Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 2 to a Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Shares of the Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF Under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust Shares, 2263-2278 [2024-00501]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2024 / Notices accordingly, the fees collected for such use should, as proposed by the Exchange, mirror the fees assessed to FINRA members. In addition, as FINRA noted in amending its fees, it believes that its proposed pricing structure is reasonable and correlates fees with the components that drive its regulatory costs to the extent feasible. The Exchange further believes that the change is reasonable because it will provide greater specificity regarding the CRD system fees that are applicable to Non-FINRA Member Organizations. All similarly situated member organizations are subject to the same fee structure, and every member organization must use the CRD system for registration and disclosure. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the fees collected for such use should likewise increase in lockstep with the fees assessed to FINRA members, as proposed by the Exchange. The Exchange further believes that the proposed fee change provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable fees and other charges, and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers, and dealers. The fee applies equally to all individuals and firms required to report information the CRD system, and the proposed change will result in the same regulatory fees being charged to all member organizations required to report information to CRD and for services performed by FINRA regardless of whether such member organizations are FINRA members. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the fee collected for such use should increase in lockstep with the fee adopted by FINRA as of January 2024, as proposed by the Exchange. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition In accordance with section 6(b)(8) of the Act,12 the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would not impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed change will reflect a fee that will be assessed by FINRA as of January 2024 and will thus result in the same regulatory fee being charged to all member organizations required to report information to the CRD system and for services performed by FINRA, regardless of whether or not such member organizations are FINRA members. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change has become effective upon filing pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) 13 of the Act and paragraph (f) thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include file number SR– NYSEAMER–2023–67 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to file number SR–NYSEAMER–2023–67. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions should refer to file number SR–NYSEAMER–2023–67 and should be submitted on or before February 2, 2024. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.14 Sherry R. Haywood, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2024–00500 Filed 1–11–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–99283; File No. SR– CboeBZX–2023–038] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 2 to a Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Shares of the Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF Under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), CommodityBased Trust Shares January 8, 2024. On June 30, 2023, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BZX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to list and trade shares (‘‘Shares’’) of the Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (‘‘Trust’’) under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust Shares. On July 11, 2023, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change, which amended and replaced the proposed rule change in its entirety. The proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, was published for comment in the Federal 14 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 12 See 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:38 Jan 12, 2024 13 15 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2263 E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1 2264 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2024 / Notices Register on July 19, 2023.3 On August 31, 2023, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act,4 the Commission designated a longer period within which to approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1.5 On September 18, 2003, the Commission instituted proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1.6 On January 5, 2024, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. Amendment No. 2 amended and replaced the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, in its entirety. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 2, from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BZX’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97900 (July 13, 2023), 88 FR 46235. Comments on the proposed rule change are available at: https:// www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboebzx-2023-038/ srcboebzx2023038.htm. 4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98266, 88 FR 61658 (Sept. 7, 2023). 6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98613, 88 FR 68849 (Oct. 4, 2023). VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:38 Jan 12, 2024 Jkt 262001 (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’) a proposed rule change to list and trade shares of the Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (the ‘‘Trust’’),7 under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the Exchange’s website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/ equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose This Amendment No. 2 to SR– CboeBZX–2023–038 amends and 7 The Trust was formed as a Delaware statutory trust on December 17, 2020 and is operated as a grantor trust for U.S. federal tax purposes. The Trust has no fixed termination date. PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 replaces in its entirety the proposal as originally submitted on June 30, 2023, and as amended by Amendment No. 1 on July 11, 2023. The Exchange submits this Amendment No. 2 in order to clarify certain points and add additional details to the proposal. The Exchange proposes to list and trade the Shares under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4),8 which governs the listing and trading of Commodity-Based Trust Shares on the Exchange.9 Invesco Capital Management LLC is the sponsor of the Trust (‘‘Sponsor’’). The Shares will be registered with the Commission by means of the Trust’s registration statement on Form S–1 (the ‘‘Registration Statement’’).10 8 The Commission approved BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4) in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65225 (August 30, 2011), 76 FR 55148 (September 6, 2011) (SR–BATS–2011–018). 9 Any of the statements or representations regarding the index composition, the description of the portfolio or reference assets, limitations on portfolio holdings or reference assets, dissemination and availability of index, reference asset, intraday indicative values, and, or the applicability of Exchange listing rules specified in this filing to list a series of Other Securities (collectively, ‘‘Continued Listing Representations’’) shall constitute continued listing requirements for the Shares listed on the Exchange. 10 See Pre-Effective Amendment No. 4 to Form S– 1 Registration Statement filed on December 29, 2023 (Registration No. 333–255175). The Registration Statement is not yet effective and the Shares will not trade on the Exchange until such time that the Registration Statement is effective. E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2024 / Notices khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES As further discussed below, the Commission has historically approved or disapproved exchange filings to list and trade series of Trust Issued Receipts, including spot-based Commodity-Based Trust Shares, on the basis of whether the listing exchange has in place a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement with a regulated market of significant size related to the underlying commodity to be held.11 Prior orders from the Commission have pointed out that in every prior approval order for Commodity-Based Trust Shares,12 there has been a derivatives market that represents the regulated market of significant size, generally a Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the ‘‘CFTC’’) regulated futures market.13 11 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83723 (July 26, 2018), 83 FR 37579 (August 1, 2018). This proposal was subsequently disapproved by the Commission. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83723 (July 26, 2018), 83 FR 37579 (August 1, 2018) (the ‘‘Winklevoss Order’’). 12 See Exchange Rule 14.11(f)(1). 13 See streetTRACKS Gold Shares, Exchange Act Release No. 50603 (Oct. 28, 2004), 69 FR 64614, 64618–19 (Nov. 5, 2004) (SR–NYSE–2004–22) (the ‘‘First Gold Approval Order’’); iShares COMEX Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 51058 (Jan. 19, 2005), 70 FR 3749, 3751, 3754–55 (Jan. 26, 2005) (SR–Amex–2004–38); iShares Silver Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 53521 (Mar. 20, 2006), 71 FR 14967, 14968, 14973–74 (Mar. 24, 2006) (SR– Amex–2005–072); ETFS Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 59895 (May 8, 2009), 74 FR 22993, 22994–95, 22998, 23000 (May 15, 2009) (SR– NYSEArca–2009–40); ETFS Silver Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 59781 (Apr. 17, 2009), 74 FR 18771, 18772, 18775–77 (Apr. 24, 2009) (SR–NYSEArca– 2009–28); ETFS Palladium Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 61220 (Dec. 22, 2009), 74 FR 68895, 68896 (Dec. 29, 2009) (SR–NYSEArca–2009–94) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca’s representation that ‘‘[t]he most significant palladium futures exchanges are the NYMEX and the Tokyo Commodity Exchange,’’ that ‘‘NYMEX is the largest exchange in the world for trading precious metals futures and options,’’ and that NYSE Arca ‘‘may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,’’ of which NYMEX is a member, Exchange Act Release No. 60971 (Nov. 9, 2009), 74 FR 59283, 59285–86, 59291 (Nov. 17, 2009)); ETFS Platinum Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 61219 (Dec. 22, 2009), 74 FR 68886, 68887–88 (Dec. 29, 2009) (SR–NYSEArca–2009–95) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca’s representation that ‘‘[t]he most significant platinum futures exchanges are the NYMEX and the Tokyo Commodity Exchange,’’ that ‘‘NYMEX is the largest exchange in the world for trading precious metals futures and options,’’ and that NYSE Arca ‘‘may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,’’ of which NYMEX is a member, Exchange Act Release No. 60970 (Nov. 9, 2009), 74 FR 59319, 59321, 59327 (Nov. 17, 2009)); Sprott Physical Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 61496 (Feb. 4, 2010), 75 FR 6758, 6760 (Feb. 10, 2010) (SR–NYSEArca–2009–113) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca’s representation that the COMEX is one of the ‘‘major world gold markets,’’ that NYSE Arca ‘‘may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,’’ and that NYMEX, of which COMEX is a division, is a member of the Intermarket Surveillance Group, Exchange Act Release No. 61236 (Dec. 23, 2009), 75 FR 170, 171, VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:38 Jan 12, 2024 Jkt 262001 174 (Jan. 4, 2010)); Sprott Physical Silver Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 63043 (Oct. 5, 2010), 75 FR 62615, 62616, 62619, 62621 (Oct. 12, 2010) (SR– NYSEArca–2010–84); ETFS Precious Metals Basket Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 62692 (Aug. 11, 2010), 75 FR 50789, 50790 (Aug. 17, 2010) (SR– NYSEArca–2010–56) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca’s representation that ‘‘the most significant gold, silver, platinum and palladium futures exchanges are the COMEX and the TOCOM’’ and that NYSE Arca ‘‘may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,’’ of which COMEX is a member, Exchange Act Release No. 62402 (Jun. 29, 2010), 75 FR 39292, 39295, 39298 (July 8, 2010)); ETFS White Metals Basket Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 62875 (Sept. 9, 2010), 75 FR 56156, 56158 (Sept. 15, 2010) (SR–NYSEArca–2010–71) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca’s representation that ‘‘the most significant silver, platinum and palladium futures exchanges are the COMEX and the TOCOM’’ and that NYSE Arca ‘‘may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,’’ of which COMEX is a member, Exchange Act Release No. 62620 (July 30, 2010), 75 FR 47655, 47657, 47660 (Aug. 6, 2010)); ETFS Asian Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 63464 (Dec. 8, 2010), 75 FR 77926, 77928 (Dec. 14, 2010) (SR–NYSEArca–2010–95) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca’s representation that ‘‘the most significant gold futures exchanges are the COMEX and the Tokyo Commodity Exchange,’’ that ‘‘COMEX is the largest exchange in the world for trading precious metals futures and options,’’ and that NYSE Arca ‘‘may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,’’ of which COMEX is a member, Exchange Act Release No. 63267 (Nov. 8, 2010), 75 FR 69494, 69496, 69500–01 (Nov. 12, 2010)); Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 68430 (Dec. 13, 2012), 77 FR 75239, 75240–41 (Dec. 19, 2012) (SR– NYSEArca–2012–111) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca’s representation that ‘‘[f]utures on platinum and palladium are traded on two major exchanges: The New York Mercantile Exchange . . . and Tokyo Commodities Exchange’’ and that NYSE Arca ‘‘may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,’’ of which COMEX is a member, Exchange Act Release No. 68101 (Oct. 24, 2012), 77 FR 65732, 65733, 65739 (Oct. 30, 2012)); APMEX Physical— 1 oz. Gold Redeemable Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 66930 (May 7, 2012), 77 FR 27817, 27818 (May 11, 2012) (SR–NYSEArca–2012–18) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca’s representation that NYSE Arca ‘‘may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,’’ of which COMEX is a member, and that gold futures are traded on COMEX and the Tokyo Commodity Exchange, with a cross-reference to the proposed rule change to list and trade shares of the ETFS Gold Trust, in which NYSE Arca represented that COMEX is one of the ‘‘major world gold markets,’’ Exchange Act Release No. 66627 (Mar. 20, 2012), 77 FR 17539, 17542–43, 17547 (Mar. 26, 2012)); JPM XF Physical Copper Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 68440 (Dec. 14, 2012), 77 FR 75468, 75469–70, 75472, 75485–86 (Dec. 20, 2012) (SR– NYSEArca–2012–28); iShares Copper Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 68973 (Feb. 22, 2013), 78 FR 13726, 13727, 13729–30, 13739–40 (Feb. 28, 2013) (SR–NYSEArca–2012–66); First Trust Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 70195 (Aug. 14, 2013), 78 FR 51239, 51240 (Aug. 20, 2013) (SR– NYSEArca–2013–61) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca’s representation that FINRA, on behalf of the exchange, may obtain trading information regarding gold futures and options on gold futures from members of the Intermarket Surveillance Group, including COMEX, or from markets ‘‘with which [NYSE Arca] has in place a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement,’’ and that gold futures are traded on PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2265 Further to this point, the Commission’s prior orders have noted that the spot commodities and currency markets for which it has previously approved spot exchange-traded products (‘‘ETPs’’) are generally unregulated and that the Commission relied on the underlying futures market as the regulated market of significant size that formed the basis for approving the series of Currency 14 and Commodity-Based Trust Shares, including gold, silver, platinum, palladium, copper, and other commodities and currencies. The Commission specifically noted in the Winklevoss Order that the First Gold Approval Order ‘‘was based on an assumption that the currency market and the spot gold market were largely unregulated.’’ 15 As such, the regulated market of significant size test does not require that the spot bitcoin market be regulated in order for the Commission to approve this proposal, and precedent makes clear that an underlying market for a spot commodity or currency being a regulated market would actually be an exception to the norm. These largely unregulated currency and commodity markets do not provide the same protections as the markets that are subject to the Commission’s oversight, but the Commission has consistently looked to surveillance sharing agreements with the underlying futures market in order to determine whether such products were consistent with the Act. With this in mind, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (‘‘CME’’) bitcoin futures (‘‘Bitcoin Futures’’) market is the proper market to consider in determining whether there is a related regulated market of significant size. Further to this point, the Exchange notes that the Commission has approved proposals related to the listing and COMEX and the Tokyo Commodity Exchange, with a cross-reference to the proposed rule change to list and trade shares of the ETFS Gold Trust, in which NYSE Arca represented that COMEX is one of the ‘‘major world gold markets,’’ Exchange Act Release No. 69847 (June 25, 2013), 78 FR 39399, 39400, 39405 (July 1, 2013)); Merk Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 71378 (Jan. 23, 2014), 79 FR 4786, 4786–87 (Jan. 29, 2014) (SR–NYSEArca–2013–137) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca’s representation that ‘‘COMEX is the largest gold futures and options exchange’’ and that NYSE Arca ‘‘may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,’’ including with respect to transactions occurring on COMEX pursuant to CME and NYMEX’s membership, or from exchanges ‘‘with which [NYSE Arca] has in place a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement,’’ Exchange Act Release No. 71038 (Dec. 11, 2013), 78 FR 76367, 76369, 76374 (Dec. 17, 2013)); Long Dollar Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 79518 (Dec. 9, 2016), 81 FR 90876, 90881, 90886, 90888 (Dec. 15, 2016) (SR– NYSEArca–2016–84). 14 See Exchange Rule 14.11(e)(5). 15 See Winklevoss Order at 37592. E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1 2266 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2024 / Notices khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES trading of funds that would primarily hold CME Bitcoin Futures that are registered under the Securities Act of 1933.16 In the Teucrium Approval, the Commission found the CME Bitcoin Futures market to be a regulated market of significant size as it relates to CME Bitcoin Futures, an odd tautological truth that is also inconsistent with prior disapproval orders for ETPs that would hold actual bitcoin instead of derivatives contracts (‘‘Spot Bitcoin ETPs’’) that use the exact same pricing methodology as the CME Bitcoin Futures. As further discussed below, both the Exchange and the Sponsor believe that this proposal and the included analysis are sufficient to establish that the CME Bitcoin Futures market represents a regulated market of significant size as it relates both to the CME Bitcoin Futures market and to the spot bitcoin market and that this proposal should be approved. Finally, as discussed in greater detail below, by using professional custodians and other service providers, the Trust provides investors interested in exposure to bitcoin with important protections that are not always available to investors that invest directly in bitcoin, including protection against insolvency, cyber attacks, and other risks. If U.S. investors had access to vehicles such as the Trust for their bitcoin investments, instead of directing their bitcoin investments into loosely regulated offshore vehicles (such as loosely regulated centralized trading platforms that have since faced bankruptcy proceedings or other insolvencies), then countless investors would have protected their principal investments in bitcoin and thus benefited. Background Bitcoin is a digital asset based on the decentralized, open source protocol of the peer-to-peer computer network launched in 2009 that governs the creation, movement, and ownership of bitcoin and hosts the public ledger, or ‘‘blockchain,’’ on which all bitcoin transactions are recorded (the ‘‘Bitcoin Network’’ or ‘‘Bitcoin’’). The decentralized nature of the Bitcoin Network allows parties to transact directly with one another based on cryptographic proof instead of relying on a trusted third party. The protocol also lays out the rate of issuance of new bitcoin within the Bitcoin Network, a rate that is reduced by half 16 See Exchange Act Release No. 94620 (April 6, 2022), 87 FR 21676 (April 12, 2022) (the ‘‘Teucrium Approval’’) and 94853 (May 5, 2022) (collectively, with the Teucrium Approval, the ‘‘Bitcoin Futures Approvals’’). VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:38 Jan 12, 2024 Jkt 262001 approximately every four years with an eventual hard cap of 21 million. It’s generally understood that the combination of these two features—a systemic hard cap of 21 million bitcoin and the ability to transact trustlessly with anyone connected to the Bitcoin Network—gives bitcoin its value. The first rule filing proposing to list an ETP to provide exposure to bitcoin in the U.S. was submitted by the Exchange on June 30, 2016.17 At that time, blockchain technology, and digital assets that utilized it, were relatively new to the broader public. The market cap of all bitcoin in existence at that time was approximately $10 billion. No registered offering of digital asset securities or shares in an investment vehicle with exposure to bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency had yet been conducted, and the regulated infrastructure for conducting a digital asset securities offering had not begun to develop.18 Similarly, regulated U.S. Bitcoin Futures contracts did not exist. The CFTC had determined that bitcoin is a commodity,19 but had not engaged in significant enforcement actions in the space. The New York Department of Financial Services (‘‘NYDFS’’) adopted its final ‘‘BitLicense’’ regulatory framework in 2015, but had only approved four entities to engage in activities relating to virtual currencies (whether through granting a BitLicense or a limited-purpose trust charter) as of June 30, 2016.20 While the first over-thecounter bitcoin fund launched in 2013, public trading was limited and the fund had only $60 million in assets.21 There 17 See Winklevoss Order. assets that are securities under U.S. law are referred to throughout this proposal as ‘‘digital asset securities.’’ All other digital assets, including bitcoin, are referred to interchangeably as ‘‘cryptocurrencies’’ or ‘‘virtual currencies.’’ The term ‘‘digital assets’’ refers to all digital assets, including both digital asset securities and cryptocurrencies, together. 19 See ‘‘In the Matter of Coinflip, Inc.’’ (‘‘Coinflip’’) (CFTC Docket 15–29 (September 17, 2015)) (order instituting proceedings pursuant to sections 6(c) and 6(d) of the CEA, making findings and imposing remedial sanctions), in which the CFTC stated: ‘‘Section 1a(9) of the CEA defines ‘commodity’ to include, among other things, ‘all services, rights, and interests in which contracts for future delivery are presently or in the future dealt in.’ 7 U.S.C. 1a(9). The definition of a ‘commodity’ is broad. See, e.g., Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. SEC, 677 F. 2d 1137, 1142 (7th Cir. 1982). bitcoin and other virtual currencies are encompassed in the definition and properly defined as commodities.’’ 20 A list of virtual currency businesses that are entities regulated by the NYDFS is available on the NYDFS website. See https://www.dfs.ny.gov/apps_ and_licensing/virtual_currency_businesses/ regulated_entities. 21 Data as of March 31, 2016 according to publicly available filings. See bitcoin Investment Trust Form S–1, dated May 27, 2016, available: https:// www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1588489/ 000095012316017801/filename1.htm. 18 Digital PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 were very few, if any, traditional financial institutions engaged in the space, whether through investment or providing services to digital asset companies. In January 2018, the staff of the Commission noted in a letter to the Investment Company Institute (‘‘ICI’’) and Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (‘‘SIFMA’’) that it was not aware, at that time, of a single custodian providing fund custodial services for digital assets.22 Fast forward to today and the digital assets financial ecosystem, including bitcoin, has progressed significantly. The development of a regulated market for digital asset securities has significantly evolved, with market participants having conducted registered public offerings of both digital asset securities 23 and shares in investment vehicles holding Bitcoin Futures.24 Additionally, licensed and regulated service providers have emerged to provide fund custodial services for digital assets, among other services, including the Custodian.25 For example, in February 2023, the Commission proposed to amend Rule 206(4)–2 under the Advisers Act of 1940 (the ‘‘custody rule’’) to expand the scope beyond client funds and securities to include all crypto assets, among other assets; 26 in May 2021, the staff of the Commission released a statement permitting openend mutual funds to invest in cashsettled Bitcoin Futures; in December 2020, the Commission adopted a conditional no-action position permitting certain special purpose broker-dealers to custody digital asset securities under Rule 15c3–3 under the Exchange Act (the ‘‘Custody Statement’’); 27 in September 2020, the 22 See letter from Dalia Blass, Director, Division of Investment Management, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to Paul Schott Stevens, President & CEO, Investment Company Institute and Timothy W. Cameron, Asset Management Group—Head, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (January 18, 2018), available at https://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment/ noaction/2018/cryptocurrency-011818.htm. 23 See Prospectus supplement filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) for INX Tokens (Registration No. 333–233363), available at: https://www.sec.gov/ Archives/edgar/data/1725882/ 000121390020023202/ea125858-424b1_ inxlimited.htm. 24 See Prospectus filed by Stone Ridge Trust VI on behalf of NYDIG bitcoin Strategy Fund Registration, available at: https://www.sec.gov/ Archives/edgar/data/1764894/ 000119312519309942/d693146d497.htm. 25 The ‘‘Custodian’’ is Coinbase Trust Company, LLC. 26 See Investment Advisers Act Release No. 6240 88 FR 14672 (March 9, 2023) (Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets). 27 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90788, 86 FR 11627 (February 26, 2021) (File Number S7– 25–20) (Custody of Digital Asset Securities by Special Purpose Broker-Dealers). E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2024 / Notices khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES staff of the Commission released a noaction letter permitting certain brokerdealers to operate a non-custodial Alternative Trading System (‘‘ATS’’) for digital asset securities, subject to specified conditions; 28 in October 2019, the staff of the Commission granted temporary relief from the clearing agency registration requirement to an entity seeking to establish a securities clearance and settlement system based on distributed ledger technology,29 and multiple transfer agents who provide services for digital asset securities registered with the Commission.30 Outside the Commission’s purview, the regulatory landscape has changed significantly since 2016, and cryptocurrency markets have grown and evolved as well. The market for bitcoin is approximately 100 times larger, having at one point reached a market cap of over $1 trillion.31 According to the CME Bitcoin Futures Report, from February 13, 2023 through March 27, 2023, CFTC regulated Bitcoin Futures represented between $750 million and $3.2 billion in notional trading volume on the CME Bitcoin Futures market on a daily basis.32 Open interest was over $1.4 billion for the entirety of the period and at one point was over $2 billion. ETPs that primarily hold CME Bitcoin Futures have raised over $1 billion dollars in assets. The CFTC has exercised its regulatory jurisdiction in bringing a number of enforcement actions related to bitcoin and against trading platforms that offer cryptocurrency trading.33 As of 28 See letter from Elizabeth Baird, Deputy Director, Division of Trading and Markets, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to Kris Dailey, Vice President, Risk Oversight & Operational Regulation, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (September 25, 2020), available at: https://www.sec.gov/divisions/ marketreg/mr-noaction/2020/finra-ats-role-insettlement-of-digital-asset-security-trades09252020.pdf. 29 See letter from Jeffrey S. Mooney, Associate Director, Division of Trading and Markets, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to Charles G. Cascarilla & Daniel M. Burstein, Paxos Trust Company, LLC (October 28, 2019), available at: https://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/mrnoaction/2019/paxos-trust-company-10281917a.pdf. 30 See, e.g., Form TA–1/A filed by Tokensoft Transfer Agent LLC (CIK: 0001794142) on January 8, 2021, available at: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/ edgar/data/1794142/000179414219000001/ xslFTA1X01/primary_doc.xml. 31 As of December 1, 2021, the total market cap of all bitcoin in circulation was approximately $1.08 trillion. 32 Data sourced from the CME Bitcoin Futures Report: 30 March, 2023, available at: https:// www.cmegroup.com/markets/cryptocurrencies/ bitcoin/bitcoin.volume.htm. 33 The CFTC’s annual report for Fiscal Year 2022 (which ended on September 30, 2022) noted that the CFTC completed the fiscal year with 18 enforcement filings related to digital assets. ‘‘Digital VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:38 Jan 12, 2024 Jkt 262001 February 14, 2023 the NYDFS has granted no fewer than thirty-four BitLicenses,34 including to established public payment companies like PayPal Holdings, Inc. and Square, Inc., and limited purpose trust charters to entities providing cryptocurrency custody services. In addition, the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (‘‘OFAC’’) has brought enforcement actions over apparent violations of the sanctions laws in connection with the provision of wallet management services for digital assets.35 In addition to the regulatory developments laid out above, more traditional financial market participants become more active in cryptocurrency: large insurance companies, asset managers, university endowments, pension funds, and even historically bitcoin skeptical fund managers have allocated to bitcoin. As noted in the Financial Stability Oversight Council (‘‘FSOC’’) Report on Digital Asset Financial Stability Risks and Regulation, ‘‘[i]ndustry surveys suggest that the scale of these investments grew quickly during the boom in crypto-asset markets through late 2021. In June 2022, PwC estimated that the number of crypto-specialist hedge funds was more than 300 globally, with $4.1 billion in assets under management. In addition, in a survey PwC found that 38 percent of surveyed traditional hedge funds were currently investing in ‘digital assets,’ compared to 21 percent the year asset actions included manipulation, a $1.7 billion fraudulent scheme, and a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) failing to register as a SEF or FCM or to seek DCM designation.’’ See CFTC FY 2022 Agency Financial Report, available at: https://www.cftc.gov/media/7941/2022afr/ download. Additionally, the CFTC filed on March 27, 2023, a civil enforcement action against the owner/operators of the Binance centralized digital asset trading platform, which is one of the largest bitcoin derivative exchanges. See CFTC Release No. 8680–23 (March 27, 2023), available at: https:// www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8680-23. 34 See https://www.dfs.ny.gov/virtual_currency_ businesses. 35 See U.S. Department of the Treasury Enforcement Release: ‘‘OFAC Enters Into $98,830 Settlement with BitGo, Inc. for Apparent Violations of Multiple Sanctions Programs Related to Digital Currency Transactions’’ (December 30, 2020) available at: https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/ 126/20201230_bitgo.pdf. See also U.S. Department of the Treasury Enforcement Release: ‘‘Treasury Announces Two Enforcement Actions for over $24M and $29M Against Virtual Currency Exchange, Bittrex, Inc.’’ (October 11, 2022) available at: https://home.treasury.gov/news/pressreleases/jy1006. See also U.S. Department of Treasure Enforcement Release ‘‘OFAC Settles with Virtual Currency Exchange Kraken for $362,158.70 Related to Apparent Violations of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations’’ (November 28, 2022) available at: https://home. treasury.gov/system/files/126/20221128_ kraken.pdf. PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2267 prior.’’ 36 The largest over-the-counter bitcoin fund previously filed a Form 10 registration statement, which the staff of the Commission reviewed and which took effect automatically, and is now a reporting company.37 Established companies like Tesla, Inc., MicroStrategy Incorporated, and Square, Inc., among others, have announced substantial investments in bitcoin in amounts as large as $1.5 billion (Tesla) and $425 million (MicroStrategy). The foregoing examples demonstrate that bitcoin has gained mainstream usage and recognition. Despite these developments, access for U.S. retail investors to gain exposure to bitcoin via a transparent and U.S. regulated, U.S. exchange-traded vehicle remains limited. Instead current options include: (i) facing the counter-party risk, legal uncertainty, technical risk, and complexity associated with accessing spot bitcoin; (ii) over-the-counter bitcoin funds (‘‘OTC Bitcoin Funds’’) with high management fees and potentially volatile premiums and discounts; 38 (iii) purchasing shares of operating companies that they believe will provide proxy exposure to bitcoin with limited disclosure about the associated risks; 39 or (iv) purchasing 36 See the FSOC ‘‘Report on Digital Asset Financial Stability Risks and Regulation 2022’’ (October 3, 2022) (at footnote 26) at https://home. treasury.gov/system/files/261/FSOC-Digital-AssetsReport-2022.pdf. 37 See Letter from Division of Corporation Finance, Office of Real Estate & Construction to Barry E. Silbert, Chief Executive Officer, Grayscale bitcoin Trust (January 31, 2020) https:// www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1588489/ 000000000020000953/filename1.pdf. 38 The premium and discount for OTC Bitcoin Funds is known to move rapidly. For example, over the period of 12/21/20 to 1/21/21, the premium for the largest OTC Bitcoin Fund went from 40.18% to 2.79%. While the price of bitcoin appreciated significantly during this period and NAV per share increased by 41.25%, the price per share increased by only 3.58%. This means that investors are buying shares of a fund that experiences significant volatility in its premium and discount outside of the fluctuations in price of the underlying asset. Even operating within the normal premium and discount range, it’s possible for an investor to buy shares of an OTC Bitcoin Fund only to have those shares quickly lose 10% or more in dollar value excluding any movement of the price of bitcoin. That is to say—the price of bitcoin could have stayed exactly the same from market close on one day to market open the next, yet the value of the shares held by the investor decreased only because of the fluctuation of the premium. As more investment vehicles, including mutual funds and ETFs, seek to gain exposure to bitcoin, the easiest option for a buy and hold strategy for such vehicles is often an OTC Bitcoin Fund, meaning that even investors that do not directly buy OTC Bitcoin Funds can be disadvantaged by extreme premiums (or discounts) and premium volatility. 39 A number of operating companies engaged in unrelated businesses—such as Tesla (a car manufacturer) and MicroStrategy (an enterprise software company)—have announced investments E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM Continued 12JAN1 2268 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2024 / Notices khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Bitcoin Futures exchange-traded funds (‘‘ETFs’’), as defined below, which represent a sub-optimal structure for long-term investors that will cost them significant amounts of money every year compared to Spot Bitcoin ETPs, as further discussed below. Meanwhile, investors in many other countries, including Canada and Brazil, are able to use more traditional exchange listed and traded products (including ETFs holding physical bitcoin) to gain exposure to bitcoin. Similarly, investors in Switzerland and across Europe have access to Exchange Traded Products which trade on regulated exchanges and provide exposure to a broad array of spot crypto assets. U.S. investors, by contrast, are left with fewer and more risky means of getting bitcoin exposure, as described above.40 To this point, the lack of a Spot Bitcoin ETP exposes U.S. investor assets to significant risk because investors that would otherwise seek crypto asset exposure through a Spot Bitcoin ETP are forced to find alternative exposure through generally riskier means. For instance, many U.S. investors that held their digital assets in accounts at FTX,41 Celsius Network LLC,42 BlockFi Inc.43 and Voyager Digital Holdings, Inc.44 have become unsecured creditors in the insolvencies of those entities. If a Spot Bitcoin ETP was available, it is likely that at least a portion of the billions of dollars tied up in those proceedings would still reside in the brokerage accounts of U.S. investors, having instead been invested in a transparent, as large as $5.3 billion in bitcoin. Without access to bitcoin exchange-traded products, retail investors seeking investment exposure to bitcoin may end up purchasing shares in these companies in order to gain the exposure to bitcoin that they seek. In fact, mainstream financial news networks have written a number of articles providing investors with guidance for obtaining bitcoin exposure through publicly traded companies (such as MicroStrategy, Tesla, and bitcoin mining companies, among others) instead of dealing with the complications associated with buying spot bitcoin in the absence of a bitcoin ETP. See e.g., ‘‘7 public companies with exposure to bitcoin’’ (February 8, 2021) available at: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/7-publiccompanies-with-exposure-to-bitcoin154201525.html; and ‘‘Want to get in the crypto trade without holding bitcoin yourself? Here are some investing ideas’’ (February 19, 2021) available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/19/ways-toinvest-in-bitcoin-without-holding-thecryptocurrency-yourself-.html. 40 The Exchange notes that the list of countries above is not exhaustive and that securities regulators in a number of additional countries have either approved or otherwise allowed the listing and trading of Spot Bitcoin ETPs. 41 See FTX Trading Ltd., et al., Case No. 22– 11068. 42 See Celsius Network LLC, et al., Case No. 22– 10964. 43 See BlockFi Inc., Case No. 22–19361. 44 See Voyager Digital Holdings, Inc., et al., Case No. 22–10943. VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:38 Jan 12, 2024 Jkt 262001 regulated, and well-understood structure—a Spot Bitcoin ETP. To this point, approval of a Spot Bitcoin ETP would represent a major win for the protection of U.S. investors in the crypto asset space. As further described below, the Trust, like all other series of Commodity-Based Trust Shares, is designed to protect investors against the risk of losses through fraud and insolvency that arise by holding digital assets, including bitcoin, on centralized platforms. Additionally, investors in other countries, specifically Canada, generally pay lower fees than U.S. retail investors that invest in OTC Bitcoin Funds due to the fee pressure that results from increased competition among available bitcoin investment options. Without an approved and regulated Spot Bitcoin ETP in the U.S. as a viable alternative, U.S. investors could seek to purchase shares of non-U.S. bitcoin vehicles in order to get access to bitcoin exposure. Given the separate regulatory regime and the potential difficulties associated with any international litigation, such an arrangement would create more risk exposure for U.S. investors than they would otherwise have with a U.S. exchange listed ETP. In addition to the benefits to U.S. investors articulated throughout this proposal, approving this proposal (and others like it) would provide U.S. ETFs and mutual funds with a U.S.-listed and regulated product to provide such access rather than relying on either flawed products or products listed and primarily regulated in other countries. Bitcoin Futures ETFs The Exchange and Sponsor applaud the Commission for allowing the launch of ETFs registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the ‘‘1940 Act’’) and the Bitcoin Futures Approvals that provide exposure to bitcoin primarily through CME Bitcoin Futures (‘‘Bitcoin Futures ETFs’’). Allowing such products to list and trade is a productive first step in providing U.S. investors and traders with transparent, exchange-listed tools for expressing a view on bitcoin. The Bitcoin Futures Approvals, however, have created a logical inconsistency in the application of the standard the Commission applies when considering Bitcoin ETP proposals. As discussed further below, the standard applicable to Bitcoin ETPs is whether the listing exchange has in place a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement with a regulated market of significant size in the underlying asset. Previous disapproval orders have made clear that a market PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 that constitutes a regulated market of significant size is generally a futures and/or options market based on the underlying reference asset rather than the spot commodity markets, which are often unregulated.45 Leaving aside the analysis of that standard until later in this proposal,46 the Exchange believes that the following rationale the Commission applied to a Bitcoin Futures ETF should result in the Commission approving this and other Spot Bitcoin ETP proposals: The CME ‘‘comprehensively surveils futures market conditions and price movements on a real-time and ongoing basis in order to detect and prevent price distortions, including price distortions caused by manipulative efforts.’’ Thus the CME’s surveillance can reasonably be relied upon to capture the effects on the CME bitcoin futures market caused by a person attempting to manipulate the proposed futures ETP by manipulating the price of CME bitcoin futures contracts, whether that attempt is made by directly trading on the CME bitcoin futures market or indirectly by trading outside of the CME bitcoin futures market. As such, when the CME shares its surveillance information with Arca, the information would assist in detecting and deterring fraudulent or manipulative misconduct related to the non-cash assets held by the proposed ETP.47 CME Bitcoin Futures pricing is based on pricing from spot bitcoin markets. The statement from the Teucrium Approval that ‘‘CME’s surveillance can reasonably be relied upon to capture the effects on the CME Bitcoin Futures market caused by a person attempting to manipulate the proposed futures ETP by manipulating the price of CME Bitcoin Futures contracts . . . indirectly by trading outside of the CME Bitcoin 45 See Winklevoss Order at 37593, specifically footnote 202, which includes the language from numerous approval orders for which the underlying futures markets formed the basis for approving series of ETPs that hold physical metals, including gold, silver, palladium, platinum, and precious metals more broadly; and 37600, specifically where the Commission provides that ‘‘when the spot market is unregulated—the requirement of preventing fraudulent and manipulative acts may possibly be satisfied by showing that the ETP listing market has entered into a surveillance-sharing agreement with a regulated market of significant size in derivatives related to the underlying asset.’’ As noted above, the Exchange believes that these citations are particularly helpful in making clear that the spot market for a spot commodity ETP need not be ‘‘regulated’’ in order for a spot commodity ETP to be approved by the Commission, and in fact that it’s been the common historical practice of the Commission to rely on such derivatives markets as the regulated market of significant size because such spot commodities markets are largely unregulated. 46 As further outlined below, both the Exchange and the Sponsor believe that the Bitcoin Futures market represents a regulated market of significant size and that this proposal and others like it should be approved on this basis. 47 See Teucrium Approval at 21679. E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2024 / Notices Futures market,’’ makes clear that the Commission believes that CME’s surveillance can capture the effects of trading on the relevant spot markets on the pricing of CME Bitcoin Futures. This was further acknowledged in the ‘‘Grayscale lawsuit’’ 48 when Judge Rao stated ‘‘. . . the Commission in the Teucrium order recognizes that the futures prices are influenced by the spot prices, and the Commission concludes in approving futures ETPs that any fraud on the spot market can be adequately addressed by the fact that the futures market is a regulated one . . .’’ The Exchange agrees with the Commission on this point and notes that the pricing mechanism applicable to the Shares is similar to that of the CME Bitcoin Futures. The structure of Bitcoin Futures ETFs provides negative outcomes for buy and hold investors as compared to a Spot Bitcoin ETP.49 Specifically, the cost of rolling CME Bitcoin Futures contracts will cause the Bitcoin Futures ETFs to lag the performance of bitcoin itself and would cost U.S. investors significant amounts of money on an annual basis compared to Spot Bitcoin ETPs. Such rolling costs would not be required for Spot Bitcoin ETPs that hold bitcoin. Further, Bitcoin Futures ETFs could potentially hit CME position limits, which would force a Bitcoin Futures ETF to invest in non-futures assets for bitcoin exposure and cause potential investor confusion and lack of certainty 51 Source: CME, Yahoo Finance 4/30/23. large open interest holder in Bitcoin Futures is an entity that holds at least 25 contracts, which is the equivalent of 125 bitcoin. At a price of approximately $29,268.81 per bitcoin on 4/30/2023, more than 100 firms had outstanding positions of greater than $3.65 million in Bitcoin Futures. 53 See Exchange Act Releases No. 94080 (January 27, 2022), 87 FR 5527 (April 12, 2022) (specifically ‘‘Amendment No. 1 to the Proposed Rule Change khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 52 A VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:38 Jan 12, 2024 Jkt 262001 about what such Bitcoin Futures ETFs are actually holding to try to get exposure to bitcoin, not to mention completely changing the risk profile associated with such an ETF. While Bitcoin Futures ETFs represent a useful trading tool, they are clearly a suboptimal structure for U.S. investors that are looking for long-term exposure to bitcoin that will, based on the calculations above, unnecessarily cost U.S. investors significant amounts of money every year compared to Spot Bitcoin ETPs and the Exchange believes that any proposal to list and trade a Spot Bitcoin ETP should be reviewed by the Commission with this important investor protection context in mind. Based on the foregoing, the Exchange and Sponsor believe that any objective review of the proposals to list Spot Bitcoin ETPs compared to the Bitcoin Futures ETFs and the Bitcoin Futures Approvals would lead to the conclusion that Spot Bitcoin ETPs should be available to U.S. investors and, as such, this proposal and other comparable proposals to list and trade Spot Bitcoin ETPs should be approved by the Commission. Stated simply, U.S. investors will continue to lose significant amounts of money from holding Bitcoin Futures ETFs as compared to Spot Bitcoin ETPs, losses which could be prevented by the Commission approving Spot Bitcoin ETPs. Additionally, any concerns related to preventing fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices related to Spot Bitcoin ETPs would apply equally to the spot markets underlying the futures contracts held by a Bitcoin Futures ETF. Both the Exchange and Sponsor believe that the CME Bitcoin Futures market is a regulated market of significant size and that such manipulation concerns are mitigated, as described extensively below. After PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2269 allowing and approving the listing and trading of Bitcoin Futures ETFs that hold primarily CME Bitcoin Futures, however, the only consistent outcome would be approving Spot Bitcoin ETPs on the basis that the CME Bitcoin Futures market is a regulated market of significant size. Given the current landscape, approving this proposal (and others like it) and allowing Spot Bitcoin ETPs to be listed and traded alongside Bitcoin Futures ETFs would establish a consistent regulatory approach, provide U.S. investors with choice in product structures for bitcoin exposure, and offer flexibility in the means of gaining exposure to bitcoin through transparent, regulated, U.S. exchange-listed vehicles. Bitcoin Futures CME began offering trading in Bitcoin Futures in 2017. Each contract represents five bitcoin and is based on the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate.50 The contracts trade and settle like other cash-settled commodity futures contracts. Nearly every measurable metric related to Bitcoin Futures has generally trended up since launch, although certain notional volume calculations have decreased roughly in line with the decrease in the price of bitcoin. For example, there were 143,215 Bitcoin Futures contracts traded in April 2023 (approximately $20.7 billion) compared to 193,182 ($5 billion), 104,713 ($3.9 billion), 118,714 ($42.7 billion), and 111,964 ($23.2 billion) contracts traded in April 2019, April 2020, April 2021, and April 2022, respectively.51 BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 50 The CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate is based on a publicly available calculation methodology based on pricing sourced from several crypto trading platforms, including Bitstamp, Coinbase, Gemini, itBit, Kraken, and LMAX Digital. E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1 2270 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2024 / Notices CME Bitcoin Futures.Open.lnterest(OI) SOK I , 70K .. :- 1iili '1..-..-------.. 2021 !2018 The number of large open interest holders 52 and unique accounts trading Bitcoin Futures have both increased, 202;:l 2022 even in the face of heightened bitcoin price volatility. CME Bitcoin Futures Large Open Interest Holders (LOIH) 120 110 100 90 fQI 80 "t:I 0 ::c .... 0 # 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 CME, Yahoo Finance 4/30/23. large open interest holder in Bitcoin Futures is an entity that holds at least 25 contracts, which 52 A VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:38 Jan 12, 2024 Jkt 262001 2021 2022 is the equivalent of 125 bitcoin. At a price of approximately $29,268.81 per bitcoin on 4/30/2023, PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 2023 more than 100 firms had outstanding positions of greater than $3.65 million in Bitcoin Futures. E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1 EN12JA24.022</GPH> 51 Source: 2020 EN12JA24.021</GPH> khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 2019 2271 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2024 / Notices CMEBitcoi.nFuturesAverageDaHy·\folume (ADV) i&sK i i3K! lli!K! j60K. 111d JssK i iotd • [50K c 1:::1 35k; 'SOK .!! :~~ 25K :, 20K z 15K !OK i · •· iSK. l 2018 2'019 BILLING CODE 8011–01–C The Sponsor further believes that publicly available research, including research done as part of rule filings proposing to list and trade shares of Spot Bitcoin ETPs, corroborates the overall trend outlined above and supports the thesis that the Bitcoin Futures pricing leads the spot market and, thus, a person attempting to manipulate the Shares would also have to trade on that market to manipulate the ETP. Specifically, the Sponsor believes that such research indicates that Bitcoin Futures lead the bitcoin spot market in price formation.53 Section 6(b)(5) and the Applicable Standards khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES The Commission has approved numerous series of Trust Issued Receipts,54 including Commodity-Based 53 See Exchange Act Releases No. 94080 (January 27, 2022), 87 FR 5527 (April 12, 2022) (specifically ‘‘Amendment No. 1 to the Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Shares of the Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust Under BZX Rule 14.11(3)(4), CommodityBased Trust Shares’’); 94982 (May 25, 2022), 87 FR 33250 (June 1, 2022); 94844 (May 4, 2022), 87 FR 28043 (May 10, 2022); and 93445 (October 28, 2021), 86 FR 60695 (November 3, 2021). See also Hu, Y., Hou, Y. and Oxley, L. (2019). ‘‘What role do futures markets play in Bitcoin pricing? Causality, cointegration and price discovery from a time-varying perspective’’ (available at: https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481826/). This academic research paper concludes that ‘‘There exist no episodes where the Bitcoin spot markets dominates the price discovery processes with regard to Bitcoin futures. This points to a conclusion that the price formation originates solely in the Bitcoin futures market. We can, therefore, conclude that the Bitcoin futures markets dominate the dynamic price discovery process based upon time-varying information share measures. Overall, price discovery seems to occur in the Bitcoin futures markets rather than the underlying spot market based upon a time-varying perspective.’’ 54 See Exchange Rule 14.11(f). VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:38 Jan 12, 2024 Jkt 262001 2020 2021 2022 Trust Shares,55 to be listed on U.S. national securities exchanges. In order for any proposed rule change from an exchange to be approved, the Commission must determine that, among other things, the proposal is consistent with the requirements of section 6(b)(5) of the Act, specifically including: (i) the requirement that a national securities exchange’s rules are designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices; 56 and 55 Commodity-Based Trust Shares, as described in Exchange Rule 14.11(e)(4), are a type of Trust Issued Receipt. 56 As the Exchange has stated in a number of other public documents, it continues to believe that bitcoin is resistant to price manipulation and that ‘‘other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices’’ exist to justify dispensing with the requisite surveillance sharing agreement. The geographically diverse and continuous nature of bitcoin trading render it difficult and prohibitively costly to manipulate the price of bitcoin. The fragmentation across bitcoin platforms, the relatively slow speed of transactions, and the capital necessary to maintain a significant presence on each trading platform make manipulation of bitcoin prices through continuous trading activity challenging. To the extent that there are bitcoin trading platforms engaged in or allowing wash trading or other activity intended to manipulate the price of bitcoin on other markets, such pricing does not normally impact prices on other trading platforms because participants will generally ignore markets with quotes that they deem non-executable. Moreover, the linkage between the bitcoin markets and the presence of arbitrageurs in those markets means that the manipulation of the price of bitcoin price on any single venue would require manipulation of the global bitcoin price in order to be effective. Arbitrageurs must have funds distributed across multiple trading platforms in order to take advantage of temporary price dislocations, thereby making it unlikely that there will be strong concentration of funds on any particular bitcoin trading platform or OTC platform. As a result, the potential for manipulation on a trading platform would require overcoming the liquidity supply of such arbitrageurs who are effectively eliminating any cross-market pricing differences. PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 (ii) the requirement that an exchange proposal be designed, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that this proposal is consistent with the requirements of section 6(b)(5) of the Act and that this filing sufficiently demonstrates that the CME Bitcoin Futures market represents a regulated market of significant size and that, on the whole, the manipulation concerns previously articulated by the Commission are sufficiently mitigated to the point that they are outweighed by quantifiable investor protection issues that would be resolved by approving this proposal. (i) Designed To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and Practices In order to meet this standard in a proposal to list and trade a series of Commodity-Based Trust Shares, the Commission requires that an exchange demonstrate that there is a comprehensive surveillance-sharing agreement in place 57 with a regulated 57 As previously articulated by the Commission, ‘‘The standard requires such surveillance-sharing agreements since ‘‘they provide a necessary deterrent to manipulation because they facilitate the availability of information needed to fully investigate a manipulation if it were to occur.’’ The Commission has emphasized that it is essential for an exchange listing a derivative securities product to enter into a surveillance- sharing agreement with markets trading underlying securities for the listing exchange to have the ability to obtain information necessary to detect, investigate, and deter fraud and market manipulation, as well as violations of exchange rules and applicable federal securities laws and rules. The hallmarks of a surveillancesharing agreement are that the agreement provides for the sharing of information about market trading activity, clearing activity, and customer identity; that the parties to the agreement have reasonable ability to obtain access to and produce requested information; and that no existing rules, laws, or E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM Continued 12JAN1 EN12JA24.023</GPH> • 2272 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2024 / Notices market of significant size. Both the Exchange and CME are members of the Intermarket Surveillance Group (‘‘ISG’’).58 The only remaining issue to be addressed is whether the Bitcoin Futures market constitutes a market of significant size, which both the Exchange and the Sponsor believe that it does. The terms ‘‘significant market’’ and ‘‘market of significant size’’ include a market (or group of markets) as to which: (a) there is a reasonable likelihood that a person attempting to manipulate the ETP would also have to trade on that market to manipulate the ETP, so that a surveillance-sharing agreement would assist the listing exchange in detecting and deterring misconduct; and (b) it is unlikely that trading in the ETP would be the predominant influence on prices in that market.59 The Commission has also recognized that the ‘‘regulated market of significant size’’ standard is not the only means for satisfying section 6(b)(5) of the act, specifically providing that a listing exchange could demonstrate that ‘‘other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices’’ are sufficient to justify dispensing with the requisite surveillance-sharing agreement.60 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES (a) Manipulation of the ETP According to the research and analysis presented above, the Bitcoin Futures market is the leading market for bitcoin price formation. Where Bitcoin Futures lead the price in the spot market such that a potential manipulator of the bitcoin spot market (beyond just the constituents of the Index 61) would have to participate in the Bitcoin Futures market, it follows that a potential manipulator of the Shares would similarly have to transact in the Bitcoin practices would impede one party to the agreement from obtaining this information from, or producing it to, the other party.’’ The Commission has historically held that joint membership in the Intermarket Surveillance Group (‘‘ISG’’) constitutes such a surveillance sharing agreement. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88284 (February 26, 2020), 85 FR 12595 (March 3, 2020) (SR–NYSEArca–2019–39) (the ‘‘Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval’’). 58 For a list of the current members and affiliate members of ISG, see www.isgportal.com. 59 See Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval. 60 See Winklevoss Order at 37580. The Commission has also specifically noted that it ‘‘is not applying a ‘cannot be manipulated’ standard; instead, the Commission is examining whether the proposal meets the requirements of the Exchange Act and, pursuant to its Rules of Practice, places the burden on the listing exchange to demonstrate the validity of its contentions and to establish that the requirements of the Exchange Act have been met.’’ Id. at 37582. 61 As further described below, the ‘‘Index’’ for the Fund is the Bloomberg Galaxy Bitcoin Index. VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:38 Jan 12, 2024 Jkt 262001 Futures market because the Index is based on spot prices. As such, the Exchange believes that part (a) of the significant market test outlined above is satisfied and that common membership in ISG between the Exchange and CME would assist the listing exchange in detecting and deterring misconduct in the Shares. (b) Predominant Influence on Prices in Spot and Bitcoin Futures The Exchange and Sponsor also believe that trading in the Shares would not be the predominant force on prices in the Bitcoin Futures market or spot market for a number of reasons, including the significant volume in the Bitcoin Futures market, the size of bitcoin’s market cap, and the significant liquidity available in the spot market. In addition to the Bitcoin Futures market data points cited above, the spot market for bitcoin is also very liquid. (c) Other Means To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and Practices As noted above, the Commission also permits a listing exchange to demonstrate that ‘‘other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices’’ are sufficient to justify dispensing with the requisite surveillance-sharing agreement. The Exchange and Sponsor believe that such conditions are present. (ii) Designed To Protect Investors and the Public Interest The Exchange believes that the proposal is designed to protect investors and the public interest. Over the past several years, U.S. investor exposure to bitcoin through OTC Bitcoin Funds has grown into the tens of billions of dollars, including through Bitcoin Futures ETFs. With that growth, so too has grown the quantifiable investor protection issues to U.S. investors through roll costs for Bitcoin Futures ETFs and premium/discount volatility and management fees for OTC Bitcoin Funds. The Exchange believes that the concerns related to the prevention of fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices have been sufficiently addressed to be consistent with the Act and, to the extent that the Commission disagrees with that assertion, such concerns are now outweighed by investor protection concerns. As such, the Exchange believes that approving this proposal (and comparable proposals) provides the Commission with the opportunity to allow U.S. investors with access to bitcoin in a regulated and transparent exchangetraded vehicle that would act to limit risk to U.S. investors by: (i) reducing PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 premium and discount volatility; (ii) reducing management fees through meaningful competition; (iii) reducing risks and costs associated with investing in Bitcoin Futures ETFs and operating companies that are imperfect proxies for bitcoin exposure; and (iv) providing an alternative to custodying spot bitcoin. Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF Delaware Trust Company is the trustee (‘‘Trustee’’). The Bank of New York Mellon will be the administrator (‘‘Administrator’’) and transfer agent (‘‘Transfer Agent’’). As noted above, Coinbase Custody Trust Company, LLC, is the Custodian and will be responsible for custody of the Trust’s bitcoin. The Bank of New York Mellon (the ‘‘Cash Custodian’’) will act as custodian of the Trust’s cash and cash equivalents.62 According to the Registration Statement, each Share will represent a fractional undivided beneficial interest and ownership in the Trust. The Trust’s assets will consist only of bitcoin, cash, and cash equivalents. According to the Registration Statement, the Trust is neither an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended,63 nor a commodity pool for purposes of the Commodity Exchange Act (‘‘CEA’’), and neither the Trust nor the Sponsor is subject to regulation as a commodity pool operator or a commodity trading adviser in connection with the Shares. When the Trust sells or redeems its Shares, it will do so in cash transactions in blocks of 5,000 Shares (a ‘‘Creation Basket’’) at the Trust’s net asset value (‘‘NAV’’). Authorized participants will deliver, or facilitate the delivery of, cash to the Trust’s account with the Cash Custodian (which will then be used to purchase bitcoin for the Trust) in exchange for Shares when they purchase Shares, and the Trust, through the Cash Custodian, will deliver cash to such authorized participants when they redeem Shares with the Trust. A third party will use cash to buy and deliver bitcoin to create Shares or withdraw and sell bitcoin for cash to redeem Shares, on behalf of the Trust. Authorized participants may then offer Shares to the public at prices that depend on various factors, including the supply and demand for Shares, the value of the Trust’s assets, and market conditions at the time of a transaction. shareholders who buy or sell Shares during the day from their broker may do so at a 62 Cash equivalents are short-term instruments with maturities of less than 3 months. 63 15 U.S.C. 80a–1. E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2024 / Notices premium or discount relative to the NAV of the Shares of the Trust. Investment Objective According to the Registration Statement and as further described below, the investment objective of the Trust is to reflect the performance as measured using Lukka Prime Bitcoin Reference Rate (the ‘‘Index’’), less the Trust’s expenses and other liabilities. In seeking to achieve its investment objective, the Trust will hold only bitcoin, cash, and cash equivalents. The Trust will value its Shares daily based on the value of the Index as of 4:00 p.m. ET, which is calculated based on the fair market value price for bitcoin, reflecting the execution price of bitcoin on its principal market as determined by Lukka Inc., an independent third-party digital asset company (the ‘‘Index Provider’’). The Trust will process all creations and redemptions in cash transactions with authorized participants. The Trust is not actively managed. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES The Index As described in the Registration Statement, the Fund will use the Index to calculate the Trust’s NAV. The Index is designed to provide an estimated fair market value for bitcoin. In determining the value of bitcoin, the Index Provider applies a five-step weighting process for identifying the principal trading platform for bitcoin and the last price on that trading platform. Currently, the Index includes the following trading platforms: Binance, Bitfinex, Bitflyer, Bitstamp, Coinbase Pro, Crypto.com, Gemini, HitBTC, Huobi, Kraken, KuCoin, OKEx and Poloniex. In identifying the principal trading platform for bitcoin, the Index Provider considers a variety of different criteria, including the trading platforms’ oversight and governance frameworks, microstructure efficiency (i.e., effective bid-ask spread), trading volume, data transparency and data integrity. A ‘‘base exchange score’’ (‘‘BES’’) that takes into account this criteria is assigned to each Index pricing source in order to select the most appropriate primary trading platform and then an executed trading platform price is determined at 4:00 p.m. ET., although the Index Provider performs this calculation every second each day. Step 1: Assign each trading platform for bitcoin and U.S. Dollars a BES reflecting static trading platform characteristics such as oversight, microstructure and technology. Step 2: Adjust the BES based on the relative monthly volume each trading VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:38 Jan 12, 2024 Jkt 262001 platform services. This new score is the Volume Adjusted Score (‘‘VAS’’). Step 3: Decay the adjusted score based on the time passed since last trade on trading platform, assessing the level of activity in the market by considering the frequency (volume) of trades. The decay factor reflects the time since the last trade on the trading platform. This is the final Decayed Volume Adjusted Score (‘‘DVAS’’), which reflects the freshness of data by tracking most recent trades. Step 4: Rank the trading platforms by the DVAS score and designate the highest-ranking trading platform as the principal market for that point in time— the principal market is the trading platform with highest DVAS. Step 5: An executed trading platform price is used to represent the fair market value at 4:00 p.m. ET. Index data and the description of the Index are based on information made publicly available by the Index Provider on its website at https://lukka.tech. Net Asset Value The Trust’s NAV is calculated by (1) taking the current market value of its bitcoin (calculated by the Index Provider) and any other assets; (2) subtracting any liabilities (including accrued by unpaid expenses); and (3) dividing that total by the total number of outstanding Shares. The Administrator calculates the NAV of the Trust on each day that the Exchange is open for regular trading, using the execution price of bitcoin on the principal market selected by the Index Provider as of 4:00 p.m. ET. However, NAVs are not officially struck until later in the day (often by 5:30 p.m. ET and almost always by 8:00 p.m. ET). The NAV for the Trust will be calculated by the Administrator once a day and will be disseminated daily to all market participants at the same time. In the event that the Index is unavailable or if the Sponsor or Administrator determines that the price provided by the Index does not reflect an accurate bitcoin price, the Sponsor’s pricing team will evaluate the prices of other similar benchmarks in an effort to ensure that the Trust’s NAV is determined based on consistent, accurate pricing that the Sponsor believes is reflective of the value of the Trust’s bitcoin, and also a transparent index methodology and process. The pricing team will recommend the price to be used to the Sponsor’s valuation committee who will then review the recommendation and approve it for use by the Trust if found appropriate.64 64 Such alternative method will only be employed on an ad hoc basis. Any permanent change to the PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2273 Availability of Information In addition to the price transparency of the Index, the Trust will provide information regarding the Trust’s bitcoin holdings as well as additional data regarding the Trust. The website for the Trust, which will be publicly accessible at no charge, will contain the following information: (a) the current NAV per Share daily and the prior business day’s NAV and the reported closing price; (b) the BZX Official Closing Price 65 in relation to the NAV as of the time the NAV is calculated and a calculation of the premium or discount of such price against such NAV; (c) data in chart form displaying the frequency distribution of discounts and premiums of the Official Closing Price against the NAV, within appropriate ranges for each of the four previous calendar quarters (or for the life of the Trust, if shorter); (d) the prospectus; and (e) other applicable quantitative information. The Trust will also disseminate its holdings on a daily basis on its website. The aforementioned information will be published as of the close of business available on the Sponsor’s website at www.invesco.com/etfs, or any successor thereto. The Intraday Indicative Value (‘‘IIV’’) will be calculated by using the prior day’s closing NAV per Share as a base and updating that value during Regular Trading Hours to reflect changes in the most recently reported price of bitcoin as reported by the Index Provider or another reporting service. The IIV disseminated during Regular Trading Hours should not be viewed as an actual real-time update of the NAV, which will be calculated only once at the end of each trading day. The IIV may differ from the NAV due to the differences in the time window of trades used to calculate each price. The IIV will be widely disseminated on a per Share basis every 15 seconds during the Exchange’s Regular Trading Hours by one or more major market data vendors. In addition, the IIV will be available through the facilities of the consolidated tape association (CTA) and Consolidated Quotation System (CQS) high speed lines. In addition, the IIV will be available through on-line information services such as Bloomberg and Reuters. The price of bitcoin will be made available by one or more major market calculation of the NAV would require a proposed rule change under Rule 19b–4. 65 As defined in Rule 11.23(a)(3), the term ‘‘BZX Official Closing Price’’ shall mean the price disseminated to the consolidated tape as the market center closing trade. E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1 2274 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2024 / Notices data vendors, updated at least every 15 seconds during Regular Trading Hours. As noted above, the Index is designed to provide an estimated fair market value for bitcoin. Information about the Index and Index value, including key elements of how the Index is calculated, will be publicly available at https:// lukka.tech. Quotation and last sale information for bitcoin is widely disseminated through a variety of major market data vendors, including Bloomberg and Reuters. Information relating to trading, including price and volume information, in bitcoin is available from major market data vendors and from the trading platforms on which bitcoin are traded. Depth of book information is also available from bitcoin trading platforms. The normal trading hours for bitcoin trading platforms are 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. Information regarding market price and trading volume of the Shares will be continually available on a real-time basis throughout the day on brokers’ computer screens and other electronic services. Information regarding the previous day’s closing price and trading volume information for the Shares will be published daily in the financial section of newspapers. Quotation and last-sale information regarding the Shares will be disseminated through the facilities of the Consolidated Tape Association (‘‘CTA’’). khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES The Bitcoin Custodian The Custodian carefully considers the design of the physical, operational and cryptographic systems for secure storage of the Trust’s private keys in an effort to lower the risk of loss or theft. The Custodian utilizes a variety of security measures to ensure that private keys necessary to transfer digital assets remain uncompromised and that the Trust maintains exclusive ownership of its assets. The operational procedures of the Custodian are reviewed by thirdparty advisors with specific expertise in physical security. The devices that store the keys will never be connected to the internet or any other public or private distributed network—this is colloquially known as ‘‘cold storage.’’ Only specific individuals are authorized to participate in the custody process, and no individual acting alone will be able to access or use any of the private keys. In addition, no combination of the executive officers of the Sponsor or the investment professionals managing the Trust, acting alone or together, will be able to access or use any of the private keys that hold the Trust’s bitcoin. VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:38 Jan 12, 2024 Jkt 262001 Creation and Redemption of Shares When the Trust sells or redeems its Shares, it will do so in cash transactions in blocks of 5,000 Shares that are based on the quantity of bitcoin attributable to each Share of the Trust (e.g., a Creation Basket) at the Trust’s NAV. According to the Registration Statement, on any business day, an authorized participant may place an order to create one or more Creation Baskets. Purchase orders must be placed by 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time, or the close of regular trading on the Exchange, whichever is earlier. The day on which an order is received is considered the purchase order date. The total deposit of cash required is an amount of cash sufficient to purchase such amount of bitcoin, the amount of which is equal to the combined NAV of the number of Shares included in the Creation Baskets being created determined as of 4:00 ET on the date the order to purchase is properly received. The Administrator determines the required deposit for a given day by multiplying the NAV per share by the number of Shares in each Creation Basket (5,000) and dividing the product by that day’s bitcoin price as determined by the Index. The procedures by which an authorized participant can redeem one or more Creation Baskets mirror the procedures for the creation of Creation Baskets. The authorized participants will deliver only cash to create shares and will receive only cash when redeeming shares. Further, authorized participants will not directly or indirectly purchase, hold, deliver, or receive bitcoin as part of the creation or redemption process or otherwise direct the Trust or a third party with respect to purchasing, holding, delivering, or receiving bitcoin as part of the creation or redemption process. The Trust will create shares by receiving bitcoin from a third party that is not the authorized participant and the Trust (through an execution agent that is acting in an agency capacity)—not the authorized participant—is responsible for selecting the third party to deliver the bitcoin. Further, the third party will not be acting as an agent of the authorized participant with respect to the delivery of the bitcoin to the Trust or acting at the direction of the authorized participant with respect to the delivery of the bitcoin to the Trust. The Trust will redeem shares by delivering bitcoin to a third party that is not the authorized participant and the Trust—not the authorized participant— is responsible for selecting the third party to receive the bitcoin. Further, the third party will not be acting as an agent PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 of the authorized participant with respect to the receipt of the bitcoin from the Trust or acting at the direction of the authorized participant with respect to the receipt of the bitcoin from the Trust. A third party, that is unaffiliated with the Trust and the Sponsor, will use cash to buy and deliver bitcoin to create Shares or withdraw and sell bitcoin for cash to redeem Shares, on behalf of the Trust. The Sponsor will maintain ownership and control of bitcoin in a manner consistent with good delivery requirements for spot commodity transactions. Rule 14.11(e)(4)—Commodity-Based Trust Shares The Shares will be subject to BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), which sets forth the initial and continued listing criteria applicable to Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The Exchange represents that, for initial and continued listing, the Trust must be in compliance with Rule 10A–3 under the Act. A minimum of 100,000 Shares will be outstanding at the commencement of listing on the Exchange. The Exchange will obtain a representation that the Trust’s NAV will be calculated daily and the NAV and information about the assets of the Trust will be made available to all market participants at the same time. The Exchange notes that, as defined in Rule 14.11(e)(4)(C)(i), the Shares will be: (a) issued by a trust that holds (1) a specified commodity 66 deposited with the trust, or (2) a specified commodity and, in addition to such specified commodity, cash; (b) issued by such trust in a specified aggregate minimum number in return for a deposit of a quantity of the underlying commodity and/or cash; and (c) when aggregated in the same specified minimum number, may be redeemed at a holder’s request by such trust which will deliver to the redeeming holder the quantity of the underlying commodity and/or cash. Upon termination of the Trust, the Shares will be removed from listing. The Trustee, Delaware Trust Company, is a trust company having substantial capital and surplus and the experience and facilities for handling corporate trust business, as required under Rule 14.11(e)(4)(E)(iv)(a) and that no change will be made to the trustee without prior notice to and approval of the Exchange. The Exchange also notes that, pursuant to Rule 14.11(e)(4)(F), neither the 66 For purposes of Rule 14.11(e)(4), the term commodity takes on the definition of the term as provided in the Commodity Exchange Act. As noted above, the CFTC has opined that bitcoin is a commodity as defined in section 1a(9) of the Commodity Exchange Act. See Coinflip. E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2024 / Notices Exchange nor any agent of the Exchange shall have any liability for damages, claims, losses or expenses caused by any errors, omissions or delays in calculating or disseminating any underlying commodity value, the current value of the underlying commodity required to be deposited to the Trust in connection with issuance of Commodity-Based Trust Shares; resulting from any negligent act or omission by the Exchange, or any agent of the Exchange, or any act, condition or cause beyond the reasonable control of the Exchange, its agent, including, but not limited to, an act of God; fire; flood; extraordinary weather conditions; war; insurrection; riot; strike; accident; action of government; communications or power failure; equipment or software malfunction; or any error, omission or delay in the reports of transactions in an underlying commodity. Finally, as required in Rule 14.11(e)(4)(G), the Exchange notes that any registered market maker (‘‘Market Maker’’) in the Shares must file with the Exchange in a manner prescribed by the Exchange and keep current a list identifying all accounts for trading in an underlying commodity, related commodity futures or options on commodity futures, or any other related commodity derivatives, which the registered Market Maker may have or over which it may exercise investment discretion. No registered Market Maker shall trade in an underlying commodity, related commodity futures or options on commodity futures, or any other related commodity derivatives, in an account in which a registered Market Maker, directly or indirectly, controls trading activities, or has a direct interest in the profits or losses thereof, which has not been reported to the Exchange as required by this Rule. In addition to the existing obligations under Exchange rules regarding the production of books and records (see, e.g., Rule 4.2), the registered Market Maker in CommodityBased Trust Shares shall make available to the Exchange such books, records or other information pertaining to transactions by such entity or registered or non-registered employee affiliated with such entity for its or their own accounts for trading the underlying physical commodity, related commodity futures or options on commodity futures, or any other related commodity derivatives, as may be requested by the Exchange. The Exchange is able to obtain information regarding trading in the Shares and the underlying bitcoin, Bitcoin Futures contracts, options on Bitcoin Futures, or any other bitcoin VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:38 Jan 12, 2024 Jkt 262001 derivative through members acting as registered Market Makers, in connection with their proprietary or customer trades. As a general matter, the Exchange has regulatory jurisdiction over its members, and their associated persons. The Exchange also has regulatory jurisdiction over any person or entity controlling a member, as well as a subsidiary or affiliate of a member that is in the securities business. A subsidiary or affiliate of a member organization that does business only in commodities would not be subject to Exchange jurisdiction, but the Exchange could obtain information regarding the activities of such subsidiary or affiliate through surveillance sharing agreements with regulatory organizations of which such subsidiary or affiliate is a member. Trading Halts With respect to trading halts, the Exchange may consider all relevant factors in exercising its discretion to halt or suspend trading in the Shares. The Exchange will halt trading in the Shares under the conditions specified in BZX Rule 11.18. Trading may be halted because of market conditions or for reasons that, in the view of the Exchange, make trading in the Shares inadvisable. These may include: (1) the extent to which trading is not occurring in the bitcoin underlying the Shares; or (2) whether other unusual conditions or circumstances detrimental to the maintenance of a fair and orderly market are present. Trading in the Shares also will be subject to Rule 14.11(e)(4)(E)(ii), which sets forth circumstances under which trading in the Shares may be halted. If the IIV or the value of the Index is not being disseminated as required, the Exchange may halt trading during the day in which the interruption to the dissemination of the IIV or the value of the Index occurs. If the interruption to the dissemination of the IIV or the value of the Index persists past the trading day in which it occurred, the Exchange will halt trading no later than the beginning of the trading day following the interruption. In addition, if the Exchange becomes aware that the NAV with respect to the Shares is not disseminated to all market participants at the same time, it will halt trading in the Shares until such time as the NAV is available to all market participants. Trading Rules The Exchange deems the Shares to be equity securities, thus rendering trading in the Shares subject to the Exchange’s existing rules governing the trading of PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2275 equity securities. BZX will allow trading in the Shares during all trading sessions on the Exchange. The Exchange has appropriate rules to facilitate transactions in the Shares during all trading sessions. As provided in BZX Rule 11.11(a) the minimum price variation for quoting and entry of orders in securities traded on the Exchange is $0.01 where the price is greater than $1.00 per share or $0.0001 where the price is less than $1.00 per share. The Shares of the Trust will conform to the initial and continued listing criteria set forth in BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4). Surveillance The Exchange represents that its surveillance procedures are adequate to properly monitor the trading of the Shares on the Exchange during all trading sessions and to deter and detect violations of Exchange rules and the applicable federal securities laws. Trading of the Shares through the Exchange will be subject to the Exchange’s surveillance procedures for derivative products, including Commodity-Based Trust Shares. FINRA conducts certain cross-market surveillances on behalf of the Exchange pursuant to a regulatory services agreement. The Exchange is responsible for FINRA’s performance under this regulatory services agreement. The Exchange, or FINRA, on behalf of the Exchange, or both, will communicate as needed regarding trading in the Shares and Bitcoin Futures with other markets and other entities that are members of the ISG, and the Exchange, or FINRA, on behalf of the Exchange, or both, may obtain trading information regarding trading in the Shares and Bitcoin Futures from such markets and other entities.67 The Exchange may obtain information regarding trading in the Shares and Bitcoin Futures via ISG, from other exchanges who are members or affiliates of the ISG, or with which the Exchange has entered into a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement. In addition, the Exchange also has a general policy prohibiting the distribution of material, non-public information by its employees. The issuer has represented to the Exchange that it will advise the Exchange of any failure by the Trust or the Shares to comply with the continued listing requirements, and, pursuant to its obligations under section 19(g)(1) of the Exchange Act, the Exchange will surveil for compliance with the continued listing requirements. 67 For a list of the current members and affiliate members of ISG, see www.isgportal.com. E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1 2276 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2024 / Notices If the Trust or the Shares are not in compliance with the applicable listing requirements, the Exchange will commence delisting procedures under Exchange Rule 14.12. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Information Circular Prior to the commencement of trading, the Exchange will inform its members in an Information Circular of the special characteristics and risks associated with trading the Shares. Specifically, the Information Circular will discuss the following: (i) the procedures for the creation and redemption of Baskets (and that the Shares are not individually redeemable); (ii) BZX Rule 3.7, which imposes suitability obligations on Exchange members with respect to recommending transactions in the Shares to customers; (iii) how information regarding the IIV and the Trust’s NAV are disseminated; (iv) the risks involved in trading the Shares outside of Regular Trading Hours 68 when an updated IIV will not be calculated or publicly disseminated; (v) the requirement that members deliver a prospectus to investors purchasing newly issued Shares prior to or concurrently with the confirmation of a transaction; and (vi) trading information. The Information Circular will also reference the fact that there is no regulated source of last sale information regarding bitcoin, that the Commission has no jurisdiction over the trading of bitcoin as a commodity, and that the CFTC has regulatory jurisdiction over the trading of Bitcoin Futures contracts and options on Bitcoin Futures contracts. In addition, the Information Circular will advise members, prior to the commencement of trading, of the prospectus delivery requirements applicable to the Shares. Members purchasing the Shares for resale to investors will deliver a prospectus to such investors. The Information Circular will also discuss any exemptive, noaction and interpretive relief granted by the Commission from any rules under the Act. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with section 6(b) of the Act 69 in general and section 6(b)(5) of the Act 70 in particular in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and 68 Regular Trading Hours is the time between 9:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. 69 15 U.S.C. 78f. 70 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:38 Jan 12, 2024 Jkt 262001 coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Commission has approved numerous series of Trust Issued Receipts, including Commodity-Based Trust Shares, to be listed on U.S. national securities exchanges. In order for any proposed rule change from an exchange to be approved, the Commission must determine that, among other things, the proposal is consistent with the requirements of section 6(b)(5) of the Act, specifically including: (i) the requirement that a national securities exchange’s rules are designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices; 71 and (ii) the requirement that an exchange proposal be designed, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that this proposal is consistent with the requirements of section 6(b)(5) of the Act and that this filing sufficiently demonstrates that the CME Bitcoin Futures market represents a regulated market of significant size and that, on the whole, the manipulation concerns previously articulated by the Commission are sufficiently mitigated to the point that they are outweighed by quantifiable investor protection issues 71 As the Exchange has stated in a number of other public documents, it continues to believe that bitcoin is resistant to price manipulation and that ‘‘other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices’’ exist to justify dispensing with the requisite surveillance sharing agreement. The geographically diverse and continuous nature of bitcoin trading render it difficult and prohibitively costly to manipulate the price of bitcoin. The fragmentation across bitcoin platforms, the relatively slow speed of transactions, and the capital necessary to maintain a significant presence on each trading platform make manipulation of bitcoin prices through continuous trading activity challenging. To the extent that there are bitcoin trading platforms engaged in or allowing wash trading or other activity intended to manipulate the price of bitcoin on other markets, such pricing does not normally impact prices on other trading platform because participants will generally ignore markets with quotes that they deem non-executable. Moreover, the linkage between the bitcoin markets and the presence of arbitrageurs in those markets means that the manipulation of the price of bitcoin price on any single venue would require manipulation of the global bitcoin price in order to be effective. Arbitrageurs must have funds distributed across multiple trading platforms in order to take advantage of temporary price dislocations, thereby making it unlikely that there will be strong concentration of funds on any particular bitcoin trading platform or OTC platform. As a result, the potential for manipulation on a trading platform would require overcoming the liquidity supply of such arbitrageurs who are effectively eliminating any cross-market pricing differences. PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 that would be resolved by approving this proposal. (i) Designed To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and Practices In order to meet this standard in a proposal to list and trade a series of Commodity-Based Trust Shares, the Commission requires that an exchange demonstrate that there is a comprehensive surveillance-sharing agreement in place 72 with a regulated market of significant size. Both the Exchange and CME are members of ISG. The only remaining issue to be addressed is whether the Bitcoin Futures market constitutes a market of significant size, which both the Exchange and the Sponsor believe that it does. The terms ‘‘significant market’’ and ‘‘market of significant size’’ include a market (or group of markets) as to which: (a) there is a reasonable likelihood that a person attempting to manipulate the ETP would also have to trade on that market to manipulate the ETP, so that a surveillance-sharing agreement would assist the listing exchange in detecting and deterring misconduct; and (b) it is unlikely that trading in the ETP would be the predominant influence on prices in that market.73 The Commission has also recognized that the ‘‘regulated market of significant size’’ standard is not the only means for satisfying section 6(b)(5) of the act, specifically providing that a listing exchange could demonstrate that ‘‘other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices’’ are sufficient to justify dispensing with the requisite surveillance-sharing agreement.74 72 As previously articulated by the Commission, ‘‘The standard requires such surveillance-sharing agreements since ‘‘they provide a necessary deterrent to manipulation because they facilitate the availability of information needed to fully investigate a manipulation if it were to occur.’’ The Commission has emphasized that it is essential for an exchange listing a derivative securities product to enter into a surveillance-sharing agreement with markets trading underlying securities for the listing exchange to have the ability to obtain information necessary to detect, investigate, and deter fraud and market manipulation, as well as violations of exchange rules and applicable federal securities laws and rules. The hallmarks of a surveillancesharing agreement are that the agreement provides for the sharing of information about market trading activity, clearing activity, and customer identity; that the parties to the agreement have reasonable ability to obtain access to and produce requested information; and that no existing rules, laws, or practices would impede one party to the agreement from obtaining this information from, or producing it to, the other party.’’ The Commission has historically held that joint membership in the ISG constitutes such a surveillance sharing agreement. See Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval). 73 Id. 74 See Winklevoss Order at 37580. The Commission has also specifically noted that it ‘‘is E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2024 / Notices (a) Manipulation of the ETP According to the research and analysis presented above, the Bitcoin Futures market is the leading market for bitcoin price formation. Where Bitcoin Futures lead the price in the spot market such that a potential manipulator of the bitcoin spot market (beyond just the constituents of the Index) would have to participate in the Bitcoin Futures market, it follows that a potential manipulator of the Shares would similarly have to transact in the Bitcoin Futures market because the Index is based on spot prices. As such, the Exchange believes that part (a) of the significant market test outlined above is satisfied and that common membership in ISG between the Exchange and CME would assist the listing exchange in detecting and deterring misconduct in the Shares. (b) Predominant Influence on Prices in Spot and Bitcoin Futures The Exchange and Sponsor also believe that trading in the Shares would not be the predominant force on prices in the Bitcoin Futures market or spot market for a number of reasons, including the significant volume in the Bitcoin Futures market, the size of bitcoin’s market cap, and the significant liquidity available in the spot market. In addition to the Bitcoin Futures market data points cited above, the spot market for bitcoin is also very liquid. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES (c) Other Means To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and Practices As noted above, the Commission also permits a listing exchange to demonstrate that ‘‘other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices’’ are sufficient to justify dispensing with the requisite surveillance-sharing agreement. The Exchange and Sponsor believe that such conditions are present. (ii) Designed To Protect Investors and the Public Interest The Exchange believes that the proposal is designed to protect investors and the public interest. Over the past several years, U.S. investor exposure to bitcoin through OTC Bitcoin Funds has grown into the tens of billions of dollars, including through Bitcoin Futures ETFs. With that growth, so too has grown the quantifiable investor not applying a ‘cannot be manipulated’ standard; instead, the Commission is examining whether the proposal meets the requirements of the Exchange Act and, pursuant to its Rules of Practice, places the burden on the listing exchange to demonstrate the validity of its contentions and to establish that the requirements of the Exchange Act have been met.’’ Id. at 37582. VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:38 Jan 12, 2024 Jkt 262001 protection issues to U.S. investors through roll costs for Bitcoin Futures ETFs and premium/discount volatility and management fees for OTC Bitcoin Funds. The Exchange believes that the concerns related to the prevention of fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices have been sufficiently addressed to be consistent with the Act and, to the extent that the Commission disagrees with that assertion, such concerns are now outweighed by investor protection concerns. As such, the Exchange believes that approving this proposal (and comparable proposals) provides the Commission with the opportunity to allow U.S. investors with access to bitcoin in a regulated and transparent exchangetraded vehicle that would act to limit risk to U.S. investors by: (i) reducing premium and discount volatility; (ii) reducing management fees through meaningful competition; (iii) reducing risks and costs associated with investing in Bitcoin Futures ETFs and operating companies that are imperfect proxies for bitcoin exposure; and (iv) providing an alternative to custodying spot bitcoin. Commodity-Based Trust Shares The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices in that the Shares will be listed on the Exchange pursuant to the initial and continued listing criteria in Exchange Rule 14.11(e)(4). The Exchange believes that its surveillance procedures are adequate to properly monitor the trading of the Shares on the Exchange during all trading sessions and to deter and detect violations of Exchange rules and the applicable federal securities laws. Trading of the Shares through the Exchange will be subject to the Exchange’s surveillance procedures for derivative products, including Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The issuer has represented to the Exchange that it will advise the Exchange of any failure by the Trust or the Shares to comply with the continued listing requirements, and, pursuant to its obligations under section 19(g)(1) of the Exchange Act, the Exchange will surveil for compliance with the continued listing requirements. If the Trust or the Shares are not in compliance with the applicable listing requirements, the Exchange will commence delisting procedures under Exchange Rule 14.12. The Exchange may obtain information regarding trading in the Shares and listed bitcoin derivatives via the ISG, from other exchanges who are members or affiliates of the ISG, or with which the Exchange PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2277 has entered into a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement. Availability of Information The Exchange also believes that the proposal promotes market transparency in that a large amount of information is currently available about bitcoin and will be available regarding the Trust and the Shares. In addition to the price transparency of the Index, the Trust will provide information regarding the Trust’s bitcoin holdings as well as additional data regarding the Trust. The website for the Trust, which will be publicly accessible at no charge, will contain the following information: (a) the current NAV per Share daily and the prior business day’s NAV and the reported closing price; (b) the BZX Official Closing Price 75 in relation to the NAV as of the time the NAV is calculated and a calculation of the premium or discount of such price against such NAV; (c) data in chart form displaying the frequency distribution of discounts and premiums of the Official Closing Price against the NAV, within appropriate ranges for each of the four previous calendar quarters (or for the life of the Trust, if shorter); (d) the prospectus; and (e) other applicable quantitative information. The Trust will also disseminate its holdings on a daily basis on its website. The aforementioned information will be published as of the close of business available on the Sponsor’s website at www.invesco.com/etfs, or any successor thereto. The IIV will be calculated by using the prior day’s closing NAV per Share as a base and updating that value during Regular Trading Hours to reflect changes in the most recently reported price of bitcoin as reported by the Index Provider or another reporting service. The IIV disseminated during Regular Trading Hours should not be viewed as an actual real-time update of the NAV, which will be calculated only once at the end of each trading day. The IIV may differ from the NAV due to the differences in the time window of trades used to calculate each price. The IIV will be widely disseminated on a per Share basis every 15 seconds during the Exchange’s Regular Trading Hours by one or more major market data vendors. In addition, the IIV will be available through the facilities of the consolidated tape association (CTA) and Consolidated Quotation System (CQS) 75 As defined in Rule 11.23(a)(3), the term ‘‘BZX Official Closing Price’’ shall mean the price disseminated to the consolidated tape as the market center closing trade. E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 2278 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2024 / Notices high speed lines. In addition, the IIV will be available through on-line information services such as Bloomberg and Reuters. The price of bitcoin will be made available by one or more major market data vendors, updated at least every 15 seconds during Regular Trading Hours. As noted above, the Index is designed to provide an estimated fair market value for bitcoin. Information about the Index and Index value, including key elements of how the Index is calculated, will be publicly available at https:// lukka.tech. Quotation and last sale information for bitcoin is widely disseminated through a variety of major market data vendors, including Bloomberg and Reuters. Information relating to trading, including price and volume information, in bitcoin is available from major market data vendors and from the trading platforms on which bitcoin are traded. Depth of book information is also available from bitcoin trading platforms. The normal trading hours for bitcoin trading platforms are 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. Information regarding market price and trading volume of the Shares will be continually available on a real-time basis throughout the day on brokers’ computer screens and other electronic services. Information regarding the previous day’s closing price and trading volume information for the Shares will be published daily in the financial section of newspapers. Quotation and last-sale information regarding the Shares will be disseminated through the facilities of the CTA. In sum, the Exchange believes that this proposal is consistent with the requirements of section 6(b)(5) of the Act, that this filing sufficiently demonstrates that the CME Bitcoin Futures market represents a regulated market of significant size, and that on the whole the manipulation concerns previously articulated by the Commission are sufficiently mitigated to the point that they are outweighed by investor protection issues that would be resolved by approving this proposal. The Exchange believes that the proposal is, in particular, designed to protect investors and the public interest. The investor protection issues for U.S. investors has grown significantly over the last several years, through roll costs for Bitcoin Futures ETFs and premium/ discount volatility and management fees for OTC Bitcoin Funds. As discussed throughout, this growth investor protection concerns need to be reevaluated and rebalanced with the prevention of fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:38 Jan 12, 2024 Jkt 262001 concerns that previous disapproval orders have relied upon. Finally, the Exchange notes that in addition to all of the arguments herein which it believes sufficiently establish the CME Bitcoin Futures market as a regulated market of significant size, it is logically inconsistent to find that the CME Bitcoin Futures market is a significant market as it relates to the CME Bitcoin Futures market, but not a significant market as it relates to the bitcoin spot market for the numerous reasons laid out above. For the above reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of section 6(b)(5) of the Act. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purpose of the Act. The Exchange notes that the proposed rule change, rather will facilitate the listing and trading of an additional exchange-traded product that will enhance competition among both market participants and listing venues, to the benefit of investors and the marketplace. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the proposed rule change. III. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include file number SR– CboeBZX–2023–038 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to file number SR–CboeBZX–2023–038. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions should refer to file number SR–CboeBZX–2023–038 and should be submitted on or before February 2, 2024. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.76 Sherry R. Haywood, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2024–00501 Filed 1–11–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–99297; File No. SR– NASDAQ–2023–057] Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Add the User Specific Routing Option January 8, 2024. Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on December 26, 2023, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and 76 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1

Agencies

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 9 (Friday, January 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2263-2278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00501]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-99283; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2023-038]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing of Amendment No. 2 to a Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade
Shares of the Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF Under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4),
Commodity-Based Trust Shares

January 8, 2024.
On June 30, 2023, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''),
pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to
list and trade shares (``Shares'') of the Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF
(``Trust'') under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust Shares.
On July 11, 2023, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed
rule change, which amended and replaced the proposed rule change in its
entirety. The proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, was
published for comment in the Federal

[[Page 2264]]

Register on July 19, 2023.\3\ On August 31, 2023, pursuant to section
19(b)(2) of the Act,\4\ the Commission designated a longer period
within which to approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1.\5\
On September 18, 2003, the Commission instituted proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change, as modified
by Amendment No. 1.\6\ On January 5, 2024, the Exchange filed Amendment
No. 2 to the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below,
which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. Amendment No. 2 amended
and replaced the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1,
in its entirety. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 2,
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97900 (July 13,
2023), 88 FR 46235. Comments on the proposed rule change are
available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboebzx-2023-038/srcboebzx2023038.htm.
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98266, 88 FR 61658
(Sept. 7, 2023).
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98613, 88 FR 68849
(Oct. 4, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX'' or the ``Exchange'') is filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' or ``SEC'')
a proposed rule change to list and trade shares of the Invesco Galaxy
Bitcoin ETF (the ``Trust''),\7\ under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-
Based Trust Shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\7\ The Trust was formed as a Delaware statutory trust on
December 17, 2020 and is operated as a grantor trust for U.S.
federal tax purposes. The Trust has no fixed termination date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
This Amendment No. 2 to SR-CboeBZX-2023-038 amends and replaces in
its entirety the proposal as originally submitted on June 30, 2023, and
as amended by Amendment No. 1 on July 11, 2023. The Exchange submits
this Amendment No. 2 in order to clarify certain points and add
additional details to the proposal.
The Exchange proposes to list and trade the Shares under BZX Rule
14.11(e)(4),\8\ which governs the listing and trading of Commodity-
Based Trust Shares on the Exchange.\9\ Invesco Capital Management LLC
is the sponsor of the Trust (``Sponsor''). The Shares will be
registered with the Commission by means of the Trust's registration
statement on Form S-1 (the ``Registration Statement'').\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\8\ The Commission approved BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4) in Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 65225 (August 30, 2011), 76 FR 55148
(September 6, 2011) (SR-BATS-2011-018).
\9\ Any of the statements or representations regarding the index
composition, the description of the portfolio or reference assets,
limitations on portfolio holdings or reference assets, dissemination
and availability of index, reference asset, intraday indicative
values, and, or the applicability of Exchange listing rules
specified in this filing to list a series of Other Securities
(collectively, ``Continued Listing Representations'') shall
constitute continued listing requirements for the Shares listed on
the Exchange.
\10\ See Pre-Effective Amendment No. 4 to Form S-1 Registration
Statement filed on December 29, 2023 (Registration No. 333-255175).
The Registration Statement is not yet effective and the Shares will
not trade on the Exchange until such time that the Registration
Statement is effective.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 2265]]

As further discussed below, the Commission has historically
approved or disapproved exchange filings to list and trade series of
Trust Issued Receipts, including spot-based Commodity-Based Trust
Shares, on the basis of whether the listing exchange has in place a
comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement with a regulated market of
significant size related to the underlying commodity to be held.\11\
Prior orders from the Commission have pointed out that in every prior
approval order for Commodity-Based Trust Shares,\12\ there has been a
derivatives market that represents the regulated market of significant
size, generally a Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the ``CFTC'')
regulated futures market.\13\ Further to this point, the Commission's
prior orders have noted that the spot commodities and currency markets
for which it has previously approved spot exchange-traded products
(``ETPs'') are generally unregulated and that the Commission relied on
the underlying futures market as the regulated market of significant
size that formed the basis for approving the series of Currency \14\
and Commodity-Based Trust Shares, including gold, silver, platinum,
palladium, copper, and other commodities and currencies. The Commission
specifically noted in the Winklevoss Order that the First Gold Approval
Order ``was based on an assumption that the currency market and the
spot gold market were largely unregulated.'' \15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83723 (July 26,
2018), 83 FR 37579 (August 1, 2018). This proposal was subsequently
disapproved by the Commission. See Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 83723 (July 26, 2018), 83 FR 37579 (August 1, 2018) (the
``Winklevoss Order'').
\12\ See Exchange Rule 14.11(f)(1).
\13\ See streetTRACKS Gold Shares, Exchange Act Release No.
50603 (Oct. 28, 2004), 69 FR 64614, 64618-19 (Nov. 5, 2004) (SR-
NYSE-2004-22) (the ``First Gold Approval Order''); iShares COMEX
Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 51058 (Jan. 19, 2005), 70 FR
3749, 3751, 3754-55 (Jan. 26, 2005) (SR-Amex-2004-38); iShares
Silver Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 53521 (Mar. 20, 2006), 71 FR
14967, 14968, 14973-74 (Mar. 24, 2006) (SR-Amex-2005-072); ETFS Gold
Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 59895 (May 8, 2009), 74 FR 22993,
22994-95, 22998, 23000 (May 15, 2009) (SR-NYSEArca-2009-40); ETFS
Silver Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 59781 (Apr. 17, 2009), 74 FR
18771, 18772, 18775-77 (Apr. 24, 2009) (SR-NYSEArca-2009-28); ETFS
Palladium Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 61220 (Dec. 22, 2009), 74
FR 68895, 68896 (Dec. 29, 2009) (SR-NYSEArca-2009-94) (notice of
proposed rule change included NYSE Arca's representation that
``[t]he most significant palladium futures exchanges are the NYMEX
and the Tokyo Commodity Exchange,'' that ``NYMEX is the largest
exchange in the world for trading precious metals futures and
options,'' and that NYSE Arca ``may obtain trading information via
the Intermarket Surveillance Group,'' of which NYMEX is a member,
Exchange Act Release No. 60971 (Nov. 9, 2009), 74 FR 59283, 59285-
86, 59291 (Nov. 17, 2009)); ETFS Platinum Trust, Exchange Act
Release No. 61219 (Dec. 22, 2009), 74 FR 68886, 68887-88 (Dec. 29,
2009) (SR-NYSEArca-2009-95) (notice of proposed rule change included
NYSE Arca's representation that ``[t]he most significant platinum
futures exchanges are the NYMEX and the Tokyo Commodity Exchange,''
that ``NYMEX is the largest exchange in the world for trading
precious metals futures and options,'' and that NYSE Arca ``may
obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,''
of which NYMEX is a member, Exchange Act Release No. 60970 (Nov. 9,
2009), 74 FR 59319, 59321, 59327 (Nov. 17, 2009)); Sprott Physical
Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 61496 (Feb. 4, 2010), 75 FR
6758, 6760 (Feb. 10, 2010) (SR-NYSEArca-2009-113) (notice of
proposed rule change included NYSE Arca's representation that the
COMEX is one of the ``major world gold markets,'' that NYSE Arca
``may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance
Group,'' and that NYMEX, of which COMEX is a division, is a member
of the Intermarket Surveillance Group, Exchange Act Release No.
61236 (Dec. 23, 2009), 75 FR 170, 171, 174 (Jan. 4, 2010)); Sprott
Physical Silver Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 63043 (Oct. 5,
2010), 75 FR 62615, 62616, 62619, 62621 (Oct. 12, 2010) (SR-
NYSEArca-2010-84); ETFS Precious Metals Basket Trust, Exchange Act
Release No. 62692 (Aug. 11, 2010), 75 FR 50789, 50790 (Aug. 17,
2010) (SR-NYSEArca-2010-56) (notice of proposed rule change included
NYSE Arca's representation that ``the most significant gold, silver,
platinum and palladium futures exchanges are the COMEX and the
TOCOM'' and that NYSE Arca ``may obtain trading information via the
Intermarket Surveillance Group,'' of which COMEX is a member,
Exchange Act Release No. 62402 (Jun. 29, 2010), 75 FR 39292, 39295,
39298 (July 8, 2010)); ETFS White Metals Basket Trust, Exchange Act
Release No. 62875 (Sept. 9, 2010), 75 FR 56156, 56158 (Sept. 15,
2010) (SR-NYSEArca-2010-71) (notice of proposed rule change included
NYSE Arca's representation that ``the most significant silver,
platinum and palladium futures exchanges are the COMEX and the
TOCOM'' and that NYSE Arca ``may obtain trading information via the
Intermarket Surveillance Group,'' of which COMEX is a member,
Exchange Act Release No. 62620 (July 30, 2010), 75 FR 47655, 47657,
47660 (Aug. 6, 2010)); ETFS Asian Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release
No. 63464 (Dec. 8, 2010), 75 FR 77926, 77928 (Dec. 14, 2010) (SR-
NYSEArca-2010-95) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE
Arca's representation that ``the most significant gold futures
exchanges are the COMEX and the Tokyo Commodity Exchange,'' that
``COMEX is the largest exchange in the world for trading precious
metals futures and options,'' and that NYSE Arca ``may obtain
trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,'' of
which COMEX is a member, Exchange Act Release No. 63267 (Nov. 8,
2010), 75 FR 69494, 69496, 69500-01 (Nov. 12, 2010)); Sprott
Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust, Exchange Act Release No.
68430 (Dec. 13, 2012), 77 FR 75239, 75240-41 (Dec. 19, 2012) (SR-
NYSEArca-2012–111) (notice of proposed rule change included
NYSE Arca's representation that ``[f]utures on platinum and
palladium are traded on two major exchanges: The New York Mercantile
Exchange . . . and Tokyo Commodities Exchange'' and that NYSE Arca
``may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance
Group,'' of which COMEX is a member, Exchange Act Release No. 68101
(Oct. 24, 2012), 77 FR 65732, 65733, 65739 (Oct. 30, 2012)); APMEX
Physical--1 oz. Gold Redeemable Trust, Exchange Act Release No.
66930 (May 7, 2012), 77 FR 27817, 27818 (May 11, 2012) (SR-NYSEArca-
2012-18) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca's
representation that NYSE Arca ``may obtain trading information via
the Intermarket Surveillance Group,'' of which COMEX is a member,
and that gold futures are traded on COMEX and the Tokyo Commodity
Exchange, with a cross-reference to the proposed rule change to list
and trade shares of the ETFS Gold Trust, in which NYSE Arca
represented that COMEX is one of the ``major world gold markets,''
Exchange Act Release No. 66627 (Mar. 20, 2012), 77 FR 17539, 17542-
43, 17547 (Mar. 26, 2012)); JPM XF Physical Copper Trust, Exchange
Act Release No. 68440 (Dec. 14, 2012), 77 FR 75468, 75469-70, 75472,
75485-86 (Dec. 20, 2012) (SR-NYSEArca-2012-28); iShares Copper
Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 68973 (Feb. 22, 2013), 78 FR 13726,
13727, 13729-30, 13739-40 (Feb. 28, 2013) (SR-NYSEArca-2012-66);
First Trust Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 70195 (Aug. 14,
2013), 78 FR 51239, 51240 (Aug. 20, 2013) (SR-NYSEArca-2013-61)
(notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca's representation
that FINRA, on behalf of the exchange, may obtain trading
information regarding gold futures and options on gold futures from
members of the Intermarket Surveillance Group, including COMEX, or
from markets ``with which [NYSE Arca] has in place a comprehensive
surveillance sharing agreement,'' and that gold futures are traded
on COMEX and the Tokyo Commodity Exchange, with a cross-reference to
the proposed rule change to list and trade shares of the ETFS Gold
Trust, in which NYSE Arca represented that COMEX is one of the
``major world gold markets,'' Exchange Act Release No. 69847 (June
25, 2013), 78 FR 39399, 39400, 39405 (July 1, 2013)); Merk Gold
Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 71378 (Jan. 23, 2014), 79 FR 4786,
4786-87 (Jan. 29, 2014) (SR-NYSEArca-2013-137) (notice of proposed
rule change included NYSE Arca's representation that ``COMEX is the
largest gold futures and options exchange'' and that NYSE Arca ``may
obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,''
including with respect to transactions occurring on COMEX pursuant
to CME and NYMEX's membership, or from exchanges ``with which [NYSE
Arca] has in place a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement,''
Exchange Act Release No. 71038 (Dec. 11, 2013), 78 FR 76367, 76369,
76374 (Dec. 17, 2013)); Long Dollar Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release
No. 79518 (Dec. 9, 2016), 81 FR 90876, 90881, 90886, 90888 (Dec. 15,
2016) (SR-NYSEArca-2016-84).
\14\ See Exchange Rule 14.11(e)(5).
\15\ See Winklevoss Order at 37592.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

As such, the regulated market of significant size test does not
require that the spot bitcoin market be regulated in order for the
Commission to approve this proposal, and precedent makes clear that an
underlying market for a spot commodity or currency being a regulated
market would actually be an exception to the norm. These largely
unregulated currency and commodity markets do not provide the same
protections as the markets that are subject to the Commission's
oversight, but the Commission has consistently looked to surveillance
sharing agreements with the underlying futures market in order to
determine whether such products were consistent with the Act. With this
in mind, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (``CME'') bitcoin futures
(``Bitcoin Futures'') market is the proper market to consider in
determining whether there is a related regulated market of significant
size.
Further to this point, the Exchange notes that the Commission has
approved proposals related to the listing and

[[Page 2266]]

trading of funds that would primarily hold CME Bitcoin Futures that are
registered under the Securities Act of 1933.\16\ In the Teucrium
Approval, the Commission found the CME Bitcoin Futures market to be a
regulated market of significant size as it relates to CME Bitcoin
Futures, an odd tautological truth that is also inconsistent with prior
disapproval orders for ETPs that would hold actual bitcoin instead of
derivatives contracts (``Spot Bitcoin ETPs'') that use the exact same
pricing methodology as the CME Bitcoin Futures. As further discussed
below, both the Exchange and the Sponsor believe that this proposal and
the included analysis are sufficient to establish that the CME Bitcoin
Futures market represents a regulated market of significant size as it
relates both to the CME Bitcoin Futures market and to the spot bitcoin
market and that this proposal should be approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\16\ See Exchange Act Release No. 94620 (April 6, 2022), 87 FR
21676 (April 12, 2022) (the ``Teucrium Approval'') and 94853 (May 5,
2022) (collectively, with the Teucrium Approval, the ``Bitcoin
Futures Approvals'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, as discussed in greater detail below, by using
professional custodians and other service providers, the Trust provides
investors interested in exposure to bitcoin with important protections
that are not always available to investors that invest directly in
bitcoin, including protection against insolvency, cyber attacks, and
other risks. If U.S. investors had access to vehicles such as the Trust
for their bitcoin investments, instead of directing their bitcoin
investments into loosely regulated offshore vehicles (such as loosely
regulated centralized trading platforms that have since faced
bankruptcy proceedings or other insolvencies), then countless investors
would have protected their principal investments in bitcoin and thus
benefited.
Background
Bitcoin is a digital asset based on the decentralized, open source
protocol of the peer-to-peer computer network launched in 2009 that
governs the creation, movement, and ownership of bitcoin and hosts the
public ledger, or ``blockchain,'' on which all bitcoin transactions are
recorded (the ``Bitcoin Network'' or ``Bitcoin''). The decentralized
nature of the Bitcoin Network allows parties to transact directly with
one another based on cryptographic proof instead of relying on a
trusted third party. The protocol also lays out the rate of issuance of
new bitcoin within the Bitcoin Network, a rate that is reduced by half
approximately every four years with an eventual hard cap of 21 million.
It's generally understood that the combination of these two features--a
systemic hard cap of 21 million bitcoin and the ability to transact
trustlessly with anyone connected to the Bitcoin Network--gives bitcoin
its value. The first rule filing proposing to list an ETP to provide
exposure to bitcoin in the U.S. was submitted by the Exchange on June
30, 2016.\17\ At that time, blockchain technology, and digital assets
that utilized it, were relatively new to the broader public. The market
cap of all bitcoin in existence at that time was approximately $10
billion. No registered offering of digital asset securities or shares
in an investment vehicle with exposure to bitcoin or any other
cryptocurrency had yet been conducted, and the regulated infrastructure
for conducting a digital asset securities offering had not begun to
develop.\18\ Similarly, regulated U.S. Bitcoin Futures contracts did
not exist. The CFTC had determined that bitcoin is a commodity,\19\ but
had not engaged in significant enforcement actions in the space. The
New York Department of Financial Services (``NYDFS'') adopted its final
``BitLicense'' regulatory framework in 2015, but had only approved four
entities to engage in activities relating to virtual currencies
(whether through granting a BitLicense or a limited-purpose trust
charter) as of June 30, 2016.\20\ While the first over-the-counter
bitcoin fund launched in 2013, public trading was limited and the fund
had only $60 million in assets.\21\ There were very few, if any,
traditional financial institutions engaged in the space, whether
through investment or providing services to digital asset companies. In
January 2018, the staff of the Commission noted in a letter to the
Investment Company Institute (``ICI'') and Securities Industry and
Financial Markets Association (``SIFMA'') that it was not aware, at
that time, of a single custodian providing fund custodial services for
digital assets.\22\ Fast forward to today and the digital assets
financial ecosystem, including bitcoin, has progressed significantly.
The development of a regulated market for digital asset securities has
significantly evolved, with market participants having conducted
registered public offerings of both digital asset securities \23\ and
shares in investment vehicles holding Bitcoin Futures.\24\
Additionally, licensed and regulated service providers have emerged to
provide fund custodial services for digital assets, among other
services, including the Custodian.\25\ For example, in February 2023,
the Commission proposed to amend Rule 206(4)-2 under the Advisers Act
of 1940 (the ``custody rule'') to expand the scope beyond client funds
and securities to include all crypto assets, among other assets; \26\
in May 2021, the staff of the Commission released a statement
permitting open-end mutual funds to invest in cash-settled Bitcoin
Futures; in December 2020, the Commission adopted a conditional no-
action position permitting certain special purpose broker-dealers to
custody digital asset securities under Rule 15c3-3 under the Exchange
Act (the ``Custody Statement''); \27\ in September 2020, the

[[Page 2267]]

staff of the Commission released a no-action letter permitting certain
broker-dealers to operate a non-custodial Alternative Trading System
(``ATS'') for digital asset securities, subject to specified
conditions; \28\ in October 2019, the staff of the Commission granted
temporary relief from the clearing agency registration requirement to
an entity seeking to establish a securities clearance and settlement
system based on distributed ledger technology,\29\ and multiple
transfer agents who provide services for digital asset securities
registered with the Commission.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\17\ See Winklevoss Order.
\18\ Digital assets that are securities under U.S. law are
referred to throughout this proposal as ``digital asset
securities.'' All other digital assets, including bitcoin, are
referred to interchangeably as ``cryptocurrencies'' or ``virtual
currencies.'' The term ``digital assets'' refers to all digital
assets, including both digital asset securities and
cryptocurrencies, together.
\19\ See ``In the Matter of Coinflip, Inc.'' (``Coinflip'')
(CFTC Docket 15-29 (September 17, 2015)) (order instituting
proceedings pursuant to sections 6(c) and 6(d) of the CEA, making
findings and imposing remedial sanctions), in which the CFTC stated:
``Section 1a(9) of the CEA defines `commodity' to include, among
other things, `all services, rights, and interests in which
contracts for future delivery are presently or in the future dealt
in.' 7 U.S.C. 1a(9). The definition of a `commodity' is broad. See,
e.g., Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. SEC, 677 F. 2d 1137, 1142
(7th Cir. 1982). bitcoin and other virtual currencies are
encompassed in the definition and properly defined as commodities.''
\20\ A list of virtual currency businesses that are entities
regulated by the NYDFS is available on the NYDFS website. See
https://www.dfs.ny.gov/apps_and_licensing/virtual_currency_businesses/regulated_entities.
\21\ Data as of March 31, 2016 according to publicly available
filings. See bitcoin Investment Trust Form S-1, dated May 27, 2016,
available: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1588489/000095012316017801/filename1.htm.
\22\ See letter from Dalia Blass, Director, Division of
Investment Management, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to
Paul Schott Stevens, President & CEO, Investment Company Institute
and Timothy W. Cameron, Asset Management Group--Head, Securities
Industry and Financial Markets Association (January 18, 2018),
available at https://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment/noaction/2018/cryptocurrency-011818.htm.
\23\ See Prospectus supplement filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1)
for INX Tokens (Registration No. 333-233363), available at: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1725882/000121390020023202/ea125858-424b1_inxlimited.htm.
\24\ See Prospectus filed by Stone Ridge Trust VI on behalf of
NYDIG bitcoin Strategy Fund Registration, available at: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1764894/000119312519309942/d693146d497.htm.
\25\ The ``Custodian'' is Coinbase Trust Company, LLC.
\26\ See Investment Advisers Act Release No. 6240 88 FR 14672
(March 9, 2023) (Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets).
\27\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90788, 86 FR 11627
(February 26, 2021) (File Number S7-25-20) (Custody of Digital Asset
Securities by Special Purpose Broker-Dealers).
\28\ See letter from Elizabeth Baird, Deputy Director, Division
of Trading and Markets, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to
Kris Dailey, Vice President, Risk Oversight & Operational
Regulation, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (September 25,
2020), available at: https://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/mr-noaction/2020/finra-ats-role-in-settlement-of-digital-asset-security-trades-09252020.pdf.
\29\ See letter from Jeffrey S. Mooney, Associate Director,
Division of Trading and Markets, U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission to Charles G. Cascarilla & Daniel M. Burstein, Paxos
Trust Company, LLC (October 28, 2019), available at: https://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/mr-noaction/2019/paxos-trust-company-102819-17a.pdf.
\30\ See, e.g., Form TA-1/A filed by Tokensoft Transfer Agent
LLC (CIK: 0001794142) on January 8, 2021, available at: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1794142/000179414219000001/xslFTA1X01/primary_doc.xml.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Outside the Commission's purview, the regulatory landscape has
changed significantly since 2016, and cryptocurrency markets have grown
and evolved as well. The market for bitcoin is approximately 100 times
larger, having at one point reached a market cap of over $1
trillion.\31\ According to the CME Bitcoin Futures Report, from
February 13, 2023 through March 27, 2023, CFTC regulated Bitcoin
Futures represented between $750 million and $3.2 billion in notional
trading volume on the CME Bitcoin Futures market on a daily basis.\32\
Open interest was over $1.4 billion for the entirety of the period and
at one point was over $2 billion. ETPs that primarily hold CME Bitcoin
Futures have raised over $1 billion dollars in assets. The CFTC has
exercised its regulatory jurisdiction in bringing a number of
enforcement actions related to bitcoin and against trading platforms
that offer cryptocurrency trading.\33\ As of February 14, 2023 the
NYDFS has granted no fewer than thirty-four BitLicenses,\34\ including
to established public payment companies like PayPal Holdings, Inc. and
Square, Inc., and limited purpose trust charters to entities providing
cryptocurrency custody services. In addition, the Treasury's Office of
Foreign Assets Control (``OFAC'') has brought enforcement actions over
apparent violations of the sanctions laws in connection with the
provision of wallet management services for digital assets.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\31\ As of December 1, 2021, the total market cap of all bitcoin
in circulation was approximately $1.08 trillion.
\32\ Data sourced from the CME Bitcoin Futures Report: 30 March,
2023, available at: https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/cryptocurrencies/bitcoin/bitcoin.volume.htm.
\33\ The CFTC's annual report for Fiscal Year 2022 (which ended
on September 30, 2022) noted that the CFTC completed the fiscal year
with 18 enforcement filings related to digital assets. ``Digital
asset actions included manipulation, a $1.7 billion fraudulent
scheme, and a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) failing to
register as a SEF or FCM or to seek DCM designation.'' See CFTC FY
2022 Agency Financial Report, available at: https://www.cftc.gov/media/7941/2022afr/download. Additionally, the CFTC filed on March
27, 2023, a civil enforcement action against the owner/operators of
the Binance centralized digital asset trading platform, which is one
of the largest bitcoin derivative exchanges. See CFTC Release No.
8680-23 (March 27, 2023), available at: https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8680-23.
\34\ See https://www.dfs.ny.gov/virtual_currency_businesses.
\35\ See U.S. Department of the Treasury Enforcement Release:
``OFAC Enters Into $98,830 Settlement with BitGo, Inc. for Apparent
Violations of Multiple Sanctions Programs Related to Digital
Currency Transactions'' (December 30, 2020) available at: https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/20201230_bitgo.pdf. See also U.S.
Department of the Treasury Enforcement Release: ``Treasury Announces
Two Enforcement Actions for over $24M and $29M Against Virtual
Currency Exchange, Bittrex, Inc.'' (October 11, 2022) available at:
https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1006. See also U.S.
Department of Treasure Enforcement Release ``OFAC Settles with
Virtual Currency Exchange Kraken for $362,158.70 Related to Apparent
Violations of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations''
(November 28, 2022) available at: https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/20221128_kraken.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In addition to the regulatory developments laid out above, more
traditional financial market participants become more active in
cryptocurrency: large insurance companies, asset managers, university
endowments, pension funds, and even historically bitcoin skeptical fund
managers have allocated to bitcoin. As noted in the Financial Stability
Oversight Council (``FSOC'') Report on Digital Asset Financial
Stability Risks and Regulation, ``[i]ndustry surveys suggest that the
scale of these investments grew quickly during the boom in crypto-asset
markets through late 2021. In June 2022, PwC estimated that the number
of crypto-specialist hedge funds was more than 300 globally, with $4.1
billion in assets under management. In addition, in a survey PwC found
that 38 percent of surveyed traditional hedge funds were currently
investing in `digital assets,' compared to 21 percent the year prior.''
\36\ The largest over-the-counter bitcoin fund previously filed a Form
10 registration statement, which the staff of the Commission reviewed
and which took effect automatically, and is now a reporting
company.\37\ Established companies like Tesla, Inc., MicroStrategy
Incorporated, and Square, Inc., among others, have announced
substantial investments in bitcoin in amounts as large as $1.5 billion
(Tesla) and $425 million (MicroStrategy). The foregoing examples
demonstrate that bitcoin has gained mainstream usage and recognition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\36\ See the FSOC ``Report on Digital Asset Financial Stability
Risks and Regulation 2022'' (October 3, 2022) (at footnote 26) at
https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/261/FSOC-Digital-Assets-Report-2022.pdf.
\37\ See Letter from Division of Corporation Finance, Office of
Real Estate & Construction to Barry E. Silbert, Chief Executive
Officer, Grayscale bitcoin Trust (January 31, 2020) https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1588489/000000000020000953/filename1.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Despite these developments, access for U.S. retail investors to
gain exposure to bitcoin via a transparent and U.S. regulated, U.S.
exchange-traded vehicle remains limited. Instead current options
include: (i) facing the counter-party risk, legal uncertainty,
technical risk, and complexity associated with accessing spot bitcoin;
(ii) over-the-counter bitcoin funds (``OTC Bitcoin Funds'') with high
management fees and potentially volatile premiums and discounts; \38\
(iii) purchasing shares of operating companies that they believe will
provide proxy exposure to bitcoin with limited disclosure about the
associated risks; \39\ or (iv) purchasing

[[Page 2268]]

Bitcoin Futures exchange-traded funds (``ETFs''), as defined below,
which represent a sub-optimal structure for long-term investors that
will cost them significant amounts of money every year compared to Spot
Bitcoin ETPs, as further discussed below. Meanwhile, investors in many
other countries, including Canada and Brazil, are able to use more
traditional exchange listed and traded products (including ETFs holding
physical bitcoin) to gain exposure to bitcoin. Similarly, investors in
Switzerland and across Europe have access to Exchange Traded Products
which trade on regulated exchanges and provide exposure to a broad
array of spot crypto assets. U.S. investors, by contrast, are left with
fewer and more risky means of getting bitcoin exposure, as described
above.\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\38\ The premium and discount for OTC Bitcoin Funds is known to
move rapidly. For example, over the period of 12/21/20 to 1/21/21,
the premium for the largest OTC Bitcoin Fund went from 40.18% to
2.79%. While the price of bitcoin appreciated significantly during
this period and NAV per share increased by 41.25%, the price per
share increased by only 3.58%. This means that investors are buying
shares of a fund that experiences significant volatility in its
premium and discount outside of the fluctuations in price of the
underlying asset. Even operating within the normal premium and
discount range, it's possible for an investor to buy shares of an
OTC Bitcoin Fund only to have those shares quickly lose 10% or more
in dollar value excluding any movement of the price of bitcoin. That
is to say--the price of bitcoin could have stayed exactly the same
from market close on one day to market open the next, yet the value
of the shares held by the investor decreased only because of the
fluctuation of the premium. As more investment vehicles, including
mutual funds and ETFs, seek to gain exposure to bitcoin, the easiest
option for a buy and hold strategy for such vehicles is often an OTC
Bitcoin Fund, meaning that even investors that do not directly buy
OTC Bitcoin Funds can be disadvantaged by extreme premiums (or
discounts) and premium volatility.
\39\ A number of operating companies engaged in unrelated
businesses--such as Tesla (a car manufacturer) and MicroStrategy (an
enterprise software company)--have announced investments as large as
$5.3 billion in bitcoin. Without access to bitcoin exchange-traded
products, retail investors seeking investment exposure to bitcoin
may end up purchasing shares in these companies in order to gain the
exposure to bitcoin that they seek. In fact, mainstream financial
news networks have written a number of articles providing investors
with guidance for obtaining bitcoin exposure through publicly traded
companies (such as MicroStrategy, Tesla, and bitcoin mining
companies, among others) instead of dealing with the complications
associated with buying spot bitcoin in the absence of a bitcoin ETP.
See e.g., ``7 public companies with exposure to bitcoin'' (February
8, 2021) available at: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/7-public-companies-with-exposure-to-bitcoin-154201525.html; and ``Want to get
in the crypto trade without holding bitcoin yourself? Here are some
investing ideas'' (February 19, 2021) available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/19/ways-to-invest-in-bitcoin-without-holding-the-cryptocurrency-yourself-.html.
\40\ The Exchange notes that the list of countries above is not
exhaustive and that securities regulators in a number of additional
countries have either approved or otherwise allowed the listing and
trading of Spot Bitcoin ETPs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

To this point, the lack of a Spot Bitcoin ETP exposes U.S. investor
assets to significant risk because investors that would otherwise seek
crypto asset exposure through a Spot Bitcoin ETP are forced to find
alternative exposure through generally riskier means. For instance,
many U.S. investors that held their digital assets in accounts at
FTX,\41\ Celsius Network LLC,\42\ BlockFi Inc.\43\ and Voyager Digital
Holdings, Inc.\44\ have become unsecured creditors in the insolvencies
of those entities. If a Spot Bitcoin ETP was available, it is likely
that at least a portion of the billions of dollars tied up in those
proceedings would still reside in the brokerage accounts of U.S.
investors, having instead been invested in a transparent, regulated,
and well-understood structure--a Spot Bitcoin ETP. To this point,
approval of a Spot Bitcoin ETP would represent a major win for the
protection of U.S. investors in the crypto asset space. As further
described below, the Trust, like all other series of Commodity-Based
Trust Shares, is designed to protect investors against the risk of
losses through fraud and insolvency that arise by holding digital
assets, including bitcoin, on centralized platforms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\41\ See FTX Trading Ltd., et al., Case No. 22-11068.
\42\ See Celsius Network LLC, et al., Case No. 22-10964.
\43\ See BlockFi Inc., Case No. 22-19361.
\44\ See Voyager Digital Holdings, Inc., et al., Case No. 22-
10943.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Additionally, investors in other countries, specifically Canada,
generally pay lower fees than U.S. retail investors that invest in OTC
Bitcoin Funds due to the fee pressure that results from increased
competition among available bitcoin investment options. Without an
approved and regulated Spot Bitcoin ETP in the U.S. as a viable
alternative, U.S. investors could seek to purchase shares of non-U.S.
bitcoin vehicles in order to get access to bitcoin exposure. Given the
separate regulatory regime and the potential difficulties associated
with any international litigation, such an arrangement would create
more risk exposure for U.S. investors than they would otherwise have
with a U.S. exchange listed ETP. In addition to the benefits to U.S.
investors articulated throughout this proposal, approving this proposal
(and others like it) would provide U.S. ETFs and mutual funds with a
U.S.-listed and regulated product to provide such access rather than
relying on either flawed products or products listed and primarily
regulated in other countries.
Bitcoin Futures ETFs
The Exchange and Sponsor applaud the Commission for allowing the
launch of ETFs registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as
amended (the ``1940 Act'') and the Bitcoin Futures Approvals that
provide exposure to bitcoin primarily through CME Bitcoin Futures
(``Bitcoin Futures ETFs''). Allowing such products to list and trade is
a productive first step in providing U.S. investors and traders with
transparent, exchange-listed tools for expressing a view on bitcoin.
The Bitcoin Futures Approvals, however, have created a logical
inconsistency in the application of the standard the Commission applies
when considering Bitcoin ETP proposals.
As discussed further below, the standard applicable to Bitcoin ETPs
is whether the listing exchange has in place a comprehensive
surveillance sharing agreement with a regulated market of significant
size in the underlying asset. Previous disapproval orders have made
clear that a market that constitutes a regulated market of significant
size is generally a futures and/or options market based on the
underlying reference asset rather than the spot commodity markets,
which are often unregulated.\45\ Leaving aside the analysis of that
standard until later in this proposal,\46\ the Exchange believes that
the following rationale the Commission applied to a Bitcoin Futures ETF
should result in the Commission approving this and other Spot Bitcoin
ETP proposals:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\45\ See Winklevoss Order at 37593, specifically footnote 202,
which includes the language from numerous approval orders for which
the underlying futures markets formed the basis for approving series
of ETPs that hold physical metals, including gold, silver,
palladium, platinum, and precious metals more broadly; and 37600,
specifically where the Commission provides that ``when the spot
market is unregulated--the requirement of preventing fraudulent and
manipulative acts may possibly be satisfied by showing that the ETP
listing market has entered into a surveillance-sharing agreement
with a regulated market of significant size in derivatives related
to the underlying asset.'' As noted above, the Exchange believes
that these citations are particularly helpful in making clear that
the spot market for a spot commodity ETP need not be ``regulated''
in order for a spot commodity ETP to be approved by the Commission,
and in fact that it's been the common historical practice of the
Commission to rely on such derivatives markets as the regulated
market of significant size because such spot commodities markets are
largely unregulated.
\46\ As further outlined below, both the Exchange and the
Sponsor believe that the Bitcoin Futures market represents a
regulated market of significant size and that this proposal and
others like it should be approved on this basis.

The CME ``comprehensively surveils futures market conditions and
price movements on a real-time and ongoing basis in order to detect
and prevent price distortions, including price distortions caused by
manipulative efforts.'' Thus the CME's surveillance can reasonably
be relied upon to capture the effects on the CME bitcoin futures
market caused by a person attempting to manipulate the proposed
futures ETP by manipulating the price of CME bitcoin futures
contracts, whether that attempt is made by directly trading on the
CME bitcoin futures market or indirectly by trading outside of the
CME bitcoin futures market. As such, when the CME shares its
surveillance information with Arca, the information would assist in
detecting and deterring fraudulent or manipulative misconduct
related to the non-cash assets held by the proposed ETP.\47\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\47\ See Teucrium Approval at 21679.

CME Bitcoin Futures pricing is based on pricing from spot bitcoin
markets. The statement from the Teucrium Approval that ``CME's
surveillance can reasonably be relied upon to capture the effects on
the CME Bitcoin Futures market caused by a person attempting to
manipulate the proposed futures ETP by manipulating the price of CME
Bitcoin Futures contracts . . . indirectly by trading outside of the
CME Bitcoin

[[Page 2269]]

Futures market,'' makes clear that the Commission believes that CME's
surveillance can capture the effects of trading on the relevant spot
markets on the pricing of CME Bitcoin Futures. This was further
acknowledged in the ``Grayscale lawsuit'' \48\ when Judge Rao stated
``. . . the Commission in the Teucrium order recognizes that the
futures prices are influenced by the spot prices, and the Commission
concludes in approving futures ETPs that any fraud on the spot market
can be adequately addressed by the fact that the futures market is a
regulated one . . .'' The Exchange agrees with the Commission on this
point and notes that the pricing mechanism applicable to the Shares is
similar to that of the CME Bitcoin Futures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\48\ Grayscale Investments, LLC v. Securities and Exchange
Commission, et al., Case No. 22-1142.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The structure of Bitcoin Futures ETFs provides negative outcomes
for buy and hold investors as compared to a Spot Bitcoin ETP.\49\
Specifically, the cost of rolling CME Bitcoin Futures contracts will
cause the Bitcoin Futures ETFs to lag the performance of bitcoin itself
and would cost U.S. investors significant amounts of money on an annual
basis compared to Spot Bitcoin ETPs. Such rolling costs would not be
required for Spot Bitcoin ETPs that hold bitcoin. Further, Bitcoin
Futures ETFs could potentially hit CME position limits, which would
force a Bitcoin Futures ETF to invest in non-futures assets for bitcoin
exposure and cause potential investor confusion and lack of certainty
about what such Bitcoin Futures ETFs are actually holding to try to get
exposure to bitcoin, not to mention completely changing the risk
profile associated with such an ETF. While Bitcoin Futures ETFs
represent a useful trading tool, they are clearly a sub-optimal
structure for U.S. investors that are looking for long-term exposure to
bitcoin that will, based on the calculations above, unnecessarily cost
U.S. investors significant amounts of money every year compared to Spot
Bitcoin ETPs and the Exchange believes that any proposal to list and
trade a Spot Bitcoin ETP should be reviewed by the Commission with this
important investor protection context in mind.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\49\ See e.g., ``Bitcoin ETF's Success Could Come at
Fundholders' Expense,'' Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2021),
available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/bitcoin-etfs-success-could-come-at-fundholders-expense-11635080580; ``Physical Bitcoin
ETF Prospects Accelerate,'' ETF.com (October 25, 2021), available
at: https://www.etf.com/sections/blog/physical-bitcoin-etf-prospects-shine?nopaging=1&__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=pmd_JsK.fjXz9eAQW9zol0qpzhXDrrlpIVdoCloLXbLjl44-1635476946-0-gqNtZGzNApCjcnBszQql.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Based on the foregoing, the Exchange and Sponsor believe that any
objective review of the proposals to list Spot Bitcoin ETPs compared to
the Bitcoin Futures ETFs and the Bitcoin Futures Approvals would lead
to the conclusion that Spot Bitcoin ETPs should be available to U.S.
investors and, as such, this proposal and other comparable proposals to
list and trade Spot Bitcoin ETPs should be approved by the Commission.
Stated simply, U.S. investors will continue to lose significant amounts
of money from holding Bitcoin Futures ETFs as compared to Spot Bitcoin
ETPs, losses which could be prevented by the Commission approving Spot
Bitcoin ETPs. Additionally, any concerns related to preventing
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices related to Spot Bitcoin
ETPs would apply equally to the spot markets underlying the futures
contracts held by a Bitcoin Futures ETF. Both the Exchange and Sponsor
believe that the CME Bitcoin Futures market is a regulated market of
significant size and that such manipulation concerns are mitigated, as
described extensively below. After allowing and approving the listing
and trading of Bitcoin Futures ETFs that hold primarily CME Bitcoin
Futures, however, the only consistent outcome would be approving Spot
Bitcoin ETPs on the basis that the CME Bitcoin Futures market is a
regulated market of significant size.
Given the current landscape, approving this proposal (and others
like it) and allowing Spot Bitcoin ETPs to be listed and traded
alongside Bitcoin Futures ETFs would establish a consistent regulatory
approach, provide U.S. investors with choice in product structures for
bitcoin exposure, and offer flexibility in the means of gaining
exposure to bitcoin through transparent, regulated, U.S. exchange-
listed vehicles.
Bitcoin Futures
CME began offering trading in Bitcoin Futures in 2017. Each
contract represents five bitcoin and is based on the CME CF Bitcoin
Reference Rate.\50\ The contracts trade and settle like other cash-
settled commodity futures contracts. Nearly every measurable metric
related to Bitcoin Futures has generally trended up since launch,
although certain notional volume calculations have decreased roughly in
line with the decrease in the price of bitcoin. For example, there were
143,215 Bitcoin Futures contracts traded in April 2023 (approximately
$20.7 billion) compared to 193,182 ($5 billion), 104,713 ($3.9
billion), 118,714 ($42.7 billion), and 111,964 ($23.2 billion)
contracts traded in April 2019, April 2020, April 2021, and April 2022,
respectively.\51\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\50\ The CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate is based on a publicly
available calculation methodology based on pricing sourced from
several crypto trading platforms, including Bitstamp, Coinbase,
Gemini, itBit, Kraken, and LMAX Digital.
\51\ Source: CME, Yahoo Finance 4/30/23.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

[[Page 2270]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12JA24.021

The number of large open interest holders \52\ and unique accounts
trading Bitcoin Futures have both increased, even in the face of
heightened bitcoin price volatility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\52\ A large open interest holder in Bitcoin Futures is an
entity that holds at least 25 contracts, which is the equivalent of
125 bitcoin. At a price of approximately $29,268.81 per bitcoin on
4/30/2023, more than 100 firms had outstanding positions of greater
than $3.65 million in Bitcoin Futures.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12JA24.022

[[Page 2271]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12JA24.023

BILLING CODE 8011-01-C
The Sponsor further believes that publicly available research,
including research done as part of rule filings proposing to list and
trade shares of Spot Bitcoin ETPs, corroborates the overall trend
outlined above and supports the thesis that the Bitcoin Futures pricing
leads the spot market and, thus, a person attempting to manipulate the
Shares would also have to trade on that market to manipulate the ETP.
Specifically, the Sponsor believes that such research indicates that
Bitcoin Futures lead the bitcoin spot market in price formation.\53\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\53\ See Exchange Act Releases No. 94080 (January 27, 2022), 87
FR 5527 (April 12, 2022) (specifically ``Amendment No. 1 to the
Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Shares of the Wise Origin
Bitcoin Trust Under BZX Rule 14.11(3)(4), Commodity-Based Trust
Shares''); 94982 (May 25, 2022), 87 FR 33250 (June 1, 2022); 94844
(May 4, 2022), 87 FR 28043 (May 10, 2022); and 93445 (October 28,
2021), 86 FR 60695 (November 3, 2021). See also Hu, Y., Hou, Y. and
Oxley, L. (2019). ``What role do futures markets play in Bitcoin
pricing? Causality, cointegration and price discovery from a time-
varying perspective'' (available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481826/). This academic research paper concludes
that ``There exist no episodes where the Bitcoin spot markets
dominates the price discovery processes with regard to Bitcoin
futures. This points to a conclusion that the price formation
originates solely in the Bitcoin futures market. We can, therefore,
conclude that the Bitcoin futures markets dominate the dynamic price
discovery process based upon time-varying information share
measures. Overall, price discovery seems to occur in the Bitcoin
futures markets rather than the underlying spot market based upon a
time-varying perspective.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 6(b)(5) and the Applicable Standards
The Commission has approved numerous series of Trust Issued
Receipts,\54\ including Commodity-Based Trust Shares,\55\ to be listed
on U.S. national securities exchanges. In order for any proposed rule
change from an exchange to be approved, the Commission must determine
that, among other things, the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of section 6(b)(5) of the Act, specifically including: (i)
the requirement that a national securities exchange's rules are
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices;
\56\ and (ii) the requirement that an exchange proposal be designed, in
general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange
believes that this proposal is consistent with the requirements of
section 6(b)(5) of the Act and that this filing sufficiently
demonstrates that the CME Bitcoin Futures market represents a regulated
market of significant size and that, on the whole, the manipulation
concerns previously articulated by the Commission are sufficiently
mitigated to the point that they are outweighed by quantifiable
investor protection issues that would be resolved by approving this
proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\54\ See Exchange Rule 14.11(f).
\55\ Commodity-Based Trust Shares, as described in Exchange Rule
14.11(e)(4), are a type of Trust Issued Receipt.
\56\ As the Exchange has stated in a number of other public
documents, it continues to believe that bitcoin is resistant to
price manipulation and that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices'' exist to justify dispensing with
the requisite surveillance sharing agreement. The geographically
diverse and continuous nature of bitcoin trading render it difficult
and prohibitively costly to manipulate the price of bitcoin. The
fragmentation across bitcoin platforms, the relatively slow speed of
transactions, and the capital necessary to maintain a significant
presence on each trading platform make manipulation of bitcoin
prices through continuous trading activity challenging. To the
extent that there are bitcoin trading platforms engaged in or
allowing wash trading or other activity intended to manipulate the
price of bitcoin on other markets, such pricing does not normally
impact prices on other trading platforms because participants will
generally ignore markets with quotes that they deem non-executable.
Moreover, the linkage between the bitcoin markets and the presence
of arbitrageurs in those markets means that the manipulation of the
price of bitcoin price on any single venue would require
manipulation of the global bitcoin price in order to be effective.
Arbitrageurs must have funds distributed across multiple trading
platforms in order to take advantage of temporary price
dislocations, thereby making it unlikely that there will be strong
concentration of funds on any particular bitcoin trading platform or
OTC platform. As a result, the potential for manipulation on a
trading platform would require overcoming the liquidity supply of
such arbitrageurs who are effectively eliminating any cross-market
pricing differences.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 2272]]

market of significant size. Both the Exchange and CME are members of
the Intermarket Surveillance Group (``ISG'').\58\ The only remaining
issue to be addressed is whether the Bitcoin Futures market constitutes
a market of significant size, which both the Exchange and the Sponsor
believe that it does. The terms ``significant market'' and ``market of
significant size'' include a market (or group of markets) as to which:
(a) there is a reasonable likelihood that a person attempting to
manipulate the ETP would also have to trade on that market to
manipulate the ETP, so that a surveillance-sharing agreement would
assist the listing exchange in detecting and deterring misconduct; and
(b) it is unlikely that trading in the ETP would be the predominant
influence on prices in that market.\59\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\57\ As previously articulated by the Commission, ``The standard
requires such surveillance-sharing agreements since ``they provide a
necessary deterrent to manipulation because they facilitate the
availability of information needed to fully investigate a
manipulation if it were to occur.'' The Commission has emphasized
that it is essential for an exchange listing a derivative securities
product to enter into a surveillance- sharing agreement with markets
trading underlying securities for the listing exchange to have the
ability to obtain information necessary to detect, investigate, and
deter fraud and market manipulation, as well as violations of
exchange rules and applicable federal securities laws and rules. The
hallmarks of a surveillance-sharing agreement are that the agreement
provides for the sharing of information about market trading
activity, clearing activity, and customer identity; that the parties
to the agreement have reasonable ability to obtain access to and
produce requested information; and that no existing rules, laws, or
practices would impede one party to the agreement from obtaining
this information from, or producing it to, the other party.'' The
Commission has historically held that joint membership in the
Intermarket Surveillance Group (``ISG'') constitutes such a
surveillance sharing agreement. See Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 88284 (February 26, 2020), 85 FR 12595 (March 3, 2020) (SR-
NYSEArca-2019-39) (the ``Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval'').
\58\ For a list of the current members and affiliate members of
ISG, see www.isgportal.com.
\59\ See Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Commission has also recognized that the ``regulated market of
significant size'' standard is not the only means for satisfying
section 6(b)(5) of the act, specifically providing that a listing
exchange could demonstrate that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices'' are sufficient to justify dispensing
with the requisite surveillance-sharing agreement.\60\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\60\ See Winklevoss Order at 37580. The Commission has also
specifically noted that it ``is not applying a `cannot be
manipulated' standard; instead, the Commission is examining whether
the proposal meets the requirements of the Exchange Act and,
pursuant to its Rules of Practice, places the burden on the listing
exchange to demonstrate the validity of its contentions and to
establish that the requirements of the Exchange Act have been met.''
Id. at 37582.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\61\ As further described below, the ``Index'' for the Fund is
the Bloomberg Galaxy Bitcoin Index.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Predominant Influence on Prices in Spot and Bitcoin Futures
The Exchange and Sponsor also believe that trading in the Shares
would not be the predominant force on prices in the Bitcoin Futures
market or spot market for a number of reasons, including the
significant volume in the Bitcoin Futures market, the size of bitcoin's
market cap, and the significant liquidity available in the spot market.
In addition to the Bitcoin Futures market data points cited above, the
spot market for bitcoin is also very liquid.
(c) Other Means To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and
Practices
As noted above, the Commission also permits a listing exchange to
demonstrate that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices'' are sufficient to justify dispensing with the
requisite surveillance-sharing agreement. The Exchange and Sponsor
believe that such conditions are present.
(ii) Designed To Protect Investors and the Public Interest
The Exchange believes that the proposal is designed to protect
investors and the public interest. Over the past several years, U.S.
investor exposure to bitcoin through OTC Bitcoin Funds has grown into
the tens of billions of dollars, including through Bitcoin Futures
ETFs. With that growth, so too has grown the quantifiable investor
protection issues to U.S. investors through roll costs for Bitcoin
Futures ETFs and premium/discount volatility and management fees for
OTC Bitcoin Funds. The Exchange believes that the concerns related to
the prevention of fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices have
been sufficiently addressed to be consistent with the Act and, to the
extent that the Commission disagrees with that assertion, such concerns
are now outweighed by investor protection concerns. As such, the
Exchange believes that approving this proposal (and comparable
proposals) provides the Commission with the opportunity to allow U.S.
investors with access to bitcoin in a regulated and transparent
exchange-traded vehicle that would act to limit risk to U.S. investors
by: (i) reducing premium and discount volatility; (ii) reducing
management fees through meaningful competition; (iii) reducing risks
and costs associated with investing in Bitcoin Futures ETFs and
operating companies that are imperfect proxies for bitcoin exposure;
and (iv) providing an alternative to custodying spot bitcoin.
Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF
Delaware Trust Company is the trustee (``Trustee''). The Bank of
New York Mellon will be the administrator (``Administrator'') and
transfer agent (``Transfer Agent''). As noted above, Coinbase Custody
Trust Company, LLC, is the Custodian and will be responsible for
custody of the Trust's bitcoin. The Bank of New York Mellon (the ``Cash
Custodian'') will act as custodian of the Trust's cash and cash
equivalents.\62\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\62\ Cash equivalents are short-term instruments with maturities
of less than 3 months.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

According to the Registration Statement, each Share will represent
a fractional undivided beneficial interest and ownership in the Trust.
The Trust's assets will consist only of bitcoin, cash, and cash
equivalents.
According to the Registration Statement, the Trust is neither an
investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940,
as amended,\63\ nor a commodity pool for purposes of the Commodity
Exchange Act (``CEA''), and neither the Trust nor the Sponsor is
subject to regulation as a commodity pool operator or a commodity
trading adviser in connection with the Shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\63\ 15 U.S.C. 80a-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

When the Trust sells or redeems its Shares, it will do so in cash
transactions in blocks of 5,000 Shares (a ``Creation Basket'') at the
Trust's net asset value (``NAV''). Authorized participants will
deliver, or facilitate the delivery of, cash to the Trust's account
with the Cash Custodian (which will then be used to purchase bitcoin
for the Trust) in exchange for Shares when they purchase Shares, and
the Trust, through the Cash Custodian, will deliver cash to such
authorized participants when they redeem Shares with the Trust. A third
party will use cash to buy and deliver bitcoin to create Shares or
withdraw and sell bitcoin for cash to redeem Shares, on behalf of the
Trust. Authorized participants may then offer Shares to the public at
prices that depend on various factors, including the supply and demand
for Shares, the value of the Trust's assets, and market conditions at
the time of a transaction. shareholders who buy or sell Shares during
the day from their broker may do so at a

[[Page 2273]]

premium or discount relative to the NAV of the Shares of the Trust.
Investment Objective
According to the Registration Statement and as further described
below, the investment objective of the Trust is to reflect the
performance as measured using Lukka Prime Bitcoin Reference Rate (the
``Index''), less the Trust's expenses and other liabilities. In seeking
to achieve its investment objective, the Trust will hold only bitcoin,
cash, and cash equivalents. The Trust will value its Shares daily based
on the value of the Index as of 4:00 p.m. ET, which is calculated based
on the fair market value price for bitcoin, reflecting the execution
price of bitcoin on its principal market as determined by Lukka Inc.,
an independent third-party digital asset company (the ``Index
Provider''). The Trust will process all creations and redemptions in
cash transactions with authorized participants. The Trust is not
actively managed.
The Index
As described in the Registration Statement, the Fund will use the
Index to calculate the Trust's NAV. The Index is designed to provide an
estimated fair market value for bitcoin. In determining the value of
bitcoin, the Index Provider applies a five-step weighting process for
identifying the principal trading platform for bitcoin and the last
price on that trading platform. Currently, the Index includes the
following trading platforms: Binance, Bitfinex, Bitflyer, Bitstamp,
Coinbase Pro, Crypto.com, Gemini, HitBTC, Huobi, Kraken, KuCoin, OKEx
and Poloniex. In identifying the principal trading platform for
bitcoin, the Index Provider considers a variety of different criteria,
including the trading platforms' oversight and governance frameworks,
microstructure efficiency (i.e., effective bid-ask spread), trading
volume, data transparency and data integrity. A ``base exchange score''
(``BES'') that takes into account this criteria is assigned to each
Index pricing source in order to select the most appropriate primary
trading platform and then an executed trading platform price is
determined at 4:00 p.m. ET., although the Index Provider performs this
calculation every second each day.
Step 1: Assign each trading platform for bitcoin and U.S. Dollars a
BES reflecting static trading platform characteristics such as
oversight, microstructure and technology.
Step 2: Adjust the BES based on the relative monthly volume each
trading platform services. This new score is the Volume Adjusted Score
(``VAS'').
Step 3: Decay the adjusted score based on the time passed since
last trade on trading platform, assessing the level of activity in the
market by considering the frequency (volume) of trades. The decay
factor reflects the time since the last trade on the trading platform.
This is the final Decayed Volume Adjusted Score (``DVAS''), which
reflects the freshness of data by tracking most recent trades.
Step 4: Rank the trading platforms by the DVAS score and designate
the highest-ranking trading platform as the principal market for that
point in time--the principal market is the trading platform with
highest DVAS.
Step 5: An executed trading platform price is used to represent the
fair market value at 4:00 p.m. ET.
Index data and the description of the Index are based on
information made publicly available by the Index Provider on its
website at https://lukka.tech.
Net Asset Value
The Trust's NAV is calculated by (1) taking the current market
value of its bitcoin (calculated by the Index Provider) and any other
assets; (2) subtracting any liabilities (including accrued by unpaid
expenses); and (3) dividing that total by the total number of
outstanding Shares. The Administrator calculates the NAV of the Trust
on each day that the Exchange is open for regular trading, using the
execution price of bitcoin on the principal market selected by the
Index Provider as of 4:00 p.m. ET. However, NAVs are not officially
struck until later in the day (often by 5:30 p.m. ET and almost always
by 8:00 p.m. ET).
The NAV for the Trust will be calculated by the Administrator once
a day and will be disseminated daily to all market participants at the
same time.
In the event that the Index is unavailable or if the Sponsor or
Administrator determines that the price provided by the Index does not
reflect an accurate bitcoin price, the Sponsor's pricing team will
evaluate the prices of other similar benchmarks in an effort to ensure
that the Trust's NAV is determined based on consistent, accurate
pricing that the Sponsor believes is reflective of the value of the
Trust's bitcoin, and also a transparent index methodology and process.
The pricing team will recommend the price to be used to the Sponsor's
valuation committee who will then review the recommendation and approve
it for use by the Trust if found appropriate.\64\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\64\ Such alternative method will only be employed on an ad hoc
basis. Any permanent change to the calculation of the NAV would
require a proposed rule change under Rule 19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Availability of Information
In addition to the price transparency of the Index, the Trust will
provide information regarding the Trust's bitcoin holdings as well as
additional data regarding the Trust. The website for the Trust, which
will be publicly accessible at no charge, will contain the following
information: (a) the current NAV per Share daily and the prior business
day's NAV and the reported closing price; (b) the BZX Official Closing
Price \65\ in relation to the NAV as of the time the NAV is calculated
and a calculation of the premium or discount of such price against such
NAV; (c) data in chart form displaying the frequency distribution of
discounts and premiums of the Official Closing Price against the NAV,
within appropriate ranges for each of the four previous calendar
quarters (or for the life of the Trust, if shorter); (d) the
prospectus; and (e) other applicable quantitative information. The
Trust will also disseminate its holdings on a daily basis on its
website. The aforementioned information will be published as of the
close of business available on the Sponsor's website at
www.invesco.com/etfs, or any successor thereto.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\65\ As defined in Rule 11.23(a)(3), the term ``BZX Official
Closing Price'' shall mean the price disseminated to the
consolidated tape as the market center closing trade.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Intraday Indicative Value (``IIV'') will be calculated by using
the prior day's closing NAV per Share as a base and updating that value
during Regular Trading Hours to reflect changes in the most recently
reported price of bitcoin as reported by the Index Provider or another
reporting service. The IIV disseminated during Regular Trading Hours
should not be viewed as an actual real-time update of the NAV, which
will be calculated only once at the end of each trading day. The IIV
may differ from the NAV due to the differences in the time window of
trades used to calculate each price. The IIV will be widely
disseminated on a per Share basis every 15 seconds during the
Exchange's Regular Trading Hours by one or more major market data
vendors. In addition, the IIV will be available through the facilities
of the consolidated tape association (CTA) and Consolidated Quotation
System (CQS) high speed lines. In addition, the IIV will be available
through on-line information services such as Bloomberg and Reuters.
The price of bitcoin will be made available by one or more major
market

[[Page 2274]]

data vendors, updated at least every 15 seconds during Regular Trading
Hours.
As noted above, the Index is designed to provide an estimated fair
market value for bitcoin. Information about the Index and Index value,
including key elements of how the Index is calculated, will be publicly
available at https://lukka.tech.
Quotation and last sale information for bitcoin is widely
disseminated through a variety of major market data vendors, including
Bloomberg and Reuters. Information relating to trading, including price
and volume information, in bitcoin is available from major market data
vendors and from the trading platforms on which bitcoin are traded.
Depth of book information is also available from bitcoin trading
platforms. The normal trading hours for bitcoin trading platforms are
24 hours per day, 365 days per year.
Information regarding market price and trading volume of the Shares
will be continually available on a real-time basis throughout the day
on brokers' computer screens and other electronic services. Information
regarding the previous day's closing price and trading volume
information for the Shares will be published daily in the financial
section of newspapers. Quotation and last-sale information regarding
the Shares will be disseminated through the facilities of the
Consolidated Tape Association (``CTA'').
The Bitcoin Custodian
The Custodian carefully considers the design of the physical,
operational and cryptographic systems for secure storage of the Trust's
private keys in an effort to lower the risk of loss or theft. The
Custodian utilizes a variety of security measures to ensure that
private keys necessary to transfer digital assets remain uncompromised
and that the Trust maintains exclusive ownership of its assets. The
operational procedures of the Custodian are reviewed by third-party
advisors with specific expertise in physical security. The devices that
store the keys will never be connected to the internet or any other
public or private distributed network--this is colloquially known as
``cold storage.'' Only specific individuals are authorized to
participate in the custody process, and no individual acting alone will
be able to access or use any of the private keys. In addition, no
combination of the executive officers of the Sponsor or the investment
professionals managing the Trust, acting alone or together, will be
able to access or use any of the private keys that hold the Trust's
bitcoin.
Creation and Redemption of Shares
When the Trust sells or redeems its Shares, it will do so in cash
transactions in blocks of 5,000 Shares that are based on the quantity
of bitcoin attributable to each Share of the Trust (e.g., a Creation
Basket) at the Trust's NAV. According to the Registration Statement, on
any business day, an authorized participant may place an order to
create one or more Creation Baskets. Purchase orders must be placed by
4:00 p.m. Eastern Time, or the close of regular trading on the
Exchange, whichever is earlier. The day on which an order is received
is considered the purchase order date. The total deposit of cash
required is an amount of cash sufficient to purchase such amount of
bitcoin, the amount of which is equal to the combined NAV of the number
of Shares included in the Creation Baskets being created determined as
of 4:00 ET on the date the order to purchase is properly received. The
Administrator determines the required deposit for a given day by
multiplying the NAV per share by the number of Shares in each Creation
Basket (5,000) and dividing the product by that day's bitcoin price as
determined by the Index. The procedures by which an authorized
participant can redeem one or more Creation Baskets mirror the
procedures for the creation of Creation Baskets.
The authorized participants will deliver only cash to create shares
and will receive only cash when redeeming shares. Further, authorized
participants will not directly or indirectly purchase, hold, deliver,
or receive bitcoin as part of the creation or redemption process or
otherwise direct the Trust or a third party with respect to purchasing,
holding, delivering, or receiving bitcoin as part of the creation or
redemption process.
The Trust will create shares by receiving bitcoin from a third
party that is not the authorized participant and the Trust (through an
execution agent that is acting in an agency capacity)--not the
authorized participant--is responsible for selecting the third party to
deliver the bitcoin. Further, the third party will not be acting as an
agent of the authorized participant with respect to the delivery of the
bitcoin to the Trust or acting at the direction of the authorized
participant with respect to the delivery of the bitcoin to the Trust.
The Trust will redeem shares by delivering bitcoin to a third party
that is not the authorized participant and the Trust--not the
authorized participant--is responsible for selecting the third party to
receive the bitcoin. Further, the third party will not be acting as an
agent of the authorized participant with respect to the receipt of the
bitcoin from the Trust or acting at the direction of the authorized
participant with respect to the receipt of the bitcoin from the Trust.
A third party, that is unaffiliated with the Trust and the Sponsor,
will use cash to buy and deliver bitcoin to create Shares or withdraw
and sell bitcoin for cash to redeem Shares, on behalf of the Trust.
The Sponsor will maintain ownership and control of bitcoin in a
manner consistent with good delivery requirements for spot commodity
transactions.
Rule 14.11(e)(4)--Commodity-Based Trust Shares
The Shares will be subject to BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), which sets
forth the initial and continued listing criteria applicable to
Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The Exchange represents that, for initial
and continued listing, the Trust must be in compliance with Rule 10A-3
under the Act. A minimum of 100,000 Shares will be outstanding at the
commencement of listing on the Exchange. The Exchange will obtain a
representation that the Trust's NAV will be calculated daily and the
NAV and information about the assets of the Trust will be made
available to all market participants at the same time. The Exchange
notes that, as defined in Rule 14.11(e)(4)(C)(i), the Shares will be:
(a) issued by a trust that holds (1) a specified commodity \66\
deposited with the trust, or (2) a specified commodity and, in addition
to such specified commodity, cash; (b) issued by such trust in a
specified aggregate minimum number in return for a deposit of a
quantity of the underlying commodity and/or cash; and (c) when
aggregated in the same specified minimum number, may be redeemed at a
holder's request by such trust which will deliver to the redeeming
holder the quantity of the underlying commodity and/or cash.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\66\ For purposes of Rule 14.11(e)(4), the term commodity takes
on the definition of the term as provided in the Commodity Exchange
Act. As noted above, the CFTC has opined that bitcoin is a commodity
as defined in section 1a(9) of the Commodity Exchange Act. See
Coinflip.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Upon termination of the Trust, the Shares will be removed from
listing. The Trustee, Delaware Trust Company, is a trust company having
substantial capital and surplus and the experience and facilities for
handling corporate trust business, as required under Rule
14.11(e)(4)(E)(iv)(a) and that no change will be made to the trustee
without prior notice to and approval of the Exchange. The Exchange also
notes that, pursuant to Rule 14.11(e)(4)(F), neither the

[[Page 2275]]

Exchange nor any agent of the Exchange shall have any liability for
damages, claims, losses or expenses caused by any errors, omissions or
delays in calculating or disseminating any underlying commodity value,
the current value of the underlying commodity required to be deposited
to the Trust in connection with issuance of Commodity-Based Trust
Shares; resulting from any negligent act or omission by the Exchange,
or any agent of the Exchange, or any act, condition or cause beyond the
reasonable control of the Exchange, its agent, including, but not
limited to, an act of God; fire; flood; extraordinary weather
conditions; war; insurrection; riot; strike; accident; action of
government; communications or power failure; equipment or software
malfunction; or any error, omission or delay in the reports of
transactions in an underlying commodity. Finally, as required in Rule
14.11(e)(4)(G), the Exchange notes that any registered market maker
(``Market Maker'') in the Shares must file with the Exchange in a
manner prescribed by the Exchange and keep current a list identifying
all accounts for trading in an underlying commodity, related commodity
futures or options on commodity futures, or any other related commodity
derivatives, which the registered Market Maker may have or over which
it may exercise investment discretion. No registered Market Maker shall
trade in an underlying commodity, related commodity futures or options
on commodity futures, or any other related commodity derivatives, in an
account in which a registered Market Maker, directly or indirectly,
controls trading activities, or has a direct interest in the profits or
losses thereof, which has not been reported to the Exchange as required
by this Rule. In addition to the existing obligations under Exchange
rules regarding the production of books and records (see, e.g., Rule
4.2), the registered Market Maker in Commodity-Based Trust Shares shall
make available to the Exchange such books, records or other information
pertaining to transactions by such entity or registered or non-
registered employee affiliated with such entity for its or their own
accounts for trading the underlying physical commodity, related
commodity futures or options on commodity futures, or any other related
commodity derivatives, as may be requested by the Exchange.
The Exchange is able to obtain information regarding trading in the
Shares and the underlying bitcoin, Bitcoin Futures contracts, options
on Bitcoin Futures, or any other bitcoin derivative through members
acting as registered Market Makers, in connection with their
proprietary or customer trades.
As a general matter, the Exchange has regulatory jurisdiction over
its members, and their associated persons. The Exchange also has
regulatory jurisdiction over any person or entity controlling a member,
as well as a subsidiary or affiliate of a member that is in the
securities business. A subsidiary or affiliate of a member organization
that does business only in commodities would not be subject to Exchange
jurisdiction, but the Exchange could obtain information regarding the
activities of such subsidiary or affiliate through surveillance sharing
agreements with regulatory organizations of which such subsidiary or
affiliate is a member.
Trading Halts
With respect to trading halts, the Exchange may consider all
relevant factors in exercising its discretion to halt or suspend
trading in the Shares. The Exchange will halt trading in the Shares
under the conditions specified in BZX Rule 11.18. Trading may be halted
because of market conditions or for reasons that, in the view of the
Exchange, make trading in the Shares inadvisable. These may include:
(1) the extent to which trading is not occurring in the bitcoin
underlying the Shares; or (2) whether other unusual conditions or
circumstances detrimental to the maintenance of a fair and orderly
market are present. Trading in the Shares also will be subject to Rule
14.11(e)(4)(E)(ii), which sets forth circumstances under which trading
in the Shares may be halted.
If the IIV or the value of the Index is not being disseminated as
required, the Exchange may halt trading during the day in which the
interruption to the dissemination of the IIV or the value of the Index
occurs. If the interruption to the dissemination of the IIV or the
value of the Index persists past the trading day in which it occurred,
the Exchange will halt trading no later than the beginning of the
trading day following the interruption.
In addition, if the Exchange becomes aware that the NAV with
respect to the Shares is not disseminated to all market participants at
the same time, it will halt trading in the Shares until such time as
the NAV is available to all market participants.
Trading Rules
The Exchange deems the Shares to be equity securities, thus
rendering trading in the Shares subject to the Exchange's existing
rules governing the trading of equity securities. BZX will allow
trading in the Shares during all trading sessions on the Exchange. The
Exchange has appropriate rules to facilitate transactions in the Shares
during all trading sessions. As provided in BZX Rule 11.11(a) the
minimum price variation for quoting and entry of orders in securities
traded on the Exchange is $0.01 where the price is greater than $1.00
per share or $0.0001 where the price is less than $1.00 per share. The
Shares of the Trust will conform to the initial and continued listing
criteria set forth in BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4).
Surveillance
The Exchange represents that its surveillance procedures are
adequate to properly monitor the trading of the Shares on the Exchange
during all trading sessions and to deter and detect violations of
Exchange rules and the applicable federal securities laws. Trading of
the Shares through the Exchange will be subject to the Exchange's
surveillance procedures for derivative products, including Commodity-
Based Trust Shares. FINRA conducts certain cross-market surveillances
on behalf of the Exchange pursuant to a regulatory services agreement.
The Exchange is responsible for FINRA's performance under this
regulatory services agreement.
The Exchange, or FINRA, on behalf of the Exchange, or both, will
communicate as needed regarding trading in the Shares and Bitcoin
Futures with other markets and other entities that are members of the
ISG, and the Exchange, or FINRA, on behalf of the Exchange, or both,
may obtain trading information regarding trading in the Shares and
Bitcoin Futures from such markets and other entities.\67\ The Exchange
may obtain information regarding trading in the Shares and Bitcoin
Futures via ISG, from other exchanges who are members or affiliates of
the ISG, or with which the Exchange has entered into a comprehensive
surveillance sharing agreement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\67\ For a list of the current members and affiliate members of
ISG, see www.isgportal.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In addition, the Exchange also has a general policy prohibiting the
distribution of material, non-public information by its employees.
The issuer has represented to the Exchange that it will advise the
Exchange of any failure by the Trust or the Shares to comply with the
continued listing requirements, and, pursuant to its obligations under
section 19(g)(1) of the Exchange Act, the Exchange will surveil for
compliance with the continued listing requirements.

[[Page 2276]]

If the Trust or the Shares are not in compliance with the applicable
listing requirements, the Exchange will commence delisting procedures
under Exchange Rule 14.12.
Information Circular
Prior to the commencement of trading, the Exchange will inform its
members in an Information Circular of the special characteristics and
risks associated with trading the Shares. Specifically, the Information
Circular will discuss the following: (i) the procedures for the
creation and redemption of Baskets (and that the Shares are not
individually redeemable); (ii) BZX Rule 3.7, which imposes suitability
obligations on Exchange members with respect to recommending
transactions in the Shares to customers; (iii) how information
regarding the IIV and the Trust's NAV are disseminated; (iv) the risks
involved in trading the Shares outside of Regular Trading Hours \68\
when an updated IIV will not be calculated or publicly disseminated;
(v) the requirement that members deliver a prospectus to investors
purchasing newly issued Shares prior to or concurrently with the
confirmation of a transaction; and (vi) trading information. The
Information Circular will also reference the fact that there is no
regulated source of last sale information regarding bitcoin, that the
Commission has no jurisdiction over the trading of bitcoin as a
commodity, and that the CFTC has regulatory jurisdiction over the
trading of Bitcoin Futures contracts and options on Bitcoin Futures
contracts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\68\ Regular Trading Hours is the time between 9:30 a.m. and
4:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In addition, the Information Circular will advise members, prior to
the commencement of trading, of the prospectus delivery requirements
applicable to the Shares. Members purchasing the Shares for resale to
investors will deliver a prospectus to such investors. The Information
Circular will also discuss any exemptive, no-action and interpretive
relief granted by the Commission from any rules under the Act.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with section
6(b) of the Act \69\ in general and section 6(b)(5) of the Act \70\ in
particular in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\69\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\70\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Commission has approved numerous series of Trust Issued
Receipts, including Commodity-Based Trust Shares, to be listed on U.S.
national securities exchanges. In order for any proposed rule change
from an exchange to be approved, the Commission must determine that,
among other things, the proposal is consistent with the requirements of
section 6(b)(5) of the Act, specifically including: (i) the requirement
that a national securities exchange's rules are designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices; \71\ and (ii) the
requirement that an exchange proposal be designed, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that
this proposal is consistent with the requirements of section 6(b)(5) of
the Act and that this filing sufficiently demonstrates that the CME
Bitcoin Futures market represents a regulated market of significant
size and that, on the whole, the manipulation concerns previously
articulated by the Commission are sufficiently mitigated to the point
that they are outweighed by quantifiable investor protection issues
that would be resolved by approving this proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\71\ As the Exchange has stated in a number of other public
documents, it continues to believe that bitcoin is resistant to
price manipulation and that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices'' exist to justify dispensing with
the requisite surveillance sharing agreement. The geographically
diverse and continuous nature of bitcoin trading render it difficult
and prohibitively costly to manipulate the price of bitcoin. The
fragmentation across bitcoin platforms, the relatively slow speed of
transactions, and the capital necessary to maintain a significant
presence on each trading platform make manipulation of bitcoin
prices through continuous trading activity challenging. To the
extent that there are bitcoin trading platforms engaged in or
allowing wash trading or other activity intended to manipulate the
price of bitcoin on other markets, such pricing does not normally
impact prices on other trading platform because participants will
generally ignore markets with quotes that they deem non-executable.
Moreover, the linkage between the bitcoin markets and the presence
of arbitrageurs in those markets means that the manipulation of the
price of bitcoin price on any single venue would require
manipulation of the global bitcoin price in order to be effective.
Arbitrageurs must have funds distributed across multiple trading
platforms in order to take advantage of temporary price
dislocations, thereby making it unlikely that there will be strong
concentration of funds on any particular bitcoin trading platform or
OTC platform. As a result, the potential for manipulation on a
trading platform would require overcoming the liquidity supply of
such arbitrageurs who are effectively eliminating any cross-market
pricing differences.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(i) Designed To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and Practices
In order to meet this standard in a proposal to list and trade a
series of Commodity-Based Trust Shares, the Commission requires that an
exchange demonstrate that there is a comprehensive surveillance-sharing
agreement in place \72\ with a regulated market of significant size.
Both the Exchange and CME are members of ISG. The only remaining issue
to be addressed is whether the Bitcoin Futures market constitutes a
market of significant size, which both the Exchange and the Sponsor
believe that it does. The terms ``significant market'' and ``market of
significant size'' include a market (or group of markets) as to which:
(a) there is a reasonable likelihood that a person attempting to
manipulate the ETP would also have to trade on that market to
manipulate the ETP, so that a surveillance-sharing agreement would
assist the listing exchange in detecting and deterring misconduct; and
(b) it is unlikely that trading in the ETP would be the predominant
influence on prices in that market.\73\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\72\ As previously articulated by the Commission, ``The standard
requires such surveillance-sharing agreements since ``they provide a
necessary deterrent to manipulation because they facilitate the
availability of information needed to fully investigate a
manipulation if it were to occur.'' The Commission has emphasized
that it is essential for an exchange listing a derivative securities
product to enter into a surveillance-sharing agreement with markets
trading underlying securities for the listing exchange to have the
ability to obtain information necessary to detect, investigate, and
deter fraud and market manipulation, as well as violations of
exchange rules and applicable federal securities laws and rules. The
hallmarks of a surveillance-sharing agreement are that the agreement
provides for the sharing of information about market trading
activity, clearing activity, and customer identity; that the parties
to the agreement have reasonable ability to obtain access to and
produce requested information; and that no existing rules, laws, or
practices would impede one party to the agreement from obtaining
this information from, or producing it to, the other party.'' The
Commission has historically held that joint membership in the ISG
constitutes such a surveillance sharing agreement. See Wilshire
Phoenix Disapproval).
\73\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Commission has also recognized that the ``regulated market of
significant size'' standard is not the only means for satisfying
section 6(b)(5) of the act, specifically providing that a listing
exchange could demonstrate that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices'' are sufficient to justify dispensing
with the requisite surveillance-sharing agreement.\74\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\74\ See Winklevoss Order at 37580. The Commission has also
specifically noted that it ``is not applying a `cannot be
manipulated' standard; instead, the Commission is examining whether
the proposal meets the requirements of the Exchange Act and,
pursuant to its Rules of Practice, places the burden on the listing
exchange to demonstrate the validity of its contentions and to
establish that the requirements of the Exchange Act have been met.''
Id. at 37582.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 2277]]

(a) Manipulation of the ETP
According to the research and analysis presented above, the Bitcoin
Futures market is the leading market for bitcoin price formation. Where
Bitcoin Futures lead the price in the spot market such that a potential
manipulator of the bitcoin spot market (beyond just the constituents of
the Index) would have to participate in the Bitcoin Futures market, it
follows that a potential manipulator of the Shares would similarly have
to transact in the Bitcoin Futures market because the Index is based on
spot prices. As such, the Exchange believes that part (a) of the
significant market test outlined above is satisfied and that common
membership in ISG between the Exchange and CME would assist the listing
exchange in detecting and deterring misconduct in the Shares.
(b) Predominant Influence on Prices in Spot and Bitcoin Futures
The Exchange and Sponsor also believe that trading in the Shares
would not be the predominant force on prices in the Bitcoin Futures
market or spot market for a number of reasons, including the
significant volume in the Bitcoin Futures market, the size of bitcoin's
market cap, and the significant liquidity available in the spot market.
In addition to the Bitcoin Futures market data points cited above, the
spot market for bitcoin is also very liquid.
(c) Other Means To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and
Practices
As noted above, the Commission also permits a listing exchange to
demonstrate that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices'' are sufficient to justify dispensing with the
requisite surveillance-sharing agreement. The Exchange and Sponsor
believe that such conditions are present.
(ii) Designed To Protect Investors and the Public Interest
The Exchange believes that the proposal is designed to protect
investors and the public interest. Over the past several years, U.S.
investor exposure to bitcoin through OTC Bitcoin Funds has grown into
the tens of billions of dollars, including through Bitcoin Futures
ETFs. With that growth, so too has grown the quantifiable investor
protection issues to U.S. investors through roll costs for Bitcoin
Futures ETFs and premium/discount volatility and management fees for
OTC Bitcoin Funds. The Exchange believes that the concerns related to
the prevention of fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices have
been sufficiently addressed to be consistent with the Act and, to the
extent that the Commission disagrees with that assertion, such concerns
are now outweighed by investor protection concerns. As such, the
Exchange believes that approving this proposal (and comparable
proposals) provides the Commission with the opportunity to allow U.S.
investors with access to bitcoin in a regulated and transparent
exchange-traded vehicle that would act to limit risk to U.S. investors
by: (i) reducing premium and discount volatility; (ii) reducing
management fees through meaningful competition; (iii) reducing risks
and costs associated with investing in Bitcoin Futures ETFs and
operating companies that are imperfect proxies for bitcoin exposure;
and (iv) providing an alternative to custodying spot bitcoin.
Commodity-Based Trust Shares
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices in that the
Shares will be listed on the Exchange pursuant to the initial and
continued listing criteria in Exchange Rule 14.11(e)(4). The Exchange
believes that its surveillance procedures are adequate to properly
monitor the trading of the Shares on the Exchange during all trading
sessions and to deter and detect violations of Exchange rules and the
applicable federal securities laws. Trading of the Shares through the
Exchange will be subject to the Exchange's surveillance procedures for
derivative products, including Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The issuer
has represented to the Exchange that it will advise the Exchange of any
failure by the Trust or the Shares to comply with the continued listing
requirements, and, pursuant to its obligations under section 19(g)(1)
of the Exchange Act, the Exchange will surveil for compliance with the
continued listing requirements. If the Trust or the Shares are not in
compliance with the applicable listing requirements, the Exchange will
commence delisting procedures under Exchange Rule 14.12. The Exchange
may obtain information regarding trading in the Shares and listed
bitcoin derivatives via the ISG, from other exchanges who are members
or affiliates of the ISG, or with which the Exchange has entered into a
comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement.
Availability of Information
The Exchange also believes that the proposal promotes market
transparency in that a large amount of information is currently
available about bitcoin and will be available regarding the Trust and
the Shares.
In addition to the price transparency of the Index, the Trust will
provide information regarding the Trust's bitcoin holdings as well as
additional data regarding the Trust. The website for the Trust, which
will be publicly accessible at no charge, will contain the following
information: (a) the current NAV per Share daily and the prior business
day's NAV and the reported closing price; (b) the BZX Official Closing
Price \75\ in relation to the NAV as of the time the NAV is calculated
and a calculation of the premium or discount of such price against such
NAV; (c) data in chart form displaying the frequency distribution of
discounts and premiums of the Official Closing Price against the NAV,
within appropriate ranges for each of the four previous calendar
quarters (or for the life of the Trust, if shorter); (d) the
prospectus; and (e) other applicable quantitative information. The
Trust will also disseminate its holdings on a daily basis on its
website. The aforementioned information will be published as of the
close of business available on the Sponsor's website at
www.invesco.com/etfs, or any successor thereto.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\75\ As defined in Rule 11.23(a)(3), the term ``BZX Official
Closing Price'' shall mean the price disseminated to the
consolidated tape as the market center closing trade.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The IIV will be calculated by using the prior day's closing NAV per
Share as a base and updating that value during Regular Trading Hours to
reflect changes in the most recently reported price of bitcoin as
reported by the Index Provider or another reporting service. The IIV
disseminated during Regular Trading Hours should not be viewed as an
actual real-time update of the NAV, which will be calculated only once
at the end of each trading day. The IIV may differ from the NAV due to
the differences in the time window of trades used to calculate each
price. The IIV will be widely disseminated on a per Share basis every
15 seconds during the Exchange's Regular Trading Hours by one or more
major market data vendors. In addition, the IIV will be available
through the facilities of the consolidated tape association (CTA) and
Consolidated Quotation System (CQS)

[[Page 2278]]

high speed lines. In addition, the IIV will be available through on-
line information services such as Bloomberg and Reuters.
The price of bitcoin will be made available by one or more major
market data vendors, updated at least every 15 seconds during Regular
Trading Hours.
As noted above, the Index is designed to provide an estimated fair
market value for bitcoin. Information about the Index and Index value,
including key elements of how the Index is calculated, will be publicly
available at https://lukka.tech.
Quotation and last sale information for bitcoin is widely
disseminated through a variety of major market data vendors, including
Bloomberg and Reuters. Information relating to trading, including price
and volume information, in bitcoin is available from major market data
vendors and from the trading platforms on which bitcoin are traded.
Depth of book information is also available from bitcoin trading
platforms. The normal trading hours for bitcoin trading platforms are
24 hours per day, 365 days per year.
Information regarding market price and trading volume of the Shares
will be continually available on a real-time basis throughout the day
on brokers' computer screens and other electronic services. Information
regarding the previous day's closing price and trading volume
information for the Shares will be published daily in the financial
section of newspapers. Quotation and last-sale information regarding
the Shares will be disseminated through the facilities of the CTA.
In sum, the Exchange believes that this proposal is consistent with
the requirements of section 6(b)(5) of the Act, that this filing
sufficiently demonstrates that the CME Bitcoin Futures market
represents a regulated market of significant size, and that on the
whole the manipulation concerns previously articulated by the
Commission are sufficiently mitigated to the point that they are
outweighed by investor protection issues that would be resolved by
approving this proposal.
The Exchange believes that the proposal is, in particular, designed
to protect investors and the public interest. The investor protection
issues for U.S. investors has grown significantly over the last several
years, through roll costs for Bitcoin Futures ETFs and premium/discount
volatility and management fees for OTC Bitcoin Funds. As discussed
throughout, this growth investor protection concerns need to be
reevaluated and rebalanced with the prevention of fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices concerns that previous disapproval
orders have relied upon. Finally, the Exchange notes that in addition
to all of the arguments herein which it believes sufficiently establish
the CME Bitcoin Futures market as a regulated market of significant
size, it is logically inconsistent to find that the CME Bitcoin Futures
market is a significant market as it relates to the CME Bitcoin Futures
market, but not a significant market as it relates to the bitcoin spot
market for the numerous reasons laid out above.
For the above reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of section 6(b)(5) of the
Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purpose of the Act. The Exchange notes that the
proposed rule change, rather will facilitate the listing and trading of
an additional exchange-traded product that will enhance competition
among both market participants and listing venues, to the benefit of
investors and the marketplace.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Solicitation of Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-CboeBZX-2023-038 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeBZX-2023-038. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeBZX-2023-038 and should
be submitted on or before February 2, 2024.

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\76\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\76\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-00501 Filed 1-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.