Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021-2022, 61520-61522 [2023-19350]
Download as PDF
61520
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2023 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–871]
Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From
India: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2021–2022
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
finds that producers and/or exporters
subject to this administrative review
made sales of subject merchandise at
less than normal value (NV) during the
period of review (POR) August 1, 2021,
through July 31, 2022. Interested parties
are invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable September 7, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred
Baker or Preston Cox, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–2924 or (202) 482–5041,
respectively.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
On August 24, 2017, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
antidumping duty order on finished
carbon steel flanges from India.1 On
August 2, 2022, Commerce published a
notice of opportunity to request an
administrative review of the Order.2 On
October 11, 2022, based on timely
requests for review, in accordance with
19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an
administrative review of the Order with
respect to 42 companies.3 On November
3, 2022, Commerce selected Norma
Group 4 and R. N. Gupta & Company
1 See Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India
and Italy: Antidumping Duty Orders, 82 FR 40136
(August 24, 2017) (Order).
2 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review and Join Annual
Inquiry Service List, 87 FR 47187, 47188 (August 2,
2022).
3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 87 FR
61278 (October 11, 2022).
4 In prior segments of this proceeding, we
determined that Norma (India) Limited, USK
Exports Private Limited, Uma Shanker Khandelwal
& Co., and Bansidhar Chiranjilal were affiliated and
should be treated as a single entity (Norma Group).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:19 Sep 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
Limited (RNG) as mandatory
respondents in this administrative
review.5 On April 25, 2023 and August
16, 2023, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
351.213(h)(2), Commerce extended the
time period for issuing these
preliminary results until no later than
August 31, 2023.6
For a complete description of the
events that followed the initiation of
this review, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.7 A list of topics
included in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is included as Appendix
I to this notice. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://access.trade.gov/public/
FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the
Order is finished carbon steel flanges.
For a complete description of the scope
of the Order, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
In this review, Norma (India) Limited and its
affiliated entities have affirmed that the factual
basis on which Commerce made its prior
determinations has not changed. Therefore,
Commerce continues to treat these four companies
as a single entity. See Norma Group’s Letter,
‘‘Supplemental Response to Section A, B, C and D
of Anti-Dumping duty Original Questionnaire,’’
dated May 4, 2023 at S2–6; see also, e.g., Finished
Carbon Steel Flanges from India: Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Postponement of Final Determination, 82 FR 9719
(February 8, 2017), and accompanying Preliminary
Decision Memorandum, at 4–5, unchanged in
Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 82
FR 29483 (June 29, 2017).
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’
dated November 3, 2022.
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative
Review,’’ dated August 16, 2023; see also
Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review,’’ dated April 25, 2023.
7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Finished Carbon Steel
Flanges from India; 2021–2022,’’ dated concurrently
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B)
and (2) of the Act. Export price is
calculated in accordance with section
772 of the Act. NV is calculated in
accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying these
preliminary results, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Rate for Non-Selected Companies
The Act and Commerce’s regulations
do not address the establishment of a
rate to be applied to companies not
selected for individual examination
when Commerce limits its examination
in an administrative review pursuant to
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally,
Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of
the Act, which provides instructions for
calculating the all-others rate in a
market economy investigation, for
guidance when calculating the rate for
companies which were not selected for
individual examination in an
administrative review. Under section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others
rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the
weighted average of the estimated
weighted average dumping margins
established for exporters and producers
individually investigated, excluding any
zero or de minimis margins, and any
margins determined entirely {on the
basis of facts available}.’’
In this administrative review, we
preliminarily calculated weightedaverage dumping margins for Norma
Group and RNG that are not zero, de
minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), or
determined entirely on the basis of facts
available. Accordingly, consistent with
guidance in section 735(c)(5)(A) of the
Act, Commerce is preliminarily
assigning to the companies not
individually examined a margin of 1.00
percent, which is the weighted average
of Norma Group’s margin and RNG’s
margin based on publicly ranged U.S.
sales values.8 The companies not
selected for individual examination are
listed in Appendix II.
Preliminary Results of Review
Commerce preliminarily determines
that the following estimated weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the
period August 1, 2021, through July 31,
2022:
8 See Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation of Margin for
Respondents Not Selected for Individual
Examination,’’ dated concurrently with this notice.
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2023 / Notices
containing business proprietary
information, until further notice.15
Unless the deadline is extended
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2),
1.15 Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review,
including the results of our analysis of
the issues raised by the parties in any
0.70 written briefs, no later than 120 days
1.00 after the date of publication of these
preliminary results.
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
Producer/exporter
R. N. Gupta & Company Limited
Norma (India) Limited/USK Exports Private Limited/Uma
Shanker Khandelwal & Co./
Bansidhar Chiranjilal ...............
Non-Selected Companies 9 ........
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Disclosure and Public Comment
Commerce intends to disclose to
interested parties the calculations
performed for these preliminary results
within five days of the date of
publication of this notice.10 Interested
parties may submit case briefs no later
than 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice.11 Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in case
briefs, may be filed no later than seven
days after the date for filing case
briefs.12 Parties who submit case briefs
or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are
encouraged to submit with each
argument: (1) a statement of the issue;
(2) a brief summary of the argument;
and (3) a table of authorities.13
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing must submit a written request to
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce, filed electronically via
ACCESS, within 30 days after the date
of publication of this notice. Requests
should contain: (1) the party’s name,
address, and telephone number; (2) the
number of participants; (3) whether any
participant is a foreign national; and (4)
a list of the issues to be discussed.
Issues raised in the hearing will be
limited to those raised in the respective
case and rebuttal briefs.14 If a request for
a hearing is made, Commerce intends to
hold the hearing at a date and time to
be determined. Parties should confirm
the date and time of the hearing two
days before the scheduled date.
All briefs and hearing requests must
be filed electronically using ACCESS
and received successfully in their
entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the
due date. Note that Commerce has
temporarily modified certain of its
requirements for serving documents
9 See Appendix II for a list of companies not
selected for individual examination.
10 See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
11 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
12 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2); see also
Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service
Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of
Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020)
(Temporary Rule).
13 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
14 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:19 Sep 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
Verification
On October 14, 2022, Weldbend
Corporation, a domestic interested
party, requested that Commerce conduct
verification of Norma Group’s and
RNG’s responses.16 Accordingly, as
provided in section 782(i)(3) of the Act,
we verified information relied upon for
the preliminary results of this review.17
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of this
administrative review, Commerce shall
determine, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries. If the weighted-average
dumping margin for a mandatory
respondent is not zero or de minimis in
the final results of this review, we will
calculate an importer-specific
assessment rate on the basis of the ratio
of the total amount of dumping
calculated for each importer’s examined
sales and the total entered value of such
sales in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1).18 If the weighted-average
dumping margin is zero or de minimis
in the final results of review, or if an
importer-specific assessment rate is zero
or de minimis, Commerce will instruct
CBP to liquidate appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.19
For entries of subject merchandise
during the period of review produced by
the respondents for which they did not
know its merchandise was destined for
the United States, we will instruct CBP
to liquidate unreviewed entries
pursuant to the reseller policy, i.e., the
assessment rate for such entries will be
15 See
Temporary Rule.
Weldbend Corporation’s Letter, ‘‘Request
for In-Person Verification,’’ dated October 14, 2022.
17 See Memorandum, ‘‘Sales Verification Report
for Norma (India) Limited; USK Exports Private
Limited; Uma Shanker Khandelwal & Co., Ltd.;
Bansidhar Chiranjilal,’’ dated concurrently with
this notice; see also Memorandum, ‘‘Sales
Verification Report for R.N. Gupta & Company
Limited,’’ dated concurrently with this notice.
18 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103
(February 14, 2012).
19 Id., 77 FR at 8102–03; see also 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2).
16 See
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61521
the all-others rate established in the
investigation if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.20
For the companies which were not
selected for individual examination, we
intend to assign an antidumping duty
assessment rate equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin determined for
the non-examined companies in the
final results of review.
Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication). The final
results of this review shall be the basis
for the assessment of antidumping
duties on entries of merchandise
covered by the final results of this
review and for future cash deposits of
estimated antidumping duties, where
applicable.21
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication in the Federal Register of
the final results of this administrative
review for all shipments of the subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the
cash deposit rate for companies subject
to this review will be equal to the
company-specific weighted-average
dumping margin established in the final
results of this administrative review; (2)
for merchandise exported by a company
not covered in this review but covered
in a prior segment of the proceeding, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published in the
completed segment for the most recent
period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review, a prior review,
or the less-than-fair-value investigation,
but the producer is, then the cash
deposit rate will be the rate established
in the most recently completed segment
of the proceeding for the producer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other producers or exporters
will continue to be 8.91 percent, the allothers rate established in the less-than20 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
21 See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
61522
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2023 / Notices
fair-value investigation.22 These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in
Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
These preliminary results of review
are issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: August 31, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Rates for Non-Examined Companies
V. Discussion of the Methodology
VI. Currency Conversion
VII. Recommendation
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
List of Companies Not Selected for
Individual Examination
1. Adinath International
2. Allena Group
3. Alloyed Steel
4. Balkrishna Steel Forge Pvt. Ltd.
5. Bebitz Flanges Works Private Limited
6. BFN Forgings Private Limited
7. C.D. Industries
8. Cetus Engineering Private Limited
9. CHW Forge
10. CHW Forge Pvt. Ltd.
11. Citizen Metal Depot
12. Corum Flange
13. DN Forge Industries
14. Echjay Forgings Limited
15. Falcon Valves and Flanges Private
Limited
16. Heubach International
17. Hindon Forge Pvt. Ltd.
18. Jai Auto Private Limited
19. Kinnari Steel Corporation
20. M F Rings and Bearing Races Ltd.
21. Mascot Metal Manufactures
22. Munish Forge Private Limited
23. OM Exports
24. Punjab Steel Works (PSW)
25. R. D. Forge
22 See
Order, 82 FR at 40138.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:19 Sep 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
[FR Doc. 2023–19350 Filed 9–6–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–896]
Magnesium Metal From the People’s
Republic of China: Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2022–2023
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) is rescinding the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty (AD) order on
magnesium metal from the People’s
Republic of China (China) for the period
of review (POR) April 1, 2022, through
March 31, 2023.
DATES: Applicable September 7, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Conniff, AD/CVD Operations, Office III,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1009.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Appendix I
Appendix II
26. Raaj Sagar Steel
27. Ravi Ratan Metal Industries
28. Rolex Fittings India Pvt. Ltd.
29. Rollwell Forge Engineering Components
and Flanges
30. Rollwell Forge Pvt. Ltd.
31. SHM (ShinHeung Machinery)
32. Siddhagiri Metal & Tubes
33. Sizer India
34. Steel Shape India
35. Sudhir Forgings Pvt. Ltd.
36. Tirupati Forge
37. Umashanker Khandelwal Forging Limited
Background
On April 4, 2023, Commerce
published in the Federal Register a
notice of opportunity to request an
administrative review of the AD order
on magnesium metal from China.1 On
April 25, 2023, US Magnesium LLC (the
petitioner) submitted a timely request
that Commerce conduct an
administrative review.2
On June 12, 2023, Commerce
published in the Federal Register a
notice of initiation of administrative
review with respect to imports of
magnesium metal exported and/or
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
To Request Administrative Review and Join Annual
Inquiry Service List, 88 FR 19916 (April 4, 2023).
2 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Request for
Administrative Review,’’ dated April 25, 2023.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
produced by Tianjin Magnesium
International Co., Ltd. and Tianjin
Magnesium Metal Co., Ltd, in
accordance with section 751(a) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i).3 On July
18, 2023, we placed on the record U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
data for entries of magnesium metal
from China during the POR, showing no
reviewable POR entries and invited
interested parties to comment.4 No
interested party submitted comments to
Commerce.
Additionally, on August 10, 2023,
Commerce notified all interested parties
of its intent to rescind the instant review
in whole because there were no
reviewable, suspended entries of subject
merchandise by any of the companies
subject to this review during the POR
and invited interested parties to
comment.5 No interested party
submitted comments to Commerce.
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is
Commerce’s practice to rescind an
administrative review of an AD order
when there are no reviewable entries of
subject merchandise during the POR for
which liquidation is suspended.6
Normally, upon completion of an
administrative review, the suspended
entries are liquidated at the AD
assessment rate calculated for the
review period.7 Therefore, for an
administrative review to be conducted,
there must be at least one reviewable,
suspended entry that Commerce can
instruct CBP to liquidate at the AD
assessment rate calculated for the
review period.8 As noted above, there
were no entries of subject merchandise
for any of the companies subject to this
review during the POR. Accordingly, in
the absence of suspended entries of
subject merchandise during the POR, we
are hereby rescinding this
administrative review, in its entirety, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR
38021 (June 12, 2023).
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Release of Customs and
Border Protection Data,’’ dated July 18, 2023.
5 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to
Rescind Review,’’ dated August 10, 2023
6 See, e.g., Dioctyl Terephthalate from the
Republic of Korea: Rescission of Antidumping
Administrative Review; 2021–2022, 88 FR 24758
(April 24, 2023); see also Certain Carbon and Alloy
Steel Cut- to Length Plate from the Federal Republic
of Germany: Recission of Antidumping
Administrative Review; 2020–2021, 88 FR 4157
(January 24, 2023).
7 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
8 See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61520-61522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19350]
[[Page 61520]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-871]
Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From India: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021-2022
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds
that producers and/or exporters subject to this administrative review
made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during
the period of review (POR) August 1, 2021, through July 31, 2022.
Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable September 7, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Baker or Preston Cox, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2924 or (202) 482-5041,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 24, 2017, Commerce published in the Federal Register the
antidumping duty order on finished carbon steel flanges from India.\1\
On August 2, 2022, Commerce published a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the Order.\2\ On October 11, 2022,
based on timely requests for review, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an administrative review of the Order
with respect to 42 companies.\3\ On November 3, 2022, Commerce selected
Norma Group \4\ and R. N. Gupta & Company Limited (RNG) as mandatory
respondents in this administrative review.\5\ On April 25, 2023 and
August 16, 2023, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), Commerce
extended the time period for issuing these preliminary results until no
later than August 31, 2023.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India and Italy:
Antidumping Duty Orders, 82 FR 40136 (August 24, 2017) (Order).
\2\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative
Review and Join Annual Inquiry Service List, 87 FR 47187, 47188
(August 2, 2022).
\3\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 87 FR 61278 (October 11, 2022).
\4\ In prior segments of this proceeding, we determined that
Norma (India) Limited, USK Exports Private Limited, Uma Shanker
Khandelwal & Co., and Bansidhar Chiranjilal were affiliated and
should be treated as a single entity (Norma Group). In this review,
Norma (India) Limited and its affiliated entities have affirmed that
the factual basis on which Commerce made its prior determinations
has not changed. Therefore, Commerce continues to treat these four
companies as a single entity. See Norma Group's Letter,
``Supplemental Response to Section A, B, C and D of Anti-Dumping
duty Original Questionnaire,'' dated May 4, 2023 at S2-6; see also,
e.g., Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India: Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of
Final Determination, 82 FR 9719 (February 8, 2017), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 4-5, unchanged in Finished
Carbon Steel Flanges from India: Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value, 82 FR 29483 (June 29, 2017).
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Respondent Selection,'' dated November 3,
2022.
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review,'' dated August 16, 2023; see also Memorandum,
``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review,'' dated April 25, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a complete description of the events that followed the
initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\7\
A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
included as Appendix I to this notice. The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Finished Carbon
Steel Flanges from India; 2021-2022,'' dated concurrently with, and
hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the Order is finished carbon steel
flanges. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with sections
751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the Act. Export price is calculated in
accordance with section 772 of the Act. NV is calculated in accordance
with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology
underlying these preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Rate for Non-Selected Companies
The Act and Commerce's regulations do not address the establishment
of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for individual
examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative
review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce
looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for
calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation, for
guidance when calculating the rate for companies which were not
selected for individual examination in an administrative review. Under
section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally ``an
amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted average
dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually
investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and any margins
determined entirely {on the basis of facts available{time} .''
In this administrative review, we preliminarily calculated
weighted-average dumping margins for Norma Group and RNG that are not
zero, de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), or determined entirely
on the basis of facts available. Accordingly, consistent with guidance
in section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, Commerce is preliminarily assigning
to the companies not individually examined a margin of 1.00 percent,
which is the weighted average of Norma Group's margin and RNG's margin
based on publicly ranged U.S. sales values.\8\ The companies not
selected for individual examination are listed in Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Memorandum, ``Calculation of Margin for Respondents Not
Selected for Individual Examination,'' dated concurrently with this
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of Review
Commerce preliminarily determines that the following estimated
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period August 1, 2021,
through July 31, 2022:
[[Page 61521]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer/exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
R. N. Gupta & Company Limited............................... 1.15
Norma (India) Limited/USK Exports Private Limited/Uma 0.70
Shanker Khandelwal & Co./Bansidhar Chiranjilal.............
Non-Selected Companies \9\.................................. 1.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
Commerce intends to disclose to interested parties the calculations
performed for these preliminary results within five days of the date of
publication of this notice.\10\ Interested parties may submit case
briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this
notice.\11\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in case briefs,
may be filed no later than seven days after the date for filing case
briefs.\12\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) a statement
of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of
authorities.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Appendix II for a list of companies not selected for
individual examination.
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
\12\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2); see also Temporary Rule
Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID-19; Extension of
Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020) (Temporary Rule).
\13\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce,
filed electronically via ACCESS, within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) the party's
name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants;
(3) whether any participant is a foreign national; and (4) a list of
the issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be
limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs.\14\
If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold the
hearing at a date and time to be determined. Parties should confirm the
date and time of the hearing two days before the scheduled date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All briefs and hearing requests must be filed electronically using
ACCESS and received successfully in their entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern
Time on the due date. Note that Commerce has temporarily modified
certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business
proprietary information, until further notice.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Temporary Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review, including the results of our
analysis of the issues raised by the parties in any written briefs, no
later than 120 days after the date of publication of these preliminary
results.
Verification
On October 14, 2022, Weldbend Corporation, a domestic interested
party, requested that Commerce conduct verification of Norma Group's
and RNG's responses.\16\ Accordingly, as provided in section 782(i)(3)
of the Act, we verified information relied upon for the preliminary
results of this review.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Weldbend Corporation's Letter, ``Request for In-Person
Verification,'' dated October 14, 2022.
\17\ See Memorandum, ``Sales Verification Report for Norma
(India) Limited; USK Exports Private Limited; Uma Shanker Khandelwal
& Co., Ltd.; Bansidhar Chiranjilal,'' dated concurrently with this
notice; see also Memorandum, ``Sales Verification Report for R.N.
Gupta & Company Limited,'' dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of this administrative review, Commerce shall
determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If the weighted-average
dumping margin for a mandatory respondent is not zero or de minimis in
the final results of this review, we will calculate an importer-
specific assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the total amount
of dumping calculated for each importer's examined sales and the total
entered value of such sales in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1).\18\ If the weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de
minimis in the final results of review, or if an importer-specific
assessment rate is zero or de minimis, Commerce will instruct CBP to
liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\19\
For entries of subject merchandise during the period of review produced
by the respondents for which they did not know its merchandise was
destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate
unreviewed entries pursuant to the reseller policy, i.e., the
assessment rate for such entries will be the all-others rate
established in the investigation if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14,
2012).
\19\ Id., 77 FR at 8102-03; see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
\20\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the companies which were not selected for individual
examination, we intend to assign an antidumping duty assessment rate
equal to the weighted-average dumping margin determined for the non-
examined companies in the final results of review.
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication). The final results of this review shall be the
basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of
merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future
cash deposits of estimated antidumping duties, where applicable.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication in the Federal Register of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the
date of publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act:
(1) the cash deposit rate for companies subject to this review will be
equal to the company-specific weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for
merchandise exported by a company not covered in this review but
covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the company-specific rate published in the
completed segment for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-
fair-value investigation, but the producer is, then the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established in the most recently completed
segment of the proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4)
the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will
continue to be 8.91 percent, the all-others rate established in the
less-than-
[[Page 61522]]
fair-value investigation.\22\ These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See Order, 82 FR at 40138.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
These preliminary results of review are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(4).
Dated: August 31, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Rates for Non-Examined Companies
V. Discussion of the Methodology
VI. Currency Conversion
VII. Recommendation
Appendix II
List of Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination
1. Adinath International
2. Allena Group
3. Alloyed Steel
4. Balkrishna Steel Forge Pvt. Ltd.
5. Bebitz Flanges Works Private Limited
6. BFN Forgings Private Limited
7. C.D. Industries
8. Cetus Engineering Private Limited
9. CHW Forge
10. CHW Forge Pvt. Ltd.
11. Citizen Metal Depot
12. Corum Flange
13. DN Forge Industries
14. Echjay Forgings Limited
15. Falcon Valves and Flanges Private Limited
16. Heubach International
17. Hindon Forge Pvt. Ltd.
18. Jai Auto Private Limited
19. Kinnari Steel Corporation
20. M F Rings and Bearing Races Ltd.
21. Mascot Metal Manufactures
22. Munish Forge Private Limited
23. OM Exports
24. Punjab Steel Works (PSW)
25. R. D. Forge
26. Raaj Sagar Steel
27. Ravi Ratan Metal Industries
28. Rolex Fittings India Pvt. Ltd.
29. Rollwell Forge Engineering Components and Flanges
30. Rollwell Forge Pvt. Ltd.
31. SHM (ShinHeung Machinery)
32. Siddhagiri Metal & Tubes
33. Sizer India
34. Steel Shape India
35. Sudhir Forgings Pvt. Ltd.
36. Tirupati Forge
37. Umashanker Khandelwal Forging Limited
[FR Doc. 2023-19350 Filed 9-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P