Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Applications for Inclusion on the Lists of Arbitrators Under the Data Privacy Framework Program, 37202-37204 [2023-12192]
Download as PDF
37202
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 7, 2023 / Notices
system within 30 days of publication of
this notice.12 Requests should contain:
(1) the party’s name, address, and
telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; (3) whether any participant
is a foreign national; and (4) a list of
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in
the hearing will be limited to those
raised in the respective case and
rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing
is made, Commerce intends to hold the
hearing at a time and date to be
determined. Parties should confirm the
date and time of the hearing two days
before the scheduled date.
Parties are reminded that all briefs
and hearing requests must be filed
electronically using ACCESS and
received successfully in their entirety by
5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date.
Note that Commerce has temporarily
modified certain of its requirements for
serving documents containing business
proprietary information, until further
notice.13
Unless the deadline is extended
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2),
Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review,
including the results of our analysis of
the issues raised by the parties in any
written briefs, no later than 120 days
after the date of publication of these
preliminary results.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Assessment Rates
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(b)(4)(i), we preliminarily
assigned subsidy rates in the amounts
shown above for the producers/
exporters shown above. Upon
completion of the administrative
review, consistent with section 751(a)(1)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2),
Commerce shall determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, countervailing duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review.
For the companies for which this
review is rescinded, we will instruct
CBP to assess countervailing duties on
all appropriate entries at a rate equal to
the cash deposit of estimated
countervailing duties required at the
time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, during the
period January 1, 2021, through
December 31, 2021, in accordance with
19 CFR 351.212(c)(l)(i). We intend to
issue assessment instructions to CBP for
these companies no earlier than 35 days
after the date of publication of the
12 See
19 CFR 351.310(c).
Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD
Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension
of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020).
13 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:01 Jun 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
preliminary results of this review in the
Federal Register.
For the companies remaining in the
review, we intend to issue assessment
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35
days after the date of publication of the
final results of this review in the
Federal Register. If a timely summons is
filed at the U.S. Court of International
Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant
entries until the time for parties to file
a request for a statutory injunction has
expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).
Cash Deposit Rate
In accordance with section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, Commerce
intends, upon publication of the final
results, to instruct CBP to collect cash
deposits of estimated countervailing
duties in the amounts calculated in the
final results for each of the reviewed
companies listed above on shipments of
subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review, except, where the rate
calculated in the final results is zero or
de minimis, no cash deposit will be
required. For all non-reviewed firms, we
will instruct CBP to continue to collect
cash deposits of estimated
countervailing duties at the all-others
rate as established in the Order (i.e.,
9.29 percent) 14 or the most recent
company-specific rate applicable to the
company, as appropriate. These cash
deposit instructions, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Interested Parties
These preliminary results of review
are issued and published pursuant to
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4) and
351.221(b)(4).
Dated: May 31, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Period of Review
V. Partial Rescission of Administrative
Review
VI. Diversification of Korea’s Economy
VII. Subsidies Valuation Information
VIII. Benchmarks and Interest Rates
IX. Analysis of Programs
X. Recommendation
14 See
PO 00000
Order, 84 FR at 18775.
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Appendix II
1. AJU Besteel Co., Ltd.
2. Chang Won Bending Co., Ltd.
3. Daiduck Piping Co., Ltd.
4. Dong Yang Steel Pipe Co., Ltd.
5. Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd.
6. EEW KHPC Co., Ltd.
7. EEW Korea Co., Ltd.
8. Hansol Metal Co. Ltd.
9. Husteel Co., Ltd.15
10. Hyundai Steel Company 16
11. Il Jin Nts Co. Ltd.
12. Kem Solutions Co., Ltd.
13. Kiduck Industries Co., Ltd.
14. Kum Kang Kind. Co., Ltd.
15. Kumsoo Connecting Co., Ltd.
16. Nexteel Co., Ltd.
17. POSCO International Corporation.
18. Samkang M&T Co., Ltd.
19. Seonghwa Industrial Co., Ltd.
20. SIN–E B&P Co., Ltd.
21. Steel Flower Co., Ltd.
22. WELTECH Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2023–12113 Filed 6–6–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
Review and Approval; Comment
Request; Applications for Inclusion on
the Lists of Arbitrators Under the Data
Privacy Framework Program
The Department of Commerce will
submit the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, on or after the date of publication
of this notice. We invite the general
public and other Federal agencies to
comment on proposed, and continuing
information collections, which helps us
assess the impact of our information
15 Subject merchandise both produced and
exported by Husteel Co., Ltd. (Husteel) is excluded
from the countervailing duty order. See Large
Diameter Welded Pipe from the Republic of Korea:
Countervailing Duty Order, 84 FR 18773 (May 2,
2019). Thus, Husteel’s inclusion in this
administrative review is limited to entries for which
Husteel was not both the producer and exporter of
the subject merchandise.
16 Subject merchandise both produced and
exported by Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai
Steel) and subject merchandise produced by
Hyundai Steel and exported by Hyundai
Corporation are excluded from the countervailing
duty order. See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from
the Republic of Korea: Countervailing Duty Order,
84 FR 18773 (May 2, 2019). Thus, Hyundai Steel’s
inclusion in this administrative review is limited to
entries for which Hyundai Steel was not the
producer and exporter of the subject merchandise
and for which Hyundai Steel was not the producer
and Hyundai Corporation was not the exporter of
subject merchandise.
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 7, 2023 / Notices
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. Public
comments were previously requested
via the Federal Register on March 30,
2023 during a 60-day comment period.
This notice allows for an additional 30
days for public comments.
Agency: International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
Title: Applications for Inclusion on
the Lists of Arbitrators Under the Data
Privacy Framework Program.
OMB Control Number: New
collection. Not yet assigned.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Request: Regular submission,
new information collection.
Number of Respondents: 36.
Average Hours per Response: 240
minutes.
Burden Hours: 144 hours.
Needs and Uses: The United States,
the European Union (EU), the United
Kingdom (UK), and Switzerland share a
commitment to enhancing privacy
protection, the rule of law, and a
recognition of the importance of
transatlantic data flows to our respective
citizens, economies, and societies, but
take different approaches to doing so.
Given those differences, the Department
of Commerce (DOC) developed the EU–
U.S. Data Privacy Framework (EU–U.S.
DPF), the UK Extension to the EU–U.S.
Data Privacy Framework (UK Extension
to the EU–U.S. DPF), and the Swiss-U.S.
Data Privacy Framework (Swiss-U.S.
DPF) in consultation with the European
Commission, the UK Government, the
Swiss Federal Administration, industry,
and other stakeholders. These
arrangements were respectively
developed to provide U.S. organizations
reliable mechanisms for personal data
transfers to the United States from the
European Union, the United Kingdom
(and, as applicable, Gibraltar), and
Switzerland while ensuring data
protection that is consistent with EU,
UK, and Swiss law.
The DOC is issuing the EU–U.S. DPF
Principles and the Swiss-U.S. DPF
Principles, including the respective sets
of Supplemental Principles (collectively
the Principles) and Annex I of the
Principles, as well as the UK Extension
to the EU–U.S. DPF under its statutory
authority to foster, promote, and
develop international commerce (15
U.S.C. 1512). The International Trade
Administration (ITA) will administer
and supervise the Data Privacy
Framework program, including
maintaining and making publicly
available the Data Privacy Framework
List, an authoritative list of U.S.
organizations that have self-certified to
the DOC and declared their commitment
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:01 Jun 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
to adhere to the Principles pursuant to
the EU–U.S. DPF and, as applicable, the
UK Extension to the EU–U.S. DPF, and/
or the Swiss-U.S. DPF. While the
decision by an organization to selfcertify its compliance pursuant to the
EU–U.S. DPF and, as applicable the UK
Extension to the EU–U.S. DPF, and/or
the Swiss-U.S. DPF and by extension
participate in the Data Privacy
Framework program is voluntary;
effective compliance is compulsory:
organizations that self-certify to the
DOC and publicly declare their
commitment to adhere to the Principles
must comply fully with the Principles.
Such commitments to comply with the
Principles are legally enforceable under
U.S. law. On the basis of the Principles,
Executive Order 14086, 28 CFR part
201, and accompanying letters and
materials, including ITA’s commitments
regarding the administration and
supervision of the Data Privacy
Framework program, it is the DOC’s
expectation that the European
Commission, the UK Government, and
the Swiss Federal Administration will
respectively recognize the adequacy of
the protection provided by the EU–U.S.
DPF, the UK Extension to the EU–U.S.
DPF, and the Swiss-U.S. DPF thereby
enabling personal data transfers from
each respective jurisdiction to U.S.
organizations participating in the
relevant part of the Data Privacy
Framework program. It is the DOC’s
present expectation that the effective
date of the EU–U.S. DPF Principles
would coincide with the entry into force
of the European Commission’s
anticipated recognition of adequacy,
whereas the respective effective dates of
the UK Extension to the EU–U.S. DPF
and the Swiss-U.S. DPF Principles
would occur before the entry into force
of the anticipated, respective
recognitions of adequacy (i.e., to enable
U.S. organizations from the earliest
possible date to self-certify their
compliance with multiple parts of the
Data Privacy Framework program).
Personal data cannot be received in
reliance on the EU–U.S. DPF, the UK
Extension to the EU–U.S. DPF, and the
Swiss-U.S. DPF until they have
respectively received such recognition
(i.e., until such formal recognition
enters into force).
As respectively described in Annex I
of the EU–U.S. DPF Principles, the UK
Extension to the EU–U.S. DPF, and
Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. DPF
Principles the DOC commits separately
with the European Commission, the UK
Government, and the Swiss Federal
Administration to implement an
arbitration mechanism to provide EU,
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37203
UK, and Swiss individuals with the
ability under certain circumstances to
invoke binding arbitration to determine,
for residual claims, whether an
organization has violated its obligations
under the Principles as to those
individuals. Organizations that selfcertify their compliance pursuant to the
EU–U.S. DPF, including those that also
elect to participate in the UK Extension
to the EU–U.S. DPF are obligated to
arbitrate claims and follow the terms as
set forth in Annex I of the EU–U.S. DPF
Principles, provided that an EU or UK
(as applicable) individual has invoked
binding arbitration by delivering notice
to the organization at issue and
following the procedures and subject to
the conditions set forth in Annex I of
the EU–U.S. DPF Principles.
Organizations that self-certify their
compliance pursuant to the Swiss-U.S.
DPF are obligated to arbitrate claims and
follow the terms as set forth in Annex
I of the Swiss-U.S. DPF Principles,
provided that a Swiss individual has
invoked binding arbitration by
delivering notice to the organization at
issue and following the procedures and
subject to the conditions set forth in
Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. DPF
Principles. An individual’s decision to
invoke this binding arbitration option is
entirely voluntary. Arbitral decisions
will be binding on all parties to the
arbitration. Under this binding
arbitration option, a panel (consisting of
one or three arbitrators, as agreed by the
parties) has the authority to impose
individual-specific, non-monetary
equitable relief (such as access,
correction, deletion, or return of the
individual’s data in question) necessary
to remedy the violation of the Principles
only with respect to the individual. No
damages, costs, fees, or other remedies
are available. The parties will select the
arbitrators from the list(s) of arbitrators
described below.
Pursuant to the EU–U.S. DPF and the
UK Extension to the EU–U.S. DPF, the
DOC and the European Commission will
develop and seek to maintain a list of
at least 10 arbitrators. The parties,
including the EU or UK individual who
has invoked binding arbitration, will
select arbitrators for the arbitration
panel from that list of arbitrators
developed under the EU–U.S. DPF (EU–
U.S. DPF List of Arbitrators). To be
eligible for inclusion on the EU–U.S.
DPF List of Arbitrators, applicants must
be admitted to practice law in the
United States and be experts in U.S.
privacy law, with expertise in EU data
protection law; and shall not be subject
to any instructions from, or be affiliated
with, either party, or any participating
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
37204
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 7, 2023 / Notices
organization, or the United States,
European Union, or any EU Member
State or any other governmental
authority, public authority, or
enforcement authority. Arbitrators will
remain on the EU–U.S. DPF List of
Arbitrators for a period of 3 years,
absent exceptional circumstances or
removal for cause, renewable by the
DOC, with prior notification to the
European Commission for additional 3year terms.
Pursuant to the Swiss-U.S. DPF the
DOC and the Swiss Federal
Administration will develop and seek to
maintain a list of up to five arbitrators
to supplement the list of arbitrators
developed under the EU–U.S. DPF. The
parties, including the Swiss individual
who has invoked binding arbitration,
will select arbitrators for the arbitration
panel from the list of arbitrators
developed under the EU–U.S. DPF, as
supplemented by the list of arbitrators
developed under the Swiss-U.S. DPF
(Swiss-U.S. DPF Supplemental List of
Arbitrators). To be eligible for inclusion
on the Swiss-U.S. DPF Supplemental
List of Arbitrators, applicants must be
admitted to practice law in the United
States and be experts in U.S. privacy
law, with expertise in European or
Swiss data protection law; and shall not
be subject to any instructions from, or
be affiliated with, either party, or any
participating organization, or the United
States, Switzerland, European Union, or
any EU Member State or any other
governmental authority, public
authority, or enforcement authority.
Arbitrators will remain on the SwissU.S. DPF Supplemental List of
Arbitrators for a period of 3 years,
absent exceptional circumstances or
removal for cause, renewable by the
DOC, with prior notification to the
Swiss Federal Administration for
additional 3-year terms.
Individuals interested in being
considered for inclusion on the EU–U.S.
DPF List of Arbitrators or the Swiss-U.S.
DPF Supplemental List of Arbitrators
would submit their applications to the
DOC online via email at dpf.program@
trade.gov.
The DOC has agreed with the
European Commission to the adoption
of arbitration rules that govern
arbitration proceedings and a code of
conduct for arbitrators under the EU–
U.S. DPF (and similarly agreed with the
UK Government as relates to arbitration
proceedings under the UK Extension to
the EU–U.S. DPF), and the Swiss
Federal Administration to the adoption
of arbitration rules that govern
arbitration proceedings and a code of
conduct for arbitrators under the SwissU.S. DPF. In the event that the rules
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:01 Jun 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
governing the proceedings and/or the
code of conduct for arbitrators need to
be changed, the DOC and the European
Commission and the Swiss Federal
Administration will agree to amend
those rules or adopt a different set of
existing, well-established U.S. arbitral
procedures, and/or amend the code of
conduct for arbitrators (as applicable).
The DOC has selected the
International Centre for Dispute
Resolution (ICDR), the international
division of the American Arbitration
Association (AAA) (collectively ICDR–
AAA) to administer arbitrations
pursuant to and manage the arbitral
fund identified in Annex I of the EU–
U.S. DPF Principles, including as relates
to the UK Extension to the EU–U.S.
DPF, and Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. DPF
Principles. Among other things, the
ICDR–AAA facilitates arbitrator fee
arrangements, including the collection
and timely payment of arbitrator fees
and other expenses.
Affected Public: Private individuals.
Frequency: Recurrent, depending on
the number of arbitrators required to
maintain active lists of arbitrators under
the Data Privacy Framework Program.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
Legal Authority: The DOC’s statutory
authority to foster, promote, and
develop the foreign and domestic
commerce of the United States (15
U.S.C. 1512).
This information collection request
may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov.
Follow the instructions to view the
Department of Commerce collections
currently under review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be
submitted within 30 days of the
publication of this notice on the
following website www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain. Find this
particular information collection by
selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day
Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or
by using the search function and
entering the title of the collection.
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of
the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs,
Commerce Department.
[FR Doc. 2023–12192 Filed 6–6–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–489–501]
Circular Welded Carbon Steel Standard
Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey:
Preliminary Results and Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2021–2022
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
determines that the sole mandatory
respondent in this administrative
review, Borusan Mannesmann Boru
Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Borusan
Mannesmann) and Borusan Istikbal
Ticaret T.A.S. (Istikbal) (collectively,
Borusan), a producer and exporter
subject to this administrative review,
made sales of subject merchandise at
less than normal value during the
period of review (POR) May 1, 2021,
through April 30, 2022. Additionally,
based on timely withdrawal of requests
for review, we are rescinding this
administrative review with respect to all
other companies for which we initiated
an administrative review. Interested
parties are invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable June 7, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Magd Zalok, AD/CVD Operations, Office
IV, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4162.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On July 14, 2022, based on timely
requests for a review, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we
initiated this administrative review of
the antidumping duty order 1 on circular
welded carbon steel standard pipe and
tube products from Turkey, covering 19
companies.2 On August 30, 2022,
Commerce selected Borusan as the
mandatory respondent for individual
examination.3 On October 12, 2022,
Nucor Tubular Products Inc. (Nucor), a
petitioner in this proceeding, withdrew
its request for an administrative review
1 Antidumping Duty Order; Welded Carbon Steel
Standard Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey, 51
FR 17784 (May 15, 1986) (Order).
2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 87 FR
42144 (July 14, 2022) (Initiation Notice).
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’
dated August 30, 2022.
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37202-37204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-12192]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment
Request; Applications for Inclusion on the Lists of Arbitrators Under
the Data Privacy Framework Program
The Department of Commerce will submit the following information
collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, on or after the date of publication of this notice. We invite the
general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and
continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of
our information
[[Page 37203]]
collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden.
Public comments were previously requested via the Federal Register on
March 30, 2023 during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for
an additional 30 days for public comments.
Agency: International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
Title: Applications for Inclusion on the Lists of Arbitrators Under
the Data Privacy Framework Program.
OMB Control Number: New collection. Not yet assigned.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Request: Regular submission, new information collection.
Number of Respondents: 36.
Average Hours per Response: 240 minutes.
Burden Hours: 144 hours.
Needs and Uses: The United States, the European Union (EU), the
United Kingdom (UK), and Switzerland share a commitment to enhancing
privacy protection, the rule of law, and a recognition of the
importance of transatlantic data flows to our respective citizens,
economies, and societies, but take different approaches to doing so.
Given those differences, the Department of Commerce (DOC) developed the
EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (EU-U.S. DPF), the UK Extension to the
EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF), and
the Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (Swiss-U.S. DPF) in consultation
with the European Commission, the UK Government, the Swiss Federal
Administration, industry, and other stakeholders. These arrangements
were respectively developed to provide U.S. organizations reliable
mechanisms for personal data transfers to the United States from the
European Union, the United Kingdom (and, as applicable, Gibraltar), and
Switzerland while ensuring data protection that is consistent with EU,
UK, and Swiss law.
The DOC is issuing the EU-U.S. DPF Principles and the Swiss-U.S.
DPF Principles, including the respective sets of Supplemental
Principles (collectively the Principles) and Annex I of the Principles,
as well as the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF under its statutory
authority to foster, promote, and develop international commerce (15
U.S.C. 1512). The International Trade Administration (ITA) will
administer and supervise the Data Privacy Framework program, including
maintaining and making publicly available the Data Privacy Framework
List, an authoritative list of U.S. organizations that have self-
certified to the DOC and declared their commitment to adhere to the
Principles pursuant to the EU-U.S. DPF and, as applicable, the UK
Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, and/or the Swiss-U.S. DPF. While the
decision by an organization to self-certify its compliance pursuant to
the EU-U.S. DPF and, as applicable the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF,
and/or the Swiss-U.S. DPF and by extension participate in the Data
Privacy Framework program is voluntary; effective compliance is
compulsory: organizations that self-certify to the DOC and publicly
declare their commitment to adhere to the Principles must comply fully
with the Principles. Such commitments to comply with the Principles are
legally enforceable under U.S. law. On the basis of the Principles,
Executive Order 14086, 28 CFR part 201, and accompanying letters and
materials, including ITA's commitments regarding the administration and
supervision of the Data Privacy Framework program, it is the DOC's
expectation that the European Commission, the UK Government, and the
Swiss Federal Administration will respectively recognize the adequacy
of the protection provided by the EU-U.S. DPF, the UK Extension to the
EU-U.S. DPF, and the Swiss-U.S. DPF thereby enabling personal data
transfers from each respective jurisdiction to U.S. organizations
participating in the relevant part of the Data Privacy Framework
program. It is the DOC's present expectation that the effective date of
the EU-U.S. DPF Principles would coincide with the entry into force of
the European Commission's anticipated recognition of adequacy, whereas
the respective effective dates of the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF
and the Swiss-U.S. DPF Principles would occur before the entry into
force of the anticipated, respective recognitions of adequacy (i.e., to
enable U.S. organizations from the earliest possible date to self-
certify their compliance with multiple parts of the Data Privacy
Framework program). Personal data cannot be received in reliance on the
EU-U.S. DPF, the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, and the Swiss-U.S.
DPF until they have respectively received such recognition (i.e., until
such formal recognition enters into force).
As respectively described in Annex I of the EU-U.S. DPF Principles,
the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, and Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. DPF
Principles the DOC commits separately with the European Commission, the
UK Government, and the Swiss Federal Administration to implement an
arbitration mechanism to provide EU, UK, and Swiss individuals with the
ability under certain circumstances to invoke binding arbitration to
determine, for residual claims, whether an organization has violated
its obligations under the Principles as to those individuals.
Organizations that self-certify their compliance pursuant to the EU-
U.S. DPF, including those that also elect to participate in the UK
Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF are obligated to arbitrate claims and
follow the terms as set forth in Annex I of the EU-U.S. DPF Principles,
provided that an EU or UK (as applicable) individual has invoked
binding arbitration by delivering notice to the organization at issue
and following the procedures and subject to the conditions set forth in
Annex I of the EU-U.S. DPF Principles. Organizations that self-certify
their compliance pursuant to the Swiss-U.S. DPF are obligated to
arbitrate claims and follow the terms as set forth in Annex I of the
Swiss-U.S. DPF Principles, provided that a Swiss individual has invoked
binding arbitration by delivering notice to the organization at issue
and following the procedures and subject to the conditions set forth in
Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. DPF Principles. An individual's decision to
invoke this binding arbitration option is entirely voluntary. Arbitral
decisions will be binding on all parties to the arbitration. Under this
binding arbitration option, a panel (consisting of one or three
arbitrators, as agreed by the parties) has the authority to impose
individual-specific, non-monetary equitable relief (such as access,
correction, deletion, or return of the individual's data in question)
necessary to remedy the violation of the Principles only with respect
to the individual. No damages, costs, fees, or other remedies are
available. The parties will select the arbitrators from the list(s) of
arbitrators described below.
Pursuant to the EU-U.S. DPF and the UK Extension to the EU-U.S.
DPF, the DOC and the European Commission will develop and seek to
maintain a list of at least 10 arbitrators. The parties, including the
EU or UK individual who has invoked binding arbitration, will select
arbitrators for the arbitration panel from that list of arbitrators
developed under the EU-U.S. DPF (EU-U.S. DPF List of Arbitrators). To
be eligible for inclusion on the EU-U.S. DPF List of Arbitrators,
applicants must be admitted to practice law in the United States and be
experts in U.S. privacy law, with expertise in EU data protection law;
and shall not be subject to any instructions from, or be affiliated
with, either party, or any participating
[[Page 37204]]
organization, or the United States, European Union, or any EU Member
State or any other governmental authority, public authority, or
enforcement authority. Arbitrators will remain on the EU-U.S. DPF List
of Arbitrators for a period of 3 years, absent exceptional
circumstances or removal for cause, renewable by the DOC, with prior
notification to the European Commission for additional 3-year terms.
Pursuant to the Swiss-U.S. DPF the DOC and the Swiss Federal
Administration will develop and seek to maintain a list of up to five
arbitrators to supplement the list of arbitrators developed under the
EU-U.S. DPF. The parties, including the Swiss individual who has
invoked binding arbitration, will select arbitrators for the
arbitration panel from the list of arbitrators developed under the EU-
U.S. DPF, as supplemented by the list of arbitrators developed under
the Swiss-U.S. DPF (Swiss-U.S. DPF Supplemental List of Arbitrators).
To be eligible for inclusion on the Swiss-U.S. DPF Supplemental List of
Arbitrators, applicants must be admitted to practice law in the United
States and be experts in U.S. privacy law, with expertise in European
or Swiss data protection law; and shall not be subject to any
instructions from, or be affiliated with, either party, or any
participating organization, or the United States, Switzerland, European
Union, or any EU Member State or any other governmental authority,
public authority, or enforcement authority. Arbitrators will remain on
the Swiss-U.S. DPF Supplemental List of Arbitrators for a period of 3
years, absent exceptional circumstances or removal for cause, renewable
by the DOC, with prior notification to the Swiss Federal Administration
for additional 3-year terms.
Individuals interested in being considered for inclusion on the EU-
U.S. DPF List of Arbitrators or the Swiss-U.S. DPF Supplemental List of
Arbitrators would submit their applications to the DOC online via email
at [email protected].
The DOC has agreed with the European Commission to the adoption of
arbitration rules that govern arbitration proceedings and a code of
conduct for arbitrators under the EU-U.S. DPF (and similarly agreed
with the UK Government as relates to arbitration proceedings under the
UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF), and the Swiss Federal Administration
to the adoption of arbitration rules that govern arbitration
proceedings and a code of conduct for arbitrators under the Swiss-U.S.
DPF. In the event that the rules governing the proceedings and/or the
code of conduct for arbitrators need to be changed, the DOC and the
European Commission and the Swiss Federal Administration will agree to
amend those rules or adopt a different set of existing, well-
established U.S. arbitral procedures, and/or amend the code of conduct
for arbitrators (as applicable).
The DOC has selected the International Centre for Dispute
Resolution (ICDR), the international division of the American
Arbitration Association (AAA) (collectively ICDR-AAA) to administer
arbitrations pursuant to and manage the arbitral fund identified in
Annex I of the EU-U.S. DPF Principles, including as relates to the UK
Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, and Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. DPF
Principles. Among other things, the ICDR-AAA facilitates arbitrator fee
arrangements, including the collection and timely payment of arbitrator
fees and other expenses.
Affected Public: Private individuals.
Frequency: Recurrent, depending on the number of arbitrators
required to maintain active lists of arbitrators under the Data Privacy
Framework Program.
Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Legal Authority: The DOC's statutory authority to foster, promote,
and develop the foreign and domestic commerce of the United States (15
U.S.C. 1512).
This information collection request may be viewed at
www.reginfo.gov. Follow the instructions to view the Department of
Commerce collections currently under review by OMB.
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information
collection should be submitted within 30 days of the publication of
this notice on the following website www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Find this particular information collection by selecting ``Currently
under 30-day Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search
function and entering the title of the collection.
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Under Secretary for
Economic Affairs, Commerce Department.
[FR Doc. 2023-12192 Filed 6-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P