Oil Country Tubular Goods From Ukraine: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021-2022, 88362-88363 [2023-28036]
Download as PDF
88362
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 244 / Thursday, December 21, 2023 / Notices
continue or recur if the Order were
revoked, and determined to the report to
the ITC rates up to 19.30 percent as the
margin of dumping likely to prevail.5
We invited interested parties to
comment on the Preliminary Results.6
We received a case brief from Archer
Daniels Midland Company, Cargill,
Incorporated, and Primary Products
Ingredients Americas LLC (collectively,
the domestic interested parties), which
notes their agreement with the
preliminary determination that
revocation of the Order would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping, which they state was
appropriately based on Commerce’s
finding that import volumes of the
subject merchandise declined
significantly after issuance of the
Order.7
We received no further case or
rebuttal briefs from interested parties;
thus, the record reflects no opposition to
the Preliminary Results nor presents
substantive issues which require further
consideration. Accordingly, the final
results remain unchanged from the
Preliminary Results.
As noted above, Commerce received
no comments in opposition to its
Preliminary Results. As a result, we
have not modified our analysis, and no
issues and decision memorandum
accompanies this Federal Register
notice. We are adopting the Preliminary
Results as the final results.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
Order includes all grades and
granulation sizes of citric acid, sodium
citrate, and potassium citrate in their
unblended forms, whether dry or in
solution, and regardless of packaging
type. For a full description of the scope
of the Order, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Dated: December 15, 2023.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Final Results of Sunset Review
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and
752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce
determines that revocation of the Order
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of dumping at a weightedaverage dumping margin up to 19.30
percent.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
5 See
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from
Belgium: Preliminary Results of the Sunset Review
of the Antidumping Duty Order, 88 FR 65365
(September 22, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
6 Id., 88 FR at 65366.
7 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter,
‘‘Domestic Industry’s Case Brief,’’ dated October 23,
2023. The domestic interested parties note that,
should the final results of the 2021–2022
administrative review of the Order be finalized
prior to the instant sunset final results, the
affirmative decision that revocation would likely
lead to the continuance of dumping could be
additionally supported with a finding that dumping
continued after issuance of the Order. However,
because the final results of the 2021–2022
administrative review have not yet been issued at
the time of signature of this notice, we continue to
decline to consider the unfinalized dumping
margins of the ongoing 2021–2022 administrative
review for the purposes of the instant
determination.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Dec 20, 2023
Jkt 262001
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to an administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This five-year sunset review and
notice are in accordance with sections
751(c)(5)(A), 752(c), and 777(i) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(3).
[FR Doc. 2023–28138 Filed 12–20–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Background
On August 3, 2023, Commerce
published the Preliminary Results of
this administrative review.1 Interpipe,2
the sole mandatory respondent, and the
domestic interested party Vallourec
Star, L.P. (Vallourec), each submitted
comments on the Preliminary Results.3
For a description of the events since the
Preliminary Results, as well as a full
discussion of the issues raised by parties
for these final results, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.4 Commerce
conducted this review in accordance
with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order 5
The products covered by the Order
are OCTG from Ukraine. For a full
description of the scope, see the Issues
and Decision Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in Interpipe’s case
brief and Vallourec’s letter in lieu of
rebuttal brief are addressed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum. A list of
these issues is attached as an appendix
to this notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://access.trade.gov/
public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
[A–823–815]
Final Results of Review
Oil Country Tubular Goods From
Ukraine: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2021–
2022
We have calculated the following
estimated weighted-average dumping
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from
Ukraine were sold at prices below
normal value during the period of
review (POR) July 1, 2021, through June
30, 2022.
DATES: Applicable December 21, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni
Page, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1398.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1 See Oil Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2021–2022, 88 FR 51289
(August 3, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum
(PDM).
2 Commerce has previously determined that
Interpipe Europe S.A.; Interpipe Ukraine LLC; PJSC
Interpipe Niznedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant; and
LLC Interpipe Niko Tube are affiliated and treated
as a single entity (i.e., Interpipe). See Preliminary
Results PDM at ‘‘Summary.’’
3 See Interpipe’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief for Interpipe,’’
dated September 5, 2023; see also Vallourec’s
Letter, ‘‘Letter in Lieu of Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated
September 11, 2023.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Oil
Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine, 2021–2022,’’
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by,
this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
5 See Termination of the Suspension Agreement
on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from
Ukraine, Rescission of Administrative Review, and
Issuance of Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 33918
(July 16, 2019) (Order).
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 244 / Thursday, December 21, 2023 / Notices
margin for Interpipe for the POR, July 1,
2021, through June 30, 2022:
Exporter or producer
Interpipe Europe S.A./Interpipe
Ukraine LLC/PJSC Interpipe
Niznedneprovsky Tube Rolling
Plant/LLC Interpipe Niko Tube
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
4.89
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce will disclose the
calculations performed in connection
with the final results of a review to
interested parties within five days of the
date of publication of the notice of final
results in the Federal Register.6
However, because Commerce made no
change to the preliminary weightedaverage dumping margin calculation for
Interpipe, there are no calculations to
disclose.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
Commerce has determined, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with these
final results of review.7 For Interpipe,
we will calculate importer-specific
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio
of the total amount of antidumping
duties calculated for each importer’s
examined sales and the total entered
value of the sales, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where an importerspecific ad valorem assessment rate is
not zero or de minimis, Commerce will
instruct CBP to collect the appropriate
duties at the time of liquidation.
Consistent with Commerce’s
assessment practice, for entries of
subject merchandise during the POR
produced by Interpipe for which it did
not know that the merchandise was
destined for the United States, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the all-others rate if there is no
rate for the intermediate company(ies)
involved in the transaction.8
Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
6 See
19 CFR 351.224(b).
Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012).
8 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
7 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Dec 20, 2023
Jkt 262001
review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the
cash deposit rate for Interpipe will be
equal to the weighted-average dumping
margin established in these final results;
(2) for previously reviewed or
investigated companies not listed above,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published for
the most recently completed segment of
this proceeding in which the company
participated; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review or in a prior
segment of the proceeding, but the
producer was covered, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding for the producer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other producers or exporters
will continue to be the all-others rate of
7.47 percent established in the lessthan-fair-value investigation.9
These cash deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
9 See
PO 00000
Order, 84 FR at 33919.
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
88363
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
final results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: December 14, 2023.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issue
Comment: Whether to Grant Interpipe a
Constructed Export Price Offset
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2023–28036 Filed 12–20–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–837]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip From Taiwan: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Final
Determination of No Shipments; 2021–
2022
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
Nan Ya Plastics Corporation (Nan Ya)
made no sales of subject merchandise to
the United States at less than normal
value during the period of review (POR)
July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022. We
also continue to find that Shinkong
Materials Technology Corporation
(SMTC)/Shinkong Synthetic Fibers
Corporation (SSFC) had no shipments of
subject merchandise to the United
States during the POR.
DATES: Applicable December 21, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles DeFilippo, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–3797.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 244 (Thursday, December 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 88362-88363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28036]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-823-815]
Oil Country Tubular Goods From Ukraine: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021-2022
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that oil
country tubular goods (OCTG) from Ukraine were sold at prices below
normal value during the period of review (POR) July 1, 2021, through
June 30, 2022.
DATES: Applicable December 21, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Page, AD/CVD Operations, Office
VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1398.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 3, 2023, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of
this administrative review.\1\ Interpipe,\2\ the sole mandatory
respondent, and the domestic interested party Vallourec Star, L.P.
(Vallourec), each submitted comments on the Preliminary Results.\3\ For
a description of the events since the Preliminary Results, as well as a
full discussion of the issues raised by parties for these final
results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\4\ Commerce conducted
this review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Oil Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021-2022, 88 FR
51289 (August 3, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
\2\ Commerce has previously determined that Interpipe Europe
S.A.; Interpipe Ukraine LLC; PJSC Interpipe Niznedneprovsky Tube
Rolling Plant; and LLC Interpipe Niko Tube are affiliated and
treated as a single entity (i.e., Interpipe). See Preliminary
Results PDM at ``Summary.''
\3\ See Interpipe's Letter, ``Case Brief for Interpipe,'' dated
September 5, 2023; see also Vallourec's Letter, ``Letter in Lieu of
Rebuttal Brief,'' dated September 11, 2023.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Oil
Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine, 2021-2022,'' dated concurrently
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order 5
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Termination of the Suspension Agreement on Certain Oil
Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine, Rescission of Administrative
Review, and Issuance of Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 33918 (July
16, 2019) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The products covered by the Order are OCTG from Ukraine. For a full
description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in Interpipe's case brief and Vallourec's letter
in lieu of rebuttal brief are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. A list of these issues is attached as an appendix to this
notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is
on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Final Results of Review
We have calculated the following estimated weighted-average dumping
[[Page 88363]]
margin for Interpipe for the POR, July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter or producer dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interpipe Europe S.A./Interpipe Ukraine LLC/PJSC Interpipe 4.89
Niznedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant/LLC Interpipe Niko Tube.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce will disclose the calculations performed in
connection with the final results of a review to interested parties
within five days of the date of publication of the notice of final
results in the Federal Register.\6\ However, because Commerce made no
change to the preliminary weighted-average dumping margin calculation
for Interpipe, there are no calculations to disclose.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with these final results
of review.\7\ For Interpipe, we will calculate importer-specific
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of
antidumping duties calculated for each importer's examined sales and
the total entered value of the sales, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1). Where an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is
not zero or de minimis, Commerce will instruct CBP to collect the
appropriate duties at the time of liquidation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14,
2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with Commerce's assessment practice, for entries of
subject merchandise during the POR produced by Interpipe for which it
did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States,
we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others
rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for Interpipe will
be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in these
final results; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies
not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment
of this proceeding in which the company participated; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this review or in a prior segment of
the proceeding, but the producer was covered, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of
this proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be
the all-others rate of 7.47 percent established in the less-than-fair-
value investigation.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Order, 84 FR at 33919.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in
effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern
business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding.
Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: December 14, 2023.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issue
Comment: Whether to Grant Interpipe a Constructed Export Price
Offset
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2023-28036 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P