Stainless Steel Flanges From India: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission of Review; 2021, 76173-76174 [2023-24481]
Download as PDFAgencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 213 (Monday, November 6, 2023)] [Notices] [Pages 76173-76174] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 2023-24481] [[Page 76173]] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C-533-878] Stainless Steel Flanges From India: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission of Review; 2021 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of stainless steel flanges from India during the period of review, January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021. Additionally, Commerce is rescinding the review with respect to one company. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable November 6, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eliza DeLong, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3878. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On October 5, 2018, Commerce published the countervailing duty order on stainless steel flanges from India.\1\ On December 5, 2022, Commerce published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the Order.\2\ On May 30, 2023, Commerce extended the time period for issuing these preliminary results by 120 days, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), to no later than October 31, 2023.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR 50336 (October 5, 2018) (Order). \2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 87 FR 74404 (December 5, 2022), as corrected by Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 7060 (February 2, 2023). \3\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,'' dated May 30, 2023. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\4\ A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as an appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Stainless Steel Flanges from India; 2021,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the Order is stainless steel flanges from India. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Act. For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we preliminarily find that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and the subsidy is specific.\5\ For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Company Not Selected for Individual Review The Act and Commerce's regulations do not directly address the subsidy rate to be applied to companies not selected for individual examination where Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(e)(2) of the Act. However, Commerce normally determines the rates for non-selected companies in reviews in a manner that is consistent with section 705(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an investigation. Section 777A(e)(2) of the Act provides that ``the individual countervailable subsidy rates determined under subparagraph (A) shall be used to determine the all-others rate under section 705(c)(5) {of the Act{time} .'' Section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act states that for companies not investigated, in general, we will determine an all-others rate by weight-averaging the countervailable subsidy rates established for each of the companies individually investigated, excluding zero and de minimis rates or any rates based solely on the facts available. Accordingly, to determine the rate for companies not selected for individual examination, Commerce's practice is to weight average the net subsidy rates for the selected mandatory respondents, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available.\6\ We preliminarily determine that Chandan Steel Limited (Chandan) and Pradeep Metals Limited (Pradeep) received countervailable subsidies that are above de minimis and are not based entirely on facts available. Therefore, we preliminarily determine to apply the weighted average of the net subsidy rates calculated for Chandan and Pradeep using publicly-ranged sales data submitted by those respondents to the non-selected company.\7\ The company for which a review was requested, and which was not selected as a mandatory respondents or found to be cross-owned with a mandatory respondent, is BFN Forgings Private Limited. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See, e.g., Certain Pasta from Italy: Final Results of the 13th (2008) Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 37386, 37387 (June 29, 2010). \7\ See Memorandum, ``Calculation of Subsidy Rate for Non- Selected Companies Under Review,'' dated concurrently with this memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Partial Rescission of Administrative Review Commerce's practice is to rescind an administrative review of a countervailing duty order, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), when the interested party that requested a review withdraws the request within 90 days of publication of notice of initiation of the requested review. On March 3, 2023, we received a withdrawal request for Hilton Metal Forging Limited (Hilton).\8\ Because no other party besides Hilton requested a review, we are rescinding this review pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1) with respect to Hilton. For this company, Commerce intends to assess duties at rates equal to the cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, during the POR, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Hilton's Letter, ``AD/CVD Review Request,'' dated March 3, 2023. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of Review For the period January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021, we preliminarily find that the following net subsidy rates exist: [[Page 76174]] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subsidy rate Producer/exporter (percent ad valorem) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Chandan Steel Limited...................................... 2.60 Pradeep Metals Limited..................................... 4.04 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following ------------------------------------------------------------------------ BFN Forgings Private Limited............................... 2.82 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure and Public Comment We will disclose to parties to this proceeding the calculations performed for these preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of these preliminary results in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\10\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) a statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\11\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS \12\ and must be served on interested parties. Executive summaries should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes. Note that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining to the service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and 351.309(d)(1). \11\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). \12\ See generally 19 CFR 351.303. \13\ See Administrative Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings; Final Rule, 88 FR 67069 (September 29, 2023) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must do so within 30 days of publication of these preliminary results by submitting a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance using Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS system.\14\ Requests should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, and a list of the issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs.\15\ If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing at a time and date to be determined. Parties should confirm the date and time of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. Parties are reminded that all briefs and hearing requests must be filed electronically using ACCESS and received successfully in their entirety by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \15\ See 19 CFR 351.310. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment Rates Consistent with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, upon issuance of the final results, Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties on all appropriate entries in accordance with the final results of this review. If the assessment rate calculated in the final results is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate all appropriate entries without regard to countervailing duties. For the company for which this review is rescinded (i.e., Hilton), Commerce will instruct CBP to assess countervailing duties on all appropriate entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of estimated countervailing duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, during the period January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(l)(i). Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). Cash Deposit Requirements Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, Commerce intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts shown for each of the companies listed above on shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this administrative review, except where the rate calculated in the final results is zero or de minimis, no cash deposit will be required. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the most recent company-specific or all-others rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash deposit instructions, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Final Results of Review Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of our analysis of the issues raised by the parties in their comments, within 120 days after publication of these preliminary results. Notification to Interested Parties This administrative review and notice are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. Dated: October 31, 2023. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Period of Review V. Rate for Non-Examined Companies VI. Subsidies Valuation Information VII. Benchmarks and Interest Rates VIII. Analysis of Programs IX. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2023-24481 Filed 11-3-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.