Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 28493-28495 [2023-09510]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 86 / Thursday, May 4, 2023 / Notices
52. Quang Minh Seafood Co., Ltd.
53. QAIMEXCO
54. Quoc Ai Seafood Processing Import
Export Co., Ltd.
55. Quoc Toan PTE
56. Quoc Toan Seafood Processing Factory
57. Quy Nhon Frozen Seafoods Joint Stock
Company
58. Safe and Fresh Aquatic Products Joint
Stock Company
59. Safe and Fresh Co.
60. Saigon Aquatic Product Trading Joint
Stock Company
61. Saigon Food Joint Stock Company
62. SEADANANG
63. Seafood Joint Stock Company No. 4
64. Seafood Travel Construction ImportExport Joint Stock Company
65. Seanamico
66. Seaspimex Vietnam
67. South Ha Tinh Seaproducts ImportExport Joint Stock Company
68. South Vina Shrimp–SVS
69. Southern Shrimp Joint Stock Company
70. Special Aquatic Products Joint Stock
Company
71. T & P Seafood Company Limited
72. Tai Nguyen Seafood Co., Ltd.
73. Tan Phong Phu Seafood Co., Ltd.
74. Tan Thanh Loi Frozen Food Co., Ltd.
75. THADIMEXCO
76. Thai Hoa Foods Joint Stock Company
77. Thai Minh Long Seafood Company
Limited
78. Thaimex
79. Thanh Doan Fisheries Import-Export Joint
Stock Company
80. Thanh Doan Sea Products Import &
Export Processing Joint-Stock Company
81. Thanh Doan Seafood Import Export
Trading Joint-Stock Company
82. The Light Seafood Company Limited
83. Thien Phu Export Seafood
84. Thinh Hung Co., Ltd.
85. Thinh Phu Aquatic Products Trading Co.,
Ltd.
86. TPP Co. Ltd.
87. Trading and Import-Export Co., Ltd.
88. Trang Corporation (Vietnam)
89. Trung Son Seafood Processing Joint Stock
Company
90. Van Duc Food Company Limited
91. Viet Phu Foods and Fish Corp.
92. Viet Shrimp Corporation
93. VIFAFOOD
94. Vinh Hoan Corp.
95. Vinh Phat Food Joint Stock Company
96. XNK Thinh Phat Processing Company
[FR Doc. 2023–09509 Filed 5–3–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
International Trade Administration
[A–533–843]
Certain Lined Paper Products From
India: Amended Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2020–2021
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 May 03, 2023
Jkt 259001
The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) is amending the
final results of the administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on
certain lined paper products from India
to correct one ministerial error. The
period of review (POR) is September 1,
2020, through August 31, 2021.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Applicable May 4, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Samuel Brummitt, AD/CVD Operations,
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7851.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 12, 2023, the Commerce
published its Final Results of the 2020–
2021 administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain lined
paper products from India.1 On April
11, 2023, Commerce disclosed its
calculations to interested parties and
provided interested parties with the
opportunity to submit ministerial error
comments.2 On April 20, 2023, the
Association of American School Paper
Suppliers and its individual members
(the petitioners) timely submitted
ministerial error comments regarding
Commerce’s Final Results.3 Commerce
is amending its Final Results to correct
a ministerial error alleged by the
petitioners.
Legal Framework
A ministerial error, as defined in
section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act), includes ‘‘errors
in addition, subtraction, or other
arithmetic function, clerical errors
resulting from inaccurate copying,
duplication, or the like, and any other
type of unintentional error which the
{Commerce} considers ministerial.’’ 4
With respect to final results of
administrative reviews, 19 CFR
351.224(e) provides that Commerce
‘‘will analyze any comments received
and, if appropriate, correct any
ministerial error by amending . . . the
final results of review . . . .’’
1 See Certain Lined Paper Products from India:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Final Determination of No Shipments;
2020–2021, 88 FR 21971 (April 12, 2023) (Final
Results).
2 See Memoranda, ‘‘Deadline for Ministerial Error
Comments for the Final Results,’’ dated April 11,
2023; and ‘‘Extension of Deadline for Ministerial
Error Comments,’’ dated April 14, 2023.
3 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Ministerial Error
Comments,’’ dated April 20, 2023.
4 See 19 CFR 351.224(f).
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28493
Ministerial Errors
In the final results of the review,
Commerce made an inadvertent error
within the meaning of section 751(h) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f) with
respect to standardizing the variable
length for the product characteristic
variables in Cellpage Ventures Private
Limited’s (Cellpage) sales and cost
databases. Accordingly, Commerce
determines that, in accordance with
section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.224(f), it made a ministerial error in
the Final Results.
For a complete description and
analysis of the specific inadvertent
error, and the petitioners’ ministerial
error allegation, see the accompanying
Ministerial Error Allegation
Memorandum.5 The Ministerial Error
Allegation Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(e),
Commerce is amending the Final
Results to reflect the correction of this
ministerial error in the calculation of
the weighted-average dumping margin
assigned to Cellpage in the Final
Results, which changes from 2.63
percent to 3.21 percent.6 Furthermore,
we are revising the review-specific,
weighted-average dumping margin
applicable to the companies not selected
for individual examination in this
administrative review, which is based
on Cellpage’s weighted-average
dumping margin.7
In addition to the ministerial error
described above, we are also including
SGM Paper Products among the
companies not selected for individual
examination in these amended final
results. SGM Paper Products was
inadvertently excluded from the list of
companies not selected for individual
examination in the Final Results.8
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Ministerial Error
Allegation,’’ dated concurrently with this notice
(Ministerial Error Allegation Memorandum).
6 Id.; see also Final Results, 88 FR at 21972.
7 We assigned Cellpage’s rate to the non-selected
companies because it was the only individually
calculated weighted-average dumping margin,
which is not zero, de minimis, or determined
entirely on the basis of facts available. See Final
Results, 88 FR at 21971.
8 See Certain Lined Paper Products from India:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; Rescission of
Administrative Review, in Part; and Preliminary
Determination of No Shipments; 2020–2021, 87 FR
60650 at 60652 (October 6, 2022); see also Final
Results, 88 FR at 21972.
E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM
04MYN1
28494
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 86 / Thursday, May 4, 2023 / Notices
Amended Final Results of Review
As a result of correcting this
ministerial error, Commerce determines
that, for the period September 1, 2020,
through August 31, 2021, the following
weighted-average dumping margins
exist:
Producer or exporter
Cellpage Ventures Private
Limited ...............................
Navneet Education Ltd 9 .......
Goldenpalm Manufacturers
PVT Limited ......................
ITC Limited-Education and
Stationery Products Business 10 ...............................
Lotus Global Private Limited
Pioneer Stationery Pvt. Ltd ..
PP Bafna Ventures Private
Limited ...............................
SGM Paper Products ...........
Magic International Pvt.
Ltd 11 .................................
Marisa International 12 ..........
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
3.21
0.00
3.21
3.21
3.21
3.21
3.21
3.21
215.93
215.93
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed for these amended final
results to parties in this review within
five days of the date of publication of
this notice in the Federal Register, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Assessment Rate
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
Commerce has determined, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with these
amended final results of the
administrative review.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
where the respondent reported the
entered value of its U.S. sales, we
calculated importer-specific ad valorem
duty assessment rates based on the ratio
of the total amount of dumping
calculated for the examined sales to the
total entered value of the sales for which
9 The weighted-average dumping margin for
Navneet Education Ltd remains unchanged from the
Final Results. See Final Results, 88 FR at 21972.
10 The correct name of the company is ITC
Limited-Education and Stationery Products
Business. Commerce has previously incorrectly
referred to this company as ITC Limited-Education
and Stationary Products Business.
11 The weighted-average dumping margin for
Magic International Pvt. Ltd remains unchanged
from the Final Results. See Final Results, 88 FR at
21972.
12 The weighted-average dumping margin for
Marisa International remains unchanged from the
Final Results. See Final Results, 88 FR at 21972.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 May 03, 2023
Jkt 259001
entered value was reported. Where the
respondent did not report entered value,
we calculated the entered value in order
to calculate the assessment rate. Where
either the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de
minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR
351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific
rate is zero or de minimis, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate
entries without regard to antidumping
duties.
For the companies that were not
selected for individual examination, we
will assign an assessment rate based on
the cash deposit rates calculated for the
mandatory respondents in this review,
i.e., Cellpage and Navneet Education
Ltd, excluding any rates that are zero, de
minimis, or determined entirely based
on facts available. For the non-selected
respondents listed above, the amended
final results of this review shall be the
basis for the assessment of antidumping
duties on entries of merchandise
covered by the amended final results of
this review and for future deposits of
estimated duties, where applicable.13
Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’
will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced
by companies included in these
amended final results of review for
which the individually-examined
companies did not know that the
merchandise they sold to the
intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading
company, or exporter) was destined for
the United States. In such instances, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate
if there is no rate for the intermediate
company(ies) involved in the
transaction.
Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the amended final results
of this review in the Federal Register.
If a timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective
retroactively for all shipments of subject
merchandise that entered, or were
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after April 12, 2023,
the date of publication of the Final
Results of this administrative review, as
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of
13 See
PO 00000
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the
companies listed above will be equal to
the weighted-average dumping margin
established in these amended final
results of review; (2) for producers or
exporters not covered in this review but
covered in a prior segment of the
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding;
(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered
in this review or another completed
segment of this proceeding, but the
producer is, then the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recently completed segment of this
proceeding for the producer of the
merchandise; and (4) if neither the
exporter nor the producer is a firm
covered in this or any previously
completed segment of this proceeding,
then the cash deposit rate will be the
all-others rate of 3.91 percent
established in the less-than-fair-value
investigation.14 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping and/or countervailing
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this POR. Failure
to comply with this requirement could
result in the Commerce’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
and/or countervailing duties occurred
and the subsequent assessment of
double antidumping duties, and/or an
increase in the amount of antidumping
duties by the amount of the
countervailing duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to an administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of return or destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
14 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper
Products from the People’s Republic of China;
Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined
Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the
People’s Republic of China); and Notice of
Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper
Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949
(September 28, 2006).
E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM
04MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 86 / Thursday, May 4, 2023 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
from Fedmet Resources Corporation
(Fedmet) 2 and the Magnesia Carbon
Bricks Fair Trade Committee
(Committee).3 For a complete
description of the events that followed
the Preliminary Results, see the Issues
and Decision Memorandum.4
The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition,
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
can be accessed directly at https://
access.trade.gov/public/
FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
International Trade Administration
Scope of the Orders
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
The amended final results and notice
are issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(h) and 777(i) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e).
Dated: April 28, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2023–09510 Filed 5–3–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
[A–570–954, C–570–955]
Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From
the People’s Republic of China: Final
Determination in Covered Merchandise
Inquiry
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (Commerce) determines that
certain refractory brick samples tested
by U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) do not reflect the chemical
composition of magnesia alumina
carbon (MAC) bricks and are covered by
the antidumping duty (AD) and
countervailing duty (CVD) orders on
certain magnesia carbon bricks (bricks)
from the People’s Republic of China
(China). Additionally, Commerce finds
that it is unable to determine whether
certain other samples tested by CBP
have the chemical composition of a
bricks subject to the AD and CVD orders
on bricks from China.
DATES: Applicable May 4, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brittany Bauer, AD/CVD Operations
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3860.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
AGENCY:
Background
On February 17, 2023, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
preliminary results of this covered
merchandise inquiry, determining that
certain refractory bricks are subject to
the AD and CVD orders on bricks from
China.1 Commerce received comments
1 See Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:43 May 03, 2023
Jkt 259001
The merchandise covered by the
Orders is magnesia carbon bricks. For a
complete description of the scope of the
Orders, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Merchandise Subject to the Covered
Merchandise Inquiry
The products subject to this inquiry
are certain refractory bricks which were
imported by Fedmet. CBP’s laboratories
tested 11 samples from these bricks and
provided the results of chemical
composition tests for the merchandise
in its referral to Commerce.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs that were submitted by
parties in this inquiry are addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
For a list of the issues raised by
interested parties and addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum, see
the Appendix to this notice.
Final Determination
We determine, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.227(e)(2), that certain bricks tested
by CBP laboratories do not constitute
(non-subject) MAC bricks and, thus, are
Covered Merchandise Inquiry, 88 FR 10292
(February 17, 2023) (Preliminary Results). See also
Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from Mexico and
the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty
Orders,75 FR 57257 (September 20, 2010); and
Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from the People’s
Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 75
FR 57442 (September 21, 2010) (collectively,
Orders).
2 See Fedmet’s Letter, ‘‘Fedmet’s Case Brief,’’
dated February 28, 2023.
3 See Committee’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated
March 7, 2023.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Final Determination of Covered Merchandise
Inquiry—EAPA Inv. 7412: Certain Magnesia Carbon
Bricks from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28495
subject to the scope of the Orders.
Although we can make such a
determination for two of the eleven
brick samples, the information on the
remaining nine samples is
indeterminate regarding the proper
scope classification for the underlying
products tested by CBP. In reaching this
determination, we relied on information
placed on the record by the Committee
and Fedmet, as well as the documents
included with the referral from CBP. For
a full description of the analysis
underlying our conclusions, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Continuation of Suspension of
Liquidation
As stated above, Commerce has made
an affirmative finding that certain of the
bricks tested by CBP, which were the
subject of this referral from CBP, are
subject to the scope of the Orders. This
affirmative in-scope finding applies on
a country-wide basis, regardless of the
producer, exporter, or importer, to all
products from the same country with
the same relevant physical
characteristics as the products at issue
that were determined to be within the
scope of the Orders. Therefore, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.227(l)(3),
Commerce will direct CBP to: (1)
continue the suspension of liquidation
of previously suspended entries and
apply the applicable cash deposit rate;
(2) suspend liquidation and require a
cash deposit of estimated duties, at the
applicable rate, for each unliquidated
entry of the product not yet suspended,
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after July 20,
2022, the date of publication of the
notice of initiation of this covered
merchandise inquiry in the Federal
Register; and (3) suspend liquidation
and require a cash deposit of estimated
duties, at the applicable rate, for each
unliquidated entry of the product not
yet suspended, entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption prior
to July 20, 2022, but after November 4,
2021.5
Customs and Border Protection
Notification
In accordance with section
517(b)(4)(B) of the Act, we will notify
CBP of the final determination in this
covered merchandise inquiry.
Commerce will direct CBP to assess,
upon further instruction by Commerce,
AD and CVD duties on all imports of
certain refractory bricks having less than
5 See Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from the
People’s Republic of China: Notice of Covered
Merchandise Referral and Initiation of Covered
Merchandise Inquiry, 87 FR 43238 (July 20, 2022).
E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM
04MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28493-28495]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-09510]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-843]
Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Amended Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020-2021
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending the
final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty
order on certain lined paper products from India to correct one
ministerial error. The period of review (POR) is September 1, 2020,
through August 31, 2021.
DATES: Applicable May 4, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Brummitt, AD/CVD Operations,
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-7851.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 12, 2023, the Commerce published its Final Results of the
2020-2021 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
certain lined paper products from India.\1\ On April 11, 2023, Commerce
disclosed its calculations to interested parties and provided
interested parties with the opportunity to submit ministerial error
comments.\2\ On April 20, 2023, the Association of American School
Paper Suppliers and its individual members (the petitioners) timely
submitted ministerial error comments regarding Commerce's Final
Results.\3\ Commerce is amending its Final Results to correct a
ministerial error alleged by the petitioners.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of
No Shipments; 2020-2021, 88 FR 21971 (April 12, 2023) (Final
Results).
\2\ See Memoranda, ``Deadline for Ministerial Error Comments for
the Final Results,'' dated April 11, 2023; and ``Extension of
Deadline for Ministerial Error Comments,'' dated April 14, 2023.
\3\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``Ministerial Error Comments,''
dated April 20, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Legal Framework
A ministerial error, as defined in section 751(h) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), includes ``errors in addition,
subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical errors resulting
from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other type
of unintentional error which the {Commerce{time} considers
ministerial.'' \4\ With respect to final results of administrative
reviews, 19 CFR 351.224(e) provides that Commerce ``will analyze any
comments received and, if appropriate, correct any ministerial error by
amending . . . the final results of review . . . .''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 19 CFR 351.224(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ministerial Errors
In the final results of the review, Commerce made an inadvertent
error within the meaning of section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.224(f) with respect to standardizing the variable length for the
product characteristic variables in Cellpage Ventures Private Limited's
(Cellpage) sales and cost databases. Accordingly, Commerce determines
that, in accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.224(f), it made a ministerial error in the Final Results.
For a complete description and analysis of the specific inadvertent
error, and the petitioners' ministerial error allegation, see the
accompanying Ministerial Error Allegation Memorandum.\5\ The
Ministerial Error Allegation Memorandum is a public document and is on
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Ministerial Error Allegation,'' dated
concurrently with this notice (Ministerial Error Allegation
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(e), Commerce is amending the Final
Results to reflect the correction of this ministerial error in the
calculation of the weighted-average dumping margin assigned to Cellpage
in the Final Results, which changes from 2.63 percent to 3.21
percent.\6\ Furthermore, we are revising the review-specific, weighted-
average dumping margin applicable to the companies not selected for
individual examination in this administrative review, which is based on
Cellpage's weighted-average dumping margin.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Id.; see also Final Results, 88 FR at 21972.
\7\ We assigned Cellpage's rate to the non-selected companies
because it was the only individually calculated weighted-average
dumping margin, which is not zero, de minimis, or determined
entirely on the basis of facts available. See Final Results, 88 FR
at 21971.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to the ministerial error described above, we are also
including SGM Paper Products among the companies not selected for
individual examination in these amended final results. SGM Paper
Products was inadvertently excluded from the list of companies not
selected for individual examination in the Final Results.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Rescission of
Administrative Review, in Part; and Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments; 2020-2021, 87 FR 60650 at 60652 (October 6, 2022); see
also Final Results, 88 FR at 21972.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 28494]]
Amended Final Results of Review
As a result of correcting this ministerial error, Commerce
determines that, for the period September 1, 2020, through August 31,
2021, the following weighted-average dumping margins exist:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The weighted-average dumping margin for Navneet Education
Ltd remains unchanged from the Final Results. See Final Results, 88
FR at 21972.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer or exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cellpage Ventures Private Limited....................... 3.21
Navneet Education Ltd \9\............................... 0.00
Goldenpalm Manufacturers PVT Limited.................... 3.21
ITC Limited-Education and Stationery Products Business 3.21
\10\...................................................
Lotus Global Private Limited............................ 3.21
Pioneer Stationery Pvt. Ltd............................. 3.21
PP Bafna Ventures Private Limited....................... 3.21
SGM Paper Products...................................... 3.21
Magic International Pvt. Ltd \11\....................... 215.93
Marisa International \12\............................... 215.93
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The correct name of the company is ITC Limited-Education
and Stationery Products Business. Commerce has previously
incorrectly referred to this company as ITC Limited-Education and
Stationary Products Business.
\11\ The weighted-average dumping margin for Magic International
Pvt. Ltd remains unchanged from the Final Results. See Final
Results, 88 FR at 21972.
\12\ The weighted-average dumping margin for Marisa
International remains unchanged from the Final Results. See Final
Results, 88 FR at 21972.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these amended
final results to parties in this review within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with
19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rate
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with these amended final
results of the administrative review.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), where the respondent reported the
entered value of its U.S. sales, we calculated importer-specific ad
valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of
dumping calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of
the sales for which entered value was reported. Where the respondent
did not report entered value, we calculated the entered value in order
to calculate the assessment rate. Where either the respondent's
weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis within the
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific rate is zero
or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate
entries without regard to antidumping duties.
For the companies that were not selected for individual
examination, we will assign an assessment rate based on the cash
deposit rates calculated for the mandatory respondents in this review,
i.e., Cellpage and Navneet Education Ltd, excluding any rates that are
zero, de minimis, or determined entirely based on facts available. For
the non-selected respondents listed above, the amended final results of
this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties
on entries of merchandise covered by the amended final results of this
review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where
applicable.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' will apply to entries of
subject merchandise during the POR produced by companies included in
these amended final results of review for which the individually-
examined companies did not know that the merchandise they sold to the
intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading company, or exporter) was
destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP
to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no
rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier
than 35 days after the date of publication of the amended final results
of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at
the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective
retroactively for all shipments of subject merchandise that entered, or
were withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after April 12,
2023, the date of publication of the Final Results of this
administrative review, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the companies listed above will be
equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in these
amended final results of review; (2) for producers or exporters not
covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review or
another completed segment of this proceeding, but the producer is, then
the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most
recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the
merchandise; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the producer is a firm
covered in this or any previously completed segment of this proceeding,
then the cash deposit rate will be the all-others rate of 3.91 percent
established in the less-than-fair-value investigation.\14\ These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper Products from the People's
Republic of China; Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined
Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the People's Republic of
China); and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined
Paper Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 (September 28,
2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure
to comply with this requirement could result in the Commerce's
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing
duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping
duties, and/or an increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the
amount of the countervailing duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern
business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding.
Timely written notification of return or destruction of APO materials
or conversion to judicial
[[Page 28495]]
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
The amended final results and notice are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(h) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.224(e).
Dated: April 28, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2023-09510 Filed 5-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
