Xanthan Gum From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022, 51286-51289 [2023-16582]

Download as PDF 51286 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 148 / Thursday, August 3, 2023 / Notices Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/ or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties, and/or increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the amount of the countervailing duties. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing the preliminary results of this review in accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and 777(i)(l) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: July 28, 2023. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Period of Review IV. Scope of the Order V. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments VI. Discussion of the Methodology VII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2023–16566 Filed 8–2–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–985] Xanthan Gum From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2021–2022 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that the exporters subject to this antidumping duty (AD) administrative review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value, and that two companies (Beijing Rodia Auto Sport Ltd. and Zamp Inc. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:35 Aug 02, 2023 Jkt 259001 dba Z Sports) had no shipments of subject merchandise during the period of review (POR) July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022. In addition, we are rescinding this review with respect to Shandong Hiking International Commerce Group Co., Ltd. (Shandong Hiking). Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable August 3, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reginald Anadio, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3166. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On July 1, 2022, Commerce published in the Federal Register a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the AD order on xanthan gum from the People’s Republic of China (China).1 Commerce published the Initiation Notice of this administrative review on September 6, 2022.2 For details regarding the events that occurred subsequent to the initiation of the review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.3 The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/ FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included in the appendix to this notice. On March 3, 2023, Commerce extended the deadline for these preliminary results to July 28, 2023.4 1 See Xanthan Gum from the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 78 FR 43143 (July 19, 2013) (Order); and Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review and Join Annual Inquiry List, 87 FR 39461 (July 1, 2022). 2 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 87 FR 54463 (September 6, 2022) (Initiation Notice). 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Ninth Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Xanthan Gum from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated March 3, 2023. PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Scope of the Order The product covered by the Order includes dry xanthan gum, whether or not coated or blended with other products. Xanthan gum is included in this Order regardless of physical form, including, but not limited to, solutions, slurries, dry powders of any particle size, or unground fiber. Merchandise covered by the scope of the Order is classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States at subheading 3913.90.20. This tariff classification is provided for convenience and customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope is dispositive. A full description of the scope of the Order is contained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments On September 22, 2022, Beijing Rodia Auto Sport Ltd. (Beijing Rodia) and Zamp Inc. dba Z Sports (Z Sports), on September 23, 2022, Shanghai Smart Chemicals Co. Ltd. (Shanghai Smart), and on October 6, 2022, Deosen Biochemical Ltd. and Deosen USA, Inc. (Deosen Biochemical), respectively, filed timely certifications that they had no exports, shipments, sales, or entries of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.5 Based on information obtained from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and on Beijing Rodia’s, Z Sports’, and Shanghai Smart’s no shipment certifications, Commerce preliminarily determines that Beijing Rodia, Z Sports, and Shanghai Smart had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.6 However, Commerce preliminarily determines that Deosen Biochemical had reviewable transactions during the POR.7 For additional information 5 See Beijing Rodia’s Letter, ‘‘Beijing Rodia Auto Sport Ltd. Notice of No Sales,’’ dated September 22, 2022; Z Sports’ Letter, ‘‘Zamp Inc. dba Z Sports Notice of No Sales,’’ dated September 22, 2022; Shanghai Smart’s Letter, ‘‘No Shipment Certification,’’ dated September 23, 2022; and Deosen Biochemical’s Letter, ‘‘No Shipment Certifications of Deosen Biochemical Ltd. and Deosen USA, Inc.,’’ dated October 6, 2022. 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Xanthan Gum from the People’s Republic of China (A–570–985, A–122– 985),’’ dated April 4, 2023 (Zamp Inc. dba Z Sports); see also Memorandum, ‘‘Xanthan Gum from the People’s Republic of China (A–570–985, A–122– 985),’’ dated April 4, 2023 (Beijing Rodia Auto Sport Ltd.) and Memorandum, ‘‘No Shipment Inquiry for Shanghai Smart Chemicals Co. Ltd. during the period 07/01/2021 through 06/30/2022,’’ dated June 7, 2023. 7 Id.; see also Xanthan Gum from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2017– 2018, 84 FR 26813 (June 10, 2019), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM 03AUN1 51287 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 148 / Thursday, August 3, 2023 / Notices regarding this determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Consistent with Commerce’s practice in non-market economy (NME) cases, we are not rescinding this administrative review with respect to Beijing Rodia, Z Sports, and Shanghai Smart, but intend to complete the review and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of the review.8 Partial Rescission of Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if all parties that requested a review withdraw their requests within 90 days of the publication date of the notice of initiation of the requested review in the Federal Register. On September 22, 2022, Gum Products International, Inc. (Gum Products) timely withdrew its request for administrative review of Shandong Hiking International Commerce Group Co., Ltd. (Shandong Hiking).9 Because no other party requested a review of Shandong Hiking, consistent with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce is rescinding this review, in part, with respect to Shandong Hiking. Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). We calculated export price and constructed export price in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Because China is an NME country within the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, we calculated normal value in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying these preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Separate Rates Commerce preliminarily determines that three non-individually examined companies are eligible for separate rates in this administrative review.10 The Act and Commerce’s regulations do not address the establishment of a separate rate to be applied to companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for separate-rate respondents which Commerce did not examine individually in an administrative review. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act states that the allothers rate should be calculated by averaging the weighted-average dumping margins calculated for individually-examined respondents, excluding dumping margins that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. For the preliminary results of this review, Commerce determined the estimated dumping margins for Fufeng and Meihua to be 2.91 percent and 36.92 percent, respectively. As explained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, we are preliminarily assigning a rate of 4.76 percent to the three non-examined respondents: Jianlong Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (formerly, Inner Mongolia Jianlong Biochemical Co., Ltd); Deosen Biochemical (Ordos) Ltd./Deosen Biochemical Ltd.; and CP Kelco (Shandong) Biological Company Limited, which qualify for a separate rate in this review, consistent with Commerce’s practice and section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. China-Wide Entity Under Commerce’s policy regarding the conditional review of the China- wide entity,11 the China-wide entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or Commerce selfinitiates, a review of the entity. Because no party requested a review of the China-wide entity in this review, the entity is not under review, and the entity’s rate (i.e., 154.07 percent) is not subject to change.12 Aside from Beijing Rodia, Z Sports, and Shanghai Smart, for which we preliminarily find no shipments, and Shandong Hiking, for which this review is being rescinded, Commerce considers all other companies for which a review was requested and did not demonstrate separate rate eligibility to be part of the China-wide entity.13 For these preliminary results, we consider A.H.A. International Co., Ltd., East Chemsources Ltd., Foodchem Biotech Co., Ltd., Greenhealth International Co., Ltd. (Hong Kong), Guangzhou Zio Chemical Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Yuanjia Chemical Co., Ltd., Hebei Xinhe Biochemical Co., Ltd., H&H International Forwarders Co., Nanotech Solutions SDN BHD, Powertrans Freight Systems, Inc., Qingdao Yalai Chemical Co., Ltd., Shanghai Tianjia Biochemical Co., Ltd., Shanxi Reliance Chemicals Co., Ltd., The TNN Development Ltd., The TNN Development USA Inc., Unionchem Corp. Ltd., Wanping Bio Chem Co., Ltd., and Weifang Hongyuan Chemical Co., Ltd. to be part of the China-wide entity because they did not file separate rate applications or certifications. For additional information, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Preliminary Results of Review We preliminarily determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the POR July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022: Weighted-average dumping margin (percent) Exporter ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Neimenggu Fufeng Biotechnologies Co., Ltd. (aka Inner Mongolia Fufeng Biotechnologies Co., Ltd.)/Shandong Fufeng Fermentation Co., Ltd./Xinjiang Fufeng Biotechnologies Co., Ltd ................................................................................................ Meihua Group International Trading (Hong Kong) Limited/Langfang Meihua Biotechnology Co., Ltd./Xinjiang Meihua Amino Acid Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................................................ (PDM) at 6 (citing Memorandum, ‘‘Deosen Biochemical Ltd. and Deosen Biochemical (Ordos) Ltd. Affiliation and Single Entity Status,’’ dated June 4, 2019, unchanged in Xanthan Gum from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2017–2018, 84 FR 64831 (November 25, 2019)). 8 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:35 Aug 02, 2023 Jkt 259001 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011); and the ‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section, infra. 9 See Gum Products’ Letter, ‘‘Xanthan Gum from the People’s Republic of China, A–570–985: Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated September 22, 2022. 10 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at the ‘‘Separate Rate Determination’’ section for more details. 11 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2.91 36.92 Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 12 See Order, 78 FR at 43144. 13 See Initiation Notice, 87 FR at 54464 (‘‘All firms listed below that wish to qualify for separate rate status in the administrative reviews involving NME countries must complete, as appropriate, either a separate rate application or certification, as described below.’’). E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM 03AUN1 51288 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 148 / Thursday, August 3, 2023 / Notices Weighted-average dumping margin (percent) Exporter ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Jianlong Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (formerly, Inner Mongolia Jianlong Biochemical Co., Ltd) ..................................................... Deosen Biochemical (Ordos) Ltd./Deosen Biochemical Ltd ....................................................................................................... CP Kelco (Shandong) Biological Company Limited .................................................................................................................... Disclosure and Public Comment Commerce intends to disclose to parties to the proceeding the calculations performed for these preliminary results of review within five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Interested parties may submit case briefs to Commerce no later than 30 days after the date of publication.14 Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed with Commerce no later than seven days after the date for filing case briefs.15 Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are requested to submit with each argument: (1) a statement of the issue, (2) a brief summary of the argument, and (3) a table of authorities.16 Executive summaries should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing, limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Requests for a hearing should contain: (1) the requesting party’s name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of individuals associated with the requesting party that will attend the hearing and whether any of those individuals is a foreign national; and (3) a list of the issues the party intends to discuss at the hearing. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce will announce the date and time of the hearing. Parties should confirm by telephone the date and time of the hearing two days before the scheduled hearing date. All submissions, with limited exceptions, must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by Commerce’s electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on the due date.17 14 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 19 CFR 351.309(d). 16 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 17 See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). 15 See VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:35 Aug 02, 2023 Jkt 259001 Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary information until further notice.18 Unless otherwise extended, Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised in any briefs, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results of review, Commerce will determine, and CBP shall assess, ADs on all appropriate entries covered by this review.19 Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 35 days after the publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). We will calculate importer/customerspecific assessment rates equal to the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for examined sales to a particular importer/customer to the total entered value of those sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).20 Where the respondent reported reliable entered values, Commerce intends to calculate importer/customer-specific ad valorem assessment rates by dividing the total amount of dumping calculated for all reviewed U.S. sales to the importer/customer by the total entered value of the merchandise sold to the importer/customer.21 Where the respondent did not report entered values, Commerce will calculate importer/customer-specific assessment rates by dividing the total amount of 18 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 19 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 20 We applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). 21 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 4.76 4.76 4.76 dumping calculated for all reviewed U.S. sales to the importer/customer by the total quantity of those sales. Commerce will calculate an estimated ad valorem importer/customer-specific assessment rate to determine whether the per-unit assessment rate is de minimis; however, Commerce will use the per-unit assessment rate where entered values were not reported.22 Where an importer/customer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is not zero or de minimis, Commerce will instruct CBP to collect the appropriate duties at the time of liquidation. Where either the respondent’s ad valorem weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer/customerspecific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis,23 Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to ADs. For respondents not individually examined in this administrative review that qualified for a separate rate, the assessment rate will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin assigned to the respondent in the final results of this review.24 Pursuant to Commerce’s refinement to its practice, for sales that were not reported in the U.S. sales database submitted by a respondent individually examined during this review, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate the entry of such merchandise at the dumping margin assigned to the China-wide entity.25 Additionally, where Commerce determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR, any suspended entries of subject merchandise that entered under that exporter’s CBP case number during the POR will be liquidated at the 22 Id. 23 See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments: 2014– 2015, 81 FR 29528 (May 12, 2016), and accompanying PDM, at 10–11, unchanged in Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Final Determination of No Shipments; 2014–2015, 81 FR 54042 (August 15, 2016). 25 For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). 24 See E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM 03AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 148 / Thursday, August 3, 2023 / Notices dumping margin assigned to the Chinawide entity. In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of ADs on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated ADs, where applicable. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of xanthan gum from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the notice of the final results of this administrative review in the Federal Register, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for companies granted a separate rate in the final results of this review, the cash deposit rate will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this review for the company (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then a cash deposit rate of zero will be required); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed China and non-China exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all China exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the China-wide entity, which is 154.07 percent; and (4) for all non-China exporters of subject merchandise that have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to China exporter(s) that supplied that non-China exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/ or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double ADs. Notification to Interested Parties Commerce is issuing and publishing these preliminary results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:35 Aug 02, 2023 Jkt 259001 the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4) and 351.221(b)(4). Dated: July 28, 2023. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Partial Rescission of Administrative Review V. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments VI. Single Entity Treatment VII. Discussion of Methodology VIII. Currency Conversion IX. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2023–16582 Filed 8–2–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–823–815] Oil Country Tubular Goods From Ukraine: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021–2022 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that sales of oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from Ukraine were made at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable August 3, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Page, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1398. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On July 16, 2019, Commerce published in the Federal Register the antidumping duty order on OCTG from Ukraine.1 On July 1, 2022, Commerce published in the Federal Register a notice of opportunity to request an 1 See Termination of the Suspension Agreement on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine, Rescission of Administrative Review, and Issuance of Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 33918 (July 16, 2019) (Order). PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 51289 administrative review of the Order on OCTG from Ukraine for the POR July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022.2 On September 6, 2022, based on timely requests for review,3 Commerce initiated an administrative review of the Order.4 The domestic interested parties are: Maverick Tube Corporation; Tenaris Bay City, Inc.; IPSCO Tubulars Inc.; and United States Steel Corporation. This review covers the sole mandatory respondent, Interpipe.5 On March 23, 2023, we extended the deadline for the preliminary results of this review by117 days in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).6 For details regarding the events that occurred subsequent to the initiation of the review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.7 A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included in the appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// 2 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 87 FR 39461 (July 1, 2022). 3 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated August 1, 2022; United States Steel Corporation’s Letter, ‘‘Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated August 1, 2022; and Interpipe’s Letter, ‘‘Request for Review—2021– 2022 AD Review Period,’’ dated July 29, 2022. 4 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 87 FR 54463 (September 6, 2022). 5 In the most recent administrative review of this proceeding, we treated the following companies as a single entity: Interpipe Europe S.A.; Interpipe Ukraine LLC; PJSC Interpipe Niznedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant; LLC Interpipe Niko Tube (collectively, Interpipe), and these companies accounted for all entries of the subject merchandise during the POR, making Interpipe the sole mandatory respondent. See Oil Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020– 2021, 87 FR 57176 (September 19, 2022), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at ‘‘Affiliation and Collapsing,’’ unchanged in Oil Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020– 2021, 88 FR 17521 (March 23, 2023), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum; and Memorandum, ‘‘Release of U.S. Customs and Border Protection Entry Data for Respondent Selection,’’ dated September 15, 2022. 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated March 23, 2023. 7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of the 2021–2022 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Oil Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM 03AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 148 (Thursday, August 3, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51286-51289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-16582]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-985]


Xanthan Gum From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary 
Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial 
Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and 
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 
determines that the exporters subject to this antidumping duty (AD) 
administrative review made sales of subject merchandise at less than 
normal value, and that two companies (Beijing Rodia Auto Sport Ltd. and 
Zamp Inc. dba Z Sports) had no shipments of subject merchandise during 
the period of review (POR) July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022. In 
addition, we are rescinding this review with respect to Shandong Hiking 
International Commerce Group Co., Ltd. (Shandong Hiking). Interested 
parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.

DATES: Applicable August 3, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reginald Anadio, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3166.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 1, 2022, Commerce published in the Federal Register a 
notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the AD 
order on xanthan gum from the People's Republic of China (China).\1\ 
Commerce published the Initiation Notice of this administrative review 
on September 6, 2022.\2\ For details regarding the events that occurred 
subsequent to the initiation of the review, see the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum.\3\ The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public 
document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list of topics 
discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included in the 
appendix to this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Xanthan Gum from the People's Republic of China: Amended 
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping 
Duty Order, 78 FR 43143 (July 19, 2013) (Order); and Antidumping or 
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; 
Opportunity to Request Administrative Review and Join Annual Inquiry 
List, 87 FR 39461 (July 1, 2022).
    \2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 87 FR 54463 (September 6, 2022) (Initiation 
Notice).
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary 
Results of the Ninth Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 
Xanthan Gum from the People's Republic of China,'' dated 
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 3, 2023, Commerce extended the deadline for these 
preliminary results to July 28, 2023.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated March 3, 
2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The product covered by the Order includes dry xanthan gum, whether 
or not coated or blended with other products. Xanthan gum is included 
in this Order regardless of physical form, including, but not limited 
to, solutions, slurries, dry powders of any particle size, or unground 
fiber. Merchandise covered by the scope of the Order is classified in 
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States at subheading 
3913.90.20. This tariff classification is provided for convenience and 
customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope is 
dispositive.
    A full description of the scope of the Order is contained in the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments

    On September 22, 2022, Beijing Rodia Auto Sport Ltd. (Beijing 
Rodia) and Zamp Inc. dba Z Sports (Z Sports), on September 23, 2022, 
Shanghai Smart Chemicals Co. Ltd. (Shanghai Smart), and on October 6, 
2022, Deosen Biochemical Ltd. and Deosen USA, Inc. (Deosen 
Biochemical), respectively, filed timely certifications that they had 
no exports, shipments, sales, or entries of subject merchandise to the 
United States during the POR.\5\ Based on information obtained from 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and on Beijing Rodia's, Z 
Sports', and Shanghai Smart's no shipment certifications, Commerce 
preliminarily determines that Beijing Rodia, Z Sports, and Shanghai 
Smart had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Beijing Rodia's Letter, ``Beijing Rodia Auto Sport Ltd. 
Notice of No Sales,'' dated September 22, 2022; Z Sports' Letter, 
``Zamp Inc. dba Z Sports Notice of No Sales,'' dated September 22, 
2022; Shanghai Smart's Letter, ``No Shipment Certification,'' dated 
September 23, 2022; and Deosen Biochemical's Letter, ``No Shipment 
Certifications of Deosen Biochemical Ltd. and Deosen USA, Inc.,'' 
dated October 6, 2022.
    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Xanthan Gum from the People's Republic of 
China (A-570-985, A-122-985),'' dated April 4, 2023 (Zamp Inc. dba Z 
Sports); see also Memorandum, ``Xanthan Gum from the People's 
Republic of China (A-570-985, A-122-985),'' dated April 4, 2023 
(Beijing Rodia Auto Sport Ltd.) and Memorandum, ``No Shipment 
Inquiry for Shanghai Smart Chemicals Co. Ltd. during the period 07/
01/2021 through 06/30/2022,'' dated June 7, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    However, Commerce preliminarily determines that Deosen Biochemical 
had reviewable transactions during the POR.\7\ For additional 
information

[[Page 51287]]

regarding this determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Id.; see also Xanthan Gum from the People's Republic of 
China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2017-2018, 84 
FR 26813 (June 10, 2019), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum (PDM) at 6 (citing Memorandum, ``Deosen Biochemical Ltd. 
and Deosen Biochemical (Ordos) Ltd. Affiliation and Single Entity 
Status,'' dated June 4, 2019, unchanged in Xanthan Gum from the 
People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2017-
2018, 84 FR 64831 (November 25, 2019)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with Commerce's practice in non-market economy (NME) 
cases, we are not rescinding this administrative review with respect to 
Beijing Rodia, Z Sports, and Shanghai Smart, but intend to complete the 
review and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final 
results of the review.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment 
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011); and the 
``Assessment Rates'' section, infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Partial Rescission of Administrative Review

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an 
administrative review, in whole or in part, if all parties that 
requested a review withdraw their requests within 90 days of the 
publication date of the notice of initiation of the requested review in 
the Federal Register. On September 22, 2022, Gum Products 
International, Inc. (Gum Products) timely withdrew its request for 
administrative review of Shandong Hiking International Commerce Group 
Co., Ltd. (Shandong Hiking).\9\ Because no other party requested a 
review of Shandong Hiking, consistent with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 
Commerce is rescinding this review, in part, with respect to Shandong 
Hiking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Gum Products' Letter, ``Xanthan Gum from the People's 
Republic of China, A-570-985: Withdrawal of Request for 
Administrative Review,'' dated September 22, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). We 
calculated export price and constructed export price in accordance with 
section 772 of the Act. Because China is an NME country within the 
meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, we calculated normal value in 
accordance with section 773(c) of the Act. For a full description of 
the methodology underlying these preliminary results, see the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

Separate Rates

    Commerce preliminarily determines that three non-individually 
examined companies are eligible for separate rates in this 
administrative review.\10\ The Act and Commerce's regulations do not 
address the establishment of a separate rate to be applied to companies 
not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits its 
examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) 
of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, 
which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an 
investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for separate-rate 
respondents which Commerce did not examine individually in an 
administrative review. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act states that the 
all-others rate should be calculated by averaging the weighted-average 
dumping margins calculated for individually-examined respondents, 
excluding dumping margins that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely 
on facts available. For the preliminary results of this review, 
Commerce determined the estimated dumping margins for Fufeng and Meihua 
to be 2.91 percent and 36.92 percent, respectively. As explained in the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum, we are preliminarily assigning a rate 
of 4.76 percent to the three non-examined respondents: Jianlong 
Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (formerly, Inner Mongolia Jianlong Biochemical 
Co., Ltd); Deosen Biochemical (Ordos) Ltd./Deosen Biochemical Ltd.; and 
CP Kelco (Shandong) Biological Company Limited, which qualify for a 
separate rate in this review, consistent with Commerce's practice and 
section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at the ``Separate Rate 
Determination'' section for more details.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

China-Wide Entity

    Under Commerce's policy regarding the conditional review of the 
China-wide entity,\11\ the China-wide entity will not be under review 
unless a party specifically requests, or Commerce self-initiates, a 
review of the entity. Because no party requested a review of the China-
wide entity in this review, the entity is not under review, and the 
entity's rate (i.e., 154.07 percent) is not subject to change.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty 
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity 
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
    \12\ See Order, 78 FR at 43144.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Aside from Beijing Rodia, Z Sports, and Shanghai Smart, for which 
we preliminarily find no shipments, and Shandong Hiking, for which this 
review is being rescinded, Commerce considers all other companies for 
which a review was requested and did not demonstrate separate rate 
eligibility to be part of the China-wide entity.\13\ For these 
preliminary results, we consider A.H.A. International Co., Ltd., East 
Chemsources Ltd., Foodchem Biotech Co., Ltd., Greenhealth International 
Co., Ltd. (Hong Kong), Guangzhou Zio Chemical Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 
Yuanjia Chemical Co., Ltd., Hebei Xinhe Biochemical Co., Ltd., H&H 
International Forwarders Co., Nanotech Solutions SDN BHD, Powertrans 
Freight Systems, Inc., Qingdao Yalai Chemical Co., Ltd., Shanghai 
Tianjia Biochemical Co., Ltd., Shanxi Reliance Chemicals Co., Ltd., The 
TNN Development Ltd., The TNN Development USA Inc., Unionchem Corp. 
Ltd., Wanping Bio Chem Co., Ltd., and Weifang Hongyuan Chemical Co., 
Ltd. to be part of the China-wide entity because they did not file 
separate rate applications or certifications. For additional 
information, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Initiation Notice, 87 FR at 54464 (``All firms listed 
below that wish to qualify for separate rate status in the 
administrative reviews involving NME countries must complete, as 
appropriate, either a separate rate application or certification, as 
described below.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of Review

    We preliminarily determine that the following weighted-average 
dumping margins exist for the POR July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Weighted-average
                      Exporter                          dumping margin
                                                           (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neimenggu Fufeng Biotechnologies Co., Ltd. (aka                     2.91
 Inner Mongolia Fufeng Biotechnologies Co., Ltd.)/
 Shandong Fufeng Fermentation Co., Ltd./Xinjiang
 Fufeng Biotechnologies Co., Ltd....................
Meihua Group International Trading (Hong Kong)                     36.92
 Limited/Langfang Meihua Biotechnology Co., Ltd./
 Xinjiang Meihua Amino Acid Co., Ltd................

[[Page 51288]]

 
Jianlong Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (formerly, Inner                   4.76
 Mongolia Jianlong Biochemical Co., Ltd)............
Deosen Biochemical (Ordos) Ltd./Deosen Biochemical                  4.76
 Ltd................................................
CP Kelco (Shandong) Biological Company Limited......                4.76
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

    Commerce intends to disclose to parties to the proceeding the 
calculations performed for these preliminary results of review within 
five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal 
Register in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Interested parties may 
submit case briefs to Commerce no later than 30 days after the date of 
publication.\14\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case 
briefs, may be filed with Commerce no later than seven days after the 
date for filing case briefs.\15\ Parties who submit case briefs or 
rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are requested to submit with each 
argument: (1) a statement of the issue, (2) a brief summary of the 
argument, and (3) a table of authorities.\16\ Executive summaries 
should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
    \15\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
    \16\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing, limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal 
briefs, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days 
after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. 
Requests for a hearing should contain: (1) the requesting party's name, 
address, and telephone number; (2) the number of individuals associated 
with the requesting party that will attend the hearing and whether any 
of those individuals is a foreign national; and (3) a list of the 
issues the party intends to discuss at the hearing. If a request for a 
hearing is made, Commerce will announce the date and time of the 
hearing. Parties should confirm by telephone the date and time of the 
hearing two days before the scheduled hearing date.
    All submissions, with limited exceptions, must be filed 
electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be 
received successfully in its entirety by Commerce's electronic records 
system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on the due date.\17\ 
Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements 
for serving documents containing business proprietary information until 
further notice.\18\ Unless otherwise extended, Commerce intends to 
issue the final results of this administrative review, which will 
include the results of its analysis of issues raised in any briefs, 
within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results in the 
Federal Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements).
    \18\ See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements 
Due to COVID-19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 
10, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Upon issuance of the final results of review, Commerce will 
determine, and CBP shall assess, ADs on all appropriate entries covered 
by this review.\19\ Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment 
instructions to CBP 35 days after the publication of the final results 
of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at 
the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will 
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties 
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 
90 days of publication).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We will calculate importer/customer-specific assessment rates equal 
to the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for examined 
sales to a particular importer/customer to the total entered value of 
those sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\20\ Where the 
respondent reported reliable entered values, Commerce intends to 
calculate importer/customer-specific ad valorem assessment rates by 
dividing the total amount of dumping calculated for all reviewed U.S. 
sales to the importer/customer by the total entered value of the 
merchandise sold to the importer/customer.\21\ Where the respondent did 
not report entered values, Commerce will calculate importer/customer-
specific assessment rates by dividing the total amount of dumping 
calculated for all reviewed U.S. sales to the importer/customer by the 
total quantity of those sales. Commerce will calculate an estimated ad 
valorem importer/customer-specific assessment rate to determine whether 
the per-unit assessment rate is de minimis; however, Commerce will use 
the per-unit assessment rate where entered values were not 
reported.\22\ Where an importer/customer-specific ad valorem assessment 
rate is not zero or de minimis, Commerce will instruct CBP to collect 
the appropriate duties at the time of liquidation. Where either the 
respondent's ad valorem weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de 
minimis, or an importer/customer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is 
zero or de minimis,\23\ Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate the 
appropriate entries without regard to ADs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ We applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted 
in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average 
Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
    \21\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    \22\ Id.
    \23\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For respondents not individually examined in this administrative 
review that qualified for a separate rate, the assessment rate will be 
equal to the weighted-average dumping margin assigned to the respondent 
in the final results of this review.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic 
of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments: 2014-2015, 81 
FR 29528 (May 12, 2016), and accompanying PDM, at 10-11, unchanged 
in Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Final 
Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015, 81 FR 54042 (August 15, 
2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Commerce's refinement to its practice, for sales that 
were not reported in the U.S. sales database submitted by a respondent 
individually examined during this review, Commerce will instruct CBP to 
liquidate the entry of such merchandise at the dumping margin assigned 
to the China-wide entity.\25\ Additionally, where Commerce determines 
that an exporter under review had no shipments of subject merchandise 
to the United States during the POR, any suspended entries of subject 
merchandise that entered under that exporter's CBP case number during 
the POR will be liquidated at the

[[Page 51289]]

dumping margin assigned to the China-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market 
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final 
results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of ADs on 
entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and 
for future deposits of estimated ADs, where applicable.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of xanthan gum from China entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the 
notice of the final results of this administrative review in the 
Federal Register, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: 
(1) for companies granted a separate rate in the final results of this 
review, the cash deposit rate will be equal to the weighted-average 
dumping margin established in the final results of this review for the 
company (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then a cash deposit 
rate of zero will be required); (2) for previously investigated or 
reviewed China and non-China exporters not listed above that received a 
separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit 
rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for 
all China exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to 
be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate 
for the China-wide entity, which is 154.07 percent; and (4) for all 
non-China exporters of subject merchandise that have not received their 
own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to China 
exporter(s) that supplied that non-China exporter. These deposit 
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of 
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties 
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. 
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's 
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing 
duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double ADs.

Notification to Interested Parties

    Commerce is issuing and publishing these preliminary results in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.213(d)(4) and 351.221(b)(4).

    Dated: July 28, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Partial Rescission of Administrative Review
V. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
VI. Single Entity Treatment
VII. Discussion of Methodology
VIII. Currency Conversion
IX. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2023-16582 Filed 8-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.