Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Make Permanent The Operation of the Program That Allows the Exchange To List P.M.-Settled Third Friday-of-the-Month S&P 500 Stock Index Options (“SPX”) Series, 66103-66106 [2023-20810]
Download as PDF
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 26, 2023 / Notices
novel legal or regulatory issues, the
Commission believes that waiving the
30-day operative delay is consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest. Therefore, the
Commission hereby waives the 30-day
operative delay and designates the
proposal operative upon filing.20
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–BOX–2023–24 and should be
submitted on or before October 17,
2023.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.21
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
BOX–2023–24 on the subject line.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–BOX–2023–24. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
20 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Sep 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
[FR Doc. 2023–20805 Filed 9–25–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–98454; File No. SR–CBOE–
2023–005]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
Exchange, Inc.; Order Granting
Approval of a Proposed Rule Change,
as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To
Make Permanent The Operation of the
Program That Allows the Exchange To
List P.M.-Settled Third Friday-of-theMonth S&P 500 Stock Index Options
(‘‘SPX’’) Series
September 20, 2023.
I. Introduction
On January 6, 2023, Cboe Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Cboe Options’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to make permanent the
operation of its pilot program
(‘‘Program’’) that permits the Exchange
to list p.m.-settled third Friday-of-themonth SPX options (‘‘SPXPM’’). The
proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
January 24, 2023.3 On March 7, 2023,
21 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 96703
(January 18, 2023), 88 FR 4265 (‘‘Notice’’).
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00158
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66103
pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act,4
the Commission designated a longer
period within which to approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove the proposed rule change.5
On March 17, 2023, the Exchange filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change (‘‘Amendment No. 1’’).6 On
April 24, 2023, the Commission
instituted proceedings to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the
proposed rule change and published
Amendment No. 1 for notice and
comment.7 On July 20, 2023, the
Commission designated a longer period
for Commission action on proceedings
to determine whether to approve or
disapprove the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 1.8 The
Commission did not receive any
comment letters and is approving the
proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1.
II. Background
When cash-settled 9 index options
were first introduced in the 1980s, they
generally utilized closing-price
settlement procedures (i.e., p.m.
settlement).10 The Commission became
4 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97063,
88 FR 15476 (March 13, 2023). The Commission
designated April 24, 2023, as the date by which the
Commission shall approve or disapprove, or
institute proceedings to determine whether to
approve or disapprove, the proposed rule change.
6 In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange filed Exhibit
3, which provides additional detail regarding the
Exchange’s analysis of the market quality impact of
p.m.-settled index options. Amendment No. 1 is
available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/srcboe-2023-005/srcboe2023005.htm.
7 Amendment No. 1 was published for comment
in the Federal Register on April 28, 2023. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97367 (April
24, 2023), 88 FR 26366 (April 28, 2023) (order
instituting proceedings and noticing Amendment
No. 1).
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97956,
88 FR 48278 (July 26, 2023). The Commission
designated September 21, 2023, as the date by
which the Commission shall either approve or
disapprove the proposed rule change.
9 The seller of a ‘‘cash-settled’’ index option pays
out the cash value of the applicable index on
expiration or exercise. A ‘‘physical delivery’’
option, like equity and ETF options, involves the
transfer of the underlying asset rather than cash.
See Characteristics and Risks of Standardized
Options, available at: https://www.theocc.com/
Company-Information/Documents-and-Archives/
Options-Disclosure-Document.
10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65256
(September 2, 2011), 76 FR 55969, at 55972
(September 9, 2011) (SR–C2–2011–008) (Order
approving proposed rule change to establish a pilot
program to list and trade SPXPM options on the C2
Options Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘C2’’)) (‘‘C2
SPXPM Approval’’). SPXPM was traded on a pilot
basis on C2 until the introduction of SPXPM trading
on Cboe Options. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 68888 (February 8, 2013), 78 FR 10668,
5 See
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
Continued
26SEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
66104
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 26, 2023 / Notices
concerned with the impact of p.m.settled, cash-settled index options on
the underlying cash equities markets,
and in particular, added market
volatility and sharp price movements
near the close on expiration days.11
These concerns were heightened during
the ‘‘triple-witching’’ hour on the third
Friday of March, June, September, and
December when index options, index
futures, and options on index futures
expired concurrently.12 Academic
research at the time provided at least
some evidence suggesting that futures
and options expirations contributed to
excess volatility and reversals around
the close on those days.13
In light of the concerns with p.m.
settlement and to help ameliorate the
price effects associated with expirations
of p.m.-settled, cash-settled index
products, in 1987, the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission approved
a proposed rule change by the Chicago
Mercantile Exchange (‘‘CME’’) to
provide for a.m. settlement 14 for index
futures, including futures on the S&P
500 Index (‘‘S&P 500’’).15 The
Commission subsequently approved a
proposed rule change by Cboe Options
to list and trade a.m.-settled options on
the S&P 500.16 In 1992, the Commission
approved Cboe Options’ proposal to
transition all of its European-style cashsettled options on the S&P 500 to a.m.
settlement.17 However, in 1993, the
Commission approved a proposed rule
change allowing Cboe Options to list
p.m.-settled options on certain broadbased indexes, including the S&P 500,
expiring at the end of each calendar
quarter (since approved as
permanent).18 Starting in 2006, the
Commission approved a number of
proposals, on a pilot basis, permitting
Cboe Options to introduce other index
options, including SPX options, with
p.m.-settlement. These include p.m.settled index options expiring weekly
(other than the third Friday) and at the
end of each month,19 SPXPM, as well as
p.m.-settled Mini-SPX Index (‘‘XSP’’)
options and Mini-Russell 2000 Index
(‘‘MRUT’’) options expiring on the third
Friday of the month.20
In the course of approving the various
pilots, the Commission reiterated its
concern about the potential impact on
the market at expiration for the
underlying component stocks for a p.m.settled, cash-settled index option.21
However, the Commission also
recognized the potential impact was
unclear.22 The Commission approved
the Program on a pilot basis to allow the
Exchange and the Commission to
monitor for and assess any potential for
adverse market effects.23 In order to
facilitate this assessment, the Exchange
committed to provide the Commission
with data and analysis in connection
with the Program 24 and to make such
data publicly available.25 In addition to
at 10668 (February 14, 2013) (SR–CBOE–2012–120)
(‘‘SPXPM Approval Order’’).
11 See C2 SPXPM Approval, 76 FR at 55972.
12 See id.
13 See Securities and Exchange Commission,
Division of Economic Risk and Analysis,
Memorandum dated February 2, 2021 on
Cornerstone Analysis of PM Cash-Settled Index
Option Pilots (September 16, 2020) (‘‘Pilot Memo’’)
at 5, available at: https://www.sec.gov/files/
Analysis_of_PM_Cash_Settled_Index_Option_
Pilots.pdf (citing, among other papers, Stoll, Hans
R., and Robert E. Whaley, ‘‘Expiration day effects
of index options and futures,’’ Monograph Series in
Finance and Economics, no. 3 (1986)).
14 The exercise settlement value for an a.m.settled index option is determined by reference to
the reported level of the index as derived from the
opening prices of the component securities on the
business day before expiration.
15 See Proposed Amendments Relating to the
Standard and Poor’s 500, the Standard and Poor’s
100 and the Standard Poor’s OTC Stock Price Index
Futures Contract, 51 FR 47053 (December 30, 1986)
(notice of proposed rule change from the CME). See
also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 24367
(April 17, 1987), 52 FR 13890 (April 27, 1987) (SR–
CBOE–87–11) (noting that the CME moved the S&P
500 futures contract’s settlement value to opening
prices on the delivery date).
16 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 24367
(April 17, 1987), 52 FR 13890 (April 27, 1987) (SR–
CBOE–87–11).
17 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 30944
(July 21, 1992), 57 FR 33376 (July 28, 1992) (SR–
CBOE–92–09). The Commission also approved
proposals by other options markets to transfer most
of their cash-settled index products to a.m.
settlement. See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 25804 (June 15, 1988), 53 FR 23475
(June 22, 1988) (SR–NYSE–87–11 and 88–04).
18 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 31800
(February 1, 1993), 58 FR 7274 (February 5, 1993)
(SR–CBOE–92–13). See also Securities Exchange
Act Release Nos. 54123 (July 11, 2006), 71 FR 40558
(July 17, 2006) (SR–CBOE–2006–65); and 60164
(June 23, 2009), 74 FR 31333 (June 30, 2009) (SR–
CBOE–2009–029).
19 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
62911 (September 14, 2010), 75 FR 57539
(September 21, 2010) (SR–CBOE–2009–075); 76529
(November 30, 2015), 80 FR 75695 (December 3,
2015) (SR–CBOE–2015–106); and 78531 (August 10,
2016), 81 FR 54643 (August 16, 2016) (SR–CBOE–
2016–046).
20 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
70087 (July 31, 2013), 78 FR 47809 (August 6, 2013)
(SR–CBOE–2013–055); and 91067 (February 5,
2021) 86 FR 9108 (February 11, 2021) (SR–CBOE–
2020–116).
21 See, e.g., SPXPM Approval Order, 78 FR at
10669. See also Securities Exchange Act Release
Nos. 64599 (June 3, 2011), 76 FR 33798, 33801–02
(June 9, 2011) (order instituting proceedings to
determine whether to approve or disapprove a
proposed rule change to allow the listing and
trading of SPXPM options on the C2 Options
Exchange, Incorporated); and C2 SPXPM Approval,
76 FR at 55972–76.
22 See, e.g., SPXPM Approval Order, 78 FR at
10669.
23 See id.
24 See id. at 10670.
25 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No.
84535 (November 5, 2018), 83 FR 56129, at 56130
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Sep 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00159
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Exchange’s data and analysis,
Cornerstone Research also conducted an
analysis at the direction of Staff from
the Commission’s Division of Economic
and Risk Analysis. The analysis utilizes
the level of expiring p.m.-settled index
options open interest and the measures
of volatility and price reversals for the
corresponding index futures, the
underlying cash index, and index
component securities in the minutes
leading up to and immediately
following the market close to study the
effects of pilot programs allowing p.m.settled index options. The Pilot Memo
is discussed in more detail below.
III. Description of the Proposal, as
Modified by Amendment No. 1
SPXPM are cash-settled SPX options
with third Friday-of-the-month
expiration dates (‘‘Expiration Friday’’)
whose exercise settlement value is
derived from closing prices on the last
trading day prior to expiration. In
February 2013, the Commission
approved the Program to list and trade
these options on a pilot basis.26
The Exchange has filed to extend the
operation of the pilot on multiple
occasions and it is currently set to
expire on the earlier of November 6,
2023, or the date on which the Program
is approved on a permanent basis.27
Now, the Exchange proposes to make
the Program permanent.
Since the Program’s inception in
2013, the Exchange has submitted
reports to the Commission regarding the
Program that detail the Exchange’s
experience with the Program, pursuant
(November 9, 2018) (SR–CBOE–2018–069) (stating
the Exchange is making public on its website data
and analyses previously submitted to the
Commission under the Program and committing to
make public any data or analyses submitted in the
future).
26 See SPXPM Approval Order.
27 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
71424 (January 28, 2014), 79 FR 6249 (February 3,
2014) (SR–CBOE–2014–004); 73338 (October 10,
2014), 79 FR 62502 (October 17, 2014) (SR–CBOE–
2014–076); 77573 (April 8, 2016), 81 FR 22148
(April 14, 2016) (SR–CBOE–2016–036); 80386
(April 6, 2017), 82 FR 17704 (April 12, 2017) (SR–
CBOE–2017–025); 83166 (May 3, 2018), 83 FR
21324 (May 9, 2018) (SR–CBOE–2018–036); 84535
(November 5, 2018), 83 FR 56129 (November 9,
2018) (SR–CBOE–2018–069); 85688 (April 18,
2019), 84 FR 17214 (April 24, 2019) (SR–CBOE–
2019–023); 87464 (November 5, 2019), 84 FR 61099
(November 12, 2019) (SR–CBOE–2019–107); 88674
(April 16, 2020), 85 FR 22479 (April 22, 2020) (SR–
CBOE–2020–036); 90263 (October 23, 2020), 85 FR
68611 (October 29, 2020) (SR–CBOE–2020–100);
91698 (April 28, 2021) 86 FR 23761 (May 4, 2021)
(SR–CBOE–2021–027); 93455 (October 28, 2021), 86
FR 60660 (November 3, 2021) (SR–CBOE–2021–
062); 94799 (April 27, 2022), 87 FR 26244 (May 3,
2022) (SR–CBOE–2022–019); 96222 (November 3,
2022), 87 FR 67736 (November 9, 2022) (SR–CBOE–
2022–054); and 97446 (May 5, 2023), 88 FR 30365
(May 11, 2023).
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 26, 2023 / Notices
to the SPXPM Approval Order.28 The
Exchange states that, during the course
of the Program, it also provided the
Commission with any additional data or
analyses the Commission requested if
the Commission deemed such data or
analyses necessary to determine
whether the Program was consistent
with the Act.29
IV. Discussion and Commission
Findings
After careful review, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 1, is
consistent with the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
a national securities exchange.30 In
particular, the Commission finds that
the proposed rule change, as modified
by Amendment No. 1, is consistent with
section 6(b)(5) of the Act,31 which
requires, among other things, that the
Exchange’s rules be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. In its proposal to make
the Program permanent, the Exchange
addressed whether the Program
negatively impacts markets or impacted
the quality of the SPX options market.
Each of these elements is discussed in
greater detail below. As stated above, no
comments were received on the
proposed rule change.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Market Impact Considerations
The Exchange states it has not
identified any evidence from the pilot
data indicating that the trading of p.m.settled SPX options has any adverse
impact on fair and orderly markets on
Expiration Fridays for the S&P 500 or
the underlying securities comprising the
S&P 500, nor have there been any
observations of abnormal market
movements attributable to p.m.-settled
SPX options from any market
participants that have come to the
attention of the Exchange.32 In order to
support its overall assessment of the
Program, the Exchange included a
28 See supra note 10. The Exchange has made
public on its website data and analyses previously
submitted to the Commission under the Program.
See https://www.cboe.com/aboutcboe/legalregulatory/national-market-system-plans/pmsettlement-spxpm-data.
29 See Notice, 88 FR at 4267.
30 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
31 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
32 See Notice, 88 FR at 4267.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Sep 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
review and analysis of pilot data.33
Among other things, the Exchange’s
analysis includes end of day volatility
as well as a comparison of the impact
of quarterly index rebalancing versus
p.m.-settled expirations.34
In addition to reviewing the data and
analysis provided by the Exchange, the
Commission reviewed the analysis in
the Pilot Memo, which evaluates
whether higher levels of expiring open
interest in p.m.-settled index options
results in increased volatility and price
reversals around the close. The Pilot
Memo shows that the market share for
p.m.-settled options on the S&P 500 has
grown substantially since 2007.35 The
Exchange’s review of pilot data also
showed this trend continuing from 2019
through 2021.36
The Pilot Memo examines whether
and to what extent expiring open
interest in p.m.-settled index options is
empirically related with the tendency of
the corresponding index futures, the
underlying index, or index components
to experience increased transitory
volatility and price reversals around the
time of market close on expiration dates.
The Pilot Memo concludes that,
although expiring p.m.-settled index
option open interest may have a
statistically significant relationship with
volatility and price reversals of the
underlying index, index futures, and
index component securities around the
market close, the magnitude of the effect
is economically very small.37 For
example, the largest settlement event
that occurred during the time period
studied in the Pilot Memo (a settlement
of $100.4 billion of notional on
December 29, 2017) had an estimated
impact on the futures price of only
approximately 0.02% (a predicted
impact of $0.54 relative to a closing
futures price of $2,677).38
The Exchange further reviewed a
sample of pilot data from 2019 through
2021, and measured the volatility of the
S&P 500 over the final fifteen minutes
of each trading day and compared
expiration days to non-expiration
days.39 Generally volatility was slightly
higher on expiration days, but in cases
where overall market volatility
increased, the normalized impact on
expiration days versus non-expiration
days remained consistent.40 The
33 See
id. at 4266–70.
id. at 4268.
35 See Pilot Memo at 2.
36 See Notice, 88 FR at 4267. Specifically, since
2007, p.m.-settled SPX options grew from 0.1% of
open interest to 30% of open interest in 2021. Id.
37 See Pilot Memo at 3.
38 See id.
39 See Notice, 88 FR at 4268.
40 See id.
34 See
PO 00000
Frm 00160
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66105
Exchange further analyzed volatility on
days when the S&P 500 was rebalanced,
and states its results suggest more
closing volatility on rebalance dates
compared to non-rebalance expiration
dates, indicating that rebalancing of the
S&P 500 may have a greater impact on
S&P 500 volatility than p.m.-settled
option expirations.41
The Exchange also reviewed a sample
of post-2018 pilot data for potential
correlation between excess market
volatility and price reversals and the
hedging activity of liquidity providers.42
To determine whether there is a
correlation, the Exchange calculated an
estimate of the amount of market-onclose (‘‘MOC’’) volume in the S&P 500
component markets attributable to
expected hedging activity as a result of
expiring in-the-money options.43 The
Exchange states its results indicate that
other sources of MOC share volume
generally exceed the volume resulting
from hedging activity for p.m.-settled
SPX options.44 Further, the Exchange
also compared hedging futures positions
that would correspond to expiring inthe-money p.m.-settled SPX options and
concludes the data indicate negligible
capacity for hedging activity to increase
volatility in the underlying markets.45
Finally, the Exchange states that the
significant changes in the closing
procedures of the primary markets in
recent decades, including considerable
advances in trading systems and
technology, have significantly
minimized risks of any potential impact
of p.m.-, cash-settled SPX options on the
underlying cash markets.46
Market Quality Considerations
The Exchange also completed an
analysis intended to evaluate whether
the Program impacted the quality of the
SPX options market. Specifically, the
Exchange compared values of key
market quality indicators (specifically,
the bid-ask spread 47 and effective
spread 48) in p.m.-settled SPX weekly
41 See
id.
id.
43 See id.
44 See id. at 4269.
45 See id.
46 See id.
47 The Exchange calculated for each of SPXW
options (with Monday, Wednesday, and Friday
expirations) and SPY Weekly options (with
Monday, Wednesday, and Friday expirations) the
daily time-weighted bid-ask spread on the Exchange
during its regular trading hours session, adjusted for
the difference in size between SPXW options and
SPY options (SPXW options are approximately ten
times the value of SPY options).
48 The Exchange calculated the volume-weighted
average daily effective spread for simple trades for
each of SPXW options (with Monday, Wednesday,
and Friday expirations) and SPY Weekly options
42 See
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
Continued
26SEN1
66106
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 26, 2023 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
(‘‘SPXW’’) options both before and after
the introduction of Tuesday expirations
and Thursday expirations for SPXW
options on April 18 and May 11, 2022,
respectively.49 The Exchange states that
analyzing whether the introduction of
new SPXW p.m.-settled expirations (i.e.,
SPXW options with Tuesday and
Thursday expirations) impacted the
market quality of then-existing SPXW
p.m.-settled expirations (i.e., SPXW
options with Monday, Wednesday, and
Friday expirations) provides a
reasonable substitute to evaluate
whether the introduction of p.m.-settled
index options impacted the market
quality of the SPX market when the
Program began.50 Therefore, the
Exchange believes analyzing the impact
of new SPXW options on then-existing
SPXW options permit the Exchange to
extrapolate that it is unlikely the
introduction of p.m.-settled SPXW
options significantly impacted the
market quality of a.m.-settled SPX
options when the Program began.51 The
Exchange concludes from this analysis
that the introduction of SPX options
with Tuesday and Thursday options had
no significant impact on the market
quality of SPXW options with Monday,
Wednesday, and Friday expirations. For
a majority of the series analyzed, the
Exchange observed no statistically
significant difference in bid-ask spread
or effective spread.52
The Commission believes that the
evidence contained in the Exchange’s
filing, the Exchange’s pilot data and
reports, and the Pilot Memo analysis
demonstrate that the Program has
benefitted investors and other market
participants by providing more flexible
trading and hedging opportunities while
also having no disruptive impact on the
market. The market for SPXPM options
has grown significantly in size over the
course of the Program, and analysis of
the pilot data did not identify any
significant economic impact on the
underlying component securities of the
S&P 500 surrounding the close as a
result of expiring p.m.-settled SPX
options nor did it indicate a
deterioration in market quality (as
measured by bid-ask and effective
spreads) for an existing product when a
new p.m.-settled expiration was
(with Monday, Wednesday, and Friday expirations)
as twice the amount of the absolute value of the
difference between an order execution price and the
midpoint of the national best bid and offer at the
time of execution, adjusted for the difference in size
between SPXW options and SPY options.
49 For purposes of comparison, the Exchange
paired SPXW options and SPY options with the
same moneyness and same days to expiration.
50 See Notice, 88 FR at 4269.
51 See id. at 4270.
52 See id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Sep 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
introduced. Further, significant changes
in closing procedures in the decades
since index options moved to a.m.
settlement may also serve to mitigate the
potential impact of p.m.-settled index
options on the underlying cash markets.
Accordingly, the Commission finds
that the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 1, is
consistent with section 6(b)(5) of the
Act 53 and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
section 19(b)(2) of the Act,54 that the
proposed rule change (SR–CBOE–2023–
005), as modified by Amendment No. 1,
be, and hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.55
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–20810 Filed 9–25–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–98443; File No. SR–ISE–
2023–19]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Options 3,
Section 13 Related to PIM
September 20, 2023.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 8, 2023, Nasdaq ISE, LLC
(‘‘ISE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Options 3, Section 7, Types of Orders
and Order and Quote Protocols; Options
3, Section 11, Auction Mechanisms; and
53 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
55 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
54 15
PO 00000
Frm 00161
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Options 3, Section 13, Price
Improvement Mechanism for Crossing
Transactions.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/
rulebook/ise/rules, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Options 3, Section 7, Types of Orders
and Order and Quote Protocols; Options
3, Section 11, Auction Mechanisms; and
Options 3, Section 13, Price
Improvement Mechanism for Crossing
Transactions. Each change is described
below.
Options 3, Section 7
Opening Only
The Exchange proposes to amend
Options 3, Section 7(u), Opening
Sweep 3 and Supplementary Material
.02(e) to Options 3, Section 7 related to
Opening Only 4 or ‘‘OPG’’ orders. The
proposed rule text was adopted as part
of a planned System migration.5
3 An Opening Sweep is a one-sided order entered
by a Market Maker through SQF for execution
against eligible interest in the System during the
Opening Process. This order type is not subject to
any protections listed in Options 3, Section 15,
except for Automated Quotation Adjustments. The
Opening Sweep will only participate in the
Opening Process pursuant to Options 3, Section
8(b)(1) and will be cancelled upon the open if not
executed. See Options 3, Section 7(u).
4 An Opening Only (‘‘OPG’’) order is entered with
a TIF of ‘‘OPG.’’ This order can only be executed
in the Opening Process pursuant to Options 3,
Section 8. This order type is not subject to any
protections listed in Options 3, Section 15, except
Size Limitation. Any portion of the order that is not
executed during the Opening Process is cancelled.
OPG orders may not route. See Supplementary
Material .02(e) to Options 3, Section 7.
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 96821
(February 6, 2023), 88 FR 8950 (February 10, 2023)
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66103-66106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20810]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-98454; File No. SR-CBOE-2023-005]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Order
Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment
No. 1, To Make Permanent The Operation of the Program That Allows the
Exchange To List P.M.-Settled Third Friday-of-the-Month S&P 500 Stock
Index Options (``SPX'') Series
September 20, 2023.
I. Introduction
On January 6, 2023, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``Cboe
Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to make permanent the operation of its pilot
program (``Program'') that permits the Exchange to list p.m.-settled
third Friday-of-the-month SPX options (``SPXPM''). The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on January 24,
2023.\3\ On March 7, 2023, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\4\
the Commission designated a longer period within which to approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule
change.\5\ On March 17, 2023, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change (``Amendment No. 1'').\6\ On April 24, 2023, the
Commission instituted proceedings to determine whether to approve or
disapprove the proposed rule change and published Amendment No. 1 for
notice and comment.\7\ On July 20, 2023, the Commission designated a
longer period for Commission action on proceedings to determine whether
to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1.\8\ The Commission did not receive any comment letters
and is approving the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No.
1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 96703 (January 18,
2023), 88 FR 4265 (``Notice'').
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97063, 88 FR 15476
(March 13, 2023). The Commission designated April 24, 2023, as the
date by which the Commission shall approve or disapprove, or
institute proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove,
the proposed rule change.
\6\ In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange filed Exhibit 3, which
provides additional detail regarding the Exchange's analysis of the
market quality impact of p.m.-settled index options. Amendment No. 1
is available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboe-2023-005/srcboe2023005.htm.
\7\ Amendment No. 1 was published for comment in the Federal
Register on April 28, 2023. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
97367 (April 24, 2023), 88 FR 26366 (April 28, 2023) (order
instituting proceedings and noticing Amendment No. 1).
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97956, 88 FR 48278
(July 26, 2023). The Commission designated September 21, 2023, as
the date by which the Commission shall either approve or disapprove
the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Background
When cash-settled \9\ index options were first introduced in the
1980s, they generally utilized closing-price settlement procedures
(i.e., p.m. settlement).\10\ The Commission became
[[Page 66104]]
concerned with the impact of p.m.-settled, cash-settled index options
on the underlying cash equities markets, and in particular, added
market volatility and sharp price movements near the close on
expiration days.\11\ These concerns were heightened during the
``triple-witching'' hour on the third Friday of March, June, September,
and December when index options, index futures, and options on index
futures expired concurrently.\12\ Academic research at the time
provided at least some evidence suggesting that futures and options
expirations contributed to excess volatility and reversals around the
close on those days.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The seller of a ``cash-settled'' index option pays out the
cash value of the applicable index on expiration or exercise. A
``physical delivery'' option, like equity and ETF options, involves
the transfer of the underlying asset rather than cash. See
Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options, available at:
https://www.theocc.com/Company-Information/Documents-and-Archives/Options-Disclosure-Document.
\10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65256 (September 2,
2011), 76 FR 55969, at 55972 (September 9, 2011) (SR-C2-2011-008)
(Order approving proposed rule change to establish a pilot program
to list and trade SPXPM options on the C2 Options Exchange,
Incorporated (``C2'')) (``C2 SPXPM Approval''). SPXPM was traded on
a pilot basis on C2 until the introduction of SPXPM trading on Cboe
Options. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68888 (February 8,
2013), 78 FR 10668, at 10668 (February 14, 2013) (SR-CBOE-2012-120)
(``SPXPM Approval Order'').
\11\ See C2 SPXPM Approval, 76 FR at 55972.
\12\ See id.
\13\ See Securities and Exchange Commission, Division of
Economic Risk and Analysis, Memorandum dated February 2, 2021 on
Cornerstone Analysis of PM Cash-Settled Index Option Pilots
(September 16, 2020) (``Pilot Memo'') at 5, available at: https://www.sec.gov/files/Analysis_of_PM_Cash_Settled_Index_Option_Pilots.pdf (citing, among
other papers, Stoll, Hans R., and Robert E. Whaley, ``Expiration day
effects of index options and futures,'' Monograph Series in Finance
and Economics, no. 3 (1986)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In light of the concerns with p.m. settlement and to help
ameliorate the price effects associated with expirations of p.m.-
settled, cash-settled index products, in 1987, the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission approved a proposed rule change by the Chicago
Mercantile Exchange (``CME'') to provide for a.m. settlement \14\ for
index futures, including futures on the S&P 500 Index (``S&P
500'').\15\ The Commission subsequently approved a proposed rule change
by Cboe Options to list and trade a.m.-settled options on the S&P
500.\16\ In 1992, the Commission approved Cboe Options' proposal to
transition all of its European-style cash-settled options on the S&P
500 to a.m. settlement.\17\ However, in 1993, the Commission approved a
proposed rule change allowing Cboe Options to list p.m.-settled options
on certain broad-based indexes, including the S&P 500, expiring at the
end of each calendar quarter (since approved as permanent).\18\
Starting in 2006, the Commission approved a number of proposals, on a
pilot basis, permitting Cboe Options to introduce other index options,
including SPX options, with p.m.-settlement. These include p.m.-settled
index options expiring weekly (other than the third Friday) and at the
end of each month,\19\ SPXPM, as well as p.m.-settled Mini-SPX Index
(``XSP'') options and Mini-Russell 2000 Index (``MRUT'') options
expiring on the third Friday of the month.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ The exercise settlement value for an a.m.-settled index
option is determined by reference to the reported level of the index
as derived from the opening prices of the component securities on
the business day before expiration.
\15\ See Proposed Amendments Relating to the Standard and Poor's
500, the Standard and Poor's 100 and the Standard Poor's OTC Stock
Price Index Futures Contract, 51 FR 47053 (December 30, 1986)
(notice of proposed rule change from the CME). See also Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 24367 (April 17, 1987), 52 FR 13890 (April
27, 1987) (SR-CBOE-87-11) (noting that the CME moved the S&P 500
futures contract's settlement value to opening prices on the
delivery date).
\16\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 24367 (April 17,
1987), 52 FR 13890 (April 27, 1987) (SR-CBOE-87-11).
\17\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 30944 (July 21,
1992), 57 FR 33376 (July 28, 1992) (SR-CBOE-92-09). The Commission
also approved proposals by other options markets to transfer most of
their cash-settled index products to a.m. settlement. See, e.g.,
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 25804 (June 15, 1988), 53 FR
23475 (June 22, 1988) (SR-NYSE-87-11 and 88-04).
\18\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 31800 (February 1,
1993), 58 FR 7274 (February 5, 1993) (SR-CBOE-92-13). See also
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 54123 (July 11, 2006), 71 FR
40558 (July 17, 2006) (SR-CBOE-2006-65); and 60164 (June 23, 2009),
74 FR 31333 (June 30, 2009) (SR-CBOE-2009-029).
\19\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 62911 (September
14, 2010), 75 FR 57539 (September 21, 2010) (SR-CBOE-2009-075);
76529 (November 30, 2015), 80 FR 75695 (December 3, 2015) (SR-CBOE-
2015-106); and 78531 (August 10, 2016), 81 FR 54643 (August 16,
2016) (SR-CBOE-2016-046).
\20\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 70087 (July 31,
2013), 78 FR 47809 (August 6, 2013) (SR-CBOE-2013-055); and 91067
(February 5, 2021) 86 FR 9108 (February 11, 2021) (SR-CBOE-2020-
116).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the course of approving the various pilots, the Commission
reiterated its concern about the potential impact on the market at
expiration for the underlying component stocks for a p.m.-settled,
cash-settled index option.\21\ However, the Commission also recognized
the potential impact was unclear.\22\ The Commission approved the
Program on a pilot basis to allow the Exchange and the Commission to
monitor for and assess any potential for adverse market effects.\23\ In
order to facilitate this assessment, the Exchange committed to provide
the Commission with data and analysis in connection with the Program
\24\ and to make such data publicly available.\25\ In addition to the
Exchange's data and analysis, Cornerstone Research also conducted an
analysis at the direction of Staff from the Commission's Division of
Economic and Risk Analysis. The analysis utilizes the level of expiring
p.m.-settled index options open interest and the measures of volatility
and price reversals for the corresponding index futures, the underlying
cash index, and index component securities in the minutes leading up to
and immediately following the market close to study the effects of
pilot programs allowing p.m.-settled index options. The Pilot Memo is
discussed in more detail below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See, e.g., SPXPM Approval Order, 78 FR at 10669. See also
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 64599 (June 3, 2011), 76 FR
33798, 33801-02 (June 9, 2011) (order instituting proceedings to
determine whether to approve or disapprove a proposed rule change to
allow the listing and trading of SPXPM options on the C2 Options
Exchange, Incorporated); and C2 SPXPM Approval, 76 FR at 55972-76.
\22\ See, e.g., SPXPM Approval Order, 78 FR at 10669.
\23\ See id.
\24\ See id. at 10670.
\25\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84535
(November 5, 2018), 83 FR 56129, at 56130 (November 9, 2018) (SR-
CBOE-2018-069) (stating the Exchange is making public on its website
data and analyses previously submitted to the Commission under the
Program and committing to make public any data or analyses submitted
in the future).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Description of the Proposal, as Modified by Amendment No. 1
SPXPM are cash-settled SPX options with third Friday-of-the-month
expiration dates (``Expiration Friday'') whose exercise settlement
value is derived from closing prices on the last trading day prior to
expiration. In February 2013, the Commission approved the Program to
list and trade these options on a pilot basis.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See SPXPM Approval Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange has filed to extend the operation of the pilot on
multiple occasions and it is currently set to expire on the earlier of
November 6, 2023, or the date on which the Program is approved on a
permanent basis.\27\ Now, the Exchange proposes to make the Program
permanent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 71424 (January 28,
2014), 79 FR 6249 (February 3, 2014) (SR-CBOE-2014-004); 73338
(October 10, 2014), 79 FR 62502 (October 17, 2014) (SR-CBOE-2014-
076); 77573 (April 8, 2016), 81 FR 22148 (April 14, 2016) (SR-CBOE-
2016-036); 80386 (April 6, 2017), 82 FR 17704 (April 12, 2017) (SR-
CBOE-2017-025); 83166 (May 3, 2018), 83 FR 21324 (May 9, 2018) (SR-
CBOE-2018-036); 84535 (November 5, 2018), 83 FR 56129 (November 9,
2018) (SR-CBOE-2018-069); 85688 (April 18, 2019), 84 FR 17214 (April
24, 2019) (SR-CBOE-2019-023); 87464 (November 5, 2019), 84 FR 61099
(November 12, 2019) (SR-CBOE-2019-107); 88674 (April 16, 2020), 85
FR 22479 (April 22, 2020) (SR-CBOE-2020-036); 90263 (October 23,
2020), 85 FR 68611 (October 29, 2020) (SR-CBOE-2020-100); 91698
(April 28, 2021) 86 FR 23761 (May 4, 2021) (SR-CBOE-2021-027); 93455
(October 28, 2021), 86 FR 60660 (November 3, 2021) (SR-CBOE-2021-
062); 94799 (April 27, 2022), 87 FR 26244 (May 3, 2022) (SR-CBOE-
2022-019); 96222 (November 3, 2022), 87 FR 67736 (November 9, 2022)
(SR-CBOE-2022-054); and 97446 (May 5, 2023), 88 FR 30365 (May 11,
2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since the Program's inception in 2013, the Exchange has submitted
reports to the Commission regarding the Program that detail the
Exchange's experience with the Program, pursuant
[[Page 66105]]
to the SPXPM Approval Order.\28\ The Exchange states that, during the
course of the Program, it also provided the Commission with any
additional data or analyses the Commission requested if the Commission
deemed such data or analyses necessary to determine whether the Program
was consistent with the Act.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See supra note 10. The Exchange has made public on its
website data and analyses previously submitted to the Commission
under the Program. See https://www.cboe.com/aboutcboe/legal-regulatory/national-market-system-plans/pm-settlement-spxpm-data.
\29\ See Notice, 88 FR at 4267.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Discussion and Commission Findings
After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, is consistent with the Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.\30\ In particular, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, is consistent
with section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\31\ which requires, among other
things, that the Exchange's rules be designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism
of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the public interest. In its proposal
to make the Program permanent, the Exchange addressed whether the
Program negatively impacts markets or impacted the quality of the SPX
options market. Each of these elements is discussed in greater detail
below. As stated above, no comments were received on the proposed rule
change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\31\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Market Impact Considerations
The Exchange states it has not identified any evidence from the
pilot data indicating that the trading of p.m.-settled SPX options has
any adverse impact on fair and orderly markets on Expiration Fridays
for the S&P 500 or the underlying securities comprising the S&P 500,
nor have there been any observations of abnormal market movements
attributable to p.m.-settled SPX options from any market participants
that have come to the attention of the Exchange.\32\ In order to
support its overall assessment of the Program, the Exchange included a
review and analysis of pilot data.\33\ Among other things, the
Exchange's analysis includes end of day volatility as well as a
comparison of the impact of quarterly index rebalancing versus p.m.-
settled expirations.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ See Notice, 88 FR at 4267.
\33\ See id. at 4266-70.
\34\ See id. at 4268.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to reviewing the data and analysis provided by the
Exchange, the Commission reviewed the analysis in the Pilot Memo, which
evaluates whether higher levels of expiring open interest in p.m.-
settled index options results in increased volatility and price
reversals around the close. The Pilot Memo shows that the market share
for p.m.-settled options on the S&P 500 has grown substantially since
2007.\35\ The Exchange's review of pilot data also showed this trend
continuing from 2019 through 2021.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ See Pilot Memo at 2.
\36\ See Notice, 88 FR at 4267. Specifically, since 2007, p.m.-
settled SPX options grew from 0.1% of open interest to 30% of open
interest in 2021. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Pilot Memo examines whether and to what extent expiring open
interest in p.m.-settled index options is empirically related with the
tendency of the corresponding index futures, the underlying index, or
index components to experience increased transitory volatility and
price reversals around the time of market close on expiration dates.
The Pilot Memo concludes that, although expiring p.m.-settled index
option open interest may have a statistically significant relationship
with volatility and price reversals of the underlying index, index
futures, and index component securities around the market close, the
magnitude of the effect is economically very small.\37\ For example,
the largest settlement event that occurred during the time period
studied in the Pilot Memo (a settlement of $100.4 billion of notional
on December 29, 2017) had an estimated impact on the futures price of
only approximately 0.02% (a predicted impact of $0.54 relative to a
closing futures price of $2,677).\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ See Pilot Memo at 3.
\38\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange further reviewed a sample of pilot data from 2019
through 2021, and measured the volatility of the S&P 500 over the final
fifteen minutes of each trading day and compared expiration days to
non-expiration days.\39\ Generally volatility was slightly higher on
expiration days, but in cases where overall market volatility
increased, the normalized impact on expiration days versus non-
expiration days remained consistent.\40\ The Exchange further analyzed
volatility on days when the S&P 500 was rebalanced, and states its
results suggest more closing volatility on rebalance dates compared to
non-rebalance expiration dates, indicating that rebalancing of the S&P
500 may have a greater impact on S&P 500 volatility than p.m.-settled
option expirations.\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\39\ See Notice, 88 FR at 4268.
\40\ See id.
\41\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also reviewed a sample of post-2018 pilot data for
potential correlation between excess market volatility and price
reversals and the hedging activity of liquidity providers.\42\ To
determine whether there is a correlation, the Exchange calculated an
estimate of the amount of market-on-close (``MOC'') volume in the S&P
500 component markets attributable to expected hedging activity as a
result of expiring in-the-money options.\43\ The Exchange states its
results indicate that other sources of MOC share volume generally
exceed the volume resulting from hedging activity for p.m.-settled SPX
options.\44\ Further, the Exchange also compared hedging futures
positions that would correspond to expiring in-the-money p.m.-settled
SPX options and concludes the data indicate negligible capacity for
hedging activity to increase volatility in the underlying markets.\45\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\42\ See id.
\43\ See id.
\44\ See id. at 4269.
\45\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange states that the significant changes in the
closing procedures of the primary markets in recent decades, including
considerable advances in trading systems and technology, have
significantly minimized risks of any potential impact of p.m.-, cash-
settled SPX options on the underlying cash markets.\46\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\46\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Market Quality Considerations
The Exchange also completed an analysis intended to evaluate
whether the Program impacted the quality of the SPX options market.
Specifically, the Exchange compared values of key market quality
indicators (specifically, the bid-ask spread \47\ and effective spread
\48\) in p.m.-settled SPX weekly
[[Page 66106]]
(``SPXW'') options both before and after the introduction of Tuesday
expirations and Thursday expirations for SPXW options on April 18 and
May 11, 2022, respectively.\49\ The Exchange states that analyzing
whether the introduction of new SPXW p.m.-settled expirations (i.e.,
SPXW options with Tuesday and Thursday expirations) impacted the market
quality of then-existing SPXW p.m.-settled expirations (i.e., SPXW
options with Monday, Wednesday, and Friday expirations) provides a
reasonable substitute to evaluate whether the introduction of p.m.-
settled index options impacted the market quality of the SPX market
when the Program began.\50\ Therefore, the Exchange believes analyzing
the impact of new SPXW options on then-existing SPXW options permit the
Exchange to extrapolate that it is unlikely the introduction of p.m.-
settled SPXW options significantly impacted the market quality of a.m.-
settled SPX options when the Program began.\51\ The Exchange concludes
from this analysis that the introduction of SPX options with Tuesday
and Thursday options had no significant impact on the market quality of
SPXW options with Monday, Wednesday, and Friday expirations. For a
majority of the series analyzed, the Exchange observed no statistically
significant difference in bid-ask spread or effective spread.\52\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\47\ The Exchange calculated for each of SPXW options (with
Monday, Wednesday, and Friday expirations) and SPY Weekly options
(with Monday, Wednesday, and Friday expirations) the daily time-
weighted bid-ask spread on the Exchange during its regular trading
hours session, adjusted for the difference in size between SPXW
options and SPY options (SPXW options are approximately ten times
the value of SPY options).
\48\ The Exchange calculated the volume-weighted average daily
effective spread for simple trades for each of SPXW options (with
Monday, Wednesday, and Friday expirations) and SPY Weekly options
(with Monday, Wednesday, and Friday expirations) as twice the amount
of the absolute value of the difference between an order execution
price and the midpoint of the national best bid and offer at the
time of execution, adjusted for the difference in size between SPXW
options and SPY options.
\49\ For purposes of comparison, the Exchange paired SPXW
options and SPY options with the same moneyness and same days to
expiration.
\50\ See Notice, 88 FR at 4269.
\51\ See id. at 4270.
\52\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that the evidence contained in the
Exchange's filing, the Exchange's pilot data and reports, and the Pilot
Memo analysis demonstrate that the Program has benefitted investors and
other market participants by providing more flexible trading and
hedging opportunities while also having no disruptive impact on the
market. The market for SPXPM options has grown significantly in size
over the course of the Program, and analysis of the pilot data did not
identify any significant economic impact on the underlying component
securities of the S&P 500 surrounding the close as a result of expiring
p.m.-settled SPX options nor did it indicate a deterioration in market
quality (as measured by bid-ask and effective spreads) for an existing
product when a new p.m.-settled expiration was introduced. Further,
significant changes in closing procedures in the decades since index
options moved to a.m. settlement may also serve to mitigate the
potential impact of p.m.-settled index options on the underlying cash
markets.
Accordingly, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 1, is consistent with section 6(b)(5) of the
Act \53\ and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a
national securities exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\53\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\54\ that the proposed rule change (SR-CBOE-2023-005), as modified
by Amendment No. 1, be, and hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\54\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\55\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\55\
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-20810 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P