Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Applications for Inclusion on the Lists of Arbitrators Under the Data Privacy Framework Program, 37202-37204 [2023-12192]

Download as PDF 37202 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 7, 2023 / Notices system within 30 days of publication of this notice.12 Requests should contain: (1) the party’s name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; (3) whether any participant is a foreign national; and (4) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing at a time and date to be determined. Parties should confirm the date and time of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. Parties are reminded that all briefs and hearing requests must be filed electronically using ACCESS and received successfully in their entirety by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary information, until further notice.13 Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of our analysis of the issues raised by the parties in any written briefs, no later than 120 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Assessment Rates In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4)(i), we preliminarily assigned subsidy rates in the amounts shown above for the producers/ exporters shown above. Upon completion of the administrative review, consistent with section 751(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. For the companies for which this review is rescinded, we will instruct CBP to assess countervailing duties on all appropriate entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of estimated countervailing duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, during the period January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(l)(i). We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP for these companies no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the 12 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 13 See VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:01 Jun 06, 2023 Jkt 259001 preliminary results of this review in the Federal Register. For the companies remaining in the review, we intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). Cash Deposit Rate In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, Commerce intends, upon publication of the final results, to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts calculated in the final results for each of the reviewed companies listed above on shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this review, except, where the rate calculated in the final results is zero or de minimis, no cash deposit will be required. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the all-others rate as established in the Order (i.e., 9.29 percent) 14 or the most recent company-specific rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash deposit instructions, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Interested Parties These preliminary results of review are issued and published pursuant to sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4) and 351.221(b)(4). Dated: May 31, 2023. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Period of Review V. Partial Rescission of Administrative Review VI. Diversification of Korea’s Economy VII. Subsidies Valuation Information VIII. Benchmarks and Interest Rates IX. Analysis of Programs X. Recommendation 14 See PO 00000 Order, 84 FR at 18775. Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Appendix II 1. AJU Besteel Co., Ltd. 2. Chang Won Bending Co., Ltd. 3. Daiduck Piping Co., Ltd. 4. Dong Yang Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. 5. Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd. 6. EEW KHPC Co., Ltd. 7. EEW Korea Co., Ltd. 8. Hansol Metal Co. Ltd. 9. Husteel Co., Ltd.15 10. Hyundai Steel Company 16 11. Il Jin Nts Co. Ltd. 12. Kem Solutions Co., Ltd. 13. Kiduck Industries Co., Ltd. 14. Kum Kang Kind. Co., Ltd. 15. Kumsoo Connecting Co., Ltd. 16. Nexteel Co., Ltd. 17. POSCO International Corporation. 18. Samkang M&T Co., Ltd. 19. Seonghwa Industrial Co., Ltd. 20. SIN–E B&P Co., Ltd. 21. Steel Flower Co., Ltd. 22. WELTECH Co., Ltd. [FR Doc. 2023–12113 Filed 6–6–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Applications for Inclusion on the Lists of Arbitrators Under the Data Privacy Framework Program The Department of Commerce will submit the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, on or after the date of publication of this notice. We invite the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information 15 Subject merchandise both produced and exported by Husteel Co., Ltd. (Husteel) is excluded from the countervailing duty order. See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Countervailing Duty Order, 84 FR 18773 (May 2, 2019). Thus, Husteel’s inclusion in this administrative review is limited to entries for which Husteel was not both the producer and exporter of the subject merchandise. 16 Subject merchandise both produced and exported by Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel) and subject merchandise produced by Hyundai Steel and exported by Hyundai Corporation are excluded from the countervailing duty order. See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Countervailing Duty Order, 84 FR 18773 (May 2, 2019). Thus, Hyundai Steel’s inclusion in this administrative review is limited to entries for which Hyundai Steel was not the producer and exporter of the subject merchandise and for which Hyundai Steel was not the producer and Hyundai Corporation was not the exporter of subject merchandise. E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM 07JNN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 7, 2023 / Notices collection requirements and minimize the public’s reporting burden. Public comments were previously requested via the Federal Register on March 30, 2023 during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. Agency: International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. Title: Applications for Inclusion on the Lists of Arbitrators Under the Data Privacy Framework Program. OMB Control Number: New collection. Not yet assigned. Form Number(s): None. Type of Request: Regular submission, new information collection. Number of Respondents: 36. Average Hours per Response: 240 minutes. Burden Hours: 144 hours. Needs and Uses: The United States, the European Union (EU), the United Kingdom (UK), and Switzerland share a commitment to enhancing privacy protection, the rule of law, and a recognition of the importance of transatlantic data flows to our respective citizens, economies, and societies, but take different approaches to doing so. Given those differences, the Department of Commerce (DOC) developed the EU– U.S. Data Privacy Framework (EU–U.S. DPF), the UK Extension to the EU–U.S. Data Privacy Framework (UK Extension to the EU–U.S. DPF), and the Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (Swiss-U.S. DPF) in consultation with the European Commission, the UK Government, the Swiss Federal Administration, industry, and other stakeholders. These arrangements were respectively developed to provide U.S. organizations reliable mechanisms for personal data transfers to the United States from the European Union, the United Kingdom (and, as applicable, Gibraltar), and Switzerland while ensuring data protection that is consistent with EU, UK, and Swiss law. The DOC is issuing the EU–U.S. DPF Principles and the Swiss-U.S. DPF Principles, including the respective sets of Supplemental Principles (collectively the Principles) and Annex I of the Principles, as well as the UK Extension to the EU–U.S. DPF under its statutory authority to foster, promote, and develop international commerce (15 U.S.C. 1512). The International Trade Administration (ITA) will administer and supervise the Data Privacy Framework program, including maintaining and making publicly available the Data Privacy Framework List, an authoritative list of U.S. organizations that have self-certified to the DOC and declared their commitment VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:01 Jun 06, 2023 Jkt 259001 to adhere to the Principles pursuant to the EU–U.S. DPF and, as applicable, the UK Extension to the EU–U.S. DPF, and/ or the Swiss-U.S. DPF. While the decision by an organization to selfcertify its compliance pursuant to the EU–U.S. DPF and, as applicable the UK Extension to the EU–U.S. DPF, and/or the Swiss-U.S. DPF and by extension participate in the Data Privacy Framework program is voluntary; effective compliance is compulsory: organizations that self-certify to the DOC and publicly declare their commitment to adhere to the Principles must comply fully with the Principles. Such commitments to comply with the Principles are legally enforceable under U.S. law. On the basis of the Principles, Executive Order 14086, 28 CFR part 201, and accompanying letters and materials, including ITA’s commitments regarding the administration and supervision of the Data Privacy Framework program, it is the DOC’s expectation that the European Commission, the UK Government, and the Swiss Federal Administration will respectively recognize the adequacy of the protection provided by the EU–U.S. DPF, the UK Extension to the EU–U.S. DPF, and the Swiss-U.S. DPF thereby enabling personal data transfers from each respective jurisdiction to U.S. organizations participating in the relevant part of the Data Privacy Framework program. It is the DOC’s present expectation that the effective date of the EU–U.S. DPF Principles would coincide with the entry into force of the European Commission’s anticipated recognition of adequacy, whereas the respective effective dates of the UK Extension to the EU–U.S. DPF and the Swiss-U.S. DPF Principles would occur before the entry into force of the anticipated, respective recognitions of adequacy (i.e., to enable U.S. organizations from the earliest possible date to self-certify their compliance with multiple parts of the Data Privacy Framework program). Personal data cannot be received in reliance on the EU–U.S. DPF, the UK Extension to the EU–U.S. DPF, and the Swiss-U.S. DPF until they have respectively received such recognition (i.e., until such formal recognition enters into force). As respectively described in Annex I of the EU–U.S. DPF Principles, the UK Extension to the EU–U.S. DPF, and Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. DPF Principles the DOC commits separately with the European Commission, the UK Government, and the Swiss Federal Administration to implement an arbitration mechanism to provide EU, PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 37203 UK, and Swiss individuals with the ability under certain circumstances to invoke binding arbitration to determine, for residual claims, whether an organization has violated its obligations under the Principles as to those individuals. Organizations that selfcertify their compliance pursuant to the EU–U.S. DPF, including those that also elect to participate in the UK Extension to the EU–U.S. DPF are obligated to arbitrate claims and follow the terms as set forth in Annex I of the EU–U.S. DPF Principles, provided that an EU or UK (as applicable) individual has invoked binding arbitration by delivering notice to the organization at issue and following the procedures and subject to the conditions set forth in Annex I of the EU–U.S. DPF Principles. Organizations that self-certify their compliance pursuant to the Swiss-U.S. DPF are obligated to arbitrate claims and follow the terms as set forth in Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. DPF Principles, provided that a Swiss individual has invoked binding arbitration by delivering notice to the organization at issue and following the procedures and subject to the conditions set forth in Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. DPF Principles. An individual’s decision to invoke this binding arbitration option is entirely voluntary. Arbitral decisions will be binding on all parties to the arbitration. Under this binding arbitration option, a panel (consisting of one or three arbitrators, as agreed by the parties) has the authority to impose individual-specific, non-monetary equitable relief (such as access, correction, deletion, or return of the individual’s data in question) necessary to remedy the violation of the Principles only with respect to the individual. No damages, costs, fees, or other remedies are available. The parties will select the arbitrators from the list(s) of arbitrators described below. Pursuant to the EU–U.S. DPF and the UK Extension to the EU–U.S. DPF, the DOC and the European Commission will develop and seek to maintain a list of at least 10 arbitrators. The parties, including the EU or UK individual who has invoked binding arbitration, will select arbitrators for the arbitration panel from that list of arbitrators developed under the EU–U.S. DPF (EU– U.S. DPF List of Arbitrators). To be eligible for inclusion on the EU–U.S. DPF List of Arbitrators, applicants must be admitted to practice law in the United States and be experts in U.S. privacy law, with expertise in EU data protection law; and shall not be subject to any instructions from, or be affiliated with, either party, or any participating E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM 07JNN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 37204 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 7, 2023 / Notices organization, or the United States, European Union, or any EU Member State or any other governmental authority, public authority, or enforcement authority. Arbitrators will remain on the EU–U.S. DPF List of Arbitrators for a period of 3 years, absent exceptional circumstances or removal for cause, renewable by the DOC, with prior notification to the European Commission for additional 3year terms. Pursuant to the Swiss-U.S. DPF the DOC and the Swiss Federal Administration will develop and seek to maintain a list of up to five arbitrators to supplement the list of arbitrators developed under the EU–U.S. DPF. The parties, including the Swiss individual who has invoked binding arbitration, will select arbitrators for the arbitration panel from the list of arbitrators developed under the EU–U.S. DPF, as supplemented by the list of arbitrators developed under the Swiss-U.S. DPF (Swiss-U.S. DPF Supplemental List of Arbitrators). To be eligible for inclusion on the Swiss-U.S. DPF Supplemental List of Arbitrators, applicants must be admitted to practice law in the United States and be experts in U.S. privacy law, with expertise in European or Swiss data protection law; and shall not be subject to any instructions from, or be affiliated with, either party, or any participating organization, or the United States, Switzerland, European Union, or any EU Member State or any other governmental authority, public authority, or enforcement authority. Arbitrators will remain on the SwissU.S. DPF Supplemental List of Arbitrators for a period of 3 years, absent exceptional circumstances or removal for cause, renewable by the DOC, with prior notification to the Swiss Federal Administration for additional 3-year terms. Individuals interested in being considered for inclusion on the EU–U.S. DPF List of Arbitrators or the Swiss-U.S. DPF Supplemental List of Arbitrators would submit their applications to the DOC online via email at dpf.program@ trade.gov. The DOC has agreed with the European Commission to the adoption of arbitration rules that govern arbitration proceedings and a code of conduct for arbitrators under the EU– U.S. DPF (and similarly agreed with the UK Government as relates to arbitration proceedings under the UK Extension to the EU–U.S. DPF), and the Swiss Federal Administration to the adoption of arbitration rules that govern arbitration proceedings and a code of conduct for arbitrators under the SwissU.S. DPF. In the event that the rules VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:01 Jun 06, 2023 Jkt 259001 governing the proceedings and/or the code of conduct for arbitrators need to be changed, the DOC and the European Commission and the Swiss Federal Administration will agree to amend those rules or adopt a different set of existing, well-established U.S. arbitral procedures, and/or amend the code of conduct for arbitrators (as applicable). The DOC has selected the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), the international division of the American Arbitration Association (AAA) (collectively ICDR– AAA) to administer arbitrations pursuant to and manage the arbitral fund identified in Annex I of the EU– U.S. DPF Principles, including as relates to the UK Extension to the EU–U.S. DPF, and Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. DPF Principles. Among other things, the ICDR–AAA facilitates arbitrator fee arrangements, including the collection and timely payment of arbitrator fees and other expenses. Affected Public: Private individuals. Frequency: Recurrent, depending on the number of arbitrators required to maintain active lists of arbitrators under the Data Privacy Framework Program. Respondent’s Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits. Legal Authority: The DOC’s statutory authority to foster, promote, and develop the foreign and domestic commerce of the United States (15 U.S.C. 1512). This information collection request may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov. Follow the instructions to view the Department of Commerce collections currently under review by OMB. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be submitted within 30 days of the publication of this notice on the following website www.reginfo.gov/ public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or by using the search function and entering the title of the collection. Sheleen Dumas, Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs, Commerce Department. [FR Doc. 2023–12192 Filed 6–6–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–489–501] Circular Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021–2022 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that the sole mandatory respondent in this administrative review, Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Borusan Mannesmann) and Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. (Istikbal) (collectively, Borusan), a producer and exporter subject to this administrative review, made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) May 1, 2021, through April 30, 2022. Additionally, based on timely withdrawal of requests for review, we are rescinding this administrative review with respect to all other companies for which we initiated an administrative review. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable June 7, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magd Zalok, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4162. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On July 14, 2022, based on timely requests for a review, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated this administrative review of the antidumping duty order 1 on circular welded carbon steel standard pipe and tube products from Turkey, covering 19 companies.2 On August 30, 2022, Commerce selected Borusan as the mandatory respondent for individual examination.3 On October 12, 2022, Nucor Tubular Products Inc. (Nucor), a petitioner in this proceeding, withdrew its request for an administrative review 1 Antidumping Duty Order; Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey, 51 FR 17784 (May 15, 1986) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 87 FR 42144 (July 14, 2022) (Initiation Notice). 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’ dated August 30, 2022. E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM 07JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37202-37204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-12192]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment 
Request; Applications for Inclusion on the Lists of Arbitrators Under 
the Data Privacy Framework Program

    The Department of Commerce will submit the following information 
collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for 
review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
1995, on or after the date of publication of this notice. We invite the 
general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and 
continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of 
our information

[[Page 37203]]

collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. 
Public comments were previously requested via the Federal Register on 
March 30, 2023 during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for 
an additional 30 days for public comments.
    Agency: International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
    Title: Applications for Inclusion on the Lists of Arbitrators Under 
the Data Privacy Framework Program.
    OMB Control Number: New collection. Not yet assigned.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Request: Regular submission, new information collection.
    Number of Respondents: 36.
    Average Hours per Response: 240 minutes.
    Burden Hours: 144 hours.
    Needs and Uses: The United States, the European Union (EU), the 
United Kingdom (UK), and Switzerland share a commitment to enhancing 
privacy protection, the rule of law, and a recognition of the 
importance of transatlantic data flows to our respective citizens, 
economies, and societies, but take different approaches to doing so. 
Given those differences, the Department of Commerce (DOC) developed the 
EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (EU-U.S. DPF), the UK Extension to the 
EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF), and 
the Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (Swiss-U.S. DPF) in consultation 
with the European Commission, the UK Government, the Swiss Federal 
Administration, industry, and other stakeholders. These arrangements 
were respectively developed to provide U.S. organizations reliable 
mechanisms for personal data transfers to the United States from the 
European Union, the United Kingdom (and, as applicable, Gibraltar), and 
Switzerland while ensuring data protection that is consistent with EU, 
UK, and Swiss law.
    The DOC is issuing the EU-U.S. DPF Principles and the Swiss-U.S. 
DPF Principles, including the respective sets of Supplemental 
Principles (collectively the Principles) and Annex I of the Principles, 
as well as the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF under its statutory 
authority to foster, promote, and develop international commerce (15 
U.S.C. 1512). The International Trade Administration (ITA) will 
administer and supervise the Data Privacy Framework program, including 
maintaining and making publicly available the Data Privacy Framework 
List, an authoritative list of U.S. organizations that have self-
certified to the DOC and declared their commitment to adhere to the 
Principles pursuant to the EU-U.S. DPF and, as applicable, the UK 
Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, and/or the Swiss-U.S. DPF. While the 
decision by an organization to self-certify its compliance pursuant to 
the EU-U.S. DPF and, as applicable the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, 
and/or the Swiss-U.S. DPF and by extension participate in the Data 
Privacy Framework program is voluntary; effective compliance is 
compulsory: organizations that self-certify to the DOC and publicly 
declare their commitment to adhere to the Principles must comply fully 
with the Principles. Such commitments to comply with the Principles are 
legally enforceable under U.S. law. On the basis of the Principles, 
Executive Order 14086, 28 CFR part 201, and accompanying letters and 
materials, including ITA's commitments regarding the administration and 
supervision of the Data Privacy Framework program, it is the DOC's 
expectation that the European Commission, the UK Government, and the 
Swiss Federal Administration will respectively recognize the adequacy 
of the protection provided by the EU-U.S. DPF, the UK Extension to the 
EU-U.S. DPF, and the Swiss-U.S. DPF thereby enabling personal data 
transfers from each respective jurisdiction to U.S. organizations 
participating in the relevant part of the Data Privacy Framework 
program. It is the DOC's present expectation that the effective date of 
the EU-U.S. DPF Principles would coincide with the entry into force of 
the European Commission's anticipated recognition of adequacy, whereas 
the respective effective dates of the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF 
and the Swiss-U.S. DPF Principles would occur before the entry into 
force of the anticipated, respective recognitions of adequacy (i.e., to 
enable U.S. organizations from the earliest possible date to self-
certify their compliance with multiple parts of the Data Privacy 
Framework program). Personal data cannot be received in reliance on the 
EU-U.S. DPF, the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, and the Swiss-U.S. 
DPF until they have respectively received such recognition (i.e., until 
such formal recognition enters into force).
    As respectively described in Annex I of the EU-U.S. DPF Principles, 
the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, and Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. DPF 
Principles the DOC commits separately with the European Commission, the 
UK Government, and the Swiss Federal Administration to implement an 
arbitration mechanism to provide EU, UK, and Swiss individuals with the 
ability under certain circumstances to invoke binding arbitration to 
determine, for residual claims, whether an organization has violated 
its obligations under the Principles as to those individuals. 
Organizations that self-certify their compliance pursuant to the EU-
U.S. DPF, including those that also elect to participate in the UK 
Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF are obligated to arbitrate claims and 
follow the terms as set forth in Annex I of the EU-U.S. DPF Principles, 
provided that an EU or UK (as applicable) individual has invoked 
binding arbitration by delivering notice to the organization at issue 
and following the procedures and subject to the conditions set forth in 
Annex I of the EU-U.S. DPF Principles. Organizations that self-certify 
their compliance pursuant to the Swiss-U.S. DPF are obligated to 
arbitrate claims and follow the terms as set forth in Annex I of the 
Swiss-U.S. DPF Principles, provided that a Swiss individual has invoked 
binding arbitration by delivering notice to the organization at issue 
and following the procedures and subject to the conditions set forth in 
Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. DPF Principles. An individual's decision to 
invoke this binding arbitration option is entirely voluntary. Arbitral 
decisions will be binding on all parties to the arbitration. Under this 
binding arbitration option, a panel (consisting of one or three 
arbitrators, as agreed by the parties) has the authority to impose 
individual-specific, non-monetary equitable relief (such as access, 
correction, deletion, or return of the individual's data in question) 
necessary to remedy the violation of the Principles only with respect 
to the individual. No damages, costs, fees, or other remedies are 
available. The parties will select the arbitrators from the list(s) of 
arbitrators described below.
    Pursuant to the EU-U.S. DPF and the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. 
DPF, the DOC and the European Commission will develop and seek to 
maintain a list of at least 10 arbitrators. The parties, including the 
EU or UK individual who has invoked binding arbitration, will select 
arbitrators for the arbitration panel from that list of arbitrators 
developed under the EU-U.S. DPF (EU-U.S. DPF List of Arbitrators). To 
be eligible for inclusion on the EU-U.S. DPF List of Arbitrators, 
applicants must be admitted to practice law in the United States and be 
experts in U.S. privacy law, with expertise in EU data protection law; 
and shall not be subject to any instructions from, or be affiliated 
with, either party, or any participating

[[Page 37204]]

organization, or the United States, European Union, or any EU Member 
State or any other governmental authority, public authority, or 
enforcement authority. Arbitrators will remain on the EU-U.S. DPF List 
of Arbitrators for a period of 3 years, absent exceptional 
circumstances or removal for cause, renewable by the DOC, with prior 
notification to the European Commission for additional 3-year terms.
    Pursuant to the Swiss-U.S. DPF the DOC and the Swiss Federal 
Administration will develop and seek to maintain a list of up to five 
arbitrators to supplement the list of arbitrators developed under the 
EU-U.S. DPF. The parties, including the Swiss individual who has 
invoked binding arbitration, will select arbitrators for the 
arbitration panel from the list of arbitrators developed under the EU-
U.S. DPF, as supplemented by the list of arbitrators developed under 
the Swiss-U.S. DPF (Swiss-U.S. DPF Supplemental List of Arbitrators). 
To be eligible for inclusion on the Swiss-U.S. DPF Supplemental List of 
Arbitrators, applicants must be admitted to practice law in the United 
States and be experts in U.S. privacy law, with expertise in European 
or Swiss data protection law; and shall not be subject to any 
instructions from, or be affiliated with, either party, or any 
participating organization, or the United States, Switzerland, European 
Union, or any EU Member State or any other governmental authority, 
public authority, or enforcement authority. Arbitrators will remain on 
the Swiss-U.S. DPF Supplemental List of Arbitrators for a period of 3 
years, absent exceptional circumstances or removal for cause, renewable 
by the DOC, with prior notification to the Swiss Federal Administration 
for additional 3-year terms.
    Individuals interested in being considered for inclusion on the EU-
U.S. DPF List of Arbitrators or the Swiss-U.S. DPF Supplemental List of 
Arbitrators would submit their applications to the DOC online via email 
at [email protected].
    The DOC has agreed with the European Commission to the adoption of 
arbitration rules that govern arbitration proceedings and a code of 
conduct for arbitrators under the EU-U.S. DPF (and similarly agreed 
with the UK Government as relates to arbitration proceedings under the 
UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF), and the Swiss Federal Administration 
to the adoption of arbitration rules that govern arbitration 
proceedings and a code of conduct for arbitrators under the Swiss-U.S. 
DPF. In the event that the rules governing the proceedings and/or the 
code of conduct for arbitrators need to be changed, the DOC and the 
European Commission and the Swiss Federal Administration will agree to 
amend those rules or adopt a different set of existing, well-
established U.S. arbitral procedures, and/or amend the code of conduct 
for arbitrators (as applicable).
    The DOC has selected the International Centre for Dispute 
Resolution (ICDR), the international division of the American 
Arbitration Association (AAA) (collectively ICDR-AAA) to administer 
arbitrations pursuant to and manage the arbitral fund identified in 
Annex I of the EU-U.S. DPF Principles, including as relates to the UK 
Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, and Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. DPF 
Principles. Among other things, the ICDR-AAA facilitates arbitrator fee 
arrangements, including the collection and timely payment of arbitrator 
fees and other expenses.
    Affected Public: Private individuals.
    Frequency: Recurrent, depending on the number of arbitrators 
required to maintain active lists of arbitrators under the Data Privacy 
Framework Program.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    Legal Authority: The DOC's statutory authority to foster, promote, 
and develop the foreign and domestic commerce of the United States (15 
U.S.C. 1512).
    This information collection request may be viewed at 
www.reginfo.gov. Follow the instructions to view the Department of 
Commerce collections currently under review by OMB.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be submitted within 30 days of the publication of 
this notice on the following website www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. 
Find this particular information collection by selecting ``Currently 
under 30-day Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search 
function and entering the title of the collection.

Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Under Secretary for 
Economic Affairs, Commerce Department.
[FR Doc. 2023-12192 Filed 6-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.