Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE Arca Equities Fees and Charges, 56903-56908 [2023-17858]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 160 / Monday, August 21, 2023 / Notices
Rule 17Ad–22(e)(2) provides that
‘‘[e]ach covered clearing agency shall
establish, implement, maintain and
enforce written policies and procedures
reasonable designed to, as applicable
[. . .] provide for governance
arrangements that are clear and
transparent’’ 16 and ‘‘[s]pecify clear and
direct lines of responsibility’’.17 The
amendments to the Policy would extend
the existing responsibilities of the
Clearing House’s committees,
management and the Board with respect
to models to also apply to risk
frameworks. The amendments would
also clarify certain responsibilities of
the Board and other relevant committees
and personnel as they relate to BAU and
Non-BAU changes to risk parameters. In
ICE Clear Europe’s view, the
amendments are therefore consistent
with the requirements of Rule 17Ad–
22(e)(2).18
(B) Clearing Agency’s Statement on
Burden on Competition
ICE Clear Europe does not believe the
proposed amendments would have any
impact, or impose any burden, on
competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. The amendments
are being adopted to update and expand
the Clearing House’s Model Risk Policy,
which relate to the Clearing House’s
internal processes for model and risk
framework review, and overall risk
management. The amendments will not
change the Clearing House Rules or
Procedures and will not change the
rights or obligations of the Clearing
House or Clearing Members. ICE Clear
Europe does not believe the
amendments and adoption would affect
the costs of clearing, the ability of
market participants to access clearing,
or the market for clearing services
generally. Therefore, ICE Clear Europe
does not believe the proposed rule
change imposes any burden on
competition that is inappropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
(C) Clearing Agency’s Statement on
Comments on the Proposed Rule
Change Received From Members,
Participants or Others
Written comments relating to the
proposed amendments have not been
solicited or received by ICE Clear
Europe. ICE Clear Europe will notify the
Commission of any written comments
received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
16 17
CFR 240.17 Ad–22(e)(2)(i).
CFR 240.17 Ad–22(e)(2)(v).
18 17 CFR 240.17 Ad–22(e)(2).
17 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:17 Aug 18, 2023
Jkt 259001
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period
up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which
the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission will:
(A) by order approve or disapprove
such proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml) or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
ICEEU–2023–019 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ICEEU–2023–019. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filings
will also be available for inspection and
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56903
copying at the principal office of ICE
Clear Europe and on ICE Clear Europe’s
website at https://www.ice.com/cleareurope/regulation.
Do not include personal identifiable
information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. We may
redact in part or withhold entirely from
publication submitted material that is
obscene or subject to copyright
protection. All submissions should refer
to File Number SR–ICEEU–2023–019
and should be submitted on or before
September 11, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–17860 Filed 8–18–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–98136; File No. SR–
NYSEARCA–2023–52]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the NYSE Arca
Equities Fees and Charges
August 15, 2023.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on August 1,
2023, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or
the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
19 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\21AUN1.SGM
21AUN1
56904
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 160 / Monday, August 21, 2023 / Notices
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
NYSE Arca Equities Fees and Charges
(‘‘Fee Schedule’’) to amend the MidPoint Liquidity (‘‘MPL’’) Order pricing
tiers. The Exchange proposes to
implement the fee changes effective
August 1, 2023. The proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
website at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Fee Schedule to amend the MPL Order 3
pricing tiers. More specifically, the
Exchange proposes to adopt new MPL
Tiers 1 and 2, replace current MPL
Orders Step Up Tier 1 with MPL Tier 3,
replace current MPL Orders Step Up
Tier 2 with MPL Tier 4, and separate
current MPL Orders tier into MPL Tier
5 and MPL Tier 6. The Exchange
proposes to implement the fee changes
effective August 1, 2023.
Background
The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market. The Commission
has repeatedly expressed its preference
for competition over regulatory
intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities
markets. In Regulation NMS, the
Commission highlighted the importance
of market forces in determining prices
and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
that current regulation of the market
system ‘‘has been remarkably successful
3 A MPL Order is a limit order that is not
displayed and does not route, with a working price
at the midpoint of the Protected Best Bid/Offer. See
NYSE Arca Rule 7.31–E(d)(3).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:17 Aug 18, 2023
Jkt 259001
in promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 4
While Regulation NMS has enhanced
competition, it has also fostered a
‘‘fragmented’’ market structure where
trading in a single stock can occur
across multiple trading centers. When
multiple trading centers compete for
order flow in the same stock, the
Commission has recognized that ‘‘such
competition can lead to the
fragmentation of order flow in that
stock.’’ 5 Indeed, equity trading is
currently dispersed across 16
exchanges,6 numerous alternative
trading systems,7 and broker-dealer
internalizers and wholesalers, all
competing for order flow. Based on
publicly available information, no single
exchange currently has more than 17%
market share.8 Therefore, no exchange
possesses significant pricing power in
the execution of equity order flow. More
specifically, the Exchange currently has
less than 10% market share of executed
volume of equities trading.9
The Exchange believes that the evershifting market share among the
exchanges from month to month
demonstrates that market participants
can move order flow, or discontinue or
reduce use of certain categories of
products, based on transaction fees and
credits. Accordingly, the Exchange’s
fees are reasonably constrained by
competitive alternatives and market
participants can readily trade on
competing venues if they deem pricing
levels at those other venues to be more
favorable.
Proposed Rule Change
In response to this competitive
environment, the Exchange has already
established multiple levels of credits for
MPL Orders that allow ETP Holders to
passively interact with trading interest
on the Exchange and offer potential
price improvement to incoming
marketable orders submitted to the
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005)
(File No. S7–10–04) (Final Rule) (‘‘Regulation
NMS’’).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61358,
75 FR 3594, 3597 (January 21, 2010) (File No. S7–
02–10) (Concept Release on Equity Market
Structure).
6 See Cboe U.S. Equities Market Volume
Summary, available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/
equities/market_share.
7 See FINRA ATS Transparency Data, available at
https://otctransparency.finra.org/otctransparency/
AtsIssueData. A list of alternative trading systems
registered with the Commission is available at
https://www.sec.gov/foia/docs/atslist.htm.
8 See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Equities Market
Volume Summary, available at https://
markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/.
9 See id.
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Exchange.10 In order to provide an
incentive for ETP Holders to provide
such liquidity, the credits increase
based on increased levels of volume
directed to the Exchange. The MPL
Order pricing tiers are intended to
incentivize ETP Holders to earn
increased credits by sending greater
amounts of liquidity-providing MPL
Orders in Tapes A, B and C securities
to the Exchange.
As noted above, the Exchange
currently provides multiple levels of
credits, ranging from $0.0010 per share
to $0.0026 per share, to ETP Holders
that send MPL Orders that provide
liquidity to the Exchange. For the
current MPL Order pricing tier, the
amount of the per share credit is based
on an ETP Holder’s ADV of provided
liquidity in MPL Orders for Tape A,
Tape B and Tape C Securities combined
(‘‘MPL Adding ADV’’). For ETP Holders
that have MPL Adding ADV during a
billing month of at least 3 million
shares, the Exchange currently provides
a credit of $0.0015 per share in Tape A
securities and $0.0020 per share in Tape
B and Tape C securities. For ETP
Holders with MPL Adding ADV during
a billing month of at least 1.5 million
shares but less than 3 million shares, the
Exchange currently provides a credit of
$0.0015 per share in Tape A, Tape B
and Tape C securities. For ETP Holders
with MPL Adding ADV during a billing
month of less than 1.5 million shares,
the Exchange currently provides a credit
of $0.0010 per share in Tape A, Tape B
and Tape C securities.11
For the current MPL Orders Step Up
Tier 1 and MPL Orders Step Up Tier 2,
the amount of the per share credit is
based on an ETP Holder’s MPL Adding
ADV as compared to such orders sent in
May 2019. Under MPL Order Step Up
Tier 1, if an ETP Holder’s traded volume
against its MPL Orders that provide
liquidity is 2 million shares more than
such ETP Holder’s baseline of MPL
liquidity-providing ADV, as measured
in May 2019, the Exchange currently
provides a credit of $0.0026 per share in
Tape A, Tape B and Tape C securities.
Under MPL Orders Step Up Tier 2, if an
ETP Holder’s traded volume against its
MPL Orders that provide liquidity is 1
million shares more than such ETP
Holder’s baseline of MPL liquidity10 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No.
54511 (September 26, 2006), 71 FR 58460, 58461
(October 3, 2006) (SR–PCX–2005–53).
11 The Exchange charges a fee of $0.0030 per
share for MPL Orders in Tape A, Tape B and Tape
C Securities that remove liquidity from the
Exchange that are not designated as ‘‘Retail
Orders.’’ MPL Orders removing liquidity from the
Exchange that are designated as Retail Orders are
subject to a fee of $0.0010 per share. See Fee
Schedule.
E:\FR\FM\21AUN1.SGM
21AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 160 / Monday, August 21, 2023 / Notices
providing ADV, as measured in May
2019, the Exchange currently provides a
credit of $0.0025 per share in Tape A,
Tape B and Tape C securities.
The Exchange now proposes to adopt
new MPL Tiers 1 and 2, replace current
MPL Orders Step Up Tier 1 with
proposed MPL Tier 3, replace current
MPL Orders Step Up Tier 2 with
proposed MPL Tier 4, and separate
current MPL Orders tier into proposed
MPL Tier 5 and proposed MPL Tier 6.
The proposed changes are described
more fully below.
First, the Exchange proposes to adopt
two new MPL Order pricing tiers. Under
proposed new MPL Tier 1, the Exchange
would provide a credit of $0.0028 per
share in Tape A, Tape B and Tape C
securities to ETP Holders that have MPL
Adding ADV during a billing month of
at least 15 million shares.
Next, under proposed new MPL Tier
2, the Exchange would provide a credit
of $0.0027 per share in Tape A, Tape B
and Tape C securities to ETP Holders
that have MPL Adding ADV during a
billing month of at least 13 million
shares.
Next, the Exchange proposes to
replace current MPL Orders Step Up
56905
MPL Tier 6. Under current MPL Orders
tier, ETP Holders that have MPL Adding
ADV during a billing month of at least
3 million shares currently qualify for a
credit of $0.0015 per share in Tape A
securities and $0.0020 per share in Tape
B and Tape C securities. The Exchange
proposes the following changes to the
current pricing tier:
• Rename the tier as MPL Tier 5;
• Lower the MPL Adding ADV
requirement to qualify for the renamed
tier, from 3 million shares to 2 million
shares; and
• Increase the credit applicable to the
renamed tier in Tape A securities, from
$0.0015 per share to $0.0020 per share.
Finally, under current MPL Orders
Tier, ETP Holders that have MPL
Adding ADV during a billing month of
at least 1.5 million shares currently
qualify for a credit off $0.0015 per share
in Tape A, Tape B and Tape C
securities. The Exchange proposes to
rename the current pricing tier as MPL
Tier 6 without any change to the volume
requirement or credits payable under
the pricing tier.
With this proposed change, the MPL
Order Tiers pricing tier would appear as
follows:
Tier 1 with proposed MPL Tier 3. Under
proposed MPL Tier 3, the Exchange
would provide a credit of $0.0026 per
share in Tape A, Tape B and Tape C
securities to ETP Holders that have MPL
Adding ADV during a billing month of
at least 5 million shares. ETP Holders
may alternatively qualify for the
proposed MPL Tier 3 credit if they have
MPL Adding ADV during the billing
month of at least 2 million shares and
have MPL Adding ADV, as a percent of
Adding ADV, of at least 50%.
Next, the Exchange proposes to
replace current MPL Orders Step Up
Tier 2 with proposed MPL Tier 4. Under
proposed MPL Tier 4, the Exchange
would provide a credit of $0.0025 per
share in Tape A, Tape B and Tape C
securities to ETP Holders that have MPL
Adding ADV during a billing month of
at least 3 million shares. ETP Holders
may alternatively qualify for the
proposed MPL Tier 4 credit if they have
MPL Adding ADV during the billing
month of at least 1 million shares and
have MPL Adding ADV, as a percent of
Adding ADV, of at least 50%.
Next, the Exchange proposes to
separate current MPL Orders tier into
proposed MPL Tier 5 and proposed
MPL order tiers
Minimum requirement
Credit for MPL adding
Tier
MPL adding
ADV as
percent of
adding ADV
MPL adding ADV
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
MPL
MPL
MPL
MPL
MPL
MPL
Tier
Tier
Tier
Tier
Tier
Tier
1
2
3
4
5
6
......................................................
......................................................
......................................................
......................................................
......................................................
......................................................
The goal of the proposed rule change
is to incentivize ETP Holders with
higher per share credits to increase the
number of MPL Orders they post on the
Exchange’s Book, which would provide
additional price improvement
opportunities for incoming orders. MPL
Orders allow for additional
opportunities for passive interaction
with trading interest on the Exchange
and are designed to offer potential price
improvement to incoming marketable
orders submitted to the Exchange. The
Exchange believes that by correlating
the level of the credit to the level of
MPL Adding ADV, the Exchange’s fee
structure would incentivize ETP
Holders to submit more liquidityproviding MPL Orders to the Exchange,
thereby increasing the potential for
price improvement to incoming
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:17 Aug 18, 2023
Jkt 259001
15 Million ........................................................
13 Million ........................................................
5 Million or 2 Million .......................................
3 Million or 1 Million .......................................
2 Million ..........................................................
1.5 Million .......................................................
50
50
........................
........................
marketable orders submitted to the
Exchange.
The Exchange believes adopting
increased credits payable under the
proposed MPL Tiers 1 and 2 would
provide an incentive for ETP Holders to
send increased order flow to qualify for
these tiers. As noted above, the
Exchange operates in a competitive
environment, particularly as it relates to
attracting MPL Orders that are posted on
the Exchange’s Book. Because each of
the proposed MPL Tiers 1 and 2 pricing
tiers would require ETP Holders to
provide increased liquidity, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
higher credits would incentivize ETP
Holders to route additional liquidityproviding orders to the Exchange to
qualify for the proposed pricing tiers.
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Tape A
($0.0028)
(0.0027)
(0.0026)
(0.0025)
(0.0020)
(0.0015)
Tape B and
tape C
($0.0028)
(0.0027)
(0.0026)
(0.0025)
(0.0020)
(0.0015)
The Exchange does not know how
much order flow ETP Holders choose to
route to other exchanges or to offexchange venues. Without having a
view of ETP Holders’ activity on other
markets and off-exchange venues, the
Exchange has no way of knowing
whether the proposed new pricing tiers
would result in any ETP Holders
sending more of their liquidityproviding orders to the Exchange to
qualify for the proposed new credits.
The Exchange cannot predict with
certainty how many ETP Holders would
avail themselves of this opportunity, but
additional liquidity-providing orders
would benefit all market participants
because it would provide greater
execution opportunities on the
Exchange. The Exchange believes the
proposed higher credits would provide
E:\FR\FM\21AUN1.SGM
21AUN1
56906
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 160 / Monday, August 21, 2023 / Notices
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 14
As the Commission itself recognized,
the market for trading services in NMS
stocks has become ‘‘more fragmented
and competitive.’’ 15 Indeed, equity
trading is currently dispersed across 16
exchanges,16 numerous alternative
trading systems,17 and broker-dealer
internalizers and wholesalers, all
competing for order flow. Based on
publicly-available information, no
single exchange currently has more than
17% market share (whether including or
excluding auction volume).18 The
Exchange believes that the ever-shifting
market share among the exchanges from
month to month demonstrates that
market participants can shift order flow,
or discontinue or reduce use of certain
categories of products, in response to fee
changes. Accordingly, the Exchange’s
fees are reasonably constrained by
competitive alternatives and market
participants can readily trade on
competing venues if they deem pricing
levels at those other venues to be more
favorable.
The Exchange believes the proposed
changes to the MPL Order pricing tiers,
including the adoption of new MPL Tier
1 and MPL Tier 2 and the proposed
adoption of an alternative criteria to
qualify for proposed MPL Tier 3 and
MPL Tier 4, are reasonable because the
current credits and the increased credits
2. Statutory Basis
under the proposed MPL Tier 1 and
The Exchange believes that the
MPL Tier 2 would provide an incentive
proposed rule change is consistent with for ETP Holders to route greater
Section 6(b) of the Act,12 in general, and amounts of liquidity-providing orders to
furthers the objectives of Sections
the Exchange. As noted above, the
6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,13 in particular, Exchange operates in a highly
because it provides for the equitable
competitive environment, particularly
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
for attracting order flow that provides
other charges among its members,
liquidity on an exchange. The Exchange
issuers and other persons using its
believes it is reasonable to continue to
facilities and does not unfairly
provide the current level of credits and
discriminate between customers,
the higher credits under the proposed
issuers, brokers or dealers.
MPL Tier 1 and MPL Tier 2 for orders
The Proposed Fee Change Is Reasonable that provide liquidity if an ETP Holder
meets the qualification for such pricing
As discussed above, the Exchange
tiers.
operates in a highly fragmented and
competitive market. The Commission
14 See Regulation NMS, supra note 4, 70 FR at
37499.
has repeatedly expressed its preference
15 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808,
for competition over regulatory
84 FR 5202, 5253 (February 20, 2019) (File No. S7–
intervention in determining prices,
05–18) (Final Rule).
products, and services in the securities
16 See Cboe U.S Equities Market Volume
markets. Specifically, in Regulation
Summary, available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/
equities/market_share. See generally https://
NMS, the Commission highlighted the
www.sec.gov/fast-answers/
importance of market forces in
divisionsmarketregmrexchangesshtml.html.
determining prices and SRO revenues
17 See FINRA ATS Transparency Data, available
and, also, recognized that current
at https://otctransparency.finra.org/
regulation of the market system ‘‘has
otctransparency/AtsIssueData. A list of alternative
trading systems registered with the Commission is
been remarkably successful in
available at https://www.sec.gov/foia/docs/
promoting market competition in its
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
an incentive for ETP Holders to submit
additional MPL Orders to the Exchange
to qualify for such credits.
As noted above, the Exchange
operates in a competitive environment,
particularly as it relates to attracting
non-marketable, providing liquidity that
would be displayed on the Exchange.
The proposed rule change is designed to
incentivize ETP Holders to increase the
orders sent to the Exchange that would
provide displayed liquidity, which
would support the quality of price
discovery and transparency on the
Exchange. The Exchange believes that
by correlating the level of the credit to
the level of executed providing volume
on the Exchange, the Exchange’s fee
structure would incentivize ETP
Holders to submit more displayed,
liquidity-providing orders to the
Exchange that are likely to be executed
(i.e., are not orders that are intended to
be displayed, but are priced such that
they are not likely to be executed),
thereby increasing the potential for
incoming marketable orders submitted
to the Exchange to receive an execution.
The proposed changes are not
otherwise intended to address any other
issues, and the Exchange is not aware of
any significant problems that market
participants would have in complying
with the proposed changes.
12 15
13 15
atslist.htm.
18 See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Equities Market
Volume Summary, available at https://
markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/.
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:17 Aug 18, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Because the proposed MPL Tier 1 and
MPL Tier 2 would be new with a
requirement to submit greater amounts
of MPL Adding ADV, no ETP Holder
currently qualifies for the proposed new
pricing tiers. The Exchange believes the
proposed increased credits are
reasonable as they would provide an
additional incentive for ETP Holders to
qualify for these new tiers and direct
their order flow to the Exchange and
provide meaningful added levels of
liquidity, thereby contributing to the
depth and market quality on the
Exchange.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed alternative to qualify for MPL
Tier 3 and MPL Tier 4 by utilizing a
lower MPL adding volume requirement
coupled with a MPL Adding ADV, as a
percent of Adding ADV, of at least 50%,
is reasonable because the proposed
adoption of an alternative criteria would
provide ETP Holders with greater
flexibility to reach these tiers, thereby
creating an added incentive for ETP
Holders to bring additional order flow to
a public exchange, thereby encouraging
greater participation and liquidity.
The Exchange believes amending the
current pricing tier by adopting an
alternative requirement may encourage
those ETP Holders who could not
previously achieve the volume
requirement an incentive to increase
their order flow on the Exchange.
Increased liquidity would benefit all
investors by deepening the Exchange’s
liquidity pool, supporting the quality of
price discovery, promoting market
transparency and improving investor
protection.
On the backdrop of the competitive
environment in which the Exchange
currently operates, the proposed rule
change is a reasonable attempt by the
Exchange to increase its liquidity and
improve its market share relative to its
competitors.
The Proposed Fee Change Is An
Equitable Allocation of Credits and Fees
The Exchange believes the proposed
fee change is an equitable allocation of
its fees and credits. The Exchange
believes that the proposed changes to
the MPL Order pricing tiers, including
the adoption of increased credits under
the proposed MPL Tier 1 and MPL Tier
2 pricing tiers and the proposed
adoption of an alternative criteria to
qualify for proposed MPL Tier 3 and
MPL Tier 4, is equitable because the
magnitude of the additional credit is not
unreasonably high in comparison to the
credit paid with respect to other pricing
tiers on the Exchange, and in
comparison to the credits paid by other
exchanges for orders that provide
E:\FR\FM\21AUN1.SGM
21AUN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 160 / Monday, August 21, 2023 / Notices
midpoint liquidity. For example, ETP
Holders currently receive credits in
Tape A, Tape B and Tape C securities
that range between $0.0010 per share
and $0.0026 per share under Standard
and Tiered rates. With respect to credits
paid by the Exchange’s competitors, the
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC provides a
credit of $0.0025 per share to add nondisplayed midpoint liquidity in Tape A,
Tape B and Tape C Securities on that
market for members that add greater
than 5 million shares of midpoint
liquidity and add 8 million shares on
non-displayed liquidity.19
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change would improve market
quality for all market participants on the
Exchange and, as a consequence, attract
more liquidity to the Exchange thereby
improving market-wide quality. ETP
Holders that currently qualify for credits
associated with MPL Orders will
continue to receive credits when they
provide liquidity to the Exchange. With
the proposed new MPL Tier 1 and MPL
Tier 2, all ETP Holders would be
eligible to qualify for the higher credit
if they increase their MPL Adding ADV.
The Exchange believes that recalibrating
the credits for providing liquidity will
continue to attract order flow and
liquidity to the Exchange, thereby
providing additional price improvement
opportunities on the Exchange and
benefiting investors generally. As to
those market participants that do not
presently qualify for the credits
associated with MPL Orders, the
proposal will not adversely impact their
existing pricing or their ability to
qualify for other credits provided by the
Exchange.
current tiered requirements to send
more of their MPL Orders to the
Exchange to qualify for such credits.
The Exchange further believes it is not
unfairly discriminatory to adopt an
alternative requirement to qualify for
the current level of credits under
proposed MPL Tier 3 and MPL Tier 4
as each such credit would be provided
on an equal basis to all ETP Holders and
each such ETP Holder would have an
opportunity to qualify for the current
level of credit by utilizing a mix of MPL
Adding ADV and Adding ADV in Tape
A, Tape B and Tape C securities. The
Exchange also believes that the
proposed changes are not unfairly
discriminatory because they are
reasonably related to the value of the
Exchange’s market quality associated
with higher volume. The credits, both
existing and the proposed higher ones,
would apply equally to all ETP Holders
as each would be required to provide
liquidity in MPL Orders for Tape A,
Tape B and Tape C Securities combined
during the billing month regardless of
whether an ETP Holder currently meets
the requirement of another pricing tier.
Finally, the submission of orders to
the Exchange is optional for ETP
Holders in that they could choose
whether to submit orders to the
Exchange and, if they do, the extent of
its activity in this regard. The Exchange
believes that it is subject to significant
competitive forces, as described below
in the Exchange’s statement regarding
the burden on competition.
For the foregoing reasons, the
Exchange believes that the proposal is
consistent with the Act.
The Proposed Fee Change Is Not
Unfairly Discriminatory
The Exchange believes that the
proposal is not unfairly discriminatory.
Moreover, this proposed rule change
neither targets nor will it have a
disparate impact on any particular
category of market participant. The
Exchange believes it is not unfairly
discriminatory to provide the current
level of credits and the increased per
share credits under proposed MPL Tier
1 and MPL Tier 2 as each such credit
would be provided on an equal basis to
all ETP Holders that add liquidity by
meeting the requirements of the existing
MPL Order pricing tiers, including the
proposed MPL Tier 1 and MPL Tier 2.
The Exchange believes the proposed
increased per share credits would
incentivize ETP Holders that meet the
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
19 See Rebate to Add Non-Displayed Midpoint
Liquidity, at https://nasdaqtrader.com/
Trader.aspx?id=PriceListTrading2.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:17 Aug 18, 2023
Jkt 259001
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act,20 the Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change would not impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Instead, as
discussed above, the Exchange believes
that the proposed changes would
encourage the submission of additional
liquidity to a public exchange, thereby
promoting market depth, price
discovery and transparency and
enhancing order execution
opportunities for ETP Holders. As a
result, the Exchange believes that the
proposed change furthers the
Commission’s goal in adopting
Regulation NMS of fostering integrated
competition among orders, which
promotes ‘‘more efficient pricing of
20 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
individual stocks for all types of orders,
large and small.’’ 21
Intramarket Competition. The
proposed changes are designed to attract
additional order flow to the Exchange.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed changes to the MPL Order
pricing tiers, including the adoption of
higher credits under proposed MPL Tier
1 and MPL Tier 2, would continue to
incentivize market participants to direct
more orders to the Exchange, and in
particular, liquidity-providing MPL
Orders. Greater liquidity benefits all
market participants on the Exchange by
providing more trading opportunities.
The proposed changes to the MPL Order
pricing tier should incentivize ETP
Holders to send liquidity-providing
orders to the Exchange, thereby
contributing to robust levels of liquidity,
which would benefit all market
participants on the Exchange. The
current and proposed new credits
would be available to all similarlysituated market participants, and, as
such, the proposed changes would not
impose a disparate burden on
competition among market participants
on the Exchange.
Intermarket Competition. The
Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market
participants can readily choose to send
their orders to other exchange and offexchange venues if they deem fee levels
at those other venues to be more
favorable. As noted above, the
Exchange’s market share of intraday
trading (i.e., excluding auctions) is
currently less than 10%. In such an
environment, the Exchange must
continually review, and consider
adjusting its fees and rebates to remain
competitive with other exchanges and
with off-exchange venues. Because
competitors are free to modify their own
fees and credits in response, the
Exchange does not believe its proposed
fee change can impose any burden on
intermarket competition.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed changes could promote
competition between the Exchange and
other execution venues, including those
that currently offer similar order types
and comparable transaction pricing, by
encouraging additional orders to be sent
to the Exchange for execution.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
21 Regulation
Sfmt 4703
56907
E:\FR\FM\21AUN1.SGM
NMS, 70 FR at 37498–99.
21AUN1
56908
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 160 / Monday, August 21, 2023 / Notices
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 22 of the Act and paragraph
(f) thereunder. At any time within 60
days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
NYSEARCA–2023–52 on the subject
line.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–NYSEARCA–2023–52. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
22 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:08 Aug 18, 2023
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
offices of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–NYSEARCA–2023–52, and should
be submitted on or before September 11,
2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.23
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–17858 Filed 8–18–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #18061 and #18062;
HAWAII Disaster Number HI–00073]
Presidential Declaration of a Major
Disaster for the State of HAWAII
ACTION:
This is a Notice of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Hawaii (FEMA–
4724–DR), dated 08/10/2023.
Incident: Wildfires.
Incident Period: 08/08/2023 and
continuing.
DATES: Issued on 08/10/2023.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 10/10/2023.
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan
Application Deadline Date: 05/10/2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing and
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery &
Resilience, U.S. Small Business
Administration, 409 3rd Street SW,
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416,
(202) 205–6734.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that as a result of the
President’s major disaster declaration on
08/10/2023, applications for disaster
loans may be filed at the address listed
above or other locally announced
locations.
The following areas have been
determined to be adversely affected by
the disaster:
SUMMARY:
23 17
Jkt 259001
Small Business Administration.
Notice.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Primary Counties (Physical Damage and
Economic Injury Loans): Maui
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury
Loans Only):
Hawaii: Kalawao
The Interest Rates are:
Percent
For Physical Damage:
Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere ......................
Homeowners without Credit
Available Elsewhere ..............
Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere ......................
Businesses without Credit
Available Elsewhere ..............
Non-Profit Organizations with
Credit Available Elsewhere ...
Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere .....................................
For Economic Injury:
Businesses & Small Agricultural
Cooperatives without Credit
Available Elsewhere ..............
Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere .....................................
5.000
2.500
8.000
4.000
2.375
2.375
4.000
2.375
The number assigned to this disaster
for physical damage is 18061 5 and for
economic injury is 18062 0.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 59008)
Francisco Sa´nchez, Jr.,
Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster
Recovery & Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2023–17935 Filed 8–18–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026–09–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #18067 and #18068;
MISSISSIPPI Disaster Number MS–00154]
Presidential Declaration of a Major
Disaster for the State of MISSISSIPPI
Small Business Administration.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This is a Notice of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Mississippi
(FEMA–4727–DR), dated 08/12/2023.
Incident: Severe Storms, Straight-line
Winds, and Tornadoes.
Incident Period: 06/14/2023 through
06/19/2023.
DATES: Issued on 08/12/2023.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 10/11/2023.
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan
Application Deadline Date: 05/13/2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing and
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21AUN1.SGM
21AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 160 (Monday, August 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56903-56908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17858]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-98136; File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2023-52]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE
Arca Equities Fees and Charges
August 15, 2023.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on August 1, 2023, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or the ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 56904]]
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE Arca Equities Fees and
Charges (``Fee Schedule'') to amend the Mid-Point Liquidity (``MPL'')
Order pricing tiers. The Exchange proposes to implement the fee changes
effective August 1, 2023. The proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule to amend the MPL
Order \3\ pricing tiers. More specifically, the Exchange proposes to
adopt new MPL Tiers 1 and 2, replace current MPL Orders Step Up Tier 1
with MPL Tier 3, replace current MPL Orders Step Up Tier 2 with MPL
Tier 4, and separate current MPL Orders tier into MPL Tier 5 and MPL
Tier 6. The Exchange proposes to implement the fee changes effective
August 1, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A MPL Order is a limit order that is not displayed and does
not route, with a working price at the midpoint of the Protected
Best Bid/Offer. See NYSE Arca Rule 7.31-E(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. The
Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over
regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services
in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, the Commission
highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and
SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation of the
market system ``has been remarkably successful in promoting market
competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors
and listed companies.'' \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (File No. S7-10-04) (Final
Rule) (``Regulation NMS'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While Regulation NMS has enhanced competition, it has also fostered
a ``fragmented'' market structure where trading in a single stock can
occur across multiple trading centers. When multiple trading centers
compete for order flow in the same stock, the Commission has recognized
that ``such competition can lead to the fragmentation of order flow in
that stock.'' \5\ Indeed, equity trading is currently dispersed across
16 exchanges,\6\ numerous alternative trading systems,\7\ and broker-
dealer internalizers and wholesalers, all competing for order flow.
Based on publicly available information, no single exchange currently
has more than 17% market share.\8\ Therefore, no exchange possesses
significant pricing power in the execution of equity order flow. More
specifically, the Exchange currently has less than 10% market share of
executed volume of equities trading.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61358, 75 FR 3594,
3597 (January 21, 2010) (File No. S7-02-10) (Concept Release on
Equity Market Structure).
\6\ See Cboe U.S. Equities Market Volume Summary, available at
https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share.
\7\ See FINRA ATS Transparency Data, available at https://otctransparency.finra.org/otctransparency/AtsIssueData. A list of
alternative trading systems registered with the Commission is
available at https://www.sec.gov/foia/docs/atslist.htm.
\8\ See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Equities Market Volume Summary,
available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/.
\9\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the
exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can
move order flow, or discontinue or reduce use of certain categories of
products, based on transaction fees and credits. Accordingly, the
Exchange's fees are reasonably constrained by competitive alternatives
and market participants can readily trade on competing venues if they
deem pricing levels at those other venues to be more favorable.
Proposed Rule Change
In response to this competitive environment, the Exchange has
already established multiple levels of credits for MPL Orders that
allow ETP Holders to passively interact with trading interest on the
Exchange and offer potential price improvement to incoming marketable
orders submitted to the Exchange.\10\ In order to provide an incentive
for ETP Holders to provide such liquidity, the credits increase based
on increased levels of volume directed to the Exchange. The MPL Order
pricing tiers are intended to incentivize ETP Holders to earn increased
credits by sending greater amounts of liquidity-providing MPL Orders in
Tapes A, B and C securities to the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54511
(September 26, 2006), 71 FR 58460, 58461 (October 3, 2006) (SR-PCX-
2005-53).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted above, the Exchange currently provides multiple levels of
credits, ranging from $0.0010 per share to $0.0026 per share, to ETP
Holders that send MPL Orders that provide liquidity to the Exchange.
For the current MPL Order pricing tier, the amount of the per share
credit is based on an ETP Holder's ADV of provided liquidity in MPL
Orders for Tape A, Tape B and Tape C Securities combined (``MPL Adding
ADV''). For ETP Holders that have MPL Adding ADV during a billing month
of at least 3 million shares, the Exchange currently provides a credit
of $0.0015 per share in Tape A securities and $0.0020 per share in Tape
B and Tape C securities. For ETP Holders with MPL Adding ADV during a
billing month of at least 1.5 million shares but less than 3 million
shares, the Exchange currently provides a credit of $0.0015 per share
in Tape A, Tape B and Tape C securities. For ETP Holders with MPL
Adding ADV during a billing month of less than 1.5 million shares, the
Exchange currently provides a credit of $0.0010 per share in Tape A,
Tape B and Tape C securities.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The Exchange charges a fee of $0.0030 per share for MPL
Orders in Tape A, Tape B and Tape C Securities that remove liquidity
from the Exchange that are not designated as ``Retail Orders.'' MPL
Orders removing liquidity from the Exchange that are designated as
Retail Orders are subject to a fee of $0.0010 per share. See Fee
Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the current MPL Orders Step Up Tier 1 and MPL Orders Step Up
Tier 2, the amount of the per share credit is based on an ETP Holder's
MPL Adding ADV as compared to such orders sent in May 2019. Under MPL
Order Step Up Tier 1, if an ETP Holder's traded volume against its MPL
Orders that provide liquidity is 2 million shares more than such ETP
Holder's baseline of MPL liquidity-providing ADV, as measured in May
2019, the Exchange currently provides a credit of $0.0026 per share in
Tape A, Tape B and Tape C securities. Under MPL Orders Step Up Tier 2,
if an ETP Holder's traded volume against its MPL Orders that provide
liquidity is 1 million shares more than such ETP Holder's baseline of
MPL liquidity-
[[Page 56905]]
providing ADV, as measured in May 2019, the Exchange currently provides
a credit of $0.0025 per share in Tape A, Tape B and Tape C securities.
The Exchange now proposes to adopt new MPL Tiers 1 and 2, replace
current MPL Orders Step Up Tier 1 with proposed MPL Tier 3, replace
current MPL Orders Step Up Tier 2 with proposed MPL Tier 4, and
separate current MPL Orders tier into proposed MPL Tier 5 and proposed
MPL Tier 6. The proposed changes are described more fully below.
First, the Exchange proposes to adopt two new MPL Order pricing
tiers. Under proposed new MPL Tier 1, the Exchange would provide a
credit of $0.0028 per share in Tape A, Tape B and Tape C securities to
ETP Holders that have MPL Adding ADV during a billing month of at least
15 million shares.
Next, under proposed new MPL Tier 2, the Exchange would provide a
credit of $0.0027 per share in Tape A, Tape B and Tape C securities to
ETP Holders that have MPL Adding ADV during a billing month of at least
13 million shares.
Next, the Exchange proposes to replace current MPL Orders Step Up
Tier 1 with proposed MPL Tier 3. Under proposed MPL Tier 3, the
Exchange would provide a credit of $0.0026 per share in Tape A, Tape B
and Tape C securities to ETP Holders that have MPL Adding ADV during a
billing month of at least 5 million shares. ETP Holders may
alternatively qualify for the proposed MPL Tier 3 credit if they have
MPL Adding ADV during the billing month of at least 2 million shares
and have MPL Adding ADV, as a percent of Adding ADV, of at least 50%.
Next, the Exchange proposes to replace current MPL Orders Step Up
Tier 2 with proposed MPL Tier 4. Under proposed MPL Tier 4, the
Exchange would provide a credit of $0.0025 per share in Tape A, Tape B
and Tape C securities to ETP Holders that have MPL Adding ADV during a
billing month of at least 3 million shares. ETP Holders may
alternatively qualify for the proposed MPL Tier 4 credit if they have
MPL Adding ADV during the billing month of at least 1 million shares
and have MPL Adding ADV, as a percent of Adding ADV, of at least 50%.
Next, the Exchange proposes to separate current MPL Orders tier
into proposed MPL Tier 5 and proposed MPL Tier 6. Under current MPL
Orders tier, ETP Holders that have MPL Adding ADV during a billing
month of at least 3 million shares currently qualify for a credit of
$0.0015 per share in Tape A securities and $0.0020 per share in Tape B
and Tape C securities. The Exchange proposes the following changes to
the current pricing tier:
Rename the tier as MPL Tier 5;
Lower the MPL Adding ADV requirement to qualify for the
renamed tier, from 3 million shares to 2 million shares; and
Increase the credit applicable to the renamed tier in Tape
A securities, from $0.0015 per share to $0.0020 per share.
Finally, under current MPL Orders Tier, ETP Holders that have MPL
Adding ADV during a billing month of at least 1.5 million shares
currently qualify for a credit off $0.0015 per share in Tape A, Tape B
and Tape C securities. The Exchange proposes to rename the current
pricing tier as MPL Tier 6 without any change to the volume requirement
or credits payable under the pricing tier.
With this proposed change, the MPL Order Tiers pricing tier would
appear as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MPL order tiers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum requirement Credit for MPL adding
Tier -------------------------------------------------------------------------
MPL adding ADV
MPL adding ADV as percent of Tape A Tape B and
adding ADV tape C
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MPL Tier 1............................ 15 Million.............. .............. ($0.0028) ($0.0028)
MPL Tier 2............................ 13 Million.............. (0.0027) (0.0027)
MPL Tier 3............................ 5 Million or 2 Million.. 50 (0.0026) (0.0026)
MPL Tier 4............................ 3 Million or 1 Million.. 50 (0.0025) (0.0025)
MPL Tier 5............................ 2 Million............... .............. (0.0020) (0.0020)
MPL Tier 6............................ 1.5 Million............. .............. (0.0015) (0.0015)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The goal of the proposed rule change is to incentivize ETP Holders
with higher per share credits to increase the number of MPL Orders they
post on the Exchange's Book, which would provide additional price
improvement opportunities for incoming orders. MPL Orders allow for
additional opportunities for passive interaction with trading interest
on the Exchange and are designed to offer potential price improvement
to incoming marketable orders submitted to the Exchange. The Exchange
believes that by correlating the level of the credit to the level of
MPL Adding ADV, the Exchange's fee structure would incentivize ETP
Holders to submit more liquidity-providing MPL Orders to the Exchange,
thereby increasing the potential for price improvement to incoming
marketable orders submitted to the Exchange.
The Exchange believes adopting increased credits payable under the
proposed MPL Tiers 1 and 2 would provide an incentive for ETP Holders
to send increased order flow to qualify for these tiers. As noted
above, the Exchange operates in a competitive environment, particularly
as it relates to attracting MPL Orders that are posted on the
Exchange's Book. Because each of the proposed MPL Tiers 1 and 2 pricing
tiers would require ETP Holders to provide increased liquidity, the
Exchange believes that the proposed higher credits would incentivize
ETP Holders to route additional liquidity-providing orders to the
Exchange to qualify for the proposed pricing tiers.
The Exchange does not know how much order flow ETP Holders choose
to route to other exchanges or to off-exchange venues. Without having a
view of ETP Holders' activity on other markets and off-exchange venues,
the Exchange has no way of knowing whether the proposed new pricing
tiers would result in any ETP Holders sending more of their liquidity-
providing orders to the Exchange to qualify for the proposed new
credits. The Exchange cannot predict with certainty how many ETP
Holders would avail themselves of this opportunity, but additional
liquidity-providing orders would benefit all market participants
because it would provide greater execution opportunities on the
Exchange. The Exchange believes the proposed higher credits would
provide
[[Page 56906]]
an incentive for ETP Holders to submit additional MPL Orders to the
Exchange to qualify for such credits.
As noted above, the Exchange operates in a competitive environment,
particularly as it relates to attracting non-marketable, providing
liquidity that would be displayed on the Exchange. The proposed rule
change is designed to incentivize ETP Holders to increase the orders
sent to the Exchange that would provide displayed liquidity, which
would support the quality of price discovery and transparency on the
Exchange. The Exchange believes that by correlating the level of the
credit to the level of executed providing volume on the Exchange, the
Exchange's fee structure would incentivize ETP Holders to submit more
displayed, liquidity-providing orders to the Exchange that are likely
to be executed (i.e., are not orders that are intended to be displayed,
but are priced such that they are not likely to be executed), thereby
increasing the potential for incoming marketable orders submitted to
the Exchange to receive an execution.
The proposed changes are not otherwise intended to address any
other issues, and the Exchange is not aware of any significant problems
that market participants would have in complying with the proposed
changes.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\12\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\13\ in particular,
because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons
using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Proposed Fee Change Is Reasonable
As discussed above, the Exchange operates in a highly fragmented
and competitive market. The Commission has repeatedly expressed its
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. Specifically,
in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market
forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
that current regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably
successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that
are most important to investors and listed companies.'' \14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Regulation NMS, supra note 4, 70 FR at 37499.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As the Commission itself recognized, the market for trading
services in NMS stocks has become ``more fragmented and competitive.''
\15\ Indeed, equity trading is currently dispersed across 16
exchanges,\16\ numerous alternative trading systems,\17\ and broker-
dealer internalizers and wholesalers, all competing for order flow.
Based on publicly-available information, no single exchange currently
has more than 17% market share (whether including or excluding auction
volume).\18\ The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share
among the exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market
participants can shift order flow, or discontinue or reduce use of
certain categories of products, in response to fee changes.
Accordingly, the Exchange's fees are reasonably constrained by
competitive alternatives and market participants can readily trade on
competing venues if they deem pricing levels at those other venues to
be more favorable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808, 84 FR 5202,
5253 (February 20, 2019) (File No. S7-05-18) (Final Rule).
\16\ See Cboe U.S Equities Market Volume Summary, available at
https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share. See generally
https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/divisionsmarketregmrexchangesshtml.html.
\17\ See FINRA ATS Transparency Data, available at https://otctransparency.finra.org/otctransparency/AtsIssueData. A list of
alternative trading systems registered with the Commission is
available at https://www.sec.gov/foia/docs/atslist.htm.
\18\ See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Equities Market Volume
Summary, available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed changes to the MPL Order pricing
tiers, including the adoption of new MPL Tier 1 and MPL Tier 2 and the
proposed adoption of an alternative criteria to qualify for proposed
MPL Tier 3 and MPL Tier 4, are reasonable because the current credits
and the increased credits under the proposed MPL Tier 1 and MPL Tier 2
would provide an incentive for ETP Holders to route greater amounts of
liquidity-providing orders to the Exchange. As noted above, the
Exchange operates in a highly competitive environment, particularly for
attracting order flow that provides liquidity on an exchange. The
Exchange believes it is reasonable to continue to provide the current
level of credits and the higher credits under the proposed MPL Tier 1
and MPL Tier 2 for orders that provide liquidity if an ETP Holder meets
the qualification for such pricing tiers.
Because the proposed MPL Tier 1 and MPL Tier 2 would be new with a
requirement to submit greater amounts of MPL Adding ADV, no ETP Holder
currently qualifies for the proposed new pricing tiers. The Exchange
believes the proposed increased credits are reasonable as they would
provide an additional incentive for ETP Holders to qualify for these
new tiers and direct their order flow to the Exchange and provide
meaningful added levels of liquidity, thereby contributing to the depth
and market quality on the Exchange.
The Exchange believes that the proposed alternative to qualify for
MPL Tier 3 and MPL Tier 4 by utilizing a lower MPL adding volume
requirement coupled with a MPL Adding ADV, as a percent of Adding ADV,
of at least 50%, is reasonable because the proposed adoption of an
alternative criteria would provide ETP Holders with greater flexibility
to reach these tiers, thereby creating an added incentive for ETP
Holders to bring additional order flow to a public exchange, thereby
encouraging greater participation and liquidity.
The Exchange believes amending the current pricing tier by adopting
an alternative requirement may encourage those ETP Holders who could
not previously achieve the volume requirement an incentive to increase
their order flow on the Exchange. Increased liquidity would benefit all
investors by deepening the Exchange's liquidity pool, supporting the
quality of price discovery, promoting market transparency and improving
investor protection.
On the backdrop of the competitive environment in which the
Exchange currently operates, the proposed rule change is a reasonable
attempt by the Exchange to increase its liquidity and improve its
market share relative to its competitors.
The Proposed Fee Change Is An Equitable Allocation of Credits and Fees
The Exchange believes the proposed fee change is an equitable
allocation of its fees and credits. The Exchange believes that the
proposed changes to the MPL Order pricing tiers, including the adoption
of increased credits under the proposed MPL Tier 1 and MPL Tier 2
pricing tiers and the proposed adoption of an alternative criteria to
qualify for proposed MPL Tier 3 and MPL Tier 4, is equitable because
the magnitude of the additional credit is not unreasonably high in
comparison to the credit paid with respect to other pricing tiers on
the Exchange, and in comparison to the credits paid by other exchanges
for orders that provide
[[Page 56907]]
midpoint liquidity. For example, ETP Holders currently receive credits
in Tape A, Tape B and Tape C securities that range between $0.0010 per
share and $0.0026 per share under Standard and Tiered rates. With
respect to credits paid by the Exchange's competitors, the Nasdaq Stock
Market LLC provides a credit of $0.0025 per share to add non-displayed
midpoint liquidity in Tape A, Tape B and Tape C Securities on that
market for members that add greater than 5 million shares of midpoint
liquidity and add 8 million shares on non-displayed liquidity.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See Rebate to Add Non-Displayed Midpoint Liquidity, at
https://nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=PriceListTrading2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change would improve market
quality for all market participants on the Exchange and, as a
consequence, attract more liquidity to the Exchange thereby improving
market-wide quality. ETP Holders that currently qualify for credits
associated with MPL Orders will continue to receive credits when they
provide liquidity to the Exchange. With the proposed new MPL Tier 1 and
MPL Tier 2, all ETP Holders would be eligible to qualify for the higher
credit if they increase their MPL Adding ADV. The Exchange believes
that recalibrating the credits for providing liquidity will continue to
attract order flow and liquidity to the Exchange, thereby providing
additional price improvement opportunities on the Exchange and
benefiting investors generally. As to those market participants that do
not presently qualify for the credits associated with MPL Orders, the
proposal will not adversely impact their existing pricing or their
ability to qualify for other credits provided by the Exchange.
The Proposed Fee Change Is Not Unfairly Discriminatory
The Exchange believes that the proposal is not unfairly
discriminatory. Moreover, this proposed rule change neither targets nor
will it have a disparate impact on any particular category of market
participant. The Exchange believes it is not unfairly discriminatory to
provide the current level of credits and the increased per share
credits under proposed MPL Tier 1 and MPL Tier 2 as each such credit
would be provided on an equal basis to all ETP Holders that add
liquidity by meeting the requirements of the existing MPL Order pricing
tiers, including the proposed MPL Tier 1 and MPL Tier 2. The Exchange
believes the proposed increased per share credits would incentivize ETP
Holders that meet the current tiered requirements to send more of their
MPL Orders to the Exchange to qualify for such credits. The Exchange
further believes it is not unfairly discriminatory to adopt an
alternative requirement to qualify for the current level of credits
under proposed MPL Tier 3 and MPL Tier 4 as each such credit would be
provided on an equal basis to all ETP Holders and each such ETP Holder
would have an opportunity to qualify for the current level of credit by
utilizing a mix of MPL Adding ADV and Adding ADV in Tape A, Tape B and
Tape C securities. The Exchange also believes that the proposed changes
are not unfairly discriminatory because they are reasonably related to
the value of the Exchange's market quality associated with higher
volume. The credits, both existing and the proposed higher ones, would
apply equally to all ETP Holders as each would be required to provide
liquidity in MPL Orders for Tape A, Tape B and Tape C Securities
combined during the billing month regardless of whether an ETP Holder
currently meets the requirement of another pricing tier.
Finally, the submission of orders to the Exchange is optional for
ETP Holders in that they could choose whether to submit orders to the
Exchange and, if they do, the extent of its activity in this regard.
The Exchange believes that it is subject to significant competitive
forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement regarding the
burden on competition.
For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal
is consistent with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\20\ the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change would not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above, the Exchange believes
that the proposed changes would encourage the submission of additional
liquidity to a public exchange, thereby promoting market depth, price
discovery and transparency and enhancing order execution opportunities
for ETP Holders. As a result, the Exchange believes that the proposed
change furthers the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of
fostering integrated competition among orders, which promotes ``more
efficient pricing of individual stocks for all types of orders, large
and small.'' \21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
\21\ Regulation NMS, 70 FR at 37498-99.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intramarket Competition. The proposed changes are designed to
attract additional order flow to the Exchange. The Exchange believes
that the proposed changes to the MPL Order pricing tiers, including the
adoption of higher credits under proposed MPL Tier 1 and MPL Tier 2,
would continue to incentivize market participants to direct more orders
to the Exchange, and in particular, liquidity-providing MPL Orders.
Greater liquidity benefits all market participants on the Exchange by
providing more trading opportunities. The proposed changes to the MPL
Order pricing tier should incentivize ETP Holders to send liquidity-
providing orders to the Exchange, thereby contributing to robust levels
of liquidity, which would benefit all market participants on the
Exchange. The current and proposed new credits would be available to
all similarly-situated market participants, and, as such, the proposed
changes would not impose a disparate burden on competition among market
participants on the Exchange.
Intermarket Competition. The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily choose to
send their orders to other exchange and off-exchange venues if they
deem fee levels at those other venues to be more favorable. As noted
above, the Exchange's market share of intraday trading (i.e., excluding
auctions) is currently less than 10%. In such an environment, the
Exchange must continually review, and consider adjusting its fees and
rebates to remain competitive with other exchanges and with off-
exchange venues. Because competitors are free to modify their own fees
and credits in response, the Exchange does not believe its proposed fee
change can impose any burden on intermarket competition.
The Exchange believes that the proposed changes could promote
competition between the Exchange and other execution venues, including
those that currently offer similar order types and comparable
transaction pricing, by encouraging additional orders to be sent to the
Exchange for execution.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
[[Page 56908]]
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective upon filing pursuant
to Section 19(b)(3)(A) \22\ of the Act and paragraph (f) thereunder. At
any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-NYSEARCA-2023-52 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSEARCA-2023-52. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to file number SR-NYSEARCA-2023-52, and should be
submitted on or before September 11, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-17858 Filed 8-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P