Non-Refillable Steel Cylinders From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020-2022, 37024-37027 [2023-12053]
Download as PDF
37024
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 6, 2023 / Notices
remand.5 On February 15, 2019,
Commerce published the Order, in
accordance with section 736(a) of the
Act.6
Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. (GTC), a
Chinese producer of truck and bus tires,
with its affiliated exporter, GTCIE, and
Double Coin with its affiliated U.S.
importer, China Manufacturers Alliance
LLC, appealed Commerce’s Final
Determination. On January 24, 2022, the
CIT remanded the Final Determination
to Commerce to: (1) comment on (a) the
Court’s stated intention of ordering
Commerce to direct CBP to liquidate
entries made prior to February 21, 2020,
without regard to antidumping duties
and to refund all cash deposits collected
on these entries, with interest as
provided by law, when it enters a
judgment to conclude the judicial
proceeding, as well as, (b) the Court’s
selection of February 21, 2020 as the
earliest possible date the Order could
have been published; and (2) reconsider
its denial of a separate rate for GTCIE
and Double Coin.7
In its remand redetermination, issued
in April 2022, Commerce: (1) stated that
‘‘{s}hould the Court proceed with its
intended remedy and it is necessary to
identify the earliest date that Commerce
hypothetically could have published the
Order following the CIT’s February 18,
2020 decision sustaining the ITC’s
affirmative redetermination, Commerce
believes the Court’s choice of February
21, 2020, is reasonable’’; and (2)
continued to find that GTCIE and
Double Coin were not eligible for a
separate rate.8 The CIT sustained
Commerce’s Final Redetermination.9
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken,10 as
clarified by Diamond Sawblades,11 the
Federal Circuit held that, pursuant to
section 516A(c) and (e) the Act,
5 See ITC’s Letter, ‘‘Truck and Bus Tires from
China, Inv. Nos. 701–TA–556 & 731–TA–1311
(Final) (Remand): Notice of Remand
Determinations,’’ dated February 8, 2019 (ITC
Remand Notification) (citing Diamond Sawblades
Mfrs. Coalition v United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed.
Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades)).
6 See Order, 84 FR 4436.
7 See Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd., et al., v United
States, Court No. 19–00031, Slip Op. 22–6 (CIT
January 24, 2022).
8 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant
to Court Order, Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd., et al., v.
United States, Court No. 19–00031, Slip Op. 22–6
(CIT January 24, 2022), dated April 22, 2022 (Final
Redetermination).
9 See Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd., et al., v United
States, Court No. 19–00031, Slip Op. 23–81 (CIT
May 22, 2023).
10 See Timken Co. v United States, 893 F.2d 337
(Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken).
11 See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers
Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir.
2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jun 05, 2023
Jkt 259001
Commerce must publish a notice of
court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’
with a Commerce determination and
must suspend liquidation of entries
pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision.
The CIT’s May 22, 2023 judgment
constitutes a final decision of the CIT
that is not in harmony with Commerce’s
Order. Thus, this notice is published in
fulfillment of the publication
requirements of Timken.
Amended Antidumping Duty Order
minimis,12 we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 516A(c) and
(e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: May 31, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2023–12051 Filed 6–5–23; 8:45 am]
Pursuant to the Court’s order,
Commerce is amending the Order with
respect GTCIE such that merchandise
produced and/or exported by GTCIE
during the period February 15, 2019,
through February 21, 2020 is not subject
to the Order; merchandise produced
and/or exported by GTCIE after
February 21, 2020 remains subject to the
Order.
Liquidation of Suspended Entries
As a result of this amended order, in
which Commerce is excluding
merchandise produced and/or exported
by GTCIE during the period February
15, 2019, through February 21, 2020,
Commerce will direct CBP to terminate
any suspension of liquidation of entries
from GTCIE during the period February
15, 2019, through February 21, 2020,
and to release any bonds or other
security and refund cash deposits
pertaining to any suspended entries
from GTCIE during the period February
15, 2019, through February 21, 2020.
Commerce will not revise the cash
deposit requirements currently in effect
for entries going forward.
At this time, Commerce remains
enjoined by CIT order from liquidating
entries that: were exported by GTCIE,
and were entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, during the period February
22, 2020, through January 31, 2024.
These entries will remain enjoined
pursuant to the terms of the injunction
during the pendency of any appeals
process.
In the event that the CIT’s ruling is
not appealed or, if appealed, upheld by
a final and conclusive court decision,
Commerce intends to instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties on
unliquidated entries of subject
merchandise produced and/or exported
by GTCIE, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b). We will instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries during this period
when the importer-specific ad valorem
assessment rate is not zero or de
minimis. Where an importer-specific ad
valorem assessment rate is zero or de
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–126]
Non-Refillable Steel Cylinders From
the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results and Preliminary
Determination of No Shipments of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2020–2022
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
determines that certain producers and
or/exporters made sales of non-refillable
steel cylinders (NRSCs) from the
People’s Republic of China (China) at
less than normal value, and one
company had no shipments of subject
merchandise during the period of
review (POR) October 30, 2020, through
April 30, 2022. Interested parties are
invited to comment on the preliminary
results of this review.
DATES: Applicable June 6, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex
Cipolla, AD/CVD Operations, Office III,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4956.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On May 11, 2021, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
antidumping duty order on NRSCs from
China.1 On May 2, 2022, Commerce
published a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
Order, covering the POR, pursuant to
12 See
19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
Certain Non-Refillable Steel Cylinders from
the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final
Antidumping Duty Determination and
Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders,
86 FR 25839 (May 11, 2021) (Order).
1 See
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 6, 2023 / Notices
section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).2 On July 14,
2022, based on timely requests for
review, Commerce initiated an
administrative review of the Order
covering the POR.3 The administrative
review covers four companies,
including the mandatory respondent,
Wuyi Xilinde Machinery Manufacture
Co., Ltd. (Wuyi Xilinde).4 On January
18, 2023, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, Commerce
extended the deadline for the
preliminary results of this review until
May 31, 2023.5
For a detailed description of the
events that followed the initiation of
this review, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.6 A list of topics
discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is attached as the
appendix to this notice. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is available via
Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://access.trade.gov/public/
FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Scope of the Order
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
The products covered by this Order
are certain seamed (welded or brazed),
non-refillable steel cylinders meeting
the requirements of, or produced to
meet the requirements of, U.S.
Department of Transportation (USDOT)
Specification 39, TransportCanada
Specification 39M, or United Nations
pressure receptacle standard ISO 11118.
A full description of the scope of the
Order is provided in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
2 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review and Join Annual
Inquiry Service List, 87 FR 25619 (May 2, 2022).
3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 87 FR
42144 (July 14, 2022) (Initiation Notice).
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’
dated September 20, 2022.
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Time Limits
for the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2020–2022,’’ dated
January 18, 2023.
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Non-Refillable Steel
Cylinders from the People’s Republic of China;
2020–2022,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jun 05, 2023
Jkt 259001
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
Based on information on the record,
we preliminarily determine that
Zhejiang Kin-Shine Technology Co.,
Ltd. (Zhejiang Kin-Shine) had no
shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR. Consistent with our
practice in non-market economy cases,
we are not rescinding this review with
respect to this company but, rather,
intend to complete the review and issue
appropriate instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
based on the final results of the review.7
For additional information regarding
this preliminary determination, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Separate Rates
Commerce preliminarily determines
that two companies, Ningbo Eagle
Machinery & Technology Co., Ltd.
(Ningbo Eagle) and Sanjiang Kai Yuan
Co. Ltd. (SKY), which were not selected
for individual examination, are eligible
for separate rates in this administrative
review.8 The Act and Commerce’s
regulations do not address the
establishment of a separate rate to be
applied to companies not selected for
individual examination when
Commerce limits its examination in an
administrative review pursuant to
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally,
Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of
the Act, which provides instructions for
calculating the all-others rate in an
investigation, for guidance when
calculating the rate for separate rate
respondents which Commerce did not
examine individually in an
administrative review. Section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act states that the allothers rate should be calculated by
averaging the weighted-average
dumping margins calculated for
individually-examined respondents,
excluding dumping margins that are
zero, de minimis, or based entirely on
facts available. For the preliminary
results of this review, Commerce
determined the estimated dumping
margin for Wuyi Xilinde to be 72.76
percent. For the reasons explained in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum,
we are assigning the 72.76 percent
weighted-average dumping margin
calculated for Wuyi Xilinde to the two
non-examined respondents which
qualify for a separate rate in this review,
7 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694, 65694–95 October 24, 2011) (NME AD
Assessment); see also the ‘‘Assessment Rates’’
section, infra.
8 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at the
‘‘Separate Rate Determination’’ section for more
details.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37025
consistent with Commerce’s practice
and section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act.
China-Wide Entity
Under Commerce’s policy regarding
the conditional review of the Chinawide entity,9 the China-wide entity will
not be under review unless a party
specifically requests, or Commerce selfinitiates, a review of the entity. Because
no party requested a review of the
China-wide entity in this review, the
entity is not under review, and the
entity’s rate (i.e., 101.67 percent) is not
subject to change.10
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B)
of the Act. For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Results of Review
Commerce preliminarily determines
that the following weighted-average
dumping margins exist for the period
October 30, 2020, through April 30,
2022:
Exporter
Wuyi Xilinde Machinery Manufacture Co., Ltd .......................
Ningbo Eagle Machinery &
Technology Co., Ltd ................
Sanjiang Kai Yuan Co. Ltd .........
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
72.76
72.76
72.76
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose to
parties to the proceeding the
calculations performed for these
preliminary results of review within five
days of the date of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Public Comment
Interested parties will be provided an
opportunity to submit written
comments (case briefs) at a date to be
determined by Commerce. Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in the
case briefs, may be filed not later than
seven days after the date for filing case
briefs.11 Pursuant to 19 CFR
9 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement
of Change in Department Practice for Respondent
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
10 See Order.
11 See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Temporary
Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
Continued
06JNN1
37026
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 6, 2023 / Notices
351.309(d)(2), rebuttal briefs must be
limited to issues raised in the case
briefs.12 Note that Commerce has
temporarily modified certain of its
requirements for serving documents
containing business proprietary
information, until further notice.13
Parties who submit case briefs or
rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are
encouraged to submit with each
argument: (1) a statement of the issue;
(2) a brief summary of the argument;
and (3) a table of authorities.14
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing, limited to issues raised in the
case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a
written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce, within 30 days after the
publication of this notice. Requests
should contain the party’s name,
address, telephone number, the number
of participants, whether any participant
is a foreign national, and a list of the
issues to be discussed. If a request for
a hearing is made, Commerce intends to
hold the hearing at a time and date to
be determined. Parties should confirm
by telephone the date, time, and
location of the hearing two days before
the scheduled date.
Unless the deadline is extended,
Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this review, including the
results of its analysis of the issues raised
in any written briefs, no later than 120
days after the date of publication of this
notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Assessment Rates
Upon issuing the final results,
Commerce will determine, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review.15 If Wuyi Xilinde’s ad valorem
weighted-average dumping margin is
not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than
0.50 percent) in the final results of this
review, Commerce will calculate
importer-specific assessment rates for
that respondent, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(b)(1).16 Pursuant to 19 CFR
to COVID–19, 85 FR 17006, 17007 (March 26, 2020)
(‘‘To provide adequate time for release of case briefs
via ACCESS, E&C intends to schedule the due date
for all rebuttal briefs to be 7 days after case briefs
are filed (while these modifications remain in
effect).’’).
12 See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303
(for general filing requirements).
13 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD
Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension
of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020).
14 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2); see also 19
CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements).
15 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
16 In these preliminary results, Commerce applied
the assessment rate calculation method adopted in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jun 05, 2023
Jkt 259001
351.212(b)(1), where the respondent
reported the entered value of its U.S.
sales, we will calculate importerspecific ad valorem duty assessment
rates based on the ratio of the total
amount of dumping calculated for the
examined sales to the total entered
value of the sales for which entered
value was reported. Where the
respondent did not report entered value,
we will calculate importer-specific perunit duty assessment rates based on the
ratio of the total amount of antidumping
duties calculated for the examined sales
to the total quantity of those sales. To
determine whether an importer-specific,
per-unit assessment rate is de minimis,
in accordance with 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2), we also will calculate an
importer-specific ad valorem ratio based
on estimated entered values. If, in the
final results, Wuyi Xilinde’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de
minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent),
Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate
the appropriate entries for that
respondent without regard to
antidumping duties.17
For entries that were not reported in
the U.S. sales database submitted by
Wuyi Xilinde during this review,
Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate
such entries at the China-wide rate (i.e.,
101.67 percent). In addition, if we
continue to find no shipments of subject
merchandise for Zhejiang Kin-Shine, for
which we preliminarily find no such
shipments during the POR, any
suspended entries of subject
merchandise associated with this
company will be liquidated at the
China-wide rate.18 For Ningbo Eagle and
SKY, the respondents that were not
selected for individual examination in
this administrative review that qualified
for a separate rate, the assessment rate
will be the separate rate established in
the final results of this administrative
review for Wuyi Xilinde.
Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012).
17 See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
18 See NME AD Assessment.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
review for shipments of the subject
merchandise from China entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C)
of the Act: (1) for the subject
merchandise exported by the companies
listed above that have a separate rate,
the cash deposit rate will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this
administrative review (except, if the rate
is zero or de minimis, then zero cash
deposit will be required); (2) for
previously investigated or reviewed
Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not
listed above that received a separate rate
in a prior segment of this proceeding,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for
all Chinese exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found
to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will be that for the Chinawide entity; and (4) for all non-Chinese
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not received their own rate, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the Chinese exporter that
supplied that non-Chinese exporter.
These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping and/or countervailing
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during these PORs.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in Commerce’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping and/or countervailing
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties, and/or an increase in the amount
of antidumping duties by the amount of
the countervailing duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
Commerce is issuing and publishing
the preliminary results of this review in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B),
751(a)(3) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4) and 351.221(b)(4).
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 6, 2023 / Notices
Dated: May 31, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Methodology
V. Currency Conversion
VI. Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of the
Act
VII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2023–12053 Filed 6–5–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–560–836]
Mattresses From Indonesia:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2020–
2022
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
determines that PT Ecos Jaya Indonesia
and PT Grantec Jaya Indonesia
(collectively, Ecos/Grantec) and the
non-individually-examined companies
for which a review was requested made
sales of mattresses from Indonesia at
prices below normal value (NV), while
PT Zinus Global Indonesia (Zinus) did
not make sales of the subject
merchandise at prices below NV during
the period of review (POR), November 3,
2020, through April 30, 2022. We invite
interested parties to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable June 6, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katherine Johnson or Brian Smith, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VIII,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4929 or
(202) 482–1766, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
AGENCY:
Background
On May 14, 2021, Commerce
published the antidumping duty order
on mattresses from Indonesia.1 On July
1 See Mattresses from Cambodia, Indonesia,
Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Republic of Turkey,
and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jun 05, 2023
Jkt 259001
14, 2022, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i), Commerce initiated an
administrative review of the Order.2
Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
on November 29, 2022, Commerce
determined that it was not practicable to
complete the preliminary results of this
review within 245 days and extended
the deadline for the preliminary results
of this review by 120 days, until May
31, 2023.3
For a detailed description of the
events that followed the initiation of
this review, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.4 The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is available via
Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be found at https://
access.trade.gov/public/
FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the Order
are mattresses from Indonesia. For a full
description of the scope, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with section 751(a) of the
Act. Export price and constructed
export price are calculated in
accordance with section 772 of the Act.
NV is calculated in accordance with
section 773 of the Act. For a full
description of the methodology
underlying these preliminary results,
see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum. A list of topics included
in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is included as Appendix
I to this notice.
information reported by Zinus for the
final results.
Rate for Non-Examined Companies
The statute and Commerce’s
regulations do not address the
establishment of a weighted-average
dumping margin to be determined for
companies not selected for individual
examination when Commerce limits its
examination in an administrative review
pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the
Act. Generally, Commerce looks to
section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which
provides instructions for calculating the
all-others rate in an investigation, for
guidance when determining the
weighted-average dumping margin for
companies which were not selected for
individual examination in an
administrative review. Under section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others
rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the
weighted average of the estimated
weighted average dumping margins
established for exporters and producers
individually investigated, excluding any
zero and de minimis margins, and any
margins determined entirely {on the
basis of facts available}.’’
In this review, the preliminary
weighted-average dumping margin for
Ecos/Grantec is not zero, de minimis, or
based entirely on facts otherwise
available, whereas Zinus’ preliminary
weighted-average dumping margin is
zero. Therefore, Commerce has
preliminarily assigned a weightedaverage dumping margin to the nonexamined companies that is equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin for
Ecos/Grantec in accordance with its
practice.5
Preliminary Results of the Review
We preliminarily determine that the
following weighted-average dumping
margins exist for the period November
3, 2020, through April 30, 2022:
Verification
Exporter or producer
As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the
Act, Commerce intends to verify the
Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final
Affirmative Antidumping Determination for
Cambodia, 86 FR 26460 (May 14, 2021) (Order).
2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 87 FR
42144 (July 14, 2022).
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for
Preliminary Results of 2020–2022 Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated November 29,
2022.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2020–2022; Mattresses from
Indonesia,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37027
PT Ecos Jaya Indonesia/PT
Grantec Jaya Indonesia 6 ........
PT Zinus Global Indonesia .........
Non-Examined Companies 7 ......
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
10.39
0.00
10.39
5 See, e.g., Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel
Products from Taiwan: Final Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018–1019,
86 FR 28554, 28555 (May 27, 2021).
6 We are treating these companies as a single
entity for purposes of this review. For a complete
discussion, see Memorandum, ‘‘Affiliation and
Collapsing of PT Ecos Jaya Indonesia and PT
Grantec Jaya Indonesia,’’ dated December 8, 2022.
7 See Appendix II for a list of these companies.
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37024-37027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-12053]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-126]
Non-Refillable Steel Cylinders From the People's Republic of
China: Preliminary Results and Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020-2022
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
determines that certain producers and or/exporters made sales of non-
refillable steel cylinders (NRSCs) from the People's Republic of China
(China) at less than normal value, and one company had no shipments of
subject merchandise during the period of review (POR) October 30, 2020,
through April 30, 2022. Interested parties are invited to comment on
the preliminary results of this review.
DATES: Applicable June 6, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex Cipolla, AD/CVD Operations,
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4956.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 11, 2021, Commerce published in the Federal Register the
antidumping duty order on NRSCs from China.\1\ On May 2, 2022, Commerce
published a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review
of the Order, covering the POR, pursuant to
[[Page 37025]]
section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\2\
On July 14, 2022, based on timely requests for review, Commerce
initiated an administrative review of the Order covering the POR.\3\
The administrative review covers four companies, including the
mandatory respondent, Wuyi Xilinde Machinery Manufacture Co., Ltd.
(Wuyi Xilinde).\4\ On January 18, 2023, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, Commerce extended the deadline for the
preliminary results of this review until May 31, 2023.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Non-Refillable Steel Cylinders from the People's
Republic of China: Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination and
Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders, 86 FR 25839 (May
11, 2021) (Order).
\2\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative
Review and Join Annual Inquiry Service List, 87 FR 25619 (May 2,
2022).
\3\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 87 FR 42144 (July 14, 2022) (Initiation
Notice).
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Respondent Selection,'' dated September
20, 2022.
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Time Limits for the
Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
2020-2022,'' dated January 18, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a detailed description of the events that followed the
initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\6\
A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
attached as the appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is available via Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at
https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Non-
Refillable Steel Cylinders from the People's Republic of China;
2020-2022,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this Order are certain seamed (welded or
brazed), non-refillable steel cylinders meeting the requirements of, or
produced to meet the requirements of, U.S. Department of Transportation
(USDOT) Specification 39, TransportCanada Specification 39M, or United
Nations pressure receptacle standard ISO 11118. A full description of
the scope of the Order is provided in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
Based on information on the record, we preliminarily determine that
Zhejiang Kin-Shine Technology Co., Ltd. (Zhejiang Kin-Shine) had no
shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. Consistent with our
practice in non-market economy cases, we are not rescinding this review
with respect to this company but, rather, intend to complete the review
and issue appropriate instructions to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) based on the final results of the review.\7\ For
additional information regarding this preliminary determination, see
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 October 24, 2011) (NME
AD Assessment); see also the ``Assessment Rates'' section, infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Separate Rates
Commerce preliminarily determines that two companies, Ningbo Eagle
Machinery & Technology Co., Ltd. (Ningbo Eagle) and Sanjiang Kai Yuan
Co. Ltd. (SKY), which were not selected for individual examination, are
eligible for separate rates in this administrative review.\8\ The Act
and Commerce's regulations do not address the establishment of a
separate rate to be applied to companies not selected for individual
examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative
review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce
looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for
calculating the all-others rate in an investigation, for guidance when
calculating the rate for separate rate respondents which Commerce did
not examine individually in an administrative review. Section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act states that the all-others rate should be
calculated by averaging the weighted-average dumping margins calculated
for individually-examined respondents, excluding dumping margins that
are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. For the
preliminary results of this review, Commerce determined the estimated
dumping margin for Wuyi Xilinde to be 72.76 percent. For the reasons
explained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, we are assigning the
72.76 percent weighted-average dumping margin calculated for Wuyi
Xilinde to the two non-examined respondents which qualify for a
separate rate in this review, consistent with Commerce's practice and
section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at the ``Separate Rate
Determination'' section for more details.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
China-Wide Entity
Under Commerce's policy regarding the conditional review of the
China-wide entity,\9\ the China-wide entity will not be under review
unless a party specifically requests, or Commerce self-initiates, a
review of the entity. Because no party requested a review of the China-
wide entity in this review, the entity is not under review, and the
entity's rate (i.e., 101.67 percent) is not subject to change.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
\10\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Results of Review
Commerce preliminarily determines that the following weighted-
average dumping margins exist for the period October 30, 2020, through
April 30, 2022:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wuyi Xilinde Machinery Manufacture Co., Ltd................. 72.76
Ningbo Eagle Machinery & Technology Co., Ltd................ 72.76
Sanjiang Kai Yuan Co. Ltd................................... 72.76
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose to parties to the proceeding the
calculations performed for these preliminary results of review within
five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal
Register in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Public Comment
Interested parties will be provided an opportunity to submit
written comments (case briefs) at a date to be determined by Commerce.
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be
filed not later than seven days after the date for filing case
briefs.\11\ Pursuant to 19 CFR
[[Page 37026]]
351.309(d)(2), rebuttal briefs must be limited to issues raised in the
case briefs.\12\ Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of
its requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary
information, until further notice.\13\ Parties who submit case briefs
or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with
each argument: (1) a statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the
argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Temporary Rule Modifying
AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID-19, 85 FR 17006, 17007
(March 26, 2020) (``To provide adequate time for release of case
briefs via ACCESS, E&C intends to schedule the due date for all
rebuttal briefs to be 7 days after case briefs are filed (while
these modifications remain in effect).'').
\12\ See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general
filing requirements).
\13\ See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements
Due to COVID-19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July
10, 2020).
\14\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2); see also 19 CFR
351.303 (for general filing requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal
briefs, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days
after the publication of this notice. Requests should contain the
party's name, address, telephone number, the number of participants,
whether any participant is a foreign national, and a list of the issues
to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends
to hold the hearing at a time and date to be determined. Parties should
confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two
days before the scheduled date.
Unless the deadline is extended, Commerce intends to issue the
final results of this review, including the results of its analysis of
the issues raised in any written briefs, no later than 120 days after
the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).
Assessment Rates
Upon issuing the final results, Commerce will determine, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by
this review.\15\ If Wuyi Xilinde's ad valorem weighted-average dumping
margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent) in the
final results of this review, Commerce will calculate importer-specific
assessment rates for that respondent, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1).\16\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), where the
respondent reported the entered value of its U.S. sales, we will
calculate importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on
the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined
sales to the total entered value of the sales for which entered value
was reported. Where the respondent did not report entered value, we
will calculate importer-specific per-unit duty assessment rates based
on the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for
the examined sales to the total quantity of those sales. To determine
whether an importer-specific, per-unit assessment rate is de minimis,
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we also will calculate an
importer-specific ad valorem ratio based on estimated entered values.
If, in the final results, Wuyi Xilinde's weighted-average dumping
margin is zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), Commerce
will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries for that
respondent without regard to antidumping duties.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\16\ In these preliminary results, Commerce applied the
assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
\17\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales database
submitted by Wuyi Xilinde during this review, Commerce will instruct
CBP to liquidate such entries at the China-wide rate (i.e., 101.67
percent). In addition, if we continue to find no shipments of subject
merchandise for Zhejiang Kin-Shine, for which we preliminarily find no
such shipments during the POR, any suspended entries of subject
merchandise associated with this company will be liquidated at the
China-wide rate.\18\ For Ningbo Eagle and SKY, the respondents that
were not selected for individual examination in this administrative
review that qualified for a separate rate, the assessment rate will be
the separate rate established in the final results of this
administrative review for Wuyi Xilinde.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See NME AD Assessment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the
subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for the subject merchandise
exported by the companies listed above that have a separate rate, the
cash deposit rate will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this administrative review (except,
if the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be
required); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-
Chinese exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a
prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue
to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all Chinese
exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be
entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the
China-wide entity; and (4) for all non-Chinese exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate applicable to the Chinese exporter that supplied
that non-Chinese exporter. These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during these PORs. Failure
to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred
and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties, and/or an
increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the amount of the
countervailing duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
Commerce is issuing and publishing the preliminary results of this
review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B), 751(a)(3) and 777(i)
of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4) and 351.221(b)(4).
[[Page 37027]]
Dated: May 31, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Methodology
V. Currency Conversion
VI. Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of the Act
VII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2023-12053 Filed 6-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P