Large Diameter Welded Pipe From the Republic of Turkey: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022, 61504-61506 [2023-19204]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
61504
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2023 / Notices
(3) a list of the issues that the party
intends to discuss at the hearing. Oral
arguments at the hearing will be limited
to issues raised in the case and rebuttal
briefs. If a hearing is requested,
Commerce will announce the date and
time of the hearing. Parties should
confirm the date and time of the hearing
two days before the scheduled hearing
date.
All submissions to Commerce must be
filed electronically via ACCESS. An
electronically filed document must be
received successfully in its entirety via
ACCESS by 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the
due date.10 Note that Commerce has
temporarily modified certain of its
requirements for serving documents
containing business proprietary
information, until further notice.11
Final Results of Review
Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review,
which will include the results of its
analysis of issues raised in any briefs,
within 120 days of publication of these
preliminary results of review in the
Federal Register, pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, unless extended.
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of this
administrative review, Commerce shall
determine, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review.12 If
Interpipe’s weighted-average dumping
margin in the final results of this review
is not zero or de minimis (i.e., greater
than or equal to 0.5 percent), we will
calculate importer-specific ad valorem
assessment rates for the merchandise by
dividing the total amount of dumping
calculated for all reviewed sales to the
importer by the total entered value of
the merchandise sold to the importer.13
Where either Interpipe’s ad valorem
weighted-average dumping margin is
zero or de minimis, or an importerspecific ad valorem assessment rate is
zero or de minimis in the final results
of review, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.14
10 See
19 CFR 351.310(c).
Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD
Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension
of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020).
12 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
13 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
14 See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2); see also
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
Reviews).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
11 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:19 Sep 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
In accordance with Commerce’s
‘‘automatic assessment’’ practice, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate POR
entries of subject merchandise which
Interpipe produced and sold but did not
know was destined for the United
States, at the all-others rate (i.e., 23.75
percent) 15 if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.16
Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be in effect for all
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication of the notice of the final
results of this administrative review in
the Federal Register, as provided for by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the
cash deposit rate for Interpipe will be
equal to the weighted-average dumping
margin established for Interpipe in the
final results of this administrative
review, except if the rate is less than
0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis
within the meaning of 19 CFR
351.106(c)(1), then the cash deposit rate
will be zero; (2) for companies that were
previously reviewed or investigated in
this proceeding that are not listed above,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the rate assigned to the company in the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding in which the company was
examined; (3) if the exporter of the
subject merchandise does not have a
company-specific rate but the producer
of the subject merchandise does, then
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
assigned to the producer of the subject
merchandise in the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding in
which the producer was examined; and
(4) the cash deposit rate for all other
producers or exporters will continue to
be the all-others rate of 23.75 percent
that was established in the investigation
in this proceeding.17 These cash deposit
15 See
Order, 86 FR 35272.
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
17 See Order, 86 FR at 35272.
16 See
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review
period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
preliminary results of review in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213(h)(2) and 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: August 31, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Affiliation/Single Entity
V. Discussion of the Methodology
VI. Currency Conversion
VII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2023–19334 Filed 9–6–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–489–833]
Large Diameter Welded Pipe From the
Republic of Turkey: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Final Determination of No
Shipments; 2021–2022
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines large
diameter welded pipe (welded pipe)
from the Republic of Turkey (Turkey) is
not being sold in the United States at
less than normal value during the
period of review (POR) May 1, 2021,
through April 30, 2022. Additionally,
Commerce determines that four
companies for which we initiated a
review had no shipments during the
POR.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2023 / Notices
Applicable September 7, 2023.
Ajay
Menon, AD/CVD Operations, Office IX,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0208.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
On September 1, 2022, Commerce
published the Preliminary Results and
invited comments from interested
parties.1 No interested party submitted
comments. Accordingly, as the final
results remain unchanged from the
Preliminary Results, there is no decision
memorandum accompanying this
notice. Commerce conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order 2
The merchandise covered by this
Order is welded pipe. For a complete
description of the scope of the Order,
see the Preliminary Results.3
Rate for Companies Not Selected for
Individual Examination
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
The Act and Commerce’s regulations
do not address the establishment of a
rate to be applied to companies not
selected for individual examination
when Commerce limits its examination
in an administrative review pursuant to
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally,
Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of
the Act, which provides instructions for
calculating the all-others rate in an
investigation, for guidance when
calculating the rate for companies
which were not selected for individual
examination in an administrative
review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of
the Act, the all-others rate is normally
‘‘an amount equal to the weighted
average of the estimated weighted
average dumping margins established
for exporters and producers
individually investigated, excluding any
zero or de minimis margins, and any
margins determined entirely {on the
basis of facts available}.’’
1 See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the
Republic of Turkey: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2021–
2022, 88 FR 37017 (June 6, 2023) (Preliminary
Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum (PDM).
2 See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the
Republic of Turkey: Amended Final Affirmative
Antidumping Duty Determination and
Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 18799 (May 2,
2019) (Order).
3 See Preliminary Results PDM at 3.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:19 Sep 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
61505
For these final results, we continue to
determine that the weighted-average
dumping margin for HDM Celik is zero
percent. Therefore, consistent with our
practice, we are applying a rate of zero
percent to the companies not selected
for individual examination because we
calculated a rate of zero percent for the
mandatory respondent.4 The companies
not selected for individual examination
are listed in the Appendix to this notice.
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review. Commerce
intends to issue assessment instructions
to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the
date of publication of the final results of
this review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
Final Determination of No Shipments
time for parties to file a request for a
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
determined that four companies did not within 90 days of publication).
have suspended entries of subject
Commerce calculated a weightedmerchandise during the POR.5 No
average dumping margin for HDM Celik
parties commented on Commerce’s
of zero in the final results of this review.
preliminary no-shipments
Accordingly, we intend to instruct CBP
determination. Therefore, for these final to liquidate the appropriate entries
results, we continue to determine that
without regard to antidumping duties.
Cimtas, Noksel, Toscelik Profil, and
For entries of subject merchandise
Toscelik Spiral had no shipments of
during the POR produced by HDM Celik
subject merchandise during the POR.
and for which HDM Celik did not know
its merchandise was destined for the
Final Results of Review
United States, we will instruct CBP to
For these final results, we determine
liquidate unreviewed entries at the allthat the following weighted-average
others rate in the Amended Final
dumping margins exist for the period
Determination of the less-than-fair-value
May 1, 2021, through April 30, 2022:
investigation (i.e., 1.57 percent),6 if
there is no rate for the intermediate
Weighted- company(ies) involved in the
average
transaction.7
Exporter or producer
dumping
For the companies that were not
margin
(percent)
selected for individual examination in
this review, we have assigned them the
HDM Celik Boru Sanayi Ve
weighted-average dumping margin
Ticaret A.S ..............................
0.00
calculated for HDM Celik (i.e., zero
Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination ...............
0.00 percent). Accordingly, we will instruct
CBP to liquidate suspended entries
during the POR for these companies
Disclosure
without regard to antidumping duties.
Normally, Commerce will disclose to
Finally, because we determined that
the parties in a proceeding the
Cimtas, Noksel, Toscelik Profil, and
calculations performed in connection
Toscelik Spiral had no shipments of
with the final results of review within
subject merchandise during the POR, we
five days of any public announcement
will instruct CBP to liquidate any
or, if there is no public announcement,
suspended entries that entered under
within five days of the date of
their antidumping duty case numbers at
publication of the notice of final results
the all-others rate, if there is no rate for
in the Federal Register, in accordance
the intermediate company(ies) involved
with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However,
in the transaction.
because we have made no changes from
Cash Deposit Requirements
the Preliminary Results, there are no
new calculations to disclose.
The following cash deposit
requirements
will be effective upon
Assessment Rates
publication in the Federal Register of
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the these final results of administrative
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
review for all shipments of the subject
Commerce has determined, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
6 See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the
4 See
Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d
1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
5 See Preliminary Results, 88 FR at 37017. These
four companies are C
¸ imtas¸ Boru Imalatiral Ticaret
Ltd (Cimtas); Noksel Celik Boru Sanayi A.S.
(Noksel); and Toscelik Profil ve Sac End. A.S. (AKA
Toscelik Profile and Sheet Ind. Co.) (Toscelik Profil)
and Toscelik Spiral Boru Uretim A.S. (Toscelik
Spiral).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Republic of Turkey: Notice of Court Decision Not in
Harmony With Amended Final Determination in
the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation; Notice of
Amended Final Determination Pursuant to Court
Decision; and Notice of Revocation of Antidumping
Duty Order, in Part, 85 FR 35262, 35263 (June 9,
2020) (Amended Final Determination).
7 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
61506
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2023 / Notices
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the publication date, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the
cash deposit rate for the companies
listed in the final results of review will
be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or
investigated companies not covered by
this review, the cash deposit will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding in
which the company participated; (3) if
the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, or the original investigation, but
the producer is, then the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the
most recently completed segment for the
producer of the subject merchandise;
and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
producers and exporters will continue
to be 1.57 percent, the all-others rate
established in the Amended Final
Determination.8 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5).
8 See Amended Final Determination, 85 FR at
35263.
19:19 Sep 06, 2023
Appendix
List of Companies Not Selected for
Individual Examination
1. Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve
Ticaret A.S.9
2. Borusan Istikbal Ticaret
3. Cagil Makina San ve Tic A.S. AKA Cagil
Makina A.S.
4. Spirally Welded Steel Pipe Inc.
5. Emek Boru Makina Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.
6. Erciyas Celik Boru Sanayi A.S.
7. Mazlum Mangtay Boru Son. Ins. Tar. Urn.
San. ve Tic. A.S.
8. Ozbal Celik Boru San. Tic. Ve TAAH A.S.
9. Umran Celik Boru Sanayii A.S.
[FR Doc. 2023–19204 Filed 9–6–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–016]
Notification to Importers
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Dated: August 30, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Jkt 259001
Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light
Truck Tires From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, Partial Rescission, and
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments; 2021–2022
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
finds that certain exporters of passenger
vehicle and light truck tires (passenger
tires) from the People’s Republic of
China (China) made sales of subject
merchandise at prices below normal
value (NV) during the period of review
(POR) August 1, 2021, through July 31,
2022. Commerce also preliminarily
finds that eight companies had no
shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR, and that it is
appropriate to rescind this review with
respect to six companies because all
requests for review of these companies
were withdrawn. We invite interested
parties to comment on these preliminary
results.
DATES: Applicable September 7, 2023.
AGENCY:
9 Subject merchandise produced and exported by
Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.
(Borusan) was excluded from the order effective
June 1, 2020. See Amended Final Determination, 85
FR at 35264. Commerce also stated in this notice
that it would not initiate a new review of Borusan’s
entries. Accordingly, Borusan is only covered by
this administrative review for subject merchandise
produced in Turkey where Borusan acted as either
the producer or exporter, but not both.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terre Keaton Stefanova or Caroline
Carroll, AD/CVD Operations, Office IX,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1280 or
(202) 482–4948, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 11, 2022, based on timely
requests for review, in accordance with
19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated this
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on passenger
tires from China.1 This review covers 43
exporters of the subject merchandise. In
April 2023, we extended the
preliminary results of this review to no
later than August 31, 2023.2
For a complete description of the
events that followed the initiation of
this administrative review, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.3
The Preliminary Decision Memorandum
is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://access.trade.gov/
public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list
of topics discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is included in
Appendix I.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the Order
are passenger tires from China. A full
description of the scope of the Order is
contained in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.4
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 87 FR
61278 (October 11, 2022); see also Certain
Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the
People’s Republic of China: Amended Final
Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination and
Antidumping Duty Order; and Amended Final
Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and
Countervailing Duty Order, 80 FR 47902 (August
10, 2015) (Order).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for
Preliminary Results of the 2021–2022 Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated April 24, 2023.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Certain Passenger Vehicle
and Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic
of China and Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments; 2021–2022,’’ dated concurrently with,
and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum).
4 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at
‘‘Scope of the Order.’’
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61504-61506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19204]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-489-833]
Large Diameter Welded Pipe From the Republic of Turkey: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final
Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines large
diameter welded pipe (welded pipe) from the Republic of Turkey (Turkey)
is not being sold in the United States at less than normal value during
the period of review (POR) May 1, 2021, through April 30, 2022.
Additionally, Commerce determines that four companies for which we
initiated a review had no shipments during the POR.
[[Page 61505]]
DATES: Applicable September 7, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ajay Menon, AD/CVD Operations, Office
IX, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0208.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 1, 2022, Commerce published the Preliminary Results
and invited comments from interested parties.\1\ No interested party
submitted comments. Accordingly, as the final results remain unchanged
from the Preliminary Results, there is no decision memorandum
accompanying this notice. Commerce conducted this administrative review
in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the Republic of Turkey:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022, 88 FR 37017
(June 6, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary
Decision Memorandum (PDM).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the Republic of Turkey:
Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination and
Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 18799 (May 2, 2019) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The merchandise covered by this Order is welded pipe. For a
complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary
Results.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Preliminary Results PDM at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate for Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination
The Act and Commerce's regulations do not address the establishment
of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for individual
examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative
review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce
looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for
calculating the all-others rate in an investigation, for guidance when
calculating the rate for companies which were not selected for
individual examination in an administrative review. Under section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally ``an amount
equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted average dumping
margins established for exporters and producers individually
investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and any margins
determined entirely {on the basis of facts available{time} .''
For these final results, we continue to determine that the
weighted-average dumping margin for HDM Celik is zero percent.
Therefore, consistent with our practice, we are applying a rate of zero
percent to the companies not selected for individual examination
because we calculated a rate of zero percent for the mandatory
respondent.\4\ The companies not selected for individual examination
are listed in the Appendix to this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d 1345 (Fed.
Cir. 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Determination of No Shipments
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce determined that four companies
did not have suspended entries of subject merchandise during the
POR.\5\ No parties commented on Commerce's preliminary no-shipments
determination. Therefore, for these final results, we continue to
determine that Cimtas, Noksel, Toscelik Profil, and Toscelik Spiral had
no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Preliminary Results, 88 FR at 37017. These four
companies are [Ccedil]imta[scedil] Boru Imalatiral Ticaret Ltd
(Cimtas); Noksel Celik Boru Sanayi A.S. (Noksel); and Toscelik
Profil ve Sac End. A.S. (AKA Toscelik Profile and Sheet Ind. Co.)
(Toscelik Profil) and Toscelik Spiral Boru Uretim A.S. (Toscelik
Spiral).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
For these final results, we determine that the following weighted-
average dumping margins exist for the period May 1, 2021, through April
30, 2022:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter or producer dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
HDM Celik Boru Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S........................ 0.00
Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination........... 0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce will disclose to the parties in a proceeding the
calculations performed in connection with the final results of review
within five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public
announcement, within five days of the date of publication of the notice
of final results in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b). However, because we have made no changes from the
Preliminary Results, there are no new calculations to disclose.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of
this review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP
no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final
results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is
filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment
instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until
the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has
expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).
Commerce calculated a weighted-average dumping margin for HDM Celik
of zero in the final results of this review. Accordingly, we intend to
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties. For entries of subject merchandise during the POR
produced by HDM Celik and for which HDM Celik did not know its
merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate in the Amended
Final Determination of the less-than-fair-value investigation (i.e.,
1.57 percent),\6\ if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies)
involved in the transaction.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the Republic of Turkey:
Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Amended Final
Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation; Notice of
Amended Final Determination Pursuant to Court Decision; and Notice
of Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order, in Part, 85 FR 35262, 35263
(June 9, 2020) (Amended Final Determination).
\7\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the companies that were not selected for individual examination
in this review, we have assigned them the weighted-average dumping
margin calculated for HDM Celik (i.e., zero percent). Accordingly, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate suspended entries during the POR for
these companies without regard to antidumping duties. Finally, because
we determined that Cimtas, Noksel, Toscelik Profil, and Toscelik Spiral
had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate any suspended entries that entered under
their antidumping duty case numbers at the all-others rate, if there is
no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication in the Federal Register of these final results of
administrative review for all shipments of the subject
[[Page 61506]]
merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the companies listed in the final
results of review will be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or
investigated companies not covered by this review, the cash deposit
will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most
recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company
participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review,
or the original investigation, but the producer is, then the cash
deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently
completed segment for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (4)
the cash deposit rate for all other producers and exporters will
continue to be 1.57 percent, the all-others rate established in the
Amended Final Determination.\8\ These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Amended Final Determination, 85 FR at 35263.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern
business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding.
Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: August 30, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination
1. Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Subject merchandise produced and exported by Borusan
Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Borusan) was excluded from
the order effective June 1, 2020. See Amended Final Determination,
85 FR at 35264. Commerce also stated in this notice that it would
not initiate a new review of Borusan's entries. Accordingly, Borusan
is only covered by this administrative review for subject
merchandise produced in Turkey where Borusan acted as either the
producer or exporter, but not both.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Borusan Istikbal Ticaret
3. Cagil Makina San ve Tic A.S. AKA Cagil Makina A.S.
4. Spirally Welded Steel Pipe Inc.
5. Emek Boru Makina Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.
6. Erciyas Celik Boru Sanayi A.S.
7. Mazlum Mangtay Boru Son. Ins. Tar. Urn. San. ve Tic. A.S.
8. Ozbal Celik Boru San. Tic. Ve TAAH A.S.
9. Umran Celik Boru Sanayii A.S.
[FR Doc. 2023-19204 Filed 9-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
