Certain Graphics Systems, Components Thereof, and Digital Televisions Containing the Same; Notice of Commission Determination To Review in Part a Final Initial Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Request for Written Submissions on the Issues Under Review and on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding, 72537-72539 [2023-23150]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 202 / Friday, October 20, 2023 / Notices
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1318]
Certain Graphics Systems,
Components Thereof, and Digital
Televisions Containing the Same;
Notice of Commission Determination
To Review in Part a Final Initial
Determination Finding a Violation of
Section 337; Request for Written
Submissions on the Issues Under
Review and on Remedy, the Public
Interest, and Bonding
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that on
July 7, 2023, the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued
a combined final initial determination
(‘‘ID’’) finding a violation of section 337
and recommended determination
(‘‘RD’’) on remedy and bonding in the
above-captioned investigation. The
Commission has determined to review
the final ID in part. The Commission
requests written submissions from the
parties on the issues under review and
submissions from the parties, interested
government agencies, and interested
persons on the issues of remedy, the
public interest, and bonding, under the
schedule set forth below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard P. Hadorn, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3179. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone
(202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on June 7, 2022, based on a complaint
filed by Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
of Santa Clara, California and ATI
Technologies ULC of Ontario, Canada
(together, ‘‘AMD’’). 87 FR 34718–19
(June 7, 2022). The complaint, as
supplemented, alleges violations of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section
337’’), based on certain graphics
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:20 Oct 19, 2023
Jkt 262001
systems, components thereof, and
digital televisions containing the same
by reason of infringement of certain
claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,742,053
(‘‘the ’053 patent’’); 8,760,454 (‘‘the ’454
patent’’); 11,184,628 (‘‘the 628 patent’’);
8,468,547 (‘‘the ’547 patent’’); and
8,854,381 (‘‘the ’381 patent’’). Id. at
34718. The complaint further alleges
that a domestic industry (‘‘DI’’) exists.
Id. The notice of investigation (‘‘NOI’’)
named 14 respondents: (1) TCL
Industries Holdings Co., Ltd. of
Guangdong, China; (2) TCL Industries
Holdings (H.K.) Co. Limited of Hong
Kong, China; (3) TCL Electronics
Holdings Ltd. f/k/a TCL Multimedia
Technology Holdings, Ltd. of Hong
Kong, China; (4) TCL Technology Group
Corporation of Guangdong, China; (5)
TTE Corporation of Hong Kong, China;
(6) TCL Holdings (BVI) Ltd. of Hong
Kong, China; (7) TCL King Electrical
Appliances (Huizhou) Co. Ltd. of
Guangdong, China; (8) Shenzhen TCL
New Technology Co., Ltd. of
Guangdong, China; (9) TCL MOKA
International Ltd. of Hong Kong, China;
(10) TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co.,
Ltd. of Binh Duong Province, Vietnam;
(11) Manufacturas Avanzadas SA de CV
of Chihuahua, Mexico; (12) TCL
Electronics Mexico, S de RL de CV of
Benito Juarez, Mexico; (13) TCL
Overseas Marketing Ltd. of Hong Kong,
China (collectively, ‘‘TCL’’); and (14)
RealTek Semiconductor Corporation of
Hsinchu, Taiwan (‘‘Realtek’’). Id. at
34719, as amended, 87 FR 62452–53
(Oct. 14, 2022). The Office of Unfair
Import Investigations is not named as a
party to this investigation. 87 FR at
34719.
On August 4, 2022, the Commission
terminated the investigation as to the
’454 patent. See Order No. 10 (July 14,
2022), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice
(Aug. 4, 2022).
On September 26, 2022, the
Commission allowed non-party TTE
Technology, Inc. of Corona, California to
intervene in this investigation as an
additional respondent (collectively,
with all others, ‘‘Respondents’’). See
Order No. 17 (Aug. 30, 2022),
unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Sept.
26, 2022).
On October 7, 2022, the Commission
terminated the investigation as to claims
17–21 of the ’547 patent and amended
the complaint and NOI to correct the
names of two respondents by changing
‘‘TCL Industries Holdings (H.K.)
Limited’’ to ‘‘TCL Industries Holdings
(H.K.) Co. Limited,’’ and ‘‘Shenzhen
TCL New Technologies Co., Ltd.’’ to
‘‘Shenzhen TCL New Technology Co.,
Ltd.’’. See Order Nos. 23 (Sept. 20, 2022)
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72537
and 24 (Sept. 20, 2022), unreviewed by
87 FR 62452–53 (Oct. 14, 2022).
On February 22, 2023, the
Commission terminated the
investigation as to the ’547 patent. See
Order No. 56 (Jan. 24, 2023), unreviewed
by Comm’n Notice (Feb. 22, 2023). On
March 7, 2023, the Commission
terminated the investigation as to claims
1–4 and 7 of the ’053 patent and claims
8, 11, and 12 of the ’628 patent. See
Order No. 64 (Feb. 7, 2023), unreviewed
by Comm’n Notice (Mar. 7, 2023).
On March 15, 2023, the Commission
granted summary determination that the
economic prong of the DI requirement
has been satisfied in this investigation
as to the remaining asserted patents—
i.e., the ’053, ’628, and ’381 patents. See
Order No. 62 (Feb. 6, 2023), aff’d by
Comm’n Notice (Mar. 15, 2023).
On March 30, 2023, the Commission
terminated the investigation as to claim
8 of the ’053 patent and claim 18 of the
’381 patent. See Order No. 70 (Mar. 14,
2023), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice
(Mar. 30, 2023). On April 19, 2023, the
Commission terminated the
investigation as to the ’628 patent. See
Order No. 72 (Apr. 3, 2023), unreviewed
by Comm’n Notice (Apr. 19, 2023).
On July 7, 2023, the ALJ issued the
subject final ID on violation and RD on
remedy and bonding. The ID finds no
violation of section 337 as to the ’053
patent, but does find a violation as to
claims 19 and 20 of the ’381 patent. The
RD recommends that, should the
Commission determine that a violation
of section 337 has occurred, the
Commission should: (i) issue a limited
exclusion order against the
Respondents’ infringing products; (ii)
issue a cease and desist order against all
the Respondents, except for Realtek and
TTE; and (iii) issue no bond for
importations of infringing products
during the period of Presidential review.
On July 21, 2023, AMD filed a
contingent petition seeking review of
certain findings in the ID, including
non-infringement of the asserted claims
of the ’053 patent and claim
construction and invalidity as to claims
15–17 of the ’381 patent. That same day,
Respondents filed a petition seeking
review of certain of the ID’s findings
concerning claim construction,
infringement, validity, and the technical
prong of the DI requirement as to claims
19 and 20 of the ’381 patent.
Respondents also contingently petition
for review of certain findings on claim
construction, infringement, validity, and
the technical prong of the DI
requirement as to the asserted claims of
the ’053 patent and claims 15–17 of the
’381 patent. On July 31, 2023, AMD and
E:\FR\FM\20OCN1.SGM
20OCN1
72538
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 202 / Friday, October 20, 2023 / Notices
Respondents each filed a response
opposing the other’s petition.
The Commission did not receive
submissions on the public interest from
the parties pursuant to Commission
Rule 210.50(a)(4), 19 CFR 210.50(a)(4).
The Commission also did not receive
any submissions on the public interest
from members of the public in response
to the Commission’s Federal Register
notice. See 88 FR 48262–63 (July 26,
2023).
Having reviewed the record of the
investigation, including the final ID, the
parties’ submissions to the ALJ, the
petitions, and the responses thereto, the
Commission has determined to review
the ID in part. Specifically, the
Commission has determined to review
the ID’s findings regarding the
construction of limitation 5[c] (‘‘a
plurality of command processing
engines, coupled to the arbiter, each
operable to receive and process the
command thread’’), as well as
infringement and satisfaction of the
technical prong of the DI requirement
with respect to limitation 5[c] of claim
5 of the ’053 patent. On review, the
Commission has determined to take no
position on those issues. The
Commission has also determined to
review the ID’s finding regarding
infringement of claim 19 of the ’381
patent. The Commission has determined
not to review the remaining findings in
the ID.
In connection with its review, the
Commission requests responses to the
following question. The parties are
requested to brief their positions with
reference to the applicable law and the
existing evidentiary record.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
(1) Whether the accused products practice
the limitation ‘‘based on respective state data
associated with each of the first [graphicsprocessing task] and second [generalcompute] tasks’’ as required by claim 19 of
the ’381 patent under the ID’s construction of
‘‘based on respective state data.’’ Provide
citations to record evidence in support of
your position.
The parties are invited to brief only the
discrete issue requested above. The
parties are not to brief other issues on
review, which are adequately presented
in the parties’ existing filings.
In connection with the final
disposition of this investigation, the
statute authorizes issuance of, inter alia,
(1) an exclusion order that could result
in the exclusion of the subject articles
from entry into the United States; and/
or (2) cease and desist orders that could
result in the respondents being required
to cease and desist from engaging in
unfair acts in the importation and sale
of such articles. Accordingly, the
Commission is interested in receiving
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:20 Oct 19, 2023
Jkt 262001
written submissions that address the
form of remedy, if any, that should be
ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an
article from entry into the United States
for purposes other than entry for
consumption, the party should so
indicate and provide information
establishing that activities involving
other types of entry either are adversely
affecting it or likely to do so. For
background, see Certain Devices for
Connecting Computers via Telephone
Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360, USITC
Pub. No. 2843, Comm’n Op. at 7–10
(Dec. 1994).
The statute requires the Commission
to consider the effects of that remedy
upon the public interest. The public
interest factors the Commission will
consider include the effect that an
exclusion order and cease and desist
orders would have on: (1) the public
health and welfare, (2) competitive
conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S.
production of articles that are like or
directly competitive with those that are
subject to investigation, and (4) U.S.
consumers. The Commission is
therefore interested in receiving written
submissions that address the
aforementioned public interest factors
in the context of this investigation.
If the Commission orders some form
of remedy, the U.S. Trade
Representative, as delegated by the
President, has 60 days to approve,
disapprove, or take no action on the
Commission’s determination. See
Presidential Memorandum of July 21,
2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005).
During this period, the subject articles
would be entitled to enter the United
States under bond, in an amount
determined by the Commission and
prescribed by the Secretary of the
Treasury. The Commission is therefore
interested in receiving submissions
concerning the amount of the bond that
should be imposed if a remedy is
ordered.
Written Submissions: The parties to
the investigation are requested to file
written submissions on the issue
identified in this notice. Parties to the
investigation, interested government
agencies, and any other interested
parties are encouraged to file written
submissions on the issues of remedy,
the public interest, and bonding. Such
submissions should address the
recommended determination by the ALJ
on remedy and bonding.
In its initial written submission, AMD
is also requested to identify the remedy
sought and to submit proposed remedial
orders for the Commission’s
consideration. AMD is further requested
to state the dates that the asserted
patents expire, to provide the HTSUS
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
subheadings under which the accused
products are imported, and to supply
the identification information for all
known importers of the products at
issue in this investigation.
The initial written submissions and
proposed remedial orders must be filed
no later than close of business on
October 30, 2023. Reply submissions
must be filed no later than the close of
business on November 6, 2023. No
further submissions on these issues will
be permitted unless otherwise ordered
by the Commission. Opening
submissions are limited to 40 pages.
Reply submissions are limited to 25
pages. No further submissions on any of
these issues will be permitted unless
otherwise ordered by the Commission.
Persons filing written submissions
must file the original document
electronically on or before the deadlines
stated above. The Commission’s paper
filing requirements in 19 CFR 210.4(f)
are currently waived. 85 FR 15798 (Mar.
19, 2020). Submissions should refer to
the investigation number (Inv. No. 337–
TA–1318) in a prominent place on the
cover page and/or the first page. (See
Handbook for Electronic Filing
Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/
documents/handbook_on_filing_
procedures.pdf). Persons with questions
regarding filing should contact the
Secretary (202–205–2000).
Any person desiring to submit a
document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential
treatment by marking each document
with a header indicating that the
document contains confidential
information. This marking will be
deemed to satisfy the request procedure
set forth in Rules 201.6(b) and
210.5(e)(2) (19 CFR 201.6(b) &
210.5(e)(2)). Documents for which
confidential treatment by the
Commission is properly sought will be
treated accordingly. Any non-party
wishing to submit comments containing
confidential information must serve
those comments on the parties to the
investigation pursuant to the applicable
Administrative Protective Order. A
redacted non-confidential version of the
document must also be filed with the
Commission and served on any parties
to the investigation within two business
days of any confidential filing. All
information, including confidential
business information and documents for
which confidential treatment is properly
sought, submitted to the Commission for
purposes of this investigation may be
disclosed to and used: (i) by the
Commission, its employees and Offices,
and contract personnel (a) for
developing or maintaining the records
of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in
E:\FR\FM\20OCN1.SGM
20OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 202 / Friday, October 20, 2023 / Notices
internal investigations, audits, reviews,
and evaluations relating to the
programs, personnel, and operations of
the Commission including under 5
U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S.
government employees and contract
personnel, solely for cybersecurity
purposes. All contract personnel will
sign appropriate nondisclosure
agreements. All nonconfidential written
submissions will be available for public
inspection on EDIS.
The Commission vote for this
determination took place on October 16,
2023.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 16, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023–23150 Filed 10–19–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice: 23–106]
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of information collection.
AGENCY:
The National Aeronautics and
Space Administration, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing information collections.
DATES: Comments are due by November
20, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for this information
collection should be sent within 30 days
of publication of this notice to
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Find this particular information
collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under
30-day Review—Open for Public
Comments’’ or by using the search
function.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument(s) and instructions should
18:20 Oct 19, 2023
Jkt 262001
I. Abstract
The ESODIS customer satisfaction
survey is performed each year (2023 is
the 20th collection) under the auspices
of NASA HQ as one of their metrics
reported to OMB as a part of the
Reduction of Paperwork Act. In this
survey, the public users of the EOSDIS
system (through the 12 Distributed
Active Archive Centers—DAACs) are
encouraged to answer specific questions
that aid NASA discern the overall user
satisfaction of its Earth data system.
NASA through DOI/FCG contracts the
management of this survey to a private
survey entity (CFI) so that the
respondents are assured the survey and
its results are collected in a unbiased
manner. The survey has two portions, a
general section of questions to
understand aspects of the data system
the user has engaged with, and a second
section that is created by each of the 12
DAACs so that these centers can address
specific types of questions for that
science domain community.
II. Methods of Collection
The collection of data from our
respondents to wholly performed using
an on-line, internet-based system that is
developed and hosted by CFI.
Information Collection: NASA Earth
Observing System Data and
Information System 2023 Customer
Satisfaction Questionnaire
VerDate Sep<11>2014
be directed to Bill Edwards-Bodmer,
NASA Clearance Officer, NASA
Headquarters, 300 E Street SW, JF0000,
Washington, DC 20546, 757–864–7998,
or b.edwards-bodmer@nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
III. Data
Title: The Annual EOSDIS Customer
Satisfaction (ACSI) User Survey.
OMB Number: 2700–xxxx.
Type of review: New.
Affected Public: Individuals.
Estimated Annual Number of
Activities: 10,000.
Estimated Number of Respondents
per Activity: 1.
Annual Responses: 10,000.
Estimated Time per Response: 15
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 2,500.
Estimated Total Annual Cost:
$118,000.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of NASA, including
whether the information collected has
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
NASA’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72539
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including automated
collection techniques or the use of other
forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection.
They will also become a matter of
public record.
William Edwards-Bodmer,
NASA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023–23241 Filed 10–19–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Sunshine Act Meetings
The National Science Board’s (NSB)
NSB–NSF Commission on Merit Review
hereby gives notice of the scheduling of
a videoconference meeting for the
transaction of National Science Board
business pursuant to the National
Science Foundation Act and the
Government in the Sunshine Act.
TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, October 25,
2023, from 12 p.m.–1 p.m. EDT.
PLACE: This meeting will be held by
videoconference through the National
Science Foundation.
STATUS: Open.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The agenda
of the meeting is: Commission Chair’s
opening remarks; Discussion of the
evaluation of Merit Review criteria;
Commission Chair’s closing remarks.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Point of contact for this meeting is:
(Chris Blair, cblair@nsf.gov), 703/292–
7000. Members of the public can
observe this meeting through a YouTube
livestream. The YouTube link will be
available from the NSB web page.
Christopher Blair,
Executive Assistant to the National Science
Board Office.
[FR Doc. 2023–23310 Filed 10–18–23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2023–0001]
Sunshine Act Meetings
Weeks of October 23, 30,
November 6, 13, 20, 27, 2023. The
schedule for Commission meetings is
subject to change on short notice. The
NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can
TIME AND DATE:
E:\FR\FM\20OCN1.SGM
20OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 202 (Friday, October 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72537-72539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23150]
[[Page 72537]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1318]
Certain Graphics Systems, Components Thereof, and Digital
Televisions Containing the Same; Notice of Commission Determination To
Review in Part a Final Initial Determination Finding a Violation of
Section 337; Request for Written Submissions on the Issues Under Review
and on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that on July 7, 2023, the presiding
administrative law judge (``ALJ'') issued a combined final initial
determination (``ID'') finding a violation of section 337 and
recommended determination (``RD'') on remedy and bonding in the above-
captioned investigation. The Commission has determined to review the
final ID in part. The Commission requests written submissions from the
parties on the issues under review and submissions from the parties,
interested government agencies, and interested persons on the issues of
remedy, the public interest, and bonding, under the schedule set forth
below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard P. Hadorn, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3179. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal, telephone (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on June 7, 2022, based on a complaint filed by Advanced Micro Devices,
Inc. of Santa Clara, California and ATI Technologies ULC of Ontario,
Canada (together, ``AMD''). 87 FR 34718-19 (June 7, 2022). The
complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (``section 337''), based
on certain graphics systems, components thereof, and digital
televisions containing the same by reason of infringement of certain
claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,742,053 (``the '053 patent''); 8,760,454
(``the '454 patent''); 11,184,628 (``the 628 patent''); 8,468,547
(``the '547 patent''); and 8,854,381 (``the '381 patent''). Id. at
34718. The complaint further alleges that a domestic industry (``DI'')
exists. Id. The notice of investigation (``NOI'') named 14 respondents:
(1) TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd. of Guangdong, China; (2) TCL
Industries Holdings (H.K.) Co. Limited of Hong Kong, China; (3) TCL
Electronics Holdings Ltd. f/k/a TCL Multimedia Technology Holdings,
Ltd. of Hong Kong, China; (4) TCL Technology Group Corporation of
Guangdong, China; (5) TTE Corporation of Hong Kong, China; (6) TCL
Holdings (BVI) Ltd. of Hong Kong, China; (7) TCL King Electrical
Appliances (Huizhou) Co. Ltd. of Guangdong, China; (8) Shenzhen TCL New
Technology Co., Ltd. of Guangdong, China; (9) TCL MOKA International
Ltd. of Hong Kong, China; (10) TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co., Ltd. of
Binh Duong Province, Vietnam; (11) Manufacturas Avanzadas SA de CV of
Chihuahua, Mexico; (12) TCL Electronics Mexico, S de RL de CV of Benito
Juarez, Mexico; (13) TCL Overseas Marketing Ltd. of Hong Kong, China
(collectively, ``TCL''); and (14) RealTek Semiconductor Corporation of
Hsinchu, Taiwan (``Realtek''). Id. at 34719, as amended, 87 FR 62452-53
(Oct. 14, 2022). The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is not
named as a party to this investigation. 87 FR at 34719.
On August 4, 2022, the Commission terminated the investigation as
to the '454 patent. See Order No. 10 (July 14, 2022), unreviewed by
Comm'n Notice (Aug. 4, 2022).
On September 26, 2022, the Commission allowed non-party TTE
Technology, Inc. of Corona, California to intervene in this
investigation as an additional respondent (collectively, with all
others, ``Respondents''). See Order No. 17 (Aug. 30, 2022), unreviewed
by Comm'n Notice (Sept. 26, 2022).
On October 7, 2022, the Commission terminated the investigation as
to claims 17-21 of the '547 patent and amended the complaint and NOI to
correct the names of two respondents by changing ``TCL Industries
Holdings (H.K.) Limited'' to ``TCL Industries Holdings (H.K.) Co.
Limited,'' and ``Shenzhen TCL New Technologies Co., Ltd.'' to
``Shenzhen TCL New Technology Co., Ltd.''. See Order Nos. 23 (Sept. 20,
2022) and 24 (Sept. 20, 2022), unreviewed by 87 FR 62452-53 (Oct. 14,
2022).
On February 22, 2023, the Commission terminated the investigation
as to the '547 patent. See Order No. 56 (Jan. 24, 2023), unreviewed by
Comm'n Notice (Feb. 22, 2023). On March 7, 2023, the Commission
terminated the investigation as to claims 1-4 and 7 of the '053 patent
and claims 8, 11, and 12 of the '628 patent. See Order No. 64 (Feb. 7,
2023), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Mar. 7, 2023).
On March 15, 2023, the Commission granted summary determination
that the economic prong of the DI requirement has been satisfied in
this investigation as to the remaining asserted patents--i.e., the
'053, '628, and '381 patents. See Order No. 62 (Feb. 6, 2023), aff'd by
Comm'n Notice (Mar. 15, 2023).
On March 30, 2023, the Commission terminated the investigation as
to claim 8 of the '053 patent and claim 18 of the '381 patent. See
Order No. 70 (Mar. 14, 2023), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Mar. 30,
2023). On April 19, 2023, the Commission terminated the investigation
as to the '628 patent. See Order No. 72 (Apr. 3, 2023), unreviewed by
Comm'n Notice (Apr. 19, 2023).
On July 7, 2023, the ALJ issued the subject final ID on violation
and RD on remedy and bonding. The ID finds no violation of section 337
as to the '053 patent, but does find a violation as to claims 19 and 20
of the '381 patent. The RD recommends that, should the Commission
determine that a violation of section 337 has occurred, the Commission
should: (i) issue a limited exclusion order against the Respondents'
infringing products; (ii) issue a cease and desist order against all
the Respondents, except for Realtek and TTE; and (iii) issue no bond
for importations of infringing products during the period of
Presidential review.
On July 21, 2023, AMD filed a contingent petition seeking review of
certain findings in the ID, including non-infringement of the asserted
claims of the '053 patent and claim construction and invalidity as to
claims 15-17 of the '381 patent. That same day, Respondents filed a
petition seeking review of certain of the ID's findings concerning
claim construction, infringement, validity, and the technical prong of
the DI requirement as to claims 19 and 20 of the '381 patent.
Respondents also contingently petition for review of certain findings
on claim construction, infringement, validity, and the technical prong
of the DI requirement as to the asserted claims of the '053 patent and
claims 15-17 of the '381 patent. On July 31, 2023, AMD and
[[Page 72538]]
Respondents each filed a response opposing the other's petition.
The Commission did not receive submissions on the public interest
from the parties pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(a)(4), 19 CFR
210.50(a)(4). The Commission also did not receive any submissions on
the public interest from members of the public in response to the
Commission's Federal Register notice. See 88 FR 48262-63 (July 26,
2023).
Having reviewed the record of the investigation, including the
final ID, the parties' submissions to the ALJ, the petitions, and the
responses thereto, the Commission has determined to review the ID in
part. Specifically, the Commission has determined to review the ID's
findings regarding the construction of limitation 5[c] (``a plurality
of command processing engines, coupled to the arbiter, each operable to
receive and process the command thread''), as well as infringement and
satisfaction of the technical prong of the DI requirement with respect
to limitation 5[c] of claim 5 of the '053 patent. On review, the
Commission has determined to take no position on those issues. The
Commission has also determined to review the ID's finding regarding
infringement of claim 19 of the '381 patent. The Commission has
determined not to review the remaining findings in the ID.
In connection with its review, the Commission requests responses to
the following question. The parties are requested to brief their
positions with reference to the applicable law and the existing
evidentiary record.
(1) Whether the accused products practice the limitation ``based
on respective state data associated with each of the first
[graphics-processing task] and second [general-compute] tasks'' as
required by claim 19 of the '381 patent under the ID's construction
of ``based on respective state data.'' Provide citations to record
evidence in support of your position.
The parties are invited to brief only the discrete issue requested
above. The parties are not to brief other issues on review, which are
adequately presented in the parties' existing filings.
In connection with the final disposition of this investigation, the
statute authorizes issuance of, inter alia, (1) an exclusion order that
could result in the exclusion of the subject articles from entry into
the United States; and/or (2) cease and desist orders that could result
in the respondents being required to cease and desist from engaging in
unfair acts in the importation and sale of such articles. Accordingly,
the Commission is interested in receiving written submissions that
address the form of remedy, if any, that should be ordered. If a party
seeks exclusion of an article from entry into the United States for
purposes other than entry for consumption, the party should so indicate
and provide information establishing that activities involving other
types of entry either are adversely affecting it or likely to do so.
For background, see Certain Devices for Connecting Computers via
Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337-TA-360, USITC Pub. No. 2843, Comm'n Op.
at 7-10 (Dec. 1994).
The statute requires the Commission to consider the effects of that
remedy upon the public interest. The public interest factors the
Commission will consider include the effect that an exclusion order and
cease and desist orders would have on: (1) the public health and
welfare, (2) competitive conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S.
production of articles that are like or directly competitive with those
that are subject to investigation, and (4) U.S. consumers. The
Commission is therefore interested in receiving written submissions
that address the aforementioned public interest factors in the context
of this investigation.
If the Commission orders some form of remedy, the U.S. Trade
Representative, as delegated by the President, has 60 days to approve,
disapprove, or take no action on the Commission's determination. See
Presidential Memorandum of July 21, 2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005).
During this period, the subject articles would be entitled to enter the
United States under bond, in an amount determined by the Commission and
prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. The Commission is
therefore interested in receiving submissions concerning the amount of
the bond that should be imposed if a remedy is ordered.
Written Submissions: The parties to the investigation are requested
to file written submissions on the issue identified in this notice.
Parties to the investigation, interested government agencies, and any
other interested parties are encouraged to file written submissions on
the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. Such
submissions should address the recommended determination by the ALJ on
remedy and bonding.
In its initial written submission, AMD is also requested to
identify the remedy sought and to submit proposed remedial orders for
the Commission's consideration. AMD is further requested to state the
dates that the asserted patents expire, to provide the HTSUS
subheadings under which the accused products are imported, and to
supply the identification information for all known importers of the
products at issue in this investigation.
The initial written submissions and proposed remedial orders must
be filed no later than close of business on October 30, 2023. Reply
submissions must be filed no later than the close of business on
November 6, 2023. No further submissions on these issues will be
permitted unless otherwise ordered by the Commission. Opening
submissions are limited to 40 pages. Reply submissions are limited to
25 pages. No further submissions on any of these issues will be
permitted unless otherwise ordered by the Commission.
Persons filing written submissions must file the original document
electronically on or before the deadlines stated above. The
Commission's paper filing requirements in 19 CFR 210.4(f) are currently
waived. 85 FR 15798 (Mar. 19, 2020). Submissions should refer to the
investigation number (Inv. No. 337-TA-1318) in a prominent place on the
cover page and/or the first page. (See Handbook for Electronic Filing
Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf). Persons with questions regarding
filing should contact the Secretary (202-205-2000).
Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential treatment by marking each document
with a header indicating that the document contains confidential
information. This marking will be deemed to satisfy the request
procedure set forth in Rules 201.6(b) and 210.5(e)(2) (19 CFR 201.6(b)
& 210.5(e)(2)). Documents for which confidential treatment by the
Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. Any non-
party wishing to submit comments containing confidential information
must serve those comments on the parties to the investigation pursuant
to the applicable Administrative Protective Order. A redacted non-
confidential version of the document must also be filed with the
Commission and served on any parties to the investigation within two
business days of any confidential filing. All information, including
confidential business information and documents for which confidential
treatment is properly sought, submitted to the Commission for purposes
of this investigation may be disclosed to and used: (i) by the
Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract personnel (a) for
developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding,
or (b) in
[[Page 72539]]
internal investigations, audits, reviews, and evaluations relating to
the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including
under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and
contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity purposes. All contract
personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements. All
nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public
inspection on EDIS.
The Commission vote for this determination took place on October
16, 2023.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 16, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-23150 Filed 10-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P