Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and Rescission of Review, in Part; 2021-2022, 90164-90167 [2023-28782]
Download as PDF
90164
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 88, No. 249
Friday, December 29, 2023
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
A copy of the notification will be
available for public inspection in the
‘‘Online FTZ Information System’’
section of the Board’s website.
For further information, contact
Juanita Chen at juanita.chen@trade.gov.
Dated: December 22, 2023.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–28779 Filed 12–28–23; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[B–65–2023]
International Trade Administration
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 125,
Notification of Proposed Production
Activity; Grand Design RV, LLC; (Motor
Homes); Middlebury, Indiana
Grand Design RV, LLC submitted a
notification of proposed production
activity to the FTZ Board (the Board) for
its facilities in Middlebury, Indiana,
within FTZ 125. The notification
conforming to the requirements of the
Board’s regulations (15 CFR 400.22) was
received on December 19, 2023.
Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ
production activity would be limited to
the specific foreign-status materials/
components and specific finished
product described in the submitted
notification (summarized below) and
subsequently authorized by the Board.
The benefits that may stem from
conducting production activity under
FTZ procedures are explained in the
background section of the Board’s
website—accessible via www.trade.gov/
ftz.
The proposed finished product is
diesel motorhomes (duty rate is 2.5%).
The proposed foreign-status materials
and components are cab chassis and van
chassis (duty rate ranges from 4.0% to
25.0%). The request indicates that
certain materials/components are
subject to duties under section 301 of
the Trade Act of 1974 (section 301),
depending on the country of origin. The
applicable section 301 decisions require
subject merchandise to be admitted to
FTZs in privileged foreign status (19
CFR 146.41).
Public comment is invited from
interested parties. Submissions shall be
addressed to the Board’s Executive
Secretary and sent to: ftz@trade.gov. The
closing period for their receipt is
February 7, 2024.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Dec 28, 2023
Jkt 262001
[A–570–970]
Multilayered Wood Flooring From the
People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, Preliminary Determination of
No Shipments, and Rescission of
Review, in Part; 2021–2022
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
determines that Jiangsu Senmao
Bamboo and Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
(Senmao) did not make sales of subject
merchandise at less than normal value
(NV), and that certain companies had no
shipments of subject merchandise
during the period of review (POR)
December 1, 2021, through November
30, 2022. In addition, we are rescinding
the review with respect to one company.
We invite interested parties to comment
on these preliminary results.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Applicable December 29, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca Trainor, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; phone:
(202) 482–4007.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on multilayered
wood flooring (MLWF) from the
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
People’s Republic of China (China).1
The review covers 48 companies,
including mandatory respondent,
Senmao.
For events that occurred since the
Initiation Notice and the analysis
behind our preliminary results herein,
see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.2 The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.
trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://access.trade.gov/public/
FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list of
topics discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is included as
Appendix I to this notice.
Scope of the Order 3
The product covered by the Order is
MLWF from China. For a complete
description of the scope of this
administrative review, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Partial Rescission of Review
On May 1, 2023, Kahrs International
Inc. (Kahrs) timely withdrew its request
for review of the Fusong Jinlong Group
(Jinlong).4 No other parties requested a
review of this company.5 Accordingly,
Commerce is rescinding the
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR
7060 (February 2, 2023) (Initiation Notice).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Multilayered Wood
Flooring from the People’s Republic of China;
2021–2022,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
3 See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the
People’s Republic of China: Notice of Amended
Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less
than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 76
FR 76690 (December 8, 2011), as amended in
Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People’s
Republic of China, 77 FR 5484 (February 3, 2012)
(collectively, Order).
4 See Kahrs’ Letter, ‘‘Notice of Withdrawal of
Request for 2021–2022 Administrative Review,’’
dated May 1, 2023.
5 Jinlong consists of the following companies:
Fusong Jinlong Wooden Group Co., Ltd.; Fusong
Qianqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd.; Dalian Qianqiu
Wooden Product Co., Ltd.; and Fusong Jinqiu
Wooden Product Co., Ltd.
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 249 / Friday, December 29, 2023 / Notices
administrative review with respect to
Jinlong.6
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
Based on an analysis of information
from U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP), no shipment
certifications, and other record
information, we preliminarily determine
that 23 companies had no shipments of
subject merchandise during the POR.
For a listing of these companies, see
Appendix II of this notice. Consistent
with our practice in non-market
economy (NME) cases, we are not
rescinding this review with respect to
these companies but, rather, intend to
complete the review and issue
appropriate instructions to CBP based
on the final results of the review.7
Separate Rates
We preliminarily determine that, in
addition to Senmao, two companies not
individually-examined are eligible for
separate rates in this administrative
review, Dalian Deerfu Wooden Product
Co., Ltd. (Deerfu) and Dalian Jaenmaken
Wood Industry Co., Ltd. (Jaenmaken).8
The Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), and Commerce’s regulations do
not address the establishment of a
separate rate to be applied to companies
not selected for individual examination
when Commerce limits its examination
in an administrative review pursuant to
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally,
Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of
the Act, which provides instructions for
calculating the all-others rate in an
investigation, for guidance when
calculating the rate for separate-rate
respondents which Commerce did not
examine individually in an
administrative review. For the
preliminary results of this review,
Commerce has determined the
estimated dumping margin for Senmao
to be zero.9 For the reasons explained in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum,
we are assigning this rate to Deerfu and
Jaenmaken, i.e., the non-examined
respondents which qualify for a separate
rate in this review.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
6 See
19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011); see also the
‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section, below.
8 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at the
‘‘Separate Rate Determinations’’ section for more
details.
9 See Memorandum, ‘‘Preliminary Results Margin
Calculation for Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood
Industry Co., Assessment Ltd.,’’ dated concurrently
with this notice.
7 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Dec 28, 2023
Jkt 262001
The China-Wide Entity
Commerce’s policy regarding
conditional review of the China-wide
entity applies to this administrative
review.10 Under this policy, the Chinawide entity will not be under review
unless a party specifically requests, or
Commerce self-initiates, a review of the
entity. Because no party requested a
review of the China-wide entity, the
entity is not under review, and the
entity’s rate (i.e. 85.13 percent) is not
subject to change. See the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum for further
discussion.
Aside from the companies for which
we preliminarily find no shipments and
the company for which the review is
being rescinded, Commerce considers
all other companies for which a review
was requested and did not demonstrate
separate rate eligibility to be part of the
China-wide entity.11 For the
preliminary results of this review, we
consider 21 companies to be part of the
China-wide entity. For a listing of these
companies, see Appendix II of this
notice.
Exporters
Dalian Jaenmaken Wood Industry Co., Ltd ..................
90165
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
00.00
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed for these preliminary results
to interested parties with an
Administrative Protective Order within
five days after the date of publication of
these preliminary results.12
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii),
interested parties may submit case briefs
no later than 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice.13 Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in the
case briefs, may be filed not later than
five days after the date for filing case
briefs.14 Interested parties who submit
case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding must submit: (1) a table of
contents listing each issue; and (2) a
table of authorities.15 As provided under
19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior
proceedings we have encouraged
Methodology
We are conducting this administrative interested parties to provide an
executive summary of their brief that
review in accordance with sections
should be limited to five pages total,
751(a)(1)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213. We calculated export prices for including footnotes. In this
administrative review, we instead
Senmao in accordance with section
request that interested parties provide at
772(a) of the Act. Because China is an
the beginning of their briefs a public,
NME country within the meaning of
for each issue raised
section 771(18) of the Act, we calculated executive summary
16 Further, we request that
in
their
briefs.
NV in accordance with section 773(c) of
interested parties limit their executive
the Act.
summary of each issue to no more than
Preliminary Results of Review
450 words, not including citations. We
intend to use the executive summaries
We preliminarily determine that the
as the basis of the comment summaries
following weighted-average dumping
included in the issues and decision
margins exist for the POR December 1,
memorandum that will accompany the
2021, through November 30, 2022:
final results in this administrative
Weightedreview. We request that interested
average
parties include footnotes for relevant
Exporters
dumping
citations in the executive summary of
margin
each issue. Note that Commerce has
(percent)
amended certain of its requirements
Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo
pertaining to the service of documents
and Wood Industry Co.,
in 19 CFR 351.303(f).17
Ltd .....................................
00.00
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
Dalian Deerfu Wooden Prodinterested parties who wish to request a
uct Co., Ltd .......................
00.00
10 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement
of Change in Department Practice for Respondent
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
11 See Initiation Notice (‘‘All firms listed below
that wish to qualify for separate rate status in the
administrative reviews involving NME countries
must complete, as appropriate, either a separate rate
application or certification, as described below.’’).
Companies that are subject to this administrative
review that are considered to be part of the Chinawide entity are listed in Appendix II.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12 See
19 CFR 351.224(b).
also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing
requirements).
14 See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative
Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings,
88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023) (APO and
Service Final Rule).
15 See 19 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
16 We use the term ‘‘issue’’ here to describe an
argument that Commerce would normally address
in a comment of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
17 See APO and Service Final Rule.
13 See
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
90166
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 249 / Friday, December 29, 2023 / Notices
hearing must submit a written request to
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, filed electronically via
ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1)
the party’s name, address, and
telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of the issues
to be discussed. Issues raised in the
hearing will be limited to those raised
in the respective case briefs. An
electronically-filed hearing request must
be received successfully in its entirety
by Commerce’s electronic system,
ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time within
30 days after the date of publication of
this notice.18
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Final Results
Unless the deadline is extended, we
intend to issue the final results of this
administrative review, which will
include the results of our analysis of the
issues raised in the case briefs, within
120 days of publication of these
preliminary results in the Federal
Register, pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213(h).
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results,
Commerce will determine, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b).
If Senmao’s ad valorem weightedaverage dumping margin is not zero or
de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent)
in the final results of this review,
Commerce will calculate importerspecific assessment rates on the basis of
the ratio of the total amount of dumping
calculated for the importer’s examined
sales and the total quantity of those
sales, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1).19 Commerce will also
calculate (estimated) ad valorem
importer-specific assessment rates with
which to assess whether the per-unit
assessment rate is de minimis. We will
instruct CBP to assess antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered
by this review when the importerspecific ad valorem assessment rate
calculated in the final results of this
review is not zero or de minimis.
For Deerfu and Jaenmaken, i.e., the
respondents that were not selected for
individual examination in this
administrative review that qualified for
a separate rate, the assessment rate will
be the separate rate established in the
final results of this administrative
review. If, in the final results, the
respondents’ weighted-average dumping
margins continue to be zero or de
minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent),
Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate
the appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties.20
For entries that were not reported in
the U.S. sales databases submitted by
Senmao during this review, and for the
21 companies that do not qualify for a
separate rate, Commerce will instruct
CBP to liquidate such entries at the
China-wide rate (i.e., 85.13 percent).21
In addition, if we continue to find no
shipments of subject merchandise for
the 23 companies for which we
preliminarily find no such shipments
during the POR,22 any suspended
entries of subject merchandise
associated with those companies will be
liquidated at the China-wide rate.23
For Jinlong, i.e., the company for
which the administrative review is
rescinded, antidumping duties shall be
assessed at a rate equal to the cash
deposit of estimated antidumping duties
required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i).
We intend to issue appropriate
assessment instructions with respect to
Jinlong, i.e., the company for which this
administrative review is rescinded, to
CBP 35 days after the publication of the
preliminary results in the Federal
Register. For all other companies that
continue to be subject to review, we
intend to issue appropriate assessment
instructions to CBP 35 days after the
publication of the final results in the
Federal Register. If a timely summons is
filed at the U.S. Court of International
Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant
entries until the time for parties to file
a request for a statutory injunction has
expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
review for all shipments of the subject
20 See
19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
Multilayered Wood Flooring from the
People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Final Determination of No Shipments; 2016–2017,
84 FR 38002 (August 5, 2019).
22 See Appendix II for a list of these companies.
23 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694, 65695 (October 24, 2011).
21 See
18 See
19 CFR 351.310(c)
19 In these preliminary results, Commerce applied
the assessment rate calculation method adopted in
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Dec 28, 2023
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
merchandise from China entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided for by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for the
companies listed above that have a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate established in the final
results of this review (except, if the rate
is de minimis, then a cash deposit rate
of zero will be required); (2) for
previously investigated or reviewed
Chinese and non-Chinese exporters for
which a review was not requested and
that received a separate rate in a prior
segment of this proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all
Chinese exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found
to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will be the rate for the
China-wide entity (i.e., 85.13 percent);
and (4) for all non-Chinese exporters of
subject merchandise that have not
received their own rate, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate applicable to
Chinese exporter that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping and/
or countervailing duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping and/or
countervailing duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties, and/or increase in
the amount of antidumping duties by
the amount of the countervailing duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing the
preliminary results of this review in
accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and
777(i)(l) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(4).
Dated: December 19, 2023
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Period of Review
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Selection of Respondents
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 249 / Friday, December 29, 2023 / Notices
VI. Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
VII. Discussion of the Methodology
VIII. Recommendation
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–423–813]
Appendix II
No Shipments
Anhui Longhua Bamboo Product Co., Ltd.
Benxi Flooring Factory (General Partnership)
Dalian Shengyu Science and Technology
Development Co., Ltd.
Dongtai Fuan Universal Dynamics, LLC
Dun Hua Sen Tai Wood Co., Ltd.
Dunhua City Dexin Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
Dunhua Shengda Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
HaiLin LinJing Wooden Products Co., Ltd.
Hunchun Xingjia Wooden Flooring Inc.
Huzhou Sunergy World Trade Co., Ltd.
Jiangsu Keri Wood Co., Ltd.
Jiangsu Mingle Flooring Co., Ltd.
Jiangsu Simba Flooring Co., Ltd.
Jiashan On-Line Lumber Co., Ltd.
Kingman Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
Linyi Youyou Wood Co., Ltd.
Pinge Timber Manufacturing (Zhejiang) Co.,
Ltd.
Power Dekor Group Co., Ltd.
Sino-Maple (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd.
Suzhou Dongda Wood Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Dadongwu Greenhome Wood Co.,
Ltd.
Zhejiang Longsen Lumbering Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Shiyou Timber Co., Ltd.
China-Wide Entity
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Benxi Wood Company
Dalian Jiahong Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
Dalian Penghong Floor Products Co., Ltd./
Dalian Shumaike Floor Manufacturing Co.,
Ltd.
Dunhua City Hongyuan Wood Industry Co.,
Ltd.
Huzhou Chenghang Wood Co., Ltd.
Huzhou Fulinmen Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
Jiangsu Guyu International Trading Co., Ltd.
Jiangsu Yuhui International Trade Co., Ltd.
Jiashan HuiJiaLe Decoration Material Co.,
Ltd.
Jiaxing Hengtong Wood Co., Ltd.
Lauzon Distinctive Hardwood Flooring, Inc.
Linyi Anying Wood Co., Ltd.
Metropolitan Hardwood Floors, Inc.
Muchsee Wood (Chuzhou) Co., Ltd.
Tongxiang Jisheng Import and Export Co.,
Ltd.
Yekalon Industry Inc.
Yihua Lifestyle Technology Co., Ltd.
(successor-in-interest to Guangdong Yihua
Timber Industry Co., Ltd.)
Yingyi-Nature (Kunshan) Wood Industry Co.,
Ltd.
Zhejiang Fuerjia Wooden Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Shuimojiangnan New Material
Technology Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Simite Wooden Co., Ltd.
Rescissions
Dalian Qianqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd.,
Fusong Jinlong Wooden Group Co., Ltd.,
Fusong Jinqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd.,
and Fusong Qianqiu Wooden Product Co.,
Ltd. (collectively, Fusong Jinlong Group)
[FR Doc. 2023–28782 Filed 12–28–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Dec 28, 2023
Jkt 262001
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts
From Belgium: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2021–2022
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
Citribel nv. (Citribel), a producer/
exporter subject to this administrative
review, made sales of citric acid and
certain citrate salts (citric acid) from
Belgium at less than normal value. The
period of review (POR) is July 1, 2021,
through June 30, 2022.
DATES: Applicable December 29, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah Cohen, AD/CVD Operations,
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4521.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On July 31, 2023, Commerce
published the preliminary results of the
2021–2022 administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on citric acid
from Belgium, covering one producer/
exporter of subject merchandise,
Citribel, and invited interested parties to
comment.1 On August 30, 2023, Archer
Daniels Midland Company, Cargill,
Incorporated, and Primary Products
Ingredients Americas LLC (collectively,
the petitioners), and Citribel timely
submitted case briefs regarding
Commerce’s Preliminary Results.2 On
September 6, 2023, the petitioners
timely submitted a rebuttal case brief.3
For a summary of the events that
occurred since Commerce published the
Preliminary Results, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.4 Commerce
1 See
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from
Belgium: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2021–2022, 88 FR 49442
(July 31, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
2 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Petitioners’ Case Brief,’’
dated August 30, 2023; see also Citribel’s Letter,
‘‘Citribel N.V. Case Brief,’’ dated August 30, 2023.
3 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Petitioners’ Rebuttal
Brief,’’ dated September 6, 2023.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from
Belgium; 2021–2022,’’ dated concurrently with, and
hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
90167
conducted this review in accordance
with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order includes all grades and
granulation sizes of citric acid, sodium
citrate, and potassium citrate in their
unblended forms, whether dry or in
solution, and regardless of packaging
type. For a full description of the scope
of the order, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs are listed in the appendix
to this notice and addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. The
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
at https://access.trade.gov/public/
FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and
analysis of the comments received, we
made changes to the preliminary
weighted-average dumping margin for
Citribel. For detailed information, see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Final Results of Review
Commerce determines that, for the
period of July 1, 2021, through June 30,
2022, the following estimated weightedaverage dumping margin exists:
Exporter/producer
Citribel nv ..............................
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
9.13
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed for these final results to
parties in this review within five days
of the date of publication of this notice
in the Federal Register, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
Commerce will determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 249 (Friday, December 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 90164-90167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28782]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-970]
Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and Rescission of Review, in
Part; 2021-2022
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
determines that Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
(Senmao) did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than normal
value (NV), and that certain companies had no shipments of subject
merchandise during the period of review (POR) December 1, 2021, through
November 30, 2022. In addition, we are rescinding the review with
respect to one company. We invite interested parties to comment on
these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable December 29, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Trainor, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; phone: (202) 482-4007.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping
duty order on multilayered wood flooring (MLWF) from the People's
Republic of China (China).\1\ The review covers 48 companies, including
mandatory respondent, Senmao.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 7060 (February 2, 2023) (Initiation
Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For events that occurred since the Initiation Notice and the
analysis behind our preliminary results herein, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.\2\ The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list of topics
discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as
Appendix I to this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Multilayered Wood
Flooring from the People's Republic of China; 2021-2022,'' dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order 3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of
China: Notice of Amended Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at
Less than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 76690
(December 8, 2011), as amended in Multilayered Wood Flooring from
the People's Republic of China, 77 FR 5484 (February 3, 2012)
(collectively, Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The product covered by the Order is MLWF from China. For a complete
description of the scope of this administrative review, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Partial Rescission of Review
On May 1, 2023, Kahrs International Inc. (Kahrs) timely withdrew
its request for review of the Fusong Jinlong Group (Jinlong).\4\ No
other parties requested a review of this company.\5\ Accordingly,
Commerce is rescinding the
[[Page 90165]]
administrative review with respect to Jinlong.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Kahrs' Letter, ``Notice of Withdrawal of Request for
2021-2022 Administrative Review,'' dated May 1, 2023.
\5\ Jinlong consists of the following companies: Fusong Jinlong
Wooden Group Co., Ltd.; Fusong Qianqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd.;
Dalian Qianqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd.; and Fusong Jinqiu Wooden
Product Co., Ltd.
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
Based on an analysis of information from U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP), no shipment certifications, and other record
information, we preliminarily determine that 23 companies had no
shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. For a listing of these
companies, see Appendix II of this notice. Consistent with our practice
in non-market economy (NME) cases, we are not rescinding this review
with respect to these companies but, rather, intend to complete the
review and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final
results of the review.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011); see
also the ``Assessment Rates'' section, below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Separate Rates
We preliminarily determine that, in addition to Senmao, two
companies not individually-examined are eligible for separate rates in
this administrative review, Dalian Deerfu Wooden Product Co., Ltd.
(Deerfu) and Dalian Jaenmaken Wood Industry Co., Ltd. (Jaenmaken).\8\
The Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and Commerce's
regulations do not address the establishment of a separate rate to be
applied to companies not selected for individual examination when
Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section
735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the
all-others rate in an investigation, for guidance when calculating the
rate for separate-rate respondents which Commerce did not examine
individually in an administrative review. For the preliminary results
of this review, Commerce has determined the estimated dumping margin
for Senmao to be zero.\9\ For the reasons explained in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum, we are assigning this rate to Deerfu and
Jaenmaken, i.e., the non-examined respondents which qualify for a
separate rate in this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at the ``Separate Rate
Determinations'' section for more details.
\9\ See Memorandum, ``Preliminary Results Margin Calculation for
Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood Industry Co., Assessment Ltd.,''
dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The China-Wide Entity
Commerce's policy regarding conditional review of the China-wide
entity applies to this administrative review.\10\ Under this policy,
the China-wide entity will not be under review unless a party
specifically requests, or Commerce self-initiates, a review of the
entity. Because no party requested a review of the China-wide entity,
the entity is not under review, and the entity's rate (i.e. 85.13
percent) is not subject to change. See the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum for further discussion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aside from the companies for which we preliminarily find no
shipments and the company for which the review is being rescinded,
Commerce considers all other companies for which a review was requested
and did not demonstrate separate rate eligibility to be part of the
China-wide entity.\11\ For the preliminary results of this review, we
consider 21 companies to be part of the China-wide entity. For a
listing of these companies, see Appendix II of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Initiation Notice (``All firms listed below that wish
to qualify for separate rate status in the administrative reviews
involving NME countries must complete, as appropriate, either a
separate rate application or certification, as described below.'').
Companies that are subject to this administrative review that are
considered to be part of the China-wide entity are listed in
Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
We are conducting this administrative review in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. We calculated
export prices for Senmao in accordance with section 772(a) of the Act.
Because China is an NME country within the meaning of section 771(18)
of the Act, we calculated NV in accordance with section 773(c) of the
Act.
Preliminary Results of Review
We preliminarily determine that the following weighted-average
dumping margins exist for the POR December 1, 2021, through November
30, 2022:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporters dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood Industry Co., Ltd........ 00.00
Dalian Deerfu Wooden Product Co., Ltd................... 00.00
Dalian Jaenmaken Wood Industry Co., Ltd................. 00.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these
preliminary results to interested parties with an Administrative
Protective Order within five days after the date of publication of
these preliminary results.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may submit
case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this
notice.\13\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case
briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing
case briefs.\14\ Interested parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal
briefs in this proceeding must submit: (1) a table of contents listing
each issue; and (2) a table of authorities.\15\ As provided under 19
CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior proceedings we have encouraged
interested parties to provide an executive summary of their brief that
should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes. In this
administrative review, we instead request that interested parties
provide at the beginning of their briefs a public, executive summary
for each issue raised in their briefs.\16\ Further, we request that
interested parties limit their executive summary of each issue to no
more than 450 words, not including citations. We intend to use the
executive summaries as the basis of the comment summaries included in
the issues and decision memorandum that will accompany the final
results in this administrative review. We request that interested
parties include footnotes for relevant citations in the executive
summary of each issue. Note that Commerce has amended certain of its
requirements pertaining to the service of documents in 19 CFR
351.303(f).\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements).
\14\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective
Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29,
2023) (APO and Service Final Rule).
\15\ See 19 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
\16\ We use the term ``issue'' here to describe an argument that
Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
\17\ See APO and Service Final Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a
[[Page 90166]]
hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS. Requests
should contain: (1) the party's name, address, and telephone number;
(2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be
discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised
in the respective case briefs. An electronically-filed hearing request
must be received successfully in its entirety by Commerce's electronic
system, ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results
Unless the deadline is extended, we intend to issue the final
results of this administrative review, which will include the results
of our analysis of the issues raised in the case briefs, within 120
days of publication of these preliminary results in the Federal
Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213(h).
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, Commerce will determine, and
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered
by this review, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b).
If Senmao's ad valorem weighted-average dumping margin is not zero
or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent) in the final results of
this review, Commerce will calculate importer-specific assessment rates
on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for
the importer's examined sales and the total quantity of those sales, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\19\ Commerce will also calculate
(estimated) ad valorem importer-specific assessment rates with which to
assess whether the per-unit assessment rate is de minimis. We will
instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries
covered by this review when the importer-specific ad valorem assessment
rate calculated in the final results of this review is not zero or de
minimis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ In these preliminary results, Commerce applied the
assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Deerfu and Jaenmaken, i.e., the respondents that were not
selected for individual examination in this administrative review that
qualified for a separate rate, the assessment rate will be the separate
rate established in the final results of this administrative review.
If, in the final results, the respondents' weighted-average dumping
margins continue to be zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5
percent), Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate
entries without regard to antidumping duties.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases
submitted by Senmao during this review, and for the 21 companies that
do not qualify for a separate rate, Commerce will instruct CBP to
liquidate such entries at the China-wide rate (i.e., 85.13
percent).\21\ In addition, if we continue to find no shipments of
subject merchandise for the 23 companies for which we preliminarily
find no such shipments during the POR,\22\ any suspended entries of
subject merchandise associated with those companies will be liquidated
at the China-wide rate.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic
of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2016-2017, 84 FR 38002
(August 5, 2019).
\22\ See Appendix II for a list of these companies.
\23\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65695 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Jinlong, i.e., the company for which the administrative review
is rescinded, antidumping duties shall be assessed at a rate equal to
the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time
of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i).
We intend to issue appropriate assessment instructions with respect
to Jinlong, i.e., the company for which this administrative review is
rescinded, to CBP 35 days after the publication of the preliminary
results in the Federal Register. For all other companies that continue
to be subject to review, we intend to issue appropriate assessment
instructions to CBP 35 days after the publication of the final results
in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court
of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not
to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a
request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this review for all shipments of
the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for the companies
listed above that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be
the rate established in the final results of this review (except, if
the rate is de minimis, then a cash deposit rate of zero will be
required); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-
Chinese exporters for which a review was not requested and that
received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific
rate; (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject merchandise that have
not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate for the China-wide entity (i.e., 85.13 percent); and
(4) for all non-Chinese exporters of subject merchandise that have not
received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to Chinese exporter that supplied that non-Chinese exporter.
These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing
duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping
duties, and/or increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the
amount of the countervailing duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing the preliminary results of this
review in accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and 777(i)(l) of the Act,
and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: December 19, 2023
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Period of Review
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Selection of Respondents
[[Page 90167]]
VI. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
VII. Discussion of the Methodology
VIII. Recommendation
Appendix II
No Shipments
Anhui Longhua Bamboo Product Co., Ltd.
Benxi Flooring Factory (General Partnership)
Dalian Shengyu Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd.
Dongtai Fuan Universal Dynamics, LLC
Dun Hua Sen Tai Wood Co., Ltd.
Dunhua City Dexin Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
Dunhua Shengda Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
HaiLin LinJing Wooden Products Co., Ltd.
Hunchun Xingjia Wooden Flooring Inc.
Huzhou Sunergy World Trade Co., Ltd.
Jiangsu Keri Wood Co., Ltd.
Jiangsu Mingle Flooring Co., Ltd.
Jiangsu Simba Flooring Co., Ltd.
Jiashan On-Line Lumber Co., Ltd.
Kingman Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
Linyi Youyou Wood Co., Ltd.
Pinge Timber Manufacturing (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd.
Power Dekor Group Co., Ltd.
Sino-Maple (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd.
Suzhou Dongda Wood Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Dadongwu Greenhome Wood Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Longsen Lumbering Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Shiyou Timber Co., Ltd.
China-Wide Entity
Benxi Wood Company
Dalian Jiahong Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
Dalian Penghong Floor Products Co., Ltd./Dalian Shumaike Floor
Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
Dunhua City Hongyuan Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
Huzhou Chenghang Wood Co., Ltd.
Huzhou Fulinmen Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
Jiangsu Guyu International Trading Co., Ltd.
Jiangsu Yuhui International Trade Co., Ltd.
Jiashan HuiJiaLe Decoration Material Co., Ltd.
Jiaxing Hengtong Wood Co., Ltd.
Lauzon Distinctive Hardwood Flooring, Inc.
Linyi Anying Wood Co., Ltd.
Metropolitan Hardwood Floors, Inc.
Muchsee Wood (Chuzhou) Co., Ltd.
Tongxiang Jisheng Import and Export Co., Ltd.
Yekalon Industry Inc.
Yihua Lifestyle Technology Co., Ltd. (successor-in-interest to
Guangdong Yihua Timber Industry Co., Ltd.)
Yingyi-Nature (Kunshan) Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Fuerjia Wooden Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Shuimojiangnan New Material Technology Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Simite Wooden Co., Ltd.
Rescissions
Dalian Qianqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd., Fusong Jinlong Wooden Group
Co., Ltd., Fusong Jinqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd., and Fusong
Qianqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd. (collectively, Fusong Jinlong
Group)
[FR Doc. 2023-28782 Filed 12-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P