Certain Aluminum Foil From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative; 2021, 75267-75269 [2023-24253]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 211 / Thursday, November 2, 2023 / Notices the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 0.00 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation, adjusted for the export-subsidy rate in the companion countervailing duty investigation.12 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties This notice is being issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5). Dated: October 26, 2023 Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results V. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Whether Kanika’s Allocation of Zinc Coating Costs is Inaccurate 12 See Order, 85 FR at 19926. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:32 Nov 01, 2023 Jkt 262001 Comment 2: Whether Kanika’s Allocation of Variable Overhead Costs is Inaccurate Comment 3: Whether Kanika’s Allocation of Fixed Overhead is Inaccurate Comment 4: Whether Kanika Significantly Manipulated Its Costs Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Apply Total Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to Kanika Comment 6: Whether Kanika Misreported Its Sales Information Comment 7: Whether RKF Under-Reported Its Freight Costs Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should Reject RKF’s Claim for Freight Revenue VI. Recommendation Appendix II List of Companies Not Individually Examined 1. A H Enterprises 2. Aadi Shree Fastener Industries 3. Aanjaney Micro Engy Pvt., Ltd. 4. Accurate Steel Forgings (I) Ltd. 5. Alps Industries Ltd. 6. Apex Thermocon Pvt., Ltd. 7. Ash Hammer Union 8. Astrotech Steels Pvt., Ltd. 9. Atlantic Container Line Pvt., Ltd. 10. Ats Exp. 07 11. Atz Shipping Trade & Transport Pvt. 12. BA Metal Processing 13. Babu Exports 14. Bee Dee Cycle Industries 15. Bhansali Inc. 16. Boston Exp. & Engineering Co. 17. C.H.Robinson International (India) 18. C.P.World Lines Pvt., Ltd. 19. Century Distribution Systems Inc. 20. Charu Enterprises 21. Chirag International 22. Daksh Fasteners 23. Dedicated Imp. & Exp. Co. 24. Dhiraj Alloy & Stainless Steel 25. Dsv Air and Sea Pvt., Ltd. 26. Eastman Industries Ltd. 27. Eos Precision 28. ESL Steel Ltd. 29. Everest Exp. 30. Everest Industrial Corporation 31. Farmparts Company 32. Fence Fixings 33. Fine Thread Form Industries 34. Galorekart Marketplace Pvt., Ltd. 35. Ganga Acrowools Ltd. 36. Ganpati Fastners Pvt., Ltd. 37. Gateway Engineering Solution 38. GDPA Fasteners 39. Gee Pee Overseas 40. Geodis India Pvt., Ltd. (Indel) 41. Goodgood Manufacturers 42. Idea Fasteners Pvt., Ltd. 43. Jindal Steel And Power Ltd. 44. JSW Steel Ltd. 45. Kanchan Trading Co. 46. Kanhaiya Lal Tandoor (P) Ltd. 47. Kapson India 48. Kapurthala Industrial Corporation 49. Karna International 50. Kei Industries Ltd. 51. King Exports 52. Kintetsu World Express In 53. Kova Fasteners Pvt., Ltd. 54. Linit Exp. Pvt., Ltd. 55. Mahajan Brothers 56. Maharaja International PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 75267 57. Mangal Steel Enterprises Ltd. 58. Maya Enterprises 59. Meenakshi India, Ltd. 60. Metalink 61. MKA Engineers And Exporters Pvt., Ltd. 62. National Cutting Tools 63. Nishant Steel Industries 64. NJ Sourcing 65. Noahs Ark International Exp. 66. Nuovo Fastenings Pvt., Ltd. 67. Oia Global India Pvt., Ltd. 68. Otsusa India Pvt., Ltd. 69. Paloma Turning Co. Pvt., Ltd. 70. Patton International Ltd. 71. Perfect Tools & Forgings 72. Permali Wallace Pvt., Ltd. 73. Polycab India Ltd. 74. Pommada Hindustan Pvt., Ltd. 75. Poona Forge Pvt., Ltd. 76. Psl Pipe & Fittings Co. 77. R A Exp. 78. Raajratna Ventures Ltd. 79. Raashika Industries Pvt., Ltd. 80. Rajpan Group 81. Rambal Ltd. 82. Randack Fasteners India Pvt., Ltd. 83. Ratnveer Metals Ltd. 84. Rimjhim Ispat Ltd. 85. Rods & Fixing Fasteners 86. S K Overseas 87. S.M Forgings & Engineering 88. Sandip Brass Industries 89. Sandiya Exp. Pvt., Ltd. 90. Sansera Engineering Pvt., Ltd. 91. Shree Luxmi Fasteners 92. Silverline Metal Engineering Pvt. Lt 93. Singhania International Ltd. 94. Sri Satya Sai Enterprises 95. Steampulse Global Llp 96. Steel Authority Of India Ltd. 97. Suchi Fasteners Pvt., Ltd. 98. Supercon Metals Pvt., Ltd. 99. Tekstar Pvt., Ltd. 100. The Technocrats Co. 101. Tijiya Exp. Pvt., Ltd. 102. Tijiya Steel Pvt., Ltd. 103. Tong Heer Fasteners 104. Trans Tool Pvt., Ltd. 105. Universal Engineering and Fabricat 106. V.J Industries Pvt., Ltd. 107. Vidushi Wires Pvt., Ltd. 108. Vrl Automation 109. VV Marine Pvt., Ltd. 110. Yogendra International 111. Zenith Steel Pipes And Industries L 112. Zenith Precision Pvt., Ltd. [FR Doc. 2023–24187 Filed 11–1–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–570–054] Certain Aluminum Foil From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative; 2021 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM 02NON1 75268 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 211 / Thursday, November 2, 2023 / Notices countervailable subsidies were provided to certain exporters/producers of certain aluminum foil (aluminum foil) from the People’s Republic of China (China) during the period of review (POR) January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021. DATES: Applicable November 2, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Natasia Harrison, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1240. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On May 4, 2023, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review in the Federal Register.1 For a complete description of the events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.2 Scope of the Order 3 The product covered by the scope of the Order is aluminum foil from China. A full description of the scope of the Order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Analysis of Comments Received khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES All issues raised by the interested parties in their case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is provided in the appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System 1 See Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Review, in Part; 2021, 88 FR 28496 (May 4, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic of China; 2021,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 3 See Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR 17360 (April 19, 2018); see also Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Amended Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation, and Notice of Amended Final Determination and Amended Countervailing Duty Order, 85 FR 47730 (August 6, 2020) (collectively, Order). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:32 Nov 01, 2023 Jkt 262001 (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/ FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of comments from interested parties and the evidence on the record, we revised the calculation of the net countervailable subsidy rates for Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd. (f/k/a Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Stock Co., Ltd.) (Zhongji). For a discussion of these changes, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Methodology Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the subsidy programs found to be countervailable, we find that there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.4 For a complete description of the methodology underlying all of Commerce’s conclusions, including our reliance, in part, on facts otherwise available, including adverse facts available, pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Companies Not Selected for Individual Review The statute and Commerce’s regulations do not address the establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(e)(2) of the Act. However, Commerce normally determines the rates for non-selected companies in reviews in a manner that is consistent with section 705(c)(5) of the Act, which provides the basis for calculating the all-others rate in an investigation. Section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act instructs Commerce, as a general rule, to calculate the all-others rate equal to the weighted average of the countervailable subsidy rates established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis countervailable 4 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 subsidy rates, and any rates determined entirely on the basis of facts available. There are 10 companies for which a review was requested and not rescinded, and which were not selected as mandatory respondents or found to be cross-owned with Zhongji, the mandatory respondent. For these nonselected companies, because the rate calculated for the only participating mandatory respondent in this review, Zhongji, was above de minimis and not based entirely on facts available, we are applying Zhongji’s subsidy rate to the 10 non-selected companies. This is the same methodology Commerce applied in the Preliminary Results for determining a rate for companies not selected for individual examination. However, due to changes in the calculation for Zhongji, we revised the non-selected rate accordingly. Consequently, for the 10 non-selected companies for which a review was requested and not rescinded, we are applying an ad valorem subsidy rate of 25.32 percent.5 Final Results of Review We determine the following net countervailable subsidy rates exist for the period January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021: 5 This reflects the net countervailable ad valorem subsidy rate without the entered value adjustment (EVA). See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 4. 6 In the first administrative review of the Order, Commerce found the following companies to be cross-owned: Anhui Maximum Aluminium Industries Company Ltd.; Jiangsu Huafeng Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd. (f/k/a Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Stock Co., Ltd.); Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., (HK) Ltd.; Shantou Wanshun Package Material Stock Co., Ltd.; and Anhui Maximum Aluminium Industries Company Ltd. The subsidy rate applies to all crossowned companies. See Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2017– 2018, 86 FR 12171 (March 2, 2021). While the petitioners (i.e., the Aluminum Association Trade Enforcement Working Group and its individual members: JW Aluminum Company, Novelis Corporation, and Reynolds Consumer Products, LLC) withdrew their review requests for Anhui Maximum Aluminium Industries Company Ltd., Jiangsu Huafeng Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd., and Shantou Wanshun Package Material Stock Co., Ltd., because these companies were previously found to be cross-owned with a company which is subject to this review, we have not rescinded the review with respect to these companies. 7 This net countervailable ad valorem subsidy rate reflects an EVA. See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 4. 8 The rates reflect the ad valorem net countervailable subsidy rate without the entered value adjustment EVA. See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 4. E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM 02NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 211 / Thursday, November 2, 2023 / Notices 75269 Subsidy rate (percent ad valorem) Producer or exporter Anhui Zhongji Battery Foil Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (aka Anhui Zhongji Battery Foil Sci&Tech Co., Ltd.); Jiangsu Huafeng Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd. (f/k/a Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Stock Co., Ltd.); Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., (HK) Limited; and Shantou Wanshun New Material Group Co., Ltd. (f/k/a Shantou Wanshun Package Material Stock Co., Ltd.) 6 .......................................................................................... 7 24.49 Review-Specific Rate Applicable to the Following Companies 8 Dingsheng Aluminum Industries (Hong Kong) Trading Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou DingCheng Aluminum Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou Dingsheng Import & Export Co. Ltd.; Hangzhou Dingsheng Industrial Group Co. Ltd.; Hangzhou Five Star Aluminium Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou Teemful Aluminum Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Dingsheng New Materials Joint-Stock Co., Ltd; Luoyang Longding Aluminum Co., Ltd.; and Walson (HK) Trading Co., Limited 9 ............................................................................................................. Luoyang Longding Aluminium Industries Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................. Shanghai Shenyan Packaging Materials Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................... Disclosure Commerce intends to disclose calculations and analysis performed for the final results of review within five days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Cash Deposit Requirements In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce also intends to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts shown above for the abovelisted companies with regard to shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of these final results of review. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the all-others rate or the most recent company-specific rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash deposit requirements, effective upon publication of these final results, shall remain in effect until further notice. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Assessment Requirements In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), Commerce has determined, and CBP shall assess, countervailing duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review, for the above-listed companies at the applicable ad valorem assessment rates listed. 9 In the investigation, Commerce found the following companies to be cross-owned: Dingsheng Aluminum Industries (Hong Kong) Trading Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou DingCheng Aluminum Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou Dingsheng Import & Export Co. Ltd.; Hangzhou Dingsheng Industrial Group Co. Ltd.; Hangzhou Five Star Aluminium Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou Teemful Aluminum Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Dingsheng New Materials Joint-Stock Co., Ltd.; Luoyang Longding Aluminum Co., Ltd.; and Walson (HK) Trading Co., Limited. The subsidy rate applies to all cross-owned companies. See Order. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:32 Nov 01, 2023 Jkt 262001 Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties The final results are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: October 27, 2023. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Non-Selected Companies Under Review V. Subsidies Valuation VI. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Application of Adverse Inferences VII. Analysis of Programs VIII. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Make an Adverse Inference to Find that Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 25.32 25.32 25.32 Co., Ltd. (f/k/a/Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Stock Co., Ltd.) (Zhongji) Benefited from the Export Buyer’s Credit (EBC) Program Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Grant Zhongji an Entered Value Adjustment (EVA) Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Revise Zhongji’s Total Sales Denominators Comment 4: Whether the Provision of Electricity for Less Than Adequate Remuneration (LTAR) Is Countervailable Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Revise the Benefit Calculation for the Provision of Electricity for LTAR Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should Find that the Input Producers Are Government Authorities Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should Continue to Make an Adverse Inference to Find Distortion in the Primary Aluminum and Aluminum Plate and/or Sheet and Strip Markets Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should Modify the Benchmark for Aluminum Plate and/or Sheet and Strip Comment 9: Whether Warehousing Fees Should Be Included in the Benchmark for Primary Aluminum Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should Adjust the Inland Freight Benchmark for the Provision of Primary Aluminum and Aluminum Plate and/or Sheet and Strip for LTAR Programs Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should Revise the Benchmark for the Provision of Land for LTAR Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should Revise the Benefit Calculations for the Provision of Land for LTAR and the Import Tariff and Value-Added Tax (VAT) Exemptions on Imported Equipment in Encouraged Industries Program Comment 13: Whether Commerce Should Apply Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to Self-Reported ‘‘Other Subsidies’’ Comment 14: Whether Commerce Should Select Hangzhou Five Star Aluminium Co., Ltd., and Its Affiliates, as an Additional Mandatory Respondent IX. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2023–24253 Filed 11–1–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM 02NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 211 (Thursday, November 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75267-75269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24253]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-570-054]


Certain Aluminum Foil From the People's Republic of China: Final 
Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative; 2021

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that

[[Page 75268]]

countervailable subsidies were provided to certain exporters/producers 
of certain aluminum foil (aluminum foil) from the People's Republic of 
China (China) during the period of review (POR) January 1, 2021, 
through December 31, 2021.

DATES: Applicable November 2, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Natasia Harrison, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1240.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On May 4, 2023, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this 
administrative review in the Federal Register.\1\ For a complete 
description of the events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, 
see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Aluminum Foil from the People's Republic of 
China: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative 
Review and Rescission of Review, in Part; 2021, 88 FR 28496 (May 4, 
2023) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of 
Certain Aluminum Foil from the People's Republic of China; 2021,'' 
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues 
and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order 3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Certain Aluminum Foil from the People's Republic of 
China: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination 
and Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR 17360 (April 19, 2018); see 
also Certain Aluminum Foil from the People's Republic of China: 
Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Amended Final 
Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation, and Notice 
of Amended Final Determination and Amended Countervailing Duty 
Order, 85 FR 47730 (August 6, 2020) (collectively, Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The product covered by the scope of the Order is aluminum foil from 
China. A full description of the scope of the Order is contained in the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised by the interested parties in their case and 
rebuttal briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 
list of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is 
provided in the appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our analysis of comments from interested parties and the 
evidence on the record, we revised the calculation of the net 
countervailable subsidy rates for Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials 
Co., Ltd. (f/k/a Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Stock Co., Ltd.) 
(Zhongji). For a discussion of these changes, see the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.

Methodology

    Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with 
section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 
For each of the subsidy programs found to be countervailable, we find 
that there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial 
contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that 
the subsidy is specific.\4\ For a complete description of the 
methodology underlying all of Commerce's conclusions, including our 
reliance, in part, on facts otherwise available, including adverse 
facts available, pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, see 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding 
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding 
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Companies Not Selected for Individual Review

    The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the 
establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for 
individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an 
administrative review pursuant to section 777A(e)(2) of the Act. 
However, Commerce normally determines the rates for non-selected 
companies in reviews in a manner that is consistent with section 
705(c)(5) of the Act, which provides the basis for calculating the all-
others rate in an investigation. Section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act 
instructs Commerce, as a general rule, to calculate the all-others rate 
equal to the weighted average of the countervailable subsidy rates 
established for exporters and producers individually investigated, 
excluding any zero or de minimis countervailable subsidy rates, and any 
rates determined entirely on the basis of facts available.
    There are 10 companies for which a review was requested and not 
rescinded, and which were not selected as mandatory respondents or 
found to be cross-owned with Zhongji, the mandatory respondent. For 
these non-selected companies, because the rate calculated for the only 
participating mandatory respondent in this review, Zhongji, was above 
de minimis and not based entirely on facts available, we are applying 
Zhongji's subsidy rate to the 10 non-selected companies.
    This is the same methodology Commerce applied in the Preliminary 
Results for determining a rate for companies not selected for 
individual examination. However, due to changes in the calculation for 
Zhongji, we revised the non-selected rate accordingly. Consequently, 
for the 10 non-selected companies for which a review was requested and 
not rescinded, we are applying an ad valorem subsidy rate of 25.32 
percent.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ This reflects the net countervailable ad valorem subsidy 
rate without the entered value adjustment (EVA). See Issues and 
Decision Memorandum at 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Review

    We determine the following net countervailable subsidy rates exist 
for the period January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ In the first administrative review of the Order, Commerce 
found the following companies to be cross-owned: Anhui Maximum 
Aluminium Industries Company Ltd.; Jiangsu Huafeng Aluminum Industry 
Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd. (f/k/a 
Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Stock Co., Ltd.); Jiangsu 
Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., (HK) Ltd.; Shantou Wanshun Package 
Material Stock Co., Ltd.; and Anhui Maximum Aluminium Industries 
Company Ltd. The subsidy rate applies to all cross-owned companies. 
See Certain Aluminum Foil from the People's Republic of China: Final 
Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018, 
86 FR 12171 (March 2, 2021). While the petitioners (i.e., the 
Aluminum Association Trade Enforcement Working Group and its 
individual members: JW Aluminum Company, Novelis Corporation, and 
Reynolds Consumer Products, LLC) withdrew their review requests for 
Anhui Maximum Aluminium Industries Company Ltd., Jiangsu Huafeng 
Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd., and Shantou Wanshun Package Material 
Stock Co., Ltd., because these companies were previously found to be 
cross-owned with a company which is subject to this review, we have 
not rescinded the review with respect to these companies.
    \7\ This net countervailable ad valorem subsidy rate reflects an 
EVA. See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 4.
    \8\ The rates reflect the ad valorem net countervailable subsidy 
rate without the entered value adjustment EVA. See Issues and 
Decision Memorandum at 4.

[[Page 75269]]



------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Subsidy rate
                  Producer or exporter                      (percent ad
                                                             valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anhui Zhongji Battery Foil Science & Technology Co.,           \7\ 24.49
 Ltd. (aka Anhui Zhongji Battery Foil Sci&Tech Co.,
 Ltd.); Jiangsu Huafeng Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd.;
 Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd. (f/k/a
 Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Stock Co., Ltd.);
 Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., (HK) Limited;
 and Shantou Wanshun New Material Group Co., Ltd. (f/k/a
 Shantou Wanshun Package Material Stock Co., Ltd.) \6\..
------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Review-Specific Rate Applicable to the Following
                      Companies \8\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dingsheng Aluminum Industries (Hong Kong) Trading Co.,             25.32
 Ltd.; Hangzhou DingCheng Aluminum Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou
 Dingsheng Import & Export Co. Ltd.; Hangzhou Dingsheng
 Industrial Group Co. Ltd.; Hangzhou Five Star Aluminium
 Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou Teemful Aluminum Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu
 Dingsheng New Materials Joint-Stock Co., Ltd; Luoyang
 Longding Aluminum Co., Ltd.; and Walson (HK) Trading
 Co., Limited \9\.......................................
Luoyang Longding Aluminium Industries Co., Ltd..........           25.32
Shanghai Shenyan Packaging Materials Co., Ltd...........           25.32
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ In the investigation, Commerce found the following companies 
to be cross-owned: Dingsheng Aluminum Industries (Hong Kong) Trading 
Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou DingCheng Aluminum Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou Dingsheng 
Import & Export Co. Ltd.; Hangzhou Dingsheng Industrial Group Co. 
Ltd.; Hangzhou Five Star Aluminium Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou Teemful 
Aluminum Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Dingsheng New Materials Joint-Stock Co., 
Ltd.; Luoyang Longding Aluminum Co., Ltd.; and Walson (HK) Trading 
Co., Limited. The subsidy rate applies to all cross-owned companies. 
See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce intends to disclose calculations and analysis performed 
for the final results of review within five days after the date of 
publication of this notice in the Federal Register in accordance with 
19 CFR 351.224(b).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce also 
intends to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect 
cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts shown 
above for the above-listed companies with regard to shipments of 
subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
consumption on or after the date of publication of these final results 
of review. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to continue 
to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the all-
others rate or the most recent company-specific rate applicable to the 
company, as appropriate. These cash deposit requirements, effective 
upon publication of these final results, shall remain in effect until 
further notice.

Assessment Requirements

    In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(2), Commerce has determined, and CBP shall assess, 
countervailing duties on all appropriate entries covered by this 
review, for the above-listed companies at the applicable ad valorem 
assessment rates listed. Commerce intends to issue assessment 
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after publication of the 
final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely 
summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the 
assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 
entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory 
injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    The final results are issued and published in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: October 27, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Non-Selected Companies Under Review
V. Subsidies Valuation
VI. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Application of Adverse 
Inferences
VII. Analysis of Programs
VIII. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Make an Adverse Inference to 
Find that Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd. (f/k/a/
Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Stock Co., Ltd.) (Zhongji) 
Benefited from the Export Buyer's Credit (EBC) Program
    Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Grant Zhongji an Entered 
Value Adjustment (EVA)
    Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Revise Zhongji's Total Sales 
Denominators
    Comment 4: Whether the Provision of Electricity for Less Than 
Adequate Remuneration (LTAR) Is Countervailable
    Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Revise the Benefit 
Calculation for the Provision of Electricity for LTAR
    Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should Find that the Input Producers 
Are Government Authorities
    Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should Continue to Make an Adverse 
Inference to Find Distortion in the Primary Aluminum and Aluminum 
Plate and/or Sheet and Strip Markets
    Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should Modify the Benchmark for 
Aluminum Plate and/or Sheet and Strip
    Comment 9: Whether Warehousing Fees Should Be Included in the 
Benchmark for Primary Aluminum
    Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should Adjust the Inland Freight 
Benchmark for the Provision of Primary Aluminum and Aluminum Plate 
and/or Sheet and Strip for LTAR Programs
    Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should Revise the Benchmark for the 
Provision of Land for LTAR
    Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should Revise the Benefit 
Calculations for the Provision of Land for LTAR and the Import 
Tariff and Value-Added Tax (VAT) Exemptions on Imported Equipment in 
Encouraged Industries Program
    Comment 13: Whether Commerce Should Apply Adverse Facts 
Available (AFA) to Self-Reported ``Other Subsidies''
    Comment 14: Whether Commerce Should Select Hangzhou Five Star 
Aluminium Co., Ltd., and Its Affiliates, as an Additional Mandatory 
Respondent
IX. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2023-24253 Filed 11-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.