Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fee Schedule for Trading on the BOX Options Market LLC Facility To Amend Certain Rebates for Qualified Contingent Cross Transactions, 38913-38915 [2023-12664]
Download as PDF
38913
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2023 / Notices
Rule 10D–1.56 Nasdaq’s proposal has
also been approved by the Commission
as consistent the Act.57 Accordingly, the
Commission finds good cause, pursuant
to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange
Act,58 to approve the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment No.
1, on an accelerated basis.
VI. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,59 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NYSE–2023–
12), as modified by Amendment No. 1,
be, and hereby is, approved on an
accelerated basis.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.60
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–12758 Filed 6–13–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–97674; File No. SR–BOX–
2023–13]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX
Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the Fee
Schedule for Trading on the BOX
Options Market LLC Facility To Amend
Certain Rebates for Qualified
Contingent Cross Transactions
June 8, 2023.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 31,
2023, BOX Exchange LLC (‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Exchange filed the proposed rule
change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,3 and Rule
19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,4 which renders
the proposal effective upon filing with
the Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
to amend the Fee Schedule to amend
the Fee Schedule [sic] for trading on
BOX to amend certain rebates for
Qualified Contingent Cross (‘‘QCC’’)
transactions on the BOX Options Market
LLC (‘‘BOX’’) options facility. While
changes to the fee schedule pursuant to
this proposal will be effective upon
filing, the changes will become
operative on June 1, 2023. The text of
the proposed rule change is available
from the principal office of the
Exchange, at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room and also on the
Exchange’s internet website at https://
boxexchange.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Fee Schedule for trading on BOX to
amend certain rebates for Qualified
Contingent Cross (‘‘QCC’’) transactions.
A QCC Order is defined as an
originating order (Agency Order) to buy
or sell at least 1,000 standard option
contracts, or 10,000 mini-option
contracts, that is identified as being part
of a qualified contingent trade, coupled
with a contra side order to buy or sell
an equal number of contracts.5
Currently, BOX assesses $0.20 per
contract to Broker Dealers and Market
Makers for both the Agency Order and
contra order of a QCC transaction.
Public Customers and Professional
Customers are not assessed a QCC
Transaction Fee. Further, rebates are
paid on all qualifying orders pursuant to
Section IV.D.1 of the BOX Fee Schedule.
Specifically, a QCC Rebate is paid to the
Participant that entered the order into
the BOX system when at least one party
to the QCC transaction is a Broker
Dealer or Market Maker. The Participant
receives a per contract rebate on QCC
transactions according to the tier
achieved. Volume thresholds are
calculated on a monthly basis by
totaling the Participant’s QCC Agency
Order volume on BOX. The Exchange
notes that the QCC Rebate is intended
to incentivize the sending of more QCC
Orders to BOX.
The Exchange now proposes to amend
the QCC Rebate structure in Section
IV.D.1 of the BOX Fee Schedule.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
amend the volume thresholds in Tiers 1,
2, and 3 and proposes to eliminate Tier
4 entirely. For Tier 1, the Exchange
proposes to amend the volume
threshold to 0 to 999,999 contracts. For
Tier 2, the Exchange proposes to amend
the volume threshold to 1,000,000 to
1,999,999 contracts. For Tier 3, the
Exchange proposes to amend the
volume threshold to 2,000,000+
contracts. Additionally, the Exchange
proposes to amend the rebates in Tiers
2 and 3. Specifically, in Tier 2, the
Exchange proposes to increase Rebate 2
to $0.25 from $0.24. In Tier 3, the
Exchange proposes to increase Rebate 1
to $0.17 from $0.16 and increase Rebate
2 to $0.27 from $0.25.
The QCC Rebate tier structure will be
as follows:
Tier
QCC Agency order volume on BOX
(per month)
1 ......................................................
2 ......................................................
3 ......................................................
0 to 999,999 contracts ............................................................................
1,000,000 to 1,999,999 contracts ...........................................................
2,000,000+ contracts ..............................................................................
56 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97060
(March 7, 2023), 88 FR 15500 (March 13, 2023) (SR–
Nasdaq–2023–005).
57 See Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 1 and
Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed
Rule Change to Establish Listing Standards Related
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jun 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
to Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Executive
Compensation (June 9, 2023) (SR–Nasdaq–2023–
005).
58 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
59 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
60 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Rebate 1
(per contract)
1 15
($0.14)
(0.16)
(0.17)
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
5 See BOX Rule 7110(c)(6).
2 17
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Rebate 2
(per contract)
($0.22)
(0.25)
(0.27)
38914
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2023 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
The Exchange also proposes to amend
the QCC Growth Rebate to account for
the changes discussed above.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes that
if a Participant’s QCC Agency Order
volume on BOX achieves Tier 2
(formerly Tier 3) of the QCC Rebate in
the month AND the Participant’s total
QCC volume combined with total QOO
volume exceeds 6 million (formerly 11
million) contracts per month, then the
Participant will qualify for the rebates in
Tier 3 (formerly Tier 4) of the QCC
Rebate. The Exchange believes that the
proposed changes discussed above will
encourage Participants to send
increased QCC and QOO order flow to
BOX in order to achieve a high rebate,
which will result in increased liquidity
on BOX to the benefit of all market
participants.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,
in general, and Section 6(b)(4) and
6(b)(5) of the Act,6 in particular, in that
it provides for the equitable allocation
of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among BOX Participants and
other persons using its facilities and
does not unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Exchange believes the proposed
changes to the QCC Rebate structure are
reasonable because the proposed
changes provide opportunities for
Participants to receive higher rebates for
their QCC Order volume on BOX.
Further, the Exchange believes the
proposed changes to the QCC rebate
structure are equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory as the proposed rebates
will apply uniformly to the Participants
that reach the applicable tiers.
The Exchange continues to believe
that the proposed rebate structure and
rebate amounts are reasonable as it
provides an incremental incentive for
Participants to strive for the higher tier
levels, which provide increasingly
higher rebates for incrementally more
QCC volume achieved, which the
Exchange believes is a reasonably
designed incentive for Participants to
grow their QCC order flow to receive the
enhanced rebates. The Exchange also
believes that continuing to have two
alternative rebates (depending on the
capacity of the parties to the
transaction) is reasonable and
appropriate as this is how the Exchange
assesses the rebates for QCC
transactions today.7
6 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
Exchange notes that Rebate 1 assesses lower
rebates than rebates in Rebate 2 because when only
7 The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jun 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
The Exchange believes the proposed
changes to the QCC Growth Rebate is
reasonable because this rebate provides
incentives for BOX Participants to
engage in substantial amounts of trading
activity which would serve to bring
additional open outcry liquidity to the
Trading Floor and additional QCC order
flow to BOX. This incentive may also
encourage Participants to begin sending
such order flow to BOX for the
opportunity to earn this rebate because
the threshold to qualify is being
lowered.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed QCC Growth Rebate
Qualifications are reasonable because
they offer Participants an opportunity to
achieve a higher QCC rebate.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed changes to the QCC Growth
Rebate are equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because any Participant
may qualify for this rebate.8 All BOX
Participants may enter order flow to
obtain a QCC Growth Rebate.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
The proposal does not impose an
undue burden on inter-market
competition. The Exchange believes its
proposal remains competitive with
other options markets and will offer
market participants with another choice
of where to transact its business. The
Exchange notes that it operates in a
highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily favor
competing venues if they deem fee
levels at a particular venue to be
excessive, or rebate opportunities
available at other venues to be more
favorable. In such an environment, the
Exchange must continually adjust its
fees and rebates to remain competitive
with other exchanges. Because
competitors are free to modify their own
fees and rebates in response, and
because market participants may readily
adjust their order routing practices, the
Exchange believes that the degree to
which fee changes in this market may
impose any burden on competition is
extremely limited.
one side of the QCC transaction is a Broker Dealer
or Market Maker then only one side of the QCC
transaction is assessed a fee, therefore the total fees
assessed are lower and the corresponding rebate is
also lower.
8 The Exchange notes that all BOX Participants
may transact an options business electronically or
on the BOX Trading Floor with a registered Trading
Permit. BOX Participants may transact business on
the Trading Floor through a Floor Broker.
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The proposed changes do not impose
an undue burden on intra-market
competition. In terms of intra-market
competition, the Exchange does not
believe that its proposals will place any
category of market participant at a
competitive disadvantage. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
changes will encourage market
participants to send their QCC orders to
BOX for execution in order to obtain
greater rebates and lower their costs.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Exchange Act 9 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,10 because
it establishes or changes a due, or fee.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend the rule change if
it appears to the Commission that the
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or would otherwise further
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
BOX–2023–13 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–BOX–2023–13. This file
9 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
10 17
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2023 / Notices
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–BOX–2023–13 and should be
submitted on or before July 5, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–12664 Filed 6–13–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
The Exchange operates on the ‘‘takermaker’’ model, whereby it generally
pays credits to members that take
liquidity and charges fees to members
that provide liquidity. Currently, the
Exchange has a schedule, at Equity 7,
section 118(e), which consists of several
different credits and fees for Retail
Orders 3 and Retail Price Improvement
Orders 4 under Rule 4780 (Retail Price
Improvement Program).
Currently, the Exchange charges a fee
of $0.0018 per share executed for RPI
Orders entered by a member that (i)
quotes Retail Price Improvement Orders
in at least 1,200 symbols on average per
day and (ii) provides liquidity through
Retail Price Improvement Orders equal
to or exceeding an average daily volume
of 2,500,000 shares. The Exchange
currently charges a fee of $0.0025 per
share executed for all other RPI Orders
that provide liquidity. The Exchange
proposes to adopt a new fee of $0.0020
per share executed for RPI Orders
entered by a member that (i) quotes
Retail Price Improvement Orders in at
least 1,200 symbols on average per day;
(ii) provides liquidity through Retail
Price Improvement Orders equal to or
exceeding an average daily volume of
1,000,000 shares; and (iii) increases its
average daily volume of liquidity
provided in Retail Price Improvement
Orders at least 10% relative to the
month of March 2023. The Exchange
hopes that the proposed fee will
encourage members to increase liquidity
providing activity in RPI Orders on the
Exchange relative to March 2023. If the
proposal is effective in achieving this
purpose, then the quality of the
Exchange’s market will improve,
particularly with respect to RPI and
Retail Orders to the benefit of all
participants, especially those who
submit RPI and Retail Orders.
At this time, the Exchange proposes to
sunset the proposed fee of $0.0020 per
share executed. The fee will be available
through September 30, 2023.5 Despite
only offering this incentive for four
months (i.e., June 2023 through
September 2023), the Exchange believes
that it may continue to encourage
members to earn lower fees by
increasing liquidity providing activity
in RPI Orders on the Exchange. The
Exchange will use this time period to
evaluate the appropriate parameters
going forward to encourage increasing
liquidity providing activity in RPI
Orders on the Exchange.
3 Retail Orders shall mean an order type with a
Non-Display Order Attribute submitted to the
Exchange by a Retail Member Organization (as
defined in Rule 4780). A Retail Order must be an
agency Order, or riskless principal Order that
satisfies the criteria of FINRA Rule 5320.03. The
Retail Order must reflect trading interest of a
natural person with no change made to the terms
of the underlying order of the natural person with
respect to price (except in the case of a market order
that is changed to a marketable limit order) or side
of market and that does not originate from a trading
algorithm or any other computerized methodology.
See Rule 4702(b)(6).
4 Retail Price Improving (‘‘RPI’’) Orders shall
mean an Order Type with a Non-Display Order
Attribute that is held on the Exchange Book in order
to provide liquidity at a price at least $0.001 better
than the NBBO through a special execution process
described in Rule 4780. A Retail Price Improving
Order may be entered in price increments of $0.001.
RPI Orders collectively may be referred to as ‘‘RPI
Interest.’’ See Rule 4702(b)(5).
5 The proposed $0.0020 per share executed fee
will be available through September 30, 2023 but
would not be available thereafter. For example, as
of October 1, 2023, the Exchange would no longer
offer the incentive.
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Exchange’s transaction fees at Equity 7,
section 118(e), as described further
below.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/
rulebook/bx/rules, at the principal office
of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–97667; File No. SR–BX–
2023–015]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the
Exchange’s Transaction Fees at Equity
7, Section 118
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
June 8, 2023.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 1,
2023, Nasdaq BX, Inc. (‘‘BX’’ or
11 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jun 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
38915
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38913-38915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-12664]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-97674; File No. SR-BOX-2023-13]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fee
Schedule for Trading on the BOX Options Market LLC Facility To Amend
Certain Rebates for Qualified Contingent Cross Transactions
June 8, 2023.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 31, 2023, BOX Exchange LLC (``Exchange'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposed rule
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon filing
with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') a proposed rule change to amend the Fee Schedule to
amend the Fee Schedule [sic] for trading on BOX to amend certain
rebates for Qualified Contingent Cross (``QCC'') transactions on the
BOX Options Market LLC (``BOX'') options facility. While changes to the
fee schedule pursuant to this proposal will be effective upon filing,
the changes will become operative on June 1, 2023. The text of the
proposed rule change is available from the principal office of the
Exchange, at the Commission's Public Reference Room and also on the
Exchange's internet website at https://boxexchange.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule for trading on BOX
to amend certain rebates for Qualified Contingent Cross (``QCC'')
transactions. A QCC Order is defined as an originating order (Agency
Order) to buy or sell at least 1,000 standard option contracts, or
10,000 mini-option contracts, that is identified as being part of a
qualified contingent trade, coupled with a contra side order to buy or
sell an equal number of contracts.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See BOX Rule 7110(c)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, BOX assesses $0.20 per contract to Broker Dealers and
Market Makers for both the Agency Order and contra order of a QCC
transaction. Public Customers and Professional Customers are not
assessed a QCC Transaction Fee. Further, rebates are paid on all
qualifying orders pursuant to Section IV.D.1 of the BOX Fee Schedule.
Specifically, a QCC Rebate is paid to the Participant that entered the
order into the BOX system when at least one party to the QCC
transaction is a Broker Dealer or Market Maker. The Participant
receives a per contract rebate on QCC transactions according to the
tier achieved. Volume thresholds are calculated on a monthly basis by
totaling the Participant's QCC Agency Order volume on BOX. The Exchange
notes that the QCC Rebate is intended to incentivize the sending of
more QCC Orders to BOX.
The Exchange now proposes to amend the QCC Rebate structure in
Section IV.D.1 of the BOX Fee Schedule. Specifically, the Exchange
proposes to amend the volume thresholds in Tiers 1, 2, and 3 and
proposes to eliminate Tier 4 entirely. For Tier 1, the Exchange
proposes to amend the volume threshold to 0 to 999,999 contracts. For
Tier 2, the Exchange proposes to amend the volume threshold to
1,000,000 to 1,999,999 contracts. For Tier 3, the Exchange proposes to
amend the volume threshold to 2,000,000+ contracts. Additionally, the
Exchange proposes to amend the rebates in Tiers 2 and 3. Specifically,
in Tier 2, the Exchange proposes to increase Rebate 2 to $0.25 from
$0.24. In Tier 3, the Exchange proposes to increase Rebate 1 to $0.17
from $0.16 and increase Rebate 2 to $0.27 from $0.25.
The QCC Rebate tier structure will be as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QCC Agency order volume on BOX Rebate 1 (per Rebate 2 (per
Tier (per month) contract) contract)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1............................................ 0 to 999,999 contracts......... ($0.14) ($0.22)
2............................................ 1,000,000 to 1,999,999 (0.16) (0.25)
contracts.
3............................................ 2,000,000+ contracts........... (0.17) (0.27)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 38914]]
The Exchange also proposes to amend the QCC Growth Rebate to
account for the changes discussed above. Specifically, the Exchange
proposes that if a Participant's QCC Agency Order volume on BOX
achieves Tier 2 (formerly Tier 3) of the QCC Rebate in the month AND
the Participant's total QCC volume combined with total QOO volume
exceeds 6 million (formerly 11 million) contracts per month, then the
Participant will qualify for the rebates in Tier 3 (formerly Tier 4) of
the QCC Rebate. The Exchange believes that the proposed changes
discussed above will encourage Participants to send increased QCC and
QOO order flow to BOX in order to achieve a high rebate, which will
result in increased liquidity on BOX to the benefit of all market
participants.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act, in general, and Section
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\6\ in particular, in that it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among BOX Participants and other persons using its facilities
and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers
or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed changes to the QCC Rebate
structure are reasonable because the proposed changes provide
opportunities for Participants to receive higher rebates for their QCC
Order volume on BOX. Further, the Exchange believes the proposed
changes to the QCC rebate structure are equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory as the proposed rebates will apply uniformly to the
Participants that reach the applicable tiers.
The Exchange continues to believe that the proposed rebate
structure and rebate amounts are reasonable as it provides an
incremental incentive for Participants to strive for the higher tier
levels, which provide increasingly higher rebates for incrementally
more QCC volume achieved, which the Exchange believes is a reasonably
designed incentive for Participants to grow their QCC order flow to
receive the enhanced rebates. The Exchange also believes that
continuing to have two alternative rebates (depending on the capacity
of the parties to the transaction) is reasonable and appropriate as
this is how the Exchange assesses the rebates for QCC transactions
today.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The Exchange notes that Rebate 1 assesses lower rebates than
rebates in Rebate 2 because when only one side of the QCC
transaction is a Broker Dealer or Market Maker then only one side of
the QCC transaction is assessed a fee, therefore the total fees
assessed are lower and the corresponding rebate is also lower.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed changes to the QCC Growth Rebate
is reasonable because this rebate provides incentives for BOX
Participants to engage in substantial amounts of trading activity which
would serve to bring additional open outcry liquidity to the Trading
Floor and additional QCC order flow to BOX. This incentive may also
encourage Participants to begin sending such order flow to BOX for the
opportunity to earn this rebate because the threshold to qualify is
being lowered.
The Exchange believes that the proposed QCC Growth Rebate
Qualifications are reasonable because they offer Participants an
opportunity to achieve a higher QCC rebate. Additionally, the Exchange
believes the proposed changes to the QCC Growth Rebate are equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory because any Participant may qualify for
this rebate.\8\ All BOX Participants may enter order flow to obtain a
QCC Growth Rebate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The Exchange notes that all BOX Participants may transact an
options business electronically or on the BOX Trading Floor with a
registered Trading Permit. BOX Participants may transact business on
the Trading Floor through a Floor Broker.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The proposal does not impose an undue burden on inter-market
competition. The Exchange believes its proposal remains competitive
with other options markets and will offer market participants with
another choice of where to transact its business. The Exchange notes
that it operates in a highly competitive market in which market
participants can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels
at a particular venue to be excessive, or rebate opportunities
available at other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment,
the Exchange must continually adjust its fees and rebates to remain
competitive with other exchanges. Because competitors are free to
modify their own fees and rebates in response, and because market
participants may readily adjust their order routing practices, the
Exchange believes that the degree to which fee changes in this market
may impose any burden on competition is extremely limited.
The proposed changes do not impose an undue burden on intra-market
competition. In terms of intra-market competition, the Exchange does
not believe that its proposals will place any category of market
participant at a competitive disadvantage. The Exchange believes that
the proposed changes will encourage market participants to send their
QCC orders to BOX for execution in order to obtain greater rebates and
lower their costs.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Exchange Act \9\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2)
thereunder,\10\ because it establishes or changes a due, or fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend the rule
change if it appears to the Commission that the action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
would otherwise further the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-BOX-2023-13 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-BOX-2023-13. This file
[[Page 38915]]
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-BOX-2023-13 and should be
submitted on or before July 5, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-12664 Filed 6-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P