Preventing the Improper Use of CHIPS Act Funding; Revised Definition of “Material Expansion”, 89572-89574 [2023-28627]
Download as PDF
89572
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 248 / Thursday, December 28, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Design Organization Approval (DOA). If
approved by the DOA, the approval must
include the DOA-authorized signature.’’
(9) This AD does not require compliance
with paragraph (5) of EASA AD 2023–0190–
E.
Note 1 paragraph (h)(9): Accomplishing a
balance correction other than with the
replacement of tail rotor drive line parts
could interfere with subsequent tail rotor
drive line balancing inspections. Airbus
Helicopters Emergency Alert Service Bulletin
No. EC130–05A042, Revision 1, dated
November 2, 2023, contains additional
information regarding balance corrections.
(10) This AD does not require compliance
with paragraph (6) of EASA AD 2023–0190–
E.
(11) Instead of the credit allowed in
paragraph (7) of EASA AD 2023–0190–E, you
may take credit for the vibration
measurements required by paragraph (1) of
EASA AD 2023–0190–E that have been
accomplished before the effective date of this
AD using Airbus Helicopters Emergency
Alert Service Bulletin No. EC130–05A042,
Revision 0, dated December 14, 2022.
(12) Instead of the credit allowed in
paragraph (8) of EASA AD 2023–0190–E, you
may take credit for accomplishing
‘‘maintenance task B,’’ as defined in EASA
AD 2023–0190–E and required by paragraph
(3) of EASA AD 2023–0190–E, to satisfy the
initial instance of ‘‘maintenance task B,’’ as
defined in EASA AD 2023–0190–E and
required by paragraph (2) of EASA AD 2023–
0190–E.
(13) This AD does not adopt the ‘‘Remarks’’
section of EASA AD 2023–0190–E.
(i) No Reporting Requirement
Although the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2023–0190–E
specifies to submit certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include that
requirement.
(j) Special Flight Permit
Special flight permits may be issued in
accordance with 14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199
only to operate the helicopter to a
maintenance location for the initial tail rotor
drive shaft inspection, provided no
passengers are onboard.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, International Validation
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the International Validation
Branch, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR730-AMOC@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:28 Dec 27, 2023
Jkt 262001
(l) Additional Information
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Dan McCully, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Ave., Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone (404) 474–
5548; email william.mccully@faa.gov.
(2) For Airbus Helicopters service
information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference, contact Airbus
Helicopters, 2701 North Forum Drive, Grand
Prairie, TX 75052; phone (972) 641–0000 or
(800) 232–0323; fax (972) 641–3775; or at
airbus.com/en/products-services/helicopters/
hcare-services/airbusworld. You may view
this service information at the FAA, Office of
the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
10101 Hillwood Parkway, Room 6N–321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information on
the availability of this material at the FAA,
call (817) 222–5110.
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) Emergency AD 2023–0190–E, dated
November 2, 2023.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For EASA material, contact EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne,
Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
ADs@easa.europa.eu; website
easa.europa.eu. You may find the EASA
material on the EASA website
ad.easa.europa.eu.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Parkway,
Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110.
(5) You may view this material at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA,
visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@nara.gov.
Issued on December 22, 2023.
Caitlin Locke,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–28720 Filed 12–26–23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
15 CFR Part 231
[Docket No. 231218–0308]
RIN 0693–AB70
Preventing the Improper Use of CHIPS
Act Funding; Revised Definition of
‘‘Material Expansion’’
CHIPS Program Office,
National Institute of Standards and
Technology, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of Commerce
(the Department), through the National
Institute of Standards and Technology,
is amending the definition of ‘‘material
expansion’’ in the September 25, 2023
final rule, Preventing the Improper Use
of CHIPS Act Funding, to clarify that the
construction of new semiconductor
manufacturing facilities falls within the
scope of the rule.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
December 28, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vikram Viswanathan at (240) 309–9040
or askchips@chips.gov. Please direct
media inquiries to the CHIPS Press
Team at press@chips.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
The CHIPS Act, 15 U.S.C. 4651, et
seq., established a semiconductor
incentives program (CHIPS Incentives
Program) to incentivize, through Federal
funding, investments in the
construction, expansion, and
modernization of facilities and
equipment in the United States for the
fabrication, assembly, testing, advanced
packaging, production, or research and
development of semiconductors,
materials used to manufacture
semiconductors, or semiconductor
manufacturing equipment. The CHIPS
Incentives Program is administered by
the CHIPS Program Office (CPO) within
the National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) of the Department.
On March 23, 2023, CPO published a
proposed rule that requested comment
on defined terms used in the Act
(including terms that will be used in
required agreements with covered
entities), identified the types of
transactions that are prohibited under
the Expansion Clawback and
Technology Clawback sections of the
Act, and provided a description of the
proposed process for notification of
certain transactions to the Secretary (88
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 248 / Thursday, December 28, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
FR 17439). After considering extensive
public comments, on September 25,
2023, CPO published a final rule
Preventing the Improper Use of CHIPS
Act Funding (88 FR 65600). Among
other issues, the final rule addressed the
Expansion Clawback, which prohibits
the covered entity and members of its
affiliated group from engaging in any
significant transaction involving the
material expansion of semiconductor
manufacturing capacity in a foreign
country of concern. The final rule also
addressed the exceptions to this general
prohibition.
The definition of ‘‘material
expansion,’’ which is used both in the
general prohibition and in one of the
exceptions, focused on the expansion of
‘‘existing’’ semiconductor
manufacturing facilities, which created
confusion as to whether the
construction of entirely new
semiconductor fabrication facilities fell
within the scope of the final rule. This
update to the final rule clarifies that
new facilities are included within the
scope of the final rule.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Changes From the Final Rule
Definition of Material Expansion
The final rule defines ‘‘material
expansion’’ as an ‘‘increase of the
semiconductor manufacturing capacity
of an existing facility by more than five
percent of the capacity memorialized in
the required agreement due to the
addition of a cleanroom, production line
or other physical space, or a series of
such additions.’’ 15 CFR 231.108.
Defining material expansion in
relation to ‘‘an existing facility’’ had the
unintended effect of suggesting that the
construction of new semiconductor
facilities fell outside the scope of the
Expansion Clawback. Such an
interpretation would be inconsistent
with the CHIPS Act and the general
restrictions of the Expansion Clawback,
which significantly limit the ability of
covered entities to expand their
semiconductor manufacturing capacity
in foreign countries of concern. Indeed,
CPO made clear in the proposed rule
and in the preamble to the final rule that
the restrictions of the Expansion
Clawback were intended to apply to the
construction of a new facility. In the
preamble of the proposed rule, CPO
noted that the term ‘‘material
expansion’’ included ‘‘the construction
of new facilities and the addition of new
semiconductor manufacturing capacity
and uses a quantitative measure of 5
percent of existing capacity to provide
clear and predictable scoping.’’ 88 FR
17439, 17441 (emphasis added).
Further, the definition in the proposed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:28 Dec 27, 2023
Jkt 262001
rule provides: ‘‘Material expansion
means the addition of physical space or
equipment that has the purpose or effect
of increasing semiconductor
manufacturing capacity of a facility by
more than five percent or a series of
such expansions which, in the aggregate
during the applicable term of a required
agreement, increase the semiconductor
manufacturing capacity of a facility by
more than five percent of the existing
capacity when the required agreement
was entered into.’’ Id. at 17447. This
definition used the term ‘‘facility’’
generally, resulting in an interpretation
that a facility may be either new or
existing.
Commenters also understood that the
Expansion Clawback was intended to
address the construction of new
semiconductor facilities. CPO received
27 comment submissions, and a
significant portion of those comments
related to material expansion.
Numerous commenters noted that the
intent of the CHIPS Act was to allow
existing facilities in a foreign country of
concern to continue to operate so that
ongoing operations would not be
undermined and so funding recipients
and could realize the value of their prior
investments. Commenters did not raise
significant concerns with placing
restrictions on the construction of new
facilities, and in some instances
suggested that the definition of material
expansion be modified to clarify that it
was triggered by new construction
(‘‘material expansion means building
new cleanroom space that does not exist
on the date of the [award];’’ material
expansion should apply to ‘‘building
new clean room/physical space’’). There
was a general understanding that the
Expansion Clawback was intended to
address new construction.
In the final rule, CPO provided
explanations that reflect the intent for
the Expansion Clawback to address the
construction of new facilities. In
response to comments on the definition
of Significant Renovations, CPO noted
that ‘‘[w]ithout the concept of
significant renovations, covered entities
could evade the expansion prohibition
simply by significantly expanding an
existing facility rather than constructing
a new facility.’’ 88 FR 65600, 65607.
This response assumes that the
construction of new facilities was
addressed by the Expansion Clawback,
and that the concept of significant
renovations was needed to prevent
circumvention of that prohibition.
In this rule, the modified definition of
‘‘material expansion’’ better reflects the
intended scope of the Expansion
Clawback.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
89573
Classification
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2), the
provisions of the APA requiring notice
of proposed rulemaking and the
opportunity for public participation are
inapplicable to this rule, which places
certain limitations on funding
recipients, because it relates to ‘‘public
property, loans, grants, benefits, or
contracts.’’ 1 Additionally, although it
was not required to do so, the
Department, through the March 23,
2023, proposed rule, provided advance
notice and opportunity for public
comment on the definition of the term
‘‘material expansion.’’
This final rule simply corrects an
inadvertent omission in the definition of
‘‘material expansion,’’ thereby
accurately reflecting the Department’s
explanation and discussion of public
comments in the September 25, 2023,
final rule. Additional advance notice
and opportunity for comment would
neither provide new information to the
public nor inform any agency decisionmaking regarding the defined term.
Finally, additional opportunity for
public comment would be contrary to
the public interest, under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), because this rule provides
clarity to applicants and awardees.
Executive Order 13132
This rule does not contain policies
with federalism implications as that
term is defined in Executive Order
13132.
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this final
rule is significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because a notice of proposed
rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment are not required to be
given for this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2),
the analytical requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq., are not applicable. Accordingly,
no regulatory flexibility analysis is
required and none has been prepared.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not contain a
collection of information requirement
for the purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.).
1 The provisions of this amendment implement
the Expansion Clawback provisions of the Act and
are also thus exempt from the rulemaking
provisions of the APA pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
4652(a)(6)(A)(iii).
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
89574
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 248 / Thursday, December 28, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 231
Business and industry, Computer
technology, Exports, Foreign Trade,
Government contracts, Grant Programs,
Investments (US investments abroad),
National defense, Research, Science &
Technology, and Semiconductor chip
products.
For reasons set out in the preamble,
15 CFR part 231 is amended as follows:
PART 231—CLAWBACKS OF CHIPS
FUNDING
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 231 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 4651, et seq.
■
2. Revise § 231.108 to read as follows:
§ 231.108
Material expansion.
Material expansion means:
(1) with respect to an existing facility,
the increase of the semiconductor
manufacturing capacity of that facility
by more than five percent of the
capacity memorialized in the required
agreement due to the addition of a
cleanroom, production line or other
physical space, or a series of such
additions; or
(2) any construction of a new facility
for semiconductor manufacturing.
Tamiko Ford,
NIST Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2023–28627 Filed 12–27–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Foreign Assets Control
31 CFR Part 587
Publication of Russian Harmful
Foreign Activities Sanctions
Regulations Web General License 78
Office of Foreign Assets
Control, Treasury.
ACTION: Publication of a web general
license.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets
Control (OFAC) is publishing one
general license (GL) issued pursuant to
the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities
Sanctions Regulations: GL 78, which
was previously made available on
OFAC’s website.
DATES: GL 78 was issued on December
1, 2023. See SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for additional relevant
dates.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OFAC: Assistant Director for Licensing,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:28 Dec 27, 2023
Jkt 262001
202–622–2480; Assistant Director for
Regulatory Affairs, 202–622–4855; or
Assistant Director for Compliance, 202–
622–2490.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Availability
This document and additional
information concerning OFAC are
available on OFAC’s website: https://
ofac.treasury.gov.
Background
On December 1, 2023, OFAC issued
GL 78 to authorize certain transactions
otherwise prohibited by the Russian
Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions
Regulations, 31 CFR part 587. GL 78 was
made available on OFAC’s website
(https://ofac.treasury.gov) when it was
issued. The text of this GL is provided
below.
OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL
Russian Harmful Foreign Activities
Sanctions Regulations
31 CFR Part 587
General License No. 78
Authorizing Limited Safety and
Environmental Transactions Involving
Certain Persons or Vessels Blocked on
December 1, 2023
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of
this general license, all transactions
prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024
that are ordinarily incident and necessary to
one of the following activities involving the
blocked persons or vessels described in
paragraph (b) are authorized through 12:01
a.m. eastern standard time, February 29,
2024, provided that any payment to a
blocked person must be made into a blocked
account in accordance with the Russian
Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions
Regulations (RuHSR):
(1) The safe docking and anchoring of any
of the blocked vessels listed in paragraph (b)
of this general license (‘‘blocked vessels’’) in
port;
(2) The preservation of the health or safety
of the crew of any of the blocked vessels; or
(3) Emergency repairs of any of the blocked
vessels or environmental mitigation or
protection activities relating to any of the
blocked vessels.
(b) The authorization in paragraph (a) of
this general license applies to the following
blocked persons and vessels listed on the
Office of Foreign Assets Control’s Specially
Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons
List and any entity in which any of the
following persons own, directly or indirectly,
individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent
or greater interest:
(1) Sterling Shipping Incorporated
(registered owner of NS Champion; IMO
9299719);
(2) Streymoy Shipping Limited (registered
owner of Viktor Bakaev, IMO 9610810); and
(3) HS Atlantica Limited (registered owner
of HS Atlantica, IMO 9322839).
(c) This general license does not authorize:
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(1) The entry into any new commercial
contracts involving the property or interests
in property of any blocked persons, including
the blocked entities and vessels described in
paragraph (b) of this general license, except
as authorized by paragraph (a);
(2) The offloading of any cargo onboard
any of the blocked vessels, including the
offloading of crude oil or petroleum products
of Russian Federation origin, except for the
offloading of cargo that is ordinarily incident
and necessary to address vessel emergencies
authorized pursuant to paragraph (a) of this
general license;
(3) Any transactions related to the sale of
crude oil or petroleum products of Russian
Federation origin;
(4) Any transactions prohibited by
Directive 2 under E.O. 14024, Prohibitions
Related to Correspondent or PayableThrough Accounts and Processing of
Transactions Involving Certain Foreign
Financial Institutions;
(5) Any transactions prohibited by
Directive 4 under E.O. 14024, Prohibitions
Related to Transactions Involving the Central
Bank of the Russian Federation, the National
Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, and
the Ministry of Finance of the Russian
Federation; or
(6) Any transactions otherwise prohibited
by the RuHSR, including transactions
involving the property or interests in
property of any person blocked pursuant to
the RuHSR, other than transactions involving
the blocked persons or vessels in paragraph
(b) of this general license, unless separately
authorized.
Gregory T. Gatjanis,
Associate Director, Office of Foreign Assets
Control.
Dated: December 1, 2023.
Bradley T. Smith,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.
[FR Doc. 2023–28670 Filed 12–27–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2023–0183
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
River Rouge, Detroit, MI
Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is altering
the operations of all movable bridges
over the River Rouge, Detroit, MI to
improve communications and establish
winter hours.
DATES: This rule is effective January 29,
2024.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 248 (Thursday, December 28, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 89572-89574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28627]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and Technology
15 CFR Part 231
[Docket No. 231218-0308]
RIN 0693-AB70
Preventing the Improper Use of CHIPS Act Funding; Revised
Definition of ``Material Expansion''
AGENCY: CHIPS Program Office, National Institute of Standards and
Technology, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department), through the
National Institute of Standards and Technology, is amending the
definition of ``material expansion'' in the September 25, 2023 final
rule, Preventing the Improper Use of CHIPS Act Funding, to clarify that
the construction of new semiconductor manufacturing facilities falls
within the scope of the rule.
DATES: This final rule is effective on December 28, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vikram Viswanathan at (240) 309-9040
or [email protected]. Please direct media inquiries to the CHIPS Press
Team at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The CHIPS Act, 15 U.S.C. 4651, et seq., established a semiconductor
incentives program (CHIPS Incentives Program) to incentivize, through
Federal funding, investments in the construction, expansion, and
modernization of facilities and equipment in the United States for the
fabrication, assembly, testing, advanced packaging, production, or
research and development of semiconductors, materials used to
manufacture semiconductors, or semiconductor manufacturing equipment.
The CHIPS Incentives Program is administered by the CHIPS Program
Office (CPO) within the National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST) of the Department.
On March 23, 2023, CPO published a proposed rule that requested
comment on defined terms used in the Act (including terms that will be
used in required agreements with covered entities), identified the
types of transactions that are prohibited under the Expansion Clawback
and Technology Clawback sections of the Act, and provided a description
of the proposed process for notification of certain transactions to the
Secretary (88
[[Page 89573]]
FR 17439). After considering extensive public comments, on September
25, 2023, CPO published a final rule Preventing the Improper Use of
CHIPS Act Funding (88 FR 65600). Among other issues, the final rule
addressed the Expansion Clawback, which prohibits the covered entity
and members of its affiliated group from engaging in any significant
transaction involving the material expansion of semiconductor
manufacturing capacity in a foreign country of concern. The final rule
also addressed the exceptions to this general prohibition.
The definition of ``material expansion,'' which is used both in the
general prohibition and in one of the exceptions, focused on the
expansion of ``existing'' semiconductor manufacturing facilities, which
created confusion as to whether the construction of entirely new
semiconductor fabrication facilities fell within the scope of the final
rule. This update to the final rule clarifies that new facilities are
included within the scope of the final rule.
Changes From the Final Rule
Definition of Material Expansion
The final rule defines ``material expansion'' as an ``increase of
the semiconductor manufacturing capacity of an existing facility by
more than five percent of the capacity memorialized in the required
agreement due to the addition of a cleanroom, production line or other
physical space, or a series of such additions.'' 15 CFR 231.108.
Defining material expansion in relation to ``an existing facility''
had the unintended effect of suggesting that the construction of new
semiconductor facilities fell outside the scope of the Expansion
Clawback. Such an interpretation would be inconsistent with the CHIPS
Act and the general restrictions of the Expansion Clawback, which
significantly limit the ability of covered entities to expand their
semiconductor manufacturing capacity in foreign countries of concern.
Indeed, CPO made clear in the proposed rule and in the preamble to the
final rule that the restrictions of the Expansion Clawback were
intended to apply to the construction of a new facility. In the
preamble of the proposed rule, CPO noted that the term ``material
expansion'' included ``the construction of new facilities and the
addition of new semiconductor manufacturing capacity and uses a
quantitative measure of 5 percent of existing capacity to provide clear
and predictable scoping.'' 88 FR 17439, 17441 (emphasis added).
Further, the definition in the proposed rule provides: ``Material
expansion means the addition of physical space or equipment that has
the purpose or effect of increasing semiconductor manufacturing
capacity of a facility by more than five percent or a series of such
expansions which, in the aggregate during the applicable term of a
required agreement, increase the semiconductor manufacturing capacity
of a facility by more than five percent of the existing capacity when
the required agreement was entered into.'' Id. at 17447. This
definition used the term ``facility'' generally, resulting in an
interpretation that a facility may be either new or existing.
Commenters also understood that the Expansion Clawback was intended
to address the construction of new semiconductor facilities. CPO
received 27 comment submissions, and a significant portion of those
comments related to material expansion. Numerous commenters noted that
the intent of the CHIPS Act was to allow existing facilities in a
foreign country of concern to continue to operate so that ongoing
operations would not be undermined and so funding recipients and could
realize the value of their prior investments. Commenters did not raise
significant concerns with placing restrictions on the construction of
new facilities, and in some instances suggested that the definition of
material expansion be modified to clarify that it was triggered by new
construction (``material expansion means building new cleanroom space
that does not exist on the date of the [award];'' material expansion
should apply to ``building new clean room/physical space''). There was
a general understanding that the Expansion Clawback was intended to
address new construction.
In the final rule, CPO provided explanations that reflect the
intent for the Expansion Clawback to address the construction of new
facilities. In response to comments on the definition of Significant
Renovations, CPO noted that ``[w]ithout the concept of significant
renovations, covered entities could evade the expansion prohibition
simply by significantly expanding an existing facility rather than
constructing a new facility.'' 88 FR 65600, 65607. This response
assumes that the construction of new facilities was addressed by the
Expansion Clawback, and that the concept of significant renovations was
needed to prevent circumvention of that prohibition.
In this rule, the modified definition of ``material expansion''
better reflects the intended scope of the Expansion Clawback.
Classification
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2), the provisions of the APA requiring
notice of proposed rulemaking and the opportunity for public
participation are inapplicable to this rule, which places certain
limitations on funding recipients, because it relates to ``public
property, loans, grants, benefits, or contracts.'' \1\ Additionally,
although it was not required to do so, the Department, through the
March 23, 2023, proposed rule, provided advance notice and opportunity
for public comment on the definition of the term ``material
expansion.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The provisions of this amendment implement the Expansion
Clawback provisions of the Act and are also thus exempt from the
rulemaking provisions of the APA pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
4652(a)(6)(A)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This final rule simply corrects an inadvertent omission in the
definition of ``material expansion,'' thereby accurately reflecting the
Department's explanation and discussion of public comments in the
September 25, 2023, final rule. Additional advance notice and
opportunity for comment would neither provide new information to the
public nor inform any agency decision-making regarding the defined
term. Finally, additional opportunity for public comment would be
contrary to the public interest, under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), because this
rule provides clarity to applicants and awardees.
Executive Order 13132
This rule does not contain policies with federalism implications as
that term is defined in Executive Order 13132.
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this
final rule is significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment are not required to be given for this rule by 5 U.S.C.
553(a)(2), the analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., are not applicable. Accordingly, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is required and none has been prepared.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not contain a collection of information
requirement for the purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501, et seq.).
[[Page 89574]]
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 231
Business and industry, Computer technology, Exports, Foreign Trade,
Government contracts, Grant Programs, Investments (US investments
abroad), National defense, Research, Science & Technology, and
Semiconductor chip products.
For reasons set out in the preamble, 15 CFR part 231 is amended as
follows:
PART 231--CLAWBACKS OF CHIPS FUNDING
0
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 231 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 4651, et seq.
0
2. Revise Sec. 231.108 to read as follows:
Sec. 231.108 Material expansion.
Material expansion means:
(1) with respect to an existing facility, the increase of the
semiconductor manufacturing capacity of that facility by more than five
percent of the capacity memorialized in the required agreement due to
the addition of a cleanroom, production line or other physical space,
or a series of such additions; or
(2) any construction of a new facility for semiconductor
manufacturing.
Tamiko Ford,
NIST Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2023-28627 Filed 12-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P