Certain Active Matrix Organic Light-Emitting Diode Display Panels and Modules for Mobile Devices, and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant Samsung Display Co., Ltd.'s Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation, 25433-25434 [2023-08733]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 2023 / Notices
Programs, at Gina.Best@boem.gov or
703–787–1341.
9. Protection of Privileged, Personal, or
Confidential Information
a. Freedom of Information Act
BOEM will protect privileged or
confidential information that you
submit when required by the Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA). Exemption 4
of FOIA applies to trade secrets and
commercial or financial information
that is privileged or confidential. If you
wish to protect the confidentiality of
such information, clearly label it and
request that BOEM treat it as
confidential. BOEM will not disclose
such information if BOEM determines
under 30 CFR 585.114(b) that it qualifies
for exemption from disclosure under
FOIA. Please label privileged or
confidential information ‘‘Contains
Confidential Information’’ and consider
submitting such information as a
separate attachment.
BOEM will not treat as confidential
any aggregate summaries of such
information or comments not containing
such privileged or confidential
information. Information that is not
labeled as privileged or confidential
may be regarded by BOEM as suitable
for public release.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
b. Personally Identifiable Information
BOEM encourages you not to submit
anonymous comments. Please include
your name and address as part of your
comment. You should be aware that
your entire comment, including your
name, address, and any personally
identifiable information (PII) included
in your comment, may be made publicly
available. All submissions from
identified individuals, businesses, and
organizations will be available for
public viewing on regulations.gov. Note
that BOEM will make available for
public inspection all comments, in their
entirety, submitted by organizations and
businesses, or by individuals identifying
themselves as representatives of
organizations or businesses.
For BOEM to consider withholding
your PII from disclosure, you must
identify any information contained in
your comments that, if released, would
constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of your personal privacy. You
must also briefly describe any possible
harmful consequences of the disclosure
of information, such as embarrassment,
injury, or other harm. Even if BOEM
withholds your information in the
context of this rulemaking, your
submission is subject to FOIA and, if
your submission is requested under the
FOIA, your information will only be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:28 Apr 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
withheld if a determination is made that
one of the FOIA’s exemptions to
disclosure applies. Such a
determination will be made in
accordance with the Department’s FOIA
regulations and applicable law.
the publication of an environmental
impact statement.
Elizabeth Klein,
Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management.
[FR Doc. 2023–08670 Filed 4–25–23; 8:45 am]
c. Section 304 of the NHPA (54 U.S.C.
307103(a))
BILLING CODE 4340–98–P
After consultation with the Secretary,
BOEM is required to withhold the
location, character, or ownership of
historic resources if it determines that
disclosure may, among other things, risk
harm to the historic resources or impede
the use of a traditional religious site by
practitioners. Tribal entities should
designate information that falls under
section 304 of NHPA as confidential.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
10. BOEM’s Environmental Review
Process
Before deciding whether leases may
be issued, BOEM will prepare an
environmental assessment (EA) under
NEPA (including public comment
periods to determine the scope of the
EA and to review and comment on the
draft EA). The EA will analyze
anticipated impacts from leasing and
site characterization and assessment
activities that BOEM may approve after
a lease is issued. Site characterization
activities include geophysical,
geotechnical, archaeological, and
biological surveys; site assessment
activities include installation and
operation of meteorological buoys.
BOEM also will conduct appropriate
consultations with Federal agencies and
Tribal, State, and local governments
during the EA. These consultations
include, but are not limited to, those
required by the Coastal Zone
Management Act, the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act, Endangered Species
Act, section 106 of the NHPA, and
Executive Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments.’’
Before BOEM may allow the
construction of a wind energy project in
the Call area, a construction and
operations plan (COP) needs to be
submitted and approved by BOEM.
Prior to the approval of a COP, BOEM
will need to consider the potential
environmental effects of the
construction and operation of any wind
energy facility under a separate, projectspecific NEPA analysis. This analysis
will include additional opportunities for
public involvement and may result in
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25433
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1351]
Certain Active Matrix Organic LightEmitting Diode Display Panels and
Modules for Mobile Devices, and
Components Thereof; Notice of a
Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Granting Complainant Samsung
Display Co., Ltd.’s Motion for Leave To
Amend the Complaint and Notice of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review the presiding administrative law
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination
(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 8) granting a motion
of complainant Samsung Display Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘Samsung Display’’) for leave to
amend the complaint and notice of
investigation.
SUMMARY:
Paul
Lall, Office of the General Counsel, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2043. Copies of
non-confidential documents filed in
connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS,
please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal, telephone (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
February 3, 2023, the Commission
instituted this investigation based on a
complaint filed by Samsung Display of
the Republic of Korea. 88 FR 7463–64
(Feb. 3, 2023). The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337
based upon the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
25434
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 2023 / Notices
or sale within the United States after
importation of certain active matrix
organic light-emitting diode display
panels and modules for mobile devices,
and components thereof by reason of the
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 9,818,803; 10,854,683;
7,414,599; and 9,330,593. Id. The
Commission’s notice of investigation
named the following respondents: AptAbility LLC d/b/a MobileSentrix of
Chantilly, VA (‘‘Apt-Ability’’); Mobile
Defenders, LLC of Caledonia, MI
(‘‘Mobile Defenders’’); DFW Imports
LLC d/b/a DFW Cellphone and Parts of
Dallas, TX (‘‘DFW Imports’’); Electronics
Universe, Inc. d/b/a Fixez.com of Las
Vegas, NV and Electronics Universe,
Inc. d/b/a Repairs Universe, Inc. of Las
Vegas, NV (‘‘Electronics Universe’’);
eTech Parts Plus LLC of Southlake, TX
(‘‘eTech Parts Plus’’); Gadgetfix Corp. of
Irvine, CA (‘‘Gadgetfix’’); Injured
Gadgets, LLC of Norcross, GA (‘‘Injured
Gadgets’’); LCTech International Inc.
d/b/a SEGMobile.com of City of
Industry, CA (‘‘LCTech International’’);
Parts4Cells Inc. of Houston, TX
(‘‘Parts4Cells’’); Phone LCD Parts LLC of
Wayne, NJ; Parts4LCD of Wayne, NJ;
Wholesale Gadget Parts, Inc. of Bixby,
OK (‘‘Wholesale Gadget Parts’’); Group
Vertical, LLC of Grand Rapids, MI;
Sourcely Plus, LLC of Tempe, AZ;
Captain Mobile Parts, Inc. of Dallas, TX;
and Mengtor Inc. of El Monte, CA. Id.
The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations (‘‘OUII’’ or ‘‘Staff’’) was
also named as a party in this
investigation. Id.
On March 15, 2023, the presiding ALJ
granted Mianyang BOE Optoelectronics
Technology Co., Ltd.’s (‘‘Mianyang
BOE’’) unopposed motion to intervene
as a respondent in this investigation and
accorded Mianyang BOE respondent
status. (Order No. 7) (Mar. 15, 2023)
unreviewed by, Comm’n Notice (Mar.
22, 2023).
On March 10, 2023, Samsung Display
moved for leave to amend the complaint
and notice of investigation to add
allegations of infringement related to
claims 1–6, 10, 12, 17, 19, 21–23, 40–
47, and 51–52 of U.S. Patent No.
11,594,578 (‘‘the ’578 patent’’). ID at 1.
In its motion, Samsung argued that the
’578 patent recently issued and ‘‘is a
continuation of two other patents (U.S.
Patent Nos. 9,818,803 (‘the ’803 patent’)
and 10,854,683 (‘the ’683 patent’))
asserted in this investigation.’’ Id. at 2.
Samsung further claimed that it worked
‘‘diligently to prepare the instant
motion’’ and that respondents ‘‘will not
be prejudiced as the investigation is ‘in
its early stages’ and ‘no new
technologies or products will be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:28 Apr 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
implicated by addition of the ’578
Patent.’ ’’ Id. at 2.
On March 22, 2023, respondents AptAbility, Mobile Defenders, DFW
Imports, Electronics Universe, eTech
Parts Plus, Gadgetfix, Injured Gadgets,
LCTech International, Parts4Cells,
Phone LCD Parts LLC d/b/a Parts4LCD
(together, ‘‘Phone LCD Parts’’), and
Wholesale Gadget Parts (collectively,
the ‘‘Participating Respondents’’) filed a
response opposing the motion. Id. at 1.
They argued that ‘‘the ’578 patent was
allowed on December 23, 2022, almost
three months ago, and before Samsung
Display filed its complaint.’’ Id. at 2.
They also claimed that ‘‘ ‘forcing [them]
to defend against twenty-five additional
claims would be burdensome and
prejudicial.’ ’’ Id. at 3 (brackets in ID).
They asked that if the motion is granted,
the procedural schedule should be
extended ‘‘to mitigate any prejudice.’’
Id.
Also on March 22, 2023, Staff filed a
response in support of Samsung
Display’s motion. See id. at 2–3. The
Staff argued that adding the ’578 patent
is in the public interest ‘‘ ‘because doing
so would allow for the efficient
adjudication of all three patents.’ ’’
However, the Staff requested that ‘‘the
parties be permitted to submit a joint
proposal regarding a revised procedural
schedule’’ to avoid any prejudice to
respondents. See id. at 3.
‘‘Respondent [Mianyang BOE] filed a
notice of joinder as to the Participating
Respondents’ opposition on March 23,
2023.’’ Id. at 1–2.
On March 28, 2023, the ALJ issued
the subject ID (Order No. 8), granting
Samsung Display’s motion. The ID finds
that Samsung Display had established
good cause for the proposed amendment
pursuant to Commission Rule 210.14(b)
(19 CFR 210.14(b)). As the ID explains,
‘‘[w]hile the ’578 patent was allowed in
December, it formally issued on
February 28, 2023. . . . Samsung
Display could therefore not have
asserted the ’578 patent at the time it
filed its complaint or prior to institution
of this investigation.’’ Id. at 4. The ID
also states that ‘‘the ’578 patent is a
continuation of the ’683 patent, which
itself is a continuation of the ’803
patent.’’ Id. The ID notes that all three
patents are ‘‘ ‘in the same family, name
the same inventor, and share the same
written description,’ and ‘[t]he products
accused of infringing the ’578 Patent are
the same as those accused of infringing
the ’803 and ’683 Patents.’ ’’ Id. (brackets
in ID). However, the ID determines that
‘‘to avoid prejudicing the Participating
Respondents (and Staff), an extension of
the procedural schedule is warranted.’’
Id. at 5.
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
No party filed a petition for review of
the subject ID.
The Commission has determined not
to review the subject ID. Pursuant to
Commission Rule 210.14, the Notice of
Investigation is amended to include
claims 1–6, 10, 12, 17, 19, 21–23, 40–
47, and 51–52 of the ’578 patent.
The Commission vote for this
determination took place on April 20,
2023.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 20, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023–08733 Filed 4–25–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Quarterly
Census of Employment and Wages
Business Supplement
Notice of availability; request
for comments.
ACTION:
The Department of Labor
(DOL) is submitting this Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS)-sponsored information
collection request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA). Public comments on the ICR are
invited.
DATES: The OMB will consider all
written comments that agency receives
on or before May 26, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
Comments are invited on: (1) whether
the collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
the agency’s estimates of the burden and
cost of the collection of information,
including the validity of the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25433-25434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-08733]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1351]
Certain Active Matrix Organic Light-Emitting Diode Display Panels
and Modules for Mobile Devices, and Components Thereof; Notice of a
Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination
Granting Complainant Samsung Display Co., Ltd.'s Motion for Leave To
Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 8)
granting a motion of complainant Samsung Display Co., Ltd. (``Samsung
Display'') for leave to amend the complaint and notice of
investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Lall, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2043. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal, telephone (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 3, 2023, the Commission
instituted this investigation based on a complaint filed by Samsung
Display of the Republic of Korea. 88 FR 7463-64 (Feb. 3, 2023). The
complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 based upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation,
[[Page 25434]]
or sale within the United States after importation of certain active
matrix organic light-emitting diode display panels and modules for
mobile devices, and components thereof by reason of the infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,818,803; 10,854,683; 7,414,599;
and 9,330,593. Id. The Commission's notice of investigation named the
following respondents: Apt-Ability LLC d/b/a MobileSentrix of
Chantilly, VA (``Apt-Ability''); Mobile Defenders, LLC of Caledonia, MI
(``Mobile Defenders''); DFW Imports LLC d/b/a DFW Cellphone and Parts
of Dallas, TX (``DFW Imports''); Electronics Universe, Inc. d/b/a
Fixez.com of Las Vegas, NV and Electronics Universe, Inc. d/b/a Repairs
Universe, Inc. of Las Vegas, NV (``Electronics Universe''); eTech Parts
Plus LLC of Southlake, TX (``eTech Parts Plus''); Gadgetfix Corp. of
Irvine, CA (``Gadgetfix''); Injured Gadgets, LLC of Norcross, GA
(``Injured Gadgets''); LCTech International Inc. d/b/a SEGMobile.com of
City of Industry, CA (``LCTech International''); Parts4Cells Inc. of
Houston, TX (``Parts4Cells''); Phone LCD Parts LLC of Wayne, NJ;
Parts4LCD of Wayne, NJ; Wholesale Gadget Parts, Inc. of Bixby, OK
(``Wholesale Gadget Parts''); Group Vertical, LLC of Grand Rapids, MI;
Sourcely Plus, LLC of Tempe, AZ; Captain Mobile Parts, Inc. of Dallas,
TX; and Mengtor Inc. of El Monte, CA. Id. The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations (``OUII'' or ``Staff'') was also named as a party in
this investigation. Id.
On March 15, 2023, the presiding ALJ granted Mianyang BOE
Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd.'s (``Mianyang BOE'') unopposed
motion to intervene as a respondent in this investigation and accorded
Mianyang BOE respondent status. (Order No. 7) (Mar. 15, 2023)
unreviewed by, Comm'n Notice (Mar. 22, 2023).
On March 10, 2023, Samsung Display moved for leave to amend the
complaint and notice of investigation to add allegations of
infringement related to claims 1-6, 10, 12, 17, 19, 21-23, 40-47, and
51-52 of U.S. Patent No. 11,594,578 (``the '578 patent''). ID at 1. In
its motion, Samsung argued that the '578 patent recently issued and
``is a continuation of two other patents (U.S. Patent Nos. 9,818,803
(`the '803 patent') and 10,854,683 (`the '683 patent')) asserted in
this investigation.'' Id. at 2. Samsung further claimed that it worked
``diligently to prepare the instant motion'' and that respondents
``will not be prejudiced as the investigation is `in its early stages'
and `no new technologies or products will be implicated by addition of
the '578 Patent.' '' Id. at 2.
On March 22, 2023, respondents Apt-Ability, Mobile Defenders, DFW
Imports, Electronics Universe, eTech Parts Plus, Gadgetfix, Injured
Gadgets, LCTech International, Parts4Cells, Phone LCD Parts LLC d/b/a
Parts4LCD (together, ``Phone LCD Parts''), and Wholesale Gadget Parts
(collectively, the ``Participating Respondents'') filed a response
opposing the motion. Id. at 1. They argued that ``the '578 patent was
allowed on December 23, 2022, almost three months ago, and before
Samsung Display filed its complaint.'' Id. at 2. They also claimed that
`` `forcing [them] to defend against twenty-five additional claims
would be burdensome and prejudicial.' '' Id. at 3 (brackets in ID).
They asked that if the motion is granted, the procedural schedule
should be extended ``to mitigate any prejudice.'' Id.
Also on March 22, 2023, Staff filed a response in support of
Samsung Display's motion. See id. at 2-3. The Staff argued that adding
the '578 patent is in the public interest `` `because doing so would
allow for the efficient adjudication of all three patents.' '' However,
the Staff requested that ``the parties be permitted to submit a joint
proposal regarding a revised procedural schedule'' to avoid any
prejudice to respondents. See id. at 3.
``Respondent [Mianyang BOE] filed a notice of joinder as to the
Participating Respondents' opposition on March 23, 2023.'' Id. at 1-2.
On March 28, 2023, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 8),
granting Samsung Display's motion. The ID finds that Samsung Display
had established good cause for the proposed amendment pursuant to
Commission Rule 210.14(b) (19 CFR 210.14(b)). As the ID explains,
``[w]hile the '578 patent was allowed in December, it formally issued
on February 28, 2023. . . . Samsung Display could therefore not have
asserted the '578 patent at the time it filed its complaint or prior to
institution of this investigation.'' Id. at 4. The ID also states that
``the '578 patent is a continuation of the '683 patent, which itself is
a continuation of the '803 patent.'' Id. The ID notes that all three
patents are `` `in the same family, name the same inventor, and share
the same written description,' and `[t]he products accused of
infringing the '578 Patent are the same as those accused of infringing
the '803 and '683 Patents.' '' Id. (brackets in ID). However, the ID
determines that ``to avoid prejudicing the Participating Respondents
(and Staff), an extension of the procedural schedule is warranted.''
Id. at 5.
No party filed a petition for review of the subject ID.
The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID.
Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.14, the Notice of Investigation is
amended to include claims 1-6, 10, 12, 17, 19, 21-23, 40-47, and 51-52
of the '578 patent.
The Commission vote for this determination took place on April 20,
2023.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 20, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-08733 Filed 4-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P