Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Modify the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule, 84030-84033 [2023-26384]
Download as PDF
84030
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 230 / Friday, December 1, 2023 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
purchasers of historical Open-Close
Data.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed incentive program for any
Member or non-Member who purchases
historical Open-Close Data is reasonable
because such purchasers would receive
a 20% discount for purchasing $20,000
or more worth of historical Open-Close
Data. The Exchange believes the
proposed discount is reasonable as it
will give purchasers the ability to use
and test the historical Open-Close Data
at a discounted rate, prior to purchasing
additional months or a monthly
subscription, and will therefore
encourage and promote users to
purchase the historical Open-Close
Data. Further, the proposed discount is
intended to promote increased use of
the Exchange’s historical Open-Close
Data by defraying some of the costs a
purchaser would ordinarily have to
expend before using the data product.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed discount is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because it will
apply equally to all Members and nonMembers who purchase historical OpenClose Data. Lastly, the purchase of this
data product is discretionary and not
compulsory. Indeed, no market
participant is required to purchase the
historical Open-Close Data, and the
Exchange is not required to make the
historical Open-Close Data available to
all investors. Potential purchasers may
request the data at any time if they
believe it to be valuable or may decline
to purchase such data.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange operates in a highly
competitive environment in which the
Exchange must continually adjust its
fees to remain competitive. Because
competitors are free to modify their own
fees in response, the Exchange believes
that the degree to which fee changes in
this market may impose any burden on
competition is extremely limited. As
discussed above, Open-Close Data is
subject to direct competition from
several other options exchanges that
offer substitutes to Open-Close Data.
Moreover, purchase of Open-Close Data
is optional. It is designed to help
investors understand underlying market
trends to improve the quality of
investment decisions, but is not
necessary to execute a trade.
The proposed rule changes are
grounded in the Exchange’s efforts to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Nov 30, 2023
Jkt 262001
compete more effectively. In this
competitive environment, potential
purchasers are free to choose which, if
any, similar product to purchase to
satisfy their need for market
information. As a result, the Exchange
believes this proposed rule change
permits fair competition among national
securities exchanges. Further, the
Exchange believes that these changes
will not cause any unnecessary or
inappropriate burden on intermarket
competition, as the proposed incentive
program applies uniformly to any
purchaser of historical Open-Close Data.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 13 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 14 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
CboeBZX–2023–094 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
13 15
14 17
PO 00000
Fmt 4703
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–26491 Filed 11–30–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–99021; File No. SR–
NYSEARCA–2023–80]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Modify the NYSE Arca
Options Fee Schedule
November 27, 2023.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
15 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
Frm 00135
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–CboeBZX–2023–094. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–CboeBZX–2023–094 and should be
submitted on or before December 22,
2023.
1 15
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
01DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 230 / Friday, December 1, 2023 / Notices
(‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on
November 15, 2023, NYSE Arca, Inc.
(‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify the
NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule (‘‘Fee
Schedule’’) regarding the Firm and
Broker Dealer Monthly Fee Cap. The
Exchange proposes to implement the fee
change effective November 15, 2023.4
The proposed rule change is available
on the Exchange’s website at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
1. Purpose
The purpose of this filing is to modify
the Firm and Broker Dealer Monthly Fee
Cap (the ‘‘Monthly Fee Cap’’). The
Exchange proposes to implement the
rule change on November 15, 2023.
The Exchange proposes to modify the
Monthly Fee Cap, which currently
provides that combined Firm
proprietary fees and Broker Dealer fees
for transactions in standard option
contracts cleared in the customer range
2 15
U.S.C. 78a.
CFR 240.19b–4.
4 The Exchange originally filed to amend the Fee
Schedule on October 31, 2023 (SR–NYSEARCA–
2023–75) and withdrew such filing on November
15, 2023.
3 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Nov 30, 2023
Jkt 262001
for Manual executions and QCC
transactions are capped at $200,000 per
month.5
The Exchange proposes to raise the
Monthly Fee Cap to $250,000 per
month. Accordingly, the Exchange
proposes to modify the Fee Schedule to
replace $200,000 with $250,000 in the
description of the Monthly Fee Cap.
Strategy executions, royalty fees, and
firm trades executed via a Joint Back
Office agreement will continue to be
excluded from fees to which the
Monthly Fee Cap would apply. Once a
Firm or Broker Dealer has reached the
Monthly Fee Cap, an incremental
service fee of $0.01 per contract for Firm
or Broker Dealer Manual transactions
will continue to apply, except for the
execution of a QCC order.
The Exchange also proposes nonsubstantive clarifying changes to the
description of the Monthly Fee Cap to
identify the fees included in the
Monthly Fee Cap more precisely. The
proposed changes are not intended to
modify any fees eligible for the Monthly
Fee Cap, but rather to improve the
clarity of the Fee Schedule.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed change, despite increasing the
amount of the Monthly Fee Cap, would
continue to incent Firms and Broker
Dealers to direct order flow to the
Exchange to receive the benefits of a fee
cap on Manual and QCC transactions.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,6 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,7 in particular,
because it provides for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its members,
issuers and other persons using its
facilities and does not unfairly
discriminate between customers,
issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Proposed Rule Change Is
Reasonable
The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market. The Commission
has repeatedly expressed its preference
for competition over regulatory
intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities
markets. In Regulation NMS, the
Commission highlighted the importance
of market forces in determining prices
and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
5 See Fee Schedule, NYSE Arca OPTIONS:
TRADE-RELATED CHARGES FOR STANDARD
OPTIONS, FIRM AND BROKER DEALER
MONTHLY FEE CAP.
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
84031
that current regulation of the market
system ‘‘has been remarkably successful
in promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 8
There are currently 17 registered
options exchanges competing for order
flow. Based on publicly-available
information, and excluding index-based
options, no single exchange has more
than 16% of the market share of
executed volume of multiply-listed
equity and ETF options trades.9
Therefore, no exchange possesses
significant pricing power in the
execution of multiply-listed equity and
ETF options order flow. More
specifically, in September 2023, the
Exchange had less than 12% market
share of executed volume of multiplylisted equity and ETF options trades.10
The Exchange believes that the evershifting market share among the
exchanges from month to month
demonstrates that market participants
can shift order flow, or discontinue or
reduce use of certain categories of
products, in response to fee changes.
Accordingly, competitive forces
constrain options exchange transaction
fees. Stated otherwise, modifications to
exchange transaction fees can have a
direct effect on the ability of an
exchange to compete for order flow.
The proposed increase to the Monthly
Fee Cap is reasonable because the
Exchange believes the fee cap, although
higher, would continue to incent Firms
and Broker Dealers to direct order flow
to the Exchange to receive the benefits
of capped fees. The Exchange also
believes the proposed change is
reasonable because the proposed fee cap
amount would be applicable to all Firms
and Broker Dealers. In addition,
although the proposed change would
raise the amount of the Monthly Fee
Cap, it would continue to offer Firms
and Broker Dealers the opportunity to
qualify for capped fees on Manual and
QCC transactions, which the Exchange
believes provides Firms and Broker
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005)
(S7–10–04) (‘‘Reg NMS Adopting Release’’).
9 The OCC publishes options and futures volume
in a variety of formats, including daily and monthly
volume by exchange, available here: https://
www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-DataReports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/MonthlyWeekly-Volume-Statistics.
10 Based on a compilation of OCC data for
monthly volume of equity-based options and
monthly volume of equity-based ETF options, see
id., the Exchange’s market share in equity-based
options increased from 10.84% for the month of
September 2022 to 11.48% for the month of
September 2023.
E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM
01DEN1
84032
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 230 / Friday, December 1, 2023 / Notices
Dealers with a benefit not offered by at
least one other options exchange.11
To the extent the proposed change
continues to attract greater volume and
liquidity, the Exchange believes the
proposed change would improve the
Exchange’s overall competitiveness and
strengthen its market quality for all
market participants. In the backdrop of
the competitive environment in which
the Exchange operates, the proposed
rule change is a reasonable attempt by
the Exchange to increase the depth of its
market and improve its market share
relative to its competitors. The
Exchange’s fees are constrained by
intermarket competition, as OTP
Holders may direct their order flow to
any of the 17 options exchanges. Thus,
OTP Holders have a choice of where
they direct their order flow, including
their Manual and QCC transactions. The
proposed rule change is designed to
continue to incent OTP Holders to
direct liquidity and, in particular, Firm
and Broker Dealer transactions to the
Exchange. In addition, to the extent OTP
Holders are incentivized to aggregate
their trading activity at the Exchange,
that increased liquidity could promote
market depth, price discovery and
improvement, and enhanced order
execution opportunities for market
participants.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
The Proposed Rule Change Is an
Equitable Allocation of Credits and Fees
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is an equitable allocation of
its fees and credits because the proposal
is based on the amount and type of
business transacted on the Exchange.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed modification of the Monthly
Fee Cap is equitable because it would
apply to all Firms and Broker Dealers
equally and would continue to provide
for the same fee cap amount for all
Firms and Broker Dealers. The Exchange
also believes that the proposed rule
change is equitable with respect to nonFirm and non-Broker Dealer market
participants because the Monthly Fee
Cap would not be meaningful for
Customers or Professional Customers
(neither of whom pay transaction
charges for Manual transactions or QCC
transactions) and because Market
Makers are offered other incentives to
reduce transaction fees.12 To the extent
the proposed change achieves its
11 See, e.g., BOX Options Fee Schedule, available
at: https://boxoptions.com/fee-schedule/ (no cap on
Firm and Broker Dealer manual or QCC transaction
fees).
12 See generally Fee Schedule (various incentives
available to Market Makers for posted monthly
volume, including on executions in penny issues,
non-penny issues, and SPY).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Nov 30, 2023
Jkt 262001
purpose in continuing to incent Firms
and Broker Dealers to aggregate their
executions at the Exchange as a primary
execution venue and does not
discourage Firms and Broker Dealers
from continuing to direct order flow to
the Exchange to achieve the benefits of
capped fees, this increased order flow
would continue to make the Exchange a
more competitive venue for, among
other things, order execution, and all
market participants would benefit from
enhanced opportunities for price
improvement and order execution.
Thus, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change would improve
market quality for all market
participants on the Exchange and, as a
consequence, attract more order flow to
the Exchange, thereby improving
market-wide quality and price
discovery.
The Proposed Rule Change Is Not
Unfairly Discriminatory
The Exchange believes that the
proposed change to the Monthly Fee
Cap is not unfairly discriminatory
because the fee cap, as proposed, would
continue to be available to all similarly
situated Firms and Broker Dealers, any
of which could continue to be incented
to direct order flow to the Exchange to
qualify for the fee cap. Moreover, the
proposed change to the Monthly Fee
Cap is not unfairly discriminatory
because it would continue to apply the
same fee cap amount to all Firms and
Broker Dealers. The Exchange notes that
offering the Monthly Fee Cap to Firms
and Broker Dealers but not other market
participants is not unfairly
discriminatory because the Monthly Fee
Cap would not be meaningful for
Customers or Professional Customers
because neither Customers nor
Professional Customers pay transaction
charges for Manual transactions or QCC
transactions and is not unfairly
discriminatory towards Market Makers,
as Market Makers have alternative
avenues to reduce transaction fees.13
To the extent that the proposed
change continues to attract Manual and
QCC transactions to the Exchange, this
increased order flow would continue to
make the Exchange a more competitive
venue for order execution. Thus, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule
change would improve market quality
for all market participants on the
Exchange and, as a consequence, attract
more order flow to the Exchange,
thereby improving market-wide quality
and price discovery. The resulting
increased volume and liquidity would
provide more trading opportunities and
13 See
PO 00000
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act, the Exchange does not believe
that the proposed rule change would
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Instead, as discussed above, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
change would encourage the submission
of additional liquidity to a public
exchange, thereby promoting market
depth, price discovery and transparency
and enhancing order execution
opportunities for all market
participants. As a result, the Exchange
believes that the proposed change
furthers the Commission’s goal in
adopting Regulation NMS of fostering
integrated competition among orders,
which promotes ‘‘more efficient pricing
of individual stocks for all types of
orders, large and small.’’ 14
Intramarket Competition. The
proposed change is designed to
continue to attract order flow to the
Exchange, which could increase the
volumes of contracts traded on the
Exchange. Greater liquidity benefits all
market participants on the Exchange,
and the Exchange believes that the
proposed change (even though it would
raise the amount of the fee cap) would
not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate
because it is intended to continue to
incentivize Firms and Broker Dealers to
direct order flow to the Exchange to be
eligible for the benefits of capped fees
on Manual and QCC transactions,
thereby promoting liquidity on the
Exchange to the benefit of all market
participants.
Intermarket Competition. The
Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market
participants can readily favor one of the
17 competing option exchanges if they
deem fee levels at a particular venue to
be excessive. In such an environment,
the Exchange must continually adjust its
14 See Reg NMS Adopting Release, supra note 8,
at 37499.
id.
Frm 00137
tighter spreads to all market participants
and thus would promote just and
equitable principles of trade, remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, protect investors and the public
interest.
Finally, the Exchange believes that it
is subject to significant competitive
forces, as described below in the
Exchange’s statement regarding the
burden on competition.
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM
01DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 230 / Friday, December 1, 2023 / Notices
fees to remain competitive with other
exchanges and to attract order flow to
the Exchange. Based on publiclyavailable information, and excluding
index-based options, no single exchange
has more than 16% of the market share
of executed volume of multiply-listed
equity and ETF options trades.15
Therefore, currently no exchange
possesses significant pricing power in
the execution of multiply-listed equity
and ETF options order flow. More
specifically, in September 2023, the
Exchange had less than 12% market
share of executed volume of multiplylisted equity and ETF options trades.16
The Exchange believes that the
proposed change reflects this
competitive environment because it
modifies the Exchange’s fees in a
manner designed to continue to incent
OTP Holders to direct trading interest
(particularly Firm and Broker Dealer
Manual and QCC transactions) to the
Exchange, to provide liquidity and to
attract order flow. To the extent that
Firms and Broker Dealers are
incentivized to utilize the Exchange as
a primary trading venue for all
transactions, all the Exchange’s market
participants should benefit from the
improved market quality and increased
trading opportunities.
The Exchange further believes that the
proposed change could promote
competition between the Exchange and
other execution venues, including those
that do not offer a cap on Firm and
Broker Dealer fees,17 by encouraging
additional orders to be sent to the
Exchange for execution. In such an
environment, the Exchange must
continually review, and consider
adjusting, its fees and credits to remain
competitive with other exchanges.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
15 The OCC publishes options and futures volume
in a variety of formats, including daily and monthly
volume by exchange, available here: https://
www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-DataReports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/MonthlyWeekly-Volume-Statistics.
16 Based on a compilation of OCC data for
monthly volume of equity-based options and
monthly volume of equity-based ETF options, see
id., the Exchange’s market share in equity-based
options increased from 10.84% for the month of
September 2022 to 11.48% for the month of
September 2023.
17 See note 11, supra.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Nov 30, 2023
Jkt 262001
84033
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 18 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 19
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 20 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–NYSEARCA–2023–80 and should be
submitted on or before December 22,
2023.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.21
Christina Z. Milnor,
Assistant Secretary.
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
NYSEARCA–2023–80 on the subject
line.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–NYSEARCA–2023–80. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
Notice is hereby given of the
following determinations: I hereby
determine that a certain object being
imported from abroad pursuant to an
agreement with its foreign owner or
custodian for temporary display in the
exhibition ‘‘Wolf Vostell: De´-coll/age Is
Your Life’’ at the Harvard Art Museums,
Cambridge, Massachusetts, and at
possible additional exhibitions or
venues yet to be determined, is of
cultural significance, and, further, that
its temporary exhibition or display
within the United States as
aforementioned is in the national
interest. I have ordered that Public
Notice of these determinations be
published in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator,
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S.
Department of State (telephone: 202–
632–6471; email:
18 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
20 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
[FR Doc. 2023–26384 Filed 11–30–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Public Notice: 12272]
Notice of Determinations; Culturally
Significant Object Being Imported for
Exhibition—Determinations: ‘‘Wolf
Vostell: De´-coll/age Is Your Life’’
Exhibition
SUMMARY:
19 17
PO 00000
Frm 00138
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21 17
E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
01DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 230 (Friday, December 1, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 84030-84033]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26384]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-99021; File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2023-80]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Modify the NYSE
Arca Options Fee Schedule
November 27, 2023.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
[[Page 84031]]
(``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given
that, on November 15, 2023, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule
(``Fee Schedule'') regarding the Firm and Broker Dealer Monthly Fee
Cap. The Exchange proposes to implement the fee change effective
November 15, 2023.\4\ The proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Exchange originally filed to amend the Fee Schedule on
October 31, 2023 (SR-NYSEARCA-2023-75) and withdrew such filing on
November 15, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this filing is to modify the Firm and Broker Dealer
Monthly Fee Cap (the ``Monthly Fee Cap''). The Exchange proposes to
implement the rule change on November 15, 2023.
The Exchange proposes to modify the Monthly Fee Cap, which
currently provides that combined Firm proprietary fees and Broker
Dealer fees for transactions in standard option contracts cleared in
the customer range for Manual executions and QCC transactions are
capped at $200,000 per month.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Fee Schedule, NYSE Arca OPTIONS: TRADE-RELATED CHARGES
FOR STANDARD OPTIONS, FIRM AND BROKER DEALER MONTHLY FEE CAP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to raise the Monthly Fee Cap to $250,000 per
month. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to modify the Fee Schedule to
replace $200,000 with $250,000 in the description of the Monthly Fee
Cap. Strategy executions, royalty fees, and firm trades executed via a
Joint Back Office agreement will continue to be excluded from fees to
which the Monthly Fee Cap would apply. Once a Firm or Broker Dealer has
reached the Monthly Fee Cap, an incremental service fee of $0.01 per
contract for Firm or Broker Dealer Manual transactions will continue to
apply, except for the execution of a QCC order.
The Exchange also proposes non-substantive clarifying changes to
the description of the Monthly Fee Cap to identify the fees included in
the Monthly Fee Cap more precisely. The proposed changes are not
intended to modify any fees eligible for the Monthly Fee Cap, but
rather to improve the clarity of the Fee Schedule.
The Exchange believes that the proposed change, despite increasing
the amount of the Monthly Fee Cap, would continue to incent Firms and
Broker Dealers to direct order flow to the Exchange to receive the
benefits of a fee cap on Manual and QCC transactions.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\6\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\7\ in particular,
because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons
using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Proposed Rule Change Is Reasonable
The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. The
Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over
regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services
in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, the Commission
highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and
SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation of the
market system ``has been remarkably successful in promoting market
competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors
and listed companies.'' \8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (S7-10-04) (``Reg NMS
Adopting Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are currently 17 registered options exchanges competing for
order flow. Based on publicly-available information, and excluding
index-based options, no single exchange has more than 16% of the market
share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options
trades.\9\ Therefore, no exchange possesses significant pricing power
in the execution of multiply-listed equity and ETF options order flow.
More specifically, in September 2023, the Exchange had less than 12%
market share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF
options trades.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The OCC publishes options and futures volume in a variety of
formats, including daily and monthly volume by exchange, available
here: https://www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/Monthly-Weekly-Volume-Statistics.
\10\ Based on a compilation of OCC data for monthly volume of
equity-based options and monthly volume of equity-based ETF options,
see id., the Exchange's market share in equity-based options
increased from 10.84% for the month of September 2022 to 11.48% for
the month of September 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the
exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can
shift order flow, or discontinue or reduce use of certain categories of
products, in response to fee changes. Accordingly, competitive forces
constrain options exchange transaction fees. Stated otherwise,
modifications to exchange transaction fees can have a direct effect on
the ability of an exchange to compete for order flow.
The proposed increase to the Monthly Fee Cap is reasonable because
the Exchange believes the fee cap, although higher, would continue to
incent Firms and Broker Dealers to direct order flow to the Exchange to
receive the benefits of capped fees. The Exchange also believes the
proposed change is reasonable because the proposed fee cap amount would
be applicable to all Firms and Broker Dealers. In addition, although
the proposed change would raise the amount of the Monthly Fee Cap, it
would continue to offer Firms and Broker Dealers the opportunity to
qualify for capped fees on Manual and QCC transactions, which the
Exchange believes provides Firms and Broker
[[Page 84032]]
Dealers with a benefit not offered by at least one other options
exchange.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See, e.g., BOX Options Fee Schedule, available at: https://boxoptions.com/fee-schedule/ (no cap on Firm and Broker Dealer
manual or QCC transaction fees).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To the extent the proposed change continues to attract greater
volume and liquidity, the Exchange believes the proposed change would
improve the Exchange's overall competitiveness and strengthen its
market quality for all market participants. In the backdrop of the
competitive environment in which the Exchange operates, the proposed
rule change is a reasonable attempt by the Exchange to increase the
depth of its market and improve its market share relative to its
competitors. The Exchange's fees are constrained by intermarket
competition, as OTP Holders may direct their order flow to any of the
17 options exchanges. Thus, OTP Holders have a choice of where they
direct their order flow, including their Manual and QCC transactions.
The proposed rule change is designed to continue to incent OTP Holders
to direct liquidity and, in particular, Firm and Broker Dealer
transactions to the Exchange. In addition, to the extent OTP Holders
are incentivized to aggregate their trading activity at the Exchange,
that increased liquidity could promote market depth, price discovery
and improvement, and enhanced order execution opportunities for market
participants.
The Proposed Rule Change Is an Equitable Allocation of Credits and Fees
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is an equitable
allocation of its fees and credits because the proposal is based on the
amount and type of business transacted on the Exchange. The Exchange
believes that the proposed modification of the Monthly Fee Cap is
equitable because it would apply to all Firms and Broker Dealers
equally and would continue to provide for the same fee cap amount for
all Firms and Broker Dealers. The Exchange also believes that the
proposed rule change is equitable with respect to non-Firm and non-
Broker Dealer market participants because the Monthly Fee Cap would not
be meaningful for Customers or Professional Customers (neither of whom
pay transaction charges for Manual transactions or QCC transactions)
and because Market Makers are offered other incentives to reduce
transaction fees.\12\ To the extent the proposed change achieves its
purpose in continuing to incent Firms and Broker Dealers to aggregate
their executions at the Exchange as a primary execution venue and does
not discourage Firms and Broker Dealers from continuing to direct order
flow to the Exchange to achieve the benefits of capped fees, this
increased order flow would continue to make the Exchange a more
competitive venue for, among other things, order execution, and all
market participants would benefit from enhanced opportunities for price
improvement and order execution. Thus, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change would improve market quality for all market
participants on the Exchange and, as a consequence, attract more order
flow to the Exchange, thereby improving market-wide quality and price
discovery.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See generally Fee Schedule (various incentives available to
Market Makers for posted monthly volume, including on executions in
penny issues, non-penny issues, and SPY).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Proposed Rule Change Is Not Unfairly Discriminatory
The Exchange believes that the proposed change to the Monthly Fee
Cap is not unfairly discriminatory because the fee cap, as proposed,
would continue to be available to all similarly situated Firms and
Broker Dealers, any of which could continue to be incented to direct
order flow to the Exchange to qualify for the fee cap. Moreover, the
proposed change to the Monthly Fee Cap is not unfairly discriminatory
because it would continue to apply the same fee cap amount to all Firms
and Broker Dealers. The Exchange notes that offering the Monthly Fee
Cap to Firms and Broker Dealers but not other market participants is
not unfairly discriminatory because the Monthly Fee Cap would not be
meaningful for Customers or Professional Customers because neither
Customers nor Professional Customers pay transaction charges for Manual
transactions or QCC transactions and is not unfairly discriminatory
towards Market Makers, as Market Makers have alternative avenues to
reduce transaction fees.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To the extent that the proposed change continues to attract Manual
and QCC transactions to the Exchange, this increased order flow would
continue to make the Exchange a more competitive venue for order
execution. Thus, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change would
improve market quality for all market participants on the Exchange and,
as a consequence, attract more order flow to the Exchange, thereby
improving market-wide quality and price discovery. The resulting
increased volume and liquidity would provide more trading opportunities
and tighter spreads to all market participants and thus would promote
just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system and, in general, protect investors and the public interest.
Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant
competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement
regarding the burden on competition.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act, the Exchange does
not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above, the Exchange believes
that the proposed change would encourage the submission of additional
liquidity to a public exchange, thereby promoting market depth, price
discovery and transparency and enhancing order execution opportunities
for all market participants. As a result, the Exchange believes that
the proposed change furthers the Commission's goal in adopting
Regulation NMS of fostering integrated competition among orders, which
promotes ``more efficient pricing of individual stocks for all types of
orders, large and small.'' \14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Reg NMS Adopting Release, supra note 8, at 37499.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intramarket Competition. The proposed change is designed to
continue to attract order flow to the Exchange, which could increase
the volumes of contracts traded on the Exchange. Greater liquidity
benefits all market participants on the Exchange, and the Exchange
believes that the proposed change (even though it would raise the
amount of the fee cap) would not impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate because it is intended to continue to
incentivize Firms and Broker Dealers to direct order flow to the
Exchange to be eligible for the benefits of capped fees on Manual and
QCC transactions, thereby promoting liquidity on the Exchange to the
benefit of all market participants.
Intermarket Competition. The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor one
of the 17 competing option exchanges if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive. In such an environment, the Exchange
must continually adjust its
[[Page 84033]]
fees to remain competitive with other exchanges and to attract order
flow to the Exchange. Based on publicly-available information, and
excluding index-based options, no single exchange has more than 16% of
the market share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF
options trades.\15\ Therefore, currently no exchange possesses
significant pricing power in the execution of multiply-listed equity
and ETF options order flow. More specifically, in September 2023, the
Exchange had less than 12% market share of executed volume of multiply-
listed equity and ETF options trades.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ The OCC publishes options and futures volume in a variety
of formats, including daily and monthly volume by exchange,
available here: https://www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/Monthly-Weekly-Volume-Statistics.
\16\ Based on a compilation of OCC data for monthly volume of
equity-based options and monthly volume of equity-based ETF options,
see id., the Exchange's market share in equity-based options
increased from 10.84% for the month of September 2022 to 11.48% for
the month of September 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed change reflects this
competitive environment because it modifies the Exchange's fees in a
manner designed to continue to incent OTP Holders to direct trading
interest (particularly Firm and Broker Dealer Manual and QCC
transactions) to the Exchange, to provide liquidity and to attract
order flow. To the extent that Firms and Broker Dealers are
incentivized to utilize the Exchange as a primary trading venue for all
transactions, all the Exchange's market participants should benefit
from the improved market quality and increased trading opportunities.
The Exchange further believes that the proposed change could
promote competition between the Exchange and other execution venues,
including those that do not offer a cap on Firm and Broker Dealer
fees,\17\ by encouraging additional orders to be sent to the Exchange
for execution. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually
review, and consider adjusting, its fees and credits to remain
competitive with other exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See note 11, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \18\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \19\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \20\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-NYSEARCA-2023-80 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSEARCA-2023-80. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSEARCA-2023-80 and should
be submitted on or before December 22, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Christina Z. Milnor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-26384 Filed 11-30-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P