellers)
of the affected contracts, the maintenance of a fair and orderly market
in the affected contracts, consistency of interpretation and practice,
efficiency of exercise settlement procedures, and the coordination with
other clearing agencies of the clearance and settlement of transactions
in the underlying interest.\10\ OCC applies these factors to a
particular corporate action on a case-by-case basis, considering the
circumstances known to it at the time the determination is made,
subject to OCC's discretion to depart from policy and precedent when
the Corporation determines that unusual circumstances make such a
departure appropriate.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See OCC By-Laws, Art. VI Sec. 11(a).
\11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OCC's By-Laws also provide general rules applicable to specific
types of corporate actions, including with respect to cash dividends or
distributions made by the issuer of an underlying security. For
example, the By-Laws establish a general rule that OCC does not adjust
listed options to reflect ``ordinary cash dividends or distributions,''
which the By-Laws define to mean ``[c]ash dividends or distributions
(regardless of size) by the issuer of the underlying security which
[OCC] believes to have been declared pursuant to a policy or practice
of paying such dividends or distributions on a quarterly or other
regular basis or which [OCC] believes represents an acceleration or
deferral of such payments.'' \12\ OCC established this general rule
because when an issuer's policy or practice of paying such dividends is
public, such ordinary dividends can be priced into options
premiums.\13\ OCC's By-Laws also provide that for cash dividends not
declared pursuant to an issuer's policy or practice of paying such
distributions at regular intervals (i.e., ``special'' cash dividends
and distributions), OCC will not adjust if the amount distributed is
less than $0.125 per share (or $12.50 per contract for listed options
with a unit of trading larger than 100 shares). OCC established this de
minimis threshold in part to avoid the proliferation of outstanding
option symbols and series.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See OCC By-Laws, Art. VI Sec. 11A, Interpretation and
Policy .01.
\13\ See Exchange Act Release No. 55258 (Feb 8, 2007), 72 FR
7701, 7703 (Feb. 16, 2007) (SR-OCC-2006-01).
\14\ Symbols can proliferate when a dividend amount is added to
the deliverable, yielding a non-standard option. Id., at note 14 and
accompanying text. The resulting non-standard options may be
illiquid and difficult to trade. Following an adjustment, exchanges
typically introduce standard options with the same strikes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In connection with the adoption of the general rules against
adjustments for cash dividends and distributions that are ordinary or
below the de minimis threshold, OCC previously filed and published
interpretative guidance promulgated by its Securities Committee to
address questions about how those rules would be administered and
applied.\15\ Presented in question and answer (``Q&A'') format, the
interpretative guidance provided an overview of OCC's adjustment
policies with respect to cash dividends and guidance on the application
of those policies in a variety of scenarios. OCC has since updated and
re-issued that interpretative guidance, the last time in 2012.\16\
Based on its continued relevance to market participants seeking to
understand how OCC applies its adjustment policies, OCC proposes to re-
issue the interpretative guidance with certain updates discussed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Exchange Act Release No. 58059 (June 30, 2008), 73 FR
39367 (July 9, 2008) (SR-OCC-2008-10).
\16\ See Exchange Act Release No. 68531, supra note 6 [sic]. See
also Exchange Act Release No. 66742 (Apr. 5, 2012), 77 FR 21819
(Apr. 11, 2012) (SR-OCC-2012-05); Exchange Act Release No. 59442
(Feb. 24, 2009), 74 FR 9654 (Mar. 5, 2009) (SR-OCC-2009-01).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Conforming Changes To Reflect the Current Determination Process
The proposed changes would remove references to the adjustment
panel of the Securities Committee in the interpretative guidance's
discussion of how options adjustments are made. Since the
interpretative guidance was last issued in 2012, the Commission
approved a proposed rule change that affected the determination
process.\17\ Previously, an adjustment panel of the Securities
Committee, consisting of representatives from the exchanges on which an
option was listed and OCC's Chairman, would make determinations about
whether that option should be adjusted in response to a corporate
action. Currently, adjustment determinations are made by OCC rather
than adjustment panels of the Securities Committee.\18\ However, the
Securities Committee still maintains a role in promulgating statements
of policy and interpretations having general
[[Page 16045]]
application to specified types of corporate actions or specified kinds
of cleared contracts.\19\ In making adjustment determinations, OCC must
consider such policy statements and interpretations in addition to the
factors and general rules set forth in the By-Laws in light of the
circumstances known to OCC at the time such determination is made,
subject to OCC's discretion to depart from policy or precedent when the
OCC determines that unusual circumstances make such a departure
appropriate.\20\ OCC assumed sole responsibility for making adjustment
determinations after corresponding updates to the Options Disclosure
Document were approved by the Commission in 2018.\21\ Accordingly, when
OCC re-issues the interpretative guidance on cash dividends and
distributions, OCC proposes to replace references to determinations
made by an adjustment panel of the Securities Committee with references
to OCC and make other non-substantive, textual edits to the
interpretative guidance consistent with that change. These changes are
intended to reflect the current, Commission-approved process for
adjustment determinations made by OCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See Exchange Act Release No. 69977 (July 11, 2013), 78 FR
42815 (July 17, 2013) (SR-OCC-2013-05).
\18\ This change in governance arose from a request by the
options exchanges promoted by a desire to consider ways to lessen
investor confusion and enhance consistency in making option contract
adjustments. See Exchange Act Release No. 69642 (May 28, 2013), 78
FR 33138, 33139 (June 3, 2013) (SR-OCC-2013-05).
\19\ See OCC By-Laws, Art. VI Sec. 11(a).
\20\ Id.
\21\ See Exchange Act Release No. 84565 (Nov. 9, 2018), 83 FR
57778, 57779 (Nov. 16, 2018) (SR-ODD-2018-01).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Additional Interpretative Guidance
OCC also proposes to add additional Q&As that would provide
guidance for several situations OCC has observed since the
interpretative guidance was last issued, including (a) specific
guidance with respect to variable dividends, and (b) additional
guidance with respect to dividends issued by real estate investment
trusts (``REITs'').
a. Variable Dividends
OCC has seen an increase in the number of issuers that have
established policies or practices of distributing ``variable
dividends.'' Typically, such variable dividends are paid at regular
intervals if issuer-defined thresholds for paying the dividends are
met. The amount of the variable dividend may increase or decrease
(sometimes significantly) from dividend to dividend based on issuer-
established thresholds and, on occasion, may not be paid at all if the
issuer-established thresholds are not met. These variable dividends may
also be in addition to regular dividends paid pursuant to the issuer's
policy or practice.
For example, on May 19, 2022, Arch Resources, Inc. (ARCH) announced
an $8.11 quarterly dividend, which included a fixed component of $0.25
and a variable component of $7.86 per share. In making its adjustment
determination, OCC considered an ARCH press release, issued on February
15, 2022, communicating that ARCH was launching a capital return
program pursuant to which it planned to ``return to stockholders
approximately 50 percent of the prior quarter's discretionary cash flow
. . . via a variable quarterly cash dividend in conjunction with its
existing fixed quarterly cash dividend.'' \22\ OCC determined that the
quarterly variable dividend was an ``ordinary dividend'' as defined in
Interpretation and Policy .01 to Article VI, Section 11A of OCC's By-
Laws, and therefore not subject to adjustment, because the dividend had
been declared pursuant to a policy or practice of paying such dividend
on a quarterly or other regular basis.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See Arch Resources Reports Fourth Quarter 2021 Results
(Feb. 15, 2022), https://investor.archrsc.com/2022-02-15-Arch-Resources-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-2021-Results.
\23\ See Info Memo #50473 (May 20, 2022). OCC does not issue
Info Memos notifying market participants that OCC has determined not
to adjust options (a ``No-Adjustment'' Info Memo) each time an
issuer announces a dividend OCC determines to be ordinary and
therefore not subject to adjustment. In general, OCC considers
whether a No-Adjustment Info Memo may be warranted based on
inquiries made by Clearing Members or others with respect to a
particular corporate action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As another example, on March 9, 2022, Zim Integrated Shipping
Services Ltd. (ZIM) announced a cash dividend of $17.00 per share,
representing 50% of ZIM's 2021 net income, taking into account the
quarterly dividends paid during the first three fiscal quarters of the
year.\24\ Pursuant to the issuer's stated policy, ZIM intended to
``distribute a dividend to shareholders on a quarterly basis at a rate
of approximately 20% of the net income derived during such fiscal
quarter with respect to the first three fiscal quarters of the year''
and that the ``cumulative annual dividend amount to be distributed by
[ZIM] (including the interim dividends paid during the first three
fiscal quarters of the year) [would] total 30-50% of the annual net
income.'' \25\ OCC determined that the $17 dividend was an ``ordinary
dividend'' declared pursuant to a policy or practice of paying such
dividend on a quarterly or other regular basis, and therefore not
subject to adjustment.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See ZIM Reports Record Financial Results for the Fourth
Quarter and Full Year 2021 (March 9, 2022), https://investors.zim.com/news/news-details/2022/ZIM-Reports-Record-Financial-Results-for-the-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2021/default.aspx.
\25\ Id.
\26\ See Info Memo #50158 (March 9, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OCC proposes to add a Q&A to the interpretative guidance reflecting
that if OCC determines such variable dividends are paid pursuant to an
issuer's policy or practice of paying such variable dividends at
regular intervals, OCC generally considers them to be ordinary
dividends and not adjustable, even if, on occasion, no variable
dividend is paid or if the amount of the dividend increases or
decreases based on the issuer-established thresholds. OCC believes this
guidance would align with the precedent described above and provide
market participants with greater clarity about how OCC applies the
adjustment policies outlined in the By-Laws to variable dividends.
b. REITs
OCC proposes to add further guidance about situations in which an
issuer may pay a dividend outside of its normal schedule of dividend
payments that the issuer describes as necessary to maintain its tax
status as a particular type of organization, such as a REIT. The
existing interpretative guidance answered several questions concerning
dividends paid by REITs and similar companies. For example, the
existing interpretative guidance addressed that while REITs may pay
dividends at irregular intervals, these companies often have regular
dividend policies, but will actually pay dividends only when certain
conditions are met, or in response to market conditions. Similar to the
variable dividend situation, in which, on occasion, no variable
dividend is paid if issuer-established thresholds are not met, the
prior interpretative guidance provided that such REIT distributions
generally would be considered ordinary distributions when they occur
pursuant to the policy of the company.
However, OCC has observed at least one case in which an issuer has
declared a dividend outside of its normal schedule of dividend payments
to maintain its tax status as a particular type of organization, such
as a REIT. Specifically, On July 22, 2022, Public Storage (``PSA'')
announced a ``special,'' ``one-time'' dividend of $13.15 per common
share.\27\ As explained in the issuer's press release, PSA was
distributing a projected tax gain in connection with its investment in
[[Page 16046]]
another company that had been acquired ``in order to meet the
distribution requirements as a [REIT].'' \28\ Nevertheless, OCC
determined that the dividend was non-ordinary under its By-Laws and
issued an Info Memo concerning an adjustment to options on PSA.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ See Public Storage Announces $2.3 Billion Special Dividend
Related to PS Business Parks Merger Consideration (July 22, 2022),
https://investors.publicstorage.com/news-events/press-releases/news-details/2022/Public-Storage-Announces-2.3-Billion-Special-Dividend-Related-to-PS-Business-Parks-Merger-Consideration/default.aspx.
\28\ Id.
\29\ See Info Memo #50775 (July 25, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As OCC would clarify in the further guidance, such a dividend would
most likely be considered non-ordinary and warrant an adjustment if OCC
determines that the dividend is not being made pursuant to the issuer's
established dividend policies and practices based on the company's
departure from its regular dividend schedule and any characterization
the company may make about the pay-out as ``special'' or ``one time.''
In other words, an issuer's characterization of a dividend as necessary
to maintain its tax status as a particular type of organization is not
determinative of whether a dividend is ``ordinary'' under OCC's By-
Laws. Rather, the question is whether the dividend is paid pursuant to
an issuer's policy of paying such a dividend at regular intervals to
maintain its tax status. If such an issuer announces a special dividend
outside of its regular dividend policies and practices, such dividend
will most likely be considered non-ordinary and warrant an adjustment
even if the issuer is paying the dividend to maintain its tax status.
OCC proposes to add a Q&A to the interpretative guidance to reflect
OCC's practices in this situation.
(2) Statutory Basis
OCC believes the proposed rule changes are consistent with Section
17A of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Exchange Act \30\ requires, among other
things, that the rules of a clearing agency be designed to protect
investors and the public interest. OCC believes that by allowing it to
amend and re-issue the interpretative guidance, the proposed changes
would protect investors and the public interest by providing market
participants with up-to-date information about OCC's current process
for making adjustment determinations. In addition, OCC believes the
additional interpretative guidance would provide investors and the
general public further clarity about the application of OCC's
adjustment policies and procedures to scenarios not specifically
addressed in the existing guidance. Providing this information will
help investors make more informed decisions in connection with their
participation in the listed options market. Accordingly, OCC believes
the proposed changes are consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the
Exchange Act.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
\31\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, Exchange Act Rule 17Ad-22(e)(23) requires OCC to
maintain written policies and procedures reasonably designed to, among
other things, publicly disclose all relevant rules and material
procedures and provide sufficient information to enable participants to
identify and evaluate the risks they incur by participating in OCC.\32\
The proposed changes would allow OCC to update interpretative guidance
concerning its adjustment policies and procedures previously filed as a
rule with the Commission, thereby facilitating the re-issuance of
guidance about material procedures that remain relevant. OCC believes
that by updating the guidance to reflect current precedent, the
proposed changes will help participants in the listed options market to
better understand the risks related to contract adjustments in the
scenarios addressed, consistent with the requirements of Rule 17Ad-
22(e)(23).\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(23)(i), (ii).
\33\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(23).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(B) Clearing Agency's Statement on Burden on Competition
Section 17A(b)(3)(I) of the Exchange Act requires that the rules of
a clearing agency not impose any burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act.\34\ The
proposed changes would amend interpretative guidance applicable to the
adjustment of all listed options issued for a particular underlying
security. These proposed changes would not impact the rights or
obligations of Clearing Members or other participants in a way that
would benefit or disadvantage any participant versus another
participant. To the contrary, this proposed change would provide all
market participants with information relevant to understanding the
risks of participation. Accordingly, OCC does not believe that the
proposed changes have any impact, or impose any burden, on competition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(I).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(C) Clearing Agency's Statement on Comment on the Proposed Rule Change
Received From Members, Participants or Others
Written comments were not and are not intended to be solicited with
respect to the proposed rule change, and none have been received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \35\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \36\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\36\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposal shall not take effect until all regulatory actions
required with respect to the proposal are completed.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ Notwithstanding its immediate effectiveness, implementation
of this rule change will be delayed until this change is deemed
certified under CFTC Regulation 40.6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-OCC-2024-003 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-OCC-2024-003. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than
[[Page 16047]]
those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of OCC and on OCC's
website at https://www.theocc.com/Company-Information/Documents-and-Archives/By-Laws-and-Rules.
Do not include personal identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-OCC-2024-003 and
should be submitted on or before March 27, 2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-04698 Filed 3-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P