Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX Emerald, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule, 46202-46204 [2023-15269]
Download as PDF
46202
DATES:
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Notices
Date of required notice: July 19,
2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sean C. Robinson, 202–268–8405.
The
United States Postal Service® hereby
gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C.
3642 and 3632(b)(3), on July 14, 2023,
it filed with the Postal Regulatory
Commission a Request of the United
States Postal Service to Add Priority
Mail, First-Class Package Service &
Parcel Select Contract 34 to Competitive
Product List. Documents are available at
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2023–183,
CP2023–187.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023–15336 Filed 7–18–23; 8:45 am]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX
Emerald, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Its Fee
Schedule
July 13, 2023.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on June 29,
2023, MIAX Emerald, LLC (‘‘MIAX
Emerald’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing a proposal to
amend the MIAX Emerald Fee Schedule
(‘‘Fee Schedule’’).
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://www.miaxglobal.com/markets/
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
4 See Exchange Rule 510(c).
5 See Cboe U.S. Options Fee Schedules, BZX
Options, effective May 15, 2023, ‘‘Fee Codes and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
00:36 Jul 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
Associated Fees,’’ at https://www.cboe.com/us/
options/membership/fee_schedule/bzx/.
6 The Nasdaq MRX proposal (SR–MRX–2023–11)
amends their fee schedule to change the Taker Fee
in Penny symbols in Tier 1 from $0.00 to $0.15 for
Priority Customer Orders and from $0.00 in Tier 1
for Priority Customer Orders in Non-Penny symbols
to $0.35.
7 The term ‘‘Priority Customer Order’’ means an
order for the account of a Priority Customer. See
Exchange Rule 100. The term ‘‘Priority Customer’’
means a person or entity that (i) is not a broker or
dealer in securities, and (ii) does not place more
than 390 orders in listed options per day on average
during a calendar month for its own beneficial
account(s). See Exchange Rule 100.
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1. Purpose
[Release No. 34–97901; File No. SR–
EMERALD–2023–15]
2 15
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
1 15
The Exchange proposes to amend the
exchange groupings of options
exchanges within the routing fee table
in Section 1)b) of the Fee Schedule, Fees
for Customer Orders Routed to Another
Options Exchange, to adjust the
groupings of options exchanges and to
adopt new routing fees.
Currently, the Exchange assesses
routing fees based upon (i) the origin
type of the order, (ii) whether or not it
is an order for standard option classes
in the Penny Interval Program 4 (‘‘Penny
classes’’) or an order for standard option
classes which are not in the Penny
Interval Program (‘‘Non-Penny classes’’)
(or other explicitly identified classes),
and (iii) to which away market it is
being routed. This assessment practice
is identical to the routing fees
assessment practice currently utilized
by the Exchange’s affiliates, Miami
International Securities Exchange, LLC
(‘‘MIAX Options’’) and MIAX PEARL,
LLC (‘‘MIAX Pearl’’). This is also similar
to the methodology utilized by the Cboe
BZX Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Cboe BZX
Options’’), a competing options
exchange, in assessing routing fees.
Cboe BZX Options has exchange
groupings in its fee schedule, similar to
those of the Exchange, whereby several
exchanges are grouped into the same
category, dependent upon the order’s
origin type and whether it is a Penny or
Non-Penny class.5
As a result of conducting a periodic
review of the current transaction fees
and rebates charged by away markets,
the Exchange has determined to amend
the exchange groupings of options
exchanges within the routing fee table to
better reflect the associated costs of
routing customer orders to those options
exchanges for execution. Specifically,
the Exchange is proposing to create a
separate group for Nasdaq MRX as a
result of a recent proposal by that
exchange to amend its fee schedule.6
The Exchange now proposes to adopt
a new row for ‘‘Routed, Priority
Customer, Penny Program,’’ and to
adopt a new associated fee of $0.30.
Additionally, the Exchange proposes to
adopt new row for, ‘‘Routed, Priority
Customer, Non-Penny Program,’’ and to
adopt a new associated fee of $0.50.
The Exchange also proposes to amend
the first row in the first column of the
table identified as, ‘‘Routed, Priority
Customer, Penny Program,’’ to relocate
Nasdaq MRX from the first row of the
table to the new proposed row also
identified as ‘‘Routed, Priority
Customer, Penny Program.’’ The impact
of this proposed change will be that the
routing fee for Priority Customer
Orders 7 in the Penny Program that are
routed to Nasdaq MRX, will increase
from $0.15 to $0.30.
The Exchange also proposes to amend
the exchange groupings in the third row
of the table, identified as ‘‘Routed,
Priority Customer, Non-Penny
Program,’’ to relocate Nasdaq MRX
Options from the third row of the table
to the new proposed row, also identified
as ‘‘Routed, Priority Customer, NonPenny Program.’’ The impact of this
proposed change will be that the routing
fee for Priority Customer Orders in the
Non-Penny Program that are routed to
Nasdaq MRX Options will increase from
$0.15 to $0.50. The purpose of the
proposed rule change is to adjust the
routing fee for Priority Customer Orders
routed to the Nasdaq MRX options
exchange to reflect the associated costs
for that routed execution in Penny and
Non-Penny Classes as a result of the
recent fee schedule change made by
Nasdaq MRX.
Accordingly, with the proposed
changes, the routing fee table will be:
us-options/emerald-options/rule-filings,
at MIAX’s principal office, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Notices
Description
Fees
Routed, Priority Customer, Penny Program, to: NYSE American, BOX, Cboe, Cboe EDGX Options, MIAX, Nasdaq PHLX (except SPY) .........................................................................................................................................................................................
Routed, Priority Customer, Penny Program, to: Nasdaq MRX ...........................................................................................................
Routed, Priority Customer, Penny Program, to: NYSE Arca Options, Cboe BZX Options, Cboe C2, Nasdaq GEMX, Nasdaq ISE,
NOM, Nasdaq PHLX (SPY only), MIAX Pearl, Nasdaq BX Options ..............................................................................................
Routed, Priority Customer, Non-Penny Program, to: NYSE American, BOX, Cboe, Cboe EDGX Options, MIAX, Nasdaq ISE,
Nasdaq PHLX ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Routed, Priority Customer, Non-Penny Program, to: Nasdaq MRX ...................................................................................................
Routed, Priority Customer, Non-Penny Program, to: NYSE Arca Options, Cboe BZX Options, Cboe C2, MIAX Pearl, Nasdaq
GEMX, NOM, Nasdaq BX Options ..................................................................................................................................................
Routed, Public Customer that is not a Priority Customer, Penny Program, to: NYSE American, NYSE Arca Options, Cboe BZX
Options, BOX, Cboe, Cboe C2, Cboe EDGX Options, Nasdaq GEMX, Nasdaq ISE, Nasdaq MRX, MIAX, MIAX Pearl, NOM,
Nasdaq PHLX, Nasdaq BX Options ................................................................................................................................................
Routed, Public Customer that is not a Priority Customer, Non-Penny Program, to: MIAX, NYSE American, Cboe, Nasdaq PHLX,
Cboe EDGX Options ........................................................................................................................................................................
Routed, Public Customer that is not a Priority Customer, Non-Penny Program, to: Cboe C2, BOX, NOM, Nasdaq ISE ................
Routed, Public Customer that is not a Priority Customer, Non-Penny Program, to: Cboe BZX Options, NYSE Arca Options,
Nasdaq GEMX, Nasdaq MRX, Nasdaq BX Options, MIAX Pearl ...................................................................................................
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
In determining to amend its routing
fees the Exchange took into account
transaction fees and rebates assessed by
the away market to which the Exchange
routes orders, as well as the Exchange’s
clearing costs, administrative,
regulatory, and technical costs
associated with routing orders to an
away market. The Exchange uses
unaffiliated routing brokers to route
orders to the away markets; the costs
associated with the use of these services
are included in the routing fees
specified in the Fee Schedule. This
routing fees structure is not only similar
to the Exchange’s affiliates, MIAX Pearl
and MIAX Options, but is also
comparable to the structure in place at
Cboe BZX Options,8 a competing
options exchange. The Exchange’s
routing fee structure approximates the
Exchange’s costs associated with routing
orders to away markets. The percontract transaction fee amount
associated with each grouping closely
approximates the Exchange’s all-in cost
(plus an additional, non-material
amount) 9 to execute that corresponding
contract at that corresponding exchange.
The Exchange notes that in determining
whether to adjust certain groupings of
options exchanges in the routing fee
8 See supra note 4. The Cboe BZX Options fee
schedule has exchange groupings, whereby several
exchanges are grouped into the same category,
dependent on the order’s Origin type and whether
it is a Penny or Non-Penny class. For example, Cboe
BZX Options fee code RR covers routed customer
orders in Non-Penny classes to NYSE Arca, Cboe
C2, Nasdaq ISE, Nasdaq Gemini, MIAX Emerald,
MIAX Pearl, or NOM, with a single fee of $1.25 per
contract.
9 This amount is to cover de minimis differences/
changes to away market fees (i.e., minor increases
or decreases) that would not necessitate a fee filing
by the Exchange to re-categorize the away exchange
into a different grouping. Routing fees are not
intended to be a profit center for the Exchange and
the Exchange’s target regarding routing fees and
expenses is to be as close as possible to net neutral.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
00:36 Jul 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
table, the Exchange considered the
transaction fees and rebates assessed by
away markets, and determined to amend
the grouping of exchanges that assess
transaction fees for routed orders within
a similar range. This same logic and
structure applies to all of the groupings
in the routing fee table. By utilizing the
same structure that is utilized by the
Exchange’s affiliates, MIAX Pearl and
MIAX Options, the Exchange’s
Members 10 will be assessed routing fees
in a similar manner. The Exchange
believes that this structure will
minimize any confusion as to the
method of assessing routing fees
between the three exchanges. The
Exchange notes that its affiliates, MIAX
Pearl and MIAX Options, will file to
make the same proposed routing fee
changes contained herein.
Implementation
The proposed rule change will
become operative on July 1, 2023.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to amend its Fee Schedule is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act 11
in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act 12 in
particular, in that it is an equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its members and
issuers and other persons using its
facilities. The Exchange also believes
the proposal furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 13 in that it is
designed to promote just and equitable
10 The term ‘‘Member’’ means an individual or
organization approved to exercise the trading rights
associated with a Trading Permit. Members are
deemed ‘‘members’’ under the Exchange Act. See
Exchange Rule 100.
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
13 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
46203
Sfmt 4703
$0.15
0.30
0.65
0.15
0.50
1.00
0.65
1.00
1.15
1.25
principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general to protect investors and the
public interest and is not designed to
permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers and dealers.
The Exchange believes the proposed
change to the exchange groupings of
options exchanges within the routing
fee table furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act and is
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the proposed
change will continue to apply in the
same manner to all Members that are
subject to routing fees. The Exchange
believes the proposed change to the
routing fee table exchange groupings
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act and is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade
and is not unfairly discriminatory
because the proposed change seeks to
recoup costs that are incurred by the
Exchange when routing Priority
Customer Orders to away markets on
behalf of Members and does so in the
same manner for all Members that are
subject to routing fees. The costs to the
Exchange to route orders to away
markets for execution primarily
includes transaction fees and rebates
assessed by the away markets to which
the Exchange routes orders, in addition
to the Exchange’s clearing costs,
administrative, regulatory and technical
costs. The Exchange believes that the
proposed re-categorization of certain
exchange groupings would enable the
Exchange to recover the costs it incurs
to route orders to the Nasdaq MRX
options exchange. The per-contract
transaction fee amount associated with
each grouping approximates the
Exchange’s all-in cost (plus an
additional, non-material amount) to
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
46204
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Notices
execute the corresponding contract at
the corresponding exchange.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange’s proposed re-categorization
of certain exchange groupings is
intended to enable the Exchange to
recover the costs it incurs to route
orders to away markets, particularly
Nasdaq MRX. The Exchange does not
believe that this proposal imposes any
unnecessary burden on competition
because it seeks to recoup costs incurred
by the Exchange when routing orders to
away markets on behalf of Members and
notes that at least one other options
exchange has a similar routing fee
structure.14
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,15 and Rule
19b–4(f)(2) 16 thereunder. At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
EMERALD–2023–15 on the subject line.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Paper Comments
[Release No. 34–97898; File No. SR–FINRA–
2023–010]
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–EMERALD–2023–15. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–EMERALD–2023–15 and should be
submitted on or before August 9, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–15269 Filed 7–18–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
supra note 4.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
16 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a
Proposed Rule Change To Provide
Relief Relating to Specified Option
Transactions Under FINRA Rule 4210
(Margin Requirements)
July 13, 2023.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 30,
2023, the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been
prepared by FINRA. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
FINRA is proposing to amend FINRA
Rule 4210 (Margin Requirements) to
provide margin relief for specified index
option transactions, known as
‘‘protected options,’’ and to make other
minor conforming revisions with regard
to the margin relief.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on FINRA’s website at
https://www.finra.org, at the principal
office of FINRA and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
FINRA included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. FINRA has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
14 See
1 15
15 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
00:36 Jul 19, 2023
17 17
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2 17
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
19JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 137 (Wednesday, July 19, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46202-46204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-15269]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-97901; File No. SR-EMERALD-2023-15]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX Emerald, LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Its Fee Schedule
July 13, 2023.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on June 29, 2023, MIAX Emerald, LLC (``MIAX Emerald'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing a proposal to amend the MIAX Emerald Fee
Schedule (``Fee Schedule'').
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://www.miaxglobal.com/markets/us-options/emerald-options/rule-filings, at MIAX's principal office, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the exchange groupings of options
exchanges within the routing fee table in Section 1)b) of the Fee
Schedule, Fees for Customer Orders Routed to Another Options Exchange,
to adjust the groupings of options exchanges and to adopt new routing
fees.
Currently, the Exchange assesses routing fees based upon (i) the
origin type of the order, (ii) whether or not it is an order for
standard option classes in the Penny Interval Program \4\ (``Penny
classes'') or an order for standard option classes which are not in the
Penny Interval Program (``Non-Penny classes'') (or other explicitly
identified classes), and (iii) to which away market it is being routed.
This assessment practice is identical to the routing fees assessment
practice currently utilized by the Exchange's affiliates, Miami
International Securities Exchange, LLC (``MIAX Options'') and MIAX
PEARL, LLC (``MIAX Pearl''). This is also similar to the methodology
utilized by the Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``Cboe BZX Options''), a
competing options exchange, in assessing routing fees. Cboe BZX Options
has exchange groupings in its fee schedule, similar to those of the
Exchange, whereby several exchanges are grouped into the same category,
dependent upon the order's origin type and whether it is a Penny or
Non-Penny class.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Exchange Rule 510(c).
\5\ See Cboe U.S. Options Fee Schedules, BZX Options, effective
May 15, 2023, ``Fee Codes and Associated Fees,'' at https://www.cboe.com/us/options/membership/fee_schedule/bzx/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As a result of conducting a periodic review of the current
transaction fees and rebates charged by away markets, the Exchange has
determined to amend the exchange groupings of options exchanges within
the routing fee table to better reflect the associated costs of routing
customer orders to those options exchanges for execution. Specifically,
the Exchange is proposing to create a separate group for Nasdaq MRX as
a result of a recent proposal by that exchange to amend its fee
schedule.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The Nasdaq MRX proposal (SR-MRX-2023-11) amends their fee
schedule to change the Taker Fee in Penny symbols in Tier 1 from
$0.00 to $0.15 for Priority Customer Orders and from $0.00 in Tier 1
for Priority Customer Orders in Non-Penny symbols to $0.35.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange now proposes to adopt a new row for ``Routed, Priority
Customer, Penny Program,'' and to adopt a new associated fee of $0.30.
Additionally, the Exchange proposes to adopt new row for, ``Routed,
Priority Customer, Non-Penny Program,'' and to adopt a new associated
fee of $0.50.
The Exchange also proposes to amend the first row in the first
column of the table identified as, ``Routed, Priority Customer, Penny
Program,'' to relocate Nasdaq MRX from the first row of the table to
the new proposed row also identified as ``Routed, Priority Customer,
Penny Program.'' The impact of this proposed change will be that the
routing fee for Priority Customer Orders \7\ in the Penny Program that
are routed to Nasdaq MRX, will increase from $0.15 to $0.30.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The term ``Priority Customer Order'' means an order for the
account of a Priority Customer. See Exchange Rule 100. The term
``Priority Customer'' means a person or entity that (i) is not a
broker or dealer in securities, and (ii) does not place more than
390 orders in listed options per day on average during a calendar
month for its own beneficial account(s). See Exchange Rule 100.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also proposes to amend the exchange groupings in the
third row of the table, identified as ``Routed, Priority Customer, Non-
Penny Program,'' to relocate Nasdaq MRX Options from the third row of
the table to the new proposed row, also identified as ``Routed,
Priority Customer, Non-Penny Program.'' The impact of this proposed
change will be that the routing fee for Priority Customer Orders in the
Non-Penny Program that are routed to Nasdaq MRX Options will increase
from $0.15 to $0.50. The purpose of the proposed rule change is to
adjust the routing fee for Priority Customer Orders routed to the
Nasdaq MRX options exchange to reflect the associated costs for that
routed execution in Penny and Non-Penny Classes as a result of the
recent fee schedule change made by Nasdaq MRX.
Accordingly, with the proposed changes, the routing fee table will
be:
[[Page 46203]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description Fees
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Routed, Priority Customer, Penny Program, to: NYSE $0.15
American, BOX, Cboe, Cboe EDGX Options, MIAX, Nasdaq
PHLX (except SPY)......................................
Routed, Priority Customer, Penny Program, to: Nasdaq MRX 0.30
Routed, Priority Customer, Penny Program, to: NYSE Arca 0.65
Options, Cboe BZX Options, Cboe C2, Nasdaq GEMX, Nasdaq
ISE, NOM, Nasdaq PHLX (SPY only), MIAX Pearl, Nasdaq BX
Options................................................
Routed, Priority Customer, Non-Penny Program, to: NYSE 0.15
American, BOX, Cboe, Cboe EDGX Options, MIAX, Nasdaq
ISE, Nasdaq PHLX.......................................
Routed, Priority Customer, Non-Penny Program, to: Nasdaq 0.50
MRX....................................................
Routed, Priority Customer, Non-Penny Program, to: NYSE 1.00
Arca Options, Cboe BZX Options, Cboe C2, MIAX Pearl,
Nasdaq GEMX, NOM, Nasdaq BX Options....................
Routed, Public Customer that is not a Priority Customer, 0.65
Penny Program, to: NYSE American, NYSE Arca Options,
Cboe BZX Options, BOX, Cboe, Cboe C2, Cboe EDGX
Options, Nasdaq GEMX, Nasdaq ISE, Nasdaq MRX, MIAX,
MIAX Pearl, NOM, Nasdaq PHLX, Nasdaq BX Options........
Routed, Public Customer that is not a Priority Customer, 1.00
Non-Penny Program, to: MIAX, NYSE American, Cboe,
Nasdaq PHLX, Cboe EDGX Options.........................
Routed, Public Customer that is not a Priority Customer, 1.15
Non-Penny Program, to: Cboe C2, BOX, NOM, Nasdaq ISE...
Routed, Public Customer that is not a Priority Customer, 1.25
Non-Penny Program, to: Cboe BZX Options, NYSE Arca
Options, Nasdaq GEMX, Nasdaq MRX, Nasdaq BX Options,
MIAX Pearl.............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In determining to amend its routing fees the Exchange took into
account transaction fees and rebates assessed by the away market to
which the Exchange routes orders, as well as the Exchange's clearing
costs, administrative, regulatory, and technical costs associated with
routing orders to an away market. The Exchange uses unaffiliated
routing brokers to route orders to the away markets; the costs
associated with the use of these services are included in the routing
fees specified in the Fee Schedule. This routing fees structure is not
only similar to the Exchange's affiliates, MIAX Pearl and MIAX Options,
but is also comparable to the structure in place at Cboe BZX
Options,\8\ a competing options exchange. The Exchange's routing fee
structure approximates the Exchange's costs associated with routing
orders to away markets. The per-contract transaction fee amount
associated with each grouping closely approximates the Exchange's all-
in cost (plus an additional, non-material amount) \9\ to execute that
corresponding contract at that corresponding exchange. The Exchange
notes that in determining whether to adjust certain groupings of
options exchanges in the routing fee table, the Exchange considered the
transaction fees and rebates assessed by away markets, and determined
to amend the grouping of exchanges that assess transaction fees for
routed orders within a similar range. This same logic and structure
applies to all of the groupings in the routing fee table. By utilizing
the same structure that is utilized by the Exchange's affiliates, MIAX
Pearl and MIAX Options, the Exchange's Members \10\ will be assessed
routing fees in a similar manner. The Exchange believes that this
structure will minimize any confusion as to the method of assessing
routing fees between the three exchanges. The Exchange notes that its
affiliates, MIAX Pearl and MIAX Options, will file to make the same
proposed routing fee changes contained herein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See supra note 4. The Cboe BZX Options fee schedule has
exchange groupings, whereby several exchanges are grouped into the
same category, dependent on the order's Origin type and whether it
is a Penny or Non-Penny class. For example, Cboe BZX Options fee
code RR covers routed customer orders in Non-Penny classes to NYSE
Arca, Cboe C2, Nasdaq ISE, Nasdaq Gemini, MIAX Emerald, MIAX Pearl,
or NOM, with a single fee of $1.25 per contract.
\9\ This amount is to cover de minimis differences/changes to
away market fees (i.e., minor increases or decreases) that would not
necessitate a fee filing by the Exchange to re-categorize the away
exchange into a different grouping. Routing fees are not intended to
be a profit center for the Exchange and the Exchange's target
regarding routing fees and expenses is to be as close as possible to
net neutral.
\10\ The term ``Member'' means an individual or organization
approved to exercise the trading rights associated with a Trading
Permit. Members are deemed ``members'' under the Exchange Act. See
Exchange Rule 100.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Implementation
The proposed rule change will become operative on July 1, 2023.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Fee Schedule
is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \11\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \12\ in
particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its members and issuers and other persons
using its facilities. The Exchange also believes the proposal furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \13\ in that it is
designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general to protect investors and the
public interest and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination
between customers, issuers, brokers and dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed change to the exchange groupings
of options exchanges within the routing fee table furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act and is reasonable, equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory because the proposed change will
continue to apply in the same manner to all Members that are subject to
routing fees. The Exchange believes the proposed change to the routing
fee table exchange groupings furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act and is designed to promote just and equitable principles of
trade and is not unfairly discriminatory because the proposed change
seeks to recoup costs that are incurred by the Exchange when routing
Priority Customer Orders to away markets on behalf of Members and does
so in the same manner for all Members that are subject to routing fees.
The costs to the Exchange to route orders to away markets for execution
primarily includes transaction fees and rebates assessed by the away
markets to which the Exchange routes orders, in addition to the
Exchange's clearing costs, administrative, regulatory and technical
costs. The Exchange believes that the proposed re-categorization of
certain exchange groupings would enable the Exchange to recover the
costs it incurs to route orders to the Nasdaq MRX options exchange. The
per-contract transaction fee amount associated with each grouping
approximates the Exchange's all-in cost (plus an additional, non-
material amount) to
[[Page 46204]]
execute the corresponding contract at the corresponding exchange.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange's proposed re-
categorization of certain exchange groupings is intended to enable the
Exchange to recover the costs it incurs to route orders to away
markets, particularly Nasdaq MRX. The Exchange does not believe that
this proposal imposes any unnecessary burden on competition because it
seeks to recoup costs incurred by the Exchange when routing orders to
away markets on behalf of Members and notes that at least one other
options exchange has a similar routing fee structure.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\15\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \16\ thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change,
the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such
action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether
the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-EMERALD-2023-15 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-EMERALD-2023-15. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-EMERALD-2023-15 and should
be submitted on or before August 9, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-15269 Filed 7-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P