Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Shares of the Global X Bitcoin Trust, Under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust Shares, 57490-57505 [2023-18103]

Download as PDF 57490 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Notices For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.35 Sherry R. Haywood, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2023–18106 Filed 8–22–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–98156; File No. SR– CboeBZX–2023–058] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Shares of the Global X Bitcoin Trust, Under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust Shares August 17, 2023. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on August 4, 2023, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BZX’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’) a proposed rule change to list and trade shares of the Global X Bitcoin Trust (the ‘‘Trust’’),3 under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the Exchange’s website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/ equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 35 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 3 The Trust was formed as a Delaware statutory trust on July 13, 2021 and is operated as a grantor trust for U.S. federal tax purposes. The Trust has no fixed termination date. 1 15 VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:27 Aug 22, 2023 Jkt 259001 concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to list and trade the Shares under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4),4 which governs the listing and trading of Commodity-Based Trust Shares on the Exchange.5 Global X Digital Assets is the sponsor of the Trust (‘‘Sponsor’’). The Shares will be registered with the Commission by means of the Trust’s registration statement on Form S–1 (the ‘‘Registration Statement’’).6 A thirdparty U.S.-based trust company and qualified custodian will be responsible for custody of the Trust’s bitcoin (the ‘‘Custodian’’). As further discussed below, the Commission has historically approved or disapproved exchange filings to list and trade series of Trust Issued Receipts, including spot-based Commodity-Based Trust Shares, on the basis of whether the listing exchange has in place a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement with a regulated market of significant size related to the underlying commodity to be held.7 Prior orders from the Commission have pointed out that in every prior approval order for Commodity-Based Trust Shares, there has been a derivatives market that represents the regulated market of significant size, generally a Commodity 4 The Commission approved BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4) in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65225 (August 30, 2011), 76 FR 55148 (September 6, 2011) (SR–BATS–2011–018). 5 All statements and representations made in this filing regarding (a) the description of the portfolio, (b) limitations on portfolio holdings or reference assets, or (c) the applicability of Exchange rules and surveillance procedures shall constitute continued listing requirements for listing the Shares on the Exchange. 6 See Form S–1 Registration Statement submitted to the Commission on July 21, 2021. The Registration Statement is not yet effective and the Shares will not trade on the Exchange until such time that the Registration Statement is effective. 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83723 (July 26, 2018), 83 FR 37579 (August 1, 2018). This proposal was subsequently disapproved by the Commission. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83723 (July 26, 2018), 83 FR 37579 (August 1, 2018) (the ‘‘Winklevoss Order’’). PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Futures Trading Commission (the ‘‘CFTC’’) regulated futures market.8 8 See streetTRACKS Gold Shares, Exchange Act Release No. 50603 (Oct. 28, 2004), 69 FR 64614, 64618–19 (Nov. 5, 2004) (SR–NYSE–2004–22) (the ‘‘First Gold Approval Order’’); iShares COMEX Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 51058 (Jan. 19, 2005), 70 FR 3749, 3751, 3754–55 (Jan. 26, 2005) (SR–Amex–2004–38); iShares Silver Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 53521 (Mar. 20, 2006), 71 FR 14967, 14968, 14973–74 (Mar. 24, 2006) (SR– Amex–2005–072); ETFS Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 59895 (May 8, 2009), 74 FR 22993, 22994–95, 22998, 23000 (May 15, 2009) (SR– NYSEArca–2009–40); ETFS Silver Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 59781 (Apr. 17, 2009), 74 FR 18771, 18772, 18775–77 (Apr. 24, 2009) (SR–NYSEArca– 2009–28); ETFS Palladium Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 61220 (Dec. 22, 2009), 74 FR 68895, 68896 (Dec. 29, 2009) (SR–NYSEArca–2009–94) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca’s representation that ‘‘[t]he most significant palladium futures exchanges are the NYMEX and the Tokyo Commodity Exchange,’’ that ‘‘NYMEX is the largest exchange in the world for trading precious metals futures and options,’’ and that NYSE Arca ‘‘may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,’’ of which NYMEX is a member, Exchange Act Release No. 60971 (Nov. 9, 2009), 74 FR 59283, 59285–86, 59291 (Nov. 17, 2009)); ETFS Platinum Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 61219 (Dec. 22, 2009), 74 FR 68886, 68887–88 (Dec. 29, 2009) (SR–NYSEArca–2009–95) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca’s representation that ‘‘[t]he most significant platinum futures exchanges are the NYMEX and the Tokyo Commodity Exchange,’’ that ‘‘NYMEX is the largest exchange in the world for trading precious metals futures and options,’’ and that NYSE Arca ‘‘may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,’’ of which NYMEX is a member, Exchange Act Release No. 60970 (Nov. 9, 2009), 74 FR 59319, 59321, 59327 (Nov. 17, 2009)); Sprott Physical Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 61496 (Feb. 4, 2010), 75 FR 6758, 6760 (Feb. 10, 2010) (SR–NYSEArca–2009–113) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca’s representation that the COMEX is one of the ‘‘major world gold markets,’’ that NYSE Arca ‘‘may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,’’ and that NYMEX, of which COMEX is a division, is a member of the Intermarket Surveillance Group, Exchange Act Release No. 61236 (Dec. 23, 2009), 75 FR 170, 171, 174 (Jan. 4, 2010)); Sprott Physical Silver Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 63043 (Oct. 5, 2010), 75 FR 62615, 62616, 62619, 62621 (Oct. 12, 2010) (SR– NYSEArca–2010–84); ETFS Precious Metals Basket Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 62692 (Aug. 11, 2010), 75 FR 50789, 50790 (Aug. 17, 2010) (SR– NYSEArca–2010–56) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca’s representation that ‘‘the most significant gold, silver, platinum and palladium futures exchanges are the COMEX and the TOCOM’’ and that NYSE Arca ‘‘may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,’’ of which COMEX is a member, Exchange Act Release No. 62402 (Jun. 29, 2010), 75 FR 39292, 39295, 39298 (July 8, 2010)); ETFS White Metals Basket Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 62875 (Sept. 9, 2010), 75 FR 56156, 56158 (Sept. 15, 2010) (SR–NYSEArca–2010–71) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca’s representation that ‘‘the most significant silver, platinum and palladium futures exchanges are the COMEX and the TOCOM’’ and that NYSE Arca ‘‘may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,’’ of which COMEX is a member, Exchange Act Release No. 62620 (July 30, 2010), 75 FR 47655, 47657, 47660 (Aug. 6, 2010)); ETFS Asian Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 63464 (Dec. 8, 2010), 75 FR 77926, 77928 (Dec. 14, 2010) (SR–NYSEArca–2010–95) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Notices lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Further to this point, the Commission’s prior orders have noted that the spot commodities and currency markets for which it has previously approved spot ETPs are generally unregulated and that Arca’s representation that ‘‘the most significant gold futures exchanges are the COMEX and the Tokyo Commodity Exchange,’’ that ‘‘COMEX is the largest exchange in the world for trading precious metals futures and options,’’ and that NYSE Arca ‘‘may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,’’ of which COMEX is a member, Exchange Act Release No. 63267 (Nov. 8, 2010), 75 FR 69494, 69496, 69500–01 (Nov. 12, 2010)); Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 68430 (Dec. 13, 2012), 77 FR 75239, 75240–41 (Dec. 19, 2012) (SR– NYSEArca–2012–111) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca’s representation that ‘‘[f]utures on platinum and palladium are traded on two major exchanges: The New York Mercantile Exchange . . . and Tokyo Commodities Exchange’’ and that NYSE Arca ‘‘may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,’’ of which COMEX is a member, Exchange Act Release No. 68101 (Oct. 24, 2012), 77 FR 65732, 65733, 65739 (Oct. 30, 2012)); APMEX Physical— 1 oz. Gold Redeemable Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 66930 (May 7, 2012), 77 FR 27817, 27818 (May 11, 2012) (SR–NYSEArca–2012–18) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca’s representation that NYSE Arca ‘‘may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,’’ of which COMEX is a member, and that gold futures are traded on COMEX and the Tokyo Commodity Exchange, with a cross-reference to the proposed rule change to list and trade shares of the ETFS Gold Trust, in which NYSE Arca represented that COMEX is one of the ‘‘major world gold markets,’’ Exchange Act Release No. 66627 (Mar. 20, 2012), 77 FR 17539, 17542–43, 17547 (Mar. 26, 2012)); JPM XF Physical Copper Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 68440 (Dec. 14, 2012), 77 FR 75468, 75469–70, 75472, 75485–86 (Dec. 20, 2012) (SR– NYSEArca–2012–28); iShares Copper Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 68973 (Feb. 22, 2013), 78 FR 13726, 13727, 13729–30, 13739–40 (Feb. 28, 2013) (SR–NYSEArca–2012–66); First Trust Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 70195 (Aug. 14, 2013), 78 FR 51239, 51240 (Aug. 20, 2013) (SR– NYSEArca–2013–61) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca’s representation that FINRA, on behalf of the exchange, may obtain trading information regarding gold futures and options on gold futures from members of the Intermarket Surveillance Group, including COMEX, or from markets ‘‘with which [NYSE Arca] has in place a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement,’’ and that gold futures are traded on COMEX and the Tokyo Commodity Exchange, with a cross-reference to the proposed rule change to list and trade shares of the ETFS Gold Trust, in which NYSE Arca represented that COMEX is one of the ‘‘major world gold markets,’’ Exchange Act Release No. 69847 (June 25, 2013), 78 FR 39399, 39400, 39405 (July 1, 2013)); Merk Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 71378 (Jan. 23, 2014), 79 FR 4786, 4786–87 (Jan. 29, 2014) (SR–NYSEArca–2013–137) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca’s representation that ‘‘COMEX is the largest gold futures and options exchange’’ and that NYSE Arca ‘‘may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,’’ including with respect to transactions occurring on COMEX pursuant to CME and NYMEX’s membership, or from exchanges ‘‘with which [NYSE Arca] has in place a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement,’’ Exchange Act Release No. 71038 (Dec. 11, 2013), 78 FR 76367, 76369, 76374 (Dec. 17, 2013)); Long Dollar Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 79518 (Dec. 9, 2016), 81 FR 90876, 90881, 90886, 90888 (Dec. 15, 2016) (SR– NYSEArca–2016–84). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:27 Aug 22, 2023 Jkt 259001 the Commission relied on the underlying futures market as the regulated market of significant size that formed the basis for approving the series of Currency and Commodity-Based Trust Shares, including gold, silver, platinum, palladium, copper, and other commodities and currencies. The Commission specifically noted in the Winklevoss Order that the First Gold Approval Order ‘‘was based on an assumption that the currency market and the spot gold market were largely unregulated.’’ 9 As such, the regulated market of significant size test does not require that the spot bitcoin market be regulated in order for the Commission to approve this proposal, and precedent makes clear that a regulated underlying market for a spot commodity or currency would be an exception to the norm. These largely unregulated currency and commodity markets do not provide the same protections as the markets that are subject to the Commission’s oversight, but the Commission has consistently looked to surveillance sharing agreements with the relevant underlying futures market to determine whether such products were consistent with the Act. With this in mind, the CME Bitcoin Futures market is the appropriate market to consider in determining whether there is a related regulated market of significant size. Further to this point, the Exchange notes that the Commission has approved proposals related to the listing and trading of funds that would primarily hold CME Bitcoin Futures that are registered under the Securities Act of 1933.10 In the Teucrium Approval, the Commission found the CME Bitcoin Futures market to be a regulated market of significant size as it relates to CME Bitcoin Futures, an odd tautological truth that is also inconsistent with prior disapproval orders for ETPs that would hold actual bitcoin instead of derivatives contracts (‘‘Spot Bitcoin ETPs’’) that use the exact same pricing methodology as the CME Bitcoin Futures. As further discussed below, both the Exchange and the Sponsor believe that this proposal and the included analysis are sufficient to establish that the CME Bitcoin Futures market represents a regulated market of significant size as it relates both to the CME Bitcoin Futures market and to the 9 See Winklevoss Order at 37592. Exchange Act Release Nos. 94620 (April 6, 2022), 87 FR 21676 (April 12, 2022) (the ‘‘Teucrium Approval’’) and 94853 (May 5, 2022) (collectively, with the Teucrium Approval, the ‘‘Bitcoin Futures Approvals’’). 10 See PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 57491 spot bitcoin market and that this proposal should be approved. Finally, as discussed in greater detail below, by using professional custodians and other service providers, the Trust provides investors interested in exposure to bitcoin with important protections that are not always available to investors that invest directly in bitcoin, including protection against insolvency, cyber attacks, and other risks. If U.S. investors had access to vehicles such as the Trust for their bitcoin investments, instead of directing their bitcoin investments into loosely regulated offshore vehicles (such as loosely regulated centralized exchanges that have since faced bankruptcy proceedings or other insolvencies), then countless investors would have had the option to better protect their principal investments in bitcoin from the aforementioned events and risks. Background Bitcoin is a digital asset based on the decentralized, open source protocol of the peer-to-peer computer network launched in 2009 that governs the creation, movement, and ownership of bitcoin and hosts the public ledger, or ‘‘blockchain,’’ on which all bitcoin transactions are recorded (the ‘‘Bitcoin Network’’ or ‘‘Bitcoin’’). The decentralized nature of the Bitcoin Network allows parties to transact directly with one another based on cryptographic proof instead of relying on a trusted third party. The protocol also lays out the rate of issuance of new bitcoin within the Bitcoin Network, a rate that is reduced by half approximately every four years with an eventual hard cap of 21 million. It’s generally understood that the combination of these two features—a systemic hard cap of 21 million bitcoin and the ability to transact trustlessly with anyone connected to the Bitcoin Network—gives bitcoin its value. The first rule filing proposing to list an exchange-traded product to provide exposure to bitcoin in the U.S. was submitted by the Exchange on June 30, 2016.11 At that time, blockchain technology, and digital assets that utilized it, were relatively new to the broader public. The market cap of all bitcoin in existence at that time was approximately $10 billion. No registered offering of digital asset securities or shares in an investment vehicle with exposure to bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency had yet been conducted, and the regulated infrastructure for conducting a digital asset securities 11 See E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM Winklevoss Order. 23AUN1 57492 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Notices lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 offering had not begun to develop.12 Similarly, regulated U.S. bitcoin futures contracts did not exist. The CFTC had determined that bitcoin is a commodity,13 but had not engaged in significant enforcement actions in the space. The New York Department of Financial Services (‘‘NYDFS’’) adopted its final BitLicense regulatory framework in 2015, but had only approved four entities to engage in activities relating to virtual currencies (whether through granting a BitLicense or a limited-purpose trust charter) as of June 30, 2016.14 While the first over-thecounter bitcoin fund launched in 2013, public trading was limited and the fund had only $60 million in assets.15 There were very few, if any, traditional financial institutions engaged in the space, whether through investment or providing services to digital asset companies. In January 2018, the Staff of the Commission noted in a letter to the Investment Company Institute and SIFMA that it was not aware, at that time, of a single custodian providing fund custodial services for digital assets.16 Fast forward to today and the digital assets financial ecosystem, including bitcoin, has progressed significantly. The development of a regulated market for digital asset securities has significantly evolved, 12 Digital assets that are securities under U.S. law are referred to throughout this proposal as ‘‘digital asset securities.’’ All other digital assets, including bitcoin, are referred to interchangeably as ‘‘cryptocurrencies’’ or ‘‘virtual currencies.’’ The term ‘‘digital assets’’ refers to all digital assets, including both digital asset securities and cryptocurrencies, together. 13 See ‘‘In the Matter of Coinflip, Inc.’’ (‘‘Coinflip’’) (CFTC Docket 15–29 (September 17, 2015)) (order instituting proceedings pursuant to Sections 6(c) and 6(d) of the CEA, making findings and imposing remedial sanctions), in which the CFTC stated: ‘‘Section 1a(9) of the CEA defines ‘commodity’ to include, among other things, ‘all services, rights, and interests in which contracts for future delivery are presently or in the future dealt in.’ 7 U.S.C. § 1a(9). The definition of a ‘commodity’ is broad. See, e.g., Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. SEC, 677 F. 2d 1137, 1142 (7th Cir. 1982). Bitcoin and other virtual currencies are encompassed in the definition and properly defined as commodities.’’ 14 A list of virtual currency businesses that are entities regulated by the NYDFS is available on the NYDFS website. See https://www.dfs.ny.gov/apps_ and_licensing/virtual_currency_businesses/ regulated_entities. 15 Data as of March 31, 2016 according to publicly available filings. See Bitcoin Investment Trust Form S–1, dated May 27, 2016, available at https:// www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1588489/ 000095012316017801/filename1.htm. 16 See letter from Dalia Blass, Director, Division of Investment Management, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to Paul Schott Stevens, President & CEO, Investment Company Institute and Timothy W. Cameron, Asset Management Group—Head, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (January 18, 2018), available at https://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment/ noaction/2018/cryptocurrency-011818.htm. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:27 Aug 22, 2023 Jkt 259001 with market participants having conducted registered public offerings of both digital asset securities 17 and shares in investment vehicles holding bitcoin futures.18 Additionally, licensed and regulated service providers have emerged to provide fund custodial services for digital assets, among other services, including the Custodian. For example, in February 2023, the Commission proposed to amend Rule 206(4)–2 under the Advisers Act of 1940 (the ‘‘custody rule’’) to expand the scope beyond client funds and securities to include all crypto assets, among other assets; 19 in May 2021, the Staff of the Commission released a statement permitting open-end mutual funds to invest in cash-settled bitcoin futures; in December 2020, the Commission adopted a conditional no-action position permitting certain special purpose broker-dealers to custody digital asset securities under Rule 15c3– 3 under the Exchange Act (the ‘‘Custody Statement’’); 20 in September 2020, the Staff of the Commission released a noaction letter permitting certain brokerdealers to operate a non-custodial Alternative Trading System (‘‘ATS’’) for digital asset securities, subject to specified conditions; 21 in October 2019, the Staff of the Commission granted temporary relief from the clearing agency registration requirement to an entity seeking to establish a securities clearance and settlement system based on distributed ledger technology,22 and 17 See Prospectus supplement filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) for INX Tokens (Registration No. 333–233363), available at https://www.sec.gov/ Archives/edgar/data/1725882/ 000121390020023202/ea125858-424b1_ inxlimited.htm. 18 See Prospectus filed by Stone Ridge Trust VI on behalf of NYDIG Bitcoin Strategy Fund Registration, available at https://www.sec.gov/ Archives/edgar/data/1764894/ 000119312519309942/d693146d497.htm. 19 See Investment Advisers Act Release No. 6240 88 FR 14672 (March 9, 2023) (Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets). 20 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90788, 86 FR 11627 (February 26, 2021) (File Number S7– 25–20) (Custody of Digital Asset Securities by Special Purpose Broker-Dealers). 21 See letter from Elizabeth Baird, Deputy Director, Division of Trading and Markets, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to Kris Dailey, Vice President, Risk Oversight & Operational Regulation, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (September 25, 2020), available at https://www.sec.gov/divisions/ marketreg/mr-noaction/2020/finra-ats-role-insettlement-of-digital-asset-security-trades09252020.pdf. 22 See letter from Jeffrey S. Mooney, Associate Director, Division of Trading and Markets, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to Charles G. Cascarilla & Daniel M. Burstein, Paxos Trust Company, LLC (October 28, 2019), available at https://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/mrnoaction/2019/paxos-trust-company-10281917a.pdf. PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 multiple transfer agents who provide services for digital asset securities registered with the Commission.23 Outside the Commission’s purview, the regulatory landscape has changed significantly since 2016, and cryptocurrency markets have grown and evolved as well. The market for bitcoin is approximately 100 times larger, having at one point reached a market cap of over $1 trillion.24 According to the CME Bitcoin Futures Report, from February 13, 2023 through March 27, 2023, CFTC regulated bitcoin futures represented between $750 million and $3.2 billion in notional trading volume on Chicago Mercantile Exchange (‘‘CME’’) (‘‘Bitcoin Futures’’) on a daily basis.25 Open interest was over $1.4 billion for the entirety of the period and at one point was over $2 billion. ETPs that primarily hold CME Bitcoin Futures have raised over $1 billion dollars in assets. The CFTC has exercised its regulatory jurisdiction in bringing a number of enforcement actions related to bitcoin and against trading platforms that offer cryptocurrency trading.26 As of February 14, 2023 the NYDFS has granted no fewer than thirty-four BitLicenses,27 including to established public payment companies like PayPal Holdings, Inc. and Square, Inc., and limited purpose trust charters to entities providing cryptocurrency custody services. In addition, the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (‘‘OFAC’’) has brought enforcement actions over apparent violations of the sanctions laws in connection with the 23 See, e.g., Form TA–1/A filed by Tokensoft Transfer Agent LLC (CIK: 0001794142) on January 8, 2021, available at https://www.sec.gov/Archives/ edgar/data/1794142/000179414219000001/ xslFTA1X01/primary_doc.xml. 24 As of December 1, 2021, the total market cap of all bitcoin in circulation was approximately $1.08 trillion. 25 Data sourced from the CME Bitcoin Futures Report: 30 March, 2023, available at https:// www.cmegroup.com/markets/cryptocurrencies/ bitcoin/bitcoin.volume.htm. 26 The CFTC’s annual report for Fiscal Year 2022 (which ended on September 30, 2022) noted that the CFTC completed the fiscal year with 18 enforcement filings related to digital assets. ‘‘Digital asset actions included manipulation, a $1.7 billion fraudulent scheme, and a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) failing to register as a SEF or FCM or to seek DCM designation.’’ See CFTC FY 2022 Agency Financial Report, available at https://www.cftc.gov/media/7941/2022afr/ download. Additionally, the CFTC filed on March 27, 2023, a civil enforcement action against the owner/operators of the Binance centralized digital asset trading platform, which is one of the largest bitcoin derivative exchanges. See CFTC Release No. 8680–23 (March 27, 2023), available at https:// www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8680-23. 27 See https://www.dfs.ny.gov/ virtual_currency_businesses. E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Notices lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 provision of wallet management services for digital assets.28 In addition to the regulatory developments laid out above, more traditional financial market participants become more active in cryptocurrency: large insurance companies, asset managers, university endowments, pension funds, and even historically bitcoin skeptical fund managers have allocated to bitcoin. As noted in the Financial Stability Oversight Council (‘‘FSOC’’) Report on Digital Asset Financial Stability Risks and Regulation, ‘‘[i]ndustry surveys suggest that the scale of these investments grew quickly during the boom in crypto-asset markets through late 2021. In June 2022, PwC estimated that the number of crypto-specialist hedge funds was more than 300 globally, with $4.1 billion in assets under management. In addition, in a survey PwC found that 38 percent of surveyed traditional hedge funds were currently investing in ‘digital assets,’ compared to 21 percent the year prior.’’ 29 The largest over-the-counter bitcoin fund previously filed a Form 10 registration statement, which the Staff of the Commission reviewed and which took effect automatically, and is now a reporting company.30 Established companies like Tesla, Inc., MicroStrategy Incorporated, and Square, Inc., among others, have announced substantial investments in bitcoin in amounts as large as $1.5 billion (Tesla) and $425 million (MicroStrategy). The foregoing examples demonstrate that bitcoin has gained mainstream usage and recognition. Despite these developments, access for U.S. retail investors to gain exposure 28 See U.S. Department of the Treasury Enforcement Release: ‘‘OFAC Enters Into $98,830 Settlement with BitGo, Inc. for Apparent Violations of Multiple Sanctions Programs Related to Digital Currency Transactions’’ (December 30, 2020) available at https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/ 126/20201230_bitgo.pdf See also U.S. Department of the Treasury Enforcement Release: ‘‘Treasury Announces Two Enforcement Actions for over $24M and $29M Against Virtual Currency Exchange, Bittrex, Inc.’’ (October 11, 2022) available at https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/ jy1006. See also U.S. Department of Treasure Enforcement Release ‘‘OFAC Settles with Virtual Currency Exchange Kraken for $362,158.70 Related to Apparent Violations of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations’’ (November 28, 2022) available at https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/ 126/20221128_kraken.pdf. 29 See the FSOC ‘‘Report on Digital Asset Financial Stability Risks and Regulation 2022’’ (October 3, 2022) (at footnote 26) at https:// home.treasury.gov/system/files/261/FSOC-DigitalAssets-Report-2022.pdf. 30 See Letter from Division of Corporation Finance, Office of Real Estate Construction to Barry E. Silbert, Chief Executive Officer, Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (January 31, 2020) https:// www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1588489/ 000000000020000953/filename1.pdf. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:27 Aug 22, 2023 Jkt 259001 to bitcoin via a transparent and U.S. regulated, U.S. exchange-traded vehicle remains limited. Instead current options include: (i) facing the counter-party risk, legal uncertainty, technical risk, and complexity associated with accessing spot bitcoin; (ii) over-the-counter bitcoin funds (‘‘OTC Bitcoin Funds’’) with high management fees and potentially volatile premiums and discounts; 31 (iii) purchasing shares of operating companies that they believe will provide proxy exposure to bitcoin with limited disclosure about the associated risks; 32 or (iv) purchasing Bitcoin Futures ETFs, as defined below, which represent a sub-optimal structure for long-term investors that will cost them significant amounts of money every year compared to Spot Bitcoin ETPs, as further discussed below. Meanwhile, investors in many other countries, including Canada and Brazil, are able to use more traditional 31 The premium and discount for OTC Bitcoin Funds is known to move rapidly. For example, over the period of 12/21/20 to 1/21/21, the premium for the largest OTC Bitcoin Fund went from 40.18% to 2.79%. While the price of bitcoin appreciated significantly during this period and NAV per share increased by 41.25%, the price per share increased by only 3.58%. This means that investors are buying shares of a fund that experiences significant volatility in its premium and discount outside of the fluctuations in price of the underlying asset. Even operating within the normal premium and discount range, it’s possible for an investor to buy shares of an OTC Bitcoin Fund only to have those shares quickly lose 10% or more in dollar value excluding any movement of the price of bitcoin. That is to say—the price of bitcoin could have stayed exactly the same from market close on one day to market open the next, yet the value of the shares held by the investor decreased only because of the fluctuation of the premium. As more investment vehicles, including mutual funds and ETFs, seek to gain exposure to bitcoin, the easiest option for a buy and hold strategy for such vehicles is often an OTC Bitcoin Fund, meaning that even investors that do not directly buy OTC Bitcoin Funds can be disadvantaged by extreme premiums (or discounts) and premium volatility. 32 A number of operating companies engaged in unrelated businesses—such as Tesla (a car manufacturer) and MicroStrategy (an enterprise software company)—have announced investments as large as $5.3 billion in bitcoin. Without access to bitcoin exchange-traded products, retail investors seeking investment exposure to bitcoin may end up purchasing shares in these companies in order to gain the exposure to bitcoin that they seek. In fact, mainstream financial news networks have written a number of articles providing investors with guidance for obtaining bitcoin exposure through publicly traded companies (such as MicroStrategy, Tesla, and bitcoin mining companies, among others) instead of dealing with the complications associated with buying spot bitcoin in the absence of a bitcoin ETP. See e.g., ‘‘7 public companies with exposure to bitcoin’’ (February 8, 2021) available at: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/7-publiccompanies-with-exposure-to-bitcoin154201525.html; and ‘‘Want to get in the crypto trade without holding bitcoin yourself? Here are some investing ideas’’ (February 19, 2021) available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/19/ways-toinvest-in-bitcoin-without-holding-thecryptocurrency-yourself-.html. PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 57493 exchange listed and traded products (including exchange-traded funds holding physical bitcoin) to gain exposure to bitcoin. Similarly, investors in Switzerland and across Europe have access to Exchange Traded Products which trade on regulated exchanges and provide exposure to a broad array of spot crypto assets. U.S. investors, by contrast, are left with fewer and more risky means of getting bitcoin exposure, as described above.33 To this point, the lack of a Spot Bitcoin ETP exposes U.S. investor assets to significant risk because investors that would otherwise seek cryptoasset exposure through a Spot Bitcoin ETP are forced to find exposure through generally riskier alternatives. For instance, many U.S. investors that held their digital assets in accounts at FTX,34 Celsius Network LLC,35 BlockFi Inc.36 and Voyager Digital Holdings, Inc.37 have become unsecured creditors in the insolvencies of those entities. If a Spot Bitcoin ETP was available, it is likely that at least a portion of the billions of dollars tied up in those proceedings would still reside in the brokerage accounts of U.S. investors, having instead been invested in a transparent, regulated, and well-understood structure—a Spot Bitcoin ETP. For this reason alone, the approval of a Spot Bitcoin ETP would represent a major win for the protection of U.S. investors in the cryptoasset space. As further described below, the Trust, like all other series of Commodity-Based Trust Shares, is designed to protect investors against the risk of losses through fraud and insolvency that arise by holding digital assets, including bitcoin, on centralized platforms. Additionally, investors in other countries, specifically Canada, generally pay lower fees than U.S. retail investors that invest in OTC Bitcoin Funds due to the fee pressure that results from increased competition among available bitcoin investment options. Without an approved and regulated Spot Bitcoin ETP in the U.S., U.S. investors could seek to purchase shares of non-U.S. bitcoin vehicles to get access to bitcoin exposure. Given the separate regulatory regime, potentially adverse foreign and U.S. tax implications, and the 33 The Exchange notes that the list of countries above is not exhaustive and that securities regulators in a number of additional countries have either approved or otherwise allowed the listing and trading of Spot Bitcoin ETPs. 34 See FTX Trading Ltd., et al., Case No. 22– 11068. 35 See Celsius Network LLC, et al., Case No. 22– 10964. 36 See BlockFi Inc., Case No. 22–19361. 37 See Voyager Digital Holdings, Inc., et al., Case No. 22–10943. E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1 57494 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Notices difficulties associated with any international legal proceeding, including litigation, such an arrangement would create more risk exposure and a diminished investment opportunity for U.S. investors than they would otherwise have with a U.S. exchange-listed ETP. In addition to the benefits to U.S. investors articulated throughout this proposal, approving this proposal (and others like it) would provide U.S. ETFs and mutual funds with an additional U.S.-listed and regulated product through which to obtain exposure to bitcoin thereby lessening the need to seek such exposure through investments in either flawed products or, to the limited extent currently permitted by Commission Staff (i.e., 10% to 15% of a fund’s assets), products listed and primarily regulated in other countries. Such an approval would also give rise to increased competition among the limited product range available in the U.S. benefitting both ETFs and mutual funds, including those seeking only minimal exposure to bitcoin for its noncorrelative investment performance, and individual investors. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Bitcoin Futures ETFs The Exchange and Sponsor applaud the Commission for allowing the launch of ETFs registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the ‘‘1940 Act’’) and the Bitcoin Futures Approvals that provide exposure to bitcoin primarily through CME Bitcoin Futures (‘‘Bitcoin Futures ETFs’’). Allowing such products to list and trade is a productive first step in providing U.S. investors and traders with transparent, exchange-listed tools for expressing a view on bitcoin. The Bitcoin Futures Approvals, however, have created a logical inconsistency in the application of the standard the Commission applies when considering bitcoin ETP proposals. As discussed further below, the standard applicable to bitcoin ETPs is whether the listing exchange has in place a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement with a regulated market of significant size in the underlying asset. Previous disapproval orders have made clear that a market that constitutes a regulated market of significant size is generally a futures and/or options market based on the underlying reference asset rather than the spot commodity markets, which are often unregulated.38 Leaving aside the 38 See Winklevoss Order at 37593, specifically footnote 202, which includes the language from numerous approval orders for which the underlying futures markets formed the basis for approving VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:27 Aug 22, 2023 Jkt 259001 analysis of that standard until later in this proposal,39 the Exchange believes that the following rationale the Commission applied to a Bitcoin Futures ETF should result in the Commission approving this and other Spot Bitcoin ETP proposals: The CME ‘‘comprehensively surveils futures market conditions and price movements on a real-time and ongoing basis in order to detect and prevent price distortions, including price distortions caused by manipulative efforts.’’ Thus the CME’s surveillance can reasonably be relied upon to capture the effects on the CME bitcoin futures market caused by a person attempting to manipulate the proposed futures ETP by manipulating the price of CME bitcoin futures contracts, whether that attempt is made by directly trading on the CME bitcoin futures market or indirectly by trading outside of the CME bitcoin futures market. As such, when the CME shares its surveillance information with Arca, the information would assist in detecting and deterring fraudulent or manipulative misconduct related to the non-cash assets held by the proposed ETP.40 CME Bitcoin Futures pricing is based on pricing from spot bitcoin markets. The statement from the Teucrium Approval that ‘‘CME’s surveillance can reasonably be relied upon to capture the effects on the CME bitcoin futures market caused by a person attempting to manipulate the proposed futures ETP by manipulating the price of CME bitcoin futures contracts . . . indirectly by trading outside of the CME bitcoin futures market,’’ makes clear that the Commission believes that CME’s surveillance can capture the effects of trading on the relevant spot markets on the pricing of CME Bitcoin Futures. This was further acknowledged in the series of ETPs that hold physical metals, including gold, silver, palladium, platinum, and precious metals more broadly; and 37600, specifically where the Commission provides that ‘‘when the spot market is unregulated—the requirement of preventing fraudulent and manipulative acts may possibly be satisfied by showing that the ETP listing market has entered into a surveillance-sharing agreement with a regulated market of significant size in derivatives related to the underlying asset.’’ As noted above, the Exchange believes that these citations are particularly helpful in making clear that the spot market for a spot commodity ETP need not be ‘‘regulated’’ in order for a spot commodity ETP to be approved by the Commission, and in fact that it’s been the common historical practice of the Commission to rely on such derivatives markets as the regulated market of significant size because such spot commodities markets are largely unregulated. 39 As further outlined below, both the Exchange and the Sponsor believe that the Bitcoin Futures market represents a regulated market of significant size and that this proposal and others like it should be approved on this basis. 40 See Teucrium Approval at 21679. PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 ‘‘Grayscale lawsuit’’ 41 when Judge Rao stated ‘‘. . . the Commission in the Teucrium order recognizes that the futures prices are influenced by the spot prices, and the Commission concludes in approving futures ETPs that any fraud on the spot market can be adequately addressed by the fact that the futures market is a regulated one . . .’’ The Exchange agrees with the Commission on this point. Further to this point, a Bitcoin Futures ETF is potentially more susceptible to potential manipulation than a Spot Bitcoin ETP that offers only in-kind creation and redemption because settlement of CME Bitcoin Futures (and thus the value of the underlying holdings of a Bitcoin Futures ETF) occurs at a single price derived from spot bitcoin pricing, while shares of a Spot Bitcoin ETP would represent interest in bitcoin directly and authorized participants for a Spot Bitcoin ETP (as proposed herein) would be able to source bitcoin from any exchange and create or redeem with the applicable trust regardless of the price of the underlying index. It is not logically possible to conclude that the CME Bitcoin Futures market represents a significant market for a futures-based product, but also conclude that the CME Bitcoin Futures market does not represent a significant market for a spotbased product. In addition to potentially being more susceptible to manipulation than a Spot Bitcoin ETP, the structure of Bitcoin Futures ETFs provides negative outcomes for buy and hold investors as compared to a Spot Bitcoin ETP.42 Specifically, the cost of rolling CME Bitcoin Futures contracts cause the Bitcoin Futures ETFs to lag the performance of bitcoin and cost U.S. investors significantly more on an annual basis than the cost of a comparable investment in a Spot Bitcoin ETP. Spot Bitcoin ETPs hold bitcoin and therefore, do not incur rolling costs. Further, Bitcoin Futures ETFs could potentially hit CME position limits, which would force a Bitcoin Futures ETF to halt its investments in Bitcoin Futures and seek other instruments that would provide 41 Grayscale Investments, LLC v. Securities and Exchange Commission, et al., Case No. 22–1142. 42 See e.g., ‘‘Bitcoin ETF’s Success Could Come at Fundholders’ Expense,’’ Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2021), available at https:// www.wsj.com/articles/bitcoin-etfs-success-couldcome-at-fundholders-expense-11635080580; ‘‘Physical Bitcoin ETF Prospects Accelerate,’’ ETF.com (October 25, 2021), available at: https:// www.etf.com/sections/blog/physical-bitcoin-etfprospects-shine?nopaging=1&__cf_chl_jschl_tk__= pmd_JsK.fjXz9eAQW9zol0qpzhXDrrlpIVdoCl oLXbLjl44-1635476946-0-gqNtZGzNApCjcnBszQql. E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Notices lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 exposure to bitcoin of which there are few options as discussed previously. Such an event could not only cause investor confusion as to the Bitcoin Futures ETF’s investment strategy, but also prevent the Bitcoin Futures ETF from achieving its investment objective (e.g., capital appreciation through exposure to CME Bitcoin Futures), not to mention completely changing its risk profile. While Bitcoin Futures ETFs represent a useful trading tool, they are clearly a sub-optimal structure for U.S. investors seeking long-term exposure to bitcoin that will unnecessarily cost U.S. investors significantly more every year when compared to the cost of investing in Spot Bitcoin ETPs. The Exchange believes any proposal to list and trade a Spot Bitcoin ETP should be reviewed by the Commission with this important investor protection context in mind, as well as the benefit of encouraging increased competition among market participants in this space. Based on the foregoing, the Exchange and Sponsor believe that any objective review of the proposals to list Spot Bitcoin ETPs compared to the Bitcoin Futures ETFs and the Bitcoin Futures Approvals would lead to the conclusion that Spot Bitcoin ETPs should be available to U.S. investors and, as such, this proposal and other comparable proposals to list and trade Spot Bitcoin VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:27 Aug 22, 2023 Jkt 259001 ETPs should be approved by the Commission. Stated simply, U.S. investors will continue to lose significant amounts of money from holding Bitcoin Futures ETFs as compared to Spot Bitcoin ETPs, losses which could be prevented by the Commission approving Spot Bitcoin ETPs. Additionally, any concerns related to preventing fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices related to Spot Bitcoin ETPs would apply equally to the spot markets underlying the futures contracts held by a Bitcoin Futures ETF. Both the Exchange and Sponsor believe that the CME Bitcoin Futures market is a regulated market of significant size and that such manipulation concerns are mitigated, as described extensively below. After allowing and approving the listing and trading of Bitcoin Futures ETFs that hold primarily CME Bitcoin Futures, however, the only consistent outcome would be approving Spot Bitcoin ETPs on the basis that the CME Bitcoin Futures market is a regulated market of significant size. Given the current landscape, approving this proposal (and others like it) and allowing Spot Bitcoin ETPs to be listed and traded alongside Bitcoin Futures ETFs would establish a consistent regulatory approach, provide U.S. investors with choice in product PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 57495 structures for bitcoin exposure, and offer flexibility in the means of gaining exposure to bitcoin through transparent, regulated, U.S. exchange-listed vehicles. Bitcoin Futures CME began offering trading in Bitcoin Futures in 2017. Each contract represents five bitcoin and is based on the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate.43 The contracts trade and settle like other cash-settled commodity futures contracts. Nearly every measurable metric related to Bitcoin Futures has generally trended up since launch, although certain notional volume calculations have decreased roughly in line with the decrease in the price of bitcoin. For example, there were 143,215 Bitcoin Futures contracts traded in April 2023 (approximately $20.7 billion) compared to 193,182 ($5 billion), 104,713 ($3.9 billion), 118,714 ($42.7 billion), and 111,964 ($23.2 billion) contracts traded in April 2019, April 2020, April 2021, and April 2022, respectively.44 BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 43 The CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate is based on a publicly available calculation methodology based on pricing sourced from several crypto exchanges and trading platforms, including Bitstamp, Coinbase, Gemini, itBit, Kraken, and LMAX Digital. 44 Source: CME, Yahoo Finance 4/30/23. E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1 The number of large open interest holders 45 and unique accounts trading Bitcoin Futures have both increased, even in the face of heightened Bitcoin price volatility. 45 A large open interest holder in Bitcoin Futures is an entity that holds at least 25 contracts, which is the equivalent of 125 bitcoin. At a price of approximately $29,268.81 per bitcoin on 4/30/2023, VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:27 Aug 22, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 more than 100 firms had outstanding positions of greater than $3.65 million in Bitcoin Futures. E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1 EN23AU23.004</GPH> Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Notices EN23AU23.003</GPH> lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 57496 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Notices The Sponsor further believes that publicly available research, including research done as part of rule filings proposing to list and trade shares of Spot Bitcoin ETPs, corroborates the overall trend outlined above and supports the thesis that the Bitcoin Futures pricing leads the spot market and, thus, a person attempting to manipulate the Shares would also have to trade on that market to manipulate the ETP. Specifically, the Sponsor believes that such research indicates that bitcoin futures lead the bitcoin spot market in price formation.46 Section 6(b)(5) and the Applicable Standards lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 The Commission has approved numerous series of Trust Issued Receipts,47 including Commodity-Based 46 See Exchange Act Releases No. 94080 (January 27, 2022), 87 FR 5527 (April 12, 2022) (specifically ‘‘Amendment No. 1 to the Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Shares of the Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust Under BZX Rule 14.11(3)(4), CommodityBased Trust Shares’’); 94982 (May 25, 2022), 87 FR 33250 (June 1, 2022); 94844 (May 4, 2022), 87 FR 28043 (May 10, 2022); and 93445 (October 28, 2021), 86 FR 60695 (November 3, 2021). See also Hu, Y., Hou, Y. and Oxley, L. (2019). ‘‘What role do futures markets play in Bitcoin pricing? Causality, cointegration and price discovery from a time-varying perspective’’ (available at: https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481826/). This academic research paper concludes that ‘‘There exist no episodes where the Bitcoin spot markets dominates the price discovery processes with regard to Bitcoin futures. This points to a conclusion that the price formation originates solely in the Bitcoin futures market. We can, therefore, conclude that the Bitcoin futures markets dominate the dynamic price discovery process based upon time-varying information share measures. Overall, price discovery seems to occur in the Bitcoin futures markets rather than the underlying spot market based upon a time-varying perspective.’’ 47 See Exchange Rule 14.11(f). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:27 Aug 22, 2023 Jkt 259001 Trust Shares,48 to be listed on U.S. national securities exchanges. In order for any proposed rule change from an exchange to be approved, the Commission must determine that, among other things, the proposal is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, specifically including: (i) the requirement that a national securities exchange’s rules are designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices; 49 and (ii) the requirement that an exchange 48 Commodity-Based Trust Shares, as described in Exchange Rule 14.11(e)(4), are a type of Trust Issued Receipt. 49 As the Exchange has stated in a number of other public documents, it continues to believe that bitcoin is resistant to price manipulation and that ‘‘other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices’’ exist to justify dispensing with the requisite surveillance sharing agreement. The geographically diverse and continuous nature of bitcoin trading render it difficult and prohibitively costly to manipulate the price of bitcoin. The fragmentation across bitcoin platforms, the relatively slow speed of transactions, and the capital necessary to maintain a significant presence on each trading platform make manipulation of bitcoin prices through continuous trading activity challenging. To the extent that there are bitcoin exchanges engaged in or allowing wash trading or other activity intended to manipulate the price of bitcoin on other markets, such pricing does not normally impact prices on other exchange because participants will generally ignore markets with quotes that they deem non-executable. Moreover, the linkage between the bitcoin markets and the presence of arbitrageurs in those markets means that the manipulation of the price of bitcoin price on any single venue would require manipulation of the global bitcoin price in order to be effective. Arbitrageurs must have funds distributed across multiple trading platforms in order to take advantage of temporary price dislocations, thereby making it unlikely that there will be strong concentration of funds on any particular bitcoin exchange or OTC platform. As a result, the potential for manipulation on a trading platform would require overcoming the liquidity supply of such arbitrageurs who are effectively eliminating any cross-market pricing differences. PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 proposal be designed, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that this proposal is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act and that this filing sufficiently demonstrates that the CME Bitcoin Futures market represents a regulated market of significant size and that, on the whole, the manipulation concerns previously articulated by the Commission are sufficiently mitigated to the point that they are outweighed by quantifiable investor protection issues that would be resolved by approving this proposal. (i) Designed To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and Practices In order to meet this standard in a proposal to list and trade a series of Commodity-Based Trust Shares, the Commission requires that an exchange demonstrate that there is a comprehensive surveillance-sharing agreement in place 50 with a regulated 50 As previously articulated by the Commission, ‘‘The standard requires such surveillance-sharing agreements since ‘‘they provide a necessary deterrent to manipulation because they facilitate the availability of information needed to fully investigate a manipulation if it were to occur.’’ The Commission has emphasized that it is essential for an exchange listing a derivative securities product to enter into a surveillance-sharing agreement with markets trading underlying securities for the listing exchange to have the ability to obtain information necessary to detect, investigate, and deter fraud and market manipulation, as well as violations of exchange rules and applicable federal securities laws and rules. The hallmarks of a surveillancesharing agreement are that the agreement provides for the sharing of information about market trading activity, clearing activity, and customer identity; that the parties to the agreement have reasonable ability to obtain access to and produce requested information; and that no existing rules, laws, or practices would impede one party to the agreement E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM Continued 23AUN1 EN23AU23.005</GPH> BILLING CODE 8011–01–C 57497 57498 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Notices market of significant size. Both the Exchange and CME are members of ISG.51 The only remaining issue to be addressed is whether the Bitcoin Futures market constitutes a market of significant size, which both the Exchange and the Sponsor believe that it does. The terms ‘‘significant market’’ and ‘‘market of significant size’’ include a market (or group of markets) as to which: (a) there is a reasonable likelihood that a person attempting to manipulate the ETP would also have to trade on that market to manipulate the ETP, so that a surveillance-sharing agreement would assist the listing exchange in detecting and deterring misconduct; and (b) it is unlikely that trading in the ETP would be the predominant influence on prices in that market.52 The Commission has also recognized that the ‘‘regulated market of significant size’’ standard is not the only means for satisfying Section 6(b)(5) of the act, specifically providing that a listing exchange could demonstrate that ‘‘other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices’’ are sufficient to justify dispensing with the requisite surveillance-sharing agreement.53 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 (a) Manipulation of the ETP According to the research and analysis presented above, the Bitcoin Futures market is the leading market for bitcoin price formation. Where Bitcoin Futures lead the price in the spot market such that a potential manipulator of the bitcoin spot market would have to participate in the Bitcoin Futures market, it follows that a potential manipulator of the Shares would similarly have to transact in the Bitcoin Futures market because the NAV is based on the price of bitcoin on the principal market, which identified market must be an active market with orderly transactions. Further, the Trust from obtaining this information from, or producing it to, the other party.’’ The Commission has historically held that joint membership in the Intermarket Surveillance Group (‘‘ISG’’) constitutes such a surveillance sharing agreement. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88284 (February 26, 2020), 85 FR 12595 (March 3, 2020) (SR–NYSEArca–2019–39) (the ‘‘Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval’’). 51 For a list of the current members and affiliate members of ISG, see www.isgportal.com. 52 See Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval. 53 See Winklevoss Order at 37580. The Commission has also specifically noted that it ‘‘is not applying a ‘cannot be manipulated’ standard; instead, the Commission is examining whether the proposal meets the requirements of the Exchange Act and, pursuant to its Rules of Practice, places the burden on the listing exchange to demonstrate the validity of its contentions and to establish that the requirements of the Exchange Act have been met.’’ Id. at 37582. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:27 Aug 22, 2023 Jkt 259001 only allows for in-kind creation and redemption, which, as further described below, reduces the potential for manipulation of the Shares through manipulation of the Trust’s methodology for calculating NAV or any of its individual constituents, again emphasizing that a potential manipulator of the Shares would have to manipulate the entirety of the bitcoin spot market, which is led by the Bitcoin Futures market. As such, the Exchange believes that part (a) of the significant market test outlined above is satisfied and that common membership in ISG between the Exchange and CME would assist the listing exchange in detecting and deterring misconduct in the Shares. (b) Predominant Influence on Prices in Spot and Bitcoin Futures The Exchange and Sponsor also believe that trading in the Shares would not be the predominant force on prices in the Bitcoin Futures market or spot market for a number of reasons, including the significant volume in the Bitcoin Futures market, the size of bitcoin’s market cap, and the significant liquidity available in the spot market. In addition to the Bitcoin Futures market data points cited above, the spot market for bitcoin is also very liquid. (c) Other Means To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and Practices As noted above, the Commission also permits a listing exchange to demonstrate that ‘‘other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices’’ are sufficient to justify dispensing with the requisite surveillance-sharing agreement. The Exchange and Sponsor believe that such conditions are present. The Exchange is proposing to take additional steps to those described above to supplement its ability to obtain information that would be helpful in detecting, investigating, and deterring fraud and market manipulation in the Commodity-Based Trust Shares. On June 21, 2023, the Exchange reached an agreement on terms with Coinbase, Inc. (‘‘Coinbase’’), an operator of a United States-based spot trading platform for Bitcoin that represents a substantial portion of US-based and USD denominated Bitcoin trading,54 to enter into a surveillance-sharing agreement (‘‘Spot BTC SSA’’) and executed an associated term sheet. Based on this agreement on terms, the Exchange and Coinbase will finalize and execute a definitive agreement that the parties 54 According to a Kaiko Research report dated June 26, 2023, Coinbase represented roughly 50% of exchange trading volume in USD–BTC trading on a daily basis during May 2023. PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 expect to be executed prior to allowing trading of the Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The Spot BTC SSA is expected to be a bilateral surveillance-sharing agreement between the Exchange and Coinbase that is intended to supplement the Exchange’s market surveillance program. The Spot BTC SSA is expected to have the hallmarks of a surveillancesharing agreement between two members of the ISG, which would give the Exchange supplemental access to data regarding spot Bitcoin trades on Coinbase where the Exchange determines it is necessary as part of its surveillance program for the Commodity-Based Trust Shares.55 This means that the Exchange expects to receive market data for orders and trades from Coinbase, which it will utilize in surveillance of the trading of Commodity-Based Trust Shares. In addition, the Exchange can request further information from Coinbase related to spot bitcoin trading activity on the Coinbase exchange platform, if the Exchange determines that such information would be necessary to detect and investigate potential manipulation in the trading of the Commodity-Based Trust Shares.56 Further, and consistent with prior points above, offering only in-kind creation and redemption will also provide unique protections against potential attempts to manipulate the price of the Shares. While the Sponsor believes that the index which it uses to value the Trust’s bitcoin is itself resistant to manipulation based on the methodology further described below, the fact that creations and redemptions are only available in-kind makes the index significantly less important. Specifically, because the Trust will not accept cash to buy bitcoin in order to create new Shares or, barring a forced redemption of the Trust or under other extraordinary circumstances, be forced to sell bitcoin to pay cash for redeemed Shares, the price that the Sponsor uses to value the Trust’s bitcoin is not particularly important.57 When authorized participants are creating Shares with the Trust, they need to deliver a certain number of bitcoin per Share (regardless of the valuation used) and when they’re redeeming, they can 55 For additional information regarding ISG and the hallmarks of surveillance-sharing between ISG members, see https://isgportal.org/overview. 56 The Exchange also notes that it already has in place ISG-like surveillance sharing agreement with Cboe Digital Exchange, LLC and Cboe Clear Digital, LLC. 57 While the Index will not be particularly important for the creation and redemption process, it will be used for calculating fees. E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Notices similarly expect to receive a certain number of bitcoin per Share. As such, even if the price used to value the Trust’s bitcoin is manipulated (which the Sponsor believes that its methodology is resistant to), the ratio of bitcoin per Share does not change and the Trust will either accept (for creations) or distribute (for redemptions) the same number of bitcoin regardless of the value. This not only mitigates the risk associated with potential manipulation, but also discourages and disincentivizes manipulation of the index because there is little financial incentive to do so. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 (ii) Designed To Protect Investors and the Public Interest The Exchange believes that the proposal is designed to protect investors and the public interest. Over the past several years, U.S. investor exposure to bitcoin through OTC Bitcoin Funds has grown into the tens of billions of dollars, including through Bitcoin Futures ETFs. With that growth, so too has grown the quantifiable investor protection issues to U.S. investors through roll costs for Bitcoin Futures ETFs and premium/discount volatility and management fees for OTC Bitcoin Funds. The Exchange believes that the concerns related to the prevention of fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices have been sufficiently addressed to be consistent with the Act and, to the extent that the Commission disagrees with that assertion, such concerns are now outweighed by investor protection concerns. As such, the Exchange believes that approving this proposal (and comparable proposals) provides the Commission with the opportunity to allow U.S. investors with access to bitcoin in a regulated and transparent exchangetraded vehicle that would act to limit risk to U.S. investors by: (i) reducing premium and discount volatility; (ii) reducing management fees through meaningful competition; (iii) reducing risks and costs associated with investing in Bitcoin Futures ETFs and operating companies that are imperfect proxies for bitcoin exposure; and (iv) providing an alternative to custodying spot bitcoin. Global X Bitcoin Trust Delaware Trust Company is the trustee (‘‘Trustee’’). The Bank of New York Mellon will be the administrator (‘‘Administrator’’) and transfer agent (‘‘Transfer Agent’’). Coinbase Custody Trust Company, LLC, a third-party regulated custodian (the ‘‘Custodian’’), will be responsible for custody of the Trust’s bitcoin. Sponsor selects the marketing agent in connection with the VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:27 Aug 22, 2023 Jkt 259001 creation and redemption of ‘‘Baskets’’ of Shares.58 According to the Registration Statement, each Share will represent a fractional undivided beneficial interest and ownership in the Trust. The Trust’s assets will consist of bitcoin held by the Custodian on behalf of the Trust. The Trust generally does not intend to hold cash or cash equivalents. However, there may be situations where the Trust will unexpectedly hold cash or cash equivalents on a temporary basis. According to the Registration Statement, the Trust is neither an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended,59 nor a commodity pool for purposes of the Commodity Exchange Act (‘‘CEA’’), and neither the Trust nor the Sponsor is subject to regulation as a commodity pool operator or a commodity trading adviser in connection with the Shares. When the Trust sells or redeems its Shares, it will do so in ‘‘in-kind’’ transactions in large blocks of Shares (a ‘‘Creation Basket’’) at the Trust’s NAV. Authorized participants will deliver, or facilitate the delivery of, bitcoin to the Trust’s account with the Custodian in exchange for Shares when they purchase Shares, and the Trust, through the Custodian, will deliver bitcoin to such authorized participants when they redeem Shares with the Trust. Authorized participants may then offer Shares to the public at prices that depend on various factors, including the supply and demand for Shares, the value of the Trust’s assets, and market conditions at the time of a transaction. Shareholders who buy or sell Shares during the day from their broker may do so at a premium or discount relative to the NAV of the Shares of the Trust. Investment Objective According to the Registration Statement and as further described below, the investment objective of the Trust is to reflect the performance of the price of bitcoin less the expenses of the Trust’s operations. In seeking to achieve its investment objective, the Trust will hold bitcoin. The Trust will value its Shares daily based on the value of bitcoin as reflected by the CoinDesk Bitcoin Price Index (XBX) (the ‘‘Index’’), a real-time, US dollar equivalent spot rate for Bitcoin. The Index leverages real-time prices from multiple constituent 58 The Exchange notes that the Sponsor is finalizing negotiations with the marketing agent and it will submit an amendment to this proposal upon execution of the agreement with the marketing agent. 59 15 U.S.C. 80a–1. PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 57499 exchanges to provide a representative spot price. Each constituent exchange is weighted proportionally to its trailing 24-hour liquidity with adjustments for price variance and inactivity. Given the potential for anomalies or manipulation at individual exchanges, constituent weights may dynamically adjust using CoinDesk Indices proprietary Constituent Weighting Adjustment Algorithm (CWAA). The algorithm is designed to calculate a real-time index that is an accurate and reliable reflection of the market price of each digital asset, using multi-sourced spot prices and dynamically reduce the weights of individual exchanges with lower liquidity, inactivity, and higher price variance. The Index is administered in alignment with the International Organization of Securities Commissions (‘‘IOSCO’’) Principles for Financial Benchmarks. The Index price is calculated using non-GAAP 60 methodology and is not used in the Trust’s financial statements. The Trust will process all creations and redemptions in-kind in transactions with authorized participants. The Trust is not actively managed. Net Asset Value The Net Asset Value (‘‘NAV’’) of the Trust is used by the Trust in its day-today operations to measure the net value of the Trust’s assets. The NAV is calculated on each business day and is equal to the aggregate value of the Trust’s assets less its liabilities based on the Index price. In determining the NAV of the Trust on any business day, the Administrator will calculate the price of the bitcoin held by the Trust as of 4:00 p.m. EST on such day. The Administrator will also calculate the NAV per Share of the Trust, which equals the NAV of the Trust divided by the number of outstanding Shares. The Administrator will rely on the Index as the Index price to be used when determining NAV. The methodology used to calculate the Index price to value bitcoin in determining the net asset value of the Trust may not be deemed consistent with U.S. GAAP. However, the Trust will utilize a pricing source that is consistent with GAAP for the Trust’s periodic financial statements. Therefore, to the extent the methodology used to calculate the Index is deemed not to be consistent with GAAP, the Trust’s periodic financial statements may not utilize net asset value or NAV. The Sponsor will determine in its sole discretion the valuation sources and policies used to 60 GAAP refers to generally accepted account principles. E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1 57500 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Notices prepare the Trust’s financial statements in accordance with GAAP. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Calculation of Net Asset Value and the Index On each Business Day, as soon as practicable after 4:00 p.m. EST, the Administrator evaluates the bitcoin held by the Trust as reflected by the Index and determines the net asset value of the Trust and the NAV. For purposes of making these calculations, a Business Day means any day other than a day when the Exchange is closed for regular trading. The Index is a real-time, USDequivalent spot rate for Bitcoin. The Index leverages real-time prices from multiple constituent exchanges to provide a representative spot price. Each constituent exchange is weighted proportionally to its trailing 24-hour liquidity with adjustments for price variance and inactivity. Given the potential for anomalies or manipulation at individual exchanges, constituent weights may dynamically adjust using CoinDesk Indices proprietary Constituent Weighting Adjustment Algorithm (CWAA). The algorithm is designed to calculate a real-time index that is an accurate and reliable reflection of the market price of each digital asset, using multi-sourced spot prices and dynamically reduce the weights of individual exchanges with lower liquidity, inactivity, and higher price variance. The Index is administered in alignment with the IOSCO Principles for Financial Benchmarks. If the Index is not available or the Sponsor determines, in its sole discretion, that the Index should not be used, the Trust’s holdings may be fair valued in accordance with the policy approved by the Sponsor. Availability of Information In addition to the price transparency of the Index, the Trust will provide information regarding the Trust’s bitcoin holdings as well as additional data regarding the Trust. The Trust will provide an Intraday Indicative Value (‘‘IIV’’) per Share updated every 15 seconds, as calculated by the Exchange or a third-party financial data provider during the Exchange’s Regular Trading Hours (9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. E.T.). The IIV will be calculated by using the prior day’s closing NAV per Share as a base and updating that value during Regular Trading Hours to reflect changes in the value of the Trust’s bitcoin holdings during the trading day. The IIV disseminated during Regular Trading Hours should not be viewed as an actual real-time update of the NAV, VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:27 Aug 22, 2023 Jkt 259001 which will be calculated only once at the end of each trading day. The IIV will be widely disseminated on a per Share basis every 15 seconds during the Exchange’s Regular Trading Hours by one or more major market data vendors. In addition, the IIV will be available through on-line information services. The website for the Trust, which will be publicly accessible at no charge, will contain the following information: (a) the current NAV per Share daily and the prior business day’s NAV and the reported closing price; (b) the BZX Official Closing Price 61 in relation to the NAV as of the time the NAV is calculated and a calculation of the premium or discount of such price against such NAV; (c) data in chart form displaying the frequency distribution of discounts and premiums of the Official Closing Price against the NAV, within appropriate ranges for each of the four previous calendar quarters (or for the life of the Trust, if shorter); (d) the prospectus; and (e) other applicable quantitative information. The Trust will also disseminate the Trust’s holdings on a daily basis on the Trust’s website. The price of bitcoin will be made available by one or more major market data vendors, updated at least every 15 seconds during Regular Trading Hours. Information about the Index, including key elements on how the Index is calculated, will be publicly available at https://www.coindesk.com/indices/xbx/. The NAV for the Trust will be calculated by the Administrator once a day and will be disseminated daily to all market participants at the same time. Quotation and last-sale information regarding the Shares will be disseminated through the facilities of the Consolidated Tape Association (‘‘CTA’’). Quotation and last sale information for bitcoin is widely disseminated through a variety of major market data vendors, including Bloomberg and Reuters. Information relating to trading, including price and volume information, in bitcoin is available from major market data vendors and from the exchanges on which bitcoin are traded. Depth of book information is also available from bitcoin exchanges. The normal trading hours for bitcoin exchanges are 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. Custody of the Trust’s Bitcoins An investment in the Shares is backed by bitcoin held by the Custodian on 61 As defined in Rule 11.23(a)(3), the term ‘‘BZX Official Closing Price’’ shall mean the price disseminated to the consolidated tape as the market center closing trade. PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 behalf of the Trust. The Custodian will keep custody of all of the Trust’s bitcoin, other than that which is maintained in the Trading Balance with the Prime Broker, in accounts that are required to be segregated from the assets held by the Custodian as principal and the assets of its other customers (the ‘‘Vault Balance’’), with any remainder of the Vault Balance held as part of a ‘‘hot storage’’.62 The Custodian will keep a substantial portion of the private keys associated with the Trust’s bitcoin in ‘‘cold storage’’ 63 or similarly secure technology (the ‘‘Cold Vault Balance’’). The hardware, software, systems, and procedures of the Custodian may not be available or cost effective for many investors to access directly. Creation and Redemption of Shares According to the Registration Statement, on any business day, an authorized participant may place an order to create one or more baskets. Purchase orders must be placed by 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time, or the close of regular trading on the Exchange, whichever is earlier. The day on which an order is received is considered the purchase order date. The total deposit of bitcoin required is an amount of bitcoin that is in the same proportion to the total assets of the Trust, net of accrued expenses and other liabilities, on the date the order to purchase is properly received, as the number of Shares to be created under the purchase order is in proportion to the total number of Shares outstanding on the date the order is received. Each night, the Sponsor will publish the amount of bitcoin that will be required in exchange for each creation order. The Administrator determines the required deposit for a 62 A portion of the Trust’s bitcoin holdings and cash holdings from time to time may be held with the Prime Broker, an affiliate of the Custodian, in the Trading Balance, in connection with in-kind creations and redemptions of Baskets and the sale of bitcoin to pay the Sponsor’s Fee and Trust expenses not assumed by the Sponsor. These periodic holdings held in the Trading Balance with the Prime Broker represent an omnibus claim on the Prime Broker’s bitcoins held on behalf of clients; these holdings exist across a combination of omnibus hot wallets, omnibus cold wallets, or in accounts in the Prime Broker’s name on a trading venue (including third-party venues and the Prime Broker’s own execution venue) where the Prime Broker executes orders to buy and sell bitcoin on behalf of its clients. 63 The term ‘‘cold storage’’ refers to a safeguarding method by which the private keys corresponding to bitcoins stored on a digital wallet are removed from any computers actively connected to the internet. Cold storage of private keys may involve keeping such wallet on a non-networked computer or electronic device or storing the public key and private keys relating to the digital wallet on a storage device (for example, a USB thumb drive) or printed medium (for example, papyrus or paper) and deleting the digital wallet from all computers. E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Notices lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 given day by dividing the number of bitcoin held by the Trust as of the opening of business on that business day, adjusted for the amount of bitcoin constituting estimated accrued but unpaid fees and expenses of the Trust as of the opening of business on that business day, by the quotient of the number of Shares outstanding at the opening of business divided by the number of Shares in a Creation Unit. The procedures by which an authorized participant can redeem one or more Creation Baskets mirror the procedures for the creation of Creation Baskets. Rule 14.11(e)(4)—Commodity-Based Trust Shares The Shares will be subject to BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), which sets forth the initial and continued listing criteria applicable to Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The Exchange will obtain a representation that the Trust’s NAV will be calculated daily and that these values and information about the assets of the Trust will be made available to all market participants at the same time. The Exchange notes that, as defined in Rule 14.11(e)(4)(C)(i), the Shares will be: (a) issued by a trust that holds a specified commodity 64 deposited with the trust; (b) issued by such trust in a specified aggregate minimum number in return for a deposit of a quantity of the underlying commodity; and (c) when aggregated in the same specified minimum number, may be redeemed at a holder’s request by such trust which will deliver to the redeeming holder the quantity of the underlying commodity. Upon termination of the Trust, the Shares will be removed from listing. The Trustee, Delaware Trust Company, is a trust company having substantial capital and surplus and the experience and facilities for handling corporate trust business, as required under Rule 14.11(e)(4)(E)(iv)(a) and that no change will be made to the trustee without prior notice to and approval of the Exchange. The Exchange also notes that, pursuant to Rule 14.11(e)(4)(F), neither the Exchange nor any agent of the Exchange shall have any liability for damages, claims, losses or expenses caused by any errors, omissions or delays in calculating or disseminating any underlying commodity value, the current value of the underlying commodity required to be deposited to the Trust in connection with issuance of Commodity-Based Trust Shares; 64 For purposes of Rule 14.11(e)(4), the term commodity takes on the definition of the term as provided in the Commodity Exchange Act. As noted above, the CFTC has opined that Bitcoin is a commodity as defined in Section 1a(9) of the Commodity Exchange Act. See Coinflip. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:27 Aug 22, 2023 Jkt 259001 resulting from any negligent act or omission by the Exchange, or any agent of the Exchange, or any act, condition or cause beyond the reasonable control of the Exchange, its agent, including, but not limited to, an act of God; fire; flood; extraordinary weather conditions; war; insurrection; riot; strike; accident; action of government; communications or power failure; equipment or software malfunction; or any error, omission or delay in the reports of transactions in an underlying commodity. Finally, as required in Rule 14.11(e)(4)(G), the Exchange notes that any registered market maker (‘‘Market Maker’’) in the Shares must file with the Exchange in a manner prescribed by the Exchange and keep current a list identifying all accounts for trading in an underlying commodity, related commodity futures or options on commodity futures, or any other related commodity derivatives, which the registered Market Maker may have or over which it may exercise investment discretion. No registered Market Maker shall trade in an underlying commodity, related commodity futures or options on commodity futures, or any other related commodity derivatives, in an account in which a registered Market Maker, directly or indirectly, controls trading activities, or has a direct interest in the profits or losses thereof, which has not been reported to the Exchange as required by this Rule. In addition to the existing obligations under Exchange rules regarding the production of books and records (see, e.g., Rule 4.2), the registered Market Maker in CommodityBased Trust Shares shall make available to the Exchange such books, records or other information pertaining to transactions by such entity or registered or non-registered employee affiliated with such entity for its or their own accounts for trading the underlying physical commodity, related commodity futures or options on commodity futures, or any other related commodity derivatives, as may be requested by the Exchange. Trading Halts With respect to trading halts, the Exchange may consider all relevant factors in exercising its discretion to halt or suspend trading in the Shares. The Exchange will halt trading in the Shares under the conditions specified in BZX Rule 11.18. Trading may be halted because of market conditions or for reasons that, in the view of the Exchange, make trading in the Shares inadvisable. These may include: (1) the extent to which trading is not occurring in the bitcoin underlying the Shares; or (2) whether other unusual conditions or PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 57501 circumstances detrimental to the maintenance of a fair and orderly market are present. Trading in the Shares also will be subject to Rule 14.11(e)(4)(E)(ii), which sets forth circumstances under which trading in the Shares may be halted. Trading Rules The Exchange deems the Shares to be equity securities, thus rendering trading in the Shares subject to the Exchange’s existing rules governing the trading of equity securities. BZX will allow trading in the Shares during all trading sessions on the Exchange. The Exchange has appropriate rules to facilitate transactions in the Shares during all trading sessions. As provided in BZX Rule 11.11(a) the minimum price variation for quoting and entry of orders in securities traded on the Exchange is $0.01 where the price is greater than $1.00 per share or $0.0001 where the price is less than $1.00 per share. Surveillance The Exchange believes that its surveillance procedures are adequate to properly monitor the trading of the Shares on the Exchange during all trading sessions and to deter and detect violations of Exchange rules and the applicable federal securities laws. Trading of the Shares through the Exchange will be subject to the Exchange’s surveillance procedures for derivative products, including Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The issuer has represented to the Exchange that it will advise the Exchange of any failure by the Trust or the Shares to comply with the continued listing requirements, and, pursuant to its obligations under Section 19(g)(1) of the Exchange Act, the Exchange will surveil for compliance with the continued listing requirements. If the Trust or the Shares are not in compliance with the applicable listing requirements, the Exchange will commence delisting procedures under Exchange Rule 14.12. The Exchange may obtain information regarding trading in the Shares and Bitcoin Futures via ISG, from other exchanges who are members or affiliates of the ISG, or with which the Exchange has entered into a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement.65 Information Circular Prior to the commencement of trading, the Exchange will inform its members in an Information Circular of the special characteristics and risks associated with trading the Shares. 65 For a list of the current members and affiliate members of ISG, see www.isgportal.com. E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1 57502 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Notices lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Specifically, the Information Circular will discuss the following: (i) the procedures for the creation and redemption of Baskets (and that the Shares are not individually redeemable); (ii) BZX Rule 3.7, which imposes suitability obligations on Exchange members with respect to recommending transactions in the Shares to customers; (iii) how information regarding the IIV and the Trust’s NAV are disseminated; (iv) the risks involved in trading the Shares outside of Regular Trading Hours 66 when an updated IIV will not be calculated or publicly disseminated; (v) the requirement that members deliver a prospectus to investors purchasing newly issued Shares prior to or concurrently with the confirmation of a transaction; and (vi) trading information. In addition, the Information Circular will advise members, prior to the commencement of trading, of the prospectus delivery requirements applicable to the Shares. Members purchasing the Shares for resale to investors will deliver a prospectus to such investors. The Information Circular will also discuss any exemptive, noaction and interpretive relief granted by the Commission from any rules under the Act. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act 67 in general and Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 68 in particular in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Commission has approved numerous series of Trust Issued Receipts, including Commodity-Based Trust Shares, to be listed on U.S. national securities exchanges. In order for any proposed rule change from an exchange to be approved, the Commission must determine that, among other things, the proposal is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, specifically including: (i) the requirement that a national securities exchange’s rules are designed to prevent fraudulent and 66 Regular Trading Hours is the time between 9:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. 67 15 U.S.C. 78f. 68 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:27 Aug 22, 2023 Jkt 259001 manipulative acts and practices; 69 and (ii) the requirement that an exchange proposal be designed, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that this proposal is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act and that this filing sufficiently demonstrates that the CME Bitcoin Futures market represents a regulated market of significant size and that, on the whole, the manipulation concerns previously articulated by the Commission are sufficiently mitigated to the point that they are outweighed by quantifiable investor protection issues that would be resolved by approving this proposal. (i) Designed To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and Practices In order to meet this standard in a proposal to list and trade a series of Commodity-Based Trust Shares, the Commission requires that an exchange demonstrate that there is a comprehensive surveillance-sharing agreement in place 70 with a regulated 69 As the Exchange has stated in a number of other public documents, it continues to believe that bitcoin is resistant to price manipulation and that ‘‘other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices’’ exist to justify dispensing with the requisite surveillance sharing agreement. The geographically diverse and continuous nature of bitcoin trading render it difficult and prohibitively costly to manipulate the price of bitcoin. The fragmentation across bitcoin platforms, the relatively slow speed of transactions, and the capital necessary to maintain a significant presence on each trading platform make manipulation of bitcoin prices through continuous trading activity challenging. To the extent that there are bitcoin exchanges engaged in or allowing wash trading or other activity intended to manipulate the price of bitcoin on other markets, such pricing does not normally impact prices on other exchange because participants will generally ignore markets with quotes that they deem non-executable. Moreover, the linkage between the bitcoin markets and the presence of arbitrageurs in those markets means that the manipulation of the price of bitcoin price on any single venue would require manipulation of the global bitcoin price in order to be effective. Arbitrageurs must have funds distributed across multiple trading platforms in order to take advantage of temporary price dislocations, thereby making it unlikely that there will be strong concentration of funds on any particular bitcoin exchange or OTC platform. As a result, the potential for manipulation on a trading platform would require overcoming the liquidity supply of such arbitrageurs who are effectively eliminating any cross-market pricing differences. 70 As previously articulated by the Commission, ‘‘The standard requires such surveillance-sharing agreements since ‘‘they provide a necessary deterrent to manipulation because they facilitate the availability of information needed to fully investigate a manipulation if it were to occur.’’ The Commission has emphasized that it is essential for an exchange listing a derivative securities product to enter into a surveillance-sharing agreement with markets trading underlying securities for the listing exchange to have the ability to obtain information necessary to detect, investigate, and deter fraud and market manipulation, as well as violations of PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 market of significant size. Both the Exchange and CME are members of ISG. The only remaining issue to be addressed is whether the Bitcoin Futures market constitutes a market of significant size, which both the Exchange and the Sponsor believe that it does. The terms ‘‘significant market’’ and ‘‘market of significant size’’ include a market (or group of markets) as to which: (a) there is a reasonable likelihood that a person attempting to manipulate the ETP would also have to trade on that market to manipulate the ETP, so that a surveillance-sharing agreement would assist the listing exchange in detecting and deterring misconduct; and (b) it is unlikely that trading in the ETP would be the predominant influence on prices in that market.71 The Commission has also recognized that the ‘‘regulated market of significant size’’ standard is not the only means for satisfying Section 6(b)(5) of the act, specifically providing that a listing exchange could demonstrate that ‘‘other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices’’ are sufficient to justify dispensing with the requisite surveillance-sharing agreement.72 (a) Manipulation of the ETP According to the research and analysis presented above, the Bitcoin Futures market is the leading market for bitcoin price formation. Where Bitcoin Futures lead the price in the spot market such that a potential manipulator of the bitcoin spot market (beyond just the constituents of the Index) would have to participate in the Bitcoin Futures market, it follows that a potential manipulator of the Shares would similarly have to transact in the Bitcoin Futures market because the NAV is exchange rules and applicable federal securities laws and rules. The hallmarks of a surveillancesharing agreement are that the agreement provides for the sharing of information about market trading activity, clearing activity, and customer identity; that the parties to the agreement have reasonable ability to obtain access to and produce requested information; and that no existing rules, laws, or practices would impede one party to the agreement from obtaining this information from, or producing it to, the other party.’’ The Commission has historically held that joint membership in the ISG constitutes such a surveillance sharing agreement. See Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval). 71 Id. 72 See Winklevoss Order at 37580. The Commission has also specifically noted that it ‘‘is not applying a ‘cannot be manipulated’ standard; instead, the Commission is examining whether the proposal meets the requirements of the Exchange Act and, pursuant to its Rules of Practice, places the burden on the listing exchange to demonstrate the validity of its contentions and to establish that the requirements of the Exchange Act have been met.’’ Id. at 37582. E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Notices based on spot prices. Further, the Trust only allows for in-kind creation and redemption, which, as further described below, reduces the potential for manipulation of the Shares through manipulation of the Trust’s methodology for calculating NAV or any of its individual constituents, again emphasizing that a potential manipulator of the Shares would have to manipulate the entirety of the bitcoin spot market, which is led by the Bitcoin Futures market. As such, the Exchange believes that part (a) of the significant market test outlined above is satisfied and that common membership in ISG between the Exchange and CME would assist the listing exchange in detecting and deterring misconduct in the Shares. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 (b) Predominant Influence on Prices in Spot and Bitcoin Futures The Exchange and Sponsor also believe that trading in the Shares would not be the predominant force on prices in the Bitcoin Futures market or spot market for a number of reasons, including the significant volume in the Bitcoin Futures market, the size of bitcoin’s market cap, and the significant liquidity available in the spot market. In addition to the Bitcoin Futures market data points cited above, the spot market for bitcoin is also very liquid. (c) Other Means To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and Practices As noted above, the Commission also permits a listing exchange to demonstrate that ‘‘other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices’’ are sufficient to justify dispensing with the requisite surveillance-sharing agreement. The Exchange and Sponsor believe that such conditions are present. The Exchange is proposing to take additional steps to those described above to supplement its ability to obtain information that would be helpful in detecting, investigating, and deterring fraud and market manipulation in the Commodity-Based Trust Shares. On June 21, 2023, the Exchange reached an agreement on terms with Coinbase, Inc. (‘‘Coinbase’’), an operator of a United States-based spot trading platform for Bitcoin that represents a substantial portion of US-based and USD denominated Bitcoin trading,73 to enter into a surveillance-sharing agreement (‘‘Spot BTC SSA’’) and executed an associated term sheet. Based on this agreement on terms, the Exchange and Coinbase will finalize and execute a 73 According to a Kaiko Research report dated June 26, 2023, Coinbase represented roughly 50% of exchange trading volume in USD-BTC trading on a daily basis during May 2023. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:27 Aug 22, 2023 Jkt 259001 definitive agreement that the parties expect to be executed prior to allowing trading of the Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The Spot BTC SSA is expected to be a bilateral surveillance-sharing agreement between the Exchange and Coinbase that is intended to supplement the Exchange’s market surveillance program. The Spot BTC SSA is expected to have the hallmarks of a surveillancesharing agreement between two members of the ISG, which would give the Exchange supplemental access to data regarding spot Bitcoin trades on Coinbase where the Exchange determines it is necessary as part of its surveillance program for the Commodity-Based Trust Shares.74 This means that the Exchange expects to receive market data for orders and trades from Coinbase, which it will utilize in surveillance of the trading of Commodity-Based Trust Shares. In addition, the Exchange can request further information from Coinbase related to spot bitcoin trading activity on the Coinbase exchange platform, if the Exchange determines that such information would be necessary to detect and investigate potential manipulation in the trading of the Commodity-Based Trust Shares.75 Further, and consistent with prior points above, offering only in-kind creation and redemption will also provide unique protections against potential attempts to manipulate the price of the Shares. While the Sponsor believes that the Index which it uses to value the Trust’s bitcoin is itself resistant to manipulation based on the methodology further described below, the fact that creations and redemptions are only available in-kind makes the manipulability of the Index significantly less important. Specifically, because the Trust will not accept cash to buy bitcoin in order to create new Shares or, barring a forced redemption of the Trust or under other extraordinary circumstances, be forced to sell bitcoin to pay cash for redeemed Shares, the price that the Sponsor uses to value the Trust’s bitcoin is not particularly important. When authorized participants are creating Shares with the Trust, they need to deliver a certain number of bitcoin per Share (regardless of the valuation used) and when they’re redeeming, they can similarly expect to receive a certain number of bitcoin per 74 For additional information regarding ISG and the hallmarks of surveillance-sharing between ISG members, see https://isgportal.org/overview. 75 The Exchange also notes that it already has in place ISG-like surveillance sharing agreement with Cboe Digital Exchange, LLC and Cboe Clear Digital, LLC. PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 57503 Share. As such, even if the price used to value the Trust’s bitcoin is manipulated (which the Sponsor believes that its methodology is resistant to), the ratio of bitcoin per Share does not change and the Trust will either accept (for creations) or distribute (for redemptions) the same number of bitcoin regardless of the value. This not only mitigates the risk associated with potential manipulation, but also discourages and disincentivizes manipulation of the Index because there is little financial incentive to do so. (ii) Designed To Protect Investors and the Public Interest The Exchange believes that the proposal is designed to protect investors and the public interest. Over the past several years, U.S. investor exposure to bitcoin through OTC Bitcoin Funds has grown into the tens of billions of dollars, including through Bitcoin Futures ETFs. With that growth, so too has grown the quantifiable investor protection issues to U.S. investors through roll costs for Bitcoin Futures ETFs and premium/discount volatility and management fees for OTC Bitcoin Funds. The Exchange believes that the concerns related to the prevention of fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices have been sufficiently addressed to be consistent with the Act and, to the extent that the Commission disagrees with that assertion, such concerns are now outweighed by investor protection concerns. As such, the Exchange believes that approving this proposal (and comparable proposals) provides the Commission with the opportunity to allow U.S. investors with access to bitcoin in a regulated and transparent exchangetraded vehicle that would act to limit risk to U.S. investors by: (i) reducing premium and discount volatility; (ii) reducing management fees through meaningful competition; (iii) reducing risks and costs associated with investing in Bitcoin Futures ETFs and operating companies that are imperfect proxies for bitcoin exposure; and (iv) providing an alternative to custodying spot bitcoin. Commodity-Based Trust Shares The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices in that the Shares will be listed on the Exchange pursuant to the initial and continued listing criteria in Exchange Rule 14.11(e)(4). The Exchange believes that its surveillance procedures are adequate to properly monitor the trading of the Shares on the Exchange during all trading sessions and to deter and detect violations of E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1 57504 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Notices lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Exchange rules and the applicable federal securities laws. Trading of the Shares through the Exchange will be subject to the Exchange’s surveillance procedures for derivative products, including Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The issuer has represented to the Exchange that it will advise the Exchange of any failure by the Trust or the Shares to comply with the continued listing requirements, and, pursuant to its obligations under Section 19(g)(1) of the Exchange Act, the Exchange will surveil for compliance with the continued listing requirements. If the Trust or the Shares are not in compliance with the applicable listing requirements, the Exchange will commence delisting procedures under Exchange Rule 14.12. The Exchange may obtain information regarding trading in the Shares and listed bitcoin derivatives via the ISG, from other exchanges who are members or affiliates of the ISG, or with which the Exchange has entered into a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement. Availability of Information The Exchange also believes that the proposal promotes market transparency in that a large amount of information is currently available about bitcoin and will be available regarding the Trust and the Shares. In addition to the price transparency of the Index, the Trust will provide information regarding the Trust’s bitcoin holdings as well as additional data regarding the Trust. The Trust will provide an IIV per Share updated every 15 seconds, as calculated by the Exchange or a third-party financial data provider during the Exchange’s Regular Trading Hours (9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. E.T.). The IIV will be calculated by using the prior day’s closing NAV per Share as a base and updating that value during Regular Trading Hours to reflect changes in the value of the Trust’s bitcoin holdings during the trading day. The IIV disseminated during Regular Trading Hours should not be viewed as an actual real-time update of the NAV, which will be calculated only once at the end of each trading day. The IIV will be widely disseminated on a per Share basis every 15 seconds during the Exchange’s Regular Trading Hours by one or more major market data vendors. In addition, the IIV will be available through on-line information services. The website for the Trust, which will be publicly accessible at no charge, will contain the following information: (a) the current NAV per Share daily and the prior business day’s NAV and the reported closing price; (b) the BZX Official Closing Price in relation to the VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:27 Aug 22, 2023 Jkt 259001 NAV as of the time the NAV is calculated and a calculation of the premium or discount of such price against such NAV; (c) data in chart form displaying the frequency distribution of discounts and premiums of the Official Closing Price against the NAV, within appropriate ranges for each of the four previous calendar quarters (or for the life of the Trust, if shorter); (d) the prospectus; and (e) other applicable quantitative information. The Trust will also disseminate the Trust’s holdings on a daily basis on the Trust’s website. The price of bitcoin will be made available by one or more major market data vendors, updated at least every 15 seconds during Regular Trading Hours. The NAV for the Trust will be calculated by the Administrator once a day and will be disseminated daily to all market participants at the same time. Quotation and last-sale information regarding the Shares will be disseminated through the facilities of the CTA. Quotation and last sale information for bitcoin is widely disseminated through a variety of major market data vendors, including Bloomberg and Reuters. Information relating to trading, including price and volume information, in bitcoin is available from major market data vendors and from the exchanges on which bitcoin are traded. Depth of book information is also available from bitcoin exchanges. The normal trading hours for bitcoin exchanges are 24 hours per day, 365 days per year In sum, the Exchange believes that this proposal is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, that this filing sufficiently demonstrates that the CME Bitcoin Futures market represents a regulated market of significant size, and that on the whole the manipulation concerns previously articulated by the Commission are sufficiently mitigated to the point that they are outweighed by investor protection issues that would be resolved by approving this proposal. The Exchange believes that the proposal is, in particular, designed to protect investors and the public interest. The investor protection issues for U.S. investors has grown significantly over the last several years, through roll costs for Bitcoin Futures ETFs and premium/ discount volatility and management fees for OTC Bitcoin Funds. As discussed throughout, this growth investor protection concerns need to be reevaluated and rebalanced with the prevention of fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices concerns that previous disapproval orders have relied upon. Finally, the PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Exchange notes that in addition to all of the arguments herein which it believes sufficiently establish the CME Bitcoin Futures market as a regulated market of significant size, it is logically inconsistent to find that the CME Bitcoin Futures market is a significant market as it relates to the CME Bitcoin Futures market, but not a significant market as it relates to the bitcoin spot market for the numerous reasons laid out above. For the above reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purpose of the Act. The Exchange notes that the proposed rule change, rather will facilitate the listing and trading of an additional exchange-traded product that will enhance competition among both market participants and listing venues, to the benefit of investors and the marketplace. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the Exchange consents, the Commission will: A. by order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or B. institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Notices Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include file number SR– CboeBZX–2023–058 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 All submissions should refer to file number SR–CboeBZX–2023–058. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions should refer to file number SR–CboeBZX–2023–058 and should be submitted on or before September 13, 2023. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.76 Sherry R. Haywood, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2023–18103 Filed 8–22–23; 8:45 am] SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–98158; File No. SR–BX– 2023–020] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Set Fees for the Purchase of Field-Programmable Gate Array Technology as an Optional Delivery Mechanism for BX Totalview August 17, 2023. Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on August 9, 2023, Nasdaq BX, Inc. (‘‘BX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to set fees for the purchase of field-programmable gate array (‘‘FPGA’’) technology as an optional delivery mechanism for BX TotalView. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/ rulebook/bx/rules, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 1 15 76 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:27 Aug 22, 2023 2 17 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 57505 A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of the proposed rule change is to establish a fee schedule for the purchase of field-programmable gate array (‘‘FPGA’’) technology as an optional delivery mechanism for BX TotalView (‘‘BX FPGA Service’’).3 This follows a recently-filed proposal to offer FPGA technology as an optional delivery mechanism for BX TotalView.4 FPGA FPGA is a hardware-based delivery mechanism that utilizes an integrated circuit that is programmed to reduce ‘‘jitter’’—a technical term of art referring to the deviation in amplitude, phase timing or width of a signal pulse in a digital signal—that will allow data to be processed in a more predictable, or ‘‘deterministic,’’ fashion. Reducing jitter can be useful for certain customers due to the variability in the timing of market data packets transmitted by an exchange over the course of the trading day. Orders, and therefore market data packets, typically accumulate in larger numbers at the beginning and end of the trading day, as well as during the peaks of activity that occur at random intervals during the day. These bursts of activity may alter the time interval between the delivery of data packets because software processes information at variable rates depending on load to the system. Processing times may increase at higher loads, and decrease during periods of lesser activity. FPGA technology processes data packets at a constant time interval, without regard to the number of packets processed. Higher levels of determinism mean less variable queuing, which improves the predictability of data transfer, particularly during times of peak market activity. 3 This Proposal was initially filed by the Exchange on May 23, 2023. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97627 (May 31, 2023), 88 FR 37112 (June 6, 2023) (SR–BX–2023–014). On July 7, 2023, that filing was withdrawn and replaced to provide supplemental information. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97946 (July 19, 2023), 88 FR 47937 (July 25, 2023) (SR–BX–2023–016). On August 9, 2023, the second filing was withdrawn and replaced with the instant filing, which provides additional information without changing the Proposal in substance. 4 See SR–BX–2023–011 (‘‘A proposal to offer field-programmable gate array (‘FPGA’) technology as an optional delivery mechanism for BX TotalView.’’), available at https://listingcenter. nasdaq.com/rulebook/BX/rulefilings. A proposal to establish a fee schedule for the use of FPGA technology for the Phlx exchange is being filed concurrently with this proposal. E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1

Agencies

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 23, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57490-57505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18103]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-98156; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2023-058]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Shares of the Global
X Bitcoin Trust, Under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust
Shares

August 17, 2023.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on August 4, 2023, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BZX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX'' or the ``Exchange'') is filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' or ``SEC'')
a proposed rule change to list and trade shares of the Global X Bitcoin
Trust (the ``Trust''),\3\ under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based
Trust Shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\3\ The Trust was formed as a Delaware statutory trust on July
13, 2021 and is operated as a grantor trust for U.S. federal tax
purposes. The Trust has no fixed termination date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to list and trade the Shares under BZX Rule
14.11(e)(4),\4\ which governs the listing and trading of Commodity-
Based Trust Shares on the Exchange.\5\ Global X Digital Assets is the
sponsor of the Trust (``Sponsor''). The Shares will be registered with
the Commission by means of the Trust's registration statement on Form
S-1 (the ``Registration Statement'').\6\ A third-party U.S.-based trust
company and qualified custodian will be responsible for custody of the
Trust's bitcoin (the ``Custodian'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\4\ The Commission approved BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4) in Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 65225 (August 30, 2011), 76 FR 55148
(September 6, 2011) (SR-BATS-2011-018).
\5\ All statements and representations made in this filing
regarding (a) the description of the portfolio, (b) limitations on
portfolio holdings or reference assets, or (c) the applicability of
Exchange rules and surveillance procedures shall constitute
continued listing requirements for listing the Shares on the
Exchange.
\6\ See Form S-1 Registration Statement submitted to the
Commission on July 21, 2021. The Registration Statement is not yet
effective and the Shares will not trade on the Exchange until such
time that the Registration Statement is effective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

As further discussed below, the Commission has historically
approved or disapproved exchange filings to list and trade series of
Trust Issued Receipts, including spot-based Commodity-Based Trust
Shares, on the basis of whether the listing exchange has in place a
comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement with a regulated market of
significant size related to the underlying commodity to be held.\7\
Prior orders from the Commission have pointed out that in every prior
approval order for Commodity-Based Trust Shares, there has been a
derivatives market that represents the regulated market of significant
size, generally a Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the ``CFTC'')
regulated futures market.\8\

[[Page 57491]]

Further to this point, the Commission's prior orders have noted that
the spot commodities and currency markets for which it has previously
approved spot ETPs are generally unregulated and that the Commission
relied on the underlying futures market as the regulated market of
significant size that formed the basis for approving the series of
Currency and Commodity-Based Trust Shares, including gold, silver,
platinum, palladium, copper, and other commodities and currencies. The
Commission specifically noted in the Winklevoss Order that the First
Gold Approval Order ``was based on an assumption that the currency
market and the spot gold market were largely unregulated.'' \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83723 (July 26,
2018), 83 FR 37579 (August 1, 2018). This proposal was subsequently
disapproved by the Commission. See Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 83723 (July 26, 2018), 83 FR 37579 (August 1, 2018) (the
``Winklevoss Order'').
\8\ See streetTRACKS Gold Shares, Exchange Act Release No. 50603
(Oct. 28, 2004), 69 FR 64614, 64618-19 (Nov. 5, 2004) (SR-NYSE-2004-
22) (the ``First Gold Approval Order''); iShares COMEX Gold Trust,
Exchange Act Release No. 51058 (Jan. 19, 2005), 70 FR 3749, 3751,
3754-55 (Jan. 26, 2005) (SR-Amex-2004-38); iShares Silver Trust,
Exchange Act Release No. 53521 (Mar. 20, 2006), 71 FR 14967, 14968,
14973-74 (Mar. 24, 2006) (SR-Amex-2005-072); ETFS Gold Trust,
Exchange Act Release No. 59895 (May 8, 2009), 74 FR 22993, 22994-95,
22998, 23000 (May 15, 2009) (SR-NYSEArca-2009-40); ETFS Silver
Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 59781 (Apr. 17, 2009), 74 FR 18771,
18772, 18775-77 (Apr. 24, 2009) (SR-NYSEArca-2009-28); ETFS
Palladium Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 61220 (Dec. 22, 2009), 74
FR 68895, 68896 (Dec. 29, 2009) (SR-NYSEArca-2009-94) (notice of
proposed rule change included NYSE Arca's representation that
``[t]he most significant palladium futures exchanges are the NYMEX
and the Tokyo Commodity Exchange,'' that ``NYMEX is the largest
exchange in the world for trading precious metals futures and
options,'' and that NYSE Arca ``may obtain trading information via
the Intermarket Surveillance Group,'' of which NYMEX is a member,
Exchange Act Release No. 60971 (Nov. 9, 2009), 74 FR 59283, 59285-
86, 59291 (Nov. 17, 2009)); ETFS Platinum Trust, Exchange Act
Release No. 61219 (Dec. 22, 2009), 74 FR 68886, 68887-88 (Dec. 29,
2009) (SR-NYSEArca-2009-95) (notice of proposed rule change included
NYSE Arca's representation that ``[t]he most significant platinum
futures exchanges are the NYMEX and the Tokyo Commodity Exchange,''
that ``NYMEX is the largest exchange in the world for trading
precious metals futures and options,'' and that NYSE Arca ``may
obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,''
of which NYMEX is a member, Exchange Act Release No. 60970 (Nov. 9,
2009), 74 FR 59319, 59321, 59327 (Nov. 17, 2009)); Sprott Physical
Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 61496 (Feb. 4, 2010), 75 FR
6758, 6760 (Feb. 10, 2010) (SR-NYSEArca-2009-113) (notice of
proposed rule change included NYSE Arca's representation that the
COMEX is one of the ``major world gold markets,'' that NYSE Arca
``may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance
Group,'' and that NYMEX, of which COMEX is a division, is a member
of the Intermarket Surveillance Group, Exchange Act Release No.
61236 (Dec. 23, 2009), 75 FR 170, 171, 174 (Jan. 4, 2010)); Sprott
Physical Silver Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 63043 (Oct. 5,
2010), 75 FR 62615, 62616, 62619, 62621 (Oct. 12, 2010) (SR-
NYSEArca-2010-84); ETFS Precious Metals Basket Trust, Exchange Act
Release No. 62692 (Aug. 11, 2010), 75 FR 50789, 50790 (Aug. 17,
2010) (SR-NYSEArca-2010-56) (notice of proposed rule change included
NYSE Arca's representation that ``the most significant gold, silver,
platinum and palladium futures exchanges are the COMEX and the
TOCOM'' and that NYSE Arca ``may obtain trading information via the
Intermarket Surveillance Group,'' of which COMEX is a member,
Exchange Act Release No. 62402 (Jun. 29, 2010), 75 FR 39292, 39295,
39298 (July 8, 2010)); ETFS White Metals Basket Trust, Exchange Act
Release No. 62875 (Sept. 9, 2010), 75 FR 56156, 56158 (Sept. 15,
2010) (SR-NYSEArca-2010-71) (notice of proposed rule change included
NYSE Arca's representation that ``the most significant silver,
platinum and palladium futures exchanges are the COMEX and the
TOCOM'' and that NYSE Arca ``may obtain trading information via the
Intermarket Surveillance Group,'' of which COMEX is a member,
Exchange Act Release No. 62620 (July 30, 2010), 75 FR 47655, 47657,
47660 (Aug. 6, 2010)); ETFS Asian Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release
No. 63464 (Dec. 8, 2010), 75 FR 77926, 77928 (Dec. 14, 2010) (SR-
NYSEArca-2010-95) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE
Arca's representation that ``the most significant gold futures
exchanges are the COMEX and the Tokyo Commodity Exchange,'' that
``COMEX is the largest exchange in the world for trading precious
metals futures and options,'' and that NYSE Arca ``may obtain
trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,'' of
which COMEX is a member, Exchange Act Release No. 63267 (Nov. 8,
2010), 75 FR 69494, 69496, 69500-01 (Nov. 12, 2010)); Sprott
Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust, Exchange Act Release No.
68430 (Dec. 13, 2012), 77 FR 75239, 75240-41 (Dec. 19, 2012) (SR-
NYSEArca-2012–111) (notice of proposed rule change included
NYSE Arca's representation that ``[f]utures on platinum and
palladium are traded on two major exchanges: The New York Mercantile
Exchange . . . and Tokyo Commodities Exchange'' and that NYSE Arca
``may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance
Group,'' of which COMEX is a member, Exchange Act Release No. 68101
(Oct. 24, 2012), 77 FR 65732, 65733, 65739 (Oct. 30, 2012)); APMEX
Physical--1 oz. Gold Redeemable Trust, Exchange Act Release No.
66930 (May 7, 2012), 77 FR 27817, 27818 (May 11, 2012) (SR-NYSEArca-
2012-18) (notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca's
representation that NYSE Arca ``may obtain trading information via
the Intermarket Surveillance Group,'' of which COMEX is a member,
and that gold futures are traded on COMEX and the Tokyo Commodity
Exchange, with a cross-reference to the proposed rule change to list
and trade shares of the ETFS Gold Trust, in which NYSE Arca
represented that COMEX is one of the ``major world gold markets,''
Exchange Act Release No. 66627 (Mar. 20, 2012), 77 FR 17539, 17542-
43, 17547 (Mar. 26, 2012)); JPM XF Physical Copper Trust, Exchange
Act Release No. 68440 (Dec. 14, 2012), 77 FR 75468, 75469-70, 75472,
75485-86 (Dec. 20, 2012) (SR-NYSEArca-2012-28); iShares Copper
Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 68973 (Feb. 22, 2013), 78 FR 13726,
13727, 13729-30, 13739-40 (Feb. 28, 2013) (SR-NYSEArca-2012-66);
First Trust Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 70195 (Aug. 14,
2013), 78 FR 51239, 51240 (Aug. 20, 2013) (SR-NYSEArca-2013-61)
(notice of proposed rule change included NYSE Arca's representation
that FINRA, on behalf of the exchange, may obtain trading
information regarding gold futures and options on gold futures from
members of the Intermarket Surveillance Group, including COMEX, or
from markets ``with which [NYSE Arca] has in place a comprehensive
surveillance sharing agreement,'' and that gold futures are traded
on COMEX and the Tokyo Commodity Exchange, with a cross-reference to
the proposed rule change to list and trade shares of the ETFS Gold
Trust, in which NYSE Arca represented that COMEX is one of the
``major world gold markets,'' Exchange Act Release No. 69847 (June
25, 2013), 78 FR 39399, 39400, 39405 (July 1, 2013)); Merk Gold
Trust, Exchange Act Release No. 71378 (Jan. 23, 2014), 79 FR 4786,
4786-87 (Jan. 29, 2014) (SR-NYSEArca-2013-137) (notice of proposed
rule change included NYSE Arca's representation that ``COMEX is the
largest gold futures and options exchange'' and that NYSE Arca ``may
obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance Group,''
including with respect to transactions occurring on COMEX pursuant
to CME and NYMEX's membership, or from exchanges ``with which [NYSE
Arca] has in place a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement,''
Exchange Act Release No. 71038 (Dec. 11, 2013), 78 FR 76367, 76369,
76374 (Dec. 17, 2013)); Long Dollar Gold Trust, Exchange Act Release
No. 79518 (Dec. 9, 2016), 81 FR 90876, 90881, 90886, 90888 (Dec. 15,
2016) (SR-NYSEArca-2016-84).
\9\ See Winklevoss Order at 37592.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

As such, the regulated market of significant size test does not
require that the spot bitcoin market be regulated in order for the
Commission to approve this proposal, and precedent makes clear that a
regulated underlying market for a spot commodity or currency would be
an exception to the norm. These largely unregulated currency and
commodity markets do not provide the same protections as the markets
that are subject to the Commission's oversight, but the Commission has
consistently looked to surveillance sharing agreements with the
relevant underlying futures market to determine whether such products
were consistent with the Act. With this in mind, the CME Bitcoin
Futures market is the appropriate market to consider in determining
whether there is a related regulated market of significant size.
Further to this point, the Exchange notes that the Commission has
approved proposals related to the listing and trading of funds that
would primarily hold CME Bitcoin Futures that are registered under the
Securities Act of 1933.\10\ In the Teucrium Approval, the Commission
found the CME Bitcoin Futures market to be a regulated market of
significant size as it relates to CME Bitcoin Futures, an odd
tautological truth that is also inconsistent with prior disapproval
orders for ETPs that would hold actual bitcoin instead of derivatives
contracts (``Spot Bitcoin ETPs'') that use the exact same pricing
methodology as the CME Bitcoin Futures. As further discussed below,
both the Exchange and the Sponsor believe that this proposal and the
included analysis are sufficient to establish that the CME Bitcoin
Futures market represents a regulated market of significant size as it
relates both to the CME Bitcoin Futures market and to the spot bitcoin
market and that this proposal should be approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\10\ See Exchange Act Release Nos. 94620 (April 6, 2022), 87 FR
21676 (April 12, 2022) (the ``Teucrium Approval'') and 94853 (May 5,
2022) (collectively, with the Teucrium Approval, the ``Bitcoin
Futures Approvals'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, as discussed in greater detail below, by using
professional custodians and other service providers, the Trust provides
investors interested in exposure to bitcoin with important protections
that are not always available to investors that invest directly in
bitcoin, including protection against insolvency, cyber attacks, and
other risks. If U.S. investors had access to vehicles such as the Trust
for their bitcoin investments, instead of directing their bitcoin
investments into loosely regulated offshore vehicles (such as loosely
regulated centralized exchanges that have since faced bankruptcy
proceedings or other insolvencies), then countless investors would have
had the option to better protect their principal investments in bitcoin
from the afore-mentioned events and risks.
Background
Bitcoin is a digital asset based on the decentralized, open source
protocol of the peer-to-peer computer network launched in 2009 that
governs the creation, movement, and ownership of bitcoin and hosts the
public ledger, or ``blockchain,'' on which all bitcoin transactions are
recorded (the ``Bitcoin Network'' or ``Bitcoin''). The decentralized
nature of the Bitcoin Network allows parties to transact directly with
one another based on cryptographic proof instead of relying on a
trusted third party. The protocol also lays out the rate of issuance of
new bitcoin within the Bitcoin Network, a rate that is reduced by half
approximately every four years with an eventual hard cap of 21 million.
It's generally understood that the combination of these two features--a
systemic hard cap of 21 million bitcoin and the ability to transact
trustlessly with anyone connected to the Bitcoin Network--gives bitcoin
its value. The first rule filing proposing to list an exchange-traded
product to provide exposure to bitcoin in the U.S. was submitted by the
Exchange on June 30, 2016.\11\ At that time, blockchain technology, and
digital assets that utilized it, were relatively new to the broader
public. The market cap of all bitcoin in existence at that time was
approximately $10 billion. No registered offering of digital asset
securities or shares in an investment vehicle with exposure to bitcoin
or any other cryptocurrency had yet been conducted, and the regulated
infrastructure for conducting a digital asset securities

[[Page 57492]]

offering had not begun to develop.\12\ Similarly, regulated U.S.
bitcoin futures contracts did not exist. The CFTC had determined that
bitcoin is a commodity,\13\ but had not engaged in significant
enforcement actions in the space. The New York Department of Financial
Services (``NYDFS'') adopted its final BitLicense regulatory framework
in 2015, but had only approved four entities to engage in activities
relating to virtual currencies (whether through granting a BitLicense
or a limited-purpose trust charter) as of June 30, 2016.\14\ While the
first over-the-counter bitcoin fund launched in 2013, public trading
was limited and the fund had only $60 million in assets.\15\ There were
very few, if any, traditional financial institutions engaged in the
space, whether through investment or providing services to digital
asset companies. In January 2018, the Staff of the Commission noted in
a letter to the Investment Company Institute and SIFMA that it was not
aware, at that time, of a single custodian providing fund custodial
services for digital assets.\16\ Fast forward to today and the digital
assets financial ecosystem, including bitcoin, has progressed
significantly. The development of a regulated market for digital asset
securities has significantly evolved, with market participants having
conducted registered public offerings of both digital asset securities
\17\ and shares in investment vehicles holding bitcoin futures.\18\
Additionally, licensed and regulated service providers have emerged to
provide fund custodial services for digital assets, among other
services, including the Custodian. For example, in February 2023, the
Commission proposed to amend Rule 206(4)-2 under the Advisers Act of
1940 (the ``custody rule'') to expand the scope beyond client funds and
securities to include all crypto assets, among other assets; \19\ in
May 2021, the Staff of the Commission released a statement permitting
open-end mutual funds to invest in cash-settled bitcoin futures; in
December 2020, the Commission adopted a conditional no-action position
permitting certain special purpose broker-dealers to custody digital
asset securities under Rule 15c3-3 under the Exchange Act (the
``Custody Statement''); \20\ in September 2020, the Staff of the
Commission released a no-action letter permitting certain broker-
dealers to operate a non-custodial Alternative Trading System (``ATS'')
for digital asset securities, subject to specified conditions; \21\ in
October 2019, the Staff of the Commission granted temporary relief from
the clearing agency registration requirement to an entity seeking to
establish a securities clearance and settlement system based on
distributed ledger technology,\22\ and multiple transfer agents who
provide services for digital asset securities registered with the
Commission.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\11\ See Winklevoss Order.
\12\ Digital assets that are securities under U.S. law are
referred to throughout this proposal as ``digital asset
securities.'' All other digital assets, including bitcoin, are
referred to interchangeably as ``cryptocurrencies'' or ``virtual
currencies.'' The term ``digital assets'' refers to all digital
assets, including both digital asset securities and
cryptocurrencies, together.
\13\ See ``In the Matter of Coinflip, Inc.'' (``Coinflip'')
(CFTC Docket 15-29 (September 17, 2015)) (order instituting
proceedings pursuant to Sections 6(c) and 6(d) of the CEA, making
findings and imposing remedial sanctions), in which the CFTC stated:
``Section 1a(9) of the CEA defines `commodity' to include, among
other things, `all services, rights, and interests in which
contracts for future delivery are presently or in the future dealt
in.' 7 U.S.C. Sec. 1a(9). The definition of a `commodity' is broad.
See, e.g., Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. SEC, 677 F. 2d 1137,
1142 (7th Cir. 1982). Bitcoin and other virtual currencies are
encompassed in the definition and properly defined as commodities.''
\14\ A list of virtual currency businesses that are entities
regulated by the NYDFS is available on the NYDFS website. See
https://www.dfs.ny.gov/apps_and_licensing/virtual_currency_businesses/regulated_entities.
\15\ Data as of March 31, 2016 according to publicly available
filings. See Bitcoin Investment Trust Form S-1, dated May 27, 2016,
available at https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1588489/000095012316017801/filename1.htm.
\16\ See letter from Dalia Blass, Director, Division of
Investment Management, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to
Paul Schott Stevens, President & CEO, Investment Company Institute
and Timothy W. Cameron, Asset Management Group--Head, Securities
Industry and Financial Markets Association (January 18, 2018),
available at https://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment/noaction/2018/cryptocurrency-011818.htm.
\17\ See Prospectus supplement filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1)
for INX Tokens (Registration No. 333-233363), available at https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1725882/000121390020023202/ea125858-424b1_inxlimited.htm.
\18\ See Prospectus filed by Stone Ridge Trust VI on behalf of
NYDIG Bitcoin Strategy Fund Registration, available at https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1764894/000119312519309942/d693146d497.htm.
\19\ See Investment Advisers Act Release No. 6240 88 FR 14672
(March 9, 2023) (Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets).
\20\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90788, 86 FR 11627
(February 26, 2021) (File Number S7-25-20) (Custody of Digital Asset
Securities by Special Purpose Broker-Dealers).
\21\ See letter from Elizabeth Baird, Deputy Director, Division
of Trading and Markets, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to
Kris Dailey, Vice President, Risk Oversight & Operational
Regulation, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (September 25,
2020), available at https://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/mr-noaction/2020/finra-ats-role-in-settlement-of-digital-asset-security-trades-09252020.pdf.
\22\ See letter from Jeffrey S. Mooney, Associate Director,
Division of Trading and Markets, U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission to Charles G. Cascarilla & Daniel M. Burstein, Paxos
Trust Company, LLC (October 28, 2019), available at https://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/mr-noaction/2019/paxos-trust-company-102819-17a.pdf.
\23\ See, e.g., Form TA-1/A filed by Tokensoft Transfer Agent
LLC (CIK: 0001794142) on January 8, 2021, available at https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1794142/000179414219000001/xslFTA1X01/primary_doc.xml.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Outside the Commission's purview, the regulatory landscape has
changed significantly since 2016, and cryptocurrency markets have grown
and evolved as well. The market for bitcoin is approximately 100 times
larger, having at one point reached a market cap of over $1
trillion.\24\ According to the CME Bitcoin Futures Report, from
February 13, 2023 through March 27, 2023, CFTC regulated bitcoin
futures represented between $750 million and $3.2 billion in notional
trading volume on Chicago Mercantile Exchange (``CME'') (``Bitcoin
Futures'') on a daily basis.\25\ Open interest was over $1.4 billion
for the entirety of the period and at one point was over $2 billion.
ETPs that primarily hold CME Bitcoin Futures have raised over $1
billion dollars in assets. The CFTC has exercised its regulatory
jurisdiction in bringing a number of enforcement actions related to
bitcoin and against trading platforms that offer cryptocurrency
trading.\26\ As of February 14, 2023 the NYDFS has granted no fewer
than thirty-four BitLicenses,\27\ including to established public
payment companies like PayPal Holdings, Inc. and Square, Inc., and
limited purpose trust charters to entities providing cryptocurrency
custody services. In addition, the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets
Control (``OFAC'') has brought enforcement actions over apparent
violations of the sanctions laws in connection with the

[[Page 57493]]

provision of wallet management services for digital assets.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\24\ As of December 1, 2021, the total market cap of all bitcoin
in circulation was approximately $1.08 trillion.
\25\ Data sourced from the CME Bitcoin Futures Report: 30 March,
2023, available at https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/cryptocurrencies/bitcoin/bitcoin.volume.htm.
\26\ The CFTC's annual report for Fiscal Year 2022 (which ended
on September 30, 2022) noted that the CFTC completed the fiscal year
with 18 enforcement filings related to digital assets. ``Digital
asset actions included manipulation, a $1.7 billion fraudulent
scheme, and a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) failing to
register as a SEF or FCM or to seek DCM designation.'' See CFTC FY
2022 Agency Financial Report, available at https://www.cftc.gov/media/7941/2022afr/download. Additionally, the CFTC filed on March
27, 2023, a civil enforcement action against the owner/operators of
the Binance centralized digital asset trading platform, which is one
of the largest bitcoin derivative exchanges. See CFTC Release No.
8680-23 (March 27, 2023), available at https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8680-23.
\27\ See https://www.dfs.ny.gov/virtual_currency_businesses.
\28\ See U.S. Department of the Treasury Enforcement Release:
``OFAC Enters Into $98,830 Settlement with BitGo, Inc. for Apparent
Violations of Multiple Sanctions Programs Related to Digital
Currency Transactions'' (December 30, 2020) available at https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/20201230_bitgo.pdf See also U.S.
Department of the Treasury Enforcement Release: ``Treasury Announces
Two Enforcement Actions for over $24M and $29M Against Virtual
Currency Exchange, Bittrex, Inc.'' (October 11, 2022) available at
https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1006. See also U.S.
Department of Treasure Enforcement Release ``OFAC Settles with
Virtual Currency Exchange Kraken for $362,158.70 Related to Apparent
Violations of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations''
(November 28, 2022) available at https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/20221128_kraken.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In addition to the regulatory developments laid out above, more
traditional financial market participants become more active in
cryptocurrency: large insurance companies, asset managers, university
endowments, pension funds, and even historically bitcoin skeptical fund
managers have allocated to bitcoin. As noted in the Financial Stability
Oversight Council (``FSOC'') Report on Digital Asset Financial
Stability Risks and Regulation, ``[i]ndustry surveys suggest that the
scale of these investments grew quickly during the boom in crypto-asset
markets through late 2021. In June 2022, PwC estimated that the number
of crypto-specialist hedge funds was more than 300 globally, with $4.1
billion in assets under management. In addition, in a survey PwC found
that 38 percent of surveyed traditional hedge funds were currently
investing in `digital assets,' compared to 21 percent the year prior.''
\29\ The largest over-the-counter bitcoin fund previously filed a Form
10 registration statement, which the Staff of the Commission reviewed
and which took effect automatically, and is now a reporting
company.\30\ Established companies like Tesla, Inc., MicroStrategy
Incorporated, and Square, Inc., among others, have announced
substantial investments in bitcoin in amounts as large as $1.5 billion
(Tesla) and $425 million (MicroStrategy). The foregoing examples
demonstrate that bitcoin has gained mainstream usage and recognition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\29\ See the FSOC ``Report on Digital Asset Financial Stability
Risks and Regulation 2022'' (October 3, 2022) (at footnote 26) at
https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/261/FSOC-Digital-Assets-Report-2022.pdf.
\30\ See Letter from Division of Corporation Finance, Office of
Real Estate Construction to Barry E. Silbert, Chief Executive
Officer, Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (January 31, 2020) https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1588489/000000000020000953/filename1.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Despite these developments, access for U.S. retail investors to
gain exposure to bitcoin via a transparent and U.S. regulated, U.S.
exchange-traded vehicle remains limited. Instead current options
include: (i) facing the counter-party risk, legal uncertainty,
technical risk, and complexity associated with accessing spot bitcoin;
(ii) over-the-counter bitcoin funds (``OTC Bitcoin Funds'') with high
management fees and potentially volatile premiums and discounts; \31\
(iii) purchasing shares of operating companies that they believe will
provide proxy exposure to bitcoin with limited disclosure about the
associated risks; \32\ or (iv) purchasing Bitcoin Futures ETFs, as
defined below, which represent a sub-optimal structure for long-term
investors that will cost them significant amounts of money every year
compared to Spot Bitcoin ETPs, as further discussed below. Meanwhile,
investors in many other countries, including Canada and Brazil, are
able to use more traditional exchange listed and traded products
(including exchange-traded funds holding physical bitcoin) to gain
exposure to bitcoin. Similarly, investors in Switzerland and across
Europe have access to Exchange Traded Products which trade on regulated
exchanges and provide exposure to a broad array of spot crypto assets.
U.S. investors, by contrast, are left with fewer and more risky means
of getting bitcoin exposure, as described above.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\31\ The premium and discount for OTC Bitcoin Funds is known to
move rapidly. For example, over the period of 12/21/20 to 1/21/21,
the premium for the largest OTC Bitcoin Fund went from 40.18% to
2.79%. While the price of bitcoin appreciated significantly during
this period and NAV per share increased by 41.25%, the price per
share increased by only 3.58%. This means that investors are buying
shares of a fund that experiences significant volatility in its
premium and discount outside of the fluctuations in price of the
underlying asset. Even operating within the normal premium and
discount range, it's possible for an investor to buy shares of an
OTC Bitcoin Fund only to have those shares quickly lose 10% or more
in dollar value excluding any movement of the price of bitcoin. That
is to say--the price of bitcoin could have stayed exactly the same
from market close on one day to market open the next, yet the value
of the shares held by the investor decreased only because of the
fluctuation of the premium. As more investment vehicles, including
mutual funds and ETFs, seek to gain exposure to bitcoin, the easiest
option for a buy and hold strategy for such vehicles is often an OTC
Bitcoin Fund, meaning that even investors that do not directly buy
OTC Bitcoin Funds can be disadvantaged by extreme premiums (or
discounts) and premium volatility.
\32\ A number of operating companies engaged in unrelated
businesses--such as Tesla (a car manufacturer) and MicroStrategy (an
enterprise software company)--have announced investments as large as
$5.3 billion in bitcoin. Without access to bitcoin exchange-traded
products, retail investors seeking investment exposure to bitcoin
may end up purchasing shares in these companies in order to gain the
exposure to bitcoin that they seek. In fact, mainstream financial
news networks have written a number of articles providing investors
with guidance for obtaining bitcoin exposure through publicly traded
companies (such as MicroStrategy, Tesla, and bitcoin mining
companies, among others) instead of dealing with the complications
associated with buying spot bitcoin in the absence of a bitcoin ETP.
See e.g., ``7 public companies with exposure to bitcoin'' (February
8, 2021) available at: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/7-public-companies-with-exposure-to-bitcoin-154201525.html; and ``Want to get
in the crypto trade without holding bitcoin yourself? Here are some
investing ideas'' (February 19, 2021) available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/19/ways-to-invest-in-bitcoin-without-holding-the-cryptocurrency-yourself-.html.
\33\ The Exchange notes that the list of countries above is not
exhaustive and that securities regulators in a number of additional
countries have either approved or otherwise allowed the listing and
trading of Spot Bitcoin ETPs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

To this point, the lack of a Spot Bitcoin ETP exposes U.S. investor
assets to significant risk because investors that would otherwise seek
cryptoasset exposure through a Spot Bitcoin ETP are forced to find
exposure through generally riskier alternatives. For instance, many
U.S. investors that held their digital assets in accounts at FTX,\34\
Celsius Network LLC,\35\ BlockFi Inc.\36\ and Voyager Digital Holdings,
Inc.\37\ have become unsecured creditors in the insolvencies of those
entities. If a Spot Bitcoin ETP was available, it is likely that at
least a portion of the billions of dollars tied up in those proceedings
would still reside in the brokerage accounts of U.S. investors, having
instead been invested in a transparent, regulated, and well-understood
structure--a Spot Bitcoin ETP. For this reason alone, the approval of a
Spot Bitcoin ETP would represent a major win for the protection of U.S.
investors in the cryptoasset space. As further described below, the
Trust, like all other series of Commodity-Based Trust Shares, is
designed to protect investors against the risk of losses through fraud
and insolvency that arise by holding digital assets, including bitcoin,
on centralized platforms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\34\ See FTX Trading Ltd., et al., Case No. 22-11068.
\35\ See Celsius Network LLC, et al., Case No. 22-10964.
\36\ See BlockFi Inc., Case No. 22-19361.
\37\ See Voyager Digital Holdings, Inc., et al., Case No. 22-
10943.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Additionally, investors in other countries, specifically Canada,
generally pay lower fees than U.S. retail investors that invest in OTC
Bitcoin Funds due to the fee pressure that results from increased
competition among available bitcoin investment options. Without an
approved and regulated Spot Bitcoin ETP in the U.S., U.S. investors
could seek to purchase shares of non-U.S. bitcoin vehicles to get
access to bitcoin exposure. Given the separate regulatory regime,
potentially adverse foreign and U.S. tax implications, and the

[[Page 57494]]

difficulties associated with any international legal proceeding,
including litigation, such an arrangement would create more risk
exposure and a diminished investment opportunity for U.S. investors
than they would otherwise have with a U.S. exchange-listed ETP. In
addition to the benefits to U.S. investors articulated throughout this
proposal, approving this proposal (and others like it) would provide
U.S. ETFs and mutual funds with an additional U.S.-listed and regulated
product through which to obtain exposure to bitcoin thereby lessening
the need to seek such exposure through investments in either flawed
products or, to the limited extent currently permitted by Commission
Staff (i.e., 10% to 15% of a fund's assets), products listed and
primarily regulated in other countries. Such an approval would also
give rise to increased competition among the limited product range
available in the U.S. benefitting both ETFs and mutual funds, including
those seeking only minimal exposure to bitcoin for its non-correlative
investment performance, and individual investors.
Bitcoin Futures ETFs
The Exchange and Sponsor applaud the Commission for allowing the
launch of ETFs registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as
amended (the ``1940 Act'') and the Bitcoin Futures Approvals that
provide exposure to bitcoin primarily through CME Bitcoin Futures
(``Bitcoin Futures ETFs''). Allowing such products to list and trade is
a productive first step in providing U.S. investors and traders with
transparent, exchange-listed tools for expressing a view on bitcoin.
The Bitcoin Futures Approvals, however, have created a logical
inconsistency in the application of the standard the Commission applies
when considering bitcoin ETP proposals.
As discussed further below, the standard applicable to bitcoin ETPs
is whether the listing exchange has in place a comprehensive
surveillance sharing agreement with a regulated market of significant
size in the underlying asset. Previous disapproval orders have made
clear that a market that constitutes a regulated market of significant
size is generally a futures and/or options market based on the
underlying reference asset rather than the spot commodity markets,
which are often unregulated.\38\ Leaving aside the analysis of that
standard until later in this proposal,\39\ the Exchange believes that
the following rationale the Commission applied to a Bitcoin Futures ETF
should result in the Commission approving this and other Spot Bitcoin
ETP proposals:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\38\ See Winklevoss Order at 37593, specifically footnote 202,
which includes the language from numerous approval orders for which
the underlying futures markets formed the basis for approving series
of ETPs that hold physical metals, including gold, silver,
palladium, platinum, and precious metals more broadly; and 37600,
specifically where the Commission provides that ``when the spot
market is unregulated--the requirement of preventing fraudulent and
manipulative acts may possibly be satisfied by showing that the ETP
listing market has entered into a surveillance-sharing agreement
with a regulated market of significant size in derivatives related
to the underlying asset.'' As noted above, the Exchange believes
that these citations are particularly helpful in making clear that
the spot market for a spot commodity ETP need not be ``regulated''
in order for a spot commodity ETP to be approved by the Commission,
and in fact that it's been the common historical practice of the
Commission to rely on such derivatives markets as the regulated
market of significant size because such spot commodities markets are
largely unregulated.
\39\ As further outlined below, both the Exchange and the
Sponsor believe that the Bitcoin Futures market represents a
regulated market of significant size and that this proposal and
others like it should be approved on this basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The CME ``comprehensively surveils futures market conditions and
price movements on a real-time and ongoing basis in order to detect and
prevent price distortions, including price distortions caused by
manipulative efforts.'' Thus the CME's surveillance can reasonably be
relied upon to capture the effects on the CME bitcoin futures market
caused by a person attempting to manipulate the proposed futures ETP by
manipulating the price of CME bitcoin futures contracts, whether that
attempt is made by directly trading on the CME bitcoin futures market
or indirectly by trading outside of the CME bitcoin futures market. As
such, when the CME shares its surveillance information with Arca, the
information would assist in detecting and deterring fraudulent or
manipulative misconduct related to the non-cash assets held by the
proposed ETP.\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\40\ See Teucrium Approval at 21679.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CME Bitcoin Futures pricing is based on pricing from spot bitcoin
markets. The statement from the Teucrium Approval that ``CME's
surveillance can reasonably be relied upon to capture the effects on
the CME bitcoin futures market caused by a person attempting to
manipulate the proposed futures ETP by manipulating the price of CME
bitcoin futures contracts . . . indirectly by trading outside of the
CME bitcoin futures market,'' makes clear that the Commission believes
that CME's surveillance can capture the effects of trading on the
relevant spot markets on the pricing of CME Bitcoin Futures. This was
further acknowledged in the ``Grayscale lawsuit'' \41\ when Judge Rao
stated ``. . . the Commission in the Teucrium order recognizes that the
futures prices are influenced by the spot prices, and the Commission
concludes in approving futures ETPs that any fraud on the spot market
can be adequately addressed by the fact that the futures market is a
regulated one . . .'' The Exchange agrees with the Commission on this
point.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\41\ Grayscale Investments, LLC v. Securities and Exchange
Commission, et al., Case No. 22-1142.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further to this point, a Bitcoin Futures ETF is potentially more
susceptible to potential manipulation than a Spot Bitcoin ETP that
offers only in-kind creation and redemption because settlement of CME
Bitcoin Futures (and thus the value of the underlying holdings of a
Bitcoin Futures ETF) occurs at a single price derived from spot bitcoin
pricing, while shares of a Spot Bitcoin ETP would represent interest in
bitcoin directly and authorized participants for a Spot Bitcoin ETP (as
proposed herein) would be able to source bitcoin from any exchange and
create or redeem with the applicable trust regardless of the price of
the underlying index. It is not logically possible to conclude that the
CME Bitcoin Futures market represents a significant market for a
futures-based product, but also conclude that the CME Bitcoin Futures
market does not represent a significant market for a spot-based
product.
In addition to potentially being more susceptible to manipulation
than a Spot Bitcoin ETP, the structure of Bitcoin Futures ETFs provides
negative outcomes for buy and hold investors as compared to a Spot
Bitcoin ETP.\42\ Specifically, the cost of rolling CME Bitcoin Futures
contracts cause the Bitcoin Futures ETFs to lag the performance of
bitcoin and cost U.S. investors significantly more on an annual basis
than the cost of a comparable investment in a Spot Bitcoin ETP. Spot
Bitcoin ETPs hold bitcoin and therefore, do not incur rolling costs.
Further, Bitcoin Futures ETFs could potentially hit CME position
limits, which would force a Bitcoin Futures ETF to halt its investments
in Bitcoin Futures and seek other instruments that would provide

[[Page 57495]]

exposure to bitcoin of which there are few options as discussed
previously. Such an event could not only cause investor confusion as to
the Bitcoin Futures ETF's investment strategy, but also prevent the
Bitcoin Futures ETF from achieving its investment objective (e.g.,
capital appreciation through exposure to CME Bitcoin Futures), not to
mention completely changing its risk profile. While Bitcoin Futures
ETFs represent a useful trading tool, they are clearly a sub-optimal
structure for U.S. investors seeking long-term exposure to bitcoin that
will unnecessarily cost U.S. investors significantly more every year
when compared to the cost of investing in Spot Bitcoin ETPs. The
Exchange believes any proposal to list and trade a Spot Bitcoin ETP
should be reviewed by the Commission with this important investor
protection context in mind, as well as the benefit of encouraging
increased competition among market participants in this space.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\42\ See e.g., ``Bitcoin ETF's Success Could Come at
Fundholders' Expense,'' Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2021),
available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/bitcoin-etfs-success-could-come-at-fundholders-expense-11635080580; ``Physical Bitcoin
ETF Prospects Accelerate,'' ETF.com (October 25, 2021), available
at: https://www.etf.com/sections/blog/physical-bitcoin-etf-prospects-shine?nopaging=1&__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=pmd_JsK.fjXz9eAQW9zol0qpzhXDrrlpIVdoCloLXbLjl44-1635476946-0-gqNtZGzNApCjcnBszQql.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Based on the foregoing, the Exchange and Sponsor believe that any
objective review of the proposals to list Spot Bitcoin ETPs compared to
the Bitcoin Futures ETFs and the Bitcoin Futures Approvals would lead
to the conclusion that Spot Bitcoin ETPs should be available to U.S.
investors and, as such, this proposal and other comparable proposals to
list and trade Spot Bitcoin ETPs should be approved by the Commission.
Stated simply, U.S. investors will continue to lose significant amounts
of money from holding Bitcoin Futures ETFs as compared to Spot Bitcoin
ETPs, losses which could be prevented by the Commission approving Spot
Bitcoin ETPs. Additionally, any concerns related to preventing
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices related to Spot Bitcoin
ETPs would apply equally to the spot markets underlying the futures
contracts held by a Bitcoin Futures ETF. Both the Exchange and Sponsor
believe that the CME Bitcoin Futures market is a regulated market of
significant size and that such manipulation concerns are mitigated, as
described extensively below. After allowing and approving the listing
and trading of Bitcoin Futures ETFs that hold primarily CME Bitcoin
Futures, however, the only consistent outcome would be approving Spot
Bitcoin ETPs on the basis that the CME Bitcoin Futures market is a
regulated market of significant size.
Given the current landscape, approving this proposal (and others
like it) and allowing Spot Bitcoin ETPs to be listed and traded
alongside Bitcoin Futures ETFs would establish a consistent regulatory
approach, provide U.S. investors with choice in product structures for
bitcoin exposure, and offer flexibility in the means of gaining
exposure to bitcoin through transparent, regulated, U.S. exchange-
listed vehicles.
Bitcoin Futures
CME began offering trading in Bitcoin Futures in 2017. Each
contract represents five bitcoin and is based on the CME CF Bitcoin
Reference Rate.\43\ The contracts trade and settle like other cash-
settled commodity futures contracts. Nearly every measurable metric
related to Bitcoin Futures has generally trended up since launch,
although certain notional volume calculations have decreased roughly in
line with the decrease in the price of bitcoin. For example, there were
143,215 Bitcoin Futures contracts traded in April 2023 (approximately
$20.7 billion) compared to 193,182 ($5 billion), 104,713 ($3.9
billion), 118,714 ($42.7 billion), and 111,964 ($23.2 billion)
contracts traded in April 2019, April 2020, April 2021, and April 2022,
respectively.\44\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\43\ The CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate is based on a publicly
available calculation methodology based on pricing sourced from
several crypto exchanges and trading platforms, including Bitstamp,
Coinbase, Gemini, itBit, Kraken, and LMAX Digital.
\44\ Source: CME, Yahoo Finance 4/30/23.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

[[Page 57496]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23AU23.003

The number of large open interest holders \45\ and unique accounts
trading Bitcoin Futures have both increased, even in the face of
heightened Bitcoin price volatility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\45\ A large open interest holder in Bitcoin Futures is an
entity that holds at least 25 contracts, which is the equivalent of
125 bitcoin. At a price of approximately $29,268.81 per bitcoin on
4/30/2023, more than 100 firms had outstanding positions of greater
than $3.65 million in Bitcoin Futures.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23AU23.004

[[Page 57497]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23AU23.005

BILLING CODE 8011-01-C
The Sponsor further believes that publicly available research,
including research done as part of rule filings proposing to list and
trade shares of Spot Bitcoin ETPs, corroborates the overall trend
outlined above and supports the thesis that the Bitcoin Futures pricing
leads the spot market and, thus, a person attempting to manipulate the
Shares would also have to trade on that market to manipulate the ETP.
Specifically, the Sponsor believes that such research indicates that
bitcoin futures lead the bitcoin spot market in price formation.\46\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\46\ See Exchange Act Releases No. 94080 (January 27, 2022), 87
FR 5527 (April 12, 2022) (specifically ``Amendment No. 1 to the
Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Shares of the Wise Origin
Bitcoin Trust Under BZX Rule 14.11(3)(4), Commodity-Based Trust
Shares''); 94982 (May 25, 2022), 87 FR 33250 (June 1, 2022); 94844
(May 4, 2022), 87 FR 28043 (May 10, 2022); and 93445 (October 28,
2021), 86 FR 60695 (November 3, 2021). See also Hu, Y., Hou, Y. and
Oxley, L. (2019). ``What role do futures markets play in Bitcoin
pricing? Causality, cointegration and price discovery from a time-
varying perspective'' (available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481826/). This academic research paper concludes
that ``There exist no episodes where the Bitcoin spot markets
dominates the price discovery processes with regard to Bitcoin
futures. This points to a conclusion that the price formation
originates solely in the Bitcoin futures market. We can, therefore,
conclude that the Bitcoin futures markets dominate the dynamic price
discovery process based upon time-varying information share
measures. Overall, price discovery seems to occur in the Bitcoin
futures markets rather than the underlying spot market based upon a
time-varying perspective.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 6(b)(5) and the Applicable Standards
The Commission has approved numerous series of Trust Issued
Receipts,\47\ including Commodity-Based Trust Shares,\48\ to be listed
on U.S. national securities exchanges. In order for any proposed rule
change from an exchange to be approved, the Commission must determine
that, among other things, the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, specifically including: (i)
the requirement that a national securities exchange's rules are
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices;
\49\ and (ii) the requirement that an exchange proposal be designed, in
general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange
believes that this proposal is consistent with the requirements of
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act and that this filing sufficiently
demonstrates that the CME Bitcoin Futures market represents a regulated
market of significant size and that, on the whole, the manipulation
concerns previously articulated by the Commission are sufficiently
mitigated to the point that they are outweighed by quantifiable
investor protection issues that would be resolved by approving this
proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\47\ See Exchange Rule 14.11(f).
\48\ Commodity-Based Trust Shares, as described in Exchange Rule
14.11(e)(4), are a type of Trust Issued Receipt.
\49\ As the Exchange has stated in a number of other public
documents, it continues to believe that bitcoin is resistant to
price manipulation and that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices'' exist to justify dispensing with
the requisite surveillance sharing agreement. The geographically
diverse and continuous nature of bitcoin trading render it difficult
and prohibitively costly to manipulate the price of bitcoin. The
fragmentation across bitcoin platforms, the relatively slow speed of
transactions, and the capital necessary to maintain a significant
presence on each trading platform make manipulation of bitcoin
prices through continuous trading activity challenging. To the
extent that there are bitcoin exchanges engaged in or allowing wash
trading or other activity intended to manipulate the price of
bitcoin on other markets, such pricing does not normally impact
prices on other exchange because participants will generally ignore
markets with quotes that they deem non-executable. Moreover, the
linkage between the bitcoin markets and the presence of arbitrageurs
in those markets means that the manipulation of the price of bitcoin
price on any single venue would require manipulation of the global
bitcoin price in order to be effective. Arbitrageurs must have funds
distributed across multiple trading platforms in order to take
advantage of temporary price dislocations, thereby making it
unlikely that there will be strong concentration of funds on any
particular bitcoin exchange or OTC platform. As a result, the
potential for manipulation on a trading platform would require
overcoming the liquidity supply of such arbitrageurs who are
effectively eliminating any cross-market pricing differences.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 57498]]

market of significant size. Both the Exchange and CME are members of
ISG.\51\ The only remaining issue to be addressed is whether the
Bitcoin Futures market constitutes a market of significant size, which
both the Exchange and the Sponsor believe that it does. The terms
``significant market'' and ``market of significant size'' include a
market (or group of markets) as to which: (a) there is a reasonable
likelihood that a person attempting to manipulate the ETP would also
have to trade on that market to manipulate the ETP, so that a
surveillance-sharing agreement would assist the listing exchange in
detecting and deterring misconduct; and (b) it is unlikely that trading
in the ETP would be the predominant influence on prices in that
market.\52\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\50\ As previously articulated by the Commission, ``The standard
requires such surveillance-sharing agreements since ``they provide a
necessary deterrent to manipulation because they facilitate the
availability of information needed to fully investigate a
manipulation if it were to occur.'' The Commission has emphasized
that it is essential for an exchange listing a derivative securities
product to enter into a surveillance-sharing agreement with markets
trading underlying securities for the listing exchange to have the
ability to obtain information necessary to detect, investigate, and
deter fraud and market manipulation, as well as violations of
exchange rules and applicable federal securities laws and rules. The
hallmarks of a surveillance-sharing agreement are that the agreement
provides for the sharing of information about market trading
activity, clearing activity, and customer identity; that the parties
to the agreement have reasonable ability to obtain access to and
produce requested information; and that no existing rules, laws, or
practices would impede one party to the agreement from obtaining
this information from, or producing it to, the other party.'' The
Commission has historically held that joint membership in the
Intermarket Surveillance Group (``ISG'') constitutes such a
surveillance sharing agreement. See Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 88284 (February 26, 2020), 85 FR 12595 (March 3, 2020) (SR-
NYSEArca-2019-39) (the ``Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval'').
\51\ For a list of the current members and affiliate members of
ISG, see www.isgportal.com.
\52\ See Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Commission has also recognized that the ``regulated market of
significant size'' standard is not the only means for satisfying
Section 6(b)(5) of the act, specifically providing that a listing
exchange could demonstrate that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices'' are sufficient to justify dispensing
with the requisite surveillance-sharing agreement.\53\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\53\ See Winklevoss Order at 37580. The Commission has also
specifically noted that it ``is not applying a `cannot be
manipulated' standard; instead, the Commission is examining whether
the proposal meets the requirements of the Exchange Act and,
pursuant to its Rules of Practice, places the burden on the listing
exchange to demonstrate the validity of its contentions and to
establish that the requirements of the Exchange Act have been met.''
Id. at 37582.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(a) Manipulation of the ETP
According to the research and analysis presented above, the Bitcoin
Futures market is the leading market for bitcoin price formation. Where
Bitcoin Futures lead the price in the spot market such that a potential
manipulator of the bitcoin spot market would have to participate in the
Bitcoin Futures market, it follows that a potential manipulator of the
Shares would similarly have to transact in the Bitcoin Futures market
because the NAV is based on the price of bitcoin on the principal
market, which identified market must be an active market with orderly
transactions. Further, the Trust only allows for in-kind creation and
redemption, which, as further described below, reduces the potential
for manipulation of the Shares through manipulation of the Trust's
methodology for calculating NAV or any of its individual constituents,
again emphasizing that a potential manipulator of the Shares would have
to manipulate the entirety of the bitcoin spot market, which is led by
the Bitcoin Futures market. As such, the Exchange believes that part
(a) of the significant market test outlined above is satisfied and that
common membership in ISG between the Exchange and CME would assist the
listing exchange in detecting and deterring misconduct in the Shares.
(b) Predominant Influence on Prices in Spot and Bitcoin Futures
The Exchange and Sponsor also believe that trading in the Shares
would not be the predominant force on prices in the Bitcoin Futures
market or spot market for a number of reasons, including the
significant volume in the Bitcoin Futures market, the size of bitcoin's
market cap, and the significant liquidity available in the spot market.
In addition to the Bitcoin Futures market data points cited above, the
spot market for bitcoin is also very liquid.
(c) Other Means To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and
Practices
As noted above, the Commission also permits a listing exchange to
demonstrate that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices'' are sufficient to justify dispensing with the
requisite surveillance-sharing agreement. The Exchange and Sponsor
believe that such conditions are present.
The Exchange is proposing to take additional steps to those
described above to supplement its ability to obtain information that
would be helpful in detecting, investigating, and deterring fraud and
market manipulation in the Commodity-Based Trust Shares. On June 21,
2023, the Exchange reached an agreement on terms with Coinbase, Inc.
(``Coinbase''), an operator of a United States-based spot trading
platform for Bitcoin that represents a substantial portion of US-based
and USD denominated Bitcoin trading,\54\ to enter into a surveillance-
sharing agreement (``Spot BTC SSA'') and executed an associated term
sheet. Based on this agreement on terms, the Exchange and Coinbase will
finalize and execute a definitive agreement that the parties expect to
be executed prior to allowing trading of the Commodity-Based Trust
Shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\54\ According to a Kaiko Research report dated June 26, 2023,
Coinbase represented roughly 50% of exchange trading volume in USD-
BTC trading on a daily basis during May 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Spot BTC SSA is expected to be a bilateral surveillance-sharing
agreement between the Exchange and Coinbase that is intended to
supplement the Exchange's market surveillance program. The Spot BTC SSA
is expected to have the hallmarks of a surveillance-sharing agreement
between two members of the ISG, which would give the Exchange
supplemental access to data regarding spot Bitcoin trades on Coinbase
where the Exchange determines it is necessary as part of its
surveillance program for the Commodity-Based Trust Shares.\55\ This
means that the Exchange expects to receive market data for orders and
trades from Coinbase, which it will utilize in surveillance of the
trading of Commodity-Based Trust Shares. In addition, the Exchange can
request further information from Coinbase related to spot bitcoin
trading activity on the Coinbase exchange platform, if the Exchange
determines that such information would be necessary to detect and
investigate potential manipulation in the trading of the Commodity-
Based Trust Shares.\56\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\55\ For additional information regarding ISG and the hallmarks
of surveillance-sharing between ISG members, see https://isgportal.org/overview.
\56\ The Exchange also notes that it already has in place ISG-
like surveillance sharing agreement with Cboe Digital Exchange, LLC
and Cboe Clear Digital, LLC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 57499]]

similarly expect to receive a certain number of bitcoin per Share. As
such, even if the price used to value the Trust's bitcoin is
manipulated (which the Sponsor believes that its methodology is
resistant to), the ratio of bitcoin per Share does not change and the
Trust will either accept (for creations) or distribute (for
redemptions) the same number of bitcoin regardless of the value. This
not only mitigates the risk associated with potential manipulation, but
also discourages and disincentivizes manipulation of the index because
there is little financial incentive to do so.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\57\ While the Index will not be particularly important for the
creation and redemption process, it will be used for calculating
fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(ii) Designed To Protect Investors and the Public Interest
The Exchange believes that the proposal is designed to protect
investors and the public interest. Over the past several years, U.S.
investor exposure to bitcoin through OTC Bitcoin Funds has grown into
the tens of billions of dollars, including through Bitcoin Futures
ETFs. With that growth, so too has grown the quantifiable investor
protection issues to U.S. investors through roll costs for Bitcoin
Futures ETFs and premium/discount volatility and management fees for
OTC Bitcoin Funds. The Exchange believes that the concerns related to
the prevention of fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices have
been sufficiently addressed to be consistent with the Act and, to the
extent that the Commission disagrees with that assertion, such concerns
are now outweighed by investor protection concerns. As such, the
Exchange believes that approving this proposal (and comparable
proposals) provides the Commission with the opportunity to allow U.S.
investors with access to bitcoin in a regulated and transparent
exchange-traded vehicle that would act to limit risk to U.S. investors
by: (i) reducing premium and discount volatility; (ii) reducing
management fees through meaningful competition; (iii) reducing risks
and costs associated with investing in Bitcoin Futures ETFs and
operating companies that are imperfect proxies for bitcoin exposure;
and (iv) providing an alternative to custodying spot bitcoin.
Global X Bitcoin Trust
Delaware Trust Company is the trustee (``Trustee''). The Bank of
New York Mellon will be the administrator (``Administrator'') and
transfer agent (``Transfer Agent''). Coinbase Custody Trust Company,
LLC, a third-party regulated custodian (the ``Custodian''), will be
responsible for custody of the Trust's bitcoin. Sponsor selects the
marketing agent in connection with the creation and redemption of
``Baskets'' of Shares.\58\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\58\ The Exchange notes that the Sponsor is finalizing
negotiations with the marketing agent and it will submit an
amendment to this proposal upon execution of the agreement with the
marketing agent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

According to the Registration Statement, each Share will represent
a fractional undivided beneficial interest and ownership in the Trust.
The Trust's assets will consist of bitcoin held by the Custodian on
behalf of the Trust. The Trust generally does not intend to hold cash
or cash equivalents. However, there may be situations where the Trust
will unexpectedly hold cash or cash equivalents on a temporary basis.
According to the Registration Statement, the Trust is neither an
investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940,
as amended,\59\ nor a commodity pool for purposes of the Commodity
Exchange Act (``CEA''), and neither the Trust nor the Sponsor is
subject to regulation as a commodity pool operator or a commodity
trading adviser in connection with the Shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\59\ 15 U.S.C. 80a-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

When the Trust sells or redeems its Shares, it will do so in ``in-
kind'' transactions in large blocks of Shares (a ``Creation Basket'')
at the Trust's NAV. Authorized participants will deliver, or facilitate
the delivery of, bitcoin to the Trust's account with the Custodian in
exchange for Shares when they purchase Shares, and the Trust, through
the Custodian, will deliver bitcoin to such authorized participants
when they redeem Shares with the Trust. Authorized participants may
then offer Shares to the public at prices that depend on various
factors, including the supply and demand for Shares, the value of the
Trust's assets, and market conditions at the time of a transaction.
Shareholders who buy or sell Shares during the day from their broker
may do so at a premium or discount relative to the NAV of the Shares of
the Trust.
Investment Objective
According to the Registration Statement and as further described
below, the investment objective of the Trust is to reflect the
performance of the price of bitcoin less the expenses of the Trust's
operations. In seeking to achieve its investment objective, the Trust
will hold bitcoin.
The Trust will value its Shares daily based on the value of bitcoin
as reflected by the CoinDesk Bitcoin Price Index (XBX) (the ``Index''),
a real-time, US dollar equivalent spot rate for Bitcoin. The Index
leverages real-time prices from multiple constituent exchanges to
provide a representative spot price. Each constituent exchange is
weighted proportionally to its trailing 24-hour liquidity with
adjustments for price variance and inactivity. Given the potential for
anomalies or manipulation at individual exchanges, constituent weights
may dynamically adjust using CoinDesk Indices proprietary Constituent
Weighting Adjustment Algorithm (CWAA). The algorithm is designed to
calculate a real-time index that is an accurate and reliable reflection
of the market price of each digital asset, using multi-sourced spot
prices and dynamically reduce the weights of individual exchanges with
lower liquidity, inactivity, and higher price variance. The Index is
administered in alignment with the International Organization of
Securities Commissions (``IOSCO'') Principles for Financial Benchmarks.
The Index price is calculated using non-GAAP \60\ methodology and is
not used in the Trust's financial statements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\60\ GAAP refers to generally accepted account principles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Trust will process all creations and redemptions in-kind in
transactions with authorized participants. The Trust is not actively
managed.
Net Asset Value
The Net Asset Value (``NAV'') of the Trust is used by the Trust in
its day-to-day operations to measure the net value of the Trust's
assets. The NAV is calculated on each business day and is equal to the
aggregate value of the Trust's assets less its liabilities based on the
Index price. In determining the NAV of the Trust on any business day,
the Administrator will calculate the price of the bitcoin held by the
Trust as of 4:00 p.m. EST on such day. The Administrator will also
calculate the NAV per Share of the Trust, which equals the NAV of the
Trust divided by the number of outstanding Shares.
The Administrator will rely on the Index as the Index price to be
used when determining NAV. The methodology used to calculate the Index
price to value bitcoin in determining the net asset value of the Trust
may not be deemed consistent with U.S. GAAP. However, the Trust will
utilize a pricing source that is consistent with GAAP for the Trust's
periodic financial statements. Therefore, to the extent the methodology
used to calculate the Index is deemed not to be consistent with GAAP,
the Trust's periodic financial statements may not utilize net asset
value or NAV. The Sponsor will determine in its sole discretion the
valuation sources and policies used to

[[Page 57500]]

prepare the Trust's financial statements in accordance with GAAP.
Calculation of Net Asset Value and the Index
On each Business Day, as soon as practicable after 4:00 p.m. EST,
the Administrator evaluates the bitcoin held by the Trust as reflected
by the Index and determines the net asset value of the Trust and the
NAV. For purposes of making these calculations, a Business Day means
any day other than a day when the Exchange is closed for regular
trading.
The Index is a real-time, USD-equivalent spot rate for Bitcoin. The
Index leverages real-time prices from multiple constituent exchanges to
provide a representative spot price. Each constituent exchange is
weighted proportionally to its trailing 24-hour liquidity with
adjustments for price variance and inactivity. Given the potential for
anomalies or manipulation at individual exchanges, constituent weights
may dynamically adjust using CoinDesk Indices proprietary Constituent
Weighting Adjustment Algorithm (CWAA). The algorithm is designed to
calculate a real-time index that is an accurate and reliable reflection
of the market price of each digital asset, using multi-sourced spot
prices and dynamically reduce the weights of individual exchanges with
lower liquidity, inactivity, and higher price variance. The Index is
administered in alignment with the IOSCO Principles for Financial
Benchmarks.
If the Index is not available or the Sponsor determines, in its
sole discretion, that the Index should not be used, the Trust's
holdings may be fair valued in accordance with the policy approved by
the Sponsor.
Availability of Information
In addition to the price transparency of the Index, the Trust will
provide information regarding the Trust's bitcoin holdings as well as
additional data regarding the Trust. The Trust will provide an Intraday
Indicative Value (``IIV'') per Share updated every 15 seconds, as
calculated by the Exchange or a third-party financial data provider
during the Exchange's Regular Trading Hours (9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
E.T.). The IIV will be calculated by using the prior day's closing NAV
per Share as a base and updating that value during Regular Trading
Hours to reflect changes in the value of the Trust's bitcoin holdings
during the trading day.
The IIV disseminated during Regular Trading Hours should not be
viewed as an actual real-time update of the NAV, which will be
calculated only once at the end of each trading day. The IIV will be
widely disseminated on a per Share basis every 15 seconds during the
Exchange's Regular Trading Hours by one or more major market data
vendors. In addition, the IIV will be available through on-line
information services.
The website for the Trust, which will be publicly accessible at no
charge, will contain the following information: (a) the current NAV per
Share daily and the prior business day's NAV and the reported closing
price; (b) the BZX Official Closing Price \61\ in relation to the NAV
as of the time the NAV is calculated and a calculation of the premium
or discount of such price against such NAV; (c) data in chart form
displaying the frequency distribution of discounts and premiums of the
Official Closing Price against the NAV, within appropriate ranges for
each of the four previous calendar quarters (or for the life of the
Trust, if shorter); (d) the prospectus; and (e) other applicable
quantitative information. The Trust will also disseminate the Trust's
holdings on a daily basis on the Trust's website. The price of bitcoin
will be made available by one or more major market data vendors,
updated at least every 15 seconds during Regular Trading Hours.
Information about the Index, including key elements on how the Index is
calculated, will be publicly available at https://www.coindesk.com/indices/xbx/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\61\ As defined in Rule 11.23(a)(3), the term ``BZX Official
Closing Price'' shall mean the price disseminated to the
consolidated tape as the market center closing trade.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The NAV for the Trust will be calculated by the Administrator once
a day and will be disseminated daily to all market participants at the
same time. Quotation and last-sale information regarding the Shares
will be disseminated through the facilities of the Consolidated Tape
Association (``CTA'').
Quotation and last sale information for bitcoin is widely
disseminated through a variety of major market data vendors, including
Bloomberg and Reuters. Information relating to trading, including price
and volume information, in bitcoin is available from major market data
vendors and from the exchanges on which bitcoin are traded. Depth of
book information is also available from bitcoin exchanges. The normal
trading hours for bitcoin exchanges are 24 hours per day, 365 days per
year.
Custody of the Trust's Bitcoins
An investment in the Shares is backed by bitcoin held by the
Custodian on behalf of the Trust. The Custodian will keep custody of
all of the Trust's bitcoin, other than that which is maintained in the
Trading Balance with the Prime Broker, in accounts that are required to
be segregated from the assets held by the Custodian as principal and
the assets of its other customers (the ``Vault Balance''), with any
remainder of the Vault Balance held as part of a ``hot storage''.\62\
The Custodian will keep a substantial portion of the private keys
associated with the Trust's bitcoin in ``cold storage'' \63\ or
similarly secure technology (the ``Cold Vault Balance''). The hardware,
software, systems, and procedures of the Custodian may not be available
or cost effective for many investors to access directly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\62\ A portion of the Trust's bitcoin holdings and cash holdings
from time to time may be held with the Prime Broker, an affiliate of
the Custodian, in the Trading Balance, in connection with in-kind
creations and redemptions of Baskets and the sale of bitcoin to pay
the Sponsor's Fee and Trust expenses not assumed by the Sponsor.
These periodic holdings held in the Trading Balance with the Prime
Broker represent an omnibus claim on the Prime Broker's bitcoins
held on behalf of clients; these holdings exist across a combination
of omnibus hot wallets, omnibus cold wallets, or in accounts in the
Prime Broker's name on a trading venue (including third-party venues
and the Prime Broker's own execution venue) where the Prime Broker
executes orders to buy and sell bitcoin on behalf of its clients.
\63\ The term ``cold storage'' refers to a safeguarding method
by which the private keys corresponding to bitcoins stored on a
digital wallet are removed from any computers actively connected to
the internet. Cold storage of private keys may involve keeping such
wallet on a non-networked computer or electronic device or storing
the public key and private keys relating to the digital wallet on a
storage device (for example, a USB thumb drive) or printed medium
(for example, papyrus or paper) and deleting the digital wallet from
all computers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Creation and Redemption of Shares
According to the Registration Statement, on any business day, an
authorized participant may place an order to create one or more
baskets. Purchase orders must be placed by 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time, or
the close of regular trading on the Exchange, whichever is earlier. The
day on which an order is received is considered the purchase order
date. The total deposit of bitcoin required is an amount of bitcoin
that is in the same proportion to the total assets of the Trust, net of
accrued expenses and other liabilities, on the date the order to
purchase is properly received, as the number of Shares to be created
under the purchase order is in proportion to the total number of Shares
outstanding on the date the order is received. Each night, the Sponsor
will publish the amount of bitcoin that will be required in exchange
for each creation order. The Administrator determines the required
deposit for a

[[Page 57501]]

given day by dividing the number of bitcoin held by the Trust as of the
opening of business on that business day, adjusted for the amount of
bitcoin constituting estimated accrued but unpaid fees and expenses of
the Trust as of the opening of business on that business day, by the
quotient of the number of Shares outstanding at the opening of business
divided by the number of Shares in a Creation Unit. The procedures by
which an authorized participant can redeem one or more Creation Baskets
mirror the procedures for the creation of Creation Baskets.
Rule 14.11(e)(4)--Commodity-Based Trust Shares
The Shares will be subject to BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), which sets
forth the initial and continued listing criteria applicable to
Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The Exchange will obtain a representation
that the Trust's NAV will be calculated daily and that these values and
information about the assets of the Trust will be made available to all
market participants at the same time. The Exchange notes that, as
defined in Rule 14.11(e)(4)(C)(i), the Shares will be: (a) issued by a
trust that holds a specified commodity \64\ deposited with the trust;
(b) issued by such trust in a specified aggregate minimum number in
return for a deposit of a quantity of the underlying commodity; and (c)
when aggregated in the same specified minimum number, may be redeemed
at a holder's request by such trust which will deliver to the redeeming
holder the quantity of the underlying commodity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\64\ For purposes of Rule 14.11(e)(4), the term commodity takes
on the definition of the term as provided in the Commodity Exchange
Act. As noted above, the CFTC has opined that Bitcoin is a commodity
as defined in Section 1a(9) of the Commodity Exchange Act. See
Coinflip.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Upon termination of the Trust, the Shares will be removed from
listing. The Trustee, Delaware Trust Company, is a trust company having
substantial capital and surplus and the experience and facilities for
handling corporate trust business, as required under Rule
14.11(e)(4)(E)(iv)(a) and that no change will be made to the trustee
without prior notice to and approval of the Exchange. The Exchange also
notes that, pursuant to Rule 14.11(e)(4)(F), neither the Exchange nor
any agent of the Exchange shall have any liability for damages, claims,
losses or expenses caused by any errors, omissions or delays in
calculating or disseminating any underlying commodity value, the
current value of the underlying commodity required to be deposited to
the Trust in connection with issuance of Commodity-Based Trust Shares;
resulting from any negligent act or omission by the Exchange, or any
agent of the Exchange, or any act, condition or cause beyond the
reasonable control of the Exchange, its agent, including, but not
limited to, an act of God; fire; flood; extraordinary weather
conditions; war; insurrection; riot; strike; accident; action of
government; communications or power failure; equipment or software
malfunction; or any error, omission or delay in the reports of
transactions in an underlying commodity. Finally, as required in Rule
14.11(e)(4)(G), the Exchange notes that any registered market maker
(``Market Maker'') in the Shares must file with the Exchange in a
manner prescribed by the Exchange and keep current a list identifying
all accounts for trading in an underlying commodity, related commodity
futures or options on commodity futures, or any other related commodity
derivatives, which the registered Market Maker may have or over which
it may exercise investment discretion. No registered Market Maker shall
trade in an underlying commodity, related commodity futures or options
on commodity futures, or any other related commodity derivatives, in an
account in which a registered Market Maker, directly or indirectly,
controls trading activities, or has a direct interest in the profits or
losses thereof, which has not been reported to the Exchange as required
by this Rule. In addition to the existing obligations under Exchange
rules regarding the production of books and records (see, e.g., Rule
4.2), the registered Market Maker in Commodity-Based Trust Shares shall
make available to the Exchange such books, records or other information
pertaining to transactions by such entity or registered or non-
registered employee affiliated with such entity for its or their own
accounts for trading the underlying physical commodity, related
commodity futures or options on commodity futures, or any other related
commodity derivatives, as may be requested by the Exchange.
Trading Halts
With respect to trading halts, the Exchange may consider all
relevant factors in exercising its discretion to halt or suspend
trading in the Shares. The Exchange will halt trading in the Shares
under the conditions specified in BZX Rule 11.18. Trading may be halted
because of market conditions or for reasons that, in the view of the
Exchange, make trading in the Shares inadvisable. These may include:
(1) the extent to which trading is not occurring in the bitcoin
underlying the Shares; or (2) whether other unusual conditions or
circumstances detrimental to the maintenance of a fair and orderly
market are present. Trading in the Shares also will be subject to Rule
14.11(e)(4)(E)(ii), which sets forth circumstances under which trading
in the Shares may be halted.
Trading Rules
The Exchange deems the Shares to be equity securities, thus
rendering trading in the Shares subject to the Exchange's existing
rules governing the trading of equity securities. BZX will allow
trading in the Shares during all trading sessions on the Exchange. The
Exchange has appropriate rules to facilitate transactions in the Shares
during all trading sessions. As provided in BZX Rule 11.11(a) the
minimum price variation for quoting and entry of orders in securities
traded on the Exchange is $0.01 where the price is greater than $1.00
per share or $0.0001 where the price is less than $1.00 per share.
Surveillance
The Exchange believes that its surveillance procedures are adequate
to properly monitor the trading of the Shares on the Exchange during
all trading sessions and to deter and detect violations of Exchange
rules and the applicable federal securities laws. Trading of the Shares
through the Exchange will be subject to the Exchange's surveillance
procedures for derivative products, including Commodity-Based Trust
Shares. The issuer has represented to the Exchange that it will advise
the Exchange of any failure by the Trust or the Shares to comply with
the continued listing requirements, and, pursuant to its obligations
under Section 19(g)(1) of the Exchange Act, the Exchange will surveil
for compliance with the continued listing requirements. If the Trust or
the Shares are not in compliance with the applicable listing
requirements, the Exchange will commence delisting procedures under
Exchange Rule 14.12. The Exchange may obtain information regarding
trading in the Shares and Bitcoin Futures via ISG, from other exchanges
who are members or affiliates of the ISG, or with which the Exchange
has entered into a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement.\65\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\65\ For a list of the current members and affiliate members of
ISG, see www.isgportal.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Information Circular
Prior to the commencement of trading, the Exchange will inform its
members in an Information Circular of the special characteristics and
risks associated with trading the Shares.

[[Page 57502]]

Specifically, the Information Circular will discuss the following: (i)
the procedures for the creation and redemption of Baskets (and that the
Shares are not individually redeemable); (ii) BZX Rule 3.7, which
imposes suitability obligations on Exchange members with respect to
recommending transactions in the Shares to customers; (iii) how
information regarding the IIV and the Trust's NAV are disseminated;
(iv) the risks involved in trading the Shares outside of Regular
Trading Hours \66\ when an updated IIV will not be calculated or
publicly disseminated; (v) the requirement that members deliver a
prospectus to investors purchasing newly issued Shares prior to or
concurrently with the confirmation of a transaction; and (vi) trading
information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\66\ Regular Trading Hours is the time between 9:30 a.m. and
4:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In addition, the Information Circular will advise members, prior to
the commencement of trading, of the prospectus delivery requirements
applicable to the Shares. Members purchasing the Shares for resale to
investors will deliver a prospectus to such investors. The Information
Circular will also discuss any exemptive, no-action and interpretive
relief granted by the Commission from any rules under the Act.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \67\ in general and Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \68\ in
particular in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\67\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\68\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Commission has approved numerous series of Trust Issued
Receipts, including Commodity-Based Trust Shares, to be listed on U.S.
national securities exchanges. In order for any proposed rule change
from an exchange to be approved, the Commission must determine that,
among other things, the proposal is consistent with the requirements of
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, specifically including: (i) the requirement
that a national securities exchange's rules are designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices; \69\ and (ii) the
requirement that an exchange proposal be designed, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that
this proposal is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of
the Act and that this filing sufficiently demonstrates that the CME
Bitcoin Futures market represents a regulated market of significant
size and that, on the whole, the manipulation concerns previously
articulated by the Commission are sufficiently mitigated to the point
that they are outweighed by quantifiable investor protection issues
that would be resolved by approving this proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\69\ As the Exchange has stated in a number of other public
documents, it continues to believe that bitcoin is resistant to
price manipulation and that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices'' exist to justify dispensing with
the requisite surveillance sharing agreement. The geographically
diverse and continuous nature of bitcoin trading render it difficult
and prohibitively costly to manipulate the price of bitcoin. The
fragmentation across bitcoin platforms, the relatively slow speed of
transactions, and the capital necessary to maintain a significant
presence on each trading platform make manipulation of bitcoin
prices through continuous trading activity challenging. To the
extent that there are bitcoin exchanges engaged in or allowing wash
trading or other activity intended to manipulate the price of
bitcoin on other markets, such pricing does not normally impact
prices on other exchange because participants will generally ignore
markets with quotes that they deem non-executable. Moreover, the
linkage between the bitcoin markets and the presence of arbitrageurs
in those markets means that the manipulation of the price of bitcoin
price on any single venue would require manipulation of the global
bitcoin price in order to be effective. Arbitrageurs must have funds
distributed across multiple trading platforms in order to take
advantage of temporary price dislocations, thereby making it
unlikely that there will be strong concentration of funds on any
particular bitcoin exchange or OTC platform. As a result, the
potential for manipulation on a trading platform would require
overcoming the liquidity supply of such arbitrageurs who are
effectively eliminating any cross-market pricing differences.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(i) Designed To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and Practices
In order to meet this standard in a proposal to list and trade a
series of Commodity-Based Trust Shares, the Commission requires that an
exchange demonstrate that there is a comprehensive surveillance-sharing
agreement in place \70\ with a regulated market of significant size.
Both the Exchange and CME are members of ISG. The only remaining issue
to be addressed is whether the Bitcoin Futures market constitutes a
market of significant size, which both the Exchange and the Sponsor
believe that it does. The terms ``significant market'' and ``market of
significant size'' include a market (or group of markets) as to which:
(a) there is a reasonable likelihood that a person attempting to
manipulate the ETP would also have to trade on that market to
manipulate the ETP, so that a surveillance-sharing agreement would
assist the listing exchange in detecting and deterring misconduct; and
(b) it is unlikely that trading in the ETP would be the predominant
influence on prices in that market.\71\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\70\ As previously articulated by the Commission, ``The standard
requires such surveillance-sharing agreements since ``they provide a
necessary deterrent to manipulation because they facilitate the
availability of information needed to fully investigate a
manipulation if it were to occur.'' The Commission has emphasized
that it is essential for an exchange listing a derivative securities
product to enter into a surveillance-sharing agreement with markets
trading underlying securities for the listing exchange to have the
ability to obtain information necessary to detect, investigate, and
deter fraud and market manipulation, as well as violations of
exchange rules and applicable federal securities laws and rules. The
hallmarks of a surveillance-sharing agreement are that the agreement
provides for the sharing of information about market trading
activity, clearing activity, and customer identity; that the parties
to the agreement have reasonable ability to obtain access to and
produce requested information; and that no existing rules, laws, or
practices would impede one party to the agreement from obtaining
this information from, or producing it to, the other party.'' The
Commission has historically held that joint membership in the ISG
constitutes such a surveillance sharing agreement. See Wilshire
Phoenix Disapproval).
\71\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Commission has also recognized that the ``regulated market of
significant size'' standard is not the only means for satisfying
Section 6(b)(5) of the act, specifically providing that a listing
exchange could demonstrate that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices'' are sufficient to justify dispensing
with the requisite surveillance-sharing agreement.\72\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\72\ See Winklevoss Order at 37580. The Commission has also
specifically noted that it ``is not applying a `cannot be
manipulated' standard; instead, the Commission is examining whether
the proposal meets the requirements of the Exchange Act and,
pursuant to its Rules of Practice, places the burden on the listing
exchange to demonstrate the validity of its contentions and to
establish that the requirements of the Exchange Act have been met.''
Id. at 37582.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 57503]]

based on spot prices. Further, the Trust only allows for in-kind
creation and redemption, which, as further described below, reduces the
potential for manipulation of the Shares through manipulation of the
Trust's methodology for calculating NAV or any of its individual
constituents, again emphasizing that a potential manipulator of the
Shares would have to manipulate the entirety of the bitcoin spot
market, which is led by the Bitcoin Futures market. As such, the
Exchange believes that part (a) of the significant market test outlined
above is satisfied and that common membership in ISG between the
Exchange and CME would assist the listing exchange in detecting and
deterring misconduct in the Shares.
(b) Predominant Influence on Prices in Spot and Bitcoin Futures
The Exchange and Sponsor also believe that trading in the Shares
would not be the predominant force on prices in the Bitcoin Futures
market or spot market for a number of reasons, including the
significant volume in the Bitcoin Futures market, the size of bitcoin's
market cap, and the significant liquidity available in the spot market.
In addition to the Bitcoin Futures market data points cited above, the
spot market for bitcoin is also very liquid.
(c) Other Means To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and
Practices
As noted above, the Commission also permits a listing exchange to
demonstrate that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices'' are sufficient to justify dispensing with the
requisite surveillance-sharing agreement. The Exchange and Sponsor
believe that such conditions are present.
The Exchange is proposing to take additional steps to those
described above to supplement its ability to obtain information that
would be helpful in detecting, investigating, and deterring fraud and
market manipulation in the Commodity-Based Trust Shares. On June 21,
2023, the Exchange reached an agreement on terms with Coinbase, Inc.
(``Coinbase''), an operator of a United States-based spot trading
platform for Bitcoin that represents a substantial portion of US-based
and USD denominated Bitcoin trading,\73\ to enter into a surveillance-
sharing agreement (``Spot BTC SSA'') and executed an associated term
sheet. Based on this agreement on terms, the Exchange and Coinbase will
finalize and execute a definitive agreement that the parties expect to
be executed prior to allowing trading of the Commodity-Based Trust
Shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\73\ According to a Kaiko Research report dated June 26, 2023,
Coinbase represented roughly 50% of exchange trading volume in USD-
BTC trading on a daily basis during May 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Spot BTC SSA is expected to be a bilateral surveillance-sharing
agreement between the Exchange and Coinbase that is intended to
supplement the Exchange's market surveillance program. The Spot BTC SSA
is expected to have the hallmarks of a surveillance-sharing agreement
between two members of the ISG, which would give the Exchange
supplemental access to data regarding spot Bitcoin trades on Coinbase
where the Exchange determines it is necessary as part of its
surveillance program for the Commodity-Based Trust Shares.\74\ This
means that the Exchange expects to receive market data for orders and
trades from Coinbase, which it will utilize in surveillance of the
trading of Commodity-Based Trust Shares. In addition, the Exchange can
request further information from Coinbase related to spot bitcoin
trading activity on the Coinbase exchange platform, if the Exchange
determines that such information would be necessary to detect and
investigate potential manipulation in the trading of the Commodity-
Based Trust Shares.\75\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\74\ For additional information regarding ISG and the hallmarks
of surveillance-sharing between ISG members, see https://isgportal.org/overview.
\75\ The Exchange also notes that it already has in place ISG-
like surveillance sharing agreement with Cboe Digital Exchange, LLC
and Cboe Clear Digital, LLC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further, and consistent with prior points above, offering only in-
kind creation and redemption will also provide unique protections
against potential attempts to manipulate the price of the Shares. While
the Sponsor believes that the Index which it uses to value the Trust's
bitcoin is itself resistant to manipulation based on the methodology
further described below, the fact that creations and redemptions are
only available in-kind makes the manipulability of the Index
significantly less important. Specifically, because the Trust will not
accept cash to buy bitcoin in order to create new Shares or, barring a
forced redemption of the Trust or under other extraordinary
circumstances, be forced to sell bitcoin to pay cash for redeemed
Shares, the price that the Sponsor uses to value the Trust's bitcoin is
not particularly important. When authorized participants are creating
Shares with the Trust, they need to deliver a certain number of bitcoin
per Share (regardless of the valuation used) and when they're
redeeming, they can similarly expect to receive a certain number of
bitcoin per Share. As such, even if the price used to value the Trust's
bitcoin is manipulated (which the Sponsor believes that its methodology
is resistant to), the ratio of bitcoin per Share does not change and
the Trust will either accept (for creations) or distribute (for
redemptions) the same number of bitcoin regardless of the value. This
not only mitigates the risk associated with potential manipulation, but
also discourages and disincentivizes manipulation of the Index because
there is little financial incentive to do so.
(ii) Designed To Protect Investors and the Public Interest
The Exchange believes that the proposal is designed to protect
investors and the public interest. Over the past several years, U.S.
investor exposure to bitcoin through OTC Bitcoin Funds has grown into
the tens of billions of dollars, including through Bitcoin Futures
ETFs. With that growth, so too has grown the quantifiable investor
protection issues to U.S. investors through roll costs for Bitcoin
Futures ETFs and premium/discount volatility and management fees for
OTC Bitcoin Funds. The Exchange believes that the concerns related to
the prevention of fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices have
been sufficiently addressed to be consistent with the Act and, to the
extent that the Commission disagrees with that assertion, such concerns
are now outweighed by investor protection concerns. As such, the
Exchange believes that approving this proposal (and comparable
proposals) provides the Commission with the opportunity to allow U.S.
investors with access to bitcoin in a regulated and transparent
exchange-traded vehicle that would act to limit risk to U.S. investors
by: (i) reducing premium and discount volatility; (ii) reducing
management fees through meaningful competition; (iii) reducing risks
and costs associated with investing in Bitcoin Futures ETFs and
operating companies that are imperfect proxies for bitcoin exposure;
and (iv) providing an alternative to custodying spot bitcoin.
Commodity-Based Trust Shares
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices in that the
Shares will be listed on the Exchange pursuant to the initial and
continued listing criteria in Exchange Rule 14.11(e)(4). The Exchange
believes that its surveillance procedures are adequate to properly
monitor the trading of the Shares on the Exchange during all trading
sessions and to deter and detect violations of

[[Page 57504]]

Exchange rules and the applicable federal securities laws. Trading of
the Shares through the Exchange will be subject to the Exchange's
surveillance procedures for derivative products, including Commodity-
Based Trust Shares. The issuer has represented to the Exchange that it
will advise the Exchange of any failure by the Trust or the Shares to
comply with the continued listing requirements, and, pursuant to its
obligations under Section 19(g)(1) of the Exchange Act, the Exchange
will surveil for compliance with the continued listing requirements. If
the Trust or the Shares are not in compliance with the applicable
listing requirements, the Exchange will commence delisting procedures
under Exchange Rule 14.12. The Exchange may obtain information
regarding trading in the Shares and listed bitcoin derivatives via the
ISG, from other exchanges who are members or affiliates of the ISG, or
with which the Exchange has entered into a comprehensive surveillance
sharing agreement.
Availability of Information
The Exchange also believes that the proposal promotes market
transparency in that a large amount of information is currently
available about bitcoin and will be available regarding the Trust and
the Shares. In addition to the price transparency of the Index, the
Trust will provide information regarding the Trust's bitcoin holdings
as well as additional data regarding the Trust. The Trust will provide
an IIV per Share updated every 15 seconds, as calculated by the
Exchange or a third-party financial data provider during the Exchange's
Regular Trading Hours (9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. E.T.). The IIV will be
calculated by using the prior day's closing NAV per Share as a base and
updating that value during Regular Trading Hours to reflect changes in
the value of the Trust's bitcoin holdings during the trading day.
The IIV disseminated during Regular Trading Hours should not be
viewed as an actual real-time update of the NAV, which will be
calculated only once at the end of each trading day. The IIV will be
widely disseminated on a per Share basis every 15 seconds during the
Exchange's Regular Trading Hours by one or more major market data
vendors. In addition, the IIV will be available through on-line
information services.
The website for the Trust, which will be publicly accessible at no
charge, will contain the following information: (a) the current NAV per
Share daily and the prior business day's NAV and the reported closing
price; (b) the BZX Official Closing Price in relation to the NAV as of
the time the NAV is calculated and a calculation of the premium or
discount of such price against such NAV; (c) data in chart form
displaying the frequency distribution of discounts and premiums of the
Official Closing Price against the NAV, within appropriate ranges for
each of the four previous calendar quarters (or for the life of the
Trust, if shorter); (d) the prospectus; and (e) other applicable
quantitative information. The Trust will also disseminate the Trust's
holdings on a daily basis on the Trust's website. The price of bitcoin
will be made available by one or more major market data vendors,
updated at least every 15 seconds during Regular Trading Hours.
The NAV for the Trust will be calculated by the Administrator once
a day and will be disseminated daily to all market participants at the
same time. Quotation and last-sale information regarding the Shares
will be disseminated through the facilities of the CTA.
Quotation and last sale information for bitcoin is widely
disseminated through a variety of major market data vendors, including
Bloomberg and Reuters. Information relating to trading, including price
and volume information, in bitcoin is available from major market data
vendors and from the exchanges on which bitcoin are traded. Depth of
book information is also available from bitcoin exchanges. The normal
trading hours for bitcoin exchanges are 24 hours per day, 365 days per
year
In sum, the Exchange believes that this proposal is consistent with
the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, that this filing
sufficiently demonstrates that the CME Bitcoin Futures market
represents a regulated market of significant size, and that on the
whole the manipulation concerns previously articulated by the
Commission are sufficiently mitigated to the point that they are
outweighed by investor protection issues that would be resolved by
approving this proposal.
The Exchange believes that the proposal is, in particular, designed
to protect investors and the public interest. The investor protection
issues for U.S. investors has grown significantly over the last several
years, through roll costs for Bitcoin Futures ETFs and premium/discount
volatility and management fees for OTC Bitcoin Funds. As discussed
throughout, this growth investor protection concerns need to be
reevaluated and rebalanced with the prevention of fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices concerns that previous disapproval
orders have relied upon. Finally, the Exchange notes that in addition
to all of the arguments herein which it believes sufficiently establish
the CME Bitcoin Futures market as a regulated market of significant
size, it is logically inconsistent to find that the CME Bitcoin Futures
market is a significant market as it relates to the CME Bitcoin Futures
market, but not a significant market as it relates to the bitcoin spot
market for the numerous reasons laid out above.
For the above reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purpose of the Act. The Exchange notes that the
proposed rule change, rather will facilitate the listing and trading of
an additional exchange-traded product that will enhance competition
among both market participants and listing venues, to the benefit of
investors and the marketplace.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
A. by order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or
B. institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

[[Page 57505]]

Electronic Comments

Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-CboeBZX-2023-058 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeBZX-2023-058. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeBZX-2023-058 and should
be submitted on or before September 13, 2023.

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\76\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\76\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-18103 Filed 8-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.