Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Change Amending Rule 7.31E(a)(2)(B) Regarding Limit Order Price Protection, 14123-14125 [2024-03774]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 38 / Monday, February 26, 2024 / Notices
Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange
Act 12 provides that proceedings to
determine whether to approve or
disapprove a proposed rule change must
be concluded within 180 days of the
date of publication of notice of filing of
the proposed rule change. The time for
conclusion of the proceedings may be
extended for up to 60 days if the
Commission determines that a longer
period is appropriate and publishes the
reasons for such determination.13 The
180th day after publication of the Notice
in the Federal Register is February 26,
2024.
The Commission is extending the
period for Commission action on the
Proposed Rule Change, as modified by
Partial Amendment No. 1 and
Amendment No. 2 (hereinafter, the
‘‘Proposed Rule Change’’). The
Commission finds that it is appropriate
to designate a longer period within
which to take action on the Proposed
Rule Change so that the Commission has
sufficient time to consider the issues
raised by the Proposed Rule Change and
to take action on the Proposed Rule
Change. Accordingly, pursuant to
section 19(b)(2)(B)(ii)(II) of the Exchange
Act,14 the Commission designates April
26, 2024, as the date by which the
Commission should either approve or
disapprove the Proposed Rule Change
SR–NSCC–2023–007.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–03775 Filed 2–23–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
American LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Change Amending Rule 7.31E(a)(2)(B)
Regarding Limit Order Price Protection
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
corruption in the markets) and Anthony LaBree
(Oct. 12, 2024) (concerns about OCC’s business
practices). Comments are available at https://
www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nscc-2023-007/
srnscc2023007.htm.
12 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
13 15 U.S.C 78s(b)(2)(B)(ii)(II).
14 Id.
15 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(57).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Feb 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 7.31E(a)(2)(B) regarding Limit
Order Price Protection. The proposed
rule change is available on the
Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
1. Purpose
[Release No. 34–99566; File No. SR–
NYSEAMER–2024–11]
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
February 20, 2024.
(‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on February
9,2024, NYSE American LLC (‘‘NYSE
American’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 7.31E(a)(2)(B) (‘‘Limit Order Price
Protection’’) to provide for the
application of Limit Order Price
Protection during the Core Trading
Session even where a contra-side NBB
(NBO) has not been established.
Currently, Rule 7.31E(a)(2)(B)
provides that a Limit Order to buy (sell)
will be rejected if it is priced at or above
(below) the greater of $0.15 or a
specified percentage away from the
National Best Offer (National Best Bid)
(‘‘NBO’’ and ‘‘NBB,’’ respectively),4 and
2 15
U.S.C. 78a.
CFR 240.19b–4.
4 For securities with a reference price between
$0.00 and $25.00, the specified percentage is 10%;
for securities with a reference price between $25.01
and $50.00, the specified percentage is 5%; and for
3 17
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14123
that Limit Order Price Protection will
not be applied to an incoming Limit
Order to buy (sell) if there is no NBO
(NBB).
The Exchange has recently received
requests from market participants to
modify this rule so that during the Core
Trading Session, Limit Order Price
Protection would apply even when no
contra-side NBB or NBO has been
established. In such cases, market
participants have suggested that the
Limit Order Price Protection calculation
should use an alternate reference price,
such as the last consolidated round-lot
price of the trading day or the prior
trading day’s official closing price. That
way, even if no contra-side NBB or NBO
has been established, the Exchange
would still apply Limit Order Price
Protection using the best-available
alternate reference price, thereby
offering market participants greater
protections against the execution of
Limit Orders with aberrant prices
during the Core Trading Session. The
Exchange is aware that the Limit Order
Price Protection rule on the MIAX Pearl
equities exchange (‘‘MIAX Pearl’’)
currently features such a hierarchy of
reference prices, so that Limit Order
Price Protection is applied to all Limit
Orders, even where no contra-side NBB
or NBO has been established.5
In light of these requests from market
participants, the Exchange now
proposes to amend Rule 7.31E(a)(2)(B)
to provide a hierarchy of reference
prices against which Limit Order Price
Protection would apply during the Core
Trading Session. As in the current rule,
during the Core Trading Session, a Limit
Order to buy (sell) would be rejected if
it is priced at or above (below) the
greater of $0.15 or a specified
percentage (as set forth in the
accompanying table) away from the
NBO (NBB). But if such NBO (NBB) has
not yet been established, the Exchange
would use as the reference price the last
consolidated round-lot price of that
trading day, or, if none, the prior trading
day’s Official Closing Price.6
securities with a reference price greater than $50.00,
the specified percentage is 3%.
5 Under current MIAX Pearl rules, a Limit Order
to buy (sell) will be rejected if it is priced at or
above (below) the greater of a specified dollar and
percentage away from (1) the PBO (PBB), or, if
unavailable, (2) the consolidated last sale price
disseminated during the Regular Trading Hours on
trade date, or, if unavailable, (3) the prior day’s
Official Closing Price. See MIAX Pearl Rule
2614(a)(1)(ix)(A).
6 The Exchange’s proposed hierarchy of reference
prices is substantially similar to the hierarchy in the
MIAX Pearl rules. The only differences are that the
Exchange’s proposal (a) would continue to
reference the NBO (NBB) instead of the PBO (PBB),
as the Exchange’s Limit Order Price Protection
E:\FR\FM\26FEN1.SGM
Continued
26FEN1
14124
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 38 / Monday, February 26, 2024 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
The Exchange does not propose for
this change to apply during the Early
and Late Trading Sessions. This is
because with respect to both the Early
and Late Trading Sessions, there is a
higher likelihood that overnight news
developments may move the market
more than the percentages specified in
the Limit Order Price Protection rule. If,
in the absence of an NBO (NBB), such
percentages were applied to the prior
trading day’s Official Closing Price, this
might lead the Exchange to reject orders
that are appropriately trying to establish
a quote at the new market level. For this
reason, the Exchange believes the
current rule should continue to govern
during the Early and Late Trading
Sessions, such that if there is no contraside NBO (NBB), Limit Order Price
Protection will not be applied.
Accordingly, the Exchange proposes
to amend and reorganize Rule
7.31E(a)(2)(B) into three sub-sections,
with sub-section (i) describing the
relevant reference prices during the
Core Trading Session, sub-section (ii)
describing the relevant reference price
during the Early and Late Trading
Sessions, and sub-section (iii)
describing the balance of the current
rule.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes
that new sub-section (i) of Rule
7.31E(a)(2)(B) would provide that
during the Core Trading Session, a Limit
Order to buy (sell) will be rejected if it
is priced at or above (below) the greater
of $0.15 or a specified percentage (as set
forth in the accompanying table) away
from ‘‘(a) the NBO (NBB), or, if none, (b)
the last consolidated round-lot price of
that trading day, or, if none, (c) the prior
trading day’s Official Closing Price.’’
The Exchange proposes that new subsection (ii) of the rule would provide
that during the Early and Late Trading
Sessions, a Limit Order to buy (sell) will
be rejected if it is priced at or above
(below) the greater of $0.15 or a
specified percentage (as set forth in the
accompanying table) away from the
NBO (NBB), and that Limit Order Price
Protection will not be applied to an
incoming Limit Order to buy (sell) if
there is no NBO (NBB).
Finally, the Exchange proposes that
the balance of the current rule be moved
mechanism has always done; and (b) unlike the
MIAX Pearl rule, which permits an odd lot to serve
as ‘‘the consolidated last sale price disseminated
during the Regular Trading Hours on trade date,’’
the Exchange’s proposal would instead use the last
consolidated round-lot price of that trading day,
which the Exchange believes is a better indication
of actual market conditions. Both the MIAX Pearl
rule and the Exchange’s proposed rule would use
the prior trading day’s Official Closing Price as the
reference price of last resort.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Feb 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
to new sub-section (iii) after the new
subtitle ‘‘Applicability.’’
The Exchange does not propose to
make any other changes to the rule, nor
does it propose any changes to the $0.15
or specified percentages used in the
calculation of Limit Order Price
Protection.
Implementation
The Exchange anticipates
implementing the proposed change in
the first quarter of 2024 and, in any
event, will implement the proposed rule
change no later than the end of June
2024. The Exchange will announce the
timing of such changes by Trader
Update.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,7 in general, and
with Section 6(b)(5),8 in particular,
because it is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in facilitating transactions in securities,
to remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system,
and, in general, to protect investors and
the public interest.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed change would remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and in
general, protect investors and the public
interest, because the use a substantially
similar hierarchy of reference prices for
the application of Limit Order Price
Protection when no contra-side NBO or
NBB has been established is currently in
effect on MIAX Pearl and therefore is
not novel.9 The Exchange further
believes that the proposed change
would enhance the Exchange’s Limit
Order Price Protection mechanism
during the Core Trading Session,
because it would apply using the bestavailable alternate reference price when
a contra-side NBO or NBB has not been
established, thereby offering market
participants greater protection from
aberrant prices and improving
continuous trading and price discovery.
In addition, the proposal to enhance
Limit Order Price Protection by adding
alternative reference prices to apply to
the Core Trading Session would assist
with the maintenance of fair and orderly
markets because such mechanisms
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
9 See supra notes 5 and 6.
protect investors from potentially
receiving executions away from the
prevailing market prices.
The Exchange also believes that it
would protect investors and the public
interest for the Exchange to maintain the
current Limit Order Price Protection
rule for the Early and Late Trading
Sessions. With respect to both the Early
and Late Trading Sessions, there is a
higher likelihood that overnight news
developments may move the market
more than the percentages specified in
the Limit Order Price Protection rule. If,
in the absence of an NBO (NBB), such
percentages were applied to the prior
trading day’s Official Closing Price, this
might lead the Exchange to reject orders
that are appropriately trying to establish
a quote at the new market level. For this
reason, the Exchange believes that, for
the protection of investors and the
public interest, the current rule should
continue to govern during the Early and
Late Trading Sessions, such that if there
is no contra-side NBO (NBB), Limit
Order Price Protection will not be
applied.
Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change will not impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change would not address
competitive issues but rather would
enhance the Exchange’s Limit Order
Price Protection mechanism, to further
protect market participants from
aberrant prices and improve continuous
trading and price discovery.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed
rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 10 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.11 Because the
proposed rule change does not: (i)
significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
prior to 30 days from the date on which
it was filed, or such shorter time as the
7 15
8 15
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
10 15
11 17
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\26FEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
26FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 38 / Monday, February 26, 2024 / Notices
Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder.12
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 13 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
NYSEAMER–2024–11 on the subject
line.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–NYSEAMER–2024–11. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
12 17
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). In addition, Rule
19b–4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to
give the Commission written notice of its intent to
file the proposed rule change at least five business
days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Feb 23, 2024
Jkt 262001
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–NYSEAMER–2024–11 and should
be submitted on or before March 18,
2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
14125
SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416,
(202) 205–6734.
Notice is
hereby given that as a result of the
President’s major disaster declaration on
02/15/2024, applications for disaster
loans may be submitted online using the
MySBA Loan Portal https://
lending.sba.gov or other locally
announced locations. Please contact the
SBA disaster assistance customer
service center by email at
disastercustomerservice@sba.gov or by
phone at 1–800–659–2955 for further
assistance.
The following areas have been
determined to be adversely affected by
the disaster:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Primary Counties (Physical Damage and
Economic Injury Loans): Spokane.
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury
Loans Only):
Washington: Lincoln, Pend Oreille,
Stevens, Whitman
Idaho: Kootenai, Benewah, Bonner
The Interest Rates are:
Percent
[FR Doc. 2024–03774 Filed 2–23–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration # 20205 and # 20206;
WASHINGTON Disaster Number WA–20005]
Presidential Declaration of a Major
Disaster for the State of Washington
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This is a Notice of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Washington
(FEMA–4759–DR), dated 02/15/2024.
Incident: Wildfires.
Incident Period: 08/18/2023 through
08/25/2023.
DATES: Issued on 02/15/2024.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 04/15/2024.
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan
Application Deadline Date: 11/15/2024.
ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan
Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to
apply for a disaster assistance loan.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small
Business Administration, 409 3rd Street
SUMMARY:
14 17
PO 00000
For Physical Damage:
Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere ......................
Homeowners without Credit
Available Elsewhere ..............
Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere ......................
Businesses without Credit
Available Elsewhere ..............
Non-Profit Organizations with
Credit Available Elsewhere ...
Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere .....................................
For Economic Injury:
Business and Small Agricultural
Cooperatives without Credit
Available Elsewhere ..............
Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere .....................................
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
2.500
8.000
4.000
2.375
2.375
4.000
2.375
The number assigned to this disaster
for physical damage is 202055 and for
economic injury is 202060.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 59008)
Francisco Sa´nchez, Jr.,
Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster
Recovery & Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2024–03877 Filed 2–23–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026–09–P
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00086
5.000
E:\FR\FM\26FEN1.SGM
26FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 38 (Monday, February 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14123-14125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03774]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-99566; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2024-11]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Change Amending Rule
7.31E(a)(2)(B) Regarding Limit Order Price Protection
February 20, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given
that, on February 9,2024, NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 7.31E(a)(2)(B) regarding Limit
Order Price Protection. The proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 7.31E(a)(2)(B) (``Limit Order
Price Protection'') to provide for the application of Limit Order Price
Protection during the Core Trading Session even where a contra-side NBB
(NBO) has not been established.
Currently, Rule 7.31E(a)(2)(B) provides that a Limit Order to buy
(sell) will be rejected if it is priced at or above (below) the greater
of $0.15 or a specified percentage away from the National Best Offer
(National Best Bid) (``NBO'' and ``NBB,'' respectively),\4\ and that
Limit Order Price Protection will not be applied to an incoming Limit
Order to buy (sell) if there is no NBO (NBB).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ For securities with a reference price between $0.00 and
$25.00, the specified percentage is 10%; for securities with a
reference price between $25.01 and $50.00, the specified percentage
is 5%; and for securities with a reference price greater than
$50.00, the specified percentage is 3%.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange has recently received requests from market
participants to modify this rule so that during the Core Trading
Session, Limit Order Price Protection would apply even when no contra-
side NBB or NBO has been established. In such cases, market
participants have suggested that the Limit Order Price Protection
calculation should use an alternate reference price, such as the last
consolidated round-lot price of the trading day or the prior trading
day's official closing price. That way, even if no contra-side NBB or
NBO has been established, the Exchange would still apply Limit Order
Price Protection using the best-available alternate reference price,
thereby offering market participants greater protections against the
execution of Limit Orders with aberrant prices during the Core Trading
Session. The Exchange is aware that the Limit Order Price Protection
rule on the MIAX Pearl equities exchange (``MIAX Pearl'') currently
features such a hierarchy of reference prices, so that Limit Order
Price Protection is applied to all Limit Orders, even where no contra-
side NBB or NBO has been established.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Under current MIAX Pearl rules, a Limit Order to buy (sell)
will be rejected if it is priced at or above (below) the greater of
a specified dollar and percentage away from (1) the PBO (PBB), or,
if unavailable, (2) the consolidated last sale price disseminated
during the Regular Trading Hours on trade date, or, if unavailable,
(3) the prior day's Official Closing Price. See MIAX Pearl Rule
2614(a)(1)(ix)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In light of these requests from market participants, the Exchange
now proposes to amend Rule 7.31E(a)(2)(B) to provide a hierarchy of
reference prices against which Limit Order Price Protection would apply
during the Core Trading Session. As in the current rule, during the
Core Trading Session, a Limit Order to buy (sell) would be rejected if
it is priced at or above (below) the greater of $0.15 or a specified
percentage (as set forth in the accompanying table) away from the NBO
(NBB). But if such NBO (NBB) has not yet been established, the Exchange
would use as the reference price the last consolidated round-lot price
of that trading day, or, if none, the prior trading day's Official
Closing Price.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The Exchange's proposed hierarchy of reference prices is
substantially similar to the hierarchy in the MIAX Pearl rules. The
only differences are that the Exchange's proposal (a) would continue
to reference the NBO (NBB) instead of the PBO (PBB), as the
Exchange's Limit Order Price Protection mechanism has always done;
and (b) unlike the MIAX Pearl rule, which permits an odd lot to
serve as ``the consolidated last sale price disseminated during the
Regular Trading Hours on trade date,'' the Exchange's proposal would
instead use the last consolidated round-lot price of that trading
day, which the Exchange believes is a better indication of actual
market conditions. Both the MIAX Pearl rule and the Exchange's
proposed rule would use the prior trading day's Official Closing
Price as the reference price of last resort.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 14124]]
The Exchange does not propose for this change to apply during the
Early and Late Trading Sessions. This is because with respect to both
the Early and Late Trading Sessions, there is a higher likelihood that
overnight news developments may move the market more than the
percentages specified in the Limit Order Price Protection rule. If, in
the absence of an NBO (NBB), such percentages were applied to the prior
trading day's Official Closing Price, this might lead the Exchange to
reject orders that are appropriately trying to establish a quote at the
new market level. For this reason, the Exchange believes the current
rule should continue to govern during the Early and Late Trading
Sessions, such that if there is no contra-side NBO (NBB), Limit Order
Price Protection will not be applied.
Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to amend and reorganize Rule
7.31E(a)(2)(B) into three sub-sections, with sub-section (i) describing
the relevant reference prices during the Core Trading Session, sub-
section (ii) describing the relevant reference price during the Early
and Late Trading Sessions, and sub-section (iii) describing the balance
of the current rule.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes that new sub-section (i) of
Rule 7.31E(a)(2)(B) would provide that during the Core Trading Session,
a Limit Order to buy (sell) will be rejected if it is priced at or
above (below) the greater of $0.15 or a specified percentage (as set
forth in the accompanying table) away from ``(a) the NBO (NBB), or, if
none, (b) the last consolidated round-lot price of that trading day,
or, if none, (c) the prior trading day's Official Closing Price.''
The Exchange proposes that new sub-section (ii) of the rule would
provide that during the Early and Late Trading Sessions, a Limit Order
to buy (sell) will be rejected if it is priced at or above (below) the
greater of $0.15 or a specified percentage (as set forth in the
accompanying table) away from the NBO (NBB), and that Limit Order Price
Protection will not be applied to an incoming Limit Order to buy (sell)
if there is no NBO (NBB).
Finally, the Exchange proposes that the balance of the current rule
be moved to new sub-section (iii) after the new subtitle
``Applicability.''
The Exchange does not propose to make any other changes to the
rule, nor does it propose any changes to the $0.15 or specified
percentages used in the calculation of Limit Order Price Protection.
Implementation
The Exchange anticipates implementing the proposed change in the
first quarter of 2024 and, in any event, will implement the proposed
rule change no later than the end of June 2024. The Exchange will
announce the timing of such changes by Trader Update.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\7\ in general, and with Section
6(b)(5),\8\ in particular, because it is designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed change would remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system, and in general, protect investors and the
public interest, because the use a substantially similar hierarchy of
reference prices for the application of Limit Order Price Protection
when no contra-side NBO or NBB has been established is currently in
effect on MIAX Pearl and therefore is not novel.\9\ The Exchange
further believes that the proposed change would enhance the Exchange's
Limit Order Price Protection mechanism during the Core Trading Session,
because it would apply using the best-available alternate reference
price when a contra-side NBO or NBB has not been established, thereby
offering market participants greater protection from aberrant prices
and improving continuous trading and price discovery. In addition, the
proposal to enhance Limit Order Price Protection by adding alternative
reference prices to apply to the Core Trading Session would assist with
the maintenance of fair and orderly markets because such mechanisms
protect investors from potentially receiving executions away from the
prevailing market prices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See supra notes 5 and 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also believes that it would protect investors and the
public interest for the Exchange to maintain the current Limit Order
Price Protection rule for the Early and Late Trading Sessions. With
respect to both the Early and Late Trading Sessions, there is a higher
likelihood that overnight news developments may move the market more
than the percentages specified in the Limit Order Price Protection
rule. If, in the absence of an NBO (NBB), such percentages were applied
to the prior trading day's Official Closing Price, this might lead the
Exchange to reject orders that are appropriately trying to establish a
quote at the new market level. For this reason, the Exchange believes
that, for the protection of investors and the public interest, the
current rule should continue to govern during the Early and Late
Trading Sessions, such that if there is no contra-side NBO (NBB), Limit
Order Price Protection will not be applied.
Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will not impose
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change would
not address competitive issues but rather would enhance the Exchange's
Limit Order Price Protection mechanism, to further protect market
participants from aberrant prices and improve continuous trading and
price discovery.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \10\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\11\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the
[[Page 14125]]
Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \13\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-NYSEAMER-2024-11 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSEAMER-2024-11.
This file number should be included on the subject line if email is
used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F
Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the
hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do
not include personal identifiable information in submissions; you
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSEAMER-2024-11 and
should be submitted on or before March 18, 2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-03774 Filed 2-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P