Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Europe Limited; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, Relating to Amendments to the Clearing Membership Policy and Clearing Membership Procedures, 74214-74217 [2023-23814]
Download as PDF
74214
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 208 / Monday, October 30, 2023 / Notices
Applicants
request an order to permit certain
registered closed-end investment
companies to issue multiple classes of
shares and to impose asset-based
distribution and/or service fees and
early withdrawal charges.
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION:
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate
Opportunities Fund and Eaton Vance
Management.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–23876 Filed 10–27–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
APPLICANTS:
The application was filed
on March 15, 2023, and amended on
April 11, 2023 and August 18, 2023.
FILING DATES:
An
order granting the requested relief will
be issued unless the Commission orders
a hearing. Interested persons may
request a hearing on any application by
emailing the SEC’s Secretary at
Secretarys-Office@sec.gov and serving
the Applicants with a copy of the
request by email, if an email address is
listed for the relevant Applicant below,
or personally or by mail, if a physical
address is listed for the relevant
Applicant below. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on November 20, 2023, and
should be accompanied by proof of
service on the Applicants, in the form
of an affidavit, or, for lawyers, a
certificate of service. Pursuant to rule 0–
5 under the Act, hearing requests should
state the nature of the writer’s interest,
any facts bearing upon the desirability
of a hearing on the matter, the reason for
the request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a
hearing may request notification by
emailing the Commission’s Secretary.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING:
The Commission:
Secretarys-Office@sec.gov. Applicants:
Deidre E. Walsh, Eaton Vance
Management, dwalsh@eatonvance.com;
with a copy to Sarah Clinton, Ropes &
Gray LLP, sarah.clinton@ropesgray.com.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Adam Large, Senior Special Counsel, at
(202) 551–7358 (Division of Investment
Management, Chief Counsel’s Office).
For
Applicants’ representations, legal
analysis, and conditions, please refer to
Applicants’ amended application, dated
August 18, 2023, which may be
obtained via the Commission’s website
by searching for the file number at the
top of this document, or for an
Applicant using the Company name
search field on the SEC’s EDGAR
system. The SEC’s EDGAR system may
be searched at https://www.sec.gov/
edgar/searchedgar/legacy/
companysearch.html. You may also call
the SEC’s Public Reference Room at
(202) 551–8090.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Oct 27, 2023
Jkt 262001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–98790; File No. SR–ICEEU–
2023–022]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE
Clear Europe Limited; Order Approving
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 1, Relating to
Amendments to the Clearing
Membership Policy and Clearing
Membership Procedures
October 24, 2023.
I. Introduction
On August 8, 2023, ICE Clear Europe
Limited (‘‘ICEEU’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
modify its Clearing Membership Policy
(‘‘Policy’’) and Clearing Membership
Procedures (‘‘Procedures’’). On August
22, 2023, ICE Clear Europe filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change to make certain changes to the
Exhibits 5A and 5B.3 Notice of the
proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1, was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
August 29, 2023.4 The Commission has
not received any comments on the
proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1 (hereinafter
‘‘Proposed Rule Change’’). For the
reasons discussed below, the
Commission is approving the Proposed
Rule Change.5
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Amendment No. 1 amends the Exhibit 5A and
Exhibit 5B to correctly reflect the addition of the
Document Handling subsection to each document’s
Table of Contents. The proposed rule change
includes an Exhibit 4A and Exhibit 4B. Exhibit 4A
shows the change that Amendment No. 1 makes to
Exhibit 5A, and Exhibit 4B does the same with
respect to Exhibit 5B.
4 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98207
(August 23, 2023), 88 FR 59547 (August 29, 2023)
(File No. SR–ICEEU–2023–022) (‘‘Notice’’).
5 Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein
have the meanings assigned to them in the Policy
or the Procedures or, if not defined therein, ICE
Clear Europe’s Clearing Rules.
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
ICEEU is registered with the
Commission as a clearing agency for the
purpose of clearing security-based
swaps. In its role as a clearing agency
for clearing security-based swaps,
ICEEU provides services to its Clearing
Members. ICEEU’s Clearing Members
enter into a Clearing Membership
Agreement with ICEEU and are
admitted as clearing members of ICEEU
under Part 2 of ICEEU’s clearing rules.6
As a result of its relationship with its
Clearing Members, ICEEU faces a
number of risks. For example, ICEEU’s
Clearing Members may not meet
membership criteria which ultimately
could increase the chances of both a
Clearing Member defaulting and ICEEU
needing to use mutualized funds.7
ICEEU manages these risks, and
relationships with its Clearing Members,
through the Policy and the Procedures.
The Policy describes ICEEU’s
membership criteria and related
processes for assessing applicants for
membership, on-going monitoring of its
Clearing Members, and termination of
its Clearing Members. The Procedures in
turn provide additional detail as to how
ICE Clear Europe applies its policies for
reviewing applications for clearing
membership, variations of permissions
for Clearing Members, ongoing
monitoring of Clearing Members, and
termination of clearing membership.8
Through the Proposed Rule Change,
ICEEU proposes to make changes to
both the Policy and the Procedures.9
These proposed changes correct an
improper reference to model
documents; clarify that clearing
members must provide notice of certain
situations; update sections on
monitoring membership criteria; update
sections on document governance;
update the Procedures’ clearing
membership application process; and
clarify that ICEEU may take certain
steps in its absolute discretion.
1. Correction of Improper Reference to
Model Documents in the Policy
The current Policy notes that
procedural aspects and relevant
6 The Clearing Membership Agreement is an
agreement between ICEEU and a Clearing Member
under which the Clearing House agrees to provide
clearing in respect of Contracts to that Clearing
Member and that Clearing Member agrees to be
bound by and subject to ICEEU’s Clearing Rules.
ICE Clear Europe Clearing Rule 101.
7 Clearing Membership Policy 2.1.
8 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 93178
(Sept. 29, 2021), 86 FR 55045, 55046 (Oct. 5, 2021)
(File No. SR–ICEEU–2021–014).
9 In addition to the changes described below,
ICEEU proposes various non-substantive changes to
the Policy and Procedures.
E:\FR\FM\30OCN1.SGM
30OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 208 / Monday, October 30, 2023 / Notices
parameters related to the Policy are set
out in the corresponding procedures
and model documents. However, Policy
parameters are set forth in parameter
documents, not model documents.10
Therefore the Proposed Rule Change
would remove the reference to model
documents and state instead that
procedural aspects and relevant
parameters related to the Policy are set
out in the corresponding procedures
and parameter documents respectively.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
2. Requiring Clearing Members To
Provide Certain Notifications in the
Policy and Procedures
In the ‘‘Objective’’ section of the
current Policy, ICEEU notes that it
achieves the objectives of the Policy by,
among other things, ‘‘includ[ing]
relevant notifications to ensure that
Clearing Members’’ promptly notify
ICEEU of certain changes that could
impact their ability to meet ICEEU’s
membership criteria. The ‘‘Objective’’
section of the current Procedures
includes similar language. The Proposed
Rule Change would change this
language in both the Policy and the
Procedures to specify that ICEEU
achieves the objectives of the Policy and
Procedures by, among other things,
‘‘requir[ing]’’ that Clearing Members
promptly notify ICEEU of any changes
to their business which may affect their
ability to meet ICEEU’s membership
criteria.11
3. Monitoring of Membership Criteria in
the Policy
The current Policy states that in order
to monitor Clearing Members’ on-going
adherence to the membership criteria,
ICEEU carries out periodic in-depth
counterparty reviews; undertakes a
quarterly review of financial position
using Audited Annual Accounts and
quarterly financial information; updates
its Counterparty Rating System on a
quarterly basis; maintains a Watch List;
requires Clearing Members to complete
an Annual Member Return; and
monitors operational matters daily,
including, for example, margin calls and
end-of-day price submissions. ICEEU
proposes to remove and consolidate
much of this text. The Policy as revised
would state that in order to monitor
Clearing Members’ on-going adherence
to the membership criteria, ICEEU
carries out periodic in-depth
counterparty reviews; undertakes
ongoing monitoring, which consists of
continuous monitoring and additional
trigger-based reviews, including relating
to credit and AML/KYC risk and to
10 Notice,
88 FR at 59548.
11 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Oct 27, 2023
Jkt 262001
daily operational matters (such as
margin calls); and requires Clearing
Members to complete an Annual
Member Return.
ICEEU proposes to remove the text
discussing quarterly review of financial
position through Audited Annual
Accounts and financial information,
updates to its Counter Party Rating
System done quarterly, and the
requirement to maintain a Watch List
because these subjects relate to credit
issues that are covered in its
Counterparty Credit Risk Policy and
Procedures.12 Given the deletion of this
text, ICEEU proposes to remove the
sentence noting that information on
monitoring is available in the Clearing
Membership Procedures and the
Counterparty Credit Risk Policy because
ICEEU believes this cross reference to
support now-deleted references would
no longer be necessary.13 Finally, ICEEU
proposes deleting the sentence that
provides that ICEEU monitors a number
of specific operational matters daily
because it would be replaced with the
text noting that ICEEU undertakes
ongoing monitoring.
4. Document Governance in the Policy
and Procedures
The Proposed Rule Change would
update the Document Governance and
Exception Handling sections of both the
Policy and the Procedures to make them
consistent with similar document
governance provisions in other ICEEU
policies.14 The updates would specify
that the scope of the document review
encompasses, at a minimum, regulatory
compliance, documentation and
purpose, implementation, use, and open
items from previous validations or
reviews (where appropriate). The
Proposed Rule Change would also add
text identifying the document owner or
relevant staff as the individuals
responsible for conducting document
reviews to ensure they are updated and
reviewed in accordance with the
internal governance processes. The
changes would also specify that the
head of the department (or their
delegate) and the Chief Risk Officer (or
their delegate) provide approval for
document reviews and that, in some
circumstances, the document review
findings are reported to the Model
12 Id.
13 Id.
14 Id. For example, ICEEU recently amended its
Recovery Plan and Outsourcing Policy to make
changes similar to those now proposed. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98337 (Sept.
8, 2023), 88 FR 63149, 63154–55 (Sept. 14, 2023)
(File No. SR–ICEEU–2023–020) (Recovery Plan);
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98387 (Sept.
14, 2023), 88 FR 64953, 64955 (Sept. 20, 2023) (File
No. SR–ICEEU–2023–018) (Outsourcing Policy).
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74215
Oversight Committee, but outside of
those circumstances, the document
review’s results, including any findings,
are reported to the Executive Risk
Committee along with the priority of
findings, proposed remediations, and
target due date to remediate the
findings. The updates also would
provide that it is the document owner’s
responsibility to address any findings,
complete internal governance, and, if
necessary, obtain regulatory approvals
before the subsequent annual review is
due. Finally, the proposed changes
would note that changes to the Policy
and Procedures must be approved in
accordance with ICEEU’s governance
process and will take effect after
completion of all necessary internal and
regulatory approvals.
5. Clearing Membership Procedures
The Proposed Rule Change would
amend the Clearing Membership
Procedures to make certain
clarifications and updates. One
proposed change would clarify that
applicants must provide sufficient
evidence, details, and information to
ICEEU as required by the Rules, as
opposed to sufficient evidence, details,
or information.15 Another adds text
indicating that the membership team
will ensure that all Applicants are
added to the schedule of insured
entities by the ICE Group insurer. The
Proposed Rule Change would also
delete a provision noting that after
approval of an application by the
Executive Risk Committee, the relevant
Product Risk Committees would be
notified of a new application for
clearing membership. ICEEU believes
that it is unnecessary to notify the
Product Risk Committees because those
committees’ duties and functions are
not implicated by a new member being
admitted.16 ICEEU’s proposed
amendments would also clarify that
ICEEU issues a Circular confirming
approval of a Clearing Member once
their application is approved and move
a clause indicating that Clearing
Members are required to respond to
additional information requests in a
timely manner statement to a standalone
sentence. ICEEU believes stating this
requirement in a standalone sentence
makes the information clearer.17
6. ICEEU’s Absolute Discretion in the
Procedures
Throughout the Procedures, ICEEU
proposes to add the phrase ‘‘in its
absolute discretion’’ in connection with
15 Notice,
88 FR at 59548.
16 Id.
17 Id.
E:\FR\FM\30OCN1.SGM
30OCN1
74216
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 208 / Monday, October 30, 2023 / Notices
certain actions described in the
Procedures. Specifically, ICEEU’s
proposed changes note that ICEEU has
absolute discretion to take certain
actions with respect to its minimum
capital requirements, standards and
characteristics of subordinated loans,
the acceptability of a Controller
Guarantee, cash or collateral
requirements, and its guaranty fund.
ICEEU also proposes changes making
clear that it defines a maximum period
between in-depth counterparty reviews
and a threshold for following up with
the Clearing Member regarding negative
changes to its financial condition in its
absolute discretion. ICEEU believes that
these amendments do not change its
existing authority, but more explicitly
state the scope of its discretion.18
III. Discussion and Commission
Findings
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act requires
the Commission to approve a proposed
rule change of a self-regulatory
organization if it finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
the organization.19 For the reasons given
below, the Commission finds that the
Proposed Rule Change is consistent
with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 20
and Rules 17Ad–22(e)(2)(i), (e)(2)(v),21
and (e)(18).22
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
A. Consistency With Section
17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act
Under Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act,
ICEEU’s rules, among other things, must
be ‘‘designed to promote the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions and, to the extent
applicable, derivative agreements,
contracts, and transactions, to assure the
safeguarding of securities and funds
which are in the custody or control of
the clearing agency or for which it is
responsible . . . and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest
. . . .’’ 23 Based on its review of the
record, and for the reasons discussed
below, the Commission concludes that
ICEEU’s Proposed Rule Change is
consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of
the Act.
As noted above, ICEEU faces a
number of risks as a result of its
relationship with its Clearing Members.
These risks include operational, default,
and other risks that could impact or
18 Id.
19 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
21 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(2).
22 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(18).
23 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
20 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Oct 27, 2023
threaten ICEEU’s ability to clear and
settle transactions, safeguard securities
and funds which are in its possession or
control or for which it is responsible, or
otherwise protect investors and the
public interest. ICEEU manages these
risks through, among other things, the
Policy and Procedures. Therefore,
improving or enhancing the Policy and
Procedures likewise improves or
enhances ICEEU’s ability to manage or
mitigate the risks it faces as a result of
its relationship with its Clearing
Members.
As discussed above, the Proposed
Rule Change would enhance the Policy
and Procedures in a number of ways,
including clarifying certain provisions,
highlighting certain important
information, removing incorrect or
duplicative information, and ensuring
the Policy and Procedures are consistent
with each other and with ICEEU’s other
policies and procedures. For example,
the Proposed Rule Change would clarify
in both the Policy and Procedures that
Clearing Members must promptly notify
ICEEU of any changes to their business
which may impact their ability to meet
membership criteria. Additionally, the
Proposed Rule Change would revise the
Procedures to clarify that Clearing
Membership applicants must provide
sufficient evidence, details, and
information to ICEEU as required by the
Rules, that ICEEU will issue a Circular
confirming approval of a Clearing
Member once its membership
application is approved, that Clearing
Members must respond to information
requests from ICEEU in a timely
manner, and that ICEEU has absolute
discretion to take certain steps.24
Similarly, the Proposed Rule Change
would update the Policy to note that
procedural aspects and relevant
parameters related to the Policy are set
out in the corresponding procedures
and parameter documents, rather than
model documents as the current Policy
states, and highlight that procedural
aspects related to the Policy are set out
in the corresponding procedures. The
Proposed Rule Change also would
delete as unnecessary and duplicative
certain information related to its
monitoring of Clearing Members’
financial information because that
information is addressed in other ICEEU
policies.25
The Proposed Rule Change will help
clarify the Policy and Procedures and
ensure that they are accurate and
consistent both with each other and
with ICEEU’s other policies and
procedures, which will enhance the
ability of ICEEU and its stakeholders to
understand the Policy and Procedures
and apply them accurately and
consistently. Ensuring the Policy and
Procedures are easily understood and
applied accurately and consistently
will, in turn, help ensure that ICEEU
effectively manages and mitigates the
operational and other risks presented by
its relationship with Clearing Members,
thereby supporting ICEEU’s ability to
promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities
transactions, assure the safeguarding of
securities and funds which are in
ICEEU’s custody or control or for which
it is responsible, and protect investors
and the public interest.
For these reasons, the Commission
finds that the Proposed Rule Change is
consistent with the requirements of
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.26
B. Consistency With Rule 17Ad–
22(e)(2)(i) and (v)
Rules 17Ad–22(e)(2)(i) and (v) require
ICEEU to ‘‘establish, implement,
maintain, and enforce written policies
and procedures reasonably designed to
. . . provide for governance
arrangements that are clear and
transparent . . . and specify clear and
direct lines of responsibility.’’ 27 Based
on its review of the record, and for the
reasons discussed below, the
Commission finds that the Proposed
Rule Change is consistent with Rule
17Ad–22(e)(2)(i) and (v).
The Proposed Rule Change clearly
defines responsibilities for a number of
ICEEU employees. For instance, in both
the Policy and Procedures, the Proposed
Rule Change identifies the document
owner and relevant staff as responsible
for conducting document reviews,
remediating findings, completing
internal governance, and receiving
regulatory approvals. The Proposed
Rule Change also would add text to the
Procedures that makes clear that the
Membership team will ensure that all
Applicants are added to the schedule of
insured entities by the ICE Group
insurer, and would remove as
unnecessary text requiring notification
of the relevant Product Risk Committees
of new applications for clearing
membership.28 By defining who has or
does not have responsibilities and
making this information readily
available in the Policy and Procedures
the Proposed Rule Change achieves
clarity and transparency.
The Commission finds, therefore, that
the Proposed Rule Change is consistent
26 15
24 Notice,
88 FR at 59548.
25 Id.
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(2).
28 Notice, 88 FR at 59548.
27 17
E:\FR\FM\30OCN1.SGM
30OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 208 / Monday, October 30, 2023 / Notices
For the Commission by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.37
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
with the requirements of Rule 17Ad–
22(e)(2)(i) and (v).29
C. Consistency With Rule 17Ad–
22(e)(18)
Rule 17Ad–22(e)(18) requires ICEEU
to ‘‘establish, implement, maintain, and
enforce written policies and procedures
reasonably designed to . . . establish
objective, risk-based, and publicly
disclosed criteria for participation,
which permit fair and open access by
direct and, where relevant, indirect
participants and other financial market
utilities, require participants to have
sufficient financial resources and robust
operational capacity to meet obligations
arising from participation in the clearing
agency, and monitor compliance with
such participation requirements on an
ongoing basis.’’ 30 Based on its review of
the record, and for the reasons
discussed below, the Commission finds
that the Proposed Rule Change is
consistent with Rule 17Ad–22(e)(18).31
The Proposed Rule Change would
update the Policy to specify that ICEEU
undertakes ongoing monitoring to
monitor Clearing Member’s adherence
to membership criteria and that ongoing
monitoring consists of continuous
monitoring and additional trigger-based
reviews, including relating to credit and
AML/KYC risk and to daily operational
matters (such as margin calls). Because
these aspects of the Proposed Rule
Change are reasonably designed to help
ensure that ICEU monitors compliance
with its membership criteria on an
ongoing basis, the Commission finds
that the Proposed Rule Change is
consistent with the requirements of Rule
17Ad–22(e)(18).32
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the Proposed
Rule Change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act, and in
particular, Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the
Act 33 and Rules 17Ad–22(e)(2)(i),
(e)(2)(v),34 and (e)(18) thereunder.35
It is therefore ordered pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act that the
Proposed Rule Change (SR–ICEEU–
2023–022) be, and hereby is,
approved.36
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
29 17
18:18 Oct 27, 2023
Jkt 262001
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–98793; File No. SR–
CboeBYX–2023–015]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
BYX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its
Fees Schedule Related to Physical
Port Fees
October 24, 2023.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on October
13, 2023, Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BYX Equities’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BYX Equities’’)
proposes to amend its Fees Schedule.
The text of the proposed rule change is
provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/
equities/regulation/rule_filings/byx/), at
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(2).
30 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(18).
31 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(18).
32 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(18).
33 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
34 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(2).
35 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(18).
36 In approving the Proposed Rule Change, the
Commission considered the proposal’s impacts on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
[FR Doc. 2023–23814 Filed 10–27–23; 8:45 am]
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
37 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74217
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
fee schedule relating to physical
connectivity fees.3
By way of background, a physical port
is utilized by a Member or non-Member
to connect to the Exchange at the data
centers where the Exchange’s servers are
located. The Exchange currently
assesses the following physical
connectivity fees for Members and nonMembers on a monthly basis: $2,500 per
physical port for a 1 gigabit (‘‘Gb’’)
circuit and $7,500 per physical port for
a 10 Gb circuit. The Exchange proposes
to increase the monthly fee for 10 Gb
physical ports from $7,500 to $8,500 per
port. The Exchange notes the proposed
fee change better enables it to continue
to maintain and improve its market
technology and services and also notes
that the proposed fee amount, even as
amended, continues to be in line with,
or even lower than, amounts assessed by
other exchanges for similar
connections.4 The physical ports may
also be used to access the Systems for
the following affiliate exchanges and
only one monthly fee currently (and
will continue) to apply per port: the
Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (options and
equities), Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.
(options and equities platforms), Cboe
3 The Exchange initially filed the proposed fee
changes on July 3, 2023 (SR–CboeBYX–2023–010).
On September 1, 2023, the Exchange withdrew that
filing and submitted SR-CboeBYX–2023–013. On
September 29, 2023, the Securities and Exchange
Commission issued a Suspension of and Order
Instituting Proceedings to Determine whether to
Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change to
Amend its Fees Schedule Related to Physical Port
Fees (the ‘‘OIP’’). On September 29, 2023, the
Exchange filed the proposed fee change (SR–
CboeBYX–2023–014). On October 13, 2023, the
Exchange withdrew that filing and submitted this
filing. No comment letters were received in
connection with any of the foregoing rule filings.
4 See e.g., The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
(‘‘Nasdaq’’), General 8, Connectivity to the
Exchange. Nasdaq and its affiliated exchanges
charge a monthly fee of $15,000 for each 10Gb Ultra
fiber connection to the respective exchange, which
is analogous to the Exchange’s 10Gb physical port.
See also New York Stock Exchange LLC, NYSE
American LLC, NYSE Arca, Inc., NYSE Chicago
Inc., NYSE National, Inc. Connectivity Fee
Schedule, which provides that 10 Gb LX LCN
Circuits (which are analogous to the Exchange’s 10
Gb physical port) are assessed $22,000 per month,
per port.
E:\FR\FM\30OCN1.SGM
30OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 208 (Monday, October 30, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74214-74217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23814]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-98790; File No. SR-ICEEU-2023-022]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Europe Limited; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1,
Relating to Amendments to the Clearing Membership Policy and Clearing
Membership Procedures
October 24, 2023.
I. Introduction
On August 8, 2023, ICE Clear Europe Limited (``ICEEU'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to modify its
Clearing Membership Policy (``Policy'') and Clearing Membership
Procedures (``Procedures''). On August 22, 2023, ICE Clear Europe filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change to make certain changes to
the Exhibits 5A and 5B.\3\ Notice of the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 1, was published for comment in the Federal
Register on August 29, 2023.\4\ The Commission has not received any
comments on the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1
(hereinafter ``Proposed Rule Change''). For the reasons discussed
below, the Commission is approving the Proposed Rule Change.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Amendment No. 1 amends the Exhibit 5A and Exhibit 5B to
correctly reflect the addition of the Document Handling subsection
to each document's Table of Contents. The proposed rule change
includes an Exhibit 4A and Exhibit 4B. Exhibit 4A shows the change
that Amendment No. 1 makes to Exhibit 5A, and Exhibit 4B does the
same with respect to Exhibit 5B.
\4\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98207 (August 23, 2023),
88 FR 59547 (August 29, 2023) (File No. SR-ICEEU-2023-022)
(``Notice'').
\5\ Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the
meanings assigned to them in the Policy or the Procedures or, if not
defined therein, ICE Clear Europe's Clearing Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
ICEEU is registered with the Commission as a clearing agency for
the purpose of clearing security-based swaps. In its role as a clearing
agency for clearing security-based swaps, ICEEU provides services to
its Clearing Members. ICEEU's Clearing Members enter into a Clearing
Membership Agreement with ICEEU and are admitted as clearing members of
ICEEU under Part 2 of ICEEU's clearing rules.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The Clearing Membership Agreement is an agreement between
ICEEU and a Clearing Member under which the Clearing House agrees to
provide clearing in respect of Contracts to that Clearing Member and
that Clearing Member agrees to be bound by and subject to ICEEU's
Clearing Rules. ICE Clear Europe Clearing Rule 101.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As a result of its relationship with its Clearing Members, ICEEU
faces a number of risks. For example, ICEEU's Clearing Members may not
meet membership criteria which ultimately could increase the chances of
both a Clearing Member defaulting and ICEEU needing to use mutualized
funds.\7\ ICEEU manages these risks, and relationships with its
Clearing Members, through the Policy and the Procedures. The Policy
describes ICEEU's membership criteria and related processes for
assessing applicants for membership, on-going monitoring of its
Clearing Members, and termination of its Clearing Members. The
Procedures in turn provide additional detail as to how ICE Clear Europe
applies its policies for reviewing applications for clearing
membership, variations of permissions for Clearing Members, ongoing
monitoring of Clearing Members, and termination of clearing
membership.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Clearing Membership Policy 2.1.
\8\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 93178 (Sept. 29, 2021),
86 FR 55045, 55046 (Oct. 5, 2021) (File No. SR-ICEEU-2021-014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Through the Proposed Rule Change, ICEEU proposes to make changes to
both the Policy and the Procedures.\9\ These proposed changes correct
an improper reference to model documents; clarify that clearing members
must provide notice of certain situations; update sections on
monitoring membership criteria; update sections on document governance;
update the Procedures' clearing membership application process; and
clarify that ICEEU may take certain steps in its absolute discretion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ In addition to the changes described below, ICEEU proposes
various non-substantive changes to the Policy and Procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Correction of Improper Reference to Model Documents in the Policy
The current Policy notes that procedural aspects and relevant
[[Page 74215]]
parameters related to the Policy are set out in the corresponding
procedures and model documents. However, Policy parameters are set
forth in parameter documents, not model documents.\10\ Therefore the
Proposed Rule Change would remove the reference to model documents and
state instead that procedural aspects and relevant parameters related
to the Policy are set out in the corresponding procedures and parameter
documents respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Notice, 88 FR at 59548.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Requiring Clearing Members To Provide Certain Notifications in the
Policy and Procedures
In the ``Objective'' section of the current Policy, ICEEU notes
that it achieves the objectives of the Policy by, among other things,
``includ[ing] relevant notifications to ensure that Clearing Members''
promptly notify ICEEU of certain changes that could impact their
ability to meet ICEEU's membership criteria. The ``Objective'' section
of the current Procedures includes similar language. The Proposed Rule
Change would change this language in both the Policy and the Procedures
to specify that ICEEU achieves the objectives of the Policy and
Procedures by, among other things, ``requir[ing]'' that Clearing
Members promptly notify ICEEU of any changes to their business which
may affect their ability to meet ICEEU's membership criteria.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Monitoring of Membership Criteria in the Policy
The current Policy states that in order to monitor Clearing
Members' on-going adherence to the membership criteria, ICEEU carries
out periodic in-depth counterparty reviews; undertakes a quarterly
review of financial position using Audited Annual Accounts and
quarterly financial information; updates its Counterparty Rating System
on a quarterly basis; maintains a Watch List; requires Clearing Members
to complete an Annual Member Return; and monitors operational matters
daily, including, for example, margin calls and end-of-day price
submissions. ICEEU proposes to remove and consolidate much of this
text. The Policy as revised would state that in order to monitor
Clearing Members' on-going adherence to the membership criteria, ICEEU
carries out periodic in-depth counterparty reviews; undertakes ongoing
monitoring, which consists of continuous monitoring and additional
trigger-based reviews, including relating to credit and AML/KYC risk
and to daily operational matters (such as margin calls); and requires
Clearing Members to complete an Annual Member Return.
ICEEU proposes to remove the text discussing quarterly review of
financial position through Audited Annual Accounts and financial
information, updates to its Counter Party Rating System done quarterly,
and the requirement to maintain a Watch List because these subjects
relate to credit issues that are covered in its Counterparty Credit
Risk Policy and Procedures.\12\ Given the deletion of this text, ICEEU
proposes to remove the sentence noting that information on monitoring
is available in the Clearing Membership Procedures and the Counterparty
Credit Risk Policy because ICEEU believes this cross reference to
support now-deleted references would no longer be necessary.\13\
Finally, ICEEU proposes deleting the sentence that provides that ICEEU
monitors a number of specific operational matters daily because it
would be replaced with the text noting that ICEEU undertakes ongoing
monitoring.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Id.
\13\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Document Governance in the Policy and Procedures
The Proposed Rule Change would update the Document Governance and
Exception Handling sections of both the Policy and the Procedures to
make them consistent with similar document governance provisions in
other ICEEU policies.\14\ The updates would specify that the scope of
the document review encompasses, at a minimum, regulatory compliance,
documentation and purpose, implementation, use, and open items from
previous validations or reviews (where appropriate). The Proposed Rule
Change would also add text identifying the document owner or relevant
staff as the individuals responsible for conducting document reviews to
ensure they are updated and reviewed in accordance with the internal
governance processes. The changes would also specify that the head of
the department (or their delegate) and the Chief Risk Officer (or their
delegate) provide approval for document reviews and that, in some
circumstances, the document review findings are reported to the Model
Oversight Committee, but outside of those circumstances, the document
review's results, including any findings, are reported to the Executive
Risk Committee along with the priority of findings, proposed
remediations, and target due date to remediate the findings. The
updates also would provide that it is the document owner's
responsibility to address any findings, complete internal governance,
and, if necessary, obtain regulatory approvals before the subsequent
annual review is due. Finally, the proposed changes would note that
changes to the Policy and Procedures must be approved in accordance
with ICEEU's governance process and will take effect after completion
of all necessary internal and regulatory approvals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Id. For example, ICEEU recently amended its Recovery Plan
and Outsourcing Policy to make changes similar to those now
proposed. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98337 (Sept. 8,
2023), 88 FR 63149, 63154-55 (Sept. 14, 2023) (File No. SR-ICEEU-
2023-020) (Recovery Plan); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98387
(Sept. 14, 2023), 88 FR 64953, 64955 (Sept. 20, 2023) (File No. SR-
ICEEU-2023-018) (Outsourcing Policy).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Clearing Membership Procedures
The Proposed Rule Change would amend the Clearing Membership
Procedures to make certain clarifications and updates. One proposed
change would clarify that applicants must provide sufficient evidence,
details, and information to ICEEU as required by the Rules, as opposed
to sufficient evidence, details, or information.\15\ Another adds text
indicating that the membership team will ensure that all Applicants are
added to the schedule of insured entities by the ICE Group insurer. The
Proposed Rule Change would also delete a provision noting that after
approval of an application by the Executive Risk Committee, the
relevant Product Risk Committees would be notified of a new application
for clearing membership. ICEEU believes that it is unnecessary to
notify the Product Risk Committees because those committees' duties and
functions are not implicated by a new member being admitted.\16\
ICEEU's proposed amendments would also clarify that ICEEU issues a
Circular confirming approval of a Clearing Member once their
application is approved and move a clause indicating that Clearing
Members are required to respond to additional information requests in a
timely manner statement to a standalone sentence. ICEEU believes
stating this requirement in a standalone sentence makes the information
clearer.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Notice, 88 FR at 59548.
\16\ Id.
\17\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. ICEEU's Absolute Discretion in the Procedures
Throughout the Procedures, ICEEU proposes to add the phrase ``in
its absolute discretion'' in connection with
[[Page 74216]]
certain actions described in the Procedures. Specifically, ICEEU's
proposed changes note that ICEEU has absolute discretion to take
certain actions with respect to its minimum capital requirements,
standards and characteristics of subordinated loans, the acceptability
of a Controller Guarantee, cash or collateral requirements, and its
guaranty fund. ICEEU also proposes changes making clear that it defines
a maximum period between in-depth counterparty reviews and a threshold
for following up with the Clearing Member regarding negative changes to
its financial condition in its absolute discretion. ICEEU believes that
these amendments do not change its existing authority, but more
explicitly state the scope of its discretion.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Discussion and Commission Findings
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act requires the Commission to approve a
proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it finds that
the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act
and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
organization.\19\ For the reasons given below, the Commission finds
that the Proposed Rule Change is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F)
of the Act \20\ and Rules 17Ad-22(e)(2)(i), (e)(2)(v),\21\ and
(e)(18).\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
\21\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(2).
\22\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(18).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Consistency With Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act
Under Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act, ICEEU's rules, among other
things, must be ``designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance
and settlement of securities transactions and, to the extent
applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and transactions, to
assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the
custody or control of the clearing agency or for which it is
responsible . . . and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest . . . .'' \23\ Based on its review of the record, and for the
reasons discussed below, the Commission concludes that ICEEU's Proposed
Rule Change is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted above, ICEEU faces a number of risks as a result of its
relationship with its Clearing Members. These risks include
operational, default, and other risks that could impact or threaten
ICEEU's ability to clear and settle transactions, safeguard securities
and funds which are in its possession or control or for which it is
responsible, or otherwise protect investors and the public interest.
ICEEU manages these risks through, among other things, the Policy and
Procedures. Therefore, improving or enhancing the Policy and Procedures
likewise improves or enhances ICEEU's ability to manage or mitigate the
risks it faces as a result of its relationship with its Clearing
Members.
As discussed above, the Proposed Rule Change would enhance the
Policy and Procedures in a number of ways, including clarifying certain
provisions, highlighting certain important information, removing
incorrect or duplicative information, and ensuring the Policy and
Procedures are consistent with each other and with ICEEU's other
policies and procedures. For example, the Proposed Rule Change would
clarify in both the Policy and Procedures that Clearing Members must
promptly notify ICEEU of any changes to their business which may impact
their ability to meet membership criteria. Additionally, the Proposed
Rule Change would revise the Procedures to clarify that Clearing
Membership applicants must provide sufficient evidence, details, and
information to ICEEU as required by the Rules, that ICEEU will issue a
Circular confirming approval of a Clearing Member once its membership
application is approved, that Clearing Members must respond to
information requests from ICEEU in a timely manner, and that ICEEU has
absolute discretion to take certain steps.\24\ Similarly, the Proposed
Rule Change would update the Policy to note that procedural aspects and
relevant parameters related to the Policy are set out in the
corresponding procedures and parameter documents, rather than model
documents as the current Policy states, and highlight that procedural
aspects related to the Policy are set out in the corresponding
procedures. The Proposed Rule Change also would delete as unnecessary
and duplicative certain information related to its monitoring of
Clearing Members' financial information because that information is
addressed in other ICEEU policies.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ Notice, 88 FR at 59548.
\25\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Proposed Rule Change will help clarify the Policy and
Procedures and ensure that they are accurate and consistent both with
each other and with ICEEU's other policies and procedures, which will
enhance the ability of ICEEU and its stakeholders to understand the
Policy and Procedures and apply them accurately and consistently.
Ensuring the Policy and Procedures are easily understood and applied
accurately and consistently will, in turn, help ensure that ICEEU
effectively manages and mitigates the operational and other risks
presented by its relationship with Clearing Members, thereby supporting
ICEEU's ability to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions, assure the safeguarding of
securities and funds which are in ICEEU's custody or control or for
which it is responsible, and protect investors and the public interest.
For these reasons, the Commission finds that the Proposed Rule
Change is consistent with the requirements of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of
the Act.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Consistency With Rule 17Ad-22(e)(2)(i) and (v)
Rules 17Ad-22(e)(2)(i) and (v) require ICEEU to ``establish,
implement, maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures
reasonably designed to . . . provide for governance arrangements that
are clear and transparent . . . and specify clear and direct lines of
responsibility.'' \27\ Based on its review of the record, and for the
reasons discussed below, the Commission finds that the Proposed Rule
Change is consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(e)(2)(i) and (v).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Proposed Rule Change clearly defines responsibilities for a
number of ICEEU employees. For instance, in both the Policy and
Procedures, the Proposed Rule Change identifies the document owner and
relevant staff as responsible for conducting document reviews,
remediating findings, completing internal governance, and receiving
regulatory approvals. The Proposed Rule Change also would add text to
the Procedures that makes clear that the Membership team will ensure
that all Applicants are added to the schedule of insured entities by
the ICE Group insurer, and would remove as unnecessary text requiring
notification of the relevant Product Risk Committees of new
applications for clearing membership.\28\ By defining who has or does
not have responsibilities and making this information readily available
in the Policy and Procedures the Proposed Rule Change achieves clarity
and transparency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ Notice, 88 FR at 59548.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission finds, therefore, that the Proposed Rule Change is
consistent
[[Page 74217]]
with the requirements of Rule 17Ad-22(e)(2)(i) and (v).\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Consistency With Rule 17Ad-22(e)(18)
Rule 17Ad-22(e)(18) requires ICEEU to ``establish, implement,
maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably
designed to . . . establish objective, risk-based, and publicly
disclosed criteria for participation, which permit fair and open access
by direct and, where relevant, indirect participants and other
financial market utilities, require participants to have sufficient
financial resources and robust operational capacity to meet obligations
arising from participation in the clearing agency, and monitor
compliance with such participation requirements on an ongoing basis.''
\30\ Based on its review of the record, and for the reasons discussed
below, the Commission finds that the Proposed Rule Change is consistent
with Rule 17Ad-22(e)(18).\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(18).
\31\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(18).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Proposed Rule Change would update the Policy to specify that
ICEEU undertakes ongoing monitoring to monitor Clearing Member's
adherence to membership criteria and that ongoing monitoring consists
of continuous monitoring and additional trigger-based reviews,
including relating to credit and AML/KYC risk and to daily operational
matters (such as margin calls). Because these aspects of the Proposed
Rule Change are reasonably designed to help ensure that ICEU monitors
compliance with its membership criteria on an ongoing basis, the
Commission finds that the Proposed Rule Change is consistent with the
requirements of Rule 17Ad-22(e)(18).\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(18).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
Proposed Rule Change is consistent with the requirements of the Act,
and in particular, Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \33\ and Rules 17Ad-
22(e)(2)(i), (e)(2)(v),\34\ and (e)(18) thereunder.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
\34\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(2).
\35\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(18).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is therefore ordered pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act
that the Proposed Rule Change (SR-ICEEU-2023-022) be, and hereby is,
approved.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ In approving the Proposed Rule Change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impacts on efficiency, competition, and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-23814 Filed 10-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P