Forged Steel Fittings From the People's Republic of China, Italy, and Taiwan: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 8167-8169 [2024-02386]
Download as PDF
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 6, 2024 / Notices
amount of dumping calculated for all
U.S. sales to the importer and dividing
this amount by the total entered value
of the merchandise sold to the
importer.10 Where the respondent did
not report entered values, Commerce
will calculate importer-specific
assessment rates by dividing the amount
of dumping for reviewed sales to the
importer by the total quantity of those
sales. Commerce will calculate an
estimated ad valorem importer-specific
assessment rate to determine whether
the per-unit assessment rate is de
minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent or below);
however, Commerce will use the perunit assessment rate where entered
values were not reported.11 Where an
importer-specific ad valorem
assessment rate is not zero or de
minimis, Commerce will instruct CBP to
collect the appropriate duties at the time
of liquidation. Where either the
respondent’s weighted average dumping
margin is zero or de minimis, or an
importer-specific ad valorem
assessment rate is zero or de minimis,
Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate
appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties.12
For entries submitted by an exporter
individually examined during this
review that were not reported in the
U.S. sales database, but that entered
under the case number of that exporter
(i.e., at the individually-examined
exporter’s cash deposit rate), Commerce
will instruct CBP to liquidate such
entries at the China-wide entity rate
(i.e., 154.07 percent).13
For respondents not individually
examined in this administrative review
that qualified for a separate rate (i.e.,
Jianlong, Deosen, and CP Kelco
(Shandong)), the assessment rate will be
the weighted average of the dumping
margin assigned to the mandatory
respondents (i.e., Fufeng and Meihua) in
these final results of this review.
For the respondents not eligible for a
separate rate that are part of the Chinawide entity, we intend to instruct CBP
to apply an ad valorem assessment rate
of 154.07 percent (i.e., the China-wide
entity rate) to all entries of subject
merchandise exported by these
companies during the POR.
Additionally, if Commerce determines
that an exporter under review had no
shipments of the subject merchandise,
any suspended entries that entered
under that exporter’s case number will
be liquidated at the China-wide entity
rate.
10 See
19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
11 Id.
12 See
13 See
19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
Order, 78 FR at 43144.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Feb 05, 2024
Jkt 262001
Cash Deposit Requirements
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act, the cash deposit requirements
effective for shipments of the subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the publication date of the final
results of review will be as follows: (1)
for the exporters listed in the table
above, the cash deposit rate will be the
rate indicated; (2) for previously
investigated or reviewed exporters of
subject merchandise not listed in the
table above that have separate rates, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the
most recently published exporterspecific rate; (3) for all China exporters
of subject merchandise that have not
been found to be entitled to a separate
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the
rate previously established for the
China-wide entity (154.07 percent); and
(4) for all non-China exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate applicable to the China
exporter that supplied that non-China
exporter. The cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification of Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during the POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in
Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility to return or destroy
proprietary information disclosed under
an APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
violation subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
Commerce is issuing and publishing
the final results of this review in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8167
Dated: January 30, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes to the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Selected
an Incorrect Surrogate Value (SV) for
Valuing Bean Pulp
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Double
Counted Energy
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should
Have Selected Other Financial
Statements and Averaged Their Ratios
Comment 4: The Cohen’s d Test
Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should
Have Selected a Different Source for
Water SVs
Comment 6: Whether SAM HPRP
Chemicals, Inc. d/b/a SAM Nutrition
(SAM) Provided Sufficient Record
Evidence to Support Commerce’s
Finding that SAM Was a Wholesaler of
Domestic Like Product during the POR
Comment 7: Whether SAM Acted to the
Best of Its Ability to Respond to
Commerce’s Questionnaires
Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should
Exclude Deosen USA, Inc. from the
Review
Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should
Rescind the Review with Respect to
Deosen Biochemical Ltd.
Comment 10: Whether Commerce Correctly
Calculated the Separate Rate
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2024–02298 Filed 2–5–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–067; A–475–839; A–583–863; C–
570–068]
Forged Steel Fittings From the
People’s Republic of China, Italy, and
Taiwan: Continuation of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Orders
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the
determinations by the U.S. Department
of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S.
International Trade Commission (ITC)
that revocation of the antidumping duty
(AD) orders on forged steel fittings (FSF)
from the People’s Republic of China
(China), Italy, and Taiwan and the
countervailing duty (CVD) order on FSF
from China would likely lead to the
continuation or recurrence of dumping
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
8168
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 6, 2024 / Notices
and countervailable subsidies, and
material injury to an industry in the
United States, Commerce is publishing
a notice of continuation of these AD and
CVD orders.
DATES:
Applicable January 31, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Palmer, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–9068.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
On November 26, 2018, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
AD orders on FSF from China, Italy, and
Taiwan and the CVD order on FSF from
China.1 On August 1, 2023, the ITC
instituted,2 and Commerce initiated,3
the first five-year (sunset) review of the
Orders, pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
As a result of its reviews, Commerce
determined that revocation of the
Orders would likely lead to the
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and countervailable subsidies, and
therefore, notified the ITC of the
magnitude of the margins of dumping
and subsidy rates likely to prevail
should the Orders be revoked.4
On January 31, 2024, the ITC
published its determination, pursuant to
sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act,
that revocation of the Orders would
likely lead to continuation or recurrence
of material injury to an industry in the
United States within a reasonably
foreseeable time.5
1 See Forged Steel Fittings from the People’s
Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 83
FR 60396 (November 26, 2018); Forged Steel
Fittings from Taiwan: Antidumping Duty Order, 83
FR 48280 (September 24, 2018); Forged Steel
Fittings from Italy and the People’s Republic of
China: Antidumping Duty Orders, 83 FR 60397
(November 26, 2018) (collectively, the Orders).
2 See Forged Steel Fittings from China, Italy, and
Taiwan; Institution of Five-Year Reviews, 88 FR
50172 (August 1, 2023).
3 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 88
FR 50110 (August 1, 2023).
4 See Forged Steel Fittings from the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited
First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty
Order, 88 FR 83903 (December 1, 2023), and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum
(IDM); see also Forged Steel Fittings from the
People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, and Italy: Final
Results of the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders, 88 FR 83909 (December
1, 2023), and accompanying IDM.
5 See Forged Steel Fittings from China, Italy, and
Taiwan, 89 FR 6131 (January 31, 2024) (ITC Final
Determination).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Feb 05, 2024
Jkt 262001
Scope of the Orders
The products covered by the Orders
are carbon and alloy forged steel fittings,
whether unfinished (commonly known
as blanks or rough forgings) or finished.
Such fittings are made in a variety of
shapes including, but not limited to,
elbows, tees, crosses, laterals, couplings,
reducers, caps, plugs, bushings, unions,
and outlets. Forged steel fittings are
covered regardless of end finish,
whether threaded, socket-weld or other
end connections.
While these fittings are generally
manufactured to specifications ASME
B16.11, MSS SP–79, MSS SP–83, MSS
SP–97, ASTM A105, ASTM A350, and
ASTM A182, the scope is not limited to
fittings made to these specifications.
The term forged is an industry term
used to describe a class of products
included in applicable standards, and
does not reference an exclusive
manufacturing process. Forged steel
fittings are not manufactured from
casting. Pursuant to the applicable
specifications, subject fittings may also
be machined from bar stock or
machined from seamless pipe and tube.
All types of fittings are included in
the scope regardless of nominal pipe
size (which may or may not be
expressed in inches of nominal pipe
size), pressure rating (usually, but not
necessarily expressed in pounds of
pressure/PSI, e.g., 2,000 or 2M; 3,000 or
3M; 6,000 or 6M; 9,000 or 9M), wall
thickness, and whether or not heat
treated. Excluded from this scope are all
fittings entirely made of stainless steel.
Also excluded are flanges, butt weld
fittings, butt weld outlets, nipples, and
all fittings that have a maximum
pressure rating of 300 pounds of
pressure/PSI or less.
Also excluded are fittings certified or
made to the following standards, so long
as the fittings are not also manufactured
to the specifications of ASME B16.11,
MSS SP–79, MSS SP–83, MSS SP–97,
ASTM A105, ASTM A350, and ASTM
A182:
• American Petroleum Institute
(API)5CT, API5L, or API 11B
• Society of Automotive Engineering
(SAE) J476, SAE J514, SAE J516, SAE
J517, SAE J518, SAE J1026, SAE
J1231, SAE J1453, SAE J1926, J2044 or
SAE AS 35411
• Underwriter’s Laboratories
(UL)certified electrical conduit
fittings
• ASTMA153, A536, A576, or A865
• Casing Conductor Connectors 16–42
inches in diameter made to
proprietary specifications
• Military Specification (MIL) MIL–C–
4109F and MIL–F–3541
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• International Organization for
Standardization (ISO) ISO 6150–B
To be excluded from the scope,
products must have the appropriate
standard or pressure markings and/or be
accompanied by documentation
showing product compliance to the
applicable standard or pressure, e.g.,
‘‘API 5CT’’ mark and/or a mill
certification report.
Subject carbon and alloy forged steel
fittings are normally entered under
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) subheadings
7307.99.1000, 7307.99.3000,
7307.99.5045, and7307.99.5060. They
also may be entered under HTSUS
subheadings 7307.92.3010,
7307.92.3030, 7307.92.9000, and
7326.19.0010. The HTSUS subheadings
and specifications are provided for
convenience and customs purposes; the
written description of the scope is
dispositive.6
Continuation of the Orders
As a result of the determinations by
Commerce and the ITC that revocation
of the Orders would likely lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping,
countervailable subsidies, and material
injury to an industry in the United
States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of
the Act, Commerce hereby orders the
continuation of the Orders. U.S.
Customs and Border Protection will
continue to collect AD and CVD cash
deposits at the rates in effect at the time
of entry for all imports of subject
merchandise.
The effective date of the continuation
of the Orders will be January 31, 2024.7
Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.218(c)(2), Commerce
intends to initiate the next five-year
reviews of the Orders not later than 30
days prior to fifth anniversary of the
date of the last determination by the
ITC.
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to parties subject to an APO of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3),
which continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
violation which is subject to sanction.
6 See
7 See
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
Orders.
ITC Final Determination.
06FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 6, 2024 / Notices
Notification to Interested Parties
These five-year (sunset) reviews and
this notice are in accordance with
sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act
and published in accordance with
section 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.218(f)(4).
Dated: January 31, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2024–02386 Filed 2–5–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–130]
Certain Walk-Behind Lawn Mowers and
Parts Thereof From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review; 2020–2021
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
Ningbo Daye Garden Machinery Co.,
Ltd. (Ningbo Daye), a producer/exporter
of certain walk-behind lawn mowers
and parts thereof (lawn mowers) from
the People’s Republic of China (China),
received countervailable subsidies
during the period of review (POR),
October 30, 2020, through December 31,
2021.
DATES: Applicable February 6, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Natasia Harrison or Harrison Tanchuck,
AD/CVD Operations, Office VI,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1240 or
(202) 482–7421, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Background
On August 3, 2023, Commerce
published the Preliminary Results of
this administrative review in the
Federal Register and invited interest
parties to comment.1 We received
timely-filed case briefs from the
Government of China (GOC) and Ningbo
1 See
Certain Walk-Behind Lawn Mowers and
Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review and Rescission of Review, in
Part; 2020–2021, 88 FR 51269 (August 3, 2023)
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Feb 05, 2024
Jkt 262001
Daye.2 On November 17, 2023,
Commerce extended the deadline for
issuing these final results to January 30,
2024.3 For a complete description of the
events that occurred since the
publication of the Preliminary Results,
see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.4
Scope of the Order 5
The merchandise covered by the
Order is lawn mowers from China. For
a complete description of the scope of
the Order, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.6
8169
countervailable, we find that there is a
subsidy, i.e., a government-provided
financial contribution that gives rise to
a benefit to the recipient, and that the
subsidy is specific.7 For a full
description of the methodology
underlying Commerce’s conclusions,
including any determination that relied
upon the use of adverse facts available,
pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of
the Act, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Final Results of Administrative Review
We determine the following net
countervailable subsidy rate exists for
the period October 30, 2020, through
December 31, 2021:
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised by interested parties
in their case briefs are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A
Subsidy
Subsidy
rate for the rate for the
list of the topics discussed in the Issues
period
period
and Decision Memorandum is provided
October
January 1,
in the appendix to this notice. The
30, 2020,
2021,
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
Company
through
through
public document and is on file
December December
31, 2020
31, 2021
electronically via Enforcement and
(percent
(percent
Compliance’s Antidumping and
ad
ad
Countervailing Duty Centralized
valorem)
valorem)
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
Ningbo Daye GarACCESS is available to registered users
den Machinery
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
Co., Ltd.8 ...........
9.12
8.57
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
Disclosure
directly at https://access.trade.gov/
public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Commerce intends to disclose to the
calculations performed in connection
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
with the final results of review within
Based on our analysis of the
five days of a public announcement or,
comments received from interested
if there is no public announcement,
parties and the evidence on the record,
within five days of the date of
we revised the calculation of the net
publication of the notice of final results
countervailable subsidy rate for Ningbo
in the Federal Register, in accordance
Daye. For a full description of these
with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
revisions, see the Issues and Decision
Assessment Rates
Memorandum.
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Methodology
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2),
Commerce conducted this
Commerce has determined, and U.S.
administrative review in accordance
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff
shall assess, countervailing duties on all
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For
appropriate entries of subject
each of the subsidy programs found
merchandise covered by this review.
Commerce intends to issue assessment
2 See GOC’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief,’’ dated September
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35
12, 2023; Ningbo Daye’s Letter, ‘‘Ningbo Daye’s
days after the date of publication of the
Case Brief,’’ dated September 12, 2023.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for
final results of this review in the
Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Federal Register. If a timely summons is
Review; 2020–2021,’’ dated November 17, 2023.
filed at the U.S. Court of International
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Trade, the assessment instructions will
Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant
Certain Walk-Behind Lawn Mowers and Parts
entries until the time for parties to file
Thereof from the People’s Republic of China; 2020–
a request for a statutory injunction has
2021,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
5 See Certain Walk-Behind Lawn Mowers and
Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China:
Countervailing Duty Order and Amended Final
Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, 86
FR 36702 (July 13, 2021) (Order).
6 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 2–3.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
the Act regarding specificity.
8 This rate applies to Ningbo Daye and its crossowned companies: Zhejiang Jindaye Holdings
Limited and Ningbo Lingyue.
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8167-8169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02386]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-067; A-475-839; A-583-863; C-570-068]
Forged Steel Fittings From the People's Republic of China, Italy,
and Taiwan: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC)
that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on forged steel
fittings (FSF) from the People's Republic of China (China), Italy, and
Taiwan and the countervailing duty (CVD) order on FSF from China would
likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping
[[Page 8168]]
and countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an industry in
the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of
these AD and CVD orders.
DATES: Applicable January 31, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Palmer, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-9068.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 26, 2018, Commerce published in the Federal Register
the AD orders on FSF from China, Italy, and Taiwan and the CVD order on
FSF from China.\1\ On August 1, 2023, the ITC instituted,\2\ and
Commerce initiated,\3\ the first five-year (sunset) review of the
Orders, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). As a result of its reviews, Commerce determined that
revocation of the Orders would likely lead to the continuation or
recurrence of dumping and countervailable subsidies, and therefore,
notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins of dumping and subsidy
rates likely to prevail should the Orders be revoked.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Forged Steel Fittings from the People's Republic of
China: Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR 60396 (November 26, 2018);
Forged Steel Fittings from Taiwan: Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR
48280 (September 24, 2018); Forged Steel Fittings from Italy and the
People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Orders, 83 FR 60397
(November 26, 2018) (collectively, the Orders).
\2\ See Forged Steel Fittings from China, Italy, and Taiwan;
Institution of Five-Year Reviews, 88 FR 50172 (August 1, 2023).
\3\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 88 FR 50110
(August 1, 2023).
\4\ See Forged Steel Fittings from the People's Republic of
China: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the
Countervailing Duty Order, 88 FR 83903 (December 1, 2023), and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (IDM); see also Forged
Steel Fittings from the People's Republic of China, Taiwan, and
Italy: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders, 88 FR 83909 (December 1, 2023), and
accompanying IDM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On January 31, 2024, the ITC published its determination, pursuant
to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, that revocation of the Orders
would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to
an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable
time.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Forged Steel Fittings from China, Italy, and Taiwan, 89
FR 6131 (January 31, 2024) (ITC Final Determination).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Orders
The products covered by the Orders are carbon and alloy forged
steel fittings, whether unfinished (commonly known as blanks or rough
forgings) or finished. Such fittings are made in a variety of shapes
including, but not limited to, elbows, tees, crosses, laterals,
couplings, reducers, caps, plugs, bushings, unions, and outlets. Forged
steel fittings are covered regardless of end finish, whether threaded,
socket-weld or other end connections.
While these fittings are generally manufactured to specifications
ASME B16.11, MSS SP-79, MSS SP-83, MSS SP-97, ASTM A105, ASTM A350, and
ASTM A182, the scope is not limited to fittings made to these
specifications.
The term forged is an industry term used to describe a class of
products included in applicable standards, and does not reference an
exclusive manufacturing process. Forged steel fittings are not
manufactured from casting. Pursuant to the applicable specifications,
subject fittings may also be machined from bar stock or machined from
seamless pipe and tube.
All types of fittings are included in the scope regardless of
nominal pipe size (which may or may not be expressed in inches of
nominal pipe size), pressure rating (usually, but not necessarily
expressed in pounds of pressure/PSI, e.g., 2,000 or 2M; 3,000 or 3M;
6,000 or 6M; 9,000 or 9M), wall thickness, and whether or not heat
treated. Excluded from this scope are all fittings entirely made of
stainless steel. Also excluded are flanges, butt weld fittings, butt
weld outlets, nipples, and all fittings that have a maximum pressure
rating of 300 pounds of pressure/PSI or less.
Also excluded are fittings certified or made to the following
standards, so long as the fittings are not also manufactured to the
specifications of ASME B16.11, MSS SP-79, MSS SP-83, MSS SP-97, ASTM
A105, ASTM A350, and ASTM A182:
American Petroleum Institute (API)5CT, API5L, or API 11B
Society of Automotive Engineering (SAE) J476, SAE J514, SAE
J516, SAE J517, SAE J518, SAE J1026, SAE J1231, SAE J1453, SAE J1926,
J2044 or SAE AS 35411
Underwriter's Laboratories (UL)certified electrical conduit
fittings
ASTMA153, A536, A576, or A865
Casing Conductor Connectors 16-42 inches in diameter made to
proprietary specifications
Military Specification (MIL) MIL-C-4109F and MIL-F-3541
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) ISO 6150-
B
To be excluded from the scope, products must have the appropriate
standard or pressure markings and/or be accompanied by documentation
showing product compliance to the applicable standard or pressure,
e.g., ``API 5CT'' mark and/or a mill certification report.
Subject carbon and alloy forged steel fittings are normally entered
under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
subheadings 7307.99.1000, 7307.99.3000, 7307.99.5045, and7307.99.5060.
They also may be entered under HTSUS subheadings 7307.92.3010,
7307.92.3030, 7307.92.9000, and 7326.19.0010. The HTSUS subheadings and
specifications are provided for convenience and customs purposes; the
written description of the scope is dispositive.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Continuation of the Orders
As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that
revocation of the Orders would likely lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping, countervailable subsidies, and material injury
to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of
the Act, Commerce hereby orders the continuation of the Orders. U.S.
Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD and CVD cash
deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of
subject merchandise.
The effective date of the continuation of the Orders will be
January 31, 2024.\7\ Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.218(c)(2), Commerce intends to initiate the next five-year
reviews of the Orders not later than 30 days prior to fifth anniversary
of the date of the last determination by the ITC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See ITC Final Determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to
an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which
is subject to sanction.
[[Page 8169]]
Notification to Interested Parties
These five-year (sunset) reviews and this notice are in accordance
with sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act and published in
accordance with section 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4).
Dated: January 31, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2024-02386 Filed 2-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P