Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the MIAX Pearl Options Fee Schedule for Purge Ports, 86193-86197 [2023-27161]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 12, 2023 / Notices
For the Commission, pursuant to delegated
authority.40
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–27159 Filed 12–11–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–99090; File No. SR–
PEARL–2023–65]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX
PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the MIAX Pearl
Options Fee Schedule for Purge Ports
December 6, 2023.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on November
22, 2023, MIAX PEARL, LLC (‘‘MIAX
Pearl’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
MIAX Pearl Options Exchange Fee
Schedule (the ‘‘Fee Schedule’’) to
amend fees for MIAX Express Network
(‘‘MEO’’) 3 Purge Ports (‘‘Purge Ports’’).4
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://www.miaxglobal.com/markets/
us-options/pearl-options/rule-filings at
MIAX Pearl’s principal office, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
40 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 ‘‘MEO Interface’’ or ‘‘MEO’’ means a binary
order interface for certain order types as set forth
in Rule 516 into the MIAX Pearl System. See the
Definitions Section of the Fee Schedule and
Exchange Rule 100.
4 The proposed fee change is based on a recent
proposal by Nasdaq Phlx LLC (‘‘Phlx’’) to adopt fees
for purge ports. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 97825 (June 30, 2023), 88 FR 43405
(July 7, 2023) (SR–Phlx–2023–28).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:03 Dec 11, 2023
Jkt 262001
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to amend
the fees for Purge Ports, which is a
function enabling the Exchange’s two
types of Members,5 Market Makers 6 and
Electronic Exchange Members 7
(‘‘EEMs’’), to cancel all open orders or
a subset of open orders through a single
cancel message. The Exchange currently
provides Members the option to
purchase Purge Ports to assist in their
quoting activity. Purge Ports provide
Members with the ability to send purge
messages to the Exchange System.8
Purge Ports are not capable of sending
or receiving any other type of messages
or information. The use of Purge Ports
is completely optional and no rule or
regulation requires that a Market Maker
utilize them.
The Exchange initially filed the
proposal on September 29, 2023 (SR–
PEARL–2023–52) (the ‘‘Initial
Proposal’’).9 On November 22, 2023, the
Exchange withdrew the Initial Proposal
and replaced it with this filing.
Unlike other options exchanges that
charge fees for Purge Ports on a per port
5 The term ‘‘Member’’ means an individual or
organization that is registered with the Exchange
pursuant to Chapter II of Exchange Rules for
purposes of trading on the Exchange as an
‘‘Electronic Exchange Member’’ or ‘‘Market Maker.’’
Members are deemed ‘‘members’’ under the
Exchange Act. See the Definitions Section of the
Fee Schedule and Exchange Rule 100.
6 The term ‘‘Market Maker’’ or ‘‘MM’’ means a
Member registered with the Exchange for the
purpose of making markets in options contracts
traded on the Exchange and that is vested with the
rights and responsibilities specified in Chapter VI
of the Exchange Rules. See the Definitions Section
of the Fee Schedule and Exchange Rule 100.
7 The term ‘‘Electronic Exchange Member’’ or
‘‘EEM’’ means the holder of a Trading Permit who
is a Member representing as agent Public Customer
Orders or Non-Customer Orders on the Exchange
and those non-Market Maker Members conducting
proprietary trading. Electronic Exchange Members
are deemed ‘‘members’’ under the Exchange Act.
See the Definitions Section of the Fee Schedule and
Exchange Rule 100.
8 The term ‘‘System’’ means the automated
trading system used by the Exchange for the trading
of securities. See Exchange Rule 100.
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98733
(October 12, 2023), 88 FR 71907 (October 18, 2023)
(SR–PEARL–2023–52).
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
86193
basis,10 the Exchange assesses a flat fee
of $750 per month, regardless of the
number of Purge Ports utilized by a
Market Maker. Currently, a Market
Maker may request and be allocated two
(2) Purge Ports per Matching Engine 11
to which it connects and not all
Members connect to all of the
Exchange’s Matching Engines.
The Exchange now proposes to amend
the fee for Purge Ports to align more
closely with other exchanges who
charge on a per port basis by providing
two (2) Purge Ports per Matching Engine
for a monthly flat fee of $600 per month
per Matching Engine. The only
difference with a per port structure is
that Members receive two (2) Purge
Ports per Matching Engine for the same
proposed monthly fee, rather than being
charged a separate fee for each Purge
Port. The Exchange proposes to charge
the proposed fee for Purge Ports per
Matching Engine, instead on a per Purge
Port basis, due to its System architecture
which provides two (2) Purge Ports per
Matching Engine for redundancy
purposes. In addition, the proposed fee
is lower than the comparable fee
charged by competing exchanges that
also charge on a per port basis,
notwithstanding that the Exchange is
providing up to two (2) Purge Ports for
that same lower fee.12
Similar to a per port charge, Members
are able to select the Matching Engines
that they want to connect to,13 based on
the business needs of each Market
Maker, and pay the applicable fee based
on the number of Matching Engines and
ports utilized. The Exchange believes
10 See Cboe BXZ Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BZX’’) Options
Fee Schedule, Options Logical Port Fees, Purge
Ports ($750 per purge port per month); Cboe EDGX
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGX’’) Options Fee Schedule,
Options Logical Port Fees, Purge Ports ($750 per
purge port per month); Cboe Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘Cboe’’) Fee Schedule ($850 per purge port per
month). See also Nasdaq GEMX, Options 7, Pricing
Schedule, Section 6.C.(3). Nasdaq GEMX, LLC
(‘‘Nasdaq GEMX’’) assesses its members $1,250 per
SQF Purge Port per month, subject to a monthly cap
of $17,500 for SQF Purge Ports and SQF Ports,
applicable to market makers. See also Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 97825 (June 30, 2023), 88
FR 43405 (July 7, 2023) (SR–Phlx–2023–28).
11 A Matching Engine is a part of the Exchange’s
electronic system that processes options quotes and
trades on a symbol-by-symbol basis. Some matching
engines will process option classes with multiple
root symbols, and other matching engines will be
dedicated to one single option root symbol (for
example, options on SPY will be processed by one
single matching engine that is dedicated only to
SPY). A particular root symbol may only be
assigned to a single designated matching engine. A
particular root symbol may not be assigned to
multiple matching engines.
12 See supra note 10.
13 The Exchange notes that each Matching Engine
corresponds to a specified group of symbols.
Certain Market Makers choose to only quote in
certain symbols while other Market Makers choose
to quote the entire market.
E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM
12DEN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
86194
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 12, 2023 / Notices
that the proposed fee provides Members
with flexibility to control their Purge
Port costs based on the number of
Matching Engines each Marker Maker
elects to connect to based on each
Market Maker’s business needs.
*
*
*
*
*
A logical port represents a port
established by the Exchange within the
Exchange’s System for trading and
billing purposes. Each logical port
grants a Member the ability to
accomplish a specific function, such as
order entry, order cancellation, access to
execution reports, and other
administrative information.
Purge Ports are designed to assist
Members 14 in the management of, and
risk control over, their orders,
particularly if the firm is dealing with
a large number of securities. For
example, if a Market Maker detects
market indications that may influence
the execution potential of their orders,
the Market Maker may use Purge Ports
to reduce uncertainty and to manage
risk by purging all orders in a number
of securities. This allows Members to
seamlessly avoid unintended
executions, while continuing to evaluate
the market, their positions, and their
risk levels. Purge Ports are used by
Members that conduct business activity
that exposes them to a large amount of
risk across a number of securities. Purge
Ports enable Members to cancel all open
orders, or a subset of open orders
through a single cancel message. The
Exchange notes that Purge Ports
increase efficiency of already existing
functionality enabling the cancellation
of orders.
The Exchange operates highly
performant systems with significant
throughput and determinism which
allows participants to enter, update and
cancel orders at high rates. Members
may currently cancel individual orders
through the existing functionality, such
as through the use of a mass cancel
message by which a Market Maker may
request that the Exchange remove all or
a subset of its quotations and block all
or a subset of its new inbound
quotations.15 Other than Purge Ports
being a dedicated line for cancelling
quotations, Purge Ports operate in the
same manner as a mass cancel message
being sent over a different type of port.
For example, like Purge Ports, mass
cancellations sent over a logical port
may be done at either the firm or MPID
level. As a result, Members can
currently cancel orders in rapid
14 Members seeking to become registered as a
Market Maker must comply with the applicable
requirements of Chapter VI of the Exchange’s Rules.
15 See Exchange Rule 519C(a) and (b).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:03 Dec 11, 2023
Jkt 262001
succession across their existing logical
ports 16 or through a single cancel
message, all open orders or a subset of
open orders.
Similarly, Members may also use
cancel-on-disconnect control when they
experience a disruption in connection to
the Exchange to automatically cancel all
orders, as configured or instructed by
the Member or Market Maker.17 In
addition, the Exchange already provides
similar ability to mass cancel orders
through the Exchange’s risk controls,
which are offered at no charge and
enables Members to establish predetermined levels of risk exposure, and
can be used to cancel all open orders.18
Accordingly, the Exchange believes that
the Purge Ports provide an efficient
option as an alternative to already
available services and enhance the
Member’s ability to manage their risk.
The Exchange believes that market
participants benefit from a dedicated
purge mechanism for specific Members
and to the market as a whole. Members
will have the benefit of efficient risk
management and purge tools. The
market will benefit from potential
increased quoting and liquidity as
Members may use Purge Ports to
manage their risk more robustly. Only
Members that request Purge Ports would
be subject to the proposed fees, and
other Members can continue to operate
in exactly the same manner as they do
today without dedicated Purge Ports,
but with the additional purging
capabilities described above.
Implementation Date
The proposed fees are immediately
effective.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
section 6(b) of the Act,19 in general, and
furthers the objectives of section 6(b)(5)
of the Act,20 in particular, in that it is
not designed to permit unfair
discrimination among customers,
brokers, or dealers. The Exchange also
believes that its proposed fee is
consistent with section 6(b)(4) of the
Act 21 because it represents an equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
16 Current Exchange port functionality supports
cancelation rates that exceed one thousand
messages per second and the Exchange’s research
indicates that certain market participants rely on
such functionality and at times utilize such
cancelation rates.
17 See Exchange Rule 519C(c).
18 See Exchange Rule 532.
19 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
20 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
21 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
other charges among market
participants.
The Exchange supports the proposed
fee change with the below justification
because a similar justification was used
in a recent 2023 proposal filed with the
Commission by another national
securities exchange, Phlx, to adopt fees
for purge ports, which the Commission
deemed acceptable by not suspending
that filing during the applicable 60-day
review period.22 In fact, the same
justification Phlx utilized was also used
in similar recent proposals to adopt fees
for purge ports by two of Phlx’s
affiliated exchanges.23 Therefore, the
Exchange utilized the below
justification based on this recent
Commission precedent from
approximately one month ago.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change would promote
just and equitable principles of trade
and remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open
market because offering Members
optional service and flexible fee
structures which promotes choice,
flexibility, efficiency, and competition.
The Exchange believes Purge Ports
enhance Members’ ability to manage
orders, which would, in turn, improve
their risk controls to the benefit of all
market participants. The Exchange
believes that Purge Ports foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities because
designating Purge Ports for purge
messages may encourage better use of
such ports. This may, concurrent with
the ports that carry orders and other
information necessary for market
making activities, enable more efficient,
as well as fair and reasonable, use of
Members’ resources. Similar
connectivity and functionality is offered
by options exchanges, including the
Exchange’s own affiliated options
exchanges, and other equities
exchanges.24 The Exchange believes that
22 See
supra note 3.
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
98770 (October 18, 2023), 88 FR 73065 (October 24,
2023) (SR–BX–2023–026); and 98768 (October 18,
2023), 88 FR 73056 (October 24, 2023) (SR–
NASDAQ–2023–041). While the Exchange included
a cost-based justification in a related filing to
amend fees for connectivity, it does not believe a
cost-based justification is require here because
Purge Ports are optional functionality and no costbased justification was provided by Phlx or any of
its affiliates in their same filings to adopt fees for
purge ports. Nor does the Commission Staff’s own
fee guidance include such a requirement. See Staff
Guidance on SRO Rule Filings Relating to Fees
(May 21, 2019), available at https://www.sec.gov/
tm/staff-guidance-sro-rule-filings-fees.
24 See supra notes 4 and 10. See also Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 77613 (April 13, 2016),
81 FR 23023 (April 19, 2016). See also Securities
23 See
E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM
12DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 12, 2023 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
proper risk management, including the
ability to efficiently cancel multiple
orders quickly when necessary, is
similarly valuable to firms that trade in
the equities market, including Members
that have heightened quoting
obligations that are not applicable to
other market participants.
Purge Ports do not relieve Members of
their quoting obligations or firm quote
obligations under Regulation NMS Rule
602.25 Specifically, any interest that is
executable against a Member’s or Market
Maker’s orders that is received by the
Exchange prior to the time of the
removal of orders request will
automatically execute. Members that
purge their orders will not be relieved
of the obligation to provide continuous
two-sided orders on a daily basis, nor
will it prohibit the Exchange from
taking disciplinary action against a
Market Maker for failing to meet their
continuous quoting obligation each
trading day.26
The Exchange is not the only
exchange to offer this functionality and
to charge associated fees.27 The
Exchange believes the proposed fee for
Purge Ports is reasonable because it is
lower than the fees currently charged by
other exchanges for similar port
functionality. For example, BZX and
EDGX charge a fee of $750 per purge
port per month, Cboe charges $850 per
purge port per month, Nasdaq GEMX
assesses its members $1,250 per SQF
Purge Port per month, subject to a
monthly cap of $17,500 for SQF Purge
Ports and SQF Ports.28
The Exchange believes it is reasonable
to charge $600 per month for Purge
Ports as proposed because such ports
were specially developed to allow
Members to send a single message to
cancel multiple orders, thereby assisting
firms in effectively managing risk. The
Exchange also believes that a Member
that chooses to utilize Purge Ports may,
in the future, reduce their need for
additional ports by consolidating cancel
messages to their dedicated Purge Port
and thus freeing up some capacity of the
existing logical ports and, therefore,
allowing for increased message traffic
without paying for additional logical
ports. Purge Ports provide the ability to
cancel multiple orders with a single
Exchange Act Release Nos. 79956 (February 3,
2017), 82 FR 10102 (February 9, 2017) (SR–
BatsBZX–2017–05); 79957 (February 3, 2017), 82 FR
10070 (February 9, 2017) (SR–BatsEDGX–2017–07);
83201 (May 9, 2018), 83 FR 22546 (May 15, 2018)
(SR–C2–2018–006).
25 See Exchange Rule 604. See also generally
Chapter VI of the Exchange’s Rules.
26 Id.
27 See supra notes 4 and 10.
28 See supra note 10.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:03 Dec 11, 2023
Jkt 262001
message over a dedicated port, and,
therefore, may create efficiencies for
firms and provide a more efficient
solution for them based on their risk
management needs. In addition, Purge
Port requests may cancel orders
submitted over numerous ports and
contain added functionality to purge
only a subset of these orders. Effective
risk management is important both for
individual market participants that
choose to utilize risk features provided
by the Exchange, as well as for the
market in general. As a result, the
Exchange believes that it is appropriate
to charge fees for such functionality as
doing so aids in the maintenance of a
fair and orderly market.
The Exchange also believes that its
ability to set fees for Purge Ports is
subject to significant substitution-based
forces because Members are able to rely
on currently available services both free
and those they receive when using
existing trading protocols. If the value of
the efficiency introduced through the
Purge Port functionality is not worth the
proposed fees, Members will simply
continue to rely on the existing
functionality and not pay for Purge
Ports. In that regard, Members may
currently cancel individual orders
through the existing functionality, such
as through the use of a mass cancel
message by which a Market Maker may
request that the Exchange remove all or
a subset of its quotations and block all
or a subset of its new inbound
quotations. Already Members can also
cancel orders individually and by
utilizing Exchange protocols that allow
them to develop proprietary systems
that can send cancel messages at a high
rate.29 In addition, the Exchange already
provides similar ability to mass cancel
orders through the Exchange’s risk
controls, which are offered at no charge
that enables Members to establish predetermined levels of risk exposure, and
can be used to cancel all open orders.30
Further, like Purge Ports, Members
may also cancel all or a subset of its
orders in the System, by firm name or
by MPID, over their existing ports, or by
requesting the Exchange staff to effect
such cancellations.31
Similarly, Members may use cancelon-disconnect control when they
experience a disruption in their
connection to the Exchange and
immediately cancel all pending quotes
29 Current Exchange port functionality supports
cancellation rates that exceed one thousand
messages per second and the Exchange’s research
indicates that certain Participants rely on such
functionality and at times utilize such cancellation
rates.
30 See Exchange Rule 532.
31 See Exchange Rule 519C(a).
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
86195
in the Exchange’s System.32 Finally, this
existing purging functionality will allow
Members to achieve essentially the same
outcome in canceling orders as they
would by utilizing the Purge Ports.
Accordingly, the Exchange believes that
the proposed Purge Ports fee is
reasonable because it is related to the
efficiency of Purge Ports and to other
means and services already available
which are either free or already a part
of a fee assessed to the Members for
existing connectivity. Accordingly,
because Purge Ports provide additional
optional functionality, excessive fees
would simply serve to reduce or
eliminate demand for this optional
product.
The Exchange also believes that
offering Purge Ports at the Matching
Engine level promotes risk management
across the industry, and thereby
facilitates investor protection. Some
market participants, in particular the
larger firms, could and do build similar
risk functionality (as described above)
in their trading systems that permit the
flexible cancellation of orders entered
on the Exchange at a high rate. Offering
Matching Engine level protections
ensures that such functionality is
widely available to all firms, including
smaller firms that may otherwise not be
willing to incur the costs and
development work necessary to support
their own customized mass cancel
functionality.
As noted above, the Exchange is not
the only exchange to offer dedicated
Purge Ports, and the proposed rate is
lower than that charged by other
exchanges for similar functionality. The
Exchange also believes that moving to a
per Matching Engine fee is reasonable
due to the Exchange’s architecture that
provides it the ability to provide two (2)
Purge Ports per Matching Engine for a
fee that would still be lower than
competing exchanges that charge on a
per port basis. Generally speaking,
restricting the Exchange’s ability to
charge fees for these services
discourages innovation and
competition. Specifically in this case,
the Exchange’s inability to offer similar
services to those offered by other
exchanges, and charge reasonable and
equitable fees for such services, would
put the Exchange at a significant
competitive disadvantage and, therefore,
serve to restrict competition in the
market—especially when other
exchanges assess comparable fees higher
than those proposed by the Exchange.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed Purge Port fees are equitable
because the proposed Purge Ports are
32 See
E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM
Exchange Rule 519C(c).
12DEN1
86196
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 12, 2023 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
completely voluntary as they relate
solely to optional risk management
functionality.
The Exchange also believes that the
proposed amendments to its Fee
Schedule are not unfairly
discriminatory because they will apply
uniformly to all Members that choose to
use the optional Purge Ports. Purge Ports
are completely voluntary and, as they
relate solely to optional risk
management functionality, no Market
Maker is required or under any
regulatory obligation to utilize them. All
Members that voluntarily select this
service option will be charged the same
amount for the same services. All
Members have the option to select any
connectivity option, and there is no
differentiation among Members with
regard to the fees charged for the
services offered by the Exchange.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Purge Ports
are completely voluntary and are
available to all Members on an equal
basis at the same cost. While the
Exchange believes that Purge Ports
provide a valuable service, Members can
choose to purchase, or not purchase,
these ports based on their own
determination of the value and their
business needs. No Member is required
or under any regulatory obligation to
utilize Purge Ports. Accordingly, the
Exchange believes that Purge Ports offer
appropriate risk management
functionality to firms that trade on the
Exchange without imposing an
unnecessary or inappropriate burden on
competition.
Furthermore, the Exchange operates
in a highly competitive environment,
and its ability to price the Purge Ports
is constrained by competition among
exchanges that offer similar
functionality. As discussed, there are
currently a number of similar offers
available to market participants for
higher fees at other exchanges.
Proposing fees that are excessively
higher than established fees for similar
functionality would simply serve to
reduce demand for the Purge Ports,
which as discussed, market participants
are under no obligation to utilize. It
could also cause firms to shift trading to
other exchanges that offer similar
functionality at a lower cost, adversely
impacting the overall trading on the
Exchange and reducing market share. In
this competitive environment, potential
purchasers are free to choose which, if
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:03 Dec 11, 2023
Jkt 262001
any, similar product to purchase to
satisfy their need for risk management.
As a result, the Exchange believes this
proposed rule change permits fair
competition among national securities
exchanges.
The Exchange also does not believe
the proposal would cause any
unnecessary or inappropriate burden on
intermarket competition as other
exchanges are free to introduce their
own purge port functionality and lower
their prices to better compete with the
Exchange’s offering. The Exchange does
not believe the proposed rule change
would cause any unnecessary or
inappropriate burden on intramarket
competition. Particularly, the proposal
would apply uniformly to any market
participant, in that it does not
differentiate between Members. The
proposal would allow any interested
Members to purchase Purge Port
functionality based on their business
needs.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange received one comment
letter on the proposal.33 This comment
letter was submitted not only on this
proposal, but also the proposals by the
Exchange and its affiliates to amend fees
for 10Gb ULL connectivity and certain
ports. Overall, the Exchange believes
that the issues raised by the commenter
are not germane to this proposal because
they apply primarily to the other fee
filings. Also, the commenter’s raised
concerns with the current environment
surrounding exchange non-transaction
fee proposals that should be addressed
by the Commission through rule
making, or Congress, more holistically
and not through an individual exchange
fee filings. However, the commenter
does raise one issue that concerns this
proposal whereby it asserts that the
Exchange’s comparison to fees charged
by other exchanges for similar ports is
irrelevant and unpersuasive. The core of
the issue raised is regarding the cost to
connect to one exchange compared to
the cost to connect to others. A thorough
response to this comment would require
the Exchange to obtain competitively
sensitive information about other
exchange architecture and how their
members connect. The Exchange is not
privy to this information. Further, the
commenter compares the Exchange’s
proposed rate to other exchanges that
33 See letter from Thomas M. Merritt, Deputy
General Counsel, Virtu Financial, Inc. (‘‘Virtu’’), to
Vanessa Countryman, Secretary, Commission, dated
November 8, 2023.
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
offer purge port functionality across all
matching engines for a single fee, but
fails to provide the same comparison to
other exchanges that charge for purge
functionality like proposed here. The
Exchange does not have insight into the
technical architecture of other
exchanges so it is difficult to ascertain
the number of purge ports a firm would
need to connect to another exchange’s
entire market. Therefore, the Exchange
is limited to comparing its proposed fee
to other exchanges’ purge port fees as
listed in their fee schedules.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,34 and Rule
19b–4(f)(2) 35 thereunder. At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
PEARL–2023–65 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–PEARL–2023–65. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
34 15
35 17
E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
12DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 12, 2023 / Notices
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–PEARL–2023–65 and should be
submitted on or before January 2, 2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.36
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–27161 Filed 12–11–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
National Women’s Business Council;
Notice of Public Meeting
Small Business Administration,
National Women’s Business Council.
ACTION: Notice of open public meeting.
AGENCY:
The public meeting will be held
on Tuesday, January 23, 2024, from
12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. EDT.
ADDRESSES: This meeting is hybrid and
will be held via Zoom, a web
conferencing platform as well as inperson. The access link will be provided
to attendees upon registration. For those
attending in-person, the event will take
place at the U.S. Small Business
Administration Headquarters (409 3rd
St. SW, Washington, DC 20416) in
Eisenhower Conference Room on the
Concourse Level.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
more information, please visit the
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
DATES:
36 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:03 Dec 11, 2023
Jkt 262001
86197
NWBC website at www.nwbc.gov, email
info@nwbc.gov or call Jordan Chapman,
Public Affairs Manager, at 202–941–
6001.
The meeting is open to the public;
however, advance notice of attendance
is requested. To RSVP, please visit the
NWBC website at www.nwbc.gov. The
‘‘Public Meetings’’ section will feature a
link to register on Eventbrite.
This event will be held over Zoom
and in-person, with a link being
provided closer to the date of the event
for Zoom attendees. During the live
event, attendees will be in listen-only
mode. For technical assistance, please
visit the Zoom Support Page. The
meeting record, including a recording
and a recap, will be made available on
www.nwbc.gov under the ‘‘Public
Meetings’’ section after the meeting has
concluded.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, the National
Women’s Business Council (NWBC)
announces its first public meeting of
Fiscal Year 2024. The 1988 Women’s
Business Ownership Act established
NWBC to serve as an independent
source of advice and policy
recommendations to the President,
Congress, and the Administrator of the
U.S. Small Business Administration
(SBA) on issues of importance to
women entrepreneurs.
This meeting will allow Council
Members to review what was
accomplished in 2023 and preview what
may be accomplished over the next
year. The event will include guest
speakers and will allow Council
Members to respond to a selection of
questions and comments from the
public.
Missouri, and at possible additional
exhibitions or venues yet to be
determined, are of cultural significance,
and, further, that their temporary
exhibition or display within the United
States as aforementioned is in the
national interest. I have ordered that
Public Notice of these determinations be
published in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator,
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S.
Department of State (telephone: 202–
632–6471; email: section2459@
state.gov). The mailing address is U.S.
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street
NW (SA–5), Suite 5H03, Washington,
DC 20522–0505.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
foregoing determinations were made
pursuant to the authority vested in me
by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat.
985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order
12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign
Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of
1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C.
6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999,
Delegation of Authority No. 236–3 of
August 28, 2000, and Delegation of
Authority No. 523 of December 22,
2021.
Dated: December 7, 2023.
Andrienne Johnson,
Committee Management Officer.
[Docket No. MARAD–2023–0221]
[FR Doc. 2023–27235 Filed 12–11–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Nicole L. Elkon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional
and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department
of State.
[FR Doc. 2023–27199 Filed 12–11–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
Coastwise Endorsement Eligibility
Determination for a Foreign-Built
Vessel: ENVA 1 (Motor); Invitation for
Public Comments
Maritime Administration, DOT.
Notice.
AGENCY:
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
ACTION:
[Public Notice: 12286]
SUMMARY:
Notice of Determinations; Culturally
Significant Objects Being Imported for
Exhibition—Determinations: ‘‘Matisse
and the Sea’’ Exhibition
Notice is hereby given of the
following determinations: I hereby
determine that certain objects being
imported from abroad pursuant to
agreements with their foreign owners or
custodians for temporary display in the
exhibition ‘‘Matisse and the Sea’’ at the
Saint Louis Art Museum, St. Louis,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Secretary of
Transportation, as represented by the
Maritime Administration (MARAD), is
authorized to issue coastwise
endorsement eligibility determinations
for foreign-built vessels which will carry
no more than twelve passengers for hire.
A request for such a determination has
been received by MARAD. By this
notice, MARAD seeks comments from
interested parties as to any effect this
action may have on U.S. vessel builders
or businesses in the U.S. that use U.S.flag vessels. Information about the
E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM
12DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 86193-86197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27161]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-99090; File No. SR-PEARL-2023-65]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the MIAX
Pearl Options Fee Schedule for Purge Ports
December 6, 2023.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on November 22, 2023, MIAX PEARL, LLC (``MIAX Pearl'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the MIAX Pearl Options Exchange Fee
Schedule (the ``Fee Schedule'') to amend fees for MIAX Express Network
(``MEO'') \3\ Purge Ports (``Purge Ports'').\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ ``MEO Interface'' or ``MEO'' means a binary order interface
for certain order types as set forth in Rule 516 into the MIAX Pearl
System. See the Definitions Section of the Fee Schedule and Exchange
Rule 100.
\4\ The proposed fee change is based on a recent proposal by
Nasdaq Phlx LLC (``Phlx'') to adopt fees for purge ports. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97825 (June 30, 2023), 88 FR
43405 (July 7, 2023) (SR-Phlx-2023-28).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://www.miaxglobal.com/markets/us-options/pearl-options/rule-filings at MIAX Pearl's principal office, and at the Commission's
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to amend the fees for Purge Ports, which
is a function enabling the Exchange's two types of Members,\5\ Market
Makers \6\ and Electronic Exchange Members \7\ (``EEMs''), to cancel
all open orders or a subset of open orders through a single cancel
message. The Exchange currently provides Members the option to purchase
Purge Ports to assist in their quoting activity. Purge Ports provide
Members with the ability to send purge messages to the Exchange
System.\8\ Purge Ports are not capable of sending or receiving any
other type of messages or information. The use of Purge Ports is
completely optional and no rule or regulation requires that a Market
Maker utilize them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The term ``Member'' means an individual or organization that
is registered with the Exchange pursuant to Chapter II of Exchange
Rules for purposes of trading on the Exchange as an ``Electronic
Exchange Member'' or ``Market Maker.'' Members are deemed
``members'' under the Exchange Act. See the Definitions Section of
the Fee Schedule and Exchange Rule 100.
\6\ The term ``Market Maker'' or ``MM'' means a Member
registered with the Exchange for the purpose of making markets in
options contracts traded on the Exchange and that is vested with the
rights and responsibilities specified in Chapter VI of the Exchange
Rules. See the Definitions Section of the Fee Schedule and Exchange
Rule 100.
\7\ The term ``Electronic Exchange Member'' or ``EEM'' means the
holder of a Trading Permit who is a Member representing as agent
Public Customer Orders or Non-Customer Orders on the Exchange and
those non-Market Maker Members conducting proprietary trading.
Electronic Exchange Members are deemed ``members'' under the
Exchange Act. See the Definitions Section of the Fee Schedule and
Exchange Rule 100.
\8\ The term ``System'' means the automated trading system used
by the Exchange for the trading of securities. See Exchange Rule
100.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange initially filed the proposal on September 29, 2023
(SR-PEARL-2023-52) (the ``Initial Proposal'').\9\ On November 22, 2023,
the Exchange withdrew the Initial Proposal and replaced it with this
filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98733 (October 12,
2023), 88 FR 71907 (October 18, 2023) (SR-PEARL-2023-52).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unlike other options exchanges that charge fees for Purge Ports on
a per port basis,\10\ the Exchange assesses a flat fee of $750 per
month, regardless of the number of Purge Ports utilized by a Market
Maker. Currently, a Market Maker may request and be allocated two (2)
Purge Ports per Matching Engine \11\ to which it connects and not all
Members connect to all of the Exchange's Matching Engines.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Cboe BXZ Exchange, Inc. (``BZX'') Options Fee Schedule,
Options Logical Port Fees, Purge Ports ($750 per purge port per
month); Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``EDGX'') Options Fee Schedule,
Options Logical Port Fees, Purge Ports ($750 per purge port per
month); Cboe Exchange, Inc. (``Cboe'') Fee Schedule ($850 per purge
port per month). See also Nasdaq GEMX, Options 7, Pricing Schedule,
Section 6.C.(3). Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (``Nasdaq GEMX'') assesses its
members $1,250 per SQF Purge Port per month, subject to a monthly
cap of $17,500 for SQF Purge Ports and SQF Ports, applicable to
market makers. See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97825
(June 30, 2023), 88 FR 43405 (July 7, 2023) (SR-Phlx-2023-28).
\11\ A Matching Engine is a part of the Exchange's electronic
system that processes options quotes and trades on a symbol-by-
symbol basis. Some matching engines will process option classes with
multiple root symbols, and other matching engines will be dedicated
to one single option root symbol (for example, options on SPY will
be processed by one single matching engine that is dedicated only to
SPY). A particular root symbol may only be assigned to a single
designated matching engine. A particular root symbol may not be
assigned to multiple matching engines.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange now proposes to amend the fee for Purge Ports to align
more closely with other exchanges who charge on a per port basis by
providing two (2) Purge Ports per Matching Engine for a monthly flat
fee of $600 per month per Matching Engine. The only difference with a
per port structure is that Members receive two (2) Purge Ports per
Matching Engine for the same proposed monthly fee, rather than being
charged a separate fee for each Purge Port. The Exchange proposes to
charge the proposed fee for Purge Ports per Matching Engine, instead on
a per Purge Port basis, due to its System architecture which provides
two (2) Purge Ports per Matching Engine for redundancy purposes. In
addition, the proposed fee is lower than the comparable fee charged by
competing exchanges that also charge on a per port basis,
notwithstanding that the Exchange is providing up to two (2) Purge
Ports for that same lower fee.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See supra note 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Similar to a per port charge, Members are able to select the
Matching Engines that they want to connect to,\13\ based on the
business needs of each Market Maker, and pay the applicable fee based
on the number of Matching Engines and ports utilized. The Exchange
believes
[[Page 86194]]
that the proposed fee provides Members with flexibility to control
their Purge Port costs based on the number of Matching Engines each
Marker Maker elects to connect to based on each Market Maker's business
needs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The Exchange notes that each Matching Engine corresponds to
a specified group of symbols. Certain Market Makers choose to only
quote in certain symbols while other Market Makers choose to quote
the entire market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
A logical port represents a port established by the Exchange within
the Exchange's System for trading and billing purposes. Each logical
port grants a Member the ability to accomplish a specific function,
such as order entry, order cancellation, access to execution reports,
and other administrative information.
Purge Ports are designed to assist Members \14\ in the management
of, and risk control over, their orders, particularly if the firm is
dealing with a large number of securities. For example, if a Market
Maker detects market indications that may influence the execution
potential of their orders, the Market Maker may use Purge Ports to
reduce uncertainty and to manage risk by purging all orders in a number
of securities. This allows Members to seamlessly avoid unintended
executions, while continuing to evaluate the market, their positions,
and their risk levels. Purge Ports are used by Members that conduct
business activity that exposes them to a large amount of risk across a
number of securities. Purge Ports enable Members to cancel all open
orders, or a subset of open orders through a single cancel message. The
Exchange notes that Purge Ports increase efficiency of already existing
functionality enabling the cancellation of orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Members seeking to become registered as a Market Maker must
comply with the applicable requirements of Chapter VI of the
Exchange's Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange operates highly performant systems with significant
throughput and determinism which allows participants to enter, update
and cancel orders at high rates. Members may currently cancel
individual orders through the existing functionality, such as through
the use of a mass cancel message by which a Market Maker may request
that the Exchange remove all or a subset of its quotations and block
all or a subset of its new inbound quotations.\15\ Other than Purge
Ports being a dedicated line for cancelling quotations, Purge Ports
operate in the same manner as a mass cancel message being sent over a
different type of port. For example, like Purge Ports, mass
cancellations sent over a logical port may be done at either the firm
or MPID level. As a result, Members can currently cancel orders in
rapid succession across their existing logical ports \16\ or through a
single cancel message, all open orders or a subset of open orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Exchange Rule 519C(a) and (b).
\16\ Current Exchange port functionality supports cancelation
rates that exceed one thousand messages per second and the
Exchange's research indicates that certain market participants rely
on such functionality and at times utilize such cancelation rates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Similarly, Members may also use cancel-on-disconnect control when
they experience a disruption in connection to the Exchange to
automatically cancel all orders, as configured or instructed by the
Member or Market Maker.\17\ In addition, the Exchange already provides
similar ability to mass cancel orders through the Exchange's risk
controls, which are offered at no charge and enables Members to
establish pre-determined levels of risk exposure, and can be used to
cancel all open orders.\18\ Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the
Purge Ports provide an efficient option as an alternative to already
available services and enhance the Member's ability to manage their
risk.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See Exchange Rule 519C(c).
\18\ See Exchange Rule 532.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that market participants benefit from a
dedicated purge mechanism for specific Members and to the market as a
whole. Members will have the benefit of efficient risk management and
purge tools. The market will benefit from potential increased quoting
and liquidity as Members may use Purge Ports to manage their risk more
robustly. Only Members that request Purge Ports would be subject to the
proposed fees, and other Members can continue to operate in exactly the
same manner as they do today without dedicated Purge Ports, but with
the additional purging capabilities described above.
Implementation Date
The proposed fees are immediately effective.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with section 6(b) of the Act,\19\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\20\ in particular, in that it
is not designed to permit unfair discrimination among customers,
brokers, or dealers. The Exchange also believes that its proposed fee
is consistent with section 6(b)(4) of the Act \21\ because it
represents an equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other
charges among market participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange supports the proposed fee change with the below
justification because a similar justification was used in a recent 2023
proposal filed with the Commission by another national securities
exchange, Phlx, to adopt fees for purge ports, which the Commission
deemed acceptable by not suspending that filing during the applicable
60-day review period.\22\ In fact, the same justification Phlx utilized
was also used in similar recent proposals to adopt fees for purge ports
by two of Phlx's affiliated exchanges.\23\ Therefore, the Exchange
utilized the below justification based on this recent Commission
precedent from approximately one month ago.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See supra note 3.
\23\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 98770 (October 18,
2023), 88 FR 73065 (October 24, 2023) (SR-BX-2023-026); and 98768
(October 18, 2023), 88 FR 73056 (October 24, 2023) (SR-NASDAQ-2023-
041). While the Exchange included a cost-based justification in a
related filing to amend fees for connectivity, it does not believe a
cost-based justification is require here because Purge Ports are
optional functionality and no cost-based justification was provided
by Phlx or any of its affiliates in their same filings to adopt fees
for purge ports. Nor does the Commission Staff's own fee guidance
include such a requirement. See Staff Guidance on SRO Rule Filings
Relating to Fees (May 21, 2019), available at https://www.sec.gov/tm/staff-guidance-sro-rule-filings-fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would promote
just and equitable principles of trade and remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market because offering
Members optional service and flexible fee structures which promotes
choice, flexibility, efficiency, and competition. The Exchange believes
Purge Ports enhance Members' ability to manage orders, which would, in
turn, improve their risk controls to the benefit of all market
participants. The Exchange believes that Purge Ports foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities because designating Purge Ports for purge messages may
encourage better use of such ports. This may, concurrent with the ports
that carry orders and other information necessary for market making
activities, enable more efficient, as well as fair and reasonable, use
of Members' resources. Similar connectivity and functionality is
offered by options exchanges, including the Exchange's own affiliated
options exchanges, and other equities exchanges.\24\ The Exchange
believes that
[[Page 86195]]
proper risk management, including the ability to efficiently cancel
multiple orders quickly when necessary, is similarly valuable to firms
that trade in the equities market, including Members that have
heightened quoting obligations that are not applicable to other market
participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See supra notes 4 and 10. See also Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 77613 (April 13, 2016), 81 FR 23023 (April 19, 2016).
See also Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 79956 (February 3,
2017), 82 FR 10102 (February 9, 2017) (SR-BatsBZX-2017-05); 79957
(February 3, 2017), 82 FR 10070 (February 9, 2017) (SR-BatsEDGX-
2017-07); 83201 (May 9, 2018), 83 FR 22546 (May 15, 2018) (SR-C2-
2018-006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Purge Ports do not relieve Members of their quoting obligations or
firm quote obligations under Regulation NMS Rule 602.\25\ Specifically,
any interest that is executable against a Member's or Market Maker's
orders that is received by the Exchange prior to the time of the
removal of orders request will automatically execute. Members that
purge their orders will not be relieved of the obligation to provide
continuous two-sided orders on a daily basis, nor will it prohibit the
Exchange from taking disciplinary action against a Market Maker for
failing to meet their continuous quoting obligation each trading
day.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See Exchange Rule 604. See also generally Chapter VI of the
Exchange's Rules.
\26\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange is not the only exchange to offer this functionality
and to charge associated fees.\27\ The Exchange believes the proposed
fee for Purge Ports is reasonable because it is lower than the fees
currently charged by other exchanges for similar port functionality.
For example, BZX and EDGX charge a fee of $750 per purge port per
month, Cboe charges $850 per purge port per month, Nasdaq GEMX assesses
its members $1,250 per SQF Purge Port per month, subject to a monthly
cap of $17,500 for SQF Purge Ports and SQF Ports.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ See supra notes 4 and 10.
\28\ See supra note 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes it is reasonable to charge $600 per month for
Purge Ports as proposed because such ports were specially developed to
allow Members to send a single message to cancel multiple orders,
thereby assisting firms in effectively managing risk. The Exchange also
believes that a Member that chooses to utilize Purge Ports may, in the
future, reduce their need for additional ports by consolidating cancel
messages to their dedicated Purge Port and thus freeing up some
capacity of the existing logical ports and, therefore, allowing for
increased message traffic without paying for additional logical ports.
Purge Ports provide the ability to cancel multiple orders with a single
message over a dedicated port, and, therefore, may create efficiencies
for firms and provide a more efficient solution for them based on their
risk management needs. In addition, Purge Port requests may cancel
orders submitted over numerous ports and contain added functionality to
purge only a subset of these orders. Effective risk management is
important both for individual market participants that choose to
utilize risk features provided by the Exchange, as well as for the
market in general. As a result, the Exchange believes that it is
appropriate to charge fees for such functionality as doing so aids in
the maintenance of a fair and orderly market.
The Exchange also believes that its ability to set fees for Purge
Ports is subject to significant substitution-based forces because
Members are able to rely on currently available services both free and
those they receive when using existing trading protocols. If the value
of the efficiency introduced through the Purge Port functionality is
not worth the proposed fees, Members will simply continue to rely on
the existing functionality and not pay for Purge Ports. In that regard,
Members may currently cancel individual orders through the existing
functionality, such as through the use of a mass cancel message by
which a Market Maker may request that the Exchange remove all or a
subset of its quotations and block all or a subset of its new inbound
quotations. Already Members can also cancel orders individually and by
utilizing Exchange protocols that allow them to develop proprietary
systems that can send cancel messages at a high rate.\29\ In addition,
the Exchange already provides similar ability to mass cancel orders
through the Exchange's risk controls, which are offered at no charge
that enables Members to establish pre-determined levels of risk
exposure, and can be used to cancel all open orders.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ Current Exchange port functionality supports cancellation
rates that exceed one thousand messages per second and the
Exchange's research indicates that certain Participants rely on such
functionality and at times utilize such cancellation rates.
\30\ See Exchange Rule 532.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, like Purge Ports, Members may also cancel all or a subset
of its orders in the System, by firm name or by MPID, over their
existing ports, or by requesting the Exchange staff to effect such
cancellations.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ See Exchange Rule 519C(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Similarly, Members may use cancel-on-disconnect control when they
experience a disruption in their connection to the Exchange and
immediately cancel all pending quotes in the Exchange's System.\32\
Finally, this existing purging functionality will allow Members to
achieve essentially the same outcome in canceling orders as they would
by utilizing the Purge Ports. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that
the proposed Purge Ports fee is reasonable because it is related to the
efficiency of Purge Ports and to other means and services already
available which are either free or already a part of a fee assessed to
the Members for existing connectivity. Accordingly, because Purge Ports
provide additional optional functionality, excessive fees would simply
serve to reduce or eliminate demand for this optional product.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ See Exchange Rule 519C(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also believes that offering Purge Ports at the
Matching Engine level promotes risk management across the industry, and
thereby facilitates investor protection. Some market participants, in
particular the larger firms, could and do build similar risk
functionality (as described above) in their trading systems that permit
the flexible cancellation of orders entered on the Exchange at a high
rate. Offering Matching Engine level protections ensures that such
functionality is widely available to all firms, including smaller firms
that may otherwise not be willing to incur the costs and development
work necessary to support their own customized mass cancel
functionality.
As noted above, the Exchange is not the only exchange to offer
dedicated Purge Ports, and the proposed rate is lower than that charged
by other exchanges for similar functionality. The Exchange also
believes that moving to a per Matching Engine fee is reasonable due to
the Exchange's architecture that provides it the ability to provide two
(2) Purge Ports per Matching Engine for a fee that would still be lower
than competing exchanges that charge on a per port basis. Generally
speaking, restricting the Exchange's ability to charge fees for these
services discourages innovation and competition. Specifically in this
case, the Exchange's inability to offer similar services to those
offered by other exchanges, and charge reasonable and equitable fees
for such services, would put the Exchange at a significant competitive
disadvantage and, therefore, serve to restrict competition in the
market--especially when other exchanges assess comparable fees higher
than those proposed by the Exchange.
The Exchange believes that the proposed Purge Port fees are
equitable because the proposed Purge Ports are
[[Page 86196]]
completely voluntary as they relate solely to optional risk management
functionality.
The Exchange also believes that the proposed amendments to its Fee
Schedule are not unfairly discriminatory because they will apply
uniformly to all Members that choose to use the optional Purge Ports.
Purge Ports are completely voluntary and, as they relate solely to
optional risk management functionality, no Market Maker is required or
under any regulatory obligation to utilize them. All Members that
voluntarily select this service option will be charged the same amount
for the same services. All Members have the option to select any
connectivity option, and there is no differentiation among Members with
regard to the fees charged for the services offered by the Exchange.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Purge Ports are completely
voluntary and are available to all Members on an equal basis at the
same cost. While the Exchange believes that Purge Ports provide a
valuable service, Members can choose to purchase, or not purchase,
these ports based on their own determination of the value and their
business needs. No Member is required or under any regulatory
obligation to utilize Purge Ports. Accordingly, the Exchange believes
that Purge Ports offer appropriate risk management functionality to
firms that trade on the Exchange without imposing an unnecessary or
inappropriate burden on competition.
Furthermore, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive
environment, and its ability to price the Purge Ports is constrained by
competition among exchanges that offer similar functionality. As
discussed, there are currently a number of similar offers available to
market participants for higher fees at other exchanges. Proposing fees
that are excessively higher than established fees for similar
functionality would simply serve to reduce demand for the Purge Ports,
which as discussed, market participants are under no obligation to
utilize. It could also cause firms to shift trading to other exchanges
that offer similar functionality at a lower cost, adversely impacting
the overall trading on the Exchange and reducing market share. In this
competitive environment, potential purchasers are free to choose which,
if any, similar product to purchase to satisfy their need for risk
management. As a result, the Exchange believes this proposed rule
change permits fair competition among national securities exchanges.
The Exchange also does not believe the proposal would cause any
unnecessary or inappropriate burden on intermarket competition as other
exchanges are free to introduce their own purge port functionality and
lower their prices to better compete with the Exchange's offering. The
Exchange does not believe the proposed rule change would cause any
unnecessary or inappropriate burden on intramarket competition.
Particularly, the proposal would apply uniformly to any market
participant, in that it does not differentiate between Members. The
proposal would allow any interested Members to purchase Purge Port
functionality based on their business needs.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange received one comment letter on the proposal.\33\ This
comment letter was submitted not only on this proposal, but also the
proposals by the Exchange and its affiliates to amend fees for 10Gb ULL
connectivity and certain ports. Overall, the Exchange believes that the
issues raised by the commenter are not germane to this proposal because
they apply primarily to the other fee filings. Also, the commenter's
raised concerns with the current environment surrounding exchange non-
transaction fee proposals that should be addressed by the Commission
through rule making, or Congress, more holistically and not through an
individual exchange fee filings. However, the commenter does raise one
issue that concerns this proposal whereby it asserts that the
Exchange's comparison to fees charged by other exchanges for similar
ports is irrelevant and unpersuasive. The core of the issue raised is
regarding the cost to connect to one exchange compared to the cost to
connect to others. A thorough response to this comment would require
the Exchange to obtain competitively sensitive information about other
exchange architecture and how their members connect. The Exchange is
not privy to this information. Further, the commenter compares the
Exchange's proposed rate to other exchanges that offer purge port
functionality across all matching engines for a single fee, but fails
to provide the same comparison to other exchanges that charge for purge
functionality like proposed here. The Exchange does not have insight
into the technical architecture of other exchanges so it is difficult
to ascertain the number of purge ports a firm would need to connect to
another exchange's entire market. Therefore, the Exchange is limited to
comparing its proposed fee to other exchanges' purge port fees as
listed in their fee schedules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ See letter from Thomas M. Merritt, Deputy General Counsel,
Virtu Financial, Inc. (``Virtu''), to Vanessa Countryman, Secretary,
Commission, dated November 8, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\34\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \35\ thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change,
the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such
action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether
the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\35\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-PEARL-2023-65 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-PEARL-2023-65. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's
[[Page 86197]]
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with
respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission,
and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change
between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be
withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C.
552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the
Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions
should refer to file number SR-PEARL-2023-65 and should be submitted on
or before January 2, 2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-27161 Filed 12-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P