Preventing the Improper Use of CHIPS Act Funding; Revised Definition of “Material Expansion”, 89572-89574 [2023-28627]

Download as PDF 89572 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 248 / Thursday, December 28, 2023 / Rules and Regulations Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.’’ (9) This AD does not require compliance with paragraph (5) of EASA AD 2023–0190– E. Note 1 paragraph (h)(9): Accomplishing a balance correction other than with the replacement of tail rotor drive line parts could interfere with subsequent tail rotor drive line balancing inspections. Airbus Helicopters Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No. EC130–05A042, Revision 1, dated November 2, 2023, contains additional information regarding balance corrections. (10) This AD does not require compliance with paragraph (6) of EASA AD 2023–0190– E. (11) Instead of the credit allowed in paragraph (7) of EASA AD 2023–0190–E, you may take credit for the vibration measurements required by paragraph (1) of EASA AD 2023–0190–E that have been accomplished before the effective date of this AD using Airbus Helicopters Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No. EC130–05A042, Revision 0, dated December 14, 2022. (12) Instead of the credit allowed in paragraph (8) of EASA AD 2023–0190–E, you may take credit for accomplishing ‘‘maintenance task B,’’ as defined in EASA AD 2023–0190–E and required by paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2023–0190–E, to satisfy the initial instance of ‘‘maintenance task B,’’ as defined in EASA AD 2023–0190–E and required by paragraph (2) of EASA AD 2023– 0190–E. (13) This AD does not adopt the ‘‘Remarks’’ section of EASA AD 2023–0190–E. (i) No Reporting Requirement Although the service information referenced in EASA AD 2023–0190–E specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD does not include that requirement. (j) Special Flight Permit Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199 only to operate the helicopter to a maintenance location for the initial tail rotor drive shaft inspection, provided no passengers are onboard. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES (k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (1) The Manager, International Validation Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the International Validation Branch, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR730-AMOC@faa.gov. (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/ certificate holding district office. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 Dec 27, 2023 Jkt 262001 (l) Additional Information DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (1) For more information about this AD, contact Dan McCully, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Ave., Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone (404) 474– 5548; email william.mccully@faa.gov. (2) For Airbus Helicopters service information identified in this AD that is not incorporated by reference, contact Airbus Helicopters, 2701 North Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052; phone (972) 641–0000 or (800) 232–0323; fax (972) 641–3775; or at airbus.com/en/products-services/helicopters/ hcare-services/airbusworld. You may view this service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110. (m) Material Incorporated by Reference (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. (i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Emergency AD 2023–0190–E, dated November 2, 2023. (ii) [Reserved] (3) For EASA material, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu; website easa.europa.eu. You may find the EASA material on the EASA website ad.easa.europa.eu. (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110. (5) You may view this material at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@nara.gov. Issued on December 22, 2023. Caitlin Locke, Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2023–28720 Filed 12–26–23; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 National Institute of Standards and Technology 15 CFR Part 231 [Docket No. 231218–0308] RIN 0693–AB70 Preventing the Improper Use of CHIPS Act Funding; Revised Definition of ‘‘Material Expansion’’ CHIPS Program Office, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Department of Commerce (the Department), through the National Institute of Standards and Technology, is amending the definition of ‘‘material expansion’’ in the September 25, 2023 final rule, Preventing the Improper Use of CHIPS Act Funding, to clarify that the construction of new semiconductor manufacturing facilities falls within the scope of the rule. DATES: This final rule is effective on December 28, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vikram Viswanathan at (240) 309–9040 or askchips@chips.gov. Please direct media inquiries to the CHIPS Press Team at press@chips.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Background The CHIPS Act, 15 U.S.C. 4651, et seq., established a semiconductor incentives program (CHIPS Incentives Program) to incentivize, through Federal funding, investments in the construction, expansion, and modernization of facilities and equipment in the United States for the fabrication, assembly, testing, advanced packaging, production, or research and development of semiconductors, materials used to manufacture semiconductors, or semiconductor manufacturing equipment. The CHIPS Incentives Program is administered by the CHIPS Program Office (CPO) within the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) of the Department. On March 23, 2023, CPO published a proposed rule that requested comment on defined terms used in the Act (including terms that will be used in required agreements with covered entities), identified the types of transactions that are prohibited under the Expansion Clawback and Technology Clawback sections of the Act, and provided a description of the proposed process for notification of certain transactions to the Secretary (88 E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM 28DER1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 248 / Thursday, December 28, 2023 / Rules and Regulations FR 17439). After considering extensive public comments, on September 25, 2023, CPO published a final rule Preventing the Improper Use of CHIPS Act Funding (88 FR 65600). Among other issues, the final rule addressed the Expansion Clawback, which prohibits the covered entity and members of its affiliated group from engaging in any significant transaction involving the material expansion of semiconductor manufacturing capacity in a foreign country of concern. The final rule also addressed the exceptions to this general prohibition. The definition of ‘‘material expansion,’’ which is used both in the general prohibition and in one of the exceptions, focused on the expansion of ‘‘existing’’ semiconductor manufacturing facilities, which created confusion as to whether the construction of entirely new semiconductor fabrication facilities fell within the scope of the final rule. This update to the final rule clarifies that new facilities are included within the scope of the final rule. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES Changes From the Final Rule Definition of Material Expansion The final rule defines ‘‘material expansion’’ as an ‘‘increase of the semiconductor manufacturing capacity of an existing facility by more than five percent of the capacity memorialized in the required agreement due to the addition of a cleanroom, production line or other physical space, or a series of such additions.’’ 15 CFR 231.108. Defining material expansion in relation to ‘‘an existing facility’’ had the unintended effect of suggesting that the construction of new semiconductor facilities fell outside the scope of the Expansion Clawback. Such an interpretation would be inconsistent with the CHIPS Act and the general restrictions of the Expansion Clawback, which significantly limit the ability of covered entities to expand their semiconductor manufacturing capacity in foreign countries of concern. Indeed, CPO made clear in the proposed rule and in the preamble to the final rule that the restrictions of the Expansion Clawback were intended to apply to the construction of a new facility. In the preamble of the proposed rule, CPO noted that the term ‘‘material expansion’’ included ‘‘the construction of new facilities and the addition of new semiconductor manufacturing capacity and uses a quantitative measure of 5 percent of existing capacity to provide clear and predictable scoping.’’ 88 FR 17439, 17441 (emphasis added). Further, the definition in the proposed VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 Dec 27, 2023 Jkt 262001 rule provides: ‘‘Material expansion means the addition of physical space or equipment that has the purpose or effect of increasing semiconductor manufacturing capacity of a facility by more than five percent or a series of such expansions which, in the aggregate during the applicable term of a required agreement, increase the semiconductor manufacturing capacity of a facility by more than five percent of the existing capacity when the required agreement was entered into.’’ Id. at 17447. This definition used the term ‘‘facility’’ generally, resulting in an interpretation that a facility may be either new or existing. Commenters also understood that the Expansion Clawback was intended to address the construction of new semiconductor facilities. CPO received 27 comment submissions, and a significant portion of those comments related to material expansion. Numerous commenters noted that the intent of the CHIPS Act was to allow existing facilities in a foreign country of concern to continue to operate so that ongoing operations would not be undermined and so funding recipients and could realize the value of their prior investments. Commenters did not raise significant concerns with placing restrictions on the construction of new facilities, and in some instances suggested that the definition of material expansion be modified to clarify that it was triggered by new construction (‘‘material expansion means building new cleanroom space that does not exist on the date of the [award];’’ material expansion should apply to ‘‘building new clean room/physical space’’). There was a general understanding that the Expansion Clawback was intended to address new construction. In the final rule, CPO provided explanations that reflect the intent for the Expansion Clawback to address the construction of new facilities. In response to comments on the definition of Significant Renovations, CPO noted that ‘‘[w]ithout the concept of significant renovations, covered entities could evade the expansion prohibition simply by significantly expanding an existing facility rather than constructing a new facility.’’ 88 FR 65600, 65607. This response assumes that the construction of new facilities was addressed by the Expansion Clawback, and that the concept of significant renovations was needed to prevent circumvention of that prohibition. In this rule, the modified definition of ‘‘material expansion’’ better reflects the intended scope of the Expansion Clawback. PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 89573 Classification Administrative Procedure Act (APA) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2), the provisions of the APA requiring notice of proposed rulemaking and the opportunity for public participation are inapplicable to this rule, which places certain limitations on funding recipients, because it relates to ‘‘public property, loans, grants, benefits, or contracts.’’ 1 Additionally, although it was not required to do so, the Department, through the March 23, 2023, proposed rule, provided advance notice and opportunity for public comment on the definition of the term ‘‘material expansion.’’ This final rule simply corrects an inadvertent omission in the definition of ‘‘material expansion,’’ thereby accurately reflecting the Department’s explanation and discussion of public comments in the September 25, 2023, final rule. Additional advance notice and opportunity for comment would neither provide new information to the public nor inform any agency decisionmaking regarding the defined term. Finally, additional opportunity for public comment would be contrary to the public interest, under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), because this rule provides clarity to applicants and awardees. Executive Order 13132 This rule does not contain policies with federalism implications as that term is defined in Executive Order 13132. Executive Order 12866 The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this final rule is significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866. Regulatory Flexibility Act Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment are not required to be given for this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2), the analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., are not applicable. Accordingly, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required and none has been prepared. Paperwork Reduction Act This action does not contain a collection of information requirement for the purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.). 1 The provisions of this amendment implement the Expansion Clawback provisions of the Act and are also thus exempt from the rulemaking provisions of the APA pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 4652(a)(6)(A)(iii). E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM 28DER1 89574 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 248 / Thursday, December 28, 2023 / Rules and Regulations List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 231 Business and industry, Computer technology, Exports, Foreign Trade, Government contracts, Grant Programs, Investments (US investments abroad), National defense, Research, Science & Technology, and Semiconductor chip products. For reasons set out in the preamble, 15 CFR part 231 is amended as follows: PART 231—CLAWBACKS OF CHIPS FUNDING 1. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 231 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 15 U.S.C. 4651, et seq. ■ 2. Revise § 231.108 to read as follows: § 231.108 Material expansion. Material expansion means: (1) with respect to an existing facility, the increase of the semiconductor manufacturing capacity of that facility by more than five percent of the capacity memorialized in the required agreement due to the addition of a cleanroom, production line or other physical space, or a series of such additions; or (2) any construction of a new facility for semiconductor manufacturing. Tamiko Ford, NIST Executive Secretariat. [FR Doc. 2023–28627 Filed 12–27–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Office of Foreign Assets Control 31 CFR Part 587 Publication of Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations Web General License 78 Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury. ACTION: Publication of a web general license. AGENCY: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing one general license (GL) issued pursuant to the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations: GL 78, which was previously made available on OFAC’s website. DATES: GL 78 was issued on December 1, 2023. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for additional relevant dates. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Assistant Director for Licensing, VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:28 Dec 27, 2023 Jkt 262001 202–622–2480; Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, 202–622–4855; or Assistant Director for Compliance, 202– 622–2490. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Electronic Availability This document and additional information concerning OFAC are available on OFAC’s website: https:// ofac.treasury.gov. Background On December 1, 2023, OFAC issued GL 78 to authorize certain transactions otherwise prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587. GL 78 was made available on OFAC’s website (https://ofac.treasury.gov) when it was issued. The text of this GL is provided below. OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations 31 CFR Part 587 General License No. 78 Authorizing Limited Safety and Environmental Transactions Involving Certain Persons or Vessels Blocked on December 1, 2023 (a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this general license, all transactions prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to one of the following activities involving the blocked persons or vessels described in paragraph (b) are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, February 29, 2024, provided that any payment to a blocked person must be made into a blocked account in accordance with the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations (RuHSR): (1) The safe docking and anchoring of any of the blocked vessels listed in paragraph (b) of this general license (‘‘blocked vessels’’) in port; (2) The preservation of the health or safety of the crew of any of the blocked vessels; or (3) Emergency repairs of any of the blocked vessels or environmental mitigation or protection activities relating to any of the blocked vessels. (b) The authorization in paragraph (a) of this general license applies to the following blocked persons and vessels listed on the Office of Foreign Assets Control’s Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List and any entity in which any of the following persons own, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest: (1) Sterling Shipping Incorporated (registered owner of NS Champion; IMO 9299719); (2) Streymoy Shipping Limited (registered owner of Viktor Bakaev, IMO 9610810); and (3) HS Atlantica Limited (registered owner of HS Atlantica, IMO 9322839). (c) This general license does not authorize: PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 (1) The entry into any new commercial contracts involving the property or interests in property of any blocked persons, including the blocked entities and vessels described in paragraph (b) of this general license, except as authorized by paragraph (a); (2) The offloading of any cargo onboard any of the blocked vessels, including the offloading of crude oil or petroleum products of Russian Federation origin, except for the offloading of cargo that is ordinarily incident and necessary to address vessel emergencies authorized pursuant to paragraph (a) of this general license; (3) Any transactions related to the sale of crude oil or petroleum products of Russian Federation origin; (4) Any transactions prohibited by Directive 2 under E.O. 14024, Prohibitions Related to Correspondent or PayableThrough Accounts and Processing of Transactions Involving Certain Foreign Financial Institutions; (5) Any transactions prohibited by Directive 4 under E.O. 14024, Prohibitions Related to Transactions Involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation; or (6) Any transactions otherwise prohibited by the RuHSR, including transactions involving the property or interests in property of any person blocked pursuant to the RuHSR, other than transactions involving the blocked persons or vessels in paragraph (b) of this general license, unless separately authorized. Gregory T. Gatjanis, Associate Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control. Dated: December 1, 2023. Bradley T. Smith, Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control. [FR Doc. 2023–28670 Filed 12–27–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 117 [Docket No. USCG–2023–0183 RIN 1625–AA09 Drawbridge Operation Regulation; River Rouge, Detroit, MI Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Coast Guard is altering the operations of all movable bridges over the River Rouge, Detroit, MI to improve communications and establish winter hours. DATES: This rule is effective January 29, 2024. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM 28DER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 248 (Thursday, December 28, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 89572-89574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28627]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology

15 CFR Part 231

[Docket No. 231218-0308]
RIN 0693-AB70


Preventing the Improper Use of CHIPS Act Funding; Revised 
Definition of ``Material Expansion''

AGENCY: CHIPS Program Office, National Institute of Standards and 
Technology, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department), through the 
National Institute of Standards and Technology, is amending the 
definition of ``material expansion'' in the September 25, 2023 final 
rule, Preventing the Improper Use of CHIPS Act Funding, to clarify that 
the construction of new semiconductor manufacturing facilities falls 
within the scope of the rule.

DATES: This final rule is effective on December 28, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vikram Viswanathan at (240) 309-9040 
or [email protected]. Please direct media inquiries to the CHIPS Press 
Team at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The CHIPS Act, 15 U.S.C. 4651, et seq., established a semiconductor 
incentives program (CHIPS Incentives Program) to incentivize, through 
Federal funding, investments in the construction, expansion, and 
modernization of facilities and equipment in the United States for the 
fabrication, assembly, testing, advanced packaging, production, or 
research and development of semiconductors, materials used to 
manufacture semiconductors, or semiconductor manufacturing equipment. 
The CHIPS Incentives Program is administered by the CHIPS Program 
Office (CPO) within the National Institute of Standards and Technology 
(NIST) of the Department.
    On March 23, 2023, CPO published a proposed rule that requested 
comment on defined terms used in the Act (including terms that will be 
used in required agreements with covered entities), identified the 
types of transactions that are prohibited under the Expansion Clawback 
and Technology Clawback sections of the Act, and provided a description 
of the proposed process for notification of certain transactions to the 
Secretary (88

[[Page 89573]]

FR 17439). After considering extensive public comments, on September 
25, 2023, CPO published a final rule Preventing the Improper Use of 
CHIPS Act Funding (88 FR 65600). Among other issues, the final rule 
addressed the Expansion Clawback, which prohibits the covered entity 
and members of its affiliated group from engaging in any significant 
transaction involving the material expansion of semiconductor 
manufacturing capacity in a foreign country of concern. The final rule 
also addressed the exceptions to this general prohibition.
    The definition of ``material expansion,'' which is used both in the 
general prohibition and in one of the exceptions, focused on the 
expansion of ``existing'' semiconductor manufacturing facilities, which 
created confusion as to whether the construction of entirely new 
semiconductor fabrication facilities fell within the scope of the final 
rule. This update to the final rule clarifies that new facilities are 
included within the scope of the final rule.

Changes From the Final Rule

Definition of Material Expansion

    The final rule defines ``material expansion'' as an ``increase of 
the semiconductor manufacturing capacity of an existing facility by 
more than five percent of the capacity memorialized in the required 
agreement due to the addition of a cleanroom, production line or other 
physical space, or a series of such additions.'' 15 CFR 231.108.
    Defining material expansion in relation to ``an existing facility'' 
had the unintended effect of suggesting that the construction of new 
semiconductor facilities fell outside the scope of the Expansion 
Clawback. Such an interpretation would be inconsistent with the CHIPS 
Act and the general restrictions of the Expansion Clawback, which 
significantly limit the ability of covered entities to expand their 
semiconductor manufacturing capacity in foreign countries of concern. 
Indeed, CPO made clear in the proposed rule and in the preamble to the 
final rule that the restrictions of the Expansion Clawback were 
intended to apply to the construction of a new facility. In the 
preamble of the proposed rule, CPO noted that the term ``material 
expansion'' included ``the construction of new facilities and the 
addition of new semiconductor manufacturing capacity and uses a 
quantitative measure of 5 percent of existing capacity to provide clear 
and predictable scoping.'' 88 FR 17439, 17441 (emphasis added). 
Further, the definition in the proposed rule provides: ``Material 
expansion means the addition of physical space or equipment that has 
the purpose or effect of increasing semiconductor manufacturing 
capacity of a facility by more than five percent or a series of such 
expansions which, in the aggregate during the applicable term of a 
required agreement, increase the semiconductor manufacturing capacity 
of a facility by more than five percent of the existing capacity when 
the required agreement was entered into.'' Id. at 17447. This 
definition used the term ``facility'' generally, resulting in an 
interpretation that a facility may be either new or existing.
    Commenters also understood that the Expansion Clawback was intended 
to address the construction of new semiconductor facilities. CPO 
received 27 comment submissions, and a significant portion of those 
comments related to material expansion. Numerous commenters noted that 
the intent of the CHIPS Act was to allow existing facilities in a 
foreign country of concern to continue to operate so that ongoing 
operations would not be undermined and so funding recipients and could 
realize the value of their prior investments. Commenters did not raise 
significant concerns with placing restrictions on the construction of 
new facilities, and in some instances suggested that the definition of 
material expansion be modified to clarify that it was triggered by new 
construction (``material expansion means building new cleanroom space 
that does not exist on the date of the [award];'' material expansion 
should apply to ``building new clean room/physical space''). There was 
a general understanding that the Expansion Clawback was intended to 
address new construction.
    In the final rule, CPO provided explanations that reflect the 
intent for the Expansion Clawback to address the construction of new 
facilities. In response to comments on the definition of Significant 
Renovations, CPO noted that ``[w]ithout the concept of significant 
renovations, covered entities could evade the expansion prohibition 
simply by significantly expanding an existing facility rather than 
constructing a new facility.'' 88 FR 65600, 65607. This response 
assumes that the construction of new facilities was addressed by the 
Expansion Clawback, and that the concept of significant renovations was 
needed to prevent circumvention of that prohibition.
    In this rule, the modified definition of ``material expansion'' 
better reflects the intended scope of the Expansion Clawback.

Classification

Administrative Procedure Act (APA)

    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2), the provisions of the APA requiring 
notice of proposed rulemaking and the opportunity for public 
participation are inapplicable to this rule, which places certain 
limitations on funding recipients, because it relates to ``public 
property, loans, grants, benefits, or contracts.'' \1\ Additionally, 
although it was not required to do so, the Department, through the 
March 23, 2023, proposed rule, provided advance notice and opportunity 
for public comment on the definition of the term ``material 
expansion.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The provisions of this amendment implement the Expansion 
Clawback provisions of the Act and are also thus exempt from the 
rulemaking provisions of the APA pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 
4652(a)(6)(A)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This final rule simply corrects an inadvertent omission in the 
definition of ``material expansion,'' thereby accurately reflecting the 
Department's explanation and discussion of public comments in the 
September 25, 2023, final rule. Additional advance notice and 
opportunity for comment would neither provide new information to the 
public nor inform any agency decision-making regarding the defined 
term. Finally, additional opportunity for public comment would be 
contrary to the public interest, under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), because this 
rule provides clarity to applicants and awardees.

Executive Order 13132

    This rule does not contain policies with federalism implications as 
that term is defined in Executive Order 13132.

Executive Order 12866

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this 
final rule is significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for 
public comment are not required to be given for this rule by 5 U.S.C. 
553(a)(2), the analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., are not applicable. Accordingly, no 
regulatory flexibility analysis is required and none has been prepared.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This action does not contain a collection of information 
requirement for the purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
3501, et seq.).

[[Page 89574]]

List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 231

    Business and industry, Computer technology, Exports, Foreign Trade, 
Government contracts, Grant Programs, Investments (US investments 
abroad), National defense, Research, Science & Technology, and 
Semiconductor chip products.

    For reasons set out in the preamble, 15 CFR part 231 is amended as 
follows:

PART 231--CLAWBACKS OF CHIPS FUNDING

0
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 231 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 4651, et seq.


0
2. Revise Sec.  231.108 to read as follows:


Sec.  231.108  Material expansion.

    Material expansion means:
    (1) with respect to an existing facility, the increase of the 
semiconductor manufacturing capacity of that facility by more than five 
percent of the capacity memorialized in the required agreement due to 
the addition of a cleanroom, production line or other physical space, 
or a series of such additions; or
    (2) any construction of a new facility for semiconductor 
manufacturing.

Tamiko Ford,
NIST Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2023-28627 Filed 12-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.