Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to ICC's New Initiatives Approval Policy and Procedural Framework, 46823-46826 [2023-15357]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 138 / Thursday, July 20, 2023 / Notices
favorable. In such an environment, the
Exchange must continually adjust its
fees and rebates to remain competitive
with other exchanges and non-exchange
trading venues that are not subject to the
same transparency or statutory
standards applicable to exchanges
relating to setting fees. Because
competitors are free to modify their own
fees and credits in response, some
without the requirement of making a
filing with the Commission, and
because market participants may readily
adjust their order routing practices, the
Exchange believes that any degree to
which fee changes in this market may
impose any burden on competition
would be extremely limited.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 18 of the Act and paragraph
(f) thereunder. At any time within 60
days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
NYSE–2023–26 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–NYSE–2023–26. This file
18 15
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–NYSE–2023–26 and should be
submitted on or before August 10, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–15356 Filed 7–19–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–97914; File No. SR–ICC–
2023–006]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE
Clear Credit LLC; Order Approving
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
ICC’s New Initiatives Approval Policy
and Procedural Framework
July 14, 2023.
I. Introduction
On May 12, 2023, ICE Clear Credit
LLC (‘‘ICC’’), filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Jul 19, 2023
19 17
Jkt 259001
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
update the ICC New Initiatives
Approval Policy and Procedural
Framework (‘‘NIA Policy’’). The
proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
June 1, 2023.3 The Commission has not
received any comments on the proposed
rule change. For the reasons discussed
below, the Commission is approving the
proposed rule change.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
A. Background
ICC is registered with the Commission
as a clearing agency for the purpose of
clearing CDS contracts.4 From time to
time, ICC implements new projects.
After ICC’s Steering Committee 5
approves some projects, ICC’s New
Initiative Approval Committee (‘‘NIAC’’)
must then approve them prior to their
launch.6 New Steering Committeeapproved projects that must be
approved by the NIAC prior to their
launch are called New Initiatives.7 New
Initiatives may involve new and
material modifications to the risk or
pricing methodology; potentially
significant changes to the processing
system, ICC Clearing Rules, or clearing
operating procedures; or Model Changes
classified as Materiality A 8 under ICC’s
Model Validation Framework.9 The NIA
Policy sets forth ICC’s policies and
procedures for the review and approval
of New Initiatives to be offered or
implemented by ICC.10 The NIA Policy
is meant to notify all relevant ICC
departments of the introduction of the
New Initiative, provide for information
sharing between departments, ensure
prior to the launch of a New Initiative
1 15
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46823
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97586 (May
25, 2023), 88 FR 35934 (June 1, 2023) (File No. SR–
ICC–2023–006) (‘‘Notice’’).
4 Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein
have the meanings assigned to them in ICC’s
Clearing Rules.
5 The Steering Committee is an ICC management
committee responsible for prioritizing the
implementation of initiatives and monitoring and
guiding delivery of those initiatives. Notice, 88 FR
at 35934.
6 Id.
7 Id.
8 ICC classifies its Model Changes based on how
substantially the Model Change affects the ICC risk
management system’s assessment of risk for the
related risk driver. Model Changes classified as
Materiality A have a substantial impact on the risk
management system’s assessment of risk for a
related risk driver. Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 85105 (Feb. 11, 2019), 84 FR 4570 n.18 (Feb.
15, 2019) (File No. SR–ICC–2018–011) (‘‘Order’’).
9 Id.
10 Notice, 88 FR at 35934.
2 17
E:\FR\FM\20JYN1.SGM
20JYN1
46824
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 138 / Thursday, July 20, 2023 / Notices
that all required governance and
regulatory filings have been completed
and New Initiative risks are considered,
and establish requirements for the prelaunch verification and testing of the
New Initiative.11
ICC proposes three groups of changes
to its NIA Policy. First, ICC proposes
edits to a review and approval process
described in the NIA Policy. Second,
ICC proposes formalizing two existing
review and approval processes by
formally incorporating them into the
NIA Policy. Third, ICC seeks to
formalize non-material changes to the
NIA Policy that were reviewed and
approved by the NIAC in 2019 and
2020.12
1. Edits to a Review and Approval
Process in the NIA Policy
ICC seeks to edit the review and
approval process for New Initiatives. As
noted above, New Initiatives are any
new projects approved by the Steering
Committee and identified by the New
Initiative Approval Committee as
requiring approval prior to launch.13
ICC seeks to change the title of the first
step of the New Initiatives review and
approval process from ‘‘Submission’’ to
‘‘Creation.’’ In the first step of the New
Initiatives review and approval process,
the Steering Committee creates a new
project proposal and submits it to the
NIAC for review. Although the first step
of the process remains unchanged, ICC
believes that changing the title of the
first step from ‘‘Submission’’ to
‘‘Creation’’ will better describe the first
step of the New Initiatives review and
approval process.14
2. Description of Existing Review and
Approval Processes
ICC also proposes describing two
existing review and approval processes
in its NIA Policy, specifically, the
review and approval process for
Approvals Matrices and Risk
Assessments.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
a. Approvals Matrix Review and
Approval Process
ICC seeks to describe in the NIA
Policy its existing three-step review and
approval process for Approvals
Matrices. An Approvals Matrix is a
document reviewed by the New
Initiative Approval Committee that
evidences and ensures that all necessary
approvals have been obtained and all
relevant comments have been
11 Id.
12 Id.
at 35935.
at 35934.
14 Id. at 35935.
13 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Jul 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
addressed.15 For example, the
Approvals Matrix would help ensure
that ICC has obtained all necessary
regulatory approvals for a New
Initiative. ICC is describing in the NIA
Policy the existing 16 review and
approval process for Approvals Matrices
to formalize and describe ICC’s
procedures regarding the use of an
Approvals Matrix in its review and
approval of a given New Initiative.17
The first step of the Approvals Matrix
review and approval process is
‘‘Creation.’’ In this step, the NIAC Chair
requests an initial draft Approvals
Matrix. The NIAC Chair may request an
initial draft Approvals Matrix prior to
completion of a New Initiative, and in
any case prior to ICC being granted all
required approvals. Upon this request,
the ICC Legal Department prepares the
initial draft Approvals Matrix. The
Approvals Matrix should include items
requiring approval (e.g., ICC Clearing
Rules or ICC Procedures); required
filings/approvals related to each item
(e.g., CFTC, SEC, and ICC Board of
Managers); and the date on which
approvals were requested, the date on
which regulatory filings were filed, and/
or the date on which approvals were
granted. The list of required approvals
included in the Approvals Matrix
should be complete. This means that it
should include both granted and to-begranted approvals. Ultimately, the ICC
Compliance Department and ICC Risk
Oversight Officer both review the initial
draft Approvals Matrix, provide their
feedback, and confirm that the
information captured in the Matrix is
accurate.
The second step of the Approvals
Matrix review and approval process is
‘‘Review/Maintenance.’’ As part of the
review and maintenance process, there
may be meetings, such as NIAC
meetings and a Pre-Launch Verification
meeting.18 The NIAC Chair may include
a review of the Approvals Matrix in a
NIAC meeting pertaining to the relevant
New Initiative, and must include a
review of the Approvals Matrix in the
relevant Pre-Launch Verification
meeting. If the Approvals Matrix must
15 New Initiatives Approval Policy and
Procedural Framework, Section II.A.
16 ICC’s current NIA Policy defines Approvals
Matrix. It also includes a template for the Approvals
Matrix and discusses aspects of the Approvals
Matrix review and approval process, for example it
identifies certain persons responsible for review of
the Approvals Matrix. New Initiatives Approval
Policy and Procedural Framework.
17 Notice, 88 FR at 35934.
18 Pre-Launch Verification meetings are meant to
allow for review of the applicable Approvals
Matrix, the risk assessments, and any post-launch
stipulations in advance of the approval of the New
Initiative. Id. at 35935 n.3.
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
be changed, the ICC Legal Department
will make the necessary changes at the
request of the NIAC Chair. To indicate
which version of the Approvals Matrix
is the most current as it moves through
the New Initiatives process, the
Approvals Matrix will be dated and
marked accordingly.
The third step of the Approvals
Matrix review and approval process is
‘‘Finalization.’’ During this step of the
review and approval process, the NIAC
Chair confirms with the ICC Legal
Department that all required approvals
have been received. At the request of the
NIAC Chair, the ICC Legal Department
must circulate the final Approvals
Matrix to the ICC Compliance
Department and ICC Risk Oversight
Officer. The ICC Legal Department must
then provide confirmation to the NIAC
Chair that the ICC Compliance
Department and the ICC Risk Oversight
Officer have reviewed the Approvals
Matrix.
b. Risk Assessment Review and
Approval Process
ICC also seeks to describe in the NIA
Policy its existing three-step review and
approval process for Risk Assessments.
A Risk Assessment is a document
reviewed by the NIAC that describes key
risks identified by the ICC Functional
Area Heads 19 and includes mitigation
plans, residual impact ratings, and other
comments.20 ICC proposes describing
the review and approval process for
Risk Assessments in the NIA Policy to
formalize ICC’s current 21 New
Initiatives risk review and approval
process.22
The first step of the Risk Assessment
review and approval process is
‘‘Creation.’’ This section of the Risk
Assessment review and approval
process provides detailed instructions
with respect to how the initial draft Risk
Assessment should be created and
reviewed. It requires the NIAC Chair to
request that the ICC President, General
Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer,
Chief Operating Officer, Chief Risk
Officer, and Head of ICC Technology all
perform initial risk assessments and
document these assessments in the Risk
Assessment document. Once the ICC
19 Some examples of ICC Functional Area Heads
include the General Counsel, Chief Compliance
Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Risk Officer,
and Head of ICC Technology. Id. at 35935 n.5.
20 Id. at 35935 n.4.
21 ICC’s current NIA Policy defines Risk
Assessment. It also includes a template for the Risk
Assessment and discusses aspects of the Risk
Assessment review and approval process, for
example it identifies certain persons responsible for
review of the Risk Assessment. New Initiatives
Approval Policy and Procedural Framework.
22 Notice, 88 FR at 35935.
E:\FR\FM\20JYN1.SGM
20JYN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 138 / Thursday, July 20, 2023 / Notices
President and Functional Area Heads
complete and document their
assessments, all Functional Area Heads
must provide their section of the initial
draft Risk Assessment to the NIAC
Chair. At that point, it is the NIAC
Chair’s responsibility to compile the
sections received from the Functional
Area Heads into a single initial draft
Risk Assessment and circulate that Risk
Assessment to all Functional Area
Heads for their review. As they review
the initial draft Risk Assessment,
Functional Area Heads should each
provide a residual risk rating for each
identified risk in the initial draft Risk
Assessment. This review and residual
risk rating of each identified risk may be
completed during an NIAC meeting, at
the discretion of the NIAC Chair. The
final version of the initial draft Risk
Assessment will be circulated to all
Functional Area Heads by the NIAC
Chair.
The proposed ‘‘Creation’’ portion of
the Risk Assessment review and
approval process, in the NIA Policy,
also specifies the content of the initial
draft Risk Assessment. Under the
proposed change, when completing the
Risk Assessment, each Functional Area
Head should consider the key risks for
their functional area. Functional Area
Heads should also document in the Risk
Assessment their view of the main risks
and any related mitigations. The
documentation of the main risks
includes: a description of the risk, a
description of any expected/
implemented risk mitigations, and a
high/medium/low rating of the residual
risk after considering the expected/
implemented risk mitigations. Each
Functional Area Head should include
reference to any work logs or other
supporting materials used by the
Functional Area Head when performing
the Risk Assessment. In the event that
an initial draft Risk Assessment is
requested prior to the completion of a
New Initiative, it should reflect the
information available at that time
related to the risks and/or expected risks
associated with the New Initiative.
The second step of the Risk
Assessment review and approval
process is ‘‘Review/Maintenance’’ of the
Risk Assessment. During the ‘‘Review/
Maintenance’’ portion of the Risk
Assessment review and approval
process, Functional Area Heads may
change their risk ratings as mitigation
plans evolve to eliminate or reduce risk.
The Pre-Launch Verification meeting
must include a review of the Risk
Assessment. At the discretion of the
NIAC Chair, NIAC meetings related to a
New Initiative may include a review of
the Risk Assessment. During this step,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Jul 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
the NIAC Chair also coordinates the
post-review update and recirculation of
the Risk Assessment to the Functional
Area Heads and marks the Risk
Assessment to indicate which version of
the document is most current.
The third step of the Risk Assessment
review and approval process is
‘‘Finalization’’ of the Risk Assessment.
At the Pre-Launch Verification NIAC
meeting, the NIAC reviews the latest
version of the Risk Assessment and
residual risk ratings. The NIAC Chair is
made aware of any further revisions to
the Risk Assessment prior to the NIAC
voting to approve the New Initiative.
The NIAC Chair sends the final Risk
Assessment to the NIAC after the PreLaunch Verification NIAC meeting.
Ultimately, the Functional Area Heads
provide their sign-off on the final Risk
Assessment via email to the NIAC Chair.
3. 2019 and 2020 Non-Material Updates
ICC seeks to formalize changes to the
NIA Policy, reviewed and approved by
the NIAC in 2019 and 2020, that ICC
deems non-material. These changes
were made to reflect changes in ICC’s
officer positions and titles.23
In 2019, ICC made changes to the
positions comprising the NIAC and the
NIAC’s leadership. Section II.G
describes and identifies who is on the
NIAC and who chairs it. It previously
listed the Senior Director, Products and
Services and Head of Special Projects as
members of the NIAC, and identified the
Head of Special Projects as the NIAC
Chair. The changes delete these
positions from the NIAC as they no
longer exist. ICC also adds text to
Section II.G to reflect that any member
of the NIAC may now be the NIAC
Chair. The term NIAC Chair is defined
in Section II.H. Since the Head of
Special Projects can no longer be the
NIAC Chair because that position title
no longer exists at ICC, ICC has changed
the definition of NIAC Chair to ‘‘the
individual designated to serve as Chair
of the New Initiative Approval
Committee by ICC management.’’
Additional references to either the Head
of Special Projects, its role as the NIAC
Chair or both have been deleted in
Section III.B, Attachment C, and
Attachment F of the NIA Policy as well.
In 2020, ICC made additional changes
to the NIA Policy related to the 2019
changes. Attachment D of the NIA
Policy contains the NIAC Charter. ICC
added text to Attachment D making it
clear that ICC Management designates
one of the NIAC members to serve as the
NIAC Chair. Additionally, references to
the Head of Special Projects have been
PO 00000
23 Id.
at 35935.
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46825
removed from Exhibit A of Attachment
D. Specifically, Exhibit A of Attachment
D no longer lists the Head of Special
Projects as the NIAC Chair and indicates
that the Chair of the NIAC, rather than
the Head of Special Projects, may
designate who will serve as Committee
Secretary.
III. Discussion and Commission
Findings
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act requires
the Commission to approve a proposed
rule change of a self-regulatory
organization if it finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
the organization.24 For the reasons given
below, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 25 and
Rules 17Ad–22(e)(2) 26 and (e)(17).27
A. Consistency With Section
17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act
Under Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act,
ICC’s rules, among other things, must be
‘‘designed to promote the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions and, to the extent
applicable, derivative agreements,
contracts, and transactions, to assure the
safeguarding of securities and funds
which are in the custody or control of
the clearing agency or for which it is
responsible . . . and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest
. . . .’’ 28 Based on its review of the
record, and for the reasons discussed
below, the Commission believes that
ICC’s proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) because it
helps ensure that New Initiatives are
clearly and consistently identified,
reviewed, and approved according to
appropriate policies and procedures.
The Commission has stated that New
Initiatives may pose operational or other
risks to ICC if not clearly and
consistently identified, reviewed, and
approved according to appropriate
policies and procedures.29 The
proposed changes to the NIA Policy
make the NIA Policy clearer. For
example, ICC seeks to better describe
the steps of the review and approval
process for New Initiatives with its edits
to the existing New Initiatives review
and approval process. ICC’s description
of a review and approval process for
Approvals Matrices and Risk
24 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
26 17 CFR 240Ad–22(e)(2).
27 17 CFR 240Ad–22(e)(17).
28 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
29 Order, 84 FR at 4570.
25 15
E:\FR\FM\20JYN1.SGM
20JYN1
46826
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 138 / Thursday, July 20, 2023 / Notices
Assessments clarifies a process through
which ICC ensures that it obtains all
necessary approvals and identifies and
addresses all relevant risks with respect
to a New Initiative. By incorporating the
2019 and 2020 revisions into the NIA
Policy, ICC helps ensure that the NIA
Policy is accurate in that it reflects
current NIAC membership, persons
eligible for NIAC positions, and the
persons responsible for naming others to
specific NIAC positions. Because the
proposed changes make the NIA Policy
clearer, they should allow the policy to
be applied consistently as well. As such,
the proposed revisions should enhance
ICC’s ability to manage risks and avoid
potential disruptions to operations
related to New Initiatives. This
enhances ICC’s ability to ensure the
prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions
which also helps ICC assure the
safeguarding of securities and funds
which are in its custody and control, or
for which it is responsible.
The Commission believes, therefore,
that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.30
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
B. Consistency with Rule 17Ad–
22(e)(2)(i) and (v)
Rule 17Ad–22(e)(2)(i) and (v) require
ICC to establish, implement, maintain,
and enforce written policies and
procedures reasonably designed to
provide for governance arrangements
that are clear and transparent and that
specify clear and direct lines of
responsibility.31 The proposed rule
change identifies who is eligible to serve
as NIAC Chair, which makes the lines
of responsibility described in the NIA
Policy clearer. As such, ICC’s
governance arrangements are made
clearer and more transparent overall as
a result of the proposed rule change.
The proposed rule change also identifies
who designates the NIAC Chair and
Committee Secretary and identifies
individuals responsible for tasks in each
step of the review and approval process
for Approvals Matrices and Risk
Assessments. Including a description of
these responsibilities in the NIA Policy
helps ensure that clear and transparent
information is available regarding roles
and responsibilities related to New
Initiatives. Thus, the Commission
believes, that the proposed rule change
is consistent with the requirements of
Rules 17Ad–22(e)(2)(i) and (v) of the
Act.32
30 15
U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(2).
32 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(2).
31 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Jul 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
C. Consistency With Rule 17Ad–
22(e)(17)
Rule 17Ad–22(e)(17) requires ICC to
establish, implement, maintain, and
enforce written policies and procedures
reasonably designed to identify the
plausible sources of operational risk,
both internal and external, and mitigate
their impact through the use of
appropriate systems, policies,
procedures and controls.33 Operational
risk refers to the likelihood that
deficiencies in information systems or
internal controls, human errors or
misconduct, management failures,
unauthorized intrusions into corporate
or production systems, or disruptions
from external events such as natural
disasters, would adversely affect the
functioning of a clearing agency.34 As
noted above, New Initiatives may pose
operational or other risks to ICC if not
clearly and consistently identified,
reviewed, and approved according to
appropriate policies and procedures.35
The proposed rule change describes a
standardized method for creating,
reviewing, and finalizing Approvals
Matrices and Risk Assessments. In
doing so it helps ensure that New
Initiatives are clearly and consistently
identified, reviewed, and approved. The
proposed rule change thereby identifies
and aids in mitigating a plausible source
of operational risk. Thus, the
Commission believes, that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of Rule 17Ad–22(e)(17) of
the Act.36
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act, and in
particular, Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the
Act 37 and Rules 17Ad–22(e)(2) 38 and
(e)(17) thereunder.39
It is therefore ordered pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act that the
proposed rule change (SR–ICC–2023–
006) be, and hereby is, approved.40
CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(17).
Exchange Act Release No. 78961
(Sept. 28, 2016), 81 FR 70786, 70837 (Oct. 13, 2016)
(File No. S7–03–14).
35 Order, 84 FR at 4570.
36 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(17).
37 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
38 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(2).
39 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(17).
40 In approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission considered the proposal’s impacts on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
PO 00000
33 17
34 Securities
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For the Commission by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.41
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–15357 Filed 7–19–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #18016 and #18017;
Vermont Disaster Number VT–00046]
Presidential Declaration of a Major
Disaster for the State of Vermont
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This is a Notice of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Vermont
(FEMA–4720–DR), dated 07/14/2023.
Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
Incident Period: 07/07/2023 and
continuing.
SUMMARY:
Issued on 07/14/2023.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 09/12/2023.
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan
Application Deadline Date: 04/15/2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing and
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery &
Resilience, U.S. Small Business
Administration, 409 3rd Street SW,
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416,
(202) 205–6734.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that as a result of the
President’s major disaster declaration on
07/14/2023, applications for disaster
loans may be filed at the address listed
above or other locally announced
locations.
The following areas have been
determined to be adversely affected by
the disaster:
Primary Counties (Physical Damage and
Economic Injury Loans):
Chittenden, Lamoille, Rutland,
Washington, Windham, Windsor.
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury
Loans Only):
Vermont: Addison, Bennington,
Caledonia, Franklin, Grand Isle,
Orange, Orleans.
Massachusetts: Franklin.
New Hampshire: Cheshire, Grafton,
Sullivan.
DATES:
41 17
E:\FR\FM\20JYN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
20JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 138 (Thursday, July 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46823-46826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-15357]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-97914; File No. SR-ICC-2023-006]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to ICC's New Initiatives
Approval Policy and Procedural Framework
July 14, 2023.
I. Introduction
On May 12, 2023, ICE Clear Credit LLC (``ICC''), filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to update the ICC
New Initiatives Approval Policy and Procedural Framework (``NIA
Policy''). The proposed rule change was published for comment in the
Federal Register on June 1, 2023.\3\ The Commission has not received
any comments on the proposed rule change. For the reasons discussed
below, the Commission is approving the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97586 (May 25, 2023), 88
FR 35934 (June 1, 2023) (File No. SR-ICC-2023-006) (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
A. Background
ICC is registered with the Commission as a clearing agency for the
purpose of clearing CDS contracts.\4\ From time to time, ICC implements
new projects. After ICC's Steering Committee \5\ approves some
projects, ICC's New Initiative Approval Committee (``NIAC'') must then
approve them prior to their launch.\6\ New Steering Committee-approved
projects that must be approved by the NIAC prior to their launch are
called New Initiatives.\7\ New Initiatives may involve new and material
modifications to the risk or pricing methodology; potentially
significant changes to the processing system, ICC Clearing Rules, or
clearing operating procedures; or Model Changes classified as
Materiality A \8\ under ICC's Model Validation Framework.\9\ The NIA
Policy sets forth ICC's policies and procedures for the review and
approval of New Initiatives to be offered or implemented by ICC.\10\
The NIA Policy is meant to notify all relevant ICC departments of the
introduction of the New Initiative, provide for information sharing
between departments, ensure prior to the launch of a New Initiative
[[Page 46824]]
that all required governance and regulatory filings have been completed
and New Initiative risks are considered, and establish requirements for
the pre-launch verification and testing of the New Initiative.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the
meanings assigned to them in ICC's Clearing Rules.
\5\ The Steering Committee is an ICC management committee
responsible for prioritizing the implementation of initiatives and
monitoring and guiding delivery of those initiatives. Notice, 88 FR
at 35934.
\6\ Id.
\7\ Id.
\8\ ICC classifies its Model Changes based on how substantially
the Model Change affects the ICC risk management system's assessment
of risk for the related risk driver. Model Changes classified as
Materiality A have a substantial impact on the risk management
system's assessment of risk for a related risk driver. Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 85105 (Feb. 11, 2019), 84 FR 4570 n.18
(Feb. 15, 2019) (File No. SR-ICC-2018-011) (``Order'').
\9\ Id.
\10\ Notice, 88 FR at 35934.
\11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ICC proposes three groups of changes to its NIA Policy. First, ICC
proposes edits to a review and approval process described in the NIA
Policy. Second, ICC proposes formalizing two existing review and
approval processes by formally incorporating them into the NIA Policy.
Third, ICC seeks to formalize non-material changes to the NIA Policy
that were reviewed and approved by the NIAC in 2019 and 2020.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Id. at 35935.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Edits to a Review and Approval Process in the NIA Policy
ICC seeks to edit the review and approval process for New
Initiatives. As noted above, New Initiatives are any new projects
approved by the Steering Committee and identified by the New Initiative
Approval Committee as requiring approval prior to launch.\13\ ICC seeks
to change the title of the first step of the New Initiatives review and
approval process from ``Submission'' to ``Creation.'' In the first step
of the New Initiatives review and approval process, the Steering
Committee creates a new project proposal and submits it to the NIAC for
review. Although the first step of the process remains unchanged, ICC
believes that changing the title of the first step from ``Submission''
to ``Creation'' will better describe the first step of the New
Initiatives review and approval process.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Id. at 35934.
\14\ Id. at 35935.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Description of Existing Review and Approval Processes
ICC also proposes describing two existing review and approval
processes in its NIA Policy, specifically, the review and approval
process for Approvals Matrices and Risk Assessments.
a. Approvals Matrix Review and Approval Process
ICC seeks to describe in the NIA Policy its existing three-step
review and approval process for Approvals Matrices. An Approvals Matrix
is a document reviewed by the New Initiative Approval Committee that
evidences and ensures that all necessary approvals have been obtained
and all relevant comments have been addressed.\15\ For example, the
Approvals Matrix would help ensure that ICC has obtained all necessary
regulatory approvals for a New Initiative. ICC is describing in the NIA
Policy the existing \16\ review and approval process for Approvals
Matrices to formalize and describe ICC's procedures regarding the use
of an Approvals Matrix in its review and approval of a given New
Initiative.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ New Initiatives Approval Policy and Procedural Framework,
Section II.A.
\16\ ICC's current NIA Policy defines Approvals Matrix. It also
includes a template for the Approvals Matrix and discusses aspects
of the Approvals Matrix review and approval process, for example it
identifies certain persons responsible for review of the Approvals
Matrix. New Initiatives Approval Policy and Procedural Framework.
\17\ Notice, 88 FR at 35934.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The first step of the Approvals Matrix review and approval process
is ``Creation.'' In this step, the NIAC Chair requests an initial draft
Approvals Matrix. The NIAC Chair may request an initial draft Approvals
Matrix prior to completion of a New Initiative, and in any case prior
to ICC being granted all required approvals. Upon this request, the ICC
Legal Department prepares the initial draft Approvals Matrix. The
Approvals Matrix should include items requiring approval (e.g., ICC
Clearing Rules or ICC Procedures); required filings/approvals related
to each item (e.g., CFTC, SEC, and ICC Board of Managers); and the date
on which approvals were requested, the date on which regulatory filings
were filed, and/or the date on which approvals were granted. The list
of required approvals included in the Approvals Matrix should be
complete. This means that it should include both granted and to-be-
granted approvals. Ultimately, the ICC Compliance Department and ICC
Risk Oversight Officer both review the initial draft Approvals Matrix,
provide their feedback, and confirm that the information captured in
the Matrix is accurate.
The second step of the Approvals Matrix review and approval process
is ``Review/Maintenance.'' As part of the review and maintenance
process, there may be meetings, such as NIAC meetings and a Pre-Launch
Verification meeting.\18\ The NIAC Chair may include a review of the
Approvals Matrix in a NIAC meeting pertaining to the relevant New
Initiative, and must include a review of the Approvals Matrix in the
relevant Pre-Launch Verification meeting. If the Approvals Matrix must
be changed, the ICC Legal Department will make the necessary changes at
the request of the NIAC Chair. To indicate which version of the
Approvals Matrix is the most current as it moves through the New
Initiatives process, the Approvals Matrix will be dated and marked
accordingly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ Pre-Launch Verification meetings are meant to allow for
review of the applicable Approvals Matrix, the risk assessments, and
any post-launch stipulations in advance of the approval of the New
Initiative. Id. at 35935 n.3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The third step of the Approvals Matrix review and approval process
is ``Finalization.'' During this step of the review and approval
process, the NIAC Chair confirms with the ICC Legal Department that all
required approvals have been received. At the request of the NIAC
Chair, the ICC Legal Department must circulate the final Approvals
Matrix to the ICC Compliance Department and ICC Risk Oversight Officer.
The ICC Legal Department must then provide confirmation to the NIAC
Chair that the ICC Compliance Department and the ICC Risk Oversight
Officer have reviewed the Approvals Matrix.
b. Risk Assessment Review and Approval Process
ICC also seeks to describe in the NIA Policy its existing three-
step review and approval process for Risk Assessments. A Risk
Assessment is a document reviewed by the NIAC that describes key risks
identified by the ICC Functional Area Heads \19\ and includes
mitigation plans, residual impact ratings, and other comments.\20\ ICC
proposes describing the review and approval process for Risk
Assessments in the NIA Policy to formalize ICC's current \21\ New
Initiatives risk review and approval process.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ Some examples of ICC Functional Area Heads include the
General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Operating Officer,
Chief Risk Officer, and Head of ICC Technology. Id. at 35935 n.5.
\20\ Id. at 35935 n.4.
\21\ ICC's current NIA Policy defines Risk Assessment. It also
includes a template for the Risk Assessment and discusses aspects of
the Risk Assessment review and approval process, for example it
identifies certain persons responsible for review of the Risk
Assessment. New Initiatives Approval Policy and Procedural
Framework.
\22\ Notice, 88 FR at 35935.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The first step of the Risk Assessment review and approval process
is ``Creation.'' This section of the Risk Assessment review and
approval process provides detailed instructions with respect to how the
initial draft Risk Assessment should be created and reviewed. It
requires the NIAC Chair to request that the ICC President, General
Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Risk
Officer, and Head of ICC Technology all perform initial risk
assessments and document these assessments in the Risk Assessment
document. Once the ICC
[[Page 46825]]
President and Functional Area Heads complete and document their
assessments, all Functional Area Heads must provide their section of
the initial draft Risk Assessment to the NIAC Chair. At that point, it
is the NIAC Chair's responsibility to compile the sections received
from the Functional Area Heads into a single initial draft Risk
Assessment and circulate that Risk Assessment to all Functional Area
Heads for their review. As they review the initial draft Risk
Assessment, Functional Area Heads should each provide a residual risk
rating for each identified risk in the initial draft Risk Assessment.
This review and residual risk rating of each identified risk may be
completed during an NIAC meeting, at the discretion of the NIAC Chair.
The final version of the initial draft Risk Assessment will be
circulated to all Functional Area Heads by the NIAC Chair.
The proposed ``Creation'' portion of the Risk Assessment review and
approval process, in the NIA Policy, also specifies the content of the
initial draft Risk Assessment. Under the proposed change, when
completing the Risk Assessment, each Functional Area Head should
consider the key risks for their functional area. Functional Area Heads
should also document in the Risk Assessment their view of the main
risks and any related mitigations. The documentation of the main risks
includes: a description of the risk, a description of any expected/
implemented risk mitigations, and a high/medium/low rating of the
residual risk after considering the expected/implemented risk
mitigations. Each Functional Area Head should include reference to any
work logs or other supporting materials used by the Functional Area
Head when performing the Risk Assessment. In the event that an initial
draft Risk Assessment is requested prior to the completion of a New
Initiative, it should reflect the information available at that time
related to the risks and/or expected risks associated with the New
Initiative.
The second step of the Risk Assessment review and approval process
is ``Review/Maintenance'' of the Risk Assessment. During the ``Review/
Maintenance'' portion of the Risk Assessment review and approval
process, Functional Area Heads may change their risk ratings as
mitigation plans evolve to eliminate or reduce risk. The Pre-Launch
Verification meeting must include a review of the Risk Assessment. At
the discretion of the NIAC Chair, NIAC meetings related to a New
Initiative may include a review of the Risk Assessment. During this
step, the NIAC Chair also coordinates the post-review update and
recirculation of the Risk Assessment to the Functional Area Heads and
marks the Risk Assessment to indicate which version of the document is
most current.
The third step of the Risk Assessment review and approval process
is ``Finalization'' of the Risk Assessment. At the Pre-Launch
Verification NIAC meeting, the NIAC reviews the latest version of the
Risk Assessment and residual risk ratings. The NIAC Chair is made aware
of any further revisions to the Risk Assessment prior to the NIAC
voting to approve the New Initiative. The NIAC Chair sends the final
Risk Assessment to the NIAC after the Pre-Launch Verification NIAC
meeting. Ultimately, the Functional Area Heads provide their sign-off
on the final Risk Assessment via email to the NIAC Chair.
3. 2019 and 2020 Non-Material Updates
ICC seeks to formalize changes to the NIA Policy, reviewed and
approved by the NIAC in 2019 and 2020, that ICC deems non-material.
These changes were made to reflect changes in ICC's officer positions
and titles.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ Id. at 35935.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2019, ICC made changes to the positions comprising the NIAC and
the NIAC's leadership. Section II.G describes and identifies who is on
the NIAC and who chairs it. It previously listed the Senior Director,
Products and Services and Head of Special Projects as members of the
NIAC, and identified the Head of Special Projects as the NIAC Chair.
The changes delete these positions from the NIAC as they no longer
exist. ICC also adds text to Section II.G to reflect that any member of
the NIAC may now be the NIAC Chair. The term NIAC Chair is defined in
Section II.H. Since the Head of Special Projects can no longer be the
NIAC Chair because that position title no longer exists at ICC, ICC has
changed the definition of NIAC Chair to ``the individual designated to
serve as Chair of the New Initiative Approval Committee by ICC
management.'' Additional references to either the Head of Special
Projects, its role as the NIAC Chair or both have been deleted in
Section III.B, Attachment C, and Attachment F of the NIA Policy as
well.
In 2020, ICC made additional changes to the NIA Policy related to
the 2019 changes. Attachment D of the NIA Policy contains the NIAC
Charter. ICC added text to Attachment D making it clear that ICC
Management designates one of the NIAC members to serve as the NIAC
Chair. Additionally, references to the Head of Special Projects have
been removed from Exhibit A of Attachment D. Specifically, Exhibit A of
Attachment D no longer lists the Head of Special Projects as the NIAC
Chair and indicates that the Chair of the NIAC, rather than the Head of
Special Projects, may designate who will serve as Committee Secretary.
III. Discussion and Commission Findings
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act requires the Commission to approve a
proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it finds that
the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act
and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
organization.\24\ For the reasons given below, the Commission finds
that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F)
of the Act \25\ and Rules 17Ad-22(e)(2) \26\ and (e)(17).\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
\25\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
\26\ 17 CFR 240Ad-22(e)(2).
\27\ 17 CFR 240Ad-22(e)(17).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Consistency With Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act
Under Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act, ICC's rules, among other
things, must be ``designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance
and settlement of securities transactions and, to the extent
applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and transactions, to
assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the
custody or control of the clearing agency or for which it is
responsible . . . and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest . . . .'' \28\ Based on its review of the record, and for the
reasons discussed below, the Commission believes that ICC's proposed
rule change is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) because it helps
ensure that New Initiatives are clearly and consistently identified,
reviewed, and approved according to appropriate policies and
procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission has stated that New Initiatives may pose operational
or other risks to ICC if not clearly and consistently identified,
reviewed, and approved according to appropriate policies and
procedures.\29\ The proposed changes to the NIA Policy make the NIA
Policy clearer. For example, ICC seeks to better describe the steps of
the review and approval process for New Initiatives with its edits to
the existing New Initiatives review and approval process. ICC's
description of a review and approval process for Approvals Matrices and
Risk
[[Page 46826]]
Assessments clarifies a process through which ICC ensures that it
obtains all necessary approvals and identifies and addresses all
relevant risks with respect to a New Initiative. By incorporating the
2019 and 2020 revisions into the NIA Policy, ICC helps ensure that the
NIA Policy is accurate in that it reflects current NIAC membership,
persons eligible for NIAC positions, and the persons responsible for
naming others to specific NIAC positions. Because the proposed changes
make the NIA Policy clearer, they should allow the policy to be applied
consistently as well. As such, the proposed revisions should enhance
ICC's ability to manage risks and avoid potential disruptions to
operations related to New Initiatives. This enhances ICC's ability to
ensure the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities
transactions which also helps ICC assure the safeguarding of securities
and funds which are in its custody and control, or for which it is
responsible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ Order, 84 FR at 4570.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes, therefore, that the proposed rule change
is consistent with the requirements of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the
Act.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Consistency with Rule 17Ad-22(e)(2)(i) and (v)
Rule 17Ad-22(e)(2)(i) and (v) require ICC to establish, implement,
maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably
designed to provide for governance arrangements that are clear and
transparent and that specify clear and direct lines of
responsibility.\31\ The proposed rule change identifies who is eligible
to serve as NIAC Chair, which makes the lines of responsibility
described in the NIA Policy clearer. As such, ICC's governance
arrangements are made clearer and more transparent overall as a result
of the proposed rule change. The proposed rule change also identifies
who designates the NIAC Chair and Committee Secretary and identifies
individuals responsible for tasks in each step of the review and
approval process for Approvals Matrices and Risk Assessments. Including
a description of these responsibilities in the NIA Policy helps ensure
that clear and transparent information is available regarding roles and
responsibilities related to New Initiatives. Thus, the Commission
believes, that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of Rules 17Ad-22(e)(2)(i) and (v) of the Act.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(2).
\32\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Consistency With Rule 17Ad-22(e)(17)
Rule 17Ad-22(e)(17) requires ICC to establish, implement, maintain,
and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to
identify the plausible sources of operational risk, both internal and
external, and mitigate their impact through the use of appropriate
systems, policies, procedures and controls.\33\ Operational risk refers
to the likelihood that deficiencies in information systems or internal
controls, human errors or misconduct, management failures, unauthorized
intrusions into corporate or production systems, or disruptions from
external events such as natural disasters, would adversely affect the
functioning of a clearing agency.\34\ As noted above, New Initiatives
may pose operational or other risks to ICC if not clearly and
consistently identified, reviewed, and approved according to
appropriate policies and procedures.\35\ The proposed rule change
describes a standardized method for creating, reviewing, and finalizing
Approvals Matrices and Risk Assessments. In doing so it helps ensure
that New Initiatives are clearly and consistently identified, reviewed,
and approved. The proposed rule change thereby identifies and aids in
mitigating a plausible source of operational risk. Thus, the Commission
believes, that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of Rule 17Ad-22(e)(17) of the Act.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(17).
\34\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78961 (Sept. 28, 2016),
81 FR 70786, 70837 (Oct. 13, 2016) (File No. S7-03-14).
\35\ Order, 84 FR at 4570.
\36\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(17).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act,
and in particular, Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \37\ and Rules 17Ad-
22(e)(2) \38\ and (e)(17) thereunder.\39\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
\38\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(2).
\39\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(17).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is therefore ordered pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act
that the proposed rule change (SR-ICC-2023-006) be, and hereby is,
approved.\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impacts on efficiency, competition, and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\41\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-15357 Filed 7-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P