Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule To Remove the Cross Asset Tier, 3005-3007 [2024-00711]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Notices
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–99310; File No. SR–
CboeBZX–2024–001]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its
Fee Schedule To Remove the Cross
Asset Tier
January 10, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January 2,
2024, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’) proposes to
amend its Fee Schedule. The text of the
proposed rule change is provided in
Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/
equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1 15
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Fee Schedule applicable to its equities
trading platform (‘‘BZX Equities’’) by
deleting the Cross Asset Tier (and a
related definition) from the Fee
Schedule. The Exchange proposes to
implement these changes effective
January 2, 2024.
The Exchange first notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive or
incentives to be insufficient. More
specifically, the Exchange is only one of
16 registered equities exchanges, as well
as a number of alternative trading
systems and other off-exchange venues
that do not have similar self-regulatory
responsibilities under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’), to
which market participants may direct
their order flow. Based on publicly
available information,3 no single
registered equities exchange has more
than 15% of the market share. Thus, in
such a low-concentrated and highly
competitive market, no single equities
exchange possesses significant pricing
power in the execution of order flow.
The Exchange in particular operates a
‘‘Maker-Taker’’ model whereby it pays
rebates to members that add liquidity
and assesses fees to those that remove
liquidity. The Exchange’s Fee Schedule
sets forth the standard rebates and rates
applied per share for orders that provide
and remove liquidity, respectively.
Currently, for orders in securities priced
at or above $1.00, the Exchange
provides a standard rebate of $0.00160
per share for orders that add liquidity
and assesses a fee of $0.0030 per share
for orders that remove liquidity.4 For
orders in securities priced below $1.00,
the Exchange provides a standard rebate
of $0.00009 [sic] per share for orders
that add liquidity and assesses a fee of
0.30% of the total dollar value for orders
that remove liquidity.5 Additionally, in
response to the competitive
environment, the Exchange also offers
tiered pricing which provides Members
opportunities to qualify for higher
rebates or reduced fees where certain
volume criteria and thresholds are met.
3 See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market
Volume Summary, Month-to-Date (December 19,
2023), available at https://www.cboe.com/us/
equities/market_statistics/.
4 See BZX Equities Fee Schedule, Standard Rates.
5 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3005
Tiered pricing provides an incremental
incentive for Members to strive for
higher tier levels, which provides
increasingly higher benefits or discounts
for satisfying increasingly more
stringent criteria.
Cross Asset Tier
Under footnote 2 of the Fee Schedule,
the Exchange offers various Step-Up
Tiers that provide enhanced rebates for
orders yielding fee codes B,6 V 7 and Y 8
where a Member reaches certain add
volume-based criteria, including
‘‘growing’’ its volume over a certain
baseline month. Additionally, under
footnote 2, the Exchange offers a Cross
Asset Tier which is designed to
incentivize Members to achieve certain
levels of participation on both the
Exchange’s equities and options
platform (‘‘BZX Options’’). The
Exchange now proposes to delete the
Cross Asset Tier from the Fee Schedule
as the tier expired on December 31,
2023. Additionally, the Exchange does
not wish to, nor is required to, maintain
such tier by proposing to amend the
expiration date or the criteria associated
with the Cross Asset Tier. More
specifically, the proposed change lets
this tier expire as the Exchange would
rather redirect future resources and
funding into other programs and tiers
intended to incentivize increased order
flow. In conjunction with discontinuing
the Cross Asset Tier, the Exchange
proposes to remove the definition of
Customer ADAV 9 from its fee schedule
as this definition is not used for any
other tier.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Act
and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.10 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 11 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
6 Fee code B is appended to displayed orders that
add liquidity to BZX in Tape B securities.
7 Fee code V is appended to displayed orders that
add liquidity to BZX in Tape A securities.
8 Fee code Y is appended to displayed orders that
add liquidity to BZX in Tape C securities.
9 Customer ADAV means average daily volume
calculated as the number of contracts added for the
account of a Priority Customer as defined in BZX
Rule 16.1.
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
3006
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Notices
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 12 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers as
well as Section 6(b)(4) 13 as it is
designed to provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among its Members and
other persons using its facilities.
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to eliminate the Cross Asset
Tier and the related definition of
Customer ADAV from the Fee Schedule
is reasonable because the tier has
expired. Additionally, the Exchange is
not required to maintain this tier by
amending the criteria or extending the
expiration date to a date in the future
nor is it required to provide Members an
opportunity to receive enhanced
rebates. The Exchange believes its
proposal to let the tier expire is also
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it applies to all
Members (i.e., the tier will not be
available for any Member). The
Exchange also notes that the proposed
rule change to remove this tier merely
results in Members not receiving an
enhanced rebate, which, as noted above,
the Exchange is not required to offer or
maintain. Furthermore, the proposed
rule change to let the Cross Asset Tier
expire enables the Exchange to redirect
resources and funding into other
programs and tiers intended to
incentivize increased order flow.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Rather, as
discussed above, the Exchange believes
that the proposed change would
encourage the submission of additional
order flow to a public exchange, thereby
promoting market depth, execution
incentives and enhanced execution
opportunities, as well as price discovery
and transparency for all Members. As a
result, the Exchange believes that the
proposed changes further the
Commission’s goal in adopting
Regulation NMS of fostering
competition among orders, which
promotes ‘‘more efficient pricing of
individual stocks for all types of orders,
large and small.’’
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule changes do not impose any burden
on intramarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Particularly,
the proposed change to not renew the
Cross Asset Tier and delete it and the
related definition of Customer ADAV
from the Fee Schedule will not impose
any burden on intramarket competition
because the changes apply to all
Members uniformly, as in, the tier will
no longer be available to any Member in
accordance with its expiration date.
Next, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule changes does not impose
any burden on intermarket competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
As previously discussed, the Exchange
operates in a highly competitive market.
Members have numerous alternative
venues that they may participate on and
direct their order flow, including other
equities exchanges, off-exchange
venues, and alternative trading systems.
Additionally, the Exchange represents a
small percentage of the overall market.
Based on publicly available information,
no single equities exchange has more
than 15% of the market share.14
Therefore, no exchange possesses
significant pricing power in the
execution of order flow. Indeed,
participants can readily choose to send
their orders to other exchange and offexchange venues if they deem fee levels
at those other venues to be more
favorable. Moreover, the Commission
has repeatedly expressed its preference
for competition over regulatory
intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities
markets. Specifically, in Regulation
NMS, the Commission highlighted the
importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues
and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ‘‘has
been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its
12 Id.
13 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Jan 16, 2024
14 Supra
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
note 3.
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 15 The
fact that this market is competitive has
also long been recognized by the courts.
In NetCoalition v. Securities and
Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit
stated as follows: ‘‘[n]o one disputes
that competition for order flow is
‘fierce.’ . . . As the SEC explained, ‘[i]n
the U.S. national market system, buyers
and sellers of securities, and the brokerdealers that act as their order-routing
agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution’;
[and] ‘no exchange can afford to take its
market share percentages for granted’
because ‘no exchange possesses a
monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in
the execution of order flow from broker
dealers’. . . .’’.16 Accordingly, the
Exchange does not believe its proposed
fee change imposes any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 17 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 18 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
15 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
16 NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C.
Cir. 2010) (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782–
83 (December 9, 2008) (SR–NYSEArca–2006–21)).
17 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
18 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f).
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2024 / Notices
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
CboeBZX–2024–001 on the subject line.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–00711 Filed 1–16–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No.
35089; File No. 812–15479]
Venerable Insurance and Annuity
Company, et al.
Paper Comments
January 11, 2024.
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–CboeBZX–2024–001. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–CboeBZX–2024–001 and should be
submitted on or before February 7, 2024.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Jan 16, 2024
Jkt 262001
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’).
ACTION: Notice.
Notice of application for an order
pursuant to section 11 of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (the ‘‘Act’’).
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants
request an order approving the terms of
an offer of exchange of certain annuity
contracts issued by Equitable Financial
Life Insurance Company (‘‘EFLIC’’) and
made available through Separate
Account No. 49 of Equitable Financial
Life Insurance Company for virtually
identical annuity contracts issued by
Venerable Insurance and Annuity
Company (‘‘VIAC’’) and made available
through the Separate Account EQ of
Venerable Insurance and Annuity
Company, pursuant to an assumption
reinsurance agreement between VIAC
and EFLIC.
APPLICANTS: Venerable Insurance and
Annuity Company, Separate Account
EQ of Venerable Insurance and Annuity
Company, and Directed Services LLC.
FILING DATES: The application was filed
on June 27, 2023 and amended on
October 13, 2023.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING:
An order granting the requested relief
will be issued unless the Commission
orders a hearing. Interested persons may
request a hearing on any application by
emailing the SEC’s Secretary at
Secretarys-Office@sec.gov and serving
the Applicants with a copy of the
request by email, if an email address is
listed for the relevant Applicant below,
or personally or by mail, if a physical
address is listed for the relevant
19 17
PO 00000
Applicant below. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on February 5, 2024, and
should be accompanied by proof of
service on applicants, in the form of an
affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of
service. Pursuant to rule 0–5 under the
Act, hearing requests should state the
nature of the writer’s interest, any facts
bearing upon the desirability of a
hearing on the matter, the reason for the
request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a
hearing may request notification by
emailing the Commission’s Secretary at
Secretarys-Office@sec.gov.
The Commission:
Secretarys-Office@sec.gov. Applicants: J.
Neil McMurdie, neil.mcmurdie@
venerable.com.
ADDRESSES:
Jill
Ehrlich, Senior Counsel, or Lisa Reid
Ragen, Branch Chief, at (202) 551–6825
(Division of Investment Management,
Chief Counsel’s Office).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For
Applicants’ representations, legal
analysis, and conditions, please refer to
Applicants’ first amended and restated
application, dated October 13, 2023,
which may be obtained via the
Commission’s website by searching for
the file number at the top of this
document, or for an Applicant using the
Company name search field, on the
SEC’s EDGAR system. The SEC’s
EDGAR system may be searched at,
https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/
legacy/companysearch.html. You may
also call the SEC’s Public Reference
Room at (202) 551–8090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024–00791 Filed 1–16–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
3007
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3005-3007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00711]
[[Page 3005]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-99310; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2024-001]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Its Fee Schedule To Remove the Cross Asset Tier
January 10, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on January 2, 2024, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BZX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``BZX'') proposes to
amend its Fee Schedule. The text of the proposed rule change is
provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule applicable to its
equities trading platform (``BZX Equities'') by deleting the Cross
Asset Tier (and a related definition) from the Fee Schedule. The
Exchange proposes to implement these changes effective January 2, 2024.
The Exchange first notes that it operates in a highly competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. More specifically, the
Exchange is only one of 16 registered equities exchanges, as well as a
number of alternative trading systems and other off-exchange venues
that do not have similar self-regulatory responsibilities under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''), to which market
participants may direct their order flow. Based on publicly available
information,\3\ no single registered equities exchange has more than
15% of the market share. Thus, in such a low-concentrated and highly
competitive market, no single equities exchange possesses significant
pricing power in the execution of order flow. The Exchange in
particular operates a ``Maker-Taker'' model whereby it pays rebates to
members that add liquidity and assesses fees to those that remove
liquidity. The Exchange's Fee Schedule sets forth the standard rebates
and rates applied per share for orders that provide and remove
liquidity, respectively. Currently, for orders in securities priced at
or above $1.00, the Exchange provides a standard rebate of $0.00160 per
share for orders that add liquidity and assesses a fee of $0.0030 per
share for orders that remove liquidity.\4\ For orders in securities
priced below $1.00, the Exchange provides a standard rebate of $0.00009
[sic] per share for orders that add liquidity and assesses a fee of
0.30% of the total dollar value for orders that remove liquidity.\5\
Additionally, in response to the competitive environment, the Exchange
also offers tiered pricing which provides Members opportunities to
qualify for higher rebates or reduced fees where certain volume
criteria and thresholds are met. Tiered pricing provides an incremental
incentive for Members to strive for higher tier levels, which provides
increasingly higher benefits or discounts for satisfying increasingly
more stringent criteria.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market Volume
Summary, Month-to-Date (December 19, 2023), available at https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/market_statistics/.
\4\ See BZX Equities Fee Schedule, Standard Rates.
\5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Asset Tier
Under footnote 2 of the Fee Schedule, the Exchange offers various
Step-Up Tiers that provide enhanced rebates for orders yielding fee
codes B,\6\ V \7\ and Y \8\ where a Member reaches certain add volume-
based criteria, including ``growing'' its volume over a certain
baseline month. Additionally, under footnote 2, the Exchange offers a
Cross Asset Tier which is designed to incentivize Members to achieve
certain levels of participation on both the Exchange's equities and
options platform (``BZX Options''). The Exchange now proposes to delete
the Cross Asset Tier from the Fee Schedule as the tier expired on
December 31, 2023. Additionally, the Exchange does not wish to, nor is
required to, maintain such tier by proposing to amend the expiration
date or the criteria associated with the Cross Asset Tier. More
specifically, the proposed change lets this tier expire as the Exchange
would rather redirect future resources and funding into other programs
and tiers intended to incentivize increased order flow. In conjunction
with discontinuing the Cross Asset Tier, the Exchange proposes to
remove the definition of Customer ADAV \9\ from its fee schedule as
this definition is not used for any other tier.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Fee code B is appended to displayed orders that add
liquidity to BZX in Tape B securities.
\7\ Fee code V is appended to displayed orders that add
liquidity to BZX in Tape A securities.
\8\ Fee code Y is appended to displayed orders that add
liquidity to BZX in Tape C securities.
\9\ Customer ADAV means average daily volume calculated as the
number of contracts added for the account of a Priority Customer as
defined in BZX Rule 16.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.\10\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change
is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \11\ requirements that the rules
of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts
and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling,
[[Page 3006]]
processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions
in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. Additionally, the Exchange
believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) \12\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or
dealers as well as Section 6(b)(4) \13\ as it is designed to provide
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among its Members and other persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\12\ Id.
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that its proposal to eliminate the Cross
Asset Tier and the related definition of Customer ADAV from the Fee
Schedule is reasonable because the tier has expired. Additionally, the
Exchange is not required to maintain this tier by amending the criteria
or extending the expiration date to a date in the future nor is it
required to provide Members an opportunity to receive enhanced rebates.
The Exchange believes its proposal to let the tier expire is also
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it applies to all
Members (i.e., the tier will not be available for any Member). The
Exchange also notes that the proposed rule change to remove this tier
merely results in Members not receiving an enhanced rebate, which, as
noted above, the Exchange is not required to offer or maintain.
Furthermore, the proposed rule change to let the Cross Asset Tier
expire enables the Exchange to redirect resources and funding into
other programs and tiers intended to incentivize increased order flow.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Rather, as discussed above,
the Exchange believes that the proposed change would encourage the
submission of additional order flow to a public exchange, thereby
promoting market depth, execution incentives and enhanced execution
opportunities, as well as price discovery and transparency for all
Members. As a result, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes
further the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering
competition among orders, which promotes ``more efficient pricing of
individual stocks for all types of orders, large and small.''
The Exchange believes the proposed rule changes do not impose any
burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Particularly, the proposed
change to not renew the Cross Asset Tier and delete it and the related
definition of Customer ADAV from the Fee Schedule will not impose any
burden on intramarket competition because the changes apply to all
Members uniformly, as in, the tier will no longer be available to any
Member in accordance with its expiration date.
Next, the Exchange believes the proposed rule changes does not
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As previously
discussed, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market.
Members have numerous alternative venues that they may participate on
and direct their order flow, including other equities exchanges, off-
exchange venues, and alternative trading systems. Additionally, the
Exchange represents a small percentage of the overall market. Based on
publicly available information, no single equities exchange has more
than 15% of the market share.\14\ Therefore, no exchange possesses
significant pricing power in the execution of order flow. Indeed,
participants can readily choose to send their orders to other exchange
and off-exchange venues if they deem fee levels at those other venues
to be more favorable. Moreover, the Commission has repeatedly expressed
its preference for competition over regulatory intervention in
determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets.
Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the
importance of market forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and,
also, recognized that current regulation of the market system ``has
been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to investors and listed
companies.'' \15\ The fact that this market is competitive has also
long been recognized by the courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities and
Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit stated as follows: ``[n]o one
disputes that competition for order flow is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC
explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market system, buyers and sellers of
securities, and the broker-dealers that act as their order-routing
agents, have a wide range of choices of where to route orders for
execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to take its market share
percentages for granted' because `no exchange possesses a monopoly,
regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from broker
dealers'. . . .''.\16\ Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe its
proposed fee change imposes any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Supra note 3.
\15\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
\16\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010)
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2,
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \17\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \18\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 3007]]
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-CboeBZX-2024-001 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeBZX-2024-001. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeBZX-2024-001 and should
be submitted on or before February 7, 2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-00711 Filed 1-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P