Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry on the Antidumping Duty Order, 37510-37512 [2023-12242]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
37510
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2023 / Notices
the Swiss-U.S. DPF an organization
must (a) be subject to the investigatory
and enforcement powers of the Federal
Trade Commission (FTC), the
Department of Transportation (DOT), or
another statutory body that will
effectively ensure compliance with the
Principles; (b) publicly declare its
commitment to comply with the
Principles; (c) publicly disclose its
privacy policies in line with the
Principles; and (d) fully implement
them.
To rely on the EU–U.S. DPF and, as
applicable, the UK Extension to the EU–
U.S. DPF, and/or the Swiss-U.S. DPF an
organization must self-certify its
adherence to the Principles to the DOC,
and both be placed and remain on the
Data Privacy Framework List. Such
organizations’ commitment to comply
with the Principles must be reflected in
their self-certification submissions to
the DOC and in their privacy policies.
Organizations that only wish to selfcertify their compliance pursuant to the
EU–U.S. DPF and/or the Swiss-U.S. DPF
may do so; however, organizations that
wish to participate in the UK Extension
to the EU–U.S. DPF must participate in
the EU–U.S. DPF. The DOC will update
the Data Privacy Framework List on the
basis of annual re-certification
submissions made by participating
organizations and by removing
organizations when they voluntarily
withdraw, fail to complete the annual
re-certification in accordance with the
DOC’s procedures, or are found to
persistently fail to comply. The DOC
will also maintain and make available to
the public an authoritative record of
U.S. organizations that have been
removed from the Data Privacy
Framework List and will identify the
reason each organization was removed.
The aforementioned authoritative list
and record will remain available to the
public on the DOC’s Data Privacy
Framework program website. An
organization’s failure to comply with
the Principles after its self-certification
is enforceable by the FTC under Section
5 of the Federal Trade Commission
(FTC) Act prohibiting unfair or
deceptive acts in or affecting commerce
(15 U.S.C. 45); by the DOT under 49
U.S.C. 41712 prohibiting a carrier or
ticket agent from engaging in an unfair
or deceptive practice in air
transportation or the sale of air
transportation; or under other laws or
regulations prohibiting such acts.
To initially self-certify or
subsequently re-certify for the EU–U.S.
DPF and, as applicable, UK Extension to
the EU–U.S. DPF, and/or the Swiss-U.S.
DPF, an organization must on each
occasion provide to the DOC a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jun 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
submission that contains the relevant
information specified in the Principles.
The submission must be made via the
DOC’s Data Privacy Framework program
website by an individual within the
organization who is authorized to make
representations on behalf of the
organization and any of its covered U.S.
entities regarding its adherence to the
Principles. Such an organization must
respond promptly to inquiries and other
requests for information from the DOC
relating to the organization’s adherence
to the Principles.
ITA has committed to follow up with
organizations that have been or wish to
be removed from the Data Privacy
Framework List. ITA will direct
organizations that allow their selfcertifications to lapse to verify whether
they intend to re-certify or instead
intend to withdraw. An organization
that intends to re-certify will be
required to further verify to the DOC
that during the lapse of its certification
status it applied the Principles to
relevant personal data received in
reliance on its participation in the Data
Privacy Framework program and clarify
what steps it will take to address the
outstanding issues that have delayed its
re-certification. An organization that
intends to withdraw will be required to
further verify to the DOC what it will do
and/or has done (as applicable) with the
relevant personal data that it received in
reliance on its participation in the Data
Privacy Framework program and who
within the organization will serve as an
ongoing point of contact for Principlesrelated questions. Organizations will be
required to provide such verification to
the DOC by completing and submitting
appropriate questionnaires to the DOC.
ITA has also committed to conduct
compliance reviews on an ongoing
basis, including, as appropriate, through
sending detailed questionnaires to
participating organizations. The DOC
will require that a participating
organization complete and submit to the
DOC such a questionnaire when: (a) the
DOC has received any specific, nonfrivolous complaints about the
organization’s compliance with the
Principles; (b) the organization does not
respond satisfactorily to inquiries by the
DOC for information relating to the
organization’s adherence to the
Principles; or (c) there is credible
evidence that the organization does not
comply with its commitments under the
EU–U.S. DPF and, as applicable, the UK
Extension to the EU–U.S. DPF, and/or
the Swiss-U.S. DPF.
Affected Public: Primarily businesses
or other for-profit organizations.
Frequency: Annual and periodic.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Legal Authority: The DOC’s statutory
authority to foster, promote, and
develop the foreign and domestic
commerce of the United States (15
U.S.C. 1512).
This information collection request
may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov.
Follow the instructions to view the
Department of Commerce collections
currently under review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be
submitted within 30 days of the
publication of this notice on the
following website www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain. Find this
particular information collection by
selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day
Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or
by using the search function and
entering the title of the collection.
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of
the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs,
Commerce Department.
[FR Doc. 2023–12199 Filed 6–7–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–831]
Fresh Garlic From the People’s
Republic of China: Initiation of
Circumvention Inquiry on the
Antidumping Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
In response to a request from
the Fresh Garlic Producers Association
and its individual members
(collectively, the petitioners), the
Department of Commerce (Commerce) is
initiating a country-wide circumvention
inquiry to determine whether imports of
small and large garlic chunks from the
People’s Republic of China (China) are
circumventing the antidumping duty
(AD) order on fresh garlic from China.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Applicable June 8, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles DeFilippo or Jacob Saude; AD/
CVD Operations, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–3979 or 202–482–0981,
respectively.
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2023 / Notices
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 16, 2023, pursuant to
section 781(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
351.226(c), the petitioners filed a
circumvention inquiry request alleging
that small and large garlic chunks are
circumventing the Order 1 and,
accordingly, should be included within
the scope of the Order. 2 On March 17,
2023, we deferred the decision to
initiate this circumvention inquiry until
the ongoing scope inquiry regarding
large and small garlic chunks from
Green Garden Produce LLC was
complete.3 On April 13, 2023,
Commerce officials held a
videoconference and in-person meeting
with counsel to the petitioners regarding
their February 16, 2023, request that
Commerce conduct a minor alterations
circumvention inquiry.4 On March 3,
2023, Commerce issued a supplemental
questionnaire to the petitioners
regarding their circumvention request.5
On May 10, 2023, the petitioners
submitted their supplemental
questionnaire response.6
Scope of the Order
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
The products covered by this Order
are all grades of garlic, whole or
separated into constituent cloves,
whether or not peeled, fresh, chilled,
frozen, provisionally preserved, or
packed in water or other neutral
substance, but not prepared or
preserved by the addition of other
ingredients or heat processing. The
differences between grades are based on
color, size, sheathing and level of decay.
A full description of the scope of the
Order is provided in the Initiation
Checklist.7
1 See Antidumping Duty Order: Fresh Garlic from
the People’s Republic of China, 59 FR 59209
(November 16, 1994) (Order).
2 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Petitioners’ Request for
Circumvention Ruling Pursuant to Section 781(c) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended,’’ dated
February 16, 2023.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Time to
Determine Whether to Initiate Circumvention
Inquiry,’’ dated March 17, 2023.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Meeting with Petitioners’
Counsel,’’ dated April 13, 2023.
5 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Circumvention Inquiry
Request Supplemental Questionnaire,’’ dated May
3, 2023.
6 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Response to
Supplemental Questionnaire in Circumvention
Inquiry Request,’’ dated May 10, 2023.
7 See Initiation Checklist, ‘‘Initiation of the
Circumvention Inquiry on the Antidumping Duty
Order,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Initiation Checklist) at 7.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jun 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
Merchandise Subject to the
Circumvention Inquiry
The circumvention inquiry covers
small and large garlic chunks produced
in China and exported to the United
States.
Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry
Section 351.226(d) of Commerce’s
regulations states that if Commerce
determines that a request for a
circumvention inquiry satisfies the
requirements of 19 CFR 351.226(c), then
Commerce ‘‘will accept the request and
initiate a circumvention inquiry.’’
Section 351.226(c)(1) of Commerce’s
regulations, in turn, requires that each
request for a circumvention inquiry
allege ‘‘that the elements necessary for
a circumvention determination under
section 781 of the Act exist’’ and be
‘‘accompanied by information
reasonably available to the interested
party supporting these allegations.’’ The
petitioners alleged circumvention
pursuant to section 781(c) of the Act
(minor alterations of merchandise).
Section 781(c) of the Act provides that
Commerce may find circumvention of
an AD order when products which are
of the class or kind of merchandise
subject to an AD order have been
‘‘altered in form or appearance in minor
respects . . . whether or not included in
the same tariff classification.’’ Section
781(c)(2) of the Act provides an
exception that ‘‘{p}aragraph 1 shall not
apply with respect to altered
merchandise if the administering
authority determines that it would be
unnecessary to consider the altered
merchandise within the scope of the AD
order.’’
While the statute is silent as to what
factors to consider in determining
whether alterations are properly
considered ‘‘minor,’’ the legislative
history of this provision indicates that
there are certain factors which should
be considered before reaching a
circumvention determination. In
conducting a circumvention inquiry
under section 781(c) of the Act,
Commerce has generally relied upon
‘‘such criteria as the overall physical
characteristics of the merchandise, the
expectations of the ultimate users, the
use of the merchandise, the channels of
marketing and the cost of any
modification relative to the total value
of the imported products.’’ 8
8 See S. Rep. No.71, 100th Cong., 1st Sess. 100
(1987) (‘‘In applying this provision, the Commerce
Department should apply practical measurements
regarding minor alterations, so that circumvention
can be dealt with effectively, even where such
alterations to an article technically transform it into
a differently designated article.’’). See also
Affirmative Preliminary Determination of
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37511
Analysis
Based on our analysis of the
petitioners’ circumvention inquiry
request, we determined that the
petitioners satisfied the criteria under
19 CFR 351.226(c), and thus, pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.226(d)(1)(ii), we have
accepted the request and are initiating
the requested circumvention inquiry of
the Order. For a full discussion of the
basis for our decision to initiate the
requested circumvention inquiry, see
Initiation Checklist.
Furthermore, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.226(c)(2)(iii), the petitioners noted
that Green Garden is the entity that
imports small and large garlic chunks
into the United States. While the
petitioners stated that they are not
aware of other exporters and/or
producers exporting small and large
garlic chunks to the United States,
beyond those that supply Green Garden,
they are concerned that there are
numerous Chinese entities that could
begin production of significant volumes
of IQF garlic chunks for exportation to
the United States. Therefore, given the
ease with which other Chinese exporters
and/or producers could engage in the
same activities as those supplying Green
Garden, Commerce is initiating this
circumvention inquiry on a countrywide basis.
Respondent Selection
Commerce intends to base respondent
selection on U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) data. Commerce
intends to place the CBP data on the
record within five days of the
publication of the initiation notice.
Comments regarding the CBP data and
respondent selection should be
submitted within seven days after
placement of the CBP data on the record
of the relevant inquiry.
Commerce intends to establish a
schedule for questionnaire responses
after respondent selection. A company’s
failure to completely respond to
Commerce’s requests for information
may result in the application of partial
or total facts available, pursuant to
section 776(a) of the Act, which may
include adverse inferences, pursuant to
section 776(b) of the Act.
Suspension of Liquidation
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.226(l)(1),
Commerce intends to notify CBP of this
Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty Order on
Certain Cut-to-Length Steel Plate from the People’s
Republic of China, 74 FR 33991, 33992 (July 14,
2009), unchanged in Affirmative Final
Determination of Circumvention of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Cut-to-Length
Carbon Steel Plate from the People’s Republic of
China, 74 FR 40565 (August 12, 2009).
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
37512
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2023 / Notices
initiation and direct CBP to continue the
suspension of liquidation of entries of
products subject to this circumvention
inquiry that were already subject to the
suspension of liquidation under the
Order and to apply the cash deposit
rates that would be applicable if the
products were determined to be covered
by the scope of the Order. Should
Commerce issue affirmative preliminary
or final circumvention determinations,
Commerce will follow the suspension of
liquidation rules under 19 CFR
351.226(l)(2)–(4).
Notification to Interested Parties
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.226(d)
and section 781(c) of the Act, Commerce
determines that the petitioners’ request
for a circumvention inquiry satisfies the
requirements of 19 CFR 351.226(c).
Accordingly, Commerce is notifying all
interested parties of the initiation of this
circumvention inquiry to determine
whether small and large garlic chunks
produced in and exported from China
are circumventing the Order and the
opportunity to comment on any
additional entities that import small and
large garlic chunks to the United States.
In addition, we have included a
description of the products that are the
subject to this inquiry and an
explanation of Commerce’s decision to
initiate this inquiry as provided in the
accompanying Initiation Checklist.9 In
accordance with 19 CFR 351.226(e)(1),
Commerce intends to issue its
preliminary circumvention
determination no later than 150 days
from the date of publication of the
notice of initiation of this
circumvention inquiry in the Federal
Register.
This notice is published in
accordance with section 781(c) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.226(d)(1)(ii).
Dated: June 1, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2023–12242 Filed 6–7–23; 8:45 am]
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
9 See
Initiation Checklist at 4 and 6.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jun 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
interested parties claimed domestic
interested party status under section
International Trade Administration
771(9)(C) of the Act as producers of the
[A–570–060, A–533–875, A–580–893, A–583– domestic like product in the United
States.6 Commerce did not receive a
860]
substantive response from any
respondent interested party, nor was a
Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber
hearing requested. On March 23, 2023,
From the People’s Republic of China,
India, the Republic of South Korea, and Commerce notified the International
Trade Commission that it did not
Taiwan: Final Results of Expedited
receive adequate substantive responses
First Sunset Reviews of the
from respondent interested parties.7 As
Antidumping Duty Orders
a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B)
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
of the Act and 19 CFR
International Trade Administration,
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce
Department of Commerce.
conducted expedited (120-day) sunset
SUMMARY: As a result of these expedited
reviews of the Orders.
sunset reviews, the U.S. Department of
Scope of the Orders 8
Commerce (Commerce) finds that
revocation of the antidumping duty
The merchandise covered by the
(AD) orders on fine denier polyester
Orders is fine denier PSF, not carded or
staple fiber (fine denier PSF) from the
combed, measuring less than 3.3 decitex
People’s Republic of China (China),
(3 denier) in diameter. The scope covers
India, the Republic of Korea (South
all fine denier PSF, whether coated or
Korea), and Taiwan would likely lead to uncoated. For a complete description of
continuation or recurrence of dumping
the scope of the Order, see the Issues
at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final
and Decision Memorandum.9
Results of Sunset Reviews’’ section of
Analysis of Comments Received
this notice.
A complete discussion of all issues
DATES: Applicable June 8, 2023.
raised in these sunset reviews,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
including the likelihood of continuation
Luke Caruso, AD/CVD Operations,
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, or recurrence of dumping and the
magnitude of the dumping margins
International Trade Administration,
likely to prevail if the Orders were
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
revoked, is provided in the Issues and
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
Decision Memorandum. A list of the
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2081.
sections in the Issues and Decision
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Memorandum is in the appendix to this
Background
notice. The Issues and Decision
After Commerce initiated these sunset Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
reviews 1 of the Orders,2 pursuant to
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
Countervailing Duty Centralized
as amended (the Act), domestic
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
interested parties 3 timely submitted
complete notices of intent to participate ACCESS is available to registered users
in,4 and adequate substantive responses at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
regarding, the reviews.5 The domestic
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
1 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 88
FR 6700 (February 1, 2023).
2 See Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the
People’s Republic of China, India, the Republic of
Korea, and Taiwan: Antidumping Duty Orders, 83
FR 34545 (July 20, 2018) (Orders).
3 The domestic interested parties are Auriga
Polymers Inc.; Fiber Industries LLC; Nan Ya Plastics
Corporation, America; and Sun Fiber LLC.
4 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Fine
Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from India—Domestic
Interested Parties’ Notice of Intent to Participate,’’
dated February 15, 2023; ‘‘Fine Denier Polyester
Staple Fiber from the People’s Republic of China—
Domestic Interested Parties’ Notice of Intent to
Participate,’’ dated February 15, 2023; ‘‘Fine Denier
Polyester Staple Fiber from the Republic of Korea—
Domestic Interested Parties’ Notice of Intent to
Participate,’’ dated February 15, 2023; and ‘‘Fine
Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from Taiwan—
Domestic Interested Parties’ Notice of Intent to
Participate,’’ dated February 15, 2023.
5 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Fine
Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from India—Domestic
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Interested Parties’ Substantive Response,’’ dated
March 3, 2023; ‘‘Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber
from the People’s Republic of China—Domestic
Interested Parties’ Substantive Response,’’ dated
March 2, 2023; ‘‘Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber
from Korea—Domestic Interested Parties’
Substantive Response,’’ dated March 3, 2023; and
‘‘Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from Taiwan—
Domestic Interested Parties’ Substantive Response,’’
dated March 2, 2023.
6 Id.
7 See Commerce’s Letter ‘‘Sunset Reviews
Initiated on February 1, 2023,’’ dated March 23,
2023.
8 See Orders.
9 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the First
Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping
Duty Orders on Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber
from India, the People’s Republic of China, the
Republic of Korea, and Taiwan,’’ dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 110 (Thursday, June 8, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37510-37512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-12242]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-831]
Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Initiation of
Circumvention Inquiry on the Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to a request from the Fresh Garlic Producers
Association and its individual members (collectively, the petitioners),
the Department of Commerce (Commerce) is initiating a country-wide
circumvention inquiry to determine whether imports of small and large
garlic chunks from the People's Republic of China (China) are
circumventing the antidumping duty (AD) order on fresh garlic from
China.
DATES: Applicable June 8, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles DeFilippo or Jacob Saude; AD/
CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3979 or 202-482-0981,
respectively.
[[Page 37511]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 16, 2023, pursuant to section 781(c) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.226(c), the petitioners
filed a circumvention inquiry request alleging that small and large
garlic chunks are circumventing the Order \1\ and, accordingly, should
be included within the scope of the Order. \2\ On March 17, 2023, we
deferred the decision to initiate this circumvention inquiry until the
ongoing scope inquiry regarding large and small garlic chunks from
Green Garden Produce LLC was complete.\3\ On April 13, 2023, Commerce
officials held a videoconference and in-person meeting with counsel to
the petitioners regarding their February 16, 2023, request that
Commerce conduct a minor alterations circumvention inquiry.\4\ On March
3, 2023, Commerce issued a supplemental questionnaire to the
petitioners regarding their circumvention request.\5\ On May 10, 2023,
the petitioners submitted their supplemental questionnaire response.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Antidumping Duty Order: Fresh Garlic from the People's
Republic of China, 59 FR 59209 (November 16, 1994) (Order).
\2\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``Petitioners' Request for
Circumvention Ruling Pursuant to Section 781(c) of the Tariff Act of
1930, As Amended,'' dated February 16, 2023.
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Time to Determine Whether to
Initiate Circumvention Inquiry,'' dated March 17, 2023.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Meeting with Petitioners' Counsel,'' dated
April 13, 2023.
\5\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Circumvention Inquiry Request
Supplemental Questionnaire,'' dated May 3, 2023.
\6\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``Response to Supplemental
Questionnaire in Circumvention Inquiry Request,'' dated May 10,
2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this Order are all grades of garlic, whole
or separated into constituent cloves, whether or not peeled, fresh,
chilled, frozen, provisionally preserved, or packed in water or other
neutral substance, but not prepared or preserved by the addition of
other ingredients or heat processing. The differences between grades
are based on color, size, sheathing and level of decay. A full
description of the scope of the Order is provided in the Initiation
Checklist.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Initiation Checklist, ``Initiation of the Circumvention
Inquiry on the Antidumping Duty Order,'' dated concurrently with,
and hereby adopted by, this notice (Initiation Checklist) at 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merchandise Subject to the Circumvention Inquiry
The circumvention inquiry covers small and large garlic chunks
produced in China and exported to the United States.
Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry
Section 351.226(d) of Commerce's regulations states that if
Commerce determines that a request for a circumvention inquiry
satisfies the requirements of 19 CFR 351.226(c), then Commerce ``will
accept the request and initiate a circumvention inquiry.'' Section
351.226(c)(1) of Commerce's regulations, in turn, requires that each
request for a circumvention inquiry allege ``that the elements
necessary for a circumvention determination under section 781 of the
Act exist'' and be ``accompanied by information reasonably available to
the interested party supporting these allegations.'' The petitioners
alleged circumvention pursuant to section 781(c) of the Act (minor
alterations of merchandise).
Section 781(c) of the Act provides that Commerce may find
circumvention of an AD order when products which are of the class or
kind of merchandise subject to an AD order have been ``altered in form
or appearance in minor respects . . . whether or not included in the
same tariff classification.'' Section 781(c)(2) of the Act provides an
exception that ``{p{time} aragraph 1 shall not apply with respect to
altered merchandise if the administering authority determines that it
would be unnecessary to consider the altered merchandise within the
scope of the AD order.''
While the statute is silent as to what factors to consider in
determining whether alterations are properly considered ``minor,'' the
legislative history of this provision indicates that there are certain
factors which should be considered before reaching a circumvention
determination. In conducting a circumvention inquiry under section
781(c) of the Act, Commerce has generally relied upon ``such criteria
as the overall physical characteristics of the merchandise, the
expectations of the ultimate users, the use of the merchandise, the
channels of marketing and the cost of any modification relative to the
total value of the imported products.'' \8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See S. Rep. No.71, 100th Cong., 1st Sess. 100 (1987) (``In
applying this provision, the Commerce Department should apply
practical measurements regarding minor alterations, so that
circumvention can be dealt with effectively, even where such
alterations to an article technically transform it into a
differently designated article.''). See also Affirmative Preliminary
Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty Order on
Certain Cut-to-Length Steel Plate from the People's Republic of
China, 74 FR 33991, 33992 (July 14, 2009), unchanged in Affirmative
Final Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty Order
on Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from the People's
Republic of China, 74 FR 40565 (August 12, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis
Based on our analysis of the petitioners' circumvention inquiry
request, we determined that the petitioners satisfied the criteria
under 19 CFR 351.226(c), and thus, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.226(d)(1)(ii), we have accepted the request and are initiating the
requested circumvention inquiry of the Order. For a full discussion of
the basis for our decision to initiate the requested circumvention
inquiry, see Initiation Checklist.
Furthermore, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.226(c)(2)(iii), the petitioners
noted that Green Garden is the entity that imports small and large
garlic chunks into the United States. While the petitioners stated that
they are not aware of other exporters and/or producers exporting small
and large garlic chunks to the United States, beyond those that supply
Green Garden, they are concerned that there are numerous Chinese
entities that could begin production of significant volumes of IQF
garlic chunks for exportation to the United States. Therefore, given
the ease with which other Chinese exporters and/or producers could
engage in the same activities as those supplying Green Garden, Commerce
is initiating this circumvention inquiry on a country-wide basis.
Respondent Selection
Commerce intends to base respondent selection on U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) data. Commerce intends to place the CBP data on
the record within five days of the publication of the initiation
notice. Comments regarding the CBP data and respondent selection should
be submitted within seven days after placement of the CBP data on the
record of the relevant inquiry.
Commerce intends to establish a schedule for questionnaire
responses after respondent selection. A company's failure to completely
respond to Commerce's requests for information may result in the
application of partial or total facts available, pursuant to section
776(a) of the Act, which may include adverse inferences, pursuant to
section 776(b) of the Act.
Suspension of Liquidation
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.226(l)(1), Commerce intends to notify CBP of
this
[[Page 37512]]
initiation and direct CBP to continue the suspension of liquidation of
entries of products subject to this circumvention inquiry that were
already subject to the suspension of liquidation under the Order and to
apply the cash deposit rates that would be applicable if the products
were determined to be covered by the scope of the Order. Should
Commerce issue affirmative preliminary or final circumvention
determinations, Commerce will follow the suspension of liquidation
rules under 19 CFR 351.226(l)(2)-(4).
Notification to Interested Parties
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.226(d) and section 781(c) of the Act,
Commerce determines that the petitioners' request for a circumvention
inquiry satisfies the requirements of 19 CFR 351.226(c). Accordingly,
Commerce is notifying all interested parties of the initiation of this
circumvention inquiry to determine whether small and large garlic
chunks produced in and exported from China are circumventing the Order
and the opportunity to comment on any additional entities that import
small and large garlic chunks to the United States. In addition, we
have included a description of the products that are the subject to
this inquiry and an explanation of Commerce's decision to initiate this
inquiry as provided in the accompanying Initiation Checklist.\9\ In
accordance with 19 CFR 351.226(e)(1), Commerce intends to issue its
preliminary circumvention determination no later than 150 days from the
date of publication of the notice of initiation of this circumvention
inquiry in the Federal Register.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Initiation Checklist at 4 and 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice is published in accordance with section 781(c) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.226(d)(1)(ii).
Dated: June 1, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2023-12242 Filed 6-7-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
