Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Schedule of Fees and Credits at Equity 7, Section 118, 23717-23720 [2023-08144]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 18, 2023 / Notices
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Electronic Comments
[Release No. 34–97290; File No. SR–BX–
2023–008]
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CBOE–2023–017 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2023–017. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2023–017 and
should be submitted on or before May
9, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–08142 Filed 4–17–23; 8:45 am]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Its Schedule of
Fees and Credits at Equity 7, Section
118
April 12, 2023.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 3,
2023, Nasdaq BX, Inc. (‘‘BX’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to (i) adjust or
eliminate several of the Exchange’s
transaction credits, at Equity 7, Section
118(a); and (ii) eliminate several of the
Exchange’s transaction fees, at Equity 7,
Section 118(a), as described further
below. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
website at https://
listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/bx/
rules, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
1 15
14 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Apr 17, 2023
2 17
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23717
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange operates on the ‘‘takermaker’’ model, whereby it generally
pays credits to members that take
liquidity and charges fees to members
that provide liquidity. Currently, the
Exchange has a schedule, at Equity 7,
Section 118(a), which consists of several
different credits that it provides for
orders in securities priced at $1 or more
per share that access liquidity on the
Exchange and several different charges
that it assesses for orders in such
securities that add liquidity on the
Exchange. The purpose of the proposed
rule change is to amend this schedule of
fees and credits, at Equity 7, Section
118(a) to: (i) adjust or eliminate several
of the Exchange’s transaction credits;
and (ii) eliminate several of the
Exchange’s transaction fees.
Revision to and Elimination of
Transaction Credits
The Exchange proposes to eliminate
two of the Exchange’s transaction
credits and adjust three of the
Exchange’s transaction credits.
Currently, the Exchange provides
$0.0015, $0.0015, and $0.0014 per share
executed credits for securities in Tape
A, Tape B, and Tape C, respectively, to
a member accessing liquidity (excluding
orders with Midpoint pegging and
excluding orders that receive price
improvement and execute against an
order with a non-displayed price): (i)
whose combined liquidity removing and
adding activities equal or exceed
0.075% of total Consolidated Volume
during a month; and (ii) that adds
liquidity equal to or exceeding an
average daily volume of 50,000 shares in
a month. The Exchange proposes to
eliminate this credit because it has not
been successful in accomplishing its
objectives. That is, it has not induced
members to materially grow liquidity
removing and adding activity on the
Exchange. The Exchange also seeks to
simplify its schedule of credits. The
Exchange has limited resources to
allocate to incentive programs and it
must, from time to time, reallocate
resources to maximize their net impact
on the Exchange, market quality, and
participants.
Currently, the Exchange provides a
$0.0018 per share executed credit for
securities in Tape B to a member
accessing liquidity that (excluding
orders with Midpoint pegging and
excluding orders that receive price
improvement and execute against an
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
23718
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 18, 2023 / Notices
order with a non-displayed price): (i)
accesses at least 60% more liquidity in
Tape B securities, as a percentage of
total Consolidated Volume during a
month, than it did during April 2021;
(ii) accesses liquidity in Tape B
securities equal to or exceeding 0.035%
of total Consolidated Volume during a
month; and (iii) adds liquidity equal to
or exceeding an average daily volume of
50,000 shares in a month. The Exchange
proposes to eliminate this credit
because the baseline month for the
growth element of the credit—April
2021—is no longer a relevant
benchmark. As such, this credit no
longer provides a growth incentive that
is aligned with the Exchange’s needs.
Again, the Exchange has limited
resources to devote to incentive
programs, and it is appropriate for the
Exchange to reallocate these incentives
periodically in a manner that best
achieves the Exchange’s overall mix of
objectives.
Presently, the Exchange provides a
$0.0015 per share executed credit for
securities in Tape C to a member
accessing liquidity (excluding orders
with Midpoint pegging and excluding
orders that receive price improvement
and execute against an order with a nondisplayed price): (i) whose combined
liquidity removing and adding activities
equal or exceed 0.10% of total
Consolidated Volume during a month;
(ii) that accesses liquidity equal to or
exceeding 0.05% of total Consolidated
Volume during a month; and (iii) that
adds liquidity equal to or exceeding an
average daily volume of 50,000 shares in
a month. The Exchange proposes to
increase the amount of this credit for
securities in Tape C to $0.0016 per share
executed.
Currently, the Exchange provides a
$0.0009 per share executed credit for
securities in Tape C to a member
accessing liquidity (excluding orders
with Midpoint pegging and excluding
orders that receive price improvement
and execute against an order with a nondisplayed price): (i) whose combined
liquidity removing and adding activities
equal or exceed 0.05% of total
Consolidated Volume during a month;
and (ii) that adds liquidity equal to or
exceeding an average daily volume of
50,000 shares in a month. The Exchange
proposes to increase the amount of this
credit for securities in Tape C to $0.0010
per share executed.
Finally, the Exchange currently
provides a $0.0004 per share executed
credit for securities in Tape C to a
member accessing liquidity (excluding
orders with Midpoint pegging and
excluding orders that receive price
improvement and execute against an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Apr 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
order with a non-displayed price) that
adds liquidity equal to or exceeding an
average daily volume of 50,000 shares in
a month. The Exchange proposes to
increase the amount of this credit for
securities in Tape C to $0.0005 per share
executed.
The Exchange proposes to increase
the three credits described above for
securities in Tape C to make these credit
amounts consistent with the credits
offered for securities in Tapes A and B.
These adjustments will align existing
incentives for members to add liquidity
or executions on the Exchange.
Elimination of Transaction Fees
In addition, the Exchange proposes to
eliminate six of the Exchange’s
transaction fees.
Currently, the Exchange charges
members providing liquidity $0.0012
per share executed for securities in
Tapes A, B, and C for displayed orders
entered by a member that adds liquidity
equal to or exceeding 0.25% of total
Consolidated Volume during a month.
The Exchange charges members
providing liquidity $0.0014 per share
executed for securities in Tapes A, B,
and C for displayed orders entered by a
member that adds liquidity equal to or
exceeding 0.15% of total Consolidated
Volume during a month. The Exchange
charges members providing liquidity
$0.0017 per share executed for
securities in Tapes A, B, and C for
displayed orders entered by a member
that adds liquidity equal to or exceeding
0.10% of total Consolidated Volume
during a month. The Exchange proposes
to eliminate these fees because they
have not been successful in
accomplishing their objectives. That is,
they have not induced members to
materially add liquidity on the
Exchange. The Exchange also seeks to
simplify its schedule of fees. The
Exchange has limited resources to
allocate to incentive programs and it
must, from time to time, reallocate
resources to maximize their net impact
on the Exchange, market quality, and
participants.
Presently, the Exchange charges
members providing liquidity $0.0017
per share executed for securities in
Tapes A, B, and C for displayed orders
entered by a member that: (i) adds
liquidity equal to or exceeding an
average daily volume of 9,500,000
shares in a month; and (ii) adds at least
15% more liquidity relative to the
member’s March 2021 average daily
volume of liquidity provided. The
Exchange charges members providing
liquidity $0.0020 per share executed for
securities in Tapes A, B, and C for
displayed orders that adds liquidity
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
entered by a member that: (i) adds
liquidity equal to or exceeding an
average daily volume of 2,500,000
shares in a month; and (ii) adds at least
25% more liquidity relative to the
member’s March 2021 average daily
volume of liquidity provided. The
Exchange proposes to eliminate these
fees because the baseline month for the
growth element of the fees—March
2021—is no longer a relevant
benchmark. As such, this fee no longer
provides a growth incentive that is
aligned with the Exchange’s needs. As
noted, the Exchange has limited
resources to devote to incentive
programs, and it is appropriate for the
Exchange to reallocate these incentives
periodically in a manner that best
achieves the Exchange’s overall mix of
objectives.
Finally, the Exchange also currently
charges members providing liquidity
$0.0024 per share executed for
securities in Tapes A, B, and C for nondisplayed orders (other than orders with
Midpoint pegging) entered by a member
that (i) adds and removes liquidity equal
to or exceeding 0.15% total
Consolidated Volume during a month;
and (ii) achieves at least a 35% ratio of
its displayed liquidity adding activity to
its total liquidity adding activity during
a month. The Exchange proposes to
eliminate this fee because the fee has
not been successful in accomplishing its
objective and the Exchange seeks to
streamline its fee schedule.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,3 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5)
of the Act,4 in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and issuers and other
persons using any facility, and is not
designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Exchange’s proposed changes to
its schedule of credits are reasonable in
several respects. As a threshold matter,
the Exchange is subject to significant
competitive forces in the market for
equity securities transaction services
that constrain its pricing determinations
in that market. The fact that this market
is competitive has long been recognized
by the courts. In NetCoalition v.
Securities and Exchange Commission,
the D.C. Circuit stated as follows: ‘‘[n]o
one disputes that competition for order
flow is ‘fierce.’ . . . As the SEC
3 15
4 15
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
18APN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 18, 2023 / Notices
explained, ‘[i]n the U.S. national market
system, buyers and sellers of securities,
and the broker-dealers that act as their
order-routing agents, have a wide range
of choices of where to route orders for
execution’; [and] ‘no exchange can
afford to take its market share
percentages for granted’ because ‘no
exchange possesses a monopoly,
regulatory or otherwise, in the execution
of order flow from broker
dealers’. . . .’’ 5
The Commission and the courts have
repeatedly expressed their preference
for competition over regulatory
intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities
markets. In Regulation NMS, while
adopting a series of steps to improve the
current market model, the Commission
highlighted the importance of market
forces in determining prices and SRO
revenues and, also, recognized that
current regulation of the market system
‘‘has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 6
Numerous indicia demonstrate the
competitive nature of this market. For
example, clear substitutes to the
Exchange exist in the market for equity
security transaction services. The
Exchange is only one of several equity
venues to which market participants
may direct their order flow. Competing
equity exchanges offer similar tiered
pricing structures to that of the
Exchange, including schedules of
rebates and fees that apply based upon
members achieving certain volume
thresholds.
Within this environment, market
participants can freely and often do shift
their order flow among the Exchange
and competing venues in response to
changes in their respective pricing
schedules. As such, the proposal
represents a reasonable attempt by the
Exchange to increase its liquidity and
market share relative to its competitors.
The Exchange believes it is
reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory to eliminate two of the
Exchange’s transaction credits, adjust
three of the Exchange’s transaction
credits, and eliminate six of the
Exchange’s transaction fees. The
Exchange seeks to simplify and
streamline its schedule of credits and
fees by: (i) eliminating credits and fees
that have not been successful in
5 NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir.
2010) (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No.
59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782–83
(December 9, 2008) (SR–NYSEArca–2006–21)).
6 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005)
(‘‘Regulation NMS Adopting Release’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Apr 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
inducing members to grow their
liquidity adding or removing activity or
that are no longer based on relevant
benchmarks; and (ii) adjusting several
credits to securities in Tape C to
streamline such credits to those
provided in Tapes A and B. The
proposed changes are designed to better
align with the Exchange’s needs. The
Exchange has limited resources to
devote to incentive programs, and it is
appropriate for the Exchange to
reallocate these incentives periodically
in a manner that best achieves the
Exchange’s overall mix of objectives.
Those participants that are
dissatisfied with the eliminations and
adjustments to the Exchange’s schedule
of credits and fees are free to shift their
order flow to competing venues that
provide more generous incentives or
less stringent qualifying criteria.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
Intramarket Competition
The Exchange does not believe that its
proposals will place any category of
Exchange participant at a competitive
disadvantage.
The Exchange intends for its proposed
changes to its credits and fees to
reallocate its limited resources more
efficiently and for optimized effect, to
recalibrate them to reflect changing
market behavior, and to align them with
the Exchange’s overall mix of objectives.
The Exchange notes that its members
are free to trade on other venues to the
extent they believe that these proposals
are not attractive. As one can observe by
looking at any market share chart, price
competition between exchanges is
fierce, with liquidity and market share
moving freely between exchanges in
reaction to fee and credit changes.
Intermarket Competition
In terms of inter-market competition,
the Exchange notes that it operates in a
highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily favor
competing venues if they deem fee
levels at a particular venue to be
excessive, or rebate opportunities
available at other venues to be more
favorable. In such an environment, the
Exchange must continually adjust its
credits and fees to remain competitive
with other exchanges and with
alternative trading systems that have
been exempted from compliance with
the statutory standards applicable to
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23719
exchanges. Because competitors are free
to modify their own credits and fees in
response, and because market
participants may readily adjust their
order routing practices, the Exchange
believes that the degree to which credit
or fee changes in this market may
impose any burden on competition is
extremely limited. The proposals are
reflective of this competition.
Even as one of the largest U.S.
equities exchanges by volume, the
Exchange has less than 20% market
share, which in most markets could
hardly be categorized as having enough
market power to burden competition.
Moreover, as noted above, price
competition between exchanges is
fierce, with liquidity and market share
moving freely between exchanges in
reaction to fee and credit changes. This
is in addition to free flow of order flow
to and among off-exchange venues,
which comprises upwards of 50% of
industry volume.
In sum, if the change proposed herein
is unattractive to market participants, it
is likely that the Exchange will lose
market share as a result. Accordingly,
the Exchange does not believe that the
proposed change will impair the ability
of members or competing order
execution venues to maintain their
competitive standing in the financial
markets.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 7 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 8 thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
7 15
8 17
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
18APN1
23720
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 18, 2023 / Notices
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
BX–2023–008 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BX–2023–008. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BX–2023–008 and should
be submitted on or before May 9, 2023.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Apr 17, 2023
Jkt 259001
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–08144 Filed 4–17–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–97291; File No. SR–FINRA–
2022–033]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of
Amendment No. 1 and Order Instituting
Proceedings To Determine Whether To
Approve or Disapprove the Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 1, To Amend the
Codes of Arbitration Procedure To
Make Various Clarifying and Technical
Changes to the Codes, Including in
Response to Recommendations in the
Report of Independent Counsel
Lowenstein Sandler LLP
April 12, 2023.
I. Introduction
On December 23, 2022, the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(‘‘FINRA’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
proposed rule change SR–FINRA–2022–
033 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Exchange Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 2
thereunder to amend the Code of
Arbitration Procedure for Customer
Disputes 3 (‘‘Customer Code’’) and the
Code of Arbitration Procedure for
Industry Disputes 4 (‘‘Industry Code’’)
(together, ‘‘Codes’’). The proposed rule
change was published for public
comment in the Federal Register on
January 12, 2023.5 The Commission
received five comment letters related to
this filing.6 On February 14, 2023,
FINRA consented to an extension of the
time period in which the Commission
must approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or
institute proceedings to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the
9 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See FINRA Rule 12000 Series (Code of
Arbitration Procedure for Customer Disputes).
4 See FINRA Rule 13000 Series (Code of
Arbitration Procedure for Industry Disputes).
5 See Exchange Act Release No. 96607 (Jan. 6,
2023), 88 FR 2144 (Jan. 12, 2023) (File No. SR–
FINRA–2022–033) (hereinafter, the ‘‘Notice’’).
6 The comment letters are available at https://
www.sec.gov/comments/sr-finra-2022-033/srfinra
2022033.htm.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
proposed rule change to April 12, 2023.7
On April 11, 2023, FINRA responded to
the comment letters received in
response to the Notice and filed an
amendment to modify the proposed rule
change (‘‘Amendment No. 1’’).8
The Commission is publishing this
order pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of
the Exchange Act 9 to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 1, and to
institute proceedings to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the
proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change, as Modified by Amendment
No. 1
A. Background
FINRA’s Dispute Resolution Services
(‘‘DRS’’) provides an arbitration forum
for disputes between customers,
member firms, and associated persons of
member firms.10 In general, FINRA
arbitrators in this forum ‘‘read the
pleadings filed by the parties, listen to
the arguments, study the documentary
and/or testimonial evidence, and render
a decision [on a claim].’’ 11 The Codes 12
7 See letter from Kristine Vo, Assistant General
Counsel, Office of General Counsel, FINRA, to
Lourdes Gonzalez, Assistant Chief Counsel,
Division of Trading and Markets, U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission (Feb. 14, 2023),
available at https://www.finra.org/sites/default/
files/2023-02/sr-finra-2022-033-extension-no-1.pdf.
8 See letter from Kristine Vo, Assistant General
Counsel, Office of General Counsel, FINRA, to
Vanessa Countryman, Secretary, U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (Apr. 11, 2023) (‘‘FINRA
Letter’’), available at https://www.sec.gov/
comments/sr-finra-2022-033/srfinra202203320164047-333995.pdf.
9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
10 See FINRA Rules 12101(a) (Applicability of
[Customer] Code), 13101(a) (Applicability of
[Industry] Code).
11 FINRA, Dispute Resolution Services: Learn
About Arbitration, https://www.finra.org/
arbitration-mediation/learn-about-arbitration.
12 As stated above, FINRA has two Codes of
Arbitration Procedure. The Customer Code governs
a customer’s claim about the business activities of
an individual or entity registered with FINRA (e.g.,
associated persons of member firms). See FINRA
Rules 12101 (Customer Code applies to any dispute
between a customer and a member or associated
person filed under Rules 12200 or 12201), 12200
(parties must arbitrate disputes about the noninsurance business activity of a member or
associated person if the customer requests
arbitration or arbitration is required by written
agreement), 12201 (permits arbitration of disputes
about the non-insurance business activity of a
member or associated person if the parties agree in
writing to submit to arbitration). The Industry Code
governs, for the most part, business disputes
exclusively among associated persons and/or
member firms. See FINRA Rules 13101 (Industry
Code applies to dispute filed under Rules 13200,
13201, or 13202), 13200 (requires arbitration ‘‘if the
dispute arises out of the business activities of a
member or an associated person and is between or
among’’ members and/or associated persons), 13201
(permits arbitration of employment discrimination,
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 18, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23717-23720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-08144]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-97290; File No. SR-BX-2023-008]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its
Schedule of Fees and Credits at Equity 7, Section 118
April 12, 2023.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on April 3, 2023, Nasdaq BX, Inc. (``BX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to (i) adjust or eliminate several of the
Exchange's transaction credits, at Equity 7, Section 118(a); and (ii)
eliminate several of the Exchange's transaction fees, at Equity 7,
Section 118(a), as described further below. The text of the proposed
rule change is available on the Exchange's website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/bx/rules, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange operates on the ``taker-maker'' model, whereby it
generally pays credits to members that take liquidity and charges fees
to members that provide liquidity. Currently, the Exchange has a
schedule, at Equity 7, Section 118(a), which consists of several
different credits that it provides for orders in securities priced at
$1 or more per share that access liquidity on the Exchange and several
different charges that it assesses for orders in such securities that
add liquidity on the Exchange. The purpose of the proposed rule change
is to amend this schedule of fees and credits, at Equity 7, Section
118(a) to: (i) adjust or eliminate several of the Exchange's
transaction credits; and (ii) eliminate several of the Exchange's
transaction fees.
Revision to and Elimination of Transaction Credits
The Exchange proposes to eliminate two of the Exchange's
transaction credits and adjust three of the Exchange's transaction
credits.
Currently, the Exchange provides $0.0015, $0.0015, and $0.0014 per
share executed credits for securities in Tape A, Tape B, and Tape C,
respectively, to a member accessing liquidity (excluding orders with
Midpoint pegging and excluding orders that receive price improvement
and execute against an order with a non-displayed price): (i) whose
combined liquidity removing and adding activities equal or exceed
0.075% of total Consolidated Volume during a month; and (ii) that adds
liquidity equal to or exceeding an average daily volume of 50,000
shares in a month. The Exchange proposes to eliminate this credit
because it has not been successful in accomplishing its objectives.
That is, it has not induced members to materially grow liquidity
removing and adding activity on the Exchange. The Exchange also seeks
to simplify its schedule of credits. The Exchange has limited resources
to allocate to incentive programs and it must, from time to time,
reallocate resources to maximize their net impact on the Exchange,
market quality, and participants.
Currently, the Exchange provides a $0.0018 per share executed
credit for securities in Tape B to a member accessing liquidity that
(excluding orders with Midpoint pegging and excluding orders that
receive price improvement and execute against an
[[Page 23718]]
order with a non-displayed price): (i) accesses at least 60% more
liquidity in Tape B securities, as a percentage of total Consolidated
Volume during a month, than it did during April 2021; (ii) accesses
liquidity in Tape B securities equal to or exceeding 0.035% of total
Consolidated Volume during a month; and (iii) adds liquidity equal to
or exceeding an average daily volume of 50,000 shares in a month. The
Exchange proposes to eliminate this credit because the baseline month
for the growth element of the credit--April 2021--is no longer a
relevant benchmark. As such, this credit no longer provides a growth
incentive that is aligned with the Exchange's needs. Again, the
Exchange has limited resources to devote to incentive programs, and it
is appropriate for the Exchange to reallocate these incentives
periodically in a manner that best achieves the Exchange's overall mix
of objectives.
Presently, the Exchange provides a $0.0015 per share executed
credit for securities in Tape C to a member accessing liquidity
(excluding orders with Midpoint pegging and excluding orders that
receive price improvement and execute against an order with a non-
displayed price): (i) whose combined liquidity removing and adding
activities equal or exceed 0.10% of total Consolidated Volume during a
month; (ii) that accesses liquidity equal to or exceeding 0.05% of
total Consolidated Volume during a month; and (iii) that adds liquidity
equal to or exceeding an average daily volume of 50,000 shares in a
month. The Exchange proposes to increase the amount of this credit for
securities in Tape C to $0.0016 per share executed.
Currently, the Exchange provides a $0.0009 per share executed
credit for securities in Tape C to a member accessing liquidity
(excluding orders with Midpoint pegging and excluding orders that
receive price improvement and execute against an order with a non-
displayed price): (i) whose combined liquidity removing and adding
activities equal or exceed 0.05% of total Consolidated Volume during a
month; and (ii) that adds liquidity equal to or exceeding an average
daily volume of 50,000 shares in a month. The Exchange proposes to
increase the amount of this credit for securities in Tape C to $0.0010
per share executed.
Finally, the Exchange currently provides a $0.0004 per share
executed credit for securities in Tape C to a member accessing
liquidity (excluding orders with Midpoint pegging and excluding orders
that receive price improvement and execute against an order with a non-
displayed price) that adds liquidity equal to or exceeding an average
daily volume of 50,000 shares in a month. The Exchange proposes to
increase the amount of this credit for securities in Tape C to $0.0005
per share executed.
The Exchange proposes to increase the three credits described above
for securities in Tape C to make these credit amounts consistent with
the credits offered for securities in Tapes A and B. These adjustments
will align existing incentives for members to add liquidity or
executions on the Exchange.
Elimination of Transaction Fees
In addition, the Exchange proposes to eliminate six of the
Exchange's transaction fees.
Currently, the Exchange charges members providing liquidity $0.0012
per share executed for securities in Tapes A, B, and C for displayed
orders entered by a member that adds liquidity equal to or exceeding
0.25% of total Consolidated Volume during a month. The Exchange charges
members providing liquidity $0.0014 per share executed for securities
in Tapes A, B, and C for displayed orders entered by a member that adds
liquidity equal to or exceeding 0.15% of total Consolidated Volume
during a month. The Exchange charges members providing liquidity
$0.0017 per share executed for securities in Tapes A, B, and C for
displayed orders entered by a member that adds liquidity equal to or
exceeding 0.10% of total Consolidated Volume during a month. The
Exchange proposes to eliminate these fees because they have not been
successful in accomplishing their objectives. That is, they have not
induced members to materially add liquidity on the Exchange. The
Exchange also seeks to simplify its schedule of fees. The Exchange has
limited resources to allocate to incentive programs and it must, from
time to time, reallocate resources to maximize their net impact on the
Exchange, market quality, and participants.
Presently, the Exchange charges members providing liquidity $0.0017
per share executed for securities in Tapes A, B, and C for displayed
orders entered by a member that: (i) adds liquidity equal to or
exceeding an average daily volume of 9,500,000 shares in a month; and
(ii) adds at least 15% more liquidity relative to the member's March
2021 average daily volume of liquidity provided. The Exchange charges
members providing liquidity $0.0020 per share executed for securities
in Tapes A, B, and C for displayed orders that adds liquidity entered
by a member that: (i) adds liquidity equal to or exceeding an average
daily volume of 2,500,000 shares in a month; and (ii) adds at least 25%
more liquidity relative to the member's March 2021 average daily volume
of liquidity provided. The Exchange proposes to eliminate these fees
because the baseline month for the growth element of the fees--March
2021--is no longer a relevant benchmark. As such, this fee no longer
provides a growth incentive that is aligned with the Exchange's needs.
As noted, the Exchange has limited resources to devote to incentive
programs, and it is appropriate for the Exchange to reallocate these
incentives periodically in a manner that best achieves the Exchange's
overall mix of objectives.
Finally, the Exchange also currently charges members providing
liquidity $0.0024 per share executed for securities in Tapes A, B, and
C for non-displayed orders (other than orders with Midpoint pegging)
entered by a member that (i) adds and removes liquidity equal to or
exceeding 0.15% total Consolidated Volume during a month; and (ii)
achieves at least a 35% ratio of its displayed liquidity adding
activity to its total liquidity adding activity during a month. The
Exchange proposes to eliminate this fee because the fee has not been
successful in accomplishing its objective and the Exchange seeks to
streamline its fee schedule.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\3\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\4\ in particular, in that it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and issuers and other persons using any facility, and is
not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's proposed changes to its schedule of credits are
reasonable in several respects. As a threshold matter, the Exchange is
subject to significant competitive forces in the market for equity
securities transaction services that constrain its pricing
determinations in that market. The fact that this market is competitive
has long been recognized by the courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities
and Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit stated as follows: ``[n]o one
disputes that competition for order flow is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC
[[Page 23719]]
explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market system, buyers and sellers of
securities, and the broker-dealers that act as their order-routing
agents, have a wide range of choices of where to route orders for
execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to take its market share
percentages for granted' because `no exchange possesses a monopoly,
regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from broker
dealers'. . . .'' \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010)
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2,
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation
NMS, while adopting a series of steps to improve the current market
model, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most
important to investors and listed companies.'' \6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 70
FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (``Regulation NMS Adopting
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Numerous indicia demonstrate the competitive nature of this market.
For example, clear substitutes to the Exchange exist in the market for
equity security transaction services. The Exchange is only one of
several equity venues to which market participants may direct their
order flow. Competing equity exchanges offer similar tiered pricing
structures to that of the Exchange, including schedules of rebates and
fees that apply based upon members achieving certain volume thresholds.
Within this environment, market participants can freely and often
do shift their order flow among the Exchange and competing venues in
response to changes in their respective pricing schedules. As such, the
proposal represents a reasonable attempt by the Exchange to increase
its liquidity and market share relative to its competitors.
The Exchange believes it is reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory to eliminate two of the Exchange's transaction credits,
adjust three of the Exchange's transaction credits, and eliminate six
of the Exchange's transaction fees. The Exchange seeks to simplify and
streamline its schedule of credits and fees by: (i) eliminating credits
and fees that have not been successful in inducing members to grow
their liquidity adding or removing activity or that are no longer based
on relevant benchmarks; and (ii) adjusting several credits to
securities in Tape C to streamline such credits to those provided in
Tapes A and B. The proposed changes are designed to better align with
the Exchange's needs. The Exchange has limited resources to devote to
incentive programs, and it is appropriate for the Exchange to
reallocate these incentives periodically in a manner that best achieves
the Exchange's overall mix of objectives.
Those participants that are dissatisfied with the eliminations and
adjustments to the Exchange's schedule of credits and fees are free to
shift their order flow to competing venues that provide more generous
incentives or less stringent qualifying criteria.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Intramarket Competition
The Exchange does not believe that its proposals will place any
category of Exchange participant at a competitive disadvantage.
The Exchange intends for its proposed changes to its credits and
fees to reallocate its limited resources more efficiently and for
optimized effect, to recalibrate them to reflect changing market
behavior, and to align them with the Exchange's overall mix of
objectives. The Exchange notes that its members are free to trade on
other venues to the extent they believe that these proposals are not
attractive. As one can observe by looking at any market share chart,
price competition between exchanges is fierce, with liquidity and
market share moving freely between exchanges in reaction to fee and
credit changes.
Intermarket Competition
In terms of inter-market competition, the Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants
can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive, or rebate opportunities available at
other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange
must continually adjust its credits and fees to remain competitive with
other exchanges and with alternative trading systems that have been
exempted from compliance with the statutory standards applicable to
exchanges. Because competitors are free to modify their own credits and
fees in response, and because market participants may readily adjust
their order routing practices, the Exchange believes that the degree to
which credit or fee changes in this market may impose any burden on
competition is extremely limited. The proposals are reflective of this
competition.
Even as one of the largest U.S. equities exchanges by volume, the
Exchange has less than 20% market share, which in most markets could
hardly be categorized as having enough market power to burden
competition. Moreover, as noted above, price competition between
exchanges is fierce, with liquidity and market share moving freely
between exchanges in reaction to fee and credit changes. This is in
addition to free flow of order flow to and among off-exchange venues,
which comprises upwards of 50% of industry volume.
In sum, if the change proposed herein is unattractive to market
participants, it is likely that the Exchange will lose market share as
a result. Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed
change will impair the ability of members or competing order execution
venues to maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \7\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \8\
thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
[[Page 23720]]
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-BX-2023-008 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2023-008. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-BX-2023-008 and should be submitted on
or before May 9, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-08144 Filed 4-17-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P