Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule Regarding Rebate Tiers, 70428-70431 [2023-22437]
Download as PDF
70428
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 11, 2023 / Notices
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–98684; File No. SR–
CboeBZX–2023–075]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its
Fee Schedule Regarding Rebate Tiers
October 4, 2023.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 29, 2023, Cboe BZX
Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or
‘‘BZX’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’) proposes to
amend its Fee Schedule. The text of the
proposed rule change is provided in
Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/
equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1 15
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:49 Oct 10, 2023
Jkt 262001
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Fee Schedule applicable to its equities
trading platform (‘‘BZX Equities’’) by (1)
discontinuing Step-Up Tier 1; and (2)
adopting a new Cross Asset Tier. The
Exchange proposes to implement these
changes effective October 2, 2023.
The Exchange first notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive or
incentives to be insufficient. More
specifically, the Exchange is only one of
16 registered equities exchanges, as well
as a number of alternative trading
systems and other off-exchange venues
that do not have similar self-regulatory
responsibilities under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’), to
which market participants may direct
their order flow. Based on publicly
available information,3 no single
registered equities exchange has more
than 14% of the market share. Thus, in
such a low-concentrated and highly
competitive market, no single equities
exchange possesses significant pricing
power in the execution of order flow.
The Exchange in particular operates a
‘‘Maker-Taker’’ model whereby it pays
rebates to members that add liquidity
and assesses fees to those that remove
liquidity. The Exchange’s Fee Schedule
sets forth the standard rebates and rates
applied per share for orders that provide
and remove liquidity, respectively.
Currently, for orders in securities priced
at or above $1.00, the Exchange
provides a standard rebate of $0.00160
per share for orders that add liquidity
and assesses a fee of $0.0030 per share
for orders that remove liquidity.4 For
orders in securities priced below $1.00,
the Exchange provides a standard rebate
of $0.00009 per share for orders that add
liquidity and assesses a fee of 0.30% of
the total dollar value for orders that
remove liquidity.5 Additionally, in
response to the competitive
environment, the Exchange also offers
tiered pricing which provides Members
opportunities to qualify for higher
rebates or reduced fees where certain
volume criteria and thresholds are met.
Tiered pricing provides an incremental
3 See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market
Volume Summary, Month-to-Date (September 22,
2023), available at https://www.cboe.com/us/
equities/_statistics/.
4 See BZX Equities Fee Schedule, Standard Rates.
5 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
incentive for Members to strive for
higher tier levels, which provides
increasingly higher benefits or discounts
for satisfying increasingly more
stringent criteria.
Under footnote 2 of the Fee Schedule,
the Exchange currently offers various
Step-Up Tiers that provide enhanced
rebates for orders yielding fee codes B,6
V 7 and Y 8 where a Member reaches
certain add volume-based criteria,
including ‘‘growing’’ its volume over a
certain baseline month. The Exchange
now proposes to discontinue Step-Up
Tier 1 as the Exchange no longer wishes
to, nor is required to, maintain such tier.
More specifically, the proposed change
removes this tier as the Exchange would
rather redirect future resources and
funding into other programs and tiers
intended to incentivize increased order
flow.
The Exchange also proposes to
introduce a new Cross Asset Tier under
footnote 2, which is designed to
incentivize Members to achieve certain
levels of participation on both the
Exchange’s equities and options
platform (‘‘BZX Options’’). The
proposed criteria is as follows:
• Cross Asset Tier 1 provides a rebate
of $0.0033 per share for securities
priced above $1.00 for qualifying orders
(i.e., orders yielding fee codes B, V or Y)
where (1) Member has a Step-Up
ADAV 9 from June 2023 ≥ 7,000,000;
and (2) Member has a Customer
ADAV 10 on BZX Options ≥ 10,000.
The proposed Cross Asset Tier is
intended to provide an additional
manner to incentive Members to add
displayed liquidity on the Exchange
while also increasing participation on
BZX Options. The Exchange believes
the addition of the Cross Asset Tier will
incentivize Members to grow their
volume on the Exchange, thereby
contributing to a deeper and more liquid
market, which benefits all market
participants and provides greater
execution opportunities on the
Exchange.
Additionally, the Exchange notes that
the proposed Cross Asset Tier will
6 Fee code B is appended to orders that add
liquidity to BZX in Tape B securities.
7 Fee code V is appended to orders that add
liquidity to BZX in Tape A securities.
8 Fee code Y is appended to orders that add
liquidity to BZX in Tape C securities.
9 Step-Up ADAV means ADAV in the relevant
baseline month subtracted from current ADAV.
ADAV means average daily volume calculated as
the number of shares added per day. ADAV is
calculated on a monthly basis.
10 Customer ADAV means average daily volume
calculated as the number of contracts added for the
account of a Priority Customer as defined in BZX
Rule 16.1. ADAV is calculated on a monthly basis.
See BZX Options Fee Schedule, Definitions.
E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM
11OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 11, 2023 / Notices
expire no later than December 31, 2023,
which the Exchange will indicate on the
Exchange’s fee schedule. Step-Up Tiers
in general are designed to provide
Members with additional opportunities
to receive enhanced rebates by
increasing their order flow to the
Exchange, which further contributes to
a deeper, more liquid market and
provides even more execution
opportunities for active market
participants. Like other Step-Up Tiers
on the Exchange,11 the proposed Cross
Asset Tier is designed to give members
an additional opportunity to receive an
enhanced rebate for orders meeting the
applicable criteria. Increased overall
order flow benefits all Members by
contributing towards a robust and wellbalanced market ecosystem.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Act
and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
section 6(b) of the Act.12 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the section
6(b)(5) 13 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the section 6(b)(5) 14 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers as
well as section 6(b)(4) 15 as it is designed
to provide for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among its Members and other persons
using its facilities.
As described above, the Exchange
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive or
incentives to be insufficient. The
11 See
BZX Equities Fee Schedule, Footnote 2,
Step-Up Tiers.
12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
13 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
14 Id.
15 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:49 Oct 10, 2023
Jkt 262001
Exchange believes that its proposal to
introduce a Cross Asset Tier reflects a
competitive pricing structure designed
to incentivize market participants to
direct their order flow to the Exchange,
which the Exchange believes would
enhance market quality to the benefit of
all Members. Additionally, the
Exchange notes that relative volumebased incentives and discounts have
been widely adopted by exchanges,16
including the Exchange,17 and are
reasonable, equitable and nondiscriminatory because they are open to
all Members on an equal basis and
provide additional benefits or discounts
that are reasonably related to (i) the
value to an exchange’s market quality
and (ii) associated higher levels of
market activity, such as higher levels of
liquidity provision and/or growth
patterns. Competing equity exchanges
offer similar tiered pricing structures,
including schedules of rebates and fees
that apply based upon members
achieving certain volume and/or growth
thresholds, as well as assess similar fees
or rebates for similar types of orders, to
that of the Exchange.18
In particular, the Exchange believes
its proposal to introduce a Cross Asset
Tier is reasonable because the revised
tier will be available to all Members and
provide all Members with an additional
opportunity to receive an enhanced
rebate. The Exchange further believes
the proposed Cross Asset Tier will
provide a reasonable means to
encourage liquidity adding displayed
orders in Members’ order flow to the
Exchange and to incentivize Members to
continue to provide liquidity adding
volume to the Exchange by offering
them an additional opportunity to
receive an enhanced rebate on
qualifying orders. An overall increase in
activity would deepen the Exchange’s
liquidity pool, offers additional cost
savings, support the quality of price
discovery, promote market transparency
and improve market quality, for all
investors.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed Cross Asset Tier represents an
equitable allocation of fees and rebates
and is not unfairly discriminatory
because all Members will be eligible for
the proposed tier and have the
opportunity to meet the tier’s criteria
and receive the corresponding enhanced
rebate if such criteria is met. To the
16 See e.g., EDGX Equities Fee Schedule, Footnote
1, Add/Remove Volume Tiers.
17 See e.g., BZX Equities Fee Schedule, Footnote
1, Add/Remove Volume Tiers.
18 See e.g., MIAX Pearl Options Fee Schedule,
Transaction Rebates/Fees; The Nasdaq Options
Market LLC (‘‘NOM’’) Pricing Schedule, Options 7,
Section 2.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70429
extent a Member participates on BZX
Equities but not on BZX Options, the
Exchange continues to believe that its
proposal represents an equitable
allocation of fees and rebates and is not
unfairly discriminatory with respect to
such Member based on the overall
benefit to the Exchange resulting from
the success of its options platform.
Particularly, the Exchange believes that
additional such success allows the
Exchange to continue to provide and
potentially expand its existing incentive
programs to the benefit of all
participants on the Exchange, regardless
of whether they participate on BZX
Options or not. Without having a view
of activity on other markets and offexchange venues, the Exchange has no
way of knowing whether this proposed
rule change would definitely result in
any Members qualifying the new
proposed tiers. While the Exchange has
no way of predicting with certainty how
the proposed changes will impact
Member activity, based on the prior
months volume, the Exchange
anticipates that at least one Member will
be able to satisfy the proposed criteria
for the proposed Cross Asset Tier. The
Exchange also notes that proposed
changes will not adversely impact any
Member’s ability to qualify for enhanced
rebates or reduced fees offered under
other tiers. Should a Member not meet
the proposed new criteria for the
proposed Cross Asset Tier, the Member
will merely not receive that
corresponding enhanced rebate.
Additionally, the Exchange believes
that its proposal to eliminate Step-Up
Tier 1 is reasonable because the
Exchange is not required to maintain
this tier or provide Members an
opportunity to receive enhanced
rebates. The Exchange believes the
proposal to eliminate this tier is also
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it applies to all
Members (i.e., the tier will not be
available for any Member). The
Exchange also notes that the proposed
rule change to remove this tier merely
results in Members not receiving an
enhanced rebate, which, as noted above,
the Exchange is not required to offer or
maintain. Furthermore, the proposed
rule change to eliminate Step-Up Tier 1
enables the Exchange to redirect
resources and funding into other
programs and tiers intended to
incentivize increased order flow.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM
11OCN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
70430
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 11, 2023 / Notices
of the purposes of the Act. Rather, as
discussed above, the Exchange believes
that the proposed changes would
encourage the submission of additional
order flow to a public exchange, thereby
promoting market depth, execution
incentives and enhanced execution
opportunities, as well as price discovery
and transparency for all Members. As a
result, the Exchange believes that the
proposed changes further the
Commission’s goal in adopting
Regulation NMS of fostering
competition among orders, which
promotes ‘‘more efficient pricing of
individual stocks for all types of orders,
large and small.’’
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule changes do not impose any burden
on intramarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Particularly,
the proposed Cross Asset Tier will
apply to all Members equally in that all
Members are eligible for the tier, have
a reasonable opportunity to meet the
tier’s criteria and will receive the
enhanced rebate on their qualifying
orders if such criteria is met. The
Exchange does not believe the proposed
changes burden competition, but rather,
enhances competition as it is intended
to increase the competitiveness of BZX
by adopting pricing incentives in order
to attract order flow and incentivize
participants to increase their
participation on the Exchange,
providing for additional execution
opportunities for market participants
and improved price transparency.
Additionally, the Exchange believes that
the proposed criteria based on total
options volume applicable to BZX
Options Priority Customers will provide
an additional incentive to those Priority
Customers to send additional orders to
BZX Options, which in turn provides
additional liquidity in the market.
Greater overall order flow, trading
opportunities, and pricing transparency
benefits all market participants on the
Exchange, as well as its affiliate options
exchange, by enhancing market quality
and continuing to encourage Members
to send orders, thereby contributing
towards a robust and well-balanced
market ecosystem. The proposed change
to discontinue Step-Up Tier 1 will not
impose any burden on intramarket
competition because the changes apply
to all Members uniformly, as in, the tier
will not longer be available to any
Member.
Next, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule changes does not impose
any burden on intermarket competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
As previously discussed, the Exchange
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:49 Oct 10, 2023
Jkt 262001
operates in a highly competitive market.
Members have numerous alternative
venues that they may participate on and
direct their order flow, including other
equities exchanges, off-exchange
venues, and alternative trading systems.
Additionally, the Exchange represents a
small percentage of the overall market.
Based on publicly available information,
no single equities exchange has more
than 14% of the market share.19
Therefore, no exchange possesses
significant pricing power in the
execution of order flow. Indeed,
participants can readily choose to send
their orders to other exchange and offexchange venues if they deem fee levels
at those other venues to be more
favorable. Moreover, the Commission
has repeatedly expressed its preference
for competition over regulatory
intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities
markets. Specifically, in Regulation
NMS, the Commission highlighted the
importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues
and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ‘‘has
been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 20 The
fact that this market is competitive has
also long been recognized by the courts.
In NetCoalition v. Securities and
Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit
stated as follows: ‘‘[n]o one disputes
that competition for order flow is
‘fierce.’ . . . As the SEC explained, ‘[i]n
the U.S. national market system, buyers
and sellers of securities, and the brokerdealers that act as their order-routing
agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution’;
[and] ‘no exchange can afford to take its
market share percentages for granted’
because ‘no exchange possesses a
monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in
the execution of order flow from broker
dealers’ . . . .’’.21 Accordingly, the
Exchange does not believe its proposed
fee change imposes any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
19 Supra
note 3.
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
21 NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C.
Cir. 2010) (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782–
83 (December 9, 2008) (SR–NYSEArca–2006–21)).
20 See
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 22 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 23 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
CboeBZX–2023–075 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–CboeBZX–2023–075. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
22 15
23 17
E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
11OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 11, 2023 / Notices
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–CboeBZX–2023–075 and should be
submitted on or before November 1,
2023.
For the Commission, by the Division
of Trading and Markets, pursuant to
delegated authority.24
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
Company. By virtue of DSV’s equity
ownership of the Company, the
Company is also considered an
Associate of the Licensee.
Therefore, the proposed transaction
requires a regulatory exemption
pursuant to 13 CFR 107.730. Notice is
hereby given that any interested person
may submit written comments on the
transaction within fifteen days of the
date of this publication to the Associate
Administrator, Office of Investment and
Innovation, U.S. Small Business
Administration, 409 Third Street SW,
Washington, DC 20416.
Bailey DeVries,
Associate Administrator, Office of Investment
and Innovation, U.S. Small Business
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2023–22441 Filed 10–10–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2017–0133]
Commercial Driver’s License (CDL):
Application for Exemption Renewal;
U.S. Custom Harvesters, Inc.
[FR Doc. 2023–22437 Filed 10–10–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of provisional renewal of
exemption; request for comments.
AGENCY:
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[License No. 06/06–0356]
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Independent Bankers Capital Fund IV,
L.P.; Notice Seeking Exemption Under
the Small Business Investment Act,
Conflicts of Interest
Notice is hereby given that
Independent Bankers Capital Fund IV,
L.P., 5949 Sherry Lane, Suite 1472,
Dallas, TX 75225, a Federal Licensee
under the Small Business Investment
Act of 1958, as amended (‘‘Act’’), in
connection with the financing of a small
concern, has sought an exemption under
Section 312 of the Act and 13 CFR
107.730 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Financings which
Constitute Conflict of Interest,
Independent Bankers Capital Fund IV,
L.P. (‘‘Licensee’’) is proposing to
provide financing to Central States Bus
Sales, Inc. (‘‘Company’’) to support its
growth.
The proposed transaction is brought
within the purview of 13 CFR 107.730
because Diamond State Ventures II, L.P.
(‘‘DSV’’), an Associate of Licensee as
defined in 13 CFR 107.50, holds a 10%
or greater equity interest in the
24 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:49 Oct 10, 2023
Jkt 262001
70431
FMCSA–2017–0133 by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. See the Public
Participation and Request for Comments
section below for further information.
• Mail: Dockets Operations, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building,
Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building, Ground Floor, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m. E.T., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Each submission must include the
Agency name and the docket number
(FMCSA–2017–0133) for this notice.
Note that DOT posts all comments
received without change to
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information included in a
comment. Please see the Privacy Act
heading below.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments, go to www.regulations.gov at
any time or visit the ground level of the
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. To be sure
someone is there to help you, please call
(202) 366–9317 or (202) 366–9826
before visiting Dockets Operations.
Privacy Act: In accordance with 49
U.S.C. 31315(b), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its
exemption process. DOT posts these
comments, without edit, including any
personal information the commenter
provides, to www.regulations.gov. As
described in the system of records
notice DOT/ALL 14–FDMS, which can
be reviewed at https://
www.transportation.gov/privacy, the
comments are searchable by the name of
the submitter.
FMCSA announces its
decision to provisionally renew a U.S.
Custom Harvesters, Inc. (USCHI)
exemption from the ‘‘K’’ intrastate
restriction on commercial driver’s
licenses (CDLs) for custom harvester
drivers operating in interstate commerce
for a two-year period, with additional
terms and conditions. FMCSA’s
regulations currently provide an
exception to the minimum age
requirements for drivers of commercial
motor vehicles (CMVs) controlled and
operated by a person engaged in
interstate custom harvesting. However,
under the Agency’s CDL regulations,
States may include an intrastate-only (or
‘‘K’’) restriction for these drivers. This
provisional renewal of the exemption
continues relief from the CDL provision
for two years.
DATES: This renewed exemption is
effective October 3, 2023, through
October 3, 2025. Comments must be
received on or before November 13,
2023.
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
You may submit comments
identified by Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) Number
FMCSA encourages you to participate
by submitting comments and related
materials.
SUMMARY:
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Ms.
La Tonya Mimms, Chief, Driver and
Carrier Operations Division, Office of
Carrier, Driver and Vehicle Safety
Standards, FMCSA, at (202) 366–9220
or latonya.mimms@dot.gov. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, contact Dockets
Operations at (202) 366–9826.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM
11OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 11, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70428-70431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22437]
[[Page 70428]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-98684; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2023-075]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Its Fee Schedule Regarding Rebate Tiers
October 4, 2023.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on September 29, 2023, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BZX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``BZX'') proposes to
amend its Fee Schedule. The text of the proposed rule change is
provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule applicable to its
equities trading platform (``BZX Equities'') by (1) discontinuing Step-
Up Tier 1; and (2) adopting a new Cross Asset Tier. The Exchange
proposes to implement these changes effective October 2, 2023.
The Exchange first notes that it operates in a highly competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. More specifically, the
Exchange is only one of 16 registered equities exchanges, as well as a
number of alternative trading systems and other off-exchange venues
that do not have similar self-regulatory responsibilities under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''), to which market
participants may direct their order flow. Based on publicly available
information,\3\ no single registered equities exchange has more than
14% of the market share. Thus, in such a low-concentrated and highly
competitive market, no single equities exchange possesses significant
pricing power in the execution of order flow. The Exchange in
particular operates a ``Maker-Taker'' model whereby it pays rebates to
members that add liquidity and assesses fees to those that remove
liquidity. The Exchange's Fee Schedule sets forth the standard rebates
and rates applied per share for orders that provide and remove
liquidity, respectively. Currently, for orders in securities priced at
or above $1.00, the Exchange provides a standard rebate of $0.00160 per
share for orders that add liquidity and assesses a fee of $0.0030 per
share for orders that remove liquidity.\4\ For orders in securities
priced below $1.00, the Exchange provides a standard rebate of $0.00009
per share for orders that add liquidity and assesses a fee of 0.30% of
the total dollar value for orders that remove liquidity.\5\
Additionally, in response to the competitive environment, the Exchange
also offers tiered pricing which provides Members opportunities to
qualify for higher rebates or reduced fees where certain volume
criteria and thresholds are met. Tiered pricing provides an incremental
incentive for Members to strive for higher tier levels, which provides
increasingly higher benefits or discounts for satisfying increasingly
more stringent criteria.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market Volume
Summary, Month-to-Date (September 22, 2023), available at https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/_statistics/.
\4\ See BZX Equities Fee Schedule, Standard Rates.
\5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under footnote 2 of the Fee Schedule, the Exchange currently offers
various Step-Up Tiers that provide enhanced rebates for orders yielding
fee codes B,\6\ V \7\ and Y \8\ where a Member reaches certain add
volume-based criteria, including ``growing'' its volume over a certain
baseline month. The Exchange now proposes to discontinue Step-Up Tier 1
as the Exchange no longer wishes to, nor is required to, maintain such
tier. More specifically, the proposed change removes this tier as the
Exchange would rather redirect future resources and funding into other
programs and tiers intended to incentivize increased order flow.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Fee code B is appended to orders that add liquidity to BZX
in Tape B securities.
\7\ Fee code V is appended to orders that add liquidity to BZX
in Tape A securities.
\8\ Fee code Y is appended to orders that add liquidity to BZX
in Tape C securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also proposes to introduce a new Cross Asset Tier
under footnote 2, which is designed to incentivize Members to achieve
certain levels of participation on both the Exchange's equities and
options platform (``BZX Options''). The proposed criteria is as
follows:
Cross Asset Tier 1 provides a rebate of $0.0033 per share
for securities priced above $1.00 for qualifying orders (i.e., orders
yielding fee codes B, V or Y) where (1) Member has a Step-Up ADAV \9\
from June 2023 >= 7,000,000; and (2) Member has a Customer ADAV \10\ on
BZX Options >= 10,000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Step-Up ADAV means ADAV in the relevant baseline month
subtracted from current ADAV. ADAV means average daily volume
calculated as the number of shares added per day. ADAV is calculated
on a monthly basis.
\10\ Customer ADAV means average daily volume calculated as the
number of contracts added for the account of a Priority Customer as
defined in BZX Rule 16.1. ADAV is calculated on a monthly basis. See
BZX Options Fee Schedule, Definitions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed Cross Asset Tier is intended to provide an additional
manner to incentive Members to add displayed liquidity on the Exchange
while also increasing participation on BZX Options. The Exchange
believes the addition of the Cross Asset Tier will incentivize Members
to grow their volume on the Exchange, thereby contributing to a deeper
and more liquid market, which benefits all market participants and
provides greater execution opportunities on the Exchange.
Additionally, the Exchange notes that the proposed Cross Asset Tier
will
[[Page 70429]]
expire no later than December 31, 2023, which the Exchange will
indicate on the Exchange's fee schedule. Step-Up Tiers in general are
designed to provide Members with additional opportunities to receive
enhanced rebates by increasing their order flow to the Exchange, which
further contributes to a deeper, more liquid market and provides even
more execution opportunities for active market participants. Like other
Step-Up Tiers on the Exchange,\11\ the proposed Cross Asset Tier is
designed to give members an additional opportunity to receive an
enhanced rebate for orders meeting the applicable criteria. Increased
overall order flow benefits all Members by contributing towards a
robust and well-balanced market ecosystem.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See BZX Equities Fee Schedule, Footnote 2, Step-Up Tiers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of section 6(b) of the
Act.\12\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change
is consistent with the section 6(b)(5) \13\ requirements that the rules
of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts
and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the section 6(b)(5) \14\ requirement that the rules of
an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers as well as section 6(b)(4) \15\
as it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among its Members and other persons using
its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\14\ Id.
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As described above, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. The Exchange believes that
its proposal to introduce a Cross Asset Tier reflects a competitive
pricing structure designed to incentivize market participants to direct
their order flow to the Exchange, which the Exchange believes would
enhance market quality to the benefit of all Members. Additionally, the
Exchange notes that relative volume-based incentives and discounts have
been widely adopted by exchanges,\16\ including the Exchange,\17\ and
are reasonable, equitable and non-discriminatory because they are open
to all Members on an equal basis and provide additional benefits or
discounts that are reasonably related to (i) the value to an exchange's
market quality and (ii) associated higher levels of market activity,
such as higher levels of liquidity provision and/or growth patterns.
Competing equity exchanges offer similar tiered pricing structures,
including schedules of rebates and fees that apply based upon members
achieving certain volume and/or growth thresholds, as well as assess
similar fees or rebates for similar types of orders, to that of the
Exchange.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See e.g., EDGX Equities Fee Schedule, Footnote 1, Add/
Remove Volume Tiers.
\17\ See e.g., BZX Equities Fee Schedule, Footnote 1, Add/Remove
Volume Tiers.
\18\ See e.g., MIAX Pearl Options Fee Schedule, Transaction
Rebates/Fees; The Nasdaq Options Market LLC (``NOM'') Pricing
Schedule, Options 7, Section 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, the Exchange believes its proposal to introduce a
Cross Asset Tier is reasonable because the revised tier will be
available to all Members and provide all Members with an additional
opportunity to receive an enhanced rebate. The Exchange further
believes the proposed Cross Asset Tier will provide a reasonable means
to encourage liquidity adding displayed orders in Members' order flow
to the Exchange and to incentivize Members to continue to provide
liquidity adding volume to the Exchange by offering them an additional
opportunity to receive an enhanced rebate on qualifying orders. An
overall increase in activity would deepen the Exchange's liquidity
pool, offers additional cost savings, support the quality of price
discovery, promote market transparency and improve market quality, for
all investors.
The Exchange believes that the proposed Cross Asset Tier represents
an equitable allocation of fees and rebates and is not unfairly
discriminatory because all Members will be eligible for the proposed
tier and have the opportunity to meet the tier's criteria and receive
the corresponding enhanced rebate if such criteria is met. To the
extent a Member participates on BZX Equities but not on BZX Options,
the Exchange continues to believe that its proposal represents an
equitable allocation of fees and rebates and is not unfairly
discriminatory with respect to such Member based on the overall benefit
to the Exchange resulting from the success of its options platform.
Particularly, the Exchange believes that additional such success allows
the Exchange to continue to provide and potentially expand its existing
incentive programs to the benefit of all participants on the Exchange,
regardless of whether they participate on BZX Options or not. Without
having a view of activity on other markets and off-exchange venues, the
Exchange has no way of knowing whether this proposed rule change would
definitely result in any Members qualifying the new proposed tiers.
While the Exchange has no way of predicting with certainty how the
proposed changes will impact Member activity, based on the prior months
volume, the Exchange anticipates that at least one Member will be able
to satisfy the proposed criteria for the proposed Cross Asset Tier. The
Exchange also notes that proposed changes will not adversely impact any
Member's ability to qualify for enhanced rebates or reduced fees
offered under other tiers. Should a Member not meet the proposed new
criteria for the proposed Cross Asset Tier, the Member will merely not
receive that corresponding enhanced rebate.
Additionally, the Exchange believes that its proposal to eliminate
Step-Up Tier 1 is reasonable because the Exchange is not required to
maintain this tier or provide Members an opportunity to receive
enhanced rebates. The Exchange believes the proposal to eliminate this
tier is also equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it
applies to all Members (i.e., the tier will not be available for any
Member). The Exchange also notes that the proposed rule change to
remove this tier merely results in Members not receiving an enhanced
rebate, which, as noted above, the Exchange is not required to offer or
maintain. Furthermore, the proposed rule change to eliminate Step-Up
Tier 1 enables the Exchange to redirect resources and funding into
other programs and tiers intended to incentivize increased order flow.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance
[[Page 70430]]
of the purposes of the Act. Rather, as discussed above, the Exchange
believes that the proposed changes would encourage the submission of
additional order flow to a public exchange, thereby promoting market
depth, execution incentives and enhanced execution opportunities, as
well as price discovery and transparency for all Members. As a result,
the Exchange believes that the proposed changes further the
Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering competition
among orders, which promotes ``more efficient pricing of individual
stocks for all types of orders, large and small.''
The Exchange believes the proposed rule changes do not impose any
burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Particularly, the proposed
Cross Asset Tier will apply to all Members equally in that all Members
are eligible for the tier, have a reasonable opportunity to meet the
tier's criteria and will receive the enhanced rebate on their
qualifying orders if such criteria is met. The Exchange does not
believe the proposed changes burden competition, but rather, enhances
competition as it is intended to increase the competitiveness of BZX by
adopting pricing incentives in order to attract order flow and
incentivize participants to increase their participation on the
Exchange, providing for additional execution opportunities for market
participants and improved price transparency. Additionally, the
Exchange believes that the proposed criteria based on total options
volume applicable to BZX Options Priority Customers will provide an
additional incentive to those Priority Customers to send additional
orders to BZX Options, which in turn provides additional liquidity in
the market. Greater overall order flow, trading opportunities, and
pricing transparency benefits all market participants on the Exchange,
as well as its affiliate options exchange, by enhancing market quality
and continuing to encourage Members to send orders, thereby
contributing towards a robust and well-balanced market ecosystem. The
proposed change to discontinue Step-Up Tier 1 will not impose any
burden on intramarket competition because the changes apply to all
Members uniformly, as in, the tier will not longer be available to any
Member.
Next, the Exchange believes the proposed rule changes does not
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As previously
discussed, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market.
Members have numerous alternative venues that they may participate on
and direct their order flow, including other equities exchanges, off-
exchange venues, and alternative trading systems. Additionally, the
Exchange represents a small percentage of the overall market. Based on
publicly available information, no single equities exchange has more
than 14% of the market share.\19\ Therefore, no exchange possesses
significant pricing power in the execution of order flow. Indeed,
participants can readily choose to send their orders to other exchange
and off-exchange venues if they deem fee levels at those other venues
to be more favorable. Moreover, the Commission has repeatedly expressed
its preference for competition over regulatory intervention in
determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets.
Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the
importance of market forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and,
also, recognized that current regulation of the market system ``has
been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to investors and listed
companies.'' \20\ The fact that this market is competitive has also
long been recognized by the courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities and
Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit stated as follows: ``[n]o one
disputes that competition for order flow is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC
explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market system, buyers and sellers of
securities, and the broker-dealers that act as their order-routing
agents, have a wide range of choices of where to route orders for
execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to take its market share
percentages for granted' because `no exchange possesses a monopoly,
regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from broker
dealers' . . . .''.\21\ Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe its
proposed fee change imposes any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ Supra note 3.
\20\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
\21\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010)
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2,
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \22\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \23\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\23\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-CboeBZX-2023-075 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeBZX-2023-075. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written
[[Page 70431]]
communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. Do not include personal identifiable
information in submissions; you should submit only information that you
wish to make available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold
entirely from publication submitted material that is obscene or subject
to copyright protection. All submissions should refer to file number
SR-CboeBZX-2023-075 and should be submitted on or before November 1,
2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-22437 Filed 10-10-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P