Large Diameter Welded Pipe From Canada: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021-2022, 3380-3382 [2024-00904]

Download as PDF 3380 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 12 / Thursday, January 18, 2024 / Notices International Trade Administration December 13, 2023, Commerce published its final results of administrative review.4 [A–122–863] Legal Framework Large Diameter Welded Pipe From Canada: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021–2022 Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), defines a ‘‘ministerial error’’ as including ‘‘errors in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical errors resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other unintentional error which the administering authority considers ministerial.’’ With respect to final results of administrative reviews, 19 CFR 351.224(e) provides that Commerce ‘‘will analyze any comments received and, if appropriate, correct any ministerial error by amending . . . the final results of review . . .’’ DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large diameter welded pipe (welded pipe) from Canada to correct a ministerial error. Based on the amended final results, we find that welded pipe from Canada was not sold in the United States at less than normal value (NV), during the period of review (POR), May 1, 2021, through April 30, 2022. DATES: Applicable January 18, 2024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Faris Montgomery, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1537. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES On December 5, 2023, Commerce disclosed its calculations to interested parties and provided interested parties with the opportunity to submit ministerial error comments.1 On December 11, 2023, Evraz 2 submitted an allegation of a ministerial error in the Final Results.3 No other party made a ministerial error allegation or provided rebuttal comments in response to Evraz’s ministerial error allegation. On 1 See Memorandum, ‘‘Deadline for Ministerial Error Comments for the Final Results,’’ dated December 6, 2023. 2 In the underlying investigation, Commerce treated Evraz Inc. NA, Evraz Inc. NA Canada, and the Canadian National Steel Corporation (collectively, Evraz) as a single entity. See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 84 FR 6378 (February 27, 2019). There is no information on this record of this review that warrants reconsideration of this single entity determination. 3 See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2021–2022, 88 FR 86316 (December 13, 2023) (Final Results), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (IDM). See also Evraz’s Letter, ‘‘Ministerial Error Comments for the Final Results,’’ dated December 11, 2023 (Ministerial Error Allegation). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:32 Jan 17, 2024 Jkt 262001 Ministerial Error Commerce has determined that it made a ministerial error in the Final Results within the meaning of section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f). In the Final Results, we made certain revisions to the preliminary results based on minor corrections found at verification to the cost of coating revenue for certain home market sales.5 In its ministerial error allegation, Evraz stated that in revising the coating revenue for certain home market sales based on minor corrections, Commerce did not apply the corrected values properly to certain applicable fields in Evraz’s home market sales data, and the correction was consequently not accounted for in Evraz’s final margin calculations.6 Commerce determines that it made a ministerial error in the Final Results pursuant to section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f) and has amended its calculations with regard to the coating revenue revised as a result of verification. For a complete discussion of the ministerial error allegation, as well as Commerce’s analysis, see the accompanying Ministerial Error Memorandum.7 The Ministerial Error Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. 4 See Final Results IDM. at 3. 6 See Ministerial Error Allegation at 2–3. 7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Ministerial Error Allegation in the Final Results,’’ dated concurrently with this notice (Ministerial Error Memorandum). 5 Id. PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(e), Commerce is amending the Final Results to reflect the correction of this ministerial error in the calculation of the weighted-average dumping margin assigned to Evraz in the Final Results, which changes from 9.17 percent to 0.00 percent. Rate for Non-Examined Companies The statute and Commerce’s regulations do not address the establishment of a weighted-average dumping margin to be determined for companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an investigation, for guidance when determining the weighted-average dumping margin for companies which were not selected for individual examination in an administrative review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis or determined entirely on the basis of facts available. As discussed in these amended final results of review, we calculated a weighted-average dumping margin that is zero for Evraz, the sole mandatory respondent in this administrative review. Because this is the only weighted-average dumping margin determined in this review for an individually examined respondent, we are applying this rate to the nonexamined companies under review consistent with section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act. Accordingly, we are amending the rate applied to the 36 non-examined companies under review 8 in the Final Results, from 9.17 percent to 0.00 percent. Amended Final Results As a result of correcting the ministerial error, Commerce determines that the following estimated weightedaverage dumping margins exists for the period May 1, 2021, through April 30, 2022: 8 See E:\FR\FM\18JAN1.SGM Appendix. 18JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 12 / Thursday, January 18, 2024 / Notices 3381 Weighted-average dumping margin (percent) Exporter or producer Evraz Inc. NA, Evraz Inc. NA Canada, and the Canadian National Steel Corporation ............................................................. Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination .................................................................................................................. Disclosure Cash Deposit Requirements We intend to disclose to parties in this proceeding, under administrative protective order, the margin calculations performed for these amended final results within five days after publication of these amended final results in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). The following deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the companies listed above will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin that is established in the amended final results of this review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed companies not subject to this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of the proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers and exporters will continue to be 12.32 percent ad valorem, the allothers rate established in the LTFV investigation.11 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Assessment Rates khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with these amended final results of review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 41 days after the date of publication of the amended final results of this review in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 356.8(a). Because the weighted-average dumping margin for Evraz is zero percent, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.9 Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ practice will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Evraz for which the company did not know that the merchandise it sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading company, or exporter) was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.10 Because the weighted-average dumping margin assigned to the companies which were not selected for individual examination is zero percent, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. 9 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 2012). 10 For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:32 Jan 17, 2024 Jkt 262001 Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. 11 See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada: Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 18775 (May 2, 2019). PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 0.00 0.00 Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(h) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.224(e). Dated: January 9, 2024. Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix Review-Specific Rate Applicable to Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination 1. Acier Profile SBB Inc 2. Aciers Lague Steels Inc 3. Amdor Inc 4. BPC Services Group 5. Bri-Steel Manufacturing 6. Canada Culvert 7. Cappco Tubular Products Canada Inc. 8. CFI Metal Inc 9. Dominion Pipe & Piling 10. Enduro Canada Pipeline Services 11. Fi Oilfield Services Canada 12. Gchem Ltd. 13. Graham Construction 14. Groupe Fordia Inc 15. Grupo Fordia Inc 16. Hodgson Custom Rolling 17. Interpipe Inc 18. K K Recycling Services 19. Kobelt Manufacturing Co 20. Labrie Environment 21. Les Aciers Sofatec 22. Lorenz Conveying P 23. Lorenz Conveying Products 24. Matrix Manufacturing 25. MBI Produits De Forge 26. Nor Arc 27. Peak Drilling Ltd 28. Pipe & Piling Sply Ltd 29. Pipe & Piling Supplies 30. Prudental 31. Prudential E:\FR\FM\18JAN1.SGM 18JAN1 3382 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 12 / Thursday, January 18, 2024 / Notices 32. Shaw Pipe Protecction 33. Shaw Pipe Protection 34. Tenaris Algoma Tubes Facility 35. Tenaris Prudential 36. Welded Tube of Can Ltd [FR Doc. 2024–00904 Filed 1–17–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Announcement of U.S. Company Recruitment for the March 11–12, 2024 Presidential Trade and Investment Mission to the Philippines International Trade Administration (ITA), Department of Commerce (DOC). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The U.S. Department of Commerce is assisting the White House in recruitment of U.S. companies to participate in a Presidential Trade and Investment Mission to the Philippines. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elliott Brewer, Philippines Desk Officer, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202–430–8025; email: elliott.brewer@trade.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States seeks to send a Presidential Trade and Investment Mission (PTIM) to the Philippines from March 11–12, 2024. The intent to dispatch the PTIM was announced by President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. on May 1, 2023, during the visit of Philippine President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr. to Washington, DC. As described in the White House’s fact sheet on ‘‘Investing in the Special Friendship and Alliance Between the United States and the Philippines,’’ the purpose of the PTIM is to enhance U.S. companies’ investment in the Philippines’ innovation economy, its clean energy transition and critical minerals sector, and the food security of its people. The mission will feature the highest caliber of U.S. business leaders dedicated to strengthening U.S.-Philippine trade and investment ties in these areas. Trade mission delegates will meet with Government of Philippines officials in Manila to learn more about business development incentives and to discuss regulatory reforms. These discussions will help identify policy actions that support mutually beneficial economic and commercial outcomes. Trade mission delegates will also be able to join networking events with relevant local firms and business organizations to foster business-to-business trade and investment promotion opportunities. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:32 Jan 17, 2024 Jkt 262001 The U.S. Department of Commerce is assisting the White House in recruitment of U.S. companies to participate in the PTIM and welcomes statements of interest in participation in the PTIM from U.S.-headquartered companies that can help the United States and Philippines achieve the goals described above. Priority will be given to companies that are (1) willing to participate in the PTIM at the Chief Executive Officer, President, or other senior executive level, (2) conducting or developing plans to conduct business in both countries, and (3) engaged in work related to the clean energy transition, critical minerals sector, food security, or that promotes the Philippines’ innovation economy, including its digital transformation, and/or greater supply chain resilience. This list of business areas is not intended to be exhaustive. Each company that is selected will be permitted to have one primary representative at the Chief Executive Officer, President, or other senior executive level join the PTIM, along with one additional supporting representative. Company representatives must be able to travel to the Philippines and to locations in the United States to attend PTIM meetings, as well as PTIM preparatory meetings. Travel and inperson activities are contingent upon the safety and health conditions in the United States and the Philippines. Should safety or health conditions not be appropriate for travel and/or inperson activities, one or more meetings may be postponed or scheduled virtually instead. It is also possible that the entire mission would be postponed or cancelled in response to changes in safety or health conditions. No fees will be collected from trade mission delegates. Trade mission delegates and their sponsoring companies will be responsible for covering all travel, lodging, meals, and incidental expenses associated with the PTIM. Interested companies should submit the following information to the U.S. Department of Commerce at PTIM@ trade.gov by Tuesday, January 30, 2024: • Company Name; • Name of Chief Executive Officer or President; • U.S. State of Incorporation; • Corporate Headquarters; • Principal Place of Business; • Main Address (Street Address, City, State, and Zip Code); • List of Subsidiary or Affiliate Offices in Asia (including in the Philippines); • Industry Area(s); • Main Products and Services; PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 • A brief (up to one page) Statement of Interest explaining: Æ Your company’s goals and qualifications for the mission. Æ How your company’s participation in the mission will strengthen U.S.Philippines trade and investment ties. Æ How your company’s work can support the clean energy transition, critical minerals sector, food security, or innovation economy—including efforts to advance digital transformation and/or greater supply chain resilience in the Philippines. • Name, title, work email, phone number, and biography of your Chief Executive Officer, President, or other senior executive who would represent the company on the PTIM. • Name, title, work email, and phone number of the main working-level point of contact that will facilitate the senior executive’s participation in the mission. • Name, title, work email, phone number, and biography of one optional accompanying staff person (if applicable). The selection of companies for the PTIM will be evaluated on a comparative basis by: (1) the level of executive representation; (2) consistency of the applicant’s goals and objectives with the stated scope of the mission; (3) suitability of the applicant’s products or services to the Philippines market; and (4) the applicant’s potential for developing trade and investment opportunities in the Philippines market. Statements of interest received after January 30 will be considered only if space and scheduling constraints permit. Please direct any questions or requests for more information about the PTIM to Mr. Elliott Brewer at 202–430– 8025 or elliott.brewer@trade.gov. David Nufrio, Deputy Director of the Office of Southeast Asia. [FR Doc. 2024–00913 Filed 1–17–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–FP–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–475–819] Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2021 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies were provided to certain producers and exporters of AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\18JAN1.SGM 18JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3380-3382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00904]



[[Page 3380]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-122-863]


Large Diameter Welded Pipe From Canada: Amended Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021-2022

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending the 
final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty 
order on large diameter welded pipe (welded pipe) from Canada to 
correct a ministerial error. Based on the amended final results, we 
find that welded pipe from Canada was not sold in the United States at 
less than normal value (NV), during the period of review (POR), May 1, 
2021, through April 30, 2022.

DATES: Applicable January 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Faris Montgomery, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1537.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 5, 2023, Commerce disclosed its calculations to 
interested parties and provided interested parties with the opportunity 
to submit ministerial error comments.\1\ On December 11, 2023, Evraz 
\2\ submitted an allegation of a ministerial error in the Final 
Results.\3\ No other party made a ministerial error allegation or 
provided rebuttal comments in response to Evraz's ministerial error 
allegation. On December 13, 2023, Commerce published its final results 
of administrative review.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Memorandum, ``Deadline for Ministerial Error Comments 
for the Final Results,'' dated December 6, 2023.
    \2\ In the underlying investigation, Commerce treated Evraz Inc. 
NA, Evraz Inc. NA Canada, and the Canadian National Steel 
Corporation (collectively, Evraz) as a single entity. See Large 
Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada: Final Affirmative Determination of 
Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 84 FR 6378 (February 27, 2019). There 
is no information on this record of this review that warrants 
reconsideration of this single entity determination.
    \3\ See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No 
Shipments; 2021-2022, 88 FR 86316 (December 13, 2023) (Final 
Results), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (IDM). See 
also Evraz's Letter, ``Ministerial Error Comments for the Final 
Results,'' dated December 11, 2023 (Ministerial Error Allegation).
    \4\ See Final Results IDM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Legal Framework

    Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 
defines a ``ministerial error'' as including ``errors in addition, 
subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical errors resulting 
from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other 
unintentional error which the administering authority considers 
ministerial.'' With respect to final results of administrative reviews, 
19 CFR 351.224(e) provides that Commerce ``will analyze any comments 
received and, if appropriate, correct any ministerial error by amending 
. . . the final results of review . . .''

Ministerial Error

    Commerce has determined that it made a ministerial error in the 
Final Results within the meaning of section 751(h) of the Act and 19 
CFR 351.224(f). In the Final Results, we made certain revisions to the 
preliminary results based on minor corrections found at verification to 
the cost of coating revenue for certain home market sales.\5\ In its 
ministerial error allegation, Evraz stated that in revising the coating 
revenue for certain home market sales based on minor corrections, 
Commerce did not apply the corrected values properly to certain 
applicable fields in Evraz's home market sales data, and the correction 
was consequently not accounted for in Evraz's final margin 
calculations.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id. at 3.
    \6\ See Ministerial Error Allegation at 2-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce determines that it made a ministerial error in the Final 
Results pursuant to section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f) and 
has amended its calculations with regard to the coating revenue revised 
as a result of verification.
    For a complete discussion of the ministerial error allegation, as 
well as Commerce's analysis, see the accompanying Ministerial Error 
Memorandum.\7\ The Ministerial Error Memorandum is a public document 
and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Memorandum, ``Ministerial Error Allegation in the Final 
Results,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Ministerial Error 
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(e), Commerce is amending the Final 
Results to reflect the correction of this ministerial error in the 
calculation of the weighted-average dumping margin assigned to Evraz in 
the Final Results, which changes from 9.17 percent to 0.00 percent.

Rate for Non-Examined Companies

    The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the 
establishment of a weighted-average dumping margin to be determined for 
companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits 
its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 
777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) 
of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others 
rate in an investigation, for guidance when determining the weighted-
average dumping margin for companies which were not selected for 
individual examination in an administrative review. Under section 
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally an amount 
equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping 
margins established for exporters and producers individually 
investigated, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis or determined 
entirely on the basis of facts available.
    As discussed in these amended final results of review, we 
calculated a weighted-average dumping margin that is zero for Evraz, 
the sole mandatory respondent in this administrative review. Because 
this is the only weighted-average dumping margin determined in this 
review for an individually examined respondent, we are applying this 
rate to the non-examined companies under review consistent with section 
735(c)(5)(B) of the Act. Accordingly, we are amending the rate applied 
to the 36 non-examined companies under review \8\ in the Final Results, 
from 9.17 percent to 0.00 percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Appendix.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Results

    As a result of correcting the ministerial error, Commerce 
determines that the following estimated weighted-average dumping 
margins exists for the period May 1, 2021, through April 30, 2022:

[[Page 3381]]



------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Weighted-average
                Exporter or producer                    dumping margin
                                                           (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evraz Inc. NA, Evraz Inc. NA Canada, and the                        0.00
 Canadian National Steel Corporation................
Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination...                0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose to parties in this proceeding, under 
administrative protective order, the margin calculations performed for 
these amended final results within five days after publication of these 
amended final results in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 
CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with these amended final 
results of review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to 
CBP no earlier than 41 days after the date of publication of the 
amended final results of this review in the Federal Register, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 356.8(a).
    Because the weighted-average dumping margin for Evraz is zero 
percent, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries 
without regard to antidumping duties.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 
2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' practice will apply to entries 
of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Evraz for which the 
company did not know that the merchandise it sold to the intermediary 
(e.g., a reseller, trading company, or exporter) was destined for the 
United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate 
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the 
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Because the weighted-average dumping margin assigned to the 
companies which were not selected for individual examination is zero 
percent, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries 
without regard to antidumping duties.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the companies 
listed above will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin that 
is established in the amended final results of this review, except if 
the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within 
the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit 
rate will be zero; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed 
companies not subject to this review, the cash deposit rate will 
continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most 
recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company 
participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, 
a prior review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 
investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the 
rate established for the most recently completed segment of the 
proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash 
deposit rate for all other producers and exporters will continue to be 
12.32 percent ad valorem, the all-others rate established in the LTFV 
investigation.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada: Antidumping 
Duty Order, 84 FR 18775 (May 2, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in 
effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement 
of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double 
antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to an 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or 
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective 
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and 
the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(h) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.224(e).

    Dated: January 9, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

Review-Specific Rate Applicable to Companies Not Selected for 
Individual Examination

1. Acier Profile SBB Inc
2. Aciers Lague Steels Inc
3. Amdor Inc
4. BPC Services Group
5. Bri-Steel Manufacturing
6. Canada Culvert
7. Cappco Tubular Products Canada Inc.
8. CFI Metal Inc
9. Dominion Pipe & Piling
10. Enduro Canada Pipeline Services
11. Fi Oilfield Services Canada
12. Gchem Ltd.
13. Graham Construction
14. Groupe Fordia Inc
15. Grupo Fordia Inc
16. Hodgson Custom Rolling
17. Interpipe Inc
18. K K Recycling Services
19. Kobelt Manufacturing Co
20. Labrie Environment
21. Les Aciers Sofatec
22. Lorenz Conveying P
23. Lorenz Conveying Products
24. Matrix Manufacturing
25. MBI Produits De Forge
26. Nor Arc
27. Peak Drilling Ltd
28. Pipe & Piling Sply Ltd
29. Pipe & Piling Supplies
30. Prudental
31. Prudential

[[Page 3382]]

32. Shaw Pipe Protecction
33. Shaw Pipe Protection
34. Tenaris Algoma Tubes Facility
35. Tenaris Prudential
36. Welded Tube of Can Ltd

[FR Doc. 2024-00904 Filed 1-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.