Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks From India: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 48437-48438 [2023-15948]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 143 / Thursday, July 27, 2023 / Notices
cash deposit rate for the companies
listed above will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this
review (except, if that rate is de minimis
within the meaning of 19 CFR
351.106(c)(1), then the cash deposit rate
will be zero); (2) for producers or
exporters not covered in this review but
covered in a prior segment of the
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recentlycompleted segment of this proceeding in
which they were reviewed; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review or a prior segment of the
proceeding but the producer is, then the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding
for the producer of the merchandise;
and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
producers or exporters will continue to
be 17.06 percent, the all-others rate
established in the less-than-fair-value
investigation.17 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in
Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
preliminary results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act,
and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2) and
351.221(b)(4).
Dated: July 20, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Methodology
V. Currency Conversion
VI. Recommendation
17 See
Order, 86 FR at 38012.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Jul 26, 2023
Jkt 259001
Appendix II
List of Companies Not Selected for
Individual Examination
1. Deestone Corporation Ltd./Deestone
Corporation Public Company Limited
2. General Rubber (Thailand) Co., Ltd.
3. LLIT (Thailand) Co., Ltd.
4. Maxxis International (Thailand) Co., Ltd.
5. Otani Radial Company Limited
6. Prinx Chengshan Tire (Thailand) Co., Ltd.
7. Sanpo (Thailand) Co., Ltd.
8. Zhongce Rubber (Thailand) Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2023–15855 Filed 7–26–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–533–894]
Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks From
India: Final Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review; 2020–
2021
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
countervailable subsidies were provided
to Bharat Forge Limited (Bharat Forge),
a producer and exporter of forged steel
fluid end blocks (fluid end blocks) from
India during the period of review (POR),
May 26, 2020, through December 31,
2021.
DATES: Applicable July 27, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicholas Czajkowski, AD/CVD
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–1395
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On February 7, 2023, Commerce
published the preliminary results of this
administrative review in the Federal
Register.1 This review covers one
mandatory respondent, Bharat Forge.
From April 3 through April 7, 2023, we
conducted an onsite verification of
Bharat Forge’s questionnaire responses.
On April 25, 2023, we released the
verification report and invited
interested parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results.2 Between May 8
1 See Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks from India:
Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2020–2021, 88 FR 7943
(March 3, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Verification of the
Questionnaire Responses of Bharat Forge Limited,’’
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48437
and 12, 2023, Bharat Forge, the
Government of India (GOI), and the
petitioners 3 submitted timely-filed case
briefs.4 On May 19, Bharat Forge and
the petitioners each submitted timelyfiled rebuttal briefs.5 On June 5, 2023,
Commerce extended the deadline for the
final results of this administrative
review to July 20, 2023.6 For a complete
description of the events that occurred
subsequent to the Preliminary Results,
see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.7
Scope of the Order 8
The products covered by the scope of
the Order are fluid end blocks. A full
description of the scope of the Order is
contained in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised by the interested
parties in their case and rebuttal briefs
are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum and are listed in the
appendix to this notice. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://access.trade.gov/public/
FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of comments
from interested parties and the evidence
on the record, we revised the
dated April 25, 2023; see also Memorandum,
‘‘Briefing Schedule,’’ dated May 1, 2023.
3 The petitioners are Ellwood City Forge
Company, Ellwood Quality Steels Company,
Ellwood National Steel Company, and A. Finkl &
Sons.
4 See Bharat Forge’s Letter, ‘‘Case brief,’’ dated
May 12, 2023; GOI’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief,’’ dated May
8, 2022; and Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Case Brief,’’ dated
May 12, 2023.
5 See Bharat Forge’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief,’’
dated May 19, 2023; and Petitioners’ Letter,
‘‘Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated May 19, 2023.
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline,’’
dated June 5, 2023.
7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of
Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks from India; 2020–
2021,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
8 See Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks from the
People’s Republic of China, the Federal Republic of
Germany, India, and Italy: Countervailing Duty
Orders, and Amended Final Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination for the People’s
Republic of China, 86 FR 7535 (January 29, 2021)
(Order).
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
48438
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 143 / Thursday, July 27, 2023 / Notices
calculation of the net countervailable
subsidy rates for Bharat Forge. For a
discussion of the issues, see the Issues
and Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For
including adverse facts available,
pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of
the Act, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Final Results of Administrative Review
We determine that the net
countervailable subsidy rate for the
period May 26, 2020, through December
31, 2021, to be as follows:
Company
Subsidy rate
(percent ad
valorem) 2020
Subsidy rate
(percent ad
valorem) 2021
Bharat Forge ............................................................................................................................................................
2.78
3.95
Cash Deposit Requirements
In accordance with section 751(a)(1)
of the Act, Commerce also intends to
instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to collect cash deposits
of estimated countervailing duties in the
amounts shown above for the abovelisted companies with regard to
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication of these final results of
review. For all non-reviewed firms, we
will instruct CBP to continue to collect
cash deposits of estimated
countervailing duties at the all-others
rate or the most recent company-specific
rate applicable to the company, as
appropriate. These cash deposit
requirements, effective upon
publication of these final results, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
each of the subsidy programs found to
be countervailable, we find that there is
a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided
financial contribution that gives rise to
a benefit to the recipient, and that the
subsidy is specific.9 For a complete
description of the methodology
underlying all of Commerce’s
conclusions, including our reliance, in
part, on facts otherwise available,
Assessment Requirements
In accordance with section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(2), Commerce has
determined, and CBP shall assess,
countervailing duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review, for the
above-listed companies at the applicable
ad valorem assessment rates listed.
Commerce intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35
days after publication of the final results
of this review in the Federal Register.
If a timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
days after the date of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order,
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
The final results are issued and
published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: July 20, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose
calculations and analysis performed for
the final results of review within five
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Subsidies Valuation Information
V. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and
Application of Adverse Inferences
VI. Analysis of Programs
VII. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether the Duty Drawback
(DDB) Scheme Is Countervailable
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should
Revise Its DDB Benefit Calculation
Comment 3: Whether the Remission of
Duties and Taxes on Export Products
(RODTEP) Program Is Countervailable
Comment 4: Whether Bharat Forge’s Export
Promotion of Capital Goods Scheme
9 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
the Act regarding specificity.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Jul 26, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(EPCGS) Information Submitted to
Commerce Is Complete and Accurate
Comment 5: Whether Bharat Forge
Benefitted from the Interest Equalization
Scheme (IES) during the POR
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2023–15948 Filed 7–26–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–073, C–570–074]
Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From
the People’s Republic of China:
Affirmative Final Determination of
Circumvention of the Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Orders; 4017
Aluminum Sheet
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
imports of aluminum sheet produced
from aluminum alloy 4017 (4017
aluminum sheet) produced in the
People’s Republic of China (China) and
exported to the United States constitutes
merchandise altered in form or
appearance in such minor respects that
it should be included within the scope
of the antidumping duty (AD) and
countervailing duty (CVD) orders on
common alloy aluminum sheet (CAAS)
from China. As a result, 4017 aluminum
sheet will be subject to suspension of
liquidation effective August 26, 2022.
DATES: Applicable July 27, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frank Schmitt, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 143 (Thursday, July 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48437-48438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-15948]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-533-894]
Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks From India: Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020-2021
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
countervailable subsidies were provided to Bharat Forge Limited (Bharat
Forge), a producer and exporter of forged steel fluid end blocks (fluid
end blocks) from India during the period of review (POR), May 26, 2020,
through December 31, 2021.
DATES: Applicable July 27, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas Czajkowski, AD/CVD
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1395
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 7, 2023, Commerce published the preliminary results of
this administrative review in the Federal Register.\1\ This review
covers one mandatory respondent, Bharat Forge. From April 3 through
April 7, 2023, we conducted an onsite verification of Bharat Forge's
questionnaire responses. On April 25, 2023, we released the
verification report and invited interested parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results.\2\ Between May 8 and 12, 2023, Bharat Forge, the
Government of India (GOI), and the petitioners \3\ submitted timely-
filed case briefs.\4\ On May 19, Bharat Forge and the petitioners each
submitted timely-filed rebuttal briefs.\5\ On June 5, 2023, Commerce
extended the deadline for the final results of this administrative
review to July 20, 2023.\6\ For a complete description of the events
that occurred subsequent to the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks from India: Preliminary
Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 88
FR 7943 (March 3, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Verification of the Questionnaire
Responses of Bharat Forge Limited,'' dated April 25, 2023; see also
Memorandum, ``Briefing Schedule,'' dated May 1, 2023.
\3\ The petitioners are Ellwood City Forge Company, Ellwood
Quality Steels Company, Ellwood National Steel Company, and A. Finkl
& Sons.
\4\ See Bharat Forge's Letter, ``Case brief,'' dated May 12,
2023; GOI's Letter, ``Case Brief,'' dated May 8, 2022; and
Petitioners' Letter, ``Case Brief,'' dated May 12, 2023.
\5\ See Bharat Forge's Letter, ``Rebuttal Brief,'' dated May 19,
2023; and Petitioners' Letter, ``Rebuttal Brief,'' dated May 19,
2023.
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline,'' dated June 5,
2023.
\7\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of
Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks from India; 2020-2021,'' dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order 8
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks from the People's Republic
of China, the Federal Republic of Germany, India, and Italy:
Countervailing Duty Orders, and Amended Final Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination for the People's Republic of
China, 86 FR 7535 (January 29, 2021) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The products covered by the scope of the Order are fluid end
blocks. A full description of the scope of the Order is contained in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised by the interested parties in their case and
rebuttal briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum and
are listed in the appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of comments from interested parties and the
evidence on the record, we revised the
[[Page 48438]]
calculation of the net countervailable subsidy rates for Bharat Forge.
For a discussion of the issues, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with
section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
For each of the subsidy programs found to be countervailable, we find
that there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial
contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that
the subsidy is specific.\9\ For a complete description of the
methodology underlying all of Commerce's conclusions, including our
reliance, in part, on facts otherwise available, including adverse
facts available, pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Administrative Review
We determine that the net countervailable subsidy rate for the
period May 26, 2020, through December 31, 2021, to be as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy rate Subsidy rate
Company (percent ad (percent ad
valorem) 2020 valorem) 2021
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bharat Forge.......................... 2.78 3.95
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce also
intends to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect
cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts shown
above for the above-listed companies with regard to shipments of
subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of publication of these final results
of review. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to continue
to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the all-
others rate or the most recent company-specific rate applicable to the
company, as appropriate. These cash deposit requirements, effective
upon publication of these final results, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Assessment Requirements
In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(2), Commerce has determined, and CBP shall assess,
countervailing duties on all appropriate entries covered by this
review, for the above-listed companies at the applicable ad valorem
assessment rates listed. Commerce intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after publication of the
final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely
summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant
entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory
injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose calculations and analysis performed
for the final results of review within five days after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal Register in accordance with
19 CFR 351.224(b).
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to
an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
The final results are issued and published in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: July 20, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Subsidies Valuation Information
V. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Application of Adverse
Inferences
VI. Analysis of Programs
VII. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether the Duty Drawback (DDB) Scheme Is
Countervailable
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Revise Its DDB Benefit
Calculation
Comment 3: Whether the Remission of Duties and Taxes on Export
Products (RODTEP) Program Is Countervailable
Comment 4: Whether Bharat Forge's Export Promotion of Capital
Goods Scheme (EPCGS) Information Submitted to Commerce Is Complete
and Accurate
Comment 5: Whether Bharat Forge Benefitted from the Interest
Equalization Scheme (IES) during the POR
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2023-15948 Filed 7-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P