Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., 10149-10152 [2024-02865]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2024 / Notices
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sandy Liu by email at: sandy.liu@
faa.gov; phone: 202–276–4748.
[FR Doc. 2024–02879 Filed 2–12–24; 8:45 am]
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Public Comments Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspect of this
information collection, including (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for FAA’s
performance; (b) the accuracy of the
estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to
enhance the quality, utility and clarity
of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be
minimized without reducing the quality
of the collected information.
OMB Control Number: 2120–0737.
Title: Aircraft Noise Certification
Documents for International Operations.
Form Numbers: None. Reference:
ICAO Annex 16, Vol. 1—Aircraft Noise,
Eighth edition (July 2017) Attachment G
for format.
Type of Review: Renewal of an
information collection.
Background: The Federal Register
Notice with a 60-day comment period
soliciting comments on the following
collection of information was published
on May 8, 2023 (88 FR 29801). On
March 2, 2010, the FAA published the
final rule Notice No. 91–312, Aircraft
Noise Certification Documents for
International Operations (75 FR 9327). It
requires operators that fly outside the
United States, using aircraft subject to
ICAO, Annex 16, Volume 1, to carry
aircraft noise certification information
on board the aircraft. This collection is
needed to ensure consistent
international compliance with the
ICAO, Annex 16, Volume 1,
Amendment 8 that requires certain
noise information be carried on board
the aircraft. This information must be
easily accessible to the flight crew and
presentable upon request to the
appropriate foreign National Aviation
Authority (NAA) officials. The
collection is mandatory based on U.S.
regulations and international standards.
Respondents: Operators of U.S.
registered civil aircraft flying outside
the United States.
Frequency: 75 airplanes.
Estimated Average Burden per
Response: 25 minutes (0.42 hours).
Estimated Total Annual Burden: $30
per airplane × 75 airplanes affected =
$2,250.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Feb 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 7,
2024.
Sandy Liu,
Engineer, Noise Division, Office of
Environment and Energy, Noise Division
(AEE–100).
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket Number FRA–2014–0003]
Petition for Extension of Waiver of
Compliance
Under part 211 of title 49 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR), this
document provides the public notice
that on January 22, 2024, Strasburg Rail
Road Company (SRC) petitioned the
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
for an extension of a waiver of
compliance from certain provisions of
the Federal railroad safety regulations
contained at 49 CFR part 240
(Qualification and Certification of
Locomotive Engineers) and part 242
(Qualification and Certification of
Conductors). The relevant Docket
Number is FRA–2014–0003.
Specifically, SRC requests relief
required to continue participation in
FRA’s Confidential Close Call Reporting
System (C3RS) Program. SRC seeks to
continue shielding reporting employees
from mandatory punitive sanctions that
would otherwise arise as provided in
§§ 240.117(e)(1)–(4); 240.305(a)(1)–(4)
and (a)(6); 240.307; 242.403(b), (c),
(e)(1)–(4), (e)(6)–(11), (f)(1)–(2); and
242.407. The C3RS Program encourages
certified operating crew members to
report close calls and protects the
employees and the railroad from
discipline or sanctions arising from the
incidents reported per the C3RS
Implementing Memorandum of
Understanding.
A copy of the petition, as well as any
written communications concerning the
petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested parties desire
an opportunity for oral comment and a
public hearing, they should notify FRA,
in writing, before the end of the
comment period and specify the basis
for their request.
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10149
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be
submitted at www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments.
Communications received by April
15, 2024 will be considered by FRA
before final action is taken. Comments
received after that date will be
considered if practicable.
Anyone can search the electronic
form of any written communications
and comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the
document, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better
inform its processes. DOT posts these
comments, without edit, including any
personal information the commenter
provides, to www.regulations.gov, as
described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can
be reviewed at https://
www.transportation.gov/privacy. See
also https://www.regulations.gov/
privacy-notice for the privacy notice of
regulations.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC.
John Karl Alexy,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety,
Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024–02920 Filed 2–12–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard; Volkswagen Group of
America, Inc.
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
AGENCY:
This document grants in full
the Volkswagen Group of America,
Inc.’s (Volkswagen) petition for
exemption from the Federal Motor
Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard (theft
prevention standard) for its ID.7 vehicle
line beginning in model year (MY) 2025.
The petition is granted because the
Agency has determined that the
antitheft device to be placed on the line
as standard equipment is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of the
theft prevention standard. Volkswagen
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
10150
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2024 / Notices
also requested confidential treatment for
specific information in its petition.
Therefore, no confidential information
provided for purposes of this notice has
been disclosed.
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with the
2025 model year.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carlita Ballard, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy, and Consumer
Programs, NHTSA, West Building,
W43–439, NRM–310, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Ms.
Ballard’s phone number is (202) 366–
5222. Her fax number is (202) 493–2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 49
U.S.C. chapter 331, the Secretary of
Transportation (and the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA) by delegation) is required to
promulgate a theft prevention standard
to provide for the identification of
certain motor vehicles and their major
replacement parts to impede motor
vehicle theft. NHTSA promulgated
regulations at 49 CFR part 541 (theft
prevention standard) to require partsmarking for specified passenger motor
vehicles and light trucks. Pursuant to 49
U.S.C. 33106, manufacturers that are
subject to the parts-marking
requirements may petition the Secretary
of Transportation for an exemption for
a line of passenger motor vehicles
equipped with an antitheft device as
standard equipment that the Secretary
decides is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements. In accordance
with this statute, NHTSA promulgated
49 CFR part 543, which establishes the
process through which manufacturers
may seek an exemption from the theft
prevention standard.
49 CFR 543.5 provides general
submission requirements for petitions
and states that each manufacturer may
petition NHTSA for an exemption of
one vehicle line per model year. Among
other requirements, manufacturers must
identify whether the exemption is
sought under section 543.6 or section
543.7. Under section 543.6, a
manufacturer may request an exemption
by providing specific information about
the antitheft device, its capabilities, and
the reasons the petitioner believes the
device to be as effective at reducing and
deterring theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements. Section
543.7 permits a manufacturer to request
an exemption under a more streamlined
process if the vehicle line is equipped
with an antitheft device (an
‘‘immobilizer’’) as standard equipment
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Feb 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
that complies with one of the standards
specified in that section.1
Section 543.8 establishes
requirements for processing petitions for
exemption from the theft prevention
standard. As stated in section 543.8(a),
NHTSA processes any complete
exemption petition. If NHTSA receives
an incomplete petition, NHTSA will
notify the petitioner of the deficiencies.
Once NHTSA receives a complete
petition the Agency will process it and,
in accordance with section 543.8(b),
will grant the petition if it determines
that, based upon substantial evidence,
the standard equipment antitheft device
is likely to be as effective in reducing
and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of part 541.
Section 543.8(c) requires NHTSA to
issue its decision either to grant or to
deny an exemption petition not later
than 120 days after the date on which
a complete petition is filed. If NHTSA
does not make a decision within the
120-day period, the petition shall be
deemed to be approved and the
manufacturer shall be exempt from the
standard for the line covered by the
petition for the subsequent model year.2
Exemptions granted under part 543
apply only to the vehicle line or lines
that are subject to the grant and that are
equipped with the antitheft device on
which the line’s exemption was based,
and are effective for the model year
beginning after the model year in which
NHTSA issues the notice of exemption,
unless the notice of exemption specifies
a later year.
Sections 543.8(f) and (g) apply to the
manner in which NHTSA’s decisions on
petitions are to be made known. Under
section 543.8(f), if the petition is sought
under section 543.6, NHTSA publishes
a notice of its decision to grant or deny
the exemption petition in the Federal
Register and notifies the petitioner in
1 49 CFR 543.7 specifies that the manufacturer
must include a statement that their entire vehicle
line is equipped with an immobilizer that meets
one of the following standards:
(1) The performance criteria (subsections 8
through 21) of C.R.C, c. 1038.114, Theft Protection
and Rollaway Prevention (in effect March 30, 2011),
as excerpted in appendix A of [part 543];
(2) National Standard of Canada CAN/ULC–
S338–98, Automobile Theft Deterrent Equipment
and Systems: Electronic Immobilization (May 1998);
(3) United Nations Economic Commission for
Europe (UN/ECE) Regulation No. 97 (ECE R97),
Uniform Provisions Concerning Approval of Vehicle
Alarm System (VAS) and Motor Vehicles with
Regard to Their Alarm System (AS) in effect August
8, 2007; or
(4) UN/ECE Regulation No. 116 (ECE R116),
Uniform Technical Prescriptions Concerning the
Protection of Motor Vehicles Against Unauthorized
Use in effect on February 10, 2009.
2 49 U.S.C. 33106(d).
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
writing. Under section 543.8(g), if the
petition is sought under section 543.7,
NHTSA notifies the petitioner in writing
of the Agency’s decision to grant or
deny the exemption petition.
This grant of petition for exemption
considers Volkswagen Group of
America, Inc.’s (Volkswagen) petition
for its ID.7 vehicle line beginning in MY
2025.
I. Specific Petition Content
Requirements Under 49 CFR 543.6
Pursuant to 49 CFR part 543,
Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention, Volkswagen petitioned for
an exemption for its specified vehicle
line from the parts-marking
requirements of the theft prevention
standard, beginning in MY 2025.
Volkswagen petitioned under 49 CFR
543.6, Petition: Specific content
requirements, which, as described
above, requires manufacturers to
provide specific information about the
antitheft device installed as standard
equipment on all vehicles in the line for
which an exemption is sought, the
antitheft device’s capabilities, and the
reasons the petitioner believes the
device to be as effective at reducing and
deterring theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements.
More specifically, section 543.6(a)(1)
requires petitions to include a statement
that an antitheft device will be installed
as standard equipment on all vehicles in
the line for which the exemption is
sought. Under section 543.6(a)(2), each
petition must list each component in the
antitheft system and include a diagram
showing the location of each of those
components within the vehicle. As
required by section 543.6(a)(3), each
petition must include an explanation of
the means and process by which the
device is activated and functions,
including any aspect of the device
designed to: (1) facilitate or encourage
its activation by motorists; (2) attract
attention to the efforts of an
unauthorized person to enter or move a
vehicle by means other than a key; (3)
prevent defeating or circumventing the
device by an unauthorized person
attempting to enter a vehicle by means
other than a key; (4) prevent the
operation of a vehicle which an
unauthorized person has entered using
means other than a key; and (5) ensure
the reliability and durability of the
device.3
In addition to providing information
about the antitheft device and its
functionality, petitioners must also
submit the reasons for their belief that
the antitheft device will be effective in
3 49
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
CFR 543.6(a)(3).
13FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2024 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft, including any theft data and other
data that are available to the petitioner
and form a basis for that belief,4 and the
reasons for their belief that the Agency
should determine that the antitheft
device is likely to be as effective as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of part 541 in reducing
and deterring motor vehicle theft. In
support of this belief, the petitioners
should include any statistical data that
are available to the petitioner and form
the basis for the petitioner’s belief that
a line of passenger motor vehicles
equipped with the antitheft device is
likely to have a theft rate equal to or less
than that of passenger motor vehicles of
the same, or a similar, line which have
parts-marked in compliance with part
541.5
The following sections describe
Volkswagen’s petition information
provided pursuant to 49 CFR part 543,
Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention. To the extent that specific
information in Volkswagen’s petition is
subject to a properly filed
confidentiality request, that information
was not disclosed as part of this notice.6
II. Volkswagen’s Petition for Exemption
In a petition dated May 15, 2025,
Volkswagen requested an exemption
from the parts-marking requirements of
the theft prevention standard for its ID.7
vehicle line beginning with MY 2025.
In its petition, Volkswagen provided a
detailed description and diagram of the
identity, design, and location of the
components of the antitheft device for
its ID.7 vehicle line. Volkswagen stated
that its fifth-generation transponderbased electronic engine immobilizer
antitheft device will be installed as
standard equipment on the entire MY
2025 ID.7 vehicle line. Volkswagen also
stated that its ID.7 is an electric vehicle
that will be equipped with a RWD or an
AWD transmission. Key components of
the antitheft device will include an
adapted ignition key (ID-transmitter or
‘‘key fob’’), In Car Application Server 1
(ICAS1) with integrated gateway (cluster
to CAN bus, only routing function) and
a Power Control Unit (LSG1) in case of
4 motion (all wheel drive) (LSG1 and
LSG2). Ford stated that an audible and
visual alarm will be offered as optional
equipment.
Pursuant to Section 543.6(a)(3),
Volkswagen explained that its
immobilizer device actively
incorporates the power control unit into
the evaluation and monitoring process.
4 49
CFR 543.6(a)(4).
CFR 543.6(a)(5).
6 49 CFR 512.20(a).
5 49
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Feb 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
Volkswagen also stated that activation
of its immobilizer device occurs
automatically after the engine is
switched off. Deactivation of the
immobilizer device occurs when the
ignition is turned on or the key fob is
recognized by the immobilizer control
unit. Specifically, when turning on the
ignition on/off switch, the key
transponder sends a fixed code to the
immobilizer control unit. If this is
identified as the correct code, a variable
code is generated in the immobilizer
control unit and sent to the transponder.
Volkswagen stated that a secret
arithmetic process is then started
according to a set of specific equations
and that a new variable code is
generated every time the immobilizer
goes through the secret computing
process. The results of the computing
process are evaluated in the control unit
and if verified, the vehicle key is
acknowledged as correct. The engine
control unit then sends a variable code
to the immobilizer control unit for
mutual identification. If all the data
matches, the vehicle can be started.
As required in section 543.6(a)(3)(v),
Volkswagen provided information on
the reliability and durability of its
proposed device. To ensure reliability
and durability of the device,
Volkswagen stated that the antitheft
device has been tested for compliance
with its corporate requirements,
including those for electrical and
electronic assemblies in motor vehicles
related to performance requirements
including electrical system temperature
stability, mechanical integrity, electrical
performance, electromagnetic
compatibility (EMC), environmental
compatibility and service life.
In accordance with 49 CFR
543.6(a)(5), Volkswagen provided data
on the theft rate of similarly-sized
vehicle lines that had been granted an
exemption from the parts-marking
requirement. Volkswagen also
referenced the effectiveness of
immobilizer devices installed on other
vehicles for which NHTSA has granted
exemptions. Specifically, Volkswagen
referenced information from the
Highway Loss Data Institute which
showed that BMW vehicles experienced
theft loss reductions resulting in a 73%
decrease in relative claim frequency and
a 78% lower average loss payment per
claim for vehicles equipped with an
immobilizer. Volkswagen also stated
that the National Crime Information
Center’s (NCIC) theft data showed that
there was a 70% reduction in theft
experienced when comparing the MY
1987 Ford Mustang vehicle thefts (with
immobilizers) to MY 1995 Ford Mustang
vehicle thefts (without immobilizers).
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10151
III. Decision To Grant the Petition
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49
CFR 543.8(b), the Agency grants a
petition for exemption from the partsmarking requirements of part 541, either
in whole or in part, if it determines that,
based upon substantial evidence, the
standard equipment antitheft device is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of part 541. The Agency
finds that Volkswagen has provided
adequate reasons for its belief that the
antitheft device for its vehicle line is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the theft prevention
standard. This conclusion is based on
the information the Volkswagen
provided about its antitheft device.
NHTSA believes, based on the
supporting evidence submitted by
Volkswagen, that the antitheft device
described for its vehicle line is likely to
be as effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of the
theft prevention standard.
The Agency concludes that
Volkswagen’s antitheft device will
provide four of the five types of
performance features listed in section
543.6(a)(3): promoting activation;
preventing defeat or circumvention of
the device by unauthorized persons;
preventing operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
The Agency notes that 49 CFR part
541, appendix A–1, identifies those
lines that are exempted from the theft
prevention standard for a given model
year. 49 CFR 543.8(f) contains
publication requirements incident to the
disposition of all part 543 petitions.
Advanced listing, including the release
of future product nameplates, the
beginning model year for which the
petition is granted and a general
description of the antitheft device is
necessary in order to notify law
enforcement agencies of new vehicle
lines exempted from the parts-marking
requirements of the theft prevention
standard.
If Volkswagen decides not to use the
exemption for its requested vehicle line,
the manufacturer must formally notify
the Agency. If such a decision is made,
the line must be fully marked as
required by 49 CFR 541.5 and 541.6
(marking of major component parts and
replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if Volkswagen
wishes in the future to modify the
device on which this exemption is
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
10152
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2024 / Notices
based, the company may have to submit
a petition to modify the exemption.
Section 543.8(d) states that a part 543
exemption applies only to vehicles that
belong to a line exempted under this
part and equipped with the antitheft
device on which the line’s exemption is
based. Further, section 543.10(c)(2)
provides for the submission of petitions
‘‘to modify an exemption to permit the
use of an antitheft device similar to but
differing from the one specified in the
exemption.’’
The Agency wishes to minimize the
administrative burden that section
543.10(c)(2) could place on exempted
vehicle manufacturers and itself. The
Agency did not intend in drafting part
543 to require the submission of a
modification petition for every change
to the components or design of an
antitheft device. The significance of
many such changes could be de
minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests
that if Volkswagen contemplates making
any changes, the effects of which might
be characterized as de minimis, it
should consult the Agency before
preparing and submitting a petition to
modify.
For the foregoing reasons, the Agency
hereby grants in full Volkswagen’s
petition for exemption for the ID.7
vehicle line from the parts-marking
requirements of 49 CFR part 541,
beginning with its MY 2025 vehicles.
Issued under authority delegated in
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2024–02865 Filed 2–12–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard; Toyota Motor North
America, Inc.
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
AGENCY:
This document grants in full
the Toyota Motor North America, Inc.’s
(Toyota) petition for exemption from the
Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard (theft prevention standard) for
its Subaru Solterra vehicle line
beginning in model year (MY) 2025. The
petition is granted because the Agency
has determined that the antitheft device
to be placed on the line as standard
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Feb 12, 2024
Jkt 262001
equipment is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the theft
prevention standard. Toyota also
requested confidential treatment for
specific information in its petition.
Therefore, no confidential information
provided for purposes of this notice has
been disclosed.
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with the
2025 model year.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carlita Ballard, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy, and Consumer
Programs, NHTSA, West Building,
W43–439, NRM–310, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Ms.
Ballard’s phone number is (202) 366–
5222. Her fax number is (202) 493–2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 49
U.S.C. chapter 331, the Secretary of
Transportation (and the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA) by delegation) is required to
promulgate a theft prevention standard
to provide for the identification of
certain motor vehicles and their major
replacement parts to impede motor
vehicle theft. NHTSA promulgated
regulations at 49 CFR part 541 (theft
prevention standard) to require partsmarking for specified passenger motor
vehicles and light trucks. Pursuant to 49
U.S.C. 33106, manufacturers that are
subject to the parts-marking
requirements may petition the Secretary
of Transportation for an exemption for
a line of passenger motor vehicles
equipped with an antitheft device as
standard equipment that the Secretary
decides is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements. In accordance
with this statute, NHTSA promulgated
49 CFR part 543, which establishes the
process through which manufacturers
may seek an exemption from the theft
prevention standard.
49 CFR 543.5 provides general
submission requirements for petitions
and states that each manufacturer may
petition NHTSA for an exemption of
one vehicle line per model year. Among
other requirements, manufacturers must
identify whether the exemption is
sought under section 543.6 or section
543.7. Under section 543.6, a
manufacturer may request an exemption
by providing specific information about
the antitheft device, its capabilities, and
the reasons the petitioner believes the
device to be as effective at reducing and
deterring theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements. Section
543.7 permits a manufacturer to request
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
an exemption under a more streamlined
process if the vehicle line is equipped
with an antitheft device (an
‘‘immobilizer’’) as standard equipment
that complies with one of the standards
specified in that section.1
Section 543.8 establishes
requirements for processing petitions for
exemption from the theft prevention
standard. As stated in section 543.8(a),
NHTSA processes any complete
exemption petition. If NHTSA receives
an incomplete petition, NHTSA will
notify the petitioner of the deficiencies.
Once NHTSA receives a complete
petition the Agency will process it and,
in accordance with section 543.8(b),
will grant the petition if it determines
that, based upon substantial evidence,
the standard equipment antitheft device
is likely to be as effective in reducing
and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of part 541.
Section 543.8(c) requires NHTSA to
issue its decision either to grant or to
deny an exemption petition not later
than 120 days after the date on which
a complete petition is filed. If NHTSA
does not make a decision within the
120-day period, the petition shall be
deemed to be approved and the
manufacturer shall be exempt from the
standard for the line covered by the
petition for the subsequent model year.2
Exemptions granted under part 543
apply only to the vehicle line or lines
that are subject to the grant and that are
equipped with the antitheft device on
which the line’s exemption was based,
and are effective for the model year
beginning after the model year in which
NHTSA issues the notice of exemption,
unless the notice of exemption specifies
a later year.
Sections 543.8(f) and (g) apply to the
manner in which NHTSA’s decisions on
petitions are to be made known. Under
section 543.8(f), if the petition is sought
1 49 CFR 543.7 specifies that the manufacturer
must include a statement that their entire vehicle
line is equipped with an immobilizer that meets
one of the following standards:
(1) The performance criteria (subsections 8
through 21) of C.R.C, c. 1038.114, Theft Protection
and Rollaway Prevention (in effect March 30, 2011),
as excerpted in appendix A of [part 543];
(2) National Standard of Canada CAN/ULC–
S338–98, Automobile Theft Deterrent Equipment
and Systems: Electronic Immobilization (May 1998);
(3) United Nations Economic Commission for
Europe (UN/ECE) Regulation No. 97 (ECE R97),
Uniform Provisions Concerning Approval of Vehicle
Alarm System (VAS) and Motor Vehicles with
Regard to Their Alarm System (AS) in effect August
8, 2007; or
(4) UN/ECE Regulation No. 116 (ECE R116),
Uniform Technical Prescriptions Concerning the
Protection of Motor Vehicles Against Unauthorized
Use in effect on February 10, 2009.
2 49 U.S.C. 33106(d).
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10149-10152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02865]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard; Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document grants in full the Volkswagen Group of America,
Inc.'s (Volkswagen) petition for exemption from the Federal Motor
Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard (theft prevention standard) for its
ID.7 vehicle line beginning in model year (MY) 2025. The petition is
granted because the Agency has determined that the antitheft device to
be placed on the line as standard equipment is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance
with the parts-marking requirements of the theft prevention standard.
Volkswagen
[[Page 10150]]
also requested confidential treatment for specific information in its
petition. Therefore, no confidential information provided for purposes
of this notice has been disclosed.
DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with
the 2025 model year.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carlita Ballard, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy, and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, West
Building, W43-439, NRM-310, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590. Ms. Ballard's phone number is (202) 366-5222. Her fax number is
(202) 493-2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 49 U.S.C. chapter 331, the Secretary
of Transportation (and the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) by delegation) is required to promulgate a theft
prevention standard to provide for the identification of certain motor
vehicles and their major replacement parts to impede motor vehicle
theft. NHTSA promulgated regulations at 49 CFR part 541 (theft
prevention standard) to require parts-marking for specified passenger
motor vehicles and light trucks. Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106,
manufacturers that are subject to the parts-marking requirements may
petition the Secretary of Transportation for an exemption for a line of
passenger motor vehicles equipped with an antitheft device as standard
equipment that the Secretary decides is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements. In accordance with this statute, NHTSA
promulgated 49 CFR part 543, which establishes the process through
which manufacturers may seek an exemption from the theft prevention
standard.
49 CFR 543.5 provides general submission requirements for petitions
and states that each manufacturer may petition NHTSA for an exemption
of one vehicle line per model year. Among other requirements,
manufacturers must identify whether the exemption is sought under
section 543.6 or section 543.7. Under section 543.6, a manufacturer may
request an exemption by providing specific information about the
antitheft device, its capabilities, and the reasons the petitioner
believes the device to be as effective at reducing and deterring theft
as compliance with the parts-marking requirements. Section 543.7
permits a manufacturer to request an exemption under a more streamlined
process if the vehicle line is equipped with an antitheft device (an
``immobilizer'') as standard equipment that complies with one of the
standards specified in that section.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 49 CFR 543.7 specifies that the manufacturer must include a
statement that their entire vehicle line is equipped with an
immobilizer that meets one of the following standards:
(1) The performance criteria (subsections 8 through 21) of
C.R.C, c. 1038.114, Theft Protection and Rollaway Prevention (in
effect March 30, 2011), as excerpted in appendix A of [part 543];
(2) National Standard of Canada CAN/ULC-S338-98, Automobile
Theft Deterrent Equipment and Systems: Electronic Immobilization
(May 1998);
(3) United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE)
Regulation No. 97 (ECE R97), Uniform Provisions Concerning Approval
of Vehicle Alarm System (VAS) and Motor Vehicles with Regard to
Their Alarm System (AS) in effect August 8, 2007; or
(4) UN/ECE Regulation No. 116 (ECE R116), Uniform Technical
Prescriptions Concerning the Protection of Motor Vehicles Against
Unauthorized Use in effect on February 10, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 543.8 establishes requirements for processing petitions for
exemption from the theft prevention standard. As stated in section
543.8(a), NHTSA processes any complete exemption petition. If NHTSA
receives an incomplete petition, NHTSA will notify the petitioner of
the deficiencies. Once NHTSA receives a complete petition the Agency
will process it and, in accordance with section 543.8(b), will grant
the petition if it determines that, based upon substantial evidence,
the standard equipment antitheft device is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements of part 541.
Section 543.8(c) requires NHTSA to issue its decision either to
grant or to deny an exemption petition not later than 120 days after
the date on which a complete petition is filed. If NHTSA does not make
a decision within the 120-day period, the petition shall be deemed to
be approved and the manufacturer shall be exempt from the standard for
the line covered by the petition for the subsequent model year.\2\
Exemptions granted under part 543 apply only to the vehicle line or
lines that are subject to the grant and that are equipped with the
antitheft device on which the line's exemption was based, and are
effective for the model year beginning after the model year in which
NHTSA issues the notice of exemption, unless the notice of exemption
specifies a later year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 49 U.S.C. 33106(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sections 543.8(f) and (g) apply to the manner in which NHTSA's
decisions on petitions are to be made known. Under section 543.8(f), if
the petition is sought under section 543.6, NHTSA publishes a notice of
its decision to grant or deny the exemption petition in the Federal
Register and notifies the petitioner in writing. Under section
543.8(g), if the petition is sought under section 543.7, NHTSA notifies
the petitioner in writing of the Agency's decision to grant or deny the
exemption petition.
This grant of petition for exemption considers Volkswagen Group of
America, Inc.'s (Volkswagen) petition for its ID.7 vehicle line
beginning in MY 2025.
I. Specific Petition Content Requirements Under 49 CFR 543.6
Pursuant to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention, Volkswagen petitioned for an exemption for its specified
vehicle line from the parts-marking requirements of the theft
prevention standard, beginning in MY 2025. Volkswagen petitioned under
49 CFR 543.6, Petition: Specific content requirements, which, as
described above, requires manufacturers to provide specific information
about the antitheft device installed as standard equipment on all
vehicles in the line for which an exemption is sought, the antitheft
device's capabilities, and the reasons the petitioner believes the
device to be as effective at reducing and deterring theft as compliance
with the parts-marking requirements.
More specifically, section 543.6(a)(1) requires petitions to
include a statement that an antitheft device will be installed as
standard equipment on all vehicles in the line for which the exemption
is sought. Under section 543.6(a)(2), each petition must list each
component in the antitheft system and include a diagram showing the
location of each of those components within the vehicle. As required by
section 543.6(a)(3), each petition must include an explanation of the
means and process by which the device is activated and functions,
including any aspect of the device designed to: (1) facilitate or
encourage its activation by motorists; (2) attract attention to the
efforts of an unauthorized person to enter or move a vehicle by means
other than a key; (3) prevent defeating or circumventing the device by
an unauthorized person attempting to enter a vehicle by means other
than a key; (4) prevent the operation of a vehicle which an
unauthorized person has entered using means other than a key; and (5)
ensure the reliability and durability of the device.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 49 CFR 543.6(a)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to providing information about the antitheft device and
its functionality, petitioners must also submit the reasons for their
belief that the antitheft device will be effective in
[[Page 10151]]
reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft, including any theft data
and other data that are available to the petitioner and form a basis
for that belief,\4\ and the reasons for their belief that the Agency
should determine that the antitheft device is likely to be as effective
as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of part 541 in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft. In support of this belief,
the petitioners should include any statistical data that are available
to the petitioner and form the basis for the petitioner's belief that a
line of passenger motor vehicles equipped with the antitheft device is
likely to have a theft rate equal to or less than that of passenger
motor vehicles of the same, or a similar, line which have parts-marked
in compliance with part 541.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 49 CFR 543.6(a)(4).
\5\ 49 CFR 543.6(a)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following sections describe Volkswagen's petition information
provided pursuant to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention. To the extent that specific information in Volkswagen's
petition is subject to a properly filed confidentiality request, that
information was not disclosed as part of this notice.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 49 CFR 512.20(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Volkswagen's Petition for Exemption
In a petition dated May 15, 2025, Volkswagen requested an exemption
from the parts-marking requirements of the theft prevention standard
for its ID.7 vehicle line beginning with MY 2025.
In its petition, Volkswagen provided a detailed description and
diagram of the identity, design, and location of the components of the
antitheft device for its ID.7 vehicle line. Volkswagen stated that its
fifth-generation transponder-based electronic engine immobilizer
antitheft device will be installed as standard equipment on the entire
MY 2025 ID.7 vehicle line. Volkswagen also stated that its ID.7 is an
electric vehicle that will be equipped with a RWD or an AWD
transmission. Key components of the antitheft device will include an
adapted ignition key (ID-transmitter or ``key fob''), In Car
Application Server 1 (ICAS1) with integrated gateway (cluster to CAN
bus, only routing function) and a Power Control Unit (LSG1) in case of
4 motion (all wheel drive) (LSG1 and LSG2). Ford stated that an audible
and visual alarm will be offered as optional equipment.
Pursuant to Section 543.6(a)(3), Volkswagen explained that its
immobilizer device actively incorporates the power control unit into
the evaluation and monitoring process. Volkswagen also stated that
activation of its immobilizer device occurs automatically after the
engine is switched off. Deactivation of the immobilizer device occurs
when the ignition is turned on or the key fob is recognized by the
immobilizer control unit. Specifically, when turning on the ignition
on/off switch, the key transponder sends a fixed code to the
immobilizer control unit. If this is identified as the correct code, a
variable code is generated in the immobilizer control unit and sent to
the transponder. Volkswagen stated that a secret arithmetic process is
then started according to a set of specific equations and that a new
variable code is generated every time the immobilizer goes through the
secret computing process. The results of the computing process are
evaluated in the control unit and if verified, the vehicle key is
acknowledged as correct. The engine control unit then sends a variable
code to the immobilizer control unit for mutual identification. If all
the data matches, the vehicle can be started.
As required in section 543.6(a)(3)(v), Volkswagen provided
information on the reliability and durability of its proposed device.
To ensure reliability and durability of the device, Volkswagen stated
that the antitheft device has been tested for compliance with its
corporate requirements, including those for electrical and electronic
assemblies in motor vehicles related to performance requirements
including electrical system temperature stability, mechanical
integrity, electrical performance, electromagnetic compatibility (EMC),
environmental compatibility and service life.
In accordance with 49 CFR 543.6(a)(5), Volkswagen provided data on
the theft rate of similarly-sized vehicle lines that had been granted
an exemption from the parts-marking requirement. Volkswagen also
referenced the effectiveness of immobilizer devices installed on other
vehicles for which NHTSA has granted exemptions. Specifically,
Volkswagen referenced information from the Highway Loss Data Institute
which showed that BMW vehicles experienced theft loss reductions
resulting in a 73% decrease in relative claim frequency and a 78% lower
average loss payment per claim for vehicles equipped with an
immobilizer. Volkswagen also stated that the National Crime Information
Center's (NCIC) theft data showed that there was a 70% reduction in
theft experienced when comparing the MY 1987 Ford Mustang vehicle
thefts (with immobilizers) to MY 1995 Ford Mustang vehicle thefts
(without immobilizers).
III. Decision To Grant the Petition
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.8(b), the Agency grants
a petition for exemption from the parts-marking requirements of part
541, either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon
substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of part 541. The Agency
finds that Volkswagen has provided adequate reasons for its belief that
the antitheft device for its vehicle line is likely to be as effective
in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements of the theft prevention standard. This
conclusion is based on the information the Volkswagen provided about
its antitheft device. NHTSA believes, based on the supporting evidence
submitted by Volkswagen, that the antitheft device described for its
vehicle line is likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking requirements
of the theft prevention standard.
The Agency concludes that Volkswagen's antitheft device will
provide four of the five types of performance features listed in
section 543.6(a)(3): promoting activation; preventing defeat or
circumvention of the device by unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
The Agency notes that 49 CFR part 541, appendix A-1, identifies
those lines that are exempted from the theft prevention standard for a
given model year. 49 CFR 543.8(f) contains publication requirements
incident to the disposition of all part 543 petitions. Advanced
listing, including the release of future product nameplates, the
beginning model year for which the petition is granted and a general
description of the antitheft device is necessary in order to notify law
enforcement agencies of new vehicle lines exempted from the parts-
marking requirements of the theft prevention standard.
If Volkswagen decides not to use the exemption for its requested
vehicle line, the manufacturer must formally notify the Agency. If such
a decision is made, the line must be fully marked as required by 49 CFR
541.5 and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement
parts).
NHTSA notes that if Volkswagen wishes in the future to modify the
device on which this exemption is
[[Page 10152]]
based, the company may have to submit a petition to modify the
exemption. Section 543.8(d) states that a part 543 exemption applies
only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted under this part and
equipped with the antitheft device on which the line's exemption is
based. Further, section 543.10(c)(2) provides for the submission of
petitions ``to modify an exemption to permit the use of an antitheft
device similar to but differing from the one specified in the
exemption.''
The Agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that
section 543.10(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and
itself. The Agency did not intend in drafting part 543 to require the
submission of a modification petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft device. The significance of many
such changes could be de minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if
Volkswagen contemplates making any changes, the effects of which might
be characterized as de minimis, it should consult the Agency before
preparing and submitting a petition to modify.
For the foregoing reasons, the Agency hereby grants in full
Volkswagen's petition for exemption for the ID.7 vehicle line from the
parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541, beginning with its MY
2025 vehicles.
Issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2024-02865 Filed 2-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
