Emergency Medical Services Education Agenda 2050: Request for Information, 80810-80812 [2023-25551]
Download as PDF
80810
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 222 / Monday, November 20, 2023 / Notices
programs and airport sponsors receiving
financial assistance for expenditures of
Federal funds on acquisition and
relocation payments and required
services to displaced persons that are
subject to the Relocation Assistance and
Real Property Acquisition Policies Act
of 1970, as amended, for file
maintenance and for annual statistical
reports.
Estimated Average Burden per
Response: The respondents
electronically submit one statistical
report each year. The average burden
per statistical report is 16.5 hours. Each
instance of file maintenance requires an
estimated average of 30 minutes to
complete.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: Total estimated average annual
burden is 25,000 hours.
Public Comments Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspect of this
information collection, including: (1)
Whether the proposed collection is
necessary for the FHWA’s performance;
(2) the accuracy of the estimated
burdens; (3) ways for the FHWA to
enhance the quality, usefulness, and
clarity of the collected information; and
(4) ways that the burden could be
minimized, including the use of
electronic technology, without reducing
the quality of the collected information.
The agency will summarize and/or
include your comments in the request
for OMB’s clearance of this information
collection.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as
amended; and 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued On: November 14, 2023.
Jazmyne Lewis,
Information Collection Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023–25537 Filed 11–17–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[DOT–NHTSA–2023–0037]
Emergency Medical Services
Education Agenda 2050: Request for
Information
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Reopening of comment period.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
AGENCY:
NHTSA published a request
for information on October 13, 2023,
seeking comments from all sources
(public, private, government, academic,
professional, public interest groups, and
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Nov 17, 2023
Jkt 262001
other interested parties) on the planned
re-envisioning of the 2000 EMS
Education Agenda for the Future: A
Systems Approach. Due to the limited
comments received and some informal
feedback indicating that the initial
comment period was too short, NHTSA
is announcing the reopening of the
comment period for the RFI in order to
solicit additional comments and request
responses to specific questions provided
in the document. The comment period
for the RFI was originally scheduled to
end on October 31, 2023. It will now be
reopened and will end on March 31,
2024.
The comment period for the RFI
published on October 13, 2023 at 88 FR
71081 is reopened and extended to
March 31, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clary Mole, EMS Specialist, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
U.S. Department of Transportation is
available by phone at (202) 868–3275 or
by email at Clary.Mole@dot.gov.
ADDRESSES: Comments must be
submitted by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building, Ground
Floor, Rm. W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
To be sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 366–9322 before
coming.
Regardless of how you submit your
comments, you must include the docket
number identified in the heading of this
document.
Note that all comments received,
including any personal information
provided, will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov. Please
see the ‘‘Privacy Act’’ heading below.
You may call the Docket Management
Facility at (202) 366–9322. For access to
the docket to read background
documents or comments received, go to
https://www.regulations.gov or the street
address listed above. We will continue
to file relevant information in the docket
as it becomes available. To be sure
someone is there to help you, please call
(202) 366–9322 before coming. We will
continue to file relevant information in
the Docket as it becomes available.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Privacy Act: In accordance with 5
U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to inform its decisionmaking process. DOT posts these
comments, without edit, including any
personal information the commenter
provides, to https://www.regulations.gov,
as described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can
be reviewed at https://
www.transportation.gov/privacy.
Anyone is able to search the electronic
form of all comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477–78).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 13, 2023, NHTSA published a
RFI to obtain public comments to
inform EMS Education Agenda 2050,
and request responses to specific
questions provided in this document.
For convenience purposes, NHTSA is
republishing introductory information,
background materials and questions
from its RFI in this notice.
I. Introductory Information
In 2012, the National EMS Advisory
Council (NEMSAC) convened a national
roundtable meeting on EMS Education
Agenda for the Future: A Systems
Approach. In a 2014 report on these
proceedings, NEMSAC advised that
stakeholders at the State and local level
had just begun to experience the full
impact of the evolution toward a
national integrated system of education
for EMS personnel. While stakeholders
were reticent to move forward with a
new education agenda, they did provide
feedback about themes that should be
considered in the future publication.
From the feedback collected at the
meeting, NEMSAC developed
recommendations to be used in the
eventual re-envision of the agenda for
EMS. These recommendations are
summarized below:
• Educational content should retain
the flexibility accorded by the National
EMS Education standards, but programs
should use nationally recognized
evidence-based guidelines to drive local
curriculum development.
• The National EMS Information
System data, evidence-based research,
and practice analyses should be sourced
in developing evidence-based
guidelines and curriculum.
• Mobile Integrated Healthcare has
received considerable attention from the
EMS Community. This and other
alternative community-based healthcare
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 222 / Monday, November 20, 2023 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
delivery models (of the future) should
evoke an expanded foundational
knowledge and critical thinking
capabilities that will poise future EMS
practitioners to be able to evolve with
the changing healthcare system or
rapidly adjust to emerging healthcare
crises.
• EMS educators should begin a
career in academia with expertise in
adult learning, educational theory,
curriculum development, and
competency evaluation but also possess
experiential knowledge in evidencebased care.
In the 10 years since NEMSAC’s
roundtable meeting, the national EMS
education system continued to evolve—
especially during the COVID–19
pandemic. In late 2021, the Federal
Interagency Committee on EMS
(FICEMS) began sponsoring listening
sessions to inform a consensus-driven,
national report entitled, FICEMS: EMS
and 911 COVID–19 Response White
Paper. This publication cited challenges
and solutions collected during
stakeholder listening sessions for the
EMS education system. Among the
challenges, EMS education stakeholders
cited scarcity (in some cases deficits) in
resources for education, rigidity of
curriculum delivery modalities, the
increased employer demands on
students, and inconsistent or delayed
responses to the needs of the national
EMS education system as major
contributors that led to the breakdown
in the EMS workforce pipeline.
Prior to the COVID–19 pandemic,
NHTSA published EMS Agenda 2050: A
People-centered Vision for the Future of
EMS (Agenda 2050). This collaborative
project set a vision for a people-centered
EMS systems that serves every
individual in every community across
the Nation. Later this year, NHTSA and
its partners will begin a new project to
develop EMS Education Agenda 2050.
This project will not replace but build
upon the achievements of the 2000 EMS
Education Agenda for the Future: A
Systems Approach to lead a national
conversation around the future vision
for EMS Education and EMS as a
profession.
II. Background
NHTSA, in partnership with Health
Resources and Services Administration,
published EMS Education Agenda for
the Future: A Systems Approach
(Education Agenda) in 2000. This
document was founded on the broad
national EMS education system
concepts introduced in the EMS Agenda
for the Future (1996). The Education
Agenda described a consensus vision of
an EMS education system with a high
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Nov 17, 2023
Jkt 262001
degree of structure, coordination, and
interdependence. It proposed a less
prescriptive system that offered
educators flexibility in creating a
student-centered learning environment
and a process for accommodating future
advancements in technology and
medicine. The proposed system
maximized efficiency, consistency in
instructional quality, and entry level
graduate competency by prescribing a
high degree of structure, coordination,
and interdependence. To achieve this
vision, the education system of the
future centered on five integrated
primary components:
• National EMS Core Content
• National EMS Scope of Practice
Model
• National EMS Education Standards
• National EMS Education Program
Accreditation
• National EMS Certification
After the Education Agenda was
published, stakeholders began
implementing their respective
integrated system components. Almost
25 years later, the national EMS
education system has successfully
evolved into one that exemplifies both
consistency and flexibility. System
interdependencies have helped to avoid
duplication of effort in curriculum and
education program development,
evaluating the minimum competencies
of graduates, certification and licensing
processes, and facilitation of
practitioner reciprocity.
In 2020, the EMS education system
interdependencies modernized by the
Education Agenda were tested.
Challenges presented by the COVID–19
pandemic forced a variety of
adaptations. Traditional education
programs reported a lag in students’
capabilities of achieving the
programmatic competencies
requirements for graduation. The lag
was attributed to a variety of causes
including a focus on pandemic response
activities over training and education,
employer demands on working
students, and the rigidity of in-person,
classroom-based education delivery
models. After the majority of programs
adjusted to the challenges, lags in
graduation were cured, and students
achieved programmatic competencies at
rates similar to those pre-pandemic. The
response to the pandemic did not
impact education programs only. The
impact to EMS agency daily operations
was felt as well. During the COVID
pandemic, agencies experienced
increases in EMS activation and
response rates which created additional
stressors for student EMS practitioners
already working in a high stress job
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
80811
environment but also enrolled in an
EMS education program. These stressors
were a major contributor to a migration
of practitioners away from the EMS
workforce. Agencies and organizational
stakeholders asserted that it could be
education program graduation
requirements causing breakdown in the
workforce pipeline; however, there were
no observed decreases in graduation or
certification testing rates. These
observations prompt two questions: If
graduation and certification testing rates
have remained unchanged, why have
agencies reported recruitment and
retention issues? If graduates are not
entering the EMS workforce, where are
they finding jobs?
With agencies experiencing increased
demand and a deficiency in qualified
EMS practitioners to respond to it,
service delivery models had to evolve.
To bridge the gap in community-based
care resources, community
paramedicine and mobile integrated
healthcare (CP–MIH) service delivery
models increased in prevalence, and
improvised training programs were used
to close new job-specific competency
gaps among existing EMS practitioners
and individuals in training. Other
themes brought to the forefront during
the pandemic include addressing
healthcare disparities; the use of EMS
data as a tool for surveillance and
nationwide quality of care
improvements; and a greater value to
having an EMS workforce that is not
only equitable, inclusive, and
accessible, but as diverse as the
community it serves. These themes,
evolving service delivery models, and
the subsequent evolution of
competencies needed by practitioners
suggest that it is time for NHTSA to
gather our partners to begin a new
conversation about the future of EMS
Education and EMS as a profession in
the United States.
III. Questions Regarding EMS
Education Agenda 2050
Responses to the following questions
are requested to help plan the revision
of the Education Agenda. Please be as
specific as possible and as appropriate
please provide references.
1. What are the most critical issues
facing EMS education system that
should be addressed in the revision of
the EMS Education Agenda? Please
provide specific examples.
2. What progress has been made in
implementing the EMS Education
Agenda since 2000?
3. How have you used EMS Education
Agenda? Please provide specific
examples.
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
80812
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 222 / Monday, November 20, 2023 / Notices
4. As an EMS Stakeholder, how might
a revised EMS Education Agenda be
most useful to you?
5. What significant changes have
occurred in the EMS education system
at the national, Federal, State, and local
levels since 2000?
6. What significant changes will
impact the EMS education system in the
next 25 years?
7. How might the revised EMS
Education Agenda contribute to
enhanced EMS for children?
8. How might the revised EMS
Education Agenda support and/or
promote data-driven and evidencebased improvements in EMS education
systems and EMS practitioner practice?
9. How could the revised EMS
Education Agenda enhance
collaboration among EMS systems,
health care providers and facilities,
public safety answering points, public
health, public safety, emergency
management, insurers, and others?
10. How could the revised EMS
Education Agenda be used to promote
community sustainability and
resilience?
11. How could the revised EMS
Education Agenda contribute to
improved coordination for disaster
response, recovery, preparedness, and
mitigation?
12. How could the revised EMS
Education Agenda enhance the
exchange of evidence-based practices
between national, Federal (and
military), State, and local levels?
13. How could the revised EMS
Education Agenda support the seamless
and unimpeded transfer of military EMS
personnel to roles as civilian EMS
providers?
14. How could the revised EMS
Education Agenda support interstate
credentialing of EMS personnel?
15. How could the revised EMS
Education Agenda support improved
patient outcomes in rural and frontier
communities?
16. How could the revised EMS
Education Agenda lead to improved
EMS systems in tribal communities?
17. How could the revised EMS
Education Agenda promote a culture of
safety among EMS personnel, agencies,
and organizations?
18. Are there additional EMS
attributes that should be included in the
revised EMS Education Agenda? If so,
please provide an explanation for why
these additional EMS attributes should
be included.
19. Are there EMS attributes in the
2000 EMS Education Agenda that
should be eliminated from the revised
edition? If so, please provide an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Nov 17, 2023
Jkt 262001
explanation for why these EMS
attributes should be eliminated.
20. What are your suggestions for the
process that should be used in revising
the EMS Education Agenda?
21. What specific agencies/
organizations/entities are essential to
involve, in a revision of the EMS
Education Agenda?
22. Do you have any additional
comments regarding the revision of the
EMS Education Agenda?
(Authority: 23 U.S.C. 403(b)(1)(A)(iv); 49 CFR
1.95; 501.8)
Issued in Washington, DC.
Nanda Narayanan Srinivasan,
Associate Administrator, Research and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2023–25551 Filed 11–17–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Foreign Assets Control
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action
Office of Foreign Assets
Control, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of the
Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets
Control (OFAC) is publishing the name
of one person that has been placed on
OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals
and Blocked Persons List (SDN List)
based on OFAC’s determination that one
or more applicable legal criteria were
satisfied. All property and interests in
property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of
this person are blocked, and U.S.
persons are generally prohibited from
engaging in transactions with them.
DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for applicable date(s).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OFAC: Bradley T. Smith, Director, tel.:
202–622–2490; Associate Director for
Global Targeting, tel.: 202–622–2420;
Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.:
202–622–2480; Assistant Director for
Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202–622–4855;
or the Assistant Director for Sanctions
Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202–622–
2490.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Electronic Availability
The SDN List and additional
information concerning OFAC sanctions
programs are available on OFAC’s
website (https://www.treasury.gov/ofac).
Notice of OFAC Actions
A. On November 7, 2023, OFAC
determined that the property and
PO 00000
Frm 00126
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
interests in property subject to U.S.
jurisdiction of the following persons are
blocked under the relevant sanctions
authority listed below.
Individuals
1. CAMACHO PORCHAS, Jesus
Francisco (a.k.a. ‘‘Pilo’’), Hermosillo,
Sonora, Mexico; DOB 11 May 1980; POB
Sonora, Mexico; nationality Mexico;
Gender Male; C.U.R.P.
CAPJ800511HSRMRS01 (Mexico)
(individual) [ILLICIT–DRUGS–
EO14059].
Designated pursuant to section 1(a)(i)
of Executive Order 14059 of December
15, 2021, ‘‘Imposing Sanctions on
Foreign Persons Involved in the Global
Illicit Drug Trade,’’ 86 FR 71549
(December 17, 2021) (E.O. 14059) for
having engaged in, or attempted to
engage in, activities or transactions that
have materially contributed to, or pose
a significant risk of materially
contributing to, the international
proliferation of illicit drugs or their
means of production.
2. CHAVARIN PRECIADO, David
Alonso (a.k.a. ‘‘Chava’’), Nogales,
Sonora, Mexico; DOB 29 Dec 1982; POB
Mexico; nationality Mexico; Gender
Male; R.F.C. CAPD821229IG4 (Mexico)
(individual) [ILLICIT–DRUGS–
EO14059].
Designated pursuant to section 1(a)(i)
of E.O. 14059 for having engaged in, or
attempted to engage in, activities or
transactions that have materially
contributed to, or pose a significant risk
of materially contributing to, the
international proliferation of illicit
drugs or their means of production.
3. HERNANDEZ MAZON, Sergio
Isaias (a.k.a. ‘‘Chavelo’’), Calle Estribo 3,
Colonia El Rodeo, Nogales, Sonora,
Mexico; DOB 23 Aug 1980; POB Sonora,
Mexico; nationality Mexico; Gender
Male; C.U.R.P. HEMS800823HSRRZR07
(Mexico) (individual) [ILLICIT–DRUGS–
EO14059].
Designated pursuant to section 1(a)(i)
of E.O. 14059 for having engaged in, or
attempted to engage in, activities or
transactions that have materially
contributed to, or pose a significant risk
of materially contributing to, the
international proliferation of illicit
drugs or their means of production.
4. MENESES OSPINA, Cristian Julian,
Mexico; DOB 31 Dec 1983; POB Ibague,
Colombia; nationality Colombia; Gender
Male; Cedula No. 14137405 (Colombia);
C.U.R.P. MEOC831231HNENSR06
(Mexico) (individual) [ILLICIT–DRUGS–
EO14059].
Designated pursuant to section 1(a)(i)
of E.O. 14059 for having engaged in, or
attempted to engage in, activities or
transactions that have materially
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 222 (Monday, November 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80810-80812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25551]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[DOT-NHTSA-2023-0037]
Emergency Medical Services Education Agenda 2050: Request for
Information
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Reopening of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NHTSA published a request for information on October 13, 2023,
seeking comments from all sources (public, private, government,
academic, professional, public interest groups, and other interested
parties) on the planned re-envisioning of the 2000 EMS Education Agenda
for the Future: A Systems Approach. Due to the limited comments
received and some informal feedback indicating that the initial comment
period was too short, NHTSA is announcing the reopening of the comment
period for the RFI in order to solicit additional comments and request
responses to specific questions provided in the document. The comment
period for the RFI was originally scheduled to end on October 31, 2023.
It will now be reopened and will end on March 31, 2024.
DATES: The comment period for the RFI published on October 13, 2023 at
88 FR 71081 is reopened and extended to March 31, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clary Mole, EMS Specialist, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation is available by phone at (202) 868-3275 or by email at
[email protected].
ADDRESSES: Comments must be submitted by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, M-30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building, Ground Floor, Rm. W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. To be sure
someone is there to help you, please call (202) 366-9322 before coming.
Regardless of how you submit your comments, you must include the
docket number identified in the heading of this document.
Note that all comments received, including any personal information
provided, will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov.
Please see the ``Privacy Act'' heading below.
You may call the Docket Management Facility at (202) 366-9322. For
access to the docket to read background documents or comments received,
go to https://www.regulations.gov or the street address listed above. We
will continue to file relevant information in the docket as it becomes
available. To be sure someone is there to help you, please call (202)
366-9322 before coming. We will continue to file relevant information
in the Docket as it becomes available.
Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to inform its decision-making process. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to https://www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed
at https://www.transportation.gov/privacy. Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment,
if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 13, 2023, NHTSA published a RFI
to obtain public comments to inform EMS Education Agenda 2050, and
request responses to specific questions provided in this document. For
convenience purposes, NHTSA is republishing introductory information,
background materials and questions from its RFI in this notice.
I. Introductory Information
In 2012, the National EMS Advisory Council (NEMSAC) convened a
national roundtable meeting on EMS Education Agenda for the Future: A
Systems Approach. In a 2014 report on these proceedings, NEMSAC advised
that stakeholders at the State and local level had just begun to
experience the full impact of the evolution toward a national
integrated system of education for EMS personnel. While stakeholders
were reticent to move forward with a new education agenda, they did
provide feedback about themes that should be considered in the future
publication. From the feedback collected at the meeting, NEMSAC
developed recommendations to be used in the eventual re-envision of the
agenda for EMS. These recommendations are summarized below:
Educational content should retain the flexibility accorded
by the National EMS Education standards, but programs should use
nationally recognized evidence-based guidelines to drive local
curriculum development.
The National EMS Information System data, evidence-based
research, and practice analyses should be sourced in developing
evidence-based guidelines and curriculum.
Mobile Integrated Healthcare has received considerable
attention from the EMS Community. This and other alternative community-
based healthcare
[[Page 80811]]
delivery models (of the future) should evoke an expanded foundational
knowledge and critical thinking capabilities that will poise future EMS
practitioners to be able to evolve with the changing healthcare system
or rapidly adjust to emerging healthcare crises.
EMS educators should begin a career in academia with
expertise in adult learning, educational theory, curriculum
development, and competency evaluation but also possess experiential
knowledge in evidence-based care.
In the 10 years since NEMSAC's roundtable meeting, the national EMS
education system continued to evolve--especially during the COVID-19
pandemic. In late 2021, the Federal Interagency Committee on EMS
(FICEMS) began sponsoring listening sessions to inform a consensus-
driven, national report entitled, FICEMS: EMS and 911 COVID-19 Response
White Paper. This publication cited challenges and solutions collected
during stakeholder listening sessions for the EMS education system.
Among the challenges, EMS education stakeholders cited scarcity (in
some cases deficits) in resources for education, rigidity of curriculum
delivery modalities, the increased employer demands on students, and
inconsistent or delayed responses to the needs of the national EMS
education system as major contributors that led to the breakdown in the
EMS workforce pipeline.
Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, NHTSA published EMS Agenda 2050: A
People-centered Vision for the Future of EMS (Agenda 2050). This
collaborative project set a vision for a people-centered EMS systems
that serves every individual in every community across the Nation.
Later this year, NHTSA and its partners will begin a new project to
develop EMS Education Agenda 2050. This project will not replace but
build upon the achievements of the 2000 EMS Education Agenda for the
Future: A Systems Approach to lead a national conversation around the
future vision for EMS Education and EMS as a profession.
II. Background
NHTSA, in partnership with Health Resources and Services
Administration, published EMS Education Agenda for the Future: A
Systems Approach (Education Agenda) in 2000. This document was founded
on the broad national EMS education system concepts introduced in the
EMS Agenda for the Future (1996). The Education Agenda described a
consensus vision of an EMS education system with a high degree of
structure, coordination, and interdependence. It proposed a less
prescriptive system that offered educators flexibility in creating a
student-centered learning environment and a process for accommodating
future advancements in technology and medicine. The proposed system
maximized efficiency, consistency in instructional quality, and entry
level graduate competency by prescribing a high degree of structure,
coordination, and interdependence. To achieve this vision, the
education system of the future centered on five integrated primary
components:
National EMS Core Content
National EMS Scope of Practice Model
National EMS Education Standards
National EMS Education Program Accreditation
National EMS Certification
After the Education Agenda was published, stakeholders began
implementing their respective integrated system components. Almost 25
years later, the national EMS education system has successfully evolved
into one that exemplifies both consistency and flexibility. System
interdependencies have helped to avoid duplication of effort in
curriculum and education program development, evaluating the minimum
competencies of graduates, certification and licensing processes, and
facilitation of practitioner reciprocity.
In 2020, the EMS education system interdependencies modernized by
the Education Agenda were tested. Challenges presented by the COVID-19
pandemic forced a variety of adaptations. Traditional education
programs reported a lag in students' capabilities of achieving the
programmatic competencies requirements for graduation. The lag was
attributed to a variety of causes including a focus on pandemic
response activities over training and education, employer demands on
working students, and the rigidity of in-person, classroom-based
education delivery models. After the majority of programs adjusted to
the challenges, lags in graduation were cured, and students achieved
programmatic competencies at rates similar to those pre-pandemic. The
response to the pandemic did not impact education programs only. The
impact to EMS agency daily operations was felt as well. During the
COVID pandemic, agencies experienced increases in EMS activation and
response rates which created additional stressors for student EMS
practitioners already working in a high stress job environment but also
enrolled in an EMS education program. These stressors were a major
contributor to a migration of practitioners away from the EMS
workforce. Agencies and organizational stakeholders asserted that it
could be education program graduation requirements causing breakdown in
the workforce pipeline; however, there were no observed decreases in
graduation or certification testing rates. These observations prompt
two questions: If graduation and certification testing rates have
remained unchanged, why have agencies reported recruitment and
retention issues? If graduates are not entering the EMS workforce,
where are they finding jobs?
With agencies experiencing increased demand and a deficiency in
qualified EMS practitioners to respond to it, service delivery models
had to evolve. To bridge the gap in community-based care resources,
community paramedicine and mobile integrated healthcare (CP-MIH)
service delivery models increased in prevalence, and improvised
training programs were used to close new job-specific competency gaps
among existing EMS practitioners and individuals in training. Other
themes brought to the forefront during the pandemic include addressing
healthcare disparities; the use of EMS data as a tool for surveillance
and nationwide quality of care improvements; and a greater value to
having an EMS workforce that is not only equitable, inclusive, and
accessible, but as diverse as the community it serves. These themes,
evolving service delivery models, and the subsequent evolution of
competencies needed by practitioners suggest that it is time for NHTSA
to gather our partners to begin a new conversation about the future of
EMS Education and EMS as a profession in the United States.
III. Questions Regarding EMS Education Agenda 2050
Responses to the following questions are requested to help plan the
revision of the Education Agenda. Please be as specific as possible and
as appropriate please provide references.
1. What are the most critical issues facing EMS education system
that should be addressed in the revision of the EMS Education Agenda?
Please provide specific examples.
2. What progress has been made in implementing the EMS Education
Agenda since 2000?
3. How have you used EMS Education Agenda? Please provide specific
examples.
[[Page 80812]]
4. As an EMS Stakeholder, how might a revised EMS Education Agenda
be most useful to you?
5. What significant changes have occurred in the EMS education
system at the national, Federal, State, and local levels since 2000?
6. What significant changes will impact the EMS education system in
the next 25 years?
7. How might the revised EMS Education Agenda contribute to
enhanced EMS for children?
8. How might the revised EMS Education Agenda support and/or
promote data-driven and evidence-based improvements in EMS education
systems and EMS practitioner practice?
9. How could the revised EMS Education Agenda enhance collaboration
among EMS systems, health care providers and facilities, public safety
answering points, public health, public safety, emergency management,
insurers, and others?
10. How could the revised EMS Education Agenda be used to promote
community sustainability and resilience?
11. How could the revised EMS Education Agenda contribute to
improved coordination for disaster response, recovery, preparedness,
and mitigation?
12. How could the revised EMS Education Agenda enhance the exchange
of evidence-based practices between national, Federal (and military),
State, and local levels?
13. How could the revised EMS Education Agenda support the seamless
and unimpeded transfer of military EMS personnel to roles as civilian
EMS providers?
14. How could the revised EMS Education Agenda support interstate
credentialing of EMS personnel?
15. How could the revised EMS Education Agenda support improved
patient outcomes in rural and frontier communities?
16. How could the revised EMS Education Agenda lead to improved EMS
systems in tribal communities?
17. How could the revised EMS Education Agenda promote a culture of
safety among EMS personnel, agencies, and organizations?
18. Are there additional EMS attributes that should be included in
the revised EMS Education Agenda? If so, please provide an explanation
for why these additional EMS attributes should be included.
19. Are there EMS attributes in the 2000 EMS Education Agenda that
should be eliminated from the revised edition? If so, please provide an
explanation for why these EMS attributes should be eliminated.
20. What are your suggestions for the process that should be used
in revising the EMS Education Agenda?
21. What specific agencies/organizations/entities are essential to
involve, in a revision of the EMS Education Agenda?
22. Do you have any additional comments regarding the revision of
the EMS Education Agenda?
(Authority: 23 U.S.C. 403(b)(1)(A)(iv); 49 CFR 1.95; 501.8)
Issued in Washington, DC.
Nanda Narayanan Srinivasan,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2023-25551 Filed 11-17-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P