Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend NOM Options 3 Rules, 45248-45253 [2023-14910]
Download as PDF
45248
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 134 / Friday, July 14, 2023 / Notices
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 742.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of NASA, including
whether the information collected has
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
NASA’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including automated
collection techniques or the use of other
forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection.
They will also become a matter of
public record.
William Edwards-Bodmer,
NASA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023–14898 Filed 7–13–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
NATIONAL FOUNDATION OF THE
ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
Institute of Museum and Library
Services
47th Meeting of the National Museum
and Library Services Board; Correction
Institute of Museum and
Library Services (IMLS), National
Foundation of the Arts and the
Humanities (NFAH).
ACTION: Notice; correction.
AGENCY:
IMLS published a document
in the Federal Register of June 26, 2023,
concerning notice of the 47th National
Museum and Library Services Board
meeting on July 18th, 2023. Since then,
the agency has updated its agenda.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katherine Maas, Chief of Staff and
Alternate Designated Federal Officer,
(202) 653–4798; kmaas@imls.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Correction
In the Federal Register of June 26,
2023, in FR Doc. 2023–13421, on page
41421, at the bottom of the third
column, please adjust the agenda to
read:
I. Call to Order
II. Approval of Minutes of the 46th Meeting
III. Director’s Welcome and Update
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Jul 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
IV. Program Overview—Library Grants to
State Program
V. IMLS 250—Preparing for the Upcoming
250th Anniversary of the United States
VI. Advancing Information Literacy
VII. National Medals for Museum and Library
Services Program
VIII. Adjourn Meeting
Week of August 7, 2023—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of August 7, 2023.
Dated: July 11, 2023.
Brianna Ingram,
Paralegal Specialist.
Week of August 21, 2023—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of August 21, 2023.
[FR Doc. 2023–14978 Filed 7–13–23; 8:45 am]
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 7036–01–P
For more information or to verify the
status of meetings, contact Wesley Held
at 301–287–3591 or via email at
Wesley.Held@nrc.gov.
The NRC is holding the meetings
under the authority of the Government
in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2023–0001]
Sunshine Act Meetings
Weeks of July 17, 24, 31,
August 7, 14, 21, 2023. The schedule for
Commission meetings is subject to
change on short notice. The NRC
Commission Meeting Schedule can be
found on the internet at: https://
www.nrc.gov/public-involve/publicmeetings/schedule.html.
PLACE: The NRC provides reasonable
accommodation to individuals with
disabilities where appropriate. If you
need a reasonable accommodation to
participate in these public meetings or
need this meeting notice or the
transcript or other information from the
public meetings in another format (e.g.,
braille, large print), please notify Anne
Silk, NRC Disability Program Specialist,
at 301–287–0745, by videophone at
240–428–3217, or by email at
Anne.Silk@nrc.gov. Determinations on
requests for reasonable accommodation
will be made on a case-by-case basis.
STATUS: Public.
Members of the public may request to
receive the information in these notices
electronically. If you would like to be
added to the distribution, please contact
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Office of the Secretary, Washington, DC
20555, at 301–415–1969, or by email at
Wendy.Moore@nrc.gov.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
TIME AND DATE:
Week of July 17, 2023
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of July 17, 2023.
Week of July 24, 2023—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of July 24, 2023.
Week of July 31, 2023—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of July 31, 2023.
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Week of August 14, 2023—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of August 14, 2023.
Dated: July 12, 2023.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Wesley W. Held,
Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–15092 Filed 7–12–23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–97870; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2023–018]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Amend
NOM Options 3 Rules
July 10, 2023.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 27,
2023, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
(‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend The
Nasdaq Options Market LLC (‘‘NOM’’)
Rules at Options 3, Options Trading
Rules, at: Section 4 Entry and Display of
Quotes; Section 5, Entry and Display of
Orders; Section 7, Types of Orders and
Order and Quote Protocols; and Section
15, Risk Protections. The Exchange also
1 15
2 17
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
14JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 134 / Friday, July 14, 2023 / Notices
proposes to amend Options 5, Section 4,
Order Routing.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/
rulebook/nasdaq/rules, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
1. Purpose
NOM proposes to amend Options 3,
Options Trading Rules, at: Section 4
Entry and Display of Quotes; Section 5,
Entry and Display of Orders; Section 7,
Types of Orders and Order and Quote
Protocols; and Section 15, Risk
Protections. The Exchange also proposes
to amend Options 5, Section 4, Order
Routing. Each change will be discussed
below. The amendments proposed
herein seek to codify the current System
functionality. The proposed
amendments will not result in System
changes.
Option 3, Sections 4 and 5
The Exchange proposes to codify
existing functionality that allows Market
Makers to submit their quotes to the
Exchange in block quantities as a single
bulk message. In other words, a Market
Maker may submit a single message to
the Exchange, which may contain bids
and offers in multiple series. The
Exchange’s current rules do not specify
bulk messaging for orders. The
Exchange has historically provided
Market Makers with information
regarding bulk messaging in its publicly
available technical specifications.3 To
promote greater transparency, the
Exchange is seeking to codify this
3 See https://www.nasdaq.com/docs/2023/01/12/
0054-Q23_SQF_8.2b%20akg_NAM.pdf (specifying
for bulk quoting of up to 200 quotes per quote block
message). The specifications note in other places
the manner in which a Participant can send such
quote block messages.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Jul 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
functionality in its Rulebook.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
amend NOM Options 3, Section 4(b)(3)
to memorialize that quotes may be
submitted as a bulk message. The
Exchange also proposes to add a
definition of ‘‘bulk message’’ in new
subparagraph (i) of Options 3, Section
4(b)(3), which will provide that a bulk
message means a single electronic
message submitted by a Market Maker to
the Exchange which may contain a
specified number of quotations as
designated by the Exchange.4 The bulk
message, submitted via SQF,5 may
enter, modify, or cancel quotes. Bulk
messages are handled by the System in
the same manner as it handles a single
quote message. MRX recently added
bulk messages to MRX Options 3,
Section 4(b)(3).6 The proposed
amendment to the Rulebook to add
NOM Options 3, Section 4(b)(3) will not
result in a System change.
The Exchange also proposes to amend
NOM Options 3, Section 4(b)(6) to
provide the following,
A quote will not be executed at a price that
trades through another market or displayed at
a price that would lock or cross another
market. If, at the time of entry, a quote would
cause a locked or crossed market violation or
would cause a trade-through, violation, it
will be re-priced to the current national best
offer (for bids) or the current national best
bid (for offers) as non-displayed, and
displayed at one minimum price variance
above (for offers) or below (for bids) the
national best price.
Where a quote is re-priced to avoid a
locked or crossed market, the best bid or
offer will be non-displayed and the repriced order will be displayed at a price
that is one minimum trading increment
4 Id. As noted above, quote bulk messages can
presently contain up to 200 quotes per message.
This is the maximum amount that is permitted in
a bulk message. The Exchange would announce any
change to these specifications in an Options
Technical Update distributed to all Participants.
5 ‘‘Specialized Quote Feed’’ or ‘‘SQF’’ is an
interface that allows Market Makers to connect,
send, and receive messages related to quotes and
Immediate-or-Cancel Orders into and from the
Exchange. Features include the following: (1)
options symbol directory messages (e.g., underlying
instruments); (2) system event messages (e.g., start
of trading hours messages and start of opening); (3)
trading action messages (e.g., halts and resumes); (4)
execution messages; (5) quote messages; (6)
Immediate-or-Cancel Order messages; (7) risk
protection triggers and purge notifications; and (8)
opening imbalance messages. The SQF Purge
Interface only receives and notifies of purge
requests from the Market Maker. Market Makers
may only enter interest into SQF in their assigned
options series. See Options 3, Section 7(e)(1)(B).
6 See Securities Exchange Act, Release No. 95982
(October 4, 2022), 87 FR 61391 (October 11, 2022)
(SR–MRX–2022–18) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
To Amend Its Rules in Connection With a
Technology Migration to Enhanced Nasdaq
Functionality) (‘‘SR–MRX–2022–18’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45249
inferior to the ABBO. A similar change
is proposed for Options 3, Section 5(d).
MRX recently amended Options 3,
Section 4(b)(6) and Options 3, Section
5(d) to include this language.7 At this
time, the Exchange proposes to amend
NOM’s rule text to reflect that the actual
price remains non-displayed in this
scenario. The proposed amendment to
the Rulebook to add NOM Options 3,
Section 4(b)(6) will not result in a
System change.
Similarly, the Exchange proposes to
add a new NOM Options 3, Section
4(b)(7) to clarify that, today, NOM’s
System will automatically execute
eligible quotes using the Exchange’s
displayed best bid and offer (‘‘BBO’’) or
the Exchange’s non-displayed order
book (‘‘internal BBO’’) 8 if the best bid
and/or offer on the Exchange has been
repriced pursuant to Options 3, Section
5(d) and Options 3, Section 4(b)(6). This
rule text seeks to codify the current
System function and make clear that the
internal BBO is comprised of both
orders and quotes.9 MRX recently
amended Options 3, Section 4(b)(7) to
include the same language.10 At this
time, the Exchange proposes to align
NOM’s rule text in Options 3, Section
4(b)(7) to MRX’s rule text in Options 3,
Section 4(b)(7). The proposed
amendment to the Rulebook to add
NOM Options 3, Section 4(b)(7) will not
result in a System change.
Finally, the Exchange proposes to
amend NOM Options 3, Section 5(c) to
include a citation to Options 3, Section
4(b)(6) as the internal BBO is comprised
of both orders and quotes, similar to
MRX.11
The amendments proposed to Options
3, Sections 4 and 5 do not change the
current System functionality.
Options 3, Section 7
The Exchange proposes to amend the
‘‘Post-Only Order type at Options 3,
Section 7(a)(9) to rename the order type
‘‘Add Liquidity Order’’. The Exchange
believes the name better describes this
order type. This is also the name of a
similar order type on MRX.12 The
Exchange also proposes to capitalize the
7 See Securities Exchange Act, Release No. 95807
(September 16, 2022), 87 FR 57933 (September 22,
2022) (SR–MRX–2022–16) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
To Amend Certain Rules in Connection With a
Technology Migration to Enhanced Nasdaq
Functionality) (‘‘SR–MRX–2022–16’’).
8 The internal BBO refers to the Exchange’s nondisplayed book.
9 The Exchange also proposes to re-number
current Options 3, Section 4(b)(7) as (8).
10 See SR–MRX–2022–16.
11 Id.
12 See MRX Options 7, Section 7(n).
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
45250
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 134 / Friday, July 14, 2023 / Notices
term ‘‘Opening Process’’ which refers to
NOM Options 3, Section 8.
The Exchange proposes to amend the
description of Specialized Quote Feed
or ‘‘SQF’’ within NOM Options 3,
Section 7(e)(1)(B) to add rule text which
states, ‘‘Immediate-or-Cancel Orders
entered into SQF are not subject to the
Order Price Protection, Market Order
Spread Protection, or Size Limitation
Protection in Options 3, Section
15(a)(1), (a)(2), and (b)(2) respectively.’’
This rule text is currently noted within
Options 3, Section 7(b)(2) above. The
Exchange is adding the same language
into the description of SQF to provide
a more complete description. The
addition of this information would align
the level of information of NOM’s rule
text to NOM’s rule text at
Supplementary Material .03(c) to
Options 3, Section 7. The Exchange is
proposing a similar amendment to
Options 3, Section 7(e)(1)(D) regarding
Quote Using Orders or ‘‘QUO’’ 13 to state
that, ‘‘Orders entered into QUO are not
subject to the Order Price Protection or
Size Limitation in Options 3, Section
15(a)(1) and (b)(2), respectively.’’ All
orders entered into QUO are not subject
to the Order Price Protection or Size
Limitation protections, not Immediateor-Cancel Orders. Also, the Market
Order Spread Protection is not
applicable to QUO because QUO cannot
be utilized to send Market Orders to the
Exchange, only FIX may be utilized to
send Market Orders. The proposed
amendment to NOM Options 3, Section
7(e)(1)(B) and (D) will not result in
System changes.
Options 3, Section 15
MRX recently amended its Order
Price Protection (‘‘OPP’’) 14 rule.15
MRX’s OPP rule utilized different rule
text to explain the OPP functionality
than is currently on NOM. At this time,
the Exchange proposes to amend NOM
Options 3, Section 15(a)(1) to align
NOM’s rule text to MRX’s rule text
within Options 3, Section 15(a)(1)(A).
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
remove the references to ‘‘day limit,
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
13 ‘‘Quote
Using Orders’’ or ‘‘QUO’’ is an interface
that allows Market Makers to connect, send, and
receive messages related to single-sided orders to
and from the Exchange. Order Features include the
following: (1) options symbol directory messages
(e.g., underlying); (2) system event messages (e.g.,
start of trading hours messages and start of
opening); (3) trading action messages (e.g., halts and
resumes); (4) execution messages; (5) order
messages; and (6) risk protection triggers and cancel
notifications. Orders submitted by Market Makers
over this interface are treated as quotes. Market
Makers may only enter interest into QUO in their
assigned options series.
14 OPP prevents the execution of Limit Orders at
prices outside pre-set parameters.
15 See SR–MRX–2022–18.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Jul 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
good til cancelled, and immediate or
cancel orders’’ and, instead, simply refer
to ‘‘Limit’’ Orders as that order type
accurately captures the scope of the
orders subject to OPP. Further, the
Exchange proposes to remove ‘‘market
orders’’ from the next sentence since
OPP only applies to limit orders. The
Exchange also proposes to capitalize
‘‘Opening’’ and add Process in Options
2, Section 15(a)(1)(A) to refer to the
Opening Process within Options 3,
Section 8. The proposed amendment to
Options 3, Section 15(a)(1) will not
result in a System change.
Additionally, the Exchange proposes
to amend its Acceptable Trade Range
(‘‘ATR’’) Rule within NOM Options 3,
Section 15(b)(1).16 MRX recently
amended its ATR rule.17 MRX’s ATR
rule utilized different rule text to
explain the ATR functionality. At this
time, the Exchange proposes to amend
Options 3, Section 15(b)(1)(A) to add the
word ‘‘quote’’ in that same sentence,
where it was omitted and also add the
words ‘‘after the Posting Period’’ to
explain when a new ATR would be
calculated to provide more context to
the rule.18
Additionally, similar to MRX Options
3, Section 15(a)(2)(A)(v) the Exchange
proposes to add the following rule text
within NOM Options 3, Section
15(b)(1)(C),
There will be three categories of options for
Acceptable Trade Range: (1) Penny Interval
Program Options trading in one cent
increments for options trading at less than
$3.00 and increments of five cents for options
trading at $3.00 or more, (2) Penny Interval
Program Options trading in one-cent
increments for all prices, and (3) Non-Penny
Interval Program Options.
This is how NOM operates today.
This rule text makes clear the
application of NOM Options 3, Section
3 to the ATR rule by explicitly stating
the Exchange’s ability to set different
ATR values by options category. These
ATR values are set forth in NOM’s
System Settings document which is
posted online.19 The Exchange believes
this rule text will add greater clarity to
the ATR rule. The proposed amendment
to Options 3, Section 15(b)(1) will not
result in a System change.
The Exchange proposes to capitalize
the words ‘‘opening process’’ at the end
16 ATR is designed to guard against the System
from experiencing dramatic price swings by
preventing the immediate execution of quotes and
orders beyond the thresholds set by the protection.
17 See SR–MRX–2022–16.
18 The Exchange also proposes technical
amendments to capitalize ‘‘the’’ and add opening
parentheses in two places.
19 https://www.nasdaq.com/docs/
BXOptionsSystemSettings.
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of Options 3, Section 15(c)(1) which
refers to the Anti-Internalization
functionality. The term refers to the
process within Options 3, Section 8.
The Exchange proposes to and the
words ‘‘or quote’’ to Options 3, Section
15(c)(3) which refers to the Post-Only
Quoting Protection. The paragraph
refers to order or quote throughout and
was mistakenly omitted in one sentence.
Options 5, Section 4
Options 5, Section 4 describes the
manner in which NOM routes orders.
The Exchange proposes to amend NOM
Options 5, Section 4(a) to eliminate the
following rule text,
The term ‘‘System routing table’’ refers to
the proprietary process for determining the
specific trading venues to which the System
routes orders and the order in which it routes
them. The Exchange reserves the right to
maintain a different System routing table for
different routing options and to modify the
System routing table at any time without
notice.
When ISE filed to amend its routing
rules, it did not include this sentence.20
At this time, the Exchange proposes to
remove this unnecessary term that is not
utilized elsewhere within Options 5,
Section 4. Removing this rule text will
harmonize NOM’s Options 5, Section 4
rule with ISE’s Options 5, Section 4(e).
The proposed amendment to Options 5,
Section 4(a) will not result in a System
change.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,21 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,22
in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest.
Option 3, Sections 4 and 5
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to memorialize its bulk
message functionality within Options 3,
Section 4(b)(3) is consistent with the
Act as it will codify existing
functionality, thereby promoting
transparency in the Exchange’s rules
20 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94894
(May 18, 2022), 87 FR 30294 (May 12, 2022) (SR–
ISE–2022–11) (Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Routing Functionality in Connection With a
Technology Migration).
21 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
22 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 134 / Friday, July 14, 2023 / Notices
and reducing any potential confusion.23
This functionality provides Market
Makers with an additional tool to meet
their various quoting obligations in a
manner they deem appropriate,
consistent with the purpose of the bulk
message functionality to facilitate
Market Makers’ provision of liquidity.
By providing Market Makers with
additional control over the quotes they
use to provide liquidity to the Exchange,
this tool may benefit all investors
through additional execution
opportunities at potentially improved
prices. Today, MRX offers this same
functionality within Options 3, Section
4(b)(3). Further, the Exchange does not
believe that the offering the bulk
message functionality to only Market
Makers would permit unfair
discrimination. Market Makers play a
unique and critical role in the options
market by providing liquidity and active
markets, and are subject to various
quoting obligations which other market
participants are not, including
obligations to maintain active markets,
update quotes in response to changed
market conditions, to compete with
other Market Makers in its appointed
classes, and to provide intra-day quotes
in its appointed classes.24 Bulk message
functionality provides Market Makers
with a means to help them satisfy these
obligations. The proposed amendment
to the Rulebook to add NOM Options 3,
Section 4(b)(3) will not result in a
System change.
The Exchange’s proposal to amend
Options 3, Section 4(b)(6) to make clear
that the actual price remains nondisplayed during re-pricing is consistent
with the Act and removes impediments
to and perfects the mechanism of a free
and open market and a national market
system because it displays a re-priced
order that does not lock or cross an
away market. The rule text clearly
explains that the best bid or offer will
be non-displayed and the re-priced
order will be displayed. A similar
change is proposed for NOM Options 3,
Section 5(d). MRX recently amended
Options 3, Section 4(b)(6) and Options
3, Section 5(d) to include the same
language.25 The proposed change aligns
NOM’s rule text to MRX’s rule text. The
proposed amendment to the Rulebook to
add NOM Options 3, Section 4(b)(6) will
not result in a System change.
The Exchange’s proposal to add a new
Options 3, Section 4(b)(7) to clarify that,
today, NOM’s System will automatically
23 As discussed above, this existing functionality
is currently described in the Exchange’s publicly
available technical specifications. See supra note 3.
24 See Options 2, Sections 4 and 5.
25 See SR–MRX–2022–16.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Jul 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
execute eligible quotes using the
Exchange’s displayed best bid and offer
(‘‘BBO’’) or the Exchange’s nondisplayed order book (‘‘internal BBO’’)
if the best bid and/or offer on the
Exchange has been repriced pursuant to
Options 3, Section 5(d) and Options 3,
Section 4(b)(6) is consistent with the
Act and protects investors and the
public interest. This rule text seeks to
codify the current System function and
make clear that the internal BBO is
comprised or both orders and quotes,
both of which are considered for price
checks. MRX recently amended Options
3, Section 4(b)(7) to include this
language.26 The proposed change aligns
NOM’s rule text to MRX’s rule text. The
proposed amendment to the Rulebook to
add NOM Options 3, Section 4(b)(7) will
not result in a System change.
Options 3, Section 7
The Exchange’s proposal to amend
the name of the ‘‘Post-Only Order type
at Options 3, Section 7(a)(9) to rename
the order type ‘‘Add Liquidity Order’’ is
a non-substantive technical amendment
that will align the name to that used on
MRX.27
The Exchange’s proposal to amend
the description of SQF within Options
3, Section 7(e)(1)(B) and the description
of QUO within Options 3, Section
7(e)(1)(D) is consistent with the Act as
this rule text is currently noted within
Options 3, Section 7(b)(2) above. The
addition of this language into the
description of SQF and QUO provides a
more complete description of this
protocol. The addition of this
information also aligns the level of
information with that offered on MRX
for SQF within Supplementary Material
.03(c) to Options 3, Section 7 and
differentiates the information from
QUO. All orders entered into QUO are
not subject to the Order Price Protection
or Size Limitation protections, not
Immediate-or-Cancel Orders. Also, the
Market Order Spread Protection is not
applicable to QUO because QUO cannot
be utilized to send Market Orders to the
Exchange, only FIX may be utilized to
send Market Orders. The proposed
amendment to NOM Options 3, Section
7(e)(1)(B) will not result in a System
change.
Options 3, Section 15
The Exchange’s proposal to amend
NOM Options 3, Section 15(a)(1) to
align NOM’s OPP rule text to MRX’s
OPP rule text within Options 3, Section
PO 00000
26 Id.
27 See
MRX Options 7, Section 7(n).
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45251
15(a)(1)(A) is consistent with the Act 28
because removing the references to ‘‘day
limit, good til cancelled, and immediate
or cancel orders’’ and, instead, referring
to ‘‘Limit’’ Orders accurately captures
the scope of the orders subject to OPP.
This change would also make
unnecessary the reference to market
orders. The proposed amendment to
Options 3, Section 15(a)(1) will not
result in a System change.
The Exchange’s proposal to amend
the ATR Rule within Options 3, Section
15(b)(1) is consistent with the Act. MRX
recently amended its ATR rule.29 MRX’s
ATR rule utilized different rule text to
explain the ATR functionality.
Amending NOM Section 15(b)(1) to add
the words ‘‘after the Posting Period’’ to
explain when a new ATR would be
calculated provides more context to the
rule will provide greater context to the
sentence. Additionally, adding the word
‘‘quote’’ in the one sentence where it is
omitted will add clarity the sentence.
The proposed amendment to Options 3,
Section 15(b)(1) will not result in a
System change. Also, adding rule text
within NOM Options 3, Section
15(b)(1)(C) to make clear the Exchange’s
ability to set different ATR values by
options category is consistent with the
Act because the ATR risk protection
limits the range of prices at which an
order and quote trades and would take
into account the minimum increment.
The ability for the Exchange to set the
ATR based on the increment allows the
Exchange to set appropriate limits. The
Exchange believes this rule text will add
greater clarity to the ATR rule. The
proposed amendment to Options 3,
Section 15(b)(1) will not result in a
System change.
Options 5, Section 4
Eliminating an unnecessary term in
Options 5, Section 4(a) that is not
utilized elsewhere within Options 5,
Section 4 which is unnecessary is
consistent with the Act as it will remove
confusion. The proposed amendment to
Options 5, Section 4(a) will not result in
a System change.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
28 MRX recently amended its Order Price
Protection (‘‘OPP’’) rule. See SR–MRX–2022–18.
29 See SR–MRX–2022–16.
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
45252
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 134 / Friday, July 14, 2023 / Notices
Option 3, Sections 4 and 5
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to memorialize its bulk
message functionality within Options 3,
Section 4(b)(3) does not impose an
undue burden on intra-market
competition. While the Exchange
currently offers this functionality to
Market Makers only, bulk messaging is
intended to provide Market Makers with
an additional tool to meet their various
quoting obligations in a manner they
deem appropriate. As such, the
Exchange believes that this functionality
may facilitate Market Makers’ provision
of liquidity, thereby benefiting all
market participants through additional
execution opportunities at potentially
improved prices. Furthermore, while
the Exchange will offer the proposed
Post-Only Quote Configuration to
Market Makers only, the proposed risk
protection will enhance the ability of
Market Makers to add liquidity and
avoid removing liquidity from the
Exchange’s order book in the manner
described above. Greater liquidity
benefits all market participants by
providing more trading opportunities
and attracting greater participation by
Market Makers. The Exchange believes
that its proposal to memorialize its bulk
message functionality within Options 3,
Section 4(b)(3) does not impose an
undue burden on inter-market
competition as other options exchanges
may adopt this functionality.
The Exchange’s proposal to amend
NOM’s rules at Options 3, Section
4(b)(6) and Options 3, Section 4(b)(7) do
not impose an undue burden on
competition because all options markets
must not trade-through other orders on
their markets as well as away markets.
The proposed change aligns NOM’s rule
text to MRX’s rule text.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Options 3, Section 7
The Exchange’s proposal to amend
the name of the ‘‘Post-Only Order type
at Options 3, Section 7(a)(9) to rename
the order type ‘‘Add Liquidity Order’’ is
a non-substantive technical amendment
that does not impose an undue burden
on competition.
Amending the description of SQF
within Options 3, Section 7(e)(1)(B) and
the description of QUO within Options
3, Section 7(e)(1)(D) does not impose an
undue burden on competition The
addition of this language into the
description of SQF and QUO provides a
more complete description of this
protocol.
Options 3, Section 15
The Exchange’s proposal to amend
NOM Options 3, Section 15(a)(1) to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Jul 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
align NOM’s OPP rule text to MRX’s
OPP rule text within Options 3, Section
15(a)(1)(A) does not impose an undue
burden on competition because
removing the references to ‘‘day limit,
good til cancelled, and immediate or
cancel orders’’ and, instead, referring to
‘‘Limit’’ Orders accurately captures the
scope of the orders subject to OPP. This
change would also make unnecessary
the reference to market orders.
The Exchange’s proposal to amend
the ATR Rule within Options 3, Section
15(b)(1) does not impose an undue
burden on competition. Amending
NOM Section 15(b)(1) to add the words
‘‘after the Posting Period’’ to explain
when a new ATR would be calculated
provides more context to the rule will
provide greater context to the sentence.
Additionally, adding the word ‘‘quote’’
in the one sentence where it is omitted
will add clarity the sentence. Adding
rule text within NOM Options 3,
Section 15(b)(1)(C) to make clear the
Exchange’s ability to set different ATR
values by options category does not
impose an undue burden on
competition because the ability for the
Exchange to set the ATR based on the
increment allows the Exchange to set
appropriate limits. The Exchange
believes this rule text will add greater
clarity to the ATR rule.
Options 5, Section 4
Eliminating an unnecessary reference
within amend Options 5, Section 4(a)
does not impose an undue burden on
competition because the term is not
utilized elsewhere within Options 5,
Section 4.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 30 and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.31
30 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give
31 17
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
NASDAQ–2023–018 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–NASDAQ–2023–018. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 134 / Friday, July 14, 2023 / Notices
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–NASDAQ–2023–018 and should be
submitted on or before August 4, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.32
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–14910 Filed 7–13–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270–818, OMB Control No.
3235–0774]
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request; Extension:
Amendments to the National Market
System Plan Governing the
Consolidated Audit Trail
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–2736
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(‘‘PRA’’) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) a request for approval of
extension of the previously approved
collection of information provided for in
connection with amendments 1 adopted
pursuant to the statutory authority
provided by the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934,2 including Sections
11A(a)(3)(B),3 17(a),4 19(b),5 and 23(a) 6
thereof, and pursuant to Rule 608(a)(2)
and (b)(2),7 to a National Market System
(NMS) Plan filed with the Commission
under Rule 613 (17 CFR 242.613), under
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
32 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88890
(May 15, 2020), 85 FR 31322 (May 22, 2020) (File
No. S7–13–19) (‘‘Adopting Release’’).
2 See 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.
3 See 15 U.S.C. 78k–1(a)(3)(B).
4 See 15 U.S.C. 78q(a).
5 See 15 U.S.C. 78s(b).
6 See 15 U.S.C. 78w(a).
7 See 17 CFR 242.608(a)(2), (b)(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Jul 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
The amendments, as adopted,
required two new collections of
information:
a. Implementation Plan. The
amendments require the Participants,
within 30 calendar days following the
effective date of the amendments, to
prepare, file with the Commission, and
make publicly available on a website a
complete CAT implementation plan
(‘‘Implementation Plan’’) that includes a
detailed timeline for achieving various
implementation milestones.
b. Quarterly Progress Reports. The
amendments require the Participants,
within 30 calendar days after the end of
each calendar quarter, to prepare, file
with the Commission, and make
publicly available on a website a
complete report (the ‘‘Quarterly Progress
Report’’) that provides a detailed and
up-to-date description of the progress
made by the Participants toward each of
the milestones identified in the
Implementation Plan.
The one-time information collection
associated with the Implementation
Plan was completed by the Participants,
so there will be no further burdens
associated with the Implementation
Plan. The Quarterly Progress Report
information collection continues.
There are currently 25 Participants,
who must complete four Quarterly
Progress Reports per year. The
Commission staff estimates that, on the
average, most Quarterly Progress
Reports require approximately 72 hours
per Participant, and cost approximately
$8,000 per Participant. The Commission
staff estimates Participants spend a total
of approximately 7,200 hours per year
(25 × 4 × 72) and $800,000 per year (25
× 4 × $8,000) complying with the rule.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
under the PRA unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The public may view background
documentation for this information
collection at the following website:
www.reginfo.gov. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent by
August 14, 2023 to (i) www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain and (ii) David
Bottom, Director/Chief Information
Officer, Securities and Exchange
Commission, c/o John Pezzullo, 100 F
Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or by
sending an email to: PRA_Mailbox@
sec.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00126
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45253
Dated: July 11, 2023.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–15000 Filed 7–13–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–97871; File No. SR–Phlx–
2023–27]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
Phlx LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Phlx Options
3 and 4A Rules
July 10, 2023.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 27,
2023, Nasdaq Phlx LLC (‘‘Phlx’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Rules at Options 3, Options Trading
Rules, at: Section 4 Entry and Display of
Quotes; Section 5, Entry and Display of
Orders; Section 7, Types of Orders and
Order and Quote Protocols; Section 8,
Options Opening Process; Section 10,
Electronic Execution Priority and
Processing in the System; Section 14,
Complex Orders; and Section 15, Risk
Protections.
The Exchange also proposes to amend
Phlx Options 4A, Sections 6, Position
Limits, and Section 12, Terms of Index
Options Contracts.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/
rulebook/phlx/rules, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
1 15
2 17
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
14JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 134 (Friday, July 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45248-45253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-14910]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-97870; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2023-018]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend NOM Options 3 Rules
July 10, 2023.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 27, 2023, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend The Nasdaq Options Market LLC
(``NOM'') Rules at Options 3, Options Trading Rules, at: Section 4
Entry and Display of Quotes; Section 5, Entry and Display of Orders;
Section 7, Types of Orders and Order and Quote Protocols; and Section
15, Risk Protections. The Exchange also
[[Page 45249]]
proposes to amend Options 5, Section 4, Order Routing.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/nasdaq/rules, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
NOM proposes to amend Options 3, Options Trading Rules, at: Section
4 Entry and Display of Quotes; Section 5, Entry and Display of Orders;
Section 7, Types of Orders and Order and Quote Protocols; and Section
15, Risk Protections. The Exchange also proposes to amend Options 5,
Section 4, Order Routing. Each change will be discussed below. The
amendments proposed herein seek to codify the current System
functionality. The proposed amendments will not result in System
changes.
Option 3, Sections 4 and 5
The Exchange proposes to codify existing functionality that allows
Market Makers to submit their quotes to the Exchange in block
quantities as a single bulk message. In other words, a Market Maker may
submit a single message to the Exchange, which may contain bids and
offers in multiple series. The Exchange's current rules do not specify
bulk messaging for orders. The Exchange has historically provided
Market Makers with information regarding bulk messaging in its publicly
available technical specifications.\3\ To promote greater transparency,
the Exchange is seeking to codify this functionality in its Rulebook.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to amend NOM Options 3, Section
4(b)(3) to memorialize that quotes may be submitted as a bulk message.
The Exchange also proposes to add a definition of ``bulk message'' in
new subparagraph (i) of Options 3, Section 4(b)(3), which will provide
that a bulk message means a single electronic message submitted by a
Market Maker to the Exchange which may contain a specified number of
quotations as designated by the Exchange.\4\ The bulk message,
submitted via SQF,\5\ may enter, modify, or cancel quotes. Bulk
messages are handled by the System in the same manner as it handles a
single quote message. MRX recently added bulk messages to MRX Options
3, Section 4(b)(3).\6\ The proposed amendment to the Rulebook to add
NOM Options 3, Section 4(b)(3) will not result in a System change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See https://www.nasdaq.com/docs/2023/01/12/0054-Q23_SQF_8.2b%20akg_NAM.pdf (specifying for bulk quoting of up to 200
quotes per quote block message). The specifications note in other
places the manner in which a Participant can send such quote block
messages.
\4\ Id. As noted above, quote bulk messages can presently
contain up to 200 quotes per message. This is the maximum amount
that is permitted in a bulk message. The Exchange would announce any
change to these specifications in an Options Technical Update
distributed to all Participants.
\5\ ``Specialized Quote Feed'' or ``SQF'' is an interface that
allows Market Makers to connect, send, and receive messages related
to quotes and Immediate-or-Cancel Orders into and from the Exchange.
Features include the following: (1) options symbol directory
messages (e.g., underlying instruments); (2) system event messages
(e.g., start of trading hours messages and start of opening); (3)
trading action messages (e.g., halts and resumes); (4) execution
messages; (5) quote messages; (6) Immediate-or-Cancel Order
messages; (7) risk protection triggers and purge notifications; and
(8) opening imbalance messages. The SQF Purge Interface only
receives and notifies of purge requests from the Market Maker.
Market Makers may only enter interest into SQF in their assigned
options series. See Options 3, Section 7(e)(1)(B).
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act, Release No. 95982 (October 4,
2022), 87 FR 61391 (October 11, 2022) (SR-MRX-2022-18) (Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Its Rules in Connection With a Technology Migration to Enhanced
Nasdaq Functionality) (``SR-MRX-2022-18'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also proposes to amend NOM Options 3, Section 4(b)(6)
to provide the following,
A quote will not be executed at a price that trades through
another market or displayed at a price that would lock or cross
another market. If, at the time of entry, a quote would cause a
locked or crossed market violation or would cause a trade-through,
violation, it will be re-priced to the current national best offer
(for bids) or the current national best bid (for offers) as non-
displayed, and displayed at one minimum price variance above (for
offers) or below (for bids) the national best price.
Where a quote is re-priced to avoid a locked or crossed market, the
best bid or offer will be non-displayed and the re-priced order will be
displayed at a price that is one minimum trading increment inferior to
the ABBO. A similar change is proposed for Options 3, Section 5(d). MRX
recently amended Options 3, Section 4(b)(6) and Options 3, Section 5(d)
to include this language.\7\ At this time, the Exchange proposes to
amend NOM's rule text to reflect that the actual price remains non-
displayed in this scenario. The proposed amendment to the Rulebook to
add NOM Options 3, Section 4(b)(6) will not result in a System change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act, Release No. 95807 (September
16, 2022), 87 FR 57933 (September 22, 2022) (SR-MRX-2022-16) (Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Certain Rules in Connection With a Technology Migration to
Enhanced Nasdaq Functionality) (``SR-MRX-2022-16'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Similarly, the Exchange proposes to add a new NOM Options 3,
Section 4(b)(7) to clarify that, today, NOM's System will automatically
execute eligible quotes using the Exchange's displayed best bid and
offer (``BBO'') or the Exchange's non-displayed order book (``internal
BBO'') \8\ if the best bid and/or offer on the Exchange has been
repriced pursuant to Options 3, Section 5(d) and Options 3, Section
4(b)(6). This rule text seeks to codify the current System function and
make clear that the internal BBO is comprised of both orders and
quotes.\9\ MRX recently amended Options 3, Section 4(b)(7) to include
the same language.\10\ At this time, the Exchange proposes to align
NOM's rule text in Options 3, Section 4(b)(7) to MRX's rule text in
Options 3, Section 4(b)(7). The proposed amendment to the Rulebook to
add NOM Options 3, Section 4(b)(7) will not result in a System change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The internal BBO refers to the Exchange's non-displayed
book.
\9\ The Exchange also proposes to re-number current Options 3,
Section 4(b)(7) as (8).
\10\ See SR-MRX-2022-16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange proposes to amend NOM Options 3, Section 5(c)
to include a citation to Options 3, Section 4(b)(6) as the internal BBO
is comprised of both orders and quotes, similar to MRX.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The amendments proposed to Options 3, Sections 4 and 5 do not
change the current System functionality.
Options 3, Section 7
The Exchange proposes to amend the ``Post-Only Order type at
Options 3, Section 7(a)(9) to rename the order type ``Add Liquidity
Order''. The Exchange believes the name better describes this order
type. This is also the name of a similar order type on MRX.\12\ The
Exchange also proposes to capitalize the
[[Page 45250]]
term ``Opening Process'' which refers to NOM Options 3, Section 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See MRX Options 7, Section 7(n).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to amend the description of Specialized Quote
Feed or ``SQF'' within NOM Options 3, Section 7(e)(1)(B) to add rule
text which states, ``Immediate-or-Cancel Orders entered into SQF are
not subject to the Order Price Protection, Market Order Spread
Protection, or Size Limitation Protection in Options 3, Section
15(a)(1), (a)(2), and (b)(2) respectively.'' This rule text is
currently noted within Options 3, Section 7(b)(2) above. The Exchange
is adding the same language into the description of SQF to provide a
more complete description. The addition of this information would align
the level of information of NOM's rule text to NOM's rule text at
Supplementary Material .03(c) to Options 3, Section 7. The Exchange is
proposing a similar amendment to Options 3, Section 7(e)(1)(D)
regarding Quote Using Orders or ``QUO'' \13\ to state that, ``Orders
entered into QUO are not subject to the Order Price Protection or Size
Limitation in Options 3, Section 15(a)(1) and (b)(2), respectively.''
All orders entered into QUO are not subject to the Order Price
Protection or Size Limitation protections, not Immediate-or-Cancel
Orders. Also, the Market Order Spread Protection is not applicable to
QUO because QUO cannot be utilized to send Market Orders to the
Exchange, only FIX may be utilized to send Market Orders. The proposed
amendment to NOM Options 3, Section 7(e)(1)(B) and (D) will not result
in System changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ ``Quote Using Orders'' or ``QUO'' is an interface that
allows Market Makers to connect, send, and receive messages related
to single-sided orders to and from the Exchange. Order Features
include the following: (1) options symbol directory messages (e.g.,
underlying); (2) system event messages (e.g., start of trading hours
messages and start of opening); (3) trading action messages (e.g.,
halts and resumes); (4) execution messages; (5) order messages; and
(6) risk protection triggers and cancel notifications. Orders
submitted by Market Makers over this interface are treated as
quotes. Market Makers may only enter interest into QUO in their
assigned options series.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Options 3, Section 15
MRX recently amended its Order Price Protection (``OPP'') \14\
rule.\15\ MRX's OPP rule utilized different rule text to explain the
OPP functionality than is currently on NOM. At this time, the Exchange
proposes to amend NOM Options 3, Section 15(a)(1) to align NOM's rule
text to MRX's rule text within Options 3, Section 15(a)(1)(A).
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to remove the references to ``day
limit, good til cancelled, and immediate or cancel orders'' and,
instead, simply refer to ``Limit'' Orders as that order type accurately
captures the scope of the orders subject to OPP. Further, the Exchange
proposes to remove ``market orders'' from the next sentence since OPP
only applies to limit orders. The Exchange also proposes to capitalize
``Opening'' and add Process in Options 2, Section 15(a)(1)(A) to refer
to the Opening Process within Options 3, Section 8. The proposed
amendment to Options 3, Section 15(a)(1) will not result in a System
change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ OPP prevents the execution of Limit Orders at prices
outside pre-set parameters.
\15\ See SR-MRX-2022-18.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the Exchange proposes to amend its Acceptable Trade
Range (``ATR'') Rule within NOM Options 3, Section 15(b)(1).\16\ MRX
recently amended its ATR rule.\17\ MRX's ATR rule utilized different
rule text to explain the ATR functionality. At this time, the Exchange
proposes to amend Options 3, Section 15(b)(1)(A) to add the word
``quote'' in that same sentence, where it was omitted and also add the
words ``after the Posting Period'' to explain when a new ATR would be
calculated to provide more context to the rule.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ ATR is designed to guard against the System from
experiencing dramatic price swings by preventing the immediate
execution of quotes and orders beyond the thresholds set by the
protection.
\17\ See SR-MRX-2022-16.
\18\ The Exchange also proposes technical amendments to
capitalize ``the'' and add opening parentheses in two places.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, similar to MRX Options 3, Section 15(a)(2)(A)(v) the
Exchange proposes to add the following rule text within NOM Options 3,
Section 15(b)(1)(C),
There will be three categories of options for Acceptable Trade
Range: (1) Penny Interval Program Options trading in one cent
increments for options trading at less than $3.00 and increments of
five cents for options trading at $3.00 or more, (2) Penny Interval
Program Options trading in one-cent increments for all prices, and
(3) Non-Penny Interval Program Options.
This is how NOM operates today. This rule text makes clear the
application of NOM Options 3, Section 3 to the ATR rule by explicitly
stating the Exchange's ability to set different ATR values by options
category. These ATR values are set forth in NOM's System Settings
document which is posted online.\19\ The Exchange believes this rule
text will add greater clarity to the ATR rule. The proposed amendment
to Options 3, Section 15(b)(1) will not result in a System change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ https://www.nasdaq.com/docs/BXOptionsSystemSettings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to capitalize the words ``opening process''
at the end of Options 3, Section 15(c)(1) which refers to the Anti-
Internalization functionality. The term refers to the process within
Options 3, Section 8.
The Exchange proposes to and the words ``or quote'' to Options 3,
Section 15(c)(3) which refers to the Post-Only Quoting Protection. The
paragraph refers to order or quote throughout and was mistakenly
omitted in one sentence.
Options 5, Section 4
Options 5, Section 4 describes the manner in which NOM routes
orders. The Exchange proposes to amend NOM Options 5, Section 4(a) to
eliminate the following rule text,
The term ``System routing table'' refers to the proprietary
process for determining the specific trading venues to which the
System routes orders and the order in which it routes them. The
Exchange reserves the right to maintain a different System routing
table for different routing options and to modify the System routing
table at any time without notice.
When ISE filed to amend its routing rules, it did not include this
sentence.\20\ At this time, the Exchange proposes to remove this
unnecessary term that is not utilized elsewhere within Options 5,
Section 4. Removing this rule text will harmonize NOM's Options 5,
Section 4 rule with ISE's Options 5, Section 4(e). The proposed
amendment to Options 5, Section 4(a) will not result in a System
change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94894 (May 18,
2022), 87 FR 30294 (May 12, 2022) (SR-ISE-2022-11) (Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Routing
Functionality in Connection With a Technology Migration).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\21\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\22\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public
interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Option 3, Sections 4 and 5
The Exchange believes that its proposal to memorialize its bulk
message functionality within Options 3, Section 4(b)(3) is consistent
with the Act as it will codify existing functionality, thereby
promoting transparency in the Exchange's rules
[[Page 45251]]
and reducing any potential confusion.\23\ This functionality provides
Market Makers with an additional tool to meet their various quoting
obligations in a manner they deem appropriate, consistent with the
purpose of the bulk message functionality to facilitate Market Makers'
provision of liquidity. By providing Market Makers with additional
control over the quotes they use to provide liquidity to the Exchange,
this tool may benefit all investors through additional execution
opportunities at potentially improved prices. Today, MRX offers this
same functionality within Options 3, Section 4(b)(3). Further, the
Exchange does not believe that the offering the bulk message
functionality to only Market Makers would permit unfair discrimination.
Market Makers play a unique and critical role in the options market by
providing liquidity and active markets, and are subject to various
quoting obligations which other market participants are not, including
obligations to maintain active markets, update quotes in response to
changed market conditions, to compete with other Market Makers in its
appointed classes, and to provide intra-day quotes in its appointed
classes.\24\ Bulk message functionality provides Market Makers with a
means to help them satisfy these obligations. The proposed amendment to
the Rulebook to add NOM Options 3, Section 4(b)(3) will not result in a
System change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ As discussed above, this existing functionality is
currently described in the Exchange's publicly available technical
specifications. See supra note 3.
\24\ See Options 2, Sections 4 and 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's proposal to amend Options 3, Section 4(b)(6) to make
clear that the actual price remains non-displayed during re-pricing is
consistent with the Act and removes impediments to and perfects the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system
because it displays a re-priced order that does not lock or cross an
away market. The rule text clearly explains that the best bid or offer
will be non-displayed and the re-priced order will be displayed. A
similar change is proposed for NOM Options 3, Section 5(d). MRX
recently amended Options 3, Section 4(b)(6) and Options 3, Section 5(d)
to include the same language.\25\ The proposed change aligns NOM's rule
text to MRX's rule text. The proposed amendment to the Rulebook to add
NOM Options 3, Section 4(b)(6) will not result in a System change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See SR-MRX-2022-16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's proposal to add a new Options 3, Section 4(b)(7) to
clarify that, today, NOM's System will automatically execute eligible
quotes using the Exchange's displayed best bid and offer (``BBO'') or
the Exchange's non-displayed order book (``internal BBO'') if the best
bid and/or offer on the Exchange has been repriced pursuant to Options
3, Section 5(d) and Options 3, Section 4(b)(6) is consistent with the
Act and protects investors and the public interest. This rule text
seeks to codify the current System function and make clear that the
internal BBO is comprised or both orders and quotes, both of which are
considered for price checks. MRX recently amended Options 3, Section
4(b)(7) to include this language.\26\ The proposed change aligns NOM's
rule text to MRX's rule text. The proposed amendment to the Rulebook to
add NOM Options 3, Section 4(b)(7) will not result in a System change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Options 3, Section 7
The Exchange's proposal to amend the name of the ``Post-Only Order
type at Options 3, Section 7(a)(9) to rename the order type ``Add
Liquidity Order'' is a non-substantive technical amendment that will
align the name to that used on MRX.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ See MRX Options 7, Section 7(n).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's proposal to amend the description of SQF within
Options 3, Section 7(e)(1)(B) and the description of QUO within Options
3, Section 7(e)(1)(D) is consistent with the Act as this rule text is
currently noted within Options 3, Section 7(b)(2) above. The addition
of this language into the description of SQF and QUO provides a more
complete description of this protocol. The addition of this information
also aligns the level of information with that offered on MRX for SQF
within Supplementary Material .03(c) to Options 3, Section 7 and
differentiates the information from QUO. All orders entered into QUO
are not subject to the Order Price Protection or Size Limitation
protections, not Immediate-or-Cancel Orders. Also, the Market Order
Spread Protection is not applicable to QUO because QUO cannot be
utilized to send Market Orders to the Exchange, only FIX may be
utilized to send Market Orders. The proposed amendment to NOM Options
3, Section 7(e)(1)(B) will not result in a System change.
Options 3, Section 15
The Exchange's proposal to amend NOM Options 3, Section 15(a)(1) to
align NOM's OPP rule text to MRX's OPP rule text within Options 3,
Section 15(a)(1)(A) is consistent with the Act \28\ because removing
the references to ``day limit, good til cancelled, and immediate or
cancel orders'' and, instead, referring to ``Limit'' Orders accurately
captures the scope of the orders subject to OPP. This change would also
make unnecessary the reference to market orders. The proposed amendment
to Options 3, Section 15(a)(1) will not result in a System change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ MRX recently amended its Order Price Protection (``OPP'')
rule. See SR-MRX-2022-18.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's proposal to amend the ATR Rule within Options 3,
Section 15(b)(1) is consistent with the Act. MRX recently amended its
ATR rule.\29\ MRX's ATR rule utilized different rule text to explain
the ATR functionality. Amending NOM Section 15(b)(1) to add the words
``after the Posting Period'' to explain when a new ATR would be
calculated provides more context to the rule will provide greater
context to the sentence. Additionally, adding the word ``quote'' in the
one sentence where it is omitted will add clarity the sentence. The
proposed amendment to Options 3, Section 15(b)(1) will not result in a
System change. Also, adding rule text within NOM Options 3, Section
15(b)(1)(C) to make clear the Exchange's ability to set different ATR
values by options category is consistent with the Act because the ATR
risk protection limits the range of prices at which an order and quote
trades and would take into account the minimum increment. The ability
for the Exchange to set the ATR based on the increment allows the
Exchange to set appropriate limits. The Exchange believes this rule
text will add greater clarity to the ATR rule. The proposed amendment
to Options 3, Section 15(b)(1) will not result in a System change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ See SR-MRX-2022-16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Options 5, Section 4
Eliminating an unnecessary term in Options 5, Section 4(a) that is
not utilized elsewhere within Options 5, Section 4 which is unnecessary
is consistent with the Act as it will remove confusion. The proposed
amendment to Options 5, Section 4(a) will not result in a System
change.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
[[Page 45252]]
Option 3, Sections 4 and 5
The Exchange believes that its proposal to memorialize its bulk
message functionality within Options 3, Section 4(b)(3) does not impose
an undue burden on intra-market competition. While the Exchange
currently offers this functionality to Market Makers only, bulk
messaging is intended to provide Market Makers with an additional tool
to meet their various quoting obligations in a manner they deem
appropriate. As such, the Exchange believes that this functionality may
facilitate Market Makers' provision of liquidity, thereby benefiting
all market participants through additional execution opportunities at
potentially improved prices. Furthermore, while the Exchange will offer
the proposed Post-Only Quote Configuration to Market Makers only, the
proposed risk protection will enhance the ability of Market Makers to
add liquidity and avoid removing liquidity from the Exchange's order
book in the manner described above. Greater liquidity benefits all
market participants by providing more trading opportunities and
attracting greater participation by Market Makers. The Exchange
believes that its proposal to memorialize its bulk message
functionality within Options 3, Section 4(b)(3) does not impose an
undue burden on inter-market competition as other options exchanges may
adopt this functionality.
The Exchange's proposal to amend NOM's rules at Options 3, Section
4(b)(6) and Options 3, Section 4(b)(7) do not impose an undue burden on
competition because all options markets must not trade-through other
orders on their markets as well as away markets. The proposed change
aligns NOM's rule text to MRX's rule text.
Options 3, Section 7
The Exchange's proposal to amend the name of the ``Post-Only Order
type at Options 3, Section 7(a)(9) to rename the order type ``Add
Liquidity Order'' is a non-substantive technical amendment that does
not impose an undue burden on competition.
Amending the description of SQF within Options 3, Section
7(e)(1)(B) and the description of QUO within Options 3, Section
7(e)(1)(D) does not impose an undue burden on competition The addition
of this language into the description of SQF and QUO provides a more
complete description of this protocol.
Options 3, Section 15
The Exchange's proposal to amend NOM Options 3, Section 15(a)(1) to
align NOM's OPP rule text to MRX's OPP rule text within Options 3,
Section 15(a)(1)(A) does not impose an undue burden on competition
because removing the references to ``day limit, good til cancelled, and
immediate or cancel orders'' and, instead, referring to ``Limit''
Orders accurately captures the scope of the orders subject to OPP. This
change would also make unnecessary the reference to market orders.
The Exchange's proposal to amend the ATR Rule within Options 3,
Section 15(b)(1) does not impose an undue burden on competition.
Amending NOM Section 15(b)(1) to add the words ``after the Posting
Period'' to explain when a new ATR would be calculated provides more
context to the rule will provide greater context to the sentence.
Additionally, adding the word ``quote'' in the one sentence where it is
omitted will add clarity the sentence. Adding rule text within NOM
Options 3, Section 15(b)(1)(C) to make clear the Exchange's ability to
set different ATR values by options category does not impose an undue
burden on competition because the ability for the Exchange to set the
ATR based on the increment allows the Exchange to set appropriate
limits. The Exchange believes this rule text will add greater clarity
to the ATR rule.
Options 5, Section 4
Eliminating an unnecessary reference within amend Options 5,
Section 4(a) does not impose an undue burden on competition because the
term is not utilized elsewhere within Options 5, Section 4.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \30\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\31\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-NASDAQ-2023-018 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-NASDAQ-2023-018. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
[[Page 45253]]
will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of
the Exchange. Do not include personal identifiable information in
submissions; you should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from
publication submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright
protection. All submissions should refer to file number SR-NASDAQ-2023-
018 and should be submitted on or before August 4, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-14910 Filed 7-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P