Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Options 3, Section 15 (Risk Protections) To Adopt an Active Quote Protection, 58373-58378 [2023-18301]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2023 / Notices
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 29 and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.30
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
ISE–2023–18 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–ISE–2023–18. This file
29 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
30 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:23 Aug 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–ISE–2023–18 and should be
submitted on or before September 15,
2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.31
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–18304 Filed 8–24–23; 8:45 am]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–98179; File No. SR–BX–
2023–019]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Options 3,
Section 15 (Risk Protections) To Adopt
an Active Quote Protection
August 21, 2023.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on August
31 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
Frm 00140
Fmt 4703
11, 2023, Nasdaq BX, Inc. (‘‘BX’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Options 3, Section 15 (Risk Protections)
to adopt an active quote protection.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/
rulebook/bx/rules, at the principal office
of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
PO 00000
58373
Sfmt 4703
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to adopt an active risk counter
functionality called active quote
protection (‘‘Active Quote Protection’’)
in Options 3, Section 15. The Exchange
intends to begin implementation prior
to December 20, 2024, and will provide
prior notice of the implementation date
to Members in an Options Trader Alert.
The Exchange proposes to offer an
optional active risk counter
functionality called Active Quote
Protection, which will be available to
Market Makers as an alternative to
existing passive risk counter
functionality described in Options 3,
Section 15(c)(2)(A) (i.e., ‘‘Quotation
Adjustments’’).3 The proposed Active
3 As described below, the Exchange will
specifically define this passive risk counter
functionality as ‘‘Rapid Fire’’ within this Rule.
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
25AUN1
58374
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2023 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Quote Protection functionality will be
similar to existing active risk counter
functionality on another options
exchange, which currently allows
exchange users to actively decrement
the risk counter by a specified amount
at any time, rather than waiting until a
risk limit is reached or the user
otherwise sends a specific instruction to
the exchange to completely reset the
counting program.4
Today, the Exchange requires Market
Makers to configure risk exposure
thresholds based on either percentage of
executed quotes (‘‘Percentage
Threshold’’) or total number of executed
contracts (‘‘Volume Threshold’’). The
Exchange also offers two optional risk
exposure thresholds based on the
absolute value of the difference between
long and short positions (‘‘Delta
Threshold’’), and absolute value of the
difference between contracts bought and
contracts sold (‘‘Vega Threshold’’)
(collectively, ‘‘Thresholds’’).5 As set
forth in Options 3, Section 15(c)(2)(A),
the System tracks each Threshold with
a corresponding risk counter over a
Market Maker-specified rolling time
period not to exceed 30 seconds.
Furthermore, Section 15(c)(2)(A)
describes that when a risk counter
exceeds the corresponding Threshold
during the specified time period, the
System would automatically remove the
Market Maker’s quotes in all series of
the applicable options class (each, a
‘‘Purge Event’’). As a result of a Purge
Event, the corresponding risk counter
and Threshold would reset upon such
removal. The Exchange also notes that
pursuant to Section 15(c)(2)(D) today,
the Thresholds and risk counters can be
completely reset if the Market Maker
specifically requests the System to
remove quotes in all options series in an
underlying issue. This risk protection is
passive in that the risk counters wait to
reset until the expiry of a specified time
period, a Purge Event, or when the
Market Maker otherwise sends a specific
4 See MEMX LLC (‘‘MEMX’’) Rule 21.16(b)
(Active Risk Counter). See also Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 95445 (August 8, 2022), 87 FR
49894 (August 12, 2022) (SR–MEMX–2022–10).
Similar to the proposed Active Quote Protection,
the active risk counter on MEMX is voluntary and
offers a way for users to proactively manage their
risk. The MEMX risk protection, however, allows
the user to actively manage all the risk limits
specified in MEMX’s rule (e.g., executed contracts,
notional value, etc.) whereas the Exchange’s
proposal would allow Market Makers to actively
manage executed contracts only, as discussed later
in this filing. In addition, the Exchange’s proposal
will only apply to quotes whereas MEMX’s
functionality applies to both orders and quotes.
5 The Thresholds are described in detail in
Options 3, Section 15(c)(2)(A)(i)–(iv). If a Market
Maker does not provide a parameter for each
Threshold, the Exchange will apply default
parameters announced to Members.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:23 Aug 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
instruction to the Exchange to remove
quotes to completely reset the counters.
The Exchange now proposes to
introduce a new risk protection called
Active Quote Protection that would
enable Market Makers to actively
manage their executed contract limit
(‘‘Contract Limit’’) by sending an
electronic instruction to the Exchange to
decrement their executed contract limit
counter (‘‘Limit Counter’’) by a specified
amount at any time, rather than waiting
until the expiry of a defined time
period, when the risk limit is exceeded
(like a Purge Event), or when the Market
Maker otherwise sends a specific
instruction to purge quotes to
completely reset the risk counter.6
The Contract Limit, as set by the
Market Maker, would apply for the
duration of the trading day. Once the
Market Maker’s Limit Counter exceeds
the Contract Limit set by the Market
Maker, the System would automatically
remove quotes in all series of the
applicable options class submitted
through the Exchange’s Specialized
Quote Feed protocol,7 identical to how
the quote removal mechanism works for
a Purge Event today.8 Today, Purge
Events are triggered under the existing
Quotation Adjustments on the first
execution that exceeds the applicable
Threshold. Once an execution occurs,
the System checks all Thresholds to see
if they have been exceeded. If exceeded,
the Market Maker’s quote would be
purged pursuant to Options 3, Section
15(c)(2)(D). In order to remain
consistent with the firm quote
obligations of a broker-dealer pursuant
to Rule 602 of Regulation NMS, any
marketable orders or quotes that are
executable against a Market Maker’s
quotes that are received 9 prior to the
time the applicable Threshold is
triggered will be automatically executed
up to the size of the Market Maker’s
quote, regardless of whether the
execution would cause the Market
Maker to exceed their pre-set Percentage
Threshold, Volume Threshold, Delta
Threshold, or Vega Threshold.10
6 If the Market Maker opting to use Active Quote
Protection does not provide a Contract Limit at the
outset, the Exchange will apply a default parameter
for the Active Quote Protection Contract Limit
(which would be announced to Participants). The
Exchange will initially set the default Contract
Limit at 100 contracts.
7 Specialized Quote Feed or ‘‘SQF’’ is an interface
that only Market Makers may use to submit quotes
to the Exchange. See Options 3, Section 7(e)(1)(B).
8 See Options 3, Section 15(c)(2)(C) (renumbered
as Section 15(c)(2)(D) under this proposal, as noted
below).
9 The time of receipt for an order or quote is the
time such message is processed by the Exchange’s
order book.
10 See current Options 3, Section 15(c)(2)(C)(ii).
The Exchange will renumber this as Section
PO 00000
Frm 00141
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Under Active Quote Protection, the
System would similarly handle the
Market Maker’s quote in that the quote
could be filled one execution over the
Contract Limit before the Market
Maker’s remaining quotes are cancelled
by the System in order to be consistent
with the firm quote obligations under
Rule 602 of Regulation NMS.
Specifically, the Exchange notes that
any marketable orders or quotes that are
executable against a Market Maker’s
quotes that are received 11 prior to the
time the Contract Limit is triggered will
be automatically executed up to the size
of the Market Maker’s quote, regardless
of whether the execution would cause
the Market Maker to exceed the Contract
Limit.12
Additionally, under Active Quote
Protection, Market Makers will be able
to submit a request (i) to decrement
their Limit Counter by a specified
number of contracts, or (ii) to fully
decrement their Limit Counter to zero.13
Market Makers that elect to use the
proposed Active Quote Protection on a
badge 14 will not be able to use the
existing Threshold risk protections
described above on the same badge (i.e.,
the active and passive risk counter
functionality would be mutually
exclusive per badge) given that it would
be unnecessarily complex to implement
from a technology standpoint. Market
Makers may be associated with multiple
badges today, so if they want to use both
risk protections for their activity on the
Exchange, they will be able to set either
the active or passive risk counter
functionality on each one.
To effectuate the foregoing changes,
the Exchange proposes to set forth the
new risk protection in paragraph (B) of
Options 3, Section 15(c)(2), as
follows: 15
15(c)(2)(D)(ii) and clarify this provision in the
manner described later in this filing.
11 See supra note 9.
12 For both the current Quotation Adjustments
and proposed Active Quote Protection, the System
will execute marketable interest up to the size of the
Market Maker’s quote, but cannot guarantee interest
will be fully executed, as is the case with any
execution in the Exchange’s order book. There is
always the possibility that the Market Maker’s quote
size (and/or Market Maker’s quote plus other
interest on the order book) may not be sufficient
volume to fill the incoming interest.
13 As discussed later in this filing, in order to reenter the System after their quotes are purged
pursuant to the Active Quote Protection, Market
Makers will need to submit the same request to
fully decrement their Limit Counter to zero.
14 The term ‘‘badge’’ means an account number,
which may contain letters and/or numbers,
assigned to BX Market Makers. A BX Market Maker
account may be associated with multiple badges.
See Options 1, Section 1(a)(6).
15 As a result, the Exchange will also renumber
existing paragraphs (C)–(F) as proposed paragraphs
(D)–(G).
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
25AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2023 / Notices
In lieu of Rapid Fire, a Market Maker may
provide an executed contract limit (‘‘Contract
Limit’’) that, if exceeded, the System will
automatically remove the Market Maker’s
quotes in all series of an options class
submitted through SQF. The System will
apply the Contract Limit for the duration of
the trading day. For each class of options, the
System will maintain an active limit counter
that will track the current number of
contracts executed through the Market
Maker’s quotes (‘‘Limit Counter’’). If the
Limit Counter exceeds the Contract Limit
established by the Market Maker, the System
will automatically remove the Market
Maker’s quotes as described in paragraph (D)
below. Market Makers may submit a request
(i) to decrement their Limit Counter by a
specified number of contracts, or (ii) to fully
decrement their Limit Counter to zero,
including to re-enter the System as described
in paragraph (F) below.
The Exchange also proposes to amend
current paragraph (F) (renumbered to
paragraph (G) under this proposal) of
Options 3, Section 15(c)(2) to specify
that the active and passive risk counter
functionality will be mutually exclusive
per badge). As amended, proposed
paragraph (G) will provide:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
The Exchange will require BX Market
Makers to utilize the Percentage Threshold,
the Volume Threshold, or the Contract Limit.
For Market Makers that elect to utilize the
Contract Limit, the Percentage Threshold,
Volume Threshold, Delta Threshold, and
Vega Threshold will not be available for use
on the Market Maker’s badge. The Delta, Vega
and Multi-Trigger Thresholds are optional.
As described above, once the Limit
Counter exceeds the Contract Limit set
by the Market Maker under the
proposed Active Quote Protection, the
System would automatically remove
quotes in the same manner as currently
specified for a Purge Event in proposed
paragraph (D) of Options 3, Section
15(c)(2). Accordingly, the Exchange
proposes to add Active Quote
Protection’s Contract Limit throughout
this Rule. Specifically, proposed
paragraph (D) will provide that the
System will automatically remove
quotes in all series of an options class
in an underlying security when the
Percentage Threshold, Volume
Threshold, Delta Threshold, Vega
Threshold, or the Contract Limit has
been exceeded. The System will
automatically remove quotes in all
series of an option class in all
underlying securities when the MultiTrigger Threshold 16 has been exceeded.
16 Multi-Trigger Threshold is defined in current
paragraph (B) (proposed paragraph (D)) of Section
15(c)(2) as the number of allowable triggers by
which the Exchange will automatically remove
quotes in all options series in all underlying issues
submitted through designated BX protocols as
specified by the Exchange. This threshold is part of
the Exchange’s Multi-Trigger risk protection.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:23 Aug 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
The System will send a Purge
Notification Message to the BX Market
Maker for all affected options when the
above thresholds have been exceeded.
Proposed subparagraph (D)(i) will
provide that the Percentage Threshold,
Volume Threshold, Delta Threshold,
Vega Threshold, Contract Limit, and
Multi-Trigger Threshold are considered
independently of each other.
Further, as discussed above, any
marketable orders or quotes that are
executable against a Market Maker’s
quotes that are received 17 prior to the
time the applicable Threshold or
Contract Limit is triggered will be
automatically executed up to the size of
the Market Maker’s quote, even if such
execution would cause the Market
Maker to exceed any of their pre-set risk
limits with respect to any of the
foregoing risk parameters. The Exchange
notes that the current related Rule in
sub-paragraph (C)(ii) only mentions that
quotes will execute up to the Market
Maker’s size, and is silent on marketable
orders. In addition, the current Rule
does not specify the time of receipt of
such marketable interest that is
executable against the size of the Market
Maker’s quote. As such, the Exchange
proposes to add this specificity in
proposed sub-paragraph (D)(ii) to better
describe how the System operates today
for Quotation Adjustments and how the
System will operate for proposed Active
Quote Protection. In particular, subparagraph (D)(ii) will provide:
The System will execute any marketable
orders or quotes that are executable against
a Market Maker’s quote and received prior to
the time the Percentage Threshold, Volume
Threshold, Delta Threshold, Vega Threshold,
or Contract Limit is triggered up to the size
of the Market Maker’s quote, even if such
execution results in executions in excess of
the Market Maker’s applicable Threshold or
Contract Limit with respect to any parameter.
In addition, when the System removes
quotes as a result of exceeding the
Contract Limit under Active Quote
Protection, the Exchange proposes to
require the Market Maker to submit a
request to re-enter the System. This
request will be the same type of message
as the request described in proposed
paragraph (B) where the Market Maker
must request to fully decrement their
Limit Counter back to zero in order to
re-enter the System. This requirement
will be added in proposed paragraph (F)
of Options 3, Section 15(c)(2), and will
be similar to how the existing quote
purge mechanism works for the
Thresholds today, except the Market
Maker needs to send a separate message
(i.e., a re-entry indicator) to re-enter the
17 See
PO 00000
supra note 9.
Frm 00142
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58375
System when their quotes are purged as
a result of exceeding any of the existing
Thresholds.
The Exchange also proposes that the
new Active Quote Protection would
leverage the existing multi-trigger
(‘‘Multi-Trigger’’) functionality currently
set forth in Options 3, Section
15(c)(2)(B) (renumbered as Section
15(c)(2)(C) under this proposal). Today,
Multi-Trigger is a risk protection offered
alongside the current Quotation
Adjustments. A BX Market Maker or BX
Market Maker Group, which is defined
as multiple affiliated BX Market
Makers,18 may provide the specified
time period and number of allowable
Purge Events by which the Exchange
will automatically remove quotes in all
options series in all underlying issues
submitted through designated BX
protocols as specified by the Exchange
(‘‘Multi-Trigger Threshold’’). MultiTrigger is triggered when during a time
period established by the Market Maker
not to exceed 30 seconds, the total
number of Quotation Adjustment Purge
Events exceeds the Multi-Trigger
Threshold provided to the Exchange by
the BX Market Maker or BX Market
Maker Group. When Multi-Trigger is
triggered, the System automatically
purges all of the Market Maker’s or
Group’s quotes in all options series in
an underlying issue. As set forth in
current Options 3, Section 15(c)(2)(E)
(renumbered to Section 15(c)(2)(F)
under this proposal), when the System
removes quotes as a result of the MultiTrigger Threshold, the Market Maker
must manually request re-entry to the
System by contacting the Exchange.
Exchange staff must then set a re-entry
indicator in this case to enable re-entry,
which will cause the System to send a
Reentry Notification Message to the BX
Market Maker or Group for all options
series in all underlying issues. The
Market Maker’s Clearing Firm will be
notified regarding the trigger and reentry into the System after quotes are
removed as a result of the Multi-Trigger
Threshold, provided the Market Maker’s
Clearing Firm has requested to receive
such notification.
Today, Multi-Trigger is meant to
provide Market Makers or a Group with
protection from the risk of multiple
executions across multiple series of an
option or across multiple options. This
risk protection recognizes that risk to
18 This would be more than one BX Market
Maker, but does not require the aggregation of all
of the Participant’s Market Makers. A Group would
be comprised of BX Market Makers affiliated with
one Participant (i.e., one BX options member firm).
The Participant would be required to define a
Group by providing a list of such affiliated BX
Market Makers to the Exchange.
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
25AUN1
58376
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2023 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Market Makers is not limited to a single
series in an option or even to all series
in an option; Market Makers that quote
in multiple series of multiple options
have significant exposure, requiring
them to offset or hedge their overall
positions. Market Makers are required to
continuously quote in assigned options,
and quoting across many series in an
option or multiple options creates the
possibility of executions that can create
large, unintended principal positions
that could expose Market Makers to
unnecessary risk. Multi-Trigger is
therefore intended to assist Market
Makers or Groups in managing their
market risk by tracking the number of
Purge Events relative to the MultiTrigger Threshold set by the Market
Maker or Group. The Exchange believes
that tracking the number of Active
Quote Protection Purge Events for a
Market Maker or Group against its
Multi-Trigger Threshold would be
similarly useful for managing market
risk.
To that end, the Exchange proposes to
update Multi-Trigger to add purge
events under Active Quote Protection to
the Multi-Trigger counter such that
Active Quote Protection purge events
and Purge Events under the current
Quotation Adjustments will be
aggregated together as counting toward
the specified Multi-Trigger Threshold.
Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to
add references to the Active Quote
Protection rule (i.e., proposed paragraph
(B) of Options 3, Section 15(c)(2))
throughout the Multi-Trigger rule in
proposed paragraph (C), specifically:
A BX Market Maker or BX Market Maker
Group (multiple affiliated BX Market Makers
is a ‘‘Group’’ as defined by a BX Participant
and provided by such Participant to the
Exchange) may provide a specified time
period and number of allowable triggers by
which the Exchange will automatically
remove quotes in all options series in all
underlying issues submitted through
designated BX protocols as specified by the
Exchange (‘‘Multi-Trigger Threshold’’).
During a specified time period established by
the BX Market Maker not to exceed 30
seconds (‘‘Multi-Trigger Specified Time
Period’’), the number of times the System
automatically removes the BX Market
Maker’s or Group’s quotes in all options
series will be based on the number of triggers
of the Percentage Threshold described in
paragraph (A)(i) above, the Volume
Threshold described in paragraph (A)(ii)
above, the Delta Threshold described in
paragraph (A)(iii) above, the Vega Threshold
described in paragraph (A)(iv) above, and the
Contract Limit described in paragraph (B)
above. Once the System determines that the
number of triggers exceeds a number
established by either the BX Market Maker or
Group, during a Multi-Trigger Specified Time
Period, the System will automatically remove
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:23 Aug 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
all quotes in all options series in all
underlying issues for that BX Market Maker
or Group. A trigger is defined as the event
which causes the System to automatically
remove quotes in all options series in an
underlying issue. A Multi-Trigger Specified
Time Period will commence after every
trigger of the Percentage Threshold, Volume
Threshold, Delta Threshold, Vega Threshold,
or Contract Limit, and will continue until the
System removes quotes as described in
paragraph (D) below or the Multi-Trigger
Specified Time Period expires. The System
counts triggers within the Multi-Trigger
Specified Time Period across all triggers for
the BX Market Maker or Group. A MultiTrigger Specified Time Period operates on a
rolling basis in that there may be multiple
Multi-Trigger Specified Time Periods
occurring simultaneously and such MultiTrigger Specified Time Periods may overlap.
The following example illustrates the
proposed behavior of the Active Quote
Protection risk protection:
Market Maker AAPL
Contract Limit: 100
• Market Maker trades a transaction
for 10 contracts in AAPL; Limit Counter
goes from 0 to 10.
• Market Maker sends a request to
decrement its Limit Counter in AAPL
for 10 contracts; Limit Counter goes
from 10 to 0.
• Market Maker trades a transaction
for 20 contracts in AAPL; Limit Counter
goes from 0 to 20.
• Market Maker trades a transaction
for 50 contracts in AAPL; Limit Counter
goes from 20 to 70.
• Market Maker sends a request to
decrement its Limit Counter in AAPL
for 20 contracts; Limit Counter goes
from 70 to 50.
• Market Maker trades a transaction
for 60 contracts in AAPL; Limit Counter
goes from 50 to 110 and all Market
Maker quotes in AAPL are automatically
purged after the execution because the
Limit Counter exceeded the Market
Maker’s Contract Limit of 100 executed
contracts.
• At this point, the Market Maker
must send a request to fully decrement
its Limit Counter in AAPL back to zero
in order to begin quoting again.
The following example illustrates
how Multi-Trigger will work with the
proposed Active Quote Protection
functionality:
• Assume Market Maker in AAPL and
SPY has Quotation Adjustments set for
AAPL and Active QP set for SPY.
• Market Maker sets its Multi-Trigger
Threshold so that it is triggered at 25
purge events within a 20 second time
period.
• On a given trading day, if an Active
Quote Protection Purge Event is
triggered 15 times in SPY and a
PO 00000
Frm 00143
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Quotation Adjustment Purge Event is
triggered 10 times in AAPL, all within
20 seconds, then the Exchange will
automatically remove all of the Market
Maker’s quotes AAPL and SPY.
Technical Amendments
The Exchange proposes a few
technical, non-substantive amendments
in Options 3, Section 15(c)(2). With the
addition of the new Active Quote
Protection rule in proposed paragraph
(B), the Exchange proposes to renumber
existing paragraphs (B)–(F) as proposed
paragraphs (C)–(G) and make related
changes to update existing cross-cites
within Section 15(c)(2). The Exchange
also proposes in paragraph (A) to correct
the current cross-cites to paragraphs (B)
and (C) to paragraphs (D) and (E)
because the Exchange originally
intended to refer to how the System
removes quotes either pursuant to a
Purge Event (which is governed by
proposed paragraph (D)) or pursuant to
a Market Maker specifically requesting
the System to remove quotes in all
series of an underlying issue (which is
governed by proposed paragraph (E)).
The Exchange proposes to reword the
rule text within proposed Options 3,
Section 15(c)(2)(D) to replace the term
‘‘options’’ with the words ‘‘series of an
options class’’ to conform the wording
in this paragraph to other rule text with
Options 3, Section 15. Additionally, the
Exchange proposes to add the words ‘‘or
Group’’ to Options 3, Section 15(c)(2)(F)
because a Group may also request reentry pursuant to proposed Options 3,
Section 15(c)(2)(C) and would receive a
Reentry Notification Message.
Lastly, the Exchange proposes to title
paragraph (A) as ‘‘Rapid Fire’’ and
paragraph (C) as ‘‘Multi-Trigger’’ to
more clearly identify which rules apply
to which risk protections.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with section 6(b)
of the Act,19 in general, and furthers the
objectives of section 6(b)(5) of the Act,20
in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed Active Quote Protection risk
protection is consistent with the Act
because it will enhance the risk
protection tools available to Market
Makers and Groups by introducing a
19 15
20 15
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
25AUN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2023 / Notices
new method of establishing and
monitoring for risk parameters that will
be offered as an alternative to existing
Rapid Fire risk parameters, thereby
supporting a Market Maker’s ability to
manage their risk on the Exchange, and
also providing them with flexibility to
use additional tools to manage risk. As
noted above, while the passive (Rapid
Fire) and active (Active QP) risk counter
functionality will be mutually exclusive
on each badge, Market Makers will still
be able to use both to cover their activity
on the Exchange by getting multiple
badges and setting each risk counter by
badge. The Exchange believes that
offering more risk management tools to
Market Makers would mitigate their
exposure to excessive risk. The
Exchange further believes that having
the new Active Quote Protection
functionality leverage the existing
Multi-Trigger functionality will
similarly support a Market Maker’s
ability to manage their risk on the
Exchange by including Active Quote
Protection purge events to the MultiTrigger counter. As noted above, the risk
to Market Makers is not limited to a
single series in an option or even
multiple series in an option as Market
Makers that quote in multiple series of
multiple options have significant
exposure, requiring them to offset or
hedge their overall positions. Market
Makers are required to continuously
quote in assigned options, and quoting
across many series in an option or
multiple options creates the possibility
of executions that can create large,
unintended principal positions that
could expose Market Makers to
unnecessary risk. Today, Multi-Trigger
is designed to assist Market Makers or
a Group in managing their market risk
by tracking the number of Purge Events
relative to the market-wide parameter
set by the Market Maker or the Group.
The Exchange therefore believes that
tracking the number of Active Quote
Protection purge events for a Market
Maker against its Multi-Trigger
Threshold would be similarly useful for
managing market risk so that they can
provide deep and liquid markets to the
benefit of all investors. Ultimately, the
Exchange believes that providing
Market Makers with additional tools in
the manner described above to manage
their risk parameters serves to perfect
the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system,
and, in general to protect investors and
the public interest because Market
Makers will be better able to manage
risks with these tools.
With regard to the impact of this
proposal on system capacity, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:23 Aug 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
Exchange notes that it has analyzed its
capacity and represents that it and the
Options Price Reporting Authority have
the necessary systems capacity to
handle any potential additional traffic
associated with the proposed rule
change. The Exchange believes that its
members will not have a capacity issue
as a result of this proposal.
The Exchange further represents that
its proposal will continue to operate
consistently with the firm quote
obligations of a broker-dealer pursuant
to Rule 602 of Regulation NMS.
Specifically, any marketable interest
that is executable against a Market
Maker’s quotes that are received 21 by
the Exchange prior to the time this
functionality is triggered will be
automatically executed at the price up
to the Market Maker’s size, regardless of
whether such execution results in
executions in excess of the Market
Maker’s pre-set Contract Limit.22 As
discussed above, this is also in line with
how current Rapid Fire operates today.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed changes in proposed subparagraph (D)(ii) to specify that this
Rule will apply to marketable orders
and quotes (currently silent on
marketable orders), and to specify the
time of receipt of such marketable
interest that is executable against the
size of the Market Maker’s quote, will
promote clarity in how the System
currently operates for Rapid Fire and
will operate for Active Quote Protection.
As noted above, the proposed Active
Quote Protection functionality is similar
to existing active risk counter
functionality on another options
exchange, which currently allows users
to actively decrement the risk counter
by a specified amount at any time,
rather than waiting until a risk limit is
reached or the user otherwise sends a
specific instruction to the exchange to
completely reset the counting
program.23
Technical Amendments
The Exchange believes that the
technical amendments in Options 3,
Section 15(c)(2) described above are
consistent with the Act because they
will promote clarity in the rules and
make the Rulebook easier to navigate for
market participants by updating rule
numbering and existing cross-cites as
described above. Furthermore, the
Exchange also believes that adding the
defined terms for Rapid Fire and MultiTrigger in the rule text will promote
supra note 9.
proposed subparagraph (D)(ii) of Options 3,
Section 15(c)(2).
23 See supra note 4.
clarity so that Members can more easily
locate the relevant functionalities in the
Rulebook. Rewording the rule text
within proposed Options 3, Section
15(c)(2)(D) to replace the term ‘‘options’’
with the words ‘‘series of an options
class’’ will conform the wording in this
paragraph to other rule text with
Options 3, Section 15. Finally, adding
the words ‘‘or Group’’ to Options 3,
Section 15(c)(2)(F) will make the
sentence more accurate because a Group
may also request re-entry pursuant to
proposed Options 3, Section 15(c)(2)(C)
and would receive a Reentry
Notification Message.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed Active Quote Protection
functionality will impose any undue
burden on intra-market competition as it
is aimed at mitigating exposure to
excessive risk when trading on the
Exchange. While the Exchange will offer
the proposed functionality to Market
Makers only, the proposed risk
protection is intended to provide Market
Makers with an additional tool to
manage their risk parameters in a
manner they deem appropriate. As such,
the Exchange believes that the proposed
functionality may facilitate Market
Makers’ provision of liquidity on the
Exchange, thereby benefitting all market
participants through additional
execution opportunities at potentially
improved prices.
The Exchange also believes that its
Active Quote Protection proposal does
not impose an undue burden on intermarket competition as the proposed risk
protection is similar to an existing risk
protection on MEMX 24 as described
above, and any options market could
adopt similar rules.
Lastly, the Exchange does not believe
that the proposed technical
amendments in Options 3, Section
15(c)(2) will impose an undue burden
on competition as these are nonsubstantive changes to promote clarity
in the rules and make the Rulebook
easier to navigate for market
participants.
21 See
22 See
PO 00000
Frm 00144
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58377
24 See
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
supra note 4.
25AUN1
58378
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2023 / Notices
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 25 and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.26
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
BX–2023–019 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–BX–2023–019. This file
25 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
26 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:23 Aug 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–BX–2023–019 and should be
submitted on or before September 15,
2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.27
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–18301 Filed 8–24–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–98173; File No. SR–MIAX–
2023–30]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami
International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change To Amend the Fee Schedule
To Modify Certain Connectivity and
Port Fees
August 21, 2023.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
27 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00145
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
notice is hereby given that on August 8,
2023, Miami International Securities
Exchange, LLC (‘‘MIAX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) a
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing a proposal to
amend the MIAX Options Exchange Fee
Schedule (‘‘Fee Schedule’’) to amend
certain connectivity and port fees.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://www.miaxoptions.com/rulefilings, at MIAX’s principal office, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Fee Schedule as follows: (1) increase the
fees for a 10 gigabit (‘‘Gb’’) ultra-low
latency (‘‘ULL’’) fiber connection for
Members 3 and non-Members; and (2)
amend the fees for Limited Service
MIAX Express Interface (‘‘MEI’’) Ports 4
available to Market Makers.5 The
3 The term ‘‘Member’’ means an individual or
organization approved to exercise the trading rights
associated with a Trading Permit. Members are
deemed ‘‘members’’ under the Exchange Act. See
Exchange Rule 100.
4 The MIAX Express Interface (‘‘MEI’’) is a
connection to MIAX systems that enables Market
Makers to submit simple and complex electronic
quotes to MIAX. See Fee Schedule, note 26.
5 The term ‘‘Market Makers’’ refers to Lead Market
Makers (‘‘LMMs’’), Primary Lead Market Makers
(‘‘PLMMs’’), and Registered Market Makers
(‘‘RMMs’’) collectively. See Exchange Rule 100. For
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
25AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 164 (Friday, August 25, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58373-58378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18301]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-98179; File No. SR-BX-2023-019]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Options 3,
Section 15 (Risk Protections) To Adopt an Active Quote Protection
August 21, 2023.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on August 11, 2023, Nasdaq BX, Inc. (``BX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Options 3, Section 15 (Risk
Protections) to adopt an active quote protection.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/bx/rules, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to adopt an active risk
counter functionality called active quote protection (``Active Quote
Protection'') in Options 3, Section 15. The Exchange intends to begin
implementation prior to December 20, 2024, and will provide prior
notice of the implementation date to Members in an Options Trader
Alert.
The Exchange proposes to offer an optional active risk counter
functionality called Active Quote Protection, which will be available
to Market Makers as an alternative to existing passive risk counter
functionality described in Options 3, Section 15(c)(2)(A) (i.e.,
``Quotation Adjustments'').\3\ The proposed Active
[[Page 58374]]
Quote Protection functionality will be similar to existing active risk
counter functionality on another options exchange, which currently
allows exchange users to actively decrement the risk counter by a
specified amount at any time, rather than waiting until a risk limit is
reached or the user otherwise sends a specific instruction to the
exchange to completely reset the counting program.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ As described below, the Exchange will specifically define
this passive risk counter functionality as ``Rapid Fire'' within
this Rule.
\4\ See MEMX LLC (``MEMX'') Rule 21.16(b) (Active Risk Counter).
See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95445 (August 8, 2022),
87 FR 49894 (August 12, 2022) (SR-MEMX-2022-10). Similar to the
proposed Active Quote Protection, the active risk counter on MEMX is
voluntary and offers a way for users to proactively manage their
risk. The MEMX risk protection, however, allows the user to actively
manage all the risk limits specified in MEMX's rule (e.g., executed
contracts, notional value, etc.) whereas the Exchange's proposal
would allow Market Makers to actively manage executed contracts
only, as discussed later in this filing. In addition, the Exchange's
proposal will only apply to quotes whereas MEMX's functionality
applies to both orders and quotes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today, the Exchange requires Market Makers to configure risk
exposure thresholds based on either percentage of executed quotes
(``Percentage Threshold'') or total number of executed contracts
(``Volume Threshold''). The Exchange also offers two optional risk
exposure thresholds based on the absolute value of the difference
between long and short positions (``Delta Threshold''), and absolute
value of the difference between contracts bought and contracts sold
(``Vega Threshold'') (collectively, ``Thresholds'').\5\ As set forth in
Options 3, Section 15(c)(2)(A), the System tracks each Threshold with a
corresponding risk counter over a Market Maker-specified rolling time
period not to exceed 30 seconds. Furthermore, Section 15(c)(2)(A)
describes that when a risk counter exceeds the corresponding Threshold
during the specified time period, the System would automatically remove
the Market Maker's quotes in all series of the applicable options class
(each, a ``Purge Event''). As a result of a Purge Event, the
corresponding risk counter and Threshold would reset upon such removal.
The Exchange also notes that pursuant to Section 15(c)(2)(D) today, the
Thresholds and risk counters can be completely reset if the Market
Maker specifically requests the System to remove quotes in all options
series in an underlying issue. This risk protection is passive in that
the risk counters wait to reset until the expiry of a specified time
period, a Purge Event, or when the Market Maker otherwise sends a
specific instruction to the Exchange to remove quotes to completely
reset the counters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Thresholds are described in detail in Options 3, Section
15(c)(2)(A)(i)-(iv). If a Market Maker does not provide a parameter
for each Threshold, the Exchange will apply default parameters
announced to Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange now proposes to introduce a new risk protection called
Active Quote Protection that would enable Market Makers to actively
manage their executed contract limit (``Contract Limit'') by sending an
electronic instruction to the Exchange to decrement their executed
contract limit counter (``Limit Counter'') by a specified amount at any
time, rather than waiting until the expiry of a defined time period,
when the risk limit is exceeded (like a Purge Event), or when the
Market Maker otherwise sends a specific instruction to purge quotes to
completely reset the risk counter.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ If the Market Maker opting to use Active Quote Protection
does not provide a Contract Limit at the outset, the Exchange will
apply a default parameter for the Active Quote Protection Contract
Limit (which would be announced to Participants). The Exchange will
initially set the default Contract Limit at 100 contracts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Contract Limit, as set by the Market Maker, would apply for the
duration of the trading day. Once the Market Maker's Limit Counter
exceeds the Contract Limit set by the Market Maker, the System would
automatically remove quotes in all series of the applicable options
class submitted through the Exchange's Specialized Quote Feed
protocol,\7\ identical to how the quote removal mechanism works for a
Purge Event today.\8\ Today, Purge Events are triggered under the
existing Quotation Adjustments on the first execution that exceeds the
applicable Threshold. Once an execution occurs, the System checks all
Thresholds to see if they have been exceeded. If exceeded, the Market
Maker's quote would be purged pursuant to Options 3, Section
15(c)(2)(D). In order to remain consistent with the firm quote
obligations of a broker-dealer pursuant to Rule 602 of Regulation NMS,
any marketable orders or quotes that are executable against a Market
Maker's quotes that are received \9\ prior to the time the applicable
Threshold is triggered will be automatically executed up to the size of
the Market Maker's quote, regardless of whether the execution would
cause the Market Maker to exceed their pre-set Percentage Threshold,
Volume Threshold, Delta Threshold, or Vega Threshold.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Specialized Quote Feed or ``SQF'' is an interface that only
Market Makers may use to submit quotes to the Exchange. See Options
3, Section 7(e)(1)(B).
\8\ See Options 3, Section 15(c)(2)(C) (renumbered as Section
15(c)(2)(D) under this proposal, as noted below).
\9\ The time of receipt for an order or quote is the time such
message is processed by the Exchange's order book.
\10\ See current Options 3, Section 15(c)(2)(C)(ii). The
Exchange will renumber this as Section 15(c)(2)(D)(ii) and clarify
this provision in the manner described later in this filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under Active Quote Protection, the System would similarly handle
the Market Maker's quote in that the quote could be filled one
execution over the Contract Limit before the Market Maker's remaining
quotes are cancelled by the System in order to be consistent with the
firm quote obligations under Rule 602 of Regulation NMS. Specifically,
the Exchange notes that any marketable orders or quotes that are
executable against a Market Maker's quotes that are received \11\ prior
to the time the Contract Limit is triggered will be automatically
executed up to the size of the Market Maker's quote, regardless of
whether the execution would cause the Market Maker to exceed the
Contract Limit.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See supra note 9.
\12\ For both the current Quotation Adjustments and proposed
Active Quote Protection, the System will execute marketable interest
up to the size of the Market Maker's quote, but cannot guarantee
interest will be fully executed, as is the case with any execution
in the Exchange's order book. There is always the possibility that
the Market Maker's quote size (and/or Market Maker's quote plus
other interest on the order book) may not be sufficient volume to
fill the incoming interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, under Active Quote Protection, Market Makers will be
able to submit a request (i) to decrement their Limit Counter by a
specified number of contracts, or (ii) to fully decrement their Limit
Counter to zero.\13\ Market Makers that elect to use the proposed
Active Quote Protection on a badge \14\ will not be able to use the
existing Threshold risk protections described above on the same badge
(i.e., the active and passive risk counter functionality would be
mutually exclusive per badge) given that it would be unnecessarily
complex to implement from a technology standpoint. Market Makers may be
associated with multiple badges today, so if they want to use both risk
protections for their activity on the Exchange, they will be able to
set either the active or passive risk counter functionality on each
one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ As discussed later in this filing, in order to re-enter the
System after their quotes are purged pursuant to the Active Quote
Protection, Market Makers will need to submit the same request to
fully decrement their Limit Counter to zero.
\14\ The term ``badge'' means an account number, which may
contain letters and/or numbers, assigned to BX Market Makers. A BX
Market Maker account may be associated with multiple badges. See
Options 1, Section 1(a)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To effectuate the foregoing changes, the Exchange proposes to set
forth the new risk protection in paragraph (B) of Options 3, Section
15(c)(2), as follows: \15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ As a result, the Exchange will also renumber existing
paragraphs (C)-(F) as proposed paragraphs (D)-(G).
[[Page 58375]]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In lieu of Rapid Fire, a Market Maker may provide an executed
contract limit (``Contract Limit'') that, if exceeded, the System
will automatically remove the Market Maker's quotes in all series of
an options class submitted through SQF. The System will apply the
Contract Limit for the duration of the trading day. For each class
of options, the System will maintain an active limit counter that
will track the current number of contracts executed through the
Market Maker's quotes (``Limit Counter''). If the Limit Counter
exceeds the Contract Limit established by the Market Maker, the
System will automatically remove the Market Maker's quotes as
described in paragraph (D) below. Market Makers may submit a request
(i) to decrement their Limit Counter by a specified number of
contracts, or (ii) to fully decrement their Limit Counter to zero,
including to re-enter the System as described in paragraph (F)
below.
The Exchange also proposes to amend current paragraph (F)
(renumbered to paragraph (G) under this proposal) of Options 3, Section
15(c)(2) to specify that the active and passive risk counter
functionality will be mutually exclusive per badge). As amended,
proposed paragraph (G) will provide:
The Exchange will require BX Market Makers to utilize the
Percentage Threshold, the Volume Threshold, or the Contract Limit.
For Market Makers that elect to utilize the Contract Limit, the
Percentage Threshold, Volume Threshold, Delta Threshold, and Vega
Threshold will not be available for use on the Market Maker's badge.
The Delta, Vega and Multi-Trigger Thresholds are optional.
As described above, once the Limit Counter exceeds the Contract
Limit set by the Market Maker under the proposed Active Quote
Protection, the System would automatically remove quotes in the same
manner as currently specified for a Purge Event in proposed paragraph
(D) of Options 3, Section 15(c)(2). Accordingly, the Exchange proposes
to add Active Quote Protection's Contract Limit throughout this Rule.
Specifically, proposed paragraph (D) will provide that the System will
automatically remove quotes in all series of an options class in an
underlying security when the Percentage Threshold, Volume Threshold,
Delta Threshold, Vega Threshold, or the Contract Limit has been
exceeded. The System will automatically remove quotes in all series of
an option class in all underlying securities when the Multi-Trigger
Threshold \16\ has been exceeded. The System will send a Purge
Notification Message to the BX Market Maker for all affected options
when the above thresholds have been exceeded. Proposed subparagraph
(D)(i) will provide that the Percentage Threshold, Volume Threshold,
Delta Threshold, Vega Threshold, Contract Limit, and Multi-Trigger
Threshold are considered independently of each other.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ Multi-Trigger Threshold is defined in current paragraph (B)
(proposed paragraph (D)) of Section 15(c)(2) as the number of
allowable triggers by which the Exchange will automatically remove
quotes in all options series in all underlying issues submitted
through designated BX protocols as specified by the Exchange. This
threshold is part of the Exchange's Multi-Trigger risk protection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, as discussed above, any marketable orders or quotes that
are executable against a Market Maker's quotes that are received \17\
prior to the time the applicable Threshold or Contract Limit is
triggered will be automatically executed up to the size of the Market
Maker's quote, even if such execution would cause the Market Maker to
exceed any of their pre-set risk limits with respect to any of the
foregoing risk parameters. The Exchange notes that the current related
Rule in sub-paragraph (C)(ii) only mentions that quotes will execute up
to the Market Maker's size, and is silent on marketable orders. In
addition, the current Rule does not specify the time of receipt of such
marketable interest that is executable against the size of the Market
Maker's quote. As such, the Exchange proposes to add this specificity
in proposed sub-paragraph (D)(ii) to better describe how the System
operates today for Quotation Adjustments and how the System will
operate for proposed Active Quote Protection. In particular, sub-
paragraph (D)(ii) will provide:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See supra note 9.
The System will execute any marketable orders or quotes that are
executable against a Market Maker's quote and received prior to the
time the Percentage Threshold, Volume Threshold, Delta Threshold,
Vega Threshold, or Contract Limit is triggered up to the size of the
Market Maker's quote, even if such execution results in executions
in excess of the Market Maker's applicable Threshold or Contract
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit with respect to any parameter.
In addition, when the System removes quotes as a result of
exceeding the Contract Limit under Active Quote Protection, the
Exchange proposes to require the Market Maker to submit a request to
re-enter the System. This request will be the same type of message as
the request described in proposed paragraph (B) where the Market Maker
must request to fully decrement their Limit Counter back to zero in
order to re-enter the System. This requirement will be added in
proposed paragraph (F) of Options 3, Section 15(c)(2), and will be
similar to how the existing quote purge mechanism works for the
Thresholds today, except the Market Maker needs to send a separate
message (i.e., a re-entry indicator) to re-enter the System when their
quotes are purged as a result of exceeding any of the existing
Thresholds.
The Exchange also proposes that the new Active Quote Protection
would leverage the existing multi-trigger (``Multi-Trigger'')
functionality currently set forth in Options 3, Section 15(c)(2)(B)
(renumbered as Section 15(c)(2)(C) under this proposal). Today, Multi-
Trigger is a risk protection offered alongside the current Quotation
Adjustments. A BX Market Maker or BX Market Maker Group, which is
defined as multiple affiliated BX Market Makers,\18\ may provide the
specified time period and number of allowable Purge Events by which the
Exchange will automatically remove quotes in all options series in all
underlying issues submitted through designated BX protocols as
specified by the Exchange (``Multi-Trigger Threshold''). Multi-Trigger
is triggered when during a time period established by the Market Maker
not to exceed 30 seconds, the total number of Quotation Adjustment
Purge Events exceeds the Multi-Trigger Threshold provided to the
Exchange by the BX Market Maker or BX Market Maker Group. When Multi-
Trigger is triggered, the System automatically purges all of the Market
Maker's or Group's quotes in all options series in an underlying issue.
As set forth in current Options 3, Section 15(c)(2)(E) (renumbered to
Section 15(c)(2)(F) under this proposal), when the System removes
quotes as a result of the Multi-Trigger Threshold, the Market Maker
must manually request re-entry to the System by contacting the
Exchange. Exchange staff must then set a re-entry indicator in this
case to enable re-entry, which will cause the System to send a Reentry
Notification Message to the BX Market Maker or Group for all options
series in all underlying issues. The Market Maker's Clearing Firm will
be notified regarding the trigger and re-entry into the System after
quotes are removed as a result of the Multi-Trigger Threshold, provided
the Market Maker's Clearing Firm has requested to receive such
notification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ This would be more than one BX Market Maker, but does not
require the aggregation of all of the Participant's Market Makers. A
Group would be comprised of BX Market Makers affiliated with one
Participant (i.e., one BX options member firm). The Participant
would be required to define a Group by providing a list of such
affiliated BX Market Makers to the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today, Multi-Trigger is meant to provide Market Makers or a Group
with protection from the risk of multiple executions across multiple
series of an option or across multiple options. This risk protection
recognizes that risk to
[[Page 58376]]
Market Makers is not limited to a single series in an option or even to
all series in an option; Market Makers that quote in multiple series of
multiple options have significant exposure, requiring them to offset or
hedge their overall positions. Market Makers are required to
continuously quote in assigned options, and quoting across many series
in an option or multiple options creates the possibility of executions
that can create large, unintended principal positions that could expose
Market Makers to unnecessary risk. Multi-Trigger is therefore intended
to assist Market Makers or Groups in managing their market risk by
tracking the number of Purge Events relative to the Multi-Trigger
Threshold set by the Market Maker or Group. The Exchange believes that
tracking the number of Active Quote Protection Purge Events for a
Market Maker or Group against its Multi-Trigger Threshold would be
similarly useful for managing market risk.
To that end, the Exchange proposes to update Multi-Trigger to add
purge events under Active Quote Protection to the Multi-Trigger counter
such that Active Quote Protection purge events and Purge Events under
the current Quotation Adjustments will be aggregated together as
counting toward the specified Multi-Trigger Threshold. Accordingly, the
Exchange proposes to add references to the Active Quote Protection rule
(i.e., proposed paragraph (B) of Options 3, Section 15(c)(2))
throughout the Multi-Trigger rule in proposed paragraph (C),
specifically:
A BX Market Maker or BX Market Maker Group (multiple affiliated
BX Market Makers is a ``Group'' as defined by a BX Participant and
provided by such Participant to the Exchange) may provide a
specified time period and number of allowable triggers by which the
Exchange will automatically remove quotes in all options series in
all underlying issues submitted through designated BX protocols as
specified by the Exchange (``Multi-Trigger Threshold''). During a
specified time period established by the BX Market Maker not to
exceed 30 seconds (``Multi-Trigger Specified Time Period''), the
number of times the System automatically removes the BX Market
Maker's or Group's quotes in all options series will be based on the
number of triggers of the Percentage Threshold described in
paragraph (A)(i) above, the Volume Threshold described in paragraph
(A)(ii) above, the Delta Threshold described in paragraph (A)(iii)
above, the Vega Threshold described in paragraph (A)(iv) above, and
the Contract Limit described in paragraph (B) above. Once the System
determines that the number of triggers exceeds a number established
by either the BX Market Maker or Group, during a Multi-Trigger
Specified Time Period, the System will automatically remove all
quotes in all options series in all underlying issues for that BX
Market Maker or Group. A trigger is defined as the event which
causes the System to automatically remove quotes in all options
series in an underlying issue. A Multi-Trigger Specified Time Period
will commence after every trigger of the Percentage Threshold,
Volume Threshold, Delta Threshold, Vega Threshold, or Contract
Limit, and will continue until the System removes quotes as
described in paragraph (D) below or the Multi-Trigger Specified Time
Period expires. The System counts triggers within the Multi-Trigger
Specified Time Period across all triggers for the BX Market Maker or
Group. A Multi-Trigger Specified Time Period operates on a rolling
basis in that there may be multiple Multi-Trigger Specified Time
Periods occurring simultaneously and such Multi-Trigger Specified
Time Periods may overlap.
The following example illustrates the proposed behavior of the
Active Quote Protection risk protection:
Market Maker AAPL
Contract Limit: 100
Market Maker trades a transaction for 10 contracts in
AAPL; Limit Counter goes from 0 to 10.
Market Maker sends a request to decrement its Limit
Counter in AAPL for 10 contracts; Limit Counter goes from 10 to 0.
Market Maker trades a transaction for 20 contracts in
AAPL; Limit Counter goes from 0 to 20.
Market Maker trades a transaction for 50 contracts in
AAPL; Limit Counter goes from 20 to 70.
Market Maker sends a request to decrement its Limit
Counter in AAPL for 20 contracts; Limit Counter goes from 70 to 50.
Market Maker trades a transaction for 60 contracts in
AAPL; Limit Counter goes from 50 to 110 and all Market Maker quotes in
AAPL are automatically purged after the execution because the Limit
Counter exceeded the Market Maker's Contract Limit of 100 executed
contracts.
At this point, the Market Maker must send a request to
fully decrement its Limit Counter in AAPL back to zero in order to
begin quoting again.
The following example illustrates how Multi-Trigger will work with
the proposed Active Quote Protection functionality:
Assume Market Maker in AAPL and SPY has Quotation
Adjustments set for AAPL and Active QP set for SPY.
Market Maker sets its Multi-Trigger Threshold so that it
is triggered at 25 purge events within a 20 second time period.
On a given trading day, if an Active Quote Protection
Purge Event is triggered 15 times in SPY and a Quotation Adjustment
Purge Event is triggered 10 times in AAPL, all within 20 seconds, then
the Exchange will automatically remove all of the Market Maker's quotes
AAPL and SPY.
Technical Amendments
The Exchange proposes a few technical, non-substantive amendments
in Options 3, Section 15(c)(2). With the addition of the new Active
Quote Protection rule in proposed paragraph (B), the Exchange proposes
to renumber existing paragraphs (B)-(F) as proposed paragraphs (C)-(G)
and make related changes to update existing cross-cites within Section
15(c)(2). The Exchange also proposes in paragraph (A) to correct the
current cross-cites to paragraphs (B) and (C) to paragraphs (D) and (E)
because the Exchange originally intended to refer to how the System
removes quotes either pursuant to a Purge Event (which is governed by
proposed paragraph (D)) or pursuant to a Market Maker specifically
requesting the System to remove quotes in all series of an underlying
issue (which is governed by proposed paragraph (E)). The Exchange
proposes to reword the rule text within proposed Options 3, Section
15(c)(2)(D) to replace the term ``options'' with the words ``series of
an options class'' to conform the wording in this paragraph to other
rule text with Options 3, Section 15. Additionally, the Exchange
proposes to add the words ``or Group'' to Options 3, Section
15(c)(2)(F) because a Group may also request re-entry pursuant to
proposed Options 3, Section 15(c)(2)(C) and would receive a Reentry
Notification Message.
Lastly, the Exchange proposes to title paragraph (A) as ``Rapid
Fire'' and paragraph (C) as ``Multi-Trigger'' to more clearly identify
which rules apply to which risk protections.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with section
6(b) of the Act,\19\ in general, and furthers the objectives of section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\20\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public
interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed Active Quote Protection
risk protection is consistent with the Act because it will enhance the
risk protection tools available to Market Makers and Groups by
introducing a
[[Page 58377]]
new method of establishing and monitoring for risk parameters that will
be offered as an alternative to existing Rapid Fire risk parameters,
thereby supporting a Market Maker's ability to manage their risk on the
Exchange, and also providing them with flexibility to use additional
tools to manage risk. As noted above, while the passive (Rapid Fire)
and active (Active QP) risk counter functionality will be mutually
exclusive on each badge, Market Makers will still be able to use both
to cover their activity on the Exchange by getting multiple badges and
setting each risk counter by badge. The Exchange believes that offering
more risk management tools to Market Makers would mitigate their
exposure to excessive risk. The Exchange further believes that having
the new Active Quote Protection functionality leverage the existing
Multi-Trigger functionality will similarly support a Market Maker's
ability to manage their risk on the Exchange by including Active Quote
Protection purge events to the Multi-Trigger counter. As noted above,
the risk to Market Makers is not limited to a single series in an
option or even multiple series in an option as Market Makers that quote
in multiple series of multiple options have significant exposure,
requiring them to offset or hedge their overall positions. Market
Makers are required to continuously quote in assigned options, and
quoting across many series in an option or multiple options creates the
possibility of executions that can create large, unintended principal
positions that could expose Market Makers to unnecessary risk. Today,
Multi-Trigger is designed to assist Market Makers or a Group in
managing their market risk by tracking the number of Purge Events
relative to the market-wide parameter set by the Market Maker or the
Group. The Exchange therefore believes that tracking the number of
Active Quote Protection purge events for a Market Maker against its
Multi-Trigger Threshold would be similarly useful for managing market
risk so that they can provide deep and liquid markets to the benefit of
all investors. Ultimately, the Exchange believes that providing Market
Makers with additional tools in the manner described above to manage
their risk parameters serves to perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest because Market Makers will be better
able to manage risks with these tools.
With regard to the impact of this proposal on system capacity, the
Exchange notes that it has analyzed its capacity and represents that it
and the Options Price Reporting Authority have the necessary systems
capacity to handle any potential additional traffic associated with the
proposed rule change. The Exchange believes that its members will not
have a capacity issue as a result of this proposal.
The Exchange further represents that its proposal will continue to
operate consistently with the firm quote obligations of a broker-dealer
pursuant to Rule 602 of Regulation NMS. Specifically, any marketable
interest that is executable against a Market Maker's quotes that are
received \21\ by the Exchange prior to the time this functionality is
triggered will be automatically executed at the price up to the Market
Maker's size, regardless of whether such execution results in
executions in excess of the Market Maker's pre-set Contract Limit.\22\
As discussed above, this is also in line with how current Rapid Fire
operates today. The Exchange believes that the proposed changes in
proposed sub-paragraph (D)(ii) to specify that this Rule will apply to
marketable orders and quotes (currently silent on marketable orders),
and to specify the time of receipt of such marketable interest that is
executable against the size of the Market Maker's quote, will promote
clarity in how the System currently operates for Rapid Fire and will
operate for Active Quote Protection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See supra note 9.
\22\ See proposed subparagraph (D)(ii) of Options 3, Section
15(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted above, the proposed Active Quote Protection functionality
is similar to existing active risk counter functionality on another
options exchange, which currently allows users to actively decrement
the risk counter by a specified amount at any time, rather than waiting
until a risk limit is reached or the user otherwise sends a specific
instruction to the exchange to completely reset the counting
program.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Amendments
The Exchange believes that the technical amendments in Options 3,
Section 15(c)(2) described above are consistent with the Act because
they will promote clarity in the rules and make the Rulebook easier to
navigate for market participants by updating rule numbering and
existing cross-cites as described above. Furthermore, the Exchange also
believes that adding the defined terms for Rapid Fire and Multi-Trigger
in the rule text will promote clarity so that Members can more easily
locate the relevant functionalities in the Rulebook. Rewording the rule
text within proposed Options 3, Section 15(c)(2)(D) to replace the term
``options'' with the words ``series of an options class'' will conform
the wording in this paragraph to other rule text with Options 3,
Section 15. Finally, adding the words ``or Group'' to Options 3,
Section 15(c)(2)(F) will make the sentence more accurate because a
Group may also request re-entry pursuant to proposed Options 3, Section
15(c)(2)(C) and would receive a Reentry Notification Message.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed Active Quote
Protection functionality will impose any undue burden on intra-market
competition as it is aimed at mitigating exposure to excessive risk
when trading on the Exchange. While the Exchange will offer the
proposed functionality to Market Makers only, the proposed risk
protection is intended to provide Market Makers with an additional tool
to manage their risk parameters in a manner they deem appropriate. As
such, the Exchange believes that the proposed functionality may
facilitate Market Makers' provision of liquidity on the Exchange,
thereby benefitting all market participants through additional
execution opportunities at potentially improved prices.
The Exchange also believes that its Active Quote Protection
proposal does not impose an undue burden on inter-market competition as
the proposed risk protection is similar to an existing risk protection
on MEMX \24\ as described above, and any options market could adopt
similar rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lastly, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed technical
amendments in Options 3, Section 15(c)(2) will impose an undue burden
on competition as these are non-substantive changes to promote clarity
in the rules and make the Rulebook easier to navigate for market
participants.
[[Page 58378]]
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \25\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\26\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-BX-2023-019 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-BX-2023-019. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-BX-2023-019 and should be
submitted on or before September 15, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-18301 Filed 8-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P