Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend its Fee Schedule, 66070-66073 [2023-20807]
Download as PDF
66070
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 26, 2023 / Notices
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–98449; File No. SR–
CboeEDGX–2023–059]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend its
Fee Schedule
September 20, 2023.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 11, 2023, Cboe EDGX
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) proposes to
amend its Fee Schedule. The text of the
proposed rule change is provided in
Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/
options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/),
at the Exchange’s Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1 15
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Sep 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Fee Schedule applicable to its equities
trading platform (‘‘EDGX Equities’’) by
adopting a new Cross Asset Tier. The
Exchange proposes to implement these
changes effective September 1, 2023.3
The Exchange first notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive or
incentives to be insufficient. More
specifically, the Exchange is only one of
16 registered equities exchanges, as well
as a number of alternative trading
systems and other off-exchange venues
that do not have similar self-regulatory
responsibilities under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’), to
which market participants may direct
their order flow. Based on publicly
available information,4 no single
registered equities exchange has more
than 14% of the market share. Thus, in
such a low-concentrated and highly
competitive market, no single equities
exchange possesses significant pricing
power in the execution of order flow.
The Exchange in particular operates a
‘‘Maker-Taker’’ model whereby it pays
rebates to members that add liquidity
and assesses fees to those that remove
liquidity. The Exchange’s Fee Schedule
sets forth the standard rebates and rates
applied per share for orders that provide
and remove liquidity, respectively.
Currently, for orders in securities priced
at or above $1.00, the Exchange
provides a standard rebate of $0.00160
per share for orders that add liquidity
and assesses a fee of $0.0030 per share
for orders that remove liquidity.5 For
orders in securities priced below $1.00,
the Exchange provides a standard rebate
of $0.00009 per share for orders that add
liquidity and assesses a fee of 0.30% of
the total dollar value for orders that
remove liquidity.6 Additionally, in
response to the competitive
environment, the Exchange also offers
tiered pricing which provides Members
3 The Exchange initially filed the proposed fee
change on August 31, 2023 (SR–CboeEDGX–2023–
055). On September 11, 2023, the Exchange
withdrew that proposal and submitted this
proposal.
4 See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market
Volume Summary, Month-to-Date (August 24,
2023), available at https://www.cboe.com/us/
equities/market_statistics/.
5 See EDGX Equities Fee Schedule, Standard
Rates.
6 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
opportunities to qualify for higher
rebates or reduced fees where certain
volume criteria and thresholds are met.
Tiered pricing provides an incremental
incentive for Members to strive for
higher tier levels, which provides
increasingly higher benefits or discounts
for satisfying increasingly more
stringent criteria.
Under footnote 1 of the Fee Schedule,
the Exchange currently offers various
Add/Remove Volume Tiers that provide
enhanced rebates for orders yielding fee
codes B,7 V,8 Y,9 3,10 and 4.11 The
Exchange now proposes to introduce a
new tier under footnote 1 titled Cross
Asset Tier, which is designed to
incentivize Members to achieve certain
levels of participation on both the
Exchange’s equities and options
platform (‘‘EDGX Options’’). The
proposed criteria is as follows:
• The Cross Asset Tier provides a
rebate of $0.0029 per share for securities
priced above $1.00 for qualifying orders
(i.e., orders yielding fee codes B, V, Y,
3, or 4) where (1) Member has a StepUp Tape B & C ADAV 12 from July 2023
≥ 4,000,000; and (2) Member has a
Market Maker Add 13 on EDGX Options
≥ 2,000,000 in SPY.
The proposed Cross Asset Tier is
intended to provide an additional
manner to incentive Members to add
displayed liquidity in Tape B and Tape
C securities on the Exchange while also
increasing participation in SPY on
EDGX Options. The Exchange believes
the addition of the Cross Asset Tier will
incentivize Members to grow their
volume on the Exchange, thereby
contributing to a deeper and more liquid
market, which benefits all market
participants and provides greater
execution opportunities on the
Exchange.
Additionally, the Exchange notes that
the proposed Cross Asset Tier will
expire no later than January 31, 2024,
7 Fee code B is appended to orders that add
liquidity to EDGX in Tape B securities.
8 Fee code V is appended to orders that add
liquidity to EDGX in Tape A securities.
9 Fee code Y is appended to orders that add
liquidity to EDGX in Tape C securities.
10 Fee code 3 is appended to orders that add
liquidity to EDGX in Tape A or Tape C securities
during the pre and post market.
11 Fee code 4 is appended to orders that add
liquidity to EDGX in Tape B securities during the
pre and post market.
12 Step-Up Tape B & C ADAV means ADAV in
Tape B and Tape C securities in the relevant
baseline month subtracted from current ADAV.
ADAV means average daily volume calculated as
the number of shares added per day. ADAV is
calculated on a monthly basis.
13 Market Maker Add means any order for the
account of a registered Market Maker on EDGX
Options appended with fee code NM or PM. See
EDGX Options Fee Schedule, Footnote 2.
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 26, 2023 / Notices
which the Exchange will indicate on the
Exchange’s fee schedule. Growth Tiers
in general are designed to provide
Members with additional opportunities
to receive enhanced rebates by
increasing their order flow to the
Exchange, which further contributes to
a deeper, more liquid market and
provides even more execution
opportunities for active market
participants. Like other Growth Tiers on
the Exchange,14 the proposed Cross
Asset Tier is designed to give members
an additional opportunity to receive an
enhanced rebate for orders meeting the
applicable criteria. Increased overall
order flow benefits all Members by
contributing towards a robust and wellbalanced market ecosystem.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Act
and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
section 6(b) of the Act.15 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the section
6(b)(5) 16 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the section 6(b)(5) 17 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers as
well as section 6(b)(4) 18 as it is designed
to provide for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among its Members and other persons
using its facilities.
As described above, the Exchange
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive or
incentives to be insufficient. The
Exchange believes that its proposal to
14 See EDGX Equities Fee Schedule, Footnote 1,
Add/Remove Volume Tiers.
15 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
16 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
17 Id.
18 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Sep 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
introduce a Cross Asset Tier reflects a
competitive pricing structure designed
to incentivize market participants to
direct their order flow to the Exchange,
which the Exchange believes would
enhance market quality to the benefit of
all Members. Additionally, the
Exchange notes that relative volumebased incentives and discounts have
been widely adopted by exchanges,19
including the Exchange,20 and are
reasonable, equitable and nondiscriminatory because they are open to
all Members on an equal basis and
provide additional benefits or discounts
that are reasonably related to (i) the
value to an exchange’s market quality
and (ii) associated higher levels of
market activity, such as higher levels of
liquidity provision and/or growth
patterns. Competing equity exchanges
offer similar tiered pricing structures,
including schedules of rebates and fees
that apply based upon members
achieving certain volume and/or growth
thresholds, as well as assess similar fees
or rebates for similar types of orders, to
that of the Exchange.21
In particular, the Exchange believes
its proposal to introduce a Cross Asset
Tier is reasonable because the revised
tier will be available to all Members and
provide all Members with an additional
opportunity to receive an enhanced
rebate. The Exchange further believes
the proposed Cross Asset Tier will
provide a reasonable means to
encourage liquidity adding displayed
orders in Members’ order flow to the
Exchange and to incentivize Members to
continue to provide liquidity adding
volume to the Exchange by offering
them an additional opportunity to
receive an enhanced rebate on
qualifying orders. An overall increase in
activity would deepen the Exchange’s
liquidity pool, offers additional cost
savings, support the quality of price
discovery, promote market transparency
and improve market quality, for all
investors.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed Cross Asset Tier represents an
equitable allocation of fees and rebates
and is not unfairly discriminatory
because all Members will be eligible for
the proposed tier and have the
opportunity to meet the tier’s criteria
and receive the corresponding enhanced
rebate if such criteria is met. To the
extent a Member participates on EDGX
19 See e.g., BZX Equities Fee Schedule, Footnote
1, Add/Remove Volume Tiers.
20 See e.g., EDGX Equities Fee Schedule, Footnote
1, Add/Remove Volume Tiers.
21 See e.g., MIAX Pearl Options Fee Schedule,
Transaction Rebates/Fees; The Nasdaq Options
Market LLC (‘‘NOM’’) Pricing Schedule, Options 7,
Section 2.
PO 00000
Frm 00126
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66071
Equities but not on EDGX Options, the
Exchange continues to believe that its
proposal represents an equitable
allocation of fees and rebates and is not
unfairly discriminatory with respect to
such Member based on the overall
benefit to the Exchange resulting from
the success of its options platform.
Particularly, the Exchange believes that
additional such success allows the
Exchange to continue to provide and
potentially expand its existing incentive
programs to the benefit of all
participants on the Exchange, regardless
of whether they participate on EDGX
Options or not. Without having a view
of activity on other markets and offexchange venues, the Exchange has no
way of knowing whether this proposed
rule change would definitely result in
any Members qualifying the new
proposed tiers. While the Exchange has
no way of predicting with certainty how
the proposed changes will impact
Member activity, based on the prior
months volume, the Exchange
anticipates that at least one Member will
be able to satisfy the proposed criteria
for the proposed Cross Asset Tier. The
Exchange also notes that proposed
changes will not adversely impact any
Member’s ability to qualify for enhanced
rebates or reduced fees offered under
other tiers. Should a Member not meet
the proposed new criteria for the
proposed Cross Asset Tier, the Member
will merely not receive that
corresponding enhanced rebate.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Rather, as
discussed above, the Exchange believes
that the proposed changes would
encourage the submission of additional
order flow to a public exchange, thereby
promoting market depth, execution
incentives and enhanced execution
opportunities, as well as price discovery
and transparency for all Members. As a
result, the Exchange believes that the
proposed changes further the
Commission’s goal in adopting
Regulation NMS of fostering
competition among orders, which
promotes ‘‘more efficient pricing of
individual stocks for all types of orders,
large and small.’’
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule changes do not impose any burden
on intramarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Particularly,
the proposed Cross Asset Tier will
apply to all Members equally in that all
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
66072
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 26, 2023 / Notices
Members are eligible for the tier, have
a reasonable opportunity to meet the
tier’s criteria and will receive the
enhanced rebate on their qualifying
orders if such criteria is met. The
Exchange does not believe the proposed
changes burden competition, but rather,
enhances competition as it is intended
to increase the competitiveness of EDGX
by adopting pricing incentives in order
to attract order flow and incentivize
participants to increase their
participation on the Exchange,
providing for additional execution
opportunities for market participants
and improved price transparency.
Additionally, the Exchange believes that
the proposed criteria based on SPY
options volume applicable to EDGX
Options Market Makers will provide an
additional incentive to those Market
Makers that concentrate their trading
activity in SPY options to send
additional SPY orders, which in turn
provides additional liquidity in the
market. Greater overall order flow,
trading opportunities, and pricing
transparency benefits all market
participants on the Exchange, as well as
its affiliate options exchange, by
enhancing market quality and
continuing to encourage Members to
send orders, thereby contributing
towards a robust and well-balanced
market ecosystem.
Next, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule changes does not impose
any burden on intermarket competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
As previously discussed, the Exchange
operates in a highly competitive market.
Members have numerous alternative
venues that they may participate on and
direct their order flow, including other
equities exchanges, off-exchange
venues, and alternative trading systems.
Additionally, the Exchange represents a
small percentage of the overall market.
Based on publicly available information,
no single equities exchange has more
than 14% of the market share.22
Therefore, no exchange possesses
significant pricing power in the
execution of order flow. Indeed,
participants can readily choose to send
their orders to other exchange and offexchange venues if they deem fee levels
at those other venues to be more
favorable. Moreover, the Commission
has repeatedly expressed its preference
for competition over regulatory
intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities
markets. Specifically, in Regulation
NMS, the Commission highlighted the
importance of market forces in
22 Supra
note 2.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Sep 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
determining prices and SRO revenues
and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ‘‘has
been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 23 The
fact that this market is competitive has
also long been recognized by the courts.
In NetCoalition v. Securities and
Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit
stated as follows: ‘‘[n]o one disputes
that competition for order flow is
‘fierce.’ . . . As the SEC explained, ‘[i]n
the U.S. national market system, buyers
and sellers of securities, and the brokerdealers that act as their order-routing
agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution’;
[and] ‘no exchange can afford to take its
market share percentages for granted’
because ‘no exchange possesses a
monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in
the execution of order flow from broker
dealers’. . . .’’.24 Accordingly, the
Exchange does not believe its proposed
fee change imposes any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 25 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 26 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
23 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
24 NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C.
Cir. 2010) (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782–
83 (December 9, 2008) (SR–NYSEArca–2006–21)).
25 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
26 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f).
PO 00000
Frm 00127
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
CboeEDGX–2023–059 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–CboeEDGX–2023–059. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–CboeEDGX–2023–059 and should be
submitted on or before October 17,
2023.
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 26, 2023 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.27
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–20807 Filed 9–25–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270–813, OMB Control No.
3235–0765]
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request; Extension: Rule 498A
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–2736.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’) (44 U.S.C.
3501–3520), the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collections of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension
and approval.
Rule 498A under the Securities Act
permits a person to satisfy its
prospectus delivery obligations under
Section 5(b)(2) of the Securities Act for
a contract by: (1) sending or giving to
new investors key information
contained in a variable contract
statutory prospectus in the form of an
initial summary prospectus; (2) sending
or giving to existing investors each year
a brief description of certain changes to
the contract, and a subset of the
information in the initial summary
prospectus, in the form of an updating
summary prospectus; and (3) providing
the statutory prospectus and other
materials online. Rule 498A considers a
person to have met its prospectus
delivery obligations for any portfolio
companies associated with a variable
contract if the portfolio company
prospectuses are posted online. Under
the rule, a registrant (or the financial
intermediary distributing the variable
contract) relying on the rule must send
the variable contract statutory
prospectus (that statutory prospectus
must be filed as part of registration
statement on Form N–3, N–4, or N–6, as
applicable) and other materials to an
investor in paper or electronic format
upon request.
27 17
Based on current EDGAR data, 82% of
variable contracts that filed annual
updates to their registration statements
filed at least one summary prospectus
under rule 498A. In the aggregate, the
Commission staff estimates the total
annual hour burden to comply with
Rule 498A to be 7,634 hours, at an
internal time cost equivalent of
$2,337,471, and a total annual external
cost burden of $9,094,866.
The estimate of average burden hours
is made solely for the purposes of the
Paperwork Reduction Act. The estimate
is based on communications with
industry representatives, and is not
derived from a comprehensive or even
a representative survey or study.
Responses will not be kept confidential.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Written comments are invited on: (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
estimate of the burden of the collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted
by November 27, 2023.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
under the PRA unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Please direct your written comments
to: David Bottom, Acting Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, c/o John
Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington,
DC 20549 or send an email to: PRA_
Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: September 21, 2023.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–20906 Filed 9–25–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–98455; File No. SR–CBOE–
2023–019]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
Exchange, Inc.; Order Granting
Approval of a Proposed Rule Change
To Make Permanent the Operation of
Its Pilot Program That Allows the
Exchange To List P.M.-Settled Third
Friday-of-the-Month Mini-SPX Index
(‘‘XSP’’) Options and Mini-Russell 2000
Index (‘‘MRUT’’) Options Series
September 20, 2023.
I. Introduction
On April 19, 2023, Cboe Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Cboe Options’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b-4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to make permanent the
operation of its pilot program
(‘‘Program’’) that permits the Exchange
to list p.m.-settled third Friday-of-themonth XSP and MRUT options (‘‘p.m.settled XSP’’ and ‘‘p.m.-settled MRUT,’’
respectively, and collectively, the ‘‘Pilot
Products’’). The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the
Federal Register on April 28, 2023.3 On
June 9, 2023, pursuant to section
19(b)(2) of the Act,4 the Commission
designated a longer period within which
to approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or
institute proceedings to determine
whether to disapprove the proposed
rule change.5 On July 27, 2023, the
Commission instituted proceedings to
determine whether to approve or
disapprove the proposed rule change.6
The Commission did not receive any
comment letters and is approving the
proposed rule change.
II. Background
When cash-settled 7 index options
were first introduced in the 1980s, they
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97366
(April 24, 2023), 88 FR 26359 (‘‘Notice’’).
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97678,
88 FR 39285 (June 15, 2023). The Commission
designated July 27, 2023, as the date by which the
Commission shall approve or disapprove, or
institute proceedings to determine whether to
approve or disapprove, the proposed rule change.
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98005,
88 FR 50943 (August 2, 2023).
7 The seller of a ‘‘cash-settled’’ index option pays
out the cash value of the applicable index on
expiration or exercise. A ‘‘physical delivery’’
option, like equity and ETF options, involves the
2 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Sep 25, 2023
66073
Continued
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00128
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66070-66073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20807]
[[Page 66070]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-98449; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2023-059]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Amend its Fee Schedule
September 20, 2023.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on September 11, 2023, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``EDGX'') proposes to
amend its Fee Schedule. The text of the proposed rule change is
provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule applicable to its
equities trading platform (``EDGX Equities'') by adopting a new Cross
Asset Tier. The Exchange proposes to implement these changes effective
September 1, 2023.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Exchange initially filed the proposed fee change on
August 31, 2023 (SR-CboeEDGX-2023-055). On September 11, 2023, the
Exchange withdrew that proposal and submitted this proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange first notes that it operates in a highly competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. More specifically, the
Exchange is only one of 16 registered equities exchanges, as well as a
number of alternative trading systems and other off-exchange venues
that do not have similar self-regulatory responsibilities under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''), to which market
participants may direct their order flow. Based on publicly available
information,\4\ no single registered equities exchange has more than
14% of the market share. Thus, in such a low-concentrated and highly
competitive market, no single equities exchange possesses significant
pricing power in the execution of order flow. The Exchange in
particular operates a ``Maker-Taker'' model whereby it pays rebates to
members that add liquidity and assesses fees to those that remove
liquidity. The Exchange's Fee Schedule sets forth the standard rebates
and rates applied per share for orders that provide and remove
liquidity, respectively. Currently, for orders in securities priced at
or above $1.00, the Exchange provides a standard rebate of $0.00160 per
share for orders that add liquidity and assesses a fee of $0.0030 per
share for orders that remove liquidity.\5\ For orders in securities
priced below $1.00, the Exchange provides a standard rebate of $0.00009
per share for orders that add liquidity and assesses a fee of 0.30% of
the total dollar value for orders that remove liquidity.\6\
Additionally, in response to the competitive environment, the Exchange
also offers tiered pricing which provides Members opportunities to
qualify for higher rebates or reduced fees where certain volume
criteria and thresholds are met. Tiered pricing provides an incremental
incentive for Members to strive for higher tier levels, which provides
increasingly higher benefits or discounts for satisfying increasingly
more stringent criteria.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market Volume
Summary, Month-to-Date (August 24, 2023), available at https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/market_statistics/.
\5\ See EDGX Equities Fee Schedule, Standard Rates.
\6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under footnote 1 of the Fee Schedule, the Exchange currently offers
various Add/Remove Volume Tiers that provide enhanced rebates for
orders yielding fee codes B,\7\ V,\8\ Y,\9\ 3,\10\ and 4.\11\ The
Exchange now proposes to introduce a new tier under footnote 1 titled
Cross Asset Tier, which is designed to incentivize Members to achieve
certain levels of participation on both the Exchange's equities and
options platform (``EDGX Options''). The proposed criteria is as
follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Fee code B is appended to orders that add liquidity to EDGX
in Tape B securities.
\8\ Fee code V is appended to orders that add liquidity to EDGX
in Tape A securities.
\9\ Fee code Y is appended to orders that add liquidity to EDGX
in Tape C securities.
\10\ Fee code 3 is appended to orders that add liquidity to EDGX
in Tape A or Tape C securities during the pre and post market.
\11\ Fee code 4 is appended to orders that add liquidity to EDGX
in Tape B securities during the pre and post market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cross Asset Tier provides a rebate of $0.0029 per
share for securities priced above $1.00 for qualifying orders (i.e.,
orders yielding fee codes B, V, Y, 3, or 4) where (1) Member has a
Step-Up Tape B & C ADAV \12\ from July 2023 >= 4,000,000; and (2)
Member has a Market Maker Add \13\ on EDGX Options >= 2,000,000 in SPY.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Step-Up Tape B & C ADAV means ADAV in Tape B and Tape C
securities in the relevant baseline month subtracted from current
ADAV. ADAV means average daily volume calculated as the number of
shares added per day. ADAV is calculated on a monthly basis.
\13\ Market Maker Add means any order for the account of a
registered Market Maker on EDGX Options appended with fee code NM or
PM. See EDGX Options Fee Schedule, Footnote 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed Cross Asset Tier is intended to provide an additional
manner to incentive Members to add displayed liquidity in Tape B and
Tape C securities on the Exchange while also increasing participation
in SPY on EDGX Options. The Exchange believes the addition of the Cross
Asset Tier will incentivize Members to grow their volume on the
Exchange, thereby contributing to a deeper and more liquid market,
which benefits all market participants and provides greater execution
opportunities on the Exchange.
Additionally, the Exchange notes that the proposed Cross Asset Tier
will expire no later than January 31, 2024,
[[Page 66071]]
which the Exchange will indicate on the Exchange's fee schedule. Growth
Tiers in general are designed to provide Members with additional
opportunities to receive enhanced rebates by increasing their order
flow to the Exchange, which further contributes to a deeper, more
liquid market and provides even more execution opportunities for active
market participants. Like other Growth Tiers on the Exchange,\14\ the
proposed Cross Asset Tier is designed to give members an additional
opportunity to receive an enhanced rebate for orders meeting the
applicable criteria. Increased overall order flow benefits all Members
by contributing towards a robust and well-balanced market ecosystem.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See EDGX Equities Fee Schedule, Footnote 1, Add/Remove
Volume Tiers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of section 6(b) of the
Act.\15\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change
is consistent with the section 6(b)(5) \16\ requirements that the rules
of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts
and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the section 6(b)(5) \17\ requirement that the rules of
an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers as well as section 6(b)(4) \18\
as it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among its Members and other persons using
its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\17\ Id.
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As described above, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. The Exchange believes that
its proposal to introduce a Cross Asset Tier reflects a competitive
pricing structure designed to incentivize market participants to direct
their order flow to the Exchange, which the Exchange believes would
enhance market quality to the benefit of all Members. Additionally, the
Exchange notes that relative volume-based incentives and discounts have
been widely adopted by exchanges,\19\ including the Exchange,\20\ and
are reasonable, equitable and non-discriminatory because they are open
to all Members on an equal basis and provide additional benefits or
discounts that are reasonably related to (i) the value to an exchange's
market quality and (ii) associated higher levels of market activity,
such as higher levels of liquidity provision and/or growth patterns.
Competing equity exchanges offer similar tiered pricing structures,
including schedules of rebates and fees that apply based upon members
achieving certain volume and/or growth thresholds, as well as assess
similar fees or rebates for similar types of orders, to that of the
Exchange.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See e.g., BZX Equities Fee Schedule, Footnote 1, Add/Remove
Volume Tiers.
\20\ See e.g., EDGX Equities Fee Schedule, Footnote 1, Add/
Remove Volume Tiers.
\21\ See e.g., MIAX Pearl Options Fee Schedule, Transaction
Rebates/Fees; The Nasdaq Options Market LLC (``NOM'') Pricing
Schedule, Options 7, Section 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, the Exchange believes its proposal to introduce a
Cross Asset Tier is reasonable because the revised tier will be
available to all Members and provide all Members with an additional
opportunity to receive an enhanced rebate. The Exchange further
believes the proposed Cross Asset Tier will provide a reasonable means
to encourage liquidity adding displayed orders in Members' order flow
to the Exchange and to incentivize Members to continue to provide
liquidity adding volume to the Exchange by offering them an additional
opportunity to receive an enhanced rebate on qualifying orders. An
overall increase in activity would deepen the Exchange's liquidity
pool, offers additional cost savings, support the quality of price
discovery, promote market transparency and improve market quality, for
all investors.
The Exchange believes that the proposed Cross Asset Tier represents
an equitable allocation of fees and rebates and is not unfairly
discriminatory because all Members will be eligible for the proposed
tier and have the opportunity to meet the tier's criteria and receive
the corresponding enhanced rebate if such criteria is met. To the
extent a Member participates on EDGX Equities but not on EDGX Options,
the Exchange continues to believe that its proposal represents an
equitable allocation of fees and rebates and is not unfairly
discriminatory with respect to such Member based on the overall benefit
to the Exchange resulting from the success of its options platform.
Particularly, the Exchange believes that additional such success allows
the Exchange to continue to provide and potentially expand its existing
incentive programs to the benefit of all participants on the Exchange,
regardless of whether they participate on EDGX Options or not. Without
having a view of activity on other markets and off-exchange venues, the
Exchange has no way of knowing whether this proposed rule change would
definitely result in any Members qualifying the new proposed tiers.
While the Exchange has no way of predicting with certainty how the
proposed changes will impact Member activity, based on the prior months
volume, the Exchange anticipates that at least one Member will be able
to satisfy the proposed criteria for the proposed Cross Asset Tier. The
Exchange also notes that proposed changes will not adversely impact any
Member's ability to qualify for enhanced rebates or reduced fees
offered under other tiers. Should a Member not meet the proposed new
criteria for the proposed Cross Asset Tier, the Member will merely not
receive that corresponding enhanced rebate.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Rather, as discussed above,
the Exchange believes that the proposed changes would encourage the
submission of additional order flow to a public exchange, thereby
promoting market depth, execution incentives and enhanced execution
opportunities, as well as price discovery and transparency for all
Members. As a result, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes
further the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering
competition among orders, which promotes ``more efficient pricing of
individual stocks for all types of orders, large and small.''
The Exchange believes the proposed rule changes do not impose any
burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Particularly, the proposed
Cross Asset Tier will apply to all Members equally in that all
[[Page 66072]]
Members are eligible for the tier, have a reasonable opportunity to
meet the tier's criteria and will receive the enhanced rebate on their
qualifying orders if such criteria is met. The Exchange does not
believe the proposed changes burden competition, but rather, enhances
competition as it is intended to increase the competitiveness of EDGX
by adopting pricing incentives in order to attract order flow and
incentivize participants to increase their participation on the
Exchange, providing for additional execution opportunities for market
participants and improved price transparency. Additionally, the
Exchange believes that the proposed criteria based on SPY options
volume applicable to EDGX Options Market Makers will provide an
additional incentive to those Market Makers that concentrate their
trading activity in SPY options to send additional SPY orders, which in
turn provides additional liquidity in the market. Greater overall order
flow, trading opportunities, and pricing transparency benefits all
market participants on the Exchange, as well as its affiliate options
exchange, by enhancing market quality and continuing to encourage
Members to send orders, thereby contributing towards a robust and well-
balanced market ecosystem.
Next, the Exchange believes the proposed rule changes does not
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As previously
discussed, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market.
Members have numerous alternative venues that they may participate on
and direct their order flow, including other equities exchanges, off-
exchange venues, and alternative trading systems. Additionally, the
Exchange represents a small percentage of the overall market. Based on
publicly available information, no single equities exchange has more
than 14% of the market share.\22\ Therefore, no exchange possesses
significant pricing power in the execution of order flow. Indeed,
participants can readily choose to send their orders to other exchange
and off-exchange venues if they deem fee levels at those other venues
to be more favorable. Moreover, the Commission has repeatedly expressed
its preference for competition over regulatory intervention in
determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets.
Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the
importance of market forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and,
also, recognized that current regulation of the market system ``has
been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to investors and listed
companies.'' \23\ The fact that this market is competitive has also
long been recognized by the courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities and
Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit stated as follows: ``[n]o one
disputes that competition for order flow is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC
explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market system, buyers and sellers of
securities, and the broker-dealers that act as their order-routing
agents, have a wide range of choices of where to route orders for
execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to take its market share
percentages for granted' because `no exchange possesses a monopoly,
regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from broker
dealers'. . . .''.\24\ Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe its
proposed fee change imposes any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ Supra note 2.
\23\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
\24\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010)
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2,
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \25\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \26\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\26\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-CboeEDGX-2023-059 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeEDGX-2023-059. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeEDGX-2023-059 and should
be submitted on or before October 17, 2023.
[[Page 66073]]
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-20807 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P