Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From India: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2021, 12825-12826 [2024-03402]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 20, 2024 / Notices
U.S. Customs and Border Protection will
continue to collect AD and CVD cash
deposits at the rates in effect at the time
of entry for all imports of subject
merchandise.
The effective date of the continuation
of the Orders will be February 7, 2024.8
Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.218(c)(2), Commerce
intends to initiate the next five-year
reviews of the Orders not later than 30
days prior to fifth anniversary of the
date of the last determination by the
ITC.
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to parties subject to an APO of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3),
which continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
violation which is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
These five-year (sunset) reviews and
this notice are in accordance with
sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act,
and published in accordance with
section 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(f)(4).
Dated: February 13, 2024.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive
functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2024–03376 Filed 2–16–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–533–872]
Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From
India: Final Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review; 2021
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
Norma (India) Ltd. (Norma) and R.N.
Gupta & Co. Ltd. (RNG) received
countervailable subsidies during the
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
AGENCY:
8 See
ITC Final Determination.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Feb 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
period of review (POR), January 1, 2021,
through December 31, 2021.
DATES:
Applicable February 20, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Preston N. Cox or Scarlet K. Jaldin, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–5041 or (202) 482–4275,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 17, 2023, Commerce
published the Preliminary Results of
this administrative review in the
Federal Register and invited interested
parties to comment.1 In September
2023, Commerce conducted verification
of the information reported in the
questionnaire responses of Norma
(India) Limited (Norma) and R.N. Gupta
& Co. Ltd. (RNG).2 On November 6,
2023, we received a timely filed case
brief from the Government of India
(GOI).3 On November 15, 2023,
Commerce extended the deadline for
issuing these final results to February 1,
2023.4 On January 23, 2024, we further
extended the deadline for these final
results to February 13, 2024.5 For a
complete description of the events that
occurred since the publication of the
Preliminary Results, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.6
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the
Order is finished carbon steel flanges.
For a complete description of the scope
of the Order, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.7
1 See Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India:
Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2021, 88 FR 56000 (August
17, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memo (PDM).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Report on Verification of
Norma (India) Limited, USK Exports Private
Limited, Uma Shanker Khandelwal & Co., and
Bansidhar Chiranjilal,’’ dated October 25, 2023; see
also Memorandum, ‘‘Report on Verification of R.N.
Gupta & Co., Ltd.,’’ dated October 25, 2023.
3 See GOI’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief on behalf,’’ dated
November 6, 2023.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for
Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review; 2021,’’ dated November 15, 2023.
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for
Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review; 2021,’’ dated January 23, 2024.
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of
Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India; 2021,’’
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by,
this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
7 Id. at 2–3.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12825
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised by the GOI in its case
brief are addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum. A list of topics
discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum is provided in Appendix
I. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://access.trade.gov/
public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of comments
from interested parties and the
information on the record, there have
been no changes made from the
Preliminary Results. For a full
discussion of the issues, see the Issues
and Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751(a)(l)(A) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For
each of the subsidy programs found to
be countervailable, we find that there is
a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided
financial contribution that gives rise to
a benefit to the recipient, and that the
subsidy is specific.8 For a full
description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions, including
our reliance on adverse facts available
pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of
the Act, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Companies Not Selected for Individual
Examination
We made no changes to the
methodology used in the Preliminary
Results 9 for determining a rate for
companies not selected for individual
examination. Therefore, we have made
no changes to the subsidy rate
calculated for companies not selected
for individual examination. The
companies for which a review was
requested and that were not selected as
mandatory respondents or found to be
cross-owned with a mandatory
respondent are listed in Appendix II.
8 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
regarding financial contribution; see also section
771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section
771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
9 See Preliminary Results PDM at 25–26.
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
12826
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 20, 2024 / Notices
countervailing duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review for the
As a result of this review, we
above-listed companies at the applicable
determine that the following net
ad valorem assessment rates. Commerce
countervailable subsidy rates exist for
intends to issue assessment instructions
the period January 1, 2021, through
to CBP no earlier than 35 days after
December 31, 2021:
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a
Subsidy rate
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Producer/exporter
(percent ad
valorem)
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
10
Norma (India) Ltd. .............
2.98 not to liquidate relevant entries until the
R.N. Gupta & Co. Ltd ...........
3.20
time for parties to file a request for a
Non-Selected Companies
Under Review 11 ................
3.09 statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
Final Results of Administrative Review
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce discloses its
calculations and analysis performed in
connection with the final results to
interested parties within five days of its
public announcement, or if there is no
public announcement, within five days
of the date of publication of this notice,
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
However, because we have made no
changes to the calculations used in
reaching the Preliminary Results, the
countervailable subsidy rates are
unchanged from the rates assigned in
the Preliminary Results, and there are
no calculations to disclose.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Pursuant to section 751(a)(1) of the
Act, Commerce intends to instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
collect cash deposits of estimated
countervailing duties in the amounts
shown for each company listed above
on shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication of these final results of this
administrative review. For all nonreviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to
continue to collect cash deposits of
estimated countervailing duties at the
all-others rate or the most recent
company-specific rate applicable to the
company or the non-selected companies
rate, as appropriate. These cash deposit
instructions, effective upon the
publication of these final results, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Assessment Requirements
In accordance with section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(2), Commerce has
determined, and CBP shall assess,
10 As discussed in the Preliminary Results PDM,
Commerce has found the following companies to be
cross-owned with Norma (India) Ltd.: USK Export
Private Limited; Uma Shanker Khandelwal and Co.;
and Bansidhar Chiranjilal. This rate applies to all
cross-owned companies.
11 See Appendix II for a list of companies not
selected for individual examination.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Feb 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
Administrative Protection Order (APO)
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to parties subject to an APO of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
These final results are issued and
published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: February 13, 2024.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations, Performing the Non-exclusive
Functions and Duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Non-Selected Companies Under Review
V. Subsidies Valuation Information
VI. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and
Application of Adverse Inferences
VII. Analysis of Programs
VIII. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether the Duty Drawback
Program Is Countervailable
Comment 2: Whether the Export Promotion
of Capital Goods Scheme Is
Countervailable
Comment 3: Whether the Interest
Equalization Scheme Is Countervailable
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Correctly
Found the Merchandise Export From
India Scheme and the Status Holder
Incentive Scheme To Be Countervailable
Comment 5: Whether Commerce Correctly
Analyzed the Electricity Duty Exemption
Under the State Government of Uttar
Pradesh Investment Promotion Scheme/
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Infrastructure and Industrial Investment
Policy (SGUP–EDE) Scheme
IX. Recommendation
Appendix II—Companies Not Selected
for Individual Examination
1. Adinath International
2. Allena Group
3. Alloyed Steel
4. Balkrishna Steel Forge Pvt. Ltd.
5. Bebitz Flanges Works Private Limited
6. C.D. Industries
7. Cetus Engineering Private Limited
8. CHW Forge
9. CHW Forge Pvt. Ltd.
10. Citizen Metal Depot
11. Corum Flange
12. DN Forge Industries
13. Echjay Forgings Limited
14. Falcon Valves and Flanges Private
Limited
15. Heubach International
16. Hindon Forge Pvt. Ltd.
17. Jai Auto Pvt. Ltd.
18. Kinnari Steel Corporation
19. M F Rings and Bearing Races Ltd.
20. Mascot Metal Manufacturers
21. Munish Forge Private Limited
22. OM Exports
23. Punjab Steel Works (PSW)
24. R.D. Forge
25. Raaj Sagar Steel
26. Ravi Ratan Metal Industries
27. Rolex Fittings India Pvt. Ltd.
28. Rollwell Forge Engineering Components
and Flanges
29. Rollwell Forge Pvt. Ltd.
30. SHM (ShinHeung Machinery)
31. Siddhagiri Metal & Tubes
32. Sizer India
33. Steel Shape India
34. Sudhir Forgings Pvt. Ltd.
35. Tirupati Forge
36. Umashanker Khandelwal Forging Limited
[FR Doc. 2024–03402 Filed 2–16–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[RTID–0648–XD729]
Draft Overview of the National
Aquaculture Development Plan and
Draft Strategic Plan for Aquaculture
Economic Development
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
On behalf of the National
Science and Technology Council
(NSTC)’s Subcommittee on Aquaculture
(SCA), NMFS announces the availability
of the draft Overview of the National
Aquaculture Development Plan (NADP)
and draft Strategic Plan for Aquaculture
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12825-12826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03402]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-533-872]
Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From India: Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2021
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
Norma (India) Ltd. (Norma) and R.N. Gupta & Co. Ltd. (RNG) received
countervailable subsidies during the period of review (POR), January 1,
2021, through December 31, 2021.
DATES: Applicable February 20, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Preston N. Cox or Scarlet K. Jaldin,
AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5041 or (202)
482-4275, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 17, 2023, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of
this administrative review in the Federal Register and invited
interested parties to comment.\1\ In September 2023, Commerce conducted
verification of the information reported in the questionnaire responses
of Norma (India) Limited (Norma) and R.N. Gupta & Co. Ltd. (RNG).\2\ On
November 6, 2023, we received a timely filed case brief from the
Government of India (GOI).\3\ On November 15, 2023, Commerce extended
the deadline for issuing these final results to February 1, 2023.\4\ On
January 23, 2024, we further extended the deadline for these final
results to February 13, 2024.\5\ For a complete description of the
events that occurred since the publication of the Preliminary Results,
see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India: Preliminary
Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2021, 88 FR
56000 (August 17, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memo (PDM).
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Report on Verification of Norma (India)
Limited, USK Exports Private Limited, Uma Shanker Khandelwal & Co.,
and Bansidhar Chiranjilal,'' dated October 25, 2023; see also
Memorandum, ``Report on Verification of R.N. Gupta & Co., Ltd.,''
dated October 25, 2023.
\3\ See GOI's Letter, ``Case Brief on behalf,'' dated November
6, 2023.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2021,'' dated November
15, 2023.
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2021,'' dated January 23,
2024.
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of
Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India; 2021,'' dated concurrently
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the Order is finished carbon steel
flanges. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Id. at 2-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised by the GOI in its case brief are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of topics discussed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum is provided in Appendix I. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of comments from interested parties and the
information on the record, there have been no changes made from the
Preliminary Results. For a full discussion of the issues, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with
section 751(a)(l)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
For each of the subsidy programs found to be countervailable, we find
that there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial
contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that
the subsidy is specific.\8\ For a full description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions, including our reliance on adverse facts
available pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding
financial contribution; see also section 771(5)(E) of the Act
regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding
specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination
We made no changes to the methodology used in the Preliminary
Results \9\ for determining a rate for companies not selected for
individual examination. Therefore, we have made no changes to the
subsidy rate calculated for companies not selected for individual
examination. The companies for which a review was requested and that
were not selected as mandatory respondents or found to be cross-owned
with a mandatory respondent are listed in Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Preliminary Results PDM at 25-26.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 12826]]
Final Results of Administrative Review
As a result of this review, we determine that the following net
countervailable subsidy rates exist for the period January 1, 2021,
through December 31, 2021:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ As discussed in the Preliminary Results PDM, Commerce has
found the following companies to be cross-owned with Norma (India)
Ltd.: USK Export Private Limited; Uma Shanker Khandelwal and Co.;
and Bansidhar Chiranjilal. This rate applies to all cross-owned
companies.
\11\ See Appendix II for a list of companies not selected for
individual examination.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy rate
Producer/exporter (percent ad
valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norma (India) Ltd. \10\................................. 2.98
R.N. Gupta & Co. Ltd.................................... 3.20
Non-Selected Companies Under Review \11\................ 3.09
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce discloses its calculations and analysis
performed in connection with the final results to interested parties
within five days of its public announcement, or if there is no public
announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this
notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However, because we have
made no changes to the calculations used in reaching the Preliminary
Results, the countervailable subsidy rates are unchanged from the rates
assigned in the Preliminary Results, and there are no calculations to
disclose.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Pursuant to section 751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce intends to
instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect cash
deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts shown for
each company listed above on shipments of subject merchandise entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of
publication of these final results of this administrative review. For
all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect
cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the all-others rate
or the most recent company-specific rate applicable to the company or
the non-selected companies rate, as appropriate. These cash deposit
instructions, effective upon the publication of these final results,
shall remain in effect until further notice.
Assessment Requirements
In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(2), Commerce has determined, and CBP shall assess,
countervailing duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review
for the above-listed companies at the applicable ad valorem assessment
rates. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
Administrative Protection Order (APO)
This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to
an APO of their responsibility concerning the disposition of
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
These final results are issued and published in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: February 13, 2024.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, Performing the
Non-exclusive Functions and Duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Non-Selected Companies Under Review
V. Subsidies Valuation Information
VI. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Application of Adverse
Inferences
VII. Analysis of Programs
VIII. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether the Duty Drawback Program Is Countervailable
Comment 2: Whether the Export Promotion of Capital Goods Scheme
Is Countervailable
Comment 3: Whether the Interest Equalization Scheme Is
Countervailable
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Correctly Found the Merchandise
Export From India Scheme and the Status Holder Incentive Scheme To
Be Countervailable
Comment 5: Whether Commerce Correctly Analyzed the Electricity
Duty Exemption Under the State Government of Uttar Pradesh
Investment Promotion Scheme/Infrastructure and Industrial Investment
Policy (SGUP-EDE) Scheme
IX. Recommendation
Appendix II--Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination
1. Adinath International
2. Allena Group
3. Alloyed Steel
4. Balkrishna Steel Forge Pvt. Ltd.
5. Bebitz Flanges Works Private Limited
6. C.D. Industries
7. Cetus Engineering Private Limited
8. CHW Forge
9. CHW Forge Pvt. Ltd.
10. Citizen Metal Depot
11. Corum Flange
12. DN Forge Industries
13. Echjay Forgings Limited
14. Falcon Valves and Flanges Private Limited
15. Heubach International
16. Hindon Forge Pvt. Ltd.
17. Jai Auto Pvt. Ltd.
18. Kinnari Steel Corporation
19. M F Rings and Bearing Races Ltd.
20. Mascot Metal Manufacturers
21. Munish Forge Private Limited
22. OM Exports
23. Punjab Steel Works (PSW)
24. R.D. Forge
25. Raaj Sagar Steel
26. Ravi Ratan Metal Industries
27. Rolex Fittings India Pvt. Ltd.
28. Rollwell Forge Engineering Components and Flanges
29. Rollwell Forge Pvt. Ltd.
30. SHM (ShinHeung Machinery)
31. Siddhagiri Metal & Tubes
32. Sizer India
33. Steel Shape India
34. Sudhir Forgings Pvt. Ltd.
35. Tirupati Forge
36. Umashanker Khandelwal Forging Limited
[FR Doc. 2024-03402 Filed 2-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P