Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada: Notice of Reinstatement of Exclusion From the Countervailing Duty Order, 85225-85226 [2023-26857]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2023 / Notices
HTSUS subheadings: 9404.21.0010,
9404.21.0013, 9404.29.1005,
9404.29.1013, 9404.29.9085, and
9404.29.9087. Products subject to this
Order may also enter under HTSUS
subheadings: 9404.21.0095,
9404.29.1095, 9404.29.9095,
9401.41.0000, 9401.49.0000, and
9401.99.9081. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
subject to this Order is dispositive. For
a complete description of the scope of
the Order, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised by the parties in
their case and rebuttal briefs, to which
we responded in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum, are listed in the
appendix to this notice. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed at
https://access.trade.gov/public/
FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Bona Fide Sales Analysis
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce
found that the sole mandatory
respondent Saffron did not have a bona
fide sale of a mattress during the POR.4
Based on an analysis of the information
on the administrative record, Commerce
continues to find that Saffron did not
have a bona fide sale during the POR.
Commerce reached this conclusion
based on its consideration of the totality
of circumstances, including, but not
limited to: (a) the atypical nature of both
the price and quantity of the sale; (b) the
expenses incurred arising from the
transaction; (c) the profitability of the
resold subject merchandise; and (d) the
likelihood that the sale is atypical due
to the business nature of the U.S.
customer. Consequently, we are
rescinding this administrative review.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Assessment Rates
Because Commerce is rescinding this
administrative review, we have not
calculated a dumping margin for
Saffron. Saffron’s entries will be
liquidated at 37.48 percent, the
company-specific rate established in the
4 See
Preliminary Results, 88 FR at 37010.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:23 Dec 06, 2023
Jkt 262001
less than fair value (LTFV)
investigation.5
Cash Deposit Requirements
Because we are rescinding this
administrative review, Saffron remains
subject to the antidumping duty rate for
its merchandise entered (i.e. 37.48
percent), which is the company-specific
rate established in the LTFV
investigation.6 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in
Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
has occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3),
which continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(3).
Dated: December 1, 2023.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
5 See Mattresses from Thailand: Final Affirmative
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 86
FR 15928, 15929 (March 25, 2021); and Order, 86
FR at 26462.
6 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
85225
Comment 1: Whether Saffron Had a Bona
Fide Sale During the POR
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Must
Conduct Verification if it Reverses its
Decision to Rescind the Administrative
Review
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should
Apply Facts Available to Calculate
Saffron’s Dumping Margin if It Reverses
Its Decision to Rescind the
Administrative Review
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should
Apply the Transactions Disregarded and
Major Input Rules if It Reverses Its
Decision to Rescind the Administrative
Review
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2023–26897 Filed 12–6–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–122–858]
Certain Softwood Lumber Products
From Canada: Notice of Reinstatement
of Exclusion From the Countervailing
Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 20, 2023, the
U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT)
issued an order in Committee
Overseeing Action for Lumber
International Trade Investigations or
Negotiations v. United States, et. al.,
Consol. Ct. No. 19–00122 (Slip Op. 23–
163), reinstating the exclusion of Les
Produits Forestiers D&G Lte´e (D&G),
Marcel Lauzon Inc. (MLI), North
American Forest Products Ltd. (NAFP)
(located in New Brunswick), and Scierie
Alexandre Lemay & Fils Inc. (Lemay),
and their cross-owned companies, from
the countervailing duty (CVD) order on
certain softwood lumber products
(softwood lumber) from Canada. In
accordance with the CIT’s order,
Commerce is issuing this notice
excluding from the CVD order D&G,
MLI, NAFP, and Lemay, and their crossowned companies. Commerce will also
direct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to discontinue
suspension of liquidation and the
collection of cash deposits for all
shipments of softwood lumber produced
and exported by D&G, Lemay, MLI, and
NAFP, entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
August 28, 2021, to liquidate all
suspended entries of shipments of
softwood lumber produced and
exported by D&G, Lemay, MLI, and
NAFP without regard to countervailing
duties; and to refund all cash deposits
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
85226
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2023 / Notices
of estimated countervailing duties
collected on all such shipments.
DATES: Applicable August 28, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristen Johnson, AD/CVD Operations,
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 4793.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Background
On January 3, 2018, Commerce
published the CVD order on softwood
lumber from Canada.1 On July 5, 2019,
Commerce published its Final Results of
Expedited Review for the Order.2 In the
Final Results of Expedited Review,
Commerce found that five companies
subject to the review had de minimis
subsidy rates, and therefore, were
excluded from the Order.3 The five
companies are D&G, Lemay, MLI, NAFP,
and Roland Boulanger & Cie Lte´e
(Roland).4
The Committee Overseeing Action for
Lumber International Trade
Investigations or Negotiations appealed
Commerce’s Final Results of Expedited
Review. On November 19, 2020, the CIT
remanded the Final Results of Expedited
Review to Commerce for reconsideration
of the statutory basis upon which
Commerce promulgated its CVD
expedited review regulations at 19 CFR
351.214(k) to determine individual
subsidy rates for companies not
individually examined in an
investigation.5
In its Final Remand, issued in
February 2021, Commerce determined
that section 103(a) of the Uruguay
Round of Agreements Act, as well as the
other legal authorities presented to the
CIT, cannot be the basis for the
promulgation of the CVD expedited
review regulations under 19 CFR
351.214(k) and, thus, Commerce lacks
the statutory authority to conduct CVD
expedited reviews.6 The CIT sustained
1 See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from
Canada: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing
Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order,
83 FR 347 (January 3, 2018) (Order).
2 See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from
Canada: Final Results of Countervailing Duty
Expedited Review, 84 FR 32121 (July 5, 2019) (Final
Results of Expedited Review), and accompanying
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
3 Id., 84 FR at 32122.
4 Id. While Commerce calculated a de minimis
rate for Roland and its cross-owned affiliates, those
companies are not a party to the litigation nor to
the Court’s order ordering this notice.
5 See Committee Overseeing Action for Lumber
International Trade Investigations or Negotiations,
et al. v. United States, et al., Court No. 19–00122,
Slip Op. 20–167 (CIT 2020).
6 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant
to Court Remand, Committee Overseeing Action for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:23 Dec 06, 2023
Jkt 262001
Commerce’s Final Remand.7
Consequently, Commerce reinstated the
excluded companies in the Order
prospectively, effective August 28, 2021,
and imposed a 14.19 percent ad valorem
cash deposit requirement based on the
all-others rate from the investigation.8
The Canadian parties appealed the CIT’s
decision.9
On April 25, 2023, the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal
Circuit) reversed the CIT’s August 18,
2021 decision and held that Commerce
has the statutory authority to adopt the
CVD expedited review process, and
remanded for further proceedings
necessitated by its holding that such
statutory authority exists.10
On October 6, 2023, D&G, Lemay,
MLI, and NAFP filed a motion with the
CIT requesting reinstatement of their
exclusion from the Order during the
pendency of this litigation.11 On
November 20, 2023, the CIT granted the
motion, finding that there was an
equitable basis for reversing the actions
of its August 18, 2021 decision, and
ordered the reinstatement of exclusion
from the Order, effective August 28,
2021, for D&G, Lemay, MLI, and
NAFP.12 The CIT also ordered
Commerce to instruct CBP to
discontinue the suspension of
liquidation and the collection of cash
deposits of estimated countervailing
duties on all shipments of softwood
lumber produced and exported by D&G,
Lemay, MLI, and NAFP, entered or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after August 28,
2021, and to instruct CBP to liquidate,
without regard to countervailing duties,
all suspended entries of shipments of
softwood lumber produced and
Lumber International Trade Investigations or
Negotiations, et al. v. United States, et al., Court No.
19–00122, Slip Op. 20–167 (CIT 2020), dated
February 17, 2021 (Final Remand), available at
https://access.trade.gov/resources/remands/20167.pdf.
7 See Committee Overseeing Action for Lumber
International Trade Investigations or Negotiations,
et al. v. United States, et al., Court No. 19–00122,
Slip Op. 21–104 (CIT 2021).
8 See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from
Canada: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony
with the Results of Countervailing Duty Expedited
Review; Notice of Amended Final Results, 86 FR
48396 (August 30, 2021) (Amended Final Results of
Expedited Review).
9 The Canadian parties are D&G, Lemay, MLI,
NAFP, Fontaine Inc., Mobilier Rustique (Beauce)
Inc., Government of Canada, Government of New
Brunswick, and Government of Que´bec.
10 See Committee Overseeing Action for Lumber
International Trade Investigations or Negotiations
v. United States, 66 F.4th 968 (Fed. Cir. 2023).
11 See Committee Overseeing Action for Lumber
International Trade Investigations or Negotiations
v. United States, Consol. Ct. No. 19–00122 (Slip Op.
23–163) (CIT Nov. 20, 2023), citing motion filed by
D&G, Lemay, MLI, and NAFP.
12 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
exported by D&G, Lemay, MLI, and
NAFP.13
Reinstatement of Exclusion From the
Order
Because of the CIT’s order, Commerce
is reinstating the exclusion from the
Order of D&G, Lemay, MLI, and NAFP,
effective August 28, 2021. Commerce’s
practice with respect to the exclusion of
companies from a CVD order is to
exclude the subject merchandise both
produced and exported by those
companies.14 As a result, we will
instruct CBP to discontinue the
suspension of liquidation and the
collection of cash deposits of estimated
countervailing duties on all shipments
of softwood lumber produced and
exported by D&G, Lemay, MLI, and
NAFP, entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
August 28, 2021. In addition, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate, without regard
to countervailing duties, all suspended
entries of shipments of softwood lumber
produced and exported by D&G, Lemay,
MLI, and NAFP, and to refund all cash
deposits of estimated countervailing
duties collected on all such shipments.
Subject merchandise that D&G, Lemay,
MLI, and NAFP export but do not
produce, as well as merchandise D&G,
Lemay, MLI, and NAFP produce but is
exported by another company remain
subject to the Order.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 516A(c) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.
Dated: November 30, 2023.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2023–26857 Filed 12–6–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–475–834]
Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-ToLength Plate From Italy: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2021–2022
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
13 Id.
14 See, e.g., Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel
Products from India, Italy, Republic of Korea and
the People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty
Order, 81 FR 48387 (July 25, 2016).
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 234 (Thursday, December 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 85225-85226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26857]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-122-858]
Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada: Notice of
Reinstatement of Exclusion From the Countervailing Duty Order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 20, 2023, the U.S. Court of International Trade
(CIT) issued an order in Committee Overseeing Action for Lumber
International Trade Investigations or Negotiations v. United States,
et. al., Consol. Ct. No. 19-00122 (Slip Op. 23-163), reinstating the
exclusion of Les Produits Forestiers D&G Lt[eacute]e (D&G), Marcel
Lauzon Inc. (MLI), North American Forest Products Ltd. (NAFP) (located
in New Brunswick), and Scierie Alexandre Lemay & Fils Inc. (Lemay), and
their cross-owned companies, from the countervailing duty (CVD) order
on certain softwood lumber products (softwood lumber) from Canada. In
accordance with the CIT's order, Commerce is issuing this notice
excluding from the CVD order D&G, MLI, NAFP, and Lemay, and their
cross-owned companies. Commerce will also direct U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) to discontinue suspension of liquidation and
the collection of cash deposits for all shipments of softwood lumber
produced and exported by D&G, Lemay, MLI, and NAFP, entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after August 28, 2021,
to liquidate all suspended entries of shipments of softwood lumber
produced and exported by D&G, Lemay, MLI, and NAFP without regard to
countervailing duties; and to refund all cash deposits
[[Page 85226]]
of estimated countervailing duties collected on all such shipments.
DATES: Applicable August 28, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristen Johnson, AD/CVD Operations,
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 4793.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 3, 2018, Commerce published the CVD order on softwood
lumber from Canada.\1\ On July 5, 2019, Commerce published its Final
Results of Expedited Review for the Order.\2\ In the Final Results of
Expedited Review, Commerce found that five companies subject to the
review had de minimis subsidy rates, and therefore, were excluded from
the Order.\3\ The five companies are D&G, Lemay, MLI, NAFP, and Roland
Boulanger & Cie Lt[eacute]e (Roland).\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Amended
Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and
Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR 347 (January 3, 2018) (Order).
\2\ See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Final
Results of Countervailing Duty Expedited Review, 84 FR 32121 (July
5, 2019) (Final Results of Expedited Review), and accompanying
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
\3\ Id., 84 FR at 32122.
\4\ Id. While Commerce calculated a de minimis rate for Roland
and its cross-owned affiliates, those companies are not a party to
the litigation nor to the Court's order ordering this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Committee Overseeing Action for Lumber International Trade
Investigations or Negotiations appealed Commerce's Final Results of
Expedited Review. On November 19, 2020, the CIT remanded the Final
Results of Expedited Review to Commerce for reconsideration of the
statutory basis upon which Commerce promulgated its CVD expedited
review regulations at 19 CFR 351.214(k) to determine individual subsidy
rates for companies not individually examined in an investigation.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Committee Overseeing Action for Lumber International
Trade Investigations or Negotiations, et al. v. United States, et
al., Court No. 19-00122, Slip Op. 20-167 (CIT 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In its Final Remand, issued in February 2021, Commerce determined
that section 103(a) of the Uruguay Round of Agreements Act, as well as
the other legal authorities presented to the CIT, cannot be the basis
for the promulgation of the CVD expedited review regulations under 19
CFR 351.214(k) and, thus, Commerce lacks the statutory authority to
conduct CVD expedited reviews.\6\ The CIT sustained Commerce's Final
Remand.\7\ Consequently, Commerce reinstated the excluded companies in
the Order prospectively, effective August 28, 2021, and imposed a 14.19
percent ad valorem cash deposit requirement based on the all-others
rate from the investigation.\8\ The Canadian parties appealed the CIT's
decision.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court
Remand, Committee Overseeing Action for Lumber International Trade
Investigations or Negotiations, et al. v. United States, et al.,
Court No. 19-00122, Slip Op. 20-167 (CIT 2020), dated February 17,
2021 (Final Remand), available at https://access.trade.gov/resources/remands/20-167.pdf.
\7\ See Committee Overseeing Action for Lumber International
Trade Investigations or Negotiations, et al. v. United States, et
al., Court No. 19-00122, Slip Op. 21-104 (CIT 2021).
\8\ See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Notice of
Court Decision Not in Harmony with the Results of Countervailing
Duty Expedited Review; Notice of Amended Final Results, 86 FR 48396
(August 30, 2021) (Amended Final Results of Expedited Review).
\9\ The Canadian parties are D&G, Lemay, MLI, NAFP, Fontaine
Inc., Mobilier Rustique (Beauce) Inc., Government of Canada,
Government of New Brunswick, and Government of Qu[eacute]bec.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 25, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit (Federal Circuit) reversed the CIT's August 18, 2021 decision
and held that Commerce has the statutory authority to adopt the CVD
expedited review process, and remanded for further proceedings
necessitated by its holding that such statutory authority exists.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Committee Overseeing Action for Lumber International
Trade Investigations or Negotiations v. United States, 66 F.4th 968
(Fed. Cir. 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On October 6, 2023, D&G, Lemay, MLI, and NAFP filed a motion with
the CIT requesting reinstatement of their exclusion from the Order
during the pendency of this litigation.\11\ On November 20, 2023, the
CIT granted the motion, finding that there was an equitable basis for
reversing the actions of its August 18, 2021 decision, and ordered the
reinstatement of exclusion from the Order, effective August 28, 2021,
for D&G, Lemay, MLI, and NAFP.\12\ The CIT also ordered Commerce to
instruct CBP to discontinue the suspension of liquidation and the
collection of cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties on all
shipments of softwood lumber produced and exported by D&G, Lemay, MLI,
and NAFP, entered or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or
after August 28, 2021, and to instruct CBP to liquidate, without regard
to countervailing duties, all suspended entries of shipments of
softwood lumber produced and exported by D&G, Lemay, MLI, and NAFP.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Committee Overseeing Action for Lumber International
Trade Investigations or Negotiations v. United States, Consol. Ct.
No. 19-00122 (Slip Op. 23-163) (CIT Nov. 20, 2023), citing motion
filed by D&G, Lemay, MLI, and NAFP.
\12\ Id.
\13\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinstatement of Exclusion From the Order
Because of the CIT's order, Commerce is reinstating the exclusion
from the Order of D&G, Lemay, MLI, and NAFP, effective August 28, 2021.
Commerce's practice with respect to the exclusion of companies from a
CVD order is to exclude the subject merchandise both produced and
exported by those companies.\14\ As a result, we will instruct CBP to
discontinue the suspension of liquidation and the collection of cash
deposits of estimated countervailing duties on all shipments of
softwood lumber produced and exported by D&G, Lemay, MLI, and NAFP,
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after
August 28, 2021. In addition, we will instruct CBP to liquidate,
without regard to countervailing duties, all suspended entries of
shipments of softwood lumber produced and exported by D&G, Lemay, MLI,
and NAFP, and to refund all cash deposits of estimated countervailing
duties collected on all such shipments. Subject merchandise that D&G,
Lemay, MLI, and NAFP export but do not produce, as well as merchandise
D&G, Lemay, MLI, and NAFP produce but is exported by another company
remain subject to the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See, e.g., Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from
India, Italy, Republic of Korea and the People's Republic of China:
Countervailing Duty Order, 81 FR 48387 (July 25, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with section
516A(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.
Dated: November 30, 2023.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2023-26857 Filed 12-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P