Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022, 55665-55667 [2023-17524]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 16, 2023 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
In the Matter of: Emilie Voissem, 172
Forsyth Road, Azle, TX 76020; Order
Denying Export Privileges
On January 12, 2022, in the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District
of Florida, Emilie Voissem (‘‘Voissem’’)
was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C.
371, the International Emergency
Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701,
et seq.) (‘‘IEEPA’’) and 18 U.S.C. 554.
Specifically, Voissem was convicted of
conspiracy to violate IEEPA, exporting
and attempting to export, and smuggling
four (4) rEvo III rebreathers from the
United States to Libya without the
required license or written approval. As
a result of her conviction, the Court
sentenced her to five months in prison,
three years of supervised release and a
$300 special assessment.
Pursuant to Section 1760(e) of the
Export Control Reform Act (‘‘ECRA’’),1
the export privileges of any person who
has been convicted of certain offenses,
including, but not limited to, 18 U.S.C.
371, IEEPA and 18 U.S.C. 554, may be
denied for a period of up to ten (10)
years from the date of his/her
conviction. 50 U.S.C. 4819(e). In
addition, any Bureau of Industry and
Security (‘‘BIS’’) licenses or other
authorizations issued under ECRA, in
which the person had an interest at the
time of the conviction, may be revoked.
Id.
BIS received notice of Voissem
conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. 371,
IEEPA and 18 U.S.C. 554. As provided
in Section 766.25 of the Export
Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or
the ‘‘Regulations’’), BIS provided notice
and opportunity for Voissem to make a
written submission to BIS. 15 CFR
766.25.2 BIS has not received a written
submission from Voissem.
Based upon my review of the record
and consultations with BIS’s Office of
Exporter Services, including its
Director, and the facts available to BIS,
I have decided to deny Voissem’s export
privileges under the Regulations for a
period of seven years from the date of
Voissem’s conviction. The Office of
Exporter Services has also decided to
revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which
1 ECRA was enacted on August 13, 2018, as part
of the John S. McCain National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, and as
amended is codified at 50 U.S.C. 4801–4852.
2 The Regulations are currently codified in the
Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730
through 774 (2022).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:39 Aug 15, 2023
Jkt 259001
Voissem had an interest at the time of
her conviction.3
Accordingly, it is hereby Ordered:
First, from the date of this Order until
January 12, 2029, Emilie Voissem, with
a last known address of 172 Forsyth
Road, Azle, TX 76020, and when acting
for or on her behalf, her successors,
assigns, employees, agents or
representatives (‘‘the Denied Person’’),
may not directly or indirectly
participate in any way in any
transaction involving any commodity,
software or technology (hereinafter
collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’)
exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the
Regulations, including, but not limited
to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, license exception, or export
control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or engaging
in any other activity subject to the
Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or
from any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
Second, no person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export, reexport, or transfer (incountry) to or on behalf of the Denied
Person any item subject to the
Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
3 The Director, Office of Export Enforcement, is
the authorizing official for issuance of denial orders
pursuant to amendments to the Regulations (85 FR
73411, November 18, 2020).
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55665
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Third, pursuant to section 1760(e) of
ECRA and sections 766.23 and 766.25 of
the Regulations, any other person, firm,
corporation, or business organization
related to Voissem by ownership,
control, position of responsibility,
affiliation, or other connection in the
conduct of trade or business may also be
made subject to the provisions of this
Order in order to prevent evasion of this
Order.
Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of
the Regulations, Voissem may file an
appeal of this Order with the Under
Secretary of Commerce for Industry and
Security. The appeal must be filed
within 45 days from the date of this
Order and must comply with the
provisions of part 756 of the
Regulations.
Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be
delivered to Voissem and shall be
published in the Federal Register.
Sixth, this Order is effective
immediately and shall remain in effect
until January 12, 2029.
Issued this 10th day of August, 2023.
Jason Seltzer,
Acting Director, Office of Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2023–17543 Filed 8–15–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–883]
Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products
From the Republic of Korea: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Final
Determination of No Shipments; 2021–
2022
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
55666
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 16, 2023 / Notices
certain hot-rolled steel flat products
(hot-rolled steel) from the Republic of
Korea (Korea) were not sold at less than
normal value during the period of
review (POR), October 1, 2021, through
September 30, 2022.
DATES: Applicable August 16, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dmitry Vladimirov or Thomas Schauer,
AD/CVD Operations, Office I,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0665 or
(202) 482–0410, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 13, 2023, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
preliminary results of the 2021–2022
administrative review 1 of the
antidumping duty order on hot-rolled
steel from Korea.2 We invited interested
parties to comment on the Preliminary
Results.3 No interested party submitted
comments. Accordingly, the final results
of review remain unchanged from the
Preliminary Results. Commerce
conducted this administrative review in
accordance with section 751(a) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this Order
are hot-rolled steel from Korea. A full
description of the scope of the Order is
provided in the Preliminary Results
PDM.4
Final Determination of No Shipments
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
As noted in the Preliminary Results,
we received a no-shipments claim from
Aekyung Chemical Co., Ltd. (Aekyung),
and we preliminarily determined that
Aekyung had no shipments during the
POR.5 Following the publication of the
Preliminary Results, we received no
1 See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from
the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2021–
2022, 88 FR 38489 (June 13, 2023) (Preliminary
Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum (PDM).
2 See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from
Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the
Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the
United Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative
Antidumping Determinations for Australia, the
Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey and
Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 67962 (October 3,
2016) (Order).
3 See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from
the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2021–
2022, 88 FR 38489, 38490 (June 13, 2023).
4 See Preliminary Results PDM.
5 See Preliminary Results, 88 FR at 38489.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:39 Aug 15, 2023
Jkt 259001
comments from interested parties
regarding Aekyung, nor has any party
submitted record evidence which calls
our preliminary determination of no
shipments for this company into
question. Therefore, for the final results
of review, we continue to find that
Aekyung had no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR.
Accordingly, consistent with
Commerce’s practice, we intend to
instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to liquidate any
existing entries of merchandise
produced by Aekyung, but exported by
other parties, at the rate for the
intermediate reseller, if available, or at
the all-others rate.6
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce
has determined, and CBP shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in
accordance with the final results of this
review. Because both of the
respondents’ weighted-average dumping
margins or an importer-specific
assessment rates are zero or de minimis
in the final results of review, we intend
to instruct CBP to liquidate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.9
The final results of this administrative
review shall be the basis for the
assessment of antidumping duties on
entries of merchandise covered by the
Final Results of Review
final results of this review and for future
deposits of estimated duties, where
We determine that the following
applicable.10
weighted-average dumping margin
For entries of subject merchandise
exists for the period October 1, 2021,
during
the POR produced by either of
through September 30, 2022:
the respondents for which they did not
Weighted- know that the merchandise was
average
destined to the United States, we will
Producer/exporter
dumping
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
margin
entries at the all-others rate if there is no
(percent)
rate for the intermediate company(ies)
Hyundai Steel Company .............
0.00 involved in the transaction.11 For the
POSCO; POSCO International
companies identified in the Appendix
Corporation 7 ...........................
0.00 that were not selected for individual
Companies Not Individually Exexamination, we will instruct CBP to
amined 8 ..................................
0.00 liquidate entries without regard to
antidumping duties.
Disclosure
Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no
Because Commerce received no
earlier than 35 days after the date of
comments on the Preliminary Results,
publication of the final results of this
we have not modified our analysis and
no decision memorandum accompanies review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
this Federal Register notice. We are
Court of International Trade, the
adopting the Preliminary Results as the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
final results of this review.
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
Consequently, there are no new
time for parties to file a request for a
calculations to disclose in accordance
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
with 19 CFR 351.224(b) for these final
results of review.
within 90 days of publication).
6 See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian
Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923
(May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal
from the Russian Federation: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR
56989 (September 17, 2010).
7 We initiated this review with respect to the
following companies: POSCO and POSCO
International Corporation. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 87 FR 74404, 74407.
Commerce previously treated POSCO and POSCO
International Corporation as a single entity. See
Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the
Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019–
2020, 86 FR 59985 (October 29, 2021), and
accompanying PDM at 6–13, unchanged in Certain
Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of
Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2019–2020, 87 FR 12660
(March 7, 2022).
8 See the appendix for a full list of companies not
individually examined in this review.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication in the Federal Register of
the notice of final results of
administrative review for all shipments
of hot-rolled steel from Korea entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication as provided by section
9 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102–
03 (February 14, 2012); see also 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2).
10 See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
11 For a full discussion of this practice, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003).
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 16, 2023 / Notices
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash
deposit rate for the respondents will be
equal to the weighted-average dumping
margin established in the final results of
this administrative review; (2) for
merchandise exported by a company not
covered in this review but covered in a
prior segment of the proceeding, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published in the
completed segment for the most recent
period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review or the original
investigation but the producer is, then
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established in the completed segment
for the most recent period for the
producer of the merchandise; (4) the
cash deposit rate for all other producers
or exporters will continue to be 6.05
percent, the all-others rate established
in the less-than-fair-value
investigation.12 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping and/or countervailing
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during the POR. Failure
to comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping and/or
countervailing duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties, and/or an increase
in the amount of antidumping duties by
the amount of countervailing duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely written notification of the return
or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation subject to sanction.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Notification to Interested Parties
Commerce is issuing and publishing
the final results of this review in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act, and 351.221(b)(5).
12 See
Order, 81 FR at 67965.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:39 Aug 15, 2023
Jkt 259001
Dated: August 10, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix—List of Companies Not
Selected for Individual Examination
1. AJU Besteel Co., Ltd.
2. Ameri Source Korea
3. Chemaven Co., Ltd.
4. Cj Cheiljedang Corp.
5. Cj Global Logistics Service Inc.
6. Dongkuk Industries Co., Ltd.
7. Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd.
8. Geco Industries Co., Ltd.
9. Geumok Tech. Co., Ltd.
10. Goi Tech Industries Co., Ltd.
11. Golden State Corporation
12. Gs Global Corp.
13. Gs Holdings Corp.
14. Hanawell Co., Ltd.
15. Hanjin Gls Co., Ltd.
16. Hankook Co., Ltd.
17. HISTEEL
18. Hyosung Corporation
19. Hyosung Tnc Corporation
20. Hyundai Glovis Co., Ltd.
21. Hyundai Rb Co., Ltd.
22. Il Jin Nts Co., Ltd.
23. Inchang Electronics Co., Ltd.
24. J&K Korea Co., Ltd.
25. Jeil Industries Co., Ltd.
26. Jeil Metal Co., Ltd.
27. Jin Young Metal
28. Jun Il Co., Ltd.
29. KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd.
30. KG Steel Corporation
31. Kumkang Kind Co., Ltd.
32. Lg Electronics Inc.
33. Maxflex Corp.
34. Mitsubishi Corp. Korea
35. Mitsui Chemicals & Skc Polyurethane
36. Nexteel Co., Ltd.
37. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
38. SeAH Steel Corporation
39. Sja Inc. (Korea)
40. Solvay Silica Korea
41. Soon Ho Co., Ltd.
42. Sumitomo Corp. Korea Ltd.
43. Sungjin Precision
44. Wintec Korea Inc.
45. Wonbangtech Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2023–17524 Filed 8–15–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[Application No. 99–15A05]
Export Trade Certificate of Review
Notice of issuance of an
amended export trade certificate of
review.
ACTION:
The Secretary of Commerce,
through the Office of Trade and
Economic Analysis (OTEA), issued an
amended Export Trade Certificate of
Review (Certificate) to California
Almond Export Association, LLC
(CAEA) on June 26, 2023.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55667
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Flynn, Director, OTEA,
International Trade Administration,
(202) 482–5131 (this is not a toll-free
number) or email at etca@trade.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of
the Export Trading Company Act of
1982 (15 U.S.C. 4011–21) (‘‘the Act’’)
authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to
issue Export Trade Certificates of
Review. An Export Trade Certificate of
Review protects the holder and the
members identified in the Certificate
from State and Federal government
antitrust actions and from private treble
damage antitrust actions for the export
conduct specified in the Certificate and
carried out in compliance with its terms
and conditions. The regulations
implementing Title III are found at 15
CFR part 325. OTEA is issuing this
notice pursuant to 15 CFR 325.6(b),
which requires the Secretary of
Commerce to publish a summary of the
certification in the Federal Register.
Under Section 305(a) of the Act and 15
CFR 325.11(a), any person aggrieved by
the Secretary’s determination may,
within 30 days of the date of this notice,
bring an action in any appropriate
district court of the United States to set
aside the determination on the ground
that the determination is erroneous.
Description of Certified Conduct
CAEA’s Certificate has been amended
as follows:
1. Removed the following Member:
• Baldwin-Minkler Farms (Orland, CA)
2. Changed the names of the following
Members:
• Fair Trade Corner, Inc. (Chico, CA) is
now Farmer’s International, Inc.
(Chico, CA)
• Nutco, LLC d.b.a. Spycher Brothers
(Turlock, CA) is now Nutco, LLC
d.b.a. Spycher Brothers—Select
Harvest (Turlock, CA)
3. Corrected the name of the following
Member:
• VF Marking Corporation DBA Vann
Family Orchards (Williams, CA) is
now VF Marketing Corporation DBA
Vann Family Orchards (Williams, CA)
CAEA’s amended Certificate
Membership is as follows:
Almonds California Pride, Inc.,
Caruthers, CA
Bear Republic Nut, Chico, CA
Blue Diamond Growers, Sacramento, CA
Campos Brothers, Caruthers, CA
Chico Nut Company, Chico, CA
Del Rio Nut Company, Livingston, CA
Farmer’s International, Inc., Chico, CA
Fisher Nut Company, Modesto, CA
Hilltop Ranch, Inc., Ballico, CA
Hughson Nut, Inc., Hughson, CA
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 16, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55665-55667]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17524]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-580-883]
Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of
Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Final Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
[[Page 55666]]
certain hot-rolled steel flat products (hot-rolled steel) from the
Republic of Korea (Korea) were not sold at less than normal value
during the period of review (POR), October 1, 2021, through September
30, 2022.
DATES: Applicable August 16, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dmitry Vladimirov or Thomas Schauer,
AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0665 or (202)
482-0410, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 13, 2023, Commerce published in the Federal Register the
preliminary results of the 2021-2022 administrative review \1\ of the
antidumping duty order on hot-rolled steel from Korea.\2\ We invited
interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results.\3\ No
interested party submitted comments. Accordingly, the final results of
review remain unchanged from the Preliminary Results. Commerce
conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic
of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022, 88
FR 38489 (June 13, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
\2\ See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Australia,
Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, the Republic
of Turkey, and the United Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative
Antidumping Determinations for Australia, the Republic of Korea, and
the Republic of Turkey and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 67962
(October 3, 2016) (Order).
\3\ See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic
of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022, 88
FR 38489, 38490 (June 13, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this Order are hot-rolled steel from Korea.
A full description of the scope of the Order is provided in the
Preliminary Results PDM.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Preliminary Results PDM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Determination of No Shipments
As noted in the Preliminary Results, we received a no-shipments
claim from Aekyung Chemical Co., Ltd. (Aekyung), and we preliminarily
determined that Aekyung had no shipments during the POR.\5\ Following
the publication of the Preliminary Results, we received no comments
from interested parties regarding Aekyung, nor has any party submitted
record evidence which calls our preliminary determination of no
shipments for this company into question. Therefore, for the final
results of review, we continue to find that Aekyung had no shipments of
subject merchandise during the POR. Accordingly, consistent with
Commerce's practice, we intend to instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise
produced by Aekyung, but exported by other parties, at the rate for the
intermediate reseller, if available, or at the all-others rate.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Preliminary Results, 88 FR at 38489.
\6\ See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR
26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal from the
Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margin
exists for the period October 1, 2021, through September 30, 2022:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ We initiated this review with respect to the following
companies: POSCO and POSCO International Corporation. See Initiation
of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 87 FR
74404, 74407. Commerce previously treated POSCO and POSCO
International Corporation as a single entity. See Certain Hot-Rolled
Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020, 86 FR 59985
(October 29, 2021), and accompanying PDM at 6-13, unchanged in
Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020,
87 FR 12660 (March 7, 2022).
\8\ See the appendix for a full list of companies not
individually examined in this review.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer/exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hyundai Steel Company....................................... 0.00
POSCO; POSCO International Corporation \7\.................. 0.00
Companies Not Individually Examined \8\..................... 0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Because Commerce received no comments on the Preliminary Results,
we have not modified our analysis and no decision memorandum
accompanies this Federal Register notice. We are adopting the
Preliminary Results as the final results of this review. Consequently,
there are no new calculations to disclose in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b) for these final results of review.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b),
Commerce has determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review. Because both of the respondents'
weighted-average dumping margins or an importer-specific assessment
rates are zero or de minimis in the final results of review, we intend
to instruct CBP to liquidate entries without regard to antidumping
duties.\9\ The final results of this administrative review shall be the
basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of
merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future
deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102-03 (February 14,
2012); see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
\10\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by
either of the respondents for which they did not know that the
merchandise was destined to the United States, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate
for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\11\ For
the companies identified in the Appendix that were not selected for
individual examination, we will instruct CBP to liquidate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication in the Federal Register of the notice of final results of
administrative review for all shipments of hot-rolled steel from Korea
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the
date of publication as provided by section
[[Page 55667]]
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the respondents
will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the
final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise
exported by a company not covered in this review but covered in a prior
segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published in the completed segment for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review or the original investigation but the producer is, then the cash
deposit rate will be the rate established in the completed segment for
the most recent period for the producer of the merchandise; (4) the
cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to
be 6.05 percent, the all-others rate established in the less-than-fair-
value investigation.\12\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Order, 81 FR at 67965.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to
comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred
and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties, and/or an
increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the amount of
countervailing duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to
an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation subject
to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
Commerce is issuing and publishing the final results of this review
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: August 10, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix--List of Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination
1. AJU Besteel Co., Ltd.
2. Ameri Source Korea
3. Chemaven Co., Ltd.
4. Cj Cheiljedang Corp.
5. Cj Global Logistics Service Inc.
6. Dongkuk Industries Co., Ltd.
7. Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd.
8. Geco Industries Co., Ltd.
9. Geumok Tech. Co., Ltd.
10. Goi Tech Industries Co., Ltd.
11. Golden State Corporation
12. Gs Global Corp.
13. Gs Holdings Corp.
14. Hanawell Co., Ltd.
15. Hanjin Gls Co., Ltd.
16. Hankook Co., Ltd.
17. HISTEEL
18. Hyosung Corporation
19. Hyosung Tnc Corporation
20. Hyundai Glovis Co., Ltd.
21. Hyundai Rb Co., Ltd.
22. Il Jin Nts Co., Ltd.
23. Inchang Electronics Co., Ltd.
24. J&K Korea Co., Ltd.
25. Jeil Industries Co., Ltd.
26. Jeil Metal Co., Ltd.
27. Jin Young Metal
28. Jun Il Co., Ltd.
29. KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd.
30. KG Steel Corporation
31. Kumkang Kind Co., Ltd.
32. Lg Electronics Inc.
33. Maxflex Corp.
34. Mitsubishi Corp. Korea
35. Mitsui Chemicals & Skc Polyurethane
36. Nexteel Co., Ltd.
37. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
38. SeAH Steel Corporation
39. Sja Inc. (Korea)
40. Solvay Silica Korea
41. Soon Ho Co., Ltd.
42. Sumitomo Corp. Korea Ltd.
43. Sungjin Precision
44. Wintec Korea Inc.
45. Wonbangtech Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2023-17524 Filed 8-15-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
