Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; NYSE American LLC; NYSEArca, Inc.; NYSE Chicago, Inc.; NYSE National, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Changes To Establish Certain Alternative Procedures for the Allocation of Power in Co-Location, 80793-80795 [2023-25548]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 222 / Monday, November 20, 2023 / Notices
further believes that listing Third Friday
NDXP would not have any adverse
effects or impact on market volatility
and the operation of fair and orderly
markets on the underlying cash market
at or near the close of trading in its
Nasdaq–100 Index options.21 Further,
the Exchange states it does not believe
that any market disruptions will be
encountered with the introduction of
Nasdaq–100 Index options with thirdFriday-of-the-month expiration dates.22
The Exchange states it will monitor for
any such disruptions or the
development of any factors that could
cause such disruptions.23 Finally, the
Exchange represents it has sufficient
capacity to handle additional traffic
associated with listing Third Friday
NDXP options and that it has in place
adequate surveillance procedures to
monitor trading in Third Friday NDXP
options.24
The Commission has had concerns
about the adverse effects and impact of
p.m.- settlement upon market volatility
and the operation of fair and orderly
markets on the underlying cash market
at or near the close of trading on
expiration days.25 However, the
Commission recently approved
proposals from several exchanges,
including the Exchange, to permanently
establish programs permitting the listing
and trading of certain p.m.-settled
broad-based index options.26 In
approving these proposals, the
Commission reviewed data provided by
the exchanges in their filings, the
exchanges’ pilot data and reports, as
well as an analysis conducted at the
direction of Staff from the Commission’s
Division of Economic and Risk Analysis
and concluded that analysis of the pilot
data did not identify any significant
economic impact on the underlying
component securities surrounding the
close as a result of expiring p.m.-settled
options nor did it indicate a
deterioration in market quality for an
existing product when a new p.m.-
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
21 See
id.
22 See id.
23 See id.
24 See id.
25 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65256
(September 2, 2011), 76 FR 55969, at 55972
(September 9, 2011) (SR–C2–2011–008) (Order
approving proposed rule change to establish a pilot
program to list and trade SPXPM options on the C2
Options Exchange, Incorporated).
26 See e.g., ISE Pilot Approval; Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 98451 (September 20,
2023), 88 FR 66088 (September 26, 2023) (SR–Phlx–
203–07) (Order approving a nonstandard
expirations pilot program and p.m.-settled XND
options) and 98454 (September 20, 2023), 88 FR
66103 at 66103–04 (September 26, 2023) (SR–
CBOE–2023–005)(Order approving p.m.-settled
Third Friday SPX options).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Nov 17, 2023
Jkt 262001
settled expiration was introduced.27
Further, the Commission stated that
significant changes in closing
procedures in the decades since index
options moved to a.m. settlement may
also serve to mitigate the potential
impact of p.m.-settled index options on
the underlying cash markets.28
As noted above, the Exchange
currently may trade Third Friday NQX
options in addition to p.m.-settled NDX
option with nonstandard expirations.29
The Exchange’s proposal, which would
permit p.m.-settled Third Friday NDX,
is reasonably designed as a limited
expansion of existing p.m.-settled
broad-based index option programs and
may provide the investing public and
other market participants more
flexibility to closely tailor their
investment and hedging decisions. The
Exchange has represented that it has an
adequate surveillance program in place
to monitor trading in the Third Friday
NDXP options and has the necessary
systems capacity to support the new
options series.30 The Commission
expects the Exchange to continue to
monitor any potential risks from large
p.m.-settled positions and take
appropriate action on a timely basis if
warranted.
Accordingly, the Commission finds
that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act 31 and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,32 that the
proposed rule change (SR–ISE–2023–20)
be, and hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.33
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–25547 Filed 11–17–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
27 See
e.g., ISE Pilot Approval, 88 FR at 66114.
id.
29 See supra note 19. In addition, the Commission
previously approved a pilot program permitting the
listing and trading of Third Friday NDX options on
Nasdaq PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’). See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 81293 (August 2, 2017),
82 FR 37138 (August 8, 2017) (approving SR–Phlx–
2017–04). Phlx did not list any options under the
program and subsequently removed the rule from
its rule book. See Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 87517 (November 13, 2019), 84 FR 63910
(November 19, 2019) (SR–Phlx–2019–49).
30 See supra note 24 and accompanying text.
31 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
32 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
33 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
28 See
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
80793
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–98937; File Nos. SR–NYSE–
2023–29, SR–NYSEAMER–2023–39, SR–
NYSEArca–2023–53, SR–NYSECHX–2023–
16, SR–NYSENAT–2023–18]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; NYSE
American LLC; NYSEArca, Inc.; NYSE
Chicago, Inc.; NYSE National, Inc.;
Order Approving Proposed Rule
Changes To Establish Certain
Alternative Procedures for the
Allocation of Power in Co-Location
November 14, 2023.
I. Introduction
On August 3, 2023, New York Stock
Exchange LLC, NYSE American LLC,
NYSEArca, Inc., and NYSE Chicago, Inc.
(the ‘‘Exchanges’’) each filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposal to amend its
connectivity fee schedule to include an
alternative procedure to allocate power
in the Mahwah Data Center based on
deposit-guaranteed orders from
colocation Users in certain
circumstances. On August 17, 2023,
NYSE National, Inc., filed with the
Commission the same proposed
amendments to its connectivity fee
schedule. The proposed rule changes
were published for comment in the
Federal Register on August 22, 2023 3
and August 25, 2023.4 The Commission
received no comments on the proposed
rule changes. This order grants approval
of the proposed rule changes.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Changes
A. Background
As more fully set forth in the Notice,
the Exchanges represent that in recent
years they have experienced
‘‘unprecedented’’ demand from
colocation Users for cabinet space and
power at the Mahwah Data Center
(‘‘MDC’’).5 The Exchanges filed, and the
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 98148
(August 16, 2023), 88 FR 57150 (SR–NYSE–2023–
29); 98149 (August 16, 2023), 88 FR 57154 (SR–
NYSEAMER–2023–39); 98150 (August 16, 2023), 88
FR 57142 (SR–NYSEArca–2023–53); 98151 (August
16, 2023), 88 FR 57159 (SR–NYSECHX–2023–16).
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98171
(August 21, 2023), 88 FR 58364 (SR–NYSENAT–
2023–18). Each proposal is referred to as the
‘‘Notice’’ and for ease of reference, page citations
are to the Notice for NYSE–2023–29.
5 Notice, supra note 3, at 57150. For purposes of
each Exchange’s colocation services, a ‘‘User’’
2 17
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
Continued
20NON1
80794
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 222 / Monday, November 20, 2023 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Commission approved, rules
establishing purchasing limits and
waitlists for cabinet space and power
orders when supply is limited.6
Pursuant to these rules, if available
cabinet inventory and/or power fall
below certain thresholds, certain
purchasing limits on cabinets and
power apply (‘‘Cabinet and Power
Purchasing Limits’’), including that a
User may not purchase more than 32
kW of power and four dedicated
cabinets.7 If the amount of available
power is zero, or if a User requests an
amount of power that, if provided,
would cause the amount of available
power to be zero, the Exchanges place
orders on a waitlist (‘‘Combined
Waitlist’’).8 Orders on the Combined
Waitlist are subject to the Cabinet and
Power Purchasing Limits.9 The
Exchanges represent that a Combined
Waitlist is in effect.
The Exchanges represent that
although they expanded the amount of
cabinet space and power available in the
MDC in 2021 and 2022 by opening new
colocation Hall 4, User demand for
power continues to increase.10 The
Exchanges are currently building a new
means any market participant that requests to
receive colocation services directly from the
Exchange. Id. at 57150 n. 5.
6 Id. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
90732 (December 18, 2020), 85 FR 84443 (December
28, 2020) (SR–NYSE–2020–73, SR–NYSEAMER–
2020–66, SR–NYSEArca–2020–82, SR–NYSECHX–
2020–26, and SR–NYSENAT–2020–28) (Notice of
Filings of Amendment No. 1 and Order Granting
Approval of Proposed Rule Changes, Each as
Modified by Amendment No. 1, Amending the
Exchanges’ Co-Location Services To Establish
Procedures for the Allocation of Cabinets to CoLocated Users if Cabinet Inventory Falls Below
Certain Thresholds). See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 91515 (April 8, 2021), 86 FR 19674
(April 14, 2021) (SR–NYSE–2021–12, SR–
NYSEAMER–2021–08, SR–NYSEArca–2021–11,
SR–NYSECHX–2021–02, SR–NYSENAT–2021–03)
(Notice of Filing of Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 and
Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed
Rule Changes, Each as Modified by Amendment
Nos. 1 and 2, to Establish Procedures for the
Allocation of Power in Co-Location When
Availability Falls Below Certain Thresholds). See
Colocation Notes 6 and 7 in the Exchanges’
Connectivity Fee Schedule, available at https://
www.nyse.com/publicdocs/Wireless_Connectivity_
Fees_and_Charges.pdf.
7 See Colocation Note 6b in each Exchange’s
Connectivity Fee Schedule. Cabinet space is offered
in the form of dedicated cabinet, which come with
4 to 8 kW of power, and partial cabinets, available
in increments of eight-rack units of space, which
may be allocated 1 or 2 kW of power.
8 See Colocation Note 7b in each Exchange’s
Connectivity Fee Schedule. If only the Cabinet
Limit is reached, pursuant to Colocation Note 7a,
a Cabinet Waitlist is created. See Colocation Note
7a in each Exchange’s Connectivity Fee Schedule.
9 See Colocation Note 7b in each Exchange’s
Connectivity Fee Schedule.
10 Notice, supra note 3, at 57150. The Exchanges
represent that the Combined Waitlist includes 27
Users requesting in excess of an additional 700 kW
of power Id. at 57151.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Nov 17, 2023
Jkt 262001
colocation hall (‘‘Hall 5’’) to satisfy this
increased demand.11 The Exchanges are
also evaluating whether there is
sufficient customer demand for
additional power for it to invest in
additional expansion.12
The Exchanges state that the current
Combined Waitlist is inadequate to
determine total demand for power
because when the Combined Waitlist is
in effect, current rules permit the
Exchanges to accept one order at a time
from a User and its Affiliates 13 of at
most 32 kW of power.14 The Exchanges
represent that the approximately 700
kW of demand on the current Combined
Waitlist may represent a ‘‘mere fraction
of User’s true power requirements.’’ 15
The Exchanges state that several Users
on the current Combined Waitlist have
expressed interest in purchasing more
than 32 kW of power, specifically
additional power of ‘‘several hundred
kilowatts.’’ 16 The Exchanges seek better
knowledge of User demand for power,
and also state that their current rules
regarding waitlist procedures are not
well-tailored to allocating large amounts
of power that become available all at
once (e.g., a new colocation hall
opens).17 Although there is a 32 kW
limit on orders when less than 350 kW
of unallocated power is available, any
time that more than 350 kW of
unallocated power is available (i.e., the
Combined Waitlist is not in effect),
current rules permit Users to place
unlimited orders that the Exchanges
must allocate on a first-come, firstserved basis.18 The Exchanges
anticipate that the availability of large
amounts of power in Hall 5 in several
intervals may result in the largest Users
placing early orders for many hundreds
of kilowatts of power that could
effectively prevent Users with more
modest demand from receiving newly
available power.19
B. Proposed Alternative Power
Allocation Procedures
To address these concerns, the
Exchanges propose to add as Colocation
Note 8 ‘‘alternative’’ procedures to
assess power demand and allocate
power in the Mahwah Data Center in
certain circumstances.20 Specifically,
the Exchanges propose that they may
announce, by customer notice, a 90-day
window (‘‘Ordering Window’’) during
which the Exchanges may accept
unlimited deposit-guaranteed orders
from Users.21 If they announce an
Ordering Window while the Cabinet
and Power Purchasing Limits and/or the
Cabinet and Combined Waitlist
provisions are in effect, the terms of the
Ordering Window would temporarily
supersede the Cabinet and Power
Purchasing Limits and/or the Cabinet
and Combined Waitlist.22
Under the proposal, Users may submit
orders for their anticipated needs, but
each User (and its Affiliates) may
finalize only one order for power during
the Ordering Window.23 During the
Ordering Window, the provision of the
Cabinet and Combined Waitlists in
Colocation Note 7 that prohibits the
Exchanges from accepting orders for
more than four dedicated cabinets and/
or 32 kW of power would not apply.24
During the Ordering Window, a User
may submit an order even if it already
has an order pending on a Cabinet or
Combined Waitlist.25 While the
Ordering Window is open, the
Exchanges would not accept new orders
to the Cabinet or Combined Waitlist
established under Colocation Note 7,
and any order submitted by a User must
meet the requirements of the Ordering
Window procedures as set forth in
Colocation Note 8.26
Orders submitted during the Ordering
Window are to be accompanied by a
deposit equal to two months’ worth of
the monthly recurring costs of the
amount of the new power ordered.27
This deposit will be applied to the
User’s invoices for the first and
subsequent months after power is
delivered until the deposit is depleted.28
The Exchanges further propose to
finalize a User’s order upon receipt of a
User’s signed order form and deposit,
and to consider void any orders not
finalized before the Ordering Window
20 Id.
at 57152.
supra note 3, at 57151.
21 Notice,
22 Id.
23 Id.
24 Id.
25 Id.
11 Id.
26 Id.
12 Id.
13 An
‘‘Affiliate’’ of a User is defined as ‘‘any
other User or Hosted Customer that is under 50%
or greater common ownership or control of the first
User.’’ See Connectivity Fee Schedule, at 1.
14 Notice, supra note 3, at 57151.
15 Id.
16 Id.
17 Id.
18 Id.
19 See Notice, supra note 3, at 57153.
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
at 57151 n.10.
The Exchanges state that the required
deposit would be calculated as the number of
kilowatts ordered by the User in its Ordering
Window order, multiplied by the appropriate ‘‘Per
kW Monthly Fee’’ as indicated in the Connectivity
Fee Schedule. The Per kW Monthly Fee is a factor
of the total number of kilowatts allocated to all of
a User’s dedicated cabinets and varies based on the
total kilowatts allocated to a User. See Notice, supra
note 3, at 57151 n.11.
28 Notice, supra note 3, at 57152.
27 Id.
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 222 / Monday, November 20, 2023 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
closes.29 A User may modify its order
during the Ordering Window, but such
modification will not be finalized until
the Exchange receives the User’s signed
modified order form and any additional
deposit.30 If the User withdraws its
order during the Ordering Window, the
deposit will be returned.31
The Exchanges propose allocation
procedures for power after the Ordering
Window ends. To prevent larger Users
from placing large orders for power and
preventing allocation of power to Users
with more modest power needs, the
Exchanges propose a multi-step
allocation procedure. In step one, the
Exchanges will allocate power to fill
orders in effect on any waitlist in effect
pursuant to Colocation Note 7 (e.g., the
current Combined Waitlist).32 In step
two, the Exchanges will allocate up to
32 kW of power to each User that
finalized an order during the Ordering
Window based on whether sufficient
power is available.33 If sufficient power
is available, the Exchanges will allocate
32 kW of power to each User, except
that orders for less than 32 kW would
be filled only up to the number of
kilowatts actually ordered.34 If
sufficient power is not available, the
Exchanges will allocate the available
power equally among all Users (rounded
to a whole number of kilowatts), except
the Exchanges will not allocate a User
more kilowatts than it actually
ordered.35 If, after step two, there is no
power to allocate, all orders finalized
during the Ordering Window will be
considered completed.36
If any power remains to be allocated
after step two, the Exchanges will
allocate power in step three to any
orders that were not completely filled
during step two.37 If sufficient power is
available, the Exchanges will allocate
power to completely fill all remaining
orders finalized during the Ordering
29 Id. The Exchanges state that if User wishes to
reduce an order that it placed during the Ordering
Window, the User’s deposit would not be reduced
or returned, but instead would be applied against
the User’s first and subsequent months’ invoices
after the power is delivered until the deposit is
depleted. Id. at 57152 n.12.
30 Notice, supra note 3, at 57152.
31 Id.
32 Id.
33 Id.
34 Id.
35 Id.
36 Id. To illustrate, if a User finalized an order for
100 kW during the Ordering Window and was
allocated 32 kW of power during step two and no
further power remained to be allocated after step 2,
the User’s order would be considered completed.
The residual 68 kW ordered would not be
transferred to a waitlist. The User would be free to
submit a new order for additional power after the
Ordering Window (subject to the Purchasing Limits,
if then in effect). Id. at 57152 n.13.
37 Notice, supra note 3, at 57152.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Nov 17, 2023
Jkt 262001
Window.38 If sufficient power is not
available to completely fill all such
orders, the Exchanges will allocate
power to fill an identical percentage of
each remaining order (rounded to a
whole number of kilowatts).39 All such
orders will then be considered
complete.40 Further, any orders received
after the end of the Ordering Window
will not be included in the Ordering
Window allocation process but instead
will be subject to the terms of the
Cabinet and Purchasing Power Limits
and the associated waitlists.41
III. Discussion and Commission
Findings
After careful review, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule changes are
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.42 In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule changes are consistent with section
6(b)(5) of the Act,43 which requires that
the rules of a national securities
exchange be designed, among other
things, to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest, and
not be designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Commission believes that the
Exchanges’ proposed Ordering Window
and associated procedures for allocating
power requested during the Ordering
Window provide a rational objective
means for the Exchanges to assess
power demand by Users prospectively
and to fairly allocate power requested
by Users in circumstances where large
amounts of power become available at
once (e.g., a new colocation hall opens).
The Exchanges will allocate power for
orders received during the Ordering
38 Id.
39 Id.
40 Id. To illustrate, if a User finalized an order for
100 kW during the Ordering Window and was
allocated a total of 90 kW of power in steps two and
three, the order would be considered completed.
The residual 10 kW ordered would not be
transferred to a waitlist. The User would be free to
submit a new order for additional power after the
Ordering Window (subject to the Purchasing Limits,
if then in effect). Id. at 57152 n.14.
41 See Notice, supra note 3, at 57152, and
Colocation Notes 6 and 7 in each Exchange’s
Connectivity Fee Schedule.
42 In approving this proposed rule change the
Commission notes that it has considered the
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
43 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
80795
Window pursuant to a three step
process.44 In step one, Users on the
Combined Waitlist will have their
orders filled first. In step two, Users
would be allocated power equally, each
receiving up to 32 kW of power
requested during the Ordering Window
if supply is sufficient (and each
receiving power equally if power is not
sufficient), with no User allocated more
kilowatts than it actually ordered. In
step three, if any power remains to be
allocated, the Exchanges will allocate
power to any orders that were not
completely filled during step two if
sufficient power is available (and will
allocate power to fill an identical
percentage of each remaining order if
sufficient power is unavailable). The
proposed allocation procedures would
provide that that each User who has
placed an order for power gets its order
at least partially filled, and that larger
Users do not use the Ordering Window
to prevent power allocation to smaller
Users with more modest power
demands. Accordingly, the Commission
believes that the proposed Ordering
Window and associated allocation
procedures are reasonably designed to
facilitate an equitable allocation of
available power and are not designed to
permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
For the foregoing reasons, Commission
finds that the proposals are consistent
with the Act.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
section 19(b)(2) of the Act,45 that the
proposed rule changes (SR–NYSE–
2023–29, SR–NYSEAMER–2023–39,
SR–NYSEArca–2023–53, SR–
NYSECHX–2023–16, SR–NYSENAT–
2023–18) be, and hereby are approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.46
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–25548 Filed 11–17–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
44 See
text accompanying notes 32–41 supra.
id.
46 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
45 See
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 222 (Monday, November 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80793-80795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25548]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-98937; File Nos. SR-NYSE-2023-29, SR-NYSEAMER-2023-39,
SR-NYSEArca-2023-53, SR-NYSECHX-2023-16, SR-NYSENAT-2023-18]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; NYSE
American LLC; NYSEArca, Inc.; NYSE Chicago, Inc.; NYSE National, Inc.;
Order Approving Proposed Rule Changes To Establish Certain Alternative
Procedures for the Allocation of Power in Co-Location
November 14, 2023.
I. Introduction
On August 3, 2023, New York Stock Exchange LLC, NYSE American LLC,
NYSEArca, Inc., and NYSE Chicago, Inc. (the ``Exchanges'') each filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant
to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'')
\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposal to amend its connectivity
fee schedule to include an alternative procedure to allocate power in
the Mahwah Data Center based on deposit-guaranteed orders from
colocation Users in certain circumstances. On August 17, 2023, NYSE
National, Inc., filed with the Commission the same proposed amendments
to its connectivity fee schedule. The proposed rule changes were
published for comment in the Federal Register on August 22, 2023 \3\
and August 25, 2023.\4\ The Commission received no comments on the
proposed rule changes. This order grants approval of the proposed rule
changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 98148 (August 16,
2023), 88 FR 57150 (SR-NYSE-2023-29); 98149 (August 16, 2023), 88 FR
57154 (SR-NYSEAMER-2023-39); 98150 (August 16, 2023), 88 FR 57142
(SR-NYSEArca-2023-53); 98151 (August 16, 2023), 88 FR 57159 (SR-
NYSECHX-2023-16).
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98171 (August 21,
2023), 88 FR 58364 (SR-NYSENAT-2023-18). Each proposal is referred
to as the ``Notice'' and for ease of reference, page citations are
to the Notice for NYSE-2023-29.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposed Rule Changes
A. Background
As more fully set forth in the Notice, the Exchanges represent that
in recent years they have experienced ``unprecedented'' demand from
colocation Users for cabinet space and power at the Mahwah Data Center
(``MDC'').\5\ The Exchanges filed, and the
[[Page 80794]]
Commission approved, rules establishing purchasing limits and waitlists
for cabinet space and power orders when supply is limited.\6\ Pursuant
to these rules, if available cabinet inventory and/or power fall below
certain thresholds, certain purchasing limits on cabinets and power
apply (``Cabinet and Power Purchasing Limits''), including that a User
may not purchase more than 32 kW of power and four dedicated
cabinets.\7\ If the amount of available power is zero, or if a User
requests an amount of power that, if provided, would cause the amount
of available power to be zero, the Exchanges place orders on a waitlist
(``Combined Waitlist'').\8\ Orders on the Combined Waitlist are subject
to the Cabinet and Power Purchasing Limits.\9\ The Exchanges represent
that a Combined Waitlist is in effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Notice, supra note 3, at 57150. For purposes of each
Exchange's colocation services, a ``User'' means any market
participant that requests to receive colocation services directly
from the Exchange. Id. at 57150 n. 5.
\6\ Id. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90732 (December
18, 2020), 85 FR 84443 (December 28, 2020) (SR-NYSE-2020-73, SR-
NYSEAMER-2020-66, SR-NYSEArca-2020-82, SR-NYSECHX-2020-26, and SR-
NYSENAT-2020-28) (Notice of Filings of Amendment No. 1 and Order
Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Changes, Each as Modified by
Amendment No. 1, Amending the Exchanges' Co-Location Services To
Establish Procedures for the Allocation of Cabinets to Co-Located
Users if Cabinet Inventory Falls Below Certain Thresholds). See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 91515 (April 8, 2021), 86 FR
19674 (April 14, 2021) (SR-NYSE-2021-12, SR-NYSEAMER-2021-08, SR-
NYSEArca-2021-11, SR-NYSECHX-2021-02, SR-NYSENAT-2021-03) (Notice of
Filing of Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 and Order Granting Accelerated
Approval of Proposed Rule Changes, Each as Modified by Amendment
Nos. 1 and 2, to Establish Procedures for the Allocation of Power in
Co-Location When Availability Falls Below Certain Thresholds). See
Colocation Notes 6 and 7 in the Exchanges' Connectivity Fee
Schedule, available at https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/Wireless_Connectivity_Fees_and_Charges.pdf.
\7\ See Colocation Note 6b in each Exchange's Connectivity Fee
Schedule. Cabinet space is offered in the form of dedicated cabinet,
which come with 4 to 8 kW of power, and partial cabinets, available
in increments of eight-rack units of space, which may be allocated 1
or 2 kW of power.
\8\ See Colocation Note 7b in each Exchange's Connectivity Fee
Schedule. If only the Cabinet Limit is reached, pursuant to
Colocation Note 7a, a Cabinet Waitlist is created. See Colocation
Note 7a in each Exchange's Connectivity Fee Schedule.
\9\ See Colocation Note 7b in each Exchange's Connectivity Fee
Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchanges represent that although they expanded the amount of
cabinet space and power available in the MDC in 2021 and 2022 by
opening new colocation Hall 4, User demand for power continues to
increase.\10\ The Exchanges are currently building a new colocation
hall (``Hall 5'') to satisfy this increased demand.\11\ The Exchanges
are also evaluating whether there is sufficient customer demand for
additional power for it to invest in additional expansion.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Notice, supra note 3, at 57150. The Exchanges represent
that the Combined Waitlist includes 27 Users requesting in excess of
an additional 700 kW of power Id. at 57151.
\11\ Id.
\12\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchanges state that the current Combined Waitlist is
inadequate to determine total demand for power because when the
Combined Waitlist is in effect, current rules permit the Exchanges to
accept one order at a time from a User and its Affiliates \13\ of at
most 32 kW of power.\14\ The Exchanges represent that the approximately
700 kW of demand on the current Combined Waitlist may represent a
``mere fraction of User's true power requirements.'' \15\ The Exchanges
state that several Users on the current Combined Waitlist have
expressed interest in purchasing more than 32 kW of power, specifically
additional power of ``several hundred kilowatts.'' \16\ The Exchanges
seek better knowledge of User demand for power, and also state that
their current rules regarding waitlist procedures are not well-tailored
to allocating large amounts of power that become available all at once
(e.g., a new colocation hall opens).\17\ Although there is a 32 kW
limit on orders when less than 350 kW of unallocated power is
available, any time that more than 350 kW of unallocated power is
available (i.e., the Combined Waitlist is not in effect), current rules
permit Users to place unlimited orders that the Exchanges must allocate
on a first-come, first-served basis.\18\ The Exchanges anticipate that
the availability of large amounts of power in Hall 5 in several
intervals may result in the largest Users placing early orders for many
hundreds of kilowatts of power that could effectively prevent Users
with more modest demand from receiving newly available power.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ An ``Affiliate'' of a User is defined as ``any other User
or Hosted Customer that is under 50% or greater common ownership or
control of the first User.'' See Connectivity Fee Schedule, at 1.
\14\ Notice, supra note 3, at 57151.
\15\ Id.
\16\ Id.
\17\ Id.
\18\ Id.
\19\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 57153.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Proposed Alternative Power Allocation Procedures
To address these concerns, the Exchanges propose to add as
Colocation Note 8 ``alternative'' procedures to assess power demand and
allocate power in the Mahwah Data Center in certain circumstances.\20\
Specifically, the Exchanges propose that they may announce, by customer
notice, a 90-day window (``Ordering Window'') during which the
Exchanges may accept unlimited deposit-guaranteed orders from
Users.\21\ If they announce an Ordering Window while the Cabinet and
Power Purchasing Limits and/or the Cabinet and Combined Waitlist
provisions are in effect, the terms of the Ordering Window would
temporarily supersede the Cabinet and Power Purchasing Limits and/or
the Cabinet and Combined Waitlist.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ Id. at 57152.
\21\ Notice, supra note 3, at 57151.
\22\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the proposal, Users may submit orders for their anticipated
needs, but each User (and its Affiliates) may finalize only one order
for power during the Ordering Window.\23\ During the Ordering Window,
the provision of the Cabinet and Combined Waitlists in Colocation Note
7 that prohibits the Exchanges from accepting orders for more than four
dedicated cabinets and/or 32 kW of power would not apply.\24\ During
the Ordering Window, a User may submit an order even if it already has
an order pending on a Cabinet or Combined Waitlist.\25\ While the
Ordering Window is open, the Exchanges would not accept new orders to
the Cabinet or Combined Waitlist established under Colocation Note 7,
and any order submitted by a User must meet the requirements of the
Ordering Window procedures as set forth in Colocation Note 8.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ Id.
\24\ Id.
\25\ Id.
\26\ Id. at 57151 n.10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Orders submitted during the Ordering Window are to be accompanied
by a deposit equal to two months' worth of the monthly recurring costs
of the amount of the new power ordered.\27\ This deposit will be
applied to the User's invoices for the first and subsequent months
after power is delivered until the deposit is depleted.\28\ The
Exchanges further propose to finalize a User's order upon receipt of a
User's signed order form and deposit, and to consider void any orders
not finalized before the Ordering Window
[[Page 80795]]
closes.\29\ A User may modify its order during the Ordering Window, but
such modification will not be finalized until the Exchange receives the
User's signed modified order form and any additional deposit.\30\ If
the User withdraws its order during the Ordering Window, the deposit
will be returned.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ Id. The Exchanges state that the required deposit would be
calculated as the number of kilowatts ordered by the User in its
Ordering Window order, multiplied by the appropriate ``Per kW
Monthly Fee'' as indicated in the Connectivity Fee Schedule. The Per
kW Monthly Fee is a factor of the total number of kilowatts
allocated to all of a User's dedicated cabinets and varies based on
the total kilowatts allocated to a User. See Notice, supra note 3,
at 57151 n.11.
\28\ Notice, supra note 3, at 57152.
\29\ Id. The Exchanges state that if User wishes to reduce an
order that it placed during the Ordering Window, the User's deposit
would not be reduced or returned, but instead would be applied
against the User's first and subsequent months' invoices after the
power is delivered until the deposit is depleted. Id. at 57152 n.12.
\30\ Notice, supra note 3, at 57152.
\31\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchanges propose allocation procedures for power after the
Ordering Window ends. To prevent larger Users from placing large orders
for power and preventing allocation of power to Users with more modest
power needs, the Exchanges propose a multi-step allocation procedure.
In step one, the Exchanges will allocate power to fill orders in effect
on any waitlist in effect pursuant to Colocation Note 7 (e.g., the
current Combined Waitlist).\32\ In step two, the Exchanges will
allocate up to 32 kW of power to each User that finalized an order
during the Ordering Window based on whether sufficient power is
available.\33\ If sufficient power is available, the Exchanges will
allocate 32 kW of power to each User, except that orders for less than
32 kW would be filled only up to the number of kilowatts actually
ordered.\34\ If sufficient power is not available, the Exchanges will
allocate the available power equally among all Users (rounded to a
whole number of kilowatts), except the Exchanges will not allocate a
User more kilowatts than it actually ordered.\35\ If, after step two,
there is no power to allocate, all orders finalized during the Ordering
Window will be considered completed.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ Id.
\33\ Id.
\34\ Id.
\35\ Id.
\36\ Id. To illustrate, if a User finalized an order for 100 kW
during the Ordering Window and was allocated 32 kW of power during
step two and no further power remained to be allocated after step 2,
the User's order would be considered completed. The residual 68 kW
ordered would not be transferred to a waitlist. The User would be
free to submit a new order for additional power after the Ordering
Window (subject to the Purchasing Limits, if then in effect). Id. at
57152 n.13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If any power remains to be allocated after step two, the Exchanges
will allocate power in step three to any orders that were not
completely filled during step two.\37\ If sufficient power is
available, the Exchanges will allocate power to completely fill all
remaining orders finalized during the Ordering Window.\38\ If
sufficient power is not available to completely fill all such orders,
the Exchanges will allocate power to fill an identical percentage of
each remaining order (rounded to a whole number of kilowatts).\39\ All
such orders will then be considered complete.\40\ Further, any orders
received after the end of the Ordering Window will not be included in
the Ordering Window allocation process but instead will be subject to
the terms of the Cabinet and Purchasing Power Limits and the associated
waitlists.\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ Notice, supra note 3, at 57152.
\38\ Id.
\39\ Id.
\40\ Id. To illustrate, if a User finalized an order for 100 kW
during the Ordering Window and was allocated a total of 90 kW of
power in steps two and three, the order would be considered
completed. The residual 10 kW ordered would not be transferred to a
waitlist. The User would be free to submit a new order for
additional power after the Ordering Window (subject to the
Purchasing Limits, if then in effect). Id. at 57152 n.14.
\41\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 57152, and Colocation Notes 6
and 7 in each Exchange's Connectivity Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Discussion and Commission Findings
After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
changes are consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange.\42\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule changes are consistent with section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\43\ which
requires that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed,
among other things, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest, and not be designed to permit unfair discrimination
between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\42\ In approving this proposed rule change the Commission notes
that it has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\43\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that the Exchanges' proposed Ordering
Window and associated procedures for allocating power requested during
the Ordering Window provide a rational objective means for the
Exchanges to assess power demand by Users prospectively and to fairly
allocate power requested by Users in circumstances where large amounts
of power become available at once (e.g., a new colocation hall opens).
The Exchanges will allocate power for orders received during the
Ordering Window pursuant to a three step process.\44\ In step one,
Users on the Combined Waitlist will have their orders filled first. In
step two, Users would be allocated power equally, each receiving up to
32 kW of power requested during the Ordering Window if supply is
sufficient (and each receiving power equally if power is not
sufficient), with no User allocated more kilowatts than it actually
ordered. In step three, if any power remains to be allocated, the
Exchanges will allocate power to any orders that were not completely
filled during step two if sufficient power is available (and will
allocate power to fill an identical percentage of each remaining order
if sufficient power is unavailable). The proposed allocation procedures
would provide that that each User who has placed an order for power
gets its order at least partially filled, and that larger Users do not
use the Ordering Window to prevent power allocation to smaller Users
with more modest power demands. Accordingly, the Commission believes
that the proposed Ordering Window and associated allocation procedures
are reasonably designed to facilitate an equitable allocation of
available power and are not designed to permit unfair discrimination
between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers. For the foregoing
reasons, Commission finds that the proposals are consistent with the
Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\44\ See text accompanying notes 32-41 supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\45\ that the proposed rule changes (SR-NYSE-2023-29, SR-NYSEAMER-
2023-39, SR-NYSEArca-2023-53, SR-NYSECHX-2023-16, SR-NYSENAT-2023-18)
be, and hereby are approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\45\ See id.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\46\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\46\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-25548 Filed 11-17-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P