Large Diameter Welded Pipe From the Republic of Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022, 86316-86318 [2023-27356]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
86316
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 13, 2023 / Notices
are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will
become a matter of public record.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. chapter 35.
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–27305 Filed 12–12–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Agriculture has
submitted the following information
collection requirement(s) to OMB for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. Comments are
requested regarding: whether the
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of burden including
the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; ways to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; and ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Comments regarding this information
collection received by January 12, 2024
will be considered. Written comments
and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be
submitted within 30 days of the
publication of this notice on the
following website www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain. Find this
particular information collection by
selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day
Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or
by using the search function
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs
potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Dec 12, 2023
Jkt 262001
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
National Institute of Food and
Agriculture
Title: National 4–H Conference
Registration Form, Leadership Position
Interest Form, and Scholarship Interest
Form.
OMB Control Number: 0524–New.
Summary of Collection: The National
4–H Conference is known as the
‘‘Secretary’s Conference’’ and has been
the flagship youth development
opportunity of USDA since 1927. The
objectives of the National 4–H
Conference are to: develop the next
generation of leaders; increase youth
familiarity with the government and
future career opportunities; and provide
an opportunity for young people
involved in 4–H in rural, urban, and
Tribal communities to share their voice
on a national level with the federal
government through a Youth
Perspective Briefing.
The National 4–H Conference is
administered by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of
Food and Agriculture (NIFA). The
statutory authority for the Conference is
under Section 7511(f)(2) of the Food,
Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
(Pub. L. 110–246), as amended.
Need and Use of the Information: All
land-grant colleges and universities are
invited to select and send high school
aged 4–H members along with adult
chaperones to the National 4–H
Conference. Each is encouraged to
partner within their state to select a
diverse state delegation based on age,
background, geographic distribution,
and/or experience with the 4–H
program. The selected youth must be 15
to 19 years old during the dates in
which the National 4–H Conference is
held to participate. NIFA will collect
information using the Registration
Form, Leadership Interest Form, and the
Scholarship Interest Form. The
information collected is used by NIFA
and the logistics company to ensure
youth and adults who would like to
attend, serve in leadership, or apply for
a scholarship role at the National 4–H
Conference can be contacted, submit
activity and dietary preferences, meet
eligibility requirements, and provide the
permissions required by law such as
parental/guardian consent.
If NIFA were unable to collect this
data, then the USDA NIFA National 4–
H Conference would be unable to
support the successful planning and
delivery of activities associated with the
National 4–H Conference.
Description of Respondents:
Individuals or households.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Number of Respondents: 400.
Frequency of Responses: Reporting:
Annually.
Total Burden Hours: 700.
Ruth Brown,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023–27291 Filed 12–12–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–122–863]
Large Diameter Welded Pipe From the
Republic of Canada: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Final Determination of No
Shipments; 2021–2022
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
Evraz Inc. NA, Evraz Inc. NA Canada,
and The Canadian National Steel
Corporation (collectively, Evraz) and the
36 non-examined companies, for which
a review was initiated, made sales of the
subject merchandise at prices below
normal value (NV), during the period of
review (POR) May 1, 2021, through
April 30, 2022. We also determine that
Forterra Pipe & Precast, Ltd. (Forterra),
Hyprescon Inc. (Hyprescon), and Canam
Group Inc. (Canam) had no shipments of
subject merchandise during the POR.
DATES: Applicable December 13, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Faris Montgomery, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–1537.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On June 6, 2023, Commerce published
the Preliminary Results in the 2021–
2022 administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on large
diameter welded pipe from Canada and
invited interested parties to comment.1
A summary of the events that occurred
since publication of the Preliminary
Results, as well as a full discussion of
1 See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Preliminary
Determination of No Shipments; 2021–2022, 88 FR
37011 (June 6, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM
13DEN1
86317
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 13, 2023 / Notices
the issues raised by parties for these
final results, are discussed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum.2 Commerce
conducted this administrative review in
accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act).
Scope of the Order 3
The merchandise covered by the
Order is welded carbon and alloy steel
pipe (other than stainless steel pipe),
more than 406.4 mm (16 inches) in
nominal outside diameter (large
diameter welded pipe), regardless of
wall thickness, length, surface finish,
grade, end finish, or stenciling. Imports
of the product are currently classifiable
in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (HTSUS) under
subheadings 7305.11.1030,
7305.11.1060, 7305.11.5000,
7305.12.1030, 7305.12.1060,
7305.12.5000, 7305.19.1030,
7305.19.1060, 7305.19.5000,
7305.31.4000, 7305.31.6090,
7305.39.1000 and 7305.39.5000. While
the HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description of the scope of
this Order is dispositive. For a complete
description of the scope of the Order,
see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in parties’ case and
rebuttal briefs are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum and
are listed in Appendix I to this notice.
The Issues and Decision Memorandum
is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://access.trade/gov/
public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the
comments received from interested
parties, Commerce made certain
changes to the margin calculations for
Evraz. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum contains descriptions of
these changes.
Rate for Non-Examined Companies
The statute and Commerce’s
regulations do not address the
establishment of a weighted-average
dumping margin to be determined for
companies not selected for individual
examination when Commerce limits its
examination in an administrative review
pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the
Act. Generally, Commerce looks to
section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which
provides instructions for calculating the
all-others rate in an investigation, for
guidance when determining the
weighted-average dumping margin for
companies which were not selected for
individual examination in an
administrative review. Under section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others
rate is normally an amount equal to the
weighted average of the estimated
weighted- average dumping margins
established for exporters and producers
individually investigated, excluding
rates that are zero, de minimis or
determined entirely on the basis of facts
available.
For these final results of review, we
calculated a weighted-average dumping
margin that is not zero, de minimis, or
based entirely on facts available for
Evraz, the sole mandatory respondent.
Because this is the only weightedaverage dumping margin determined in
this review for an individually
examined respondent, we are applying
this rate to the non-examined
companies under review consistent with
section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act.4
Determination of No Shipments
As noted in the Preliminary Results,
we received no shipment claims from
Forterra, Hyprescon, and Canam and
preliminarily determined that Forterra,
Hyprescon, and Canam had no
shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR.5 We received no
comments from interested parties with
respect to these claims. Therefore,
because the record indicates that
Forterra, Hyprescon, and Canam had no
suspended entries of subject
merchandise to the United States during
the POR, we continue to find that
Forterra, Hyprescon, and Canam had no
shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR.
Final Results of Review
We determine that the following
weighted-average dumping margins
exist for the period May 1, 2021,
through April 30, 2022:
Weighted-average
dumping margin
(percent)
Producer/exporter
Evraz Inc. NA; Evraz Inc. NA Canada; The Canadian National Steel Corporation ...................................................................
Non-Examined Companies 6 ........................................................................................................................................................
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed for Evraz within five days of
the date of publication of this notice to
parties in this proceeding, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Assessment Rates
Commerce has determined, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries in this review, in
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2021–
2022 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review:
Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada,’’ dated
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Dec 12, 2023
Jkt 262001
9.17
9.17
accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b).
Commerce intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35
days after the date of publication of
these final results in the Federal
Register. If a timely summons is filed at
the U.S. Court of International Trade,
the assessment instructions will direct
CBP not to liquidate relevant entries
until the time for parties to file a request
for a statutory injunction has expired
(i.e., within 90 days of publication).
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
because Evraz’s weighted-average
dumping margin is not zero or de
minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR
351.106(c)(1), and Evraz reported the
entered value of all its U.S. sales, we
calculated importer-specific ad valorem
duty assessment rates based on the ratio
of the total amount of dumping
calculated for the examined sales to the
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
3 See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada:
Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 18775 (May 2,
2019) (Order).
4 See Appendix II for a list of non-examined
companies under review.
5 See Preliminary Results, 88 FR at 37011.
6 See Appendix II for a list of these companies.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM
13DEN1
86318
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 13, 2023 / Notices
total entered value of those sales. Where
an importer-specific assessment rate is
zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP
to liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.7
For entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by Evraz for
which it did not know its merchandise
was destined for the United States, we
intend to instruct CBP to liquidate such
entries at the all-others rate (i.e., 12.32
percent) 8 if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.9
For the companies which were not
selected for individual examination, we
will instruct CBP to assess antidumping
duties at a rate equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin determined for
the non-examined companies in the
final results of review.10
For the companies with no shipments,
i.e., Forterra, Hyprescon, and Canam,
any suspended entries made under that
exporter’s case number (i.e., at that
exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the
all-others rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.
Cash Deposit Requirements
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the
cash deposit rate for the companies
listed above will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of the
review; (2) for subject merchandise
exported by a company not covered in
this review but covered in a prior
completed segment of the proceeding,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published in
the completed segment for the most
recent period; (3) if the exporter is not
a firm covered in this review or the lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but
the producer is, then the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established in the
completed segment for the most recent
period for the producer of the subject
merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate
for all other producers or exporters will
7 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102
(February 14, 2012).
8 See Order, 84 FR at 18775–76.
9 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
10 See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Dec 12, 2023
Jkt 262001
continue to be 12.32 percent ad
valorem, the all-others rate established
in the LTFV investigation.11 These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in
Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping occurred
and the subsequent assessment of
double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to an administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
violation subject to sanction.
Appendix II
Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to
Companies Not Selected for Individual
Examination
1. Acier Profile SBB Inc.
2. Aciers Lague Steels Inc.
3. Amdor Inc.
4. BPC Services Group
5. Bri-Steel Manufacturing
6. Canada Culvert.
7. Cappco Tubular Products Canada Inc.
8. CFI Metal Inc.
9. Dominion Pipe & Piling
10. Enduro Canada Pipeline Services
11. Fi Oilfield Services Canada
12. Gchem Ltd.
13. Graham Construction
14. Groupe Fordia Inc.
15. Grupo Fordia Inc.
16. Hodgson Custom Rolling
17. Interpipe Inc.
18. K K Recycling Services
19. Kobelt Manufacturing Co.
20. Labrie Environment
21. Les Aciers Sofatec
22. Lorenz Conveying P
23. Lorenz Conveying Products
24. Matrix Manufacturing
25. MBI Produits De Forge
26. Nor Arc
27. Peak Drilling Ltd.
28. Pipe & Piling Sply Ltd.
29. Pipe & Piling Supplies
30. Prudental
31. Prudential
32. Shaw Pipe Protecction
33. Shaw Pipe Protection
34. Tenaris Algoma Tubes Facility
35. Tenaris Prudential
36. Welded Tube of Can Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2023–27356 Filed 12–12–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
final results of administrative review in
accordance with sections 751(a) and
777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5).
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Dated: December 1, 2023.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-toLength Plate From the Republic of
Korea: Final Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review; 2021
Appendix I
AGENCY:
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Adjustments to Evraz’s
General and Administrative (G&A)
Expense Calculation
Comment 2: Treatment of Materials as CoProducts in Evraz’s Scrap Adjustment
Comment 3: Correction of Clerical Errors
Generated from Missing Values
VI. Recommendation
11 See
PO 00000
Order, 84 FR at 18768.
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
International Trade Administration
[C–580–888]
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
countervailable subsidies were provided
to POSCO, a producer and exporter of
certain carbon and alloy steel cut-tolength plate (CTL plate) from the
Republic of Korea (Korea), during the
period of review (POR) from January 1,
2021, through December 31, 2021.
DATES: Applicable December 13, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Faris Montgomery, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM
13DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 86316-86318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27356]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-122-863]
Large Diameter Welded Pipe From the Republic of Canada: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final
Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
Evraz Inc. NA, Evraz Inc. NA Canada, and The Canadian National Steel
Corporation (collectively, Evraz) and the 36 non-examined companies,
for which a review was initiated, made sales of the subject merchandise
at prices below normal value (NV), during the period of review (POR)
May 1, 2021, through April 30, 2022. We also determine that Forterra
Pipe & Precast, Ltd. (Forterra), Hyprescon Inc. (Hyprescon), and Canam
Group Inc. (Canam) had no shipments of subject merchandise during the
POR.
DATES: Applicable December 13, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Faris Montgomery, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1537.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 6, 2023, Commerce published the Preliminary Results in the
2021-2022 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large
diameter welded pipe from Canada and invited interested parties to
comment.\1\ A summary of the events that occurred since publication of
the Preliminary Results, as well as a full discussion of
[[Page 86317]]
the issues raised by parties for these final results, are discussed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ Commerce conducted this
administrative review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary
Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022, 88 FR 37011 (June 6, 2023)
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the 2021-2022 Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada,'' dated concurrently
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order 3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada: Antidumping Duty
Order, 84 FR 18775 (May 2, 2019) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The merchandise covered by the Order is welded carbon and alloy
steel pipe (other than stainless steel pipe), more than 406.4 mm (16
inches) in nominal outside diameter (large diameter welded pipe),
regardless of wall thickness, length, surface finish, grade, end
finish, or stenciling. Imports of the product are currently
classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) under subheadings 7305.11.1030, 7305.11.1060, 7305.11.5000,
7305.12.1030, 7305.12.1060, 7305.12.5000, 7305.19.1030, 7305.19.1060,
7305.19.5000, 7305.31.4000, 7305.31.6090, 7305.39.1000 and
7305.39.5000. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this
Order is dispositive. For a complete description of the scope of the
Order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in parties' case and rebuttal briefs are
addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum and are listed in
Appendix I to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at
https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues
and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade/gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the comments received from interested
parties, Commerce made certain changes to the margin calculations for
Evraz. The Issues and Decision Memorandum contains descriptions of
these changes.
Rate for Non-Examined Companies
The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the
establishment of a weighted-average dumping margin to be determined for
companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits
its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section
777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5)
of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others
rate in an investigation, for guidance when determining the weighted-
average dumping margin for companies which were not selected for
individual examination in an administrative review. Under section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally an amount
equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted- average
dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually
investigated, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis or determined
entirely on the basis of facts available.
For these final results of review, we calculated a weighted-average
dumping margin that is not zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts
available for Evraz, the sole mandatory respondent. Because this is the
only weighted-average dumping margin determined in this review for an
individually examined respondent, we are applying this rate to the non-
examined companies under review consistent with section 735(c)(5)(A) of
the Act.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Appendix II for a list of non-examined companies under
review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determination of No Shipments
As noted in the Preliminary Results, we received no shipment claims
from Forterra, Hyprescon, and Canam and preliminarily determined that
Forterra, Hyprescon, and Canam had no shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR.\5\ We received no comments from interested parties with
respect to these claims. Therefore, because the record indicates that
Forterra, Hyprescon, and Canam had no suspended entries of subject
merchandise to the United States during the POR, we continue to find
that Forterra, Hyprescon, and Canam had no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Preliminary Results, 88 FR at 37011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins
exist for the period May 1, 2021, through April 30, 2022:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-average
Producer/exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evraz Inc. NA; Evraz Inc. NA Canada; The Canadian 9.17
National Steel Corporation.........................
Non-Examined Companies \6\.......................... 9.17
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Appendix II for a list of these companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to disclose the calculations performed for Evraz within
five days of the date of publication of this notice to parties in this
proceeding, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries in
this review, in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.212(b). Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to
CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of these
final results in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at
the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), because Evraz's weighted-average
dumping margin is not zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR
351.106(c)(1), and Evraz reported the entered value of all its U.S.
sales, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates
based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the
examined sales to the
[[Page 86318]]
total entered value of those sales. Where an importer-specific
assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping
duties.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14,
2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Evraz
for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United
States, we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the all-
others rate (i.e., 12.32 percent) \8\ if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Order, 84 FR at 18775-76.
\9\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the companies which were not selected for individual
examination, we will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties at a
rate equal to the weighted-average dumping margin determined for the
non-examined companies in the final results of review.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the companies with no shipments, i.e., Forterra, Hyprescon, and
Canam, any suspended entries made under that exporter's case number
(i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the all-others
rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results
of this administrative review as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of
the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the companies listed above will
be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the
final results of the review; (2) for subject merchandise exported by a
company not covered in this review but covered in a prior completed
segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published in the completed segment for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review or the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the
producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in
the completed segment for the most recent period for the producer of
the subject merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
producers or exporters will continue to be 12.32 percent ad valorem,
the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation.\11\ These
cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Order, 84 FR at 18768.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement
of antidumping occurred and the subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and
terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these final results of administrative
review in accordance with sections 751(a) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: December 1, 2023.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Adjustments to Evraz's General and Administrative
(G&A) Expense Calculation
Comment 2: Treatment of Materials as Co-Products in Evraz's
Scrap Adjustment
Comment 3: Correction of Clerical Errors Generated from Missing
Values
VI. Recommendation
Appendix II
Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to Companies Not Selected for
Individual Examination
1. Acier Profile SBB Inc.
2. Aciers Lague Steels Inc.
3. Amdor Inc.
4. BPC Services Group
5. Bri-Steel Manufacturing
6. Canada Culvert.
7. Cappco Tubular Products Canada Inc.
8. CFI Metal Inc.
9. Dominion Pipe & Piling
10. Enduro Canada Pipeline Services
11. Fi Oilfield Services Canada
12. Gchem Ltd.
13. Graham Construction
14. Groupe Fordia Inc.
15. Grupo Fordia Inc.
16. Hodgson Custom Rolling
17. Interpipe Inc.
18. K K Recycling Services
19. Kobelt Manufacturing Co.
20. Labrie Environment
21. Les Aciers Sofatec
22. Lorenz Conveying P
23. Lorenz Conveying Products
24. Matrix Manufacturing
25. MBI Produits De Forge
26. Nor Arc
27. Peak Drilling Ltd.
28. Pipe & Piling Sply Ltd.
29. Pipe & Piling Supplies
30. Prudental
31. Prudential
32. Shaw Pipe Protecction
33. Shaw Pipe Protection
34. Tenaris Algoma Tubes Facility
35. Tenaris Prudential
36. Welded Tube of Can Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2023-27356 Filed 12-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
